Microstructure and magnetism of Co2FeAl Heusler alloy prepared by arc and induction melting compared with planar flow casting

Microstructure and magnetism of Co2FeAl Heusler alloy prepared by arc and induction melting compared with planar flow casting A. Titov, Y. Jiraskova, O. Zivotsky, J. Bursik, and D. Janickovic Citation: AIP Advances 8, 047206 (2018); doi: 10.1063/1.4993698 View online: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4993698 View Table of Contents: http://aip.scitation.org/toc/adv/8/4 Published by the American Institute of Physics Articles you may be interested in Decomposing the permeability spectra of nanocrystalline finemet core AIP Advances 8, 047205 (2018); 10.1063/1.4991941 Investigation of measurement method of saturation magnetization of iron core material using electromagnet AIP Advances 8, 047202 (2018); 10.1063/1.4993998 Dependence of magnetic permeability on residual stresses in alloyed steels AIP Advances 8, 047201 (2018); 10.1063/1.4994202 Critical exponent analysis of lightly germanium-doped La0.7Ca0.3Mn1-xGexO3 (x = 0.05 and x = 0.07) AIP Advances 8, 047204 (2018); 10.1063/1.4993412 Using magnetic charge to understand soft-magnetic materials AIP Advances 8, 047301 (2018); 10.1063/1.4994219 Very low frequency noise reduction in orthogonal fluxgate AIP Advances 8, 047203 (2018); 10.1063/1.4994208 AIP ADVANCES 8, 047206 (2018) Microstructure and magnetism of Co2FeAl Heusler alloy prepared by arc and induction melting compared with planar flow casting A. Titov,1,2,aY. Jiraskova,2,3 O. Zivotsky,1J. Bursik,3and D. Janickovic4 1Department of Physics, VSB-Technical University of Ostrava, Ostrava-Poruba 708 33, Czech Republic 2CEITEC IPM, Institute of Physics of Materials, AS CR, Brno 616 62, Czech Republic 3Institute of Physics of Materials, AS CR, Brno 616 62, Czech Republic 4Institute of Physics, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava 845 11, Slovakia (Received 30 June 2017; accepted 2 October 2017; published online 19 October 2017) This paper is devoted to investigations of the structural and magnetic properties of the Co2FeAl Heusler alloy produced by three technologies. The alloys prepared by arc and induction melting have resulted in coarse-grained samples in contrast to the fine-grained ribbon-type sample prepared by planar flow casting. Scanning electron microscopy completed by energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction, M¨ ossbauer spectroscopy, and magnetic methods sensitive to both bulk and surface were applied. The chemical composition was slightly different from the nominal only for the ribbon sample. From the viewpoint of magnetic properties, the bulk coercivity and remnant magnetization have followed the structure influenced by the technology used. Saturation magnetization was practically the same for samples prepared by arc and induction melting, whereas the magnetization of ribbon is slightly lower due to a higher Al content at the expense of iron and cobalt. The surface magnetic properties were markedly influenced by anisotropy, grain size, and surface roughness of the samples. The surface roughness and brittleness of the ribbon-type sample did not make domain structure observation possible. The other two samples could be well polished and their highly smooth surface has enabled domain structure visualization by both magneto-optical Kerr microscopy and magnetic force microscopy. © 2017 Author(s). All article content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4993698 I. INTRODUCTION The Heusler alloys still attract remarkable attention regarding various compositions, physical properties, and subsequent applications.1This is documented by an increasing number of scientific papers in recent years, about 500 in total. The Heusler alloys are characterized by the formula X2YZ, where X and Y are transition metals (e.g. Fe, Co, Mn) and Z is an element from a group III, IV, or V. Basically, this formula consists of two binary B2 compounds XY and XZ both of CsCl type crystal structure. This means that an ability of a compound to form the B2 structure can also indicate the