Do female directors affect accounting conservatism in European Union?

Alves, Sandra Article Do female directors affect accounting conservatism in European Union? Cogent Business & Management Provided in Cooperation with: Taylor & Francis Group Suggested Citation: Alves, Sandra (2023) : Do female directors affect accounting conservatism in European Union?, Cogent Business & Management, ISSN 2331-1975, Taylor & Francis, Abingdon, Vol. 10, Iss. 2, pp. 1-22, https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2219088 This Version is available at: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/294478 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Terms of use: Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your personal and scholarly purposes. You are not to copy documents for public or commercial purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. If the documents have been made available under an Open Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=oabm20 Cogent Business & Management ISSN: (Print) (Online) Journal homepage: www.tandfonline.com/journals/oabm20 Do female directors affect accounting conservatism in European Union? Sandra Alves To cite this article: Sandra Alves (2023) Do female directors affect accounting conservatism in European Union?, Cogent Business & Management, 10:2, 2219088, DOI: 10.1080/23311975.2023.2219088 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2219088 © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. Published online: 30 May 2023. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 1154 View related articles View Crossmark data Citing articles: 2 View citing articles ACCOUNTING, CORPORATE GOVERNANCE & BUSINESS ETHICS | RESEARCH ARTICLE Do female directors affect accounting conservatism in European Union? Sandra Alves 1 * Abstract: Gender diversity on corporate boards is an important governance issue. Prior research suggests that female directors tend to be more ethical, conservative, socially responsible, independent and risk averse. Thus, female directors may contribute to improve board performance and earnings quality. Using a sample of 3.808 non-financial European Union listed companies from 2011 to 2020, this study examines the effect of female directors on accounting conservatism in European Union listed firms, and whether their influence is more evident when a critical mass of female directors is reached. The study also investigates whether gender equality index moderates the relationship between female directors and accounting conservatism. We document a positive and significant relationship between female directors and accounting conservatism. Firms that have reached a critical mass of female directors on their board tend to report more conservative earnings compared to firms with a ratio of female directors less than a critical mass. This study further suggests that the impact of female directors on accounting conservatism is stronger in the presence of a higher gender equality index. The results of this study may contribute to the ongoing debate on the optimal level of gender diversity in corporate governance and its impact on financial reporting practices. Subjects: Economics; Finance; Business, Management and Accounting Keywords: female directors; accounting conservatism; critical mass theory; Europe 1. Introduction Board gender diversity is considered currently one of the most significant governance issues (Huse, 2018). The under-representation of women on corporate boards has received an increasing emphasis from academic researchers, practitioners, and policymakers (Ararat & Yurtoglu, 2021; Dezsö & Ross, 2012). Since 2005, regulators in different Union European countries have implemented mandatory female quotas for their listed companies (e.g. Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Portugal, Spain); while others have implemented best practice guidelines and recommendations (e.g. Bulgaria, Croatia, Denmark, Finland, Hungary, Ireland, Lithuania, Poland, Romania, Slovakia) (Deloitte, 2022). Previous research suggests that compared to male directors, female directors are commonly perceived as more: participative on boards (Virtanen, 2012), ethical (Doan & Iskandar Datta, 2020), conservative (B. Francis et al., 2015), socially responsible (Boulouta, 2013; Virtanen, 2012), Alves, Cogent Business & Management (2023), 10: 2219088 https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2219088 Page 1 of 22 Received: 06 April 2023 Accepted: 22 May 2023 *Corresponding author: Sandra Alves, Govcopp,school of Accountancy and Administration, University of Aveiro, Rua Associação Humanitário Bombeiros de Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal E-mail: [email protected] Reviewing editor: Collins G. Ntim, Accounting, University of Southampton, UK Additional information is available at the end of the article © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The terms on which this article has been published allow the posting of the Accepted Manuscript in a repository by the author(s) or with their consent. independent (Adams & Ferreira, 2009), cautious (Mather et al., 2021), likely to report fraudulent financial reporting and less engaged in fraud (Wahid, 2019), less aggressive decision-makers (Shin et al., 2020), opportunistic (Watson & McNaughton, 2007), over-investment (Saleh & Sun, 2021), risk-averse (Achour, 2021; Charness & Gneezy, 2012). These features indicate that female directors are likely to supervise management effectively. Accounting conservatism is seemed as one crucial factor that determines financial reporting quality (Lim, 2011; Watts, 2003a, 2003b). Watts (2003a) points out that conservatism accounting is essential to limit management’s opportunistic behaviour and to offset biases introduced in financial reports. Prior studies indicate that firms with conservative accounting are less likely to employ earnings management (Gao, 2013; Khalifa & Othman, 2015). Conservative reporting reduces the potential for overstatements by mitigating aggressive managerial estimates (Basu, 1997; Khan & Watts, 2009; Watts, 2003a) and helps in decreasing the information asymmetry (Hu et al., 2014; LaFond & Watts, 2008). Female directors tend to be more conservative and ethical. Thus, we expect that female directors are more likely to demand that managers adopt conservative accounting practices to limit managerial opportunism, to reduce information asymmetry, to reduce litigation risks and to reduce the probability and magnitude of corporate collapses. Thus, we predict that firms with higher presence of female directors on the board will exhibit more conservative accounting. Previous studies suggest that having a critical mass of women on boards can lead to improved board performance (Birindelli et al., 2019; Rossi et al., 2017; Srivastava et al., 2018; Torchia et al., 2011). Thus, we hypothesize that female directors are more likely to influence earnings quality decisions (more accounting conservatism) when a critical mass is reached. Substantial research also suggests that gender equality is associated with higher earnings quality. Countries with higher gender equality index (GEI) scores tend to have higher wages, better job security and better benefits for both men and women. Higher GEI scores also have a positive impact on the overall economic growth of a country. This is because more gender equality leads to higher productivity and more efficient use of resources. Therefore, we also examine whether the gender equality index moderates the relationship between female directors and accounting conservatism. Thus, our research questions are as follows: (1) Do female directors affect accounting conservatism in European Union? (2) Is the impact of female directors on accounting conservative more evident when there is a critical mass of female directors on the board? (3) Do gender equality index moderates the relationship between female directors and accounting conservatism in European Union? This paper contributes to the prior literature in several ways. First, we examine if female directors affect the accounting conservatism in European Union listed firms, an issue that has drawn attention from empirical studies. To our knowledge, few studies (García-Sánchez et al., 2017; Srinidhi et al., 2017; Sultana & Van der Zahn, 2011; Wang, 2015) directly examine the effect of female directors on accounting conservatism. Srinidhi et al. (2017) and Sultana and Van der Zahn (2011) focus on Australian and American firms, respectively. Wang (2015) analyzes Finnish companies. García-Sánchez et al. (2017) focus on the banking industry. This study intends to fill a portion of this gap in the literature mainly in Europe. Second, to our knowledge, no previous studies have