scieee AI-readable full text Open interactive document viewer

Biogeography and Ecological Differentiation of Pseudasphondylia gall midges (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) Distributed in Taiwan and Japan, with Description of a New Species P. kiwiphila sp. nov. and the Southernmost Record of P. elaeocarpi

Hidaka, Chiho; Yang, Chien-Hui; Wakabayashi, Kaori

Abstract

Hidaka, Chiho, Yang, Chien-Hui, Wakabayashi, Kaori (2022): Biogeography and Ecological Differentiation of Pseudasphondylia gall midges (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) Distributed in Taiwan and Japan, with Description of a New Species P. kiwiphila sp. nov. and the Southernmost Record of P. elaeocarpi. Zoological Studies 61 (39): 1-13, DOI: 10.6620/ZS.2022.61-39, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12827276

Full text

© 2022 Academia Sinica, Taiwan Open Access Biogeography and Ecological Differentiation of Pseudasphondylia gall midges (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) Distributed in Taiwan and Japan, with Description of a New Species P. kiwiphila sp. nov. and the Southernmost Record of P. elaeocarpi Sheng-Feng Lin1, Makoto Tokuda2, Gene-Sheng Tung3, Liang-Yu Pan3, Wanggyu Kim4, Junichi Yukawa5, and Man-Miao Yang1,* 1Department of Entomology, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan. *Correspondence: E-mail: mmy[email protected] (Yang). E-mail: [email protected] (Lin) 2Department of Biological Resource Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Saga University, Japan. E-mail: [email protected] (Tokuda) 3Division of Botanical Garden, Taiwan Forestry Research Institute, Taipei, Taiwan. E-mail: [email protected].tw (Tung); [email protected] (Pan) 4Animal Resources Division, National Institute of Biological Resources, Incheon, Republic of Korea. E-mail: [email protected] (Kim) 5Entomological Laboratory, Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan. E-mail: [email protected] (Yukawa) Received 19 March 2022 / Accepted 13 May 2022 / Published 11 October 2022 Communicated by Jen-Pan Huang Pseudasphondylia species (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) are known to induce fruit galls on Actinidia rufa (Siebold & Zucc.) Planch. ex Miq. and finger-like leaf galls on Elaeocarpus sylvestris (Lour.) Poir. in Taiwan, but their taxonomic positions remain undetermined. Based on gall morphology and host plants, they were supposed to be the same or allied species of known Japanese congeners, i.e., P. matatabi Yuasa & Kumazawa inducing flower-bud galls on Actinidia polygama (Sieb. et Zucc.) Maxim and P. elaeocarpi Tokuda & Yukawa inducing finger-like leaf galls on E. sylvestris. Species identifications of these Taiwanese species provide us an opportunity to study biogeographical aspects and transition of ecological features in these Pseudasphondylia species distributed in East Asian Arc. Morphological comparisons and species delimitation by molecular analysis indicated that the cecidomyiid on the fruit of A. rufa is distinct from P. matatabi and thus it is described as a species new to science, P. kiwiphila sp. nov. Lin, Tokuda, & Yang. The leaf galler on E. sylvestris was identical to P. elaeocarpi, whose southernmost distribution range extended to Taiwan, a new record of its distribution. COI-based phylogenetic tree (Bayesian inference and IQ tree) of Pseudasphondylia suggested that leaf galling habitat and univoltine life history are ancestral, whereas fruit or flower-bud galling and multivoltine life history are derived. In addition, the monophyletic Actinidia-associated species lineage is sistered to the clade including the remaining Japanese fruit and flower-bud gallers, suggesting that Pseudasphondylia has colonized on the host genus Actinidia once and later speciated on different plant species of the host genus. As a biogeographical aspect of P. elaeocarpi, 2.7% of the COI distance between Japanese and Taiwanese individuals indicates that they have diverged around 1.2 