Residents’ perceptions regarding the implementation of a tourist tax at a UNESCO World Heritage Site: a cluster analysis of Santiago de Compostela (Spain)

  Citation: Soares, J.R.R.; Remoaldo, P.; Perinotto, A.R.C.; Gabriel, L.P.M.C.; Lezcano-González, M.E.; Sánchez-Fernández, M.-D. Residents’ Perceptions Regarding the Implementation of a Tourist Tax at a UNESCO World Heritage Site: A Cluster Analysis of Santiago de Compostela (Spain). Land 2022,11, 189. https://doi.org/10.3390/ land11020189 Academic Editors: Alastair M. Morrison and Hossein Azadi Received: 3 December 2021 Accepted: 17 January 2022 Published: 25 January 2022 Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Copyright: © 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ 4.0/). land Article Residents’ Perceptions Regarding the Implementation of a Tourist Tax at a UNESCO World Heritage Site: A Cluster Analysis of Santiago de Compostela (Spain) Jakson Renner Rodrigues Soares 1,2,* , Paula Remoaldo 3, AndréRiani Costa Perinotto 2,4 , Larissa Paola Macedo Castro Gabriel 5, María Elvira Lezcano-González 6 and María-Dolores Sánchez-Fernández 1 1Department of Business, University of A Coruña, 15001 A Coruña, Spain; [email protected] 2Master in Tourism Business Management, Universidade Estadual do Ceará, Fortaleza 60714-903, Brazil; [email protected] 3Lab2PT and Department of Geography, Universidade do Minho, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal; [email protected] 4Department of Tourism, Parnaiba Delta Federal University, Parnaíba 64202-020, Brazil 5Tourism, Economy and Sustainability Research Group, Universidade Estadual do Ceará, Fortaleza 60714-903, Brazil; [email protected] 6Department of Humanities, University of A Coruña, 15001 A Coruña, Spain; [email protected] *Correspondence: jakson.soar[email protected] Abstract: Even though the residents’ perceptions on the tourist activity have been thoroughly investigated in the last three decades, there are still few similar studies on destinations that are listed as UNESCO World Heritage Sites. The research presented in this article assesses the perception of the residents of the municipality of Santiago de Compostela (Spain) regarding the implementation of a tourist tax. The study is based on 588 residents’ responses to a survey conducted through a questionnaire prepared by the authors. Owing to the exponential increase in the number of visitor arrivals to the city, the implementation of a tourist tax could be one of the strategies deployed to improve the tourist experience. It may also allow for a less negative interaction between residents and tourists. The analysis revealed the existence of three clusters: tax-skeptics, tax-enthusiasts, and tax-reactionaries. The results are consistent with the nature of a mature destination, with most respondents supporting the implementation of a tourist tax that could contribute to improving, amongst other things, the quality of the tourist destination for both visitors and residents. Keywords: cluster analyses; overtourism; impacts of tourism; residents’ perceptions; UNESCO World Heritage Sites 1. Introduction There is a general understanding about the importance of cultural tourism for the economic development of destinations. Nevertheless, one cannot forget that the great success recognized by economic actors resulting from the tourist use of heritage can produce discomfort for the local community [ 1 ]. Thus, tourism planning must be based on policies capable of improving the tourist experience in a responsible manner and safeguarding the residents’ quality of life. Consulting residents in local communities is an important piece for the creation of sustainable destinations in terms of tourism, since they are considered key actors in the development of sustainable tourism strategies [2,3]. Among the numerous investigations that address the strategies needed to reduce the negative impacts resulting from tourism revised by the authors in their literature review, several defended tourism taxation [ 4 – 10 ]. Nevertheless, although there are numerous studies on residents’ perceptions of tourism [ 3 , 11 – 17 ], none of them analyzed this variable. Land 2022,11, 189. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11020189 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/land Land 2022,11, 189 2 of 18 A recent study [ 18 ] about the attitudes towards tourism confirmed a relation between residents’ perceptions and attitudes towards tourism and the impacts associated with this activity. Themes such as perception of the impacts of tourism in improving the quality of life or the role of residents in the image of the destination have been more widely researched than the perception of residents regarding the implementation of a tourist tax. According to an analysis of scientific articles on residents’ attitudes, the largest number of publications was conducted in the USA (n= 19–21.1%) and only 5 (5.5%) in Spain, but none of them dealt with the residents’ perception of the implementation of a tax [18]. Therefore, the literature review indicates that even though there are studies that analyze the impacts of implementing a tourist tax in a destination, none of them portrayed the resident’s point of view regarding that implementation. Nonetheless, a study of this type could serve to support political decisions that might be less consensual, and might prevent the increase of conflicts between residents and tourists and improve their relationship. The implementation of a tourist tax can also revert in favor of the preservation of the cultural heritage that has been under stress over the decades and especially in the last few years. The implementation of a tourist tax is something that has been practiced in several countries for a long time (e.g., France and Italy) to minimize the externalities resulting from tourism. Even so, after numerous studies that discuss the effectiveness and benefits of such a tax [ 10 , 19 , 20 ] in some consolidated destinations, this topic still