Swine enteric colibacillosis: Current treatment avenues and future directions

TYPE Mini Review PUBLISHED 28 October 2022 DOI 10.3389/fvets.2022.981207 OPEN ACCESS EDITED BY Mariangela Caroprese, University of Foggia, Italy REVIEWED BY Eric R. Burrough, Iowa State University, United States Yanhong Liu, University of California, Davis, United States *CORRESPONDENCE Joana Castro [email protected] Carina Almeida [email protected] SPECIALTY SECTION This article was submitted to Veterinary Infectious Diseases, a section of the journal Frontiers in Veterinary Science RECEIVED 29 June 2022 ACCEPTED 10 October 2022 PUBLISHED 28 October 2022 CITATION Castro J, Barros MM, Araújo D, Campos AM, Oliveira R, Silva S and Almeida C (2022) Swine enteric colibacillosis: Current treatment avenues and future directions. Front. Vet. Sci. 9:981207. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.981207 COPYRIGHT ©2022 Castro, Barros, Araújo, Campos, Oliveira, Silva and Almeida. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. Swine enteric colibacillosis: Current treatment avenues and future directions Joana Castro1*, Maria Margarida Barros1, Daniela Araújo1, Ana Maria Campos1, Ricardo Oliveira1,2,3, Sónia Silva1,4,5 and Carina Almeida1,2,3,4,5* 1National Institute for Agrarian and Veterinarian Research (INIAV), Vila do Conde, Portugal, 2LEPABE – Laboratory for Process Engineering, Environment, Biotechnology and Energy, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal, 3ALiCE – Associate Laboratory in Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal, 4Centre of Biological Engineering, Braga, Portugal, 5LABBELS – Associate Laboratory, Braga/Guimarães, Portugal Enteric colibacillosis is a common disease in nursing and weanling pigs. It is caused by the colonization of the small intestine by enterotoxigenic strains of Escherichia coli (ETEC) that make use of specific fimbria or pili to adhere to the absorptive epithelial cells of the jejunum and ileum. Once attached, and when both the immunological systems and the gut microbiota are poorly developed, ETEC produce one or more enterotoxins that can have local and, further on, systemic effects. These enterotoxins cause fluid and electrolytes to be secreted into the intestinal lumen of animals, which results in diarrhea, dehydration, and acidosis. From the diversity of control strategies, antibiotics and zinc oxide are the ones that have contributed more significantly to mitigating post-weaning diarrhea (PWD) economic losses. However, concerns about antibiotic resistance determined the restriction on the use of critically important antimicrobials in food-producing animals and the prohibition of their use as growth promoters. As such, it is important now to begin the transition from these preventive/control measures to other, more sustainable, approaches. This review provides a quick synopsis of the currently approved and available therapies for PWD treatment while presenting an overview of novel antimicrobial strategies that are being explored for the control and treatment of this infection, including, prebiotics, probiotics, synbiotics, organic acids, bacteriophages, spray-dried plasma, antibodies, phytogenic substances, antisense oligonucleotides, and aptamers. KEYWORDS enteric colibacillosis, post-weaning diarrhea, gut microbiome, antibiotic therapy, zinc oxide, novel antimicrobial approaches Introduction Post-weaning period is a critical phase in the pig’s life because the immune system is immature, and the sow milk removal, and consequent interruption of nutritive intake of immunoglobulin present in the milk, increases pigs’ susceptibility to microbial infections, especially in the current lines of hyperprolific sows (1). As such, piglets are highly Frontiers in Veterinary Science 01 frontiersin.org Castro et al. 10.3389/fvets.2022.981207 susceptible to Post-Weaning Diarrhea (PWD), a disorder that often affects pigs during the first 2 weeks of weaning and is characterized by sudden death or diarrhea and growth retardation in surviving piglets (2). PWD is one of the most serious threats to the swine industry worldwide, with episodes reaching mortality rates of 20 to 30% (2) and is associated with the proliferation of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) in the pig intestine (3). ETEC are gram-negative, flagellated bacilli and most pathogenic strains form smooth to mucoid colonies. Virulence factors include