Full text
Local scale marine modelling of Fukushima releases. Assessment of water and sediment contamination and sensitivity to water circulation description R. Periáñez a, ⇑ , Kyung-Suk Suh b , Byung-Il Min b a Dpt Fı ´sica Aplicada I, ETSIA, Universidad de Sevilla, Ctra. Utrera, km 1, 41013 Sevilla, Spain b KAERI, Daegeok-Daero 989-111, Yuseong-Gu, Daejeon, Republic of Korea article info Keywords: 137 Cs Marine dispersion Fukushima Numerical modelling Sediments abstract The dispersion of 137 Cs released from Fukushima nuclear power plant to the sea after the March 11th 2011 tsunami has been studied using numerical models. The 3D dispersion model consists of an advection/diffusion equation with terms describing uptake/release reactions between water and seabed sediments. The dispersion model has been fed with daily currents provided by HYCOM and JCOPE2 ocean models. Seabed sediment 137 Cs patterns obtained using both current data set have been compared. The impact of tides and of atmospheric deposition has been evaluated as well. It has been also found that a 2-step kinetic model (two consecutive reversible reactions) for describing water/sediment interactions produces better results than a 1-step model (one single reversible reaction). Ó2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction After March 11th, 2011, a significant amount of radionuclides were released into the Pacific Ocean from Fukushima nuclear power plant, as a result of the earthquake and tsunami occurred in such date. A number of studies concerning numerical modelling of 137 Cs dispersion in the ocean have been published. The work by Nakano and Povinec (2012) deals with dispersion in the global ocean using an annually averaged water velocity field. Radionuclide sources are direct release of contaminated water to the ocean and atmospheric deposition. Dispersion is calculated through a particle-tracking method. Given its coarse resolution (2°), the model cannot give details on radionuclide distribution in the area close to Fukushima, where higher activities are measured. They estimate that the 137 Cs patch will reach the US coast in about 4–5 years, but specific activities will be low (<3 Bq/m 3 ). Kawamura et al. (2011) focus on a more regional scale and use a nesting method to study dispersion around Japan with a resolution about 6 km, as well as dispersion in the coastal area of Fukushima with a higher resolution (about 2 km). Dispersion of radionuclides is calculated using a particle-tracking method and two numerical experiments were carried out. In one case only direct release to the ocean is considered; in the other experiment both direct release to the ocean and atmospheric deposition are considered. A reasonable agreement between calculated 137 Cs concentrations and measurements near Fukushima was obtained. These authors also found that direct releases are dominant over atmospheric deposition from the end of March on. Moreover, the effects of atmospheric deposition are more significant in the case of 131 I than for 137 Cs. A similar domain to the coastal one described above has been used by Tsumume et al. (2012) with a spatial resolution of 1 km. Hydrodynamics is forced by wind stress and heat and freshwater fluxes provided by a weather forecasting model and tidal effects are also included. Dispersion is calculated in an Eulerian frame. These authors have also found that 137 Cs coming from direct releases to the ocean is more significant than that originating from atmospheric deposition. Honda et al. (2012) have simulated 137 Cs dispersion over a larger scale using a particle-tracking model fed with currents provided by the Japan Coastal Ocean Predictability Experiment 2 (JCOPE2). They have found that high 137 Cs concentrations measured north of 40°latitude have to be attributed to aeolian input. A clear agreement between regional models (Honda et al., 2012; Kawamura et al., 2011; Tsumume et al., 2012) is that mesoscale eddies significantly affect offshore transport, leading to complex dispersion patterns. A comparison of the performance of five models in simulating the dispersion of dissolved 137 Cs is presented in Masumoto et al. (2012). It