Socio-emotional and cognitive development in learning. Educational goals in competition?!

Becke , Michael [H sg.]; Digna h, Cha lo e [H sg.]; Bihle , Lilly-Ma len [H sg.]; Gaspa d, Hanna [H sg.]; McEl any, Nele [H sg.] Socio-emo ional and cogni i e de elopmen in lea ning. Educa ional goals in compe i ion?! Müns e ; New Yo k : Waxmann 2026, 109 S. - (Do munde Symposium de Empi ischen Bildungs o schung; 9) Quellenangabe/ Re e ence: Becke , Michael [H sg.]; Digna h, Cha lo e [H sg.]; Bihle , Lilly-Ma len [H sg.]; Gaspa d, Hanna [H sg.]; McEl any, Nele [H sg.]: Socio-emo ional and cogni i e de elopmen in lea ning. Educa ional goals in compe i ion?! Müns e ; New Yo k : Waxmann 2026, 109 S. - (Do munde Symposium de Empi ischen Bildungs o schung; 9) - URN: u n:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-345032 - DOI: 10.25656/01:34503 h ps://nbn- esol ing.o g/u n:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-345032 h ps://doi.o g/10.25656/01:34503 in Koope a ion mi / in coope a ion wi h: h p://www.waxmann.com Nu zungsbedingungen Te ms o use Dieses Dokumen s eh un e olgende C ea i e Commons-Lizenz: h p://c ea i ecommons.o g/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.de - Sie dü en das We k bzw. den Inhal un e olgenden Bedingungen e iel äl igen, e b ei en und ö en lich zugänglich machen sowie Abwandlungen und Bea bei ungen des We kes bzw. Inhal es an e igen: Sie müssen den Namen des Au o s/Rech einhabe s in de on ihm es geleg en Weise nennen. Dieses We k bzw. de Inhal da nich ü komme zielle Zwecke e wende we den. Die neu en s andenen We ke bzw. Inhal e dü en nu un e Ve wendung on Lizenzbedingungen wei e gegeben we den, die mi denen dieses Lizenz e ages iden isch ode e gleichba sind. This documen is published unde ollowing C ea i e Commons-License: h p://c ea i ecommons.o g/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.en - You may copy, dis ibu e and ansmi , adap o exhibi he wo k in he public and al e , ans o m o change his wo k as long as you a ibu e he wo k in he manne speci ied by he au ho o licenso . You a e no allowed o make comme cial use o he wo k. I you al e , ans o m, o change his wo k in any way, you may dis ibu e he esul ing wo k only unde his o a compa able license. Mi de Ve wendung dieses Dokumen s e kennen Sie die Nu zungsbedingungen an. By using his pa icula documen , you accep he abo e-s a ed condi ions o use. Kon ak / Con ac : peDOCS DIPF | Leibniz-Ins i u ü Bildungs o schung und Bildungsin o ma ion In o ma ionszen um (IZ) Bildung E-Mail: [email p o ec ed] In e ne : www.pedocs.de Do munde Symposium de Empi ischen Bildungs o schung edi ed by Nele McEl any Volume 9 Michael Becke , Cha lo e Digna h, Lilly-Ma len Bihle , Hanna Gaspa d, and Nele McEl any (Eds.) Socio-emo ional and cogni i e de elopmen in lea ning Educa ional goals in compe i ion?! Waxmann 2026 Müns e ⋅New Yo k Bibliog aphic in o ma ion published by Die Deu sche Na ionalbiblio hek Die Deu sche Na ionalbiblio hek lis s his publica ion in he Deu sche Na ionalbibliog a ie; de ailed bibliog aphic da a a e a ailable in he in e ne a h p://dnb.dnb.de. Do munde Symposium de Empi ischen Bildungs o schung, olume 9 ISSN 2366-6439 P in -ISBN 978-3-8188-0096-3 E-Book-ISBN 978-3-8188-5096-8 Waxmann Ve lag GmbH, 2026 S ein u e S aße 555, 48159 Müns e , Ge many Waxmann Publishing Co. P. O. Box 1318, New Yo k, NY 10028, U. S. A. www.waxmann.com [email p o ec ed] Co e Design: Anne B ei enbach, Müns e Co e pho o: N. Law enson/peopleimages.com – s ock.adobe.com Se ing: sa z & sonde s GmbH, Dülmen This wo k is a ailable unde he license CC BY-NC-SA 4.0: A ibu ion – Non Comme cial – Sha e Alike 4.0 in e na ional ( h ps://c ea i ecommons.o g/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode.de ) This licence applies only o he o iginal ma e ial. All ma ked hi d-pa y con en (e.g., illus a ions, pho os, quo a ions, e c.) is excluded om he CC licence, and i may be necessa y o ob ain u he pe mission om he copy igh holde o i s euse. The ee a ailabili y o he e-book edi ion o his publica ion was made possible by he Fede al Minis y o Resea ch, Technology and Space, he “Specialised In o ma ion Se ice o Educa ional Science and Resea ch (FID)”, and a ne ‐ wo k o scien i ic ins i u ions and lib a ies p omo ing open access in he edu‐ ca ional sciences. Biblio hek de Hochschule de Bundesagen u ü A bei Mannheim Biblio hek de Ka holischen Hochschule No d hein-Wes alen Köln Biblio hek de Pädagogischen Hochschule F eibu g Biblio hek de Pädagogischen Hochschule Zü ich Biblio hek ü Bildungsgeschich liche Fo schung des DIPF Be lin Biblio heks- und In o ma ionssys em de Ca l on Ossie zky Uni e si ä Oldenbu g DIPF I Leibniz-Ins i u ü Bildungs o schung und Bildungsin o ma ion F ank u a.M. FOM – Hochschule ü Oekonomie & Managemen Essen F eie Uni e si ä Be lin / Uni e si ä sbiblio hek Go ied Wilhelm Leibniz Biblio hek – Niede sächsische Landesbiblio hek Hanno e Hochschulbiblio hek de Pädagogischen Hochschule Ka ls uhe Hochschulbiblio hek de Pädagogischen Hochschule Ludwigsbu g IU In e na ionale Hochschule GmbH E u Jus us-Liebig-Uni e si ä Gießen / Uni e si ä sbiblio hek KIT-Biblio hek Ka ls uhe Landesbiblio hek Oldenbu g Leibniz Ins i u ü Bildungsmedien I Geo g-Ecke -Ins i u B aunschweig Leuphana Uni e si ä Lünebu g Pädagogische Hochschule Heidelbe g Pädagogische Hochschule Thu gau / Campus-Biblio hek RPTU Kaise slau e n-Landau / Uni e si ä sbiblio hek Landau Sächsische Landesbiblio hek – S aa s- und Uni e si ä sbiblio hek D esden S aa s- und Uni e si ä sbiblio hek Halle Technische In o ma ionsbiblio hek (TIB) Hanno e Technische Uni e si ä B aunschweig Uni e si ä s- und Landesbiblio hek Müns e Uni e si ä s- und S ad biblio hek Köln Uni e si ä sbiblio hek Augsbu g Uni e si ä sbiblio hek Bay eu h Uni e si ä sbiblio hek Be n, Biblio hek on Roll Uni e si ä sbiblio hek Biele eld Uni e si ä sbiblio hek Bochum Uni e si ä sbiblio hek Chemni z Uni e si ä sbiblio hek de Technischen Uni e si ä Be lin Uni e si ä sbiblio hek de Fe nUni e si ä Hagen Uni e si ä sbiblio hek de Humbold -Uni e si ä zu Be lin Uni e si ä sbiblio hek de LMU München Uni e si ä sbiblio hek Do mund Uni e si ä sbiblio hek Duisbu g-Essen Uni e si ä sbiblio hek E langen-Nü nbe g Uni e si ä sbiblio hek G az Uni e si ä sbiblio hek G ei swald Uni e si ä sbiblio hek Hildesheim Uni e si ä sbiblio hek Johann Ch is ian Senckenbe g F ank u a.M. Uni e si ä sbiblio hek Kassel Uni e si ä sbiblio hek Klagen u Uni e si ä sbiblio hek Leipzig Uni e si ä sbiblio hek Mainz Uni e si ä sbiblio hek Mannheim Uni e si ä sbiblio hek Ma bu g Uni e si ä sbiblio hek Passau Uni e si ä sbiblio hek Regensbu g Uni e si ä sbiblio hek T ie Uni e si ä sbiblio hek Tübingen Uni e si ä sbiblio hek Vech a Uni e si ä sbiblio hek Wü zbu g Uni e si ä sbiblio hek Wuppe al Zen al- und Hochschulbiblio hek Luze n Table o Con en s P e ace . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Pa 1: Designing socio-emo ional lea ning o he e ogeneous g oups Sa a E. Rimm-Kau man Socio-emo ional lea ning P omising syne gies wi h academic de elopmen in ea ly adolescence . . . 15 Elsbe h S e n Lea ning and pe o mance do no ha e o come a he expense o socio-emo ional de elopmen . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 Flo ian Schmiedek Lea ning o a - isk s uden s A dynamic pe spec i e . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 Pa 2: Emo ions, mo i a ion and well-being – he ole o socio-emo ional aspec s in lea ning Anne C. F enzel & Thomas Goe z Lea ning and emo ions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67 Ca men Zu b iggen Well-being and lea ning Taking inclusi e educa ion as a p ominen example . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81 Rica da S einmay Lea ning and mo i a ion Which mo i a ion is impo an and how o os e i . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93 . Sa a E. Rimm-Kau man Socio-emo ional lea ning P omising syne gies wi h academic de elopmen in ea ly adolescence 1. In oduc ion Pic u e Sp ing Middle School1, a school se ing you h be ween age 11 and 13 in a small no heas ci y in he Uni ed S a es. His o ically, he ci y was mos ly popula ed by whi e, middle- and wo king-class amilies and hei child en. Since 2000, he ci y expe ienced an in lux o immig an s and now oughly 1 in 10 people in he ci y a e immig an s (O ice o New Ame icans Repo , 2023). Now, Sp ing Middle School has abou 480 s uden s wi h 32 % bo n ou side o he U.S., ep esen ing 28 di e en home coun ies. 47 % o he s uden s speak a i s language o he han English and his school has 21 home languages ep‐ esen ed. S uden s come om Gua emala, Bu undi, Angola, Sudan, E hiopia, I aq, Hondu as, Namibia, Gabon, Rwanda among o he s (LeClai e, 2022). Like mos U.S. middle schools, he school s i es o mee he needs o ea ly adolescen s who a e expe iencing d ama ic de elopmen al changes in physical, emo ional, cogni i e, and social domains. Wha makes Sp ing Middle School pa icula ly unique is he emendous e hnic di e si y o s uden s and he a ‐ ied needs o you h and amilies who a e e y ecen immig an s. This scena io calls a en ion o a ques ion: How can schools mee psychological needs and p omo e academic g ow h among you h wi h such a wide ange o backg ounds and expe iences? The solu ion o his school has been complex. Ins ead o ocusing on aca‐ demic achie emen as he sole ocus, hey b oadened hei goals o ad ance a h ee-dimensional ision o s uden achie emen ha includes mas e y o skills and knowledge, cul i a ion o cha ac e a ibu es, and high-quali y s uden wo k on opics ha a e ele an and engaging o hei s uden s (Be ge e al., 2021). Engaging in C ew – daily mee ings wi h abou 15–20 s uden s and one adul —is one p ac ice ha con ibu es o his mul i ace ed ision o s uden 1 Sp ing Middle School is a pseudonym. 16 Sa a E. Rimm-Kau man success. C ew c ea es an oppo uni y o s uden s o de elop posi i e ela ion‐ ships wi h adul s and o he s uden s, ha e cou ageous con e sa ions abou is‐ sues in s uden s’ li es, c ea e a sense o communi y, expe ience belonging, and e lec on he pu pose o school lea ning (Be ge e al., 2021). This anecdo e se s he s age o a con e sa ion abou how schools can cul‐ i a e social and emo ional compe encies and c ea e meaning ul academic ex‐ pe iences. This chap e desc ibes he basic de ini ions o social and emo ional lea ning (SEL), explo es ypical ajec o ies o g ow h o social and emo ional compe encies (SEC), and examines he ways in which meaning ul lea ning c e‐ a es class oom expe iences ha op imize academic lea ning while also mee ing he psychological needs o you h. The pape closes wi h implica ions o educa‐ o s s i ing o mee he needs o ea ly adolescen s. 2. Wha is social and emo ional lea ning? The Collabo a i e o Academic, Social and Emo ional Lea ning (CASEL) is an o ganiza ion a he Uni e si y o Illinois-Chicago ha is he cen al-mos hub in he U.S. o SEL esea ch, p ac ice and policy. The CASEL de ini ion o SEL is “ he p ocess h ough which all young people and adul s acqui e and apply he knowledge, skills, and a i udes o de elop heal hy iden i ies, manage emo ions and achie e pe sonal and collec i e goals, eel and show empa hy o o he s, es ablish and main ain suppo i e ela ionships, and make esponsible and ca ing decisions” (CASEL, 2025). The e a e wo a ibu es o his de ini ion ha equi e ca e ul a en ion. The de ini ion poin s ou ha all young people and adul s can expe ience SEL. This is impo an because many people assume ha SEL is jus o child en and you h. In ac , SEL also occu s in adul s. Fo example, when educa o s lea n and apply new in e cul u al skills o wo king wi h s uden s o colo o ecen immig an s, ha ep esen s an aspec o adul SEL. A second a ibu e o his de ini ion e e s o wha people lea n and can ap‐ ply – SEL in ol es he de elopmen o mo e han skills. SEL also in ol es new knowledge and a i udes ha people acqui e. Fo ins ance, in he U.S. he e has been a mo emen o inc ease cul u al esponsi eness o SEL. To achie e his goal, educa o s ha e had o lea n and apply new skills, de elop new knowledge abou cul u es, and change hei a i udes abou people who we e un amilia o hem in he pas (Wanless e al., 2023). All his is necessa y be o e eache s a e eady o apply hese compe encies in hei class ooms. By de ini ion, SECs occu as a p oduc o SEL. SECs all in o h ee b oad ca ‐ ego ies: sel -skills, social skills, and decision-making (CASEL, 2025), as shown in Figu e 1. The b oad ca ego y o sel -skills co esponds o he in ape sonal Socio-emo ional lea ning 17 Figu e 1: CASEL model showing he de elopmen o social and emo‐ ional compe encies compe encies o sel -awa eness and sel -managemen . Sel -awa eness e e s o a pe son’s abili y o unde s and hei own alues, hough s, and emo ions and he ways hese ideas link o hei beha io . Sel -awa eness in ol es iden i ying one’s own emo ions, hei pe sonal and cul u al asse s, examina ion o one’s own p ejudices and biases, de eloping sel -e icacy, a g ow h mindse and a sense o pu pose. When an eigh h g ade desc ibes hemsel es as iewing mis akes as a no mal pa o lea ning and indica ion ha hey need o y a di e en idea o sol e a p oblem, hey a e demons a ing g ow h mindse , which is one aspec o sel -awa eness. Sel -managemen e e s o he abili y o a pe son o egula e and manage hei hough s, beha io s, and emo ions and o adjus hose beha ‐ io s o ma ch di e en con ex s. Use o s ess managemen s a egies, managing s ong emo ions, exis ing sel -discipline, showing ini ia i e and di ec ing hei a en ion o pe sonal and collec i e goals a e examples o sel -managemen . Codeswi ching, he modi ica ion o one’s beha io o way o speaking o ma ch hei immedia e cul u al en i onmen , also equi es sel -managemen skills. The b oad ca ego y o social skills also has wo subca ego ies and includes social awa eness and ela ionship skills. Social awa eness e e s o he abili y o unde s and he pe spec i e o o he s, e en i hey a e om cul u es and backg ounds ha a e di e en han onesel . I in ol es an unde s anding ha 18 Sa a E. Rimm-Kau man o he people ha e had di e en expe iences han onesel and ha e belie s and ac ions ha de i e om hose expe iences. I means showing compassion o o he s and unde s anding wha was conside ed igh in one his o ical pe iod is no necessa ily conside ed noble in ano he . Being able o iden i y injus ices i s wi hin social awa eness. Rela ionship skills e e o people’s abili y o c ea e and main ain ela ionships and manage social si ua ions wi h di e se g oups. A pe son wi h s ong ela ionship skills can communica e well, lis en ca e ully o o he s, wo k wi h o he s o sol e p oblems, na iga e con lic well, lead o ollow, when he si ua ion calls o i . Rela ionship skills can mean showing cul u al compe ency, esis ing nega i e social p essu e, seeking o o e ing help. The i h compe ency is esponsible decision-making, e lec ing people’s abil‐ i y o make e ec i e choices abou one’s own beha io in a a ie y o di e en si ua ions. Responsible decision-making in ol es being able o hink h ough he consequences o one’s ac ions and how hose ac ions will in luence onesel , o he s, and socie y collec i ely. Responsible decision-making equi es open- mindedness, lea ning how o size up complex si ua ions and make judgmen s, and iden i ying and enac ing solu ions o social and pe sonal p oblems. Social and emo ional skills, knowledge and a i udes a e mul iply de e ‐ mined. People lea n hese a home, school, neighbo hood, h ough social media and ia o he social in e ac ions. Because class ooms and schools a e malleable, a g ea deal o a en ion has been gi en o SEL in hose con ex s, co esponding o he class oom and school e ec s desc ibed in Figu e 1. 3. Educa ing o social and emo ional lea ning SEL is ce ainly no new. Educa o s ha e been eaching s uden s manne s, kind‐ ness, empa hy, sel -con ol, and o he ela ed skills o decades—e en cen u ies (Oshe e al., 2016). Wha is new is ha e o s o imp o e you h SECs ha e become an explici aspec o he school expe ience o child en and you h. The e a e wo main ways ha SEL akes shape in schools – by in oducing p og ams designed o enhance SEL o by using SEL-p ac ices o ganically as a pa o he cul u e o he school. SEL p og ams a e p e alen in he U.S. as e idenced by he $ 765 million spen on such p og ams be ween No embe 2019 and Ap il 2021 (Ty on Pa ‐ ne s, 2021). SEL p og ams ypically include a pape o online manual, aining, and coaching ha can be pu chased and used o in-se ice p o essional de el‐ opmen . These p og ams can be desc ibed in a ew main ways; some in eg a e SEL in o academic ins uc ional con en , o he s o e ee-s anding lessons on SEL opics, ye o he s a e school-wide app oaches ha in ol e class oom and Socio-emo ional lea ning 19 school-le el ac i i ies designed o enhance s uden s’ a i udes, knowledge and skills while also s i ing o c ea e a school cul u e ha is conduci e o lea ning social and emo ional compe encies. P og ams can be implemen ed in indi id‐ ual class ooms o school-wide, depending on he p og am and dis ic . The adop ion o SEL p og ams con as s o SEL ha occu s wi hou p o‐ g ams in place. SEL can be na u ally embedded in o he cul u e o a school as eache s model social and emo ional compe encies owa d s uden s. Fo in‐ s ance, when you h see espec ul in e ac ions among eache s and be ween eache s and o he s uden s, child en lea n how o in e ac wi h pee s. Teache s cul i a e emo ion lea ning h ough he daily expe iences o class oom li e (e.g., a eache ge ing us a ed and hen alking aloud o calm hemsel es down when he echnology is no wo king). Whe he SEL is deli e ed h ough a p og am o o ganically ia he cul u e o he school, SEL can be uni e sal and deli e ed o all s uden s o a ge ed and designed o people wi h mode a e o ch onic, se e e needs equi ing in en‐ si e, one-on-one wo k be ween a school counselo o eache and he s uden . Uni e sal SEL esembles he idea o luo ide in wa e – i is an in e en ion ha can bene i each and e e y s uden . Howe e , many s uden s need mo e in ensi e suppo o de elop SECs, in which cases o e ing mo e one-on-one oppo uni ies o ouch base wi h adul s o access o clinical se ices can add ess hose needs. 