scieee AI-readable full text Open interactive document viewer

New Fossils Of Sivatherium Giganteum (Giraffidae, Mammalia) From The Upper Siwaliks Of The Indian Subcontinent

KUMAR, SURESH

Abstract

KUMAR, SURESH (2022): New Fossils Of Sivatherium Giganteum (Giraffidae, Mammalia) From The Upper Siwaliks Of The Indian Subcontinent. Acta Palaeontologica Romaniae 18 (2): 85-92, DOI: 10.35463/j.apr.2022.02.04, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.35463/j.apr.2022.02.04

Full text

https://doi.org/10.35463/j.apr.2022.02.04 ACTA PALAEONTOLOGICA ROMANIAE (2022) V. 18(2), P. 85-92 ________________________________ Department of Anthropology, Panjab University, Chandigarh-160014, [email protected] 85 NEW FOSSILS OF SIVATHERIUM GIGANTEUM (GIRAFFIDAE, MAMMALIA) FROM THE UPPER SIWALIKS OF THE INDIAN SUBCONTINENT Suresh Kumar Received: 27 June 2021 / Accepted: 30 March 2022 / Published online: 18 April 2022 Abstract Fossil material of Sivatherium giganteum is reported here from the Upper Siwaliks of the Indian Subcontinent. The paper restricts itself only to the systematic description of this fossil material. The material consists of a half right maxillary second molar and a left mandibular fragment with partial M2 and M3 of Sivatherium giganteum collected from the Tatrot Formation of the Upper Siwaliks exposed north of Gobindpur village near Naraingarh Town (Haryana), northwest India. These specimens were found associated with several Pliocene mammalian taxa, which include Stegodon insignis, Hexaprotodon sivalensis, Leptobos falconeri, and yet to be identified Bovini. The mammalian faunal assemblage suggests an Early Pliocene age for the Tatrot deposits of Upper Siwaliks in the area.The present discovery is significant in the sense that records of Sivatherium giganteum are very rare in the Indian Subcontinent. Moreover, it is for the first time that Sivatherium giganteum is being described from the Upper Siwaliks of the study area. Keywords: Sivatherium, Giraffidae, Tatrot Formation, Upper Siwaliks INTRODUCTION The family Giraffidae in recent times is represented by two genera, Okapia Lankester (1902) and Giraffa Linnaeus (1758), both of which are confined to Africa. Giraffidae were more widespread and taxonomically more diverse during the Neogene of the Old World (Bohlin, 1926; Hamilton, 1978; Heintz et al. 1981; Geraads, 1985, 1986; Janis and Scott, 1987; Gentry, 1993; Gentry et al. 1999; Geraads et al. 2004; Rios et al. 2017). The Siwalik giraffids are represented by three subfamilies - i.e., Palaeotraginae, Sivatheriinae, and Giraffinae (Colbert, 1935). The so-called subfamily Palaeotraginae comprises only the genus Giraffokeryx, whereas subfamily Sivatheriinae includes the genera Sivatherium, Bramatherium, Helladotherium, and Hydaspitherium. The subfamily Giraffinae includes the genus Giraffa. The three subfamilies of Siwalik giraffids evolved concurrently but their migration to Siwaliks occurred at different times. In the Siwaliks, the presence of Palaeotraginae and Giraffinae was established earlier than that of Sivatheriinae (Akhtar et al. 1991; Solounias, 2007). Sivatherium giganteum is a gigantic giraffid restricted to Upper Siwaliks of India and Pakistan (Falconer & Cautley, 1835; Bohlin, 1926; Colbert, 1935), found near the Pliocene-Pleistocene boundary of the Himalayan foothills (Patnaik & Nanda, 2010). The first report of Sivatherium giganteum was by Falconer & Cautley (1835) from the Indian Siwaliks. Since then a number of genera and species of fossil giraffids has been recorded from various formations of the Siwaliks by different workers such as Lydekker (1876, 1878), Pilgrim (1910, 1911), Matthew (1929), Gaur (1987), Nanda &Shukla (2001), Khan & Sarwar (2002) & Khan et al. (2011). Fossil remains of Sivatherium giganteum are very rare in comparison to other fossil giraffids known from the Indian Siwaliks. The fossil taxon Sivatherium itself is represented here by only one species, Sivatherium giganteum, which is known from the Pinjor Formation of Upper Siwaliks (Gaur, 1987). Meanwhile, the genus Sivatherium is known by two species, namely S. hendeyi