possibility to form a Heusler alloy. Among a huge number of various compositions, the Co-based Heusler compounds are of particular interest because they are good ferromagnetic materials, show comparatively high Curie temperatures, up to 1000 K, and have relatively low degrees of atomic disordering.2Moreover, it was reported that their tunnelling magnetoresistance can exceed up to 1000%.3,4This makes Heusler-based devices attractive for magnetic data storage applications. At present, Co2FeAl belongs to one of the most studied Heusler alloys. It provides huge tunnelling magnetoresistance ratio in magnetic tunnel junctions5,6but also a low Gilbert damping7essential for aCorresponding author. Email: [email protected] 2158-3226/2018/8(4)/047206/10 8, 047206-1 ©Author(s) 2017 047206-2 Titov et al. AIP Advances 8, 047206 (2018) spin switching with low currents and spin torque oscillators. The use of Co2FeAl as a ferromagnetic material in spintronic devices requires deep knowledge and control of its magnetic properties. One of the key parameters is magnetic anisotropy, which is directly related to the spin-orbit-coupling relativistic effect. Magnetic anisotropy and its changes can be effectively modified by microstructure and thereby also by a modification of the electronic structure in bulk, surface and/or interfaces. There are several ways to synthesize Heusler alloys. Beside conventional techniques (e.g., arc melting, commercial induction furnace melting of stoichiometric amounts of the constituents in a protective noble gas atmosphere into a form of bulk compounds,8mechanical alloying method,9,10 molecular beam epitaxy,11 chemical route,12 electrospinning method,13 co-precipitation route,14 etc.), there is ongoing effort to search for non-traditional preparation technologies which could produce Heusler alloys with improved properties. This is also the case of the present study. The conventional arc and induction melting technologies were completed by the planar flow casting technology known from the preparation of amorphous and/or nanocrystalline materials into a ribbon form. II. EXPERIMENTAL A. Sample preparation Co2FeAl Heusler alloys were prepared from high-purity elements: Fe – 99.95%, Co – 99.8%, and Al – 99.95%. Arc melting (AM) using a MAM-1 furnace (Buehler GmbH) and induction melting (IM) were used for the production of buttonand cylindrical-type ingots. Each arc-melted ingot was melted four times to guarantee a good homogeneity; the weight loss was close to 1%. The ingots were cut using spark erosion in deionized water into discs about 500 µm thick. The surface of the disc-sample was first grinded and polished to remove oxides. Subsequently, the samples, denoted DAM and DIM, respectively, were polished using Vibromet for 24 h to guarantee the best possible surface smoothness. One cylindrical type ingot was used for the preparation of 2 mm wide and 20 µm thick ribbons using planar flow casting procedure. This sample is denoted by R. The high surface roughness of the ribbon and impossibility of polishing owing to high brittleness were the limitations for the surface sensitive magneto-optical and atomic force microscope observation. B. Experimental methods 1. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) A TESCAN LYRA 3XMU FEG/SEM scanning electron microscope working at accelerating voltage of 20 kV equipped with an XMax80 Oxford Instruments detector for energy dispersive X-ray analysis (EDX) was used to follow the morphology and microstructure. 2. X-ray diffraction (XRD) An X’PERT PRO diffractometer with Co Kαradiation (λ= 0.17902 nm) was used to study the structural and compositional properties. The X-ray diffractograms were measured at room temperature (RT) from 2θ= 35◦to 135◦in steps of 0.008◦and 500 s per deg. The analysis of powder patterns was realized by HighScore Plus program using the Rietveld structure refinement method15 and the ICSD database of inorganic and related structures.16 Besides the lattice parameters of the analyzed phases, the size of coherently diffracting domains and microstrains were obtained from the pattern analysis. 