Seamless S/4HANA Transition: Leveraging data stewardship platform for strategic migration success

 Corresponding author: Pavan Kumar Bollineni Copyright © 2025 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article. This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0. Seamless S/4HANA Transition: Leveraging data stewardship platform for strategic migration success Pavan Kumar Bollineni * Blekinge Institute of Technology, Sweden. Global Journal of Engineering and Technology Advances, 2025, 23(02), 016-024 Publication history: Received on 18 March 2025; revised on 26 April 2025; accepted on 28 April 2025 Article DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/gjeta.2025.23.2.0136 Abstract Transitioning to SAP S/4HANA represents a transformative milestone for organizations, with data migration across critical business domains posing significant challenges that demand sophisticated solutions. This article provides a detailed examination of how the Data Stewardship Platform (DSP) enables successful S/4HANA data migration through domain-specific workflows and technical integration capabilities. By analyzing the unique migration requirements for financial data (AP/AR), master data, assets, and Work in Process (WIP), it demonstrates how DSP extends SAP's native migration tools with specialized extraction routines, transformation logic, and multi-dimensional validation frameworks. The article details specific migration phases, sequencing strategies, and technical approaches for each business data domain, providing concrete methods for preserving critical business relationships despite S/4HANA's simplified data model. Through industry case studies and implementation examples, we illustrate how organizations achieve significant improvements in migration accuracy and efficiency across various business sectors. From domainspecific extraction techniques to comprehensive reconciliation frameworks, this exploration of technical migration strategies offers a detailed roadmap for leveraging DSP capabilities to ensure data integrity while accelerating the transition to S/4HANA's advanced business functionality. Keywords: Data Migration; S/4HANA Transformation; Data Stewardship Platform; Automated Validation; Enterprise Data Governance 1. Introduction 1.1. The Evolution from SAP ECC to S/4HANA The transition from traditional SAP ECC systems to S/4HANA represents a fundamental shift in enterprise resource planning architecture. According to Cloud4C's analysis, organizations undertaking this journey face a complex migration landscape where approximately 73% of companies report data quality as their primary concern [1]. This architectural evolution is not merely a technical upgrade but a complete reimagining of how business data flows through organizational processes. The in-memory computing paradigm of S/4HANA eliminates redundant data storage while providing real-time analytics capabilities that were previously unattainable in legacy systems. As enterprises navigate this transition, they must reconcile decades of accumulated data structures with S/4HANA's streamlined data model, requiring significant transformation of both master and transactional data elements. 1.2. Data Migration Challenges and Organizational Impact The data migration component of S/4HANA implementations introduces multifaceted challenges that extend beyond technical considerations. Historical data accumulated in legacy systems often contains inconsistencies, duplications, and structural anomalies that become critically apparent during migration planning. The IDC's research on ERP Global Journal of Engineering and Technology Advances, 2025, 23(02), 016-024 17 transformations highlights that organizations typically underestimate the resources required for data preparation by 40-60% when planning their migration timelines [2]. This preparation gap creates cascading effects throughout implementation projects, impacting not only technical delivery but also organizational change management efforts. Legacy customizations further complicate the landscape, as custom tables and fields require careful evaluation for relevance and transformation requirements within the simplified S/4HANA data model. 1.3. The Data Stewardship Platform Approach The Data Stewardship Platform (DSP) methodology addresses these migration challenges through automated governance frameworks designed specifically for complex ERP transformations. By implementing structured data quality rules, validation patterns, and transformation mappings, DSPs create a systematic approach to data migration that significantly reduces manual intervention while improving outcome quality. Cloud4C notes that DSP implementations can accelerate data cleansing activities by establishing automated validation processes that identify exceptions requiring human intervention [1]. These systems continuously monitor quality metrics throughout the migration lifecycle, providing real-time visibility into progress and potential issues. The architectural approach aligns with modern enterprise data management principles described by the Shared Services and Outsourcing Network, which emphasizes the importance of maintaining data lineage and governance throughout transformation initiatives [2]. This governance continuity ensures that data quality improvements achieved during migration become sustainable organizational practices rather than one-time project activities. 