The Roman villa of Salar (Granada). The sculptural program in archaeological context

Archivo Español de Arqueología, 2021, 94, e20 ISSN-L: 0066-6742 | eISSN: 1988-3110 https://doi.org/10.3989/aespa.094.021.20 The Roman villa of Salar (Granada). The sculptural program in archaeological context* La villa romana de Salar (Granada). El programa escultórico en contexto arqueológico María Luisa Loza Azuaga Instituto Andaluz del Patrimonio Histórico [email protected] / ORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2554-8219 José Beltrán Fortes Universidad de Sevilla [email protected] / ORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5841-4140 Julio Miguel Román Punzón Universidad de Granada [email protected] / ORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6351-2511 Pablo Ruiz Montes Universidad de Granada [email protected] / ORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3595-4184 Manuel Moreno Alcaide Universidad de Málaga [email protected] / ORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9906-4773 María Isabel Fernández García Universidad de Granada [email protected] / ORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3030-346X Enviado: 10-11-2020. Aceptado: 25-01-2021. Publicado online: 10-11-2021 Citation / Cómo citar este artículo: Loza Azuaga, M. L., Beltrán Fortes, J., Román Punzón, J. M., Ruiz Montes, P., Moreno Alcaide, M. and Fernández García, M. I. (2021). “The Roman villa of Salar (Granada). The sculptural program in archaeological context”. Archivo Español de Arqueología, 94, e20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3989/aespa.094.021.20 ABSTRACT: During the last decade various excavation campaigns have taken place at the Roman villa of Salar (Granada, Spain), located in the province Baetica. The excavated sector corresponds to the area surrounding a large peristyle of the pars urbana. Presiding over the open courtyard on one of the shorter sides is a triclinium, * This work was carried out within the framework of the Project HAR2017-89004-P, sponsored by the Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad of the Government of Spain and with ERDF Funds (Fondos FEDER), and the Project PID2019-105294GB-100/ AEI/10.13039/501100011033, sponsored by the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación of the Government of Spain and with ERDF Funds (Fondos FEDER); as well as the Research Groups HUM 143 and HUM 402 (Plan Andaluz de Investigación of the Junta de Andalucía). We thank the City Council of Salar (Granada) for supporting the systematic archaeological excavation project in villa Salar, approved by the Junta de Andalucía (Consejería de Cultura y Patrimonio Histórico) as a General Research Project. María Luisa Loza azuaga / José BeLtrán Fortes / JuLio MigueL roMán Punzón / PaBLo ruiz Montes / ManueL Moreno aLcaide / María isaBeL Fernández garcía 2Archivo Español de Arqueología, 2021, 94, e20 | ISSN-L: 0066-6742 | eISSN: 1988-3110 | https://doi.org/10.3989/aespa.094.021.20 of the municipal wastewater treatment station in November 2004. A research team carried out an initial phase of excavations between 2006 and 2013, uncovering a triclinium associated with a nymphaeum and part of the eastern peristyle corridor or ambulacrum, as well as the beginning of the southern colonnade (González and El-Amrany, 2013; González Martín, 2014 and 2016). A new team began work again in 2016 and has continued annually up to present2, excavating a large part of the western peristyle corridor, as well as several rooms that open onto it (Fig. 2). The decoration found in this area contains outstanding mosaics, mural paint2 Research team from the University of Granada, coordinated by María Isabel Fernández García, and led by Julio M. Román Punzón and Pablo Ruiz Montes, of the University of Granada, and Manuel Moreno Alcaide, of the University of Málaga; as collaborators, the authors María Luisa Loza Azuaga (Instituto Andaluz del Patrimonio Histórico, Seville) and José Beltrán Fortes (University of Seville). A General Research Project has been approved by the Consejería de Cultura y Patrimonio Histórico of the Junta de Andalucía to continue research work until at least 2023. which in turn is associated with a nymphaeum. The ambulacrum on the opposite side of the peristyle was also excavated, uncovering a mosaic pavement with an interesting hunting scene, as well as other rooms that open onto it. In this work, the typological and iconographic study of the