Redescription of the Snailfish Careproctus rhodomelas (Cottoidei: Liparidae), with Ontogenetic and Distributional Notes

© 2021 The Japanese Society of Systematic Zoology Species Diversity 26: 23–29 Redescription of the Snailfish Careproctus rhodomelas (Cottoidei: Liparidae), with Ontogenetic and Distributional Notes Kenta Murasaki1,5, Yoshiaki Kai2, Hiromitsu Endo3, and Atsushi Fukui4 1 Institute of Oceanic Research and Development, Tokai University, 3-20-1 Orido Shimizu-ku, Shizuoka 424-8610, Japan E-mail: [email protected] 2 Maizuru Fisheries Research Station, Field Science Education andResearch Center, Kyoto University, Nagahama, Maizuru, Kyoto 625-0086, Japan 3 Laboratory of Marine Biology, Faculty of Science and Technology, Kochi University, 2-5-1 Akebono-cho, Kochi 780-8520, Japan 4 School of Marine Science and Technology, Tokai University, 3-20-1 Orido Shimizu-ku, Shizuoka 424-8610, Japan 5 Corresponding author (Received 16 September 2020; Accepted 6 November 2020) The rare Japanese deep-sea snailfish Careproctus rhodomelas Gilbert and Burke, 1912 is redescribed based on the holotype and 10 newly-collected specimens (30.0–131.4 mm standard length), with notes on morphological variations in pelvic disk size and body coloration caused by ontogenetic development. An updated distribution of the species is also provided, including the first voucher-supported records off eastern Miyakejima Island and the Hatoma Knoll in the southern part of the Okinawa Trough. Key Words: Taxonomy, Teleostei, rare species, pelvic disk, body color. Introduction Careproctus Krøyer, 1862 is one of the most speciose genera of snailfishes in the family Liparidae, comprising over 130 species distributed worldwide (Chernova et al. 2004; Orr et al. 2019). The former is primarily distinguished from other genera by the following combination of characters: one pair of nostrils; pseudobranch absent; pelvic disk present; pectoral fins typically with fewer rays than anal fin; body color uniformly light or dark, often gradually darkening posteriorly when otherwise light, rarely variegated (Orr and Maslenikov 2007). Additionally, the absence of a coronal pore and small papillae on some cephalic pores, and the teeth usually arranged in band-like rows clearly distinguish Careproctus from Pseudoliparis Andriashev and Pitruk, 1993, Allocareproctus Pitruk and Fedorov, 1993, and Squaloliparis Pitruk and Fedorov, 1993, species in the latter three genera had been previously assigned to the former (Andriashev and Pitruk 1993; Pitruk and Fedorov 1993a, b; Orr and Busby 2006). Because many species of Careproctus are rare or uncommon, pertinent biological information is often lacking. Careproctus rhodomelas Gilbert and Burke, 1912, a rare species in Japanese waters, was originally described from the holotype and single paratype, collected off the Bungo Channel and south of Suruga Bay, respectively. In the absence of other reports supported by voucher specimens, Kido (1988) redescribed the species based on two further specimens collected from Tosa Bay (near the type locality). However, morphological variation in the species and its distributional range are unclear because of the small number of known specimens. Accordingly, C. rhodomelas is redescribed herein based on the holotype and 10 newly-collected specimens, with notes on ontogenetic morphological variations and an updated distribution. Materials and Methods Counts, measurements, and descriptive terminology followed Orr and Maslenikov (2007), except for cephalic pore terminology, which follows Stein et al. (2001). Vertebral and median-fin