scieee Open visual document viewer

The maternal genetic make-up of the Iberian Peninsula between the Neolithic and the Early Bronze Age

Ponce Martínez, Juana; Hunt Ortiz, Mark A.; Mejías García, Juan Carlos; Pecero Espín, Juan Carlos; Cruz-Auñón Briones, Rosario

Abstract

Agriculture first reached the Iberian Peninsula around 5700 BCE. However, little is known about the genetic structure and changes of prehistoric populations in different geographic areas of Iberia. In our study, we focus on the maternal genetic makeup of the Neolithic (~ 5500–3000 BCE), Chalcolithic (~ 3000–2200 BCE) and Early Bronze Age (~ 2200–1500 BCE). We report ancient mitochondrial DNA results of 213 individuals (151 HVS-I sequences) from the northeast, central, southeast and southwest regions and thus on the largest archaeogenetic dataset from the Peninsula to date. Similar to other parts of Europe, we observe a discontinuity between hunter-gatherers and the first farmers of the Neolithic. During the subsequent periods, we detect regional continuity of Early Neolithic lineages across Iberia, however the genetic contribution of hunter-gatherers is generally higher than in other parts of Europe and varies regionally. In contrast to ancient DNA findings from Central Europe, we do not observe a major turnover in the mtDNA record of the Iberian Late Chalcolithic and Early Bronze Age, suggesting that the population history of the Iberian Peninsula is distinct in character.

Full text

1 SCIENTIFIC REPORTS | 7: 15644 | DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-15480-9 www.na u e.com/scien i ic epo s The ma e nal gene ic make-up o he Ibe ian Peninsula be ween he Neoli hic and he Ea ly B onze Age Anna Szécsényi-Nagy 1, Ch is ina Ro h2, Guido B and 3, C is ina Rihue e-He ada 4, C is ina Tejedo -Rod íguez5, Pe a Held2, Íñigo Ga cía-Ma ínez-de-Lag án5, Héc o A cusa Magallón5, S ephanie Zesch6, Co ina Knippe 7, Esz e Bán y8, Susanne F iede ich9, Ha ald Melle 9, P imi i a Bueno Ramí ez10, Rosa Ba oso Be mejo10, Rod igo de Balbín Beh mann10, Ana M. He e o-Co al11, Raúl Flo es Fe nández12, Ca men Alonso Fe nández13, Ja ie Jiménez Eche a ia13, Lau a Rindlisbache 14, Camila Olia 4, Ma ía-Inés F egei o4, Ignacio So iano4, O iol Vicen e 4, Ra ael Micó4, Vicen e Lull4, Jo ge Sole Díaz15, Juan An onio López Padilla15, Consuelo Roca de Togo es Muñoz15, Mau o S. He nández Pé ez16, F ancisco Ja ie Jo e Maes e16, Joaquín Lomba Mau andi17, Azucena A ilés Fe nández17, Ka ina T. Lillios18, Ana Ma ia Sil a 19,20, Miguel Magalhães Ramalho21, Luiz Miguel Oos e beek22, Claudia Cunha23, Anna J. Wa e man24, Jo di Roig Buxó25, And és Ma ínez26, Juana Ponce Ma ínez27, Ma k Hun O iz27, Juan Ca los Mejías-Ga cía 27, Juan Ca los Pece o Espín27, Rosa io C uz-Auñón B iones27, Tiago Tomé28, Edua do Ca mona Balles e o29, João Luís Ca doso30, Ana C is ina A aújo31, Co ina Liesau on Le ow-Vo beck 32, Concepción Blasco Bosqued32, Pa icia Ríos Mendoza32, Ana Pujan e33, José I. Royo-Guillén34, Ma co Au elio Esquemb e Be iá35, Vic o Manuel Dos San os Goncal es36, Rui Pa ei a36, Elena Mo án He nández36, Elena Méndez Izquie do37, Jo ge Vega y Miguel38, Robe o Menduiña Ga cía38, Vic o ia Ma ínez Cal o39, Osca López Jiménez39, Johannes K ause3, Sand a L. Pichle 14, Ra ael Ga ido-Pena32, Michael Kuns 40, Robe o Risch4, Manuel A. Rojo-Gue a41, Wol gang Haak 3,42 & Ku W. Al 43,44 1Labo a o y o A chaeogene ics in he Ins i u e o A chaeology, Resea ch Cen e o he Humani ies, Hunga ian Academy o Sciences, Budapes , Hunga y. 2Ins i u e o O ganismic and Molecula E olu ion, Johannes Gu enbe g Uni e si y, Mainz, Ge many. 3Max Planck Ins i u e o he Science o Human His o y, Jena, Ge many. 4Depa amen o de P ehis o ia, Uni e si a Au ònoma de Ba celona, Ba celona, Spain. 5A cadia-Gene al Founda ion o Valladolid Uni e si y, Valladolid, Spain. 6Ge man Mummy P ojec , Reiss-Engelho n-Museen, Mannheim, Ge many. 7Cu - Engelho n-Zen um A chäome ie gGmbH, Mannheim, Ge many. 8Romano-Ge manic Commission, Ge man A chaeological Ins i u e, F ank u am Main, Ge many. 9S a e O ice o He i age Managemen and A chaeology Saxony-Anhal and S a e Museum o P ehis o y, Halle, Ge many. 10Depa amen o de His o ia y Filoso ía, Uni e sidad de Alcalá de Hena es, Alcalá de Hena es, Spain. 11Depa amen o de P ehis o ia, Uni e sidad Complu ense de Mad id, Mad id, Spain. 12P o essional A chaeologis , Pa la (Mad id), Spain. 13C onos SC A queología y Pa imonio, Bu gos, Spain. 14In eg a i e P ehis o y and A chaeological Science, Uni e si y o Basel, Basel, Swi ze land. 15Museo A queológico de Alican e-MARQ, Alican e, Spain. 16Depa amen o de P ehis o ia, A queología, His o ia An igua, Filología G iega y Filología La ina, Uni e sidad de Alican e, Alican e, Spain. 17Depa amen o de P ehis o ia, A queología, His o ia An igua, His o ia Medie al y Ciencias y Técnicas His o iog á icas, Uni e sidad de Mu cia, Mu cia, Spain. 18Depa men o An h opology, Uni e si y o Iowa, Iowa Ci y, Iowa, Uni ed S a es o Ame ica. 19Labo a o y o P ehis o y, CIAS, Depa men o An h opology, Uni e si y o Coimb a, Coimb a, Po ugal. 20UNIARQ, Uni e si y o Lisbon, Lisboa, Po ugal. 21Labo a ó io Nacional de Ene gia e Geologia, I.P., Museu Geológico, Lisboa, Po ugal. 22Ins i u o Poli écnico de Toma , Ins i u o Te a e Memó ia, Geosciences Cen e o Coimb a Uni e si y, Toma , Po ugal. 23P og ama de Capaci ação Ins i ucional MCTIC/MPEG, Museu Pa aense Emílio Goeldi, Belém, B azil. 24Depa men o Na u al and Applied Sciences, Moun Me cy Uni e si y, Ceda Rapids, Iowa, Uni ed S a es o Ame ica. 25A ago L d, Ba celona, Spain. 26Museo A quelógico de Lo ca, Lo ca, Spain. 27Depa amen o de P ehis o ia y A queología, Uni e sidad de Se illa, Se illa, Spain. 