Misinformation, Racism, and Social Media: A Conceptual Framework for Social Psychological Intervention

1 Misinformation, Racism, and Social Media: A Conceptual Framework for Social Psychological Intervention Samantha Davies Independent Researcher Contact: [email protected] 2 Abstract The widespread use of social media has transformed how information is produced, disseminated, and consumed, creating conditions under which misinformation can spread rapidly and with limited oversight. In recent years, misinformation circulating online has increasingly intersected with racist and discriminatory discourse, contributing to social harm experienced by marginalized communities. This paper presents a conceptual analysis of racist misinformation on social media through a social psychological lens, drawing on established theories to explain why such content is readily accepted, amplified, and left unchallenged in digital environments. Specifically, the analysis highlights the roles of confirmation bias, social influence processes, the theory of planned behaviour, and the bystander effect in shaping engagement with misinformation. Building on this theoretical framework, the paper examines the real-world implications of racist misinformation, including its normalization through online discourse and its potential to reinforce prejudice and hostility offline. Finally, the paper outlines interventionoriented approaches aimed at mitigating the spread and impact of racist misinformation, emphasizing community-based initiatives, platform-level accountability, and the importance of early corrective action. By integrating social psychological theory with applied intervention considerations, this work contributes to ongoing efforts to understand and address the societal consequences of misinformation in contemporary media environments. Keywords: misinformation, social media, racism, social psychology, intervention strategies 3 Introduction: Misinformation in the Contemporary Media Environment Conventional news outlets have increasingly been displaced by internet-based platforms that offer rapid access to information and global communication (Aïmeur et al., 2023). The rise of social media has fundamentally altered patterns of news consumption, with heightened accessibility and user engagement making it more difficult for individuals to assess the credibility of sources (Ayers & Reder, 1998). Within this digital environment, misinformation has emerged as a pervasive challenge. The widespread availability of social media, coupled with limited regulatory oversight regarding who may publish content, has created conditions in which misleading or false information can be disseminated with relative ease (Hilary & Dumebi, 2021). Anonymity on social media platforms further contributes to this phenomenon by reducing accountability and increasing the likelihood that individuals will express inappropriate, extreme, or harmful views without fear of social repercussions (Marwick, 2018). However, anonymity alone does not fully account for the persistence and influence of misinformation. Social psychological theories provide additional insight into how individuals interpret, react to, and propagate misleading content following exposure (Ayers & Reder, 1998). Once misinformation is introduced into online spaces, it can be difficult or impossible to fully remove, allowing false narratives to persist and continue circulating over time (Aïmeur et al., 2023). The rapid diffusion of information across social media platforms amplifies the potential consequences of misinformation, which may be detrimental to individuals and communities affected by its perpetuation (Shu et al., 2020). As a result, scholars have emphasized the need for increased awareness of the influence and reach of social media, as well as greater caution among users when engaging with and sharing unverified information (Hilary & Dumebi, 2021). Given 4 the absence of a definitive solution capable of eliminating misinformation entirely, attention has increasingly shifted toward the development of intervention strategies aimed at mitigating its impact and limiting its spread. Misinformation, Social Media, and Racist Discourse Misinformation on social media is often structured to maximize visibility and engagement, frequently relying on vivid and compelling narratives that capture attention and encourage sharing (Persily & Tucker, 2020). Such content persists in part because audiences and interest groups actively seek information that aligns with and promotes their existing interests (Persily & Tucker, 2020). While social media platforms serve important functions related to interpersonal communication and identity formation, they have also become central arenas for political and social discourse (Ekman, 2019). The prominence