sculptural program recovered is carried out. The sculptural assemblage consists of 1) two nymph sculptures discovered in the nymphaeum associated with the triclinium; and 2) a Capitoline type Venus statue, which possibly decorated another fountain located on the southern side of the peristyle. The archaeological context and petrographic analyses add to the study of the pieces, as well as the analysis of this sculptural program related to nymphaea and garden environments. Keywords: Baetica; fountain-statues; nymphaeum; Roman sculpture; Venus Capitolina; nymphs. RESUMEN: Durante la última década se han desarrollado varias campañas de excavación en la villa romana de Salar (Granada, España), situada en la provincial romana de la Bética. El sector excavado corresponde a la pars urbana, articulada en torno a un gran peristilo central. Presidiendo uno de los lados cortos del patio abierto se sitúa el triclinium, asociado con un nymphaeum. El ambulacrum en el lado opuesto del peristilo ha sido también excavado, descubriéndose un pavimento de mosaico con una interesante escena de caza, así como otras habitaciones que abren a este patio. En este trabajo se aborda el estudio tipológico e iconográfico del programa escultórico de la villa. El conjunto está integrado por: dos esculturas de ninfas, descubiertas en el nymphaeum asociado con el triclinium; y 2) una estatua de Venus, tipo Capitolina, que posiblemente decorase otra fuente, localizada en el lado sur del peristilo. El contexto arqueológico y los análisis petrográficos se integran en el estudio de las piezas, así como el análisis del programa escultórico del nymphaeum y el jardín circundante. Palabras clave: Bética; estatuas-fuente; ninfeo; escultura romana; Venus Capitolina; ninfas. Copyright: © 2021 CSIC. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) License. 1. INTRODUCTION The Roman villa is located in the present province of Granada (Spain) within the municipality of Salar (Fig. 1), which occupies the middle Singilis valley, or present Genil River, all within the territory of the Roman province Baetica and ascribed to the conventus Astigitanus. To which ager it belonged to is not known; the nearest Roman city within the province of Granada is Ilurco (Pinos Puente), approximately 45 km away (Morales and Castillo, 2009), or Vlisi (Archidona) in the province of Malaga, approximately 35 km away (Beltrán and Loza, 2012). Literary and epigraphic sources mention several other Roman cities in this same area, Baxo, Vesci Faventia, Ilipula Laus or Calecula; however, their exact locations are not known1. Archaeological evidence of the villa was uncovered accidentally during the construction 1 An approach to this territory in Roman times can be seen in González Román, 2001. For the specific case of the nearby territory of Loja, whether there was or not a Roman city: Gómez Comino, 2011. The Roman villa of SalaR (GRanada). The SculpTuRal pRoGRam in aRchaeoloGical conTexT 3Archivo Español de Arqueología, 2021, 94, e20 | ISSN-L: 0066-6742 | eISSN: 1988-3110 | https://doi.org/10.3989/aespa.094.021.20 ings that imitate marbles (for Baetica see: Fernández Díaz, 2010), as well as statuary, on which this paper focuses, consisting of three exceptional pieces: two nymph statues found in the nymphaeum and a statue of Venus recovered in the western corridor of the peristyle. The first two pieces have been described by the discoverers (González and El-Amrani, 2013, pp. 48-51; González Martín, 2014, pp. 177-179), whereas, the third has already been analyzed individually (Loza et al., 2020). 2. THE TRICLINIUM NYMPHAEUM STATUES The triclinium of villa Salar included a fountain consisting of a wide U-shaped perimeter channel that partially surrounded the room and a nymphaeum located at the rear or eastern wall (Román et al., 2018a and 2018b; Román, 2019; Moreno et al., in press). A large apsidal basin and the fountain source itself, located at the back, completed this water display. It flows over an inclined surface, creating a small waterfall. The inclined slope that descends from the niche to the second level of the fountain is covered with speleothem fragments; that is, a mineral deposit, which is formed by the precipitation of calcium carbonate deposits in caves, taking on a variety of forms such as stalagmites and stalactites (Fig. 3, A-B). This carbonate formation must have been intentionally extracted from one of the caves close to the town to be used in the decoration of the