28Uni e sidade Fede al do Pa á, Campus Uni e si á io Recei ed: 8 Feb ua y 2017 Accep ed: 27 Oc obe 2017 Published: xx xx xxxx OPEN www.na u e.com/scien i ic epo s/ 2 SCIENTIFIC REPORTS | 7: 15644 | DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-15480-9 Ag icul u e i s eached he Ibe ian Peninsula a ound 5700 BCE. Howe e , li le is known abou he gene ic s uc u e and changes o p ehis o ic popula ions in di e en geog aphic a eas o Ibe ia. In ou s udy, we ocus on he ma e nal gene ic makeup o he Neoli hic (~ 5500–3000 BCE), Chalcoli hic (~ 3000–2200 BCE) and Ea ly B onze Age (~ 2200–1500 BCE). We epo ancien mi ochond ial DNA esul s o 213 indi iduals (151 HVS-I sequences) om he no heas , cen al, sou heas and sou hwes egions and hus on he la ges a chaeogene ic da ase om he Peninsula o da e. Simila o o he pa s o Eu ope, we obse e a discon inui y be ween hun e -ga he e s and he i s a me s o he Neoli hic. Du ing he subsequen pe iods, we de ec egional con inui y o Ea ly Neoli hic lineages ac oss Ibe ia, howe e he gene ic con ibu ion o hun e -ga he e s is gene ally highe han in o he pa s o Eu ope and a ies egionally. In con as o ancien DNA indings om Cen al Eu ope, we do no obse e a majo u no e in he m DNA eco d o he Ibe ian La e Chalcoli hic and Ea ly B onze Age, sugges ing ha he popula ion his o y o he Ibe ian Peninsula is dis inc in cha ac e . The changeo e om a hun e -ga he e li es yle o a p oduc i e mode o subsis ence i s eme ged a ound 10,000 BCE in he Nea Eas 1–3. This so-called ‘Neoli hic ansi ion’ b ough abou undamen al changes in economy, social s uc u e, demog aphy and human heal h, and laid he ounda ions o ag a ian socie ies and hus o ancien ci iliza ions. O e he cou se o he 7 h and 6 h millennia BCE, ag icul u e sp ead om he Balkans o Cen al Eu ope. Ano he ou e o dissemina ion an along he Medi e anean coas lines o G eece, I aly and he sou h o F ance o he Ibe ian Peninsula and no h o he Pa is Basin and Cen al Eu ope4. Howe e , he p ocess o Neoli hisa ion was non-linea , wi h he a chaeological eco d documen ing in luences o local cul u al a- di ions5. In Ibe ia, he Neoli hic ansi ion, which began a ound 5700 BCE, appea s o ha e been complex, and Mesoli hic and a ming communi ies coexis ed and in e ac ed o as long as wo millennia6. The a e ac ual emains, mainly ce amic, a es o he di e en o igins and modes o Neoli hisa ion on he Ibe ian Peninsula. On one hand s ands a Medi e anean ma i ime coloniza ion by Neoli hic pionee s cha ac e - ized by ce amic wi h clea pa allels o he Ligu ian Imp essa collec ions o I alian o igin7–9. Some Ea ly Neoli hic si es we e also loca ed in he hin e land, sugges ing u he ou es o dissemina ion h ough he Py enees and/o along majo i e s, such as he Eb o10,11,16. On he o he hand, No h A ican in luences and con ac s a e angible in he sou he n Ibe ian Neoli hic12,13. All in all, Ibe ia appea s a mel ing po o in luences and g oups, combining Neoli hic li eways and wi h indigenous mechanisms o adap a ion14. In he Ea ly Neoli hic, we can obse e common ea u es sha ed o e la ge a eas, bu also some egionally es ic ed phenomena15. In he whole e i o y, o example, he e exis ed sophis ica ed sys ems o ag icul u e and li es ock handling, wi h adap able c ops16,17 and seasonal s a egies in lock managemen 18–20. The g oups o he F anco-Ibe ian Ca dial and he Epica dial po e y s yles appea ed a his ime and ecen s udies ha e e ealed mu ual diach onic in luences in he ma e ial cul u e and economies o hese cul u es15,21. An inc easing numbe o bu ials om ha epoch ha e come o ligh in he las yea s22–24. The oldes a e indi idual inhuma ions, some imes g ouped in ceme e ies25. I is also common o ind human emains in ca es, which we e inc easingly used o collec i e bu ials26. F om he la e 5 h millennium BCE onwa d, bu ial monu- men s appea ed, and megali hic ombs became widesp ead27. This phenomenon links Ibe ia wi h o he pa s o Eu ope, indica ing long-dis ance ne wo ks o communica ion. Meanwhile, ce ain pa s o no heas Ibe ia main ained indi idual inhuma ions in pi s, mos ly in small ceme e ies28. Besides megali hic ombs, di ched enclo- su es ex ending o e mo e han 100 hec a es s a ed o domina e he landscapes o sou he n and cen al Ibe ia om 3300 o 3100 BCE, highligh ing ano he widely sp ead Eu opean phenomenon29,30. Du ing he Ibe ian Chalcoli hic pe iod (3000–2200 BCE), o i ied se lemen s wi h s one walls and semi-ci cula bas ions appea ed in he wes e n and sou he n pa s o he Peninsula, while elsewhe e, open se lemen s we e s ill ex an 31. The di e si y in se lemen and bu ial ypes sugges s he exis ence o social s uc u es wi h di e en le els o com- plexi y32. A he same ime, as exchange ne wo ks, ci cula ed p ecious goods such as i o y om A ica and e en Asia o Ibe ia33. F om ~2600 BCE onwa ds, he so-called ‘Bell Beake phenomenon’ became mani es wi h i s cha ac e is- ic po e y, coppe weapons, gold o namen s, and o he p es ige goods, an a chaeological e lec ion o impo - an social and economic changes which sp ead ac oss as egions o wes e n and cen al Eu ope34. Ibe ia’s Bell Beake assemblages a e among he iches and mos di e se in wes e n Eu ope35, bo h in e ms o se lemen s and do Guamá, Belém, B azil. 29Se icio Te i o ial de Cul u a de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain. 30Depa amen o de Ciencias Sociais e de Ges ao, Uni e sidade Abe a, Lisboa, Po ugal. 31Resea ch Cen e in Biodi e si y and Gene ic Resou ces (CIBIO-InBIO) & Di ec o a e-Gene al o Cul u al He i age (DGPC), Lisboa, Po ugal. 32Depa amen o de P ehis o ia y A queología, Uni e sidad Au ónoma de Mad id, Mad id, Spain. 33A queología Es udios, Mu cia, Spain. 34Technical a chaeologis , Gobie no de A agón, Za agoza, Spain. 35A pa Pa imonio L d, Alican e, Spain. 36Cen o de A queologia da Uni e sidade de Lisboa (Unia q), Lisboa, Po ugal. 37G upo de In es igación HUM-949 TELLUS, P ehis o ia y A queología en el Su de Ibe ia, Uni e sidad de Se illa, Se illa, Spain. 38ARGEA L d., Mad id, Spain. 39GIPSIA L d., Toledo, Spain. 40Ge man A chaeological Ins i u e Mad id, Mad id, Spain. 