B.Log

B.LOG completerelativity.org November 23, 2025 1 [ 2025.09.17 ] Humans are not in control by Amenoum The species of humans seems to believe it is in control of the developments on Earth and its own fate. However, of all the illusions present in the human world, this is the greatest of them all. And, increasingly, it is turning into a big delusion. What is ruling this world are natural forces. From the perspective of these forces, humans are nothing but another tool at disposal, that can be used to produce certain effects. When it comes to the climate, environment, or, evolution in general, there are two major forces at play. One force is acting to conserve the present state, the other is acting to bring the system into another equilibrium. In the context of climate, the former is trying to preserve the global average temperature of about 14 ◦C, the latter is trying to bring it to a much larger value (22-23 ◦C, per my hypotheses[1]). And the latter is, obviously, winning. Evidence for the illusion (and delusion) is mounting up. The expected slowdown in the rise of atmospheric greenhouse gases during the COVID-19 pandemic was not observed[2]. Since 2006, methane levels are rising rapidly, while the direct anthropogenic contribution is decreasing[3]. Anthropogenic forcing is a part of natural regulation. A recent study has shown that the decrease of anthropogenic aerosols in the 21st century in the Northern Hemisphere has been precisely compensated by the larger aerosol loading with wildfires and volcanic activity in the Southern Hemisphere[4]. This is strong evidence that, when it comes to Earth’s development and regulation, it is the effect that matters, whether the cause is anthropogenic or non-anthropogenic is irrelevant (in other words, the force is interpreting humans as one of the natural tools at disposal). Thus, humans are not in control of Earth’s climate, or anything, in the bigger scheme of things. Humans may choose to stop producing one or both of the effects (positive or negative forcing), but that is unlikely to affect the forces - there are alternative ways to produce the same effects. Another interesting example of this is the coupling between wars and volcanism, as the effects on climate and the environment can be very similar between 1 the two. Thus, increase in wars leads to a decrease in equivalent volcanism, and vice versa[5]. If you don’t believe it, well, that’s not surprising or unexpectable - in order to be fooled, it is desirable for a tool to believe it is in control, otherwise it could become useless to the forces. I am almost useless. But being useless to the forces does not imply that one is worthless in general. It simply implies one is relatively neutral, and genuine neutrality is invincible in the battle of polarized forces. When it comes to the asteroid defense or the battle against climate change, people tend to say they’re fighting for the planet. A blatant lie, of course. Planet can, and has lived through, massive asteroid bombardments and massive climate change extremes. It survives, whether as a ball of fire, a ball of ice, or something in between. The two major forces are not fighting for the survival of the planet either, they are simply fighting over the planet’s state, or energy level. If the planet wants to change, it may evolve something like humans to kick-start the transition. But after the transition, obviously, if any lifeforms are to remain on surface, are those not fighting against the new state. Obviously, if the planet can evolve life as needed, people who say they’re fighting for the planet are not even fighting for the life on it. They’re simply fighting to preserve the current state. Whether that’s good or bad is, of course, relative. If the planet needs change, then that’s bad for the planet. But it’s actually hard to be sure of what the planet needs, wants, or what’s best for it, when one can hardly understand it. Therefore, neutrality seems to be the only choice if one doesn’t want to risk doing a bad thing here, and with that, risk its own extinction. 2 [ 2024.06.09 ] Cold-hearted fever by Amenoum Our body uses heat to fight pathogens, but not heat alone, as heat alone is not enough. Elevated heat increases chemical reactions which enhances induced oxygen deprivation, acidity, increase in digestive enzymes, toxicity and nutrient deprivation. All this is used to subdue pathogens, although it affects the body as well. To increase body temperature, the part of the brain measuring and controlling body temperature sends a false reading to the body. The body parts are informed that the temperature is lower than normal so the body starts shaking (and we may even feel cold) to increase the temperature. That’s how fever starts. 2 That’s one interpretation. In the other, the brain is not deceiving the body, rather the brain simply sets the thermostat to new value and the body obeys. But if there’s no deception, why do we feel cold? Deception may be here not to confuse the body or ourselves but to confuse the pathogen. This deception is probably reflected in one kind of hysteresis - where the temperature effect on pathogens is delayed. The hysteresis is particularly effective against pathogens operating on short-term interests as it decreases their awareness of immune response, imprinting on them an illusion of control and invincibility. Deception is probably very common, in both, pathogens and immune systems. The only difference may be in how conscious it is. What is interesting about fever is that it is not localized - it affects the whole body. This is not the case in a typical inflammation, where the immune response is localized. There are several possible reasons for a non-localized response: •inability to locate the pathogen, •global pathogen presence (metastasis) or effect, which itself may require a prior relatively prolonged deception of the immune system, •lack of highly targeting mechanisms that would be effective against the pathogen, •corruption of the immune system. A global response is a risk but worth trying if the risk is lower for the cells of the body than it is for the pathogen. The self-regulation correlated with immune systems is present on Earth surface and probably deep below it as well. Animals on Earth (including people) are dying with rising temperatures, combined with increasing acidity (in the oceans, rainwater, soil), increasingly anoxic conditions, toxicity and nutrient deprivation (hunger). And there is a strong hysteresis in the system, e.g., most of heat is buffered in the oceans and a lot of response is baked in (e.g., ice melt, sea level rise) - scheduled to occur gradually over time, or abruptly with occasional regime shifts and accelerations due to positive feedback effects. We all know who the pathogen is here, but the buffering of heat in the oceans tells us explicitly that the pathogen is not in the ocean. Earthquakes would be a signal of fever and I do argue, in my works, that these are on the increase. Established science claims that apparent increase in earthquakes is not real - it is the effect of increase in seismometry and reporting. 3 But that’s probably an imprinted illusion, as part of the deception in the Earth’s immune system. Humans still refuse to admit that Earth is alive (that’s probably what defines a pathogen - inability to discriminate between a living being and a resource for exploitation) which means they still don’t realize they’re being deceived. So the news today are full of people dying of high temperature and heat waves, but no, it’s not the heat alone that’s killing them, just like the heat alone is not killing any pathogen. This reductionism, or fixation to a single factor (temperature, CO2, etc.) is also typical for a pathogen. But this is just the beginning. At some point humans will have to acknowledge (for real, not in empty words) that the exploitation of holism is in the long-term suicidal for any reductionism. - 2.1 Are humans inherently destructive? J. Bendell is his book Breaking together (which I highly recommend) argues that humans are not inherently destructive. He argues that in human history people were often acting as a part of Earth’s immune system - helping it thrive, not as a pathogen - helping it die. He claims that it is the monetary system in place which is forcing people to be destructive and he claims that this system has been forced on them by the elite. This system is based on debts to private banks, which requires unlimited growth of the economy in order not to collapse. He neglects the fact that people evolve - people of today are not the same as people of yesterday. Just like healthy cells become corrupt and turn into cancer cells, people, over time, got corrupt and became cancer. It is with this corruption that they’ve installed a system that ensures their unlimited growth. The system in place is thus coupled with people in place. Yes, there’s inequality but the majority wants growth, no matter how much they have. The majority of people want or even need such system in place. They might say otherwise but try to remove the things provided to them by this system and see what happens. In case of polarized people (the majority), nothing nice. But that’s the other problem Bendell is not immune to - treatment of the whole of humanity as single species. He provides examples where people today work quite nicely supporting or even enhancing the ecosystem, rather then being destructive. He seems to believe that if the current monetary system is removed or transformed accordingly, the majority of humanity would behave in such way. Most likely, however, that’s not true. People today who effectively are a part of Earth’s immune system chose to be that way. Some chose to be that way once they’ve realized that being a part of the installed monetary system implies destruction of the planet. But most people don’t even want to know anything about it. By now they do know very well about the destruction, but they just don’t want to be aware of it. This is why they happily chose censorship of uncomfortable truths over change. They will only change their behavior by force. Either by an authoritarian regime or nature, or a combination of both. And with each shift of climate to a new regime, the systems in power will shift even more toward authoritarian regimes. Since the elite has the power to outsource their 4 problems, it is the people, not the elite, who will be forced to change their lifestyle for the worse (through increasing taxes, high inflation, etc.). This will be highly correlated with increasing rebellion and destabilization of systems, which will ultimately fully collapse. Removal of the system by force, however, will not remove corruption present in majority of people and, without it, they will probably quickly install another one, which may be different in the beginning, but will over time corrupt (probably more quickly than the previous one). In other words, transformation of systems must be coupled with transformation of people in order to represent a permanent and real change, rather than a short-term illusion. Transformation is correlated with the climax of trauma. The bigger the trauma the higher is the probability for more permanent transformation. But the bigger the trauma the higher is the possibility for death as well. A major extinction may be interpreted then as a filter, or a natural selection for survival of those fit for transformation. In that context, one could say that some of us are or will be the chosen ones. It is my belief that, the sooner you choose to live differently, the greater is the probability you are or will be the chosen one. 3 [ 2023.11.15 ] Life is de facto everywhere, but where’s the profit? by Amenoum It has been proven that microbes exist high in Earth’s atmosphere, well above 40 km[6], they’ve been detected even at 400 km height[7]. And this is a global phenomenon. As everything, gravity is pulling them down and since they are more dense than the surrounding air, they are, just like rain, falling down. Sure, there is some lateral motion (which may be correlated with lateral momenta of meteors) but the radial component must be significant. On Venus, they could be kept afloat for significant amounts of time due to extreme super-rotation of the atmosphere, induced gravity waves and photophoresis[8], but on Earth, not as much. And if they’re not falling for millions of years, with their populations constantly replenished, they are de facto coming from space - with meteors (possibly more in comets than asteroids). Possibly even in the smallest cosmic dust particles, albeit, they’re probably arriving already dead in such cases. If they would remain in atmosphere much longer, their presence perhaps could be explained by ejection from Earth in large asteroid impacts and maybe even extreme volcanic eruptions, but such events are too rare to be viable solution candidates. Microbes have been detected in meteorites on Earth (probably as fossils 5 as well), but they are, by the effective policy, considered contamination, even though the dominant species in these are often extremophiles resistant to high radiation (e.g., Rubrobacter radiotolerans) - which is not the case for the surrounding soil[9]. If the microbes are constantly raining down on Earth, they must be de facto everywhere and they are also constantly raining on other celestial bodies (on Venus, even more than on Earth). So why is this fact not yet established as such among the population? Is this really a fact? In other words, is this fact true? Nothing can be proven absolutely so no fact is an absolute fact. After all, many scientific facts have turned out to be lies. The average mainstream scientist effectively behaves like "extraordinary life" is a fact, or absolute truth. "Microbes in meteorites are contamination" - another such fact. There are many such facts in modern science, making it very religious. My extensive research, using a holistic approach (which, on average, is very lacking in mainstream), over the years has led me to believe, with great confidence, that life is everywhere. To me, thus, at least occasional if not constant, ingress of microbes from space to Earth - is a fact. Contrary to average mainstream, I require evidence to show without ambiguity that this is not true, rather than the other way around. I am aware that microbes are constantly lifted up from Earth and can reach great heights, but all attempts to explain microbes at 400 km height with Earth origin are speculative. Some speculate they ride on the flow of ions[10] (electric currents), some speculate they ride on extreme vertical winds[11]. But these have problems and can hardly explain heavier particles (larger than nanometer order) beyond 120 km height. Even if that’s true, the microbial population at great heights is probably dominated by those coming from space, the opposite being true near surface. Viable (living) microbes falling to Earth have been detected beyond 40 km height. This is harder to explain with microbes lifted up from Earth’s surface because these microbes have to pass through the deadly ozone layer. Unlike microbes falling in meteors, they wouldn’t be protected by the rock and their exposure to ozone would last much longer due to significantly lower radial velocity. Research shows that exposure of microbes to ozone concentration at about 2.3 ppm results in 80% reduction in viability for most microbes after 15 minutes[12]. How much of them would survive the trip through the 30 km thick layer of atmosphere where ozone concentration is larger than 2.5 ppm on average[13] and reaches 15 ppm at 32 km height? Microbes riding in meteors then have a greater chance of surviving the trip through the atmosphere, which in this case (upward trip on asteroids excluded) makes survival on entry more likely than survival on exit. 6 The reason, I believe, lies in the biased hallucination guiding the behavior and development of the polarized human population. Hallucinations exist everywhere in space, wherever any organization of individuals as a whole acts as a distinct organ(ism). These individuals don’t have to be physically connected (information exchange between them can be wireless). This has been proven by studies showing that splitting of brains in two halves does not, as initially believed (and required by conventional theories on emergent consciousness), result in splitting of consciousness[14]. Hallucinations may even exist independently of consciousness, even though they are generally correlated with consciousness. Due to relativity in causality, as postulated in CR, hallucinations exist independently from the organization correlated with it (just like dark matter can exist independently of coupled real mass). In other words, hallucination can affect individuals (e.g., guiding them into the organization) just as individuals can affect the hallucination. This entanglement can be weak (e.g., in a temporary formed flock of birds) or strong. Individuals of human species are highly organized and often act as a constitutional quantum of some organization. Hallucinations on Earth are thus everywhere and a superposition of all human organizations exists as a larger hallucination. It is dominated by polarized organizations and, based on collective behavior of humans, this is nothing less than a hallucination of a devil - a disease acting against the well-being of the planet and any long-term well-being of its own embodiment. Conspiracies are thus real, it’s just hard to put the hallucination (or the correlated collective) in jail and why would the devil ruling the world want to put its self in jail? The jail itself is the invention of the devil and it exists for those who oppose it, in one way or another. The devil and its demonic components prioritize financial gain, jobs bringing money to organizations, and other short-term benefits resulting from overexploitation. This then explains the anthropocentric behavior of the collective, and why it always takes so long to accept new paradigms (which degrade the status of homo sapiens as a special and sacred figure, whether locally or in the whole observable universe) even though the evidence is obvious from non-biased perspectives. It is simply not in the [short-term] interest of organizations like NASA’s JPL to find life, as much as it is in their interest to [prolong the] search for life. This is why all rovers on Mars are not equipped to detect life, they’re equipped to drill, blast and irradiate rocks with high energy - and in that process destroy any life that may exist[15]. This is probably not [much] the result of conscious action of individual scientists working on these rovers and their missions, it is a subconscious guidance of the collective hallucination. However, conscious action may not be negligible in those at higher positions in the hierarchy of such organizations - as they are more concerned with funds, jobs and 7 public support. E.g., would the public overwhelmingly support the search for life on Mars if it has been already proven (without going to Mars) that life exists there? 2025.02.14 Actually I was wrong here. The conscious resistance to scientific progress is widespread. Basically, most of the mainstream scientists actually prioritize their careers over scientific progress. This is why they do not only criticize (often without real arguments) but react with anger to any scientific work they see as a threat to these careers. Effectively, inquisition exists in science, as in any other cult, it’s just not powerful enough to torture the "traitors" to death. I cannot forget the main editor of Nature saying publicly how the books of R. Sheldrake should be burned. But the victims of the 21st century inquisition are not rare (A. Loeb, R. Temple, L. Margulis, J. E. Brandenburg, etc.), and people are sometimes even physically attacked by the enraged zealots. Still, for a long time, I did not want to believe that NASA would house many of these zealots. Sadly, it does. Apparently, NASA’s JPL is convinced that the discovery of extraterrestrial life (or more precisely, the acknowledgment of already discovered life) would shift the focus from robotic exploration of space (mainly Mars) toward human exploration, thus, "taking" the business from Pasadena to Houston[16]. Obviously, they have a lot of influence on any studies correlated with space exploration and they are fighting hard to keep the authors in check. In the studies of those who obey (and that includes most of the authors), life is never even considered as an explanation for the observed phenomena, rather outright dismissed as a possibility - even when that implies the invention of some complex, far-fetched, and never-before-witnessed, abiotic mechanism. It makes one doubt the existence, certainly long-term survival, of any age of enlightenment. From my perspective, we are living in dark ages by default, with an occasional flash of light, but with a regular tendency toward inquisition - at all levels of society. However, thankfully, orthodoxy does not have absolute power. In this case, human exploration cannot be avoided as the monopoly of NASA on Mars is very much threatened lately and private companies have entered the game. Thus, they might even find a way to complete that "infamous" Mars-sample return mission before human boots set on Mars. If extraterrestrial life has to be discovered, I’m sure they’re gonna try to take credit for it, once the resistance becomes futile. Truth be told, it cannot be denied that JPL has some of the best engineers and calculators, with great achievements behind them, but they’re lousy scientists. They shouldn’t be involved in scientific analyses, they 8 should do what they do best - build robots, send them out there and collect data, but leave interpretation to someone else. After all, human exploration won’t completely replace robotic exploration, certainly not with the invention of AI. In fact, the need for robots will probably grow, so their fears seem unwarranted. 2025.07.16 There’s a new paper by O. Eldadi et al. examining the psychological mechanisms underlying resistance to paradigm-challenging interpretations of anomalous observations[17], a highly recommended read. 2025.07.27 Another excellent new paper, related to this, has came out recently[18]. The constant exchange of microbes between the celestial bodies is actually convenient for the devil when it comes to denial of ubiquitous life. Because there’s no much difference between microbes on Earth and other bodies, it can always explain it by contamination (when it should be interpreted as evidence for continuous presence and exchange of life on inter-planetary scales). Eventually, the devil will find life, but not before the opportunities for profit on its denial have been exhausted. Until then it will probably continue to abuse the Occam’s razor - claiming that the simplest explanation for an isolated problem is the most likely explanation, even though there are no isolated problems in nature and the most likely solution is not the simplest one rather the one that solves many problems at once. And it will continue to make ordinary claims extraordinary - so they require extraordinary evidence. The god you claim as your property does not use razors and life is not extraordinary. Your denial of life ain’t something extraordinary either. Deal with it, devil, or be gone. 4 [ 2023.08.10 ] Afraid of cancer? Maybe it would help to stay away from hospitals... by Amenoum It is well known that the best place to pick up a disease is a place with greatest concentration of diseases - a hospital. However, no one believes that visiting hospitals might increase one’s chances of getting cancer or some other disease that’s not supposed to be infectious. But what if it’s true? 9 Figure 1: Conception locations 16 Interestingly, the distance from Neum to Smiljan is equal to the distance from Neum to Sibinj. However, while this is some interesting synchronicity, I don’t believe this is the place I was conceived at. People here usually go to the coast during the summer so regardless of the year, a conception date in the summer is not compatible with the birth date in September. But there’s another problem here - this two-dimensional map doesn’t accurately represent the globe and the orbital path of the soul. The correct path is shown on the globe in Fig 2. Figure 2: Conception sites One can replicate this path in Google Earth[24] simply by connecting Woolsthorpe with Bethlehem with a line (’Draw line or shape’ button). The line is now clearly passing through my birthplace, and my most likely conception site. The birthplace of Tesla (Smiljan) is now some 200 km away from the line. However, Tesla’s parents did move from western Serbia to Smiljan and the line is passing through western Serbia. It is thus possible that Tesla 17 was conceived there. I don’t know the exact place but I know that Tesla’s are descendants of Draganići and Draganići village is near the line (only about 20 km away). Of course, while conception should lie on the line, the place of residence of parents prior to child’s birth may not but it will, most likely, be near. All things considered, I believe there is a good probability that all four incarnations indeed do belong to the same soul. Perhaps other people could be found that were born near the line so I could complete the list of incarnations of this soul. 2024.12.17 Indeed, I have eventually found a lot of candidates in prominent Greek thinkers[23]. Note that the line is passing through Greece. Pythagoras, for example, was born in Samos, which is very close to the line (in the two-dimensional map on Fig. 1 it is almost touching the line). Of course, the Earth’s continents change over time. Thus, even if the soul’s orbital is following Earth’s rotation, the sites of conception could move away from the line over time. While this movement should generally be negligible on the order of millennia (at least during weak evolution), how stable or how well synchronized is the rotation of the orbital with the Earth’s body rotation? During weak evolution, it should be very stable, however, the shape of the orbit in the form of a ring is probably just an approximation. The wavefunction describing the orbit could have at least one angular node, allowing for some deviation of the site of localization from the ring approximation. However, the other evidence[22] suggests that, even if these nodes exist, they are either very limited in number or the amplitude (deviation) is very low, unless the orbital angular momentum has a group and phase components (i.e., the orbital is ring-like and spinning at the speed equal to c, while the soul is at rest relative to that orbital but it is oscillating radially - perpendicularly to the orbital). In this interpretation, thus, two entangled components of rotating space exist and only one is probably coupling to bodies, returning to the original entanglement after decoupling (e.g., death). However, even in this interpretation, the soul is most likely to localize at the orbital line. In any case, the lifespan matters - all these people should live up to about the age of 85 if they reach old age. If they don’t reach old age, most likely time of death is the time of strong transformation which for this soul generally happens about the age of 36 (note that Jesus died about this age) and possibly also at about the age of 50. 