raises great discussions, as is the case of Santiago de Compostela (Spain). Santiago de Compostela stands out as an object of research, as analyzes related to UNESCO World Heritage cities are still scarce, and even more so studies about the application of a cluster analysis, i.e., analyzing the perception of residents through segmentation [ 17 ]. Tourist destinations included in the UNESCO’s World Heritage Site list demand special care because they must retain their especial universal value, and integrally meet the criteria outlined in UNESCO’s listings [ 21 ]. Based on these assumptions, the two main objectives of this study are to assess residents’ perceptions of the impacts of implementing a tourist tax in the city of Santiago de Compostela and to segment residents according to their perceptions using a cluster analysis. Once the cluster analysis is carried out, we will be in the position to make more contributions to the design of strategies for sustainable tourism not only in a World Heritage Site, but in other cultural destinations as well. This research aims to offer tourism planners useful information regarding the implementation of a tourist tax in tourist destinations. Segmenting residents into different groups is useful for designing strategies to deal with the different groups in a destination [22]. 2. Research on the Implementation of Fees in Tourism It is not an easy task to define the tourist product and identify the best way to levy taxes on tourist activities [ 23 ]. The discussion about the adoption of taxes is complex, although taxes are intended to solve problems of public roads, generate funds that aimed to improve the environment and create infrastructure more aligned with the pressure economic activities. Moreover, revenue coming from tourism taxes could be used to carry out interventions in the urban landscape to optimize the destination, increase the resident’s well-being and improve the relationship between visitors and residents, since the local communities are the ones who suffer the most the impacts of tourism activity [ 23 , 24 ]. The numerous externalities caused by this activity generate costs that affect the economy and the environment, as well as the social and cultural life of the destination. Therefore, tourism taxation could offer a workable solution to those challenges [ 25 ]. This makes sense, as taxing highly tourism-intensive sectors increases the destination’s revenue [ 7 ]. In this way, tourists would bear the costs of the tax, while the inhabitants of the destination would enjoy the benefits of public spending [26]. There have been many studies on the taxation of tourism; these studies range from taxation on transport and accommodation services to studies on the effect of the tax on tourist demand and tourism planning [ 4 – 6 , 8 – 10 ]. The movement to tax tourism can be Land 2022,11, 189 3 of 18 used to amend problems such as the increased traffic congestion on the roads (improving infrastructure) and actions to avoid the deterioration of the environment [ 27 ]. Furthermore, it is possible to accept the imposition of a tax as a reasonable and civilized solution to the problem caused by a large flows of tourists, since it allows for compensating the damage caused [10]. Many of the largest tourist cities in the world have the Tourist Tax or Tourist Fee collected in hotels and other accommodations (e.g., Lisbon charges between € 1 and € 2, Barcelona charges up to € 4.25, Paris charges up to € 4.4, Rome charges between € 2 and € 3, and New York charges € 3.5). It is generally not difficult to collect and manage these taxes, which results in limited compliance costs [ 7 ]. As highlighted [ 24 ], while part of the destinations dedicate the funds collected to the maintenance and conservation of the cultural heritage, other destinations employ these funds in the recovery of the ecological damage derived from anthropic pressure, which results mostly in investments for tourism promotion. Out of the 45 types of tourist taxes identified [ 7 , 28 ], 30 are directly paid by tourists. In this regard, we will discuss taxes that aim to reduce the inconveniences caused by tourism. Some cities charge the fee at the end of tourist stay. In this case, it is a voluntarily contribution paid by the visitors, they are called Room Tax, Stay Tax or Tourist Tax. It is usually applied in destinations that have an organization specialized in capturing events, such as the Convention Bureau. It should be noted that even though the payment may be optional; however, in some European cities or countries, its collection is mandatory. The implementation of such taxes in Europe was based on European Union regulations that recommend the introduction of fees to guarantee greater efficiency in the transport system [ 9 ], proposing to charge a tourist tax on the rental of tourist transport. Thus, it is understood that one should have tax incentives, such as specific taxes for this sector and Value Added Tax (VAT) [29]. The tax regime can help stimulate the growth of tourism, as it can reduce the investment and maintenance costs of a tourist business. Although, most tour operators consider taxes as barriers to business and investment [ 23 ]. A study on tourist tax elasticity in Florida identified that contrary to what researchers and the tourism industry believe, tourists may not be as sensitive to small changes in tax rates [ 30 ]. Considering all the stress that the tourist activity places on the host communities and over its resources, most importantly over the natural environment, some aspects of taxation are important to reduce or mitigate some of its impacts from the perspective of sustainable management of the local economy [ 31 ]. In theory, the hotel tax might be paid by visitors due to the scrutiny of tourist resources since it is related to the length of the visit in the host community [ 23 , 31 ]. Additionally, tourism development has potential risk to result in unplanned growth in destinations, which it can deplete the resources [ 31 ]. Revenue raised from a tourist tax could be an important source of income to reduce or mitigate the impacts of tourism, despite the difficulties to implement it. An appropriate way of taxing tourism is the collection of a fee based on the tourists’ daily spending capacity; but, it is difficult to identify the spending standards of tourists on their performed activities. Therefore, a more realistic approach must be found in each city, region, or country. It is also important to highlight that tourism can be taxed in two ways [ 31 ]: indirectly through the general tax system, particularly on profits and sales taxes, or directly through the introduction of special taxes, attached to tourist activities, especially for arrival, boarding fees, or hotel fees. In this line, the authors of a study on tourism taxation of in Spain’s focusing Balearic Islands and its “ecotasa” [ 8 ], found that a 10% accommodation tax generates significant public revenues, and increases social welfare. On the other hand, a VAT increase on the tourist products and services can have the same effects on tourist expenses, however it might cause greater impact on the country’s economy. Finally, it is notable that tourist taxes (fees) have become a simple alternative for the public administration to obtain extra income to finance investments, infrastructure, and social services. Since tourism represents a primary source of wealth and employment for many destinations, it is important not to Land 2022,11, 189 4 of 18 impose excessive taxes on the sector [ 20 ]. Thus, verifying the Italian model [ 32 ], the authors confirmed that the tourist tax respects the principle of progressivity in relation to the classification of accommodation and the nights spent up to a maximum number of nights. In some cases, the fee is higher in the first few days, decreasing in the remaining days. There are some types of exemptions linked to minors, people with functional diversity and their companions, public transport drivers and tourist guides. 3. Methodology Before moving on to the technical aspects that defined the methodology of this research, it is important to briefly present the tourist situation of the destination object of this study, which is Santiago de Compostela (Figure 1), one of the cities where the debate on the implementation of a tourist tax has recently resurfaced. In 2017, the local government of Santiago de Compostela raised the discussion about this implementation, but the Xunta de Galicia (Autonomous Government), did not accept this possibility, opposing the implementation of a tourist tax in the Galician capital. Santiago has a population of approximately 100 thousand stable inhabitants plus 23 thousand students who are not registered in the territory, but live there during the academic course [ 33 ]. The city of Santiago de Compostela is a very special city in Spain, because of the considerable number of paths in the St. James’ Way that end in the city, Santiago is more exposed to overtourism than any other Spanish UNESCO World Heritage Sites, and, for that reason, it is necessary to assess the local community’s view about specific strategies to counter this scenario. Land2021,10,xFORPEERREVIEW4of19  incometofinanceinvestments,infrastructure,andsocialservices.Sincetourism representsaprimarysourceofwealthandemploymentformanydestinations,itis importantnottoimposeexcessivetaxesonthesector[20].Thus,verifyingtheItalian model[32],theauthorsconfirmedthatthetouristtaxrespectstheprincipleof progressivityinrelationtotheclassificationofaccommodationandthenightsspentupto amaximumnumberofnights.Insomecases,thefeeishigherinthefirstfewdays, decreasingintheremainingdays.Therearesometypesofexemptionslinkedtominors, peoplewithfunctionaldiversityandtheircompanions,publictransportdriversand touristguides. 3.Methodology Beforemovingontothetechnicalaspectsthatdefinedthemethodologyofthis research,itisimportanttobrieflypresentthetouristsituationofthedestinationobjectof thisstudy,whichisSantiagodeCompostela(Figure1),oneofthecitieswherethedebate ontheimplementationofatouristtaxhasrecentlyresurfaced.In2017,thelocal governmentofSantiagodeCompostelaraisedthediscussionaboutthisimplementation, buttheXuntadeGalicia(AutonomousGovernment),didnotacceptthispossibility, opposingtheimplementationofatouristtaxintheGaliciancapital.Santiagohasa populationofapproximately100thousandstableinhabitantsplus23thousandstudents whoarenotregisteredintheterritory,butlivethereduringtheacademiccourse[33].The cityofSantiagodeCompostelaisaveryspecialcityinSpain,becauseoftheconsiderable numberofpathsintheSt.James’Waythatendinthecity,Santiagoismoreexposedto overtourismthananyotherSpanishUNESCOWorldHeritageSites,and,forthatreason, itisnecessarytoassessthelocalcommunity’sviewaboutspecificstrategiestocounter thisscenario.  Figure1.MapswiththelocationofSantiagodeCompostela.Source:Ownelaboration(preparedby MateusR.dosSantos). Figure 1. Maps with the location of Santiago de Compostela. Source: Own elaboration (prepared by Mateus R. dos Santos). Land 2022,11, 189 5 of 18 The city was declared a World Heritage Site by UNESCO in 1985, due to its urban complex, monumental integrity and because it is the destination of an ancient pilgrimage route. From the 9th century on, the Camino de Santiago became a meeting place for the faith and thought of the Western world. It has 16 museums and surprising contemporary architecture [ 33 ]. Santiago is also the protagonist of the Xacobeo events, which take place at a regular rate of 6-5-6-11 years. In addition, the destination is the stage for several cultural events, such as popular festivals and annual festivals of music, cinema, theater, and art exhibitions. It is also important to highlight the apostle’s festivals held in July, declared of International Tourist Interest [33]. The place attracts millions of visitors throughout the year. Some of them motivated by devotion and others by their monumental beauty. There are also those who choose Santiago de Compostela as the location for their