scieee AI-readable full text Open interactive document viewer

A new record of Pteragogus flagellifer (Valenciennes, 1839), Cocktail Wrasse (Actinopterygii, Perciformes, Labridae), from Taiwan, northwestern Pacific Ocean

Su, Yo; Hsu, Yu-Chieh; Lin, Tzu-Yung

Abstract

Pteragogus flagellifer (Valenciennes, 1839), Cocktail Wrasse, is recorded from Taiwan based on a single specimen. Although this species has previously been recorded in Taiwanese literature, we found all the previous records to be based on misidentifications. Therefore, our specimen represents the first reliable record from Taiwan and fills the distribution gap of this species between the Philippines and Japan. A checklist of Pteragogus Peters, 1855 recorded from Taiwan is provided and discussed. A key to species of Pteragogus from the northwestern Pacific Ocean is also provided.

Full text

the journal of biodiversity data NOTES ON GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION 1108 Academic editor: Zeehan Jaafar Received: 13 August 2025 Accepted: 29 October 2025 Published: 12 November 2025 Copyright © The authors. This is an open‑access article distributed under terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (Attribution 4.0 International – CC BY 4.0) Abstract. Pteragogus flagellifer ( Valenciennes, 1839), Cocktail Wrasse, is recorded from Taiwan based on a single specimen. Although this species has previously been recorded in Taiwanese literature, we found all the previous records to be based on misidentifications. Therefore, our specimen represents the first reliable record from Taiwan and fills the distribution gap of this species between the Philippines and Japan. A check‑ list of Pteragogus Peters, 1855 recorded from Taiwan is provided and discussed. A key to species of Pteragogus from the northwestern Pacific Ocean is also provided. Key words. Biodiversity, biogeography, checklist, ichthyology, identification key, morphology Su Y, Hsu Y-C, Lin T-Y (2025) A new record of Pteragogus flagellifer (Valenciennes, 1839), Cocktail Wrasse (Actinopterygii, Perciformes, Labridae), from Taiwan, northwestern Pacific Ocean. Check List 21 (6): 1108– 1114. https://doi.org/10.15560/21.6.1108 INTRODUCTION The labrid genus Pteragogus Peters, 1855 (Actinopterygii, Perciformes, Labridae) is characterized by having: dorsal‑fin spines IX–XI; anal‑fin rays III, 9; br anched caudal‑fin ray s 10– 11; lateral lin e continuous, uninter‑ rupted; corner of moth without canine teeth; posterior margin of preopercle serrated; and cheek scaley (Westneat 2001; Iino and Motomura 2022a). Currently, 11 species are recognized as valid and distributed in the Indo‑Pacific Ocean (Randall 2013; Randall and Victor 2022; Iino and Motomura 2022a), of which four species have been recorded from Taiwan: P. aurigarius (Richardson, 1845), P. cryptus Randall, 1981, P. enneacanthus (Bleeker, 1853), and P. flagellifer (Valenciennes, 1839) (Randall 1981; Shen 1984, 1993; Shen and Wu 2011; Koeda 2019; Iino and Motomura 2021). However, the figures of P. flagellifer depicted by Shen (1993) are not P. flagellifer (see Discussion), and the population of P. cryptus from the Pacific and eastern Indian Oceans was described as a new species, P. turdus Iino & Motomura, 2022 (Iino and Motomura 2022a). Recently, a specimen belonging to the wrasse genus Pteragogus collected by local fisherman from southern Taiwan was purchased via aquarium trade. It is identified as P. flagellifer based on its unique color‑ ation and several characteristics. The specimen represents the first confirmed record from Taiwan and fills the distribution gap of this species between the Philippines and Japan. A detailed description and a fresh