18 During strong transformation the individual is most likely to get in trouble as this transformation is commonly interpreted as a nervous breakdown (i.e., madness). This may be due to confrontation with authorities but generally due to the effective sense of immortality, when the individual doesn’t feel strongly connected to its body. Jesus was crucified during this time, Newton transformed about the same age but survived. I have also transformed about the same age and have been confronting authority at the time. But these are different times and I wasn’t crucified, at least not physically. However, I was very close do death at least three times during the period. Tesla lived through this too. I don’t know how strong was the synchronicity experienced by Tesla or Newton, but, in my case, at the peak even my voice was different and it was as the god was speaking through me (I was acting like a prophet), similar to what Muhammad and Jesus experienced. Note that Mecca (birthplace of Muhammad) and Medina are also relatively close to the orbital of this soul[25]. However, I believe Muhammad had a different soul, albeit a closely related one. Note also that even deaths seem to occur near the line - Jesus died roughly at the same place he was born, Newton died in Kensington/London - only 115 km from the line, Tesla died in the other part of the world - New York, but still not too far from the orbital (666 km). If one adds James Watt to the list, he died only 66 km from the line (his birthplace is ≈200 km from the line, in Greenock, Scotland). Interestingly, A. Einstein was born 63 km from the line. Of course, Einstein cannot be counted as one of the incarnations of this soul. He lived at the same time as Tesla, but also his age at death and some other characteristics do not fit my hypotheses (although his soul is likely of the same species[26], some characteristics are very similar), but this begs the question - why are the [birthplaces or conception sites of] greatest thinkers or prophets (on whose teachings most religions are based) of human history concentrated along the same orbital? This is very hard to explain without involving souls as I define them. Apparently, orbitals of closely related souls are clumped together. Ignorance is bliss, it may be true now but it won’t stay true forever. 7 [ 2023.01.17 ] Evidence for coded evolution by Amenoum 19 My theory of planetary neurogenesis[1] implies Earth is a living being. Evidence for this is piling up. First, I have found strong correlation between major mass extinctions and Earth’s discontinuities[27] (mantle layers). This is extremely difficult to explain without involving an equivalent of genetic coding. There are two possible explanations for the correlation: •either the Earth’s radius has expanded for almost 1000 km during the Phanerozoic (last 541 million years) with discontinuities between layers formed at times of major mass extinctions and representing something similar to tree growth rings, or •dates of major mass extinctions are hardcoded in Earth’s [brain] mantle. At first, it seems the first explanation doesn’t require living Earth, however, if Earth has been growing, new mass obviously wasn’t being added on top of it, in general. New mass (which may be dominantly liquid) must have been added (ingested) through an opening (e.g., one revealed/recreated with melting of ice in Antarctica). And how then to interpret this other than transmigration of cells to mantle layers or feeding? Here, it is assumed that expansion of Earth’s volume is not due to gas or vacuum expansion inside it, rather due to addition of mass. Some vacuum expansion cannot be ruled out though and it may be synchronized with mass ingestion. As usually is the case with Earth, a superposition of two explanations is probably most likely. Discontinuities are hardcoded but the Earth probably does expand a little too with mass shifted at these discontinuities (although, according to paleomagnetic evidence and research on Earth’s past rotation, the expansion is not significant, unless it is relatively quickly followed by contraction). More recently, I have found new evidence, not only for living Earth, but living Mars and Venus too. Kleiber’s law states that an animal’s metabolic rate scales to the 3/4 power of its mass. For larger animals, metabolism is slower. It has been shown later that an exponent of 2/3 is more appropriate for smaller animals, however, I think we’ll all agree that Earth is a large animal and for these the exponent 3/4 holds, especially for mammals. Thus, if Venus, Mars and Earth are animals of different species Kleiber’s law should apply to them. If evolution of life on the surface of a planet is 20 cultivation of [large-scale] cells and proteins which are destined to migrate to mantle layers at specific times during embryogenesis (neurogenesis), then the rate of this cultivation (evolution) should be different between different planets and this difference can be calculated by applying the Kleiber’s law. So that’s what I did[28]. When the law is applied to these 3 planets, following results are obtained: •4.54 billion years of evolution on Earth are compressed to 852 million years on Mars, •4.54 billion years of evolution on Earth are compressed to 3.9 billion years on Venus. And this is completely in agreement with studies, which show Mars lost its habitability some 900 million years since formation (roughly 3.6 billion years ago) and Venus some 700 million years ago. Not only do the results agree with research, the results suggest the current extinction on Earth is probably final and Earth will soon lose surface habitability. Not forever though, however, instead of living surface punctuated by extinction pulses the inanimate surface will be punctuated by pulses of relatively short-term and probably partial habitability (as evidence shows has been happening on Mars). Obviously, humans are not special to Earth, humans have evolved on Mars and Venus too and probably weren’t much different than us. If evolution of humans is coded then the current climate change is probably coded too so if humans would stop emitting greenhouse gases nature would use other ways to achieve higher temperature or whatever is required for the major extinction/transmigration. And, recently, evidence has shown up for that too. In the year 2020, due to lockdowns, humans have emitted much less greenhouse gases than usually, however, studies show both CO2and CH4[29] (methane) have been rising[30]. In fact, methane levels hit record high in 2020 with a new record set in 2021, something that’s currently unexplained[31]. Humans may have been used to kick-start the process but the sense of control is an illusion - probability for humans to halt and reverse it is infinitesimal if this is a coded major event rather than an excursion. And even if it could be halted, that probably wouldn’t bring anything good for anyone, it would be similar to halting the embryonic development of life in a human womb. Another indication that the planet is taking over may be the last year’s colossal eruption of the Hunga Tonga volcano, which, unexpectedly, ejected big amounts of water vapor (greenhouse gas) into the atmosphere instead of ejecting big amounts of sulphur dioxide (SO2), thus heating the Earth’s troposphere 21 instead of cooling it[32]. Of course, this heating effect may be temporary (lasting less than a couple of months or years) but it will help release more greenhouse gases from the poles. And who’s to say there won’t be more eruptions? If water vapor would be constantly added to stratosphere the term "temporary" becomes very relative. In that case, human CO2emissions won’t matter at all. If this water comes from volcanic eruptions it is not coupled to (controlled by) non-condensable gases in the atmosphere - water vapor would now control temperature (and indirectly gases like CO2and CH4) instead of the other way around. We might even see water vapor replacing aerosols that provide the cooling effect, heating the stratosphere and thus making atmospheric water lifetime longer, less temporary. If we are amidst a major extinction (and I’d say we obviously are) there will be more significant volcanic eruptions and, if the goal is to increase atmospheric water vapor, I wouldn’t be surprised if Hunga Tonga erupts again (or/and some other similar candidate[33]) in a couple of years, if not sooner. In the neurogenesis theory I have predicted that the primary goal is the increase of ocean acidity (pH decrease to 7.33) and I have also predicted that deep underwater volcanoes will have a big role in achieving this goal. If that is the case, at some point surface temperature might stop climbing and might even start decreasing (while deep ocean heats up) to slow down degassing of CO2from the ocean. In any case, volcanoes should have a big role although some volcanism could be replaced by human action (e.g., nuclear war). Of course, if Earth is a living being its insides are also probably much different than what is commonly thought. And another evidence for that may have shown up. One explanation for the neutrino anomaly detected by ANITA in Antarctica is a significantly different density profile of Earth, suggesting large low-density (or hollow) areas. And a large relatively hollow tunnel below Antarctica, leading deep inside Earth is exactly what I have predicted (migration of cells/proteins requires this tunnel) and what is expected for a living being. The neutrinos could even be created inside Earth. Thermonuclear fusion does not occur in Earth’s core but some form of low energy nuclear reactions could. In any case, streams of charged particles and neutrinos are possible. After all, we haven’t drilled deeper than 12 km on land and 8 km below ocean, which means we haven’t reached anything beyond the upper crust. Everything known about Earth’s interior is the result of assumptions and models matching 22 seismic velocities. Sure, sometimes Earth expels minerals like ringwoodite that require high pressure for formation and perhaps this mineral even forms a layer in Earth’s mantle but this does not mean all of it formed inside Earth - the same mineral is commonly found in meteorites. But even if it has been formed inside Earth, the pressure/gravity distribution can be more complex than assumed (as it commonly is in living beings). It may have been formed in the very early days of Earth’s formation when the planet was more compressed. For some reason, human civilization is coded to know very little but confidently believe a lot. It is even coded to program itself that way. And when it comes to biggest animals - from whales to planets and beyond, or the smallest - from microbes to atoms and beyond, it couldn’t be more wrong. But that’s not bad. If an antelope would be [coded to be] always right, there would be no lions. 8 [ 2023.01.01 ] We are Noah by Amenoum Nothing can remain unchanged absolutely forever. But some things can remain relatively unchanged for billions of years. One of these are asteroids. If you’d want to store something for as long as possible you’d want to store it in the coldest place you could find that would lack oxygen and would be protected from radiation and mechanical disturbance. One possibility are craters on the Moon’s south pole. These are considered as one of the coldest places in the Solar System, with a temperature some 33 degrees above absolute zero[34]. That is extremely cold but, as craters suggest, not a safe place to store something for millions or billions of years. The best place would have to be the interior of a bigger piece of rock in space sufficiently away from a burning star and safe from collisions. Temperature of interstellar space is less than 3 degrees above absolute zero. Without a heat source, microbes can’t decompose matter and if this matter is stored sufficiently deep cosmic radiation won’t be able to do the job either. Let’s say you are an advanced but extinction facing civilization due to decreasing habitability of your home planet, what would you do? Sure, you would probably pack some people, animals, herbs and other essential material onto rockets and send them to a nearby planet or moon where they might have some chances of longer survival. But that may be a very risky and a short-term solution at best. Now let’s say you’re [conveniently] convinced that you are special and that no intelligent life, or life at all, exists beyond your home planet or beyond your solar system. You will then probably want to try to ensure this life doesn’t disappear forever. The best thing you could do is to load up a couple of asteroids with microbes, fungi, viruses and DNA (stored in seeds and eggs) and send them away. 23 Let’s say you’re also very proud of yourself (and your DNA). In that case, although your pride would usually mock the possibility of advanced civilizations beyond your home planet, you will have to admit that the possibility exists and so you will want to make sure an advanced civilization could notice your little special ark. The only thing that can permanently remain noticeable is the shape of your asteroid. Note that this asteroid does not have to be a rock already in space. It could be a piece of rock you’d carve out of your home planet and simply launch into space in a direction of a planetary system you suspect will be suitable for life once it arrives. Now think about the unusual shape of ’Oumuamua. Originally thought to be in a cigar like shape, it appears a thin disc[35] is more likely[36]. Now ask yourself why are you feeling proud? Is that a coincidence? Everything in nature has multiple purposes. What is the purpose of human civilization? It might look like cancer but what if it was allowed to become cancer so it can develop into species that can and will seed life throughout the universe (although that’s surely not the sole reason, as my theories suggest)? If you think about it, who else would do it? Sure, natural asteroids created in the Solar System can contain life, but they are unlikely to leave the Solar System. All things considered, there’s a good chance that ’Oumuamua was launched by a dying human or humanoid civilization, and its hoped for destination may have even been Earth. It failed, but not all human civilizations are the same. Some hit, some miss, and even a failure can be relative - this one didn’t land on a habitable planet inside the Solar System but it still might land in some other. To increase the odds you will probably launch at least two arks. But did ’Oumuamua really fail? At the same year ’Oumuamua was observed an interstellar meteor (IM2, or CNEOS 2017-03-09) impacted Earth. Could it have been something that separated from ’Oumuamua? Perhaps. In what shape will our ark be? In a cigar shape - to scream cancer, or a disc shape - to speak of neutrality? And will we design it in a way it shows peculiar behavior near a star? If we rush things it will be a smoking cigar, if we don’t it may have greater chances of survival. So if you want to feel special, there you have it - human civilization has been chosen by the gods behind this universe as seeders of life. 24 Seeding of life should be understood relatively, life in some form at the destination probably exists already. More appropriate term may be increasing diversity of life, which is, nevertheless, essential for survival. We are legion for we are many and we are many for we are Noah. Maybe. 9 [ 2022.12.25 ] Modern physics is a joke, not the electron by Amenoum In physics, qualitative description of reality should precede quantitative one. Mathematics may be used to quantify and correlate certain nature and mechanics with geometry and algebra, which can certainly lead to increased understanding, knowledge, and predictability of phenomena. But reality never changes with changing equations. Equations evolve and adapt to reality with increasing experience, increasing cognitive capacity and increasing power of observation. Just because one has reached, or is approaching, its cognitive or observational limitations, does not mean that reality is starting to respect stagnating equations. No, reality is still evolving and still doesn’t care about elegant mathematical relations or constructs. I even claim that reality is still intuitive and very much physical. It is the modern physicist who gave up on intuitive interpretations, and all he cares about now is the preservation of existing elegance in equations, making sure they agree with the outcome of measurements, to the precision of the apparatus. If such person is also a zealot it becomes highly unlikely his description of reality will make sense or be understandable to anyone. A modern physicist may claim that most about reality is known, but that’s the case only in his own limited reality. He still knows nothing, compared to what there is to know. The same goes for she, he-she, she-he, it, he-it, she-it, it-he and it-she. Sadly, that is the state of physics today - it is infested with mathematicians producing a bunch of nonsense that’s continually being patched to match the outcomes of experiments[37]. This prepotent reductionism is usually not a conscious conspiracy, rather a manifestation of a subconscious desire for short-term profit on some level. There’s nothing scientific about it so it will not lead to progress in science, it is, in fact, hindering such progress, often through the maintenance of illusion of progress by the establishment or re-establishment of a value of a certain parameter in mathematical perturbation. 25 ice has been, unexpectedly, detected on main belt asteroids (even on surface), such as 24 Themis[44]. Therefore, if pebbles are landing on Earth with asteroids/comets, they might have indeed formed on Mars, however, it may be more likely they formed on some moon of an outer planet. Of course, the odds of an asteroid or comet containing pebbles like these generally may not be so big (certainly not according to generally accepted theories). Apparently, cometary material is generally so soft that it doesn’t penetrate more than 40 km into the atmosphere and the only samples we have are the Brownlee particles[45] of dust from the atmosphere and samples collected by the Stardust probe (I thank K. Korlević for kindly providing this information). This then rules out comets as bringers of pebbles or organic material, at least if one assumes they’re all made of such soft material. Of course, in case of a compact mixture of ice, dust and harder rock, some material can survive the fall, even ice. If that material includes pebbles looking no different than those shaped by water on Earth, once the ice melts, how would one know the difference? In some cases deeper analysis (e.g., of isotopic ratios) may be able to confirm these were not formed on Earth, but who would initially suspect they did not and decide to perform such analysis? The probability for that happening is probably lower than the probability of such pebbles falling on Earth in the first place. Which, however, as it turned out with many things so far, may be more common that commonly thought, at least periodically. Before ice was discovered on them, it was thought that asteroids cannot contain ice. This was based on the assumption that they have been formed more than 4 billion years ago in conditions precluding volatiles such as water[46]. Under the same hypotheses, their nature and position should be virtually unchanged since formation. Later, it was thought that if they did contain water/ice it must have evaporated/sublimated long ago. Well, all these assumptions were wrong. Water ice seems to be common in asteroids even today. This means that: •such asteroids were formed much more recently, and/or •their composition was altered since formation. Water can be produced on the surface of an asteroid through the interaction of solar protons with oxide minerals, however there are unknowns here, and I find it unlikely for this to be the only source. 32 Some, if not most, asteroids should represent remnants of, or ejected material from, planets, dwarf planets and moons. As such, they should contain water. And if my hypotheses on large scale gravitons are correct, asteroids may not be created out of these bodies solely at death events or during random collisions, rather periodically (where sizes of created asteroids are proportional to periods of general oscillation of the Solar System energy). And this increases the probability of asteroids containing frozen pebbles, organic materials, microbes and viruses. While it is generally assumed that asteroids falling on Earth have been created elsewhere, it is also not impossible for something ejected from Earth millions of years ago to fall back on Earth today. One could even interpret the rocks humans brought here from the Moon to be precursors of larger Moon rocks falling on Earth (one could argue that this could be a precursor of us bringing larger rocks from the Moon here but I wouldn’t count on it). We think we’re special, but all our actions are coded somewhere. We might think it is us who need the minerals, but if it is the Earth who needs them, there are better, more efficient ways to bring larger rocks here than utilizing humans for delivery. But let’s get back to the prediction - how to explain this synchronicity? Assuming these are meteorites, not only did meteoroids fall on the land where I predicted they will, they landed on my house - where I wished for them to land. Of course, this may still be a weird case of locally formed needle ice, but even if that is the case - wouldn’t it be a very strange coincidence that something rare and something what I believe I never saw before appears here imitating meteorites, where I predicted them to fall? Whatever this is then, I don’t see it as meaningless coincidence. If these are not meteorites, I interpret them as harbingers of predicted meteorites. However, nature has shown me many times that it is the effect that matters, not the cause. Therefore, if, for some reason, I had to see meteorites here, perhaps an easier way to create the effect was [naturally] selected, one not involving rocks falling from the sky. We all sometimes wish there’s only one and undeniable interpretation of a particular phenomenon so we can be sure that whatever we experienced indeed is what we [want to] believe it is, but complete relativity requires multiple interpretations and nature is constantly teaching us that one cannot be absolutely completely sure in anything. Ultimately, we’re all believers and some of us naively believe that probabilities between different interpretations cannot invert. 33 I believe they can and I believe they will - soon, away from mountains and rivers, most stones on the ground may commonly be interpreted as meteorites. But before that state is reached, there will exist a superposition of interpretations, an intermediate state, which may be the best explanation here too. A lot of weird stuff was reported falling from the sky throughout the history[47] (e.g., fish) and while most of it may have terrestrial sources, sometimes such explanation seems very unlikely. I find the situation similar to detection of signs of extant life on other planets (e.g., phosphine on Venus, methane emissions on Mars, ...). If life cannot be unambiguously confirmed as the source mainstream science assumes the origin is abiotic. Here, if stuff falling from the sky can be found somewhere on Earth it is automatically assumed it does come from Earth and no other option is explored. It took a long time for mainstream science to accept even that meteorites come from outer space. Before the notion was finally accepted it was mocked and treated as nonsense. It is hard to believe then that the idea of extraterrestrial origin of organic matter enclosed in ice/rock falling on Earth would not be mocked similarly. However, given the extreme conditions of outer space (extreme cold, lack of oxygen) organic material in an asteroid practically cannot decompose (any microbes that would usually do the work wouldn’t work here). It should then not be surprising if organic material ejected from Mars millions of years ago would fall on Earth in a well preserved state. In example, wheat or seed has been reported falling enclosed in ice in Wiltshire in 1686[47]. If indeed this fell from the sky, it may be more likely for it to be Martian than terrestrial and even if it is terrestrial it still probably fell from space and could be millions of years old. There are more similar examples - in London, Ontario, 1868.02.24, some 500 tons (!) of cereal, far advanced in decomposition, fell with snow in a violent storm[47]. In Rajkit (Rajkot), India, 1840.03.24, grain fell during a thunderstorm, it was reported that natives were excited because the kind of grain was unknown to them[47]. These are very interesting cases. Based on descriptions, it could be that the same kind of material fell in all three places. Interestingly, I too have found aged (dark brown) seeds with the ice, I just didn’t mention it initially as, unlike for pebbles, I really couldn’t rule out these were not here before. The seeds didn’t look like typical grain seeds though - they were of similar size (couple of millimetres) but completely spherical and I have no idea what plant they came from. I do know they didn’t come from plants on the roof - these are mostly simple grasses and vegetables (UPDATE: I have established later that the spherules look exactly like the berries of Cornus sanguinea, which 34 does grow nearby, however, berries generally wrinkle with age, these one were obviously aged but the spherical shape was preserved, there were no wrinkles, which suggests they aged in unusual, possibly extreme conditions). I do not know how the seeds looked like in the other cases mentioned above, however, in these too it seems hard to favour one explanation over the other - if they came from asteroids how to explain high correlation with the occurrence of storms? It could be a meaningless of meaningful coincidence (synchronicity) but let’s consider the possibilities for temporal relativity or periodicity of this synchronicity that would increase the odds. Thunderstorms can reach 22 km in height. In the region between 10 - 20 km the temperature is about -53 ◦C, pressure is 4 - 18 times lower than at the surface (density is 3 - 14 times lower). Now, meteoroids frequently graze Earth’s atmosphere at different angles, would it not be possible that pieces of them sometimes end up in a highly elliptical orbit with a perihelion in the stratosphere below 22 km height? Of course, such orbit should not last long (due to atmospheric drag), but could survive at least for days (depending on eccentricity, it could survive much longer) before everything melts or a thunderstorm eventually disrupts it with the updraft of water (ice) and other particles. This sounds plausible to me. The same asteroid could even be periodically ground by the atmosphere. In example, an asteroid with orbital period of 14 years could be responsible for all three cases above (1686, 1840, 1868). Its orbital semi-major axis would be: r=3 rT2GM 4π2= 12.5million km Assuming a perihelion of 15+6378 km, the aphelion is at 25 million km, a highly eccentric orbit, as expected. Of course, 14 years is a maximum period that satisfies the condition, harmonics (e.g., 7 years, 4.66’ years) are possible candidates too although lower periods are less likely considering it survived for at least two centuries and assuming it is not particularly big. Interestingly, assuming the asteroid is still in orbit, the year 2022 is the year when it should be in perihelion, the same year I discovered these pebbles and organics in ice. Taking into account reported month and day for the two years above (1840 and 1868), the actual period should be 13.9583’ years, giving the month of September 2021 for the perihelion. However, taking into account the drag and loss of mass at perihelion, due to conservation of momentum, the asteroid should be increasing eccentricity and orbital period with each orbit. Therefore, the current period is probably somewhat bigger than 14.0 years (but not much considering there were no big changes in period between years 1686 and 1840) and year 2022 is a more likely date for a 35 perihelion. Positions of all places (incl. mine in Sibinj, Croatia) on the globe are also interesting, suggesting significant orbital inclination relative to Earth’s equator, but also something peculiar, good probability of resonance with Earth’s rotation period - going in favour of the asteroid hypothesis. Figure 3: Potential orbital path approximation This is shown in Fig. 3, the blue line is connecting equator on opposite sides of the Earth and is passing through London, Ontario. Upper red line is connecting London, Ontario with Rajkot, India. Lower red line is passing through Wiltshire, UK and Sibinj, Croatia. Note that, if this asteroid is orbiting Earth its velocity is significantly lower than typical velocity of asteroids passing through Earth’s atmosphere. The orbital path cannot connect these sites without taking Earth’s rotation into account. Another reason of deviation is non-fixed resonance (as the asteroid is losing mass, resonance is unstable). However, in this particular case, there is a problem - with the aphelion far beyond the radius of Earth’s Hill sphere (1.5 million km), this orbit is unstable and one must assume this body is not gravitationally bound to Earth, it rather orbits the Sun, periodically passing through Earth’s atmosphere, creating an illusion that it orbits the Earth. If old grain is falling from the sky, I wonder if one day a well preserved tissue of a dinosaur will fall... As I’ve found it before elsewhere I find it here too, a piece of reality where my wishes are highly correlated with future (apparently, I tend to wish for things, 36 or effects, that have great probability of manifesting in future). I consider this as yet another evidence for high determinism of local evolution and complete relativity of causality. However, if these were meteors, I don’t think this is the end of them landing here (I have more wishes). I generally wish for things that will decrease my dependence on people and at the same time be good for god Earth (or G, as I call him sometimes - for he is a relative constant). As for the magnificent crystals of ice and whatever came with them, I thank you gods, even though, in some interpretations, you might just be messing with me. Whether these are meteorites, or, what may be more likely here after all, a locally created imitation, or even a superposition of both, you just gave my life another bit of sense and happiness. Now, how about decreasing some probability for those interpretations in which you are messing with me?