professional events. The destination offers a network of accommodation of more than 10,700 beds, specific infrastructure for meetings and conferences, and a substantial gastronomic offer. All this in a region in which tourism accounted for 10.4% of the economy’s GDP in 2018 and 11% of employments (123.772 people are employed in tourism) [ 34 ]. In addition, it received more than 5.1 million tourists in 2019, making Santiago the destination with the largest number of overnight stays in the region, reaching the mark of 1.4 million in 2019 [ 34 ]. According to data offered by Turismo de Santiago, the Camino also achieved in 2019 a new historical peak, with almost 350,000 pilgrims (whose final destination was the city of Santiago de Compostela) and a growth of 6% over 2018 [35]. Most of the local stakeholders in Santiago de Compostela are aware of the threat of overtourism [ 36 ]. The perception of overtourism seems to be conditioned by people’s personal circumstances, by their economic and professional interests and, mainly, by the space-time variable. Tourist congestion with the ensuing overtourism issues intensify in the of the Old City of Santiago, a small must-see tourist attraction which, experiences a strong concentration of tourists. As a result of these figures, Santiago, the final destination in the Way of St.-James (the “Camino”, as it is popularly known), has become a massive destination. In recent years, alarms have been triggered, especially as a result of the discontent of the local population. The World Heritage Cities group aims to defend common interests, study solutions to similar problems, as well as promote quality tourism. For this reason, such a study can be of great help for future action. This study was designed on the characteristics of the territory and the tourist situation. It is a quantitative study, based on primary and secondary sources. Regarding primary sources, a survey by questionnaire was conducted amongst residents and non-residents of the city of Santiago de Compostela (capital of Galicia—Spain). In total, 614 questionnaires were collected from February to June 2018 using a convenience sample. As it was important for respondents to have a citizen relationship with the city (either live or work there), an initial question was asked to ensure that those who did not have this relationship could not answer the questionnaire. Based on this premise, 588 questionnaires were considered with complete data (margin of error 5% and confidence level 95%). A pre-test was carried out with 11 people from different levels of education, social classes, age groups and gender. During the pre-test, it turned out that an average of 9 min were necessary to fill the questionnaire out. For the final version, some adjustments were made to make some questions clearer and more objective and, as the survey was online, it was mandatory to answer the entire questionnaire in order to finalize and send it. It must be noted that after a questionnaire in paper was used in the first phase of the survey, which proved to be very hard, the authors decided to use the online version of the questionnaire to continue with the survey. As 85.6% of the population residing in Santiago de Compostela has access to the Internet [ 37 ], we considered that this methodology was the most appropriate. In addition to a more effective and safer procedure, the online survey ensured that all the questions were answered and, therefore, valid for our analysis. Previous studies on the residents’ perceptions about the impacts of tourism were the base for the questionnaire [ 2 , 12 , 14 , 16 , 17 , 38 – 40 ]. Although some studies have sample Land 2022,11, 189 6 of 18 numbers below 300 while others exceed 1000 responses [ 3 ], most studies consider samples between 350 and 450 questionnaires [17,38,41,42]. Nevertheless, this is the first questionnaire to be designed and used to collect the residents’ perceptions about tourist tax. As Cronbach’s alpha of the scale resulted in 0.879 (greater than the minimum acceptable 0.8), the instrument passes the test of reliability [ 43 – 45 ]. This indicates your ability to measure that construct. Thus, the result was a questionnaire with 26 questions, most of which were categorized and structured according to a five-level Likert scale, ranging from the “strongly disagree” option to the “strongly agree” option. At the end, the respondent’s sociodemographic information (age, gender, education level, family income, occupation) was included. Some geographical variables, such as being born in the municipality, the time the person lived in Santiago de Compostela and the parish where they lived were also provided. In this article, only the question related to the tourist tax was considered for analysis (Indicate your opinion regarding the introduction of a tourist tax in Santiago, with 1 not in agreement with the measure and 5 in complete agreement). In case of no having no opinion, respondents were asked to check the box “without opinion”. Four statements that covered various arguments for the implementation of the tourist tax were then offered: (a) It would improve the economic impact of tourism in the city; (b) it would help reduce tourism seasonality in the city; (c) it would be positive for the city; and (d) it would be positive for me. Taking as a starting point the study performed by Vareiro, Remoaldo and Cadima [ 17 ], the statistical procedures were performed, the SPSS software (version 24) was used in the following research steps. The first step, the “univariate” statistical data calculation, was performed for all items on the survey. In the second step, a unidirectional ANOVA analysis was performed, and t-tests were used to identify differences between six sociodemographic variables in relation to the 4 items that measure the perception regarding the tourist tax included in question 11. When the independent variable was divided in two groups (gender, link with the tourism industry), t-tests were applied. ANOVA tests were applied