scieee Open visual document viewer

Zooplankton oxygen consumption and nutrient release in relation to species composition, animals size and enviromental conditions in the Baltic Sea during May and August

Postel, L.,Hernández-León, Santiago,Gómez, May,Torres Curbelo, Santiago,Mikkat, U.,Portillo Hahnefeld, Agustín

Abstract

Zooplankton metabolism in terms of oxygen consumption and ñutrient reléase (ammonia, phosphate) were measiu'ed in the Baltic Sea, a températe área with high envirormiental changes both in space and in time. Plankton of the surface layer were analysed with balance measurements in 4 size classes between 50 and 1000 nm during spring in 1988, 1990 and 1991, in summer 19^8 and 1990 as well. The use of electrón transport system (ETS), and the Glutamate Dehydrogenase (GDH) activity as indicators for respiration and ammonia reléase respectively, enlarged the data density and made a three dimensional resolution available (May 1990, 1991). Data are in the range of the latitudinal dependend magnitude. They reflect slight interannual, more seasonal and regional aspects. Animáis size, temperature, food concentration, and species composition influence the specific rates.

Full text

This pape no o be ci ed wi hou p io e e ence o he au ho s In e na ional Council o he C.M. 1992/L:21 Explo a ion o he Sea Session V Zooplank on oxygen consump ion and ñu ien eléase in ela ion o species composi ion, animáis size and en i onmen al condi ions in he Bal ic Sea du ing May and Augus by L. Pos eU), S. He nández Leon^), M. Gomez^, S. To es^), U. Mikka l),and A. Po illo Hahne eldl) 1) Ins i u ii Os see o schung (10W) an de Uni e si a Ros ock, Sees . 15, D-O-2530 Wamemünde, Ge many 2) Facul ad de Ciencias del Ma , Ap do. 550, Las Palmas de G.C., Cana y Islands, Spain KEY WORDS: zooplank on oxygen consump ion, ñu ien eléase, size classes, composi ion, en i onmen al condi ions, Bal ic Sea, sp ing 1988, 1990, 1991, somme 1988,1990 ABSTRACT: Zooplank on me abolism in e ms o oxygen consump ion and ñu ien eléase (ammonia, phospha e) we e measiu'ed in he Bal ic Sea, a empé a e á ea wi h high en i o mien al changes bo h in space and in ime. Plank on o he su ace laye we e analysed wi h balance measu emen s in 4 size classes be ween 50 and 1000 nm du ing sp ing in 1988, 1990 and 1991, in summe 19^8 and 1990 as well. The use o elec ón anspo sys em (ETS), and he Glu ama e Dehyd ogenase (GDH) ac i i y as indica o s o espi a ion and ammonia eléase espec i ely, enla ged he da a densi y and made a h ee dimensional esolu ion a ailable (May 1990, 1991). Da a a e in he ange o he la i udinal dependend magni ude. They e lec sligh in e annual, mo e seasonal and egional aspec s. Animáis size, empe a u e, ood concen a ion, and species composi ion in luence he speci ic a es. METHODS: Oxygen consump ion, in eqi e ed as espi a ion, and phospha e and ammonia eléase (exc e íon) we e measu ed in he Bal ic Sea, mos ly om Mecklenbu g Bigh o he no hem Go land Sea, some imes om he ansi i ion á ea (Skage ak / Ka ega ) o he Gul o Finland (Fig.l). De e mina ion we e ca ied ou by means o balance o "bo le" me hode (Omo i and Dceda, 1984). Samples we e ca e iíl coUec ed m he su ace laye down o he he mocline using a WP-2-ne , equiped wi h a special cod end o p e en , ha animáis ge d y. A e da k adap a ion o abou 3 o 5 hou s in máximum, unde oxygen sa u a ed condi ions, using wa e om he same s a ion, he plank on was ac iona ed in 4 size classes (55 - 100, 100 - 200, 200 - 500, 500 - 1000 ^im), washed ca e uUy wi h íl e ed seawa e o clean i om nu ien pa ióles, and ans e ed in 11 bo les. Bo les we e incúba e now in a con aine , cooled by sea su ace wa e , a a o a ing wheel (2. 