investigated the impact of a critical mass of female directors on accounting conservatism. Consequently, this study intends to fill this gap in the literature, too. Thus, the results of this study may contribute to the ongoing debate on the optimal level of gender diversity in corporate governance and its impact on financial reporting practices. Third, to our knowledge, no previous studies have also investigated the role of gender equality index on the association between female directors and accounting conservatism. This study also proposes to fill this gap in the literature. Finally, given our study’s findings on the impact of female directors on accounting Alves, Cogent Business & Management (2023), 10: 2219088 https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2219088 Page 2 of 22 conservatism, it will be of relevance to shareholders, investors, executives, supervisors, and standard setters. Using three proxies for accounting conservatism, the results support the predicted (positive) relationship between female directors and accounting conservatism for a sample of 3.808 nonfinancial European Union listed companies. In addition, our research shows that firms reaching a critical mass of female directors on board tend to have a more conservative approach towards reported earnings when compared to those with a ratio of female directors less than a critical mass. The results also suggest that the influence of female directors on accounting conservatism seems to be stronger in the presence of a higher gender equality index. The remainder of the paper is structured as follows. Section two provides a brief presentation of the theoretical background and formulates our testable hypothesis. Next, we present the data, variable measurement, and research design in section three. Section four presents the research design. Subsequently, in section five, we report the main results. Finally, section six summarises and concludes this paper. 2. Theoretical background and testable hypothesis Gender diversity has emerged as a critical issue in the contemporary business world. Historically, there has been a lack of diversity, particularly gender diversity, in top corporate positions. However, over the years, there has been a growing interest in promoting gender diversity, recognizing its importance in ensuring organizational effectiveness and sustainable development (World Development Report, 2012). According to the Institute of Business Ethics (2011), gender diversity is considered as a vital ethical issue for companies. Regulatory, reform, and policy issues play an essential role in addressing the underrepresentation of women on corporate boards. Policymakers have placed great importance on achieving board gender diversity (Pucheta-Martínez et al., 2018), leading to both mandatory and voluntary policy reforms at a global level. In fact, gender diversity is widely considered as a critical factor to enhance board effectiveness and an essential component of corporate governance (Valls Martínez et al., 2020; Terjesen et al., 2015). The role of women on corporate boards in Europe has also been a significant topic of discussion in recent years. In 2020, the European Commission endorsed its Gender Equality Strategy (2020–2025), which includes a key objective of achieving gender balance in decision-making positions, including those in company boards (European Commission, 2020). Several countries in Europe have implemented policies and regulations to increase the representation of women on corporate boards. For example, Norway was the first country in the world to introduce a quota system in 2003, which requires that women must comprise at least 40% of corporate board members. Other countries in Europe have followed suit, including France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the Netherlands, among others. These developments have raised questions about the potential impact of gender diversity on financial reporting quality, particularly in relation to accounting conservatism. Accounting conservatism refers to the extent to which companies recognize potential losses and liabilities in their financial statements and is seen as an important aspect of financial reporting quality. It has been suggested that female directors may be more likely to support conservative accounting policies due to their risk-averse nature and greater concern for the long-term sustainability of the firm. Given the regulatory and policy developments aimed at increasing gender diversity on corporate boards in the European Union, it is an appropriate context to investigate the potential impact of female directors on accounting conservatism. This study has the potential to contribute to the ongoing debate about the value of gender diversity in corporate leadership and the potential benefits of more conservative accounting policies for financial reporting quality. Alves, Cogent Business & Management (2023), 10: 2219088 https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2219088 Page 3 of 22 2.1. Female boards and accounting conservatism Accounting conservatism is considered an important characteristic of high-quality accounting information (Basu, 1997; Watts, 2003a; Xu & Lu, 2008). Literature suggests that conservatism benefits financial statement users by limiting managerial opportunism, alleviating agency problems related with managerial investment decisions, and facilitating efficient debt contracts in the presence of asymmetric information (Watts, 2003a, 2003b; Basu, 2005; Balakrishnan et al., 2016; Goh et al., 2017). Prior researchers have found that accounting conservatism facilitates access to external capital (e.g., Ahmed et al., 2002; Beatty et al., 2008), lowers costs of capital (e.g., Ahmed et al., 2002; Goh et al., 2017; Li, 2015), improves investment efficiency (e.g., García Lara et al., 2016; J. R. Francis & Martin, 2010), increases the value of cash holdings (Lin et al., 2018; Louis et al., 2012), reduces incentive of management to manipulate earnings (Ball, 2001; Khalifa et al., 2016; García Lara et al., 2019; Watts, 2003a), enhances firm value (B. Francis et al., 2013; Bertomeu et al., 2017), decreases bankruptcy risk (Biddle et al., 2019; Zhang, 2008), downside risk of operating cash flows (Biddle et al., 2015; Hsu et al., 2017) and stock price crash risk (Kim & Zhang, 2016; Kousenidis et al., 2014). As a result, accounting conservatism seems to play an important role in providing monitoring and decision-useful information to directors. The board of directors is seemed as the most important internal corporate governance mechanisms (Fama & Jensen, 1983; Jensen & Meckling, 1976). The key functions of board members are to represent and protect shareholders’ interests. Therefore, board members are expected to promote greater conservatism to monitor their managers. Substantial research suggests that a more diverse board (including gender diversity) improves board effectiveness. Gender diversity has come to be considered as a fundamental feature of a successful board. This is because female directors are more independent (Adams & Ferreira, 2009), more diligent monitors (Ararat & Yurtoglu, 2021), enhance firm’s investment efficiency (Mirza et al., 2020), less overconfident (Chen et al., 2019) and more active in board committees (Ararat & Yurtoglu, 2021). Studies have also shown that female directors are more ethical (Doan & Iskandar Datta, 2020; Vermeir & Van Kenhove, 2008), more sensitive to the ethical implications of various issues (Bernardi et al., 2009) and better able to recognize unethical actions than men (Khazanchi, 1995) and demand more audit efforts (Gul et al., 2009). Furthermore, it is also well established that females are more risk-averse (Arun et al., 2015; Belaounia et al., 2020), more anxious and less assertive (Farrell & Hersch, 2005; Powell & Ansic, 1997), adopt less aggressive strategies (Chen et al., 2019), less tax aggressive (Lanis et al., 2017) and improve the level of corporate financial risk disclosure (Bufarwa et al., 2020). All these characteristics suggest that female directors have a conservative mindset and a low tendency to commit fraud (Ho et al., 2015). Indeed, female directors have been shown to increase the financial reporting quality. Previous research shows that female directors are associated with less likely to manipulate financial statements for personal gain (Srinidhi et al., 2011; Zalata et al., 2018), less corporate fraud (Capezio & Mavisakalyan, 2016; Kaplan et al., 2009; Sun et al., 2017), less financial reporting mistakes (Pucheta-Martínez et al., 2016), less restatements (Abbott et al., 2012), less likely to manipulate earnings (Arun et al., 2015; Belaounia et al., 2020; Gavious et al., 2012; Orazalin, 2020; Peni et al., 