ray counts were made from radiographs. Counts of gill rakers were taken from the first gill arch on the right side. Cephalic pores were examined after staining with Cyanine Blue following Saruwatari et al. (1997). Colors of the peritoneum, stomach, and pyloric caeca were noted following dissection. The right pectoral girdle was removed from MSM-20-65, and cleared and stained following Potthoff (1984). Holotype description are given first, followed by non-type descriptive notes in parentheses when different. Standard length and head length are abbreviated as SL and HL, respectively. The specimens examined are deposited in the fish collections of the Faculty of Science and Technology, Kochi University, Japan (BSKU), the Marine Science Museum, Tokai University, Shizuoka, Japan (MSM), and the Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History, Suitland, USA (USNM). Published online 1 January 2021 DOI: 10.12782/specdiv.26.23 24 Kenta Murasaki et al. Careproctus rhodomelas Gilbert and Burke, 1912 [Standard Japanese name: Bara-bikunin] (Figs 1–5; Table 1) Careproctus rhodomelas Gilbert and Burke, 1912: 365, fig. 7, pl. 44 (original description, type locality: off the Bungo Channel, Japan, 741 m depth; paratype locality: south of Suruga Bay, Japan, 927 m depth); Jordan et al. 1913: 307 (off the Bungo Channel and south of Suruga Bay, Japan); Burke 1930: 118, figs 37, 38 (description of the type specimens); Taranetz 1937: 134 (off the Bungo Channel and south of Suruga Bay, Japan; key); Okada and Matsubara 1938: 347 (off the Bungo Channel and south of Suruga Bay, Japan; key); Matsubara 1955: 1194 (off the Bungo Channel and south of Suruga Bay, Japan; key); Okamura 1982: 293, pl. 209 (Bungo Channel to Suruga Bay, Japan; description); Kido 1984: 338, pl. 304-J (Bungo Channel to Suruga Bay, Japan; brief description); Kido 1988: 198, fig. 37 (description of third and fourth specimens from Tosa Bay, Japan, 605–750 m depth); Nakabo 1993: 584, unnumbered fig. (Bungo Channel to Suruga Bay, Japan; key); Nakabo 2000: 669, unnumbered fig. (Bungo Channel to Suruga Bay, Japan; key); Shinohara et al. 2001: 320 (Tosa Bay, Japan; listed); Chernova et al. 2004: 15 (Bungo Channel to Suruga Bay, Japan; listed); Nakabo and Kai 2013: 1210, unnumbered fig. [?Sea of Japan (off Oki, Shimane); Bungo Channel; Tosa Bay; Suruga Bay, Japan; key]. Materials examined. Holotype: USNM 73334, 111.1 mm SL, male, off the Bungo Channel, Japan, Albatross station 4958, 32.606°N, 132.408°E, 741 m depth, 23 August 1906. Non-types (10 specimens, 30.0–131.4 mm SL): BSKU 20294, 117.8 mm SL, male, off eastern Miyakejima Island, Japan, 34.058°N, 140.000°E, 1160 m depth, 14 November 1972; BSKU 46963, 131.4 mm SL, sex unknown, Tosa Basin (off-shore from Tosa Bay), Japan, 32.895°N, 133.678°E–32.913°N, 133.694°E, 996–1010 m depth, 8 November 1989, R/V Tansei-maru (KT89-16, T1), beam trawl; BSKU 102864, 87.4 mm SL, male, Hatoma Knoll, southern Okinawa Trough, Japan, latitude and longitude unknown, 1530 m depth, 10 May 2005; MSM-20-63, 40.2 mm SL, immature female, South Komagoe Submarine Canyon, Suruga Bay, Japan, 34.947°N, 138.550°E–34.947°N, 138.578°E, 534–821 m depth, 5 February 2008, R/V Hokuto, epibenthic ring net; MSM-20-64, 30.0 mm SL, immature, off the Fujigawa River estuary mouth, Suruga Bay, Japan, 35.060°N, 138.643°E–35.063°N, 138.683°E, ca. 910 m depth, 16 December 2009, R/V Hokuto, epibenthic ring net; MSM-2065, 75.5 mm SL, male, Hagoromo Submarine Canyon, Suruga Bay, Japan, 35.003°N, 138.553°E–35.003°N, 138.617°E, 400–1196 m depth, 12 December 2012, R/V Hokuto, beam trawl; MSM-20-66, 