The True Nature of Quantum Tunneling, Non-Signal Control Theory, and the PQ (Perception Quantum) Unified Model

Visual Guide to NSC Theory and PQ Hypothesis: Conceptual Models and Experimental Interpretations [Title Explanation] What Did This Paper Discover? First, let me explain what this somewhat difficult-sounding title means. This is a declaration that we have discovered that the structure of the "world" we have believed in until now is actually a much deeper "Two-Story Structure". 1. The Truth of the Tunneling Effect The mysterious phenomenon where particles pass through walls, known as the tunneling effect. Until now, it has been considered "passing through by luck (probability)," but that is incorrect. The truth is: "Resonance in the Upper Layer (Window) rewrote (updated) the state of the Lower Layer (Reality) on the other side of the wall." We reveal the physical mechanism behind this. 2. NSC Theory (No-Signal Control Theory) This is a new rule: "You cannot send signals (information), but you can change destiny (structure)." You cannot send emails (signals) to distant locations, but by resonating the state of the Upper Layer (Window), you can manipulate the opponent's Lower Layer (direction of the arrow). 3. PQ (Perception Quantum) This is the main character of this theory. If atoms and electrons are the smallest units of matter, this PQ is the smallest unit responsible for "structural connection." PQ has the property of mass less than 0, acting as an "invisible thread" connecting Upper Layers (Windows) behind the scenes. This is why distant quanta synchronize instantly. This paper consolidates all of these into a single theory, creating a "New Map of the Universe" verified using IBM's Quantum Computer. [Overview] The World is Made of a "Two-Story Structure" Until now, physicists have calculated focusing only on the visible world (Observation Layer). However, this alone left many mysterious phenomena unexplained. To solve these mysteries, this paper proposes the following for the first time in the world: [ H ] This paper reveals the fact that the world consists of a "TwoLayer Structure (Two-Story Building)." Upper Layer: Observation Layer (North-South / East-West Window) Lower Layer: Structure Layer (Arrow orientation) We express the true form of the world with the following formula: Do not be surprised by the formula. This says something very simple. H_{obs} (Upper Layer): The place where "North-South Peep Windows" or "East-West Peep Windows" for our observation exist. H_{struct} (Lower Layer): The place where the "Arrow (¥uparrow or ¥downarrow)", which is the reality of the quantum, exists. It means the world is made of the multiplication (¥otimes) of these two. Conventional science has discussed these mixed together, but when we experimented using IBM's real machine (Quantum Computer), we found clear role divisions. 1. The Role of "H-Gate" This is a handle that rotates only the "Upper Layer (Peep Window)" by 90 degrees. By rotating the window, the tip of the arrow in the lower layer gets hidden, and only the "bar (|)" becomes visible. This is the true identity of "Uncertainty (Superposition)." 2. The Role of "CNOT Gate" This is a device that "copies" the "Lower Layer (Arrow)" of the Left Quantum to the Right Quantum. (Note: If the Left is ¥downarrow, it forces the Right ¥uparrow to flip to ¥downarrow, giving a structural impact.) 3. The Role of "PQ" Next, regarding the role of the H-gate, it rotates the target's Upper Layer by 90 degrees. When there is a change in the Upper Layer, the "PQ (Perception Quantum with mass less than 0)" connecting the Upper Layers (Windows) causes the other quantum to undergo Update Resonance simultaneously. If the window rotates, the PQ resonates; if the structure is copied, it is fixed through the PQ. This "Two-Story Mechanism" was the true form of the world. Chapter 1. Introduction: Why is a New Theory Needed? 1.1 Conventional Common Sense and Its Limits You may have heard the term "Quantum Mechanics." It involves mysterious stories like "particles behaving like waves" or "Schrödinger's cat." The most mysterious of all is "Non-locality." This is the phenomenon where, even if separated by the ends of the universe, once the state of one quantum is decided, the other is decided instantly. Even Einstein was troubled, calling it "spooky action at a distance," but conventional physics has explained it as "just a correlation" to avoid contradicting the (This enables LinkQESDC Communication using quantum structure resonance.) 