2010; Qi & Tian, 2012; Srinidhi et al., 2011; Zalata & Abdelfattah, 2021; Zalata et al., 2019, 2021), less likely to not-compliance with securities laws and regulations (Ararat & Yurtoglu, 2021) and high earnings quality (Dobija et al., 2021; Krishnan & Parsons, 2008; Luo et al., 2017; Pucheta-Martínez et al., 2016; Tee & Kasiplillai, 2022). Thus, previous studies suggest that female directors are more likely to promote more conservative accounting practices in financial reporting to monitor their managers. Moreover, considering the conservative, risk averse and ethical inclinations of female directors, we expect a positive effect of female directors on accounting conservatism. Conservative accounting facilitates the monitoring of managers. Female directors are expected to use conservative accounting to help them in supervising agency conflict and in supplying Alves, Cogent Business & Management (2023), 10: 2219088 https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2219088 Page 4 of 22 transparent financial reporting. In fact, accounting conservatism can help to reduce the risk of financial misstatements or fraud, which can have considerable consequences for a firm and its directors. Thus, conservatism reduces the risks faced by female directors associated with managerial opportunism. Their ethical values also lead female directors to favor conservative accounting, because conservatism helps them to reduce the firm’s exposure to ethical dilemmas. Conservatism also helps to create long-term value for the firm and be more responsible, which in turn helps to protect their reputation. Empirical studies have shown that firms with female directors are associated with higher accounting conservatism. For example, Ho et al. (2015), using US data, find a positive relationship between the presence of a female chief executive officer (CEO) and a firm’s conservatism in accounting. Additionally, they also find that this relationship seems to be greater in firms with high rather than low litigation and takeover risks. B. Francis et al. (2015), using US data, find a positive relationship between female chief financial officer (CFO) and conservatism. This association is more pronounced when firms have higher litigation risk, default risk, systematic risk, or management turnover risk. For a sample of UK listed companies, Arun et al. (2015) find that firms with female directors on the boards may tend to be more conservative. Boussaid et al. (2015), using French data, find that female directors encourage more conservative reporting in financial statements. García-Sánchez et al. (2017), using a sample of banks from nine different countries, find that female directors have a positive effect on accounting conservatism. Makhlouf et al. (2018), using a sample of Jordanian listed firms, find a positive association between gender diversity and accounting conservatism. Al-Shaer and Harakeh (2020), using the UK listed companies, document that female executives exhibit a higher level of conservatism in their financial reporting than their male counterparts. The above discussion leads to our first hypothesis: H1: The proportion of female directors on the board is positively associated to accounting conservatism. 2.2. Critical mass of female directors on the board and accounting conservatism The critical mass theory suggests that a certain proportion or “critical mass” of women on a board of directors is necessary in order for there to be meaningful changes in the behavior and decisions of the board. The theory suggests that when there is an unbalanced gender ratio on the board, female directors are often not given equal opportunities to participate in board discussions, and their perspectives are not considered. However, when a critical mass of women is reached, they are more likely to be heard, and their perspectives are more likely to influence the board’s decisionmaking (Abebe & Dadanlar, 2021; Amin et al., 2022; Konrad et al., 2008; Kramer et al., 2006; Liu et al., 2014; Shahab et al., 2020). As emphasized by Liu et al. (2014, p. 171), the critical mass theory on board gender diversity posits that “one is a token, two is a presence, and three is a voice”. Consequently, in the absence of a critical mass, female directors may be acting as mere tokens and have a limited impact (García-Meca et al., 2022; Schwartz-Ziv, 2017). Previous studies of women on corporate boards suggest that the critical mass of female directors is achieved when boards of directors have “at least three women” (Erkut et al., 2008; Konrad et al., 2008; Torchia et al., 2011). The discussion above suggests that it is only after a given threshold of gender diversity that the influence of female directors may be most effective. As a result, we hypothesize that increasing the number of women on boards of directors could improve the board’s monitoring effectiveness, leading to greater quality of reporting practices, and thus promote accounting conservatism. Hence, we expect that female directors are more likely to endorse accounting conservatism when the critical mass of women is achieved. That is, if female directors have influences on accounting conservatism, those influences should be more pronounced when the critical mass is reached. Alves, Cogent Business & Management (2023), 10: 2219088 https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2219088 Page 5 of 22 Specifically, this study proposes that board monitoring dynamics can be dependent on the type of group identified by Kanter (1977): (1) skewed groups controlled by men in which women account for up to 20%; (2) tilted groups with a more adequate allocation of men and women (percentage of women is from 20% to 40%); and (3) balanced groups with an equal or quasi-equal gender distribution (percentage of women is from 40% to 60%). Skewed groups lead to a lack of representation and perspectives of women in the decisionmaking process of the firm. Thus, when the board is skewed, the effect of female directors on accounting conservatism may be reduced since they are treated as tokens. Conversely, when the board is tilted or balanced, women are more likely to bring diverse perspectives and experiences to the board, which can lead to more effective decision-making (Joecks et al., 2013). In this sense, previous studies find that boards with at least 30% female are more likely to have better decisionmaking processes, stronger monitoring mechanisms, and improved financial performance (Joecks et al., 2013). Therefore, the titled and balanced boards could be more effective in inducing more conservative accounting practices since the number of female directors has enhanced, and they are more likely to influence board monitoring effectiveness. Accordingly, we test the following hypothesis: H2a: Skewed boards (women account for up to 20%) are not related to accounting conservatism. H2b: Tilted boards (comprise 20%-40% women) are positively related to accounting conservatism. H2c: Balanced boards (comprise 40%-60% women) are positively related to accounting conservatism. 2.3. Moderating effect of gender equality index As referred previously, literature suggests that the presence of female directors on average leads to better monitoring and advising of the board of directors. However, the efficacy of female directors may be affected by specific contextual factors. We predict that the GEI may be one of these factors. The GEI is a measure of gender equality in a country, developed by the European Institute for Gender Equality. It is calculated based on a number of factors, including economic opportunity, political participation, and health and education outcomes. Female directors in countries with higher gender equality index have greater access to educational and professional opportunities. This access to resources and opportunities helps them to develop the skills and confidence needed to succeed in the boardroom. The amicable dynamics of a gender equal society can also help to create a more welcoming and supportive atmosphere, allowing female directors to feel more comfortable and confident in the boardroom. This can lead to an increase in their influence and authority. Therefore, we expect that if female directors have influences on accounting conservatism, those influences should be more pronounced when the gender equality index is higher. In this sense, Belaounia et al. (2020), using a multi-country sample, also find that countries with greater gender equality strengthen female directors’ monitoring effect on earnings quality. On the other hand, for countries with lower gender equality, female directors do not seem to have any real impact on earnings management. The GEI might play a role as a moderator in the relationship between female board representation and accounting conservatism, because in societies or organizations with high levels of gender equality, there is likely to be more support for, and acceptance of, the presence of women in leadership positions. This can lead to a more positive and productive working environment where female board members can effectively contribute to the decision-making processes and overall performance of the firm. Alves, Cogent Business & Management (2023), 10: 2219088 https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2219088 Page 6 of 22 Thus, we hypothesize that GEI may serve as an important moderator in the relationship between female board representation and accounting conservatism. Consequently, we expect that the impact of female directors on accounting conservatism should be more pronounced when the gender equality index is higher. Accordingly, we test the following hypotheses: H3: The GEI mediate the relationship between female directors and accounting conservatism. H4a: The GEI mediate the relationship between skewed boards and accounting conservatism. H4b: The GEI mediate the relationship between tilted boards and accounting conservatism. H4c: The GEI mediate the relationship between balanced boards and accounting conservatism. 