Dissemination of data measured at the CERN n TOF facility

EPJ Web of Conferences 146, 07002 (2017) DOI: 10.1051/epjconf/201714607002 ND2016 Dissemination of data measured at the CERN n TOF facility E. Dupont1,a, N. Otuka2, O. Cabellos3, O. Aberle4,G.Aerts 1, S. Altstadt5, H. Alvarez6, F. Alvarez-Velarde7, S. Andriamonje1, J. Andrzejewski8, L. Audouin9, M. Bacak4,10,1, G. Badurek10,J.Balibrea 7, M. Barbagallo11,S.Barros 12, P. Baumann13,V.B ´ ecares7,F.Be ˇ cv´ aˇ r14, C. Beinrucker5, F. Belloni15, B. Berthier9, E. Berthoumieux1, J. Billowes16, V. Boccone4, D. Bosnar17,A.Brown 18, M. Brugger4, M. Caama˜ no6, M. Calviani4, F. Calvi˜ no19, D. Cano-Ott7, R. Capote2, R. Cardella4, C. Carrapic¸o12, A. Casanovas19, D.M. Castelluccio20, P. Cennini4, F. Cerutti4, Y.H. Chen9, E. Chiaveri4,M.Chin 4, N. Colonna11,G.Cort ´ es19,M.A.Cort ´ es-Giraldo21,L.Cosentino 22, A. Couture23,J.Cox 23, L.A. Damone11,S.David 9,K.Deo 24, M. Diakaki1, I. Dillmann25, C. Domingo-Pardo26, R. Dressler27,W.Dridi 1, I. Duran6, C. Eleftheriadis28, M. Embid-Segura7,B.Fern ´ andez-Dom´ ınguez6, L. Ferrant9, A. Ferrari4,P.Ferreira 12, P. Finocchiaro22,K.Fraval 1, R.J.W. Frost16,K.Fujii 15,W.Furman 29, S. Ganesan24,A.R.Garcia 7,A.Gawlik 8, I. Gheorghe30, S. Gilardoni4, G. Giubrone26, T. Glodariu30,K.G ¨ obel5, M.B. Gomez-Hornillos19, I.F. Goncalves12, E. Gonzalez-Romero7, A. Goverdovski31, F. Gramegna32, E. Griesmayer10,C.Guerrero 21, F. Gunsing1,4, P. Gurusamy24, R. Haight33, H. Harada34,T.Heftrich 5,M.Heil 25,S.Heinitz 27,A.Hern ´ andez-Prieto19,J.Heyse 35,M.Igashira 36,S.Isaev 9, D.G. Jenkins18, E. Jericha10, Y. Kadi4, F. Kaeppeler25, A. Kalamara37, D. Karadimos38, D. Karamanis38, T. Katabuchi36, P. Kavrigin10, M. Kerveno13, V. Ketlerov31, V. Khryachkov31,A.Kimura 34,N.Kivel 27, M. Kokkoris37, V. Konovalov31, M. Krtiˇ cka14,J.Kroll 14, D. Kurtulgil5, C. Lampoudis28, C. Langer5, E. Leal-Cidoncha6, C. Lederer39, H. Leeb10, C. Le Naour9, J. Lerendegui-Marco21, L.S. Leong9, M. Licata40,S.LoMeo 20, S.J. Lonsdale39,R.Losito 4, M. Lozano21, D. Macina4, A. Manousos28, J. Marganiec8, T. Martinez7, S. Marrone11,A.Masi 4,C.Massimi 40,P.Mastinu 32, M. Mastromarco11, F. Matteucci15, E.A. Maugeri27, A. Mazzone11, E. Mendoza7, A. Mengoni20, P.M. Milazzo15, F. Mingrone40,4,M.Mirea 30, W. Mondelaers35, S. Montesano4, C. Moreau15, M. Mosconi25, A. Musumarra41,A.Negret 30, R. Nolte42,S.O’Brien 23,A.Oprea 30, F.R. Palomo-Pinto21, J. Pancin1, C. Paradela6,35, N. Patronis38, A. Pavlik43, P. Pavlopoulos4, J. Perkowski8, L. Perrot1, M.T. Pigni10,R.Plag 25, A. Plompen35, L. Plukis1, A. Poch44,I.Porras 45, J. Praena45,C.Pretel 44, J.M. Quesada21, D. Radeck42, K. Rajeev24, T. Rauscher46,47,R.Reifarth 5,A.Riego 19, M. Robles6, F. Roman4, P.C. Rout24, G. Rudolf13, C. Rubbia4, P. Rullhusen35,J.A.Ryan 16, M. Sabat´ e-Gilarte4, J. Salgado12, C. Santos12, L. Sarchiapone4, R. Sarmento12, A. Saxena24, P. Schillebeeckx35, S. Schmidt5, D. Schumann27, P. Sedyshev29, A.G. Smith16, N.V. Sosnin16, A. Stamatopoulos37, C. Stephan9, S.V. Suryanarayana24, G. Tagliente11,J.L.Tain 26, A. Tarife˜ no-Saldivia19,D.Tarr ´ ıo6,L.Tassan-Got 9,L.Tavora 12, R. Terlizzi11, A. Tsinganis4, S. Valenta14, G. Vannini40, V. Vari al e11,P.Vaz 12, A. Ventura40, R. Versaci4, M.J. Vermeulen18, D. Villamarin7, M.C. Vicente7, V. Vlachoudis4, R. Vlastou37,F.Voss 25,A.Wallner 48, S. Walter25,T.Ware 16, S. Warren16, M. Weigand5,C.Weiß 4,C.Wolf 5, M. Wiesher23, K. Wisshak25, P.J. Woods39, T. Wright16,P. ˇ Zugec17, and the n TOF Collaboration (www.cern.ch/ntof) 1CEA, Irfu, Universite´ ı Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France 2IAEA Nuclear Data Section, Vienna, Austria 3OECD Nuclear Energy Agency, Boulogne-Billancourt, France 4CERN, European Organization for Nuclear Research, Geneva, Switzerland 