fimbriae, enterotoxins, endotoxins, and capsules. Fimbriae are the small hair-like structures on the bacterial surface that allow attachment to specific receptors on the surface of mucosal enterocytes of the small intestine, being crucial in the colonization process. Pathogenic strains also produce one or more enterotoxins, which are exotoxins elaborated locally in the small intestine that can have either local or systemic effects (1). There are 5 common, antigenically different fimbriae types found in pigs: F4 (K88), F5 (K99), F41, F6 (987P), and F18. The first 4 fimbriae types are responsible for mediating adhesion in neonates, while F18 is not associated with neonatal colibacillosis but is common in postweaning colibacillosis as is F4. It is also important to note that hemolysis is a common trait for pathogenic F4 and F18 isolates. Furthermore, the virulence of ETEC can also be characterized by the production of heat-labile toxins (LT), heat-stable toxin A (StA), heat-stable toxin B (StB), and verotoxin (shiga-like toxin, STX). The first three act locally interfering with electrolytes fluid increasing the fluid secretion to the lumen leading to diarrhea while verotoxin is responsible for the systemic vascular effects of edema disease (4). As an attempt to promote health and growth performance, different approaches have been used to prevent PWD, including mostly dietary supplementation, such as prebiotics and probiotics; genetic breeding for ETEC-resistant herds; administration of growth promotors; and vaccines (5,6). It is important to highlight that growth promoters and zinc oxide (7), have been (or are being) banned from animal husbandry. Also, antibiotics use is now more restricted because of antimicrobial resistance observed in ETEC and potential consequences for human health (1). These restrictions are strongly affecting the control of PWD (8). This makes room for innovative, antibiotic-free, intervention/control strategies that can control ETEC infections. Antibiotics used to treat PWD Antibiotic therapy is required in many cases of enteric colibacillosis, being the main antimicrobials used for the treatment of enteric colibacillosis listed in Supplementary Table 1. According to Luppi, the choice of antibiotics for the treatment of PWD must consider several aspects (1): (i) the local of infection that must be located mainly in the small intestine; (ii) the empiric treatments based on the knowledge of the individual herd and local data on the resistance pattern; and (iii) the evaluation of the isolated strain’s antimicrobial susceptibility. However, as an outbreak of colibacillosis frequently requires quick actions, the use of antibiotics almost always precedes the results of the resistance pattern (1,9). Also, it has been established that the antibiotic should be administered to all animals exhibiting signs referable to colibacillosis and sick pigs must be treated parenterally since they eat and drink very little. In practice when mortality occurs, a metaphylactic approach is applied wherein all animals in the pens are treated (1,9–11). Of note that guidelines for the prudent use of antimicrobials in veterinary medicine (2015/C/ 299/04) published in the official journal of the European Union considered the use of metaphylaxis and stated that antimicrobial metaphylaxis should be prescribed only when there is a real need for treatment and that the veterinarian should justify and document the treatment on the basis of clinical findings on the development of a disease in herd or flock (10). Current measures used to prevent PWD in piglets As described above, alternatives to antibiotic therapy are some preventive approaches that have been applied to avoid the development of colibacillosis illness. Those therapies are essentially based on genetic breeding, vaccines, and zinc oxide administration, as illustrated in Figure 1. Genetic breeding for ETEC-resistant swine herds The advances in molecular approaches sparked the interest of the scientific community in obtaining genetic breeding for ETEC-resistant herds. As mentioned above, the pig population presents specific receptors on the intestinal epithelial cells for the F4 and F18 fimbriae, which are the primary virulence factors carried by E. coli responsible for PWD. However, certain pigs do not have receptors for F4 and F18 adhesins and are thus resistant to infection by these fimbriae. Therefore, an attractive approach to