41Depa amen o de P ehis o ia y A queología, Uni e sidad de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain. 42School o Biological Sciences, The Uni e si y o Adelaide, Adelaide, Aus ia. 43Cen e o Na u al and Cul u al His o y o Man, Danube P i a e Uni e si y, K ems, Aus ia. 44Depa men o Biomedical Enginee ing and Depa men o En i onmen al Science, Basel Uni e si y, Basel, Swi ze land. Co espondence and eques s o ma e ials should be add essed o A.S.-N. (email: szecsenyi-nagy. [email p o ec ed]) o K.W.A. (email: [email p o ec ed]) www.na u e.com/scien i ic epo s/ 3 SCIENTIFIC REPORTS | 7: 15644 | DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-15480-9 bu ials36. I has hus long been a ocus o a chaeological esea ch, commencing om mig a ionis hypo heses and leading up o cu en social explana ions, whe e he Bell Beake phenomenon is pe cei ed as a package o p es ig- ious objec s exchanged and consumed by eli e g oups and displayed on special occasions37. A ound 2200 BCE, he Chalcoli hic se lemen and une a y p ac ices we e suddenly discon inued, pa icu- la ly in he wes e n and sou he n pa o Ibe ia, whe e mos o he di ched and o i ied se lemen s we e aban- doned and collec i e si es and megali hic ombs we e eplaced by indi idual bu ials31. El A ga g oup began o eme ge in sou heas Ibe ia, wi h la ge and massi ely o i ied u ban cen e s like La Bas ida (Mu cia, n. 28 on Fig.1)38, which managed o con ol a e i o y o o e 35,000 km2 du ing he ollowing 650 yea s. Wi h ega d o i s popula ion his o y, he Ibe ian Peninsula has been he ocus o se e al ecen a chaeogene ic s udies39–44. S udies ocusing no only on m DNA bu also on Y ch omosome ma ke s ha e suppo ed he model o a pionee coloniza ion in he no h-eas e n coas al egions o he Ibe ian Peninsula a he onse o he Ibe ian Neoli hic39,45. On he o he hand, he no he n pa o Spain (Can ab ian inge) a es ed o a a he complex Neoli hic ansi ion42. Recen m DNA and genome-wide analyses ha e pu an emphasis on he gene ic a ini y and sha ed Nea Eas e n ances y be ween he ea ly Ibe ian a me s and he con empo a y Cen al Eu opean Linea bandke amik (LBK) popula ion46–48. The la es m DNA and genomic s udies ha e e ealed inc eased sub- sequen admix u e o hun e -ga he e elemen s du ing he local middle Neoli hic (La Mina; Al o de Reinoso, n. 51–52 on Fig.1)44,47 and he Chalcoli hic (El Po alón; El Mi ado , n. 60–62. on Fig.1) again eminiscen o p ocesses obse ed in Cen al Eu ope41,49,50. Despi e nume ous esea ch p ojec s being ca ied ou o e he pas yea s, he Neoli hic se lemen his o y o Eu ope can s ill only be explained a a b oad scale47,49,51–54. Regional ansec s h ough ime de ailing he de el- opmen s and he cou se o he Neoli hic in cen al Ge many55–57 and in he Ca pa hian Basin58 ha e mos ly been examined by mi ochond ial DNA (m DNA) con ol egion da a. Ou p ojec comple es he la e se ies by ocusing on he a chaeological models and hypo heses ha ha e been pu o wa d o he Ibe ian Peninsula, and whe e diach onic (i.e. ‘ h ough ime’) sampling o ancien DNA allows he de ec ion o demog aphic changes and discon inui ies be ween 5700 and 1500 BCE. Essen ial esea ch ques ions ocus on h ee le els: i) he indi idual si es, ii) he Ibe ian Peninsula as a scene o Neoli hic ansi ion and iii) a compa ison wi h con empo aneous ancien and mode n-day Eu opeans. A key ques ion o ou s udy o he m DNA di e si y on he Ibe ian Peninsula h ough ime was o examine o wha ex en egional and sup a- egional cul u al g oups could be ecognized as gene ically iden i iable en i ies, as shown in o he a eas o Eu ope46,55. A ela ed ques ion was whe he he cul u al b eaks ha can be seen, o ins ance, a he end o he Neoli hic and Chalcoli hic pe iods, we e also accompanied by human popula ion u no e s. Resul s We p ocessed ancien DNA samples o 318 human indi iduals om p ehis o ic Ibe ia and gene a ed ep oducible mi ochond ial hype a iable egion haplo ypes (HVS-I, np 16020–16401) om 151 indi iduals ollowing s ic au hen ica ion c i e ia (see Me hods). M DNA haplog oup classi ica ion o u he 62 samples was based on mul- iplex yping o single nucleo ide polymo phisms (SNPs) (Fig.1, Supplemen a y Tables S1–4). The DNA ampli- ica ion and ep oduc ion success o he HVS-I showed s ong di e ences among samples om di e se egions o he Ibe ian Peninsula: he highes ampli ica ion success a es we e obse ed in no heas Ibe ia (NEI) and highe al i ude egions o cen al Ibe ia (CI) (71–78%), while especially he sou he n pa o he Ibe ian Peninsula (sou heas e n Ibe ian (SEI) g oup and sou hwes Ibe ia (SWI) had e y low ampli ica ion success a es (20–43%). We me ged hese da a wi h p e iously published HVS-I m DNA esul s om 125 p ehis o ic indi iduals (Supplemen a y TablesS5, S15), and sepa a ed he HVS-I da ase o 238, and m DNA haplog oup in o ma ion o 305 p ehis o ic Ibe ian indi iduals in o geog aphically and ch onologically de ined g oups (see Me hods). The esul ing haplog oup composi ions o hese g oups a e p esen ed in Fig.2. Haplog oup based analyses. The Ibe ian p e-Neoli hic m DNA subs a e is s ill poo ly unde s ood. Recen NGS s udies desc ibed hun e -ga he e s belonging o haplog oup U5b in no h Ibe ia43,59, while he sug- ges ed p e- a ming p esence o haplog oups H, N and U442 we e epo ed in s udies ha did no mee ou s ic au hen ica ion c i e ia (see Me hods). The e o e, we used Holocene pe iod hun e -ga he e s om Cen al, Wes and No h Eu ope as p oxy o he Ibe ian p e-Neoli hic m DNA subs a e in ou quan i a i e analyses (Fig.2, Supplemen a y TablesS6, S15). This con inen al hun e -ga he e da ase (HG_HOL, n = 35) con ains p edomi- nan ly U haplog oups (U5b and U5a domina ed, bu also R, U2, U4, U* we e obse ed53,57,58,60–63). In Ibe ia, hap- log oup U5b was ound mos equen ly in he CI Neoli hic da ase (19.4%; n = 62), and showed also ela i e high equency in he CI Chalcoli hic (13.9%; n = 79) and NEI Chalcoli hic-Ea ly B onze Age g oups (14.8%; n = 