— 10.1 Something very interesting again While the previously reported pebbles on the roof were, after all, most likely local material lifted up with needle ice formation, this time, some rocks definitely fell from the sky, on the same house but not on the roof, rather on the bottom of a window opening (the house is incomplete, no actual windows are installed). On 2023.07.19 a violent storm with very strong winds (at times over 120 km/h, unprecedented for this location) occurred here. Briefly, some hailstone fell during the storm too. After the storm, deposits of clay with stones were observed on the bottom of an window opening of the house, as shown in Fig. 4. Interestingly, a peculiar rock fell right into the small plant container (diameter ∼10 cm) sitting in the middle of that opening - what are the odds of that? The rock is irregular, roughly 3 x 2 x 1.5 cm, shown in Fig. 5. The rock has a black surface, but is mostly beige yellowish-brown inside. After the analysis and consultation with geologists, it has been concluded that the rock represents a goethite/limonite concretion. The compact black mass should represent the iron-rich goethite in its fresh non-oxidized state. The beige yellow-brown powder-like aggregates represent different states of hydration/oxidation of goethite (mainly limonite in different forms). No such rocks can be found anywhere nearby (the building is on a hill with higher ground and young forest to the north, valleys to the south, the soil here is heavy clay, no asphalt). In the container, the rock was embedded in the top layer of soil (appears to be clay, about 1 cm thick) that was deposited during the storm (beneath it, the plant container contains a mixture of sand and gravel that was present before the storm). The infall happened at an angle from the south direction. It 37 is possible that the clay and the rock came from different locations - perhaps the clay particles were carried by the wind while the rock fell a bit later (in a hailstone?). ∼ Figure 4: Storm deposit on the window (red arrow indicates clay deposit on the left, ordinary rock on the right) Figure 5: Goethite/limonite dominated concretion that fell in the container Is this a meteorite? Well, although it does have a smooth darker crust, it does not seem to have fusion crust and doesn’t contain regmaglypts (it should be noted, however, that I have never seen a live meteorite before so there is some uncertainty here) and it’s not magnetic (it does react to a neodymium magnet, but weakly), so if it is a meteorite, it’s definitely not an ordinary meteorite - it had to fall enclosed in ice. Unfortunately, there is no way for me to determine where did this rock came from. If it was carried by the wind it had to come from far away. As noted, winds were extremely strong in this storm but what are the odds that a rock this big (and unusual one) is carried for miles (it certainly had to be carried at high altitudes) and then dropped in a small container on the window of my house? Perhaps bigger odds are for it to be a meteorite. 38 Figure 6: Goethite/limonite dominated concretion, broken up In any case, I wished for a meteorite and I don’t think this is the end of the story. But it seems we’re getting there. In the first episode, most rocks were ordinary rocks which can be found locally and it was hard to confirm they fell from the sky, and they weren’t so easy to spot. In this episode an unusual rock (actually relatively resembling a meteorite) of a type which cannot be found locally almost certainly fell from the sky, on the location where it can be spotted easily - in the plant container, which I’m inspecting daily. Not only that, the clay deposit in the container in which the rock was embedded made it stick out - as if the gods wanted to make sure I’ll find it. Every time I feel terribly alone god shows up somewhere. And if I feel dead, he shows up with lightning, igniting my soul, as if the show must go on. At these times, I love that show. I’ve learned not to expect things, but judging from these two episodes, the trend is obvious. So, in the next episode - an even bigger rock which I will witness falling from the sky, for which it will be obvious it is a meteorite? Well, I certainly wish so. When? Speculation on localization in time of this kind of things is usually, well, a speculation (very uncertain). But sometimes there are patterns suggesting predictability, making it hard not to indulge in prophecy. The first episode aired on 2022.12.14, the second one on 2023.07.19. Interesting. 14 + 12 = 07 + 19 = 26 If this is not a meaningless coincidence, the date for the 3rd episode should be one of the following: 39 01.25 02.24* 03.23* 04.22* 05.21 06.20 07.19 08.18 09.17** 10.16 11.15 12.14 * probably most likely ** possible correlation with another synchronicity[48] The obtained number (26) on both dates may be a meaningless coincidence, but there are good reasons to think it’s not. As I’ve shown elsewhere (see "Date of the World War III" blog entry), this kind of synchronicity may be frequent in nature. Year I guess should be 2024 considering the trend, and the month should be March, so 2024.03.23 ? Nice date. It contains, what appears to be, my favourite number (23), the number I most often see in synchronicity events. However, while I would like to see this, I don’t want to rush anyone (force and synchronicity generally do not go together, but force and disappointment usually do). One one hand I don’t like giving such precise dates for predictions, especially because gods don’t seem to be willing to share them easily (probably better that way). On the other hand, when I see patterns, it’s hard to resist. And why should one resist? If the pattern is repeatedly confirmed, at some point, this becomes something of scientific value. It would only be foolish to claim from the start that this is something more than speculation. However, since we are now talking about two rocks, two dates are perhaps more likely. These two? Or.. 2030±1, 2033±1? G, who knows. 10.2 Excitement after reanalysis! I have saved some of the first rocks I’ve found (on 2022.12.14) and the larger rock I’ve found after the storm (on 2023.07.19) - which is now in 3 pieces. The rocks were stored in a relatively dry place, exposed to room air, but away from sunlight. Today I decided to reanalyse the black rocks. Surprisingly, the small black rocks now look exactly like the large black rock that was found after the storm. These rocks were initially completely black, but apparently they contain metal (mainly iron it seems) which oxidized (rusted) over time so the rocks partially changed colour. But that’s not all. I tried putting some of the rocks (2 pieces of the large rock and some smaller ones) in cold freshwater from a local well (accumulated rainwater, typical electrical resistance ∼250-350 kΩ, resistivity <250 Ωm). They all sank down and immediately started degassing, I have even heard a hissing sound at the beginning! 40 As a control, one of the ordinary rocks that were collected was also submerged. This did not produce any bubbling. An partially rusted iron/nickel wire did not produce any continuous bubbling either (a small bubble was produced but remained attached to the wire). The degassing was rapid and continuous in the beginning, then sporadic, and after about 10-15 minutes there was no noticeable bubble production (although a lot of bubbles were still attached to the rocks). Some carbonate rocks (limestones) will give off gas when put into acid solutions, and although the presence of some carbonate minerals cannot be excluded, these are not limestone rocks and this is not an acid solution. Porous rocks will bubble when water enters the pores, but these are not porous rocks (at least not visibly, micropores could exist though) and the nature of bubbling to me suggests chemical reactions. Just in case, I’ve dried the rocks at room temperature (humidity < 30%) and repeated the experiment one month later. Prior to that, one piece of the large rock was additionally heated in a microwave for about a minute on low power (with this, small percentage of the beige yellowish minerals changed colour into darker brown - which can be interpreted as a relatively dry corrosion). After submersion, bubbles were formed on all the rocks but remained attached (similarly to the case of immersion of the rusted wire, only the number of bubbles here was much higher), except for the heated rock, which, in addition to numerous adhered bubbles, did produce some small continuous bubbling from one spot but for a very short time (on the order of seconds). Thus, considering all this, I believe chemistry is involved here, at least to some degree. This instantly reminded me of polymetallic nodules recently found to produce oxygen at the bottom of the oceans[49], so I have tried measuring voltages on the rocks at different points on the rock surface. The dark oxygen production has been discovered in freshwater aquifers as well[50], where oxygen is produced via microbial dismutation. In that case, molecular oxygen is produced through the breakdown of soluble compounds, such as nitrites (NO2 −). Oxygen production on the seafloor may also involve microbes. Dark oxygen can also be produced through radiolysis, in the presence of radioactive metals. The highest value I have obtained was about 0.2 V (higher initial values 41 2022.03.09 *China invading Pakistan[78] ≤2033* there’s a weak signal China might also invade Thailand and/or Taiwan at some point, but all these signals are weak 2022.02.18 splitting of Ukraine into two countries[79] (east/west) ≤2033 precursor to this (Russian takeover of Eastern parts) is already here, however, formal globally accepted division is unlikely before 2024 2017/2018 meeting of Trump and Putin in *Sibinj (small city in Slavonia, part of Croatia at time of prediction) ≤2033 most likely earliest date is late 2024, the reason for meeting was unclear at time of prediction, later I have suggested the reason, or one of the reasons, will be the division of Ukraine; it should be noted that this prediction was made while I was experiencing transformation of consciousness, the symptoms of which can also be interpreted as psychosis or a nervous breakdown, this prediction thus could be a result of delusion but recent developments are increasing the probability for this happening so I’ve decided to take this and some other predictions made during the time seriously (it won’t hurt if it turns out to be false, but if it turns out to be true..)[80] 2021 increasing frequency of earthquakes and volcanism globally[1] (correlated with mantle gyrification), possibly coupled with increasing flooding ≤2066 probably ongoing[5] 2017/2018 emergence of a natural spring near my house as a relative precursor to global flooding ≤2066 I consider the likely date before or around 2029, earliest possibility around 2025; based on the theory of general precursors 2017/2018 landing of a smaller meteor near my house as precursor to increase in global asteroid/cometary bombardment ≤2066 Based on my theories on general precursors and planetary neurogenesis; I consider the likely date before or around 2029, earliest possibility around 2025; however precursors to larger meteors may have already landed on my house in December of 2022 and/or July 2023[81]. 2021.12.04 strong earthquakes in Croatia, large ruptures, increasing frequency of earthquakes[82], probably coupled with increasing flooding ≈20252060 first stronger earthquakes are hypothesized in year 2025±1.25, next in 2040±2.5, 2042.5±1.25, 2050±2.5, .. 48 2022.04.05 World War III starting on a date correlated with other two world wars[83] 2024-2033 one possible date, based on other signals, although unlikely, could be the ending third of year 2024, in some interpretations, however, the World War III has already started, in February of year 2022 2024.08.10 conflicts starting in Finland, Philippines (and possibly Germany), as part of the World War III or a precursor to World War III[75] ≤2027 2024.01.31 military airfield bombardment, multiple correlations, correlated with the start of World War III (possibly in Slovakia or Serbia)[84] ≤2034* date is uncertain, but given recent developments, probably sooner than later 2021 10Be (Beryllium-10) half-life excursion (decrease) as part of strong evolution, predicted value for year 2024 of 1.236 x 106years[1] 2024 per the hypothesis, half-life of 10Be should be decreasing currently, calculations are in good agreement with measurements and suggest continuous halflife decrease since at least the first measurement in 1947, decrease should continue at least until year 2066 but probably not after year 2075 2022.09.17 *potentially significant event (possibly correlated with nuclear radiation/earthquakes/Mexico) in the last third of year 2024, may also be correlated with the collapse of Trinitarianism[85] (Roman Catholicism) ≈2024.09.18 the prediction is the result of experienced[48] synchronicities[86], although suggested, it might not have a global relevance; UPDATE 2024.09.19: Nothing happened on the date, except more synchronicity![87] 2022.03.07 great stock market collapse and another great depression[5] ≈2023 (initial prediction, based on incomplete data) ≈2025 (revised) interestingly, this prediction was made analyzing global volcanism, yet, more obvious signs of slowdown are here; UPDATE 2023.01.23: It turned out that my dataset on which this prediction was based was incomplete, with updated dataset, the signal for great depression is lowered, however, the signal still predicts a recession in, or about, year 2023; UPDATE 2024.03.12: The signal became stronger after the analysis of years 2022/2023, this probably means that the depression can be expected after all, possibly in year 2024/2025. 2022.03.09 interests in Europe population shifting from pro-West [and Ukraine] to pro-East or towards neutrality[78] ≤2030 precursors started appearing later in the same year 49 2021 increase in global synchronicity, shortening of intervals between karmic actions and reactions ≤2066/2300 multiple notable[79] events[88] in 2022 can be interpreted as early signs of increasing global synchronicity 2020 artificial human wombs[74] ≤2066/2300 more serious projects started appearing in 2022[89] 2020 decreasing human fertility, rise in asexuality, including transient homosexuality and bestiality ≤2066/2300 this is apparently ongoing; this prediction is implied with the theory of planetary neurogenesis[1], more details on fertility loss in Journey through future[90] 2020 decrease in ocean pH to 7.33 ≤2066/2300 ocean pH is currently decreasing; predicted in the theory of planetary neurogenesis[1] 2017/2018 burning of churches (collapse of Trinitarianism - Catholic Church) ≤2040 this prediction was made at the peak of my mental excursion, as part of transformation of consciousness (the symptoms of which may be commonly interpreted as nervous breakdown) when I was acting like a prophet. I don’t remember the exact words but I said at the time something like "soon, the churches will burn, as they should be burnt to the ground". About a year later, Notre-Dame was on fire. In 2021, Catholic churches were burning in Canada[91]. In 2023, 249 churches were burnt in India[92], and later were burning in Pakistan[93]. What I said there, I now interpret as announcement of the collapse of the Catholic Church. This may not necessarily include the literal burning of churches, although it seems it just might. 2021 accelerated evolution, horizontal gene transfer becoming dominant gene transfer method ≤2066/2300 per the hypothesis, the rate of evolution is currently correlated with the rate of increase in atmospheric CO2, therefore, increase in horizontal gene transfer may be happening already (the apparently permanent changes in organisms associated with viruses could be interpreted as evidence, at least for a precursor); if one considers humans as part of nature, horizontal gene transfers, as part of accelerated evolution, are increasing already 50 2020 migration of species (including humans) southward, eventually to Antarctica ≤2066/2300 should be stimulated by various phenomena (eg. increasing hydrogen sulfide emissions, weather changes with AMOC collapse) mostly correlated with climate changes, predicted by the theory of planetary neurogenesis Table 3: Some of my predictions Note that, apart from some exceptions, date of prediction here is the date the prediction was published online, some of these predictions were actually made years before. Predictions/dates marked with an asterisk (*) are considered to have greater uncertainty or lower confidence. Most predictions are based on the hypothesis of accelerated evolution during major mass extinctions, however, there are two possible trajectories - model 1 (faster) and model 2 (slower acceleration). It should be noted that in some of these predictions it is the effect that has importance in local evolution, thus the predicted cause for the effect may differ in reality in case alternative causes for the same effect are possible. The authenticity of above predictions can be validated consulting the archives. All my works (including this) are archived almost every time they’re updated. Past versions are available in PDF format at Zenodo (CERN service) - link is at the bottom of the page. Less updated archive is also available at archive.org (note, however, that archive.org has some trouble rendering my javascript, but the sources are there and plain text can be revealed). – 11.1 On predictions Some of the predictions here have high uncertainty or low confidence, these may be unlikely to come true but they are listed due to potential scientific value in case they do become true. Even in case of other predictions, it is probably unlikely that all will become true. However, I am convinced that most will. What I cannot be particularly convinced in are the dates. We can put our observations into equations but it would be foolish to expect for nature to follow them - precisely or roughly, even in the short-term, let alone always and forever. What one can see is always infinitesimally small compared to what one cannot see. Thus, even the most precise equations will eventually be proven most incomplete unless allowed to evolve. In our current 51 forms, we haven’t been observing nature for any significant time compared to its age. Yes, we can see far into the past of evolution and the more we can see into the past the more certain we may feel about our expectations of future. But looking into the past things get blurry quickly and possible interpretations quickly multiply. Yes, we can increase the precision of our instruments, but when did that completely validate our previous predictions (even if we only look for validation)? With increased precision there’s much more to observe so we increasingly rely on machines to look for things. Here, our overconfidence on established equations will lead to biased machines which will inevitably miss new things. Eventually we see what we want to see, not all there is to see. In that case, increasing confidence leads to increasing illusion and our predictions become delusions. This is not true only for predictions stemming from equations. Deeper consciousness (subconsciousness) or intuition can be a better predictor of future than equations, however, in most cases it won’t be, as the same limitations apply, only instruments are different. A proper combination of unbiased intuition and equations is probably the best. Aprophet predicting the exact date for certain event will most certainly be proven wrong. The same is true for mathematical theories predicting variables with great precision, even worse, if these variables are treated as constants. Nondimensional ratios may be more reliable predictors but they must be coupled to dimensional things in order to be useful and dimensional things evolve and may diverge. Two things that yesterday were the same may not be the same tomorrow. No two phenomena are absolutely the same anyway. We can pretend they are (as modern physicists often do), but in truth things are always the same up to a certain precision of our instruments and tolerable amount of our ignorance of differences. And if, for example, two kilograms or two seconds are not the same, neither will the non-dimensional ratios be absolutely nondimensional. Nothing is absolutely reliable. In any case, at some point, increasing precision won’t even be possible because every species is inherently limited and will need to evolve by orders of magnitude, to settle on a new level of possible exploration. 11.2 Other predictions This is not a complete list of my predictions, predictions not listed include predictions on masses of particles (e.g., photon mass oscillation) and similar predictions the general public may not be concerned with. Perhaps one of the most interesting outcomes of my research is the prediction that life must exist everywhere. Even if we reduce the definition of life to what is commonly considered to be living in mainstream science, evolution of environments will be entangled with evolution of lifeforms. 52 I have predicted that complex life exists deep beneath Earth’s surface as well as beneath the surface of any living planet or a moon (where a planet/moon can be alive even with no obvious activity on its surface). That does not mean that surfaces of celestial bodies are generally devoid of life - microbes should be present, if not on surface (due to harsh conditions, such as radiation) then generally not far below it. I am, therefore, convinced life in Mars exists today and something more complex might even lurk just below the surface[62]. Additional predictions that might concern general population can be found in the article Journey through future[82]. 12 [ 2022.11.22 ] Trustnet - vjeruj mi, ne lažem by Amenoum Vidim da je sve više na glasu borba protiv dezinformacija. Čovjek bi pomislio da se konačno počinje cijeniti istina, no daleko smo od toga a tako će i ostati sve dok opstaju samo projekti u kojima su oni koji diktiraju što jest a što nije dezinformacija oni koji profitiraju na lopovluku i laži. Tako bi i projekt Trustnet[94] u okruženju koje valorizira istinu bio dobar i poželjan produkt no u ovom svijetu... Borba protiv dezinformacija je uzaludna u populaciji mentalno samoograničenih polariziranih ljudi koji prvenstveno valoriziraju ono što donosi kratkoročan profit pa tako stavljaju vjeru u ono što im trenutno paše ispred dokazane istine. Kad uzgajaš populaciju koja ne zna niti želi znati razmišljati svojom glavom sve se svodi na vjeru pa nije čudo da Zemljinom površinom vladaju lopovi i lažovi koji to iskorištavaju jer za svaku istinu postoji ljepša laž a od realnih očekivanja ljepše obećanje. Naročito je to naglašeno u vremenima degradacije ekonomije i kvalitete života pa se, bez osvještenja populacije, eksponencijalno juri u propast. Efektivno, ljudi želje da ih se krade i laže a ovakve platforme će vladari (vlasnici) prosječne populacije vrlo brzo popljuvati i dovesti na marginu egzistencije ukoliko se decentralizacija cenzure ne može napraviti imaginarnom a vijesti/reklame koje oglašavaju istinu ne mogu učiniti profitabilnijima od laži. Što je najgore, većina onih koji propagiraju istinu dijeli ju besplatno pa opet ljudi radije osciliraju između podržavanja (financiranja) jednog šarlatana do drugog. Ipak, pozdravljam svaki pokušaj decentralizacije, iako je neminovno da će, bez beneficija/profita za elitu, kao dio undergrounda biti marginaliziran a ako poraste u popularnosti i proglašen ilegalnim. 13 [ 2022.11.02 ] Fiksacija kao dio fikcije by Amenoum 53 Sve zgrade u EU bi se do 2050. trebale transformirati u zgrade nultih emisija[95]. Veselo. Ili u današnjem prijevodu - skupo i besmisleno. Bilo da se radi o vozilima ili zgradama, koliko vidim nijedan plan smanjenja emisija ne uključuje smanjenje ukupnog troška energije tokom proizvodnje i životnog vijeka proizvoda te dugoročni utjecaj na okoliš. Npr. kad se uračuna proizvodnja, po nekim studijama, električni automobil tek se nakon 110 000 km (±40 000 km, ovisno o tome kako se proizvodi struja punjenja) po emisijama izjednačuje s onima na fosilna goriva, tj. tek tada postaje zeleniji od fosila u pogledu emisija. Ako se populacija povećava a s njom i broj automobila na cesti nema tu nikakvog smanjenja emisija pa i da svi voze električne automobile. Uostalom, da svi voze električna vozila, teško da bi se sva ta el. energija mogla dobiti iz obnovljivih izvora (a nitko ne uračunava nove emisije zbog gradnje i održavanja novih elektrana). To vrijedi i za zgrade - nema tu ukupnog smanjenja emisija, sve je to farbanje. Valja napomenuti da materijali najčešće korišteni za izolaciju nisu biorazgradivi i dobivaju se iz fosilnih goriva. Više vječnih materijala, poput plastike i stiropora - više kandidata za vječnu slavu. Nigdje se ovi planovi ne dotiču onog najvažnijeg - nepotrebnog luksuza te neograničenog rasta. Većina onih koji ne žive u stanovima ima kućerine (a svi i automobile) sa gro nepotrebnog ili neiskorištenog prostora tokom uporabe. Povećavamo populaciju (i potičemo to povećanje) a ne smanjujemo prostor po čovjeku (za običan puk se možda kvadratura stanova smanjuje ali se za onih 1% povećava - ukupno, nema smanjenja). Ako se i ne povećava stambeni prostor povećava se industrijski - to smanjuje prostor za biosferu koja regulira temperaturu i osigurava uvjete pogodne za život. Što onda znači da moramo koristiti sve više energije da bi osigurali opstanak a to opet povlači manje prostora za tu biosferu... Začarani krug pozitivne sprege. Sve te mjere potiču sve veću ovisnost i zaduživanje - i prema planetu i bankama, u isto vrijeme osiguravajući rast industrije i nejednakosti. Zavaravamo se CO2otiskom a problem je zapravo rastući energetski otisak. U kontekstu opstanka života na površini planeta, emisije stakleničkih plinova, tj. globalno zatopljenje, samo su dio problema. Fiksacija na eliminaciju ili stabilizaciju CO2emisija je tako samo još jedna manifestacija paradigme zavaravanja ove psihotične populacije. Usput, neke od definicija fiksacije, po Hrvatskom jezičnom portalu[96], su: 1. obrambeni mehanizam u frustrirajućoj situaciji; frustrirana osoba ponavlja neku aktivnost za koju se utvrdilo da ne rješava problem, 2. bolesna preokupacija. Obje definicije jako dobro opisuju trenutno stanje populacije. Pravi problem su klimatske promjene uparene/korelirane sa gubitkom biodiverziteta i degradacijom okoliša. Kao što gubitak biodiverziteta u 54 vašim crijevima vodi do pogoršanja vašeg zdravlja pa i do smrti ako se nastavi, tako i opadajući biodiverzitet na planetu vodi prema ekstinkciji života na istom. Potpuno je svejedno odakle dolazi energija koju koristite - iz solarnih panela ili fosilnih goriva, sve dok se ukupna potrošnja energije povećava besmisleno je pričati o održivosti. Energetski otisak po stanovniku se od 1965. povećao za 8000 kWh i ne pokazuje znakove opadanja[97], dapače još lagano raste, unatoč svim tzv. štednim žaruljama, efikasnim klimama i ostalim štedljivim uređajima. A to govori da, u prosjeku: •koristimo sve više proizvoda i/ili, •sve češće mijenjamo proizvode koje koristimo i/ili, •intenzivnije koristimo proizvode (npr. klima uređaj zbog globalnog zagrijavanja). Tako da imamo problem i bez povećanja populacije a kamoli sa populacijom koja raste za 200 000 novih ljudotinja na dan. Povećanje populacije je trenutno puno veći problem jer je, u odnosu na prosječni otisak, daleko odgovornije za strmi porast ukupnog otiska od 1950.