fountain, evoking a nymphaeum or sacred grotto consecrated to the nymphs, according to Pomponius Mela (II, 3). Hence, a large number of nymph votive offerings modeled in the form of grottoes are known, alluding to nymph sanctuaries located in caves. The water from this grotto-like nymphaeum poured into the basin and hydraulic mortar coated canal. The triclinium floor, situated below the fountain floor level, is paved with a geometric pattern mosaic (Marín, 2014-2015) (Fig. 4), while the lower walls are reveted with marble. The eastern perimeter corridor or ambulacrum opens onto the peristyle by means of a large entranceway flanked by two columns. This corridor is also situated above the lateral ambulacra, joining with them using two steps, as seen in the southern part of the perisytle (Hidalgo, 2016, p. 194). The eastern corridor is paved with a marine thiasos mosaic, the western part depicting a nereid riding on a ketos or sea monster (Fig. 5), dated, more likely, to the second half of the 4th century AD than to early 3rd century AD, as proposed in previous studies (Marín, 2016, pp. 438439). Two features relate villa Salar to the nearby villa Gabia (Gutiérrez Rodríguez et al., 2016). In the first place, the use of tubi fittili of the type “terracotta vaulting tube with nozzle” (Lancaster, 2015, pp. 106-108 Figure 1. Roman villa Salar location (red star) (own elaboration, topographic map 1:25.000, IGN). María Luisa Loza azuaga / José BeLtrán Fortes / JuLio MigueL roMán Punzón / PaBLo ruiz Montes / ManueL Moreno aLcaide / María isaBeL Fernández garcía 4Archivo Español de Arqueología, 2021, 94, e20 | ISSN-L: 0066-6742 | eISSN: 1988-3110 | https://doi.org/10.3989/aespa.094.021.20 Figure 2. Groundplan indicating where the sculptures were found (PGI Villa romana de Salar). The Roman villa of SalaR (GRanada). The SculpTuRal pRoGRam in aRchaeoloGical conTexT 5Archivo Español de Arqueología, 2021, 94, e20 | ISSN-L: 0066-6742 | eISSN: 1988-3110 | https://doi.org/10.3989/aespa.094.021.20 and 115-118) for some of the vaults (Moreno, Román and Ruiz, 2019). In villa Salar, they were most certainly employed in the nymphaeum vaulting, as various fragments were recovered in the fill here (Moreno, Román and Ruiz, 2019, pp. 138-140). Secondly, the presence of pieces of wall opera sectilia; those from villa Gabia were found in a cryptoporticus dated to the 4th century AD (Gutiérrez Rodíguez et al., 2016, pp. 299-301). Also, at the villa suburbana La Estación (Antequera, Málaga), dated to the same period, but located further away, similar opus sectile wall decor has also been documented (Gutiérrez Deza, 2005; López and Neira, 2010, p. 28). A triclinium with a nymphaeum, occupying the rear wall and providing these rooms with water, is a common feature in Roman dwellings. Some cases are very similar to those described by Pliny the Younger (Fornell, 2009) and can be found in garden settings, for example, in Pompeian houses, being generically referred to as “water triclinia” (Salsa, 1987, p. 138). Triclinia tended to grow larger over time to house a greater number of guests (Dunbabin, 1991); the use of stibadia associated with fountains also developed (Morvillez, 2008). In the province Baetica, villa El Ruedo (Almedinilla), dated to the 4th century AD (Carrillo, 2016; Stephenson, 2009, p. 347) houses an outstanding nymphaeum ad edicola, decorated with an exceptional sculptural program composed of bronze and marble statues, that supplied a stibadium fountain with water (Vaquerizo and Noguera, 1997). Perhaps, the remains discovered in villa Caserío Silverio Mayorga (Antequera) (see discussion in Hidalgo, 2016, pp. 215-217), associated with a unique iconographic assemblage of small-sized statues, can be seen as another example of fountain stibadium (Beltrán and Rodríguez, 2018). Furthermore, the addition of rooms arranged around the same axis allowed the development of multiple stibadia, as seen, for example, in Figure 3. Fountain presiding the triclinium of villa Salar. A: Detail of the apsidal basin before the excavation of the niche. B: Speleothem fragments in the niche (Photo J. Beltrán). Figure 4. Virtual reconstruction of the triclinium mosaic (J. A. Benavides / J. A. Esquivel). Figure 5. Nereid riding on a ketos (Photo Siglos, S.L.). A B María Luisa Loza azuaga / José BeLtrán Fortes / JuLio MigueL roMán Punzón / PaBLo ruiz Montes / ManueL Moreno aLcaide / María isaBeL Fernández garcía 6Archivo Español de Arqueología, 2021, 94, e20 | ISSN-L: 