3. Data and variables 3.1. Sample We obtain the financial and board structure data from Amadeus, a database managed by Bureau Van Dijk and Informa DandB, S.A. Our initial sample contains all European Union listed firms in main stock exchange for the period 2011–2020. We exclude the financial firms and the firms without data available to measure the variable used in this study. We also exclude from the analysis countries with less than 20 firms. The final sample comprises 20 European Union countries and consists of 30.808 firm-year observations. Table 1 reports the sample composition and country’s gender equality index. 3.2. Variables 3.2.1. Measuring female director In line with previous studies (e.g. Arioglu, 2020; Arun et al., 2015), we use the proportion of females on the board of directors to compute the existence of females on boards of directors. Thus, B_Women is measured as the number of women board members divided by the total number of board directors. Following the Kanter’s theory (Kanter, 1977), we characterise the next categories of boards: Skewed boards (takes a value “1” if boards have less than 20% of women, “0” otherwise); Tilted boards (takes a value “1” if boards have between 20%-40% of women, “0” otherwise) and Balanced boards (takes a value “1” if boards have between 40%-60% of women, “0” otherwise) 3.2.2. Measuring accounting conservatism At the present, there is no single “best” measure of accounting conservatism. However, in the past accounting literature, the most frequently used measurements are the asymmetric earnings timeliness model (Basu, 1997; Khan & Watts, 2009), the market-value measure (Beaver & Ryan, 2000) and the accrual-based measure of Givoly and Hayn’s (2000) model (Basu, 1997; García Lara et al., 2009; Khan & Watts, 2009; Ruddock et al., 2006). Givoly et al. (2007) point out that any single measure of conservatism is insufficient to evaluate all dimensions of conservatism in the sample of interest. Therefore, we employ three dominant proxies for accounting conservatism: (1) C-Score developed by Khan and Watts (2009); (2) market-value based proxy (Beaver & Ryan, 2000) and (3) accrual-based (CON_ACCRUAL) proxy (Givoly & Hayn, 2000). While the C-Score captures conditional conservatism, the market-value measure and the accrual-based measure capture unconditional conservatism. Alves, Cogent Business & Management (2023), 10: 2219088 https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2219088 Page 7 of 22 Table 5. OLS regression results of models 5 e 6 Model 5 Model 6 Dependent variable Dependent variable CON_MTB CON_ACCRUAL CON_C_SCORE CON_MTB CON_ACCRUAL CON_C_SCORE Independent variable Coef. t-values Coef. t-values Coef. t-values Coef. t-values Coef. t-values Coef. t-values B_Women*GEI 0.016 1.014** 0.031 1.989*** 0.056 2.091*** - - - - - - Skewed boards*GEI - - - - - – 0.005 1.078 0.013 0.382 0.008 0.211 Titled boards*GEI - - - - - - 0.027 2.777*** 0.050 2.986*** 0.046 2.157*** Balanced boards*GEI - - - - - - 0.009 1.098 0.022 1.275** 0.019 2.016** Control variables Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Observations 38080 38080 38080 38080 38080 38080 Ajusted R 2 24.47% 27.92% 30.21% 33.34% 39.09% 43.83% F-statistic 7.078*** 9.042*** 11.098*** 12.783*** 16.653*** 19.763*** Notes: CON_MTB is the market-to-book ratio; CON_ACCRUAL represents the income operations plus depreciation less cash flows from operations deflated by average total assets, multiplied by negative one; CON_C_SCORE is the C-Score developed by Khan and Watts (2009); B_Women*GEI represents the interaction variable of B_Women and GEI; Skewed boards*GEI represents the interaction variable of Skewed boards and GEI; Titled boards*GEI represents the interaction variable of Titled boards and GEI; Balanced boards*GEI represents the interaction variable of Balanced boards and GEI; Control variables included: Bsize is the number of members on the board; Leverage is ratio between the book value of all liabilities and the total assets of firm; Size represents the firm’s size. ***, **, * denote statistical significance at the 1%, 5%, and 10% level, respectively. Alves, Cogent Business & Management (2023), 10: 2219088 https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2219088 Page 14 of 22 Table 6. Change of female director proportion and earning conservatism - Results of models 3 e 4 Model 3 Model 4 Dependent variable Dependent variable CON_MTB CON_ACCRUAL CON_C_SCORE CON_MTB CON_ACCRUAL CON_C_SCORE Independent variable Coef. t-values Coef. t-values Coef. t-values Coef. t-values Coef. t-values Coef. t-values Change_B_Women 0.011 0.061* 0.014 0.067** 0.062 0.055*** - - - - - - Skewed boards - - - - - - 0.009 1.052 0.016 0.465 0.009 0.480 Titled boards - - - - - - 0.042 2.501*** 0.037 2.599*** 0.018 2.877*** Balanced boards - - - - - - 0.010 1.844 0.026 1.202** 0.013 1.335* Control variables Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Observations 38080 38080 38080 38080 38080 38080 Ajusted R 2 25% 26.5% 31.3% 31.06% 37.87% 41.21% F-statistic 6.570*** 7.003*** 12.677*** 11.201*** 15.799*** 18.081*** Notes: CON_MTB is the market-to-book ratio; CON_ACCRUAL represents the income operations plus depreciation less cash flows from operations deflated by average total assets, multiplied by negative one; CON_C_SCORE is the C-Score developed by Khan and Watts (2009); Change_B_Women represents the change of female director proportion; Skewed boards dummy variable which takes a value 1 if boards have less than 20% of women and 0 otherwise; Titled boards dummy variable which takes a value 1 if boards have between 20%-40% of women and 0 otherwise; Balanced boards dummy variable which takes a value 1 if boards have between 40%-60% of women and 0 otherwise; Control variables included: Bsize is the number of members on the board; Leverage is ratio between the book value of all liabilities and the total assets of firm; Size represents the firm’s size. ***, **, * denote statistical significance at the 1%, 5%, and 10% level, respectively. Alves, Cogent Business & Management (2023), 10: 2219088 https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2219088 Page 15 of 22 Table 7. Change of female director proportion and earning conservatism - Results of models 5 e 6 Model 5 Model 6 Dependent variable Dependent variable CON_MTB CON_ACCRUAL CON_C_SCORE CON_MTB CON_ACCRUAL CON_C_SCORE Independent variable Coef. t-values Coef. t-values Coef. t-values Coef. t-values Coef. t-values Coef. t-values B_Women*GEI 0.020 1.072** 0.035 1.992*** 0.074 2.189*** - - - - - - Skewed boards*GEI - - - - - – 0.010 1.145 0.015 0.301 0.011 0.199 Titled boards*GEI - - - - - - 0.039 2.938*** 0.052 3.082*** 0.053 2.382*** Balanced boards*GEI - - - - - - 0.011 1.108 0.034 1.833** 0.027 2.104** Control variables Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Observations 38080 38080 38080 38080 38080 38080 Ajusted R 2 25.05% 26.89% 31.65% 34.09% 39.55% 44.02% F-statistic 7.093*** 9.002*** 11.455*** 12.902*** 16.751*** 19.809*** Notes: CON_MTB is the market-to-book ratio; CON_ACCRUAL represents the income operations plus depreciation less cash flows from operations deflated by average total assets, multiplied by negative one; CON_C_SCORE is the C-Score developed by Khan and Watts (2009); B_Women*GEI represents the interaction variable of B_Women and GEI; Skewed boards*GEI represents the interaction variable of Skewed boards and GEI; Titled boards*GEI represents the interaction variable of Titled boards and GEI; Balanced boards*GEI represents the interaction variable of Balanced boards and GEI; Control variables included: Bsize is the number of members on the board; Leverage is ratio between the book value of all liabilities and the total assets of firm; Size represents the firm’s size. ***, **, * denote statistical significance at the 1%, 5%, and 10% level, respectively. Alves, Cogent Business & Management (2023), 10: 2219088 https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2219088 Page 16 of 22 Table 8. 