photograph of the specimen are provided and compared to data of other specimens. A revised list of Pteragogus from Taiwan and a key to Pteragogus found in northwestern Pacific Ocean are provided. METHODS The specimen was fixed in 4% formaldehyde and transferred to 70% ethanol for long‑term preservation, and deposited at the Pisces Collection, National Museum of Marine Biology and Aquarium, Pingtung, Tai‑ wan (NMMB‑P) Counts and measurements follow Hubbs and Lagler (1947) and Iino and Motomura (2021). Data taken from bilateral characters were counted on both sides and expressed as left/right whenever available. Mea‑ surements were made using digital calipers to the nearest 0.1 mm. Morphometric data were expressed as percentages or ratios of standard length (SL) and/or head length (HL), except where otherwise indicated. The distribution map was generated from Ocean Data View (Schlitzer 2025). 21 (6) · https://doi.org/10.15560/21.6.1108 21 (6): 1108–1114. https://doi.org/10.15560/21.6.1108 A new record of Pteragogus flagellifer (Valenciennes, 1839), Cocktail Wrasse (Actinopterygii, Perciformes, Labridae), from Taiwan, northwestern Pacific Ocean Yo Su1, Yu-Chieh Hsu2, Tzu-Yung Lin1 1 Department and Graduate Institute of Aquaculture, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology No.142, Haijhuan Rd., Nanzih Dist., Kaohsiung 81157, Taiwan 2 Department of Biological Sciences, National Sun Yat-sen University, 70 Lienhai Rd. Gushan Dist. Kaohsiung 80424, Taiwan Corresponding author: Tzu-Yung Lin ([email protected]) Check List 21 (6) · https://doi.org/10.15560/21.6.1108 Su et al. · New distribution record for Pteragogus flagellifer 1109 RESULTS Family Labridae Cuvier, 1816 Genus Pteragogus Peters, 1855 Pteragogus flagellifer (Valenciennes, 1839) English name: Cocktail Wrasse Chinese name: 絲鰭長鰭鸚鯛 Figure 1; Tables 1, 2 Ctenolabrus flagellifer Valenciennes in Cuvier and Valenciennes, 1839: 240 [original description. Type locality unknown. Holotype: MNHN A‑7368]. Pteragogus flagellifer (Valenciennes, 1839) — Randall in Smith and Heemstra (1986: 701) [western Indian Ocean]; Randall et al. (1994: 233) [Arabian Gulf]; Randall (1995: 288) [Oman]; Carpenter et al. (1997: 199) [Kuwait]; Parenti and Randall (1998: 473) [Red Sea]; Allen et al. in Hoese et al. (2006:1410) [listed, Australia]; Allen and Erdmann (2012: 717) [East Indies]; Randall (2013: 39) [in key, western Indian Ocean]; Gloerfelt‑Tarp and Kailola (2022: 245) [Indonesia]; Iino and Motomura (2022a: 213) [mentioned, compared to the new species described]; Iino and Motomura (2022b: 7) [first specimen‑based record from Japan]; Randall and Victor in Heemstra et al. (2022: 247) [western Indian Ocean]. Pteragogus flagellifera (Valenciennes, 1839) — Allen and Swainston (1988: 118) [northwestern Australia]; Westneat in Car‑ penter and Niem (2001: 3403) [listed, western Central Pacific]. Cossyphus filamentosus Peters, 1855: 453 [original description. Type locality: Mozambique. Syntypes: ZMB 2472‑73 and BMNH 1861.5.2.47]. Crenilabrus nematopterus Bleeker, 1851: 250 Banda Neira, Banda Islands, Indonesia Duymaeria caeruleomaculata Günther, 1862: 122 [original description. Type locality: Aneiteum Island, Vanuatu. Holotype: BMNH 1860.7.18.19]. Duymaeria japonica Bleeker, 1856: 53 [original description. Type locality: Nagasaki, Japan]. Labrus ramentosus Forsskål, 1775: 34, xi [original description. Type locality: Mocha, Yemen, Red Sea. No types known] Figure 1. Pteragogus flagellifer (Valenci‑ ennes, 1839), NMMB‑P 42263, 95.5 mm SL. A. Fresh condition. B. Preserved condition. Check List 21 (6) · https://doi.org/10.15560/21.6.1108 Su et al. · New distribution record for Pteragogus flagellifer 1110 New record. Taiwan–Pingtung • ca. 22°08′N, 120°41′E; 29 March 2025; Y.