and S. maurusium, from Africa (Harris et al. 2010). The Upper Siwaliks exposed near Naraingarh Town of Haryana State in northwest India yielded a rich collection of fossil mammals but the occurrences of Sivatherium giganteum appear to be very rare here (Kumar, 2009, 2014). Indeed, there is no published report of the genus Sivatherium from the Upper Siwaliks exposed near Naraingarh area until now. The specimens reported here – PUA/SK07/49, a half right maxillary second molar, and PUA/SK/ -06/ 34, a left mandibular fragment with partial M 2 and M 3 – were collected in situ from a greyish yellow mudstone layer of the Tatrot Formation of the Upper Siwaliks exposed north of Gobindpur Village. (Figs. 1, 2). This report is significant in the sense that it represents the first record of Sivatherium giganteum from the present study area, and a new addition to our knowledge of this extinct taxon. According to the Dennell et al. (2006), the Upper Siwaliks of the Indian Subcontinent span the Late Pliocene to Middle Pleistocene time interval (3.3– 0.6 Ma). No radiometric dates are as yet available for the Tatrot Formation of India. Most of the magnetostratigraphic studies were conducted in the Pakistan Siwaliks whereas in India, only scanty magnetostratigraphic data are available (Nanda, 2013). In the Indian Siwaliks the first magnetostratigraphic investigations of the Upper Siwaliks near Suketi and in the Suresh Kumar 86 Chandigarh region were conducted by Azzaroli & Napoleone (1982) and Tandon et al. (1984), and these placed the Tatrot/Pinjor formational boundary at the Gauss/Matuyama transition at about 2.5 Ma. Azzaroli & Napoleone (1982) placed the lower limit of the Tatrot Formation in the Suketi area at 3.15 Ma. However, studies in the Pakistan Siwaliks by Johnson et al. (1982) placed the Dhok Pathan/Tatrot formational boundary at 5.1 Ma. A radiometric age of 2.53 Ma was assigned by Johnson et al. (1982) to the volcanic tuff layer in the Kotal Kund and Jalalpur Upper Siwalik sections of Pakistan, which helped to identify the boundary between the Gauss and Matuyama magnetic chrons that is considered to mark the transition between the Tatrot and Pinjor formations (Opdyke et al. 1979; Johnson et al. 1982; Barry et al. 1982; Hussain et al. 1992 & Nanda, 2002). The present fossil specimens were found associated with several Pliocene mammalian taxa, which include Stegodon Fig. 1 Generalized locality map of the study area. New fossils of Sivatherium giganteum (Giraffidae, Mammalia) from the Upper Siwaliks of the Indian Subcontinent 87 Fig. 2 Local stratigraphic section of the Tatrot Formation in the study area. Suresh Kumar 88 insignis, Hexaprotodon sivalensis, Leptobos falconeri, and yet to be identified Bovini (Fig. 2). According to Gaur (1987), the mammalian faunal assemblage of the Tatrot Formation of the Upper Siwaliks in the study area is suggestive of an Early Pliocene age. Future discoveries of Sivatherium giganteum from the present study area and magnetostratigraphic data may throw better light on the precise old age of this genus in the Indian Siwaliks. Abbreviations: AMNH – American Museum of Natural History, New York; NHMUK – Natural History Museum, London; PUA – Panjab University Anthropology; UGC – University Grant Commission; L – length; B – breadth; I – index; M – molar, P –premolar; Ma – Million years ago. Systematic Palaeontology Order Artiodactyla Owen, 1848 Suborder Ruminantia Scopoli, 1777 Superfamily Giraffoidea Gray, 1821 Family Giraffidae Gray, 1821 Subfamily Sivatheriinae Bonaparte, 1850 Genus Sivatherium Falconer and Cautley, 1835 Species Sivatherium Falconer and Cautley, 1835 giganteum Holotype: NHMUK-15283, a skull. Type Horizon: Upper Siwaliks. Additional Material: PUA/SK - 07/49, a half right maxillary second molar; PUA/SK06/ 34, a left mandibular fragment with partial M 2 and M 3. Horizon: Tatrot Formation of the Upper Siwaliks. Locality: About 1km north of Gobindpur Village. Description PUA/SK-07/49 The present specimen is a half right maxillary second molar. The tooth preserves its complete mesial half and only a small part of the distal half of the