2SLS regressions results of models 3 e 4 Model 3 Model 4 Dependent variable Dependent variable CON_MTB CON_ACCRUAL CON_C_SCORE CON_MTB CON_ACCRUAL CON_C_SCORE Independent variable Coef. t-values Coef. t-values Coef. t-values Coef. t-values Coef. t-values Coef. t-values B_Women_Predicted 0.008 0.049* 0.011 0.059** 0.047 0.078** - - - - - - Skewed boards - - - - - - 0.003 1.049 0.008 0.398 0.011 0.303 Titled boards - - - - - - 0.032 2.489*** 0.031 2.629*** 0.022 2.544*** Balanced boards - - - - - - 0.006 1.301 0.020 1.312** 0.029 1.455** Control variables Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Observations 38080 38080 38080 38080 38080 38080 Ajusted R 2 22.01% 24.34% 19.43% 29.33% 35.23% 40.34% F-statistic 6.078*** 6.983*** 10.843*** 10.384*** 13.843*** 19.384*** Notes: CON_MTB is the market-to-book ratio; CON_ACCRUAL represents the income operations plus depreciation less cash flows from operations deflated by average total assets, multiplied by negative one; CON_C_SCORE is the C-Score developed by Khan and Watts (2009); B_Women_Predicted represents the predicted level of female directors; Skewed boards*GEI represents the interaction variable of Skewed boards and GEI; Titled boards*GEI represents the interaction variable of Titled boards and GEI; Balanced boards*GEI represents the interaction variable of Balanced boards and GEI; Control variables included: Bsize is the number of members on the board; Leverage is ratio between the book value of all liabilities and the total assets of firm; Size represents the firm’s size. ***, **, * denote statistical significance at the 1%, 5%, and 10% level, respectively. Alves, Cogent Business & Management (2023), 10: 2219088 https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2219088 Page 17 of 22 on accounting conservatism. We also test the critical mass theory to evaluate the ability of female directors to impact accounting conservatism based on their numerical representation on the board of directors, an issue that has not been studied earlier. Moreover, this study examines whether the relationship between female directors and accounting conservatism is moderated by the GEI, another subject that has not been explored in prior research. Consistent with our first hypothesis, the results show a positive relationship between female directors and accounting conservatism. This result suggests that female directors on the board may increase the likelihood of accounting conservatism. The findings indicate that the initiatives implemented in several European countries to enhance the representation of women on corporate boards could have a positive impact on earnings quality through the promotion of accounting conservatism. In line with the second hypothesis, we find that titled and balanced boards are positively related to accounting conservatism. The results support the critical mass theory, suggesting that reaching the critical mass level of female directors increases the impact on the decisions and outcomes of the board, hence, significantly affecting the level of accounting conservatism. Our findings are consistent with the third hypothesis, which suggests that the relationship between female directors and accounting conservatism is moderated by the GEI. As a result, the presence of female directors may have a stronger influence on the adoption of conservative accounting practices in countries with high GEI. Thus, it is essential to consider the GEI as a potential moderator when examining the relationship between gender diversity and financial reporting outcomes. Globally, the outcomes in this study reveal that board gender diversity positively influences the implementation of conservative accounting policies in European Union listed firms. The study offers significant contributions to both theory and practice. First, this paper supports legislating to reach a greater presence of female directors and suggests that increasing the representation of female directors on boards can lead to the adoption of more conservative accounting policies in European Union listed firms. Second, the research contributes to critical mass theory by providing evidence of the impact of the number of female directors on accounting conservatism, which suggests a minimum of women that a board should reach to obtain benefits of gender diversity. Accordingly, firms with skewed boards should consider adding female directors to their boards. Third, the study also extends the literature on gender diversity by exploring the moderating effect of GEI on the relationship between gender diversity and accounting conservatism. Thus, this study emphasizes the significance of considering specific contextual factors, such as the GEI, when examining the impact of gender diversity on accounting practices. Fourth, the results of the study offer valuable insights for policymakers and investors to assess the impact of augmenting the representation of women on the boards of publicly listed companies. The study indicates that having female directors on the board of a company leads to increased accounting conservatism, which provides assurance and trust in investors. Finally, knowledge of how female directors affect earnings quality (more accounting conservatism) plays a crucial role in advocating for increased representation of women on corporate boards worldwide. This, in turn, can help enhance the efficiency of financial reporting. The results of this study are subject to some limitations. First, this study does not test the impact of other diversity variables related gender (e.g. experience, expertise, skills, busyness, multiple directorships), which may impact conservatism accounting and earnings quality. Thus, future studies should consider exploring the effect of these attributes. Second, despite controlling for various board-governance factors and firm characteristics, there may still be some omitted factors in our study. Therefore, for future research, it would also be interesting to include boardgovernance factors and firm characteristics, such as ownership structure, and independent directors. Third, as this study’s sample only consists of publicly listed companies, it may not be possible to generalize our findings to smaller and non-listed firms. Thus, it would be valuable for future research to replicate the analyses using data from European Union SMEs. Alves, Cogent Business & Management (2023), 10: 2219088 https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2219088 Page 18 of 22 Funding This work was financially supported by the research unit on Governance, Competitiveness and Public Policy (UIDB/ 04058/2020) + (UIDP/04058/2020), funded by national funds through FCT - Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia. Author details Sandra Alves 1 E-mail: [email protected] 1 Govcopp,school of Accountancy and Administration, University of Aveiro, Rua Associação Humanitário Bombeiros de Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal. Disclosure statement No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author. Citation information Cite this article as: Do female directors affect accounting conservatism in European Union?, Sandra Alves, Cogent Business & Management (2023), 10: 2219088. References Abbott, L. J., Parker, S., & Presley, T. J. (2012). Female board presence and the likelihood of financial restatement. Accounting Horizons, 26(4), 607–629. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-50249 Abebe, M., & Dadanlar, H. (2021). From tokens to key players: The influence of board gender and ethnic diversity on corporate discrimination lawsuits. Human Relations, 74(4), 527–555. https://doi.org/10. 1177/0018726719888801 Achour, Z. (2021). Board gender diversity and firm risk. Corporate Governance - Recent Advances and Perspectives. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/ intechopen.100189 Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2), 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.10.007 Ahmed, A. S., Billings, B. K., Morton, R. M., & StanfordHarris, M. The role of accounting conservatism in mitigating bondholder-shareholder conflicts over dividend policy and in reducing debt costs. (2002). The Accounting Review, 77(4), 867–890. 