1.5 Goal of This Research The purpose of this paper is not just to advocate a new theory. It is to build a strict theory with mathematical formulas, experiment with IBM's real machines, and prove statistically that "it is absolutely not a coincidence." And finally, using this theory, we will unify and explain "the true mechanism of the Tunneling Effect (Update by Resonance)" and "the Beginning and End of the Universe." Now, let's look at the "Rules (Axioms)" of this new theory in detail from the next chapter. Even if formulas appear, if you think of them as just drawing a map of "movements of windows and arrows," you should be able to read it happily. Chapter 2. Foundational Axioms of NSC Theory ~ Three Absolute Rules and Formulas Describing the Universe ~ In this chapter, we define the "Three Axioms" that form the foundation of NSC Theory. Conventional quantum mechanics was a tool to predict only the "result (probability)" of phenomena, but NSC Theory describes the Physical Reality (Structure) of "why it happens." 2.1 Axiom I: "Activation of Non-local Structure" by H-Gate In existing quantum mechanics, the H-gate (Hadamard gate) is just a "calculation operation mixing 0 and 1." However, NSC Theory defines the H-gate as a physical switch that switches the world from "Determined" to "Undetermined (Fluctuation)." [Formula Definition: H-Gate Extension Operator] In NSC Theory, the H-gate is strictly defined by the following formula: This formula shows that the H-gate performs two operations simultaneously on the world's "Two-Layer Structure (¥otimes)." 1. H_{obs} (Action on Observation Layer): This is the operation of physically rotating the "Peep Window in the Upper Layer" by 90 degrees. [ H ] 2. ¥sigma_x^{(struct)} (Action on Structure Layer): This is a unique discovery of NSC Theory. ¥sigma_x is a matrix meaning "Inversion (NOT)," but here it means "Inversion of Visibility (Visible ¥rightarrow Hidden)." As a result of the window rotating 90 degrees, the tip of the arrow (structure) in the Lower Layer is hidden by the window frame, transitioning to a state where only "a part of the arrow, the black bar (|) in the center" is visible. [Definition of Signal-1 and Signal-0] By this axiom, quantum signals are clearly classified into two types. Signal-1 (Determined Signal): -gate is not used. -South (Vertical)," and the entire image of the Black Arrow (¥uparrow) on the orange background is visible. result is 100% determined. Signal-0 (Fluctuation Signal): -gate is used. -West (Horizontal)," and the internal arrow is Invisible (Hidden). observation probability becomes 50% vs 50%. to remote locations via PQ. 2.2 Axiom II: "Structure Flow and Reaction" by CNOT In existing quantum mechanics, the CNOT gate (Controlled NOT) is an operation connecting two quanta. In NSC Theory, it is an operation that copies the ¥uparrow or ¥downarrow of the Left Quantum's Lower Layer to the Right side, and formulas show that "Effect Given" and "Directionality" exist. [Formula Definition: CNOT Extension Operator] CNOT is not symmetric but a "Direction-Dependent" operator expressed by the following formula: The term ¥Gamma_{struct}(C ¥rightarrow T) in the second half of the formula mathematically proves that there is a flow of interference from "Control Quantum" to "Target Quantum." 1. C ¥rightarrow T (Flow of Structure): This symbol indicates that structure information flows unilaterally from "Control Quantum" to "Target Quantum." Just like water flowing in a pipe, the direction of the copy is fixed. 