The Identity of Homoioplax haswelli (Miers, 1884) (Crustacea: Decapoda: Brachyura)

© 2022 Academia Sinica, Taiwan Open Access The Identity of Homoioplax haswelli (Miers, 1884) (Crustacea: Decapoda: Brachyura) Peter K. L. Ng1, Paul F. Clark2,* , and Shane T. Ahyong3 1Lee Kong Chian Natural History Museum, Faculty of Science, National University of Singapore, 2 Conservatory Drive, Singapore 117377, Republic of Singapore. E-mail: [email protected] (Ng) 2Department of Life Sciences, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, England. *Correspondence: E-mail: [email protected] (Clark) 3Australian Museum Research Institute, Australian Museum, 1 William Street, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia, and School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW 2052, Australia. E-mail: sha[email protected].au (Ahyong) Received 18 October 2021 / Accepted 24 December 2021 / Published 12 April 2022 Communicated by Benny K.K. Chan The brachyuran crab Pseudorhombila haswelli Miers, 1884, described on the basis of two juveniles from the Arafura Sea, is a poorly known species of uncertain systematic position. It was made the type and only species of Homoioplax Rathbun, 1914, and assigned to the Prionoplacinae (Goneplacidae). Subsequent revisions of the goneplacids showed Prionoplacinae to be a junior synonym of Eucratopsinae Stimpson, 1871, as a member of the Panopeidae Ortmann, 1893, but no one has re-evaluated the position of Homoioplax. As a result, Homoioplax has remained in the Panopeidae as the only Indo-West Pacific representative of the family. This study assesses the systematic status of Homoioplax haswelli based on a re-examination of the type and other material of the species. Homoioplax haswelli is here attributed to Carcinoplax H. Milne Edwards, 1852 (Goneplacidae), justifying the recognition of the species described by Miers as C. haswelli. Moreover, Carcinoplax haswelli is shown to be a senior synonym of C. sinica Chen, 1984, described from the South China Sea. Therefore, C. haswelli is now known to range from southern Taiwan and the Philippines, through the South China Sea, northern Vietnam, the eastern waters of Singapore to the Madura Straits in eastern Java and Arafura Sea, northern Australia, at 25–187 m, but usually less than 100 m depth. Key words: Pseudorhombila haswelli, Carcinoplax, New combination, Senior synonym, C. sinica, New distribution, Goneplacidae. Citation: Ng PKL, Clark PF, Ahyong ST. 2022. The identity of Homoioplax haswelli (Miers, 1884) (Crustacea: Decapoda: Brachyura). Zool Stud 61:6. doi:10.6620/ZS.2022.61-06. BACKGROUND The Panopeidae Ortmann, 1893, is a wholly American and Atlantic brachyuran family, with the exception of Homoioplax haswelli (Miers, 1884), a taxon first described from the Arafura Sea, north of Australia. The species was subsequently reliably reported only from off the Kei Islands (Tesch 1918), and off northwestern Australia (Poore et al. 2008). Homoioplax Rathbun, 1914, was established and assigned to the Prionoplacinae Alcock, 1900 in the Goneplacidae MacLeay, 1838, because the male pleon did not fully reach the bases of the ambulatory legs (Rathbun 1914: 146). Prionoplacinae was subsequently shown to be a junior synonym of Eucratopsinae Stimpson, 1871, and eventually placed in the Panopeidae Ortmann, 1893 (Guinot 1969a 1971 1978), but the position of Homoioplax was not re-evaluated. As a result, Homoioplax has remained in the Panopeidae as the only Indo-West Pacific representative of the family. To date, no one has re-examined the types of H. haswelli to clarify its identity and systematic position. Consequently, this study examined the juvenile syntypes of H. haswelli in detail with a view to revising its systematics. Zoological Studies 61: 6 (2022) doi:10.6620/ZS.2022.61-06 1 © 2022 Academia Sinica, Taiwan MATERIALS AND METHODS Specimens examined are deposited in The Natural History