4. T ends in social and emo ional lea ning Resea che s a he RAND Co po a ion conduc ed a na ionally ep esen a i e su ey o almos 28,954 eache s and 12,954 p incipals asking hem o a e he impo ance o eaching a ange o social and emo ional skills (Hamil on e al., 2019). The su ey asked abou sel -skills including unde s anding and managing emo ions, se ing and achie ing posi i e goals, de eloping a sense o iden i y, ela ionships skills including es ablishing and main aining posi i e e‐ la ionships and eeling and showing empa hy owa d o he s, as well as decision- making skills such as making esponsible decisions. Fo all skills measu ed, o e 90 % o p incipals and eache s desc ibed hese skills as ai ly o e y impo an . Fo mos skills, 97–99 % o educa o s epo ed hem as ai ly o e y impo an . The impo ance o SEL has been e iden in ecen policies wi h 27 s a es ha ing s a e s anda ds o SEL o g ades K-12 in place as o 2022 (De mody & Dusen‐ bu y, 2022). On one hand, he U.S. has shown a ise in SEL p io i ies and policies ye he e a e coun e o ces a wo k, as well. SEL has eme ged as a poli ical lash‐ poin . Many conse a i e-leaning poli icians and conse a i e pa en g oups 20 Sa a E. Rimm-Kau man ha e pushed back on SEL s a ing ha eaching social and emo ional compe‐ encies is ou side o he scope o schools and ha you h should be lea ning hose alues om hei amilies and eligious o ganiza ions. Mos le -leaning poli icians and pa en g oups ag ee wi h he p emises o SEL. Ye , some le - leaning schola s and educa o s aise issues because ypical SEL is oo ocused on “mains eam” whi e U.S. alues and does oo li le o adap o cul u al di e si y p esen in he schools. Fo example, many s eng hs in s uden s o colo a e no ecognized as s eng hs no a e ampli ied by ypical SEL (e.g., he abili y o Black s uden s o codeswi ch) (Rimm-Kau man e al., 2023). SEL is no only a U.S. phenomenon. Many schools in Ge many use SEL. Some p og ams ocus na owly on an i-bullying and an i- iolence, o ins ance, whole school an i-bullying p oblems using app oaches by Olweus (1993), he ‘Faus los’ cu iculum- iolence p e en ion, he P oACT+E app oach and use o he ‘Fai playe Manual’ (Schei haue & Bull, 2008). O he schools ocus mo e b oadly on cul i a ing SECs. Fo ins ance, Second S ep has been adap ed om he U.S. p og am o be used in Ge many, as has he Mindma e s p og am. Ye o he schools ha e ocused on men al heal h needs o s uden s by adop ing p og ams such as Lion’s Ques ha suppo s adolescen s’ de elopmen o sense o sel , eaches lis ening, empa hy, and wise decision-making h ough a se ies o lessons (Ce ai e al., 2018). These a e all examples o e o s o enhance social and emo ional compe‐ encies. New me a-analy ic wo k shows he ways in which SEL con ibu es o sho - and long- e m gains in social, emo ional, academic and beha io al ou ‐ comes (Cip iano e al., 2023; Taylo e al., 2017). SEL app oaches ha e ga ne ed widesp ead a en ion impac ing bo h policy and p ac ice. Despi e his ocus, we know oo li le abou how SECs change o e ime, especially du ing adoles‐ cence. 5. The de elopmen o social and emo ional compe encies I is easy o assume ha child en and you h lea n s eadily and g adually as hey ma u e. Achie emen p o ides a basis o ha assump ion in ha we know, on a e age, you h show gains in eading and ma h skills o e ime wi h he g ea es magni ude o g ow h annually in ea ly childhood and hen smalle inc eases du ing he middle and high school yea s (Hill e al., 2008). Unlike achie emen , you h de elopmen o SECs does no show a simple, upwa d end. Ins ead, he e a e quali a i e shi s in de elopmen ha can lead o in e up ion and e en U-shaped pa e ns (So o & Tacke , 2015). Take sel -managemen as an example. One longi udinal s udy (Ross e al., 2019) showed ha sel -manage‐ men (e.g., deciding on a goal and s icking o i ) was bes modeled quad a ically; Socio-emo ional lea ning 21 sel -managemen dec eased om age 10 o age 17 ollowed by an inc ease o age 18. Findings like his ques ion assump ions in he ield. Be o e in es iga ing u ‐ he , he e a e impo an issues ela ed o measu emen o hese cons uc s o aise. Some SECs, such as sel -e icacy o g ow h mindse , can only be assessed h ough s uden - epo which means ou comes e lec ac ual p esence o SECs as well as s uden s’ pe cep ion o hemsel es ela i e o o he s a ound hem. In e p e a ion o s uden - epo da a has some ad an ages, o ins ance, he wo k ele a es you h oice and helps esea che s unde s and s uden s’ ac ual li ed expe ience. Howe e , s uden - epo also in oduces bias based on he a ia ion in s uden s’ in e nal app aisal o hei compe encies. To pu sue inqui y abou how SECs de elop, he au ho (S. Rimm-Kau man) and wo colleagues (J. Soland and M. Kuh eld) iden i ied an ideal da a se . A g oup o Cali o nia school dis ic s called he CORE dis ic s s a ed conduc ‐ ing annual su eys abou you h’s de elopmen o SECs in 2015 (Wes e al., 2018). These da a we e a ailable o esea che s o analysis and we e ideal be‐ cause o he la ge sample and use o s anda dized measu es. Thus, he pape by Rimm-Kau man and colleagues (2024) was designed o be e unde s and de elopmen al ends in SECs. The s udy was in o med by he S age-En i onmen Fi Theo y (Eccles e al., 1993) which posi s ha de el‐ opmen al declines in mo i a ion and pe cep ion o sel in adolescence “ esul om a misma ch be ween he needs o de eloping adolescen s and he oppo ‐ uni ies a o ded hem by hei social en i onmen s” (Eccles e al., 1993, p. 91). Despi e he heo y being hi y yea s old, ea ly adolescen s s ill expe ience a p oblema ic s age-en i onmen i . Ea ly adolescen you h de elop mo e need o au onomy and become e y sensi i e o social compa ison, ye hey con‐ inue o need close ela ionships wi h adul s (Na ional Academies o Sciences, Enginee ing, and Medicine [NASEM], 2019; Yu e al., 2018). Fu he , young adolescen s desi e espec and s a us and adi ional schooling can seem un‐ in e es ing as hey de elop a undamen al need o use hei skills o imp o e he con ibu e o he wo ld a ound hem (Fuligni, 2019). Jus as hese de el‐ opmen al changes a e occu ing, mos you h a e mo ing om elemen a y o middle school. In elemen a y school, s uden s ypically s ay in a class oom wi h one adul and oughly 25 s uden s. In middle school, s uden s ypically mo e om class oom o class oom and eache s ha e as many as 130 s uden s in any gi en day. The demands o middle school a e high – eache s expec s uden s o come o class p epa ed, open only ce ain abs on hei compu e wi hou being dis ac ed by he in e ne , and wo k on long e m p ojec s wi hou wai ing un il las minu e o comple e hem. Middle school also means high-s akes g ading, abili y g ouping, mo e disciplina y ac ion, and an inc ease in he public e al‐ 22 Sa a E. Rimm-Kau man ua ion o academic wo k (Deu sch, 2022). Taken oge he , his new con ex c ea es a challenge o he de eloping child. To pu sue deepe unde s anding o de elopmen o SECs, analyses we e conduc ed o examine how much g ow h occu s in social and emo ional compe encies om G ades 4–12? 6. Quan i a i e analysis and esul s The CORE da a collec ion included nine dis ic s in Cali o nia ha adminis‐ e ed su eys o all s uden s each yea s a ing in 2015, esul ing in a sample o 95,998 s uden s in g ades ou h ough 12 ( oughly ages nine o 18). Collec ing da a each yea esul ed in longi udinal da a o up o ou yea s. Thus, he analy‐ sis included s uden s who ook he su ey a leas once be ween 2015 and 2018. The sample o s uden s was almos e enly spli be ween gi ls (49 % ) and boys (51 % ).2 Roughly 25 % we e om amilies wi h pa en s wi h low educa ional a ainmen (i.e., high school o below). The sample was 73 % La ine, 11 % Whi e, 10 % Black, and 7 % Asian. Table 1. Measu es Collec ed in he CORE Dis ic s wi h Selec ed I ems Cons uc s Example I ems # i ems Alphas G ow h Mindse I can change my in elligence wi h ha d wo k. I am capable o lea ning any hing. 4 .70 Sel -E icacy I can mas e he ha des opics in my classes. I can do well on my es s, e en when hey a e di icul . 4 .86 Sel -Managemen I came o class p epa ed. I paid a en ion, e en when he e we e dis ac ions. 5 .85 Social Awa eness How o en did you complimen o he s’ accomplishmen s? How well did you ge along wi h s uden s who a e di e en om you? 5 .81 The 18-i em measu e adminis e ed assessed g ow h mindse , sel -e icacy, sel - managemen , and sel -awa eness, as shown in Table 1. To add ess he key e‐ 2 Gende da a we e limi ed o bina y ca ego ies o gi l and boy. Socio-emo ional lea ning 23 sea ch ques ion, an Accele a ed Longi udinal Design (ALD) G ow h Models was used. Fi s , mul ile el g ow h cu e models we e es ima ed and hen lin‐ ea , quad a ic, and cubic g ow h cu es we e es ed. See Rimm-Kau man e al. (2024) o mo e de ails. Fo h ee o he ou cons uc s, indings showed a shi in s uden s’ pe ‐ cep ions o hei in ape sonal and in e pe sonal compe encies a ound 6 h o 7 h g ade. Figu e 2 shows he pa e ns. Resul s o g ow h mindse gene ally showed inc eases in sco es o e ime. Sel -e icacy showed a somewha di e en pa e n: s uden s ended o show consis en declines as hey mo ed om 5 h o 6 h g ade and beyond, bu ha ajec o y la ened o e en cu ed upwa ds in 11 h and 12 h g ade. Fo sel -managemen , s uden s we e le el in 4 h and 5 h g ade, hen showed declines be ween 6 h and 8 h g ade, ollowed by inc eases in la e high school. Fo social awa eness, s uden s showed declines be ween 6 h and 8 h g ade, and, hen inc eases om 9 h h ough 12 h . Ye ano he poin equi es a en ion. The models indica e conside able s u‐ den -le el a iabili y in he la en slope pa ame e s sugges ing ha g ow h in Figu e 2: Plo s o Model-Based G ow h Es ima es by Cons uc No e: The do ed black line ep esen s he model-implied ajec o ies using he accele a ed longi udi‐ nal design. The o he lines each ep esen coho -speci ic es ima es. The Y-Axis is he numbe o s an‐ da d de ia ions om he a e age in g ade 4. Rep in ed om Rimm-Kau man e al. (2024, p. 366). 24 Sa a E. Rimm-Kau man hese cons uc s di e s conside ably dependen on he s uden . Fo example, while s uden s ended o decline in sel -e icacy in he ea ly g ades, a non‐ negligible pe cen age showed g ow h du ing hose yea s. To desc ibe his phe‐ nomenon quan i a i ely, as an example, he mean o he linea slope o g ow h mindse was .17 SDs. I one we e o ake he squa e oo o he slope a iance, i would equal .4 SDs. Thus, a s uden app oxima ely 2 SDs abo e he slope mean would ha e a linea coe icien o .97 SDs, and a s uden 2 SDs below he slope mean would ha e a linea coe icien o -.63 SDs. Examples like hese indica e ha elying only on a e ages masks conside able a iabili y in hese SEC ajec o ies, a poin discussed u he in Rimm-Kau man e al. (2024). 7. Changes in SECs SECs de elop in ela ion o one ano he and changes in one de elopmen al domain in luence ano he domain. As an example, he indings show a g adual dec ease in sel -managemen om 4 h h ough 11 h g ade wi h a sligh up ick be ween 11 h and 12 h g ade, indings ha ma ch o he longi udinal wo k (Ross e al., 2019). Also, du ing ea ly adolescence, he demands o school and he need o sel -managemen in ensi ies as s uden s shi o middle school. Middle schoole s may pe cei e d ops in hei sel -managemen because o he heigh ‐ ened demands. In he p esence o dips in sel -managemen , sel -e icacy is also likely o d op (Musci e al., 2022). Lowe sel -managemen and eeling ine ica‐ cious may c ea e s ess ul si ua ions ha means you h will pu hei own needs i s and show lowe social awa eness. These de elopmen al changes occu in con ex o s uden s’ school expe i‐ ences. Middle schools end o be la ge han elemen a y schools. You h a e a ing hemsel es in compa ison o o he s jus as hei compa ison g oup g ows o include a wide social ci cle a school and likely, online. G ow h mindse is an anomaly in ha i shows con inued g ow h. G ow h mindse in e en ions ha e become mo e common in school, which may be one possible explana ion. Ano he plausible explana ion is ha some aspec s o in elligence (e. g., ocabu‐ la y, wo king memo y) inc ease du ing he een yea s (Ha sho ne & Ge mine, 2015). The declines in sel -e icacy, sel -managemen and social awa eness ha e consequences o ac ion among he educa o s who a e a pa o you hs’ de el‐ opmen al expe ience. You h a e a a u ning poin . I adul s o e sca olding o mee he new demands and show posi i e ega d o you h, s uden s will e‐ main engaged in lea ning. I adul s espond wi h discipline and blame, nega i e ela ionships will eme ge and s uden s will disengage om school (Engels e al., Socio-emo ional lea ning 31 Du lak, J. (2023). The s a e o e idence o social and emo ional lea ning: A con‐ empo a y me a-analysis o uni e sal school-based SEL in e en ions. Child De el‐ opmen , 94(5), 1181–1204. h ps://doi.o g/10.1111/cde .13968 . Collabo a i e o Academic, Social and Emo ional Lea ning. (2025). CASEL’s SEL ame‐ wo k. h ps://casel.o g/ undamen als-o -sel/wha -is- he-casel- amewo k/ . De mody, C. M., & Dusenbu y, L. (2022). 2022 social and emo ional lea ning s a e sco e‐ ca d scan. h ps://casel.o g/2022-s a e-scan/? iew=1 . Deu sch, N. L. (2022). ‘You jus ha e o ge h ough i ’: Le ing go o endu ing s e eo‐ ypes abou middle school. Phi Del a Kappan, 104(2), 6–10. h ps://doi.o g/10.1177/ 00317217221130624 . Du lak, J. A., Domi o ich, C. E., & Mahoney, J. L. (2025). Handbook o social and emo ional lea ning (2nd ed.). Guil o d. . Eccles, J. S., Midgley, C., Wig ield, A., Buchanan, C. M., Reuman, D., Flanagan, C., & MacI e , D. (1993). De elopmen du ing adolescence: The impac o s age-en i‐ onmen i on young adolescen s’ expe iences in schools and in amilies. Ame ican Psychologis , 48(2), 90–101. h ps://doi.o g/10.1037/0003-066X.48.2.90 . Engels, M. C., Colpin, H., Van Leeuwen, K., Bij ebie , P., Van Den Noo ga e, W., Claes, S., Goossens, L., & Ve schue en, K. (2016). Beha io al engagemen , pee s a us, and eache -s uden ela ionships in adolescence: A longi udinal s udy on ecip ocal in‐ luences. Jou nal o You h and Adolescence, 45, 1192–1207. h ps://doi.o g/10.1007/ s10964-016-0414-5 . Fuligni, A. J. (2019). The need o con ibu e du ing adolescence. Pe spec i es on Psycho‐ logical Science, 14(3), 331–343. h ps://doi.o g/10.1177/1745691618805437 . Hamil on, L. S., Doss, C. J., & S eine , E. D. (2019). Teache and p incipal pe spec i es on social and emo ional lea ning in Ame ica’s schools. Findings om he Ame ican Educa o Panels. h ps://doi.o g/10.7249/RR2991 . Ha sho ne, J. K., & Ge mine, L. T. (2015). When does cogni i e unc ioning peak? The asynch onous ise and all o di e en cogni i e abili ies ac oss he li e span. Psychological Science, 26(4), 433–443. h ps://doi.o g/10.1177/0956797614567339 . Hill, C. J., Bloom, H. S., Black, A. R., & Lipsey, M. W. (2008). Empi ical benchma ks o in e p e ing e ec sizes in esea ch. Child De elopmen Pe spec i es, 2(3), 172–177. h ps://doi.o g/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2008.00061.x . Hughes, J. N., & Cao, Q. (2018). T ajec o ies o eache -s uden wa m h and con lic a he ansi ion o middle school: E ec s on academic engagemen and achie emen . Jou nal o School Psychology, 67, 148–162. h ps://doi.o g/10.1016/j.jsp.2017.10.003 . LeClai e, C. (2022, Ap il). We a e c ew: School clima e and cul u e. In S. E. Rimm- Kau man (Chai ), C ea ing good human beings: New pe spec i es on cul i a ing e h‐ ical cha ac e in expedi iona y lea ning middle schools. Symposium a he Ame ican Educa ion Resea ch Associa ion, San Diego, CA. . Musci, R. J., Voeg line, K., Raghuna han, R., Ialongo, N., Johnson, S. (2022). Di e en ial impac o a uni e sal p e en ion p og am on academic sel -e icacy: The mode a ing 32 Sa a E. Rimm-Kau man ole o baseline sel -con ol. P e en ion Science, 23, 513–522. h p://doi.o g/10.1007/ s11121-021-01315-7 . Na ional Academies o Sciences, Enginee ing, and Medicine. (2019). The p omise o adolescence: Realizing oppo uni y o all you h. Na ional Academies P ess. h ps:// doi.o g/10.17226/25388 . O ice o New Ame icans Repo . (2023). Plan o es ablish he Maine O ice o New Ame icans. h ps://www.maine.go / u u e/si es/maine.go . u u e/ iles/inline- iles/ ONA%20Repo %20V.FinalLayou .pd . Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying a school: Wha we know and wha we can do. Blackwell. . Oshe , D., Kid on, Y., B acke , M., Dymnicki, A., Jones, S., & Weissbe g, R. P. (2016). Ad ancing he science and p ac ice o social and emo ional lea ning: Looking back and mo ing o wa d. Re iew o Resea ch in Educa ion, 40(1), 644–681. h ps://doi. o g/10.3102/0091732X16673595 . Rimm-Kau man, S. E., S amble , M. J., & Schone -Reichl, K. A. (2023). In S.E. Rimm- Kau man, M. J. S amble , & K. A. Schone -Reichl (Eds.), Social and emo ional lea ning in ac ion: C ea ing sys emic change in schools (pp. 1–32). Guil o d. . Rimm-Kau man, S. E., Soland, J., & Kuh eld, M. (2024). Social and emo ional compe‐ ency de elopmen om ou h o 12 h g ade: Rela ions o pa en al educa ion and gende . Ame ican Psychologis . Ad ance online publica ion. h ps://doi.o g/10.1037/ amp0001357 . Ross, K. M., Kim, H., Tolan, P. H., & Jennings, P. A. (2019). An explo a ion o no ma i e social and emo ional skill g ow h ajec o ies du ing adolescence. Jou nal o Applied De elopmen al Psychology, 62, 102–115. h ps://doi.o g/10.1016/j.appde .2019.02. 006 . Schei haue , H., & Bull, H. D. (2008). ai playe .manual: Fö de ung on sozialen Kom‐ pe enzen und Zi ilcou age – P ä en ion on Bullying und Schulgewal . Vandenhoeck & Rup ech . . So o, C. J., & Tacke , J. L. (2015). Pe sonali y ai s in childhood and adolescence: S uc u e, de elopmen , and ou comes. Cu en Di ec ions in Psychological Science, 24(5), 358–362. h p://doi.o g/10.1177/0963721415589345 . Taylo , R. D., Obe le, E., Du lak, J. A., & Weissbe g, R. P. (2017). P omo ing posi i e you h de elopmen h ough school-based social and emo ional lea ning in e en‐ ions: A me a-analysis o ollow-up e ec s. Child De elopmen , 88(4), 1156–1171. h ps://doi.o g/10.1111/cde .12864 . Thomas, K., Ross, L., & Ruzek, E. (2025). Teache disc imina ion and s uden en‐ gagemen in he con ex o class oom quali y: The media ing e ec o ela ional us . Jou nal o Educa ional Psychology. Ad ance online publica ion. h ps://doi.o g/ 10.1037/edu0000920 . Ty on Pa ne s. (2021). Finding you place 2021: Social emo ional lea ning akes cen‐ e s age in K-12. h ps:// y onpa ne s.com/app/uploads/2021/10/Ty on-Pa ne s_ Finding-You -Place-2021_SEL-Takes-Cen e -S age-in-K12.pd Socio-emo ional lea ning 33 . Wanless, S., Spea , C. F., A inge , J. V., & B iggs, J. O. (2023). C ea ing spaces o adul lea ning and p o essional de elopmen : SEL skills o acili a ing acial equi y discus‐ sions. In S. Rimm-Kau man, M. J. S amble , & K. A. Schone -Reichl (Eds.), Social and emo ional lea ning in ac ion: C ea ing sys emic change in schools (pp. 138–156). Guil o d P ess. . Wa d-Seidel, A. R., Rimm-Kau man, S. E., & Sandilos, L. E. (2024). Schoolwo k wi h pu pose: A mixed me hods s udy on you hs’ pe spec i e on wha makes lea ning meaning ul. Jou nal o Adolescen Resea ch. Ad ance online publica ion. h ps://doi. o g/10.1177/07435584241280266 . Wes , M. R., Buckley, K., K achman, S. B., & Bookman, N. (2018). De elopmen and implemen a ion o s uden social-emo ional su eys in he CORE Dis ic s. Jou nal o Applied De elopmen al Psychology, 55, 119–129. h ps://doi.o g/10.1016/j.appde . 