is common to all developed models to consider 137 Cs as a perfectly conservative radionuclide, thus scavenging processes and adsorption on seabed sediments are neglected. Interaction processes between water and sediments should be included in a proper assessment of the aftermath of Fukushima releases since contaminated sediments will act as a long-term delayed source 0025-326X/$ - see front matter Ó2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2012.08.030 ⇑ Corresponding author. E-mail address: [email protected] (R. Periáñez). Marine Pollution Bulletin 64 (2012) 2333–2339 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Marine Pollution Bulletin journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/marpolbul
of radionuclides previously adsorbed on sediments. The description of water–sediment interactions on the basis of the equilibrium distribution coefficient, k d , concept is not appropriate in the vicinity of the source and for non-instantaneous releases, since the system water–sediment is not at equilibrium (Periáñez, 2003a). Thus, a kinetic approach will be more adequate. Several kinetic models (involving single or multi-step reversible reactions) could be adopted (Periáñez, 2003b, 2004). The objective of this paper is to analyse, using numerical modelling, the dispersion of 137 Cs in the coastal area around Fukushima, taking into account for the first time water/sediment interactions. Calculated 137 Cs concentrations in the seabed are compared with measurements. Two kinetic models for those interactions have been tested. We will mainly focus on 137 Cs distributions in seabed sediments, which have not been studied up to present day. Also, the effect of water circulation description on dispersion patterns was studied: the relevance of tides, with respect to residual circulation (wind and density driven currents), has been assessed. Also, two descriptions of this residual circulation have been used and compared: the provided by HYCOM and JCOPE2 models. We have limited our work to the coastal area around Fukushima since activities are higher here, thus this region is more relevant from the radiological point of view. The model is presented in the following section. Next, results are presented and discussed. 2. Model description The dispersion model described below has been developed by the authors and tested in different marine environments (Periáñez, 2003a,b, 2008, 2009, 2012). This code has been modified to import currents from HYCOM and JCOPE2 models. Thus, exactly the same dispersion model is run, the only difference is the source of currents to calculate advective transport. A brief description of hydrodynamic models is given below. Next, the dispersion model is briefly described as well, since details may be seen in current literature (references cited above). 2.1. Water circulation 2.1.1. Tidal currents Tides are obtained from a 2D depth-averaged model since other authors have already stated that it is a reasonable approach (Dyke, 2001; Yanagi, 1999). Equations may be seen, for instance, in Periáñez (2005). The solution of these equations provides the water currents at each point in the model domain and for each time step. Currents are treated through standard tidal analysis (Pugh, 1987, Chapter 4) and tidal constants are stored in files that will be read by the dispersion code to calculate the advective transport. The model includes the two main tidal constituents, M 2 and S 2 . Thus, the hydrodynamic equations are solved for each constituent and tidal analysis is also carried out for each constituent separately. A residual transport cannot be produced by the pure harmonic currents given by the tidal analysis, thus tidal residuals have been calculated as well. The procedure may be seen in detail in Periáñez (2012). Hydrodynamic equations are solved using explicit finite difference schemes, with a second order accuracy scheme for non-linear terms. Boundary conditions consist of specifying water surface elevations, from measured tidal constants, along open boundaries of the domain. Model equations and numerical schemes have been carefully tested in the past (Periáñez, 2008, 2009, 2012). As an example, tide amplitude and current amplitude for the M 2 tide, calculated on the HYCOM domain (see below), are presented in Fig. 1. A comparison between measured and calculated tidal constants at two points indicated in Fig. 1 is presented in Table 1. It may bee seen that there is a generally good agreement between both set of data. It must be pointed out that, differently to wind and density driven circulation, tides have been calculated by the authors using their own codes. 