Museum, London, U.K. (NHM); Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris, France (MNHN); Museum Victoria, Melbourne (NMV); and Zoological Reference Collection of the Lee Kong Chian Natural History Museum, National University of Singapore (ZRC). Measurements (in millimetres) of the material examined are of the maximum carapace width (including teeth) and length, respectively. The following abbreviations are used: G1 = first male gonopod; G2 = second male gonopod; P2–P5 = pereiopods 2–5 (ambulatory legs 1–4), juv. = juvenile and stn = station. The terminology used follows Ng et al. (2008) and Davie et al. (2015). RESULTS TAXONOMY Family Goneplacidae MacLeay, 1838 Genus Carcinoplax H. Milne Edwards, 1852 Carcinoplax haswelli (Miers, 1884) comb. nov. (Figs. 1–5) Pseudorhombila vestita var. sexdentata — Miers, 1884: 184, 240, pl. 24, fig. B. Pseudorhombila haswelli Miers 1884: 241. Homoioplax haswelli — Rathbun 1914: 146; Tesch 1918: 190, pl. 10, fig. 1; Serène 1968: 91; Davie 2002: 374; Ng et al. 2008: 189; Poore et al. 2008: 73. Carcinoplax sinica Chen, 1984: 190, text-fig. 2, pl. 1, figs. 6, 10; Chen 1998: 266; fig. 3; Dai et al. 1986: 366, text-figs 190-2–1904, pl. 53, fig. 5; Guinot 1989: 285, figs. 12–14, pl. 5; Dai and Yang 1991: 395, text-figs. 190-2–190-4, pl. 53, fig. 5; Hsueh and Huang 2002: 119 126, figs. 8D, 11; Castro 2007: 640; Ng et al. 2008: 189; Ng and Mitra 2019: 2, figs. 4, 5, 6E–H, 7D–F, K, L, 8K–N. Non Pilumnoplax vestita var. sexdentata — Miers 1886: xxxi, xxxvii, 229. [= Entricoplax vestita (De Haan, 1833)] Non Homoioplax haswelli — Sakai 1939: 566, pl. 102, fig. 2; Sakai 1940: 42; Miyake 1961: 74; 1991: 220; Miyake et al. 1962: 130; Sakai 1976: 540, text-fig, 287; Kikuchi and Miyake 1978: 42 [= Carcinoplax inaequalis (Yokoya, 1933)]. Type material examined: Lectotype (here designated): male (10.2 × 7.3 mm) (NHM 1882.7), stn No. 160, Arafura Sea, Australia, 58.5–65.8 m, coll. HMS Alert, October 1881. Paralectotype: female (9.0 × 6.6 mm) (NHM 1882.7), same data as lectotype. Other material examined: 1 male (17.2 × 12.4 mm), 2 females (16.8 × 12.2 mm, 16.5 × 12.0 mm) (MNHNIU-2017-9590), stn 2, ca. 20 km northeast of Lubang Island, Western Philippines, 187 m, 14°02.8'N 120°18.8'E, coll. MUSORSTOM 1 Expedition, 19 March 1976. 1 female (40.9 × 27.7 mm) (MNHNIU-2014-11510), stn 6269, South China Sea, 31 m, coll. H. Chen, 13 May 1960; 1 male (31.7 × 20.9 mm) (ZRC 2011.0607), stn 6215, sand-mud substrate, Gulf of Tonkin, South China Sea, 48 m, ChinaVietnam Cooperative Expedition of Comprehensive Oceanographic Investigation on Beibu Gulf (Gulf of Tonkin) 1959–1960, trawl, coll. 18 April 1960; 1 juvenile female (30.2 × 19.3 mm) (ZRC 2011.0609), stn 6234, muddy-sand substrate, Gulf of Tonkin, South China Sea, 30 m, China-Vietnam Co-operative Expedition of Comprehensive Oceanographic Investigation on Beibu Gulf (Gulf of Tonkin) 1959– 1960, trawl, coll. 21 April 1960; 1 male (28.5 × 19.5 mm) (ZRC 1984.5693), near Horsburg Lighthouse, about 241.4 km off Singapore, South China Sea, coll. trawlers, H. Huat, 28 August 1983; 2 females (35.9 × 25.6 mm, 30.6 × 21.0 mm) (ZRC 1984.6312–6313), about 48.3 km from Horsburg Lighthouse, South China Sea, off Singapore, coll. trawlers, H. Huat, 10 September 1983; 1 male (35.2 × 23.4 mm), 1 female (42.8 × 29.2 mm) (ZRC 1984.7842–7843), Horsburg Lighthouse, South China Sea, near Singapore, coll. trawlers, H. Huat, 26 November 1982 and 15 December 1982; 1 male (34.6 × 25.0 mm) (ZRC 1984.6314), near Horsburg Lighthouse, about 241.4 km off Singapore, South China Sea, coll. trawlers, H. Huat, 28 August 1983; 1 female (44.0 × 29.3 mm) (ZRC 2001.0136), Tungkang, Kaohsiung County, southwestern Taiwan, coll. L.