5Johann-Wolfgang-Goethe Universit¨ at, Frankfurt, Germany 6Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Spain 7CIEMAT, Centro de Investigaciones Energeticas Medioambientales y Tecnol´ ogicas, Madrid, Spain 8University of Lodz, Poland 9IPN, CNRS-IN2P3, Universit´ e Paris-Sud, Universit´ e Paris-Saclay, Orsay, France 10 TUW, Technische Universit¨ at Wien, Vienna, Austria 11 INFN, Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Bari, Italy 12 Instituto Superior T´ ecnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal 13 CNRS/IN2P3 – IPHC, Strasbourg, France 14 Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic 15 INFN, Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Trieste, Italy 16 University of Manchester, UK 17 Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Zagreb, Croatia 18 University of York, UK ae-mail: [email protected] © The Authors, published by EDP Sciences. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). EPJ Web of Conferences 146, 07002 (2017) DOI: 10.1051/epjconf/201714607002 ND2016 19 Universitat Polit´ ecnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain 20 ENEA, Agenzia nazionale per le nuove tecnologie, Bologna, Italy 21 Universidad de Sevilla, Spain 22 INFN – Laboratori Nazionali del Sud, Catania, Italy 23 University of Notre Dame, Indiana, USA 24 BARC, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai, India 25 KIT, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany 26 Instituto de F´ ısica Corpuscular, Universidad de Valencia, Spain 27 PSI, Paul Scherrer Institut, Villigen, Switzerland 28 Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece 29 JINR, Dubna, Russia 30 Horia Hulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering, Bucharest – Magurele, Romania 31 IPPE, Obninsk, Russia 32 INFN – Laboratori Nazionali di Legnaro, Italy 33 LANL, New Mexico, USA 34 JAEA, Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Japan 35 EC-JRC-Geel, European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Geel, Belgium 36 Tokyo Institute of Technology, Japan 37 NTUA, National Technical University of Athens, Greece 38 University of Ioannina, Greece 39 University of Edinburgh, UK 40 Dipartimento di Fisica, Universit` a di Bologna, and Sezione INFN di Bologna, Italy 41 Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia, Universit` a di Catania and INFN-Laboratori Nazionali del Sud, Catania, Italy 42 PTB, Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, Braunschweig, Germany 43 University of Vienna, Faculty of Physics, Vienna, Austria 44 Universidad Polit´ ecnica de Madrid, Spain 45 Universidad de Granada, Spain 46 Centre for Astrophysics Research, University of Hertfordshire, UK 47 Department of Physics, University of Basel, Switzerland 48 Australian National University, Canberra, Australia Abstract.The n TOF neutron time-of-flight facility at CERN is used for high quality nuclear data measurements from thermal energy up to hundreds of MeV. In line with the CERN open data policy, the nTOF Collaboration takes actions to preserve its unique data, facilitate access to them in standardised format, and allow their re-use by a wide community in the fields of nuclear physics, nuclear astrophysics and various nuclear technologies. The present contribution briefly describes the n TOF outcomes, as well as the status of dissemination and preservation of n TOF final data in the international EXFOR library. 