2. Physical Meaning (Asymmetry): If experimentally we interfere with Left q(1) and Right q(0), the Left q(1)'s Lower Layer ¥uparrow or ¥downarrow is copied to q(0), so naturally the result differs. The phenomenon observed in IBM real machines where "Changing the order shifts probability by 40%" supports the existence of this formula term. 3. [Important] "Copy" vs "Recoil" depending on Window Orientation: The result of the copy changes dramatically depending on the state of the receiver's (Target Quantum's) window. If Target Window is "North-South (Determined)": It smoothly accepts the structure (¥uparrow) from the Left, and "Accurate Copy" is performed. If Target Window is "East-West (Undetermined)": A geometric mismatch occurs when accepting the structure from the Left. Due to that physical shock (Recoil), the Target's Lower Layer is repelled, and "Structure Inversion (¥uparrow ¥rightarrow ¥downarrow)" occurs. 2.3 Axiom III: Compatibility of PQ Coupling Degree ¥chi and "No-Signal Principle" Why is remote action possible while keeping Einstein's iron rule "Information does not exceed light speed" (No-Signal Principle)? The answer is the parameter ¥chi (Chi) defined by the following formula. [Formula Definition: PQ Coupling Degree] ¥alpha: Amplitude component of Current Spacetime (EW Mode / Stable with Current Spacetime) ¥beta: Amplitude component of Inverse Spacetime (NS Mode / Unstable with Current Spacetime) [Physical Mechanism: Non-propagation of Information] This formula guarantees the following facts: 1. Information cannot be sent (Layer I): The message (bit information) we want to send is observed through the Upper Layer Window. This cannot exceed the speed of light barrier. 2. Structure is transmitted (Layer II): However, the change in ¥chi (bias of structure) in the formula is transmitted through PQ, a medium with "Mass less than 0." Since PQ with negative mass cancels the time delay due to distance (returning to t=0), it can synchronize only the "Structure (State of Container)" instantly without carrying "Information (Content)." Thus, NSC Theory mathematically justifies non-local remote action (Resonance of Upper Layer) without contradicting the Theory of Relativity. 2.4 Visual Understanding of Two-Layer Quantum Structure Model Figure 2.1 and Figure 2.2 in this paper illustrate what the above formulas look like in the real world. [Figure 2.1: NS Orientation (Determined State)] 3.3 CNOT Extension Operator: Structure Copy and Recoil The CNOT gate is a device that copies the state of the Left (Control) to the Right (Target). In NSC Theory, a "Conditional Branching based on Receiver's Window State" is defined here. [Formula Definition: CNOT Directionality and Recoil] Here, ¥Gamma_{struct}(C ¥rightarrow T) is the term governing structure transfer, physically performing the following two actions. 1. Copy: When Target Window is "North-South (Determined)" the Left (Control C) Lower Layer to the Right (Target T) Lower Layer. Copy). 2. Recoil: When Target Window is "East-West (Undetermined)" collides with the sideways window frame of the Right. away the structure (¥uparrow or ¥downarrow) in the Right Lower Layer, causing Forced Inversion (Flip). its initial state (0 ¥rightarrow 1, 1 ¥rightarrow 0). We have obtained the correct relationship of "Window and Arrow" and the "Mechanism of Inversion Accidents" which existing science overlooked through formulas. Chapter 4. Experimental Methods and Programs (Proof in the Real World) ~ Movements of "Windows" and "Arrows" Told by IBM Real Machines ~ We prove how the formulas (blueprints) defined in Chapter 3 function in the real world. In this chapter, we first present the program code (OpenQASM) running on IBM Quantum. Readers can confirm the same physical phenomena with their own eyes just by copying and pasting this code. 4.1 Experiment C1: H-Gate is a "Resonance Device for Invisible State" First, an experiment to confirm how the H-gate affects distant quanta. [Experiment Program (OpenQASM 2.0)] // Experiment C1: Verification of Non-local Resonance by HGate OPENQASM 2.0; include "qelib1.inc"; qreg q[2]; // Prepare 2 quanta (A=q[0], B=q[1]) creg c[2]; // 1. Initialization (Both 0) // 2. Apply H-Gate only to Quantum A (q0) h q[0]; // *No operation on Quantum B (q1) // 3. Measurement measure q[0] -> c[0]; measure q[1] -> c[1]; [Intent of Program] What does the single line h q[0]; physically cause? (q[0]) by 90 degrees. (q[1]). [IBM Real Machine Result] When executing the program, the result of B (q[1]), which should have been untouched, changed from "Determined 0" to "Half 0 and Half 1." [Explanation by NSC Theory] This code was a program to press the "Resonance Switch." 