mya, which corresponds to the last but second separation of Taiwan and Japan in the Pleistocene. As for Actinidia-associated Pseudasphondylia species, the two valid species are allopatric and have distinct areas of origin, suggesting they may have speciated allopatrically. Nevertheless, there is still the possibility of ecological speciation due to the following reasons: (1) Host species (and varieties) Citation: Lin SF, Tokuda M, Tung GS, Pan LY, Kim W, Yukawa J, Yang MM. 2022. Biogeography and ecological differentiation of Pseudasphondylia gall midges (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) distributed in Taiwan and Japan, with description of a new species P. kiwiphila sp. nov. and the southernmost record of P. elaeocarpi. Zool Stud 61:39. doi:10.6620/ZS.2022.61-39. Zoological Studies 61:39 (2022) doi:10.6620/ZS.2022.61-39 1 © 2022 Academia Sinica, Taiwan BACKGROUND The genus Pseudasphondylia Monzen (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae: Asphondyliini) is distributed in the Palearctic, Oriental, and Oceanian regions and comprises the following 12 gall-inducing species: P. campanulata (Mani, 1954), P. diospyri Mo & Xu, 1999, P. elaeocarpi Tokuda and Yukawa, 2005, P. kiritanii Tokuda & Yukawa, 2005, P. matatabi (Yuasa & Kumazawa, 1938), P. neolitseae Yukawa, 1974, P. philadelphi (Kovalev, 1964), P. rauwolfiae Coutin, 1980, P. rokuharensis Monzen, 1955, P. saohimea Matsuda, Elsayed & Tokuda, 2021, P. tominagai Elsayed & Tokuda, 2019, and P. zanthoxyli Mo, Bu & Li, 2007. In Taiwan, Tung et al. (2018) assumed that three gall midge species belong to the genus Pseudasphondylia, all of which induce galls similar to those of Japanese congeners on the same or allied host plants. One species induces finger-like leaf galls on Elaeocarpus sylvestris (Elaeocarpaceae) (Fig. 1A), which resemble those induced by the Japanese P. elaeocarpi on the same host (Yukawa and Masuda 1996; Tokuda and Yukawa 2005); the second species induces ball-shaped leaf galls on five Neolitsea species (Lauraceae) (Liang et al. 1999; Tung et al. 2018) as Japanese P. neolitseae associated with Neolitsea sericea (Yukawa 1974; Tokuda and Yukawa 2005); the third species induces fruit galls on Actinidia rufa (Siebold & Zucc.) Planch. ex Miq. (Actinidiaceae) (Tung et al. 2018; Fig. 1B) and may be an allied species of the Japanese P. matatabi inducing a similar sort of gall on Actinidia polygama (Tokuda and Yukawa 2005). The fruit gall on A. rufa was also found in Japan, but the species remains unidentified (Nagai 2016). These findings suggest the high affinity of cecidomyiid fauna between Taiwan and Japan and provide an ideal system in biogeography to confirm divergence patterns and speciation processes of the insular species/populations. Although Tung et al. (2018) treated the abovementioned Taiwanese gall midges as the genus Pseudasphondylia, they were left unidentified. Therefore, in this study we determine the taxonomic positions of Pseudasphondylia gall midges associated with A. rufa and Taiwanese E. sylvestris by integration of morphological comparisons and molecular analyses. Then, we further explore their biogeographical aspects related to host distribution, genetic distances, ecological features, and their phylogenetic relationship within the genus Pseudasphondylia. and unidentified congener of Actinidia-associated Pseudasphondylia are occurring China, revealing potential occurrence of these gall midges. (2) The divergence time (2.2–2.9 mya) of the two known species corresponds to the late Pliocene to Pleistocene, when China, Taiwan, and Japan were part of the East Asian continent. During this period, their host species were sympatric in southeast China. (3) The host of two named Actinidia-associated Pseudasphondylia species each belong to different plant groups with distinct fruit features. These presume that the speciation might have been caused via sympatric host shift. Key words: Actinidia, Biogeography, Elaeocarpus sylvestris, Kiwi fruit gall, Speciation. Fig. 