when the independent variable was divided into three or more subgroups (neighborhood, level of education, family income, exposure to tourism). In the third step, a non-hierarchical cluster analysis was performed. It used the k means cluster algorithm for each of the 4 items, and they measure residents’ perceptions regarding the implementation of a tourist tax. Therefore, those residents could be grouped only by their perceptions, as the sociodemographic variables were not accounted for. Regarding the sociodemographic profile of the subjects of the survey sample, 58% of respondents were female, very similar to the 54% that were registered in 2018 [ 46 ]. About the age group, most respondents were between 25 and 65 years old (86.4%—Table 1), corresponding to an underrepresentation of this age group, since in the municipality the percentage is 65% of the population [ 46 ]. Only 30% worked in the tourism industry. As for the variable level of education, 48.5% had university studies and 27.2% achieved a master’s degree or a Ph.D. The second most representative level was that of people with secondary education (11.5%). Finally, we found 10.5% of the population with professional training and only 2.7% with primary education. This section may be divided by subheadings. It should provide a concise and precise description of the experimental results, their interpretation, as well as the experimental conclusions that can be drawn. Most respondents (74.5%) live in non-tourist neighborhoods, with 62.9% living in the urban area. The remaining 25.5% live in in the Old City (Zona Vella) or in the neighborhood of São Pedro, tourist neighborhoods within the city. In addition, 11.6% of the respondents live in the outskirts of the city, away from the urban area but maintaining some daily relationship (work or study) with Santiago de Compostela. The remaining sociodemographic characteristics of the respondents lead us to consider that we are dealing with a sample that corresponds to a middle/lower-middle class (Figure 2). Land 2022,11, 189 7 of 18 Table 1. Profile of respondents. N % N % Gender Link with the tourist industry Male 239 40.6 Yes 173 29.5 Female 341 58 No 412 70 No answer 8 1.4 No answer 3 0.5 Age group Residency 15–24 65 11.1 Tourist area 150 25.5 25–65 508 86.4 Non-tourist area 370 62.9 Older than 65 15 2.5 Outskirts 68 11.6 Level of education Monthly family income Basic 16 2.7 No income 15 2.6 Secondary 65 11.1 Less than 500 Euros 16 2.6 Vocational training 62 10.5 501–1000 Euros 81 13.8 Undergraduate 285 48.5 1001–1500 Euros 145 24.7 Postgraduate 160 27.2 1501–2500 Euros 175 29.8 2501–5000 Euros 140 23.8 More than 5000 Euros 16 2.7 Source: own elaboration. Land2021,10,xFORPEERREVIEW7of19  Table1.Profileofrespondents. N%N% GenderLinkwiththetouristindustry  Male23940.6Yes17329.5 Female34158No41270 Noanswer81.4Noanswer30.5 Agegroup Residency 15–246511.1Touristarea15025.5 25–6550886.4Non‐touristarea37062.9 Olderthan65152.5Outskirts6811.6 Levelofeducation  Monthlyfamilyincome Basic162.7Noincome152.6 Secondary6511.1Lessthan500Euros162.6 Vocationaltraining6210.5501–1000Euros8113.8 Undergraduate28548.51001–1500Euros14524.7 Postgraduate16027.21501–2500Euros17529.8 2501–5000Euros14023.8 Morethan5000Euros162.7 Source:ownelaboration. Mostrespondents(74.5%)liveinnon‐touristneighborhoods,with62.9%livinginthe urbanarea.Theremaining25.5%liveinintheOldCity(ZonaVella)orinthe neighborhoodofSãoPedro,touristneighborhoodswithinthecity.Inaddition,11.6%of therespondentsliveintheoutskirtsofthecity,awayfromtheurbanareabutmaintaining somedailyrelationship(workorstudy)withSantiagodeCompostela.Theremaining sociodemographiccharacteristicsoftherespondentsleadustoconsiderthatweare dealingwithasamplethatcorrespondstoamiddle/lower‐middleclass(Figure2).  Figure2.Demographicprofileofthesurveyrespondents.Source:ownelaboration. Figure 2. Demographic profile of the survey respondents. Source: own elaboration. 4. Results It is important to point out some general data about the sample. Table 2presents the results for the four statements and the answers to the items related to the implementation of the tourist tax. For all items, the Likert scale ranged from 1 “strongly disagree” to 5 “strongly agree”. An examination of the available data reveals that, in general, respondents agreed to the implementation of a tourist tax in Santiago de Compostela. Land 2022,11, 189 8 of 18 Table 2. Results for 4 statements regarding the perception of the implementation of the tax. The Introduction of a Tourist Tax in Santiago . . . 1 2 3 4 5 Average Standard Deviation It would improve the economic impact of tourism in the city 17.2 6.8 12.6 16.5 46.9 3.57 1.54 It would help reduce tourism seasonality 23.8 9.9 19.0 11.2 36.1 2.90 1.52 It would be positive for the city 17.2 6.5 13.6 16.0 46.8 3.58 1.53 It would be positive for myself 32.8 10.5 11.1 9.2 36.4 2.58 1.59 Source: own elaboration. Using the statement “The introduction of a tourist tax in Santiago would improve the economic impact of tourist in the city”, we can conclude that 63.4% of respondents expressed a positive opinion about the tourist tax, they are agreeing that it was good for the city. In the same line, when asked if it would be positive for the city, 62.8% said yes. This result leads us to conclude that the desire to implement a tourist tax should be discussed with representatives of residents’ associations and with other stakeholders, since there is still a considerable percentage of respondents who do not consider the tourist tax positively (Figure 3). Land2021,10,xFORPEERREVIEW8of19  4.Results Itisimportanttopointoutsomegeneraldataaboutthesample.Table2presentsthe resultsforthefourstatementsandtheanswerstotheitemsrelatedtotheimplementation ofthetouristtax.Forallitems,theLikertscalerangedfrom1“stronglydisagree”to5 “stronglyagree”.Anexaminationoftheavailabledatarevealsthat,ingeneral, respondentsagreedtotheimplementationofatouristtaxinSantiagodeCompostela. Table2.Resultsfor4statementsregardingtheperceptionoftheimplementationofthetax. TheIntroductionofaTouristTaxinSantiago…12345AverageStandardDeviation Itwouldimprovetheeconomicimpactoftourism inthecity17.26.812.616.546.93.571.54 Itwouldhelpreducetourismseasonality23.89.919.011.236.12.901.52 Itwouldbepositiveforthecity17.26.513.616.046.83.581.53 Itwouldbepositiveformyself32.810.511.19.236.42.581.59 Source:ownelaboration. Usingthestatement“TheintroductionofatouristtaxinSantiagowouldimprovethe economicimpactoftouristinthecity”,wecanconcludethat63.4%ofrespondents expressedapositiveopinionaboutthetouristtax,theyareagreeingthatitwasgoodfor thecity.Inthesameline,whenaskedifitwouldbepositiveforthecity,62.8%saidyes. Thisresultleadsustoconcludethatthedesiretoimplementatouristtaxshouldbe discussedwithrepresentativesofresidents’associationsandwithotherstakeholders, sincethereisstillaconsiderablepercentageofrespondentswhodonotconsiderthe touristtaxpositively(Figure3).  