2.1.2. Residual circulation A brief description of the main characteristics of the hydrodynamic models from which wind and density driven currents are obtained is given in the following paragraphs. 140 140.5 141 141.5 142 35 35.5 36 36.5 37 37.5 38 38.5 39 39.5 Longitude Latitude • Onahama • Shiogama • Fukushima 0.29 0.3 0.31 0.32 0.33 0.34 140 140.5 141 141.5 142 35 35.5 36 36.5 37 37.5 38 38.5 39 39.5 Longitude • Onahama • Shiogama • Fukushima 0 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 0.025 0.03 0.035 0.04 0.045 0.05 Fig. 1. Maps of computed tide amplitude (m, left panel) and tidal current amplitude (m/s, right panel) for the M 2 constituent and on the HYCOM domain. 2334 R. Periáñez et al. / Marine Pollution Bulletin 64 (2012) 2333–2339
HYCOM model Daily averaged three dimensional current fields have been obtained from the HYCOM (HYbrid Coordinate Ocean Model) in the time frame from March 12th to May 30th. Details may be seen in http://www.hycom.org. The area studied ranges from 140°to 142.96°longitude and from 35.03°to 39.48°latitude. There are 33 vertical levels and spatial resolution is about 7 km. JCOPE2 model Daily averaged three dimensional currents have also been obtained from the JCOPE2 (Japan Coastal Ocean Predictability Experiment 2) model in the time frame from March 12th to June 30th. The area studied extends from 140.46°to 142.04°longitude and from 35.96°to 39.54°latitude. There are 23 vertical levels and spatial resolution is about 9 km. Details may be seen in http:// www.jamstec.go.jp/frcgc/jcope/htdocs/e/ jcope_system_description.html. As an example, surface currents corresponding to March 12th, produced by both models, may be seen in Fig. 2. The Kuroshio current-flowing to the NE-is clearly appreciated, specially in the larger HYCOM domain. Currents are weak in the area of Fukushima and flow southwards. To the south of Fukushima an anticyclonic eddy may be seen in both domains, although its position is not exactly the same. It must be commented that, if tides are included in a given simulation, non-linear interactions between tidal constituents and between tides and wind plus density driven flows are removed if a simple addition of hydrodynamic model results is carried out. However, this is a common practice in transport modelling (Proctor et al., 1994; Elliott and Clarke, 1998; Periáñez, 2009). 2.2. Dispersion model The dispersion model consists of a 3D advection/diffusion equation with terms describing the adsorption/desorption reactions between the deepest water layer, in contact with the seabed, and bed sediments. These processes are formulated in a dynamic way, in terms of kinetic transfer coefficients. A detailed description of such formulation may be seen elsewhere (Periáñez, 2008, 2009, 2012). There has been evidence to suggest that uptake takes place in two stages: fast surface adsorption followed by slow migration of ions to pores and interlattice spacings (Nyffeler et al., 1984; Turner et al., 1992; Turner and Millward, 1994; Ciffroy et al., 2001; El Mrabet et al., 2001). Consequently, two kinetic models have been tested. The 1-step model considers that exchanges of radionuclides between water and sediments are governed by a first-order reversible reaction, being k 1 and k 2 the forward and backward rates respectively. The 2-step model considers that exchanges are governed by two consecutive reversible reactions: surface adsorption is followed by another process that may be a slow diffusion of ions into pores and interlattice spacings, inner complex formation or a transformation such as an oxidation. k 3 and k 4 are forward and backward rates for this second reaction (Fig. 3). Thus, sediments are divided