preventing PWD is increasing the presence of both the F18 and F4 resistance loci in the pig population through breeding (12). Despite all the efforts, there are more insights about F18 resistance loci than about F4 resistance loci. In this sense, it was employed a molecular test for the large-scale selection of resistant pigs for breeding, using the polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) methodology. In brief, using this approach, we can detect polymorphisms in the FUT1 gene in a piglet, that encodes an α-(1,2) fucosyltransferase protein. It is important to highlight that FUT1 polymorphisms are Frontiers in Veterinary Science 02 frontiersin.org Castro et al. 10.3389/fvets.2022.981207 FIGURE 1 Current therapies used to control PWD in piglets. responsible for controlling the expression of the receptor for F18 fimbriated E. coli in the intestinal mucosa. Regarding the F4 resistance loci, by using PCR-RFLP approach (13), it is also possible to detect polymorphisms in the MUC4 gene in a piglet, that encodes for a membrane-bound-O-glycoprotein that is extensively expressed on the surface of gastrointestinal epithelial cells in which protects and lubricates the epithelial surfaces (14,15). As such, using this approach, it was possible to select the piglets that do not present these receptors for the E. coli F18 and F4 adhesion (12,16,17). Vaccines It is known that newborn pigs can establish immune reactions against mucosal antigens (18,19). However, the newly weaned pigs need active intestinal mucosal immunization due to the lack of passive lactogenic immunity. Therefore, these vaccines can induce this protective effect by activating the mucosal immune system and antigen-specific immunoglobulins (A and M) responses (20,21). Thus, 3 main types of vaccines have been used on pigs. Firstly, intramuscular injectable vaccines stimulate systemic immunity by increasing circulating antibodies to keep intestinal bacteria levels low enough to be non-pathogenic (21). Secondly, an oral administration of live attenuated or live wild-type non-enterotoxigenic E. coli strains with fimbrial adhesins can stimulate intestinal colonization by this E. coli by inducing the secretion of intestinal antibodies, and finally blocks the adherence of ETEC (22). For example, a single dose of a commercial vaccine (Coliprotec R F4) showed a significant reduction in the incidence of diarrhea, ileum colonization by F4-ETEC, and fecal shedding of F4-ETEC after the heterologous challenge at 7 and 21 days post-vaccination (23). Lastly, the oral administration of purified fimbria results in a specific mucosal immune response in the intestines and may cause a significant decrease in fecal excretion of the pathogenic E. coli (21,24). Supplementary Table 2 shows the current vaccines available in the market. Zinc oxide and end-of-use policies Pig producers have been successful with weaning at an early age with limited signs of gastrointestinal disease shortly after weaning (25,26). In fact, it has been described that feed containing between 2,400 and 3,000 ppm of zinc reduces Frontiers in Veterinary Science 03 frontiersin.org Castro et al. 10.3389/fvets.2022.981207 diarrhea and mortality, and improves the growth of piglets. However, in the last decade, several studies have centered attention on heavy metals used in animal farming and possible mechanisms that could promote the spread of antibiotic resistance via co-selection (1). Furthermore, the use of zinc oxide possesses an environmental hazard, as most of the zinc is excreted with the feces and through manuring, it accumulates in soil (27). Recently, the Committee for Medicinal Products for Veterinary Use (CVMP) of the European Medicines Agency set the referral procedure for veterinary medicinal products containing zinc oxide to be administered orally to foodproducing species. The Committee adopted an opinion by consensus determining that the benefits of zinc oxide for the prevention of diarrhea in pigs do not outweigh the risks to the environment. The CVMP emphasized that there is a risk of co-selection for resistance related to the use of zinc oxide, but at the present time, that risk is not quantifiable. Accordingly, medicinal zinc oxide has been prohibited in the European Union effectively coming into force no later than June 2022 (28,29). Consequently, there is an urgent need for adopting novel strategies for the control of PWD. Alternative strategies