molar. The occlusal aspect of the preserved part of the molar shows two major cusps in the anterior half, namely, mesio-buccally, the metacone, and mesiolingually, the protocone. The metacone is broad in the middle with a strongly developed median rib and sloping anterior and posterior ridges. The anterior ridge is united with the parastyle whereas the posterior ridge is connected with the anterior ridge of the metacone, which is completely broken. The lingual part of the specimen displays a roughly crescent-shaped protocone the mesial limb of which extends up to the mesiolingual aspect of the metacone. The metacone and protocone are separated by a deep and broad pre-fossette, in the mesial half of the molar. Only a small part of the mesial portion of the hypocone is preserved. The molar displays a median basal pillar on its lingual side which extends up to one third the height of the crown. A moderately developed cingulum can be seen around the base of the lingual side of the protocone, extending from the basal pillar to the middle of the mesial side. A strong facet is visible on the mesial side of the molar. The enamel is thick and rugose. The tooth shows slight wear. The colour of enamel is dark brownish yellow and that of dentine is dull brown. PUA/SK06/34 The specimen under description is a left mandibular fragment with partially preserved M 2 and M 3. The preserved portion of the mandibular ramus is deep. It is eroded on the lingual face, exposing portion of the roots of the third molar, while distal to the third molar is laterally compressed. M2 The molar is half broken and badly preserved. The crown details cannot be clearly demarcated as all the major cuspids as well as stylids are missing. The tooth shows heavy wear. M3 This molar is highly worn and is roughly rectangular in outline. The crown displays only two cuspids, the mesiolingual metaconid and the mesio-buccal protoconid. In the mesial half, the paraconid and the protoconid are separated by a crescent-shaped pre-fossettid. The distal aspect of the tooth is badly damaged therefore the major cuspids in this area, namely, the metaconid, hypoconid, and entoconid as well as the stylids such as the paratstylid, mesostylid, and metasylid, are completely missing. Only a trace of the mesial part the post-fossettid is preserved. The hypoconulid is also broken. Only a trace of cingulum can be seen at the mesio-buccal border of the protoconid. On the lingual side the roots of M 3 are visible; these extend up to the lower one-third of the ramus. The colour of enamel is yellow-greyish brownish while the dentine is medium brown in colour. DISCUSSION AND COMPARISONS Several genera of fossil giraffids, namely, Giraffa, Giraffokeryx, Sivatherium, Hydaspitherium, Helladotherium, and Bramatherium, are known from the Siwaliks of India and Pakistan. Several workers in the past, such as Lydekker (1876, 1878), Pilgrim (1910, 1911), Matthew (1929), Gaur (1987), Nanda & Shukla (2001), Akhtar et al.(1991), Khan & Sarwar (2002), and Khan et al. (2011), respectively, have reported fossil Siwaliks giraffids. Although the Upper Siwaliks of the study area have yielded many mammalian fossils, those of Sivatherium giganteum are very rare when compared to other mammals of the fauna (Kumar, 2009). So far, Sivatherium giganteum is the only known species of the genus Sivatherium from the Upper Siwaliks of the Indian Subcontinent (Gaur, 1987). The earliest occurrence of the genus Sivatherium was reported by Falconer & Cautley (1835; see also Bohlin, 1926; Colbert, 1935; Gaur, 1987). The present New fossils of Sivatherium giganteum (Giraffidae, Mammalia) from the Upper Siwaliks of the Indian Subcontinent 89 discovery is significant in the sense that it represents the first report of Sivatherium giganteum from the Tatrot Formation of the Upper Siwaliks of Indian Subcontinent. As yet, there is no published report of the Sivatherium giganteum from the Tatrot Formation of the Upper Siwaliks of the Indian Subcontinent. The problem of the boundary between the Pliocene and the Pleistocene is still very doubtful both from geological and faunal