52.1 mm SL, immature male, collected with MSM-20-65; MSM-20-67, 35.7 mm SL, immature, collected with MSM-20-65; MSM-20-71, 30.4 mm SL, immature, Hagoromo Submarine Canyon, Suruga Bay, Japan, 35.005°N, 138.538°E–35.005°N, 138.617°E, 414–1208 m depth, 16 January 2013, R/V Hokuto, beam trawl; MSM20-72, 30.5 mm SL, immature, Hagoromo Submarine Canyon, Suruga Bay, Japan, 35.003°N, 138.560°E–35.005°N, 138.615°E, 460–1209 m depth, 15 March 2013, R/V Hokuto, beam trawl. Diagnosis. A species of Careproctus distinguished from all currently recognized congeners by the following combination of characters: total vertebrae 60–63, dorsal-fin rays 54–58, anal-fin rays 48–51, pectoral-fin rays 28–31, teeth on both jaws strongly trilobed, gill slit entirely above pectoral-fin base or extending ventrally to 1st–3rd pectoral-fin ray base, longest ray of lower lobe pectoral fin longer than or nearly equal to HL (90.0–128.0% HL), peritoneum and stomach black. Description. Counts and measurements given in Table 1. Body slender, rounded in cross section anteriorly, tapering gradually and becoming moderately compressed posteriorly, deepest at nape region (Fig. 1). Skin lacking prickles, containing thin subdermal gelatinous layer. Head small, dorsal profile rounded from nape to snout. Snout deep, slightly (or not) projecting. Mouth subterminal, small, oral cleft extending to below center of orbit (or anterior margin of orbit); maxilla extending to below posterior margin of orbit (or between center and posterior margin of orbit) (Fig. 2A). Lower jaw slightly inferior, mandibular tooth plates somewhat behind premaxillary tooth plates. Teeth on both jaws short, strongly trilobed; inner teeth larger than outer teeth (Fig. 2B). Premaxillary teeth in about 10 (6–10) oblique rows of 3–6 (3–9) teeth forming bands. Mandibular teeth in about 9 (5–9) oblique rows of 4–6 (3–8) teeth forming bands. Diastema absent at upper and lower jaw symphyses. Single nostril tube-like, horizontally level with center of orbit. Orbit size moderate, dorsal contour not touching dorsal profile of head; pupil round. Cephalic lateralis pores small, almost same size or smaller than nostril, nasal pores 2, maxillary pores 6, preoperculomandibular pores 7, suprabranchial pores 2; pore pattern 2-6-7-2 (damaged in holotype) (Fig. 2A). Coronal pore absent. Chin pores (=anteriormost preoperculomandibular pores) paired, opening separately, not in common pit. About 13–20 free neuromasts forming irregular rows, originating from around nape and extending posteriorly to about two-thirds of body length (damaged in holotype). Gill slit short, upper margin horizontally level with upper margin of orbit; lower margin entirely above pectoral-fin base or extending ventrally to 1st–3rd pectoralfin ray base (damaged in holotype). Gill rakers restricted to lower part of arch, blunt and minute (status in holotype unknown). Pseudobranch absent (status in holotype unknown). Opercular flap angular (or slightly rounded), supported by two spines; upper spine (from opercle) and lower spine (from subopercle) extending posteriorly to just before vertical through dorsal-fin origin. Dorsaland anal-fin rays deeply buried in gelatinous tissue anteriorly. Anteriormost pterygiophore of dorsal fin with ray, inserted between 4th and 5th (or 3rd and 4th) neural spines. Membrane of posterior dorsal-fin rays continuous with caudal fin, overlapping 40.7–51.0% of caudal-fin length (damaged in holotype). Anal-fin origin below 9th (7th–9th) dorsal-fin ray base. Membrane of posterior anal- Redescription of Careproctus rhodomelas 25 fin rays continuous