in two phases: a reversible and a slowly reversible fraction. It has been shown that the 2-step model reproduces both the adsorption and release kinetics of 137 Cs in the Irish Sea, where it is released from Sellafield nuclear fuel reprocessing plant (Periáñez, 2003b). A detailed formulation of these models may be seen in Periáñez (2003b, 2004), thus will not be repeated here. However, a few comments are made. The adsorption process is a surface phenomenon that depends on the surface of particles per water volume unit into the grid cell. This quantity has been denoted as the exchange surface (Periáñez, 2003a, 2004, 2008, 2009). Thus: k 1 ¼ v Sð1Þ where Sis the exchange surface (dimensions [L] 1 ) and v is a parameter with the dimensions of a velocity. It is denoted as the exchange velocity (Periáñez, 2003a, 2004, 2008, 2009). Assuming spherical particles, the exchange surface is written as (see references cited above): Table 1 Observed, index obs, and computed, index comp, amplitudes (A, m) and phases (g, deg) of tidal elevations at several locations indicated in Fig. 1. The source of data is NOAA (1982). M 2 S 2 Station A obs g obs A comp g comp A obs g obs A comp g comp Onahama 0.30 106 0.31 105 0.14 149 0.15 150 Shiogama 0.35 97 0.33 98 0.16 141 0.16 143 140 140.5 141 141.5 142 35 35.5 36 36.5 37 37.5 38 38.5 39 39.5 Longitude Latitude 0.50 m/s 140.5 141 141.5 142 36 36.5 37 37.5 38 38.5 39 39.5 Longitude Latitude 0.50 m/s Fig. 2. Surface currents produced by HYCOM (left) and JCOPE2 (right) models for March 12th. Fig. 3. Scheme representing both kinetic models tested in this study. R. Periáñez et al. / Marine Pollution Bulletin 64 (2012) 2333–2339 2335
S¼3Lfð1pÞ/ RH ð2Þ where Ris particle radius, pis sediment porosity and /is a correction factor that takes into account that part of the sediment particle surface may be hidden by other sediment particles. Lis the sediment mixing depth (thickness of the sediment layer which interacts with water above it), His the thickness of the deepest water layer (in contact with the sediment) and fgives the fraction of fine (muddy) sediment particles. This is required since the transfer of radionuclides to sediments is essentially due to such small particles. This formulation has been successfully used in all modelling works cited above. Real particles are not spheres, but with this approach it is possible to obtain an analytical expression for the exchange Table 2 Summary of model runs. Run Hydrodynamics Kinetic model Tides 1 HYCOM 1-step No 2 HYCOM 1-step Yes 3 HYCOM 2-step No 4 JCOPE2 2-step No 140 140.5 141 141.5 142 35 35.5 36 36.5 37 37.5 38 38.5 39 39.5 Longitude Latitude March 22th −3 −2 −1 0 1 2 3 140 140.5 141 141.5 142 35 35.5 36 36.5 37 37.5 38 38.5 39 39.5 Longitude Latitude May 11th • 3.08 • 3.15 • 1.4 • 1.70 • 1.93 • 2.51 • 1.97 −3 −2 −1 0 1 2 3 140 140.5 141 141.5 142 35 35.5 36 36.5 37 37.5 38 38.5 39 39.5 Longitude Latitude May 16th • 2.04 • 0.85 • 1.38 • 1.08 • 1.70 −3 −2 −1 0 1 2 3 −3 −2 −1 0 1 2 3 140 140.5 141 141.5 142 35 35.5 36 36.5 37 37.5 38 38.5 39 39.5 Longitude Latitude May 26th • 1.78 • 1.83 • 1.57• 1.08 • 2.32 • 0.76 • 1.76 • 1.45 • 1.89 Fig. 4. Calculated (using HYCOM circulation) and measured 137 Cs concentrations in seabed sediments (Bq/kg). Logarithms of calculated and measured concentrations are drawn. 2336 R. Periáñez et al. / Marine Pollution Bulletin 64 (2012) 2333–2339
surface (Duursma and Carroll, 1996). Full model equations in a 3D form may be seen in Periáñez (2009). Numerical solution is carried out using second order accuracy finite difference schemes (Periáñez, 2005). 