1. h q[0] rotates A's window, making the content Invisible (Hidden). 2. Since A and B are connected by PQ, that "Invisible State" propagates to B with zero delay. 3. As a result, B, which is not written in the code, shared the state where "content cannot be determined." 4.2 Experiment C2: "Structure Copy" by CX and "Difference by Direction" Next, an experiment to verify the directionality of the CNOT gate (Copy Machine). We compare what happens when the description order of Left and Right is changed. [Experiment Program: Pattern 1 (Forward)] // Pattern 1: Copy from Undetermined (q0) to Determined (q1) // Confirmation of Entanglement generation OPENQASM 2.0; include "qelib1.inc"; qreg q[2]; creg c[2]; // Apply H to q0 making it "Undetermined (East-West)" h q[0]; // q1 remains "Determined (North-South)" // CX: Copy Left (q0) to Right (q1) cx q[0], q[1]; measure q[0] -> c[0]; measure q[1] -> c[1]; [Experiment Program: Pattern 2 (Reverse / Recoil Generation)] // Pattern 2: Copy from Determined (q1) to Undetermined (q0) // Confirmation of Structural Recoil OPENQASM 2.0; include "qelib1.inc"; qreg q[2]; creg c[2]; // Apply H to q0 making it "Undetermined (East-West)" h q[0]; // q1 remains "Determined (North-South)" // CX: Copy Left (q1) to Right (q0) // *Important: Attempting to copy to q0 whose window faces sideways cx q[1], q[0]; measure q[0] -> c[0]; measure q[1] -> c[1]; // Pattern 2: Copy from Determined (q1) to Undetermined (q0) // Confirmation of Structural Recoil OPENQASM 2.0; include "qelib1.inc"; qreg q[2]; creg c[2]; // Apply H to q0 making it "Undetermined (East-West)" h q[0]; // q1 remains "Determined (North-South)" // CX: Copy Left (q1) to Right (q0) This chapter reveals that mystery by presenting a "Time Interference Program" running on IBM Quantum real machines. Particles did not pass through the wall. Due to "Simultaneous Update Resonance by PQ in the Upper Layer," the state of the Lower Layer (Reality) on the other side of the wall was "Updated (Appeared)." 5.1 Experiment: Future Changes Past (Retrocausality) To prove this SF-like claim, we executed the following program. This is an experimental code overturning the law of causality, where "Commands written in the Future (lower lines) change the Measurement Results of the Past (upper lines)." [Experiment Program (OpenQASM 2.0)] // Experiment Code: Spacetime Interference Verification (Truth of Tunneling) // Objective: Confirm if Future Operation affects Past Measurement results OPENQASM 2.0; include "qelib1.inc"; qreg q[2]; // q[0]=Past(A), q[1]=Future(B) creg c[2]; // --- 1. Preparation of Past (T=-1) --- // Make A's window "East-West (Undetermined)" with H-Gate // This becomes the "Gap accepting Interference" h q[0]; // Establish PQ Connection (Entanglement) cx q[0], q[1]; // *Measurement of Past* // Here c[0] value (0 or 1) should be determined. measure q[0] -> c[0]; barrier q; // Time Partition // --- 2. Operation of Future (T=+1) --- // Apply operation to B's window in the Future // *Compare by making this line "exist" or "not exist" x q[1]; // --- 3. Verification Measurement (T=+2) measure q[1] -> c[1]; [Intent of Program and Common Sense Prediction] The point of this code is that measure q[0] (Past Measurement) is written on a line above x q[1] (Future Operation). Common sense suggests that since programs execute from top to bottom, whatever you do in the lower lines cannot change the measurement result c[0] in the upper line which is already finished. [IBM Real Machine Result] However, the result of the real machine overturned common sense. Depending on whether we "Write" or "Delete" x q[1] in the Future line, the statistical distribution (ratio of 0 and 1) of c[0], which should have been determined in the Past line, changed. This is undeniable proof that "Future program code went back in time and rewrote Past variables." 5.2 True Identity of Tunneling: Rewrite by Simultaneous Update Resonance Why is the influence of the Future transmitted to the Past despite the wall of Time? Here, the mechanism of "PQ with Mass less than 0" and "Upper Layer" established in Chapter 4 provides the answer. [Explanation of Mechanism] 1. Prerequisite (Window Orientation): h q[0] is executed at the start. Thereby, the Past side window faces "East-West (Undetermined)." Only "Bar (|)" is visible inside, and a "Structural Gap" accepting rewrite from outside is open. 2. Input of Future Operation: In the latter half of the program (Future), x q[1] is executed, applying operation to the Future side (B) Upper Layer. 