-S. Huang, 4 August 1996; 1 male (16.3 × 12.2 mm) (NMV J55673), off Ningaloo North, 21°54'4"S 113°49'12"E to 21°59'03"S 113°49'12"E, 170–177 m, RV Southern Surveyor SS10/2005/152, coll. G. Poore, 10 December 2005. Comparative material: Carcinoplax longimanus (De Haan, 1833): 1 male (24.7 × 19.4 mm) (MNHNIU-2014-11510), stn CP63, Tanimbar Island, Moluccas, 8°00'S 132°58'E, 214–215 m, Moluccas, Indonesia, coll. KARUBAR Expedition, N.O. Baruna Jaya 1, 1 November 1991; 2 males, 1 female, 1 large chela, 2 juvenile males (10.9 × 8.4 mm, 14.1 × 10.5 mm), 3 juv. females (12.9 × 9.8 mm, 13.6 × 10.5 mm, 15.0 × 10.9 mm) (ZRC 2019.1691), stn CP37, substrate fine mud with pieces of small branches, south of Cilacap, Java, Indonesia, 8°07.462'S 109°05.639'E – 8°07.864'S 109°06.470'E, 163–166 m, beam trawl, coll. SJADES 2018, 30 March 2018; 3 males (smallest 20.6 × 15.0 mm) (ZRC 1999.772), Dasi, Ilan County, Taiwan, coll. P.K.L. Ng and K. Lim, May 1999. Carcinoplax purpurea Rathbun, 1914: 2 males (8.5 × 6.7 mm, 13.3 × 10.3 mm), 1 female (20.0 × 15.0 mm) (ZRC 2006.187), stn CP 2377, Dipolog Bay, 8°40.6'N, 123°20.3'E, 85–88 m, Bohol/Sulu seas, Philippines, coll. PANGLAO page 2 of 16Zoological Studies 61: 6 (2022) © 2022 Academia Sinica, Taiwan 2005 Deep-Sea Cruise, M/V DA-BFAR, 28 May 2005; 1 male (16.9 × 13.3 mm) (ZRC 2001.18), Dasi, Ilan County, Taiwan, coll. K.-X. Li, 6 November 2000. See Ng and Mitra (2019) for additional comparative material of C. purpurea and C. mistio Ng & Mitra, 2019. Diagnosis: Carapace transversely hexagonal, width 1.34–1.56 times length; dorsal surface gently convex, smooth, lateral surfaces with densely packed low, rounded granules, more prominent in adults; epigastric region low but visible; postorbital regions not clearly demarcated; frontal margin lamellar, truncate, bilobed with small median notch, supraorbital lobe low, not easily discernible, demarcated by groove, but not distinctly projecting laterally; anterolateral margin with first tooth low not spiniform, second tooth spiniform, long, acute, sharp, curving gently obliquely anteriorly; posterolateral margin gradually converging posteriorly or subparallel; posterior margin of epistome with prominent but low triangular median projection, separated from lateral lobe by obtuse cleft. Third maxilliped merus with anteroexternal margin auriculiform. Cheliped with dorsal margin of palm Fig. 1. Overall dorsal view. Carcinoplax haswelli (Miers, 1884) comb. nov. A, lectotype male (10.2 × 7.3 mm) (NHM 1882.7); B, paralectotype female (9.0 × 6.6 mm) (NHM 1882.7). Taken by Kevin Webb, NHM Photo Unit. Scale bar in millimetres. page 3 of 16 Zoological Studies 61: 6 (2022) © 2022 Academia Sinica, Taiwan rounded, smooth; carpus mesial margin with prominent, low rounded tooth, lateral margin with small spine; merus elongate with low rounded tooth on distal onethird of dorsal margin. Ambulatory legs (P2–P5) slender, long. Thoracic sternum surface covered with numerous small, rounded, densely packed granules; sternopleonal cavity extending to about two-thirds length of sternite 4, reaching imaginary line connecting proximal part of coxae of chelipeds. Male pleon triangular, transversely broad in adults, somite 6 transversely rectangular, width 1.85 times length, lateral margins gently convex. Telson triangular with distinctly concave lateral margins. Adult G1 relatively slender, distal two-thirds with mesial margin gently concave; distal part slightly flared, laterally flattened, subtruncate; G2 longer than G1, distal article flagelliform, about three-quarters length of basal segment; vulvae ovate, large, level with surface of sternum. Remarks: Homoioplax Rathbun, 1914, is here considered to be a junior subjective synonym of Carcinoplax H. Milne Edwards, 1852. Rathbun (1914) argued for a separate genus because of the slightly Fig. 2. Carcinoplax haswelli (Miers, 1884) comb. nov. A, C, D, lectotype male (10.2 × 7.3 mm) (NHM 1882.7); B, E, F, paralectotype female (9.0 × 6.6 mm) (NHM 1882.7). A, B, frontal view of cephalothorax; C, E, ventral view of cephalothorax; D, F, outer view of left chela. Taken by Kevin Webb, NHM Photo Unit. Scale bar in millimetres. page 4 of 16Zoological Studies 61: 6 (2022) © 2022 Academia Sinica, Taiwan narrower male