TIL VA TA'LIM INTEGRATSIYASI: ILG'OR XORIJIY TAJRIBALAR

INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC AND PRACTICAL CONFERENCE “INTEGRATION OF MODERN LINGUISTICS WITH SCIENCE, EDUCATION, AND PRACTICE IN THE PROCESS OF GLOBALIZATION: NEW APPROACHES, OPPORTUNITIES, AND CHALLENGES”, DECEMBER 4, 2025 433 TIL VA TA’LIM INTEGRATSIYASI: ILG‘OR XORIJIY TAJRIBALAR Ibroximov Asror Askar O'g'li Common Grammar Problems Faced by Uzbek Learners of English Buxoro viloyati Qorako'l tumani 33-maktab Ingliz tili fani o'qituvchisi https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17813027 Annotation. This thesis examines the most common grammar problems faced by Uzbek learners of English. It analyzes frequent errors in articles, verb tenses, prepositions, word order, subject–verb agreement, and auxiliary verbs, explaining their causes and suggesting practical teaching strategies to overcome these challenges. Annotatsiya. Ushbu tezis o‘zbek tilida so‘zlashuvchi ingliz tili o‘rganuvchilari duch keladigan eng keng tarqalgan grammatik muammolarni tahlil qiladi. Maqolada artikllar, zamonlar, predloglar, so‘z tartibi, ot–fe’l moslashuvi va yordamchi fe’llar bo‘yicha tipik xatolar sabablari izohlanadi hamda ularni bartaraf etish bo‘yicha tavsiyalar beriladi. Annotatsiya. Данная тезисная работа анализирует наиболее распространённые грамматические трудности, с которыми сталкиваются изучающие английский язык узбекские учащиеся. В работе рассматриваются типичные ошибки в употреблении артиклей, времён, предлогов, порядка слов, согласования подлежащего и сказуемого, а также вспомогательных глаголов и предлагаются пути их устранения. Keywords: Uzbek learners, English grammar, articles, prepositions, verb tenses, subject– verb agreement, auxiliary verbs. Introduction English has become a global language of communication, education, and professional development. In Uzbekistan, proficiency in English is increasingly essential for academic success and career opportunities. However, Uzbek learners of English frequently face challenges in acquiring accurate grammatical structures due to significant typological differences between their native language and English. Uzbek is an agglutinative language with a flexible word order, no articles, and relatively simple tense marking, while English is analytic, has a rigid word order, employs articles, auxiliary verbs, and a complex system of tense and aspect. These structural contrasts create predictable errors among learners, which can affect both their written and spoken English. Understanding these common grammar problems is crucial for teachers to design effective instruction and for learners to develop strategies to overcome difficulties. This thesis aims to analyze the most frequent grammatical errors of Uzbek learners, explore the underlying causes, and suggest pedagogical strategies to improve accuracy and fluency in English. Main part One of the most persistent difficulties for Uzbek learners of English is the correct use of articles. Uzbek does not have articles, so learners often omit them or use them incorrectly. In English, articles are essential to indicate whether a noun is specific or general. For instance, the indefinite articles “a” and “an” are used with singular, non-specific nouns, as in “I saw a cat in the garden,” while the definite article “the” refers to something specific or already mentioned, as INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC AND PRACTICAL CONFERENCE “INTEGRATION OF MODERN LINGUISTICS WITH SCIENCE, EDUCATION, AND PRACTICE IN THE PROCESS OF GLOBALIZATION: NEW APPROACHES, OPPORTUNITIES, AND CHALLENGES”, DECEMBER 4, 2025 434 in “The cat I saw was black.” Common errors include omission, such as “I have cat,” overuse, as in “The love is important,” or confusion in generic statements, like “The English is difficult.” To address these issues, teachers should provide contrastive examples, visual aids, and repeated exposure to authentic texts, while exercises distinguishing general and specific references can help learners internalize proper usage. English verb tenses and aspects present another major challenge. While Uzbek verbs indicate tense primarily through suffixes, they do not mark aspect in the same systematic way as English. This leads to confusion with the present perfect and past simple, continuous forms, and future constructions. Learners might say “I lived here for three years” when they mean an ongoing situation, or “I am knowing this” instead of “I know this.” Expressing future intentions is also difficult, as Uzbek marks future with suffixes, while English uses constructions such as “will” or “going to,” for example, “I will visit my friend tomorrow” or “I am going to start a new project.” Visual aids, timelines, and contextualized exercises can help learners distinguish these nuances more effectively. Prepositions are another source of difficulty, as Uzbek relies on suffixes and postpositions rather than prepositions. This often results in errors such as “married with” instead of “married to,” “in Friday” instead of “on Friday,” and “discuss about” instead of “discuss.” Teachers can improve learners’ understanding through context-specific practice, collocations, and contrastive tables that illustrate differences between Uzbek and English usage. Word order in English is more rigid than in Uzbek, which allows flexible sentence structure. Errors occur frequently with adjective placement, adverb position, and question formation. Learners might say “red big car” instead of “big red car,” “Always I go there” instead of “I always go there,” or form questions as “You are coming?” without proper inversion. Focused instruction on sentence structure, transformation exercises, and guided practice with authentic examples are effective ways to internalize correct patterns. Subject–verb agreement also poses a challenge because Uzbek verbs do not change according to the subject in the same way as English. Mistakes such as “He go to school” or “People is