2017.06.001 . Yu, M. V. B., Johnson, H. E., Deu sch, N. L., & Va ga, S. M. (2018). “She calls me by my las name”: Explo ing adolescen pe cep ions o posi i e eache -s uden ela‐ ionships. Jou nal o Adolescen Resea ch, 33(3), 332–362. h ps://doi.o g/10.1177/ 0743558416684958 . Elsbe h S e n Lea ning and pe o mance do no ha e o come a he expense o socio-emo ional de elopmen 1. In oduc ion All subjec s augh in school aim o os e meaning ul lea ning and concep ual unde s anding. The knowledge acqui ed in he class oom is supposed o enable s uden s o be e unde s and he wo ld a ound hem, as well as o de elop and achie e sho - e m and long- e m goals. The eali y, howe e o en looks di e en : S uden s acqui e knowledge ha is bound o he na ow con ex o he class oom, which means hey do no achie e a deepe unde s anding o he con en deal wi h. I a all, s uden s can e ie e he knowledge in he nex exam, bu i s isola ed ep esen a ion in long- e m memo y makes i unlikely o be ac i a ed in new con ex s inside and ou side o school (Mähle & S e n, 2006). This is de imen al o s uden s, eache s, pa en s and socie y as a whole. I is pa icula ly us a ing o s uden s o expe ience day a e day ha hey ha e o lea n hings ha hey do no unde s and and whose in ellec ual o p ac ical bene i s hey canno comp ehend. These expe iences will mos likely c ea e eelings o helplessness and belonging unce ain y (Cohen, 2022), which has a long- e m impac on s uden s’ socio-emo ional de elopmen and impai s hei u he academic de elopmen (Baume e al., 2023). P o iding an educa ion sys em ha mee s he needs o socie y and a he same ime bene i s he b oad a ie y o lea ne s, is one o he g ea es challenges in he mode n wo ld. Scien i ic p og ess made in a ious a eas ela ed o lea n‐ ing and educa ion can help o be e unde s and he challenges o p o iding lea ning en i onmen s ha suppo child en in de eloping posi i e a i udes o pe o mance and equipping hem wi h sel -e icacy. Th ee lines o esea ch, which will be discussed in de ail in his a icle, can con ibu e o his goal: a) P epa a ion o u u e lea ning ins ead o sho - e m e ec s: P omo ing he acquisi ion o usable and ans e able knowledge. Schools we e ounded be‐ cause skills such as eading, w i ing and a i hme ic ha e e ol ed o e he cou se o cul u al de elopmen and need p o essional ins uc ion o be passed o he nex gene a ion. The e o e, lea ning a school is by de ini ion mo e demanding han he acquisi ion o skills o which e olu ion has p epa ed us. A he same 36 Elsbe h S e n ime, we ha e no ye exhaus ed he oppo uni ies o acili a ing lea ning ha he lea ning sciences o e us. By p o iding lea ning en i onmen s ha mee he a o dances and cons ain s o human in o ma ion p ocessing (Schumache & S e n, 2022), lea ne s a e mo e likely o ha e success ul expe ience and he eby gain sel -con idence and sel -e icacy (Yu & Schunn, 2024). b) C ea ing mo i a ion by p omo ing mas e y ins ead o pe o mance o i‐ en a ion: In con as o e e yday concep s held also by many eache s, o Psy‐ chologis s mo i a ion is a he a s a e han a ai . This means ha lea ne s’ mo i a ion can be in luenced by eache s, and his does no ha e o be done by lowe ing s anda ds. The sel -de e mina ion heo y (Deci & Ryan, 2012) p o‐ ides he amewo k o his. c) Managing di e si y in cogni i e abili ies, p io knowledge, in e es and social backg ound. When en e ing a class, s uden s do no s a a he same le el, and hey o en end up e en mo e di e se. In pa icula , cogni i e abili ies as measu ed wi h in elligence es s a e a s able pe sonali y ai wi h a s ong impac on lea ning ou comes (S e n, 2017; 2024). Managing di e si y o he bene i o all is a majo challenge o eache s, which needs mo e a en ion. 2. P epa a ion o u u e lea ning ins ead o sho - e m e ec s: P omo ing he acquisi ion o usable and ans e able knowledge E ec i e lea ning en i onmen s ha e o conside a o dances and cons ain s o he human minds. Thanks o scien i ic p og ess in cogni i e science, we now ha e a solid unde s anding o how he human mind wo ks and how lea ning can be p omo ed. To a oid us a ion among s uden s and eache s, lea ning ma e ial and ins uc ional in e en ions mus conside how incoming in o ‐ ma ion is encoded, s o ed and e ie ed. In he in e es s o e icien lea ning en i onmen s, he mul i-s o e model o human in o ma ion p ocessing ag eed on by psychologis s should be aken in o accoun in all educa ional ac i i ies. Senso y memo y is he ea lies s age o p ocessing he la ge amoun o con in‐ uously incoming in o ma ion om sigh , hea ing and o he senses. In o de o allow goal di ec ed beha io and selec i e a en ion, only a ac ional amoun o incoming in o ma ion passes in o he wo king memo y, which is esponsible o empo a ily main aining and manipula ing in o ma ion du ing cogni i e ac i i y. The special a chi ec u e o wo king memo y is one o he unique ea‐ u es o humans. Wha he cell is o Biology and he molecule is o Chem‐ is y is wo king memo y o Psychology, as his cons uc can b oadly explain wha con ols human beha io (S e n, 2024). The limi ed capaci y o wo king memo y allows con ol o a en ion and he eby enabling goal di ec ed and Lea ning and pe o mance 37 conscious in o ma ion p ocessing. Wo king memo y is he ga ekeepe o he long- e m memo y, which is assumed o ha e an unlimi ed capaci y. He e, in‐ o ma ion acqui ed h ough expe ience and easoning can be s o ed in di e en modali ies as well as in symbol sys ems (e.g., language, sc ip , ma hema ical no‐ a ion sys ems, pic o ials, music p in s). Wo king memo y enables in en ional in o ma ion p ocessing by ocused a en ion, bu i can also p ocess inciden al in o ma ion. The mul i-s o e model o human in o ma ion p ocessing is no a all a one-way s ee , and long- e m memo y is no o be seen as a s o e oom o a ha d-disk whe e in o ma ion emains unal e ed once i has been deposi ed. A mo e app op ia e model o long- e m memo y is a sel -o ganizing ne wo k, in which e bal concep s, images, o p ocedu es a e ep esen ed as in e linked nodes wi h a ying associa i e s eng h (S e n, 2017). Wo king memo y egula es he in e ac ion be ween incoming in o ma ion om senso y memo y and knowledge ac i a ed om long- e m memo y. In case o e y s ong incoming s imuli (e.g., a loud noise o a ha sh ligh ), wo king memo y ac i i ies will be in e up ed. Fo he mos pa , howe e , wo king memo y is gua ding agains incoming in o ma ion o make su e ha goals ha ha e been se will be achie ed app op ia ely. This means, wo king memo y is con inuously busy wi h selec ing incoming in o ma ion, aligning i o knowledge e ie ed om long- e m memo y, and p epa ing esponses o accomplishing equi emen s demanded by he en i onmen . Inapp op ia e and unsui able in o ma ion in uding om senso y as well as om long- e m memo y has o be inhibi ed, while app op ia e and sui able in o ma ion om bo h sou ces has o be upda ed. These wo king memo y ac i i ies pe manen ly change knowledge ep esen ed in long- e m memo y by adding new nodes and by al e ing he associa i e s eng h be ween hem. Wo king memo y ac i i ies a e in e wined wi h he con ex as well as wi h he knowledge s o ed in he long- e m memo y. One o he mos impo an insigh s om he lea ning sci‐ ences is ha p io knowledge is he mos impo an p edic o o u u e lea ning. Success ul eaching means o p o ide lea ning oppo uni ies ha mee wi h p io knowledge. Psychologis s ha e ag eed on dis inguishing be ween decla a i e (knowing ha ) and p ocedu al (knowing how) knowledge. Decla a i e knowledge can be communica ed because i is ep esen ed on he basis o symbol sys ems (lan‐ guage, sc ip , ma hema ical o isual-spa ial ep esen a ions). I is he basis o cons uc ing meaning ul concep ual knowledge h ough p ocesses o in e ence and elabo a ion. In con as o decla a i e knowledge, p ocedu al knowledge can be di ec ly applied o pe o m a ask, and i includes mo o ic ac ions like d i ing ca s as well as men al ac ions like algeb aic ans o ma ions. P oce‐ du al knowledge eme ges as a consequence o epe i ion, by which single ac‐ 38 Elsbe h S e n ions become inc easingly in eg a ed in o a coo dina ed se ies o ac ions. I he associa ion be ween hese ac ions is s ong enough, hey can ac i a e each o he and he e o e only need a minimum o wo king memo y unc ions. Be‐ cause au oma ed knowledge is a mos pa ly open o conscious inspec ion, i can ha dly be e balized, and is esis an o modi ica ion. Mas e y o any aca‐ demic con en a ea equi es p ocedu al and concep ual knowledge. Bo h kinds o knowledge a e s ongly in e wined (Schneide & S e n, 2010), bu hey a e acqui ed h ough di e en mechanisms. P ocedu al knowledge is acqui ed by condensing single pieces o knowledge in o b oade uni s. The epea ed exe‐ cu ion o ac ions composed o single s eps esul s in au oma ed p ocedu es. The epea ed p esen a ion o se s o small single s imuli may esul in pu ing hem oge he o a meaning ul whole, which is called a chunk. Once chunks and p ocedu es a e c ea ed, hey can be p ocessed wi h low memo y equi emen s. T ans o ming single le e s in o wo ds is an example o chunking. Concep ual knowledge, on he o he hand, ep esen s meaning, wha can show up in classi ica ions, p inciples, gene aliza ions, heo ies o models in a con en a ea. I can be communica ed ia symbol sys ems and i is cons uc ed h ough easoning ha has been s imula ed in in e ac ions wi h o he indi id‐ uals, w i en ma e ial o o he media. Engaging wi h con en in his way is a challenge o wo king memo y – in pa icula o a eas ha a e mainly based on abs ac concep s, as i is he case o many STEM a eas. How o p omo e usable knowledge The goal o academic lea ning is he acquisi ion o usable knowledge ha is lex‐ ible enough o ans e and p oblem sol ing. Usable knowledge is composed o p ocedu es and chunks o elie e wo king memo y unc ions which can hen be used o g asping he gis o a p oblem. Con en a eas and academic disciplines di e in he composi ion o bo h kinds o knowledge, and his may a ec he impo ance o in elligence o achie ing expe ise. Typical a eas o expe ise which a e p ima ily cha ac e ized by he o ma ion o chunks a e eading and chess. Lea ning om ex s is e ec i e i wo king memo y esou ces a e a ail‐ able o p ocessing he con en ins ead o decoding le e s. Expe ienced eade s ha e chunked le e s in o wo ds and pa e ns o wo ds and he e o e can con‐ cen a e on he con en . Expe ise in chess is gained by chunking single chess posi ions in o b oade uni s which can be ecognized and s o ed wi h minimum wo king memo y esou ces. Also, in b oade disciplines, chunking is essen ial and e lec s expe ise. The audience o my lec u e on “Human Lea ning” a e mas e ’s s uden s om di e en STEM a eas. To demons a e he impac o p io knowledge on memo y, I show my s uden s pic u es p esen ed in Figu e 1 Lea ning and pe o mance 39 Figu e 1: The pic u es p esen ed in he le column p esen impo an concep s om Chemis y (choles‐ e ol molecule), Biology (animal cell) and Ma hema ics ( i s and second de i a i e o a polynomial unc ion). The pic u es we e p esen ed o a ew seconds o STEM s uden s wi h di e en disciplina y backg ounds, who we e asked o d aw hem a e wa ds. Examples o he d awings om he s uden s a e p esen ed in he cells o demons a e he impo ance o p io knowledge o memo izing complex in o ma ion. o a ew seconds and hen ask my s uden s o d aw hem. The pic u es ep e‐ sen concep s ha make sense o expe s in he ield, while being mo e o less andom o o he s. This becomes ob ious in hei d awings. Depending on hei disciplina y backg ound, hey ei he ep oduce he image exac ly o p o ide a ough ske ch ha lacks key concep ual ea u es. Au oma ed p ocedu es and chunks a e necessa y bu no su icien o mas‐ e ing b oade academic a eas. STEM disciplines as well as humani ies a e cul‐ u al achie emen s and mas e ing hem means unde s anding s a emen s ex‐ p essed in symbolic sys ems such as language, w i ing, o mal no a ions, pic‐ o ial and g aphical ep esen a ions. Compe ence is e iden in hese a eas by building a ne wo k o in e connec ed bu dis inc concep s, which p o ide he basis o deduc i e, induc i e, and analogical easoning. Such cogni i e p o‐ cesses enable ans e o knowledge o new si ua ions and p oblems, which is a challenge o all lea ne s, no ma e how in elligen hey a e. The di icul ies ha e been bes explo ed in ma hema ics and he na u al sciences, especially in physics. He e s uden s no only ha e o lea n new concep s, as i is he case o all academic ields, bu hey mus also es uc u e he meaning o many exp essions used in daily li e, among hem concep s like o ce o ene gy. Ma h‐ 40 Elsbe h S e n ema ics is based on heo ems and ela ions be ween numbe s and igu es ha a e de i ed by deduc i e easoning. Lea ning en i onmen s a e e ec i e i hey mee wi h s uden s’ p io knowl‐ edge and add ess lea ne s’ de ici s ei he in e ms o concep ual misunde s and‐ ings o in e ms o a lack o chunking and au oma ion. In he pas decades, lea ning sciences ha e de eloped and sys ema ically e alua ed so called means o cogni i e ac i a ion ha can be implemen ed in ins uc ional uni s. These means ha e in common ha hey in end o ace lea ne s wi h de ici s and mis‐ unde s andings ega ding hei p io knowledge (Schumache & S e n, 2022). P esen ing lea ning ma e ial ha equi es sys ema ic compa ison be ween su‐ pe icially simila bu concep ually di e en si ua ions can help o ex ac ab‐ s ac concep s. P omp ing sel -explana ions o asking me acogni i e ques ions aises lea ne s’ awa eness o hei p io knowledge, including de ici s and mis‐ concep ions. Thanks o p og ess in digi iza ion, eache s now ha e me hods like o ma i e assessmen a hei disposal which allow hem o diagnose hei s uden s’ de ici s and p o ide hem wi h app op ia e lea ning oppo uni ies. A second g ade may answe “7” when asked: “Wha is a qua e o 32”. A eache may conclude ha he s uden does no mas e mul iplica ion ables p ope ly and he e o e asks he s uden o jus p ac ice. Howe e , by asking he s uden o explain why he ended up wi h se en may shed ligh on se e e concep ual de ici s: “A qua e is always 25, and 32-25 esul s in 7”. In his case, he concep o “qua e ” has o be add essed. “Knowing wha s uden s know” is he key o be e adap lea ning oppo uni ies o s uden s needs and sa es a lo o us a‐ ion o s uden s and eache s. This kind o cogni i e empa hy on he pa o he eache s can be expec ed o p omo e s uden s’ social-emo ional de elopmen . 3. Mo i a ion: P omo ing mas e y ins ead o pe o mance o ien a ion Many eache s complain abou hei s uden s’ lack o mo i a ion, as hey ha e he eeling ha no ma e wha e o s hey make, s uden s a e no willing o ge in ol ed. A bes , hey de elop ex insic mo i a ion, i.e. hey wo k owa ds passing he exam o ge ing he bes g ade wi h minimal e o . Such expe i‐ ence sugges s ha mo i a ion is a ixed indi idual cha ac e is ic a he han a malleable s a e. Such a i udes a e suppo ed by messages deli e ed by some psychologis s, e.g. by Duckwo h e al. (2019), who emphasizes ha a s uden ’s g i – hei passion and pe se e ance o long- e m goals – is decisi e o he lea ning ou comes. P econdi ion o de eloping g i is o de elop passion and in e es s and o cul i a e delibe a e p ac ice. The emphasis on passion and in‐ Lea ning and pe o mance 47 Changing school sys ems is a long and edious p ocess, and in Ge many se ‐ e al a emp s o o e come he disad an ages o acking we e doomed o ailu e. Fu u e changes need o be be e planned. In he mean ime, o mi iga e he impac o social backg ound on admission o uni e si y educa ion, educa ional sciences should ca e ully e alua e unde wha condi ions in elligence es s can help o make decisions as ai as possible. Ad 2: The cen al ole o wo king memo y unc ions in academic lea ning om a uni e sal, a de elopmen al, and a di e en ial pe spec i e should de‐ e mine u he esea ch. Thanks o he cogni i e load heo y, he uni e sal pe spec i e is eady o be implemen ed in lea ning ma e ial and en i onmen s. Mo e esea ch, howe e , is needed conce ning cons ain s in b ain de elop‐ men a ec ing wo king memo y unc ions. While ea ly childhood and adoles‐ cence go su icien a en ion, mo e has o be lea ned abou he a o dances and cons ain s o wo king memo y among elemen a y school child en in o de o op imally exploi hei lea nabili y in he i s yea s o school, when he oun‐ da ions o li e acy as well as o ma hema ical and scien i ic easoning a e laid. As discussed abo e, wo king memo y and easoning abili ies measu ed in in‐ elligence es s a e closely ela ed, bu hey a e no iden ical. Reasoning abili ies need cogni i e challenges o de elop, acili a ed by a well- unc ioning wo king memo y. While measu es o easoning and wo king memo y show high co ‐ ela ions, he e a e de ia ions in bo h di ec ions. Some indi iduals wi h high wo king memo y unc ions do no ully ansla e hese in o easoning. O h‐ e s a e able o de elop easoning abili ies ha exceed hei wo king memo y unc ions. Fu u e esea ch should ocus on easons o hese pa e ns as well as consequences o u u e lea ning. Rega ding he implica ions o p ac ice, he ui ul collabo a ion be ween lea ning scien is s and subjec -speci ic expe s should be con inued. Teache educa ion p og ams as well as aining p og ams o in-se ice- eache s should ocus on he implemen a ion o p o en means o use ul knowledge cons uc‐ ion in co e con en a eas o hei subjec . Awa eness o he mission o o ma‐ i e assessmen and implemen ing i in o daily class oom p ac ice should be a op p io i y. Unde s anding wha exac ly causes s uden s’ di icul ies can hen help o o e he app op ia e lea ning oppo uni ies. Re e ences . Allenswo h, E. M., Cla k, K. (2020). High school GPAs and ACT sco es as p edic o s o college comple ion: Examining assump ions abou consis ency ac oss high schools. Educa ional Resea che , 49, 198–211. h ps://doi.o g/10.3102/0013189X20902110 . Baume , B., Rau, F., Baue meis e , T., Döh mann, M., Ewig, M., F iede ich, Y., Haas, 48 Elsbe h S e n T., Kü he, E., Lo h, G., Ruse , K., Schalle , M., Sch öde , L., Schwee , M. K. W., S ein, M., Vie buchen, M.