Figure3.Answerstothequestionnaire(percentagesrelatedtoa5‐pointLikertscale)reflectingthe localcommunities’perceptionsabouttheintroductionofataxinSantiago.Source:ownelaboration. Figure 3. Answers to the questionnaire (percentages related to a 5-point Likert scale) reflecting the local communities’ perceptions about the introduction of a tax in Santiago. Source: own elaboration. Land 2022,11, 189 9 of 18 Almost half of the respondents (47.3%) expressed a less positive perception regarding the statement “The introduction of a tourist tax in Santiago would promote minimizing the seasonality of tourism in the city”. Even so, it is questionable that if we consider only the respondents who chose to agree/disagree completely with these statements, a total number of 32.8% expressed total disagreement with the statement that “The introduction of a tourist tax in Santiago would be positive for me”. This is probably because the residents of Santiago de Compostela think more about the collective good and the city than about themselves. 4.1. Anova and Testes t Some statistical differences were found when the ANOVA analysis and t-tests were performed, and the results are detailed in the sequence. While analyzing the variable “Do you usually have contact with tourists (at work or during leisure time)?”, it was found that, although there were no significant differences between the level of contact, those who have more contact with tourism are more in agreement with the benefits of a tourist tax. This means that, except for the indicator “The introduction of a tourist tax in Santiago would promote minimizing the seasonality of tourism in the city”, the people who are most in contact with visitors (often or very often) are those who present higher averages regarding the positive effects of a tourist tax. Therefore, the results of the ANOVA tests (Table 3) indicated that residents who have frequent contact with tourists at work understand that tourism would benefit from the implementation of a tourist tax. When analyzing contact with tourists during leisure time (there are also no significant differences for the factors considered), a strand was identified that leads us to confirm that the respondent is in agreement with the proposal regarding the introduction of a tourist tax in Santiago de Compostela, thus being a generalized perception. Focusing on averages, those who never have contact with tourists during leisure time, and those who have contact very often have a very positive perception of the use of taxes. Table 3. Perception of the implementation of the tourist tax according to contact with visitors (work or leisure). The Introduction of a Tourist Tax in Santiago . . . Never Few Times Sometimes Frequently Very Frequently F-Ratio p-Value At work It would improve the economic impact of tourism in the city 3.57 3.59 3.27 3.82 3.72 1.333 0.274 It would help reduce tourism seasonality 2.86 3.07 2.76 3.04 2.78 0.693 0.609 It would be positive for the city 3.59 3.62 3.33 3.84 3.62 1.005 0.421 It would be positive for me 2.56 2.64 2.29 2.89 2.69 1.190 0.306 At leisure It would improve the economic impact of tourism in the city 3.90 3.47 3.54 3.58 3.85 0.781 0.538 It would help reduce tourism seasonality 3.24 2.93 2.86 2.74 3.09 0.724 0.576 It would be positive for the city 3.79 3.50 3.57 3.60 3.83 0.517 0.724 It would be positive for myself 2.32 2.51 2.61 2.77 2.44 0.576 0.680 Source: own elaboration. The level of education was discriminatory in only one of the statements (“The introduction of a tourist tax in Santiago would be positive for the city”). Table 4indicates that the higher the education level of residents, the better expectations about the implementation of a tourist tax in the city. Land 2022,11, 189 16 of 18 area of the city and their demographic profile is not distinguished according to gender, but it is marked by including mainly younger and more educated residents. “Tax-enthusiasts” make up the largest group comprising 40% of the sample. In addition to being a group that has extremely positive opinions on the benefits of implementing a tax, they are the only ones who consider that the implementation of the tourist tax is good for themselves. We can conclude that the extremely positive perception of these subjects may be in close relationship with the nature of the city as a mature tourist destination. Even so, what is most notable for differentiating the residents who belong to this cluster is the greater presence of people who live in the tourist districts of the city of Santiago de Compostela, that is, the individuals most affected by this activity. This result matches the results of the studies by Gabriel et al. [ 1 ], who concluded that people who reside in tourist regions have a more critical view on the use of their cultural heritage for tourism purposes. Finally, from the analysis of the group of “tax reactionaries”, the people who are completely opposed to the implementation of a tourist tax, we conclude that this segment is reluctant to the implementation of the tax because, as they work in the tourism sector, they fear that the tax will affect tourism in the city, and