‑C. Hsu leg., collected by local fish‑ erman; 95.5 mm SL; 1♂; NMMB‑P 42268. Identification. Among the four species of Pteragogus in the northwestern Pacific Ocean, the present specimen is identified as Pteragogus flagellifer in having: dorsal‑fin elements IX, 11 (vs. X in P. turdus); ocellated black spot on opercle absent (vs. present in P. aurigarius and P. enneacanthus); a distinct oblique white band from lower margin of eye to pectoral‑fin base (vs. absent in P. aurigarius and P. enneacanthus); black spots on abdomen absent (vs. present in P. aurigarius); and several black spots present behind eye (vs. absent in P. aurigarius and P. enneacanthus; Randall 2013; Iino and Motomura 2022b). Description of NMMB-P 42268. Meristic and morphometric data are provided in Tables 1 and 2. Paired‑ fin characters are presented as left/right. Dorsal‑fin rays IX, 11. Pectoral‑fin rays 13/13. Pelvic‑fin rays I, 5/ I, 5. Anal‑fin rays III, 9. Gill rakers on outer face of first arch 4 + 9 = 13. Lateral‑line scales 24/24; scale rows above lateral line 2/2; scale rows below lateral line 6/6. Body oblong, body depth 2.5 in SL. Head moderately large, length 2.5 in SL; upper profile of head round‑ ed and curved to dorsal‑fin origin; eyes large, 3.5 in HL; interorbital space narrow and slightly convex, width 5.2 in HL; snout slightly pointed, length 3.5 in HL. Mouth moderate, upper‑jaw length 2.1 in HL; posterior end of maxilla reaching vertical through mid‑ dle of eye. Two nostrils anterior to eye, with anterior nostril forming tube and posterior nostril forming pore; posterior nostril slightly larger and situated higher than anterior nostril; both nostrils above horizontal through middle of eye. Premaxilla with two large, recurved canine teeth anteriorly, followed by one row of small conical teeth; those teeth on posterior portion slightly enlarged. Dentary with one large, recurved canine tooth anteriorly, followed by one row of small, conical teeth. Gill rakers on first arch short and laterally compressed; their size gradually becoming smaller from first to fourth arches. Gill filaments present on all four arches. No slit between fourth arch and fifth ceratobranchial. Body scales cycloid, covering body, nape, opercle, subopercle, chest, and dorsal‑, caudal‑, and anal‑fin bases. Lateral line single, its anterior portion slightly curved, with abrupt downturn below eighth dorsal‑fin soft ray, and straight to caudal‑fin base; lateral‑line scales same size as adjacent scales, with their midline forming ridge. Dorsal‑fin origin above first lateral‑line scale; its base 1.9 in SL; membrane of first‑six spines distinctly elongated; all soft rays branched. Pectoral‑fin origin below vertical through lower margin of eye. Pelvic‑fin origin below lower end of pectoral‑fin base; its length 5.2 in SL; its tip reaching anus when adpressed. Anal‑ fin origin below eighth dorsal‑fin spine; its base 3.4 in SL; membrane between first‑three spines elongated; all rays branched. Caudal fin rounded, with middle 5+5 rays branched. Caudal‑peduncle stout, its length and depth 2.3 and 2.1 in HL, respectively. Coloration: when fresh (Figure 1A), body yellow, with six dark‑green vertical bars across body and ex‑ tends onto both dorsal‑ and anal‑fin bases. Head green, with white radial lines around eye; one distinct white oblique band running from lower margin of eye to pectoral‑fin base; about nine black spots behind eye; lower jaw orange yellow. Dorsal fin yellow or green; one black spot and several white spots between first two spines. Pelvic fin yellow, becoming more orange anteriorly. Pectoral fin slightly orange. Anal‑fin or‑ Table 