0066-6742 | eISSN: 1988-3110 | https://doi.org/10.3989/aespa.094.021.20 the Lusitanian villa Quinta das Longas (Elvas) with a triple-apsed triclinium (Dunbabin, 1996, p. 77), associated with an exceptional sculptural assemblage, all dated to the 4th century AD (Nogales, Carvalho and Almeida, 2004). The development of multiple triclinia and stibadia made it possible to entertain the guests during dinners with music, theatre, poetry, stunts, etc. Nymphaea would have provided these rooms with an architectural stage-like scaenae frons (Dunbabin, 2008), refreshing as well the summer evenings and providing a pleasant, soft background murmur (Fornell, 2005, pp. 368-376). In all, they were carefully planned rooms, following standards and professional guidelines, like those given by Vitruvius (VI, 5, 1-3), and steeped in cultural importance where the love of nature and good taste was clearly expressed in the décor elements (mosaics, mural paintings, sculptures and fabrics). The villa Salar nymphaeum would have been a niched fountain (Gagniers et al., 1969) with an inclined wall, following the nymphaeum ad edicola type of Neuerburg (1965, pp. 61-64) and Letzner (1990, type XVI). In this case, the niche structure was placed behind the space coated with hydraulic mortar. The most frequently mentioned examples are those found in domestic settings of Pompeii and Herculaneum, although at Ostia, in the Casa d’Amore e Psiche, this type appears with a single central niche, therefore, similar to villa Salar, but from a later era (Jansen, 2018, p. 418, fig. 15). This first type is less complex than the facade nymphaeum type, which usually has a semicircular central niche flanked by two smaller ones, like the example located next to the triclinium in the Casa del Torello at Pompeii (Soprano, 1950) with niches capable of housing fountain-figures (Neuerburg, 1965, p. 76; Anderson, 1990, pp. 221-224). As to U-shaped perimeter canal fountains that surround the triclinium walls, the best example in Hispania is Casa dos Repuxos at Conimbriga (Hidalgo, 2016, pp. 208-209), although in this case it is lacking the fountain structure. Perhaps another example can be seen in villa Cadima (Los Gallardos) (Llidó, López and Martínez, 2016), but the room in question could either have been a large exedra-shaped fountain pool or a triclinium set on axis with the peristyle. Statues could have been installed in the exedra (Hidalgo, 2016, p. 209), as several unstudied sculptural fragments recovered in this room suggest. Among this collection is a female hand with a thyrsus, perhaps a maenad, and a statue support of a personification, possibly a character from a Bacchus thiasos (Llidó, López and Martínez, 2016, p. 30, fig. 7). Two female sculptures carved in marble were found in the fill that had sealed the nymphaeum exedra of villa Salar. They had served as fountain-figures in the decor program of the water display, perhaps inside the fountain niche or, more likely, installed on the facade. The first figure, representing a nymph (Fig. 6, A-B), was made in white marble, fine to medium-grained with homogeneous texture, coming from Pentelic quarries (Greece) according to petrographic analysis3. It measures 52 cm (height), 18 cm (width) and 11 cm (thick) with an irregular plinth, 4 cm in height. The head and right forearm are missing, also the central torso presents a large fracture, as well as other minor ones in the left arm, shoulder and neck, but all fragments join. A deep slit, running from the nape of the neck to the waist, shows traces of a small lead pipe4, confirming its fountain-statue function. Usually in this model, water poured forth from a vessel held by the figure, but in this case, the figure had been repiped, making it flow from above. The nymph is depicted resting her weight on the left leg, wearing a mantle that covers the underbelly – hinting at view of the pubis – and legs with only the tips of her sandaled feet visible. The upper part of the mantle appears rolled up, as well as on the left forearm, from where it falls into a stepwise ray of folds. As mentioned before, the tilt of the torso was compensated by placing the right arm on a pedestal or low column where an attribute, usually a jug or pitcher, was added to help support the figure. In the study case, the statue support is missing and only a puntello remains on this side. Its stylistic features date it to the 2nd century AD, possibly, towards the middle or third quarter of the century, and