with caudal fin, overlapping 43.5–51.0% of caudal-fin length (damaged in holotype). Caudal fin truncate. Hypural plates fused with terminal vertebral centrum, upper and lower plates separated by a narrow slit. A single epural. Two (or three) paired minute pleural ribs on posterior abdominal vertebrae (rarely absent in immature specimens). Pectoral fin deeply notched, shortest ray at notch shorter than or almost equal to half length of longest ray in both lobes (damaged in holotype). Upper lobe rays slightly free from membrane at tip; 2nd (2nd–4th) ray from dorsalmost longest, reaching to below 7th (6th–9th) dorsal-fin ray base. Lower lobe rays more prominent than upper lobe rays; 5th (3rd–5th) rays from ventralmost longest, longer than (or nearly equal to) head. Rays in notch more widely spaced than on either lobe. Uppermost pectoral-fin base at about 1/2 body depth, lowermost pectoral-fin base below posterior margin of orbit. Proximal radials 4 (3+1), robust, rounded, lacking notches or interradial fenestrae (Fig. 2C). Scapula and coracoid with short stout helve, lacking notches. Distal radials supporting all pectoral-fin rays. Pelvic disk triangular (rarely slightly oval in immature specimens), longer than wide, anterior lobe well developed and moderately upturned (Fig. 3). Relative size of pelvic disk widely variable (Table 1), apparently becoming smaller with growth, particularly between 30.0 mm SL and 87.4 mm Table 1. Counts and measurements of Careproctus rhodomelas. Holotype Non-types n SL (mm) 111.1 30.0–131.4 10 Counts Vertebrae (abdominal+caudal) 61 (10+51) 60–63 (9 or 10+50–53) 10 Dorsal-fin rays 55 54–58 10 Anal-fin rays 48 48–51 10 Pectoral-fin rays 31 28–31 10 Caudal-fin rays 10 10–13 10 Principal caudal-fin rays (upper+lower) 9 (4+5) 9 or 10 (4 or 5+5) 10 Procurrent caudal-fin rays (upper+lower) 1 (1+0) 1–3 (1 or 2+0 or 1) 10 Branchiostegal rays 6 6 10 Gill rakers Unknown 6–8 7 Pyloric caeca Unknown 7–10 5 Measurements in percent of SL (HL) Head length 18.7 18.0–22.7 10 Head width 12.3 (65.9) 11.9–16.2 (57.1–74.8) 10 Maximum body depth 16.7 (88.9) 15.8–17.7 (72.2–88.6) 10 Body depth at pelvic disk 15.7 (83.7) 14.0–17.7 (72.2–81.5) 10 Body depth at anal-fin origin 14.0 (74.5) 9.9–14.4 (46.2–72.0) 10 Snout length 5.1 (27.4) 5.2–7.7 (27.5–35.4) 10 Maxilla length 7.7 (40.9) 7.0–10.9 (38.0–52.8) 10 Mandible length 7.5 (39.9) 6.5–10.5 (36.2–50.6) 10 Mouth width 8.9 (47.6) 8.2–10.4 (37.7–49.4) 10 Orbit length 4.6 (24.5) 4.2–6.2 (22.2–27.5) 10 Interorbital width (flesh) 8.1 (43.3) 7.0–10.9 (37.6–48.7) 10 Interorbital width (bony) 2.9 (15.4) 2.2–3.9 (11.9–18.5) 10 Suborbital to maxilla length 2.7 (14.4) 2.8–4.0 (14.1–17.7) 10 Gill slit length Unknown 2.9–4.6 (12.8–22.2) 9 Pectoral-fin ray length (upper lobe) 12.2 (64.9) 10.9–14.6 (50.8–69.9) 10 Pectoral-fin ray length (lower lobe) ca. 20.6 (ca. 110.1) 18.5–23.0 (90.0–128.0) 10 Pectoral-fin ray length at notch Unknown 4.2–7.7 (20.6–41.3) 10 Pelvic disk length 2.3 (12.5) 2.3–5.0 (12.7–22.1) 10 Pelvic disk width 2.2 (11.5) 2.1–4.5 (11.4–20.3) 10 Caudal fin length 10.1 (53.8) 9.2–14.3 (46.2–64.6) 10 Predorsal fin length 20.9 (111.5) 19.9–25.8 (101.1–122.0) 10 Snout to pelvic disk 11.2 (59.6) 10.5–16.9 (53.8–77.2) 10 Mandible to pelvic disk 8.2 (43.8) 8.8–14.4 (47.3–70.0) 10 Snout to anus 16.4 (87.5) 17.3–25.6 (89.0–115.0) 10 Mandible to anus 14.7 (78.4) 15.4–23.6 (77.9–107.2) 10 Pelvic disk to anus 4.5 (24.0) 3.4–7.9 (16.0–34.8) 10 Preanal fin length 31.9 (170.2) 29.9–34.8 (135.2–183.9) 10 Anus to anal-fin origin 16.5 (88.0) 9.2–15.2 (41.2–84.7) 10 Dorsal-fin origin to anal-fin origin 22.3 (119.2) 18.1–20.1 (81.2–109.3) 10 Abbreviations: SL, standard length; HL, head length. 