to current therapies for PWD control The increasing evidence that the current approaches to treat/prevent PWD raise problems associated with antimicrobial resistance or the risks to the environment sparked the interest of the scientific community in exploring new eco-friendly prophylactic or antimicrobial tools. Thus, in recent years, studies of anti-enteric colibacillosis agents started to include prebiotics, probiotics, synbiotics, organic acids, phytogenic substances, bacteriophages, spray-dried plasma, antibodies, antisense oligonucleotides, and aptamers (see Table 1). Prebiotics, probiotics, synbiotics Maintaining a healthy gut is crucial for a pig to digest and absorb dietary nutrients efficiently (76). As such, prebiotics, which are non-digestible feed ingredients positively affecting the host by stimulating the growth and/or the activity of a limited number of bacteria in the gastrointestinal microbiota (5), can be used to modulate the gut microbiota. Probiotics are defined as viable microorganisms that when ingested in sufficient amounts reach the intestine in an active state where they can exert positive effects on the host’s health status (77, 78). In last, synbiotics are defined as a mixture comprising live microorganisms (probiotics) and substrate(s) (prebiotics) selectively utilized by host microorganisms that confer a health benefit on the host (79). According to Girard and colleagues, this combination improves the survival rate and favors the growth and activity of beneficial microorganisms in the gut of the piglets (51). Among the prebiotics and probiotics evaluated for the control of ETEC colonization in pigs, inulin and Lactobacillus plantarum are the ones that have been more systematically assessed, either individually or in combination (see Table 1). Overall, the results of the different studies indicate that these strategies can reduce ETEC colonization and relieve some symptoms. However, a few studies also have found no significant differences between the tested probiotics and the respective controls (41). This is not surprising as the effect of these approaches is most probably highly dependent on the strains, concentrations applied, animal age, and the strategies used for the delivery in the gut. Further studies are necessary to systematically evaluate the real potential of those approaches for controlling ETEC. Organic acids Organic acids (OA) are considered powerful antimicrobials, which are extensively used as feed additives in pig nutrition, in particular the short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) and mediumchain fatty acids (MCFAs) (80). Because of their antimicrobial effects, OA are able to prevent the colonization and proliferation of pathogenic bacteria (52) and their antimicrobial effects are related to their action on cellular metabolism and their ability to deplete cellular energy. Normally, a reduction in pH of the diet can happen because of the dissociation of OA, which is favorable for the growth of lactic acid bacteria (55). In contrast, the non-dissociated OA can act as an antimicrobial agent, since it can penetrate the cell wall of bacteria and interfere with normal physiology (81). In the pigs with a diet containing OA, gastrointestinal health is improved, reducing the incidence to develop diarrhea as described in Table 1. Phytogenic substances Plant-derived compounds are also studied as alternative growth promoters in pigs, as is the case of phytogenic feed additives (82–84). These compounds are added to the pigs’ diet, due to their positive effects on animal growth and health, since they present antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant properties (59). Examples of substances used as phytogenic feed additives include essential oils, herbs, and spices (see Table 1). Recent studies reported the positive results of these compounds in pig health, such as growth performance and nutrient digestibility (82). Moreover, to improve its performance, the combination of different phytogenic substances has been explored in order to study the synergistic or complementary activity on pig health. Frontiers in Veterinary Science 04 frontiersin.org Castro et al. 10.3389/fvets.2022.981207 TABLE 1 Benefits and limitations of the major alternative agents for the control of post-weaning diarrhea (PWD) based on studies published since 2010. Agent Application/Tested Main results Reference Prebiotic In vitro Anti-adhesive