27). The haplog oup composi ion o he Ibe ian Neoli hic popula ion shows simila i ies o he Ea ly Neoli hic da a om Ana olia (~6500–6000 BCE), he Ca pa hian Basin (~5800–4900 BCE), and Cen al Eu ope (~5500–4000 BCE, ep esen ed by he cen al Ge man Mi elelbe-Saale egion)49,55,58. Haplog oups K, J, T2, HV, V and X a e obse ed in compa able equencies in Ibe ian and Cen al Eu opean g oups. Howe e , he p opo ion o hap- log oup H is highe in he Ibe ian Ea ly Neoli hic (EN) (22.2%; n = 27) han in Cen al Eu ope (15%; n = 160), while he equency o N1a is e y low (3.7% compa ed o 9.4% in Cen al Eu ope). Ano he di e ence wi h ega ds o Cen al Eu ope is he occu ence o haplog oup N* in Neoli hic NEI g oup (Supplemen a y TablesS6, S15). We used he haplog oup equencies o he s udied g oups o p incipal componen analyses (PCA, see Me hods). When compa ed o published ancien DNA da a om he Nea Eas , he wes e n Ana olian Neoli hic popula ion is mos simila o Cen al Eu opean Ea ly-Middle Neoli hic popula ions and o he Neoli hic o no heas Ibe ia (Fig.3, Supplemen a y Fig. S1–2), bu i also shows some a ini ies wi h u he Ibe ian a me s h ough common EN haplog oups (e.g. K, J, T2)49. The p esence o haplog oup N* in he P e-Po e y Neoli hic in Sy ia and in NEI can also be in e p e ed in his ligh 39,64, bu his link needs o be e i ied by whole mi ogenome www.na u e.com/scien i ic epo s/ 4 SCIENTIFIC REPORTS | 7: 15644 | DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-15480-9 Figu e 1. Map o he s udied si es, including he published e e ence da a and iming o a chaeological pe iods on he Ibe ian Peninsula and in Cen al Eu ope. Geog aphic egions, also di e en ia ed in he m DNA analyses, a e indica ed as: NEI: no heas , SEI: sou heas , SWI: sou hwes Ibe ia. Numbe s on he map a e colo ed acco ding o he ch onological pe iods, ep esen ed in he lowe pa o he igu e. Fo he Cen al Eu opean ch onology we used eco ds om he mos impo an compa a i e egion o cen al Ge man Mi elelbe- Saale55. See Supplemen a y TableS5 o u he de ails. Si e codes: 1. Moi a do Sebas ião, 2. Gale ia da Cis e na (Almonda ca e), 3. G u a de Nossa Senho a das Lapas, 4. G u a do Cada al, 5. G u a das Alcobe as, 6. G u a do Poço Velho, 7. G u a dos Ossos, 8. Tholos de Pai Mogo I, 9. Hipogeu de Mon e Canelas I, 10. Hipogeu de Mon e Canelas III, 11. Bolo es, 12. G u a de Malgas a, 13.Valencia de la ConcepciónA ea 9, 14. G u a do Ca alhal de Tu quel, 15. Cob e las C uces, 16. Co a de l’O , 17. Co a de la Sa sa, 18. Co a d’en Pa do, 19. Molinos del Papel, 20. Co a del Ba anc del Migdia, 21. Co a del Can al, 22. Camino de Molino, 23. Fuen e Álamo, 24. Lo ca-Los Tin es, 25. Lo ca-Mad e Me ceda ias, 26. Lo ca-Cas illo de Lo ca, 27. Rincón de Moncada, 28. La Bas ida, 29. Tabayá, 30. Ille a dels Banye s, 319. Co a Bonica, 32. Can Sadu ní, 33. Co a d’A ellane , 34. Els T ocs, 35. San Pau de Camp, 36. Ba anc d’en Ri à, 37. Balma de Sa gan ana, 38. Co a de la Ven osa, 39. Co a de Mon anissel, 40. Miguel Vi es, 41. Can Gambús, 42. Cha es, 43. Valdescusa, 46. Al o de Rodilla, 47. Fuen e Celada, 48. Fuen e Pecina 1, 49. Fuen e Pecina 2, 50. Fuen e Pecina 4, 51. Al o de Reinoso, 52. La Mina, 53. La Ta ayuela, 54. El Juncal, 55. A oyal I, 56. El Hundido, 57. Camino de las Yese as, 58. Humanejos, 59. Valle de las Higue as, 60–61. El Po alón, 62. El Mi ado , 63. Es Fo a de ses A i ges. Backg ound map o Ibe ia (copy igh holde Uni e si a Au ònoma Ba ceolna) was modi ied in Adobe Illus a o CS6 so wa e (www.adobe.com/p oduc s/illus a o ). www.na u e.com/scien i ic epo s/ 5 SCIENTIFIC REPORTS | 7: 15644 | DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-15480-9 analyses. Haplog oup composi ions o all o he Ibe ian g oups a e highly simila o each o he , esul ing in clus- e s on he PCA plo s and Wa d clus e ing ee. Ou la ges Ibe ian da ase s a e om Neoli hic and Chalcoli hic o CI (n = 62 and 79), which show an ele a ed equency o U5b compa ed o he NEI Neoli hic. In e es ingly, we also obse e p obable hun e -ga he e haplog oups U2 and U4, whe eas he cha ac e is ic EN haplog oups N*, N1a a e missing in he CI egion. The sou heas e n Ibe ian da ase (n = 48) con ains eigh La e Neoli hic indi iduals wi h haplog oups K, H and U5b, 28 indi iduals om he Chalcoli hic and 12 om he Ea ly B onze Age (EBA). Simila ly o he CI g oups, SEI shows a mix u e o haplog oups o he NEI g oup, bu some o hem (N*, N1a, U3) a e missing. The numbe o Neoli hic and Chalcoli hic SWI samples (n = 12 and n = 31) is oo small o es ima e he popu- la ion dynamics in he egion eliably (Supplemen a y TableS6). The combined da ase shows a p edominance o haplog oup K (35.7%) and high equency o haplog oups H, J and T (16.7–14.3–14.3%). As Middle Neoli hic (~ 4500–3500 BCE) and La e Neoli hic (~3500–3000 BCE) pe iods o mos si es a e no sepa able a he cu en s a e o a chaeological esea ch, we combine hese da a in ou analyses (MLN). Fishe ’s exac (p = 0.5473) and popula ion con inui y (p = 0.3385–0.3722) es s con i m he connec ion be ween he EN and MLN pe iods o Ibe ia in gene al. Some o he Ibe ian Neoli hic m DNA haplog oups (U2, N*, N1a) a e no obse ed in he successi e Chalcoli hic Ibe ian popula ion (n = 156), whe eas o he s main ain a s eady equency (V, T2, X) h oughou 3500 yea s. An in e es ing excep ion is haplog oup L1b in he La e Chalcoli hic cen al Ibe ia a he si e Camino de las Yese as (n. 57 on Fig.1), nea Mad id. This g oup is mos equen in oday’s Wes -Cen al A ica65, and hin s a a connec ion o he No h-Wes A ican coas s in p ehis o ic imes. In con as o U5b, haplog oup U5a (common in Cen al Eu opean Mesoli hic and La e Neoli hic55,5760) appea s i s in he 3000–2500 BCE pe iod o cen al Ibe ia. O he ypical Cen al Eu opean and Ca pa hian Basin Neoli hic haplog oups such as H5, T1, W and U8, which a e obse ed in la e Cen al Eu opean Neoli hic pe iods, a e missing om he en i e p ehis o ic Ibe ian da ase . These quali a