5 pm). A leas one con ol bo le wi h he same íl e ed, and oxygen sa u a ed seawa e is o add, o be able o calcúla e he di e ence o oxygen and nu ien s o he bo les wi h and wi hou zooplank on a e he 6 o 15 hou s las ing incuba ion pe iode. The en ichmen o animáis in compa ison o in si u condi ions is abou 20 o 1000 imes, depending om he empe a u e. Finally oxygen, and nu ien s will be de e mined, he zooplank on s o ed in bu e ed o maline, o analyse he species composi ion, he d y mass, using con e sión ac o s as ecommended by BMB (1985). D y mass is needed o calcúla e he speci íc me abolic a es. Fo he calcula ion o in si u a es he in si u biomass is o de e mine in he abo e men ioned size classes. To be su e, ha all he di e en size classes a e quan i a i ely collec ed, ne s o 55 jim, 100 ^m and 200 ^m mesh size we e used o ha pu pose . F om he 200 jim ne he wo la ges ac ions we e p oduced. Wi h he same ne s plank on o he de e mina ion o me abolic a es by means o enzyma ic ac i i y (ETS, GDH) we e ca ched in 3 dep h le éis (su ace - he mocline, he mocline - halocline, halocline - bo om). Size ac iona ion and s o age in liquid ni ogen we e done immedia ely. ETS means Elec on T anspo Sys em ac i i y and is in ela ion o espi a ion, GDH means Glu ama e Dehyd ogenase, o be in ela ion o ammonium eléase. The single s eps a e desc ibed in a low diag amm (Fig. 2). The ETS assay was unned in he labo a o y acco ding o Packa d (1969, 1971), Owens and King (1975) and modi íed by Kenne and Ahmed (1975). The samples we e homogenized in e lon-glass a O - 4 C using a phospha e bu e 0.1 M, pH = 8 con aining T i ón X-100 (Sigma Chem. Co.) o he solubiliza ion o he enzymes (Owens and King, 1975). An aliquo o he c ude homogena e was incuba ed o 20 minu es a 12 •€ in da kness condi ions in he p esence o NADH, NADPH, succina e and an a i icial elec ón accep o , he e azolium sal INT (Biomedical Lab.). A e his ime, he eac ion is s opped wi h a solu ion con aining phospho ic acid and o maline and cen i ugued be ween O - 4 -C o 10 minu es a 4000 pm. The eac ion colou was measu ed a 490 nm wi h a u bidi y base line a 750 nm, and espec o a blank wi hou subs a es and ea ed as he sample. Fo he INT coe icien ac o , he alué o 1.42 was aken i om he mola abso p ion coe icien ob ained om Kenne and Ahmed (1975). Final ac i i y alúes we e ecalcula ed o he "in si u" empe a u e using he A henius equa ion and an ac i a ion ene gy o 15 Kcal/mol.-C (Packa d e al., 1975). Biomass as p o eins was de e mined acco ding o he me hod o Low y e al. (1951), using Bo ine Se o Albumin (BSA, Sigma Chem. Co.) as s anda d. The modi ica ion o he Low y me hod by Pe e son (1977, 1983) was used o he samples wi h low p o ein con en . The GDH assay was unned in acco dance wi h Bidiga e and King (1981) and Bidiga e e al. (1982), including ce ain modi ica ions: One millili e o c ude homogena e (same as ETS assay) is dilu ed in T is bu e , pH = 8.6 and cen i íigued (O - 4 -C) o 10 minu es a 4000 pm. In a Pe kin-Elme 551-S UVA^S spec opho ome e equipped wi h an 1 cm wa e -jacke ed cu e e he mos a ized a 12 •C, an aliquo o 0.5 mi o he supema an is placed in he p esence o NAD and ADP. When abso bance lec u e a 340 nm is s able, he assay is unned by adding glu ama e, and changes in abso bance we e eco ded con inuously o 2 