feedstuffs (wheat bran; casein glycomacropeptide; MOS; locust bean extract; and Aspergillus oryzae fermentation extract) —Assessment of the adhesion of ETEC to the IPEC-J2 cells and analysis of the innate immune response. —The supplementation of an alginate-derived oligosaccharide could alleviate damages exerted by ETEC infection by decreasing apoptosis. (30) Galacto-oligosaccharides (GOS) —Assessment of the adhesion of E. coli K88 to piglet mucins. —Neoglycans of porcine albumin conjugated with GOS partially inhibited E. coli K88 adhesion to piglet mucins in vitro. (31) In vivo Fructooligosaccharides (FOS) —24 weaned pigs were divided into 3 groups: (1) control with non-challenge pigs, (2) ETEC-challenge ones, and (3) ETEC-challenge with FOS treatment. —FOS could improve the growth performance and intestinal health in weaned pigs upon ETEC challenge. (32) Manno-oligosaccharide (MOS) —32 pigs were assigned to different treatments and fed with basal or MOS diet. —MOS can alleviate ETEC-induced injury, which was associated with suppressed inflammation and improved antioxidant capacity and intestinal epithelial functions. (33) Probiotic In vitro Lactobacillus plantarum —Assessment of the adhesion of ETEC to IPEC-J2 cells. —L. plantarum might prevent ETEC growth, inhibit ETEC adhesion to the intestinal mucosa, and activate the innate immune response to secret antimicrobial peptides. (34) Pediococcus pentosaceus —Assessment of the adhesion of ETEC to IPEC-J2 IEC cells. —P. pentosaceus decreased the adhesion of ETEC to IPEC-J2 cells. (35) Enterococcus faecium,Lactobacillus rhamnosus,Bifidobacterium breve and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii —The CoMiniGut model, mimicking the small intestine of piglets, was used to evaluate the potential of 4 probiotic strains against the development of diarrhea in weaned pigs. —This model was not representative of the high variation among pigs, so the results regarding the effect of probiotics were not clear. (36) Bacillus subtilis —Assessment of the cytotoxicity of ETEC on IPEC-J2 IEC cells. —It was observed that preor co-incubation with B. subtilis protected IPEC-J2 cells from ETEC-induced cytotoxicity. (37) E. faecium —Determination the effect of the treatment with E. faecium on the internal redox state, paracellular permeability, IL-6 and IL-8 secretion of IPEC-J2 cells and adhesion of ETEC to IPEC-J2 IEC cells. —E. faecium was able to reduce oxidative stress and paracellular permeability of IPEC-J2 cells and could inhibit the adhesion of E. coli (38) Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus plantarum and P. pentosaceus Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) —Determination of the antimicrobial activity of cell-free culture supernatants (CFCS) against pathogenic E. coli. —CFCS from LAB can inhibit the growth of pathogenic E. coli. (39) In vivo Pediococcus acidilactici and Saccharomyces cerevisiae boulardi —43 were assigned for this study. —The administration of P. acidilactici or S. cerevisiae boulardii was effective in reducing ETEC attachment to the ileal mucosa, whereas the presence of P. acidilactici was required to modulate the expression of intestinal inflammatory cytokines in pigs challenged with ETEC. (40) (Continued) Frontiers in Veterinary Science 05 frontiersin.org Castro et al. 10.3389/fvets.2022.981207 TABLE 1 (Continued) Agent Application/Tested Main results Reference Probiotics A: Calcium carbonate kieselguhr as anticaking agent B. subtilis, Bacillus licheniformis (BioPlus2B -commercial probiotic) B: Saccharose as carrier cellulose derivative as an encapsulating agent, E. faecium (Cylactin LBC - commercial probiotic) —30 sows and 48 piglets of the Danbred breed were assigned to different treatments. —No significant differences between treatment groups and controls were found concerning the immune parameters evaluated (proportion of white blood cells and their subpopulations, and serum concentration of cytokines and acute phase proteins) except for probiotic product B. (41) Clostridium butyricum —48 weaned piglets were assigned to either a basal diet or a C. butyricum-supplemented diet. —C. butyricum enhanced intestinal barrier function and inhibited apoptosis-associated speck-like protein-independent NLRP3 inflammasome signaling pathway. (42) Bacteriocins produced by E. coli strains —25 weaned piglets were divided into 5 subgroups: the control without probiotic candidates