3. M¨ ossbauer spectrometry (MS) 57Fe M¨ ossbauer spectrometry was used to gain insight into the structural evolution of the local environment of the iron atoms. The measurements were carried out at RT using a 57Co(Rh) source. Standard transmission geometry was applied for the ribbon-type R sample; backscattering geometry using γ-rays for the disc-type, DAM and DIM, samples. The calibration of velocity scales in both measuring geometries was performed with α-Fe and the isomer shifts are given with respect to the RT M¨ ossbauer spectrum of α-Fe. All spectra were measured with nearly the same quality and evaluated within the transmission integral approach using the CONFIT program.17 In the measured M¨ ossbauer spectrum, the crystalline components are represented by discrete single-, double-, and/or six-line 047206-3 Titov et al. AIP Advances 8, 047206 (2018) Lorentzian sub-spectra determined by discrete values of hyperfine parameters: δisomer shift(s), ∆- quadrupole splitting(s), and Bhyperfine induction(s), corresponding to paramagnetic (δand ∆) and/or ferromagnetic (δ,∆, and B) phases, respectively. All components are further described by their intensities, A. 4. Magnetic measurements a. Bulk magnetic properties. RT hysteresis loops were obtained using a vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM) Microsense EV9 with maximal magnetic field up to 1600 kA/m. The magnetic characteristics, coercivity, remnant and saturation magnetizations were derived from the hysteresis loops with the accuracy of ±1%. The magnetic measurements were also applied to determine Henkel plots. Typically, they are constructed using isothermal remanence (IRM) and DC demagnetization (DCD) curves.18 However, some simplifications described in Ref. 19 enable us to obtain the same information using the relation between the initial (virgin) curve, MVIR(H), and magnetizations at increasing MUP(H) and decreasing MDOWN(H) positive magnetic fields: ∆M(H)=MVIR(H)−(MUP(H) + MDOWN(H))/2. (1) b. Surface magnetic properties. The surface hysteresis loops of all samples (DAM, DIM, and R) were measured using the longitudinal and the polar magneto-optical Kerr effect (MOKE), the red laser diode of 670 nm wavelengths and expressed as the dependence of Kerr rotation on applied magnetic field. The contributions of the in-plane longitudinal magnetization component ML, parallel to both the applied magnetic field and the plane of incident light, and the out-of-plane polar component MP, perpendicular to the sample surface, were separated from the loops measured at an oblique incident angle of 50◦. These results were confirmed at normal incident geometry, when the polar magnetization component MPwas clearly detected. The surface magnetic domain structure was observed by magneto-optical Kerr microscopy (MOKM) and by magnetic force microscopy (MFM) with NTEGRA Prima platform operated in semi-contact mode. III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION A. Morphology, chemical and phase composition The morphology of as-prepared samples is shown in Fig. 1. The SEM micrographs of the DAM (a) and DIM (b) samples clearly document their coarse-grained structure. The grain size varies between 300 µm up to 500 µm, whereas the grains in the R sample are substantially smaller, 1-3 µm. The chemical analyses taken from the area of about 1 mm2at the DAM and DIM samples and summarized in Table Ido not yield any important difference from the nominal composition. A detailed analysis of the individual grains of the DAM sample has pointed at dendrite structure with a slightly higher Al content at the expense of Fe in dendrite cores (48.34 ±0.23 at.% Co, 22.20 ±0.46 at.% Fe, 29.46 ±0.31 at.% Al). Uneven droplet-like and flake-like shapes of R sample pieces did not enable us standard surface polishing; the EDX analyses in this case have larger scatter as it is documented in Table I, last row. The X-ray diffractograms of DAM and DIM samples show virtually no difference and therefore only the diffraction pattern of the DAM sample is shown in Fig. 2a together with a slightly different FIG. 1. Surface morphology of the arc melted, DAM, sample and detail (inset) of dendrite structure observed at grains (a); of the induction melted, DIM, sample (b), and of the ribbon, R, sample (c). 