i e di e ences accoun o he sepa a ion o mos o he Ibe ian p ehis o ic g oups om he Cen al Eu opean Neoli hic and Ea ly B onze Age popula ions along he second componen o he PCA, shown on Fig.3. Tes s o popula ion con inui y and Fishe ’s exac es be ween he whole Ibe ian Ea ly and La e Chalcoli hic da ase s esul in non-signi ican p alues (p = 0.5444–0.5578 and 0.9779), which suppo popula ion con inui y be ween he wo pe iods. Un o una ely, a ine ch onological sepa a ion o he Chalcoli hic (CHA) da ase can- no be achie ed o all samples and he e o e we conside only a subse o he CHA da ase (n = 71 o Ea ly and n = 47 o La e CHA) in his analysis (Supplemen a y TableS8). We also es ed whe he his con inui y could be he esul o da a me ging ac oss bigge geog aphic dis ance. Howe e , he gene ic con inui y du ing he Ea ly o La e Chalcoli hic ansi ion also holds a egional scale, as ou popula ion con inui y es canno ejec con inui y be ween he Neoli hic (con aining mainly La e Neoli hic) and CHA g oups o cen al Ibe ia (p = 0.6033–0.6143), and NEI (p = 0.9038–0.7835). This con inuous gene ic makeup is also suppo ed by non-signi ican (p = 0.2264 and 0.4484) di e ences in haplog oup composi ions (Supplemen a y TablesS7–8). Figu e 2. M DNA haplog oup composi ion o he p ehis o ic Ibe ian g oups. Abb e ia ions: Hun e - ga he e s in Eu ope om he Holocene (HG_HOL), no heas Ibe ian Neoli hic (NEI_Neo), no heas Ibe ian Chalcoli hic and Ea ly B onze Age (NEI_CHA_EBA), cen al Ibe ian Neoli hic (CI_Neo), cen al Ibe ian Chalcoli hic (CI_CHA), sou hwes Ibe ian Neoli hic (SWI_Neo), sou hwes Ibe ian Chalcoli hic (SWI_CHA), sou heas Ibe ian Neoli hic (SEI_Neo), Chalcoli hic and B onze Age (SEI_ CHA_EBA). Rela i e haplog oup equencies a e p esen ed in Supplemen a y TableS6. The backg ound map o Ibe ian Peninsula (h ps://en.wikipedia.o g/wiki/File:Relie _Map_o _Spain.png# ile) is licensed unde CC BY-SA 3.0 (h ps:// c ea i ecommons.o g/licenses/by-sa/3.0/) was modi ied in Adobe Illus a o CS6 so wa e (www.adobe.com/ p oduc s/illus a o ). www.na u e.com/scien i ic epo s/ 6 SCIENTIFIC REPORTS | 7: 15644 | DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-15480-9 The Ea ly B onze Age sample se in he Ibe ian p ehis o ic ansec is s ill e y small (a o al o n = 37 indi- iduals om all ou egions s udied). A he m DNA haplog oup le el he EBA does no show new in luences o popula ion changes a he onse o he Ibe ian B onze Age acco ding o esul s om Fishe ’s es and es o popula ion con inui y, when bo h he en i e Peninsula and sou heas e n Ibe ia in pa icula we e conside ed (Supplemen a y TablesS7-8). A mo e de ailed analysis o H subhaplog oups ocuses on 17 SNPs in he coding egion o he human mi og- enome. The la ges p opo ion o he H indi iduals belongs o he subhaplog oup H1 (65.1%), and he second la ges g oup is subhaplog oup H3 (14%), while 18.6% o he H indi iduals canno be assigned o any o he sub- g oups included in he H-PLEX assay (see Me hods, Supplemen a y TablesS3-4)66. H3 is de ec ed in Chalcoli hic indi iduals om cen al, sou heas and sou hwes Ibe ia. H1 is obse ed in each pe iod and egion, bu mo e equen ly in he Chalcoli hic and Ea ly B onze Age han in he Neoli hic. The compa a i e ancien H da a om he Eu opean p ehis o y is oo spa se o in-dep h s a is ical analyses. Howe e i becomes appa en om ou esul s ha he H di e si y in p ehis o ic Ibe ia is di e en om he H di e si y o Cen al Eu ope55,58,67,68, and mo e simila o he Neoli hic popula ions in F ance69,70. No ably, common Cen al Eu opean subhaplog oups H5 and H767,68 ha e no ye been obse ed in Sou hwes Eu ope. O e all, we do no obse e di ec links be ween he Cen al Eu opean La e Neoli hic (ch onologically compa- able o he Chalcoli hic in Ibe ia) and he Ibe ian (en i e and la e) CHA g oups a he haplog oup le el, and hus canno con i m a La e Chalcoli hic expansion owa d Cen al Eu ope as sugges ed by haplog oup H mi ogenome da a68. Haplo ype and sequence based analyses. The m DNA a ia ion in p ehis o ic Ibe ia is u he explo ed by HVS-I sequence and haplo ype analyses o 238 indi iduals om he Peninsula. The haplo ype di e si y o he hun e -ga he e popula ions o Cen al Eu ope (HG_PLEI (Pleis ocene): Hd = 0.879; n = 29, Figu e 3. P incipal componen analysis based on haplog oup equencies o 955 indi iduals om 16 p ehis o ic g oups. The i s wo componen s display 42.8% o he o al a iance. G oups a e colo ed acco ding o hei geog aphical posi ions: b own: Ibe ia, pu ple: F ance, och e: Cen al and Eas -Cen al Eu ope, yellow: Eas e n Eu ope and Nea Eas . Fo abb e ia ions o Ibe ian g oups, see legend o Fig.2. Fu he abb e ia ions: Cen al and No h Eu opean hun e -ga he e s om he Holocene (HG_HOL), Neoli hic Ana olia (ANAT) Yamnaya (YAM), Ea ly Neoli hic Ca pa hian Basin (CB_EN), Ea ly Neoli hic Ge many (GER_EN), Middle Neoli hic Ge many (GER_MN), La e Neoli hic Ge many (GER_LN), Ea ly B onze Age Cen al Eu ope (CEU_ EBA), Neoli hic Gu gy si e in F ance (FRA_GUR), Neoli hic T eilles cul u e in F ance (TRE). Fo u he in o ma ion see Supplemen a y TableS6. www.na u e.com/scien i ic epo s/ 7 SCIENTIFIC REPORTS | 7: 15644 | DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-15480-9 HG_HOL (Holocene): Hd = 0.931; n = 35) p o ides he baseline o his compa a i e se ies. The di e si y is lowe in he Ea ly Neoli hic o Ibe ia (Hd = 0.926; n = 27) bu inc eases in he ollowing Middle-La e Neoli hic (Hd = 0.933; n = 74) and Chalcoli hic pe iods (Hd = 0.944; n = 118). The Ea ly B onze Age shows again a lowe di e si y (Hd = 0.917; n = 16), al hough his could be he esul o he small numbe o in es iga ed indi id- uals (Supplemen a y TableS9). The haplo ype di e si y among he egional g oups is he lowes in he SWI Neoli hic-Chalcoli hic g oup in Ibe ia, and ha along wi h he de ec ed common basal J and K haplo ypes could cause po en ial bias in lineage sha ing esul s p esen ed below. The haplo ype sha ing (SHA) be