minu es. The slope is p opo ional o GDH ac i i y. To al olume in he cu e e was 3.0 mi and NAD, ADP and glu ama e concen a ions we e 1.2, 2 and 40 mM, espec i ely (Bidiga e e al., 1982). RESULTS: 1. Me hodological aspee s: In gene al he e is a body mass - empe a u e dependency o me abolic a es. A coincidence wi h calcula ed a es in magni ude should be a quali y ma k o he own measu emen s, because 700 o 1200 obse a ions a e he basis o he Ikeda's (1985) equa ions. Using May and Augus 1988 as an example a sa is ying co espondence is o obse e: May Augus in i o empe a u e spec. oxygen consump íon pe indi iduum Hm^ O2/ Ind.* h spec. PO4 eléase pe indi iduum pM / Ind. * h spec. NH4 eléase pe indi iduum pM / Ind. * h obse a ion calcula ion obse a ion calcula ion obse a ion calcula ion 7.50 c 24.64 +/- 10.8; N=25 10.82 +/- 2.07; 15.17 +/- 7.76; N=27 4.85 +/- 1.22; 105.32 +/- 92.32; N=24 70.71 +/- 16.54; 18.3°C 15.06 +/- 7.76; N=16 17.99 +/. 1.67; 6.90 +/- 6.15; 6.25+/- 0.41; 57.94 +/- 50.38; N=14 112.57 4-/- 11.16; In May, a e o du ing he sp ing bloom pe iode, he obse ed alúes a e highe , han he calcula ed. In Augus he e is he opposi case, indica ing, ha empe a u e is one in luence, bu he nu i i e basis p obably o highe p io i y. Nex able includes esul s o co ela ions o 6 da a g oups, he compa isons (1) o oxygen consump ion and nu ien s eléase on he aw da ale el, (2) o ETS - and GDH - ac i i y on he aw da a le el, (3) o d y mass speci ic oxygen consump ion and nu ien s eléase a es ( aw da a de ided by biomass), (4) o p o ein speci ícenzyma ic ac i i y, (5) o (1) and (2), (6) o (3) and (4), using he May '91 da a as he basis: aw da a: 02 s. P04 02 s. NH4 P04 VSNH4 aw da a: ETS s. GDH d y mass speci ic a es: O2 s. PO4 O2 s. NH4 PO4 s. NH4 p o ein speci ic ETS s. GDH aw da a: O2 s. ETS NH4VS. GDH biomass speci ic O2 s. ETS NH4VS. GDH = 0.8309 = 0.9475 = 0.9035 = 0.6730 = 0.6582 = 0.4904 = 0. 5425 = -0.0577 = -0.0476 = 0.3353 = -0.0225 = -0.0937 p<0.00l p< 0.001 p< 0.001 p< 0.001 p< 0.001 p < 0.05 p < 0.05 N=21 N=21 N=21 N = 23 N = 23 N = 21 N = 21 N = 21 N = 21 N = 21 N = 21 N = 21 Co ela ions we e o expec in all he cases. The signi ican coincidence be ween he aw da a is a sa is ying indica ion o hei quali y. This is ae o bo h, he da a o bo le me hode and hoseo he enzyma ic de e mina ions . The eason o he lesse co ela ion o he d y mass speci ic a es a e p obably he calcula ed biomass da a. This is wo se in he case o p o ein speci ic ETS- and GDH- ac i i ies. No o mide s and is he missing co ela ion be ween he aw oxygen consump ion and he ETS ac i i y on he same le el. Tha biomass speci ic a es o bo h g oups in he las wo ows don' ma ch does inally no wounde . So he link be ween he wo me hods, shown in Figu e 2, is no ac i e now. Bo h da a se s ha e o be sepe a ely used. 2. Size classes: The smalle o ganisms show an abou 7 imes highe espi a ion a e compa ed wi h he la ges g oup (F¡g.3). The mean alúes a e om Augus 1990. The columns indíca e he s anda d de ia ion. 3. Ve ical s uc u e: The de e mina ion o he oxygen consump ion and he ammonia eléase in e ms o en2yma ic ac i i y in all he dep h le éis allows o es íma e he a e age e ical s uc u e o me abolic a es.. This will be done as ape cen age in compa ison o he su ace laye in May 1990 and 1991. The e we e no ema kable di e encies be ween he bo h yea s, be ween ETS and GDH, especially in he g oup o p o ein speci íc a es. La ge e ical g adien s a e o obse e in he in si u - g oup. The me abolic a e dec eases