1. Introduction The CERN n TOF facility [1] is used since 2001 for high quality nuclear data measurements. A considerable amount of valuable experimental results have been obtained and published, and new measurements are going on. These results are important for the end-users of nuclear data, in particular for the improvement of evaluated nuclear data libraries. In line with global standards in data preservation and Open Science, the n TOF Collaboration takes actions to preserve its unique data, facilitate access to them in standardised format, and allow their re-use by a wide community in the fields of nuclear physics, nuclear astrophysics and various nuclear technologies for medical and energy applications. In the latter fields, all evaluated nuclear reaction libraries are built from the international EXFOR library [2], which has been successfully developed and maintained for 50 years by the International Network of Nuclear Reaction Data Centres (NRDC). Accordingly, the n TOF Collaboration strengthened the links with the IAEA Nuclear Data Section and the NEA Data Bank to improve the dissemination and preservation of its data through the EXFOR library. The present paper describes the main nTOF outcomes, and the status of data dissemination activities. 2. The n TOF outcomes The facility is based on the 20 GeV/c pulsed proton beam from CERN’s Proton Synchrotron impinging on a lead spallation target. A layer of water around the spallation target moderates the initially fast neutrons down to a white spectrum of neutrons covering the full range between meV and GeV neutron energies. During Phase-I when the first spallation target was used from 2001 up to 2004, the water coolant also served as moderator. Starting from Phase-II, after the installation in 2008 of an upgraded spallation target, the latter was enclosed with a separate cooling circuit followed by an exchangeable borated water moderator. Since 2001, neutron induced reactions are measured in the experimental area EAR-1 [3] at approximately 185 m from the spallation source. In 2014, a second experimental area, EAR-2 [4], at about 18 m from the neutron source has been constructed for Phase-III and is offering new possibilities for demanding cross section measurements. Table 1gives an overview of the number of measurements since 2001. 2.1. Phase-I (2001–2004) & Phase-II (2009–2012) During the first phase from 2001 to 2004 capture and fission data for a number of isotopes have been 2 EPJ Web of Conferences 146, 07002 (2017) DOI: 10.1051/epjconf/201714607002 ND2016 taken. Capture measurements with C6D6liquid scintillator detectors concerned both stable and radioactive isotopes of Mg, Fe, Zr, La, Sm, Os, Au, Pb, Bi, and Th. A 4πTotal Absorption Calorimeter (TAC) [5] consisting of 40 BaF2crystals has been used for neutron capture measurements of 197Au, 233U, 234U, 237Np, 240Pu, and 243Am. Fission cross sections were measured with the FIC fission detectors [6]for232Th, 233U, 234U, 235U, 236U, 238U, 237Np, 241Am, 243Am, and 245Cm. Other fission detectors based on Parallel Plate Avalanche Counters (PPAC) [7,8] were used in measurements of the fission cross sections of nat Pb, 209Bi, 232Th, 237Np, 233U, 234U, 235U and 238U. The full list of measured isotopes and reactions together with the final or most relevant publication is given in Ref. [9]. During Phase-II in 2009–2012 mostly capture measurements were performed, while new PPAC were used for additional fission experiments, including the measurement of the fission-fragment angular distributions [10]. The (n,γ) reaction was investigated on additional stable and radioactive isotopes of Mg, Fe, Ni, and Zr. In order to handle unsealed, but still encapsulated, highly radioactive samples, EAR-1 was transformed in a type A laboratory. After this transformation, measurements of the capture reactions were performed for 236U, 238U and 241Am, for the latter two with two different capture detector systems (C6D6and TAC). The TAC was also used in combination with a Micromegas detector in a first attempt to measure the 235U(n,γ) reaction using a veto on the fission reaction. In addition to these measurements several other techniques have been tested and the full list of the Phase-II measurements and their references are given in Ref. [9]. Table 1. Overview of the number of n TOF measurements. Phase-I Phase-II Phase-III Reaction (2001–2004) (2009–2012) (2014–...)