26 Kenta Murasaki et al. Fig. 2. Sketches of Careproctus rhodomelas, MSM-20-65, 75.5 mm SL, male. A: Lateral view of head and anterior part of body; B: premaxillary teeth (right side); C: pectoral girdle (right side). Abbreviations: C, coracoid; DR, distal radial; PR, proximal radial; S, scapula. Fig. 1. Fresh specimens of Careproctus rhodomelas. A: MSM-20-65, 75.5 mm SL, male; B: MSM-20-63, 40.2 mm SL, immature female; C: MSM-20-64, 30.0 mm SL, immature. Redescription of Careproctus rhodomelas 27 SL (Figs 3, 4). Anus closer to posterior margin of pelvic disk than to anal-fin origin, vertically below dorsal-fin origin. Small conical urogenital papilla present behind anus (absent in immature specimens). Stomach and pyloric caeca located on left side of visceral cavity. Color when fresh. Head, body and fin coloration differ with body size: at 75.5 mm SL - anterior part of head (especially snout and chin) reddish, posterior part of head, body, and basal parts of dorsal and anal fins pink, distal margins of dorsal and anal fins dark red, caudal fin reddish, pectoral fin dark red, except black distal margin of upper lobe (Fig. 1A); at 40.2 mm SL - head, anterior half of body, dorsal and anal fins black, posterior half of body, dorsal and anal fins, and caudal fin pale pink, pectoral fin black (Fig. 1B); at 30.0 mm SL - similar to 40.2 mm SL, except pale (whitish) on posterior half of body, dorsal and anal fins, and caudal fin (Fig. 1C). Eye black. Gill cavity and peritoneum (visible through skin) black. Color in alcohol. Fresh reddish or pinkish colors fading to pale white; black coloration unchanged or becoming slightly lighter. Lips and mouth cavity dusky. Gill cavity, peritoneum and stomach black. Pyloric caeca completely black or mottled at tips. Distribution. Known from the western North Pacific adjacent to southern Japan: off the eastern part of Miyakejima Island, Suruga Bay, Tosa Bay, off the Bungo Channel, and the Hatoma Knoll (southern Okinawa Trough) in 400– 1530 m depth (Fig. 5). Remarks. The newly-collected specimens agreed well with the holotype of C. rhodomelas in having similar counts of vertebrae and fin rays, strongly trilobed teeth, long rays in the pectoral fin lower lobe, and a black peritoneum and stomach. Pelvic disk size and body coloration of examined specimens varied with ontogenetic development. Such changes with development have not been noted previously Fig. 3. Ventral views of head and anterior part of body (preserved condition) of Careproctus rhodomelas. A: MSM-20-71, 30.4 mm SL, immature; B: MSM-20-65, 75.5 mm SL, male; C: BSKU 20294, 117.8 mm SL, male. Scale bar: 3 mm. Fig. 4. Relationship between standard length (SL) and pelvic disk length to head length (DL/HL). Open circle, holotype; solid circles, non-types. Fig. 5. Distribution of specimens of Careproctus rhodomelas examined in this study. 28 Kenta Murasaki et al. in species of Careproctus, although Burke (1930) referred to the greatly reduced pelvic disk in the type specimens of C. rhodomelas relative to other species in the genus. They may indicate a life-style change with growth, such as increasing independence from the sea-floor or some substrates. Kobayashi (1962) noted that the pelvic disk of the smooth lumpsucker Aptocyclus ventricosus (Pallas, 1769) belonging to Cyclopteridae [= a sister family of Liparidae (see Orr et al. 2019)] was much smaller in pelagic sub-adult specimens (<122 mm SL) than in benthic adults (160–295 mm SL), and suggested that the size was related to life-style