also indicate that it was not manufactured in Hispania, but imported. This nymph statue is a replica of a well-known Greco-Roman type, which derives from the Aphrodite Pontia Euploia model (e.g. Delivorrias, Berger and Kossatz-Deissmann, 1984, pp. 69-70; Díez Platas, 1987; Inan, 1989; Schroder, 2004, pp. 257-260, n. 150; Aristodemou, 2012, pp. 116-119), closely related also to the Venus Marina type, well defined by G. Becatti (1971; also, for example, Delivorrias, Berger and Kossatz-Deissmann, 1984, p. 65, n. 554-562; Loza, 1992; Schröder, 2004, pp. 172-175). Both types were frequently used, although not exclu3 Archaeometric analysis report on the sculptures found in the Roman villa of Salar (Granada) by Dr. Esther Ontiveros Ortega (reference PPT000506), Geology Laboratory of the Instituto Andaluz de Patrimonio Histórico (IAPH). 19_VS_2 GE sample, petrographic, mineralogical and geochemical study using optical microscopy of light transmitted on thin sheets, X-ray diffraction and X-ray fluorescence. Corresponds to a finegrained calcic marble (MGS 1mm) with mosaic texture and curved and semi-curved contacts. 4 According to González and El Amrani (2014, p. 49) they are the remains of an iron spike to join with the head, which we consider incorrect. The Roman villa of SalaR (GRanada). The SculpTuRal pRoGRam in aRchaeoloGical conTexT 7Archivo Español de Arqueología, 2021, 94, e20 | ISSN-L: 0066-6742 | eISSN: 1988-3110 | https://doi.org/10.3989/aespa.094.021.20 in very poor condition, making it impossible to establish their types, as the two small fragmentary sculptures from Lusitania, one from Ança in the Museo Nacional Machado de Castro (Coimbra) collection (Loza, 1992, pp. 438-439, n. 96, lám. LXXXIX; Díez Platas, 2013, p. 65) and the other in the Museo Regional of Evora (Loza, 1992, pp. 447-448, no. 96, lam. LXXXIX; Díez Platas, 2013, p. 65). Also, a larger and well preserved sculpture found in the Lusitanian city of Augusta Emerita (Mérida) is posed like the Salar copy, but, even though its right arm is resting on a column where a jug lays horizontally, its general iconography is more akin to the semi-drapped Venus Pudica type (Loza, 1992, pp. 424-427, n. 76, lam. LXXV). A second figure was discovered next to the nymph sculpture described above, in this case, a nymph with a shell (Fig. 7, A-B). It was carved in white marble, most likely local stone6, visually identified by its macroscopic aspect and dolomitic properties with marble from the southern region of Sierra Mijas (Málaga) (Beltrán and Loza, 2003). In any case, the use of local marble ensures that it was produced in a local workshop towards the end of the 2nd century AD or, more likely, the beginning of the 3rd century AD. It is known that local workshops manufactured statuary with marbles extracted from Mijas (Málaga) quarries up until the Severan period (Beltrán and Loza, 2003; Beltrán et al., 2018). The figure is preserved only from the waist down, measuring 42 cm in height and 24.5 cm in width with a plinth, curved in the front and left side fragmented, 7 cm in height. The mantle falls along the back, surrounds the hips and opens on the side, exposing the legs and bare feet. It holds a large shell in both hands, covering the abdomen and pubic area, bored with a hole, like a labrum, from which water poured forth into the fountain. This hole appears also at the back, boring through the statue almost horizontally. The standing nymph holding a shell is one of the most common types of fountain-statues, stemming back to the 3rd century BC Hellenistic period, although it also has iconographic similarities with Aphrodite representations that derive from sculptural prototypes that inspired the 4th-3rd centuries BC creations, as G. Becatti has pointed out (Becatti, 1971). However, the addition of a shell functioning as a fountain source dates to Roman era, as seen in the first known example, a relief from Ischia (Díez Platas, 1987 and 2013, p. 62). Altogether, the shell motif associated 6 The petrographic analysis (vid., supra, note 3) did not reach an exact conclusion. Sample 19_VS_1 GE (IAPH Geology Laboratory) corresponds to a calcic marble, with heteroblastic texture, MGS >2 mm and straight and sutureed grain contact. sively, as fountain-figures, differing only in the mantle arrangement. Thus, the Aphrodite Pontia Euploia model was simplified by leaving part of the left arm uncovered and eliminating the usual triangular end arrangement of the mantle in front