with it, their source of income. This cluster has the largest share of people working in tourism (40% of respondents). Due to the conclusions, this study also envisaged contributing to the advancement of strategies in understanding the implementation of a tourist tax in Santiago de Compostela. However, we firmly believe that it will be of great importance that political decisions, with their respective tourism planning in Santiago de Compostela, maintain an attitude closer to the perceptions of the local population in relation to the sector. Local strategies must therefore incorporate residents’ concerns based on the argument [ 4 ] that a tax on tourism could resolve tourism externalities. Finally, public tourist policymakers should not be afraid to move towards improving the quality of tourism. This is because, on one side of it, the results of this investigation demonstrate that although Santiago de Compostela’s residents are critical of tourism, they do not demonstrate to be against this activity. Likewise, at least tax-skeptics and tax-enthusiasts (more than 70% of the population) agree that a tourist tax helps to improve the quality of tourism; therefore, they endorse the decisions of the planners of this very important activity that affects both the lives of the residents. Furthermore, it is worth noting that, contrary to what researchers and the tourism sector think, tourists are not sensitive to small changes in tax rates [30]. This study was the first approach to investigate the perceptions of Santiago de Compostela’s residents about the implementation of a tourist tax. It followed the approaches of several other authors; we recommend that future research focus on evaluating other destinations in different life cycles (emerging or consolidated) to validate the instrument. It is important to remember that, although we managed to obtain a good sample volume it was difficult to obtain the perception of elderly residents. The absenteeism of elderly’s position is one of the limitations of the study carried out, it is proposed for future works to invest in more qualitative manner studies, it might venture on several focus groups, cultural and recreational institutions representing residents. Finally, we remind you that the data from this survey were collected in 2018. Additionally, in the last two years, the world tourism sector was subject to the effects of a pandemic. Therefore, we see, as future lines of research, the carrying out of comparative studies to continue investigating the implementation of a tourist tax in destinations such as Santiago de Compostela. Author Contributions: All authors were involved in conceptualization, research, formal analysis and writing. All authors have contributed to the development of this paper. Review and editing were done by J.R.R.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. Funding: This research received no external funding. Land 2022,11, 189 17 of 18 Institutional Review Board Statement: In compliance with European and Spanish regulations on the protection of personal data, as well as the code of ethics that governs social research, we informed the respondents that the data collected for the project/study will be stored guaranteeing anonymity and confidentiality and will be only used for statistical purposes. They will never be processed individually. Informed Consent Statement: Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study. Acknowledgments: The authors sincerely acknowledge the valuable support of the Mateus R. dos Santos from the Research Group of Estudos de Sustentabilidade e Patrimônio em Bacias Hidrográficas— GESBHAP (Parnaiba Delta Federal University-Brazil) to prepare the map of Santiago de Compostela. Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results. References 1. Gabriel, L.P.M.C.; Soares, J.R.R.; Godoi, C.K. O uso turístico do património: Congruências e incongruências no discurso de residentes e não residentes de uma cidade património da humanidade. In Sociedade, Economia e Património num Cenário Tendente a Uma Maior Coesão Territorial; Pina, H., Martins, F., Eds.; FLUP: Porto, Portugal, 2017; pp. 214–228. 2. Jackson, L.A. Residents’ perceptions of the impacts of special event tourism. J. Place Manag. Dev. 2008,1, 240–255. [CrossRef] 3. Lopes, H.D.S.; Remoaldo, P.; Ribeiro, V. Residents’ perceptions of tourism activity in a rural North-Eastern Portuguese community: A cluster analysis. Bull. Geogr. Socio-Econ. Ser. 2019,46, 119–135. [CrossRef] 4. Bird, R. Taxing tourism in developing countries. World Dev. 1992,20, 1145–1158. [CrossRef] 5. Abeyratne, R. Air transport tax and its consequences on tourisms. Ann. Tour. Res. 1993,20, 450–460. [CrossRef] 6. Piga, C.A. Territorial Planning and Tourism Development Tax. Ann. Tour. Res. 2003,30, 886–905. [CrossRef] 7. Gooroochurn, N.; Sinclair, M.T. Economics of tourism taxation. Ann. Tour. Res. 2005,32, 478–498. [CrossRef] 8. Labandeira, X.; Gago, A.; Picos, F.; Rodríguez, M. Taxing Tourism in Spain: Results and Recommendations. SSRN Electron. J. 2006,40, 1–26. [CrossRef] 9. Palmer-Tous, T.; Riera-Font, A.; Rosselló-Nadal, J. Taxing tourism: The case of rental cars in Mallorca. Tour. Manag. 2007 ,28, 271–279. [CrossRef] 10. Fontana, C.; Lagutin, I. Tourist Taxes in Italy and Russia. Russ. Law J. 2018,6, 83–99. [CrossRef] 11. Fredline, E.; Faulkner, B. Host community reactions. Ann. Tour. Res. 2000,27, 763–784. [CrossRef] 12. Besculides, A.; Lee, M.E.; McCormick, P.J. Residents’ perceptions of the cultural benefits of tourism. Ann. Tour. Res. 2002 ,29, 303–319. [CrossRef] 13. Brunt, P.; Courtney, P. Host perceptions of sociocultural impacts. Ann. Tour. Res. 1999,26, 493–515. [CrossRef] 14. Kuvan, Y.; Akan, P. Residents’ attitudes toward general and forest-related impacts of tourism: The case of Belek, Antalya. Tour. Manag. 2005,26, 691–706. [CrossRef] 15. Lawson, R.; Williams, J.; Young, T.; Cossens, J. A comparison of residents’ attitudes towards tourism in 10 New Zealand destinations. Tour. Manag. 