and the 4 others groups were inoculated with a single probiotic candidate (582, B771, or B1172) or the combination of the 3 (cocktail). —It was observed a significant reduction in pathogen counts for the cocktail of probiotic candidates, in comparison with the untreated control. (43) L. acidophilus,L. casei, Bifidobacterium thermophilum, and E. faecium —32 newly weaned crossbred pigs were assigned to different diets. —The multispecies probiotics enhanced growth performance by reducing intestinal inflammation, oxidative stress, and morphological damages. (44) Lactiplantibacillus plantarum and P. acidilactici —72, 2-day-old, healthy neonatal piglets were recruited into the study. —Supplementing with microencapsulated probiotics helped to improve the composition of the gut microbiota by increasing the numbers and proportions of beneficial bacteria. (45) Lactobacillus casei —48 newborn piglets were allocated randomly to 2 groups: treated with recombinant L. casei and a control with a basic diet. —The oral administration of recombinant L. casei favors the functional maturation of the intestinal microbiota in newborn piglets. (46) Lactobacilli,Lactococci, Enterococci,Streptococci, Leuconostoc,Pediococci and Lactobacillus Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) —32 male mice were divided into 4 groups: (1) control with PBS; (2) control of the gut inflammatory model that was challenged with E. coli; (3) mice orally administrated with mixed LAB and (4) mice orally administrated with mixed LAB and oral challenge with E. coli. —Mixed LAB strains from wild pigs exerted a beneficial effect on the host via immunomodulation of IL-6 and IL-1b against the infection of E. coli. (47) Synbiotics In vivo E. coli probiotic and raw potato starch (RPS) —49, 17-day-old, weaned piglets were randomly assigned to 4 treatments: (1) positive control; (2) only probiotic; (3) only prebiotic; and (4) prebiotic and probiotic together. —The combination of the probiotic with the RPS resulted in a reduction of diarrhea and increased microbial diversity in the gut. (48) Oligosaccharide lactulose and L. plantarum —72 weaned pigs were assigned to different diets. —An increase in the ileum villous height and a reduction of the pig major acute-phase protein in serum were observed. —The inclusion of the probiotic increased the number of L. plantarum bacteria in the ileum and colon, and it showed a trend to reduce diarrhea. (49) (Continued) Frontiers in Veterinary Science 06 frontiersin.org Castro et al. 10.3389/fvets.2022.981207 TABLE 1 (Continued) Agent Application/Tested Main results Reference A: Inulin, L. reuteri, L. plantarum, L. pentosus, S. cerevisiae B: Inulin, L. reuteri, L. plantarum, L. pentosus, L. rhamnosus S. cerevisiae C: Inulin, L. reuteri, L. plantarum, L. pentosus, L. rhamnosus, L. paracasei, S. cerevisiae — 30 sows and 48 piglets of the Danbred breed were assigned to different treatments. —No significant differences between treatment groups and controls were found concerning the immune parameters evaluated (proportion of white blood cells and their subpopulations, and serum concentration of cytokines and acute phase proteins) except for serum immunoglobulin concentration, which was significantly increased by synbiotic products B and C. (41) Fermented Soy Bean Meal (FSBM) (fermented with 3 probiotic strains: Streptococcus thermophilus, Saccharomyces cerevisiae and B. subtilis) —24 crossbred piglets were allotted into 2 diet treatments (one with FSBM and the other one without FSBM). —Dietary FSBM replacement improved growth performance and alleviated the diarrhea of weaned piglets challenged with ETEC K88, which could be due to modulation of fecal microbiota composition and down-regulation of inflammatory cytokines production. (50) Inulin, immunoglobulins, vitamins, selenium, Enterococcus faecium, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae —14 sows were assigned in this study. —The supplementation resulted in an improvement in average daily gain. —Treated piglets had a more diverse core microbiota, with bacteria from the Lactobacillus genus. (51) Organic acids (OA) In vitro Sorbic acid, benzoic acid and hexanoic acid —Evaluation of the susceptibility of E. coli K88 to selected organic acids as antimicrobial compounds. —Benzoic acid seems to be effective against bacterial proliferation —Benzoic acid has the ability to downregulate the expression of the E. coli K88 major enterotoxin