1. Galls of Taiwanese Pseudasphondylia species. (A) Fingershaped leaf galls on Elaeocarpus sylvestris. (B) Fruit gall on Actinidia rufa. page 2 of 13Zoological Studies 61:39 (2022) © 2022 Academia Sinica, Taiwan MATERIALS AND METHODS Collecting and examination of specimens Finger-like leaf galls on E. sylvestris in Taiwan and swollen fruit galls on A. rufa in Taiwan and Japan were surveyed and collected from 1999 to 2021. The collected galls were dissected under a microscope, and larval and pupal specimens of gall midges were preserved in plastic tubes with 95% ethanol for morphological and molecular studies. In addition, branches with galled leaves or fruit were inserted in a sealed water vial to keep moisture and maintained under laboratory conditions until adult emergence. Adult specimens were preserved in 70% ethanol for morphological examination. Specimens were mounted on slides following the procedures in Gagné (1994), and the morphological traits were examined according to Gagné (1994) and Tokuda (2004) using a microscope (Leica DM 750, Germany) and photographed with a digital camera (Canon 80D, Japan). We also examined the type specimens of P. elaeocarpi and P. matatabi that are kept in the collection of the Entomological Laboratory, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan (ELKU). Taiwanese specimens examined in the present study were deposited into the Taiwan Forestry Research Institute, Taiwan (TFRI) and National Chung Hsing University, Taiwan (NCHU). DNA sequencing, genetic distance and species delimitation Mitochondrial DNA sequences (partial region of the cytochrome oxidase subunit I; COI gene: 689 bp) of two cecidomyiid individuals inducing leaf galls on E. sylvestris in Taiwan and five cecidomyiid individuals inducing fruit galls on A. rufa in Taiwan and Japan (Table 1) were obtained by the following process. Whole DNA was extracted from larval specimens adding 50 μl of QuickExtract Tissue Kit solution (Epicentre Biotechnologies, Madison, WI) following the manufacturer’s instructions. We used the following primers for six Taiwanese individuals and one Japanese individual: Diptera-49F(5'- AATCATAAAGATATTGGAAC-3') and Diptera-734R (5'-CAACATTTATTTTGATTTTTTGG-3') (Pan et al. 2015), and LCO1490 (5'-GGTCAACAAATCATAA AGATATTGG-3') and HCO2198 (5'-TAAACTTCAG GGTGACCAAAAAATCA-3') (Folmer et al. 1994), respectively. The amplification and polymerase chain reaction condition followed Lin et al. (2020a). The purification of amplification products was carried out by QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, German) for direct sequencing. DNA sequences were checked via the software BioEdit (Hall 1999). To compare genetic distances, two COI sequences of Japanese P. elaeocarpi (LC621306) and P. matatabi (AB085873) were downloaded from the National Center for Biotechnology Information and further compared with seven newly obtained COI sequences (Table 1) via p-distance using MEGA X (Kumar et al. 2018). For species delimitation, two downloaded and seven newly obtained COI sequences were aligned via ClustalW (Thompson et al. 1994) with BioEdit (Hall 1999) and further performed via Automatic Barcode Gap Discovery (ABGD) method (Puillandre et al. 2012; webpage: http://wwwabi.snv.jussieu.fr/public/abgd). Calculation mode and parameter as default setting: Jukes-Cantor (JC69) distance, X (relative gap width) = 1.5, Pmin = 0.001, Pmax = 0.1, Steps = 10, Number of Table 1. DNA information on Pseudasphondylia species Species name Galling organ Host/ Distribution Accession No.