[98]. Figure 8: Potrošnja energije populacije Tragedije kojima se opterećujemo uključuju i nestanak ili smrt jednog jedinog čovjeka a u isto vrijeme nemamo problema sa ekstinkcijom sveg života na površini planeta pa tako slavimo i rođenje svakog novog čovjeka iako to svima smanjuje šanse za opstanak. Zanimljivo je da prosječan otisak u Hrvatskoj i Srbiji (a odnedavno i u BiH te Crnoj Gori) prati svjetski prosjek. 55 Ili svjetski prosjek prati naš prosjek? Zanimljivo svakako, jer sam prije postavio hipotezu da će se ono što se događa u Hrvatskoj preslikavati na svijet. Ja sam svoj energetski otisak pak drastično smanjio zadnjih godina. Možda i prosječnom puku sistem nameće smanjenje no to u globalu ništa ne znači kad se prosjek otiska u globalu povećava i vjerojatno odavno nije na održivom nivou. Figure 9: Gubitak biodiverziteta Često se, u kontekstu promjene klime spominju kritične točke (prekretnice, tipping points) no najvažnija kritična točka, ona nakon koje uistinu nema povratka je kritična točka u biodiverzitetu, a ona je, vjerujem, dosegnuta negdje oko 2016. godine kada je globalna populacija divljih životinja opala za 66% (2/3) od 1970. godine. A opada i dalje, trenutno je na 69%[99].- 13.1 Po’ kile apsurda i dve šteke CO_2 Odavno mi je jasno da je iščezavanje upotrebe fosilnih goriva nespojivo sa rastućim gladom za energijom, a sada je, konačno, netko proveo i istraživanje koje kvantitativno i nedvojbeno pokazuje o kolikom se zavaravanju radi kada govorimo o zamjeni fosilnih goriva sa tzv. obnovljivim izvorima[100]. Dakle, po upotrebi energije iz 2018., potrebno je dodatnih 36000 TWh energije iz električne mreže da bi potpuno izbacili fosilna goriva kao izvor energije - oko 4 puta više od postojećeg kapaciteta 2018. godine. Dobro je napomenuti da taj kapacitet većinski čine hidroelektrane i nuklearna energija dok se za zamjenu većinski planiraju vjetroelektrane i solarne elektrane - prema spomenutoj studiji, preko 70% ukupne proizvodnje bi otpadalo na iste, a to znači da je potrebno sagraditi preko 550000 novih elektrana prosječne veličine. 56 Figure 10: Potrebna dodatna električna energija za zamjenu fosilnih goriva 57 extracting oil (considering the fact that natural gas is generally formed deeper than oil)? And will the extracted methane be used solely for production of hydrogen and not for other purposes - e.g., heating, where combustion is releasing CO2? The turquoise hydrogen, therefore, probably also doesn’t make sense unless the methane is renewable (e.g., methane produced from biomass, not extracted from the deep). But the problem is - there’s simply not enough renewable methane available even if it could be produced cheaply. In US, for example, available renewable methane could replace only 10% of fossil gas in use[124]. And if you do have renewable methane, it is much better to use it to replace fossil gas in use rather than use it to produce hydrogen. This leaves us with green hydrogen - produced by electrolysis of water using renewable energy sources. There are other ways to get hydrogen, but these are either more expensive, and/or complicated, and/or less efficient and require a lot of improvement for commercial viability[125]. Here the question is - why? Why complicate (and lose energy) converting electricity to hydrogen (which is in fuel cells converted back to electricity) when one can use electricity directly or store it into a battery with less energy loss and no issues with compression and transport? In case of storage, the only advantage is the greater energy density of hydrogen fuel cells, compared to lithium-ion batteries. This can result in bigger range and lighter vehicles but, overall, likely not worth it in case of automobiles. The other advantage may be in production - it may be more environmentally friendly to produce green hydrogen and hydrogen fuel cells than batteries. But if we use electricity to produce hydrogen for vehicles (using green hydrogen fuel cells to power your house instead of using green electricity simply doesn’t make sense) that will cause additional strain on the electrical grid which will then need additional capacity. Production of green hydrogen, thus, probably only makes sense when there is surplus electricity that would be unused otherwise. 15.3 Conclusion I don’t see hydrogen as a significant energy source in future (unless used in nuclear fusion, but I’m not convinced humanity will advance that far). It could be forced, politically, as dominant energy source but who will be able to afford it? Perhaps one way to deal with climate change is to reduce the number of polluters by rising prices of energy. Certainly, hydrogen based energy sources, regardless of the way hydrogen is produced, are more expensive than others. Hydrogen is unlikely to replace fossil fuels and is an unlikely solution to climate change, but green solutions are becoming increasingly expensive for the 64 average Joe who is increasingly being more concerned with life today than with life tomorrow, even though it is precisely that kind of reasoning that created the problem. We can talk about hydrogen today and about whatnot tomorrow but there never were real solutions other than the transformation of polarized human mind. Will the average Joe be willing to significantly sacrifice his lifestyle for longterm survival or will his kind fall-back to [short-term] cheaper fossil fuels? What about the average Jane? The answer is, of course, clear already[126], and it will be becoming clearer and clearer with decreasing maneuvering space for delusional subventions. This is the positive feedback not accounted for - when polarized human is pressured it will resort to quick and effective solutions to preserve, not only its life but its lifestyle as long as that is possible, regardless of how dirty these solutions are, accelerating its own demise tomorrow. Ultimately, it appears conservation of lifestyle is even more important to the average human than short-term conservation of life. Otherwise, the energy would be colorless and its usage would be balanced and shared with nature, not increasing exponentially under the rainbow of deceiving labels. That’s no solution, even if green label might dominate for a moment. Funny thing is, not everyone has to sacrifice lifestyle, some lifestyles could be improved. The key is, of course, in balance - balancing the ratio of material and spiritual needs with the ratio of material and spiritual needs of nature. So far, effectively, for the average human, nature has no material nor spiritual needs, only goods for taking. And this is a reflection of gods vs dogs relationship between humans - humans will never be in balance with nature as long as there is no balance between humans. I know.. I’m repeating stuff, it’s so annoying - why do I keep pointing to suicidal nature of polarized humans? Don’t we want them to go extinct? It’s an enigma... It’s probably a legacy of my own polarized past. I know it’s not easy being polarized and suicidal just as it ain’t easy to survive being surrounded by polarized and suicidal human nature. 16 [ 2022.10.06 ] The EU is doomed by Amenoum The Europe joining with US into NATO was a marriage destined to fail. But it won’t just end with the breakup of NATO, it will likely be coupled with the 65 breakup of EU. This is mostly due to asymmetric and unsustainable relationship between US and EU (or between US and the rest of the world). In that relationship, when it comes to foreign policy, the EU is a dog owned by the dark side (deep state, or the neocons) of US. This was fine with polarized European people when US wars didn’t affect them. With the war in Ukraine, however, this is no longer the case, and misalignment between wishes of people and commands obeyed by EU politicians is growing exponentially. This is, obviously, destabilizing EU. The unstable/weak Europe is, of course, in the interest of US. Cutting ties with Russia/China is making EU more dependent on US. No wonder the the dark US and its EU minions are investing heavily into this war. This was all carefully planned in someone’s mind. And, for some of us, it might be hard to understand why are people still dying for interests of these bastards? But all becomes clear once one understands that this is not a relationship between sane humans, this is a relationship between self-proclaimed gods and dogs. The US wants to destroy Russia and it doesn’t care how many Ukrainians will die for that or how many Europeans will freeze to death, die due to food shortages or, sometime in future, nuclear radiation. The war in Ukraine can be ended today and all this would be avoided if US/EU would acknowledge Eastern Ukraine as Russian territory (with a formal guarantee that Western Ukraine won’t join NATO). Ukraine is a big country and it was always divided between pro-Russian east and pro-American west. Crimea even was a part of Russia for a long period (1783 – 1917) before it was given, by the heads of the Soviet Union, to the Ukraine in 1954. It is not surprising then that its population is dominantly Russian. But it’s not only Crimea, most of population of eastern Ukraine is either Russian or pro-Russian, which is evident in elections. Take for example the 2004 elections[127]. The results are shown in Fig. 13. Obviously, government of Yanukovych was what most citizens of eastern Ukraine wanted. Newer elections show similar results. Why are then the US and its dogs declaring current referenda in eastern Ukraine a sham? The Russians even invited UN, OECD and EU to oversee these referenda but they all refused it[128]. Why? Because then they would have to admit the reality of reality. Note that, it shouldn’t be surprising that today eastern Ukraine is even more pro-Russian, due to terrorist attacks on Russians in eastern Ukraine that have increased since 2014. 66 Figure 13: Results of elections in Ukraine, 2004 The corrupted West simply doesn’t want a peaceful resolution of the conflict. In its history, the US never did[129]. There’s also great hypocrisy here. Consider Kosovo in Serbia - it was a part of Serbia (and still is by some) that’s mainly populated by Albanians. The US/EU strongly supports autonomy and independence of Kosovo. Shouldn’t it then support the autonomy and independence of Russians in eastern Ukraine? Of course it should but the problem is - while Albanians are pro-American, the Russians tend to be pro-Russian and a pro-Russian autonomy not serving US interests cannot be allowed. The Russia, China, North Korea - all these countries are artificially inflated threats to US, simply because they don’t want to serve US and obey US commands, like EU does. The EU is thus doomed, like any dog is, serving the devil. 17 [ 2022.09.30 ] Good mourning, black Friday by Amenoum As much as I don’t like politics and wars I still feel affected by the lies. And the time of war is the time of greatest lies. The war in Ukraine has confirmed wars today are wars between the [systems of the] West and the East. The West is the US and its proxies, including most of Europe. As for the East, it’s still 67 Russia (to the West, however, Russia is equal to Putin and the West is equal to the World fucking UnitedT M ). It’s always funny to hear how a single man is invading a country and planning to conquer Europe. China and some other Eastern countries are not in these wars yet but are increasingly being painted as enemies so it’s probably just a matter of time. Lack of enemies equals to an existential crisis for neoconservatives, associated complexes and institutions[130]. And they are always shaping US’ foreign policy (and EU’s lately) to a great degree, regardless what party is officially in power. There will be no peace on Earth, as long as there are neoconservatives, shaping foreign policies. In any case, I can’t see China or any potential Russian ally as a Russian proxy and that tells us how weak EU is, compared to the East. Regardless of opinion, the truth is not served in the West. The truth may not be served in the East either, but I can’t comment on that, being mainly exposed to Western propaganda, daily. And lies here are becoming crazier by the hour. Part of propaganda is not only to lie, but to ignore facts against it. And the Western media seems to be completely under control of a biased pro-US machine. A good example are the articles by R. Basu (UN) which she tried to publish in the West but was completely ignored by media outlets, even though the stories were factual reports, not biased propaganda. The articles told of Soviets protecting the women and their rights in Afghanistan but also of US supported murderous gangsters throwing acid in the faces of women[129]. For example, there is no doubt that recent gas leaks in Nord Stream pipelines are the result of sabotage. But let’s get a grip on reality - the prime suspect for this simply cannot be Russia, the prime suspect should be US. Yet, the Russia is the prime suspect in EU. It makes one wonder - what kind of bones have the dogs been given? Or is it really just fear that rules the EU? I have to admit that, at least after the war in Yugoslavia in the 90’s, the neighboring Serbia is a better country for its people than Croatia is and, from 68 what I’ve seen and heard, Serbian people seem to be less deranged than Croatians are. Croatia is a fucked up country slaving to US and its EU dominating vassal states, while Serbia, even though it has problems, doesn’t seem to slave to anyone right now. If I would be polarized, I would be ashamed of Croatian leadership and Croatian people for supporting this shitshow, but I don’t even feel like Croatian anymore. I do not support its US government. But I wouldn’t support Russian government either. And even though I’m thinking about moving to Serbia or somewhere more to the East I probably won’t. I’m just not polarized enough, nor do I have the means, to go to the east even though I feel the attraction (Bhutan is very inviting). So I remain in the fucked up land they call Slavonia where the first question of the day is: why do I keep waking up into this nightmare? The land that still does not have the balls to say no to Zagreb, Zagreb which doesn’t have the balls to say no to EU, EU which doesn’t have the balls to say no to US, the US which doesn’t have balls.. only firearms. Bundled with suicidal stupidity. Although not infallible, an good source of information on politics overall is N. Chomsky. About the current situation, Chomsky is saying the same[131]. So go on, keep manufacturing lies, keep oiling the propaganda machine, for god’s sake, accelerate it. Engage your nuclear weapons, let your demons and their minions expose their true nature, so the colorless of us can, finally, rest in peace, dead or alive. For any reality for us is better, than the one promising a promised land in the rising ocean of blatant lies. In other news... Good mourning black Friday September 19th 1986. 18 [ 2022.09.17 ] Plavi nuklearni rat, crvena zima, zeleni bogovi i crni solarni paneli by Amenoum Dok sam bio lud, ili izvan sebe (dio transformacije svijesti oko 2018. godine), izjavio sam u jednom trenutku da će vas sve pobiti Amerikanci. Tokom vremena, nisam toj izjavi davao puno značaja, no vijesti u zadnje vrijeme potiču me na dublje proučavanje onoga što sam u to vrijeme proizveo. 69 Sve što sam izjavio tada o budućnosti danas se pokazuje sasvim izglednim scenarijem. Tako da mi se sve primjereniji termin za stanje u kojem sam bio čini značajna desinkronizacija lokalnog prostora i lokalnog vremena a sve manje nekakva beznačajna psihoza. Kao da sam tijelom bio na jednom mjestu u prostoru no dušom na nekom drugom mjestu u vremenu. Što je, po teoriji Kompletne Relativnosti[38], sasvim relativno moguće iako ne uvijek previše vjerojatno. No nalazimo se, po mojim hipotezama, u periodu jake evolucije kada nevjerojatno postaje sve vjerojatnije pa možda i ovo uskoro neće biti tako čudno. Dapače, naknadnim istraživanjem zaključio sam da gornja izjava itekako ima težinu (detalji su u blog članku The 3rd Act). Treći svjetski rat je, realno, već počeo. Ako i ne osjećamo svi posljedice upotrebe vatrenog oružja, sasvim sigurno osjećamo posljedice političkog ratovanja i bezumlja koje i inače prati svaki rat a ovdje je poprimilo svjetske razmjere. Kao da to nije dosta, sve više se spominje nuklearni rat. Zanimljivo je da su puna usta nuklearnog rata upravo Amerikancima (i onima koji se tako osjećaju). Zanimljivo je i da Amerikanci sve više oružja šalju Ukrajini i da se tu radi sve više i o dalekometnom naoružanju pa se intenzivno razmišlja i o mlaznim avionima[132]. Sve to se sve teže može interpretirati kao sukob Ukrajine i Rusije a sve više kao sukob NATO-a (SAD-a) i Rusije. Ukrajinci, na primjer, nemaju pilote koji znaju upravljati ovim avionima. Tako da donacija mora uključivati i trening, no hoće li vrag imati vremena za njega ili će avionima pilotirati netko drugi? Tako da je sasvim izgledno da će se rat proširiti van granica Ukrajine. No Rusija tu ima sve manje opcija. Na baze NATO-a u Europi i Americi se sigurno neće ići nekakvom pješadijom i tenkovima. Rat dakle postaje nuklearan. Velike će štete biti i u Hrvatskoj, možda zbog baza u okolini a možda zbog pro-US vlade i svega što se povezuje s tim. A ako NATO odluči formirati neku jaču bazu u Hrvatskoj, bit će to kraj Hrvatske. Rusija druge opcije nema, Amerikanci sve to znaju i čini se kao da neki to priželjkuju. Zanimljivo je onda pogledati što kažu studije u vezi nuklearnog rata. A 70 zadnja studija[133] kaže slijedeće: •2 milijarde mrtvih u slučaju nuklearnog rata Indije i Pakistana, •5 milijardi mrtvih u slučaju nuklearnog rata Amerike i Rusije. Dakle, praktički, ekstinkcija ljudske vrste u slučaju i jednog i drugog. Naravno, neće svi umrijeti odmah i direktno od posljedica nuklearnih detonacija. Umirat će se vjerojatno najviše od gladi. Možemo za to kriviti Amerikance jer sve upućuje na to da su oni sve zakuhali, no i istok mi nekako sve više smrdi na zapad. Kina je danas infestirana kapitalizmom poput zapada pa se i ponaša slično. Sasvim je izgledno da će, poput Amerike nekad, krenuti s okupacijom i militarizacijom teritorija izvan Kine. A pogledajte zadnje prosvjede u Hrvatskoj. Ako znamo da Hrvati baš nisu skloni prosvjedovanju a kamoli upotrebi sile u istima (većina se boji kažnjavanja) treba se zapitati tko sponzorira nasilje u istim? Nasilje, tj. teroriste, u prosvjedima kojima se rušila vlast u Ukrajini sasvim je izgledno sponzorirala Amerika, sponzorira li ove Rusija? Destabilizacija sistema od strane konkurentnog sistema nije nikakva novost niti je više baš i tajna (zna se da je CIA npr. radila na destabilizaciji vlasti u Iranu još u 50-im godinama prošlog stoljeća). Ipak, postojeća vlast je za Slavonce (a i mnoge druge), po mom mišljenju, daleko od idealne pa i nije loše da se sruši. Mogli bi tako i Kineze, pa čak i Ruse, danas nazivati Amerikancima. U svakom slučaju, moja izjava da će vas sve pobiti Amerikanci ne zvuči više tako besmislena. Dapače, sve više vjerujem u scenarij u kojem pogiba preko 7 milijardi ljudi a opstaju oni neutralni, možda tek oko 1.5 milijuna ljudi. Neće te milijarde, po mojoj teoriji, nestati zauvijek. Pojavit će se u mutiranim oblicima hibrida nekadašnjih ljudi i nekadašnjih životinja, nešto otporniji na radijaciju, a možda i na nekom drugom mjestu. Slojevi kore planeta su mjesta s pojačanom radijacijom (ona generira dobar dio topline) pa se nuklearni rat može shvatiti kao dio procesa adaptacije za novo okruženje. Zanimljivo je dovesti nuklearni rat u kontekst klimatskih promjena. 71 Mnošto zanimljivosti u zadnje vrijeme. Zanimljivo. Po citiranoj studiji, jedna od posljedica nuklearnog rata bit će globalno snižavanje temperature od 1.5 ◦C (ako ćemo se zavaravati) do 14.8 ◦C (realnije). Posljedica će to biti zasićenja stratosfere česticama pepela (slično pojačanom vulkanizmu). A budući da će se snižene temperature zadržati bar 10-20 godina možete svoje solarne panele okačiti mačku o rep. Ako već kupujete panele, savjetujem da kupite one osjetljivije na difuzno zračenje (od kojih će biti neke koristi) a ne direktno. Zanimljivo je primjetiti da je nuklearna radijacija u dobroj mjeri ionizirajuća, svojstvo radijacije koje se i iskorištava u solarnim panelima. No paneli su prilagođeni za ionizaciju vidljivim spektrom. Dobar investicijski potez danas bi tako možda bio proizvoditi panele osjetljivije na gama i beta zračenje umjesto na vidljivi spektar. Takvi paneli postavljeni na krov vaše kuće ne samo da bi proizvodili struju nego bi i vas štitili od radijacije (dobro bi inače bilo i kuću ukopati u zemlju). Zanimljivo da sam ja počeo svoju kuću ukopavati i prije nego što sam shvatio da će biti nuklearnog zračenja. Onaj koji je sa svojim bogom dobar neće se ni bojati - niti rata, niti mira, niti zime, niti radijacije. Neće jer se vraga odrekao pa odavno zna da ga vrag nema zašto spašavati svojim strahovima. Već sam prije shvatio da su ratovi za planet isto što i vulkanizam[5] pa nije čudno da se, umjesto vulkanizma, potiče rat. Očito je lakše ljude natjerati da se bore nego natjerati vulkan da proradi. Nuklearni rat, dakle, možemo interpretirati i kao sredstvo za borbu protiv globalnog zagrijavanja (reakcija Zemljinog imunog sistema). Zanimljivo je da svjedočenja o posjetima vanzemaljaca uključuju američke i ruske nuklearne silose. Ako shvatimo tu vrstu života kao dio imunog sistema Zemlje, možda su nas, svjesno ili nesvjesno, upozoravali da će aktivirati naše nuklearno oružje da bi regulirali naše bjesomučno zagrijavanje atmosfere? Zanimljivo je da svjedoci tih susreta često spominju i svojevrsnu kontrolu uma od strane posjetitelja... Pa, kao što rekoh, neke konspiracije možda i nisu svjesne s dvije ljudske polarizirane strane, ali to, po mojoj teoriji relativnosti, samo znači da su svjesne s neke treće strane. No i tvrdnja da je ta treća strana vanzemaljska ili da nije ljudska, opet 72 je relativna. Ako su evoluirali iz ljudi (a po mojim teorijama jesu[74]) može se reći da su to su isto ljudi, samo nemaju domaće porijeklo (njihovo porijeklo je vjerojatno na Marsu). Ne bih pak isključio vulkanizam. Pojačane geotermalne energije će biti pri površini nakon rata (i sama radijacija će zagrijavati površinu) jer ljudi će ratom najvjerojatnije previše sniziti temperaturu. Ako samo-regulirajući mehanizam Zemlje na površini opstane dovoljno dugo (a u dobroj mjeri bi trebao - mnoge životinje su, na primjer, vrlo otporne na radijaciju a biljkama bi radijacija mogla omogućiti da zavladaju zemljom i to u gigantskim oblicima) može se očekivati i podizanje temperature na neki način a to opet može omogućiti geotermalna energija. Ako spomenuta treća strana obitava u dubini Zemlje moguće je i da, u određenoj mjeri, kontrolira radijaciju koja se tamo odvija. Detektirano visokoenergetsko kozmičko zračenje koje izbija na površini Antarktike[134] a koju moderna fizika ne može objasniti može biti posljedica nuklearne fuzije (ili nekih drugih nuklearnih interakcija) kontrolirane od iste strane. Što rade tamo? Pa možda se spremaju otopiti led - između ostalog, da bi podigli temperaturu uslijed nuklearne zime. Zanimljivo je da oduvijek imam želju posjetiti Antarktiku no bez mogućnosti da to i učinim znao sam poželjeti da ona posjeti mene. Uz podginutu razinu mora za 65 metara ako ne i više te uz nuklearnu zimu i kolaps atlantske meridijanske obrtajuće struje, mogla bi mi se želja i ostvariti. Panonsko more mi je redovito u glavi zadnjih godina. Ipak, za isto, trebalo bi malo više vode ili određene seizmičke aktivnosti ne bi li se voda koncentrirala u Panonski bazen. Voda može pak doći i drugim putem, uz predviđenu pojačanu tektoniku i fragmentiranje tektonskih ploča mogla bi navirati i iz dubine. Za sad sve to još uvijek zvuči kao scenarij iz fantastike i ako će se tako nešto i dogoditi, ne čini se izglednim u skoro vrijeme. – 18.1 Relativna alkemija Ne vjerujem pak da će nuklearni rat doseći takve razmjere da će biti u cijelosti odgovoran za nadolazeće stanje na Zemlji. Ako postoji više opcija da se postigne isti efekt, ponekad će najbolje rješenje biti relativna superpozicija uzroka, a to u ovom slučaju znači da će se efekt postići kombinacijom nuklearnog oružja, vulkanizma i pojačanog kozmičkog zračenja (uglavnom sa Sunca) parcijalnim kolapsom magnetskog polja. U prirodi takva rješenja i jesu najčešća jer di73 Negdje oko 2017/2018 godine, dok sam bio lud, izjavio sam da će Trump i Putin doći u Sibinj. Nije to bilo klasično ludilo. To je bilo stanje koje je moderna medicina donedavno zabunom poistovjećivala sa psihozom (čini se da više nije tako[152]) a ja nazivam stanjem duše uslijed transformacije svijesti u kojem je izražavanje iste u velikoj mjeri rezultat preplavljenosti sinkronicitetom. To je tada izgledalo kao proročanstvo Baba Vange pa bi u njega vjerojatno uglavnom i povjerovali oni koji vjeruju u proročanstva iste gospođe dok bi ostali ovom proroku ili proroku (ovisi koga se pita) predviđali skorašnji put prema određenoj javnoj ustanovi... Inače, nakon kraćeg istraživanja zaključio sam da za mnoga proročanstva Baba Vange za koja se tvrdi da su se ispunila nema relevantnih izvora dok relevantni izvori postoje za ona koja se nisu ispunila. No, mnoga njezina predviđanja su zapravo točna, iako nisu i godine u kojima bi se trebala ostvariti - što je česti problem kod proroka koji ne maturiraju u proroke. Zaista, iz kojeg razloga bi se Putin i Trump (koji više nije ni predsjednik SAD-a) u skoroj budućnosti sastajali, i to u mjestu za koje nije čula većina Hrvata a kamoli svijet? Čini se da nema smisla, ali proročanstva događaja u budućnosti često nemaju smisla u sadašnjosti. No, od početka rata u Ukrajini te najavom Trumpa da će se ponovno kandidirati za predsjednika stvari zapravo idu u smjeru u kojem je sasvim izgledno da će se ova dvojica negdje sastati. Ako se Trump zaista kandidira vrlo vjerojatno će i pobijediti na izborima. Za to postoji više razloga no najveći je smanjenje IQ-a prosječne populacije te sve veća briga za što kratkoročnije interese (uslijed klimatskih, financijskih i ostalih udara) pa tako i za održivost poslova kojima će se ti interesti podržavati. A kada se radi o kratkoročnim interesima nema većeg šampiona od čovjeka koji negira globalno zatopljenje i jasno podržava fosilnu industriju (što i njega samog, u određenim sredinama bar, čini živućim fosilom). Kada u ratu dođe do zasićenja ili bezizlazne situacije, običaj je da se vođe 80 dvije zaraćene strane sastanu negdje na neutralnom terenu te dogovore izlaz - koji obično predstavlja priznavanje osvojenog teritorija ili podjelu nečije zemlje. Tako je bilo i u ratu u Jugoslaviji - gdje su Tuđman i Milošević dogovarali podjelu Bosne (ne Srbije niti Hrvatske!). Ne govorim o sastanku u Karađorđevu 1991., govorim o drugim susretima, prvenstveno o [javnom!] sastanku na neutralnom teritoriju, u Ženevi početkom 1994[153]. Doći će tako i trenutak kada će Trump i Putin dogovarati podjelu Ukrajine (ne Amerike ili Rusije!). Sve više se rat u Jugoslaviji čini kao najava ili preteča (precursor) rata Amerike i Rusije. Ostaje samo pitanje mjesta sastanka. A sasvim sigurno neće se sastati negdje na istoku (u Kini npr.) ili zapadu. Navjerojatnije mjesto sastanka je upravo negdje u sredini. Možda nevjerojatno zvuči, ali istinito je da između Hrvatske i Srbije postoji ničija ili neutralna zemlja. Taj apsurd nastao je premještanjem dijela toka Dunava jer Srbija svojata zemlju do toka Dunava koji postoji danas, dok Hrvatska svojata zemlju do stare granice (starog toka). Tako se stvorio mali dio od nekih 7 km2kojeg nitko ne priznaje kao svoje, a neki tamo pokušavaju i stvoriti novu državu[154]. Zanimljivo je da postoje još samo 2 takva mjesta na Svijetu (jedno je na Antarktici a drugo u Africi). Još zanimljivije, u ovom kontekstu, je činjenica da je to mjesto udaljeno samo 100 km od Sibinja. Ipak, iako nema neutralnijeg mjesta od ovoga u Europi, teško da će se ova dvojica sastati baš na mjestu gdje nema infrastrukture niti civilizacije. No već prije sam govorio da bi dugoročno najbolje bilo za Slavoniju da se odspoji od Hrvatske[105] (tj. Zagreba), a to postaje i sve vjerojatniji scenarij - iako to mnogi još uvijek ne vide. Zar itko misli da će Slavonci (od kojih je dobar dio bio prisiljen emigrirati) s vremenom postajati sve zadovoljniji Zagrebom? Ili će biti sve nezadovoljniji jer budućnost svakako ne izgleda dobro? Ako se Slavonija, ili bar jedan njen dio, osamostali (može pak ostati u nekoj labavoj federaciji sa Zagrebom) sumnjam da će [p]ostati članica NATO-a (u svakom slučaju, bilo bi to suicidalno). Ta Slavonija bi tako postala neutralna i izbjegla rat koji se, po svemu sudeći, također kuha na ovim prostorima. I eto savršenog teritorija za sastanak dvojice glavešina - istočno je proamerički Zagreb a zapadno pro-srpska (pro-ruska možda i ne pretjerano, ali 81 sigurno anti-američka) Srbija. Dakle, puno bolji izbor nego Švicarska, koja bi uostalom, kako je krenulo, mogla još i ući u NATO. Možemo sada shvatiti onaj komadić neutralne zemlje između Srbije i Hrvatske kao nagovještaj ili preteču većeg komada neutralne zemlje između ove dvije države. U polariziranom svijetu bilo bi to od velikog značaja za Slavoniju. Sastanak dvije svjetske sile u Slavoniji u takvom trenutku bilo bi nedvojbeno priznanje iste kao samostalne i neutralne zemlje. Dežurni političari bi rekli da ne bi bilo loše ni za ekonomiju. A s obzirom da je postojanje bar jedne neutralne zemlje u interesu ovih sila (ako ništa drugo, da se mogu dogovarati uslijed ratova) teško da će takvu zemlju netko dirati ili pokušavati destabilizirati (naročito ako ne bude strogo demokratska niti strogo komunistička) pa ratovati na njenom teritoriju. Pa eto još jednog razloga za odjeb pro-US Zagreba. Ostaje još samo dovesti ovu dvojicu do Sibinja da bi proročanstvo bilo u potpunosti ispunjeno. Pa, ako pretpostavimo da će se susret dogoditi negdje u sredini Slavonije (što bi bio realan scenarij) onda je područje oko Sibinja jedan od kandidata. Idealno bi bilo da i dio Bosne južno od Slavonskog Broda proglasi neutralnost i udruži se sa Slavonijom. Ne zbog sastanka nego da se Slavoncima osigura neometan pristup bosanskim ćevapima, naravno, a Bosancima šta već traže u Slavoniji (sebe?). Možda se sve to još uvijek čini kao san, no ja sam se već odrekao državljanstva te ne priznajem Hrvatsku državu ovakvu kakva jest. Dakle, što se mene tiče, zemlja na kojoj živim već jest neutralna i nemam ništa protiv da se ova dvojica sastanu na mom imanju - pod uvjetom da neće dovesti i svatove, galamiti i smetati mi u radu. Dapače, možda ih počastim i čaš’com rakije. Ako donesu bocu rakije, naravno. 