-C. (2023). Los in T ans o ma ion? Chancen und He aus‐ o de ungen ü inklusi en Un e ich im Angesich de digi alen T ans o ma ion. In D. Fe encik-Lehmkuhl, I. Huynh, C. Laubmeis e , C. Lee, C. Melze , I. Schwank, H. Weck, & K. Ziemen (Eds.), Inklusion digi al! Chancen und He aus o de ungen inklu‐ si e Bildung im Kon ex on Digi alisie ung (pp. 33–48). Ve lag Julius Klinkha d . h ps://doi.o g/10.35468/5990-03 . Be kowi z, M., Edelsb unne , P., S e n, E. (2022). The ela ion be ween wo king mem‐ o y and ma hema ics pe o mance among s uden s in ma h-in ensi e STEM p o‐ g ams. In elligence, 92, 101649. h ps://doi.o g/10.1016/j.in ell.2022.101649 . Bloss eld, H. P., Buchholz, S., Skopek, J., & T i en i, M. (Eds.). (2016). Models o sec‐ onda y educa ion and social inequali y: An in e na ional compa ison. Edwa d Elga Publishing. h ps://doi.o g/10.4337/9781785367267 . Cohen, G. (2022). Belonging: The science o c ea ing connec ion and b idging di ides. WW No on & Company. . Dea y, I. J. (2004). The impac o childhood in elligence on la e li e: Following up he Sco ish men al su eys o 1932 and 1947. Jou nal o Pe sonali y and Social Psychol‐ ogy, 86, 130–147. h ps://doi.o g/10.1037/0022-3514.86.1.130 . Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2012). Mo i a ion, pe sonali y, and de elopmen wi hin embedded social con ex s: An o e iew o sel -de e mina ion heo y. In R. M. Ryan (Ed.), The Ox o d handbook o human mo i a ion (pp. 85–107). Ox o d Uni e si y P ess. h ps://doi.o g/10.1093/ox o dhb/9780195399820.013.0006 . Duckwo h, A. L., Qui k, A., Gallop, R., Hoyle, R. H., Kelly, D. R., & Ma hews, M. D. (2019). Cogni i e and noncogni i e p edic o s o success. P oceedings o he Na‐ ional Academy o Sciences, 116(47), 23499–23504. h ps://doi.o g/10.1073/pnas. 1910510116 . Gold ho pe, J. (2016). Social class mobili y in mode n B i ain: changing s uc u e, con‐ s an p og ess. Jou nal o he B i ish Academy, 4, 89–111. h ps://doi.o g/10.5871/ jba/004.089 . Laza ides, R., Schie ele, U., He inge , K., & F ommel , M. C. (2023). T acing he signal om eache s o s uden s: How eache s’ mo i a ional belie s longi udinally ela e o s uden in e es h ough s uden - epo ed eaching p ac ices. Jou nal o Educa ional Psychology, 115, 290–308. h ps://doi.o g/10.1037/edu0000777 . Lich enbe ge , A., Ho e , S., S e n, E., Va e laus, A. (2024). Enhanced concep ual unde ‐ s anding h ough o ma i e assessmen : esul s o a andomized con olled in e en‐ ion s udy in physics classes. Educa ional Assessmen , E alua ion and Accoun abili y 37, 5–33. h ps://doi.o g/10.1007/s11092-024-09445-6 . Mähle , C., & S e n, E. (2006). T ans e . In D. Ros (Ed.), Handwö e buch Pädagogische Psychologie (pp. 782–793). Bel z. . Pe e ande l, S., Edelsb unne , P. A., Deiglmay , A., Schumache , R., & S e n, E. (2023). Wha skills ela ed o he con ol-o - a iables s a egy need o be augh , and who Lea ning and pe o mance 49 gains mos ? Di e en ial e ec s o a aining in e en ion. Jou nal o Educa ional Psy‐ chology, 115, 813–835. h ps://doi.o g/10.1037/edu0000799 . Ridley, M. (2003). Na u e ia nu u e: Genes, expe ience, and wha makes us human. Ha pe Collins Publishe s. . Ro h, B., Becke , N., Romeyke, S., Schä e , S., Domnick, F., & Spina h, F. M. (2015). In elligence and school g ades: A me a-analysis. In elligence, 53, 118–137. h ps:// doi.o g/10.1016/j.in ell.2015.09.002 . Schneide , M., & S e n, E. (2010). The de elopmen al ela ions be ween concep ual and p ocedu al knowledge: A mul ime hod app oach. De elopmen al Psychology, 46(1), 178–192. h ps://doi.o g/10.1037/a0016701 . Schneide , W., Niklas, F., Schmiedele , S. (2014). In ellec ual de elopmen om ea ly childhood o ea ly adul hood: The impac o ea ly IQ di e ences on s abili y and change o e ime. Lea ning and Indi idual Di e ences, 32, 156–162. h ps://doi.o g/ 10.1016/j.lindi .2014.02.001 . Schumache , R., S e n, E. (2022). P omo ing he cons uc ion o in elligen knowledge wi h he help o a ious me hods o cogni i ely ac i a ing ins uc ion. F on ie s in educa ion, 7, 979430. h ps://doi.o g/10.3389/ educ.2022.979430 . Ships ead, Z., Ha ison, T. L., Engle, R. W. (2016). Wo king memo y capaci y and luid in elligence: Main enance and disengagemen . Pe spec i es on Psychological Science 11, 771–799. h ps://doi.o g/10.1177/1745691616650647 . S einbe g, L. (2017). Adolescen b ain science and ju enile jus ice policymaking. Psy‐ chology, Public Policy, and Law, 23, 410–420. h ps://doi.o g/10.1037/law0000128 . S e n, E. (2017). Indi idual di e ences in he lea ning po en ial o human beings. npj Science Lea n 2, 2. h ps://doi.o g/10.1038/s41539-016-0003-0 . S e n, E. (2024). Resea ch on in elligence and lea ning: How o uni e es anged siblings. Pe sonali y and Indi idual Di e ences, 221, 112555. h ps://doi.o g/10.1016/j.paid. 2024.112555 . Swelle J. (2010). Elemen in e ac i i y and in insic, ex aneous, and ge mane cogni i e load. Educa ional Psychology Re iew, 22, 123–138. h ps://doi.o g/10.1007/s10648- 010-9128-5 . Tucke -D ob, E. M., & Ba es, T. C. (2016). La ge c oss-na ional di e ences in gene x socioeconomic s a us in e ac ion on in elligence. Psychological Science, 27, 138–149. h ps://doi.o g/10.1177/0956797615612727 . Tu kheime E., Haley A., Wald on M., D’Ono io B., Go esman I. (2003). Socioeco‐ nomic s a us modi ies he i abili y o IQ in young child en. Psychological Science, 14, 623–628. h ps://doi.o g/10.1046/j.0956-7976.2003.psci_1475.x . Wol e eck, R. (1909). Wei e e expe imen elle Un e suchungen übe A e ände ung, speziell übe das Wesen quan i a i e A un e schiede bei Daphniden. Ve handlun‐ gen de deu schen zoologischen Gesellscha , 19, 110–173. . Yu, Q., & Schunn, C. D. (2024). Which expe iences a e consis en ly associa ed wi h o he - egula ion o pee eedback leng h? Jou nal o Educa ional Psychology, Ad ance online publica ion. h ps://doi.o g/10.1037/edu0000913 . Flo ian Schmiedek Lea ning o a - isk s uden s A dynamic pe spec i e In ecen yea s, he e has been g owing conce n abou he socio-emo ional well- being and men al heal h o child en and adolescen s. These conce ns add o he ongoing conce ns abou he academic achie emen o hese age g oups, pa ‐ icula ly wi h ega d o basic compe encies, and especially o child en om disad an aged backg ounds. Fo an educa ion sys em ha no only aims o p omo e he de elopmen o such compe encies, bu also akes esponsibili y as an impo an en i onmen o he iden i ica ion and p e en ion o men al heal h p oblems and he gene al imp o emen o socio-emo ional well-being, he ques ion a ises as o how hese wo gene al domains o ou comes a e e‐ la ed. A e hey posi i ely in e wined, such ha p omo ing one domain will au oma ically bene i he o he – and ailing o do so will inc ease isk in he o he ? O a e hese ou come domains in con lic , equi ing decisions abou how o alloca e limi ed educa ional esou ces? In wha ollows, I will a gue ha a emp s o answe hese ques ions a a gene al le el a e limi ed. Ra he , he dynamic p ocesses ha link lea ning and well-being and ha may place lea ne s a isk o academic ailu e and men al heal h p oblems should be unde s ood as po en ially highly indi idualized and he e o e dese ing o in es iga ion om a wi hin-pe son pe spec i e ha akes his indi iduali y in o accoun . 1 S uden s a isk o academic ailu e and men al heal h p oblems Since he sobe ing esul s o he i s PISA s udies, he e has been inc eased moni o ing o he educa ional sys em, esul ing in wo ying igu es on he p e alence o s uden s a isk o academic ailu e. Fo example, he e a e he la ge and inc easing pe cen ages o s uden s ailing o mee minimum s an‐ da ds in basic compe encies as documen ed by he IQB Bildungs end (S ana e al., 2023) and simila ly conce ning ends in he numbe o s uden s d op‐ ping ou o school, as epo ed in he mos ecen Na ional Repo on Educa‐ ion (Au o :inneng uppe Bildungsbe ich e s a ung, 2024). Asking abou he isk ac o s ha in u n p edic such indica o s o academic ailu e, he e is s ong empi ical e idence o gene al (backg ound o dis al) ac o s like, o 52 Flo ian Schmiedek example, po e y (Sel i opu & Kaya, 2023) and mig a ion backg ound (Hea h & B inbaum, 2014). These con ibu e o mo e p oximal isk ac o s a he le el o he indi idual s uden , like lack o language compe ences (Snowling e al., 2021), socio-emo ional compe ences (McLeod & Kaise , 2004), o sel - egula‐ ion compe ences (Robson e al., 2020). I he exp ession o such indi idual ac‐ o s is p onounced, i can lead o ul illing he diagnos ic c i e ia o high- isk ca ego ies such as lea ning diso de s o a en ion de ici hype ac i i y diso de (Ca iola e al., 2024). Wi h ega d o socio-emo ional well-being, he e is g owing e idence o a dis u bingly high and inc easing p e alence o men al heal h p oblems among child en and adolescen s. Repo s by bo h in e na ional (McGo y e al., 2024) and na ional expe commissions (Deu sche Akademie de Na u o sche Leopoldina, 2024) ha e ecen ly e iewed he empi ical li e a u e and no iced he magni ude and u gency o he p oblem. Among he mos impo an isk ac o s o men al heal h p oblems, again backg ound ac o s such as po e y (Klasen e al., 2017) a e p ominen . As mo e p oximal ac o s, amilial ac o s (e.g., men al heal h p oblems o pa en s; Bea dslee e al., 2011), expe ience o iolence and abuse (Baldwin e al., 2023), and mobbing (Du y & Spe y, 2012), o example show ele an oles in p edic ing men al heal h p oblems, which can mani es in diagnoses o men al diso de s in he ex eme case. In child en and adolescen s, he diso de ca ego ies o dep ession, anxie y, and psychosoma ic p oblems a e pa icula ly p e alen (Deu sche Akademie de Na u o sche Leopoldina, 2024). In summa y, he cu en numbe s and longi udinal ends in bo h domains, academic achie emen s. ailu e and socio-emo ional well-being s. men al heal h p oblems, a e ala ming and call o inc eased poli ical and socie al e o s o add ess and educe hese p oblems. The ac ha impo an isk ac o s o bo h p oblem domains a e pa ly he same may lead o he expec a ion ha he e should be a posi i e ela ionship be ween bo h p oblem domains. So, wha is he scien i ic e idence o such an associa ion? 2. The ela ion o academic achie emen and well-being: Theo e ical a gumen s and empi ical indings Rega ding heo e ical conside a ions, one can ind a gumen s o , bo h, a pos‐ i i e (“win-win”) ela ion, as well as a nega i e (“ ade-o ”) ela ion be ween academic achie emen and well-being. A gumen s o a posi i e ela ion o ‐ en posi posi i e ecip ocal e ec s be ween bo h domains. Fo example, he B oaden-and-Build Theo y (F ed ickson, 2001) p oposes ha well-being can Lea ning o a - isk s uden s 53 os e lea ning p ocesses h ough a b oadening o hough -ac ion epe oi es, which can allow o build pe sonal esou ces ha , in u n, enhance well-being. Sel -de e mina ion heo y (Ryan & Deci, 2000) also assumes ecip ocal ela‐ ions, wi h academic success sa is ying he need o compe ence. Being one o he basic psychological needs acco ding o his heo y, i s sa is ac ion con‐ ibu es o well-being. Fu he mo e, i se es a basis o he de elopmen o in‐ insic mo i a ion, which in u n is again bene icial o academic pe o mance. Recip ocal e ec s a e also cen al o De elopmen al Cascades Theo y (Moilanen e al., 2010), which posi s ha ex e nalizing and in e nalizing symp oms and academic ailu e can mu ually enhance each o he . Howe e , a gumen s can also be ound o a nega i e ela ionship be ween he wo domains (see Högbe g, 2023, o a summa y). The simple ac ha ime is limi ed po en ially leads o oppo uni y cos s: s uden s who in es a lo o ime in lea ning ha e less ime le o o he (e.g., leisu e and social) ac i i‐ ies ha a e bene icial o hei socio-emo ional well-being. In addi ion, high- achie ing con ex s (such as eli e schools) a e o en cha ac e ized by a compe i‐ i e clima e and a disp opo iona e emphasis on pe o mance, which can ha e nega i e emo ional consequences. Gi en ha hese di e en heo e ical mecha‐ nisms may all con ibu e o he o e all ela ionship be ween academic achie e‐ men and well-being and hus (pa ially) coun e ac each o he , i is pe haps no su p ising ha empi ical e idence is mixed and quan i a i e me a-analy ic summa ies sugges a he weak ela ionships. A me a-analysis by Bücke e al. (2018) epo s an a e age co ela ion o .16 and ano he one by Kaya and E dem (2021) esul s in an a e age ela ionship (Fishe ’s z) o .17. Looking a hese numbe s alone, one migh be emp ed o conclude ha academic achie emen and socio-emo ional well-being a e ela i ely independen om each o he and he e o e could also be add essed by independen measu es. In he ollowing, howe e , I would like o highligh ha such an a e age ela ion o be ween- pe son di e ences may no be in o ma i e abou he mechanisms ha link aca‐ demic achie emen and well-being a he le el o indi idual s uden s, ha hese mechanisms may in ac be qui e he e ogeneous ac oss s uden s, and ha he e is he e o e much o be gained by also conside ing ela ionships a he le el o wi hin-pe son a iabili y by aking a dynamic pe spec i e on he in e play be ween academic achie emen and well-being. 54 Flo ian Schmiedek 3. The ela ionship be ween academic achie emen and well-being: Wi hin-pe son ela ionships A cen al insigh ha has ecei ed inc easing a en ion in psychology in ecen decades is ha ela ions obse ed a he le el o be ween-pe son di e ences may no be in o ma i e abou ela ions a he le el o he indi iduals unde lying hese be ween-pe son di e ences. Only unde s ic condi ions (i.e., e godici y; Molenaa , 2004), in e ences om be ween-pe son ela ions o wi hin-pe son ela ions a e possible. Indi iduals may di e om each o he in hei wi hin- pe son ela ions and he a e age wi hin-pe son ela ion may di e om he be ween-pe son ela ion. Figu e 1 p o ides an illus a i e example. I shows esul s om he FLUX s udy (Di k & Schmiedek, 2016), in which 110 hi d and ou h g ade s pa icipa ed in sma phone-based ambula o y assessmen s se e al imes a day o up o 31 days. On hese occasions, hey comple ed di ‐ e en wo king memo y asks and se e al sel - epo measu es, including a ‐ ings o ask- ela ed enjoymen . The main sca e plo shows he posi i e ela‐ ionship be ween wo king memo y pe o mance and enjoymen a e aged o e all measu emen occasions o each child and indica es a posi i e ela ion‐ ship ( = .33) – child en who pe o m be e on a e age end o enjoy wo k‐ ing on he asks mo e. Howe e , when looking a he le el o wi hin-pe son a ia ion ac oss he di e en measu emen occasions o indi idual s uden s, he pic u e can be qui e di e en . In he example, wo s uden s (Child 1 and Child 2) wi h e y simila a e age le els o pe o mance and enjoymen show adically di e en wi hin-pe son ela ionships – o Child 1 his ela ionship is qui e s ong ( = .56), o Child 2 he e is no sys ema ic ela ionship a all ( = -.01). Nei he one is well cha ac e ized by he be ween-pe son co ela ion o .33. Mu ayama e al. (2017) p o ide u he illus a i e examples o he e o‐ geneous wi hin-pe son ela ionships in educa ional psychology esea ch con‐ ex s. Such he e ogenei y o wi hin-pe son ela ionships sugges s ha he causal mechanisms p oducing he obse ed ela ionships may also di e ac oss indi‐ iduals. And e en when simila wi hin-pe son ela ionships a e obse ed, he unde lying causal mechanisms may s ill be di e en . Conside ing he ela ion‐ ship be ween academic achie emen and socio-emo ional well-being, he e may be achie emen -o ien ed s uden s o whom achie emen is a p ima y sou ce o sel -es eem and well-being. Fo o he s, hei success in lea ning may be highly dependen on he absence o nega i e emo ions – which would also p oduce a posi i e wi hin-pe son ela ionship be ween achie emen and well-being, ye based on a di e en causal mechanism. I may also be he case ha an obse ed posi i e ela ionship is p oduced by hi d a iables ha mu ually in luence bo h Lea ning o a - isk s uden s 55 Figu e 1. Compa ison o he be ween-pe son ela ionship o wo king memo y pe o mance and ask- ela ed enjoymen in N= 110 child en pa icipa ing in up o 31 days o ambula o y assessmen in he FLUX s udy (Di k & Schmiedek, 2016) wi h he wi hin-pe son ela ionships o wo selec ed child en ac oss s udy occasions. Wo king memo y (WM) pe o mance is a composi e o accu acy on nume ical and igu al-spa ial WM upda ing asks wi h di e en memo y load condi ions (see Di k & Schmiedek, 2016). Task- ela ed joy is a composi e o sel - a ing on he i ems “I jus had a lo o un wo king on he ( asks and) ques ions o e all.”, “I jus enjoyed wo king on he ( asks and) ques ions.”, and “I jus ound wo king on he ( asks and) ques ions bo ing.” ( e e sed i em) wi h 5-poin Like scales. achie emen and well-being, such as day- o-day a ia ions in sleep quali y o heal h s a us. I is e en possible ha he ela ionship may be nega i e o in‐ di idual s uden s. Conside a child who pe o ms bes a imes when pa en al p essu e o pe o m well is high, which o his child is associa ed wi h lowe le els o well-being due o s ess and es anxie y. O conside an adolescen who goes h ough pe iods o spending a lo o ime wi h pee s, which has a posi i e impac on socio-emo ional well-being by mee ing he need o social inclusion, bu a nega i e impac on ime spen lea ning. While hese examples a e specula i e, hey should se e o illus a e ha a weak be ween-pe son co ‐ ela ion be ween achie emen and well-being may mask a la ge he e ogenei y o indi idual ela ions and unde lying causal mechanisms. I known, hese di ‐ e en mechanisms would also sugges di e en indi idual s a ing poin s o in e en ions aimed a imp o ing achie emen and well-being. Howe e , i is only by examining wi hin-pe son a ia ion wi h measu emen -in ensi e longi‐ udinal s udies ha we may be able o iden i y such be ween-pe son a iabili y in ela ionships and mechanisms. 