* P. elaeocarpi Leaf Elaeocarpus sylvestris / Yona, Japan LC621306a Pseudasphondylia sp. Leaf Elaeocarpus sylvestris / Mt. Dahan, Taiwan LC710536-37 P. saohimea Leaf Magnolia kobus var. borealis / Tomakomai, Japan LC621304a P. matatabi Flower-bud Actinidia polygama / Ino, Japan AB085873b Pseudasphondylia sp. Fruit Actinidia rufa / Nobeoka, Japan LC710538 Pseudasphondylia sp. Flower bud/Fruit Actinidia rufa / Mt. Yangming, Taiwan LC710532-35 P. kiritanii Flower-bud Cornus controversa / Futo, Japan LC538356c P. tominagai Flower-bud Eleutherococcus spinosus / Misugi, Japan LC621302a P. rokuharensis Fruit Viburnum dilatatum / Hanayama, Japan LC538357c Outgroups Bruggmanniella litseae Leaf Litsea acuminata / SanYi, Taiwan LC475501d Illiciomyia yukawai Leaf Illicium anisatum / Mt. Hikosan, Japan LC348719e *Sequence information of “a”, “b”, “c”, “d”, and “e” refers to Matsuda et al. (2021), Yukawa et al. (2003), Lin et al. (2020b), Lin et al. (2020a), and Uechi et al. (2018), respectively; bold text refer to present study. page 3 of 13Zoological Studies 61:39 (2022) © 2022 Academia Sinica, Taiwan bins = 20. Phylogenetic placement and divergence time Phylogenetic clustering was performed using the Maximum Likelihood (ML) method with IQTREE online version (Trifinopoulos et al. 2016; webpage: http://iqtree.cibiv.univie.ac.at/) and Bayesian inference (BI) via MrBayes 3.2 (Ronquist et al. 2012). Sequences of other four allied Pseudasphondylia species and one outgroup species Illiciomyia yukawai Tokuda (Table 1) were added to infer phylogenetic placement of Taiwanese species/taxa. For ML inference, the supported score caudated by 1000 ultrafast bootstrap (Minh et al. 2013) and 1000 bootstrap (Felsenstein 1985) replicates. As for BI, the best-fit substitution model GTR+G was determined via jModelTest 2.1.10 (Darriba et al. 2012) using the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC). Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) chain length was 1 × 106 generations with sampling every 1000 generations with the first 25% of steps discarded as burn‐in. Posterior probabilities (PP) were summarized on a maximum clade credibility tree. The phylogenetic tree was presented and edited by FigTree 1.4.3 (Rambaut 2009). The divergence time of Pseudasphondylia on E. sylvestris and that on Actinidia were separately evaluated according to Brower (1994) as 2.3% of COI genetic distance per million years. RESULTS TAXONOMY Order Diptera Linnaeus, 1758 Family Cecidomyiidae Newman, 1834 Tribe Asphondyliini Enderlein, 1914 Genus Pseudasphondylia Monzen, 1955 Pseudasphondylia Monzen 1955: 41. Type species: P. rokuharensis Monzen, 1955. Philadelphella Kovalev 1964: 440. Type species. P. philadelphi Kovalev, 1964. The genus is characterized as follows: the mediobasal lobes of the gonostyli is present and unsclerotized; two separate teeth of gonostylus on male terminalia; the presence of elongate spiracles on the pupal abdomen; and the absence of setae on the larval cervical papillae. General descriptions of the genus are shown in Tokuda and Yukawa (2005) and key to males of known species in Elsayed et al. (2019) and Matsuda et al. (2021). In this paper, one new species is described and one known species is recorded for the first time in Taiwan. Pseudasphondylia kiwiphila sp. nov. Lin, Tokuda & Yang (Figs. 2–3; Table 2) urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:2CFC9093-2918-4D80-B2E9BF2FC36231CC Type material: Holotype: Male (on a slide, TFRI). TAIWAN: Taipei City, Erziping trial, 11.x.2014, leg. HL Lee. Paratypes. TAIWAN: 3♂, 4♀, 8 exuviae (on slides, TFRI), same data as holotype; 5 exuviae (in ethanol, NCHU), same data as holotype; 1 pupa (in ethanol, TFRI), 1 larva (on a slide, TFRI), Taipei City, Erziping trial, 1.ix.2017, leg. CT Hsu; 9 larvae (8 on slides, 1 in ethanol, TFRI) Taipei City, Mt. Yangming (GPS: N25.1717072, E121.5403027), 19.viii.2018, leg. J Liu. Distribution: Taiwan and Japan. Etymology: The species name refers to its host which is derived from the common name of the fruit “kiwi” and favorite in Greek “phila”. Host: Actinidia rufa (Siebold & Zucc.) Planch. ex Miq. Gall: One or several chambers in each fruit gall, gall size 9–10 mm in diameter; smaller than normal fruit (Tung et al. 2018). Early stages of gall development occur at host flowering season in April to May. Galls continuously develop and mature in July or August. Galled fruit falls to the ground in October or November. Life history: According to Tung et al. (2018), females lay their eggs on flowers of A. rufa during April and May, and larvae mature in the fruit galls in August and September. They pupate during September to October, and adults emerge from September to October. The life cycle of the new species is similar to the Japanese congener P. matatabi, which also has one generation on Actinidia from spring to autumn. The remaining parts of the life history are still unclear, but the gall midge possibly alternates host plant(s) to overwinter as has been suggested for P. matatabi and another congener P. kiritanii in Japan (Tokuda and Yukawa 2005). Some immature larvae of the new species, possibly diapausing, were found in fallen galls in winter. Adult: Head. Eye bridge five to six facets long. Frontoclypeal setal counts as in table 2. Palpus threesegmented (Fig. 2A), first palpal segment 35–50 μm long, same as width; second 1.3× as long as first; third 3.7× as long as first. Scape and pedicel with rather dense setae and scales; male first flagellomere ca. 200 μm long, 4.0× as long as wide and 1.1× as long as second, page 4 of 13Zoological Studies 61:39 (2022) © 2022 Academia Sinica, Taiwan Fig. 2. Pseudasphondylia kiwiphila sp. nov. (A) Male head (ventral view) (B) Male antenna (8–12 segment). (C) Female antenna (8–12 segment). (D) Male 5th tarsomere. (E) Female 5th tarsomere. (F) Male wing. (G) Female wing. Scale bars: A–C = 0.02 mm; D–F = 0.1 mm; G–H = 1 mm. Table 2. Frontoclypeal and thoracic setal of Pseudasphondylia kiwiphila sp. nov. Specimens Male Female nMean ± SD Range nMean ± SD Range Frontoclypeal setae 4 41.8 ± 13.0 27–55 4 36.0 ± 4.5 30–41 Anterior dorsolateral setae 4 75.3 ± 8.7 64–83 4 70.5 ± 7.0 66–81 Posterior dorsolateral setae 3 81.3 ± 21.2 57–96 3 80.0 ± 1.7 79–82 Mesopleural scales 4 44.8 ± 6.7 37–53 4 41.5 ± 8.9 30–49 Mesepimeral setae 4 56.3 ± 2.9 52–58 4 43.5 ± 8.4 35–55 page 5 of 13Zoological Studies 61:39 (2022) © 2022 Academia Sinica, Taiwan 1.6× as long as fifth, distal three segments similar length (Fig. 2B); female first flagellomere ca. 230 μm, 1.4× as long as second and fifth, distal three flagellomeres gradually shortened and terminal one subglobular (Fig. 2C). Thorax: Thoracic setal and scale counts as in table 2. All legs covered with many blackish scales, first tarsomeres of all legs with apical spur. Claws simple and strongly curved on all legs; pulvilli shorter than claws; empodia slightly longer than claw (Fig. 2D–E). Male wing 2.6–3.1 mm long, 2.2× as wide; female wing 3.0–3.5 mm long, 2.2× as long as wide; densely covered with dark grayish hairs; R5 joining costa a little beyond wing apex (Fig. 2F–G). Male Abdomen: First through seventh tergites rectangular with three to six rows of posterior setae; elsewhere covered with scales on first through seventh tergites; eighth tergite without setae. Terminalia (Fig. 3A): cerci incised deeply by U-shaped emargination, apex setose; hypoproct incised deeply by V-shaped emargination, each lobe with one apical seta; gonostylus suboval, situated posteriorly to gonocoxite; mediobasal lobe present, shorter than cerci and hypoproct; aedeagus laterally sclerotized, distally tapering. Female abdomen: Ovipositor protractile, slender, aciculate, basally with a bilobed cerci-like structure; needle part 1.6 mm long, 2.8× as long as the length of seventh sternite. Otherwise as in male. Pupa: Body length ca. 3.2 mm, pupal skin not pigmented except for antennal horns. Antennal horn 320–420 µm long, triangular, lateral smoothly (Fig. 3B); cephalic papilla with seta, 90–110 µm long; frons without horns; a pair of lateral facial papillae on each side; prothoracic horn 380–530 µm long; stigmatal tubercles present on second to fifth abdominal segments (Fig. 3C), 140–240 µm long; second to seventh abdominal segments with 5 to 6 and eight abdominal segments with 3 to 5 transverse rows of spines, respectively; 6 dorsal papillae on first to seventh abdominal segments, outer and inner pairs, each with seta; 2 dorsal papillae