2. Understanding the S/4HANA Data Migration Landscape 2.1. S/4HANA Migration Phases and Data Transfer Requirements The S/4HANA migration journey involves distinct phases with specific data transfer requirements that DSP platforms must address. In the preparation phase, legacy SAP ECC data structures must be mapped to S/4HANA's simplified data model, addressing fundamental changes such as the merger of previously separate FI-AR and FI-AP tables into a unified Financial Document table. Organizations typically underestimate the complexity of these structural changes, with approximately 60% requiring significant data transformation logic beyond simple field-to-field mapping [3]. The execution phase encompasses staged migration waves typically organized by business function, with master data objects transferred first (Material, Customer, Vendor, GL accounts) followed by open transaction data (AP/AR open items, WIP orders, Assets), and finally historical data as permitted by business requirements and storage constraints. The reconciliation phase demands comprehensive validation across multiple dimensions, with financial data often requiring the most extensive validation protocols to ensure complete balance transfer and audit compliance. 2.2. Data Domain-Specific Migration Challenges in S/4HANA Each business data domain presents unique migration challenges that require specialized DSP capabilities. Financial data migration (AP/AR) presents complex challenges due to S/4HANA's unified document structure, with organizations typically discovering that approximately 37% of open items require enrichment with additional attributes not previously mandatory in ECC [3]. The material master migration to S/4HANA requires substantial transformation due to the simplification of previously separate tables (MARA, MARC, MARD) into consolidated structures, with organizations typically needing to harmonize inconsistent material classifications across plants and storage locations. Asset data migration presents unique challenges related to depreciation calculations and historical values, with migration validation requiring precise reconciliation of accumulated depreciation values. Work in Progress (WIP) data transfer demands careful handling of in-flight production and project orders, with validation processes comparing sum totals and individual line items between source and target systems to verify completeness. 2.3. Technical Migration Methods and DSP Application S/4HANA provides multiple technical migration methods that DSP platforms must support effectively. Standard SAP migration tools like Migration Cockpit and LTMC provide baseline capabilities but typically address only 65-70% of complex migration requirements [4]. The DSP platform extends these native capabilities through specialized transformation logic, enhanced validation rules, and reconciliation frameworks tailored to each data domain. For transactional data like AP/AR, DSP typically implements specialized extraction routines that maintain document relationships and enhance records with additional required fields. For master data objects, the DSP implements business rule validation to ensure newly mandatory fields contain appropriate values derived from either existing data or predefined rules. The integration between DSP capabilities and standard SAP migration tools creates a comprehensive framework that combines SAP's optimized loading mechanisms with the enhanced transformation and validation capabilities required for complex migration scenarios. Global Journal of Engineering and Technology Advances, 2025, 23(02), 016-024 18 Figure 1 S/4HANA Domain Specific Data Migration Landscape [3, 4] 3. Data Stewardship Platform: Core Capabilities for S/4HANA Migration 3.1. Data Domain-Specific Migration Workflows in DSP The DSP implements specialized migration workflows tailored to each S/4HANA data domain, extending beyond generic migration capabilities to address domain-specific requirements. For Accounts Payable and Accounts Receivable migration, the DSP implements specialized open item handling that maintains document relationships while transitioning from separate AP/AR tables to S/4HANA's unified financial document structure. This approach typically achieves a 30% reduction in post-migration financial reconciliation efforts compared to standard migration tools [5]. For material master migration, the DSP implements hierarchical data validation that ensures consistency across the simplified S/4HANA material data model, with particular emphasis on extended material attributes and consolidated classification structures. Asset data migration workflows incorporate specialized handling for depreciation schedules and asset history, ensuring that historical values properly transfer while maintaining depreciation continuity in the S/4HANA environment. These domain-specific workflows incorporate both technical and business validation rules, ensuring that migrated data not only satisfies S/4HANA's technical requirements but also maintains business meaning and relationship integrity. 