1998,19, 247–256. [CrossRef] 16. Sharma, B.; Dyer, P. Examen de Diverses Perceptions de Résidents: Impacts Du Tourisme et Variables Démographiques. Tour. Geogr. 2009,11, 187–213. [CrossRef] 17. Vareiro, L.M.D.C.; Remoaldo, P.; Ribeiro, J.C. Residents’ perceptions of tourism impacts in Guimarães (Portugal): A cluster analysis. Curr. Issues Tour. 2013,16, 535–551. [CrossRef] 18. Hadinejad, A.; Moyle, B.; Scott, N.; Kralj, A.; Nunkoo, R. Residents’ attitudes to tourism: A review. Tour. Rev. 2019 ,74, 150–165. [CrossRef] 19. Caramés Vieitez, L. Informe Executivo Provisional Sobre a Taxa Turística. (Provisional Executive Report on the Tourist Tax). Available online: http://www.santiagoturismo.com/files/2018/03/InformeTaxaTursticaPdf.pdf (accessed on 20 November 2021). 20. Rosselló, J.; Sansó, A. Taxing tourism: The effects of an accommodation tax on turism demand in the Balearic Island (Spain). Cuad. Económicos ICE 2017,93, 157–174. [CrossRef] 21. UNESCO. Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention; UNESCO World Heritage Centre: Paris, France, 2021. 22. Brida, J.G.; Osti, L.; Barquet, A. Segmenting resident perceptions towards tourism—A cluster analysis with a multinomial logit model of a mountain community. Int. J. Tour. Res. 2010,12, 591–602. [CrossRef] 23. Corthay, L.; Loeprick, J. Taxing Tourism in Developing Countries: Principles for Improving the Investment Climate Through Simple, Fair, and Transparent Taxation. In Investment Climate in Practice; World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2010; Available online: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/10485 (accessed on 18 November 2021). 24. López, A.M.G.; Gómez, M.J.M.; Maestre, M. Sobre la oportunidad de las tasas turísticas: El caso de Sevilla. Cuad. Turismo 2018 ,42, 161–183. [CrossRef] Land 2022,11, 189 18 of 18 25. Palmer, T.; Riera, A. Tourism and environmental taxes. With special reference to the “Balearic ecotax”. Tour. Manag. 2003 ,24, 665–674. [CrossRef] 26. Aguiló, E.; Riera, A.; Rosselló, J. The short-term price effect of a tourist tax through a dynamic demand model: The case of the Balearic Islands. Tour. Manag. 2005,26, 359–365. [CrossRef] 27. Sinclair, T.; Stabler, M. The Economics of Tourism; Routledge: London, UK, 1997. 28. WTO. Tourism Taxation: Striking a Fair Deal; World Tourism Organization: Madrid, Spain, 1998. 29. Jensen, T.C.; Wanhill, S. Tourism’s taxing times: Value added tax in Europe and Denmark. Tour. Manag. 2002 ,23, 67–79. [CrossRef] 30. Mills, B.M.; Rosentraub, M.S.; Jakar, G. Tourist tax elasticity in Florida: Spatial effects of county-level room tax rate variation. Tour. Manag. Perspect. 2019,31, 174–183. [CrossRef] 31. Pazienza, P. Should we tax tourism? Theoretical justifications from the economics of non-renewable resource use. Environ. Econ. 2011,2, 8–16. 32. Rinaldi, A. Externalities and tourist tax evidence from Italy. Riv. Di Sci. Del Tur. 2012,2, 79–91. 33. Turismo, S. Apresentação: Caminho de Santiago Património da Humanidade. (Presentation: Camino de Santiago World Heritage Site). 2022. Available online: https://www.santiagoturismo.com/info-xeral/presentacion (accessed on 18 January 2022). 34. INE. Número de Turistas Según Comunidad Autónoma de Destino Principal. (Number of Tourists by Autonomous Community of Main Destination); Instituto Nacional de Estadística: Madrid, Spain, 2019. 35. Turismo, S. Santiago Logróen 2019 un Nuevo Récord de Pernoctaciones en Los Hoteles de la Ciudad. 2020. Available online: https://www.santiagoturismo.com/novas/santiago-logrou-no-2019-un-novo-record-de-pernoctacions-nos-hoteis-dacidade (accessed on 20 November 2021). 36. Lopez, L.; Óton, M.P.; Pineiro Antelo, M.A. Existe overtourism en Santiago de Compostela? Contribuciones para un debate iniciado. Boletín Asoc. Geógrafos Españoles 2019,83, 1–48. [CrossRef] 37. Osimga. A mocidade e as TIC. (Youth and ICT); Xunta de Galicia: Santiago, Spain, 2019. 38. Williams, J.; Lawson, R. Community issues and resident opinions of tourism. Ann. Tour. Res. 2001,28, 269–290. [CrossRef] 39. Monjardino, I. Indicadores de sustentabilidade do turismo nos Açores: O papel das opiniões e da atitude dos residentes face ao turismo na região. Paper presented at the 15 Congresso da APDR—Redes e Desenvolvimento Regional, Praia, Cabo Verde. 2009. Available online: http://www.apdr.pt/congresso/2009/pdf/Sess%C3%A3o%2014/29A.pdf (accessed on 19 August 2021). 40. Remoaldo, P.; Duque, E.; Ribeiro, C. Los impactos medioambientales del evento “2012 Guimarães Capital Europea de la Cultura” percibidos por la comunidad local. Ambient. Desarro. 2015,19, 29. [CrossRef] 41. Faulkner, B.; Tideswell, C. A Framework for Monitoring Community Impacts of Tourism. J. Sustain. Tour. 1997 ,5, 3–28. [CrossRef] 42. McDowall, S.; Choi, Y. A Comparative Analysis of Thailand Residents’ Perception of Tourism’s Impacts. J. Qual. Assur. Hosp. Tour. 2010,11, 36–55. [CrossRef] 43. Gliem, J.A.; Gliem, R.R. Calculating, Interpreting, and Reporting Cronbach’s Alpha Reliability Coefficient for Likert-Type Scales. In Midwest Research-to-Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community Education; The Ohio State University: Columbus, OH, USA, 2003. 44. Hair, J.F., Jr.; Anderson, R.E.; Tatham, R.L.; Black, W.C. Análise Multivariada de Dados (Multivariate Data Analysis), 5th ed.; Bookman: Porto Alegre, Brazil, 2005. 45. Hair, J.F., Jr.; da Silva Gabriel, M.L.D.; Patel, V.K. Modelagem de Equações Estruturais Baseada em Covariância (CB-SEM) com o AMOS: Orientações sobre a sua aplicação como uma Ferramenta de Pesquisa de Marketing. Rev. Bras. Mark. 2014 ,13, 44–55. [CrossRef] 46. INE. Habitantes Empadronados en el MUNICIPIO de Santiago de Compostela; Instituto Nacional de Estadística: Madrid, Spain, 2018. 47. Pérez, E.A.; Nadal, J.R. Host community perceptions a cluster analysis. Ann. Tour. Res. 2005,32, 925–941. [CrossRef] 48. IGE. Indicador da Intensidade da Demanda Turística (Indicator of the Intensity of Tourist Demand); Instituto Galego de Estatística: Santiago de Compostela, Spain, 2017.