56 Flo ian Schmiedek Wi h he g ow h o measu emen -in ensi e s udies, empi ical e idence o such be ween-pe son a iabili y is beginning o accumula e in se e al esea ch a eas o psychology, including educa ional psychology. Fo example, Niepel e al. (2022) in es iga ed he c oss-lagged ela ionships be ween ma hema ical sel -concep and pe cei ed ma hema ics achie emen in 372 seconda y school s uden s, using sel - epo measu es a e each ma hema ics lesson o e a h ee- week pe iod. They ound signi ican a e age c oss-lagged e ec s in bo h di ec‐ ions (i.e., be e pe o mance in one lesson p edic ed be e sel -concep in he nex lesson and ice e sa). The e we e also signi ican andom e ec s, indica ‐ ing be ween-pe son di e ences in he s eng h o hese wi hin-pe son e ec s. In e es ingly, he co ela ion o hese andom e ec s was nega i e ( = -.56), indica ing ha he ecip ocal e ec s ended o be s onge in one di ec ion o he o he o di e en g oups o s uden s. Such an indica ion o po en ial he e ogenei y in wi hin-pe son ela ions o cons uc s ela ed o pe o mance and well-being was also epo ed by Neubaue e al. (2019). Using da a om he FLUX s udy (see abo e) and mix u e modeling, hey we e able o iden i y la en classes wi h di e en pa e ns o ela ions be ween wo king memo y pe o mance and ou di‐ mensions o momen a y a ec i e well-being (posi i e and nega i e a ec , ac i a ion and deac i a ion). While wo o he la en classes showed el‐ a i ely s ong (o weak) wi hin-pe son ela ions o pe o mance wi h all a ec dimensions, he o he wo la en classes we e cha ac e ized by pe ‐ o mance being speci ically associa ed wi h nega i e a ec and deac i a‐ ion o exclusi ely wi h ac i a ion. Again, such he e ogenei y may sug‐ ges di e en p omising app oaches when conside ing indi idualized in‐ e en ions (e.g., educing nega i e a ec o inc easing le els o ac i a‐ ion). 4. F om bi a ia e wi hin-pe son ela ions o complex dynamic ne wo ks In clinical psychology, esea ch on men al diso de s has in ecen yea s inc eas‐ ingly adop ed measu emen -in ensi e s udies and ocused on wi hin-pe son p ocesses, ypically assessed in pa ien s’ e e yday li e con ex s using ambula‐ o y assessmen (T ull & Ebne -P ieme , 2013). This g ow h has os e ed a pa allel new concep ual de elopmen based on dynamic sys ems heo y and ne wo k modeling app oaches (Bo sboom, 2017). The gene al mo i a ion be‐ hind his is o mo e away om he adi ional iew in psychia y and clinical psychology, which concep ualizes men al diso de s as sepa a e ca ego ies ha Lea ning o a - isk s uden s 63 educa ional a ainmen . Ame ican Sociological Re iew, 69(5), 636–658. h ps://doi. o g/10.1177/000312240406900502 . Moelle , J., Vilja an a, J., Tol anen, A., K acke, B., & Die ich, J. (2022). In oducing he DYNAMICS amewo k o momen - o-momen de elopmen in achie emen mo i‐ a ion. Lea ning and Ins uc ion, 81, 101653. h ps://doi.o g/10.1016/j.lea nins uc. 2022.101653 . Moilanen, K. L., Shaw, D. S., & Maxwell, K. L. (2010). De elopmen al cascades: Ex‐ e nalizing, in e nalizing, and academic compe ence om middle childhood o ea ly adolescence. De elopmen and Psychopa hology, 22(3), 635–653. h ps://doi.o g/10. 1017/S0954579410000337 . Molenaa , P. C. M. (2004). A mani es o on psychology as idiog aphic science: B ing‐ ing he pe son back in o scien i ic psychology, his ime o e e . Measu emen : In‐ e disciplina y Resea ch and Pe spec i es, 2(4), 201–218. h ps://doi.o g/10.1207/ s15366359mea0204_1 . Mu ayama, K., Goe z, T., Malmbe g, L.-E., Pek un, R., Tanaka, A., & Ma in, A. J. (2017). Wi hin-pe son analysis in educa ional psychology: Impo ance and illus a‐ ions. In D. W. Pu wain & K. Sma (Eds.), BJEP Monog aph Se ies II: Pa 12 The Role o Compe ence and Belie s in Teaching and Lea ning. B i ish Psychological Socie y. h ps://doi.o g/10.53841/bpsmono.2017.ca 2023.6 . Neubaue , A. B., Di k, J., & Schmiedek, F. (2019). Momen a y wo king memo y pe ‐ o mance is coupled wi h di e en dimensions o a ec o di e en child en: A mix u e model analysis o ambula o y assessmen da a. De elopmen al Psychology, 55(4), 754–766. h ps://doi.o g/10.1037/de 0000668 . Niepel, C., Ma sh, H. W., Guo, J., Pek un, R., & Mölle , J. (2022). Re ealing dynamic ela ions be ween ma hema ics sel -concep and pe cei ed achie emen om lesson o lesson: An expe ience-sampling s udy. Jou nal o Educa ional Psychology, 114(6), 1380–1393. h ps://doi.o g/10.1037/edu0000716 . Robson, D. A., Allen, M. S., & Howa d, S. J. (2020). Sel - egula ion in childhood as a p edic o o u u e ou comes: A me a-analy ic e iew. Psychological Bulle in, 146(4), 324–354. h ps://doi.o g/10.1037/bul0000227 . Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Sel -de e mina ion heo y and he acili a ion o in‐ insic mo i a ion, social de elopmen , and well-being. The Ame ican Psychologis , 55(1), 68–78. h ps://doi.o g/10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68 . Sel i opu, A., & Kaya, M. (2023). A me a-analy ic e iew o he e ec o socioeconomic s a us on academic pe o mance. Jou nal o Educa ion, 203(4), 768–780. h ps://doi. o g/10.1177/00220574211031978 . Snowling, M. J., Moll, K., & Hulme, C. (2021). Language di icul ies a e a sha ed isk ac o o bo h eading diso de and ma hema ics diso de . Jou nal o Expe imen al Child Psychology, 202, 105009. h ps://doi.o g/10.1016/j.jecp.2020.105009 . S ana , P., Schipolowski, S., Schneide , R., Wei ich, S., Henschel, S., & Sachse, K. A. (Eds.). (2023). IQB-Bildungs end 2022. Sp achliche Kompe enzen am Ende de 64 Flo ian Schmiedek 9. Jah gangss u e im d i en Lände e gleich. Waxmann. h ps://doi.o g/10.31244/ 9783830997771 . Tamu a, A., Ishii, R., Yagi, A., Fukuzumi, N., Ha ano, A., Sakaki, M., Tanaka, A., & Mu ayama, K. (2022). Explo ing he wi hin-pe son con empo aneous ne wo k o mo i a ional engagemen . Lea ning and Ins uc ion, 81, 101649. h ps://doi.o g/10. 1016/j.lea nins uc.2022.101649 . T ull, T. J., & Ebne -P ieme , U. (2013). Ambula o y assessmen . Annual Re iew o Clinical Psychology, 9(1), 151–176. h ps://doi.o g/10.1146/annu e -clinpsy-050212- 185510 . an de Leempu , I. A., Wiche s, M., C ame , A. O. J., Bo sboom, D., Tue linckx, F., Kuppens, P., an Nes, E. H., Viech baue , W., Gil ay, E. J., Aggen, S. H., De om, C., Jacobs, N., Kendle , K. S., an De Maas, H. L. J., Neale, M. C., Pee e s, F., Thie y, E., Zacha , P., & Sche e , M. (2014). C i ical slowing down as ea ly wa ning o he onse and e mina ion o dep ession. P oceedings o he Na ional Academy o Sciences, 111(1), 87–92. h ps://doi.o g/10.1073/pnas.1312114110 . Wiche s, M., Wigman, J. T. W., & Myin-Ge meys, I. (2015). Mic o-le el a ec dynamics in psychopa hology iewed om complex dynamical sys em heo y. Emo ion Re iew, 7(4), 362–367. h ps://doi.o g/10.1177/1754073915590623 Pa 2: Emo ions, mo i a ion and well-being – he ole o socio-emo ional aspec s in lea ning . Anne C. F enzel & Thomas Goe z Lea ning and emo ions In his con ibu ion, we se ou o ake ou eade s on a jou ney o be e un‐ de s and he na u e o emo ions, as well as hei an eceden s and lea ning ou ‐ comes. The p esen ed emo ion heo y and exis ing empi ical e idence poin s o close links be ween emo ions and lea ning; hence i seems ha class ooms designed o op imize s uden s’ emo ions should also be conduci e o e ec i e cogni i e de elopmen . Ne e heless, we conclude by ealizing ha i is no i ial o align socio-emo ional and cogni i e de elopmen goals in class ooms. Ins ead, he ypical, pe o mance-o ien ed class oom se ings seem o make hose goals ope a e in compe i ion. By emphasizing mas e y-o ien a ion and de aching he oles o “ins uc o ” e sus “examine ”, a be e alignmen o he wo goals does seem achie able. Bu now, in o he jungle o human emo ional expe iences . . . 1. Emo ions in educa ional con ex s: Concep ualiza ion Emo ions unc ion as an “in e ace be ween an o ganism and i s en i onmen ” (Sche e & Moo s, 2019, p. 721), comp ising a ious componen s such as si ‐ ua ional e alua ions, ac ion endencies, physiological esponses, exp essi e be‐ ha io s, and subjec i e eelings. Fo example, he subjec i e eeling o p ide can a ise when an indi idual has achie ed an academic success due o hei pe ‐ sonal abili y o e o . This goes in line wi h a mo i a ion o engage in simila ac i i ies, and is accompanied by physiological changes like inc eased hea a e and body empe a u e, as well as exp essi e beha io s such as smiling, il ing he head back, expanding he ches , and po en ially aising a ms. In con as , he subjec i e eeling o anxie y eme ges in ace o a po en ial academic ailu e, and goes in line wi h a desi e o escape he si ua ion, as well as physiological eac ions like a apid hea a e, swea ing, wide eyes, and c ouched pos u e, and wo ies abou nega i e consequences o he po en ial academic ailu e. Emo ions a e ypically o sho du a ion and di ec ed owa d speci ic objec s, se ing hem apa om moods, which end o be longe -las ing, less ocused on speci ic objec s, and associa ed wi h weake physiological esponses and exp essions (Coppin & Sande , 2021). The ex ensi e ocabula y a ound emo‐ ions illus a es hei di e si y and he a ying unc ions emo ions can ake on. 68 Anne C. F enzel & Thomas Goe z Fo example, we can desc ibe how we eel wi h adjec i es like chee ul, ela ed, con iden , joy ul, p oud, i i a ed, annoyed, es less, ang y, anxious, bo ed, sad, epida ious, so ow ul, wea y, o dull. Fu he mo e, emo ions can be concep ualized along a con inuum om s a e o ai (Laza us, 1994). Emo ional s a es ep esen momen a y esponses a is‐ ing om in e ac ions wi h he en i onmen , whe eas emo ional ai s e lec he endency o indi iduals o expe ience ce ain emo ions mo e equen ly o in ensely o e ime and si ua ions han o he s. By de ini ion, emo ional ai s a e ela i ely s able, as highligh ed in esea ch dis inguishing s a e and ai componen s o achie emen emo ions (Ne e al., 2017). 1.1 Types o emo ions in educa ional se ings Clea ly he bes - esea ched ype o emo ions expe ienced in educa ional con‐ ex s a e achie emen emo ions, which eme ge du ing e alua ions o one’s pe ‐ o mance in ela ion o achie emen s anda ds (Pek un, 2006). One can ei he achie e hose s anda ds – hence, succeed; o no – hence, ail. I is a basic human emo ional esponse o eel posi i e abou success and nega i e abou ailu e. Examples o disc e e achie emen emo ions include es anxie y, shame, elie , bo edom, ange , p ide and enjoymen . Educa ional se ings in ol e ex emely equen and e y salien encoun e s o achie emen s anda ds – s uden s a e cons an ly old wha hey a e supposed o accomplish, and p o ided wi h eed‐ back as o whe he hey achie ed he p oposed s anda ds. Acco dingly, hey cons an ly expe ience successes and ailu es, which ine i ably b ing abou co ‐ esponding posi i e and nega i e achie emen emo ions. Fu he , he e a e also epis emic emo ions, such as su p ise, cu iosi y, and con usion. Epis emic emo ions do no di ec ly pe ain o success and ailu e in ela ion o a desi ed achie emen s anda d, bu s ill in ol e subjec i e judg‐ men s o one’s gaps and changes in knowledge (Pek un, Vogl, e al., 2017). They a ise in con ex s equi ing engagemen wi h no el o non- ou ine asks, such as p oblem-sol ing o esea ch p ojec s, as hey ypically eme ge when being con‐ on ed wi h unexpec ed in o ma ion o cogni i e incong ui y. Con usion and us a ion a e pa icula ly salien epis emic emo ions in educa ional esea ch (Di Leo e al., 2019; Muis e al., 2018). Ano he ca ego y, opic- ela ed emo ions, is igge ed di ec ly by he subjec ma e o lea ning asks. Examples include eelings o sadness when lea ning abou poli ical con lic s, o disgus when engaging wi h ce ain scien i ic ma‐ e ials. Las ly, social emo ions ela e o o he s’ ac ions o achie emen s. These emo ions encompass admi a ion, en y, o sympa hy, becoming especially ele‐ an in collabo a i e lea ning en i onmen s (Jä elä, 2012). Lea ning and emo ions 69 In sum, educa ional se ings, and he ac i i y – and du y – o lea ning in‐ ol es a ich a ay o emo ions. Clea ly, achie emen emo ions a e qui e e‐ quen he e: The pleasu e o success, and pain o ailu e a e pe asi e in educa‐ ional se ings. Howe e , lea ning in e ms o expanding and eo ganizing one’s knowledge base also bea s nuanced epis emic emo ions, lea ning opics can a ouse emo ions in and o hemsel es, and gi en ha educa ional se ings a e ypically o ganized in communi ies o simila ly aged lea ne s, social emo ions also accompany lea ning. 1.2 App aisal an eceden s o achie emen emo ions A key heo y in educa ional psychology is Pek un’s Con ol-Value Theo y (CVT; e.g., Pek un, 2018). This heo y is g ounded in app aisal pe spec i es, sugges ing ha an indi idual’s cogni i e assessmen s o a si ua ion play a c u‐ cial ole in emo ional expe iences (Sche e & Moo s, 2019). CVT in eg a es elemen s om ansac ional heo ies o s ess- ela ed emo ions (Laza us & Folkman, 1984) and a ibu ion heo y conce ning emo ions (G aham & Tay‐ lo , 2014), alongside concep ual o e laps wi h expec ancy- alue heo ies o achie emen mo i a ion (Eccles, 2005; Rosenzweig e al., 2019). Ini ially, CVT concen a ed on achie emen emo ions (see Pek un, 2024, o a e ised e sion ha encompasses mul iple g oups o emo ions). Acco ding o CVT, wo ap‐ p aisals a e pa icula ly in luen ial in elici ing achie emen emo ions: subjec‐ i e con ol o e lea ning and pe o mance ac i i ies and he subjec i e alue o hese ac i i ies and ou comes. Di e en disc e e emo ions o m based on dis inc pa e ns o con ol and alue app aisals; o example, enjoymen a ises when con ol is high and success is an icipa ed, while es anxie y inc eases when con ol is low and po en ial ailu e is a possibili y. Fu he mo e, con ol and alue app aisals in e ac , implying ha he impac o one app aisal on an emo ion can be assumed o depend on he le el o he o he . Fo ins ance, a s uden aking a low-s akes es (li le alue) may ind ha hei pe cei ed con‐ ol (i.e., low con idence in success) has less in luence on es anxie y compa ed o when he es is high-s akes (e.g. c ucial o college en y; hence has a high alue). Ex ensi e empi ical esea ch suppo s he links be ween s uden s’ con ol and alue app aisals and a ange o achie emen emo ions. T adi ional class‐ oom s udies a e summa ized by Pek un and Pe y (2014), while Lode e e al. (2020) add ess echnology-based lea ning en i onmen s. 70 Anne C. F enzel & Thomas Goe z 1.3 Social-cogni i e an eceden s o achie emen emo ions CVT adop s a social-cogni i e pe spec i e, posi ing ha he pe cei ed social en i onmen plays a signi ican ole in shaping s uden s’ con ol and alue ap‐ p aisals, and consequen ly, hei achie emen emo ions. Pek un (2018) iden i‐ ies key aspec s o he social en i onmen , including (1) ace s o ins uc ion, (2) alue induc ion, (3) au onomy suppo , (4) goal s uc u es and expec a ions es ablished by eache s o class ooms, and (5) achie emen eedback and i s consequences. Empi ical e idence demons a es co ela ional and p edic i e links be ween hese en i onmen al ac o s and s uden s’ emo ions, wi h con ol and alue app aisals se ing as media o s. Fo example, Laza ides and Buchholz (2019) ound ha s uden s’ pe cep ions o ins uc ional elemen s like eache sup‐ po , cogni i e ac i a ion, and class oom managemen we e linked o hei emo ions o enjoymen , anxie y, and ange . Fu he , Flunge e al. (2019) conduc ed a ield expe imen con as ing au onomy-suppo i e ins uc ion wi h adi ional eache -cen e ed me hods in physics educa ion, e ealing ha au onomy suppo —cha ac e ized by o e ing choices and in o ma ional language—enhanced posi i e achie emen emo ions while educing nega i e ones, especially among s uden s wi h s onge p io pe o mance. In addi ion, achie emen eedback, o en con eyed as g ades in o mal educa ional se ings, signi ican ly impac s s uden s’ con ol and alue app aisals ega ding hei lea ning ac i i ies and subsequen ly a ec s hei achie emen emo ions (see Goe z e al., 2018, o a e iew on eedback and emo ions). Beyond he class oom, amily dynamics, pee g oups, and b oade mac o- con ex s (such as cul u ally shaped a i udes owa ds educa ion) in luence s u‐ den s’ achie emen emo ions. Fo ins ance, esea ch by Ansong e al. (2017) and Dong e al. (2020) highligh ha pa en s and pee s signi ican ly shape al‐ ues o adolescen s in Ghana and China, a ec ing hei engagemen , enjoymen , and bo edom in school. A a mac o-sys em le el, high-s akes es ing has been consis en ly shown o unde mine child en’s well-being (Cho & Chan, 2020). 2. Rele ance o emo ions o lea ning and pe o mance D awing om basic psychological esea ch on he unc ions o emo ions, i is e iden ha emo ions a e linked wi h lea ning in many di e en ways, and hence a e linked wi h pe o mance ou comes. Speci ically, he connec ion be‐ ween emo ions and pe o mance is media ed by a ious cogni i e, sel - egu‐ la o y, and mo i a ional mechanisms (Pek un, 2018). The e is empi ical e i‐ dence ha nega i e emo ions du ing lea ning—such as ange , anxie y, shame, Lea ning and emo ions 71 bo edom, and hopelessness—a e associa ed wi h ask-i ele an hinking, a endency o use shallow lea ning s a egies (e.g., ehea sal), and less equen use o me acogni i e s a egies (Pek un e al., 2002). Con e sely, enjoymen in lea ning is linked o lowe le els o ask-i ele an hinking, enhanced ocus, and mo e e ec i e sel - egula ion, con ibu ing o deepe and mo e sus ainable lea ning (Ahmed e al., 2013; Obe g iesse & S oege , 2020). Fu he mo e, subs an ial empi ical e idence exis s ega ding he ela ion‐ ships be ween achie emen emo ions and achie emen mo i a ion du ing he lea ning p ocess (see Huang, 2011, o a me a-analysis on he links be ween achie emen goals and emo ions). Emo ions also in luence bo h in insic and ex insic o ms o mo i a ion; o ins ance, posi i e emo ions, pa icula ly en‐ joymen , a e signi ican d i e s o in insic mo i a ion (Isen & Ree e, 2005). In con as , nega i e emo ions like anxie y and ange can lead lea ne s o ocus on he ask’s ad e se aspec s o he consequences o po en ial ailu e, co ela ing posi i ely wi h ex insic mo i a ion o less sel -de e mined ypes o mo i a ion. I is impo an o no e, howe e , ha esea ch on achie emen emo ions has a ely been in eg a ed wi h s udies on in insic e sus ex insic mo i a ion om a sel -de e mina ion heo y pe spec i e (an excep ion is Su e -B andenbe ge e al., 2018). Fu he , nume ous s udies ha e examined di ec ela ionships be ween achie emen emo ions and academic pe o mance. Gene ally, hese links a e posi i e o pleasan emo ions and nega i e o unpleasan emo ions, as e i‐ denced by mul iple me a-analyses including a ious di e en disc e e achie e‐ men emo ions, including enjoymen , ange / us a ion, bo edom, and he mos p ominen ( es ) anxie y (Camacho-Mo les e al., 2021; Tze e al., 2016; on de Embse e al., 2018). Longi udinal s udies ha e shown ha hese co e‐ la ions a e o en ecip ocal, wi h emo ions in luencing academic pe o mance and ice e sa (Fo sblom e al., 2022; Lich en eld e al., 2022; Pek un, Lich en‐ eld, e al., 2017; Pek un e al., 2023). In summa y, he e is compelling e idence ha emo ions signi ican ly in lu‐ ence achie emen , while achie emen ou comes also a ec emo ions. The e is a complex in e play among emo ions, cogni ions, mo i a ion, lea ning beha ‐ io s, and achie emen , which c ea es posi i e and nega i e cycles. 