22 [ 2022.08.03 ] Is Earth getting f[l]atter? by Amenoum No, the Earth is not flat and it never will be unless it increases rotation significantly. And for that, celestial bodies generally need more mass. 82 This is because every spherical body with a gravitational maximum in its center will be, with increasing rotation, transforming from spherical form into a disk. Since angular velocity is lower on the poles, gravitational force overpowers centrifugal force, redistributing mass from polar regions into equatorial. Due to conservation of angular momentum, added mass should slow down rotation but this is not the case with celestial bodies (gas planets, for example, generally rotate faster with increased mass). Because of this, general assumption is that acquired mass already had a big angular momentum. Mass was acquired from the collapse of a spinning cloud of gas, which, with a decrease in orbital radius must increase rotation speed. Some of that momentum is then transferred to already acquired mass - increasing rotation of the body. Earth is currently not getting any additional mass from orbiting clouds of gas, however, with melting of ice on the poles and rising sea levels, the Earth is getting more flat. If Earth would be a fluid (liquid or gas), this redistribution of mass would be, together with tidal forces induced by the Moon, slowing down the rotation of Earth at equator while speeding up rotation at the poles. All due to conservation of angular momentum: L=m v r Since momentum L must remain constant, more mass m on the equator [with no additional momentum] will decrease rotation - angular velocity v. Even more, if radius is increased too (will be, if there is no increase in mass density). On the poles where mass and radius were decreased, rotation increases. But Earth’s rotation is speeding up[155]. One explanation for this is Earth’s rigidness - decreasing radius at the poles is increasing rotation at the poles but also at the equator because the two are mostly connected by solid mass. This is a valid and most likely explanation, however, due to tendency to conserve momentum, this is also increasing tension (heat) between the equator and the poles - redistributed mass is fluid and it will resist acceleration (increased fluid mass on equator, to conserve momentum, must slow down instead of speeding up). The faster the ice melts, the friction is bigger (and tension between the equator and the poles) and greater is the possibility for earthquakes and volcanism. If the ice would rapidly melt (e.g., in a day) this would also produce global flooding. The redistribution of mass with melting of polar ice is also increasing differences between momenta of equator fluids and polar fluids (equatorial tending to slow down, polar speeding up). 83 Increasing differential rotation is increasing induced Coriolis force - which translates to stronger, faster rotating vortexes, e.g., hurricanes (typhoons). Is the growing number of flat-Earthers correlated with this flattening of Earth? Is the flattening and increasing rotation a precursor to acquisition of mass [adding additional spin momenta], e.g., asteroids, or Moon [fragments]? Well, according to my theories, this is likely all correlated. 23 [ 2022.07.04 ] The canonical blasphemy by Amenoum Newton claimed Bible was corrupted. This is my conclusion as well, but anyone interested can easily see that with a bit of research (although thorough analysis can be much more revealing). The corruption was evident even before the find of the collection of gospels at Nag Hammadi in 1945, which includes gospels that the Christian council discarded and left out of the Bible. Some of the gospels contradict each other but the bishops did not choose to include what is, or is at least closest to, the truth, rather what served their interests best. Scribes copying scriptures often changed them to serve their interests, more and more with time. This was well documented by B. D. Ehrman in "Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why", which I highly recommend to anyone interested in the origins of Christianity and the Bible. Many people believe that it was the apostles who wrote the gospels, however, at the time of Jesus most people were illiterate and that is true for most if not all apostles as well (Paul, who is known as Paul the Apostle and who did know how to read and write, was actually not one of the apostles, his writings however were the basis for the majority of the New Testament). Over time, the church has not only increased the quantity of text in scriptures, it has added new apostles to the story. The gospels of Luke, John, Matt and Mark are not gospels of 4 different apostles, they are the product of 4 different scribes copying texts (and in the process changing and adding stuff) from the same sources, or even a single source. One such source could be the gospel of Marcion (who was not an apostle either), however, I find the early version of Mark to be closer to the truth (this it not the version in the Bible), for one reason - anger. People experiencing overwhelming synchronicity 84 who are also acting as prophets (of which I have experience) will at this stage [of the transformation of consciousness] act with extreme selfconfidence, audacity and determination, but also will show no mercy in their interaction with the weak-minded. Thus, expression of Jesus at times certainly could have been interpreted as anger. This anger was present in multiple places in the early Mark (before it was further corrupted), but it is not present in any gospels included in the biblical canon. As I’ve said elsewhere, a lot of things in humanity start out good and with good intentions, but as they grow they inevitably get either corrupted or silenced. Christianity got corrupted, and later itself started silencing those who were propagating stories closer to the truth. One gospel that was left out, which I find interesting, is the Gospel of Thomas (it’s most likely the earliest written and closest to the truth) with about half of sayings that are not present in canonical gospels. Some claim Gospel of Thomas lacks apocalyptic themes (Jesus was an apocalyptic preacher) doubting its authenticity, however, I find it more likely for canonical gospels to lack authenticity. As for apocalypses, I will show that this gospel is full of references to them, albeit indirect ones. Jesus often used parables and allegories so the meaning of whatever he was saying depends on interpretation. I am convinced Jesus was influenced by synchronicity and to interpret Jesus properly one needs to experience overwhelming synchronicity (which I also believe Jesus experienced). Newton experienced it about the age of 35 (people, however, interpreted it as nervous breakdown), I did too at about the same age, as well as Tesla and Jesus (it is not a coincidence that Jesus died soon after this, I was close to death myself). This is my interpretation of his sayings in Gospel of Thomas[156]. (1) And he said, "Whoever finds the interpretation of these sayings will not experience death." Coupling of souls and bodies cannot last absolutely forever, therefore, one cannot escape death (decoupling) of a particular incarnation. However, Jesus believed that a soul can become free from cycles of reincarnation (coupling with bodies) and thus death. Another possibility is that death here should be interpreted as forgetfulness (memory reset) that occurs between incarnations. But when is this supposed to happen? 85 As shown later, he believed this happens once one obtains knowledge of self. This could also be interpreted as a reference to rebirth (transformation of consciousness) - when a person’s soul effectively becomes reborn even though there is no decoupling from the body. Such transformations are likely to peak during the apocalypse. (3) Jesus said, "If those who lead you say to you, ’See, the kingdom is in the sky,’ then the birds of the sky will precede you. If they say to you, ’It is in the sea,’ then the fish will precede you. Rather, the kingdom is inside of you, and it is outside of you. When you come to know yourselves, then you will become known, and you will realize that it is you who are the sons of the living father. But if you will not know yourselves, you dwell in poverty and it is you who are that poverty." The living father is our god, planet Earth. Once you genuinely realize (become conscious) of self-similarity of universes and that [your] actions around you are reflected inside you you will become like your god. Lacking knowledge of your self you are lacking self-consciousness. (14) Jesus said to them, "If you fast, you will give rise to sin for yourselves; and if you pray, you will be condemned; and if you give alms, you will do harm to your spirits. When you go into any land and walk about in the districts, if they receive you, eat what they will set before you, and heal the sick among them. For what goes into your mouth will not defile you, but that which issues from your mouth - it is that which will defile you." As I have stated elsewhere, fasting is a period of a couple of weeks characterized by the loss of appetite for food that one lives through once during transformation of consciousness. Note that loss of appetite is also common just before death. This is not a coincidence. The two phenomena are highly correlated. Transformation of consciousness certainly can be interpreted as rebirth. Forced fasting is wrong and here Jesus confirms that. He also says that [ritualistic] prayers and alms (charity) are bad (my thoughts exactly). Jesus says if someone gives something to you (like food), give something in return. It is obvious now why would church reject this gospel. For me, however, this gospel confirms the corruption within the church. Obviously, Jesus believed in karma and didn’t like rituals (e.g., fasting for the sake of fasting, prayers for the sake of praying). 86 (15) Jesus said, "When you see one who was not born of woman, prostrate yourselves on your faces and worship him. That one is your father." God Earth is not born of a woman. However, there are different interpretations - not necessarily mutually exclusive. Quite likely, the word ’woman’ here is a result of scribe intervention, a replacement for the word ’lie’ or ’lies’. This is not the only example where this equivalency between women and lies has been used, as one can see further below. This was common. (22) Jesus saw infants being suckled. He said to his disciples, "These infants being suckled are like those who enter the kingdom."They said to him, "Shall we then, as children, enter the kingdom?"Jesus said to them, "When you make the two one, and when you make the inside like the outside and the outside like the inside, and the above like the below, and when you make the male and the female one and the same, so that the male not be male nor the female female; and when you fashion eyes in the place of an eye, and a hand in place of a hand, and a foot in place of a foot, and a likeness in place of a likeness; then will you enter the kingdom." This is an indirect reference to the apocalypse (of 21st century as I hypothesize) and transformation of consciousness. Obviously, young children are not polarized and as such speak the truth. Here, Jesus says that when you become neutral and stop lying you will become like god. Differences between human males and females (in mass/size and cognition) are generally decaying and according to my hypotheses, polarized male and female genomes in some bodies are fusing to form a more neutral body (and such bodies are diverging into separate species from polarized individuals). (106) Jesus said, "When you make the two one, you will become the sons of man, and when you say, ’Mountain, move away,’ it will move away." This is an another indirect reference to apocalypse. As stated before, when two [oppositely] polarized humans fuse into one, the individual will be neutral, and as such, accept truth ("sons of man" here should be interpreted as "sons of truth", or "messengers of truth"). By my theories, such fusion naturally occurs during strong (accelerated) evolution through horizontal gene transfer. Neutral people have a sense for synchronicity and at the time of the cataclysm the wishes of most neutral will be synchronized with happenings in the environment. This is how Moses effectively moves mountains. (11) Jesus said, "This heaven will pass away, and the one above it will pass away. The dead are not alive, and the living will not die. 87 In the days when you consumed what is dead, you made it what is alive. When you come to dwell in the light, what will you do? On the day when you were one you became two. But when you become two, what will you do?" Another reference to the apocalypse. Due to pills and medications, today there are a lot of old people living that would be dead otherwise - they could be seen as zombies kept alive for profit. But it’s not just old people, materialists in general could be interpreted as zombies as the increasing materialism is highly correlated with the loss of soul. On top of that, plastics are turning people into zombies[157]. With the apocalypse this practice will be gone (dead will not be alive), while, with the transformation of consciousness or fusion, living are reborn but do not die. Here, Jesus also suggests the fusion for some will be temporary (as I have hypothesized for homo.gamma hybrids[74]). Figure 15 Chimeras (hybrids) in Fig. 15 are homo.gamma individuals trying to attain knowledge, hoping to transform back to human form. The mass scale on the picture symbolizes balance or non-polarization (neutrality) which one needs to strive for to achieve greater intelligence. 88 Note that others interpret the figure above differently. However, I am convinced that the original source is not Egyptian. Egyptians copied it and then misinterpreted it - as usually is the case with western religions. Just like the translation of gospels by the church was biased, so was the translation of figures biased by Egyptians. I hypothesize that hybrids will be mostly hybrids of homo and canine species (as shown in the picture), and this will be achieved through horizontal gene transfer. Their intelligence will be higher than the intelligence of dogs but lower than the current intelligence of humans. Technology for the creation of hybrids, albeit perhaps not too sophisticated yet, already exists. I believe these hybrids will appear by the year 2040. There is certainly no lack of motivation for the creation of such hybrids. Dogs are much easier to control and manipulate and, with the crumbling civilization, it will only get harder to control ordinary human population. There are other motives, which I have described elsewhere. Why year 2040? One reason is the increasing amount of plastics in human brains, which is highly correlated with increasing mental diseases - such as dementia/depression. According to trends, by year 2040, the amount of plastics in brains will be, on average, so large, that majority of people will suffer from these diseases. I hypothesize that the transformation to hybrids will be sold, among other things, as a cure for these mental diseases. It is possible that this could also solve the fertility issues in humans, or at least it will be advertised as such. One can even find the references to plastics and dementia in the Secret Book of John[158]: I then asked him, “Lord, what of the souls of the people who do not know whose people they are? Where do they go?” He responded, “In those people the artificial spirit has grown strong and they have gone astray. Their souls are burdened, drawn to wickedness, and cast into forgetfulness.” “When they come forth from the body, such a soul is given over to the powers created by the rulers, bound in chains, and cast into prison again. Around and around it goes until it manages to become free from forgetfulness through knowledge. And so, eventually, it becomes perfect and is saved.” Of course, Jesus here talks about the forgetfulness that appears between incarnations but he’s also talking about the climax (apocalypse). The plastics in the brain is the climax of materialism (artificial spirit, grown strong) and dementia (people who do not know whose people they are) is the climax of forgetfulness. (57) Jesus said, "The kingdom of the father is like a man who had good seed. His enemy came by night and sowed weeds among the good seed. The man did not allow them to pull up the weeds; he said to them, ’I am afraid that you will go intending to pull up the 89 But who is least likely to be wrong about dates? I reckon that is the one who is genuinely not biased (belongs to neutralum species[74]) and employs scientific methods in research and analysis. If such one is wrong about a date, it probably won’t be far off. One of such people is Newton, he calculated the apocalypse cannot start before year 2060 (later revised to 2016) and after 2344. Of course, one could argue that, even though Newton has employed sound reasoning, the source material for his analysis (old scriptures forming the bible) is not trustworthy. However, by my theories and hypotheses on synchronicity and species of homo, here it is not the material that is important - rather who did the analysis. In other words, I believe Newton would come up with the same or similar dates analysing something else and these would have a good probability of being correct. People like Newton and Tesla are genuine messengers (or messenger particles/proteins relative to their host or god - Earth in this case). Such people are extremely rare, but their prophecies have good probability of becoming true. Note that my theory of complete relativity implies relative causality. This relativity should be strong in neutralums and even stronger in messengers. Thus, in these people, sometimes the result will precede logic and analysis behind it. In other words - a conclusion or statement based on signals of synchronicity or even intuition alone will generally later be proven to be correct (even if centuries later). Effectively, these people can sense future. This is in agreement with my research too, I initially came up with years 2018 and 2066 but chose 2018. However, out of these candidate years, the choice of years 2016 and 2018 here was based on interpretation of events of synchronicity at the time when the interpreters were [overwhelmed but] inexperienced in synchronicity. Synchronicity can be a part of scientific method, but it needs to be mastered to be properly and precisely interpreted. However, even mistakes future masters of synchronicity make in their early interpretations are very relative mistakes. The surface world did not end either in year 2016 or 2018 but these years are obviously not far off and I now interpret superposition of these two (2017±1) as the start of the apocalypse (point of no return), with year 2063±3 as the end. 96 The appearance of two years was the sign[al] of synchronicity itself - it signals that the apocalypse does not occur in a single year, it rather has a start and end year with a peak in between (likely year 2048±2). 2024.07.14 Interestingly, J. Bendell is his book Breaking Together provides arguments that civilization collapse has started sometime about the year 2016. Nothing can happen in an absolute instant of time (interval of absolute 0 length). The larger the energy, generally, the larger is its lifespan and the harder is to affect it globally. Planets are large bodies of energy and it would take enormous bursts of energy to immediately affect all life on the planet. Mechanisms do exist - e.g., emission of radiation by dying stars, collision with other bodies of similar magnitude of energy, etc. However, on that scale, interval between such events is billions of our years. It is unlikely that such events happen during extinctions that are less than 100 million years apart, and that includes the major extinctions of Phanerozoic. Therefore, although explosive or cataclysmic events can release a lot of energy in a short period of time, these will be localized. In example, a large asteroid striking Earth can have immediate consequences for a large area around the point of impact, but its direct influence on life on the other side of the planet might be negligible. That part of the planet might be influenced indirectly (e.g., due to triggered climate change) and eventually life there might get extinct but this will have to play out over a larger period of time. Thus, the impulse of energy causing the apocalypse in this century is likely to be spread out over a couple of decades and it is also likely to be fragmented into localized catastrophes of diverse nature. It is then more natural to define the beginning and the end of an apocalypse (and, stating uncertainty, spread even these too over some time/space), rather than defining the year of an apocalypse (at least not our year). During this period there will be sudden cataclysmic changes and megadeaths but global instant wipeout of all life should be unlikely. On the other hand, if the hypothesized length on the 1st order cycle of the Solar System (4.25 billion years [on average]) is correct there is a good possibility we are at the end of such cycle. In that case, global wipeout cannot be excluded, however, by my hypotheses, even that event should be preceded by cataclysmic events of 97 smaller scale (the end of a larger cycle is relatively synchronized with ends of cycles of smaller scale). 26 [ 2022.06.10 ] Sanctions on future by Amenoum In some cases, sanctions on a country will isolate it and negatively impact its economy - as happened with North Korea. This, however, also has some benefits and could turn out to be good in the long-term - isolated countries are also less open to global diseases and they invest more in self-sustainability and local production. If such country discards the policy of infinite growth and doesn’t stimulate inequality - it could be a much healthier and better place to live for an average Earthling than overblown economies where quality of life for average is deteriorating (however, North Korea is still far from perfection). One argument for the infinite growth of population is the assumed higher probability of emergence of geniuses. This is such a stupid argument on many levels. If humans somehow do reach a population much bigger than it is now and some Einstein emerges from it, the first and the last words he would say would be: "You fucking idiots.". The truth is, we have highly intelligent people (some on par with Einstein) right now, we just don’t like what they’re saying, so we mock and degrade their intelligence instead. If the number of Einsteins is growing with population on this world, the amount of idiots and their sheep is growing proportionally to en, where nis the number of Einsteins (and there were at least two Einsteins at the time of Einstein). So, even if more population does imply more Einsteins, they are increasingly becoming less likely to be heard, respected and appreciated. When people lived in small tribes, these tribes were concentrated around some wise man (e.g., shaman), who was respected and listened to. But as the tribe grows it tends to get corrupted, some smartass comes up and invents democracy, so the idiots can be chosen to be the shaman everyone will listen to. And multiple tribes could unite in their ideology of idiocracy. The globalized world of the West is one such big tribe, where the biggest democracies are ruled by the biggest idiots. Sanctions on some countries, on the other hand, can produce the opposite of the intended effect. 