047206-4 Titov et al. AIP Advances 8, 047206 (2018) TABLE I. Element concentrations obtained by EDX from areas about 1 mm2. Sample Co (at.%) Fe (at.%) Al (at.%) DAM 48.84 ±0.59 24.06 ±1.70 27.10 ±2.11 DIM 49.29 ±0.21 25.53 ±0.10 25.18 ±0.31 R 40.70 ±2.62 22.21 ±1.48 37.09 ±4.02 FIG. 2. XRD patterns of arc melted (DAM) sample (a) and ribbon (R) sample (b). diffraction pattern of the R sample in Fig. 2b. The peaks are labeled by corresponding h, k, l, values. In the full-Heusler alloy of the chemical formula X2YZ, the ordered L21structure (Fig. 3) and two kinds of disordered structures referred to as B2 (Y-Z disordering) and A2 (X-YZ disordering) can exist. Based on relations between atomic orderings and superlattice diffraction lines, the patterns can be divided into odd (h, k, l are odd numbers, e.g. (111)), even ((h+k+l)/2 = 2n+1, e.g. (200)), FIG. 3. Schematic representation of the L21structure of full-Heusler alloys; the X (Co) atoms are placed on the Wyckoff position 8c, the Y(Fe) and Z(Al) atoms are located on 4a and 4b positions, respectively. 047206-5 Titov et al. AIP Advances 8, 047206 (2018) and fundamental (((h+k+l)/2 = 2n, independent of the ordering structures, e.g.(220)) diffraction.20 The Rietveld analysis of measured data for all samples was done using the ICSD 57 607 database21 for Co2FeAl alloy considering the L21structure. It has yielded the lattice parameter 0.5733(4) nm for the DAM and DIM samples and 0.5729(3) nm, for the R sample, i.e., virtually identical within an experimental error. A slight difference was obtained only for the coherently diffracting domains size, d(not equivalent to grain size visible in Fig. 1), and lattice microstrain, E. These parameters were determined by comparing the profile width of a standard profile with a sample profile according to the Scherrer formula (daverage =Kλ/((Bobs -Bstd)cosθ) and according to the tangent formula (E=√(B2obs -B2std)/(4tanθ) using Size/Strain calculator as a part of programs X’Pert Data viewer and HighScorePlus both by Panalytical.15 The values for DAM and DIM samples were d= 50 ÷60 nm and E= 0.210 % and for R sample d= 43 nm and E= 0.265 %. Nevertheless, it turned out that this ICSD 57 607 database is not too satisfactory for analysis of present X-ray patterns. The detected types of superlattice diffraction lines (odd, even, fundamental) have indicated a complex atomic ordering. Its evaluation, i.e., the degree of B2-ordering and L21-ordering has required a more detailed analysis based on traditional analytical approach of Webster,22 appropriately extended by Takamura.23 This proceeds at presence and the results, exceeding the scope of this paper, will be published elsewhere. FIG. 4. M¨ ossbauer spectra of the arc melted, DAM, (a), induction melted, DIM, (b), and planar flow casting, R, (c) samples resolved into ferromagnetic (1, 2, 3, 4, see Table II) and paramagnetic (see text) sub-components. 047206-6 Titov et al. AIP Advances 8, 047206 (2018) B. M¨ ossbauer spectrometry Since M¨ ossbauer spectrometry is a highly sensitive method for the study of magnetic properties on an atomic level, it was also applied in the present investigation. The main purpose was to detect atom ordering in the surroundings of resonating Fe atoms and to see fine structural differences between the alloys prepared by various technological conditions. The Co2FeAl full-Heusler alloy of general formula X2YZ crystallizes in the L21structure consisting of four fcc sublattices shown in Fig. 3. The resonating Fe atoms have Fe, Co, and Al atoms in their neighborhood; their ordering together with structure defects influences the hyperfine parameters, namely hyperfine induction and isomer shift. The quadrupole splitting in the ideal L21structure should be, owing to cubic symmetry, zero. The spectra of the DAM and DIM samples measured using γ-rays in the backscattering geometry with a depth sensitivity of about 30 µm are shown in Figs. 4a and 4b and compared with