of these discussions has been associated with the circulation of racist rhetoric and anti-immigration sentiments within online environments (Ekman, 2019). Research suggests that certain political audiences are more likely to share discriminatory content online, particularly narratives targeting Black individuals and other marginalized groups (Covington, 2010). However, overt political affiliation alone does not account for the presence of racism on social media platforms. Racist discourse may also manifest in more subtle or muted forms at micro-levels of online interaction, such as comment exchanges between users, where discriminatory beliefs are normalized through everyday communication (Ekman, 2019). The spread of misinformation is not a novel phenomenon. Historically, misleading information has been used to manipulate public attitudes in support of specific campaigns through practices commonly described as propaganda (Casey, 1944). Contemporary 5 misinformation shares several defining characteristics with historical propaganda, particularly the intention to mislead and influence public opinion (Marwick, 2018). A key distinction between these forms lies in the scale and speed at which misinformation can now circulate, as well as the reduced emphasis placed on identifying or evaluating the credibility of its source (Marwick, 2018). The likelihood that misinformation gains traction is influenced by both the perceived credibility of the individual sharing it and the volume of users contributing to its dissemination (Marwick, 2018). In the context of racism, misinformation may spread more effectively when discriminatory agendas are conveyed subtly, thereby limiting skepticism toward the integrity of the source (Ekman, 2019). An illustrative example of community-level responses to racial misinformation can be observed in the curation of social media spaces such as “Black Twitter,” which has been described as a digital community in which Black users share experiences, engage in collective dialogue, and negotiate aspects of Black identity (Lockett, 2021). These spaces can serve as platforms for resistance against racial misinformation and harmful rhetoric (Lockett, 2021). However, the open nature of platforms such as Twitter complicates efforts to maintain the boundaries of these communities, as it can be difficult to identify or prevent the participation of individuals who do not share the community’s lived experiences or intentions (Hilary & Dumebi, 2021). High levels of exposure to misinformation and external criticism within such spaces may further intensify racial discourse rather than mitigate it (Freelon et al., 2022). Consequently, even well-intentioned uses of social media to foster community and dialogue may be vulnerable to misinterpretation of cultural rhetoric and the spread of misinformation when accessed or reframed by broader audiences (Freelon et al., 2022; Hilary & Dumebi, 2021). 6 Implications of Misinformation for Social Harm and the Need for Intervention Debates surrounding the potential harms of misinformation on social media are reflected in its observable real-world consequences, particularly in relation to online racism and its offline implications (Guadagno & Guttieri, 2019). Individuals who are especially susceptible to engagement-driven misinformation may be more easily exposed to, and influenced by, racist narratives that circulate widely online (Tynes et al., 2019). In this sense, misinformation does not merely reflect pre-existing prejudices but may contribute to their amplification and normalization within digital spaces. Contemporary geopolitical conflicts provide salient examples of how misinformation can intersect with racial and religious prejudice. Ongoing discourse surrounding the conflict in Gaza has been characterized by widespread contestation and denial across social media platforms, including the dissemination of misleading or selectively framed information by pro-Zionist entities (Jaffee, 2024). The proliferation of such content on platforms such as X (formerly Twitter) has been described as an effort to shape public perception and deflect responsibility for civilian harm (Tamimi & Vargas, 2024). Manipulation of media and information, alongside narratives that portray Palestinians in a dehumanizing manner, has been associated with increased public support for harmful policies and actions (Tamimi & Vargas, 2024). These dynamics have been linked to broader patterns of Islamophobia in Western contexts, where antiMuslim attitudes are reinforced and legitimized through online misinformation (Gul & Ashraf, 2024). Misinformation has similarly played a role in promoting racism during public health crises. Discourse surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic illustrates how uncertainty and fear can 7 