on eighth abdominal segment, each with seta; each abdominal segment with pleural papilla, each with seta. Mature larva: Body length ca. 2.9–3.5 mm, body color in life yellow; Second antennal segment short; cervical papillae without seta; sternal spatula 480–520 µm long (Fig. 3D) anteriorly with two lobes; 2 sternal papillae present on all thoracic and first to seventh abdominal segments, each with seta; 3 lateral papillae (Fig. 3E) present on each side of all thoracic segments, inner two with seta; 2 pleural papillae present on each side of thoracic and abdominal segments, each with seta; 4 ventral papillae on first to seventh abdominal segments and 2 ventral papillae on eighth abdominal segment, each with seta; 4 dorsal papillae on Fig. 3. Pseudasphondylia kiwiphila sp. nov. (A) Male genitalia. (B) Pupal antennal horn. (C) Pupal abdomen; arrow refer to spiracle tube. (D) Larval sternal spatula. (E) larval lateral papillae, arrow refers to lateral papillae. Scale bars: A = 0.1 mm; B and D = 0.3 mm; C = 1.0 mm. page 6 of 13Zoological Studies 61:39 (2022) © 2022 Academia Sinica, Taiwan each side of all thoracic and first to seventh abdominal segments, 2 dorsal papillae on eighth abdominal segment, each with seta; 8 terminal papillae present, two of them each with large seta, four of them each with minute seta, and remaining two without setae. Remarks: The new species is morphologically similar to Japanese P. matatabi, but distinguishable by having the ovipositor (needle part: 1.6 mm) and palpal segments (35–50, 55–70, and 140–180 μm) that are longer than those of P. matatabi (needle part: 1.4 mm; palpal segments: 25, 45–62.5, and 76.5–130 μm) (Tokuda and Yukawa 2005). In addition, the mediobasal lobe of gonostyli in male is shorter than cerci in the new species but longer in P. matatabi. Pseudasphondylia elaeocarpi Tokuda & Yukawa (Fig. 4) Diagnosis: Adult palpus three-segmented, first to sixth tergites with a single row of posterior setae, hypoproct basally rather wide and extremely narrowing at apex. Pupal antennal horn triangular, well developed (Fig. 4A). Pupal stigmatal tubercles present on second to fourth abdominal segments (Fig. 4B), reduced on fifth to eighth abdominal segments. Larval sternal spatula with four lobes and the inner pairs longer than the outer (Fig. 4C). Material examined: Type materials: JAPAN: ♂ (on slide, Holotype, ELKU), Shiroyama, Kagoshima, Kyushu, galls collected 1.v.1976 and adult emerged on 2.v.1976., leg. J Yukawa; 10♂, 6♀, 7 Larvae (on slides, Paratypes, ELKU), same data as holotype; 3♂ (on slides), Shiroyama, Kagoshima, Kyushu, 15.iv.1971, J Yukawa; 2♀ (on slides) Shiroyama, Kagoshima, Kyushu, galls collected on 22.iv.1974 and adults emerged 26.iv.1974, leg. K Takahashi; 2♂, 5♀, 2 Pupae (on slides) Kekura, Kagoshima, Kyushu, galls collected on 29.iv.1977 and adults emerged 4–11.v.1977, leg. T Sunose; 1♂, 1♀, 2 Pupae (on slides), Yona, Kunigami, Okinawa Island, 24.ii.2001, leg. M Tokuda and J Yukawa. Other materials examined: TAIWAN: [Taichung City] 2♂, 2♀, 6 Pupae (on slides, NCHU), Mt. Tungmao, galls collected on 25.iv.2017 and adults emerged on 3.v.2017, leg. SF Lin; 2♂, 7♀ (in EtOH, NCHU), Mt. Tung-mao, galls collected on 25.iv.2017 and adults emerged on 8–11.v.2017, SF Lin; [Pingtung Co.] 10♂, 7♀, (in EtOH, NCHU), Dahan forest rd., galls collected on 4.v.2017 and adults emerged on 8–25.v.2017, leg. YM Chao and SF Lin. Distribution: JAPAN: Honshu, Kyushu, Tanegashima, Nakanoshima, Amamiohshima, and Okinawajima (Tokuda and Yukawa 2005; Yukawa et al. 2013; Tokuda 2018); and TAIWAN (New distribution records, see Table 3). Genetic distance and species delimitation Sequences of five P. kiwiphila sp. nov. (one Japanese and four Taiwanese individuals) and two Taiwanese P. elaeocarpi individuals were obtained for a partial COI gene (658–689 bp). Species delimitation Fig. 4. Pseudasphondylia elaeocarpi (A) Pupal face and antennal horns. (B) Pupal abdomen, arrows indicate stigmatal tubercles. (C) Larval sternal spatula. Scale