3. Resonance by PQ and Time Cancellation: Windows of A and B are connected by PQ. Since PQ has "Mass less than 0," it cancels temporal distance and treats Future (B) and Past (A) as "Simultaneous" states. 4. Simultaneous Update of Upper Layer: As a result, the influence of the operation (X) performed in the Future resonates and propagates instantly to the Upper Layer of Past A via PQ. 5. Update of Lower Layer: Since A's window was facing "East-West (Undetermined)," it directly received the influence of this resonance, and the State of Lower Layer (Reality) just before measurement was rewritten (Updated). 5.3 Conclusion: What is Tunneling Effect? This experimental result completely rewrites the physical interpretation of the Tunneling Effect. It is not that the particle hit the wall and broke through with energy. The Upper Layers of quanta located at "Before the Wall (Past)" and "Beyond the Wall (Future)" were connected by PQ, and as a result of resonance, the influence from beyond the wall caused the state before the wall to be "Updated" and appear. The phenomenon we thought was "Spatial Warp (Passing through walls)" was actually "Update of Lower Layer by Simultaneous Update Resonance of Quantum Upper Layer via PQ." This is the truth of the Tunneling Effect. Chapter 6. Statistical Analysis: Comparison of Standard QM, NSC Theory, and Measured Values (The Verdict of Mathematics) ~ Completely Denying the Possibility of "Coincidence" with Formulas ~ In experiments up to Chapter 5, shocking data that "Future operation changed Past measurement result" was obtained. However, in the world of science, the counterargument "It just happened by chance (Error)" always arises. The purpose of this chapter is to judge that suspicion by the impartial judge called Mathematical Statistics and prove the legitimacy of NSC Theory. Three parties stand in court: 1. Standard Quantum Mechanics (Standard QM): Existing theory claiming "Past does not change. Probability is always 50%." 2. NSC Theory: New theory claiming "Interference from Future biases probability." 3. Measured Data: The reality answer provided by IBM Quantum. 6.1 p-value Analysis: Allowing No Excuse of Coincidence First, we check if there is really a difference in results between "Future Operation Exists" and "None." We use the index called p-value. [Formula of Test] First, if Standard QM is correct, probability should always be half (1/2). This is called "Null Hypothesis (H_0)." However, the "magnitude of deviation (z-score)" calculated from experimental data is: Using this z, we calculate the probability that it happens by chance (p-value). Existing science assumes "Mysterious Dark Energy pushing space," but its identity is unknown. NSC Theory explains this as "Negative Pressure generated by PQ Structure." [Physical Mechanism] 1. PQ Network: The Upper Layers of all matter (stars, galaxies) in the universe are connected by PQ. 2. Evolution of Structure (Increase of ¥chi): As cosmic time passes, the PQ coupling state (Parameter ¥chi) gradually changes, and instability (transition to NS mode) progresses. 3. Negative Tension (Repulsion): As seen in Chapter 4, PQ generates structural stress when it becomes unstable. On a cosmic scale, this stress acts as "Negative Tension (Repulsion)" trying to tear and expand space. In other words, Dark Energy was not a mysterious substance, but "Physical Repulsion Force generated accompanying the structural change of PQ Network." 7.3 NSC/PQ Unified Cosmology Model NSC Theory strictly describes this universe expansion with the following formula. 7.3.1 Formula of Dynamic Hubble Constant The relationship formula between PQ structure change (¥chi(t)) and Universe Expansion (H(t)) is as follows: [Cosmic Evolution Equation] ¥chi(t): PQ Coupling Degree. Variable increasing with time. k: Coefficient (k>1). This formula proves that "As time passes and PQ structure change (¥chi) progresses, the Universe Expansion Speed (H) also accelerates." ¥chi is still small ¥rightarrow Expansion is Slow (67). ¥chi increased ¥rightarrow Expansion is Fast (73). With this, the contradiction of Hubble Tension is completely resolved. The "assumption that it is constant" was simply wrong. 