3. Designing lea ning en i onmen s conside ing s uden s’ emo ions Based on he insigh s in o he an eceden s o s uden s’ emo ions, i is possible o de i e implica ions o how lea ning en i onmen s can be designed so ha s uden s expe ience mo e posi i e and less nega i e emo ions. Gi en he s ong connec ions be ween s uden s’ emo ions and hei lea ning and achie emen 72 Anne C. F enzel & Thomas Goe z Figu e 1. P inciples o op imizing s uden s’ con ol and alue app aisals o design emo ionally heal hy lea ning en i onmen s. Abbildung e ügba un e : 10 . 6084 / m9 . igsha e . 30103837 , un e CC license ( h ps://c ea i ecommons.o g/licenses/by/4.0/ ) ou comes, such lea ning en i onmen s should also be conduci e o e ec i e lea ning and op imal achie emen ou comes. The ollowing p inciples ou line ways o achie e his, aligning wi h and expanding upon he “design p inciples o adap i e mo i a ion and emo ion in educa ion” p oposed by Linnenb ink- Ga cia e al. (2016). A isual summa y is depic ed in Figu e 1. 3.1 P omo ing enjoymen o lea ning Fos e ing enjoymen o lea ning should be a p io i y o op imize he emo ional a mosphe e in he class oom. Wi hou eso ing o o e ly en e aining me h‐ ods, eache s can ocus on making opics and lea ning ac i i ies engaging and enjoyable. I is also ad isable o eache s o ocus on hei own enjoymen du ‐ ing eaching, and o emind hemsel es o wha hey hemsel es ind ascina ing abou he lesson con en : The e is consis en e idence ha eache s’ own enjoy‐ men and en husiasm du ing eaching can ansmi o s uden s (F enzel e al., 2018; F enzel e al., 2021; F enzel e al., 2024). O cou se, simply c ea ing a joy‐ ul class oom a mosphe e likely will no su ice o p omo e lea ning. Howe e , s uden s’ willingness o main ain hei a en ion and o exe men al e o will likely be enhanced when he lea ning asks a e enjoyable. Lea ning and emo ions 79 . Obe g iesse , S., & S oege , H. (2020). S uden s’ emo ions o enjoymen and bo edom and hei use o cogni i e lea ning s a egies – How do hey a ec one ano he ? Lea ning and Ins uc ion, 66, 101285. h ps://doi.o g/10.1016/j.lea nins uc.2019.101285 . Pek un, R. (2006). The con ol- alue heo y o achie emen emo ions: Assump ions, co olla ies, and implica ions o educa ional esea ch and p ac ice. Educa ional Psy‐ chology Re iew, 18, 315–341. h ps://doi.o g/10.1007/s10648-006-9029-9 . Pek un, R. (2018). Con ol- alue heo y: A social-cogni i e app oach o achie emen emo ions. In G. A. D. Liem & D. M. McIne ney (Eds.), Big heo ies e isi ed 2: A olume o esea ch on sociocul u al in luences on mo i a ion and lea ning (pp. 165– 190). In o ma ion Age Publishing. . Pek un, R. (2024). Con ol-Value Theo y: F om Achie emen Emo ion o a Gene al Theo y o Human Emo ions. Educa ional Psychology Re iew, 36(3). h ps://doi.o g/ 10.1007/s10648-024-09909-7 . Pek un, R., Goe z, T., Ti z, W., & Pe y, R. P. (2002). Academic emo ions in s u‐ den s’ sel - egula ed lea ning and achie emen : A p og am o quali a i e and quan‐ i a i e esea ch. Educa ional Psychologis , 37, 91–105. h ps://doi.o g/10.1207/ S15326985EP3702_4 . Pek un, R., Lich en eld, S., Ma sh, H. W., Mu ayama, K., & Goe z, T. (2017). Achie e‐ men emo ions and academic pe o mance: Longi udinal models o ecip ocal e ‐ ec s. Child De elopmen , 88, 1653–1670. h ps://doi.o g/10.1111/cde .12704 . Pek un, R., Ma sh, H. W., Suessenbach, F., F enzel, A. C., & Goe z, T. (2023). School g ades and s uden s’ emo ions: Longi udinal models o wi hin-pe son ecip ocal e ‐ ec s. Lea ning and Ins uc ion, 83, 101626. h ps://doi.o g/10.1016/j.lea nins uc. 2022.101626 . Pek un, R., & Pe y, R. P. (2014). Con ol- alue heo y o achie emen emo ions. In R. Pek un & E. A. Linnenb ink-Ga cia (Eds.), In e na ional handbook o emo ions in educa ion (pp. 120–141). Rou ledge. h ps://doi.o g/10.4324/9780203148211 . Pek un, R., Vogl, E., Muis, K. R., & Sina a, G. M. (2017). Measu ing emo ions du ing epis emic ac i i ies: he epis emically- ela ed emo ion scales. Cogni ion and Emo ion, 31(6), 1268–1276. h ps://doi.o g/10.1080/02699931.2016.1204989 . Pian a, R. C., Ham e, B. K., & Allen, J. P. (2012). Teache -s uden ela ionships and engagemen : Concep ualizing, measu ing, and imp o ing he capaci y o class oom in e ac ions. In S. Ch is enson, A. Reschly & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook o esea ch on s uden engagemen (pp. 365–386). Sp inge . h ps://doi.o g/10.1007/978-1-4614- 2018-7_17 . Pu wain, C. W., Nicholson, L. J., & Ku uk, G. (2022). Wa ning s uden s o he con‐ sequences o examina ion ailu e: An e ec i e s a egy o p omo ing s uden en‐ gagemen ? Jou nal o Educa ional Psychology, 115(1), 36–54. h ps://doi.o g/10.1037/ edu0000741 . Quin, D. (2017). Longi udinal and con ex ual associa ions be ween eache -s uden e‐ la ionships and s uden engagemen : A sys ema ic e iew. Re iew o Educa ional Re‐ sea ch, 87(2), 345–387. h ps://doi.o g/10.3102/0034654316669434 80 Anne C. F enzel & Thomas Goe z . Ree e, J. (2009). Why eache s adop a con olling mo i a ing s yle owa d s uden s and how hey can become mo e au onomy suppo i e. Educa ional Psychologis , 44, 159– 175. h ps://doi.o g/10.1080/00461520903028990 . Roo da, D., Koomen, H., Spil , J., & Oo , F. (2011). The in luence o a ec i e eache - s uden ela ionships on s uden s’ school engagemen and achie emen : A me a-an‐ aly ic app oach. Re iew o Educa ional Resea ch, 81(4), 493–529. h ps://doi.o g/10. 3102/0034654311421793 . Rosenzweig, E. Q., Wig ield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2019). Expec ancy- alue heo y and i s ele ance o s uden mo i a ion and lea ning. In K. A. Renninge & S. E. Hidi (Eds.), The Camb idge handbook o mo i a ion and lea ning (pp. 617–644). Camb idge Uni‐ e si y P ess. h ps://doi.o g/10.1017/9781316823279.026 . Ro weile , A.-L., S ockinge , K., & Ne , U. E. (2023). S uden s’ egula ion o anxie y and hope – A mul ile el la en p o ile analysis. Emo ion, 23(7), 1891–1903. h ps:// doi.o g/h ps://doi.o g/10.1037/emo0001200 . Sche e , K. R., & Moo s, A. (2019). The emo ion p ocess: E en app aisal and compo‐ nen di e en ia ion. Annual Re iew o Psychology, 70, 719–745. h ps://doi.o g/10. 1146/annu e -psych-122216-011854 . S ockinge , K., D esel, M., Ma sh, H., & Pek un, R. (2025). S a egies o egula ing achie emen emo ions: Concep ualiza ion and ela ions wi h uni e si y s uden s’ emo ions, well-being, and heal h. Lea ning and Ins uc ion, 98, 102089. h ps://doi. o g/10.1016/j.lea nins uc.2025.102089 . Su e -B andenbe ge , C. C., Hagenaue , G., & Hasche , T. (2018). S uden s’ sel -de e ‐ mined mo i a ion and nega i e emo ions in ma hema ics in lowe seconda y educa‐ ion – In es iga ing ecip ocal ela ions. Con empo a y Educa ional Psychology, 55, 166–175. h ps://doi.o g/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.10.002 . Tze, V. M. C., Daniels, L. M., & Klassen, R. M. (2016). E alua ing he ela ionship be‐ ween bo edom and academic ou comes: A me a-analysis. Educa ional Psychology Re iew, 28(1), 119–144. h ps://doi.o g/10.1007/s10648-015-9301-y . on de Embse, N., Jes e , D., Roy, D., & Pos , J. (2018). Tes anxie y e ec s, p edic o s, and co ela es: A 30-yea me a-analy ic e iew. Jou nal o A ec i e Diso de s, 227, 483–493. h ps://doi.o g/10.1016/j.jad.2017.11.048 . Vygo sky, L. S. (1980). Mind in socie y: The de elopmen o highe psychological p o‐ cesses. Ha a d Uni e si y P ess. h ps://doi.o g/10.2307/j.c j 9 z4 Ca men Zu b iggen Well-being and lea ning Taking inclusi e educa ion as a p ominen example 1. In oduc ion O e he las wo decades, s uden well-being has inc easingly mo ed in o he spo ligh o educa ional esea ch. An examina ion o he apidly g owing body o li e a u e e eals ha s uden well-being is conside ed bo h pa icula ly el‐ e an o academic unc ioning and as a a ou able educa ional ou come in i sel (S einmay e al., 2018; Suldo e al., 2011). I is widely assumed ha well- being and lea ning a e in ica ely linked. On he one hand, s uden s’ school- ela ed well-being se es as an indica o o he quali y o a lea ning en i on‐ men , which acili a es posi i e lea ning p ocesses. On he o he hand, i is gen‐ e ally expec ed ha success ul lea ning os e s s uden s’ well-being (Hasche , 2012). Simila assump ions apply o he con ex o inclusi e educa ion, whe e s uden s’ well-being is ecognised no only as a key indica o o he quali y o inclusion bu also as an aim o inclusi e educa ion (Powell & Hadja , 2018; Vene z, 2015; Wäch e e al., 2024). None heless, a ecen sys ema ic e iew ega ding he associa ion be ween well-being and academic achie emen o school-aged child en has unco e ed inconsis encies in indings, anging om posi i e associa ions o no associ‐ a ion o con adic o y esul s (Amhol e al., 2020). Con lic ing esul s a e also epo ed ega ding s uden s’ well-being in ela ion o inclusi e educa ion (Dalgaa d e al., 2022; Goldan e al., 2022). Fu he mo e, se e al s udies ha e demons a ed a gene al decline in subjec i e well-being om childhood o ado‐ lescence (Bücke e al., 2023; Casas & González-Ca asco, 2019), and om p i‐ ma y o lowe seconda y educa ion (Knickenbe g & Zu b iggen, 2021; Obe ‐ meie e al., 2022). These appa en con adic ions aise he ques ion o a pos‐ sible ade-o be ween os e ing s uden s’ well-being and p omo ing academic lea ning and achie emen (Cla ke, 2020). Agains his backd op, his chap e aims i s o b ie ly elucida e he concep o s uden well-being and i s measu emen , and second, o p o ide concise in‐ sigh s in o he s a e o esea ch conce ning he associa ions be ween s uden s’ 82 Ca men Zu b iggen subjec i e well-being and academic achie emen , as well as on ele an ac o s o he lea ning en i onmen wi hin a class oom. Addi ionally, exempla y ind‐ ings on s uden s’ subjec i e well-being in ela ion o inclusi e educa ion a e p esen ed, ollowed by a (p elimina y) conclusion and sugges ions o u u e di ec ions. 2. Focus on s uden s’ subjec i e well-being 2.1 Concep ualising well-being Since well-being is a b oad, mul i ace ed cons uc (To , 2018), i may explain inconsis encies in indings ega ding he associa ion o s uden s’ well-being and academic achie emen . Co esponding o an umb ella e m, which is equen ly used in e changeably wi h o he e ms (e.g., happiness, men al heal h, li e sa ‐ is ac ion) and applied in many di e en con ex s, well-being is o en iewed as an ambiguous concep (Joos e al., 2018). The a ie y o e ms o de ini ions desc ibing well-being can be b oadly g ouped in o objec i e and subjec i e aspec s o dimensions o well-being (Voukela ou e al., 2021). While objec i e well-being e lec s people’s ma e ial li ing condi ions and hei obse able quali y o li e – including aspec s such as physical heal h, sa e y, en i onmen , and academic achie emen – subjec i e well-being cap u es people’s own pe cep ions o e alua ions o hei o e all quali y o li e o o speci ic domains o si ua ions. Empi ical educa ional esea ch has mainly ocused on s uden s’ subjec i e well-being. The mos widely acknowledged concep ion o subjec i e well-being is he one by Ed Diene (Schimmack, 2008). Acco ding o Diene (1984), sub‐ jec i e well-being consis s o he e lec i e cogni i e judgemen s people make abou hei li e in gene al o in speci ic domains (e.g., wo k, school, amily), as well as posi i e and nega i e emo ional esponses o ongoing li e expe iences o speci ic si ua ions (Diene e al., 2018). 2.2 Measu ing s uden s’ subjec i e well-being in school When concep ualising subjec i e well-being, i is essen ial o no only di e en‐ ia e be ween componen s (i.e., cogni i e, a ec i e) and li e domains (i.e., gen‐ e al, domain-speci ic), bu also be ween ime ames as in he gene al s a e- ai model (Eid, 2008). Acco dingly, he amewo k model o he measu emen o subjec i e well-being by Lische zke and Eid (2006) dis inguishes be ween ha‐ bi ual and momen a y o si ua ion-speci ic subjec i e well-being. Well-being and lea ning 83 This dis inc ion is also impo an when measu ing s uden s’ subjec i e well- being in school. One p ominen example o subjec i e well-being as a ai is he concep ion by Hasche (2010). She de ined s uden s’ subjec i e well-being in school as a mul icomponen cons uc ha includes posi i e a i udes owa ds school, enjoymen in school, he absence o wo ies abou school, a posi i e academic sel -concep , and he absence o social p oblems as well as physical complain s in school. Measu ing s uden s’ subjec i e well-being as a s a e p i‐ ma ily conce ns i s a ec i e componen , o mo e speci ically, posi i e and neg‐ a i e a ec i e expe ience in speci ic (lea ning) si ua ions. A ec i e expe ience o s a e-like emo ions can be assessed ia momen a y da a echniques such as he expe ience sampling me hod (ESM; Hek ne e al., 2007), which allows o cap u e s a e cha ac e is ics in si u and in eal- ime. In educa ional s udies, esea che s ha e ypically elied on e ospec i e sel - epo s when measu ing s uden s’ subjec i e well-being. Howe e , such mem‐ o y-based epo s o emo ional aspec s a e o en o e - o unde es ima ed (Con‐ ne & Ba e , 2012). To in es iga e e ospec ion e ec s o s uden s’ emo ional expe ience in he class oom and possible changes du ing ea ly adolescence, we compa ed e ospec i ely assessed a ec i e expe ience (i.e., posi i e and nega‐ i e ac i a ion) wi h in si u ia ESM epo ed a ec i e expe ience (Zu b iggen e al., 2021). Ou indings indica ed o a posi i e ecall bias (i.e., ‘ osy iew’) o s uden s’ a ec i e expe ience a he end o p ima y educa ion and o a nega i e shi in ecall bias (i.e., ‘blue iew’) by he end o lowe seconda y educa ion. 3. Subjec i e well-being, academic achie emen , and he lea ning en i onmen While abou wen y yea s ago esea che s had o make a plea o he ele ance o well-being in school (Fend & Sandmeie , 2004), i is nowadays gene ally as‐ sumed ha s uden s’ subjec i e well-being e lec s a school en i onmen ha acili a es lea ning p ocesses and p omo es s uden s’ academic achie emen . Success ul lea ning, in u n, is hough o be essen ial o expe iencing sa is ac‐ ion and posi i e emo ions in school (Hasche & Hagenaue , 2011). Thus, sub‐ jec i e well-being is iewed as a p edic o o s uden s’ engagemen and mo i a‐ ion o lea n (Hasche , 2012). Since school and he class oom a e also sou ces o nega i e expe iences (e.g., academic ailu e, ejec ion by pee s), subjec i e well- being can also se e a p e en i e unc ion. 84 Ca men Zu b iggen 3.1 Associa ions o subjec i e well-being wi h academic achie emen and engagemen Based on such heo e ical conside a ions, se e al s udies ha e examined he e‐ la ionship be ween s uden s’ subjec i e well-being and academic achie emen . The i s me a-analysis on his opic showed a posi i e, bu only small co ‐ ela ion ( = 0.164) be ween academic achie emen and subjec i e well-being (Bücke e al., 2018). The co ela ion was s able ac oss a ious le els o de‐ mog aphic a iables, di e en componen s, and domains o subjec i e well- being, as well as ac oss di e en con en s and al e na i e measu es o academic achie emen . The au ho s concluded ha high-achie ing s uden s do no nec‐ essa ily epo high subjec i e well-being, and low-achie ing s uden s do no au oma ically epo low subjec i e well-being. As s uden s’ engagemen has been desc ibed as an impo an s eng h lead‐ ing o well-being and posi i e lea ning ou comes, Wong and colleagues (2024) in es iga ed in hei ecen me a-analysis he associa ions o s uden s’ academic engagemen wi h subjec i e well-being and academic achie emen . Thei me a- analysis e ealed medium co ela ions be ween s uden s’ engagemen and sub‐ jec i e well-being, being mos closely ela ed o a ec i e engagemen ( = .40), ollowed by cogni i e ( = .35) and beha iou al ( = .31) engagemen . The a e ‐ age co ela ion o engagemen wi h subjec i e well-being ( = .35) was simila o he one wi h academic achie emen ( = .33). 3.2 Fac o s o he lea ning en i onmen a ec ing subjec i e well-being Al hough he class oom is conside ed he mos in luen ial school con ex bo h on s uden s’ subjec i e well-being and hei lea ning (Hasche , 2012), empi i‐ cal e idence suppo ing hese heo e ical assump ions is s ill sca ce. Howe e , se e al s udies ha e explo ed he impac o ce ain aspec s o he lea ning en i‐ onmen wi hin a class oom on s uden s’ subjec i e well-being. A la ge pa o hese aspec s co esponds o social cha ac e is ics o he lea ning en i onmen , bu also a eache ’s ins uc ional p ac ice plays a decisi e ole in de eloping and os e ing s uden s’ well-being. Social ac o s wi hin a class oom ha posi i ely a ec s uden s’ subjec‐ i e well-being include posi i e ela ionships wi h pee s and pee suppo (Goswami, 2012; Ho e ich e e al., 2021), a posi i e s uden - eache ela ion‐ ship (Zheng, 2022), and a suppo i e class oom clima e (Obe le, 2018; Zu ‐ b iggen, Ho mann, e al., 2023). Fac o s ha nega i ely a ec s uden s’ sub‐ jec i e well-being include pee bullying, (s ong) compe i ion among pee s (A slan e al., 2021; Ho e ich e & Rau elde , 2017), con lic s wi h eache s, Well-being and lea ning 85 and p essu e om eache s o achie e (Kiu u e al., 2020; S ang-Rab ig e al., 2023). Rega ding eache s’ ins uc ional p ac ices, ecen s udies ha e shown ha di e en ia ed ins uc ion is posi i ely ela ed o s uden s’ subjec i e well-being (Pozas e al., 2021) and ha good ins uc ional quali y has a posi i e impac on s uden s’ subjec i e well-being (Obe meie e al., 2022). 4. Inclusi e educa ion and s uden s’ subjec i e well-being Mos o he a o emen ioned ac o s posi i ely a ec ing s uden s’ subjec i e well-being and lea ning co espond o c ucial cha ac e is ics o he success ul implemen a ion o inclusi e educa ion. Inclusi e educa ion no only means ac‐ cess o gene al educa ion bu also p o iding high-quali y eaching and lea ning en i onmen s ha maximise he academic and social-emo ional de elopmen o all s uden s (Uni ed Na ions [UN], 2006, A . 