Organization Studies in Regional Governance: Research Materials on Performative Dysfunction in the Tokaj Wine Region (2023–2025)
Dr. Köpeczi-Bócz, Tamás
- Publisher
- Zenodo
- Language
- en
Abstract
This dataset accompanies the study “Performative Dysfunction in Regional Economic Self-Governance” and provides all research materials created between 2023 and 2025 in the Tokaj Wine Region (Hungary). The study is rooted in organization theory, particularly democratic performativity and institutional critique, and explores how formally representative structures fail to articulate complex field dynamics. The dataset includes: Council Meeting Observation (2023–2024)– Discourse-based coding matrix based on empirical records from all regional council meetings. SANRA-Based Literature Synthesis– Dual review of 21 organization theory works and 28 pedagogical sources; six theoretical indicators are defined to diagnose performative dysfunction. Regional Questionnaire (2025)– Hidden-theme survey with an exceptionally high response rate (N=67), measuring trust, representation, and strategic discourse in self-governance. The dataset also includes a pedagogical framework for potential interventions, based on organizational learning theory and participatory education models. It allows the conceptual diagnosis to support practical developmental strategies. All data are ethically processed.
Full text
Indicator axis (SANRA-derived) Technical AI score (0 3) Governance practice score (0 3) Learnability capacity score (0 3) Technical raw metric (how computed) Governance raw metric (how computed) Learnability raw metric (how computed) 1. Representational articulation 0.85 0.28 0.75 Keyword count in SRS = 20 (normalized to max=71) Prop. community articulation (Type=3 or 4) = 0.09375 Pedagogical mechanism count = 1 (normalized to max=4) 2. Deliberation 3.0 1.06 3.0 Keyword count in SRS = 71 (max) Deliberation index mean = 0.3538 (comments, contributors, length) Pedagogical mechanism count = 4 (max) 3. Strategic thinking 0.08 0.75 2.25 Keyword count in SRS = 2 Prop. strategic reference (i) = 0.25 Pedagogical mechanism count = 3 4. Material-factor articulation 1.14 1.22 3.0 Keyword count in SRS = 27 Prop. terroir/tradition mention (i) = 0.40625 Pedagogical mechanism count = 4 5. Structural openness/closure 0.59 1.12 2.25 Keyword count in SRS = 14 Prop. stakeholder representation (i) = 0.375 Pedagogical mechanism count = 3 6. Trust & legitimacy 0.0 0.94 1.5 Keyword count in SRS = 0 Prop. critical comment (i) = 0.3125 (proxy for contestation) Pedagogical mechanism count = 2 Table 1. Repeatable data table underpinning Figure 1 (SANRA-derived indicators, normalized scores, and computation notes)