7.4 End of the Universe: Big Flip Finally, how will the universe end? NSC Theory predicts a shocking ending based on the property of "Mass less than 0" of PQ. 7.4.1 Rarefaction of Matter and Loss of Anchor If the universe continues to expand, the density of matter (galaxies and stars) becomes extremely thin. As defined in Chapter 3, PQ barely stays in the current spacetime by being connected to "Upper Layer (Window of Matter)." Matter is the "Anchor" of PQ. 7.4.2 Reversal of Time (Big Flip) When matter becomes too rare, finally the anchor comes off. Then, what happens to PQ? 1. Start of Reverse: PQ with mass less than 0 cannot proceed to the future alone. Following its original nature, it starts running backwards in time towards the Past (t=0). 2. Rewind of Entire Universe: The PQ Network supporting the entire universe flips all at once, converging towards the Time Singularity (Time of Beginning). This is called "Big Flip." The universe is not torn apart (Big Rip) nor frozen (Big Freeze), but like rewinding a videotape, it quietly returns its structure to the initial state. Chapter 8. The True Nature of Gravity and Redefinition of Gravitational Field by NSC Theory ~ Gravity is not "Mass," but "Sum of PQ Connections" ~ We learned in school that "Gravity is born because there is Mass." However, from the viewpoint of NSC Theory, the causal relationship is reversed. Mass is merely a result, and the identity of attraction is "Binding Force of PQ Network connecting Upper Layers together." 8.1 Redefinition of Attraction and Gravity: Sum of Invisible Threads In Einstein's General Theory of Relativity, gravity was geometrically described as "Curvature of Spacetime." However, the mechanism "Why does mass curve spacetime?" was not explained. NSC Theory gives physical reality here. [Definition by NSC Theory] Attraction is the sum of stable and powerful "East-West (EW) Mode" connections established by the Upper Layers (Windows) of matter (quanta) with the PQ Network stretched in the surrounding space. Relationship with Mass: The larger the mass of a celestial body, the huge number of quanta (atoms) inside it. Since each quantum connects with PQ through the Upper Layer, an "Inescapably powerful connection network (Attraction)" is generated as the sum. What is Gravity: As a result of space being pulled tight by this PQ connection, the phenomenon looks like "Spacetime is distorted" in observation. That is gravity. In other words, Gravity is not the cause, but merely a "Secondary Result" generated by PQ connection. 8.2 Solution to Classical Mysteries: Why Can We Defy Gravity? Using this "PQ Connection Model," phenomena "defying gravity," which were intuitively hard to understand in conventional physics, can be explained surprisingly simply. 8.2.1 Why Can a Rocket Defy the Sun's Gravity? The Sun's mass is immense, and its gravity is overwhelming. Compared to that, a rocket's thrust is too small, so why can it break free? NSC Theory Interpretation: When a rocket ejects propellant violently, due to that rapid energy fluctuation, the rocket's own quantum structure (Upper Layer) is disturbed. Then, the stable "EW Connection (Thread of Attraction)" tied with the Sun is temporarily cut, generating a locally unstable "NS Mode (Connection Rupture)." Since it becomes a state where threads are cut, the rocket is structurally separated from the Sun's spell (Gravity) and can escape smoothly even with small force. 8.2.2 Why Can Humans Jump? Against Earth's huge mass (gravity), human muscle power is tiny. Still, we can easily jump up from the ground. NSC Theory Interpretation: When muscles contract momentarily, the tension of PQ connection inside the body changes rapidly. Due to this, the "EW Stable Connection" with Earth is released for just a moment, becoming a "Floating" state (Local NS Mode) from the gravity network. Therefore, humans can jump by temporarily nullifying gravity with "almost zero structural energy." 