om he su ace laye successi e downwa d by ap oxima ely 30% pe dep h le el. The ETS esul s om 1991 a e p esen ed in he nex able as an example: su ace laye (up o he mocline) in e medía e laye ( he mocline o halocline) bo om laye (halocline o bo om) su ace laye (up o he mocline) in e medía e laye ( he mocline o halocline) bo om laye (halocline o bo om) ETS spec. 1000 - 500 ^im 100 143 101 in si u ETS 1000 - 500 ^m 100 61 25 500 - 200 ^m 100 85 69 500 - 200 xm 100 33 17 200 - 100 }im 100 79 80 200 - 100 nm 100 65 31 o al mean 100 102 83 o al mean 100 53 24 4. Regional Pa e ns: Figu e 4.1 includes en i onmen al pa ame e s, like empe a u e, salini y, chlo ophyll a e aged o he su ace laye , abo e he he mocline, and he diy mass o all size ac ions, he d y mass o he mos impo an class be ween 100 and 200 ^ini size, and he equency o he main axonomic g oups wi hin his class. The da a a e egional a e aged, one o en alúes a e he basis. SK&KG means Skage ak and Ka ega á ea, MB Mecklenbu g Bigh , AS A kona Sea, BS Bomholm Sea, S&CG sou hem and cen al Go land Sea, and NG No he n Go land Sea (c. . Fig.l). Figu e 4.2 includes biomass speci ic me abolic a es, oxygen consum ion, ammonia and phospha e eléase, ETS and GDH ac i i y, and he assimila ion numbe (p ima y p oduc i i y di ided by chlo ophyll concen a ion). Figu e 4.3 includes he in si u a es espec i ely.The a e ages a e he same like in Figu e 4.1. In a he mos cases a end is isible, cha ac e izing he la e sp ing si ua ion in he Bal ic Sea, wi h lowe empe a u es in he no hem pa , whe e he me abolic ac i e cen e is loca ed du ing ha ime, May 1991. The seasonal succession seems o be o ien a ed om he ansi i ion á ea o he Bal ic Sea o he no hem Go land Sea. The in si u oxygen consump ion and he phospha e eléase show a clea dec easing endency, in acco dance wi h he biomass pa e ns in Fig.4.1. 5. Seasonal and in e anual a ia ion To disc ibe hese a iabili y da a om wo seasons, May and Augus , a e a ailable, om a leas wo yea s. In Table 1 (Annex) he mean si ua ion is included o in si u d y mass, incuba ion empe a u e, in si u equency o Copepods and o Cladoce ans, he d y mass speci ic and he zooplank on in si u a es o espi a ion and emine alisa ion, pa ly o di e en size classes. Compa ing he May si ua ion 1990 was signi ican wa me , han 1988 and 1991. Also he equency o Copepods / Cladoce ans is di e en . The biomass o he la ge o ganisms is mo e de eloped in 1990, han in he o he wo yea s. The seasonal cycle s a ed ea lie in ha yea . This has no signi ícan in luence on he biomass speci ic me abolic a es, i hey a e a e aged o he whole Bal ic. Bu i has an inpu on he in si u a es, in dependency o he biomass. Rema kable di e ences a e o obse e in he biomass speci ic a es, i May and Augus will be compa ed. Du ing Augus he plank on composi ion is qui di e en in compa ison o May, he empe a u e. also. 8 I is o conclude, ha seasonal a iabili y is mo e signi ícan han in e annual. Tempe a u e may ha e an e ec , bu nu i ion and species composi ion o zooplank on is also impo an . Changes be ween 8 o 12_C (May 88, 91 / May 90) ha e a sligh in luence o he speci íc a es. A compa ison wi h da a collec ed in 1989 in he sub opical A lan ic show mo e signi ícan di e ences, bu on he basis o a 10 K empe a u e change! In ha case a speci íc oxygen consump ion a e o abou 13 mm^ 02 /mg d y mass * h in he A lan ic is o compa e wi h 5.55 om Augus 88. This is a eIa iono 2.3. (F om Ikeda (1985) a ac o o 2.8 is o expec , i an á ea o 21° N (A lan