26). Di e en ia ed ins uc‐ ion is seen as a ehicle o achie e inclusi e educa ion (Pozas e al., 2021) by implemen ing, o ins ance, adequa ely adap ed eaching p ac ices ailo ed o s uden s’ needs (Gheyssens e al., 2023). As al eady men ioned, s uden s’ subjec i e well-being is conside ed an im‐ po an indica ion o he quali y o inclusi e educa ion. Simul aneously, i also se es as a use ul indica o o adap i e eaching, as i a ec s a eache ’s deci‐ sions on how o design class oom in e en ions and ins uc ions (P ae o ius e al., 2015). Thus, accu a e eache judgemen o s uden s’ subjec i e well-being is an impo an condi ion o adap i e eaching, which in u n p omo es each s uden ’s lea ning and academic de elopmen . In he ollowing, exempla y indings o ou own s udies on he opic o in‐ clusi e educa ion and subjec i e well-being a e b ie ly p esen ed. 4.1 S uden s’ emo ional expe ience and adap i e eaching The i s esea ch ques ion ela es o he a ec i e componen o subjec i e well-being as a s a e: How do s uden s expe ience di e en class oom si ua‐ ions o adap i e eaching in inclusi e educa ion? To add ess his ques ion, we conduc ed an expe ience sampling s udy in 40 class ooms o G ades 5 and 6 in Swi ze land (p ima y educa ion) wi h abou 720 s uden s and a o al o o e 8000 occasions (Zu b iggen & Vene z, 2018). The esul s o ou mul i‐ le el mul ig oup analyses showed ha he included cha ac e is ics o adap i e eaching had a simila posi i e e ec on s uden s’ emo ional expe ience. When s uden s had he op ion o choose be ween asks, hey we e gene ally mo e posi i ely ac i a ed (e.g., mo e ene ge ic) and less nega i ely ac i a ed (e.g., 86 Ca men Zu b iggen less s essed) han when hey could no choose be ween asks. Simila ly, he s uden s we e mo e posi i ely ac i a ed and less nega i ely ac i a ed when hey we e able o wo k wi h hei pee s and did no ha e o wo k alone. Fu he mo e, s uden s’ emo ional expe ience was bes when he pe cei ed di icul y le el o a ask was sligh ly highe han a e age. Howe e , one di e en ial e ec be ween s uden g oups was obse ed: The g oup o s uden s wi h abo e-a e age aca‐ demic achie emen and well-adjus ed social beha iou only eached maximum posi i e ac i a ion o asks ha hey expe ienced as signi ican ly mo e di icul han a e age. 4.2 Teache judgemen accu acy o s uden s’ subjec i e well-being in inclusi e educa ion Second, we in es iga ed eache s’ judgemen accu acy o s uden s’ subjec i e well-being as a ai and whe he he (in-)accu acy in eache epo s (i.e., speci‐ ici y) could be explained by s uden and eache cha ac e is ics. To add ess hese ques ions, we d ew om he sel - epo s o abou 2600 s uden s in G ade 6 and he co esponding a ings o abou 430 home oom eache s and applied a mul iple-indica o co ela ed ai -co ela ed me hod minus one model wi h explana o y a iables (Zu b iggen, Nusse , e al., 2023). Following he concep‐ ion by Hasche (2010), we ocused on h ee componen s: emo ional well-being in school, social inclusion in class, and academic sel -concep . To in es iga e ac o s explaining he speci ici y in eache epo s o s uden s’ subjec i e well- being, we accoun ed o selec ed cha ac e is ics ele an in he con ex o inclu‐ si e educa ion and adap i e eaching. Ou indings showed ha eache s’ judgemen accu acy o s uden s’ subjec‐ i e well-being was only low o mode a e. 12 % o he a iance in eache epo s o s uden s’ emo ional well-being was sha ed wi h he s uden s’ sel - epo s and 18 % wi h ega d o social inclusion, while o he academic sel -concep he consis ency was a li le highe a 33 % . In e ms o s uden cha ac e is ics, he s a us o special educa ional needs (SEN), gende , and academic achie emen we e signi ican ly ela ed o he speci ici y in eache epo s o all h ee aspec s o s uden s’ subjec i e well- being. The e ec s we e mos p onounced o academic achie emen , pa ic‐ ula ly on he academic sel -concep . Ge man as a p ima y s. seconda y lan‐ guage could only explain he speci ici y in eache epo s o he academic sel - concep . The eache cha ac e is ics included could explain he speci ici y in eache epo s only o a small ex en . While eaching expe ience was nega‐ i ely, bu only e y weakly, associa ed wi h he speci ici y in eache epo s o he s uden s’ academic sel -concep , eache s’ sel -e icacy, hei a i udes Well-being and lea ning 87 owa ds inclusion, and hei esponsibili y o e e y s uden we e posi i ely associa ed wi h he speci ici y in eache epo s o s uden s’ emo ional well- being and hei social inclusion in class. 4.3 De elopmen o s uden s’ subjec i e well-being in lowe seconda y educa ion The hi d and las esea ch ques ion ela es o he de elopmen o s uden s’ subjec i e well-being in inclusi e class ooms du ing lowe seconda y educa‐ ion and whe he s uden s’ academic achie emen can p edic changes in hei subjec i e well-being. To his end, we d aw on da a om he longi udinal p ojec Inclusi e Educa‐ ion in Lowe Seconda y Schools in Ge many (INSIDE). The sample consis ed o abou 4600 s uden s om lowe seconda y educa ion who pa icipa ed in G ades 6, 7, and 9. We speci ied a la en neighbou change model wi h p edic o s o change in subjec i e well-being. As expec ed, he indings showed ha s uden s’ emo ional well-being and hei social inclusion sligh ly dec eased om G ade 6 o G ade 9. The academic sel -concep emained ela i ely s able. Fu he mo e, pee - ela ed class oom clima e and s uden - eache ela ionship could p edic change in s uden s’ subjec i e well-being. 5. Conclusion and u u e di ec ions This leads back o he ini ial ques ion o his chap e : whe he he e is a ade- o be ween well-being and lea ning. Ra he han being incompa ible goals, e‐ sea ch sugges s ha hei ela ionship is no s aigh o wa d and ha se e al gaps need o be add essed (Cla ke, 2020). To each a mo e solid conclusion abou he assumed ecip ocal ela ionship be ween s uden s’ subjec i e well- being and academic achie emen o o he lea ning ou comes, mo e longi udi‐ nal s udies a e equi ed (Bücke e al., 2018). Fu u e s udies would bene i om including po en ial mode a ing o media ‐ ing a iables a he indi idual, class oom, and school le els, such as pe sonali y, ins uc ional s a egies, o school clima e (S einmay e al., 2018). Fo ins ance, i could be wo hwhile o in es iga e he ole o s uden s’ engagemen in his ega d, as s uden s’ subjec i e well-being seems o be mo e s ongly associa ed wi h academic engagemen han wi h academic achie emen . Ou indings indica e ha adap i e eaching has a posi i e impac on s u‐ den s’ emo ional expe ience (Zu b iggen & Vene z, 2018). The ques ion e‐ mains whe he adap i e eaching has medium- and long- e m e ec s on s u‐ den s’ subjec i e well-being as well as on success ul lea ning. Addi ional e‐ 88 Ca men Zu b iggen sea ch di e en ia ing be ween componen s and ime ames o subjec i e well- being could p o ide impo an insigh s in o speci ic e ec s and unde lying p o‐ cesses. In ligh o he ela i ely low accu acy o eache judgemen ega ding s u‐ den s’ subjec i e well-being (Zu b iggen, Nusse e al., 2023), he e is a isk o unjus ly accusing eache s o placing addi ional p essu e on hese al eady hea ily bu dened p o essionals. Gi en he complexi y and di icul y o es i‐ ma ing subjec i e o in e nal cons uc s, he disc epancies be ween he sel - epo s and eache a ings o s uden s’ subjec i e well-being could be jus used as diagnos ic in o ma ion. Being awa e o s uden ’s own iew and possible bias may educe he expec ancy e ec s o unde - o o e es ima ion, o ins ance, o s uden s wi h SEN o low achie emen . In e en ions ega ding inclusion ha e he po en ial o change eache s’ belie s, pa icula ly i hey p o ide he oppo uni y o gain expe ience wi h inclusi e p ac ices (Digna h e al., 2022). As o u he p ac ical implica ions, c ea ing a suppo i e social class oom clima e can enhance s uden s’ subjec i e well-being, bu also posi i ely a ec lea ning p ocesses and achie emen . This could be unde aken by inco po a ‐ ing elemen s and s a egies o ‘posi i e educa ion’ (Seligman e al., 2009), o by implemen ing e idence-based, sys emic social and emo ional lea ning (Rimm- Kau man e al., 2023). In his ein, eache s should be suppo ed in hei en‐ dea ou s in os e ing a ich lea ning en i onmen whe e all s uden s can h i e academically and enhance hei subjec i e well-being. Re e ences . Amhol , T. T., Dammeye , J., Ca e , R., & Niclasen, J. (2020). Psychological well-being and academic achie emen among school-aged child en: A sys ema ic e iew. Child Indica o Resea ch 13, 1523–1548. h ps://doi.o g/10.1007/s12187-020-09725-9 . A slan, G., Allen, K. A., & Tanhan, A. (2021). School bullying, men al heal h, and well‐ being in adolescen s: Media ing impac o posi i e psychological o ien a ions. Child Indica o Resea ch, 14, 1007–1026. h ps://doi.o g/10.1007/s12187-020-09780-2 . Bücke , S., Nu aydin, S., Simonsmeie , B. A., Schneide , M, & Luhmann, M. (2018). Sub‐ jec i e well-being and academic achie emen : A me a-analysis. Jou nal o Resea ch in Pe sonali y, 74, 83–94. h ps://doi.o g/10.1016/j.j p.2018.02.007 . Bücke , S., Luhmann, M., Haehne , P., Bühle , J. L., Dapp, L. C., Luciano, E. C., & O h, U. (2023). The de elopmen o subjec i e well-being ac oss he li e span: A me a- analy ic e iew o longi udinal s udies. Psychological Bulle in, 149(7–8), 418–446. h ps://doi.o g/10.1037/bul0000401 . Casas, F., & González-Ca asco, M. (2019). Subjec i e well-being dec easing wi h age: New esea ch on child en o e 8. Child De elopmen , 90(2), 375–394. h ps://doi. o g/10.1111/cde .13133 Lea ning and mo i a ion 95 Figu e 2: G aphical illus a ion o he inc emen al alidi y o mo i a ion in p edic ing academic achie e‐ men abo e and beyond in elligence. Figu e 2 illus a es his c i ical concep in unde s anding he ole o mo i a ion in academic pe o mance. As depic ed, some a iance in academic achie emen is unaccoun ed o by bo h cons uc s. Some a iance in academic achie emen is only explained by in e indi idual di e ences in in elligence, some only by in e indi idual di e ences in mo i a ion and some by bo h. In se e al s ud‐ ies, we explo ed he inc emen al alidi y o mo i a ion beyond in elligence, pe sonali y, o a combina ion o bo h when p edic ing academic achie emen (Laue mann e al., 2020; S einmay & Spina h, 2007, 2009; S einmay e al., 2011, 2018, 2019; S einmay & Meißne , 2013). One such s udy (S einmay & Spina h, 2009) exempli ies his ela ionship. Figu e 3 displays he main esul s. Figu e 3: G aphical illus a ion o he commonali y analysis esul s pe o med by S einmay and Spina h (2009). In Figu e 3, he medium g ey po ions o he ba s in he esul s ep esen he unique a iance in academic achie emen a ibu ed o mo i a ion alone, e en 96 Rica da S einmay a e con olling o in elligence. Simila indings ha e been obse ed when con olling o pe sonali y alone o bo h in elligence and pe sonali y (S ein‐ may & Spina h, 2007; S einmay e al., 2011). In all s udies mo i a ion ac‐ coun ed o a iance in academic achie emen which was no accoun ed o by he o he cons uc s. As indica ed by he ligh g ey po ions o he ba s, some mo i a ional cons uc s p edic academic achie emen in conjunc ion wi h in‐ elligence. This sha ed a iance—pa icula ly s ong o he cons uc “hope o success” in he displayed s udy—sugges s an in e ac ion e ec be ween in‐ elligence and achie emen mo i es. Suppo ing his, o he s udies (Be gold & S einmay , 2018; Hu e -Thamm e al., 2023) demons a ed ha in elligence was posi i ely ela ed o school g ades only when accompanied by a ce ain le el o achie emen mo i a ion, highligh ing an in e play be ween hese cons uc s in p edic ing academic success. Besides i s inc emen al alidi y in explaining a iance in academic achie e‐ men , he impo ance o mo i a ion is also unde lined by i s powe o explain change in academic achie emen . When asked abou hei child’s academic s uggles, many pa en s a ibu e i o a lack o mo i a ion, belie ing ha e‐ newed mo i a ion could lead o imp o ed pe o mance. Resea ch suppo s his pe cep ion (see Lespe ance e al., 2022). Ac oss se e al s udies, mo i a ional cons uc s ha e been shown o p edic changes in academic achie emen , mea‐ su ed by bo h school g ades and s anda dized achie emen es s (S einmay e al., 2018, 2019; S einmay & Spina h, 2009). This is pa icula ly no ewo hy gi en ha indi idual di e ences in academic pe o mance end o s abilize o e ime, limi ing he po en ial o change. Rema kably, he e ec o mo i a ional cons uc s on changes in academic achie emen was up o ou imes g ea e han he e ec o in elligence, unde sco ing mo i a ion’s c i ical ole in os e ‐ ing academic g ow h (S einmay e al., 2019b; S einmay & Spina h, 2009). 2. E alua ing he ela i e impo ance o mo i a ional cons uc s in academic achie emen Gi en he di e se a ay o mo i a ional cons uc s i is c ucial o empi ically iden i y which a e mos p edic i e o academic success. Since he speci ic cha ‐ ac e is ics o a sample can in luence he obse ed co ela ions, i is ad isable o examine mul iple mo i a ional cons uc s wi hin a single sample o ule ou he possibili y ha di e ences in co ela ions a e a ibu able o he sample’s cha ‐ ac e is ics. Fu he mo e, expec ancy- alue cons uc s a e o en domain-speci ‐ ically ope a ionalized, while achie emen mo i es a e gene ally ea ed as mo e s able, ai -like cha ac e is ics assessed in a b oade con ex . Since con ex ual‐ Lea ning and mo i a ion 97 iza ion a ec s he associa ion be ween cons uc s (c . Michel e al., 2022), i is essen ial o assess bo h mo i a ional cons uc s and achie emen ou comes a equi alen le els o speci ici y. To ensu e he gene alizabili y o indings ac oss academic domains, i is also ecommended o c oss- alida e esul s in mul iple a eas. Ano he challenge in mo i a ional esea ch is mul icollinea i y among cons uc s. Ce ain cons uc s, such as abili y sel -concep s, sel -e icacy, and expec a ions o success, o en o e lap o he ex en ha hey a e nea ly indis‐ inguishable empi ically (e.g., Ma sh e al., 2019). Simila ly, in insic alues, in insic mo i a ion, and in e es a e also closely ela ed o each o he bu also o expec ancy a iables. App op ia e s a is ical echniques, such as commonal‐ i y analysis and ela i e weigh analysis, a e he e o e necessa y o disen angle he speci ic con ibu ions o hese cons uc s ( o speci ics on ela i e weigh analysis see Johnson & LeB e on, 2004; Tonidandel & LeB e on, 2011). Las bu no leas , o de elop e ec i e educa ional policies and implemen meaning ul school e o ms, i is essen ial o ga he s ong empi ical e idence on whe he di e en mo i a ional cons uc s can accoun o a ia ions in school pe o ‐ mance beyond he e ec s o o he impo an a iables, such as in elligence and p io achie emen . Excluding hese la e ac o s isks o e s a ing he ole o mo i a ion in academic success. Taking in o accoun hese hough s, S einmay e al. (2019) sough o add ess hese me hodological conside a ions by examining a ious mo i a ional con‐ s uc s alongside p io pe o mance and in elligence, wi h all a iables assessed a compa able le els o speci ici y. We e alua ed cons uc s om expec ancy- alue heo y, including alues and abili y sel -concep s, as well as achie emen mo i es (hope o success and ea o ailu e), achie emen goals (lea ning- app oach, pe o mance-app oach, pe o mance-a oidance), and wo k a oid‐ ance. Each a iable was measu ed ac oss di e en academic domains (gene al academic abili y, ma h, and Ge man), enabling c oss- alida ion ac oss sub‐ jec a eas and ensu ing consis en speci ici y le els. A ela i e weigh analy‐ sis, which quan i ies he ela i e impo ance o each p edic o in explaining a iance in a c i e ion (LeB e on & Tonidandel, 2008), was employed due o he high in e co ela ions among mo i a ional cons uc s. The ela i e weigh ε can be in e p e ed as an indica o o he ela i e impo ance o each mo i a‐ ional cons uc compa ed o o he p edic o s and i s hough o ep esen he sha e o explained a iance in he speci ic g ade by his speci ic mo i a ional cons uc . In he s udy by S einmay e al. (2019), p io ma h g ades eme ged as he mos signi ican p edic o o subsequen ma h g ades (explaining 45 % o he unique a iance), ollowed by ma h sel -concep (19 % ). S uden s’ ma h ask alues (9 % ), lea ning goals (5 % ), wo k a oidance (7 % ), ea o ailu e, and hope o success (6 % ) did no signi ican ly di e in hei con ibu ions. No ably, 98 Rica da S einmay pe o mance goals and in elligence did no signi ican ly p edic achie emen when analyzed alongside p io g ades. Simila pa e ns we e obse ed o o e ‐ all school achie emen and language a s g ades. He e again, among all mo i‐ a ional a iables abili y sel -concep s and alues we e he s onges p edic o s ( o mo e de ails see S einmay e al., 2019b). In a simila s udy, conside ing u he a iables such as g i – he consis ency o in e es s and pe sis ence in he pu sui o long- e m goals (Duckwo h e al., 2007) – and pe sonali y – ope a ionalized as he Big Fi e o pe sonali y (Cos a & McC ae, 1995) – S ein‐ may e al. (2018) also ound expec ancy- alue a iables o be s onges p e‐ dic o s o academic achie emen among all conside ed mo i a ional a iables. Howe e , in bo h s udies, expec ancy- a iables we e mo e s ongly associa ed wi h academic achie emen han alue a iables. These indings held ega dless o whe he p io pe o mance and in elligence we e con olled (see also S ein‐ may & Spina h, 2009; S einmay e al., 2011, 2018). Thus, ega ding he ques‐ ion o which mo i a ional cons uc s a e pa icula ly in luen ial in shaping academic pe o mance hese s udies demons a ed ha domain-speci ic abili y sel -concep s, especially in ma h, a e c i ical p edic o s o academic achie e‐ men . Howe e , when i comes o achie emen - ela ed choices—such as oca‐ ional o academic pa hways— alues, pa icula ly in insic alues, become as signi ican as abili y sel -concep s (S einmay & Spina h, 2010). Consequen ly, in he ollowing discussion, I will ocus on expec ancy- alue cons uc s, which a e bo h cen al o academic achie emen - ela ed c i e ia. 3. How o os e ideal expec ancies and alues Be o e os e ing expec ancy cons uc s, i is essen ial o i s de e mine he de‐ si ed le el o de elopmen . The ques ion whe he indi iduals should s i e o a ealis ic o an op imis ically biased sel - iew has especially been discussed wi h ega d o abili y sel -concep s. Unlike in insic mo i a ion, which is b oadly bene icial i i is high, he op imal sel -concep is less s aigh o wa d. Should one aim o a sel -pe cep ion ha aligns wi h ac ual abili ies, o is a posi i ely biased (o e es ima ed) sel - iew mo e ad an ageous? I so, shall I o e es ima e mysel jus a li le o g ea ly? The esul s o empi ical esea ch on sel -es ima‐ ion biases and academic pe o mance a e mixed, wi h some s udies inding posi i e e ec s and o he s inding nega i e ones. These inconsis encies may a ise om heo e ical and s a is ical issues ha o en con ound sel -es ima‐ ion bias wi h sel - iew e ec s (Humbe g e al., 2018, 2019). Recen wo k by Paschke e al. (2020, 2023) cla i ies ha posi i ely iewing one’s compe en‐ cies—i espec i e o ac ual abili y le els—can ha e a a o able impac on aca‐ demic achie emen . Lea ning and mo i a ion 99 I a posi i e sel -concep (and in insic mo i a ion) is bene icial, wha os‐ e s such an ou look? Se e al models explain he de elopmen o abili y sel - concep s ac oss di e en domains, including he I/E model (Ma sh, 1986), he big- ish-li le-pond e ec (e.g. Ma sh e al., 2004), and he si ua ed expec ancy- alue model (e.g. Eccles & Wig ield, 2020). Acco ding o he la e model, so‐ cialize s’ belie s and beha io s—pa icula ly hose o eache s (c . S einmay e al., 2019a)—a ec s uden s’ sel -concep s, which a e empi ically equi alen o expec a ions o success, and also alues. Howe e , he p ac ical signi icance o eache expec ancy e ec s on s uden s’ de elopmen has occasionally been ques ioned due o hei ela i ely small size (Jussim, 2017; Jussim & Ha be , 2005). Bu mos s udies ha e concen a ed on school pe o mance, hus, his c i ique may o e look he possibili y ha eache expec a ions in luence nu‐ me ous o he impo an aspec s o s uden s’ li es beyond academic achie e‐ men , o example abili y sel -concep s and alues, as hypo hesized by he si ‐ ua ed expec ancy- alue model. The s udy by Be gold and S einmay (2023) in‐ es iga ed how eache s’ expec a ions ega ding s uden s’ abili ies impac a ‐ ious s uden ou comes, including expec ancy- alue cons uc s. The longi udi‐ nal s udy in ol ed 1,092 nin h-g ade s uden s om oca ional ack schools in Ge many. S uden s comple ed assessmen s o hei ma h and eading com‐ pe encies, abili y sel -concep s, in insic mo i a ion, academic and oca ional aspi a ions, and subjec i e well-being. Teache s a ed s uden s’ abili ies in ma h and Ge man using a se en-poin scale based on na ional pe o mance dis ibu‐ ions. Ou analysis e ealed unique e ec s o ma h eache s’ expec a ions on s uden s’ change in ma h pe o mance, abili y sel -concep s, and educa ional aspi a ions. Though he e ec o ma h eache s’ expec a ions on in insic mo‐ i a ion was ma ginally insigni ican (p = .07), in insic mo i a ion a base‐ line p edic ed changes in ma h pe o mance. Ge man bu no ma h eache s’ expec ancies a ec ed s uden s’ li e sa is ac ion. Teache judgmen s hus a ec many s uden ou comes a he same ime, among hem expec ancy- alue con‐ s uc s, unde sco ing hei p ac ical impo ance o s uden s’ li es. Fu he ‐ mo e, hey seem o be mo e impo an o expec ancies han o in insic alues. Thus, he ques ion emains which a iables addi ionally con ibu e o change o alue a iables. The si ua ed expec ancy- alue model (Eccles & Wig ield, 2020) does no only explain di e ences in in insic alues bu also in o he alues such as u ili y o a ainmen alues and cos s. Recen ly he e has been a lo o esea ch on in e ‐ en ions, especially minimal in e en ions o change alues bu also expec an‐ cies especially o disad an aged g oups (c . Rosenzweig e al., 2020, 2022). Mo eo e , he e is also inc eased in e es in domain-speci ic belie s abou he na u e o abili ies, ollowing esea ch in implici in elligence heo ies / mindse s. 100 Rica da S einmay Implici belie s abou he na u e o in elligence—whe he iewed as ixed o malleable—a e also pe inen o unde s anding mo i a ional dynamics. Mind‐ se s e e o an indi idual’s subjec i e belie s abou whe he speci ic a ibu es, such as in elligence o ma hema ical abili y, a e unchangeable o can be de el‐ oped and imp o ed (e.g., Dweck & Yeage , 2019). The belie ha an a ibu e is ixed ep esen s a ixed mindse , while he belie ha i can be cul i a ed e lec s a g ow h mindse . Unlike a ixed mindse , a g ow h mindse is heo ized o enhance s uden s’ mo i a ion and academic pe o mance, especially among hose acing challenges. Resea ch indica es ha when eache s iew in elligence as unchangeable, hei beha io ends o be mo e achie emen -o ien ed, ocus‐ ing on pe o mance ou comes a he han he lea ning p ocess (e.g., LaCosse e al., 2021; Pa k e al., 2016). Howe e , such pe o mance-o ien ed beha io has been linked o lowe le els o s uden mo i a ion, as i may c ea e a high- p essu e en i onmen ha p io i izes esul s o e e o and imp o emen (e.g., Ames, 1992; Wi hwein e al., 2021). Fu he mo e, he na u e o he lea ning en i onmen signi ican ly in luences he way success is pe cei ed and pu sued. In achie emen -o ien ed lea ning en i onmen s, he emphasis is on demon‐ s a ing one’s compe encies, wi h success o en being de ined in compa ison o he accomplishmen s o pee s (Ciani e al., 2010; Dweck & Legge , 1988). This ocus on ela i e pe o mance s eng hens he associa ion be ween indi‐ idual success and ex e nal alida ion. In con as , lea ning-o ien ed en i on‐ men s p io i ize he p ocess o acqui ing knowledge and imp o ing pe sonal compe encies in hose en i onmen s, success is measu ed by indi idual g ow h and mas e y, leading o a weake associa ion wi h ex e nal compa isons o pee - ela i e ou comes (Dweck & Legge , 1988; Meece e al., 2006). The sel - de e mina ion heo y explains indi idual di e ences in in insic mo i a ion, among o he s, by di e en eeling o compe ences. Thus, in a lea ning-o ien ed en i onmen , e en s uden s who ecei e pe o mance eedback (in Ge many mos ly ope a ionalized by g ades) sugges ing hey a e no pe o ming as well as hei pee s can emain in insically mo i a ed. He e, i espec i e o a s u‐ den s’ pe o mance le el, all s uden s ha e he possibili y o inc ease hei com‐ pe encies and hus pe cei e hemsel es as success ul and compe en lea ne s which should weaken he associa ion be ween g ades and in insic alues. In con as , in a pe o mance-o ien ed en i onmen , only s uden s ou pe o ming hei pee migh be mo i a ed which should s eng hen he associa ion be ween pe o mance eedback and in insic mo i a ion. Following hese a ionales, Heyde e al. (2020) in es iga ed whe he ma h- speci ic implici in elligence belie s a ec ed he associa ion be ween s uden s’ in insic mo i a ion and pe o mance eedback (g ades) in ma h in a la ge sample o Ge man ou h g ade s and hei 56 eache s. Findings e ealed ha Lea ning and mo i a ion 101 eache s we e mo e likely o a ibu e success in ma h o inna e abili y com‐ pa ed o Ge man language a s. Fu he mo e, he s onge a eache held a belie in he necessi y o inna e abili y o ma h success, he lowe he in insic mo i a ion o hei low-achie ing s uden s. These esul s highligh ha each‐ e s’ pe cep ions o ma h as equi ing inna e abili y may hinde he c ea ion o a class oom en i onmen ha p omo es in insic mo i a ion o all s uden s and migh be especially de imen al o low-achie ing s uden s. These a e jus a ew examples o ac o s ha migh in luence expec ancy- alue a iables. Beyond in e en ions and socialize s’ belie s, nume ous o he ac o s impac hese a iables, including cul u al no ms, class oom cha ac e ‐ is ics, eaching s yles, eache a ibu es, en i onmen al ac o s, and mo e (see Baume e al., 2002; Eccles & Wig ield, 2020; Kun e e al., 2013). Recen e‐ sea ch has ocused on s uden s’ pe cep ions o socialize s’ belie s (e.g., Reschke e al., 2023) and class oom cha ac e is ics (Wi hwein e al., 2021). Unde ‐ s anding he in e play be ween objec i e cha ac e is ics, s uden s’ pe cep ions o hem, he ac o s in luencing hose pe cep ions, and hei impac on key mo i a ional cons uc s such as expec ancy- alue a iables will signi ican ly enhance ou unde s anding o mo i a ion. 4. Conclusion on he impo ance o mo i a ion Among he a ious mo i a ional a iables, expec a ions and alues s and ou as signi ican p edic o s o in e indi idual di e ences in ca ee aspi a ions, aca‐ demic achie emen , and i s p og ession o e ime (Nishen e al., 2024; S ein‐ may & Spina h, 2009, 2010; S einmay e al., 2018, 2019). Thus, mo i a ion holds conside able po en ial o enhance achie emen - ela ed ou comes ac oss STEM ields and o he domains. Impo an ly, i can be in luenced by ex e nal ac o s beyond he indi idual, such as eache s’ belie s abou abili y, which can be modi ied o a ce ain ex en . Howe e , he ole o mo i a ion in academic achie emen should no be o e s a ed, as academic achie emen is in luenced by nume ous ac o s as ou lined by se e al models explaining in e indi idual di e ences in academic achie emen (e.g., Eccles & Wig ield, 2020; Baume e al., 2002, p. 16). Some o hese ac o s a e e y ha d o change and a e hus ela i ely s able, such as social and educa ional amily backg ound, while o h‐ e s a e mo e lexible, including he quali y o eaching, o example due o a eache change. Addi ionally, some ac o s in e ac wi h mo i a ion, such as ap i ude (Be gold & S einmay , 2018), while o he s a e un ela ed. Academic achie emen is a highly complex phenomenon ha canno be ully explained by a single a iable o e en a se o ela ed a iables like mo i a ion. This complex‐ i y unde sco es he need o a mul idimensional app oach o unde s anding 102 Rica da S einmay and os e ing academic achie emen which should conside mo i a ion and i s in e play wi h u he achie emen - ela ed a iables. Fu he mo e, qui e a lo o open ques ions emain conce ning he ole o mo i a ion o academic achie emen as mo i a ion is a complex cons uc in luenced by a a ie y o ac o s spanning indi idual, con ex ual, cul u al, and biological domains. Recen esea ch highligh s he ecip ocal e ec s be‐ ween eache cha ac e is ics and s uden mo i a ion, emphasizing he dynamic in e play be ween educa o s’ a i udes, beha io s, and s uden s’ mo i a ional de elopmen (K iegbaum e al., 2019). These indings unde sco e he impo ‐ ance o eache -s uden in e ac ions in shaping long- e m educa ional ou ‐ comes. The e ec i eness o mo i a ional s a egies and in e en ions has also ga ne ed conside able a en ion, pa icula ly ega ding hei sus ainabili y o e ime. Minimal in e en ions, which equi e ela i ely low in es men o ime and esou ces, ha e been shown o yield signi ican bene i s in ce ain con ex s (Ha ackiewicz e al., 2023). Howe e , unde s anding hei long- e m impac on s uden mo i a ion and achie emen is c i ical o in o ming e idence-based p ac ices in educa ion. Cul u al di e ences u he complica e he landscape o mo i a ion. Cul u al no ms, alues, and belie s can shape mo i a ional p o‐ cesses, in luencing how indi iduals pe cei e success, e o , and ailu e (e.g., Chi ko e al., 2003; Heine e al., 2001). These a ia ions highligh he neces‐ si y o cul u ally esponsi e mo i a ional s a egies o suppo di e se s uden popula ions which has a ely been in es iga ed. On a mo e undamen al le el, biological and neu ophysiological ounda ions o mo i a ion p o ide insigh s in o he unde lying mechanisms d i ing mo i a ional beha io s. Ad ances in neu oscience ha e e ealed how b ain s uc u es, neu o ansmi e sys ems, and ho monal p ocesses in e ac o in luence mo i a ion and goal-di ec ed ac‐ ions (Di Domenico & Ryan, 2017; Mo is e al., 2022). Howe e , he e is s ill a need o a deepe unde s anding o how hese biological and neu ophysio‐ logical ac o s combine o p oduce unique mo i a ional pa e ns, aking in o accoun pe sonal, en i onmen al, and cul u al in luences. While signi ican p og ess has been made in iden i ying gene al mechanisms, much emains o be explo ed ega ding hei nuanced in e play and eal-wo ld applica ions. An‐ o he ac o ha needs mo e esea ch is emo ion. Mo i a ion is also in ica ely linked wi h emo ions. Emo ional s a es can signi ican ly enhance o unde mine mo i a ional p ocesses, shaping indi iduals’ goals (Chamani e al., 2023; Jä ‐ enoja e al., 2018), and pe o mance in a ious ac i i ies. Howe e , he p o‐ cess unde lying hese ela ions a e no ully unde s ood. The in e play be ween mo i a ion and emo ions is hus a c i ical a ea o u he in es iga ion. Las ly, sou ces o indi idual di e ences in mo i a ion ex end beyond amewo ks like he si ua ed expec ancy- alue model (Eccles & Wig ield, 2020). Fac o s such as Lea ning and mo i a ion 103 pe sonali y ai s, p io expe iences, and social in luences con ibu e o hese di e ences, unde sco ing he need o a mo e in eg a i e unde s anding o he ac o s shaping mo i a ion. By explo ing hese di e se dimensions, esea che s and p ac i ione s can de elop mo e holis ic app oaches o os e ing mo i a ion in educa ional and o he se ings. Gi en i s impo ance o academic achie e‐ men , he endea o is wo hwhile. Re e ences . Ames, C. (1992). Class ooms: Goals s uc u es, and s uden mo i a ion. Jou nal o Edu‐ ca ional Psychology, 84, 261–271. h ps://doi.o g/10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.261 . Baume , J., A el , C., Klieme, E., Neub and, M., P enzel, M., Schie ele, U., Schneide , W., Tillmann, K.-J., & Weiß, M. (2002). PISA 2000 – Die Lände de Bundes epub‐ lik Deu schland im Ve gleich. Leske + Bud ich. h ps://doi.o g/10.1007/978-3-663- 11042-2 . Be gold, S., & S einmay , R. (2016). The ela ion o e ime be ween achie emen mo i a ion and in elligence in young elemen a y school child en: A la en c oss- lagged analysis. Con empo a y Educa ional Psychology, 46, 228–240. h ps://doi.o g/ 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.06.005 . Be gold, S., & S einmay , R. (2018). Pe sonali y and in elligence in e ac in he p edic‐ ion o academic achie emen . Jou nal o In elligence, 6(2), 27. h ps://doi.o g/10. 3390/jin elligence6020027 . Be gold, S., & S einmay , R. (2023). Teache judgmen s p edic de elopmen s in adoles‐ cen s’ school pe o mance, mo i a ion, and li e sa is ac ion. Jou nal o Educa ional Psychology, 115(4), 642–664. h ps://doi.o g/10.1037/edu0000786 . Bjø nebekk, G., Dise h, Å., & Ul iksen, R. (2013). Achie emen mo i es, sel -e icacy, achie emen goals, and academic achie emen a mul iple s ages o educa ion: A lon‐ gi udinal analysis. Psychological Repo s, 112(3), 771–787. h ps://doi.o g/10.2466/ 14.09.p 0.112.3.771-787 . Ce asoli, C. P., Nicklin, J. M., & Fo d, M. T. (2014). In insic mo i a ion and ex insic incen i es join ly p edic pe o mance: A 40-yea me a-analysis. Psychological Bul‐ le in, 140(4), 980–1008. h ps://doi.o g/10.1037/a0035661 . Chamani, S., Razi, A., & Xodabande, I. (2023). Mo i a ional and emo ional s a es in sel -di ec ed language lea ning: A longi udinal s udy. Disco e Educa ion, 2(1), 23. h ps://doi.o g/10.1007/s44217-023-00048-9 . Chi ko , V., Ryan, R. M., Kim, Y., & Kaplan, U. (2003). Di e en ia ing au onomy om indi idualism and independence: A sel -de e mina ion heo y pe spec i e on in e ‐ naliza ion o cul u al o ien a ions and well-being. Jou nal o Pe sonali y and Social Psychology, 84(1), 97–110. h ps://doi.o g/10.1037/0022-3514.84.1.97 . Ciani, K. D., Middle on, M. J., Summe s, J. J., & Sheldon, K. M. (2010). Bu e ing agains pe o mance class oom goal s uc u es: The impo ance o au onomy suppo and 104 Rica da S einmay class oom communi y. Con empo a y Educa ional Psychology, 35(1), 88–99. h ps:// doi.o g/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2009.11.001 . Cos a, P. T., & McC ae, R. R. (1995). Domains and ace s: Hie a chical pe sonali y as‐ sessmen using he e ised NEO pe sonali y in en o y. Jou nal o Pe sonali y Assess‐ men , 64(1), 21–50. h ps://doi.o g/10.1207/s15327752jpa6401_2 . Di Domenico, S. I., & Ryan, R. M. (2017). The eme ging neu oscience o in insic mo‐ i a ion: A new on ie in sel -de e mina ion esea ch. F on ie s in Human Neu o‐ science, 11, 145. h ps://doi.o g/10.3389/ nhum.2017.00145 . Duckwo h, A. L., Pe e son, C., Ma hews, M. D., & Kelly, D. R. (2007). G i : Pe se e ‐ ance and passion o long- e m goals. Jou nal o Pe sonali y and Social Psychology, 92(6), 1087–1101. h ps://doi.o g/10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1087 . Dweck, C. S., & Legge , E. L. (1988). A social-cogni i e app oach o mo i a ion and pe ‐ sonali y. Psychological Re iew, 95(2), 256–273. h ps://doi.o g/10.1037/0033-295X. 95.2.256 . Dweck, C.S., & Yeage , D.S. (2019). Mindse s: A View F om Two E as. Pe spec i es on Psychological Science, 14, 481–496. h p://doi.o g/10.1177/1745691618804166 . Eccles, J. S., & Wig ield, A. (2020). F om expec ancy- alue heo y o si ua ed ex‐ pec ancy- alue heo y: A de elopmen al, social cogni i e, and sociocul u al pe spec‐ i e on mo i a ion. Con empo a y Educa ional Psychology, 61. h ps://doi.o g/10. 1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101859 . Ellio , A. J., & Chu ch, M. A. (1997). A hie a chical model o app oach and a oidance achie emen mo i a ion. Jou nal o Pe sonali y and Social Psychology, 72(1), 218– 232. h ps://doi.o g/10.1037/0022-3514.72.1.218 . Gagné, F., & S Pè e, F. (2002). When IQ is con olled, does mo i a ion s ill p e‐ dic achie emen ? In elligence, 30(1), 71–100. h ps://doi.o g/10.1016/S0160- 2896(01)00068-X . Ha ackiewicz, J. M., Hech , C. A., Ashe , M. W., Beyme , P. N., Lamon , L. B., Wheele , N. S., Else-Ques , N. M., P iniski, S. J., Smi h, J. L., Hyde, J. S., & Thoman, D. B. (2023). A p osocial alue in e en ion in ga eway STEM cou ses. Jou nal o Pe sonal‐ i y and Social Psychology, 125(6), 1265–1307. h ps://doi.o g/10.1037/pspa0000356 . Heckhausen, H., & Heckhausen, J. (2018). Mo i a ion und Handeln: Ein üh ung und Übe blick. Sp inge -Ve lag. h ps://doi.o g/10.1007/978-3-662-53927-9 . Heine, S. J., Lehman, D. R., Ide, E., Leung, C., Ki ayama, S., Taka a, T., & Ma sumo o, H. (2001). Di e gen consequences o success and ailu e in Japan and No h Ame ica: An in es iga ion o sel -imp o ing mo i a ions and malleable sel es. Jou nal o Pe ‐ sonali y and Social Psychology, 81(4), 599–615. h ps://psycne .apa.o g/doi/10.1037/ 0022-3514.81.4.599 . Heyde , A., Weidinge , A. F., Cimpian, A., & S einmay , R. (2020). Teache s’ belie ha ma h equi es inna e abili y p edic s lowe in insic mo i a ion among low- achie ing s uden s. Lea ning and Ins uc ion, 65, 101220. h ps://doi.o g/10.1016/ j.lea nins uc.2019.101220