3. Results Some parameters are required to simulate 137 Cs dispersion. Rates k 2 ,k 3 and k 4 are taken from previous works dealing with dispersion of this radionuclide (Periáñez, 2004, 2008). Although it is true that kinetic rates are site-specific, there is not information about them in Japan Pacific Ocean coastal waters. Thus, representative values already used in the English Channel and Western Mediterranean have been used as a first order approximation. As discussed before (Periáñez, 2003a, 2004, 2008, 2009), the exchange velocity v can be deduced from rates mentioned above and the radionuclide distribution coefficient k d . The mean value of the measured Cs distribution coefficient is 2.1 10 3 (Honda et al., 2012), comparable to the IAEA (2004) recommended value. We have fixed k d =210 3 to deduce v following the procedure described in such references. The distribution of fine sediments in the seabed, described by parameter f, has been reconstructed from information in Saito (1989). It has been fixed L= 0.05 m. This parameter typically ranges from 0.035 m (Periáñez, 2008)to 0.10 m (Periáñez, 2000, 2003b, 2004, 2009). Also, /= 0.1 (Periáñez, 2000, 2003b, 2004, 2009). A representative value R=10 l m has been used for the mean particle size, very similar to the used in Periáñez (2000). To avoid uncertainties in the source term (liquid releases of 137 Cs to the sea) the measured concentration of this radionuclide in the release point (Bailly du Bois et al., in press) has been defined as a ‘‘boundary condition’’ in the grid cell where such point is located in each computational mesh. The same approach was adopted by Kawamura et al. (2011). These authors assumed that the observed concentration at the outlet extended over an area of 1.5 km 2 in front of the plant. We used the same approach. Since the grid cell surface is larger than 1.5 km 2 in both domains, a correction factor was introduced to assure that the total activity in the release grid cell is the same as if the discharge was homogeneous over an 1.5 km 2 area. Given the shallow waters in the outlet point, it was also assumed 137 Cs concentration here is vertically homogeneous. An estimation of atmospheric deposition of 137 Cs on the sea surface is also included from atmospheric dispersion modelling results in Honda et al. (2012). A number of numerical experiments have been carried out, which are summarized in Table 2. The most relevant results will be commented. Essentially the same results (differences could not be appreciated) were obtained from runs 1 and 2. From this comparison it could be deduced that tides do not play a significant role in dispersion, compared with wind and density driven circulation. Indeed, it may be seen in Fig. 1 that tidal currents for the main constituent are below 5 cm/s in most of the domain. A comparison of results from experiments 1 and 3 highlighted that a 2-step model produces 137 Cs concentrations in the seabed in better agreement with observations than a 1-step model. This is not a surprising result, as has already been found in numerical modelling of Sellafield releases in the Irish Sea (Periáñez, 2003b) and in laboratory experiments (Ciffroy et al., 2001). Dissolved 137 Cs concentrations in surface water are not affected by the kinetic model used to describe water/sediment interactions in the seabed. The present model does not improve former ones with respect to dissolved 137 Cs in surface water, as will be also discussed below. However, our objective is simulating, for the first time, contamination of seabed sediments. From these experiments it was concluded that tides may be neglected in comparison with residual circulation. Also, it seems that a 2-step model is producing better results than a 1-step model. Now, experiments 3 and 4 are compared in detail to assess differences purely due to the description of residual circulation (HYCOM or JCOPE2). Measured and computed 137 Cs concentration in seabed sediments produced by the dispersion model fed with HYCOM currents may be seen in Fig. 4. Soon after the tsunami (March 22th), 137 Cs in sediments remains close to the release point. By the middle of April (not shown) a very steady distribution is obtained in sediments, and this remains essentially the same during May, as can be seen in Fig. 4. However, the model generally underestimates concentrations by approximately one order of magnitude. Also, contamination of the seabed extends along a relatively narrow coastal band, differently to experimental results. Measured and calculated dissolved 137 Cs concentrations in surface water, 15 km offshore Fukushima, may be seen in Fig. 5. Maximum concentrations, which are reached by the beginning of April, are very well reproduced by the model. However, there