the spectrum of the R sample, at the bottom in the same figure, obtained in transmission geometry. All spectra consist of the magnetically split component which was fitted using four six-line sub-components yielding the best result. The values of the hyperfine induction, isomer shift and relative area for individual sub-spectra are summarized in Table II. They relate to different local orderings of atoms in the neighborhood of the resonating Fe atoms. The mean values of the Band δparameters and a ratio of intensities of the second and the first M¨ ossbauer line, D21, are presented in Table III. The D21 reflects the orientation of magnetic moments in the sample with respect to the direction of the γ-rays and as it follows from the table it is markedly influenced by technology. The spectrum of the R sample shown in Fig. 4c differs from both DAM and DIM samples by a presence of about 15% of the paramagnetic component represented by two doubleand one single-line component of hyperfine parameters; δ= 0.192(4) mm/s, ∆= 0.517(9) mm/s, δ= 0.660(59) mm/s, ∆= 1.831(110) mm/s, for the doublets and δ= 0.233(7) mm/s for the singlet. This paramagnetic component can be, at present only speculatively, ascribed to chemical and topological surface disorder and surface oxidation. The paramagnetic component formed by the doublet and singlet of similar parameters was also observed in M¨ ossbauer spectrum of the Co2FeAl nanoparticles prepared by co-precipitation and thermal deoxidation procedure,14 where the surface phenomena were taken into account because of the high surface area of nanoparticles. Nevertheless, contrary to present spectra analysis, the authors in Ref. 14 have detected only one sextuplet of hyperfine parameters, B= 33 T, δ= 0.126 mm/s, and ∆= 0.002 mm/s, ascribed to a crystalline ferromagnetic phase. TABLE II. The hyperfine parameters: hyperfine induction, B; isomer shift, δ; relative intensity, A; of individual analyzed component. Comp. 1 2 3 4 Sample B(T) δ(mm/s) A(%) B(T) δ(mm/s) A(%) B(T) δ(mm/s) A(%) B(T) δ(mm/s) A(%) DAM 31.93 0.042 25.5 30.17 0.043 51.9 29.52 −0.173 9..2 29.37 0.220 13.4 ±0.12 ±0.007 ±3.0 ±0.11 ±0.015 ±3.3 ±0.31 ±0.046 ±2.8 ±0.34 ±0.052 ±2.5 DIM 32.78 0.043 4.9 31.23 0.047 45.2 30.26 0.068 40.4 29.14 0.064 9.5 ±.18 ±0.011 ±1.0 ±0.09 ±0.002 ±4.0 ±0.13 ±0.003 ±4.0 ±0.18 ±0.008 ±3.2 R31.81 0.017 19.0 30.66 0.031 49.9 29.50 0.040 13.5 27.96 0.003 2.7 ±0.05 ±0.003 ±1.6 ±0.02 ±0.002 ±1.4 ±0.09 ±0.005 ±1.0 ±0.21 ±0.002 ±0.6 TABLE III. The mean values of hyperfine parameters; Bmean, δmean, and intensity ratio, D21, of the second and the first M¨ ossbauer line. Sample Bmean (T) δmean (mm/s) D21 DAM 30.45 ±0.03 0.047 ±0.003 0.315 ±0.009 DIM 30.71 ±0.01 0.057 ±0.007 0.509 ±.005 R 30.65 ±0.01 0.028 ±0.003 0.861 ±0.003 047206-7 Titov et al. AIP Advances 8, 047206 (2018) FIG. 5. Magnetic hysteresis curves (a) and Henkel plots (b) of the arc melted, DAM, induction melted, DIM, and planar flow casted, R, samples. C. Magnetic measurements The bulk hysteresis loops for all samples are shown in Fig. 5a. The magnetic characteristics estimated from the measured curves are summarized in Table IV. The saturation magnetization of the DAM and DIM samples are nearly the same. However, the more sensitive structural parameters, Mr and Hc, are higher for the DAM sample due to dendrites observed in grains of this sample by SEM. Lower saturation magnetization of the R sample is caused by a higher content of Al at the expense of Fe and Co, as confirmed by EDX analysis. The ∆M(H) calculated for all samples using equation (1) is graphically represented as Henkel plots in Fig. 5b. They are negative that is an evidence of prevailing magnetic dipolar (magnetostatic dipole-dipole) interactions. They are produced by the magnetic moment of each grain and depend on the number of Fe and Co atoms present. The highest intensity ∆M(H) = -6.01 Am2/kg, and, simultaneously, the peak position at very low magnetic field of 1.59 kA/m were obtained for R sample. This sample is characterized by the highest remanence (2.391 Am2/kg) and the low coercivity (0.84 kA/m) value being between those for