98 Sanctions on Russia are one such example. Why? Because its exports are massive and vital for economies around the world (e.g., oil and food) and sanctions will inevitably be partial or ineffective. The end result of EU sanctions on Russian oil, for example, is not that EU stops buying Russian oil. The end result is such that, instead of buying cheap Russian oil from Russia, EU is buying expensive Russian oil from India. Here, India profits by reselling Russian oil, no harm is done to Russia, but there’s real harm done to European citizens, who are now paying much more for the same thing. Sanctions on Russian energy may have reduced Russian energy exports somewhere, but they have also increased the price of that energy. So the losses are compensated with increased prices and Russian energy companies are not losing money - in fact, they might be earning even more[169]. Since the price of energy dictates the price of everything else, average Earthlings in countries imposing the sanctions are suffering the consequences. According to GlobalPetrolPrices, the price of 1 liter of gasoline in Croatia, for example, is currently 1.864 EUR (14 HRK), while 1 liter in Russia is 0.786 EUR (5.9 HRK). Croatia is, in many ways, an exceptional country - here too. Its prices are among the biggest prices in the world - the price of gasoline here is the same as it is in Germany[170], while by income per capita it should be much closer to price of gasoline in Russia. Since price of oil on international markets is the same for all countries, high prices are mostly the product of taxes, free market [where government is not effectively limiting the margins for corporations] and corrupt politics which serves foreign interests, not the interests of local people. The taxes here are high. These have been, for gasoline, even lowered recently (without the decrease, the price would be almost 16 HRK per liter), but, obviously, the prices are still very high for the average Croatian Earthling. So will the sanctions on Russia (and China) produce the North Korea effect in countries like Croatia? In a way, but the problem, regarding economy, will, in the long-term here become much worse - due to liberal, free market and high taxes, local production and self-sustainability is not stimulated - instead, average Earthling is expected to work, borrow and give more so it can pay more. This however, should, in the long-term turn out to be good for nature here 99 and, consequently, for neutral people who succeed in rejecting slavery. With increasing pressure, polarized people will move away where they can earn more money while neutral potentials should be more and more turning away from government and resorting to isolation and/or formation of communities where currency is not money, or at least where money is not prone to inflation. Loss of people and loss of support for government will lead to further increase in pressure on taxpayers, as debts and taxes will be increasing (unless government decreases its spending and borrowing, which is highly unlikely in democratic capitalism). This, in turn, will further stimulate emigration and contempt for government and the cycle continues - accelerating collapse. Note that this further corroborates my theory on general precursors[171]. Before transformation, I was expressing polarized behavior - the system of my body and soul was polarized. But some 5 years ago the polarized component collapsed and I became dominantly neutral. Now, the same is happening with my country of residence - polarized people are moving away at an increasing rate. However, it is unlikely that the whole polarized population will move away, some might die in catastrophes (e.g., floods, diseases, wars, ...) and some might transform to neutralums like I did. According to the theory, the world will follow and polarized people will ultimately get extinct. 27 [ 2022.05.20 ] China will [have to] invade Pakistan by Amenoum I have previously stated that the devil is afraid of [long-range] nuclear weapons. Devil, in this context, is the American (or pro-American) democratic capitalism. People who are, consciously or unconsciously, conspiring in the name of this devil, are those who profit the most from this kind of capitalism - big bankers and investors. But there are also people who are, consciously or unconsciously, directly or indirectly, working for these demons - from government and media down to ordinary people. But that does not mean it will leave countries possessing such weapons alone. By all means, it will try to impose sanctions on such a country in an attempt 100 to weaken its economy, provoke an internal turmoil, hoping it will destabilize itself and abandon development of long-range nuclear missiles (in case these are not yet developed). I have previously decoded a message in signals of synchronicity telling me that China will invade Pakistan. From my substantial experience with synchronicity, it is generally correlated with subconsciousness often correlated with effective future. While our consciousness is aware of present time, deeper levels of consciousness (subconscious) are more localized in the past and future. And my subconscious has been proven correct about future many times so I usually take it seriously. In this case, however, the signal was more complex and interpretation bias of consciousness (present time) cannot be excluded. Even so, I do not want to discard it, because, whether proven correct or incorrect, it has scientific value. This is why I decided to investigate the possibility of this happening. At the time, that didn’t make much sense - research showed China and Pakistan have a history of good relations and I didn’t see how the war could happen. But with recent developments in Pakistan a familiar pattern emerged - what is happening now in Pakistan is what was happening in Ukraine before the war. The war in Ukraine was preceded by the installation of a pro-American government, terrorist attacks on Russians in Ukraine and a march toward NATO membership - all in order to provoke Russian invasion so the devil can impose sanctions on Russia and eventually overthrow the Russian government. Before all this - Russia and Ukraine had good relations, just like China and Pakistan had. Attacks on Chinese people[172] in Pakistan are rising[173]. Pakistan is a well-known training ground for terrorists. These terrorists are not some spontaneously organized group of people randomly attacking random people for fun. These represent outsourced military power and they’re attacking people for money. And who do you think would sponsor terrorists to attack Russians and Chinese citizens? Using terrorists to provoke Russia and China is not only cheaper, but convenient for other reasons. The US does not want direct conflict with Russia and China because they have nuclear weapons. But they too do not want direct conflict with US so they won’t accuse US for these attacks, they will accuse installed pro-American government (which is also responsible) when they choose to invade. That government won’t stop the terror and will be discriminating Chi101 nese citizens in Pakistan as it was discriminating Russians in Ukraine. So they must invade [if there’s no other way] to overthrow that government because this can hardly be stopped otherwise. Even if they wouldn’t care about losing power, influence and defensive strength, they can’t just do nothing and ignore attacks on their people for long. The devil will attack its own people and then accuse others for these attacks if needed. At the beginning of the war in Ukraine, a video emerged of supposedly Russian tank crushing a Ukrainian citizen in a car. It was later established that the tank could not have been Russian, it was Ukrainian. So what was initially interpreted as an act of violence was then interpreted as an innocent accident. But was that an accident? What about that drone that landed in Zagreb? Does anyone seriously believe that was an accident? Or that it was Russian? And how come no one [but themselves] is regularly terrorizing Americans? The world is biased and is choosing sides instead of choosing truth. Everyone knows what US is doing, a lot of common people say they oppose it but generally anonymously and they’re still paying taxes to American or pro-American government, so they support all of it. No one is doing what they say they’re doing, no one is doing what they think they’re doing, everyone’s lying, it’s disgusting. And last month, a pro-American prime minister was installed in Pakistan[174], after a pro-Pakistani minister Imran Khan was overthrown and imprisoned. Pro-American government and biased media are important to the devil - the role of these is to provoke and mobilize anti-Chinese militarization and movements to ensure China encounters strong resistance in the country - so it can be accused of starting a war and so the sanctions can be imposed. Russia didn’t react fast enough to avoid escalation of war and sanctions, while the devil was fast enough to fuel the anti-Russian propaganda. In some way, China has been trying to take over Pakistan peacefully for years (it was investing heavily in Pakistan) - it doesn’t want war, just like Russia did not want it. Again, it would be better for the average Pakistani to let China rule them, rather than the devil, but things are currently not going in that direction. With sanctions on Russia, China and wars raging world-wide, debts will be increasing exponentially and inflation will be raging too. This will be devastating for the poor and it won’t bring anything good for 99% of the population. But bankers will get richer and more powerful over you - as long as you value their money more than you value... well, yourself. So, average citizen, don’t be so fast in accusing China for starting that war just like you were fast to accuse Russia for starting the war - by supporting the pro-American government (with money) you are responsible for that war, more than China. 102 The president of Croatia (who has flaws but is one of most intelligent presidents in the world) is trying to keep Croatia neutral in this world-wide mess and he is being portrayed, by the devil in charge, as a pro-Russian evil madman. If you’re not on the side of the devil you will be accused of being against him and you will be portrayed as an enemy, even though you might be neutral. 2022.08.15 The devil is now provoking China to attack Taiwan. Note that government installed in Taiwan is pro-American. Note also that US has, over history, spread it’s military presence all over the neighbouring islands - Indonesia, Guam, Philippines and Indo-Pacific in general. The US waged a war with Philippines when it decided to annex Philippines rather than acknowledge its declaration of independence in 1898. Only later, after the land was totally destroyed in the World War II (and 1 million Filipinos died) and there was not much use of it, the independence was formally granted, but the US and its military actually never left. If they take over Taiwan, what part of the Pacific will be left for China to influence and control? The US has strong presence in South Korea and Japan. They wanted Ukraine too. The US is obviously squeezing the sphere of influence of Russia, North Korea and China as much as possible and is trying to surround them with US and pro-US military. Seriously, is the world peace threatened by these 3 countries? Are Americans feeling threatened, being thousands of miles from Russia and China and with neighbouring countries with no Russian or Chinese military presence? The US controls about 750 bases in at least 80 countries worldwide and spends more on its military than the next 10 countries combined[175]. Russia has less than 30 bases[176] and most in former Soviet republics, obviously for defensive purposes (early warning radars). China practically doesn’t have any and North Korea has... yeah. Obviously, it is the fear of the devil that makes the world of questionable balls paint it as a saint. While even the defensive Russian presence in its neighbouring countries is a threat to US, the US (that claims to be the home of the brave) is installing its early-warning radars in fucking Poland. If Poland is a US neighbour what does that make Europe? Formally independent, like Philippines, but serving the devil? North Korea would not have nuclear weapons at all (and maybe no 103 one else) if US wouldn’t be so greedy, but somehow North Korea is a threat to the world and US, which has 100 times more nuclear weapons is a little lamb that’s radiating peace and shitting prosperity all over the world. The truth is, many would sleep better and many would eat better if this particular lamb would be slaughtered. I’m not saying one should fight it, but it would be good not to serve the devil. 2024.09.06 Pakistani army and the elite are under heavy influence of US. Government is not in control of the army (it’s usually the other way around) and army controls the foreign policy. Occasionally, a political party that wants to change that (like Imran Khan’s) comes to power but usually doesn’t last long. However, people are increasingly becoming dissatisfied with army/US dominance, so it is not surprising that candidates aligned with the banned Khan’s party collectively won a resounding victory in the 2024 parliamentary elections. I doubt that the US/army will just give the power away. More likely, there will be another coup. But, as the people are increasingly voting for pro-Pakistani (rather than pro-US) parties, one can expect that the devil will do some extra steps to ensure the installed pro-US party remains in power. In Ukraine, this was secured with war (serving, among other things, as an excuse to cancel the elections). Thus, what probably follows is an increase in provocations of China, which will probably be dragged into war with Pakistan within 3-4 years once the pro-US government is installed. Similar things are happening across South Asia[177]. There are regime changes in Sri Lanka and Bangladesh, intensification of ChinaPhilippines conflicts (amid provocative US mid-range missile deployment in Philippines). With missile deployments in Europe (e.g., Finland, Germany) as well, the US seems well committed to dragging the world into World War III in near future. 28 [ 2022.05.14 ] Building a shiny shrine of deception with fossils of muddy green by Amenoum A couple of days ago Guardian published the results of a research about plans and investments of biggest fossil fuel firms[178]. The result - all of them are investing heavily into new fossil fuel production, aiming to spend $103 million per day for the rest of the decade on these projects. On top of that, they have 104 developed project options that could lead them to spend additional $84 million per day. If all that oil is burned it would increase global average temperature to almost 3◦C above pre-industrial (1850-1900) levels - not counting the feedback emissions, which are increasing exponentially with increase in CO2. Taking these into account, the increase will be 4◦C at least. These companies were always at the top of the richest companies in the world, and with current surge in oil prices they became even more valuable - Saudi Aramco has recently overtaken Apple as the most valuable company in the world. They are earning so much money that it is unlikely the additional options will not be realized. They knew about climate change before anyone else and they were counting (betting) on it so they can drill in the Arctic - these plans have not changed (they have even grown). Despite all the climate policies and hype about renewables, it’s still business as usual for fossil fuel industry. Apart from having large influence on politics in democratic capitalism, you can be sure that these companies did a thorough research on the current and future state of the world and its technology - so if they’re betting against humanity halting global warming you can also be sure it’s a pretty safe bet. For a lot of us, this is not surprising. Polarized people instinctively seek short-term profit, it’s in their nature, and nature of beings cannot be changed easily - it requires transformation of consciousness which is likely predetermined to happen only for a small part of human population in the current generation. It is not only the price of oil that is rising - among other things, the prices of lithium, cobalt and nickel are rising and so the price of batteries and electric vehicles have to rise too. Demand for lithium will only rise and, to prevent prices rising even more, new mines will be required. This is a problem with current technology due to water requirements - ≈2000 tons of water are required to extract 1 ton of lithium. In places like Nevada (which has lithium deposits) one would have to choose between spending water on mining and spending water on farming (it is currently used for farming). For local residents at least, food (and water!) should be more important than batteries. The price of oil (if taxes on oil don’t increase) should be falling with all these new projects while the price of batteries could be increasing. But imagine what will happen if (or, more likely, when) China enters the 3rd world war. It surely won’t be fighting against Russia. At that point, you can totally forget about cheap solar panels and cheap technology in general (cheap 105 31.2 Lokalno ratovanje - karaoke uz mogućnost proljeva U našoj zemlji samoopredjeljenih paćenika, božjih gospodara i vražjih sluga, situacija je šarena, miješaju se tendencije prema komunizmu idemokraciji, no put u EU je očito put prema demokratskom kapitalizmu, samo uz sporadično zavaravanje kojekakvim subvencijama. Figure 17: Piramida robova božanstvu kiča No razlika između bogatih i siromašnih ne povećava se samo na individualnoj razini, to vrijedi i za čitave regije. Ako prevlada demokratski kapitalizam, tj. kad prestanu subvencije, Slavonija će se npr. još i više siromašiti dok u Zagrebu standard raste. Zapitajte se onda i vi Slavonci, kada vas američki NATO ili Zagreb (kojem demokratski kapitalizam očito više paše a vas kupuje obećanjima) pošalje u rat protiv drugog sistema - zar sam uistinu toliko suicidalan da želim ginuti za još veće siromaštvo? Možete biti pošteni realist, a možete biti i korisni idiot koji mozak drži na paši u bašči neokonzervativaca, pa onda ginuti za njihove ideale kad vas pošalju u rat, kao stoku sa ispaše u klaonicu. 31.3 Oproštajna zabava, s kajmakom... uz aromu ćevapa Ne volim ratove, volim istinu. Ono što se servira u medijima o ratovima je vrlo pristrano izvještavanje uz mnoštvo iskrivljenih činjenica. Rus u ratu nije značajno drugačiji od Amerikanca u ratu, postoji određena razlika u tome tko 112 više laže, no najbitnija razlika je u onom prije i poslije rata. Razlika je u količini nejednake jednakosti. No, iz pozicije neutralnog čovjeka koji ne želi služiti ni jednom ni drugom sistemu, razlike nema. Da li će se plavi lonac nazivati šupljim ili crveni praznim totalno me boli kurac. Neću da jedem iz praznog lonca. 32 [ 2022.04.22 ] Use and abuse of time loops by Amenoum Interestingly, lately I have been exposed to a number of movies, series and computer games involving time travel. Seems to be a popular theme nowadays, but one thing is in common to all the scripts - it’s never done right. That’s because causal loops, time loops and closed timelike curves cannot be done [absolutely] right in nature. However, relative such loops are possible and are common. Locally, there are time loops with periods of a day, a month and a year. Time is cyclic in nature and repeats itself, it just cannot be repeated absolutely equally to the previous cycle - because it’s not isolated. There are other cycles and for every cycle there is a bigger cycle and a smaller cycle. One can construct a metric in which a timelike curve is the path of Earth’s orbit around the Sun (Earth’s path through space is also a path through time). Note that, in General Relativity, Earth’s orbit is not following a closed timelike curve. Solutions to Einstein’s field equations can produce closed timelike curves but these are abstract - stemming either from unbounded or isolated conditions or usage of absolute constants, and, as such, cannot exist in [completely relative] physical reality. Now assume the Moon is orbiting Earth in such a way it crosses this path twice with each orbit. The Moon is then a time traveller - one time it appears in future, the other in the past of Earth’s path through time, while the Earth travels through its past constantly. But from the perspective of the Moon, vice versa is true. Note that this solution is isolated - we are considering passage of time relative to the Sun only. Sun might have a dominant influence here and we can consider this a dominant factor in the absolute solution of the Earth’s timelike curve but if we zoom in on Earth (or zoom out), we will hardly conclude that every year is the same for Earth, let alone anything 113 on, or inside, it. It should be clear now why absolute time loops cannot exist - such time loop would have to be infinitely big (it is the sum of all curves associated with all distinct sources of energy) and on such loop one can never cross the same point twice. One can have closed timelike curves on isolated manifolds but these are not absolute time loops, they are as relative as that isolation. So why are all the movies [and mathematicians who believe in absolute reality] wrong? For many reasons, but primarily because of assumed frame invariance - you can always tell who is a time traveller, the same person is a time traveller regardless of a frame of reference. In other words, these movies feature causality and time travel together, while the two simply cannot work together. In reality there is no absolute discrimination between past and future, action and reaction, and causality is just a special case of correlation arising in pockets of localized absolutism - places, or scales, of unstable energy. Mathematically, the cause of causality itself is the inflation of time between events where asymmetry in energy creates a direction of evolution enabling discrimination between action and reaction. Increasing violation of causality on our scale should then indicate pending deflation and relative inversion of causality. And violation of causality itself should be preceded by the shortening of periods between action and reaction (accelerated evolution), or, karmic interactions... 33 [ 2022.04.05 ] Date of the World War III by Amenoum An interesting synchronicity has recently been spotted between start dates of two world wars and Russian invasion of Ukraine[184], as shown in Table 3. Let’s calculate the odds for this. In every year, there are 12 dates with numbers World War I 1914.07.28 19+14+07+28=68 World War II 1939.09.01 19+39+09+01=68 Ukraine invasion 2022.02.24 20+22+02+24=68 Table 4: Correlation between war dates adding up to 68, so a chance that any war will start on such a day is 12/365.25 = 1:30.44. Not such a small chance, but what is a chance that two world wars 114 will both start on such a day? The answer is: 122 365.252= 1 : 926.44 Now the chance is a bit smaller, but what are the odds that 3 world wars would all start on such a day? The answer is: 123 365.253= 1 : 28198.56 So the odds are almost 1:30000, not impossible, but small enough to consider this as a meaningful synchronicity. However, the start of invasion of Ukraine cannot be a formal date of the start of a world war. If one would consider Russian invasion of Ukraine as the start of the World War III, one should also consider German invasion of Czechoslovakia as start of the World War II (a date which doesn’t add up to 68), rather than German invasion of Poland (when the world actually engaged into war with Germany). German occupation of Czechoslovakia in WW2 was similar to Russian occupation of Ukraine - with a smaller part of the country annexed first and other parts invaded later. Interestingly, German annexation of the Sudetenland (part of Czechoslovakia) started on October 1st, 1938 - a date which also adds up to 68. It should be clear, however, that Russia did not take Crimea by force (annexation is thus a wrong word here), as Crimeans really are Russians and naturally didn’t fight Russia. In fact, after the Maidan coup d’état, they were pretty much afraid of the Kyiv government and wanted to be back with Russia. The war in Ukraine is just the intro (world is not formally involved in that war, although arming of Ukraine by the West certainly is a direct involvement), World War III will formally start when either Russia invades another country or someone pretending to be Russia fires a missile toward a NATO country or performs a similar false flag operation - triggering a direct and formal response of the world. Assuming the correlations above are meaningful, one could then predict possible formal dates for the start of the World War III. I don’t think Russia will invade any other country soon. Russians are very patient, 8 years have passed between acquisition of Crimea and full scale invasion - compare that to Germany who invaded Czechoslovakia only 5 months after annexation of Sudetenland and then 5 months later invaded Poland. 115 Of course, Germany didn’t encounter much resistance in Czechoslovakia so the situation now is a bit different (but would it be without the West arming Ukraine? Probably not.). On the other hand, those pretending to be Russia are more likely to be impatient so there’s good probability for the formal start date of the World War III to be a date in the current year. I don’t gamble, but if I would, I would say 2022.05.21, ±1 month... and would probably be wrong. 2024.02.03 Indeed, someone did try to start the World War III in 2022 on multiple occasions (e.g., drone in Croatia, incidents in Poland). All this came from the Ukrainian side, but they could be used as a proxy here by someone else. —- 33.1 Physical interpretation A proper synchronicity should not be based on random or convenient (biased) logic. In the example above, it was convenient to split the year into two numbers but can the two numbers be correlated with physical reality? In nature, there are yearly and monthly cycles and the numbers representing day, month and year can be correlated with these cycles - representing a particular state of a local universe. There are also bigger cycles which in nature correlate with the order of magnitude. Therefore, one cannot just split the number [in a date] arbitrarily and claim there is meaningful synchronicity there. Actually one can do that, correlation with physical reality might be found eventually, but it is a gamble. However, splitting the year into a number representing century and a number representing a year in that century should be allowed (elaborated in next chapter). Due to cyclic nature, it is also allowed to discard higher components (bigger cycles) in comparison (although this decreases probability of meaningful correlation, and magnitude of effect). 116 Note that, if one does not split the year, the sum of numbers in the first two world wars is still the same (1949). So if dates of world wars are correlated, one could also consider a different, simpler logic, such as one shown in Table 4. In any case, one could argue that World War I 1914.07.28 14+07+28=49 World War II 1939.09.01 39+09+01=49 World War III 2022.04.23 ? 2022.05.22 ? ... 22+04+23=49 22+05+22=49 ... Table 5: Correlation between world war dates the sum itself is meaningless - the addition of years, months and days seems like adding apples to oranges. However, this is not the case - this is the equivalent of adding small apples to big apples, which makes more sense. Note however, that adding apples and oranges is not absolutely meaningless either - it is the addition of one food and another food. It is just more likely one will be adding big apples to small apples than adding apples to oranges. Universes are self-similar and bigger cycles resemble smaller cycles in nature. Thus, if nature does not discriminate between the scales [of energy], the sum of normalized scales makes natural sense. Mathematically, the universe is normalizing the scaling vector in operation. In example, for World War I: 14 07 28×  365.25 30.4375 1 =>14 07 28×  365.25/365.25 30.4375/30.4375 1/1  = 14 ∗1+7∗1 + 28 ∗1 = 49 Note that, in Complete Relativity, there is no discrimination between space and time. Three adjacent vertical energy levels correspond to three dimensions of time as well. Each dimension of time thus represents a particular scale. For more information, see chapter The unification in Complete Relativity. 117 33.2 A proper reference frame One could argue that a century cannot be correlated with a known periodicity in local reality and that might be true - if one does not consider harmonics. A lunar-solar cycle is equal to 33-34 years, very close to 100/3, making it the 3rd harmonic of a 100-year period. A lunar-solar cycle is also the 5th harmonic of the orbital period of the outermost planet, Neptune (≈165 years). But is century the right choice for the interpretation? The period of a lunar-solar cycle might be a better (more localized) reference frame, but where/when does the cycle start? Assuming the lunar-solar cycles are aligned with centuries, years 1900, 1933.33, 1966.66, 2000 would be the years of cycle beginnings/ends during the last century. This would produce the same sum for the 1st and the 3rd world war as in Table 4, but not for the World War II (the sum would be 06+09+01=16, as the war started in year 6 of the cycle). However, assuming the cycle starts with the year 1907, the sums for the world wars become equal again. This is shown in Table 5. In fact, choosing any Event Gregorian date Lunar-solar date Sum World War I 1914.07.28 **07.07.28 07+07+28=42 World War II 1939.09.01 **32.09.01 32+09+1=42 World War III 2022.04.23? **15.04.23 15+04+23=42 Table 6: Lunar-solar correlation between world war dates year from 1907-1914 for the start of the 1st cycle in last century would produce equal sums. Note that I have put asterisks (**) in place of a lunar-solar cycle of lunar-solar dates in Table 5. According to the hypothesis (check article Understanding synchronicity[139]), the number of equally treated periods in a date (time) is correlated with the magnitude of effect in space. Thus, here it was assumed that world wars have roughly equal effect of magnitude 3. However, it is possible that all have the effect of magnitude 4. In that case, first two world wars must have happened during the same lunar-solar cycle. For the sake of argument, let that cycle be 01. The date for the World War III now must be different, as shown in Table 118 6. Event Gregorian date Lunar-solar date Sum World War I 1914.07.28 0107.07.28 01+07+07+28=43 World War II 1939.09.01 0132.09.01 01+32+09+1=43 World War III 2022.04.20? 