* (n,γ)27 16 12(+14) (n,f) 18 46(+2) (n,cp) 0 3 5(+1) *The numbers between parentheses correspond to additional approved measurements, as of March 2017. 2.2. Phase-III (2014-. . . ) Since 2014, two experimental areas are available for capture and fission measurements, and new challenging experiments are now possible in EAR-2, such as 240Pu(n,f), 244Cm(n,γ), 246Cm(n,γ), 7Be(n,α) and 7Be(n,p). The list of the 2014-2015 measurements is available in Ref. [9] and an update is given in Ref. [11]. 3. Data dissemination Publication of results is obviously essential for knowledge transfer and preservation, but this is not enough when dealing with nuclear data for applications. Indeed, these data should be usable and actually used. Hence, once the data are finalized, published and fully exploited by the nTOF Collaboration, it is essential to make them widely available to all users. In the field of nuclear technologies especially, the EXFOR library is known as the “Mother of all libraries” and is the ground for the development of all evaluated nuclear reaction libraries for particle transport, activation, dosimetry, standards, etc. Moreover, EXFOR has been successfully maintained for decades and is continuously updated by the NRDC network. These two reasons make EXFOR an appropriate place for both an efficient dissemination and preservation of n TOF data. 3.1. IAEA recommendations The IAEA organised in 2013 a meeting on EXFOR data in the resonance region and spectrometer response functions [12]. Participants agreed on recommendations and prepared templates for submission of time-of- flight spectra to NRDC. The main recommendations for experimentalists can be summarized as follows. •Reaction yield or transmission should be reported in addition to cross sections. •Data should be reported vs. time-of-flight in addition to the required neutron energy. •Total uncertainty and uncorrelated uncertainty components should be reported separately. •Additional information necessary to reconstruct the full covariance matrix should be reported if correlations due to data reduction are significant. •Additional quantities of interest should be reported, such as the neutron flux distribution, energydependent backgrounds and correction factors, as well as the spectrometer response function to be used with the data. 3.2. Dissemination of n TOF final data The raw n TOF data are available on CERN computers, whereas the final reduced data of interest to users are generally only available from the physicists doing the analysis. In order to release and preserve these final data, the n TOF authors use the IAEA recommendations and templates as guidelines for the information to be supplied, with emphasis on data not already available in the publications. In order to quantify the status and progress of the dissemination of n TOF data, one should distinguish between various acceptable levels of completeness in data reporting. After publication of the final results, it is acknowledged that the necessary data to disseminate and preserve are the main experimental quantities (such as pointwise reaction yields, cross sections, crosssection ratios) and the associated statistical/uncorrelated uncertainty vs. energy with the best possible resolution. The status of n TOF data available in EXFOR with this necessary information is considered as acceptable. The dissemination and preservation in EXFOR of more comprehensive datasets is obviously encouraged, and actually done on