the DAM and the DIM sample. The ∆M(H) obtained for DAM sample is only slightly lower as compared to R sample whereas the required magnetic field is several times higher (see Table IV). The weakest dipolar interactions are observed in the DIM sample. The DAM and DIM samples differ in grain size and therefore it is important to take also into account exchange interactions between the neighboring grains which are defined as the exchange coupling of magnetic moments located at grain interface while the grains are in direct contact with each other. Despite the size of grains at the DAM and DIM samples being nearly the same, in the DIM sample the effect of exchange coupling is stronger than that of the magnetostatic interaction. In case of the DAM sample, it can be speculated that the dendrites decrease the effect of exchange coupling and therefore the dipolar interactions prevail. Similar behaviour was also observed for the arc melted and planar flow casted Co2FeSi samples.24 The surface hysteresis loops of the DAM sample presented in Fig. 6were taken from the spot of about 300 µm in diameter and penetration depth of about tens of nm. It was measured at the oblique TABLE IV. Magnetic parameters derived from the VSM hysteresis loops: coercivity, Hc; saturation, Ms, and remnant, Mr, magnetization. Peak position, ∆H, and intensity, ∆M, of the Henkel plots. Sample DAM DIM R Ms(Am2/kg) 137.57 138.26 132.82 Mr(Am2/kg) 1.291 0.860 2.391 Hc(kA/m) 1.30 0.69 0.84 ∆H(kA/m) 49.36 25.47 1.59 ∆M(Am2/kg) -5.13 -0.98 -6.01 047206-8 Titov et al. AIP Advances 8, 047206 (2018) FIG. 6. Surface MOKE hysteresis loops of polished arc melted, DAM, sample; a) hysteresis loops in longitudinal configuration mutually distinguished by rotation of the sample and magnetic field by 180◦, b) separated longitudinal and polar magnetization components, c) measured polar magnetization component at normal incidence geometry. incident angle of 50◦and with the magnetic field applied parallel to the plane of light incidence - longitudinal configuration (Fig. 6a). After the loop depicted by a full line was measured, the sample and magnetic field were rotated by 180◦and the next loop (dashed line) was taken from the same place. Due to the symmetry of permittivity tensor of cubic crystal the contributions of the in-plane ML (longitudinal) and out-of-plane MP(polar) magnetization component can be easily distinguished by subtracting and adding both loops from Fig. 6a and dividing by 2. This is shown in Fig. 6b confirming the presence of both mentioned magnetization components. The out-of-plane MPcomponent yields faster reversal and the saturation in the 75 kA/m magnetic field. On the other hand, the in-plane ML component is not completely saturated even in the maximal applied 125 kA/m magnetic field. The shapes and saturation effects of magnetization components may differ in the local sample places owing to imaging different grains with various anisotropies under the laser spot. The second in-plane magnetization component called transversal was separated in a similar way (not presented), but its contribution was significantly lower as compared to the longitudinal one. The in-plane magnetization component falls down to zero at the normal incidence geometry (Fig. 6c) and the polar component reaches its maximal effect of 0.44 mrad at about 75 kA/m magnetic field. Similar MOKE loops were measured also for the DIM sample in the present study and previously presented for the Co2FeSi Heusler alloy in Ref. 24. The hysteresis loop of the R sample measured in longitudinal configuration with magnetic field applied along the ribbon axis is presented in Fig. 7. Co2FeAl ribbon is magnetically softer being saturated at a markedly lower magnetic field than DAM and DIM samples. Due to the preparation technology and low ribbon thickness (about 20 µm) the magnetization lies in the ribbon plane and no MPcomponent was detected. The shape and magnetic parameters of the loop are again strongly dependent on the local surface place illuminated by the laser spot. FIG. 7. Longitudinal magneto-optical hysteresis loop of ribbon, R, sample.