in that species. Among the species of Careproctus known from the Japanese waters, C. rhodomelas shares trilobed teeth and a dark (brown or black) peritoneum with Careproctus melanurus Gilbert, 1892, Careproctus simus Gilbert, 1896, Careproctus marginatus Kido, 1988, Careproctus rotundifrons Sakurai and Shinohara, 2008, and Careproctus surugaensis Murasaki, Takami, and Fukui, 2017 (Stein 1978; Kido 1985, 1988; Sakurai and Shinohara 2008; Murasaki et al. 2017; this study). However, the former clearly differs from the latter species in having 60–63 total vertebrae (vs. 52–55 in C. marginatus, 53–56 in C. rotundifrons and 50 in C. surugaensis), 54–58 dorsal-fin rays (vs. 47–50 in C. marginatus and C. rotundifrons, and 47 in C. surugaensis), 48–51 analfin rays (vs. 40–43 in C. marginatus, 41–45 in C. rotundifrons and 39 in C. surugaensis), 28–31 pectoral-fin rays (vs. 34–40 in C. rotundifrons), gill slit entirely above pectoral-fin base or extending ventrally to 1st–3rd pectoral-fin ray base (vs. extending ventrally to 7th pectoral-fin ray base in C. surugaensis), long lower pectoral-fin rays, 90.0–128.0% HL (vs. short, 34.8–50.3% HL in C. simus and 35.8–58.2% HL in C. marginatus), and a black stomach (vs. pale in all five species) (Stein 1978; Kido 1985, 1988; Sakurai and Shinohara 2008; Murasaki et al. 2017; this study). In addition, all teeth on both jaws are trilobed in C. rhodomelas (vs. simple teeth mixed in C. simus, C. melanurus and C. rotundifrons) (Stein 1978; Kido 1985; Sakurai and Shinohara 2008; Orr et al. 2019; this study). The voucher-supported records of C. rhodomelas are limited (see Introduction), and other records are uncertain. Yanai (1950) and Kato (1956) listed C. rhodomelas from the Sea of Japan without any voucher specimens or descriptive details, and were later cited by several authors (e.g., Shinohara et al. 2014). However, Yanai (1950) failed to list Careproctus trachysoma Gilbert and Burke, 1912, despite that species being common in the Sea of Japan, as Nakabo and Kai (2013) pointed out, and may have misidentified C. trachysoma as C. rhodomelas. Accordingly, the record of C. rhodomelas from the Sea of Japan remains unsupported and likely invalid. Takemura et al. (2010) reported reproduction in C. rhodomelas collected by a remotely-operated vehicle (ROV) from around the hydrothermal vents on Hatoma Knoll in the southern part of the Okinawa Trough at 1480–1530 m depth (temperature 3.8–3.9°C). According to their report, the species is a year-round spawner, producing a small number of large elliptic eggs (c.f. usually round in snailfishes) ca. 6 mm in maximum diameter. Sakata et al. (2015) subsequently reported on the visual systems of C. rhodomelas from the Hatoma Knoll by the molecular analysis of rhodopsin, and showed that the eyesight of the specimens appeared sufficiently developed to recognize bioluminescence produced by other animals living near the hydrothermal vents. However, those records of C. rhodomelas from the Hatoma Knoll without showing any supporting evidence for species identification or museum deposition of the specimens for re-examination. The present specimens from off eastern Miyakejima Island (BSKU 20294) and the Hatoma Knoll, southern Okinawa Trough (BSKU 102864) are the first voucher-supported records of C. rhodomelas from those areas, and represent the most eastern, western, and southern records of the species. Comparative material. Careproctus surugaensis: holotype, MSM-17-81, 82.6 mm SL, female, northern part of Suruga Trough, Suruga Bay, 34.978°N, 138.637°E–34.923°N, 138.638°E, 1450–1570 m depth, 28 