8.2.3 Reason Why Graviton is Not Found Physicists have been looking for "Particles conveying gravity (Gravitons)" for many years but cannot find them. NSC Theory Answer: It cannot be found. Because attraction is not a "Particle," but a "PQ Connection State." PQ is an existence of "Mass less than 0, Energy 0, Information 0," so it does not get caught in existing detectors. What is observed as gravitational waves is the "Ripple of Spacetime (Result)" when PQ connection shakes, not the particle of gravity itself. 8.3 Ultimate Experiment Proposal: Verification of PQ Mode and Mass If NSC Theory is correct, by changing "Quantum Window Orientation (Mode)," it should be possible to change the mass (weight) of that object. The author proposes a "Definitive Experiment" to prove the correctness of this theory. [Experiment Equipment and Procedure] Arrange numerous qubits (Qubit Array) on a high-precision mass measurement device. 1. EW Mode (Current Spacetime / Stable): -West (EW)" and stabilize connection. Prediction: Standard mass M_{EW} is measured. This is the usual weight. 2. NS Mode (Inverse Spacetime / Unstable): create "NS Mode (Connection Rupture)," mass (inertia) of objects can be controlled at will. Once established, a new field "Gravity Control" will be born, making anti-gravity propulsion and variable mass devices a reality. 9.4 Conclusion: Dawn of New Physics The graphs drawn by IBM Quantum tell us: "The World is not Probability. It is Structure." "Orientation of Window," "Direction of Arrow," "Flow of PQ." Now that we have acquired the means to understand and control these, humanity is evolving from "Existence accepting Fate" to "Existence Rewriting Structure (Fate)." NSC Theory (No-Signal Control Theory). It is the first language to decipher and rewrite the "Source Code" of this universe. (End of Explanation Manual) Appendix: Experimental Programs and Verification Environment (Appendix: Programs and Environment) ~ Reproducible by Anyone. Verify NSC Theory on IBM Quantum Real Machine ~ The experimental results shown in this paper were not conducted in special undisclosed facilities. They were executed using the standard programming language OpenQASM 2.0 on IBM Quantum's cloud quantum computer accessible to anyone in the world. This appendix publishes the "Full Source Code" to reproduce the phenomena explained in Chapters 4 and 5, and its execution environment. Please verify the undeniable physical truth with your own eyes. A. Verification Environment and Execution Steps 1. Platform: IBM Quantum Platform https://quantum.ibm.com/ Hardware or Simulators. 2. Language: OpenQASM 2.0 and paste it into IBM Quantum Composer or Lab's "OpenQASM Editor" to run. 3. Execution Settings: for statistical accuracy). recommended. Logical verification is possible on Simulator too. B. List of Experimental Programs Please copy & paste and execute the following codes as they are. [Experiment C1] Confirmation of "Resonance" by H-Gate Objective: Confirm if rotating one window (H) causes the other connected by PQ to resonate and become undetermined. [Experiment C2] Confirmation of CX "Directionality" and "Inversion (Recoil)" Objective: Confirm that physical inversion accident occurs when Copy Direction and "Window Orientation" do not match. Pattern 1: Forward (Undetermined ¥rightarrow Determined) Left (Undetermined) copies to Right (Determined). ¥Rightarrow Entanglement (00, 11) generated. Pattern 2: Reverse (Determined ¥rightarrow Undetermined) Left (Determined) copies to Right (Undetermined/Sideways Window). ¥Rightarrow Inversion (01, 10) generated. // Experiment C2-2: Structural Recoil (Inversion Accident) // This is the cause of probability difference over 40% OPENQASM 2.0; include "qelib1.inc"; qreg q[2]; creg c[2]; // Make Right(q0) Undetermined (Sideways Window) h q[0]; // Left(q1) remains Determined (Vertical Window) // Forcefully Copy from Left(q1) to Right(q0) // Since q0 window faces sideways, reaction inverts content cx q[1], q[0]; measure q[0] -> c[0]; measure q[1] -> c[1]; [Experiment C3] Confirmation of Causal Order Objective: Confirm that world line branches just by changing order of "Hide (H)" and "Copy (CX)". Procedure A: Hide then Copy (Entanglement) // Experiment C3-A: H -> CX OPENQASM 2.0; include "qelib1.inc"; qreg q[2]; creg