200. https:// doi.org/10.2308/accr.2002.77.4.867 Ahmed, A. S., & Duellman, S. (2011). Evidence on the role of accounting conservatism in monitoring managers’ investment decisions. Accounting & Finance, 51(3), 609–633. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-629X.2010. 00369.x Al-Shaer, H., & Harakeh, M. (2020). Gender Differences in Executive Compensation on British Corporate Boards: The Role of Conditional Conservatism. The International Journal of Accounting, 55(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.1142/S109440602050002X Amin, A., Ur Rehman, R., Ali, R., & Ntim, C. G. (2022). Does gender diversity on the board reduce agency cost? Evidence from Pakistan. Gender in Management, 37 (2), 164–181. https://doi.org/10.1108/GM-10-20200303 Ararat, M., & Yurtoglu, B. (2021). Female directors, board committees, and firm performance: Time-series evidence from Turkey. Emerging Markets Review, 48, 1– 27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2020.100768 Arioglu, E. (2020). The affiliations and characteristics of female directors and earnings management: Evidence from Turkey. Managerial Auditing Journal, 35(7), 927–953. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-07-2019-2364 Armstrong, C. S., Core, J. E., & Guay, W. R. (2014). Do independent directors cause improvements in firm transparency?. Journal of Financial Economics, 113 (3), 383–403. Arun, T. G., Almahrog, Y. E., & Aribi, Z. A. (2015). Female directors and earnings management: Evidence from Uk companies. International Review of Financial Analysis, 39, 137–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa. 2015.03.002 Balakrishnan, K., Watts, R., & Zuo, L. (2016). The effect of accounting conservatism on corporate investment during the Global Financial Crisis. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 43(5/6), 513–542. https://doi. org/10.1111/jbfa.12206 Ball, R. (2001). Infrastructure requirements for an economically efficient system of public financial reporting and disclosure. Brookings-Wharton Papers on Financial Services, 127–182. Basu, S. (1997). The conservatism principle and the asymmetric timeliness of earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 24(1), 3–37. https://doi. org/10.1016/S0165-4101(97)00014-1 Basu, S. (2005). Discussion of “Conditional and Unconditional conservatism: Concepts and Modeling”. Review of Accounting Studies, 10(2–3), 311–321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-005-15335 Beatty, A., Weber, J., & Yu, J. J. (2008). Conservatism and Debt. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 45(2–3), 154–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2008.04. 005 Beaver, W., & Ryan, S. (2000). Biases and lags in book value and their effects on the ability of the book-tomarket ratio to predict book return on equity. Journal of Accounting Research, 38(1), 127–148. https://doi. org/10.2307/2672925 Belaounia, S., Tao, R., & Zhao, H. (2020). Gender equality´s impact on female directors’ efficacy: A multi-country study. International Business Review, 29(5), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2020.101737 Bernardi, R. A., Bosco, S. M., & Columb, V. L. (2009). Does female representation on boards of directors associate with the ‘most ethical companies’ list? Corporate Reputation Review, 12(3), 270–280. https://doi.org/10. 1057/crr.2009.15 Bertomeu, J., Darrough, M., & Xue, W. (2017). Optimal conservatism with earnings manipulation. Contemporary Accounting Research, 34(1), 252–284. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12247 Biddle, G. C., Ma, M. L. Z., & Song, F. M. (2015). The risk management role of accounting conservatism for operating cash flows. Working paper, University of Hong Kong. Biddle, G. C., Ma, M. L. Z., & Song, F. M. (2019). Accounting conservatism and bankruptcy risk. Working paper, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract= 1621272 Birindelli, G., Iannuzzi, A. P., & Savioli, M. (2019). The impact of women leaders on environmental performance: Evidence on gender diversity in banks. Corporate Social Responsibility & Environmental Management, 26(6), 1485–1499. https://doi.org/10. 1002/csr.1762 Boulouta, I. (2013). Hidden Connections: The Link Between Board Gender Diversity and Corporate Social Performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 113(2), 185–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1293-7 Boussaid, N., Hamza, T., & Sougné, D. (2015). Corporate Board Attributes and Conditional Accounting Conservatism: Evidence from French Firms. The Alves, Cogent Business & Management (2023), 10: 2219088 https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2219088 Page 19 of 22 Journal of Applied Business Research, 31(3), 871–889. https://doi.org/10.19030/jabr.v31i3.9224 Bufarwa, I. M., Elamer, A. A., Ntim, C. G., & AlHares, A. (2020). Gender diversity, corporate governance and financial risk disclosure in the UK. International Journal of Law and Management, 62(6), 521–538. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-10-2018-0245 Capezio, A., & Mavisakalyan, A. (2016). Women in the boardroom and fraud: Evidence from Australia. Australian Journal of Management, 41(4), 719–734. https://doi.org/10.1177/0312896215579463 Charness, G., & Gneezy, U. (2012). Strong Evidence for Gender Differences in Risk Taking. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 83(1), 50–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2011.06.007 Chen, X., Cheng, Q., & Wang, X. (2015). Does increased board independence reduce earnings management? Evidence from recent regulatory reforms. Review of Accounting Studies, 20(2), 899–933. Chen, J., Leung, W. S., Song, W., & Goergen, M. (2019). Why female board representation matters: The role of female directors in reducing male CEO overconfidence. Journal of Empirical Finance, 53, 70–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2019.06.002 DeFond, M. L., & Jiambalvo, J. (1994). Debt Covenant Violation and Manipulations of Accruals. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 17(1–2), 145–176. https:// doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(94)90008-6 Deloitte. (2022). Women in the boardroom: A global perspective (7th ed.). Deloitte. Dezsö, C., & Ross, D. (2012). Does female representation in top management improve firm performance? A panel data investigation. Strategic Management Journal, 33(9), 1072–1089. https://doi.org/10.1002/ smj.1955 Doan, T., & Iskandar Datta, M. (2020). Are female top executives more risk-averse or more ethical? Evidence from corporate cash holdings policy. Journal of Empirical Finance, 55(C), 161–176. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2019.11.005 Dobija, D., Hryckiewicz, A., Zaman, M., & Puławska, K. (2021). Critical mass and voice: Board gender diversity and financial reporting quality. European Management Journal, 40(1), 29–44. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.emj.2021.02.005 Erkut, S., Kramer, V. W., & Konrad, A. M. (2008). Critical Mass: Does the Number of Women on a Corporate Board Make a Difference? In S. Vinnicombe, V. Singh, R. J. Burke, D. Bilimoria, & M. Huse (Eds.), Women on Corporate Boards of Directors:International Research and Practice (pp. 222–232). (Edward Elgar. European Commission. (2020). Gender Equality StrategyGender Equality Strategy. The Council. Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of Ownership and Control. Journal of Law & Economics, 2(26), 301–325. https://doi.org/10.1086/467037 Farrell, K. A., & Hersch, P. L. (2005). Additions to corporate boards: The effect of gender. Journal of Corporate Finance, 11(1–2), 85–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jcorpfin.2003.12.001 Francis, B., Hasan, I., Park, J. C., & Wu, Q. (2015). Gender Differences in Financial Reporting Decision Making: Evidence from Accounting Conservatism. Contemporary Accounting Research, 32(3), 1285–1318. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846. 12098 Francis, B., Hasan, I., & Wu, Q. (2013). The Benefits of Conservatism Accounting to Shareholders: Evidence from the Financial Crisis. Accounting Horizons, 27(2), 319–346. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-50431 Francis, J. R., & Martin, X. (2010). Acquisition profitability and timely loss recognition. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 49(1/2), 161–178. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.jacceco.2009.09.003 Gao, P. (2013). A measurement approach to conservatism and earnings management. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 55(2/3), 251–268. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.jacceco.2012.10.001 García Lara, J. M., Garcia Osma, B., & Penalva, F. (2016). Accounting conservatism and firm investment efficiency. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 61 (1), 221–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2015. 