happy” are common. Repetitive drills, visual charts, and immediate feedback are necessary to help learners grasp these rules and apply them consistently. Similarly, auxiliary verbs like “do,” “does,” and “did” are frequently omitted or misused. Learners might produce sentences like “Why you didn’t come?” instead of “Why didn’t you come?” or “He don’t like coffee” instead of “He doesn’t like coffee.” Explicit teaching of auxiliary verbs and structured practice in question formation and negation can help overcome these difficulties. The distinction between countable and uncountable nouns is another area of difficulty. Uzbek does not make the same grammatical distinction, which leads to errors such as “many information” instead of “much information” or “much apples” instead of “many apples.” Teachers can use visual aids, quantity expressions, and contextual exercises to reinforce these differences and help learners internalize correct usage. Modal verbs like “can,” “must,” and “should” also create challenges because they do not take infinitive markers or personal endings, unlike Uzbek verbs. Learners may say “She can to swim” or “He musts go.” Practice through dialogues, sentence formation, and role-play can improve understanding and prevent direct translation errors. INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC AND PRACTICAL CONFERENCE “INTEGRATION OF MODERN LINGUISTICS WITH SCIENCE, EDUCATION, AND PRACTICE IN THE PROCESS OF GLOBALIZATION: NEW APPROACHES, OPPORTUNITIES, AND CHALLENGES”, DECEMBER 4, 2025 435 In all these areas, the grammatical difficulties of Uzbek learners are systematic rather than random, reflecting the influence of the native language and the structural differences between Uzbek and English. Addressing these challenges requires a combination of contrastive analysis, explicit teaching, contextualized practice, and continuous feedback. By focusing on these problem areas, learners can improve their accuracy and fluency, which in turn enhances overall communication skills and prepares them for academic, professional, and real-life use of English. Conclusion In conclusion, Uzbek learners of English face a range of predictable and systematic grammatical difficulties. These difficulties are primarily caused by the structural and typological differences between Uzbek and English. Uzbek, being an agglutinative language with flexible word order, no articles, and relatively simple tense marking, differs significantly from English, which relies on rigid word order, articles, auxiliary verbs, and a complex tense–aspect system. As a result, learners often produce errors in key areas such as article usage, verb tenses and aspects, prepositions, word order, subject–verb agreement, auxiliary verbs, and the distinction between countable and uncountable nouns. These errors are not random; they reflect native language interference, incomplete acquisition of English structures, and overgeneralization of certain rules. For example, omission of articles, incorrect use of prepositions, and improper verb forms are common because Uzbek learners attempt to transfer familiar linguistic patterns from their native language. Such errors can impede effective communication and limit learners’ ability to achieve fluency and accuracy in English. Addressing these challenges requires a systematic and targeted pedagogical approach. Teachers should employ contrastive analysis to demonstrate differences between English and Uzbek structures, provide contextualized exercises, offer explicit grammar instruction, and give continuous feedback. Learners should also engage in extensive practice with authentic materials, self-monitoring, and peer correction to internalize proper grammatical usage. By systematically identifying the most common grammatical errors and understanding their underlying causes, educators are better equipped to design targeted and effective teaching strategies that address the specific challenges faced by Uzbek learners of English. These strategies may include contrastive analysis between Uzbek and English, structured exercises emphasizing problematic areas, repeated exposure to authentic language use, and personalized feedback on recurring mistakes. Addressing grammatical difficulties in a focused and consistent manner not only helps learners produce more accurate sentences in both writing and speaking but also fosters a deeper understanding of English sentence structure and language rules. As learners gradually internalize correct forms, they gain confidence in their ability to communicate effectively, which increases their motivation and engagement in learning. REFERENCES 1. Celce-Murcia, M., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (1999). The Grammar Book: An ESL/EFL Teacher’s Course. Boston: Heinle & Heinle. 2. Swan, M. (2005). Practical English Usage (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 3. Cook, V. (2016). Second Language Learning and Language Teaching. London: Routledge. 4. Richards, J. C., & Schmidt, R. (2010). Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics. London: Longman. INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC AND PRACTICAL CONFERENCE “INTEGRATION OF MODERN LINGUISTICS WITH SCIENCE, EDUCATION, AND PRACTICE IN THE PROCESS OF GLOBALIZATION: NEW APPROACHES, OPPORTUNITIES, AND CHALLENGES”, DECEMBER 4, 2025 436 5. Yuldashev, A. (2012). O‘zbek tilining grammatikasi. Toshkent: O‘zbekiston Fanlar Akademiyasi Nashriyoti. 6. Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon. 7. Nation, I. S. P. (2013). Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 8. Thornbury, S. (1999). How to Teach Grammar. Harlow: Pearson Education. 9. Rahmatullayev, R. (2006). Hozirgi o‘zbek adabiy tili: Morfologiya. Toshkent: O‘qituvchi. 10. Ellis, R. (2008). The Study of Second Language Acquisition (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 11. Larsen-Freeman, D., & Long, M. H. (1991). An Introduction to Second Language Acquisition Research. London: Longman.