1. Meristic characters of Pteragogus flagellifer (Valenciennes, 1839). Data of other specimens were retrieved from Iino and Motomura (2022b). Paired characters are presented as left/right whenever available. Abbreviations: F, female; M, male. This study Iino and Motomura 2022b NMMB-P 42268 KAUM–I. 59434 CSIRO CA 4030 ROM 57127 Sex M F M M Locality Taiwan Okinawa Australia Comores Dorsal‑fin rays IX, 11 IX, 11 IX, 11 IX, 11 Pectoral‑fin rays 13/13 13 13 13 Pelvic‑fin rays I, 5/I, 5 I, 5 I, 5 I, 5 Anal‑fin rays III, 9 III, 9 III, 9 III, 9 Principal caudal‑fin rays 12 12 12 12 Gill rakers 4 + 9 = 13 4 + 7 = 11 4 + 6 = 10 4 + 8 = 12 Lateral‑line scales 24/24 24 24 24 Scale rows above lateral line 2/2 222 Scale rows below lateral line 6/6 666 Check List 21 (6) · https://doi.org/10.15560/21.6.1108 Su et al. · New distribution record for Pteragogus flagellifer 1111 ange, becoming red distally. Membranes between caudal‑fin rays scattered with small black spots. Dorsal‑, anal‑, caudal‑, and pelvic‑fin rays blueish green, with soft rays slightly paler than spines. When preserved (Figure 1B), coloration similar to fresh, with yellow and orange colors faded. DISTRIBUTION This species is known from scattered localities throughout the Indo‑West Pacific, including South Afri‑ ca, Madagascar, the Comoros, Aldabra, Seychelles, Mauritius, Lakshadweep, and India (Randall and Victor 2022); the Arabian Gulf (Randall et al. 1994); the Red Sea (Parenti and Randall 1998); Oman (Randall 1995); Indonesia (Gloerfelt‑Tarp and Kailola 2022); Australia, from the Bonaparte Archipelago southward to the Monte Bello Islands, Western Australia, and along the Great Barrier Reef, Queensland, to New South Wales in eastern Australia (Allen and Swainston 1988; Allen et al. 2006; Bray 2025); New Caledonia, Vanuatu (Ran‑ dall and Victor 2022), the Philippines (Iino and Motomura 2022b); and Japan (Yaku‑shima and Okinawa‑jima islands; Iino and Motomura 2022b). The present specimen fills the distributional gap between the Philip‑ pines and Japan. Table 2. Morphometric characters of Pteragogus flagellifer (Valenciennes, 1839). Data of other specimens were re‑ trieved from Iino and Motomura (2022b). Abbreviations: A, anal‑fin; AS, anal‑fin spine; C, caudal‑fin; D, dorsal‑fin; DS, dorsal‑fin spine; F, female; HL, head length; M, male; P, pectoral‑fin; SL, standard length; V, pelvic‑fin. This study Iino and Motomura 2022b NMMB-P 42286 KAUM–I. 59434 CSIRO CA 4030 ROM 57127 Sex M F M M Locality Taiwan Okinawa Australia Comores SL 95.5 35.0 70.9 83.2 % SL HL 37.6 37.1 38.1 40.1 Body depth 41.7 30.3 41.2 46.6 Body width 17.7 10.3 16.2 17.1 Predorsal length 36.7 37.7 38.4 40.3 Prepelvic length 38.1 37.4 37.5 40.9 Preanal length 60.1 58.0 56.8 61.9 Caudal‑peduncle length 16.5 18.6 15.0 15.3 Caudal‑peduncle depth 18.1 14.3 15.4 18.0 Snout length 13.1 12.3 13.4 15.0 Orbit diameter 7.9 10.0 9.7 9.0 Interorbital width 7.8 9.1 7.1 8.3 D base 59.0 52.0 65.0 61.8 1 DS 14.9 11.4 11.8 12.3 9 DS N/A 16.9 19.0 16.5 Longest D soft ray N/A 14.0 26.7 26.0 A base 29.8 24.6 33.1 32.5 1 AS 9.6 9.7 9.0 8.2 2 AS N/A 16.6 14.8 13.5 3 AS N/A 15.7 16.5 16.3 Longest A soft ray N/A 17.4 26.9 28.0 P length N/A 20.6 23.7 24.8 V spine 12.5 13.4 13.1 13.9 V soft ray 21.9 17.1 20.5 23.0 C length N/A 24.6 39.9 42.9 Check List 21 (6) · https://doi.org/10.15560/21.6.1108 Su et al. · New distribution record for Pteragogus flagellifer 1112 Checklist of species of Pteragogus recorded from Taiwan Table 3 lists all species of Pteragogus recorded from Taiwan as well as those re‑identified in this study. In total, four species have been recorded: P. aurigarius, P. enneacanthus, P. flagellifer, and P. turdus (Shen 1984, 1993; Shen and Wu 