07.003 García Lara, J. M., Garcia Osma, B., & Penalva, F. (2019). Conditional conservatism and the Limits to Earnings Management. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/ abstract=2165694. García Lara, J. M., Osma, B. G., & Penalva, F. (2009). Accounting conservatism and corporate governance. Review of Accounting Studies, 14(1), 161–201. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s11142-007-9060-1 García-Meca, E., López-Iturriaga, F. J., & Santana-Martín, D. J. (2022). Board gender diversity and dividend payout: The critical mass and the family ties effect. International Review of Financial Analysis, 79, 101973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2021.101973 García-Sánchez, I. M., Martínez-Ferrero, J., & García-Meca, E. (2017). Gender diversity, financial expertise and its effects on accounting quality. Management Decision, 55(2), 347–382. https://doi. org/10.1108/MD-02-2016-0090 Gavious, I., Segev, E., & Yosef, R. (2012). Female directors and earnings management in high-technology firms. Pacific Accounting Review, 24(1), 4–32. https://doi. org/10.1108/01140581211221533 Givoly, D., & Hayn, C. (2000). The changing time-series properties of earnings, cash flows and accruals: Has financial reporting become more conservative? Journal of Accounting and Economics, 29(3), 287–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(00) 00024-0 Givoly, D., Hayn, C. K., & Natarajan, A. (2007). Measuring Reporting Conservatism. The Accounting Review, 82(1), 65–106. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2007.82.1.65 Goh, B. W., Lim, C. Y., Lobo, G. J., & Tong, Y. H. (2017). Conditional conservatism and debt versus equity financing. Contemporary Accounting Research, 34(1), 216–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12237 Gul, F. A., Fung, S. Y. K., & Jaggi, B. (2009). Earnings quality: Some evidence on the role ofauditor tenure and auditors’ industry expertise. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 47(3), 265–287. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2009.03.001 Ho, S. S., Li, A., Tam, K., & Zhang, F. (2015). CEO gender, ethical leadership, and accounting conservatism. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(2), 351–370. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-2044-0 Hsu, C., Novoselov, K. E., & Wang, R. (2017). Does Accounting Mitigate the Shortcomings of CEO Overconfidence? The Accounting Review, 92(6), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51718 Hu, J., Li, A. Y., & Zhang, F. (2014). Does accounting conservatism improve the corporate information environment? Taxation, 23(1), 32–43. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2014.02.003 Huse, M. (2018). Gender in the Boardroom: Learnings from world-leader Norway. FACTBase Bulletin, 58, 1– 16. http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2579967 Institute of Business Ethics. (2011). Business Ethics and Board Diversity. Business Ethics Briefing. Alves, Cogent Business & Management (2023), 10: 2219088 https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2219088 Page 20 of 22 Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency, and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 4(3), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76) 90026-X Jiang, W., Lee, P., & Anandarajan, A. (2008). The association between corporate governance and earnings quality: Further evidence using the GOV-score. Advances in Accounting Incorporating Advances in International Accounting, 24(2), 191–201. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.adiac.2008.08.011 Joecks, J., Pull, K., & Vetter, K. (2013). Gender Diversity in the Boardroom and Firm Performance: What Exactly Constitutes a “Critical Mass?”. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(1), 61–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10551-012-1553-6 Kanter, R. M. (1977). Some Effects of Proportions on Group Life: Skewed Sex Ratios and Responses to Token Women. The American Journal of Sociology, 82(5), 965–990. https://doi.org/10.1086/226425 Kaplan, S., Pany, K., Samuels, J., & Zhang, J. (2009). An examination of the association between gender and reporting intentions for fraudulent financial reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(1), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9866-1 Khalifa, M., & Othman, H. B. (2015). The effect of conservatism on cost of capital: MENA evidence. Applied Economics, 47(1), 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 00036846.2014.962223 Khalifa, M., Othman, H. B., & Hussainey, K. (2016). Temporal variation and cross-sectional differences of accounting conservatism in emerging countries. International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation, 12(1), 45–69. https://doi.org/ 10.1504/IJAAPE.2016.073887 Khan, M., & Watts, R. L. (2009). Estimation and empirical properties of a firm-year measure of accounting conservatism. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 48 (2–3), 132–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2009. 08.002 Khazanchi, D. (1995). Unethical Behavior in information systems: The gender factor. Journal of Business Ethics, 14(9), 741–749. https://doi.org/10.1007/ BF00872327 Kim, J.-B., & Zhang, L. (2016). Accounting Conservatism and Stock Price Crash Risk: Firm-level Evidence. Contemporary Accounting Research, 33(1), 412–441. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12112 Konrad, A. M., Kramer, V., & Erkut, S. (2008). Critical mass: The impact of three or more women on corporate boards. Organizational Dynamics, 37(2), 145–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2008.02.005 Kousenidis, D. V., Ladas, A. C., & Negakis, C. I. (2014). Accounting conservatism quality of accounting information and crash risk of stock prices. Journal of Economic Asymmetries, 11, 120–137. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jeca.2014.09.001 Kramer, V., Konrad, A., & Erkut, S. (2006). Critical mass on corporate boards: Why three or more women enhance governance. Wellesley Center for Women Working Paper. Krishnan, G. V., & Parsons, L. M. (2008). Getting to the bottom line: An exploration of gender and earnings quality. Journal of Business Ethics, 78(1–2), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9314-z LaFond, R., & Watts, R. L. (2008). The information role of conservatism. The Accounting Review, 83(2), 447–478. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2008.83.2.447 Lanis, R., Richardson, G., & Taylor, G. (2017). Board of Director Gender and Corporate Tax Aggressiveness: An Empirical Analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 144 (3), 577–596. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-0152815-x Li, X. (2015). Accounting Conservatism and the Cost of Capital: An International Analysis. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 42(5–6), 555–582. https://doi. org/10.1111/jbfa.12121 Lim, R. (2011). Are corporate governance attributes associated with accounting conservatism? Accounting & Finance, 51(4), 1007–1030. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1467-629X.2010.00390.x Lin, C.-M., Chan, M.-L., Chien, I.-H., & Li, K.-H. (2018). The relationship between cash value and accounting conservatism: The role of controlling shareholders. International Review of Economics & Finance, 55, 233–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2017.07.017 Liu, Y., Wei, Z., & Xie, F. (2014). Do women directors improve firm performance in China? Journal of Corporate Finance, 28, 169–184. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.jcorpfin.2013.11.016 Louis, H., Sun, A. X., & Urcan, O. (2012). Value od Cash Holdings and Accounting Conservatism. Contemporary Accounting Research, 29(4), 1249–1271. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1911-3846.2011.01149.x Luo, J. H., Xiang, Y., & Huang, Z. (2017). Female directors and real activities manipulation: Evidence from China. China Journal of Accounting Research, 10(2), 141–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjar.2016.12.004 Makhlouf, M. H., Al-Sufy, F. J., & Almubaideen, H. (2018). Board Diversity and Accounting Conservatism: Evidence from Jordan. International Business Research, 11(7), 130–141. https://doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v11n7p130 Mather, P., Ranasinghe, D., & Unda, L. A. (2021). Are gender diverse boards more cautious? The impact of board gender diversity on sentiment in earnings press releases. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 17(3), 100278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jcae.2021.100278 Mirza, S. S., Majeed, M. A., & Ahsan, T. (2020). Board gender diversity, competitive pressure and investment efficiency in Chinese private firms. Eurasian Business Review, 10(3), 417–440. https://doi.org/10. 