viewpoints. Accordingly, due to the paucity of relevant fossil material and to limited magnetostratigraphic studies in the present study area, it is not possible to comment about the precise age of the genus Sivatherium in the Siwaliks. Hence, it is necessary to extensively explore the Siwaliks in order to solve this problem. The Siwalik giraffids can be grouped according to their size into larger-bodied and smaller-bodied forms, respecttively (Colbert, 1935; Solounias, 2007; Harris et al. 2010). The group of large forms includes Sivatherium giganteum, Bramatherium megacephalum, and Hydaspitherium megacephalum. whereas smaller forms include Giraffa punjabiensis and Giraffokeryx punjabiensis. According to (Colbert, 1935, see also Geraads and Gülec, 1999), Siwalik giraffids can be distinguished on the basis of their dentition, separating the genera Sivatherium, Bramatherium, and Hydaspitherium with largesized teeth in comparison with the genera Giraffa and Giraffokeryx with small teeth. The studied specimens (PUA/SK-07/49 and PUA/SK06/34) show largesized teeth with moderate height, and with a thick and rugose enamel, both of which are typical characteristic features of the genus Sivatherium (Table 1). According to Falconer & Cautley (1836), in the genus Sivatherium the protocone is truly crescentic with its praeprotocrista projected backward. The specimen PUA/SK-07/49 can be differentiated from the genus Bramatherium which has an L-shaped protocone; whereas in Sivatherium the protocone is crescent-shaped. According to Gentry (1997), the size of teeth is the only criterion to differentiate the Siwalik giraffid species in addition to the presence of styles/stylids, obliteration in the central fossettes, and the rugosity. Fig. 3 (a, b, c), PUA/SK - 07/49, a half right maxillary M2 of Sivatherium giganteum in a) occlusal view; b buccal view; c lingual view. (d, e, f), PUA/SK06/ 34, a left mandibular fragment with partial M 2 and M 3 of Sivatherium giganteum in d occlusal view; e buccal view; f lingual view. Bar scale represents 2cm. Suresh Kumar 90 New fossils of Sivatherium giganteum (Giraffidae, Mammalia) from the Upper Siwaliks of the Indian Subcontinent 91 The present specimens differ from Giraffa punjabiensis and Giraffokeryx punjabiensis in their overall size (Table 1). These can be also differentiated from Hydaspitherium megacephalus which is smaller than Sivatherium giganteum. The above comparisons of the specimens suggest show close morphological and dimensional similarities with Sivatherium giganteum. Moreover, S. giganteum is the only species of the genus Sivatherium known from the Upper Siwaliks of India (Gaur, 1987) Hence these specimens are assigned to Sivatherium giganteum. CONCLUSIONS The selenodont tooth pattern seen in the studied specimens indicates that the teeth belong to a ruminant. The large size and low crowns indicate that they belong to the Giraffidae, rather than to any other ruminant group. The thick and rugose enamel is indicative of Sivatherium giganteum. No worker has yet reported the occurrence of any other species of the genus Sivatherium except for S. giganteum from the Upper Siwaliks of India. Earlier, Sivatherium giganteum was recovered from the Pinjor Formation of Upper Siwaliks (Gaur, 1987). The present report extends the range of the genus Sivatherium to the Tatrot Formation, whereas it was hitherto known only from the Pinjor Formation of the Upper Siwaliks of the Indian Subcontinent. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Part of this work was carried out by the author as PostDoctoral Project Associate under the U.G.C. Major Project entitled “Search for Mio-Pliocene Primates and other Mammalia in the Siwaliks of Northwest India” awarded to the Prof. Rajan Gaur via grant number F. No. 3976/2010 (SR). Thanks are also due to Prof. Rajan Gaur for his valuable comments. The author is also thankful to the two reviewers, Jan van der Made as well as an anonymous reviewer whose comments were helpful to improve this paper. REFERENCES Akhtar, M., Sarwar, M., Saeed, M. & Khan, A. A., 1991. Vertical distribution of Siwalik Giraffids. Acta Scientia, 1(2): 145-152. Azzaroli, A. & Napoleone, G., 1982. Magnetostratigraphic investigation of the Upper Siwaliks near Pinjor, India. Rivista Italiana di Paleontologia e Stratigrafia, 87(4): 739-762. Barry, J.C., Lindsay, E.H. & Jacobs, L.L., 1982. A biostratigraphic zonation of the Middle and Upper Siwaliks of the Potwar Plateau of northern Pakistan. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 37: 95-130. Bohlin, B., 1926. Die familie Giraffidae. Palaeontologia Sinica Peking, C4 (1): 1-78. Bonaparte, C.L., 1850. Conspectus Systematis Mastozoologiae. Editio Altéra Reformata. In Conspectus Systematum, Leiden. Colbert, E. H., 1935. Siwalik mammals in the American Museum of Natural History. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, New Series 26: 1401. Dennell, R., Coard, R. & Turner, A. 2006. The biostratigraphy and magnetic polarity zonation of the Pabbi Hills, northern Pakistan: an Upper Siwalik (Pinjor Stage) Upper Pliocene-Lower Pleistocene fluvial sequence. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 234: 168-185. Falconer, H. & Cautley, P. T., 1835. Synopsis of fossil genera and species from the upper deposits of the Tertiary strata of the Siwalik Hills, in the collection of the authors. Journal Asiatic Society Bengal, 4: 706-707. Falconer, H. & Cautley, P. T., 1836. Sivatherium giganteum, a new fossil ruminant genus from the valley of the Markanda in the Siwalik Branch of the SubHimalayan Mountains. Asiatic Researches, 19: 1-24. Gaur, R., 1987. Environment and Ecology of Early Man in Northwest India: Geological and Palaeontological Evidences, B. R. Publishing Corporation, Delhi, 252 pp. Gentry, A.W., 1993. The Miocene differentiation of the old world Pecora (Mammalia). Historical Biology, 7: 115–158. Gentry, A. W., 1997. Fossil ruminants (Mammalia) from the Manonga Valley, Tanzania. In: T.J. Harrison (ed.), Neogene Paleontlogy of the Manonga Valley, Tanzania. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 107-135. Gentry, A.W., Rössner, G.E. & Heizmann, E.P.J., 1999. Suborder Ruminantia, In Rössner, G.E. & Heissig, K. (eds.), The Miocene Land Mammals of Europe. Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil, Munich, pp. 225-253. Geraads, D., 1985. Sivatherium maurusium (Pomel) (Giraffidae, Mammalia) de Pléistocène de la République de Djibouti. Paläontologische Zeitschrift, 59(3-4): 311-321. Geraads, D., 1986. Remarques sur la systrématique et la phylogénie des Giraffidae (Artiodactyla, Mammalia). Geobios, 19: 465–477. Geraads, D., Spassov, N. & Kovachev, D., 2005. Giraffidae (Artiodactyla, Mammalia) from the Late Miocene of Kalimantsi and Hadjidimovo, Southwestern Bulgaria. Geologica Balcanica, 35(1-2): 11-18. Geraads, D. & E. Gülec., 1999. A Bramatherium skull (Giraffidae, Mammalia) from the late Miocene of Kavakdere (Central Turkey): biogeographic and phylogenetic implications. Bulletin of the Mineral Research and Exploration, 121: 51-56. Gray, J.E., 1821. On the natural arrangements of vertebrose animals. London Medical Repository, 15: 297–310. Harris, J., Solounias, N. & Geraads, D., 2010. Giraffoidea. In: Werdelin, L. & Sanders, W. J. (eds.), Cenozo- Suresh Kumar 92 ic Mammals of Africa. University of California Press, 39, pp. 797-811. Hamilton, W.R., 1978. Fossil giraffes from the Miocene of Africa and a revision of the phylogeny of Giraffoidea. Transaction of Philosophical Royal Society of London B, 283: 165–229. Heintz, E., Brunet, M. & Şen, S., 1981. Un nouveau Giraffide du Miocène supérieur d’Irak: Injanatherium hazimi n. g., n. sp. Compte Rendu Hebdomadaire des Séances de l’Academie des Sciences, Paris, 292: 423– 426. Hussain, S.T.,Van Den Bergh, G.D., Steensma, K.J., De Visser J.A., De Vos, J., Arif, M., Van Dam, J., Sondaar, P.Y. & Malik, S.B., 1992. Biostratigraphy of the Plio-Pleistocene continental sediments (Upper Siwaliks) of the Mangla-Samwal Anticline, Azad Kashmir, Pakistan. Proceedings Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, Amsterdam, 95: 6580. Janis, C.M. & Scott, K.M., 1987. Grades and clades in hornless ruminant evolution: the reality of Gelocidae and the systematic position of Lophiomeryx and Bachitherium. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 7: 200–216. Johnson, N.M., Stix, J., Tauxe, L., Cerveny, P.F. & Tahirkheli, R.A.K., 1982. Magnetic polarity Stratigraphy and ages of Siwalik Group rocks of the Potwar Plateau, Pakistan. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 37: 17-42. Khan, A.A, Khan, M.A, Iqbal, M, Akhtar, M & Sarwar, M., 2011. Sivatherium (Artiodactyla, Ruminantia, Giraffidae) from the Upper Siwaliks, Pakistan. The Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences, 21(2): 202-206. Khan, A.A. & Sarwar, M., 2002. A new large Giraffe Bramatherium giganteus sp. nov. from Siwalik formations, Punjab, Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 5(3): 348-351. Kumar, S., 2009. Mammalian Palaeontology and Palaeoecological analysis of Upper Siwalik Deposits exposed in the northwest-northeast of Naraingarh (Haryana). Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Panjab University, Chandigarh. 228pp. Kumar, S., 2014. First record of Cervus (Cervidae, Mammalia) from the Tatrot Formation of Upper Siwaliks of the Indian Subcontinent. Journal Punjab Academy of Sciences, 11-12(1&2): 81-82. Lankester, E.R., 1907. On the existence of rudimentary antlers in the okapi. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 1: 126–135. Linnaeus, C., 1758. Systema Naturae per Regna Tria Naturae, Secundum Classes, Ordines, Genera, Species, cum Characteribus, Differentiis, Synonymis, Locis, Editio decima, reformata. Laurentii Salvii, Holmiae, 823 pp. Lydekker, R., 1876. Molar teeth and other remains of Mammalia. Palaeontologia Indica, 10(2): 19–87. Lydekker, R., 1878. Notices of Siwalik Mammals. Records of the Geological Survey of India, 11: 64-104. Mathew, W.D., 1929. Critical observations upon Siwalik mammals. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 56: 437-560. Nanda, A.C., 2002. Upper Siwaliks Mammalian faunas of India and associated events. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 21: 47-58. Nanda, A.C., 2013. Upper Siwalik mammalian faunas of the Himalayan foothills. Journal of the Palaeontological Society of India, 58(1): 75-86. Nanda, A.C & Shukla, S.D., 2001. Fossil giraffid from the Middle Siwalik subgroup near Dehradun. Himalayan Geology, 22(2):121-125. Opdyke, N.D., Lindsay, E., Johanson, G.D., Johnson, N., Tahirkheli, R.A.K. & Mirza, M.A., 1979. Magnetic polarity Stratigraphy and vertebrate paleontology of the Upper Siwalik Subgroup of northern Pakistan. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 27: 1-34. Owen, R., 1848. Description of teeth and portions of jaws of two extinct anthracotherioid quadrupeds (Hyopotamys vectianus and Hyopotamys bovinus) discovered by the Marchioness of Hasting in the Eocene deposits on the N.W. coast of the Island of Wright: With an attempt to develop Cuvier’s idea of the classification of pachyderms by the number of their toes. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London, 4: 103–141. Patnaik, R. & Nanda, A.C., 2010. Early Pleistocene mammalian faunas of India and evidence of connections with other parts of the World. In: Fleagle, J. G., Shea, J.J., Grine, F.E., Baden, A.L. & Leakey, R. E. (eds.). Out of Africa I: The First Hominin Colonization of Eurasia, New York, pp. 129-143. Pilgrim, G.E., 1910. Notices of new Mammalian genera and species from the Tertiaries of India. Records of the Geological Survey of India, 40: 63–71. Pilgrim, G.E., 1911. The fossil Giraffidae of India. Memoirs of the Geological Survey of India, Palaeontologia Indica, New Series 4: 1–29. Ríos, M., Sánchez, I.M. & Morales, J., 2017. A new giraffid (Mammalia, Ruminantia, Pecora) from the late Miocene of Spain, and the evolution of the sivatheresamothere lineage. Plos One, 12(11): 1-59. Solounias, N., 2007. Family Giraffidae. In: Donald R. P. and Scott E. F. (eds.), The evolution of artiodactyls, The Johns Hopkins University Press, USA, pp. 257277. Tandon S.K., Kumar R., Koyama M.& Nitsuma N., 1984. Magnetic Polarity Stratigraphy of the Upper Siwalik Subgroup East of Chandigarh, Punjab SubHimalaya, India. Journal Geological Society of India, 25: 45-55.