of the thighs. Some 20 Roman replicas of this type have been documented and debates focus on its origin –whether in Rhodes in the 2nd century BC or Alexandria towards the end of the century (Inan, 1989; discussion in Schröder, 2004, pp. 275-260) – or if it represents a nymph or the goddess Venus, although “la estatua fue transformada en una Afrodita sólo en tiempos romanos” (Schröder, 2004, p. 259). Statue supports were usually placed next to the left leg, although in the nymph or Venus statue from villa Salar it appears on the opposite side. Also, the coiled arm bracelets have been left out, and the mantle arrangement and its folds are quite simple. However, its interest lies in the fact that it is the first representation of this Roman sculpture type documented up until now in Hispania5. Other figures have been documented, but 5 The Prado Museum Venus or nymph, dated between 75-100 AD, is not come from Hispania, but was originally part of Christine of Sweden’s collection in Rome (Schröder, 2004, pp. 257-260, n. 150). Nor is the Venus Marina statue of the Museo de Zaragoza Spanish, but originally part of the Marquis of Villahermosa collection (Mora, 2001, p. 135, fig. 7). Figure 6. Pudica nymph from villa Salar. A: Front. B: Back (Photo: PGI Villa romana de Salar). A B María Luisa Loza azuaga / José BeLtrán Fortes / JuLio MigueL roMán Punzón / PaBLo ruiz Montes / ManueL Moreno aLcaide / María isaBeL Fernández garcía 8Archivo Español de Arqueología, 2021, 94, e20 | ISSN-L: 0066-6742 | eISSN: 1988-3110 | https://doi.org/10.3989/aespa.094.021.20 were found in the province capital colonia Patricia Corduba, belonging perhaps to part of the theater’s decorative program (Loza, 1993, pp. 145-146, lám. 2), together with another smaller sized copy, currently lost (Loza, 1993, p. 146); also, there is a fragmentary figure from Tarraco (Tarragona) (Loza, 1992, pp. 327329, n 63, láms. LX and LXI; Díez Platas, 2013, p. 65). As well as a copy in the Prado Museum, however the shell is a Modern Age addition and its provenance is foreign (Schröder, 2004, pp. 167-171, n. 18); lastly, there is another example in the Alba collection (Loza and Beltrán, 2011, pp. 314-316, n. 13). The second nymph type, like the villa Salar copy, derives from the Venus Landolina prototype (Ghedini, 1985). This model receives its name on account of a sculpture found in a nymphaeum at Syracuse, corroborating its original function as part of fountain decor (Becatti, 1971, pp. 27-28). In some cases, as when water flowed directly from the breasts, the shell was only an attribute, like the Bardo Museum example or another copy discovered in Marseille (Kapossy, 1969, p. 14). Up until now, the only known replica in Roman Hispania was a fragmentary figure, missing the head, arms and part of the shell, from Tarraco (Tarragona). Presumably, it belonged to a domestic environment and formed part of the sculptural arrangement in a small nymphaeum; the rough finishing on its backside suggests that it was installed in a niche (Koppel, 1985, p. 119, n. 187, lam. 83, pp. 3-5). Another sculpture fragment, discovered when cleaning the pool on the right side of the nymphaeum, corresponds to a third female statue (Fig. 7, C). It is modeled in fine-grained white marble and visibly similar to the stone of the first sculptures studied, as, at the moment, no analysis has been carried out. The measurements preserved are the following: height, 13 cm; with Venus and nymphs was highly popular in the Roman world, appearing in standing or crouching nymph fountain-figures (Leander-Touati, 2005, 13), clothed or completely naked (Ghedini, 1985; Baratta, 2013), following the diverse iconographic types. Their association to nymphaea made them a common feature in the decoration of stepped fountains, a small-sized water display found frequently in Roman houses, like an example on display in the Archaeological Museum of Altino (Galliazzo, 1979, lám. XVI, fig. 21) and another in the Archaeological Museum of Sparta (Aristodemou, 2012, p. 120, n. 75). This nymph type also appears in various Pompeian mural paintings, as in the Casa delle Vestali, Casa dei Ceii, Casa di Romolo e Remo, Casa di Cecilio Iucundo or Casa di Salustio; in other wall decoration examples, they were depicted as sculptures, for example, in the Casa della Fontana dell’Amore, Casa della Venere in Bikini, Casa di Marco Lucrezio or also in the Stabian baths (Moorman, 1988, p. 44). The most common sculptural scheme is the standing