ween he la ge ch onological g oups de ec s no hun e -ga he e con ibu- ion in he EN g oup o Ibe ia, and a low le el o hun e -ga he e ma e nal lineages in he MLN pe iods (6.8%) (Table1). Du ing he MLN, se e al new hun e -ga he e - ype U5b lineages appea . Be ween he wo successi e Neoli hic pe iods, he haplo ype sha ing amoun s o 50%, and 43.2% o he MLN lineages a e al eady p esen in he EN (as seen om ou ances al SHA). In he Chalcoli hic pe iod, we also obse e a s ong ances al EN con ibu ion (44.9%), wi h only 14.4% o he lineages o igina ing om la e Neoli hic pe iods. The con inui y o lineages is also seen in he smalle EBA da ase , which shows close connec ions o EN, MLN and CHA pe iods, and in which only 18.8% o he haplo ypes a e new (Table1, Supplemen a y TableS10). The Ibe ian ea ly a ming g oups sha e gene ally high numbe o lineages (38.3–82.4%) wi h each o he (Supplemen a y Fig.S3). The Cen al Eu opean Ea ly Neoli hic has he highes numbe o sha ed haplo ypes compa ing o he no heas Ibe ian g oups, bu he sha ing is also high wi h sou heas Ibe ian da ase . In con- as , lineage sha ing wi h Holocene pe iod hun e -ga he e s is he highes in he mos ly Chalcoli hic sou heas Ibe ian g oup (8.6%) and in CI Neoli hic (6.7%). Conce ning empo al succession in NEI egion, he p opo ion o hun e -ga he e lineages inc eases ( om 0 o 4.8%) du ing he Chalcoli hic pe iod (Supplemen a y TableS10). Con inui y be ween Neoli hic and Chalcoli hic g oups is e lec ed by he amoun o sha ed lineages be ween he wo pe iods in CI (61.2%), bu bo h CI da ase also sha e many lineages wi h all o he Ibe ian g oups (Supplemen a y TableS10). Gene ic dis ances (Fs ) a e gene ally low among he Ibe ian p ehis o ic g oups, and none o hem a e signi - ican (Supplemen a y TableS11). We obse e he sho es dis ances om Cen al Eu opean EN-MN in no h- eas Ibe ia. By plo ing he HVS-I based gene ic dis ances a e mul idimensional scaling (MDS, Supplemen a y Fig.S4), la ge-scale ela ionships a e displayed. He e, he NEI popula ions a e wi hin he clus e o he o he Ibe ian g oups, whe eas he Cen al Eu opean and F ench da ase s o m a clus e ha is sligh ly o se . In e es ingly, MDS shows ha some g oups (e.g. Neoli hic NEI) appea less di e en ia ed om he emaining popula ions when compa ed o haplog oup-based PCA. The clus e ing o he g oups on MDS plo was he e o e es ed by he analysis o molecula a iance. The bes -suppo ed g oupings (i.e. wi h he highes a iance among he clus e s and lowes wi hin he clus e s) we e e alua ed by i e a i ely al e na ing he composi ion o he g oup- ings. The Ibe ian g oups di e en ia ed om an EN Cen al Eu opean- Ca pa hian Basin and a MLN-EBA Cen al Eu opean- LN F ench clus e s in his analysis as well, and can be u he di ided in o a Neoli hic-Chalcoli hic CI and a NEI-SEI-SWI clus e (Supplemen a y TableS12). We u he compa ed HVS-I sequences o h ee la ge ch onological g oups (EN, MLN and CHA) o he Ibe ian Peninsula wi h 133 mode n popula ions. Gene ic dis ances o mode n-day popula ions a e gene ally low, and es ic ed o ce ain egion(s) o Eu ope (Supplemen a y Fig.S5, Supplemen a y TableS13). The Ea ly Neoli hic shows ela i ely high a ini y o mode n A ghanis an, Pales ine, I an, and Tu key (Fs = 0.00173– 0.00428), bu also high a ini ies o se e al Eu opean popula ions (e.g. I alian, F ench bu also Belo ussian). The gene ic dis ances o mode n popula ions inc ease wi h he MLN and CHA pe iods, bu show gene al simila i y o mode n-day Eu ope. Recen genomic s udies ha e highligh ed he simila i y o ea ly a me s o mode n Sou h Eu opeans71, especially o mode n day Sa dinians47,49. This pic u e is no e lec ed in ou m DNA da ase , whe e A:SHA n sample De ec ed in he ollowing popula ions: HG_HOL EN MLN CHA EBA m DNA lineages: HG_HOL 35 100 0 6.76 5.08 0 EN 27 0 100 50 53.38 28.13 MLN 74 31.43 66.67 100 52.54 25 CHA 118 34.29 66.67 66.22 100 40.63 EBA 16 0 33.33 31.08 43.22 100 B: ances al SHA De ec ed in he ollowing popula ions: n sample HG_HOL EN MLN CHA EBA m DNA lineages: HG_HOL 35 100 EN 27 0 100 MLN 74 6.76 43.24 50 CHA 118 5.08 44.92 14.41 35.59 EBA 16 0 56.25 18.75 6.25 18.75 Table 1. Resul s o sha ed haplo ype analysis (SHA): pe cen age o sha ed HVS-I haplo ypes among he Ibe ian ch onological g oups (A), and ances al haplo ype analysis wi h he s udied Ibe ian g oups (B). Abb e ia ions: Cen al and No h Eu opean hun e -ga he e s om he Holocene (HG_HOL), Ea ly Neoli hic (EN), Middle and La e Neoli hic (MLN), Chalcoli hic (CHA), Ea ly B onze Age (EBA) in Ibe ia. Fo u he de ails, see Supplemen a y TableS10 and Me hods. www.na u e.com/scien i ic epo s/ 8 SCIENTIFIC REPORTS | 7: 15644 | DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-15480-9 Sa dinians ank only he 67 h closes o he Ibe ian EN g oup ou o 133 mode n popula ions, and 46 h om he MLN g oup (Supplemen a y TableS13). Discussion Du ing he Las Glacial Maximum, he Ibe ian Peninsula, jus as Sou heas Eu ope and he I alian Peninsula, o med a classic Glacial Re uge A ea o Eu opean popula ions, well documen ed by a chaeological e idence72–74. The e o e, i is assumed ha pa s o oday’s Eu opean popula ion a e he descendan s o he esiden s o hese e ugia. This heo y is based on coalescence da e es ima es o some m DNA lineages (H1, H3, V, U5b1), which p eda e he Neoli hic expansion, and also based on he high abundances o hese lineages in Ibe ia oday75–79. Howe e , he F anco-Can ab ian glacial e uge heo y has no ye been con i med by ancien m DNA o genomic analyses, and mo e Ibe ian Pleis ocene and especially Holocene samples need o be in es iga ed a ull mi og- enomic esolu ion. Wi h he end o he Las Ice Age and he beginning o he Holocene ~12,000 BCE, a common Eu opean Mesoli hic popula ion eme ged, which also included a dis inc signal o Nea Eas e n o igin59. The indigenous Ibe ian la e Uppe Paleoli hic and Mesoli hic popula ions we e ep esen ed by whole mi ogenome haplo ypes assigned