pleon, notably somite 3 of H. haswelli that does not cover the part of the sternum next to the P5 coxa. It is not possible, however, to confirm this character because Miers (1884) did not figure the male pleon and this structure is now missing from the type specimen. A good series of juvenile C. longimanus, C. purpurea Rathbun, 1914, and C. sinica Chen, 1984, however, was examined for this study including specimens similar in size to the types of H. haswelli. In juvenile Carcinoplax, the lateral edge of male pleonal somite 3 does not reach the base of the P5 coxa, leaving a small gap (Figs. 4G, 6F, 8D). In juveniles and adults, the edge of pleonal somite 3 almost reaches or partly overlaps the coxa (Figs. 4H, 7C). In juvenile females, the pleon is triangular overall with somite 3 transversely narrower, leaving a wide area of the sternum exposed (Fig. 4F). As such, the primary diagnostic character for Homoioplax is size-related and typical of juvenile Carcinoplax at a similar stage. In all other characters, Homoioplax corresponds to Carcinoplax; the two genera are herein considered synonymous. Determining which of the two juvenile NHM Fig. 3. Overall dorsal view. Carcinoplax haswelli (Miers, 1884) comb. nov. A, female (16.5 × 12.0 mm) (MNHN-IU-2017-9590), Philippines; B, male (28.5 × 19.5 mm) (ZRC 1984.5693), South China Sea. page 5 of 16 Zoological Studies 61: 6 (2022) © 2022 Academia Sinica, Taiwan Fig. 4. Carcinoplax haswelli (Miers, 1884) comb. nov. A, F, female (16.5 × 12.0 mm) (MNHN-IU-2017-9590), Philippines; B, female (16.8 × 12.2 mm) (MNHN-IU-2017-9590), Philippines; C, D, E, G, male (17.2 × 12.4 mm) (MNHN-IU-2017-9590), Philippines; H, male (28.5 × 19.5 mm) (ZRC 1984.5693), South China Sea. A–C, dorsal view of carapace; D, ventral view of cephalothorax; E, frontal view of cephalothorax; F–H, posterior thoracic sternum and pleon. page 6 of 16Zoological Studies 61: 6 (2022) © 2022 Academia Sinica, Taiwan type specimens of Pseudorhombila vestita var. haswelli Miers, 1884 was figured by Miers (1884: pl. 24, fig. B) proved relatively straight forward even though both are now without a pleon. Enigmatically, Miers (1884: 241) referred to these two specimens as, “one male and the other sterile”. One specimen was clearly recognised as a male by its possession of gonopods, or “verges” fide Miers (1884: 241). The base of the P5 coxa of both type specimens was examined and one was found to possess a tiny translucent papilla, which is the penis, i.e., it is a male. The other specimen, lacking the penis, would correspond to the “sterile”, specimen, and is determined here to be a juvenile female. The absence of gonopods together with a presumably narrow, juvenile pleon explains the uncertainty by Miers about the sex of the specimen. The carapace of the male is the larger (10.2 × 7.3 mm) and agrees better with the specimen figured by Miers (1884: pl. 24, fig. B). Furthermore, the right cheliped, although not shown in figure 1A, is detached but still extant. In the smaller female (9.0 × 6.6 mm), the right cheliped is larger and more swollen (Fig. 1B) than that figured by Miers. The male is here designated the lectotype in order to stabilize the taxonomy of this species, which is now referred to as Carcinoplax haswelli comb. nov. The pleonal morphology of the juvenile specimens of C. haswelli comb. nov. is of interest. In the juvenile specimens identified as “C. sinica” from the Philippines (MNHN-IU-2017-9590), the pleon is triangular and male-like. Guinot (1989: 285) recorded all three as males, but only one is male, the other two being juvenile females. In comparison to that of the male, the pleon in the juvenile females is more acutely triangular with somite 3 narrower, exposing more of the adjacent thoracic sternum (Fig. 4F), the peg on sternite 5 for the pleonal locking mechanism is distinct, the vulvae are not visible but the pleopods are distinct although not setose. In the juvenile male, the pleon is wider