3.2. DSP Data Extraction and Transformation Mechanisms for S/4HANA The DSP implements sophisticated extraction and transformation mechanisms tailored to S/4HANA's specific data structure requirements. For master data migration, the platform typically employs hierarchical extraction patterns that maintain parent-child relationships through the transformation process, preserving critical business structures while adapting to S/4HANA's simplified data model. Between 60-85% of data quality issues originate from incomplete extraction logic that fails to capture all relevant attributes and relationships [5]. The transformation capabilities leverage field-level mapping combined with record-level business rules that ensure all S/4HANA mandatory fields receive valid values, even when source systems lack direct equivalents. For complex objects like material masters, the transformation incorporates conditional logic that adapts generic fields to material-type specific requirements in the S/4HANA environment. For transactional data like AP/AR open items, the transformation logic includes sophisticated document linkage preservation mechanisms that maintain reference relationships despite structural changes in the underlying data model. Global Journal of Engineering and Technology Advances, 2025, 23(02), 016-024 19 3.3. Validation and Reconciliation Frameworks for S/4HANA Data Transfer The DSP implements multi-dimensional validation frameworks specifically designed for S/4HANA data migration verification. For financial data, the validation incorporates both sum-total reconciliation and document-level comparison, ensuring both overall balance correctness and individual transaction integrity. This multi-level approach typically reduces post-migration financial discrepancies by up to 75% compared to standard validation methods [6]. For master data objects, the validation framework combines structure verification (ensuring all required fields contain valid values) with relationship validation (confirming that hierarchical relationships remain intact). For assets, the validation incorporates specialized verification routines that compare depreciation schedules and accumulated values between source and target systems. The exception management framework automatically categorizes validation failures based on severity and type, routing critical issues to appropriate domain experts for resolution while tracking correction status. The continuous monitoring capabilities establish ongoing reconciliation between source and target systems throughout the migration process, providing real-time visibility into migration progress and quality metrics that enable proactive issue identification and resolution. Figure 2 Domain-Specific Migration Workflows in the Data Stewardship Platform [5, 6] 4. Implementation Methodology: A Phased Approach for S/4HANA Data Migration 4.1. Detailed Data Migration Planning and Sequencing Successful S/4HANA data migration requires comprehensive planning that sequences migration activities based on data dependencies and business criticality. Organizations investing at least 15% of project timeline in migration planning achieve approximately 47% fewer critical issues during execution [7]. The planning process must begin with a detailed assessment of data volumes and complexity across all relevant domains, with particular attention to transactional data like AP/AR (typically 30-40% of migration effort), master data (20-30%), assets (10-15%), and other domain-specific objects. The migration sequence must account for object dependencies, with foundation master data (chart of accounts, controlling areas, company codes) migrated first, followed by dependent master data (customers, vendors, materials), and finally transactional data that references these master objects. The planning should establish specific data quality criteria for each domain, with appropriate threshold levels that balance perfectionism against practical business requirements. For complex domains like customer/vendor master or materials, the plan should incorporate data harmonization activities that resolve structural inconsistencies before migration, reducing transformation complexity while improving data quality. Global Journal of Engineering and Technology Advances, 2025, 23(02), 016-024 20 4.2. Data Extraction and Transformation Strategies by Domain Each business data domain requires specialized extraction and transformation strategies implemented through the DSP platform. For financial data migration (AP/AR), the extraction strategy must capture both header and line item details while maintaining document relationships, typically implementing delta extraction mechanisms for high-volume transaction areas. Organizations using structured extraction methodologies typically reduce financial data migration timelines by approximately 32% compared to ad-hoc approaches [8]. For master data objects, the transformation strategy must address S/4HANA's enhanced field requirements, implementing business rules that derive values for newly mandatory fields not present in source systems. Material master transformation requires particular attention to classification hierarchies and extended attributes, often implementing specialization logic that varies transformation rules based on material type. Asset data transformation must preserve historical values while adapting to S/4HANA's enhanced depreciation functionalities, implementing specialized calculation verification to ensure financial consistency. Work in Process (WIP) transformation strategies must account for in-flight orders, implementing specialized handling for partially completed production or project activities to ensure continuity in the S/4HANA environment. 