o haplog oup U5b om No he n Spain43,59. The Ibe ian Peninsula is cha ac e ized by di e se landscapes wi h dis inc economic po en ials. Du ing he ini- ial phase o Neoli hisa ion, i s a me s p obably a i ed in no heas Ibe ia p ima ily along he Medi e anean ou e and om he e sp ead along he coas line and i e s (e.g., he Eb o Valley) in o he hin e land7–9,80. Ou gene ic da a suppo a subs an ial in lux o Neoli hic immig an s o no heas e n Spain, whe e a me line- ages a e mos abundan and di e se, and on o o he egions, like he SEI and CI. We ound he pe sis ence o ‘hun e -ga he e ’ m DNA haplog oups in he Neoli hic o be s onges in Cen al Ibe ia. These gene ic esul s ma ch he a chaeological da a on he mode o Neoli hisa ion desc ibed o hese a eas, so ha he ully es ablished Neoli hic Ibe ian communi ies had dis inc hun e -ga he e componen s16,81,82. The u he he ea ly a me s ad anced in o he inne /cen al and sou he n pa s o he Peninsula, he highe he p opo ion o indigenous hun e -ga he e lineages. Geog aphy appea s o ha e been a decisi e ac o in he ad ance o Neoli hic li eways. P ehis o ic cen al Ibe ia (sou he n and no he n Mese a, Amb ona Valley), howe e , was ne e an isola ed egion su ounded by moun ains, bu a he an impo an hub o inno a ions and impulses coming in o Ibe ia83. On a gene ic le el, Neoli hic cen al Ibe ia showed co esponding mi ogenomic connec ions o no heas and sou heas Ibe ian egions (Supplemen a y TableS7). The Py enees a e also an a ea o special in e es wi h ega d o he ou e o immig a ion o he i s a me s. This s udy includes en samples om he ca e si e o Els T ocs, da ed o he Ea ly and Middle Neoli hic20. Due o he conside able empo al di e ences be ween he occupa ions, he espec i e sample se s can be conside ed as gene ically independen . The 14C da a o he six indi iduals om he ea lies phase clus e closely (Supplemen a y In o ma ion). Genome-wide analyses o i e o hese EN indi iduals e ealed he g oup o be ea ly Neoli hic immig an s47,49,50. Haplog oups N1a, J, T2, K and V appea , while he ypical Ibe ian hun e -gah e e m DNA haplog oup U5b is missing. The e o e, we suspec he p esence o a (s ill) isola ed EN g oup a Els T ocs. The isola ed geog aphic posi ion in he Py enees sugges s immig a ion o his communi y om no h o he Py enees (o e en om Cen al Eu ope ia he Rhone Valley) a he han om he wes along he Medi e anean coas line. This al e na i e ga eway o Spain has also been p oposed based on a chaeobo anical e idence17,84. The i s and ( o ou knowledge) sole Ibe ian appea ance o he m DNA haplog oup N1a in an adul om Els T ocs, which ma ches iden ical HVS-I N1a haplo ype in Ana olia and Cen al Eu ope, migh ha e a i ed on he con inen- al ou e47,49,55,85. The sha ed oo s be ween Sou hwes and Cen al Eu ope we e especially conspicuous in he No heas Ibe ian EN g oup, as he ag eemen in he common m DNA haplog oups such as V, J, K, T2 and X sugges s. The ansi ion om he EN o he MLN is documen ed in ecen ancien genomic s udies, which desc ibed an inc ease o hun e -ga he e elemen s in he a ming popula ions o cen al Ibe ia du ing he MLN pe iod a he si e o La Mina and he Chalcoli hic si es o El Mi ado and El Po alón41,47,49. The Ibe ian Middle Neoli hic genomic da a a e s ill oo sca ce (concen a ed on a single si e La Mina) o d aw gene al conclusions abou admix- u e wi h la e hun e -ga he e s47. La Mina people had 18.9–22.8% hun e -ga he e ances y, double han he EN indi iduals om Els T ocs (6.8–11%)50, and also highe han hei con empo a ies in Cen al Eu ope. These hun e -ga he e p opo ion u he inc eased in he CHA o 27%50. In ou s udy, we could suppo he gene al con inui y o ma e nal lineages be ween MLN-CHA pe iods. The inc ease o hun e -ga he e ma e nal lineages h ough ime is no seen on la ge scale SHA (Table1), bu obse able in egional g oups, such as in NEI, whe e he Fs om HG_HOL dec eases and he amoun o HG_HOL haplo ypes inc eases om he Neoli hic o he CHA-EBA pe iods (0–4.76%). The same end can be seen in ou Fs analyses whe e he CI_CHA (Fs = 0.17406) appea close o he HG_HOL g oup han he CI_Neo g oup (Fs = 0.21267) (Supplemen a y TablesS7-8, S11). Acco ding o he da a cu en ly a ailable, he homogenei y o Chalcoli hic ancien DNA esul s sugges s ha human mobili y and gene ic mixing had gene ally inc eased in Ibe ia by he Chalcoli hic. Al hough we analyzed ou geog aphically sepa a ed CHA g oups in he no heas , cen al as well as in he sou heas and sou hwes o he Ibe ian Peninsula, hey did no exhibi any signi ican di e ences excep o he compa ison o he cen al and he sou heas e n g oup (Fishe ’s es esul s in Supplemen a y TableS7, Fig.2). The de ec ion o he ‘A ican’ Lb1 haplog oup a he La e Chalcoli hic si e Camino de las Yese as (Mad id, cen- al Ibe ia) is ema kable, gi en ha i o y ado nmen s o A ican o igin ha e also been documen ed a his and o he con empo aneous si es86–88. The obse a ion o a wes e n-cen al ‘A ican’ haplog oup alongside A ican a e ac s and aw ma e ials in Coppe Age Ibe ia indica e long dis ance exchange ha a leas occasionally seem o ha e in ol ed mobili y o indi iduals and/o gene low. The Bell Beake phenomenon was a decisi e elemen in he Ibe ian Chalcoli hic, las ing om he La e CHA o he EBA (~2600–1800 BCE)35,36. Ou es s o popula ion con inui y and Fishe ’s es s be ween Ea ly and La e www.na u e.com/scien i ic epo s/ 9 SCIENTIFIC REPORTS | 7: 15644 | DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-15480-9 CHA pe iods suppo ed popula ion con inui y be ween he wo phases. Howe e , ou da a s uc u e did no allow s udying he Ea ly o La e CHA popula ion changes a a egional scale, so ha u he s udies migh e eal local a ia ion wi h ega d o indi iduals wi h Bell Beake / non-Bell Beake cul u al a ilia ions. In e es ingly, we did no ind e idence o di ec gene ic links be ween Chalcoli hic Ibe ia and con empo aneous Cen al Eu ope. Links be ween he wo egions had p e iously been sugges