and more obtusely triangular with somite 3 wide and reaching almost to the coxa of the walking legs (Fig. 4G), the peg on sternite 5 for the pleonal locking mechanism is visible, the G1 is visible but still soft and not well developed, but the penis is distinct, being present as a tube extending from the gonopore on the condyle of the P5 coxa and resting on a groove reaching to the base of the G1. The two type specimens Fig. 5. Carcinoplax haswelli (Miers, 1884) comb. nov., male (16.3 × 12.2 mm) (NMV J55673), Western Australia. A, carapace, dorsal view; B, cephalothorax, ventral view; C, cephalothorax, anterior view; D, right chela, outer view. page 7 of 16Zoological Studies 61: 6 (2022) © 2022 Academia Sinica, Taiwan of C. haswelli comb. nov. are juveniles, complicating taxonomic determination, more so because many species of Carcinoplax undergo substantial ontogenetic changes, with changes in carapace shape and reduction of armature, and changes in relative pereiopod length and proportions with increasing body size, for instance (see Guinot 1989). Several features present in the types of C. haswelli comb. nov., however, allow significant narrowing of closely related or conspecific species of Carcinoplax: the carapace is transversely rectangular to subhexagonal, with the posterolateral margins subparallel; the anterolateral margin has the first tooth low, with the second tooth acute and curved; the outer surface of the carpus of the cheliped has a short spine; the spine on the inner angle of the carpus of the cheliped is dorsoventrally flattened, gently curved with the tip bluntly rounded, rather than acutely sharp; and the fingers of the chelipeds are not pigmented brown or black. The combination of these features place C. haswelli comb. nov. within in a small group of species of Carcinoplax, each of which generally occupies mid to outer shelf depths: C. purpurea (17–180 m), C. sinica (25–187 m) and C. mistio Ng & Mitra, 2019 (13–49 m) (Chen 1984; Guinot 1989; Castro 2007; Ng and Mitra 2019). In describing C. sinica, Chen (1984: 192, 201) examined a large series of specimens spanning a wide size range of this species as well as C. purpurea. Chen separated the two species mainly by the shape of the carapace, shape and strength of the last anterolateral spine and colour pattern of freshly collected specimens. Guinot (1989: 287) further refined the taxonomy of C. sinica, distinguishing it from C. purpurea by characters of the degree of inflation of the carapace and anterolateral armature, as well as colour in life, although the characters are best observed in adult specimens. Castro (2007) followed the assessment of Guinot in his revision of the genus. Ng and Mitra (2019) showed that specimens of C. sinica reported from the Persian Gulf (Guinot 1989; Castro 2007; Naderloo 2017) belonged to a new species, C. mistio, and provided additional characters to separate the three species. Carcinoplax mistio is excluded from our detailed comparisons because it is known only from adults and because it is a northern Indian Ocean species, ranging from the western Bay of Bengal to the Persian Gulf (Stephensen 1946; Guinot 1989; Naderloo 2017; Ng and Mitra 2019), which is well outside of the range of C. sinica, C. purpurea and C. haswelli comb. nov., each of which are western Pacific or southwestern Indian Ocean species occurring to the east of Singapore (Miers 1884; Chen 1984; Guinot 1989; Castro 2007; Ng and Mitra 2019). Given that the types of C. haswelli comb. nov. are juveniles, comparisons with allied taxa are best accomplished with specimens at a similar stage of development. Only adults of C. mistio are known, but fortunately, series of C. purpurea and C. sinica, including juveniles, were available for study. Comparisons show that C. haswelli comb. nov. and C. sinica are indistinguishable, but readily separated from C. purpurea. The carapace of juvenile P. haswelli comb. nov. and C. sinica is more transversely