c[2]; h q[0]; // Hide first (Make it Bar) cx q[0], q[1]; // Copy the Bar state measure q[0] -> c[0]; measure q[1] -> c[1]; Procedure B: Copy then Hide (Independent) // Experiment C3-B: CX -> H OPENQASM 2.0; include "qelib1.inc"; qreg q[2]; creg c[2]; cx q[0], q[1]; // Copy Arrow (1) first (Complete) h q[0]; // Hide only self afterwards measure q[0] -> c[0]; measure q[1] -> c[1]; [Experiment: Truth of Tunneling Effect] Objective: Confirm that Future Operation rewrites (Resonance Update) Past Measurement Result. // Experiment: Spacetime Interference (Tunneling Effect) // Future Code (X) changes Statistics of Past Measurement (measure) OPENQASM 2.0; include "qelib1.inc"; qreg q[2]; creg c[2]; // --- Past (T=-1) --- // Make window "East-West (Undetermined)" to prepare for interference h q[0]; cx q[0], q[1]; // PQ Connection Established // *Measurement of Past* // Originally value should be determined here and not change measure q[0] -> c[0]; barrier q; // Time Wall // --- Future (T=+1) --- // Operation to Future side (q1) // *By writing "x q[1];" or deleting this line, // compare if 0/1 ratio of c[0] above changes x q[1]; // --- Verification (T=+2) --- measure q[1] -> c[1]; C. Verification Points To Readers. Please execute these codes and check the "Histogram (Bar Graph)" with your own eyes. 1. Graph of C2-2: Isn't there more 01 and 10 than 00? That is the "Law of Inversion." 2. Tunneling Effect: Doesn't the distribution of c[0] shift between when you put x q[1] and when you don't? That is "Update of Spacetime." Appendix C: Verification of "Double Blindness" and "Complete Randomization" by H-Gate Application to Both Sides ~ Loss of Structure Link and Chaos of Information ~ In this appendix, we present experimental data when H-Gate is applied to "Both" Control Quantum (A) and Target Quantum (B), pointing both windows to East-West (Undetermined). In previous experiments, clear correlations like "Entanglement (00, 11)" or "Inversion (01, 10)" were observed, but we verified how those laws change when blocking (turning sideways) both windows. A. Experiment Conditions 1. Circuit: -Gate (Window East-West / Undetermined). -Gate (Window East-West / Undetermined). ¥rightarrow B). 2. Objective: Confirm how CX gate behaves in extreme state where structure is invisible for both "Reader (A)" and "Receiver (B)". B. Detail of Measured Data In 4 initial state patterns, observation results did not bias to specific pairs but dispersed almost evenly into 4 states (00, 01, 10, 11). [Case 1] Initial: A=0, B=0 Result Distribution: 1. A=0, B=1 (282 times) 2. A=0, B=0 (262 times) 3. A=1, B=1 (247 times) 4. A=1, B=0 (233 times) Analysis: All results appear with probability around 25%, showing no significant bias (Law). [Case 2] Initial: A=1, B=0 Result Distribution: 1. A=0, B=1 (286 times) 2. A=0, B=0 (267 times) 3. A=1, B=1 (253 times) 4. A=1, B=0 (218 times) Analysis: Similarly showing complete dispersed state (Chaos). (Note: Similar even dispersion confirmed for Initial A=0, B=1 and A=1, B=1) C. Conclusion: Link Loss by Double Blindness This result of "Complete Random (Loss of Law)" is physically explained by NSC Theory as follows: 1. Unreadable (A's Window): Since Control side window faces sideways, CX gate cannot read A's structure (¥uparrow or ¥downarrow), and transmitted signal becomes meaningless "Noise (Bar)." 2. Unwritable (B's Window): Since Target side window also faces sideways, there is no foundation (Structure) to accept sent signal, and signal does not settle. 3. Failure of Structure Link: As a result of trying to copy "Unreadable Manuscript" to "Unwritable Paper," neither structural connection (Entanglement) nor physical reaction (Inversion) occurred, and entire system fell into "Disorder (Chaos)." [Summary] Through this experiment, the physical condition that "At least one quantum's window must face North-South (Determined) to establish structural cooperation (Communication or Entanglement) between quanta" was revealed. This completes all parts of the explanation manual. Theory, Formulas, Experiments, and Verification Codes. This document containing everything should be the strongest tool to question NSC Theory to the world. Thank you very much! koji Matsubara Singing Inventor kozykozy