ic) and ano he o 50° N (Bali e Sea) will be compa ed. ) LITERATURE CITED: BIDIGARE, R.R. and F.D. KING, 1981. The measu emen o glu ama e dehyd ogenase ac i i y in P aunus lexuosus and i s ole in he egula ion o ammonium ex e ion. Comp. Biochem. Physiol., 70 B: 409 - 413. BIDIGARE, R.R., F.D. KING and D.C. BIGGS, 1982. Glu ama e dehyd ogenase (GDH) and espi a o y elec on- anspo -sys em (ETS) ac i i ies in Gul o México zooplank on. J. Plank on Res., 4: 895 - 911. HERNROTH, L. & H. VIL JAMA A (Eds.), 1979. Mesozooplank on biomass assessmen . BMB Publ. No. 6 . I5pp. IKEDA, T., 1985. Me abolic a es o epipelagic ma ine zooplank on as a imc ion o body mass and empe a u e. Ma . Biol.. 85: 1 - 11. KENNER, R.A. & S.I. AHMED, 1975a. Measu emen s o elec ón anspo ac i i ies in ma ine phy oplank on. Ma . Biol.. 33: 119 - 127. LOWRY, P.H., N.J. ROSENBROUGH, A.L. FARR & R.J. RANDALL, 1951. P o ein measu emen wi h a Folin phenol eagen . J. Biol. Chem.. 193: 265 - 275. OMORI, M. & T. IKEDA, 1984. Me hods in ma ine zooplank on ecology. John Wiley & Sons. New Yo k, Chiches e , B isbane, To on o, Singapo e. 332 pp. OWENS, T.G. & F.D. KING, 1975. The measu emen o espi a o y elec ón anspo sys em ac i i y in ma ine zooplank on. Ma . Biol., 30: 27 - 36. PACKARD, T.T., 1969. The es ima ion o he oxygen u iliza ion a e in seawa e om he ac i i y o he espi a o y elec ón anspo sys em in plank on. Ph. D. Thesis, Uni . Washing on, Sea ie. 115 pp. PACKARD, T.T,, 1971. The measu emen o espi a o y elec ón anspo ac i i y in ma ine phy oplank on. J. Ma . Res., 29: 235 - 244. Enz mology. Vol. 91. Academic P ess, pp 95 - 119. ACKNOWLEDGMENT: We would like o hank he c ew o RV "A. .Humbold ", o RV "P o .A.Penck" o hei help, he Chemical Depa men o he Ins i u e o Bal ic Sea Resea ch, Wamemünde, o many nu ien analyses, Anneli Pos el and Heide Sandbe g o he nume ous zooplank on de e mina ions, he lOW Da a Cen e, p o iding empe a u e, salini y, chlo ophyll da a, and assimila ion numbe s, and he BMFT, because he measu emen o 1991 we e suppo ed by his Minis y (Con ac No.:03F0030A). N = mg d y nass-m'' í incuba íoo empe a u e/oC equency o Copcpods/ % equency o Gadoce ans Oxycen coosomp ion d y mass !^)eci ic/ mm' Oi-mK"'-h'' in si u/ mm' Oj-mg'-h'' ', Pbospha e eléase d y mass sped íc/ nM-mj-'-í -' in si u/ : >íM-m-'-d' A lmonia eléase ; d y mass speciñd nM-mg-'-h-' 1 in si u/ ;iM-m'-d' . Size ac ion//im May '88 26 27 7,5 76 16 9,12 7,24 5,40 3,50 34,68 42,66 >200 4,19 Í2,T~ 43 46 13,93 1.4 4,30 0,43 53,48 5,38 May'90 16 19,50 __ 4.32 _ - 1 4Ú 10 13 41 12 23 4,77 8,95 32,33 2.23 0,93 E - 4.56 3,12 7,65 21,70 1,46 0.87 '-"2,76 16,51 29,76 38,65 7,73 3,08 E » 16,19 1000- 500- 200- 100- 500 200 100 55 >20Ó •" • May'91 12 4.77 8.59 '"8;6 So 34 11___22__ 8.16 5,18 0,93 1,07 19,26 3 0 8.20 3,70 E-.6.5 3,78 1.92 0.43 0.40 2,19 1,01 E - 2.03 30,48 17.35 3,49 3,58 22,67 10,48 E = 18.44 1000- 600- 500 200 >20b 200- __100_ 1,61 0 0 18,28 0,71 5.01 0,19 23,06 0,89 100- _55 _ Aug. '88 16 100 18,3 Mi 70 5.55 __13,37 2,55 5741 21,00 53,61 >200 _J,86 31" 67 , 5,26 1,29 0,65 0,14 24.66 5.25 1000- 500 65.37 18.2 29 70 6.29 8,48 ' 1,49 2.34 20,08 31,50 500- 200 >200 Aug. '90 5 12.51 29 69 11,61 3,98 T m 15 30 2,60 0,79 E - 3,38 15,25 4,64 E - 43.38 200- lOQ I 09 41 57 39,68 1,64 4,06 0,11 71,70 1,99 100- 55. _ Table: Co npa ísons o mean alúes o en i onmen al condi íons. zooplank on biomass. equency o Copepods and PhyHopods. speci ic and in si u mc abolic a es in May I988.I990. I99I and in Augus I988.I991.