nymph, represented partially draped in a mantle slung around the hips, as the copy in study. However, they correspond to two different types depending upon the mantle and leg arrangement, those being the Venus Pudica and the Venus of Siracusa or Landolina (Ghedini, 1985; Aristodemou, 2012, pp. 119-120; Baratta, 2013). In the first case, the mantle appears wrapped around the hips and completely covering the legs, while it holds a large scallop shell (Ghedini, 1985); whereas, in the second type the legs are left uncovered, as in villa Salar’s figure. The Venus Pudica type was very common throughout the entire Roman Empire (Kapossy, 1969, pp. 12-13, figs. 1-2; Baratta, 2013, p. 199) and a few copies have been documented in Hispania. Two slightly larger than life-sized statues Figure 7. A-B. Nymph with shell from villa Salar. A: Front. B: Back (Photo: PGI Villa romana de Salar). C. Sculpture fragment, from villa Salar (Photo J. Beltrán). A B C The Roman villa of SalaR (GRanada). The SculpTuRal pRoGRam in aRchaeoloGical conTexT 9Archivo Español de Arqueología, 2021, 94, e20 | ISSN-L: 0066-6742 | eISSN: 1988-3110 | https://doi.org/10.3989/aespa.094.021.20 nymph holding the shell would have stood in a central position flanked by two Pontia Euploia type nymphs, forming a pendant. This mode was followed in Hispania and can be found in similar fountain contexts near villa Salar, for example, in villa Bullas (Murcia), where various marble Erotes fountain-figures have been found (Loza and Noguera, 2018). According to this hypothetical arrangement, only one of the two nymph replicas has been recovered in villa Salar, that is, the figure holding a jug on its right side, which in the original scheme would have been positioned to the left of the main sculpture. 3. THE VENUS STATUE As stated earlier, the access between the eastern ambulacrum and the peristyle had been monumentalized with two large columns sustaining a pediment. A diaeta decorated with a mosaic pavement added to the embellishment of this area of the open courtyard (Hidalgo, 2016, p. 192). In our opinion, various columns, smaller in size than the supports used in the ambulacra and re-used in a late Roman remodeling of this environment, could have been taken from a fountain display or pool located in the non-excavated central area of the courtyard. A perimeter canal coated with hydraulic mortar completed the additional architectural elements found in the peristyle. The western ambulacrum and the southwestern part of the interior courtyard have been completely excavated, revealing the presence of small semicircular fountains located width, 7,5 cm; thickness, 6,5 cm, which suggests that this figure was slightly larger than the other two sculptures discovered in the fountain. It shows part of the right arm and elbow, and, at least, the part preserved appears naked. Its partial state impedes identifying the character represented, as well as the sculptural type it would correspond to. However, it must have been part of the nymphaeum statuary decoration, most likely, a representation of a nymph, as the other two preserved sculptures. The arrangement of the fountain, which reproduces a grotto, reinforces this hypothesis and, therefore, the decorative program would have consisted of three sculptures, most probably nymphs. The villa Salar nymphs most certainly adorned the nymphaeum in the 4th century AD, although their exact arrangement is unknown. They could have simply been installed on the facade, displaying the variety of nymphs as fountain sources and decor. The aforementioned relief from Ischia, in the Hermitage collection and dated to the 1st century AD (Piotrovsky, 2001, p. 142), offers a hypothetical sculptural arrangement. In the central part, a nymph or Venus is depicted pouring water from a scallop shell and flanked by two other nymphs, each supporting an overturned vessel on a pedestal from which water flows, creating a pendant, a sculptural display well-known in the Roman world (Bartman, 1988 and 1991, pp. 80-82). Although this votive relief, which possibly represents an ideal statue arrangement in a nymphaeum, has no direct relation to the Salar pieces, it can be used as a proposal for their original sculptural arrangement. According to this, the Figure 8. Villa Salar. Sounding 4. Western corridor hunting scene mosaic, adjacent rooms, and the possible original location of the Venus statue in the peristyle garden fountain (red circle) (Photo PGI Villa romana de Salar).