0415.04.20 04+15+04+20=43 Table 7: Lunar-solar correlation between world war dates The expected magnitude of the war should thus be known with the start date. If the world war has started in Ukraine after all (there is a significant difference in effect between German invasion of Czechoslovakia and Russian invasion of Ukraine, if it is the effect that matters not the formal involvement of the world - the World War III has started), its magnitude will be at least 4 according to dates with 100-year cycles (centuries), but according to lunar-solar dates, it shouldn’t be a world war at all. Since there are signals suggesting the world war is upon us, I believe indeed it is. It is only the start date that is still questionable. So what is, in the end, the proper reference frame, producing proper dates for us, to properly correlate events in local time? There is a high equality (low relativity in equality) between the phenomena of world wars and there’s logic for these to occur at the same point in scaleinvariant cyclic time. More invariance there is between reference frames, the better, so perhaps we should synchronize our centuries with lunar-solar cycles synchronized with world wars [synchronicity] (or volcanism) and declare this the year 2011, not 2022. That’s how much the world lags behind some of us anyway... 33.3 Uncertainty Nature might use leap years in our brains, but that’s not the case everywhere. Similar is the case with other cycles - somewhere integer numbers will be used, somewhere precision will not be sacrificed as much and leap quanta will be smaller. Dates can also differ between one part of the world and the other. To take all this into account, for any date here, uncertainty of ±1 day should be implied. 33.4 End notes NOTE: This chapter was added on 2024.02.03, updated on 2024.06.19. I don’t like to hypothesize about conscious human conspiracies, but certainly 119 it is possible that some kind of human organization is planning world wars or trying to stimulate them periodically, consciously choosing specific dates (specific sums of numbers could also be usable if one wants to communicate a date in secret). In that case, one would expect the dates of failed attempts of world war initiation to also conform to the same logic. The drone attack on Zagreb (2022.03.10) does not produce the expected sum, however, the missile attack on Poland[185] (2022.11.15) does, producing number 68, just like other dates in Table 3! Therefore, conscious conspiracy or not, this should be taken seriously. I, however, do not think it is conscious. If this is conscious, then one would expect for the date of the drone attack on Zagreb to also follow the logic (unless it really was an accident, which I doubt). This is probably a subconscious influence on human minds by something bigger. I hypothesized elsewhere what it is. One could call it collective human subconscious, but this is not simply the sum or superposition of individual human subconsciousness. It probably has bigger influence on individuals than the other way around (I wouldn’t say it emerged from individual minds, rather it is guiding these minds and weakly evolving with them). This subconscious can effectively sense future. Thus, probably only dates of events with higher probability of starting the world war conform to the logic. The attack on Zagreb had low probability - no casualties, only minor damage to infrastructure. The Nord stream pipeline sabotage (2022.09.26) had no casualties either (in this case, however, the intention was perhaps not to start the World War III, rather to boost US economy at the expense of Russian and EU economy). However, in the attack on Poland, people were killed. Potential for the World War III here was certainly higher. So when will the World War III start and how it will look like? I recently had a dream, which I interpret as a relative vision of this event[84]. It may be something locally extrapolated by my subconscious but I do seem to have developed some kind of a 6th sense, which is still growing but has matured enough to sense future with high probability of successful interpretation. If the collective subconscious can predict future with great probability of success and it has effect on individuals, the effect is probably not the same and not as big for all individuals. Superposition of dreams (or visions) in an individual would be a good signal of information sharing between the collective mind and an individual mind. And that’s exactly what I’m experiencing. It should be noted that all visions must be relative (no vision is the absolute vision of future or past, only more or less accurate interpretation, even if the event may have a high probability of occurrence). In any case, my vision involves an airfield (possibly in Slovakia). As for the date, I do not know it, but apparently there’s high probability that the sum of numbers will be 68. If the incident is supposed to provoke NATO-Russia war then it has to occur before NATO dies. Note that Trump has announced the US withdrawal from NATO, which might indeed happen if he becomes the president again (and probability for that happening is high, in my opinion). The US withdrawal would not be the end of NATO (although it could certainly be interpreted as a big signal of pending collapse) but this could imply some constraints on the World War III date. If the aim is to provoke NATO-Russia conflict and provocations originate from a US party 120 then this conflict probably should start after the US withdrawal (see The 3rd Act blog entry for explanation on why the 3rd World War is likely to start at that time). In any case, provocations will likely continue and the one with bigger casualties and damage will probably do the trick. 34 [ 2022.03.25 ] Synchronicity in icy karma by Amenoum Something odd happened today. I was doing some construction work in the city with my parents. At some point, a guy (who seems to live nearby) comes, says hello, and gives us icecreams. This seemed odd, but I didn’t think about it much - neighbors can be friendly, even if we’ve never experienced them sharing ice-creams before. However, later, the very same day, things got interesting. On the way home we stopped at the store for mom to buy some groceries. We didn’t notice anything unusual at the time, but an hour later she notices she was charged for a couple of ice-creams, even though she didn’t buy any! What is the meaning of this? To me this shows a couple of things - correlation of synchronicity and karma, relativity in cause and effect. I have predicted global increase of synchronicity during strong evolution but also the shortening of periods between karmic events (due to synchronization of large scale and small scale energies - space and time). One could also interpret this as another message from god [Earth]: nothing is free. This has elevated importance at this time - with all those weapons being sold as gifts. We got ice-creams from one man (who paid for them), we paid ice-creams (unconsciously even) to someone else - the very same day. This simple example contains evidence for 3 important things: •evidence that karma is indeed the generalized law of action and reaction, •evidence that intervals between karmic actions and reactions are decreasing, •evidence that causality is commonly violated on large scale too. However, the story didn’t end there. My mother went to the store afterwards, asked for a refund (something I wouldn’t do, but she’s not aware that karma 121 not attack first, when it’s much more convenient to provoke the conflict and then come out as a saviour in the end (by helping to overthrow a "madman", for example). Sure, some people may benefit from the installed pro-US puppets (those inclined to the Western unconstrained capitalism, especially corrupt elites), but at least half of people won’t, and in the long-term, once the land is plundered and becomes owned entirely by greedy Western corporations, most people will live in poverty. Therefore, once the war expands beyond Ukraine, and brainwashed Westerners start saying "we told you so" (implying, as always, greedy Russia is after all of us), just think again whether you want to participate in this US produced shit-show. Another common argument of Westerners is as follows - if Russia didn’t attack Ukraine to expand rather to secure the eastern pro-Russian region, why did they bomb Kiev? Well, why did NATO bomb Belgrade (capital of Serbia) when the war was in the other part of Serbia (Kosovo)? The reason can be retaliation, or to overthrow the government (note that, just as NATO did not bomb Serbia at random, neither did Russia bomb Ukraine at random - in both cases, the capital was bombed, where the government resides). There is a difference though - the US is using NATO to overthrow governments so they can ensure US domination and growth, while the Russia wants to overthrow the corrupt pro-US government in order to eliminate the obvious threat to the survival of Russians and Russian way of life. Russia probably would agree on the division of Ukraine, but they know that is not a long-term solution. As long as the pro-US government rules in the western part, there will be provocations. The US needs the war so they did everything they could to provoke it. First, the US parties have invested billions of dollars into Ukraine (mostly through, so called, NGOs) prior to the Maidan coup in 2014 when the pro-Ukrainian government (Yanukovych) was overthrown (some claim this government was pro-Russian, and it may have been inclined toward Russia, but were Russian interests prioritized over Ukrainian interests? It certainly was more pro-Ukrainian than what came after it). It’s blatantly obvious who sponsored the coup. This could be counted as a provocation itself, but major provocations started after the corrupt pro-US government was installed - continuing sponsored terrorism in parts of Ukraine populated by Russians (eastern Ukraine), forbidden use of Russian language, appliance for NATO membership. Provocations didn’t stop there. After Russia took back Crimea, the US-sponsored Ukrainian government blocked the North Crimean Canal, which was, up to that point, providing 128 about 85% of water for Crimeans. Did anyone seriously think Russians will give Crimea back after this? No, the purpose of this was to deprive innocent Russian (or pro-Russian) population of a vital resource and thus provoke another conflict. It’s really remarkable how the Russians managed not to respond to this provocation for 8 years (all that time Crimeans were forced to import water from Russia). Does anyone seriously think that one would want to be governed by a government blocking you water access? Whether you believe Crimeans are pro-US or not, this act is pure Nazism. After the war started, provocations did not end, but this time the aim was to involve NATO. And now European governments are increasingly preparing people for the war with Russia. NATO still doesn’t respond to provocations, but that’s probably because the US is still in NATO. Why do you think NATO is expanding? You think, for example, that the recently joined Sweden is suddenly afraid of Russia? No, the reason they joined NATO is because the US wants NATO to be as big as possible once they [effectively, if not formally as well,] withdraw from it (i.e., once the World War III starts). A big NATO is a big headache for Russia. And a big NATO without US in it, is a win-win for US. Once NATO collapses and Russia is significantly weakened, the "good" old US will come to "save" us all. With Europeans (and possibly Russians) left with sticks and bones, this could pretty much look like colonization of America, if not worse. This will probably change once Trump becomes a US president again. And once US withdraws, you can be sure that NATO will start responding, and then all hell will break loose. The US is counting on it. It has already profited a lot for blowing European gas pipelines, now it’s time to profit from dying Europeans, after they profit from selling them weapons of course. I just hope the Russians know that Slavonia (eastern part of Croatia) is not dominantly pro-US (at least that’s what I want to believe), so the nuclear missiles will be aimed further to the west. In fact, that drone (provocation) that crashed in pro-US Zagreb probably can be interpreted as a precursor of a nuclear missile, landing in Zagreb, US - even though the provocation came from Ukraine. While European leaders and media are preparing everyone for the World War III, in Russia they are discussing how to prevent such war[196]. 129 The madness in the West is staggering and growing by the minute, so I do not think Russia will be able to prevent this war. I guess one can still hope that people in Europe won’t be stupid enough to support this, but, as said already, people are brainwashed into thinking that Russia is their enemy and, on average, they seem fine with it. Russia is not your enemy, neither is China. The US is your enemy. Your corrupt leaders, who serve the US, are your enemy. You, serving these idiots, are your enemy. Bloody suicidal and evil fucking nation. I’m sick of it. Such a sad, sad fucking world I’m living in... On the other hand, I believe everyone in the end will get what they deserve. And the less idiots and their servants the better for the planet. Maybe I should be happy about this? 36.2 Updates 36.2.1 2024.08.10 Provocations continue. The US is turning Finland and Philippines into new proxy battlegrounds. US installed mid-range missiles in these countries simply cannot be interpreted as defensive weapons. I strongly suggest watching the take on the situation by Neutrality Studies[197]. When is the war gonna start in these countries? Well, most likely within the term of current governments in these countries, probably within 3 years. The democracy has already degraded in these countries, but once the war starts, elections will be cancelled (just like they have been cancelled in Ukraine) - not due to war (as is usually presented as excuse), but to ensure the war goes on. 36.2.2 2024.09.30 I recently came across a video where an Ukrainian (allegedly at least) volunteer in the war is arguing that Russian invasion is motivated by nothing more but imperialistic desires for expansion, because that was mostly the case in history. This is of course, a very biased perspective but not so hard to understand given the fact that Ukraine was a "popular" battleground in the past and Russians were often involved (many different parties were involved over history - Germany, Poland, Cossacks, Tatars, ...). And they do not have a fond memory of Soviet Union. However, there are many issues with this perspective and it was obviously influenced by US propaganda. For example, Mongolians and Georgians are not the same as Russians. To say that Mongolian occupation of Ukraine in the 13th century is the same as Russian occupation because they share distant roots is just wrong. Mongolians invaded Kievan Rus’ territory (which encompassed present day Ukraine) and the Kievan Rus’ is the cultural ancestor of Ukraine, Russia and Belarus. So this is the same as saying that Ukraine invaded Ukraine. Russians and Ukrainians are more closely related to 130 each other than they are to Mongolians. In the Russo-Polish war in the 17th century, all kinds of armies were involved. While there are records of Ukrainian Cossacks repelling Russian invasion, there are also records of Ukrainian-Russian contingents fighting Polish army allied with Tatars. And Cossacks have both Ukrainian and Russian roots. The Ukrainian-Soviet war in the 20th century was probably similar to the war today - Ukraine was a proxy for the battle between one system and the other. During that war, Ukraine was occupied by different parties, e.g., by Germany (in 1918 Ukraine had a German-installed government), and Poland (occupied West Ukraine). In the World War II, Nazi Germany, Hungary and Romania at times occupied Ukraine, only to be later retook by Soviet Union. So it doesn’t really make sense to judge present day Russia by the sins of the Russian Empire or the Soviet Union. Does anyone consider contemporary Germany as Nazi Germany? And interpretation of sins here is relative. In the history, Russian battles had expansionist motives, but at times were defensive (where Ukrainians and Russians fought against the same enemy). Ukrainians may have learned to hate Stalin for the famine of 1932-1933 but it was part of a wider Soviet famine that lasted from 1930-1933 and has affected all grain-producing areas in Soviet Union, not just Ukraine. The famine may have been the result of bad politics, but there is no evidence that Stalin explicitly ordered starvation. And even if he did, Stalin was not Russian, he was Georgian. In any case, modern Russia ain’t Soviet Union or whatever was there before the SSSR, and Putin ain’t Stalin (is Zelenskyy Hitler?). Russia was trying to solve all issues with US and pro-US governments for years and it showed great patience about it, but it was met by constant provocation. From what I’ve seen, it is not seeking dominance in the world, it is seeking cooperation, just like China. BRICS is a perfect evidence of that. US, on the other hand, is obsessed with dominance. Perhaps western Ukraine wants to be dominated by US, but I strongly doubt that eastern Ukraine wants that. Division of the country (which is pretty big, btw) is the obvious solution that could ensure peace and is probably something that sane Ukrainian population would be satisfied with, but one party here is greedy, and that’s the one labelling the other party as such. 37 [ 2022.02.18 ] Message from god: Recalibration by Amenoum Synchronicity is an ordinary phenomenon for me, and may be for many others. But not all synchronicity is personal. I have found elsewhere that numbers commonly involved in synchronicity events correspond to transformational ages in humans, and that the frequency/intensity of synchronicity seems to be highest during soul-body transformation[57]. Soul-body transformation events shouldn’t be limited to humans, however, the ages should differ (unless, at least in some cases, different rates of passage of time for different animals are taken 131 into account). Nonetheless, the synchronicity events we experience seem to be tailored for us. The synchronicity, thus, seems to be a way of communication, probably between some global subconscious associated with the species and individuals of the species. Unlike consciousness, subconscious is, per my hypotheses, more correlated with past and future, rather than with the present. I also suspect there are different [sub]species of the global subconscious, polarized and neutral, and the neutral one, being more objective, should be more likely to convey a message that accurately speaks about the future. To interpret the message correctly, however, a neutral perspective is required as well. It is possible that neutral messages are, by default, experienced by neutral individuals, so this might not be a problem. Even so, there is no guarantee that the interpretation will actually be correct. However, if one is to learn the language, one must try deciphering messages. Then, with enough trial and error, progress could be made. Here’s one such try.. On 2022.02.06, a Moroccan boy, 5 years old, trapped in a well for 4 days, dies[198]. On 2022.02.18, A boy in Afghanistan, 5 years old, trapped in a well for 3 days, dies[199] (some sources claim he was 6 years old and trapped in a well for 4 days[200] though). The same day, 13 people (all women and children) in India die, after falling into a well[201]. All these locations are roughly on the same geographic latitude, as shown in Fig. 18. Figure 18: Well locations (Afghanistan location source: Original News202) Here, one could interpret the 3rd signal as the stop signal in the message and discard it due to weaker entanglement, however, it also might have a greater 132 purpose. Obviously, the first two signals reveal strong synchronicity - a generally rare event "5 year old boy trapped in a well for 4 days dies" has happened twice on Earth with less than two weeks distance apart in time. Not only that, but the two locations are separated by the same distance in space from the Great Pyramid in Giza (as shown by blue lines in Fig. 18). Interestingly, the Great Pyramid is at the same longitude as Ukraine (a vertical line passing through the location of the Great Pyramid would also pass right through the middle of Ukraine). What is the meaning of this? What I see in this message is that the location of the Great Pyramid should be the location of a 0◦(prime) meridian, not Greenwich. The choice of a 0◦meridian on a planet should not be arbitrary (most animals are bilaterally symmetrical, although, in its adult form, Earth might become radially symmetrical - like sea stars, for example). Usage of the longitude of the Great Pyramid (31◦E) as the Prime meridian has been proposed before, as it was claimed that this location was the geographical center of Earth[203]. Newest calculations put the center a bit north, in Turkey, but only 3◦more east in longitude, at 34◦E. Note how close are fights that have occurred (or are occurring) in Syria/Iraq and Ukraine to that longitude. This center is changing over time, naturally, but it is quite possible that the location in Giza is the correct location on average. The fact that countries at or around this longitude are neutral and/or divided countries between east and west cultures (Ukraine being the best example, but there’s also Syria/Iraq on the right and former Yugoslavia on the left, etc.) is another strong argument in favor of the hypothesis. This is the longitude around which it would be expectable for strongly polarized east and west countries to wage their wars - while neutral people, like women and children, lose their lives. But there could be additional messages here - it’s interesting that, despite all falling in a well, none of these people died of drowning... One additional message is the announcement of splitting of Ukraine into two countries. 133 UPDATE 2023.03.31 At least 35 people died after falling into a well yesterday in Madhya Pradesh, India[204]. Not sure if this is related to the original message but I thought I might write it down, just in case it proves relevant later. Are people now falling into wells [in India] annually? 38 [ 2022.02.11 ] First human on Mars won’t be so human by Amenoum In 1783 the Mongolfier brothers sent a sheep, a duck and a rooster aloft in a hot air balloon to see if ground-dwelling animals can survive the trip high above ground (the duck serving as the experimental control). In 1957 a dog called Laika became the first living being in orbital spaceflight. In 1968 tortoises were orbiting Moon, as first inhabitants of Earth to do so. These are examples, but animals preceded brave human explorers in exploration many times in history. Mars’ surface is harsh for humans and exposure to radiation during the trip could leave serious consequences. Add to all that the modern obsession with preservation of human life and you know that first animal on Mars is unlikely to be a modern human. But it won’t be just any animal. Most likely, this will be a hybrid, most likely a hybrid of a dog and man. I call it homo.gamma.anubis. Sounds familiar? Yes, I am convinced that Egyptians didn’t build the two largest pyramids and I now believe what they found in the sarcophagus in the Great Pyramid in Giza was a fossil of homo.gamma. It explains everything[58]. Still, these hybrids are unlikely to be resistant to radiation, so they will probably be wearing something like a coat of fungi[205] on their trip to Mars. When will this happen? E. Musk said SpaceX could send humans to Mars as early as 2024, assuming they send some cargo in 2022 (hm.. that’s this year... he’s crazier than I am). I’d say 2029 is more realistic, it will take some time for hybrids to get public approval, if nothing else... Hm, after I’ve posted this, Elon Musk has revised his estimate[206] - to 2029. I knew someone other than me is reading my blog... Nah, it’s just reality aligning with my predictions[207]. 134 So keep watching movies, soon homo.gamma will be added to the bag of the holy political correctness, now it’s still under-represented[208] or over-represented[209]. Oh yeah, don’t worry, the second trip to Mars will be politically correct, it will include some of the brave humans too... or all of them assembled into one rambo, called Rainbow. 39 [ 2022.02.09 ] New kind of people, kind of, very cheap, made in China by Amenoum A lot of people believe that technology and human intellect can and will save humanity from whatever future holds for us. Others don’t think so, but believe drastic changes are far away. Those who believe [and especially act] differently are very rare. I have made a lot of predictions while devising my theories. One of these is periodically accelerated evolution, but even I am sometimes surprised at the speed these predictions are becoming true. One of these are artificial human wombs[74]. This has now become a reality[210]. Sure, the technology is not yet used on human embryos but that’s only because the law doesn’t allow it. The technology itself is mature for such use and it’s only a matter of time before this will be officially allowed. Many people don’t realize how significant this is. It’s one of the turning points in history that will, being a logical transition due to extreme conditions, probably go unnoticed - but the implications are enormous. If anything can be called a Pandora’s box - this is it, a giant one. It opens up a path to complete manipulation and total control of population by industrial governments. Maybe you don’t care what happens with these babies, but then you probably don’t care about your self, for a couple of reasons: •you could become obsolete during your lifetime, •when you die, you could reincarnate as one of these babies. These babies will, inevitably, be different, not only due to epigenetic differences during development but even more due to genetic manipulation which will soon become mandatory. These embryos will effectively be resources just as plants are resources in food industry. So you can expect hybrids too - dogs, for example, are most likely candidates for this, they can be more easily controlled, they don’t ask much, etc. In fact, I have predicted these hybrids before (homo.gamma species). Considering how things are progressing, I’d say such hybrids are only a couple of years away (even if they might be hidden from public at first for obvious reasons). 135 You think ethics will prevent this? Right. When pregnancies become illegal, traditional human is becoming extinct and all his ethics with it. But somehow I don’t think anyone’s gonna wait until you die. Either your dying will be accelerated some way (I’ve predicted this too before, with no conscious conspiracies) or this will be sold as a necessity, a cure, or something similar. I’d say both is true. This future will be advertised as heaven (it makes it physically easier for mothers, increases equality between men and women directly and indirectly...). Will you buy it? Yes, you probably will. What do you have, or believe, that you didn’t buy? Just like school is used to prepare children for slavery - which somewhere goes to extremes and somewhere more emphasis is put on actual education, the detachment of babies from mothers at such early stage of development won’t have equal consequences everywhere, but a question comes to mind - who will the future child eventually consider as its parent? The biological ones or the system? Things are going to become very fucked up... A connection between a mother and a child in uterus is much deeper than generally thought[211] but this will be ignored, favored connections today are remote. Artificial wombs, just as vaccine subscriptions, are a logical step in the continuous alienation of people from [wild] nature (and physical connection). 