facilitate the spread of xenophobic narratives, particularly targeting Asian communities (Harris & Fuyuki, 2023). Social media speculation regarding the origins of the virus contributed to the circulation of racially charged misinformation, including unfounded claims related to Chinese cultural practices and laboratory conspiracies (Harris & Fuyuki, 2023). Despite the absence of sufficient evidence to definitively establish the origins of the virus, such explanations gained traction in online spaces (Sheikh & Rath, 2023). As a result, Asian communities were frequently subjected to displaced blame and hostility in response to the broader social and economic impacts of the pandemic (Harris & Fuyuki, 2023). Taken together, these examples highlight the need for intervention strategies aimed at reducing the spread and impact of racist misinformation on social media platforms. Online environments remain vulnerable to the presence of individuals and groups seeking to promote discriminatory narratives (Bigman et al., 2019). Misinformation has been described as a mechanism through which racial hostility is translated from digital discourse into real-world harm (Guadagno & Guttieri, 2019). At the micro-level, repeated exposure to racially charged misinformation and microaggressions online may contribute to harassment, abuse, and other forms of hate-motivated behavior directed toward marginalized individuals and communities (Tynes et al., 2019). Social Psychological Mechanisms Underlying Misinformation Engagement Human behaviour in digital environments can be examined through established social psychological theories that help explain how misinformation is processed, accepted, and disseminated. One prominent mechanism is confirmation bias, which describes the tendency for individuals to seek out, interpret, and remember information in ways that reinforce their pre- 8 existing beliefs while discounting contradictory evidence (Alsaad et al., 2018). Within the context of social media, confirmation bias provides a compelling explanation for why individuals may be particularly susceptible to misinformation, as algorithmically curated content can repeatedly expose users to belief-consistent narratives (Alsaad et al., 2018). When such narratives align with racist beliefs, they may be readily adopted and shared, reinforcing discriminatory attitudes and contributing to their broader circulation (Alsaad et al., 2018). The theory of planned behaviour further clarifies the motivations underlying both the creation and spread of racist misinformation. This theory posits that an individual’s likelihood of engaging in a behaviour is influenced by their attitudes toward the behaviour, perceived social pressure, and perceived ease of performing the action (Jung, 2023). In the context of misinformation, individuals who hold prejudiced attitudes may be more motivated to generate or disseminate false narratives targeting marginalized groups (Jung, 2023). For audiences, the same framework helps explain decisions to share or challenge misinformation, as perceived norms and the anticipated effort required to intervene may either facilitate or inhibit corrective action (Jung, 2023). Relatedly, social influence processes shape how misinformation travels across online networks. The persuasiveness of misinformation and propaganda is influenced by the perceived credibility and trustworthiness of the content, particularly as it moves from user to user within social media platforms (Davlembayeva & Papagiannidis, 2024). Information that appears credible and is repeatedly endorsed by others may be more likely to be shared, while simultaneously becoming more difficult for platforms to monitor and regulate (Davlembayeva & Papagiannidis, 2024). Similar to the theory of planned behaviour, social influence mechanisms 9 emphasize the role of perceived norms and informational cues in determining whether individuals choose to propagate or challenge misleading content (Davlembayeva & Papagiannidis, 2024). Finally, the bystander effect offers insight into why misinformation often remains unchallenged in online settings. This phenomenon describes a reduced likelihood of intervention when individuals perceive that others are present, resulting in a diffusion of responsibility (Yaeger, 2019). On social media, anonymity may intensify this effect by further diminishing personal accountability for correcting false information (Yaeger, 2019). Misinformation that achieves high levels of visibility and endorsement is therefore rarely disputed, as users may interpret widespread acceptance as validation of accuracy (Yaeger, 2019). As false narratives gain popularity, individuals may increasingly defer to perceived consensus, further entrenching misinformation within online discourse (Yaeger, 2019). Conceptual