October 2015. Acknowledgments We are grateful to the captains and crews of R/V Tanseimaru and Hokuto for their assistance in the field. Grateful thanks are also given to J. T. Williams, S. Raredon, D. G. Smith, K. Murphy and D. Pitassy (USNM) for their kind hospitality during the first author’s visit to examine the holotype of C. rhodomelas, S. Raredon (USNM) for the radiographs of the holotype of C. rhodomelas, S. Tomiyama (MSM) for depositing some of the newly-collected specimens, G. S. Hardy (Ngunguru, New Zealand) for his critical reading of the manuscript and providing some references, and M. Takami (Tokai University) for information on the deep-sea fish fauna of Suruga Bay. This study was supported in part by Grants-in-Aid for the Promotion of Scientific Research (C) (no. 18K05792) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan to the last author. References Andriashev, A. P. and Pitruk, D. L. 1993. Review of the ultra-abyssal (hadal) genus Pseudoliparis (Scorpaeniformes, Liparidae) with a description of a new species from the Japan Trench. Voprosy Ikhtiologii 33: 325–330. [In Russian] Burke, C. V. 1930. Revision of the fishes of the family Liparidae. Bulletin of the United States National Museum 150: 1–204. Chernova, N. V., Stein, D. L., and Andriashev, A. P. 2004. Family Liparidae Scopoli 1777—Snailfishes. California Academy Sciences Annotated Checklists of Fishes 31: 1–72. Gilbert, C. H. and Burke, C. V. 1912. New cyclogasterid fishes from Japan. Proceedings of the United States National Museum 42: 351–380. Jordan, D. S., Tanaka, S., and Snyder, J. O. 1913. A catalogue of the fishes of Japan. Journal of the College of Science, Imperial University of Tokyo 33: 1–497. Kato, G. 1956. [A list of marine fishes of the Sea of Japan]. Bulletin of the Japan Sea Regional Fisheries Research Laboratory 4: 310–331. [In Japanese] Redescription of Careproctus rhodomelas 29 Kido, K. 1984. Liparididae. Pp. 337–341. In: Masuda, H., Amaoka, K., Araga, C., Uyeno, T., and Yoshino, T. (Eds) The Fishes of the Japanese Archipelago. Tokai University Press, Tokyo. Kido, K. 1985. New and rare species of the genus Careproctus (Liparididae) from the Bering Sea. Japanese Journal of Ichthyology 32: 6–17. Kido, K. 1988. Phylogeny of the family Liparididae, with the taxonomy of the species found around Japan. Memoirs of the Faculty of Fisheries, Hokkaido University 35: 125–256. Kobayashi, K. 1962. Larvae of the smooth lumpsucker, Aptocyclus ventricosus (Pallas), with discussion on revision of the taxonomy of the species. Memoirs of the Faculty of Fisheries, Hokkaido University 13: 153–164. Matsubara, K. 1955. Liparidae. Pp. 1184–1197. In: Matsubara, K. Fish Morphology and Hierarchy. Part 2. Ishizaki Shoten, Tokyo. [In Japanese] Murasaki, K., Takami, M., and Fukui, A. 2017. Careproctus surugaensis sp. nov. (Liparidae), a new snailfish from Suruga Trough, Japan. Ichthyological Research doi 10.1007/s10228-017-0611-6 (22 November 2017), 65: 237–244 (25 April 2018). Nakabo, T. 1993. Liparidae. Pp. 580–590, 1304. In: Nakabo, T. (Ed.) Fishes of Japan with Pictorial Keys to the Species. First Edition. Tokai University Press, Tokyo. [In Japanese] Nakabo, T. 2000. Liparidae. Pp. 665–677, 1536–1537. In: Nakabo, T. (Ed.) Fishes of Japan with Pictorial Keys to the Species. Second Edition. Tokai University Press, Tokyo. [In Japanese] Nakabo, T. and Kai, Y. 2013. Liparidae. Pp. 1205–1218, 2072–2076. In: Nakabo, T. (Ed.) Fishes of Japan with Pictorial Keys to the Species. Third Edition. Tokai University Press, Hadano. [In Japanese] Okada, Y. and Matsubara, K. 1938. Keys to the