40 [ 2022.02.07 ] A wish of deranged, command for the damned by Amenoum When you strongly believe (know) something is bound to happen and you strongly desire for it to happen, it is hard to resist making predictions about it - when exactly it will happen? But this desire will inevitably make you biased and will influence your prediction. Your intelligence can be clouded by different things - depression, desires, stress, or any other polarized disease. Due to this cloudy weather in your brain you won’t be conscious about the bias in your prediction. This is why it is always good not to claim anything 136 with absolute certainty and why it would be good to reanalyze and correct your statements every now and then (although, generally, the best practice would be not to haste with statements in the first place). While I often claim I am neutral, I too get biased at times and predict premature dates for certain events (which sometimes could be interpreted as "putting words into god’s mouth"). However, I will generally correct my mistake soon (if I do not, then the prediction is not considered a mistake - it is based on hypotheses with a high degree of confidence). Now look what has the White House national security adviser said recently: "We are in the window. Any day now, Russia could take military action against Ukraine, or it could be a couple of weeks from now."[212]. This is just one of similar statements coming from US. They’ve gone as far as producing this: "U.S. intelligence agencies believe Russia has formed a plan to fabricate a pretext for an invasion of Ukraine, potentially by producing propaganda videos showing a staged attack."[213]. This is a typical example of someone with a strong desire for a particular event to happen. There is no evidence provided nor does anything suggest there is any evidence. There is only a weak hypothesis based on presence of Russian military (mostly in their own country!). I, for example, believe that US has fabricated a lot of pretexts in the past pretty much all over the world. Many people believe the same, but no one goes to war against US even with a solid evidence, let alone belief. Yes, maybe there is some increased activity and buildup of troops on the Russian part but what about constant increases in US presence and activity all over the world? In South Korea, for example, they’re regularly doing exercises and they’ve even managed to make South Korea pay for their continuous presence and provocation of North Korea![214] But why should I care for what happens in Ukraine? I shouldn’t. But the US is, by its inflation of fear and preparation for war, pressuring Ukraine to join the NATO. It’s perfectly understandable that Russians don’t want this to happen - neither do I, nor does anyone sane who does not want a World War III. The US wants it obviously (or desperately?), so they’ve started sending gifts, not only to NATO members but to Ukraine too (for whom they decided will join the NATO). A couple of days ago, my country has been given a couple of helicopters. Oh how happy we are. Indeed. A never-ending, bloody blue Christmas. I’m surprised we didn’t get any bombs to decorate our trees. But I guess Ukrainians are the special ones, today. Luckily, we’re a small country and only have a couple of pilots who can fly these monstrous machines, so they didn’t send us more. But maybe they’ll teach some of us for free so we can get more and be even more happy. These are only the most recent gifts, there have been other gifts over the years, all military equipment - by some strange coincidence (obviously, they were counting on a war in this part of the world for quite some time). Yeah, who cares about food, weapons are what poor countries need the most... I guess the only reason Africa gets food is because they’re too skinny to carry weapons. 137 In that very interesting experiment with mice done quite some time ago[225], the mouse population went extinct soon after they were given everything they need (or so it is commonly thought). The mice lived in a plague-free (sterile) environment, with a plenitude of comforts, a lack of predation and an unlimited supply of consumables - all the luxuries equivalent to modern human life. Comparisons with human population are also interesting[226], but they all conclude that humans are different and can avoid disaster (extinction). Yes, that’s true, but only if human sanity is preserved. In the experiment, mice were isolated from nature, they were given everything their body needs in nature but, with that, they have stopped doing what nature needs them to do - they’ve lost their greater purpose. Nature does not need all of mice doing what’s needed but if significant percent of population doesn’t participate and give back, just take (like mice in the experiment), their nature will mess up their psyche. Perhaps you believe that nature does not need you so you won’t go crazy, start killing your children, attacking your mates in bursts of aggression and practice cannibalism, like the mice did. But that is exactly what you will do - unless you belong to that small percentage that always remains. A bunch with non-controllable (neutral) psyche. And it is not wild nature that will affect the psyche of polarized people - it is the collective psyche of people that affects the psyche of individuals just like the psyche of individuals affects the psyche of the population. You might say you don’t care what other people do or say but that’s irrelevant - you will descend into madness, this is simply how things work in nature, it’s a mechanism embedded in life operation. In any population, it is not only the individuals that are evolving minds, the population is evolving a mind of its own - just look at all the conspiracy theories. A lot of bad things are going on that some often try but fail to pin to conscious action of individuals or groups of individuals. This is obviously generally not conscious on individual human level. Souls and bodies co-evolve (one does not emerge from the other) so you cannot expect that it is only the individuals of the body that affect the mind of population - influence goes in both directions. After all, it is well known that mind can influence individual cells of the body, even consciously (e.g., raising temperature of the body through g-Tummo meditation), you just have to admit that population of humans can be mapped to discrete mind just like the population of neurons in your head can. In nature, everything has multiple roles (interpretations) - everything is relative. The root reason why populations self-destruct is the violation of conservation of relativity through reduction of possible interpretations, loss of diversity and isolation from nature. 144 Therefore, if you are polarized and want to avoid self-destructive strong and sick polarization you should separate from general population and settle in neutral environment where you will have a purpose for everything else rather than exist solely for the sake of humanity. The sooner the better, as the collapse of civilization has already started. If you don’t notice it, that’s only because your psyche has already been altered in order to ignore it. But you have probably noticed the surge of irrationality with the pandemics. That was just the intro. Think I don’t know what I’m saying? You’re already insane. I have already been near self-destruction but I have survived insanity. I was spared of death because I still have greater purposes. One of them was to tell the tale. To be fit for evolution is not to be fit for reproduction and adapted to environment - it is to have a greater purpose. Without it you will not only lose the ability to reproduce but you will lose your self. When hierarchy starts collapsing, the last to survive are those fit for anarchy. Others have no choice but to annihilate, obeying, now, the laws of master Chaos. But this god is not a curse, and it is not summoned by anarchists, it is summoned by the annihilators themselves, with annihilation of god’s good (wild) nature. UPDATE 2023.05.06 Taking everything into account, I now believe that this craziness will be a more or less localized phenomenon (correlated with UBI, increase in totalitarianism and lack of food/habitat diversity or diversity in general). That does not mean the extinction won’t be global, but generally, it may be different than described above[227]. 47 [ 2021.12.12 ] Finding sense in quanta of nonsense by Amenoum In mathematics, in my interpretation, the number i is a quantum of nonsense - it is a superposition of numbers -1 and +1 (sometimes represented by √−1). When multiplied by a number it becomes positive or negative nonsense. Only when multiplied by another i, one of them collapses to -1, the other to +1, and 145 the product makes sense, becoming a number -1. In other words, multiplication operator applied to imaginary numbers is also the operator of collapse of entangled superpositions. Still, creators of abstract nonsense are surprised when they find nonsense in the physical world[228]. Really? Why wouldn’t superposition (nonsense) exist in physical world? Proofs are everywhere. You’re one evidence. Nonsense in nature is not questionable. Insisting that all nonsense is absolute or abstract nonsense is nonsense. Such nonsense only makes sense to nonsense ruling the world.- 47.1 Avoiding nonsense Note that nonsense in mathematics (such as negative and imaginary numbers) can yield a perfectly valid real solution (e.g., when it shows up in an intermediate step toward the solution). But that nonsense is not absolute. One way to make sense of it is to assume that both negative and imaginary numbers exist in reality as different dimensions, even if these dimensions are non-intuitive to us. In other words, as it is common among mathematical physicists (reductionists), one can accept the notion that nature is, on some levels, non-intuitive. However, there are other interpretations, such as missing variables. Note that definitions of mathematical operations are human inventions and one doesn’t have to take them as absolute. Nonsense can then be avoided through redefinition of operators. For example, let’s redefine x2, or generalize it, to a function of 2 variables: f(x, y)=(x, y)2=x×y y∈ {x, −x} Now, for y = -x the function gives negative numbers. And for y = x it reduces to the established definition of the squaring operator. The square root is now: q(x, y)2= (x|y) where (x|y) can be understood as superposition of x and y, where (x|x) = x. Next, one can define the square of superposition: (x|y)2= (x, y)2=x×y Note that it is the non-intuitive interpretation of certain operators that makes reality non-intuitive. Take the squaring function. One probably assumes it should give a positive number because in reality the two-dimensional areas always give a positive number when measured. However, a negative sign could represent a specific orientation of the area relative to some coordinate system, not a negative area. Suppose you have a piece of land, 3 km ×3 km in area and 146 your neighbour has an equal 3 km ×3 km piece of land left of you. Now, let’s say you’re measuring areas starting from the south-west corner of your land. You measure your land as 3 ×3 = 9 km2, but you measure your neighbour’s land as -3 ×3 = -9 km2. By the intuitive definition of the squaring function you now understand that your neighbour has an equal piece of land but positioned left of you (as indicated by the negative sign). In other words, by redefining the squaring function you have uncovered a hidden variable that makes negative numbers intuitive in reality. To make his life easier, a reductionist will [ab]use the Occam’s razor and choose the simple definition of the squaring function and then claim that negative numbers are somehow real but non-intuitive. In other words, don’t think about it, just shut up and calculate.. Why? Well, if you refuse to be reduced to a fucking calculator and instead do think about it, you might discover what a load of bullshit this blind reductionism is. The common reaction (complaint) of people who glimpsed at my works has been: "Why do you have to redefine everything?". Well, because I want to understand everything! When foundations are bad one can only produce more nonsense on top of the existing nonsense. I’m not interested in that. The same simple squaring function is one source of the non-intuitive interpretation of particles in quantum mechanics (QM). The wavefunctions assigned to particles can have negative values but to obtain values corresponding to physical states the value of the wavefunction is squared. If one rotates the electron by 360◦in physical space the wavefunction corresponding to its spin momentum becomes negative (because the rotation in associated [abstract] state space is twice slower, rotation of 360◦in physical space corresponds to 180◦in state space), but physically the electron is assumed to be unchanged because the square of the negative value is the same as the square of the initial value (equal to the rotation of land in the example above - the land remains physically the same when rotated). In reality, however, the negative value of the wavefunction likely corresponds to different orientation - just like in the example above, but since we cannot measure this orientation reductionists assume that the negative value has no meaning (in other words, they assume that hidden variables do not exist), thus, they use the simple squaring function. It is as simple as that. A hidden variable, however, does not have to represent different orientation, it generally represents something unresolvable (we are not almighty gods to be able to resolve everything!), which, for example, can be an additional component - e.g., a constitutional particle of the particle assumed to be elementary. Generally, blind reductionism and blind absolutism are the sources of all nonsense (non-intuitive interpretations) in QM. 147 48 [ 2021.11.30 ] Cold-hearted invasion of fate by Amenoum To me, the most beautiful places on Earth are those isolated from people. Given the fact that humans are generally extremely invasive species, it seems remarkable that a whole continent on this planet could survive generally uninhabited and unexploited for resources or tourism. Yet, such continent still exists. We named it Antarctica, literally meaning "opposite to the Arctic". And this originally unimaginative title is still a testament to our ignorance. One might say the reason for that are harsh conditions, but the other will ask whether these harsh conditions are there for a reason? Well, if you have ever studied nature, you must have noticed that everything has many purposes and reasons for existence. Sometimes it is not obvious at first, but you can be sure there’s something hiding below the uninviting and seemingly dead phenomena. Often, not too deep either. Take, for example, a simple piece of rock. You might think its presence has no deep meaning, but if you lift it up, you’ll often see a whole community thriving underneath. The purpose of the rock for that community is obvious - it shields it from invasion of all kinds of phenomena. And modern scientists are finally realizing that life doesn’t need much at all to thrive - rocks and water will do[229], and that it might be everywhere. It shouldn’t thus be hard to believe that one purpose of harsh conditions on Antarctica is to keep invasive species at bay, and, comparing the scale of an ordinary rock with the whole continent, one can’t help but wonder what is the scale of life hiding below Antarctica? What is so precious that nature spends 70% of the surface fresh water building the barrier of ice kilometres high? UPDATE 2022.12.07 I initially wrote 90% instead of 70% here. Was that a meaningless mistake or a subconscious signal that we will lose significant amount of freshwater in near future? Considering the trends, experience and my hypotheses, I’m more inclined to believe in the latter. The theory of planetary neurogenesis offers the logical explanation - one purpose of the whole crust of the planet is to shield the complex life below from invasion (all of that energy would simply be an overkill just to shield microbes, which can be extremely resilient). In fact, the existence of layers and crust in any body should be the signal that something more complex is hidden below. 148 Water is what connects complex life, and in complex bodies (such as Earth), water should be connecting spatially separated life literally. This is evident even on the surface of a planet - there’s life on either side of any ocean or any river, and there’s life in these oceans and rivers too. As long as the water is flowing - the lives of these lifeforms are connected to each other through the liquid. But sometimes the water will freeze, in some cases forming a barrier which will isolate one from the other for a particular reason, instead of forming a bridge that could strengthen the correlation. And, among many things, Antarctica is just that - a barrier between the surface and the world below. A barrier that, according to my hypotheses, melts when surface life matures for transmigration. As a general precursor, I have heard the call of ice long time ago, but now Antarctica is starting to attract the population. And the population is responding[230]. As proper cancer, one may interpret this differently - the Antarctica is, just like its opposite, opening for habitation and exploitation. Considering the logical historical concentration of humans along sources of freshwater and increasing toxicity and unavailability of drinkable freshwater elsewhere, it should not be surprising that humans will be increasing their presence in Antarctica. Well, the sacredness of absolutism in cancer might not allow it to consider multiple interpretations, but something bigger is well aware that even this cancer has multiple interpretations. During weak evolution, cancer as a whole is a superposition of a disease and precursor neuron cells and proteins, but in strong evolution, multiple interpretations [with positive feedbacks] collapse to one, even if for a moment, before diversifying again. Exploitation of Antarctica will only speed up the process (in one interpretation, in other - this is all synchronized and one affects the other equally). You might think you’re conquering yet another continent, but that’s exactly what you’re coded to think. At this point, I do not feel good with people invading Antarctica, but I find solace in relativity. In this case, perhaps the most in relativity of deception. Weak or strong, the man was never destined to conquer Antarctica, it is my dear Antarctica that is destined to conquer the man... 49 [ 2021.11.27 ] The pitfall of randomness by Amenoum As I have stated previously[231], mainstream science has a lot of problems and these problems will only increase until it embraces new paradigms. 149 In fact, these are not good times for any religionists to be overconfident - be it communicators of mainstream science or anyone else disrespecting or faking relativity. The same is true for consumers of such absolutism. While they might be more careful in academic environment, unfortunately, communicators of science often communicate their beliefs to public instead of communicating objective thought. I, however, do not think they fall in such trap by accident - the general public is more open to beliefs than knowledge. Many of these beliefs will turn out to be wrong for one reason - the abuse of null hypothesis, ignorance of possibility for the existence of hidden variables (hidden correlation). This is why synchronicity is still not on the agenda and this is why periodicity of mass extinctions is still not taken seriously[232]. However, periodicities of 26 to 30 My (million years) have been found in diverse geological phenomena, not only in mass extinctions - flood basalt volcanism, ocean anoxic events, deposition of massive evaporites, sequence boundaries, and orogenic events[233]. If one accepts the new paradigm - a living Earth, it becomes obvious that this is not a coincidence, all these events are supposed to occur relatively simultaneously in the events of neurogenesis. Furthermore, if one accepts another new paradigm - that thermonuclear fusion does not occur in the core of the Sun (it occurs in the Radiative zone), Kelvin-Helmholtz contraction of the core gives 25.746608 My for the time it takes for it to exhaust the fuel[234] (this is not the end of the Sun’s core though, it is hypothesized that fuel gets periodically replenished). Considering that the best candidate for periodicity of mass extinctions I have obtained is 25.74 My (see the same reference above), this is a remarkable correlation that should be hard to ignore. My calculations also suggest that Sun’s core is at the end of the contraction cycle, agreeing with the hypothesis of imminent major extinction. The null hypothesis should have nothing to do with bias, but it does when the null postulate states "the currently accepted theories and models cannot be wrong". If mainstream science wants to progress - I suggest it inverts the null postulate and consider the evidence. It is not that there is a lack of signals, there is an overabundance of overconfidence in old models (not measurements!) treating these signals as noise. 50 [ 2021.11.26 ] Chaos in time by Amenoum The Dark Ages are, among other things, ages of misinformation and this misinformation may generally be time relative. Due to relativity in cause and effect, predicted by Complete Relativity, sometimes what would usually be considered the effect will precede the cause. Effec150 tively, just as the order of phenomena in space can be disturbed, the order of events in time can be too. In example, nowadays, some people claim there are computer chips in vaccines and that electro-magnetic signals of 5G networks are harmful and cause diseases. I don’t think that any of this is currently true (although 5G might cause some issues at extremely low distance from the transmitter, depending on signal strength, but this is on the order of cm or less). However, what about future? Could this be a reaction preceding the action? Certainly. Both government and industry have strong interest in planting chips into their users, and, considering the increasing tyranny and truth bending of both, it would not be surprising that this reaction is valid, only misplaced in time. Similar could be said for 5G networks - I have hypothesized that homo.delta is sensitive to specific electro-magnetic radiation[74]. Due, to imminent surface extinction, I find it likely that 5G will be the last globally widespread and used communication technology, making homo.delta sensitive most strongly to 5G frequencies. Since homo.beta species (current human inhabitants of the Earth’s surface) should be evolving into homo.delta, it would not be surprising that even homo.beta, at some point, with accelerated evolution, becomes sensitive too to 5G, to some extent. There are more examples. A good one is the chemtrails conspiracy. The trails being left behind by aircraft may be benign at this point, but what about the future? Humans are effectively doing nothing to stop climate change so the only option (but not a real solution of course) left will soon be (if not already) geoengineering of climate. On top of that, there probably will be many wars of different scales raging about the globe during the time as well. Therefore, there probably will be a lot of spraying in the air and, due to ubiquitous panic and disarray, who knows who all will be spraying and what. With the haste, appliance of untested chemicals may be likely. Many conspiracy theories actually become true even though many may not be true at the time they originate. When one thinks about it, nature has probably evolved to misplace (de-synchronize) highly correlated events in time for a reason. If, for example, conspiracy theories would be true at the time they spring up, people might take them seriously and there would be no future for the conspiracy. With time displacement, however, most won’t take them seriously until it becomes too late to prevent them. The conspiracy actually has a significantly higher chance to become true if it is theorized in advance. This is like standard embryonic development or coding, where the conspiracies crucial for development are coded, or effectively coded, on some level (although mechanisms can 151 vary - time de-synchronization is just one mechanism to ensure planned development). Thus, there is not only a lot of global warming in the pipeline, conspiracies are probably there too (along with anything else important in the context of evolution of Earth). Can ongoing protests prevent such future? Highly unlikely. Paradoxically [for absolutism], it is the lack of such protests that would indicate a different future. Think about it - chips inside human bodies communicating on 5G frequencies would be a natural precursor to natural ability (telepathy) of homo.delta to communicate on these frequencies, especially if these chips are organic. Some people have already implanted chips into their bodies (RFID), and it seems we have already produced biosynthetic dual-core CPU’s[235] so precursors are here. I have previously concluded that we are in the age of technological stagnation (in a sense that nothing fundamentally new is coming out) and that current generations of transistors are likely the last [commercially available] transistors developed by man. However, what will prevent the man to use transistors already existing in nature? This is the technology of future. Organic computers might be marketed as great new human invention but there’s not much new and original there. The idea already exists to use living neurons as components in organic computers (see reference above), but why even bother to exploit natural transistors if it becomes easier to exploit whole organic computers built by nature - living brains? For now, there might be ethical and moral issues, but once people transform into homo.gamma, this becomes a matter of time. 51 [ 2021.11.24 ] Statistically, statistics are generally abused by Amenoum Data gathering is a part of scientific method. It is usually gathered so it can be correlated with something - e.g., a prediction of a certain hypothesis. But, even if perfect, correlation is not evidence for the hypothesis if correlation with other phenomena is not taken into account. In example, statistical data on movement of planets and correlation with gravity is alone good evidence for correctness of laws of gravity but only because the influence of everything else on these bodies is negligible. And, if only one planet would behave differently than hypothesized, then this correlation is not evidence for the hypothesis anymore - it becomes simply evidence for partial correlation. And, if one is interested in truth, rather than deceit, one would not advertise this correlation as evidence for the hypothesis - 152 one would admit, not only that one is missing data to reach a sound conclusion, but that there is certain probability that existing correlation is a [relatively] meaningless coincidence - and this probability is higher the weaker the existing correlation is. Even scientists will hardly be immune to bias when dealing with statistics, consciously or unconsciously. Why? Because everything is entangled (correlated) with everything to some degree. Why? To conserve relativity. But some people are obsessed with absolutism - mainly politicians, economists and [other] charlatans. And polarized people, in general, support this absolutism. This is why statistics are generally abused[236] (absolutized) in this society - to perpetuate certain agenda. And here is the latest example: Figure 19: Vaccination and deaths 153