Approaches to Mitigating Misinformation Misinformation tends to exert its greatest influence once it reaches peak visibility, at which point factual corrections may struggle to achieve comparable reach. Although corrective information may reach some individuals, others who were initially exposed to misleading content may remain misinformed. For this reason, intervention efforts are most effective when misinformation is addressed in its early stages, either by limiting its dissemination before it gains widespread exposure or by clearly correcting and flagging misleading content to reduce potential harm to social media users. One commonly proposed intervention involves the promotion of credible sources to support factual claims shared online. Providing research-based evidence, statistical data, and 16 Hilary, I. O., & Dumebi, O. O. (2021). Social Media as a Tool for Misinformation and Disinformation Management. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S1), 496-505. https:// lingcure.org/index.php/journal/article/view/1435 Jaffee, L. J. (2024). Anti-Zionism is not Antisemitism: The Centrality of Palestinian Liberation in the Struggle for Anti-Oppressive Education. Critical Education, 15(1), 29-51. https:// doi.org/10.14288/ce.v15i1.186771 Jung, C. W. (2023). Role of Informal Social Control in Predicting Racist Hate Speech on Online Platforms: Collective Efficacy and the Theory of Planned Behavior. Cyberpsychology, behavior and social networking, 26(7), 507–518. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2022.0107 Lee, J. H., Bhattacharya, A., Spiro, E. S., Santero, N., & May, E. (2022). Community-based strategies for combating misinformation: Learning from a popular culture fandom. Harvard Kennedy School: Misinformation Review. https://misinforeview.hks.harvard.edu/article/ community-based-strategies-for-combating-misinformation-learning-from-a-popularculture-fandom/ LexisNexis. (2024). Consequences of Sharing Misinformation. LexisNexis. https:// www.lexisnexis.com/community/amp-insights/72/consequences-of-sharing-misinformation Linden, S. v. d., Leiserowitz, A., Rosenthal, S., & Maibach, E. (2017). Inoculating the Public against Misinformation about Climate Change. Global Challenges, 1(2). https://doi.org/ 10.1002/gch2.201600008 Lockett, A. (2021). What is Black Twitter? A Rhetorical Criticism of Race, Dis/Information, and Social Media. In Lockett, A., Ruiz, I. D., Sanchez, J. C., & Carter, C. (Eds.), Race, 17 Rhetoric, and Research Methods (pp. 165-213). The WAC Clearinghouse. http://doi.org/ 10.37514/PER-B.2021.1206 Manyika, J., Silberg, J., & Presten, B. (2019). What Do We Do About the Biases in AI? Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2019/10/what-do-we-do-about-the-biases-in-ai Marwick, A. E. (2018).Why do People Share Fake News? A Sociotechnical Model of Media Effects. Georgetown Law Technology Review, 2(2), 474-513. https:// georgetownlawtechreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/2.2-Marwick-pp-474-512.pdf Persily, N., & Tucker, J. A. (Eds.). (2020). Social Media and Democracy: The State of the Field and Prospects for Reform. Cambridge University Press. http://doi.org/ 10.1017/9781108890960 Sheikh, Z., & Rath, L. (2023). What Is the History of Coronavirus? WebMD. https:// www.webmd.com/covid/coronavirus-history Shu, K., Wang, S., Lee, D., & Liu, H. (2020). Disinformation, Misinformation, and Fake News in Social Media: Emerging Research Challenges and Opportunities. Springer, Cham. https:// doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42699-6 Superior Court of Justice. (2018). Social Media Communication Terms of Use. Ontario Courts. https://www.ontariocourts.ca/scj/social-media-use/ Tamimi, T., & Vargas, D. S. (2024). Propaganda vs. truth: Israeli propaganda and Palestinian demonisation. E-International Relations, 1-6. https://www.e-ir.info/2024/02/13/israelipropaganda-and-palestinian-demonisation/ Tynes, B. M., Lozada, F. T., Smith, N. A., Stewart, A. M. (2019). From Racial Microaggressions to Hate Crimes: A Model of Online Racism Based on the Lived Experiences of 18 Adolescents of Color. In Torino, G. C., Rivera, D. P., Capodilupo, C. M., Nadal, K. L., & Sue, D. W. (Eds.), Microaggression Theory: Influence and Implications (pp. 517-533). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119466642.ch12 Whitmore, S. E., Guest, L., & Oake, A. (2021). Media and communications: Risks of liability emerging for online platforms in Canada. Torys. https://www.torys.com/en/our-latestthinking/publications/2021/11/risks-of-liability-emerging-for-online-platforms-in-canada Yaeger, R. (2019). Is Social Media Use Connected to the Bystander Effect? Communicating Psychological Science. https://www.communicatingpsychologicalscience.com/blog/issocial-media-use-connected-to-the-bystander-effect