Fishes and Fish-like Animals of Japan. Sanseido, Tokyo, xl+584 pp. Okamura, O. 1982. Liparididae. Pp. 292–293. In: Okamura, O., Amaoka, K., and Mitani, F. (Eds) Fishes of the Kyushu-Palau Ridge and Tosa Bay. The Intensive Research of Unexploited Fishery Resources on Continental Slopes. Japan Fisheries Resource Conservation Association, Tokyo. [In Japanese and English] Orr, J. W. and Busby, M. S. 2006. Revision of the snailfish genus Allocareproctus Pitruk & Fedorov (Teleostei: Liparidae), with descriptions of four new species from the Aleutian Islands. Zootaxa 1173: 1–37. Orr, J. W. and Maslenikov, K. P. 2007. Two new variegated snailfishes of the genus Careproctus (Teleostei: Scorpaeniformes: Liparidae) from the Aleutian Islands, Alaska. Copeia 2007: 699–710. Orr, J. W., Spies, I. B., Stevenson, D. E., Longo, G. C., Kai, Y., Ghods, S., and Hollowed, M. 2019. Molecular phylogenetics of snailfishes (Cottiformes: Liparidae) based on MtDNA and RADseq genomic analyses, with comments on selected morphological characters. Zootaxa 4642: 1–79. Pitruk, D. L. and Fedorov, V. V. 1993a. Allocareproctus gen. novum (Scorpaeniformes, Liparidae)—a new genus of snailfishes from the northwest Pacific Ocean. Voprosy Ikhtiologii 33: 16–20. [In Russian] Pitruk, D. L. and Fedorov, V. V. 1993b. Squaloliparis (Scorpaeniformes, Liparidae)—a new genus of snailfishes from the Sea of Okhotsk. Voprosy Ikhtiologii 33: 602–608. [In Russian] Potthoff, T. 1984. Clearing and staining techniques. Pp. 35–37. In: Moser, H.G., Richards, W. J., Cohen, D. M., Fahay, M. P., Kendall, A. W. Jr., and Richardson, S. L. (Eds) Ontogeny and Systematics of Fishes. American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists, Lawrence, KS. Sakata, R., Kabutomori, R., Okano, K., Mitsui, H., Takemura, A., Miwa, T., Yamamoto, H., and Okano, T. 2015. Rhodopsin in the dark hot sea: molecular analysis of rhodopsin in a snailfish, Careproctus rhodomelas, living near the deep-sea hydrothermal vent. PLoS ONE 10: e0135888. Sakurai, H. and Shinohara, G. 2008. Careproctus rotundifrons, a new snailfish (Scorpaeniformes: Liparidae) from Japan. Bulletin of the National Museum of Nature and Science, Series A, Supplement 2: 39–45. Saruwatari, T., Lopez, J. A., and Pietsch, T. W. 1997. Cyanine Blue: a versatile and harmless stain for specimen observation. Copeia 1997: 840–841. Shinohara, G., Endo, H., Matsuura, K., Machida, Y., and Honda, H. 2001. Annotated checklist of the deepwater fishes from Tosa Bay, Japan. National Science Museum Monographs 20: 283–343. Shinohara, G., Nakae, M., Ueda, Y., Kojima, S., and Matsuura, K. 2014. Annotated checklist of deep-sea fishes of the Sea of Japan. National Science Museum Monographs 44: 225–291. Stein, D. L. 1978. A review of the deepwater Liparidae (Pisces) from the coast of Oregon and adjacent waters. Occasional Papers of the California Academy of Sciences 127: 1–55. Stein, D. L., Chernova, N. V., and Andriashev, A. P. 2001. Snailfishes (Pisces: Liparidae) of Australia, including descriptions of thirty new species. Records of the Australian Museum 53: 341–406. Takemura, A., Tamotsu, S., Miwa, T., and Yamamoto, H. 2010. Preliminary results on the reproduction of a deep-sea snailfish Careproctus rhodomelas around the active hydrothermal vent on the Hatoma Knoll, Okinawa, Japan. Journal of Fish Biology 77: 1709–1715. Taranetz, A. Y. 1937. Handbook for identification of fishes of Soviet Far East and adjacent waters. Bulletins of the Pacific Science Institute 11: 1–200. [In Russian] Yanai, T. 1950. [Fishes of the San-in District]. Zoological Magazine 59: 17–22. [In Japanese]