is a clear underestimation afterwards. The model predicts a too fast dispersion of 137 Cs away from this area. It is interesting to note that all models previously applied to predict dissolved 137 Cs dispersion fail to simulate the relatively high concentrations measured some km offshore Fukushima (Masumoto et al., 2012). Results for sediments, if water circulation produced by JCOPE2 model is used, may be seen in Fig. 6. In this case, seabed contamination reaches areas far from Fukushima, in agreement with observations (see for instance maps of May 26th and June 10th). A essentially steady distribution in sediments is not reached until the beginning of June, thus later than with HYCOM circulation. Finally, it may be seen that calculated concentrations in the sediment are higher than those of Fig. 4, and generally agree (at least by order of magnitude) with observations. Results for dissolved 137 Cs in surface water 15 km offshore Fukushima are presented in Fig. 5. As with HYCOM circulation, the initial peak is very well reproduced by the model. A too fast decrease in concentrations is again produced, although results seem to improve with respect to those obtained with HYCOM circulation. Generally speaking, it seems that currents provided by JCOPE2 model produce 137 Cs concentrations in surface water and seabed sediments in better agreement with observations than currents 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 10−1 100 101 102 103 Days after March 11th Dissolved137 Cs (Bq/L) Measurements HYCOM JCOPE2 Fig. 5. Measured and calculated dissolved 137 Cs concentrations in surface water 15 km offshore Fukushima. Black squares indicate measurements below the 5 Bq/L detection limit. R. Periáñez et al. / Marine Pollution Bulletin 64 (2012) 2333–2339 2337
produced by HYCOM model. Also, a 2-step kinetic model seems to work better than a 1-step model. With both HYCOM and JCOPE2 currents there is a too fast decrease in dissolved surface 137 Cs concentrations. The reason could maybe be related to the existence of an eddy, too small to be adequately reproduced by circulation models, which could trap dissolved 137 Cs near the coast. But of course this cannot be confirmed. It is worth commenting that the model by Tsumume et al. (2012) also underestimates, by one order of magnitude, 137 Cs concentrations in water in the coastal area around Fukushima after mid-April. Another experiment was carried out in the conditions of run 4 in Table 2 but without atmospheric deposition. No significant differences in results were observed. As already noted by Kawamura et al. (2011) and Tsumume et al. (2012), direct releases to the sea are dominant over atmospheric deposition on the surface. The sediment half-time has been defined (Periáñez, 2003a)as the time in which the radionuclide content in the sediment decreases by a factor 2. It is known that a contaminated sediment may act as a long-term delayed source of previously released contaminants (Cook et al., 1997). Consequently, it is relevant to have estimations of the sediment half-time. The total inventory of 137 Cs over the JCOPE2 domain in bed sediments has been evaluated each time step. From numerical fitting of the temporal evolution of such inventory (once it has started to decrease, i.e., 40 days after March 12th) to an exponential decay function, it was obtained that sediment half-time is 167 days. This number is of the same order as 137 Cs sediment halving time in the English Channel obtained with a 2-step kinetic model (Periáñez, 2004). 4. Conclusions A three dimensional dispersion model has been used to evaluate 137 Cs dispersion in the coastal area around Fukushima nuclear power plant. The model includes uptake/release reactions between water and seabed sediments, which are described in a dynamic way using kinetic transfer coefficients. Two kinetic models have been tested: a 1-step model consisting of a single reversible reaction and a 2-step model consisting of two consecutive reversible reactions. All simulations carried out before considered 137 Cs as a perfectly conservative radionuclide. Tides have been calculated using a 2D depth averaged model. Three dimensional