4.3. Domain-Specific Validation and Reconciliation Techniques Comprehensive validation architectures must implement domain-specific verification techniques that address the unique characteristics of each data area. Organizations implementing at least three distinct validation cycles for each data domain identify approximately 91% of critical issues before production impact [7]. For financial data validation, the framework must implement both balance verification (ensuring overall financial totals match between source and target) and transaction verification (confirming individual documents transferred correctly with all relevant attributes). Master data validation requires both completeness checks (ensuring all records transferred) and relationship verification (confirming hierarchies and dependencies remain intact). Asset validation demands specialized verification of depreciation schedules, accumulated values, and remaining useful life calculations to ensure financial reporting continuity. The reconciliation methodology should implement both automated and manual verification components, with automated routines handling high-volume comparison while manual processes focus on exception investigation and resolution. By establishing domain-specific validation thresholds, organizations can implement risk-based verification approaches that concentrate resources on the most critical business data while implementing streamlined verification for lower-risk domains. Figure 3 S/4HANA Domain-Specific Implementation Methodology Framework [7, 8] Global Journal of Engineering and Technology Advances, 2025, 23(02), 016-024 21 5. Case Studies: DSP Implementation Success Stories 5.1. Manufacturing Sector Implementation Outcomes The manufacturing sector presents distinctive challenges for S/4HANA migrations due to complex production environments and intricate material master data structures. Industry analysis highlights that manufacturers implementing comprehensive data stewardship frameworks achieve approximately 67% faster time-to-value from their digital transformation investments compared to organizations using traditional migration approaches [9]. This accelerated value realization stems from the DSP's ability to maintain uninterrupted production operations throughout the migration process while simultaneously implementing S/4HANA's advanced production planning capabilities. Manufacturing organizations particularly benefit from the DSP's ability to manage the complex transformation of bill of materials structures, where legacy customizations often create intricate dependencies that must be carefully mapped to S/4HANA's simplified data model. The implementation of automated governance frameworks creates standardized approaches to managing material master hierarchies, establishing consistent classification methodologies that significantly improve inventory management capabilities while reducing data maintenance requirements. These governance improvements extend beyond the migration to establish sustainable data management practices that continue delivering value through improved product lifecycle management and streamlined supply chain operations. 5.2. SAP S/4HANA Retail Module Implementation Experiences Retail implementations of S/4HANA through DSP methodologies demonstrate significant improvements in SAP's retailspecific modules and omnichannel capabilities. Research from SAP retail implementation studies indicates that organizations leveraging DSP frameworks for S/4HANA Retail achieve approximately 42% higher customer data consolidation rates when migrating from legacy SAP ERP systems [10]. This improved consolidation enables more sophisticated customer segmentation within S/4HANA's customer management framework, directly impacting SAP Marketing Cloud integration and retail promotion efficiency. The retail sector's implementation of SAP's S/4HANA merchandise management represents another area where DSP capabilities deliver substantial value, particularly in harmonizing diverse product hierarchy structures between legacy SAP ECC and S/4HANA Retail. The implementation of automated transformation logic specific to SAP retail taxonomies enables more efficient merchandise planning while improving inventory optimization across the SAP Extended Warehouse Management platform. The exception management capabilities prove particularly valuable in S/4HANA Retail implementations where seasonal merchandise planning and region-specific pricing attributes create complex mapping scenarios requiring domain expertise in SAP's retail solution portfolio. These capabilities ensure that specialized retail configurations are effectively incorporated into SAP S/4HANA transformation rules while maintaining consistent governance across the broader SAP landscape. 5.3. Financial Services S/4HANA Banking Implementation Journeys Financial services organizations face unique migration challenges when implementing SAP S/4HANA for Banking due to stringent regulatory requirements and complex financial instrument classifications. Implementation research demonstrates that financial institutions implementing DSP methodologies for SAP S/4HANA Banking achieve approximately 55% improvement in data lineage documentation, significantly reducing compliance verification efforts during regulatory audits of their SAP systems [10]. This improved lineage creates comprehensive audit trails that demonstrate SAP S/4HANA Banking transformation methodology compliance with regulatory requirements, substantially reducing validation timelines during post-implementation reviews. The financial sector particularly benefits from the DSP's sophisticated validation frameworks when implementing SAP Financial Products Subledger (FPSL), which implements multi-dimensional verification approaches that align with regulatory expectations for data integrity and transaction traceability in SAP banking modules. These validation capabilities extend beyond technical correctness to include business rule