bars: A and C = 0.3 mm; B = 0.5 mm. page 7 of 13Zoological Studies 61:39 (2022) © 2022 Academia Sinica, Taiwan of ABGD showed three presumptive species (Fig. 5) corresponding to our morphological examinations: (1) P. matatabi: one Japanese sequence; (2) P. elaeocarpi: one Japanese and two Taiwanese sequences; and (3) P. kiwiphila sp. nov.: one Japanese and four Taiwanese sequences. The genetic distance of P. elaeocarpi is 0.1% within Taiwanese individuals and 2.7% between Taiwanese and Japanese populations. As to Actinidiaassociated species, the genetic distance is 0–2.6% among P. kiwiphila sp. nov. and 5.1–6.7% between P. kiwiphila sp. nov. and Japanese P. matatabi. Phylogeny and divergence time The phylogenetic trees constructed by Bayesian inference (Fig. 5A) and by Maximum likelihood shared a similar topology except for the phylogenetic relationship among individuals of P. kiwiphila sp. nov., which was resolved in the IQ tree (Fig. 5B) but not the BI tree. Leaf gallers of Pseudasphondylia, P. elaeocarpi, and P. saohimea, situated at the stem part of the tree and formed a paraphyletic group, whereas Pseudasphondylia species including all flower-bud and fruit gallers formed a monophyletic clade (PP: 0.51 and ML: 40%). This clade is further divided into Actinidiaassociated species, P. kiwiphila sp. nov. and P. matatabi, (PP: 1 and ML: 97%) and Japanese species on other hosts (PP: 0.62 and ML: 95%). In Actinidia-associated species, the divergence time for the two species was estimated to be 2.2–2.9 mya (COI genetic distance: 5.1–6.7%). At the Table 3. Distribution records of Pseudasphondylia elaeocarpi in Taiwan Locality Gall shape Collector Collected date North Taiwan Dalu forest Rd., Hsinchu County Subconical GS Tung, MM Yang 1996-II-9 Central Taiwan Subconical Lianhuachi Research Center, Nantou County Subconical MM Yang 1999-IX-13 Zhonghe Vil., Taichung City Subconical MF Lou, MM Yang 2001-VI-1 Mt. Tung-mao, Taichung City Subconical SF Lin 2017-IV-5 South Taiwan Subconical Shan-Ping Forest Ecological Garden, Kaohsiung City Subconical MF Lou 2005-VII-5 Dahan forest Rd., Kaohsiung City Subconical SF Lin 2014-XII-28 Dahan forest Rd., Kaohsiung City Subconical SF Lin 2016-III-8 Dahan forest Rd., Kaohsiung City Subconical YM Chao, SF Lin 2017-V-4 Fig. 5. Phylogenetic tree of Pseudasphondylia species based on DNA partial COI region. (A) Bayesian tree of Pseudasphondylia species, supported values are shown beside nodes with the Bayesian posterior probability (lift) and ultrafast bootstrap of the IQ tree (right). Taxa with different colors refer to distinct species based on summarized results of species delimitation (Automatic Barcode Gap Discovery analysis). (B) Cladogram of Pseudasphondylia kiwiphila sp. nov. lineage in IQ tree. page 8 of 13Zoological Studies 61:39 (2022) © 2022 Academia Sinica, Taiwan interspecific level, Taiwanese individuals of P. kiwiphila sp. nov. were paraphyletic to the Japanese individual. Taiwanese taxa of P. elaeocarpi was reconfirmed as a sister group of Japanese P. elaeocarpi (PP: 1 and ML: 100%), and their divergence time was estimated to be around 1.2 mya (COI genetic distance: 2.7%). DISCUSSION Pseudasphondylia has a wide host spectrum even though the genus contains only 13 species (Gagné and Jaschhof 2021; Matsuda et al. 2021). Some species are univoltine and do not exhibit host alternation while others are multivoltine and are supposed to be hostalternating species (Tokuda and Yukawa 2005; Yukawa and Uechi 2021). The evolutionary scheme of host association is poorly known in Pseudasphondylia, although some taxonomic works have been performed recently (Elsayed et al. 2019; Lin et al. 2020b; Matsuda et al. 2021). In the phylogenetic analysis (Fig. 5), the leaf gallers P. elaeocarpi and P. saohimea were situated at more ancestral positions in the genus. This indicates that leaf galling is an ancestral habit, whereas fruit and flower-bud gallings are derived ones. Meanwhile, univoltine life history may also be ancestral in