scieee AI-readable full text Open interactive document viewer

Corrections and additions to Leptus Latreille (Trombidiformes: Erythraeidae) of the world: revised classification and keys

Saboori, Alireza; Hakimitabar, Masoud; Khademi, Narjes; Masoumi, Hamidreza; Katouzian, Ahmad-Reza

Abstract

Saboori, Alireza, Hakimitabar, Masoud, Khademi, Narjes, Masoumi, Hamidreza, Katouzian, Ahmad-Reza (2019): Corrections and additions to Leptus Latreille (Trombidiformes: Erythraeidae) of the world: revised classification and keys. Persian Journal of Acarology 9 (2): 209-212, DOI: 10.22073/pja.v9i2.60814

Full text

Persian J. Acarol., 2019, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 209–212. http://dx.doi.org/10.22073/pja.v9i2.60814 Journal homepage: http://www.biotaxa.org/pja   How to cite: Saboori, A., Hakimitabar, M., Khademi, N., Masoumi, H. & Katouzian, A.-R. (2020) Corrections an d additions to Leptus Latreille (Trombidiformes: Erythraeidae) of the world: revised classification and keys. Persia n J ournal of Acarology, 9(2): 209–212.  Correspondence Corrections and additions to Leptus Latreille (Trombidiformes: Erythraeidae) of the world: revised classification and keys Alireza Saboori1*, Masoud Hakimitabar2, Narjes Khademi3, Hamidreza Masoumi1 and Ahmad-Reza Katouzian4 1. Jalal Afshar Zoological Museum, Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran; E-mails: [email protected], [email protected] 2. Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahrood University of Technology, Shahrood, Iran; E-mail: [email protected] 3. Department of Entomology, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran; E-mail: narjes_ [email protected] 4. School of Biology and Centre of Excellence in Phylogeny of Living Organisms, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran; Email: [email protected] * Corresponding author PAPER INFO.: Received: 31 March 2020, Accepted: 1 April 2020, Published: 15 April 2020 Saboori et al. (2020) in the reclassification of Leptus, identified 220 species and divided the genus into 8 morpho-groups, and 40 subgroups of species and made 11 synonymies. In the couplet of 18 of key to subgroups of phalangii species group, an explanation is added in the parentheses. The key is changed as follows: Key to subgroups of phalangii species group 1. BFe III with solenidion ...................................................................... candangus species subgroup – BFe III without solenidion ............................................................................................................. 2 2. TFe I with ≥ 1 solenidion ..................................................................... schedingi species subgroup – TFe I without solenidion ................................................................................................................ 3 3. Ge I with 2 solenidia ………............................................................. torresianus species subgroup – Ge I with 1 solenidion .................................................................................................................... 4 4. Ti I with 3 solenidia .......................................................................... indianensis species subgroup – Ti I with 2 solenidia ....................................................................................................................... 5 5. Ti III with 2 solenidia ............................................................................. hozumii species subgroup – Ti III with 1 solenidion .................................................................................................................. 6 6. Ge II with 1 solenidion ............................................................... kuroshimaensis species subgroup – Ge II without solenidion ................................................................................................................ 7 7. Solenida on Ti II absent ................................................................... phyllotretae species subgroup – Solenidia on Ti II present ............................................................................................................... 8 210 SABOORI ET AL. 2020 CORRCTIONS AND ADDITIONS TO REVISED CLASSIFICATION AND KEYS TO SPECIES OF LEPTUS 8. Ti II with 1 solenidion ........................................................................... asahinai species subgroup – Ti II with 2 solenidia ...................................................................................................................... 9 9. BFe III with 2 setae ............................................................................. guilinicus species subgroup – BFe III with 1 seta ....................................................................................................................... 10 10. Sensillary setae significantly setulose throughout the length ........... killingtoni species subgroup – Sensillary setae setulose about distal half ................................................................................. 11 11. ASens bases posterior to PL bases ................................................. chelonethus species subgroup – ASens bases anterior to PL bases .............................................................................................. 12 12. ASens bases level with or anterior to AL bases ..................................... gagzoi species subgroup – ASens bases between AL and PL bases .................................................................................... 13 13. Large microsetae on Ge I-II & Ti I ...................................................... aldonae species subgroup – Microsetae on Ge I-II & Ti I normal ......................................................................................... 14 14. Chelicerae striated .................................................................................... treati species subgroup – Chelicerae punctate ................................................................................................................... 15 15. fD > 125 .......................................................................................... millipedius species subgroup – fD < 125 ..................................................................................................................................... 16 16. 100 < fD < 125 ............................................................................... meloidarum species subgroup – fD < 100 ..................................................................................................................................... 17 17. Scutum distinctly longer than wide (L−W > 15 μm) ......................... gagrellae species subgroup – Scutum otherwise ...................................................................................................................... 18 18. Scutum distinctly wider than long (usually W−L ≥ 14 μm) .................. gifuensis species subgroup – Scutum length and width semi-equal (L > W; or W−L < 14 μm)* ............................................. 