2011; Koeda 2019; Iino and Motomura 2021, 2022a; this study). Although Shen (1993) reported and depicted two specimens (one male and one female) of P. flagellifer from Taiwan, plates 157‑9 and 157‑10 are clearly not of P. flagellifer. Both specimens figured by Shen (1993) possess a distinct ocellus on the opercle (vs. absent in P. flagellifer), and no elongation on membranes between anal‑fin spines and first soft ray. As a result, plates 157‑9 and 157‑10 are here re‑identified as P aurigarius and P. enneacanthus, respectively. The sp.1 and sp. 2 reported by Shen (1984) are herein re‑identified as P aurigarius. Table 3. Checklist of Pteragogus recorded from Taiwan. Species Chinese name Reference Remarks Pteragogus aurigarius (Richardson, 1845) 長鰭鸚鯛 Shen (1984; 1993); Chen (2003); Koeda (2019) Shen (1984) reported as spp. 1 and 2; Shen (1993) reported as P. flagellifer P. enneacanthus (Bleeker, 1853) 九棘長鰭鸚鯛 Shen (1984; 1993); Chen et al. (2010); Shen and Wu (2011) Shen (1984; 1993) depicted as P. flagellifer; Shen and Wu (2011) depicted as P. aurigarius P. flagellifer (Valenciennes, 1839) 絲鰭長鰭鸚鯛 This study P. turdus Iino & Motomura, 2022 白紋長鰭鸚鯛 Randall (1981); Shen and Wu (2011); Iino and Motomura (2022) Previously recorded as P. cryptus (Randall 1981; Shen and Wu 2011) Figure 2. Previous records of Pteragogus flagellifer (Valenciennes, 1839) from northwestern Pacific Ocean. Star = present study; circle = previous records. Check List 21 (6) · https://doi.org/10.15560/21.6.1108 Su et al. · New distribution record for Pteragogus flagellifer 1113 Key to species of Pteragogus in the northwestern Pacific Ocean 1a. Dorsal‑fin spines X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . P. turdus 1b. Dorsal‑fin spines IX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 2a. Black ocellated spot on opercle absent; anal‑fin membranes between first and third spines elongated; distinct white band from lower margin of eye to pectoral‑fin base . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . P. flagellifer 2b. Black ocellated spot on opercle present; anal‑fin membranes between first and third spines not elongat‑ ed; no white band from lower margin of eye to pectoral‑fin base . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 3a. White stripes on body present; one single white band from snout to anterior margin of eye; abdomen without black spots . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . P. enneacanthus 3b. White stripes on body very faint and only present on abdomen; no white band from snout to anterior margin of eye; abdomen with black spots (more distinct in adults) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . P. aurigarius DISCUSSION Compared to previous data (Iino and Motomura 2022b; Tables 1, 2), the meristic characters agree with other specimens collected from Japan, Australia, and Comoros; however, several differences were found in the morphometric characters. Our specimen possesses shorter orbit diameter (7.9% SL vs. 9.0–10.0% SL in Iino and Motomura, 2022b; Table 2), shorter predorsal length (36.7% SL vs. 37.7–40.3% SL), and shorter pelvic‑fin spine (12.5% SL vs. 13.1–13.9% SL). Given the broad range of variation observed in other morphometric char‑ acters (e.g. body depth, dorsal‑fin base length; Table 2), these differences are likely attributable to intraspe‑ cific variation. However, additional specimens are needed to confirm this interpretation (Iino and Motomura 2022b). ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We thank the anonymous fisherman for providing the specimen; H.‑C. Ho (NKUST) for providing facilities and resource materials; P.