validation essential for complex SAP financial products where calculation methodologies must be preserved throughout the migration from legacy SAP banking solutions to S/4HANA. The implementation of structured governance frameworks establishes clear data ownership protocols that align with regulatory expectations for SAP banking data stewardship, creating sustainable compliance practices that extend beyond the initial migration. These governance improvements directly translate to business benefits through reduced regulatory reporting efforts in SAP and more responsive financial product development capabilities enabled by improved data quality in the S/4HANA Banking platform. Global Journal of Engineering and Technology Advances, 2025, 23(02), 016-024 22 Table 1 Manufacturing Sector DSP Implementation Results [9, 10] Implementation Approach DSP Application Area Legacy System Key Performance Indicator DSP-Led Manufacturing Migration Material Master Governance SAP ECC 6.0 67% faster time-to-value with streamlined BOM structures DSP-Enabled Retail Transformation Customer Master Consolidation SAP Retail 42% higher data consistency with improved segmentation DSP-Guided Banking Implementation Financial Product Mapping SAP Banking 55% better data lineage with enhanced compliance reporting DSP-Supported Consumer Goods Transition Product Hierarchy Standardization SAP CRM/ERP 48% fewer post-migration data reconciliation issues 6. Best Practices and Future Considerations for S/4HANA Data Migration 6.1. Domain-Specific Data Migration Best Practices Successful S/4HANA data migrations employ specialized best practices tailored to each business data domain. For Accounts Payable and Accounts Receivable migration, organizations achieving the highest success rates implement comprehensive document relationship mapping that preserves parent-child connections despite the fundamental restructuring in S/4HANA's unified financial document table. This approach reduces financial reconciliation issues by approximately 70% compared to field-level mapping techniques [11]. For material master migration, best practices include pre-migration harmonization of material types and classification hierarchies, typically reducing transformation complexity by 45-50% while improving data quality outcomes. Asset data migration benefits from specialized routines that validate depreciation calculations at both individual asset and asset class levels, ensuring financial continuity while leveraging S/4HANA's enhanced asset accounting capabilities. Work in Process (WIP) migration requires strategies for handling in-flight production and project orders, with leading organizations implementing specialized status mapping that maintains process continuity despite structural changes in the underlying data model. General Ledger migration demands particular attention to balance verification at multiple levels (company code, profit center, cost center), with successful implementations establishing automated reconciliation routines that verify consistency across all financial dimensions. 6.2. Technical Migration Tools and Integration Mechanisms The technical foundation for successful S/4HANA data migration combines SAP's native migration tools with the enhanced capabilities of the DSP platform. Organizations implementing synchronized approaches across their migration toolset experience approximately 45% fewer data reconciliation errors during cutover [12]. The integration architecture typically leverages SAP's Migration Cockpit or Legacy System Migration Workbench for final data loading while employing the DSP for enhanced extraction, transformation, and validation capabilities. For high-volume transactional data, the technical approach often implements staging tables that enable iterative validation before final loading, reducing cutover risk while enabling comprehensive verification. The migration architecture must implement delta synchronization mechanisms to handle ongoing business transactions during extended migration timelines, particularly for phased implementations where legacy and S/4HANA systems operate concurrently. These synchronization capabilities become especially critical for high-volume transaction domains like sales orders and purchasing documents, ensuring that business operations continue uninterrupted while migration activities proceed in parallel. The technical implementation should leverage SAP-specific loading mechanisms like IDocs or direct database loads based on volume and complexity characteristics, with the DSP managing the end-to-end process flow while leveraging the most efficient loading mechanism for each data domain. 6.3. Measuring Migration Success and Continuous Improvement Comprehensive migration metrics enable organizations to quantitatively assess data transfer quality while identifying optimization opportunities for future migration waves. Organizations establishing detailed migration quality metrics achieve approximately 60% faster stabilization periods following cutover [11]. For financial data migration, effective measurement frameworks track both overall balance accuracy and document-level reconciliation statistics, establishing clear thresholds for acceptable variance based on materiality considerations. Master data migration metrics should include completeness percentages, relationship integrity measures, and usage validation statistics that verify not only Global Journal of Engineering and Technology Advances, 2025, 23(02), 016-024 23 technical transfer but also business usability. Asset migration measurement requires specialized metrics for depreciation accuracy, accumulated value reconciliation, and asset class consistency to ensure financial reporting continuity. Work in Process migration metrics must validate both financial values and operational statuses to ensure both accounting accuracy and production continuity. By implementing domain-specific measurement approaches for each data area, organizations create objective criteria for determining migration success, avoiding subjective quality assessments that often miss critical issues. The metrics framework should establish a continuous improvement cycle where findings from each migration wave inform refinements to subsequent iterations, progressively enhancing migration efficiency while reducing implementation risk across the entire S/4HANA transformation program. 