19 19. Ti I < 125 ........................................................................................ molochinus species subgroup – Ti I > 125 ................................................................................................................................... 20 20. Ti III > 340 & Ti I > 280 ........................................................... boggohoranus species subgroup – Ti III < 340 or Ti I < 280 ................................................................... phalangii species subgroup * The character “L< 14 μm” in the parentheses should be replaced with “L > W; or W−L < 14 μm” in the definition of the molochinus, boggohoranus and phalangii species subgroups in Saboori et al. (2020). Leptus (L.) clelandi Southcott, 1999 and L. (L.) tindalei Southcott, 1999 which were placed in the gifuensis species subgroup are placed in the meloidarum species subgroup. Thus, species in these two subgroups and the keys to species are changed as follows. meloidarum species subgroup BFe III without solenidion, TFe I without solenidion, Ge I with 1 solenidion, Ti I with 2 solenidia, Ti III with 1 solenidion, Ge II without solenidion, Ti II with 2 solenidia, TFe III with 1 seta, sensillary setae setulose in about distal half, ASens bases between AL and PL bases, solenidia on Ti II present, microseta on Ge I-II & Ti I normal, chelicerae punctate, 100 < fD < 125. Species included: L. (L.) meloidarum Beron, 1975 (syn.: L. (L.) gyas Fain & Amico, 1997, L. (L.) mariae Haitlinger, 1987*, L. (L.) clarki Southcott, 1989, L. (L.) baudini Southcott, 1999, L. (L.) clelandi Southcott, 1999, L. (L.) tindalei Southcott, 1999. * The redescription of Southcott (1992) is considered. Key to species of meloidarum species subgroup 1. Ti III/AW > 2 ................................................................................................................................. 2 – Ti III/AW < 1.80 ............................................................................................................................ 4 2020 PERSIAN JOURNAL OF ACAROLOGY 211 CORRCTIONS AND ADDITIONS TO REVISED CLASSIFICATION AND KEYS TO SPECIES OF LEPTUS 2. Ti III/AW > 2.50 .......................................................................................... L. (L.) clarki Australia – Ti III/AW < 2.40 ............................................................................................................................ 3 3. L > 120, PL > 70 ....................................................................................................... L. (L.) mariae Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Czech Republic [N], Estonia, Hungary, Italy, Latvia, Luxembourg, Macedonia, Norway, Poland, Romania, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, The Netherlands – L < 100, PL < 50 ....................................................................................... L. (L.) tindalei Australia 4. L > 90 ............................................................................................................................................. 5 – L < 80 ........................................................................................................ L. (L.) baudini Australia 5. W 126–133, PSens 68–75, ASens 42–45 ............. L. (L.) meloidarum Bulgaria, Italy, Kyrgyzstan – W 112–115, PSens 41–45, ASens 28–32 ................................................. L. (L.) clelandi Australia gifuensis species subgroup BFe III without solenidion, TFe I without solenidion, Ge I with 1 solenidion, Ti I with 2 solenidia, Ti III with 1 solenidion, Ge II without solenidion, Ti II with 2 solenidia, TFe III with 1 seta, sensillary setae setulose in about distal half, ASens bases between AL and PL bases, solenidia on Ti II present, microseta on Ge I-II & Ti I normal, chelicerae punctate, fD < 100, scutum distinctly wider than long (usually W−L ≥ 14 μm). Species included: L. (L.) gifuensis Kawashima, 1958, L. (L.) alberti Haitlinger, 1991, L. (L.) cercopius Southcott, 1992, L. (L.) rwandae Fain & Jocqué, 1996, L. (L.) admeti Haitlinger, 1998, , L. (L.) fisheri Southcott, 1999, , L. (L.) brasilicus Haitlinger, Šundić & Pompermaier, 2017, L. (L.) haitlingeri Jacinavicius, BassiniSilva & Welbourn, 2019.   Key to species of gifuensis species subgroup 1. L < 65 ........................................................................................................... L. (L.) gifuensis Japan – L > 70 .............................................................................................................................................. 2 2. With four hypostomal setae ............................................................................................................ 3 – With two hypostomal setae ............................................................................................................. 7 3. Ti III/AW < 2.30 ............................................................................................................................. 4 – Ti III/AW > 2.40 ............................................................................................................................. 6 4. Anterior border of scutum concave ............................................................ L. (L.) brasilicus Brazil – Anterior border of scutum nearly staight ....................................................................................... 5 5. Ti III 195, Ti I 170 ...................................................................................... L. (L.) fisheri Australia – Ti III 117–119, Ti I 105–108 .................................................................... L. (L.) rwandae Rwanda 6. SoTa I ~30, aHy small (14 long) .................................................................. L. (L.) cercopius USA – SoTa I 62–66, aHy minute (3–4 long) ...................................................... L. (L.) haitlingeri Brazil 7. AL 44, PL 60 ................................................................................................... L. (L.) alberti Brazil – AL > 70, PL > 80 ..................................................................... L. (L.) admeti Indonesia (Sumatra) ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We are grateful to Dr. Andreas Wohltmann for the critical review of the manuscript and useful comments. Also, we are thankful to Mr. Samuel Costa (Ph. D. candidate, Acarology lab from the Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Brazil) for informing us about incorrect placement of L. (L.) clelandi and L. (L.) tindalei. 212 SABOORI ET AL. 2020 CORRCTIONS AND ADDITIONS TO REVISED CLASSIFICATION AND KEYS TO SPECIES OF LEPTUS REFERENCE Saboori, A., Hakimitabar, M., Khademi, N., Masoumi, H. & Katouzian, A.-R. (2020) Leptus Latreille (Trombidiformes: Erythraeidae) of the world: revised classification and keys. Persian Journal of Acarology, 9(Supplement 1): 1–57. DOI: 10.22073/pja.v9i1st%20Suppl..57900 COPYRIGHT Saboori et al. Persian Journal of Acarology is under a free license. This open-access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons-BY-NC-ND which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.