scieee AI-readable full text Open interactive document viewer

Research With, Not On: Navigating Ethics in Law and Diversity Research

Bols, Sophie

Abstract

This presentation examines what it means to conduct Research With, Not On research participants within Law and Diversity research. Working with groups historically marginalised by law, policy, and within academia requires ethical approaches that move beyond the traditional research-ethics checklists. Existing frameworks often fail to address structural inequality, power imbalances, epistemic hierarchies, and extractivist research practices. Drawing on two ongoing projects, 1) my PhD research on the construction of masculinity in EU border externalisation, and 2) a Participatory / Participant Driven Action Research project on Safe Reporting mechanisms for undocumented sex workers in collaboration with Utsopi, the presentation explores how positionality, epistemic justice, participatory methodologies, and humility strengthen research. Participatory arts-based research, community-led agenda setting, and continuous dialogue illustrate how experiential knowledge can be recognised as expertise and centred throughout the research process. The presentation concludes by outlining five commitments: humility, epistemic justice, positionality, reflexive ethics, and responsibility beyond academia, as essential pillars for genuinely collaborative and accountable research practices.

Full text

Doing Research With , Not On Navigating Ethics in Law and Diversity Research Faculty Research Day 2025 PhD Researcher Law and Diversity & Migration Law Sophie Bols Content Overview Ethical Responsibility in Law & Diversity Research Example 1: Excluded Masculinities Example 2: Legal Clinic x Utsopi What “Research With, Not On” requires Ethical Responsibility in Law & Diversity Research Historically marginalised communities Stigmatisation in law and academic research Limitations of Research Ethics Insufficiently addressed: Structural inequalities Power relations Epistemic hierarchies Extractivist research practices Legitimacy Challenges Post-truth era: Mis/disinformation Ideological polarisation Within academia: Feminist, queer, decolonial, CRT critiques No disembodied “neutral” researcher Positionality & Epistemic Justice Explicit situatedness Transparency Strengthens scientific rigor Positionality Whose knowledge counts? Who speaks / is spoken about? Experts through theory & experience Epistemic Justice EU Border Externalisation & Constructions of Masculinity Focus: racialised migrant men seeking international protection Intersectionality as methodology Example 1 : PhD Research Camera metaphor Filter = analytical framework, add-on after data-collection Lens shapes the entire research design = Intersectionality as methodology Intersectional Masculinity Lens Art workshops where: Participants become research collaborators Experiential knowledge is shared through art Co-analysis decentres the researcher Trauma-sensitive Inclusive storytelling Participatory Arts - Based Research