a case-by-case basis, depending on the end-use of the data and interactions with expert users such as evaluators. Figure 1and Table 2illustrate the excellent data dissemination status of n TOF data for fission. It shows the strong commitment of the fission team, which took the initiative early 2015 to make these data widely available to the nuclear data community. Figure 2shows the progress for the dissemination of capture data measured during Phase-I. The situation is not as satisfactory as for fission yet, essentially because capture measurements were performed by different teams, which partly turned to other activities along the different 3 EPJ Web of Conferences 146, 07002 (2017) DOI: 10.1051/epjconf/201714607002 ND2016 Figure 1. Evolution of data dissemination for Phase-I fission data. “Final” corresponds to datasets with a final publication; “OK” to datasets available in EXFOR with all necessary data; “OK +ongoing” includes also datasets under compilation by NRDC. Figure 2. Evolution of data dissemination for (n,γ)data (Phase-I). See Fig. 1for explanation of the legend. nTOF phases. Nevertheless, the situation is improving and contacts have been established with authors in order to retrieve old data and complement current EXFOR entries. Table 2shows the global dissemination status of n TOF data, as of March 2017. Overall, 75% of the datasets with a final publication are available in EXFOR with an acceptable status, i.e., all necessary data available. The current objective is to reach dissemination values higher than 80% for all reactions and phases. This should be possible thanks to ongoing efforts to retrieve as much as possible Phase-I capture yields from backups. 4. Outlook Experimental data are useful and unique, accordingly they must be usable, actually used, and preserved. In order to improve the usability and long-term preservation of Table 2. Dissemination status of n TOF data as of March 2017. nTOF Datasets with Data phases Reaction a final dissemination publication status* Phase-I (n,γ)26 58% (2001–2004) (n,f) 14 100% All 40 73% Phase-II (n,γ)771% (2009–2012) (n,f) 2100% (n,cp) 2100% All 11 82% Phase-III (2014–...) (n,cp) 1100% *Percentage of final datasets with all necessary data already available in EXFOR or under compilation by NRDC. nTOF outcomes, the data dissemination is continuously monitored: new data are systematically released after the final publication, whereas the backlog of final data not available is being reduced. This is made possible thanks to an improved organisation for the data dissemination, and of course to the involvement of the whole n TOF Collaboration, especially for the retrieval of old datasets. A list of measurements since 2001 is available on the nTOF public TWiki webpage [13]. That list includes detailed information on the measured reactions: n TOF phase, experimental area, detectors, energy range, data status (preliminary or final), main publications and corresponding EXFOR entries. References [1] The n TOF Collaboration, CERN/INTC-O-011, INTC-2002-037, CERN-SL-2002-053 ECT (2003) [2] N. Otuka, et al., Nucl. Data Sheets 120, 272 (2014) [3] C.Guerrero,etal.,Eur.Phys.J.A49, 27 (2013) [4] C. Weiß, et al., Nucl. Instr. Meth. A 799,90 (2015) [5] C. Guerrero, et al., Nucl. Instr. Meth. A 608, 424 (2009) [6] M. Calviani, et al., Nucl. Instr. Meth. A 594, 220 (2008) [7] C. Paradela, et al., Phys. Rev. C 82, 034601 (2010) [8] D. Tarr´ ıo, et al., Phys. Rev. C 83, 044620 (2011) [9] F. Gunsing, et al., Eur. Phys. J. Plus 131, 371 (2016) [10] D. Tarr´ ıo, et al., Nucl. Instr. Meth. A 743,79 (2014) [11] F. Gunsing, et al., this conference I107 (2016) [12] F. Gunsing, P. Schillebeeckx, V. Semkova, Report INDC(NDS)-0647 (IAEA, Vienna, 2013) [13] http://twiki.cern.ch/NTOFPublic 4