‑N. Lee (NMMB‑P) for curatorial assistance. Lastly, we thank the reviewers and the subject editor Z. Jaafar for providing valuable suggestions and improving the manuscript. This study was supported by the National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Taiwan. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Conflict of interest The authors declare that no competing interests exist. Ethical statement No ethical statement is reported. Funding This study was financially supported by National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology. Author contributions Conceptualization: YS, YCH. Formal analysis: YS. Funding acquisition: TYL. Investigation: YS, YCH. Project administration: TYL. Supervision: TYL. Visualization: YS, YCH. Writing – original draft: YS. Writing – review and editing: YCH, TYL. Author ORCID iDs Yo Su https://orcid.org/0000‑0002‑3576‑9229 Yu‑Chieh Hsu https://orcid.org/0009‑0000‑1905‑4656 Tzu‑Yung Lin https://orcid.org/0000‑0002‑9034‑4397 Data availability All data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text. REFERENCES Allen GR, Cross NJ, Allen CJ, Gomon MF (2006). Labridae. Labrinae. In: Hoese DF, Bray DJ, Paxton JR, Allen GR (Eds.), Zoological catalogue of Australia. Volume 35. Fishes, Part 2. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, Australia, 1148–1173. Allen GR, Erdmann, MV (2012) Reef fishes of the East Indies. Volume II. Tropical Reef Research, Perth, Australia, 425–855. Allen GR, Swainston R (1988) The marine fishes of north‑western Australia. A field guide for anglers and divers. Western Australian Museum, Perth, Australia, i–vi + 1–201, pls. 1–70. Bleeker P (1853) Derde bijdrage tot de kennis der ichthyologische fauna van Amboina. Natuurkundig Tijdschrift voor Nederlandsch Indië 4 (1): 91–130. Check List 21 (6) · https://doi.org/10.15560/21.6.1108 Su et al. · New distribution record for Pteragogus flagellifer 1114 Bray DJ (2025) Pteragogus flagellifer in Fishes of Australia. https://fishesofaustralia.net.au/home/species/275. Accessed on 2025‑ 09028. Carpenter KE, Krupp F, Jones, DA, Zajonz U (1997). FAO species identification guide for fishery purposes. The living marine resources of Kuwait, eastern Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates. FAO, Rome, Italy, 1–293, pls. 1–17. Chen C-H (2003) Fishes of Penghu. Fishery Research Center, Taipei, Taiwan, 379 pp. [In Chinese] Chen J-P, Shao K-T, Jan R-Q, Kuo J-W, Chen J-Y (2010) Marine fishes of Kenting National Park. First revised edition. Kenting National Park Headquarters, Kenting, Taiwan, 650 pp. [In Chinese] Cuvier G (1816) Le Règne Animal distribué d’après son organisation pour servir de base à l’histoire naturelle des animaux et d’intro‑ duction à l’anatomie comparée. Les reptiles, les poissons, les mollusques et les annélides, tome II. Deterville, Paris, France, xviii + 532 pp., pls. 9–10. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.41460 Cuvier G, Valenciennes A (1839) Histoire naturelle des poissons. Tome treizième. Livre seizième. Des Labroïdes. v. 13: i–xix + 1–505 + 1 p., pls. 369–388. Gloerfelt-Tarp T, Kailola PJ (2022) Trawled fishes of southern Indonesia and northwestern Australia. 2nd ed. Australian Society for Fish Biology, Australia, i–vii+ 1–422, pls. 1–3. Hubbs CL & Lagler KF (1947) Fishes of the Great Lakes region. The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA, xv + pls. 44 + 213 pp. Hutchins JB (2001) Checklist of the fishes of Western Australia. Records of the Western Australian Museum Supplement 63: 9–50. https://doi.org/10.18195/issn.0313‑122x.63.2001.009‑050 Iino T, Motomura H (2021) First specimen‑based records of Pteragogus enneacanthus (Bleeker, 1853) (Labridae) from Japan, with a review of Japanese records on the basis of