ed based in pa icula on Bell Beake elemen s p esen ac oss a wide geog aphic ange89–91, as well as by he ma e nal gene ic analyses o he El Mi ado si e40. In e es ingly, we also do no ind e idence o in lux in he Eas o Wes di ec ion, as none o he in es iga ed Chalcoli hic indi iduals show ‘s eppe ances y’, which seen in con empo aneous Cen al Eu opean Co ded Wa e and Bell Beake g oups, sugges ing ha eas e n in luxes did no each he Ibe ian Peninsula un il la e pe iods49. An e alua ion o his unexpec ed obse a ion will need u he palaeogene ic s udies. A ound 2200 BCE, he eme gence o he El A ga g oup was e iden ly p eceded by a b eak in Chalcoli hic cul u al adi ions in sou heas Ibe ia. Ye he e a e no appa en new in luences o signals o subs an ial popu- la ion change on he m DNA haplog oup le el a his ime, so ha he obse ed changes may ei he be due o an uphea al o exis ing social s uc u es o an in lux o g oups ha canno be dis inguished om he local pop- ula ion a he p esen le el o gene ic esolu ion, e.g., om Sou heas e n Eu ope, as p e iously p oposed o El A ga . Un a eling hese appa en ly con adic o y da a will ce ainly equi e u he in-dep h analyses bo h on he a chaeological and he a chaeogene ic le el. Conclusion The p esen s udy, based on 213 new and 125 published m DNA da a o p ehis o ic Ibe ian indi iduals sugges s a mo e complex mode o in e ac ion be ween local hun e -ga he e s and incoming ea ly a me s du ing he Ea ly and Middle Neoli hic o he Ibe ian Peninsula, as compa ed o Cen al Eu ope. A cha ac e is ic o Ibe ian popu- la ion dynamics is he p opo ion o au och honous hun e -ga he e haplog oups, which inc eased in ela ion o he dis ance o he Medi e anean coas . In con as , he ea ly a me s in Cen al Eu ope showed compa a i ely li le admix u e o con empo aneous hun e -ga he e g oups. Al eady du ing he i s cen u ies o Neoli hic an- si ion in Ibe ia, we obse e a mix o emale DNA lineages o di e en o igins. Ea lie hun e -ga he e haplog oups we e ound oge he wi h a a ie y o new lineages, which ul ima ely de i e om Nea Eas e n a ming g oups. On he o he hand, some ea ly Neoli hic si es in no heas Ibe ia, especially he ea ly g oup om he ca e si e o Els T ocs in he cen al Py enees, seem o exhibi a ini ies o Cen al Eu opean LBK communi ies. The di e si y o emale linages in he Ibe ian communi ies con inued e en du ing he Chalcoli hic, when popula ions became mo e homogenous, indica ing highe mobili y and admix u e ac oss di e en geog aphic egions. E en hough he sample size a ailable o Ea ly B onze Age popula ions is s ill limi ed, especially wi h ega ds o he El A ga g oup, we obse e no signi ican changes o he mi ochond ial DNA pool un il he end o ou ime ansec (1500 BCE). The expansion o g oups om he eas e n s eppe47,92, which p o oundly impac ed La e Neoli hic and EBA g oups o Cen al and No h Eu ope, canno (ye ) be seen in he con empo aneous popula ion subs a e o he Ibe ian Peninsula a he p esen le el o gene ic esolu ion. This highligh s he dis inc cha ac e o he Neoli hic ansi ion bo h in he Ibe ian Peninsula and elsewhe e and emphasizes he need o u he in-dep h a chaeogene ic s udies o econs uc ing he close ecip ocal ela ionship o gene ic and cul u al p ocesses on he popula ion le el. Ma e ials and Me hods The s udied si es a e dis ibu ed ac oss he Ibe ian Peninsula, wi h an emphasis on he a chaeologically ele an egions on he Medi e anean coas s, in cen al and no he n Spain and in sou he n Po ugal (Fig.1). We a ge ed ep esen a i e si es om he Mesoli hic, Neoli hic, Chalcoli hic and he Ea ly B onze Age o co e 4,000 yea s o p ehis o y on he Ibe ian Peninsula. Gi en ha he Sou he n Eu opean clima e is usually un a o able o DNA p ese a ion, we implemen ed a lexible sampling scheme con ingen on ampli ica ion successes, ex ending sam- pling om si es wi h good ancien DNA p ese a ion and/o including addi ional si es o ob ain su icien da a. Sample speci ic con ex in o ma ion we e supplied by ou colleagues and p ojec pa ne s in Po ugal and Spain o collec ed om p e iously published pape s. All a chaeological si es, ele an adioca bon da es, and indi idu- als inco po a ed in he p esen s udy a e lis ed in Supplemen a y TablesS1-2. Al oge he , 318 indi iduals om 57 a chaeological si es in Spain, Po ugal and Mo occo we e sampled and analyzed o his s udy. Whene e possible we p e e ed samples om ecen exca a ions o e hose ha had been held a museum collec ions o p olonged pe iods o ime. Tee h and bone samples we e aken unde clean condi ions in Ibe ian museums, a he Ins i u e o An h opology a Johannes Gu enbe g Uni e si y in Mainz, o di ec ly on si e in he case o La Mina, A oyal, Els T ocs and in pa a La Bas ida. Mi ochond ial p o iles o 37 indi iduals om ou p ojec (Al o de Reinoso (n = 27), La Mina (n = 5) and Els T ocs (n = 5) we e p e iously published by ou esea ch eam44,47,49. He e we also epo addi ional samples om he si es o La Mina and Els T ocs. The ch onological classi ica ion o he bu ials was based on he a chaeological da a. In o de o a oid possible p oblems due o e minological inconsis encies, we used empo al ( om Mesoli hic o Ea ly B onze Age; based on ela i e ch onology and absolu e da ing) and geog aphic g oupings o assess he popula ion mi ogene ic da a om he Ibe ian Peninsula. We u he dis inguished g oups based on con ex ual a chaeological e idence, e. g. subsis ence s a egies, such as hun e -ga he e s s. ea ly a me s. We a ge ed collec ing wo o h ee ee h om each skele on and sampled bones only when ee h we e no a ailable. Ancien DNA sample p epa a ion. S anda d sample p epa a ion p o ocols we e used du ing he ancien DNA wo k in he Ins i u e o An h opology, Johannes Gu enbe g Uni e si y in Mainz55. Samples we e i s UV i adia ed o 30 min each side and hen, he su ace was emo ed by sho -blas ing wi h aluminium-oxide-ab asi e. Samples we e hen g ound o ine powde using a mixe mill (Re sch). The milling