7. Conclusion The journey to SAP S/4HANA represents far more than a technical upgrade—it offers organizations an opportunity to fundamentally transform their data management practices through specialized migration capabilities provided by Data Stewardship Platforms. By implementing the domain-specific migration methodologies detailed in this article for critical business areas such as AP/AR, master data, assets, and WIP, organizations can navigate the complexities of S/4HANA data transfer with greater confidence and precision. The case studies presented demonstrate that successful implementations share common elements: comprehensive planning with proper data sequencing, domain-specific extraction and transformation strategies, and rigorous multi-level validation frameworks that ensure both technical accuracy and business continuity. The technical integration between DSP capabilities and SAP's native migration tools creates a comprehensive framework that addresses the unique challenges of each data domain while maintaining critical business relationships throughout the transformation process. As organizations continue to evolve their digital landscapes, the structured migration approaches and validation techniques established during S/4HANA implementation will serve as crucial foundations for ongoing data excellence. The Data Stewardship Platform, when properly implemented with domain-specific migration workflows, not only facilitates a smoother transition to S/4HANA but also empowers organizations to realize the full potential of their data assets in driving strategic business outcomes and maintaining competitive advantage in an increasingly data-centric business environment. References [1] Cloud4C, "Key Benefits and Challenges of Migrating from SAP ECC to S/4HANA," 13 Oct. 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.cloud4c.com/blogs/benefits-and-challenges-of-migrating-from-sap-ecc-to-s4hana [2] Paul Rodwell, "ERP Transformation & Enterprise Data Management Two Critical Enablers for Global Finance Shared Services," Shared Services and Outsourcing Network, 18 June 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.ssonetwork.com/finance-accounting/articles/erp-transformation-enterprise-data-management [3] Gemini Data Services, "Ensuring Data Quality in SAP S/4HANA Migration," Tech Innovation Forum, 8 Sep. 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.gemini-us.com/sap/ensuring-data-quality-in-sap-s-4hana-migration [4] Nilesh Kulkarni and Saurav Bansal, "Defining Data Migration Strategies for Seamless ERP Transformation: Case Study," ResearchGate, Sep. 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/377791343_Defining_Data_Migration_Strategies_for_Seamless_ERP _TransformationCase_Study [5] Deshna Malik, "The Role of Data Governance in Data Migration," NRX Asset Hub, 20 July 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.nrx.com/the-role-of-data-governance-in-data-migration/ [6] Optimus SBR, "Automated Data Transformation for Smarter Business Operations," 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.optimussbr.com/insights/case-studies/data-transformation-process-automation/ [7] Storyteller Tech Trail, "Successful SAP S/4HANA Implementation," 22 Feb. 2024. [Online]. Available: https://storytellertechtrail.com/successful-sap-s-4hana-implementation/ [8] Dilip Kumar Vaka, "The SAP S/4HANA Migration Roadmap: From Planning to Execution," Journal of Science and Applied Engineering Research, JSAER Vol. 11, Issue 6, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://jsaer.com/download/vol-11-iss-6-2024/JSAER2024-11-6-46-54.pdf [9] BigCommerce, "Digital Transformation is Changing the Manufacturing Industry Forever," BigCommerce Team, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.bigcommerce.com/articles/b2b-ecommerce/manufacturing-digitaltransformation/ [10] Imre Munkacsi et al., "Implementation Challenges of Industry-Specific ERP System Solutions by Utilizing Best Practices," Oct. 2024. [Online]. Available: Global Journal of Engineering and Technology Advances, 2025, 23(02), 016-024 24 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/385162538_Implementation_Challenges_of_IndustrySpecific_ERP_System_Solutions_by_Utilizing_Best_Practices [11] Valentyn Zubenko, "Data Governance as the Backbone of Digital Transformation," Avenga, 27 May 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/data-governance-backbone-digital-transformation-avenga-n0ulf [12] Vítor Hugo Machado Ribeiro et al., "Sustainable Data Governance: A Systematic Review and a Conceptual Framework," 2022. [Online]. Available: https://estudogeral.uc.pt/bitstream/10316/115289/1/Sustainable%20Data%20Governance_%20A%20Syste matic%20Review%20and%20a%20Conceptual.pdf