genes. (52) In vivo Two blends of organic acids and medium chain fatty acids (OM) —A blend of organic acids and even-numbered medium-chain fatty acids and other with organic acids and odd-numbered medium-chain fatty acids were used to prevent the inflammatory response and intestinal barrier dysfunction in EHEC-infected mice. —Both OM1 and OM2 significantly reduced the body weight loss and production of IL-6 and TNF-αinduced by EHEC. —OM1 and OM2 decreased serum D-lactic concentration, bacterial transfer to the liver and spleen. (53) Formic/propionic acid mixture —30 weaning piglets were submitted to 5 diets to evaluate the effect of formic and propionic acids in the diet. —Inclusion of OA in the diet induced a decrease in rectal temperature. —The OA supplementation alleviated the inflammatory response and reduced diarrhea incidence in piglets with ETEC. (54) Blend of OA and cinnamaldehyde —Evaluation of the effects of a blend of OA and cinnamaldehyde on tissue homeostasis of piglets exposed to ETEC. — The combination of organic acid-based feed additive and cinnamaldehyde enhanced intestinal swine health. (55) OA and essential oils (EO) mixture (Fumaric, malic, citric, and sorbic acids, and thymol vanillin and eugenol EOs) —24 piglets were assigned to evaluate the effects of OA/EO on growth performance, immune system, gut barrier function, nutrient absorption, and abundance of ETEC F4. —The supplementation of OA and EO partially enhanced gut health. —The OA/EO did not significantly attenuate the induced inflammation, the reduced digestive enzyme activities, and the increased gut permeability. (56) (Continued) Frontiers in Veterinary Science 07 frontiersin.org Castro et al. 10.3389/fvets.2022.981207 TABLE 1 (Continued) Agent Application/Tested Main results Reference Phytogenic substances In vitro Winter savory and manuka EOs —The minimum inhibitory concentration and minimum bactericidal concentration of winter savory and manuka EOs were determined against strains of E. coli —The application of EOs alone showed slight antibacterial effectiveness. —The strong action was obtained with the blends of the 2 EOs. (57) In vivo FRESTA R F Wean blend of Clove (5%, Cinnamon 3%, Fenugreek 16%, Delacon) —120 crossbred pigs were assigned to 1 of the 4 diets: control; one treatment supplemented with apramycin antibiotic (T2), other with FRESTA R F (T3) and a final group with a commercial mix of organic acids (T4). —The administration of T3 increased average daily gain. —The apparent total tract digestibility was significantly greater at week 1 with T3 and T4 and at week 6 with T3 treatment. (58) Commercial EO based on cinnamaldehyde and thymol —144 weaned piglets were allotted to evaluate the EO effect on apparent nutrient digestibility, small intestinal morphology, intestinal microbiota, immune properties and antioxidant activities. —EO supplementation increased average daily gain and the apparent digestibility of dry matter. —The E. coli and total anaerobes in the rectum decreased in the EO group. —The concentrations of albumin, IgA, IgG and total antioxidant capacity were higher in the EO group compared to the control group. (59) ColiFit Icaps and Phyto Ax’Cell ColiFit Icaps (trans-cinnamald ehyde, eugenol, carvacrol, thymol, and diallyl disulfure) and Phyto Ax’Cell (plant extracts and green propolis extract) —96 piglets were allotted to assess the effect of supplementation with two-plant additives on growth performance, clinical signs, microbial analysis, inflammatory response, intestinal morphology, and ileal gene expression. —The supplementation with ColiFit Icaps and with Phyto Ax’Cell enhanced the animal response to ETEC F4. —It was not observed a significant effect of the treatments on the incidence of diarrhea prevalence or fecal score. (60) Calcium butyrate with tannin extract —The effect of calcium butyrate associated with tannin extract was evaluated in terms of growth performance, incidence of diarrhea, intestinal histology, immune-expression of cyclooxenase-2 and tumor necrosis factor αin piglets. —The basal diet supplementation with butyrate plus tannin extract reduced the incidence of diarrhea in piglets compared to the control group. — The piglets showed a lower inflammatory process in the duodenum of piglets. (61) Phytogenic premix (caraway oil, lemon oil, clove, cinnamon, nutmeg, onion, pimento, orange peel, peppermint, and chamomile powder) with and without short and