underwater photographs. Ichthy, Natural History of Fishes of Japan 9: 21–26. https:// doi.org/10.34583/ichthy.9.0_21 [In Japanese and English abstract] Iino T, Motomura H (2022a) Pteragogus turdus, a new species of wrasse (Perciformes: Labridae) from the Indo‑West Pacific Ocean. Ichthyological Research 70: 207–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10228‑022‑00875‑0 Iino T, Motomura H (2022b) First specimen‑based record of Pteragogus flagellifer (Valenciennes, 1839) (Labridae) from Japan, with a review of Japanese records on the basis of underwater photographs. Ichthy, Natural History of Fishes of Japan 17: 5–10. https:// doi.org/10.34583/ichthy.17.0_5 [In Japanese and English abstract] Koeda K (2019) Family Labridae. In: Koeda K, Ho H‑C (Eds.), Fishes of Southern Taiwan II. National Marine Museum of Biology and Aquarium, Checheng, Pingtung, Taiwan, 999–1046. Parenti P, Randall JE (1998) First record of the labrid fish Pteragogus flagellifer (Valenciennes, 1839) from the Red Sea. Fauna of Ara‑ bia 17: 473–475. Peters WCH (1855) Übersicht der in Mossambique beobachteten Seefische. Bericht über die zur Bekanntmachung geeigneten Ver‑ handlungen der Königlichen Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin 1855: 428–466. Randall JE (1981) Two new species and six new records of labrid fishes from the Red Sea. Senckenbergiana Maritima 13 (1/3): 79–109, pls. 1–3. Randall JE (1986) Family No. 220: Labridae. In: Smith MM, Heemstra PC (Eds.) Smiths’ sea fishes. Macmillan South Africa, Johannes‑ burg, South Africa, 683–706, pls. 89–105, 109. Randall JE (1995) Coastal fishes of Oman. Crawford House Publishing, Bathurst, Australia, i–xvi + 1–439. Randall JE (2013) Seven new species of labrid fishes (Coris, Iniistius, Macropharyngodon, Novaculops, and Pteragogus) from the western Indian Ocean. Journal of the Ocean Science Foundation 7: 1–43. Randall JE, Downing N, McCarthy LJ, Stanaland BE, Tarr AB (1994) Fifty‑one new records of fishes from the Arabian Gulf. Fauna of Saudi Arabia 14: 220–258. Randall JE, Williams JT, Smith DG, Kulbicki M, Mou Tham G, Labrosse P, Kronen M, Clua E, Mann BS (2003) Checklist of the shore and epipelagic fishes of Tonga. Atoll Research Bulletin 502: i–ii + 1–35. Randall JE, Victor BC (2022) Family Labridae. Wrasses. In: Heemstra PC, Heemstra E, Ebert DA, Holleman W, Randall JE (Eds.) Coastal fishes of the western Indian Ocean. Volume 4. South African Institute for Aquatic Biodiversity, Makhanda, South Africa, 166– 265, pls. 55–102 Richardson J (1845) Ichthyology.—Part 2. In: Hinds RB (Ed.) The zoology of the voyage of H. M. S. Sulphur, under the command of Captain Sir Edward Belcher, R. N., C. B., F. R. G. S., etc., during the years 1836‑42, No. 9, Smith, Elder & Co., London, U.K., 71–98, pls. 45–54. Schlitzer R (2025) Ocean data view. https://odv.awi.de/. Accessed on: 2025‑08‑02. Shen S-C (1984) Coastal Fishes of Taiwan. National Taiwan Museum, Taipei, Taiwan, 380 pp. [In Chinese and English] Shen S-C (1993) Family Labridae. In: Shen S‑C, Lee S‑C, Shao K‑T, Mok H‑K, Chen C‑T, Chen C‑H (Eds.), Fishes of Taiwan. Department of Zoology, National Taiwan University, Taipei, 444–470, pls. 140‑2–157‑2. [In Chinese] Shen S-C, Wu K-Y (2011) Fishes of Taiwan. National Museum of Marine Biology and Aquarium, Pingtung, 896 pp. [In Chinese] Westneat MW (2001) Labridae. Wrasses (also, hogfishes, razorfishes, corises, and tuskfishes). In: Carpenter KE, Niem VH (Eds.) FAO species identification guide for fishery purposes. The living marine resources of the western central Pacific. Vol 6. Bony fishes part 4 (Labridae to Latimeriidae), estuarine crocodiles, sea turtles, sea snakes and marine mammals. FAO, Rome, Italy, 3381– 3467.