1007/s40821-019-00138-5 Orazalin, N. (2020). Board gender diversity, corporate governance, and earnings management: Evidence from an emerging market. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 35(1), 37–60. https://doi. org/10.1108/GM-03-2018-0027 Oyotode Adebile, R., & Ujah, N. U. (2021). Is social capital a determinant of board gender diversity?. Journal of Financial Research, 41(1), 25–52. Peasnell, K. V., Pope, P. F., & Young, S. (2000). Accrual Management to meet earnings targets: UK evidence preand post-Cadbury. The British Accounting Review, 32(4), 415–445. https://doi.org/10.1006/bare.2000.0134 Peni, E., Vähämaa, S., & Yu, S. (2010). Female executives and earnings management. Managerial Finance, 36(7), 629–645. https://doi.org/10.1108/03074351011050343 Powell, M., & Ansic, D. (1997). Gender differences in risk behaviour in financial decision-making: An experimental analysis. Journal of Economic Psychology, 18(6), 605–628. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4870(97) 00026-3 Pucheta-Martínez, M. C., Bel-Oms, I., & Olcina-Sempere, G. (2016). Corporate Governance, Female Directors and Quality of Financial Information. Business Ethics: A European Review, 25(4), 363–385. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/beer.12123 Pucheta-Martínez, M. C., Bel-Oms, I., & Olcina-Sempere, G. (2018). Female Institutional Directors on Boards and Firm Value. Journal of Business Ethics, 152(2), 343– 363. Alves, Cogent Business & Management (2023), 10: 2219088 https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2219088 Page 21 of 22 Qi, B., & Tian, G. (2012). The impact of Audit Committees’ personal characteristics on earnings management: Evidence from China. The Journal of Applied Business Research, 28(6), 1331–1343. https://doi.org/10. 19030/jabr.v28i6.7347 Rossi, F., Hu, C., & Foley, M. (2017). Women in the boardroom and corporate decisions of Italian Listed companies: Does the “critical mass” matter? Management Decision, 55(7), 1578–1595. https://doi. org/10.1108/MD-01-2017-0029 Ruddock, C., Taylor, S. J., & Taylor, S. L. (2006). Nonaudit Services and Earnings Conservatism: I Auditor Independence Impaired? Contemporary Accounting Research, 23(3), 701–746. https://doi.org/10.1506/ 6AE8-75YW-8NVW-V8GK Saeed, A., Belghitar, Y., & Yousal, A. (2016). Firm-level determinats of gender diversity in the boardrooms: Evidence from some emerging markets. International Business Review, 25, 1076–1088. Saleh, N. M., & Sun, X. W. (2021). The influence of female directors proportion on investment efficiency: The mediating role of caution. Gender in Management, 37 (3), 289–304. https://doi.org/10.1108/GM-09-20200295 Schwartz-Ziv, M. (2017). Gender and Board Activeness: The Role of a Critical Mass. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 52(2), 751–780. https://doi. org/10.1017/S0022109017000059 Shahab, Y., Ntim, C. G., Ullah, F., Yugang, C., & Ye, Z. (2020). CEO power and stock price crash risk in China: Do female directors’ critical mass and ownership structure matter? International Review of Financial Analysis, 68, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2020.101457 Shin, Y. Z., Chang, J.-Y., Jeon, K., & Kim, H. (2020). Female directors on the board and investment efficiency: Evidence from Korea. Asian Business & Management, 19(4), 438–479. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41291-01900066-2 Srinidhi, B., Gul, F. A., & Tsui, J. (2011). Female directors and earnings quality. Contemporary Accounting Research, 28(5), 1610–1644. https://doi.org/10.1111/ j.1911-3846.2011.01071.x Srinidhi, B., Tsui, J. S. L., & Zhou, G. (2017). Board Gender Diversity and Accounting Conservatism. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2977817 Srivastava, V., Das, N., & Pattanayak, J. K. (2018). Women on boards in India: A need or Tokenism? Management Decision, 56(8), 1769–1786. https://doi. org/10.1108/MD-07-2017-0690 Sultana, N., & Van der Zahn, J.-L. W. (2011). Board Gender Diversity and Earnings Conservatism. Working paper, Curtin University. Sun, J., Kent, P., Qi, B., & Wang, J. (2017). Chief financial officer demographic characteristics and fraudulent financial reporting in China. Accounting & Finance, 59 (4), 2705–2734. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12286 Tee, C. M., & Kasiplillai, J. (2022). Female directors’ monitoring and earnings quality: The moderating effect of political connections and family ownership. International Journal of Manpower, 43(5), 1085–1107. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-02-2021-0101 Terjesen, S., Couto, E. B., & Francisco, P. M. (2015). Does the presence of independent and female directors impact firm performance? A multi-country study of board diversity. Journal of Management & Governance, 20, 447–483. Torchia, M., Calabro, A., & Huse, M. (2011). Women Directors on Corporate Boards: From Tokenism to Critical Mass. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(2), 299–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0815-z Valls Martínez, M. C., Martín Cervantes, P. A., & Cruz Rambaud, S. (2020). Women on corporate boards and sustainable development in the American and European markets: Is there a limit to gender policies?. Corporate Social Responsibility & Environmental Management, 27(6), 2642–2656. Vermeir, I., & Van Kenhove, P. (2008). Gender Differences in Double Standardas. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(2), 281–295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9494-1 Virtanen, A. (2012). Women on the boards of listed companies: Evidence from Finland. Journal of Management & Governance, 16(4), 571–593. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s10997-010-9164-z Wahid, A. S. (2019). The Effects and the Mechanisms of Board Gender Diversity: Evidence from Financial Manipulation. Journal of Business Ethics, 159(3), 705–725. https://doi. org/10.1007/s10551-018-3785-6 Wang, L. (2015). Board Gender Diversity and Accounting Conservatism: Evidence from Finland, Master´s Thesis, Oulu Business School, Oulun Yliopisto University of Oulu. Watson, J., & McNaughton, M. (2007). Gender Differences in Risk Aversion and Expected Retirement Benefits. Financial Analysts Journal, 63(4), 52–62. https://doi. org/10.2469/faj.v63.n4.4749 Watts, R. L. (2003a). Conservatism in accounting part I: Explanations and Implications. Accounting Horizons, 17 (3), 207–221. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2003.17.3. 207 Watts, R. L. (2003b). Conservatism in accounting part II: Evidence and Research Opportunities. Accounting Horizons, 17(4), 287–301. https://doi.org/10.2308/ acch.2003.17.4.287 Watts, R. L., & Zimmerman, J. L. (1990). Positive Accounting Theory: A Ten Year Perspective. The Accounting Review, 65(1), 131–156. Wintoki, M. B., Linck, J. S., & Netter, J. M. (2012). Endogeneity and the dynamics of internal corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics, 105(3), 581–606. World development report (2012). Gender equality and development. World Bank. Xu, J., & Lu, C. (2008). Accounting Conservatism: A study of market-level and firm level-explanatory factors. China Journal of Accounting Research, 1, 11–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1755-3091(13)60003-9 Zalata, A. M., & Abdelfattah, T. (2021). Non-executive female directors and earnings management using classification shifting. Journal of Business Research, 134, 301–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.063 Zalata, A. M., Mansour Ntim, C., Aboud, A., & Gyapong, E. (2019). Female CEOs and Core Earnings Quality: New Evidence on the Ethics versus Risk-Aversion Puzzle. Journal of Business Ethics, 160(2), 515–534. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3918-y Zalata, A. M., Ntim, C. G., Alsohagy, M. H., & Malagila, J. (2021). Gender diversity and earnings management: The case of female directors with financial background. Review of Quantitative Finance & Accounting, 58(1), 101–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11156-021-00991-4 Zalata, A. M., Tauringana, V., & Tingbani, I. (2018). Audit committee financial expertise, gender, and earnings management: Does gender of the financial expert matter? International Review of Financial Analysis, 55, 170–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2017.11.002 Zhang, J. (2008). The contracting benefits of accounting conservatism to lenders and borrowers. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 45(1), 27–54. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2007.06.002 Alves, Cogent Business & Management (2023), 10: 2219088 https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2219088 Page 22 of 22