wind and density driven circulation has been obtained from the output of two well-known ocean models: HYCOM and JCOPE2. Exactly the same dispersion model is run, but with different water currents. Daily averaged values from both models are used. Several conclusions are obtained from the numerical experiments which have been carried out: Tides do not play a significant role in transport and mixing in Fukushima coastal area, since essentially the same results are obtained in simulations carried out with and without them. Accordingly to previous simulations, direct releases to the sea dominate over atmospheric deposition on the sea surface. A 2-step kinetic model produces results in better agreement with observations than a 1-step model. The same conclusion was obtained from past simulations in the Irish Sea. In general, the dispersion model produces better results if it is fed with JCOPE2 currents than with HYCOM currents. With HYCOM circulation, seabed contamination remains close to the coast, which is not in agreement with measurements. Also, concentration levels in sediments are generally underestimated. Dissolved surface 137 Cs concentrations offshore Fukushima are underestimated after the initial activity peak. Maybe this could be attributed to the low spatial resolution of circulation models. 140.5 141 141.5 142 36 36.5 37 37.5 38 38.5 39 39.5 Longitude Latitude May 11th • 3.08 • 3.15 • 1.4 • 1.70 • 1.93 • 2.51 • 1.97 −3 −2 −1 0 1 2 3 140.5 141 141.5 142 36 36.5 37 37.5 38 38.5 39 39.5 Longitude Latitude May 16th • 2.04 • 0.85 • 1.38 • 1.08 • 1.70 −3 −2 −1 0 1 2 3 140.5 141 141.5 142 36 36.5 37 37.5 38 38.5 39 39.5 Longitude Latitude May 26th • 1.78 • 1.83 • 1.57• 1.08 • 2.32 • 0.76 • 1.76 • 1.45 • 1.89 −3 −2 −1 0 1 2 3 140.5 141 141.5 142 36 36.5 37 37.5 38 38.5 39 39.5 Longitude Latitude June 10th • 2.20 • 2.40 • 1.66 • 1.25 • 1.52 • 1.38 −3 −2 −1 0 1 2 3 140.5 141 141.5 142 36 36.5 37 37.5 38 38.5 39 39.5 Longitude Latitude June 20th • 2.80 • 2.30 • 1.95 • 1.89 • 1.40 −3 −2 −1 0 1 2 3 140.5 141 141.5 142 36 36.5 37 37.5 38 38.5 39 39.5 Longitude Latitude June 30th • 1.04 • 1.65 −3 −2 −1 0 1 2 3 Fig. 6. Calculated (using JCOPE2 circulation) and measured 137 Cs concentrations in seabed sediments (Bq/kg). Logarithms of calculated and measured concentrations are drawn. 2338 R. Periáñez et al. / Marine Pollution Bulletin 64 (2012) 2333–2339
Acknowledgements The authors are indebted to Dr. Masanao Nakano (JAERI), who supplied JCOPE2 current data and to Claude Estournel (University of Toulouse) for useful discussions. KAERI was partially supported by a nuclear research and development program funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology in Korea. This work was carried out in the frame of the Fukushima accident assessment being performed by UNSCEAR. References Bailly du Bois, P., Laguionie, P., Boust, D., Korsakissok, I., Didier, D., Fiévet, B. in press. Estimation of marine source term following Fukushima Dai-ichi accident. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity. Ciffroy, P., Garnier, J.M., Pham, M.K., 2001. Kinetics of the adsorption and desorption of radionuclides of Co, Mn, Cs, Fe, Ag and Cd in freshwater systems: experimental and modelling approaches. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 55, 71–91. Cook, G.T., MacKenzie, A.B., McDonald, P., Jones, S.R., 1997. Remobilization of Sellafield derived radionuclides and transport from the north east Irish Sea. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 35, 227–241. Duursma, E.K., Carroll, J., 1996. Environmental Compartments. Springer, Berlin. Dyke, P.P.G., 2001. Coastal and Shelf Sea Modelling. Kluwer, The Netherlands. El Mrabet, R., Abril, J.M., Manjón, G., Garcı ´a-Tenorio, R., 2001. Experimental and modelling study of plutonium uptake by suspended matter in aquatic environments from southern Spain. Water Research 35, 4184–4190. Elliott, A.J., Clarke, S., 1998. Shallow water tides in the Firth of Forth. The Hydrographic Journal 87, 19–24. Honda, M., Aono, T., Aoyama, M., Hamajima, Y., Kawakami, H., Kitamura, M., Masumoto, Y., Miyazawa, Y., Takigawa, M., Saino, T., 2012. Dispersion of artificial caesium-134 and -137 in the western North Pacific one month after the Fukushima accident. Geochemical Journal 46, 1–9. IAEA, 2004. Sediment distribution coefficients and concentration factors for biota in the marine environment. Technical Reports Series 422, Vienna. Kawamura, H., Kobayashi, T., Furuno, A., In, T., Ishikawa, Y., Nakayama, T., Shima, S., Awaji, T., 2011. Preliminary numerical experiments on oceanic dispersion of 131 I and 137 Cs discharged into the ocean because of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant disaster. Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology 48, 1349– 1356. Masumoto, Y., Miyazawa, Y., Tsumune, D., Tsubono, T., Kobayashi, T., Kawamura, H., Estournel, C., Marseleix, P., Lanerolle, L., Mehra, A., Garraffo, Z.D., 2012. Oceanic dispersion simulations of 137 Cs released from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant. Elements 8, 207–212. Nakano, M., Povinec, P., 2012. Long-term simulations of the 137 Cs dispersion from the Fukushima accident in the world ocean. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 111, 109–115. NOAA, 1982. Computer Applications to Tides in the National Ocean Survey. Supplement to Manual of Harmonic Analysis and Prediction of Tides (Special Publication No. 98). National Ocean Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, January 1982. Nyffeler, U.P., Li, Y.H., Santschi, P.H., 1984. A kinetic approach to describe trace element distribution between particles and solution in natural aquatic systems. Geochimica Cosmochimica Acta 48, 1513–1522. Periáñez, R., 2000. Modelling the tidal dispersion of 137 Cs and 239,240 Pu in the English Channel. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 49, 259–277. Periáñez, R., 2003a. Redissolution and long-term transport of radionuclides released from a contaminated sediment: a numerical modelling study. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 56, 5–14. Periáñez, R., 2003b. Kinetic modelling of the dispersion of plutonium in the eastern Irish Sea: two approaches. Journal of Marine Systems 38, 259–275. Periáñez, R., 2004. Testing the behaviour of different kinetic models for uptakerelease of radionuclides between water and sediments when implemented on a marine dispersion model. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 71, 243–259. Periáñez, R., 2005. Modelling the Dispersion of Radionuclides in the Marine Environment. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg. Periáñez, R., 2008. A modelling study on 137 Cs and 239,240 Pu behaviour in the Alborán Sea, western Mediterranean. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 99, 694–715. Periáñez, R., 2009. Environmental modelling in the Gulf of Cadiz: heavy metal distributions in water and sediments. Science of the Total Environment 407, 3392–3406. Periáñez, R., 2012. Modelling the environmental behavior of pollutants in Algeciras Bay (south Spain). Marine Pollution Bulletin 64, 221–232. Proctor, R., Flather, R.A., Elliott, A.J., 1994. Modelling tides and surface drift in the Arabian Gulf: application to the Gulf oil spill. Continental Shelf Research 14, 531–545. Pugh, D.T., 1987. Tides, Surges and Mean Sea Level. Wiley, Chichester, p. 472. Saito, Y., 1989. Late pleistocene coastal sediments, drainage patterns and sand ridge systems on the shelf off Sendai, northeast Japan. Marine Geology 89, 229–244. Tsumume, D., Tsubono, T., Aoyama, M., Hirose, K., 2012. Distribution of oceanic 137 Cs from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant simulated numerically by a regional ocean model. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 111, 100– 108. Turner, A., Millward, G.E., 1994. Partitioning of trace metals in a macrotidal estuary. Implications for contaminant transport models. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 39, 45–58. Turner, A., Millward, G.E., Balet, A.J., Morris, A.W., 1992. The solid-solution partitioning of trace metals in the southern North Sea-in situ radiochemical experiments. Continental Shelf Research 12, 1311–1329. Yanagi, T., 1999. Coastal Oceanography. Kluwer, The Netherlands. R. Periáñez et al. / Marine Pollution Bulletin 64 (2012) 2333–2339 2339