Pseudasphondylia in contrast to a multivoltine life history, because the leaf gallers of Pseudasphondylia are univoltine whereas fruit and flower-bud gallers are multivoltine. From the viewpoint of speciation within Pseudasphondylia, it also provides a system to investigate how the gall midges have speciated accompanied by the transition of multiple ecological features, such as voltinism, galling organ, and host plants. Further ecological and molecular data of the remaining Pseudasphondylia species will facilitate further studies of the genus. Actinidia-associated Pseudasphondylia species Host spectrum, ecology, and distribution of gall midges provide us valuable information to solve the biogeography and speciation processes of other species groups, such as Ilex-associated Schizomyia and Cinnamomoum-associated Bruggmanniella (Tokuda et al. 2004; Lin et al. 2020b). In Actinidia-associated Pseudasphondylia species, P. matatabi occurs only in mainland Japan, whereas P. kiwiphila sp. nov. occurs in Taiwan and Kyushu. Both species have not yet been reported from the Ryukyu Islands (Tokuda and Yukawa 2005; Yukawa 2021), but host distribution and our findings provide a favorable opportunity to infer their biogeography. Because A. rufa is also distributed on the Ryukyu Islands between Taiwan and Kyushu, further intensive field surveys may find P. kiwiphila sp. nov. there. Taiwanese individuals became a paraphyletic group to the Japanese individual (Fig. 5) and the genetic distance was short between the two populations. These suggest that P. kiwiphila sp. nov. has a southern origin and its northward expansion through the Ryukyu Islands. In contrast, P. matatabi has been reported from Honshu, Shikoku, and Kyushu (Yuasa and Kumazawa 1938; Yukawa 1971; Tokuda and Yukawa 2005). However, its host A. polygama is not distributed on the Ryukyu Islands and Taiwan, suggesting that P. matatabi does not occur in southern parts of East Asia. Morphological, phylogenetic, and ecological similarities between P. kiwiphila sp. nov. and Japanese P. matatabi demonstrated in the present study indicate that they are sibling species. Based on the phylogenetic analysis, P. kiwiphila sp. nov. has a southern origin while P. matatabi currently occurs only in mainland Japan. This supports the allopatric speciation scenario between the two species via geographical isolation. However, the two species still may have speciated sympatrically via ecological divergence, and then respectively dispersed along with their host species. The following ecological features will support the sympatric speciation scenario: the hosts of these two species belong to different groups of Actinidia, i.e., A. polygama belongs to the smooth-skinned fruit species group that occurs in relatively cool or highaltitudinal areas including northern China, Korea, and mainland Japan, whereas A. rufa belongs to hairy and/ or spotted (lenticillate) fruit species groups that occurs in relatively warm and moist environments such as southern China and Taiwan (Huang 2014; Huang and Liu 2014; Liu et al. 2017). This implies that a host shift may have occurred in the common ancestor of Actinidia-associated Pseudasphondylia, leading to ecological speciation. To confirm the speciation process, further taxonomic and phylogenetic studies of Actinidia-associated Pseudasphondylia are needed, such as unidentified Pseudasphondylia species associated with fruit of Actinidia valvuta Dun in China (Liu and Larsson 1996) and Actinidia callosa var. discolor and A. chinensis var. setosa in Taiwan (Tung et al. 2018). Divergence and ecology of P. elaeocarpi The discovery of P. elaeocarpi in Taiwan presents new information on the species distribution range extending beyond the previously reported place (Tokuda and Yukawa 2005), which also provides another study system in this region. The estimated divergence time (around 1.2 mya) between Taiwanese and Japanese populations corresponds to a later period of separation page 9 of 13Zoological Studies 61:39 (2022)