medium-chain fatty acids (SCFA and MCFA) —The phytogenic premix with and without short and medium-chain fatty acids was evaluated in 27 weaned piglets to protect against ETEC infection. —The piglets with a dietary supplemented with SCFA and MCFA presented a lower average feed intake and a lower frequency of diarrhea compared to the piglets supplemented with only 0.2% of phytogenic premix. —It was revealed the prevention of diarrhea in weaned piglets, through the supplementation of feed diets with phytogenic compounds plus SCFA and MCFA. (62) Phytogenic feed additive (bitter citrus extract; microencapsulated blend of thymol and carvacrol; mixture of bitter citrus extract, thymol and carvacrol, premixture of grape seed, grape marc extract, green tea and hops and fenugreek seed powder) —63, 4-week-old, weaned pigs were assigned to 7 treatment groups. The growth performance, nutrient digestibility, intestinal morphology, and immune response were evaluated in weaned pigs infected with E. coli. —The average daily gain and feed efficiency were increased in the phytogenic feed additives groups and the fecal score decreased. —The treatment with a mixture of bitter citrus extract, thymol and carvacrol had a higher immunoglobulin G and immunoglobulin A concentration compared to the control group. (63) (Continued) Frontiers in Veterinary Science 08 frontiersin.org Castro et al. 10.3389/fvets.2022.981207 TABLE 1 (Continued) Agent Application/Tested Main results Reference Bacteriophages In vitro Bacteriophage EK99P-1 —The IPEC-J2/ peripheral blood mononuclear cell transwell co-culture system was used to investigate whether the modulation of barrier disruption and chemokine secretion by phage EK99P-1 in ETEC-infected IPEC-J2 would influence immune cells. —The phage EK99P-1 seems to prevent ETEC K99-induced barrier dysfunction in IPEC-J2 and alleviated inflammation caused by ETEC infection. —Reinforcement of the intestinal barrier, such as regulation of permeability and cytokines, by phage EK99P-1 also modulates the immune cell inflammatory response. (64) In vivo Bacteriophage A: Basal diet +bacteriophage (0.25 g/kg) B: Basal diet +bacteriophage (0. 5 g/kg) —30 sows and 44 pigs were assigned to different diets. —The inclusion of bacteriophage (0.5 g/kg) treatment led to a higher Lactobacillus concentration compared with the basal diet. (65) Lytic phage CJ12 CJ12 was isolated from the sewage of a pig farm in Korea —24 pigs weaned at 3 weeks of age were used in this experiment. Phage was mixed with feed at a ratio of 1:1.000 (0.1%). —Pigs belonging to the phage-treated group (106PFU/g and 108PFU/g) showed more resistance to diarrhea due to ETEC infection compared to positive control on the third day after the initial challenge. (66) Bacteriophage Cocktail of Salmonella typhimurium, S. enteritidis, S. cholerasuis and S. derby, Staphylococcus aureus,E. coli and Clostridium perfringens types A and C with 109plaque-forming units per gram (pfu/g) —200 barrows were assigned to different diets. —Dietary increasing levels of bacteriophage linearly improved the average daily gain, average daily feed intake and apparent total tract digestibility of dry matter. (67) Bacteriophage Cocktail of S. typhimurium, S. enteritidis, S. cholerasuis and S. derby), S. aureus,E. coli and C. perfringens types A and C with 109 plaque-forming units per gram (pfu/g) —30 sows and 200 weaned pigs were assigned to different diets. —Supplementation of bacteriophage in the diet improved average daily gain and gain-to-feed ratio. —Duodenum and jejunum villus heights were considerably increased. (68) Spray-dried animal plasma In vivo Spray-dried porcine plasma protein (SDPP) — Weaned pigs were assigned to different diets for 14 days post-weaning, followed by a common diet to day 28 post-weaning. —It was observed an increase in average daily weight gain and a tendency for improved average daily intake and gain-to-feed-ratio when compared with the controls during the initial 14-day period. (69) SDPP —18 pairs of intrauterine growth retardation and normal birth weight weaned pigs were allotted to be fed a starter diet containing SDPP for 2 -weeks. —SDPP diet improved bacterial diversity and increased the abundance of Firmicutes, but decreased the Proteobacteria in colonic digesta, associating with higher genera Lactobacillus and lower genera Escherichia–Shigella. (70) (Continued) Frontiers in Veterinary Science 09 frontiersin.org