rectangular in shape (Figs. 1A, B, 3A, 4A–C, 5A, B) than the more narrowly quadrate form in C. purpurea, Fig. 6A, B); the last anterolateral spine is prominent, directed obliquely outwards at an angle of about 45° to the longitudinal and is usually gently curved but sometimes almost straight (Figs. 1A, B, 3A, 4A–C) (versus spine distinctly shorter, and curved more anteriorly at an angle of about 30° to the longitudinal in C. purpurea, Fig. 6A, B); and the supraorbital lobe is very low to almost undiscernible in juveniles (Figs. 1A, B, 3A, 4A–C), becoming more obvious in adults only because the fissure demarcating it is more pronounced but the lobe is still low (Fig. 3B) (versus there is a small but visible lateral lobe just behind the front, corresponding to a supraorbital tooth, low in juveniles in C. purpurea, Fig. 6A, C; but more distinct in larger specimens, Fig. 6B). These differences are also evident in the excellent figures of the juvenile specimens of C. purpurea and C. sinica by Chen (1984: figs. 1.1–4, 2.1–4). The differences in carapace shape also correlate with differences in the width to length proportions; in C. purpurea, the carapace is proportionally narrower, with a width to length ratio of 1.27–1.32 compared to 1.34–1.56 in C. sinica, and 1.40 and 1.36 for the two types of C. haswelli comb. nov. The variation in C. haswelli relates mainly to the strength of the last anterolateral tooth. In addition, the median part of the posterior margin of the epistome is often also proportionately slightly narrower and more produced in frontal view in P. haswelli and C. sinica (Figs. 2A, B, 4E, 5C) than in C. purpurea (versus proportionately wider and straighter, Fig. 6D). Altogether, we could find no features to distinguish C. haswelli comb. nov. from C. sinica. Therefore, on the basis of the available evidence, C. haswelli comb. nov. (Miers, 1884) is regarded as a senior subjective synonym of C. sinica Chen, 1984. Castro (2007: 640) recorded a specimen of “C. sinica” from the Tanimbar Islands, Moluccas, eastern Indonesia, at 215 m depth (MNHN-IU-2014-11510). This specimen, re-examined here, is considered to be a juvenile male of C. longimanus (Fig. 7). In juvenile C. longimanus the first anterolateral tooth of the carapace is low, the second tooth is acute and straight or slightly curved at an angle of about 45°, the outer surface of the carpus of the cheliped has a short spine, and the spine on the inner angle of the carpus of the cheliped is dorsoventrally flattened (Figs. 7A, 8A, 9). The inner page 8 of 16Zoological Studies 61: 6 (2022) © 2022 Academia Sinica, Taiwan Fig. 6. Carcinoplax purpurea Rathbun, 1914. A, C–F: male (8.5 × 6.7 mm) (ZRC 2006.187), Philippines; B, male (16.9 × 13.3 mm) (ZRC 2001.18), Taiwan. page 9 of 16Zoological Studies 61: 6 (2022) © 2022 Academia Sinica, Taiwan Števčić Z. 2011. Addition to the reclassification of brachyuran crabs (Crustacea: Decapoda: Brachyura). Part I. New taxa. Natura Croatica 20(1):125–139. Stimpson W. 1858. Prodromus descriptionis animalium evertebratorum in expeditione ad Oceanum Pacificum Septentrionalem missa, C. Ringgold et Johanne Rodgers ducibus, observatorum et descriptorum. Pars IV. Crustacea Cancroidea et Corystoidea. Proc Acad Natl Sci Philad 10:31–40 [29–37]. Stimpson W. 1871. Preliminary Report on the Crustacea dredged in the Gulf Stream in the Straits of Florida, by L. F. de Pourtales, Assist. U. S. Coast Survey. Part I. Brachyura. Bull Mus Comp Zool Harv 2:109–160. Tesch JJ. 1918. The Decapoda Brachyura of the Siboga Expedition. Hymenosomidae, Retroplumidae, Ocypodidae, Grapsidae and Gecarcinidae. Siboga Exped 39c:1–148, pls. 1–6. Yokoya Y. 1933. On the distribution of Decapod Crustaceans inhabiting the continental shelf around Japan, chiefly based upon the materials collected by the S.S. Sôyô-Maru, during the year 1923–1930. J Coll Agric Tohoku Imp Univ 12(1):1–226, figs. 1–71, tabs. 1–4. page 16 of 16Zoological Studies 61: 6 (2022)