scieee Open visual document viewer

Characterization of off-axis fishbones

Heidbrink, W. W.; Austin, M. E.; Fisher, R. K.; García Muñoz, Manuel; Matsunaga, G.

Abstract

Repetitive bursting instabilities with strong frequency chirping occur in highbeta, beam-heated plasmas with safety factor q > 1 in the DIII-D tokamak. Although the mode structures differ, in many ways, the off-axis fishbones are similar to the q = 1 fishbones first observed on the Poloidal Divertor Experiment (PDX). The modes are driven by energetic trapped ions at the fastion precession frequency. During a burst, the frequency changes most rapidly as the mode reaches its maximum amplitude. Larger amplitude bursts have larger growth rates and frequency chirps. Unlike PDX fishbones, the decay phase is highly variable and is usually shorter than the growth phase. Also, the waveform is highly distorted by higher harmonics during the latter portion of a burst. The radial mode structure alters its shape during the burst. Like PDX fishbones, the modes expel trapped ions in a ‘beacon’ with a definite phase relationship relative to the mode. Seven types of loss detectors measure the beacon. The losses scale linearly with mode amplitude. The neutron rate changes most rapidly at maximum mode amplitude but, depending on the loss diagnostic, the losses often peak a few cycles later. The non-ambipolar fast-ion losses cause a sudden change in toroidal rotation frequency across the entire plasma. In addition to an overall drop, the neutron signal oscillates in response to the wave. Unlike the beacon of lost particles, which maintains a fixed phase relative to the mode, the phase of the neutron oscillations steadily increases throughout the burst, with the greatest phase slippage occurring in the highly nonlinear phase near maximum mode amplitude

Full text

Plasma Physics and Con olled Fusion Cha ac e iza ion o o -axis ishbones To ci e his a icle: W W Heidb ink e al 2011 Plasma Phys. Con ol. Fusion 53 085028 View he a icle online o upda es and enhancemen s. Rela ed con en ‘Beam-emission spec oscopy’ diagnos ics also measu e edge as -ion ligh - Beam-ion con inemen o di e en injec ion geome ies - Cen al la ening o he as -ion p o ile in e e sed-shea DIII-D discha ges - Recen ci a ions Mechanisms o ene ge ic-pa icle anspo in magne ically con ined plasmas W. W. Heidb ink and R. B. Whi e - O igin o ion cyclo on emission a he p o on cyclo on equency om he co e o deu e ium plasmas in he ASDEX- Upg ade okamak B Chapman e al - Compa ing heo y and simula ion o ion cyclo on emission om ene ge ic ion popula ions wi h sphe ical shell and ing- beam dis ibu ions in eloci y-space B Chapman e al - This con en was downloaded om IP add ess 87.218.223.151 on 18/08/2020 a 11:42 IOP PUBLISHING PLASMA PHYSICS AND CONTROLLED FUSION Plasma Phys. Con ol. Fusion 53 (2011) 085028 (23pp) doi:10.1088/0741-3335/53/8/085028 Cha ac e iza ion o o -axis ishbones W W Heidb ink1,MEAus in2, R K Fishe 3, M Ga c´ ıa-Mu˜ noz4, G Ma sunaga5, G R McKee6, R A Moye 7, C M Musca ello1, M Okabayashi8,DCPace 9, K Shinoha a5, W M Solomon8, E J S ai 3, M A Van Zeeland3and Y B Zhu1 1Depa men o Physics and As onomy, Uni e si y o Cali o nia, I ine, CA, USA 2Ins i u e o Fusion S udies, Uni e si y o Texas a Aus in, Aus in, TX, USA 3Gene al A omics, San Diego, CA, USA 4Max-Planck-Ins i u ¨ u Plasmaphysik, Ga ching, Ge many 5Japan A omic Ene gy Agency, Naka Ci y, Iba aki, Japan 6Depa men o Enginee ing Physics, Uni e si y o Wisconsin a Madison, Madison, WI, USA 7Cen e o Ene gy Resea ch, Uni e si y o Cali o nia, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA 8P ince on Plasma Physics Labo a o y, P ince on, NJ, USA 9Oak Ridge Ins i u e o Science and Educa ion, Oak Ridge, TN, USA Recei ed 28 Feb ua y 2011, in inal o m 13 June 2011 Published 7 July 2011 Online a s acks.iop.o g/PPCF/53/085028 Abs ac Repe i i e bu s ing ins abili ies wi h s ong equency chi ping occu in high- be a, beam-hea ed plasmas wi h sa e y ac o q>1 in he DIII-D okamak. Al hough he mode s uc u es di e , in many ways, he o -axis ishbones a e simila o he q=1 ishbones i s obse ed on he Poloidal Di e o Expe imen (PDX). The modes a e d i en by ene ge ic apped ions a he as - ion p ecession equency. Du ing a bu s , he equency changes mos apidly as he mode eaches i s maximum ampli ude. La ge ampli ude bu s s ha e la ge g ow h a es and equency chi ps. Unlike PDX ishbones, he decay phase is highly a iable and is usually sho e han he g ow h phase. Also, he wa e o m is highly dis o ed by highe ha monics du ing he la e po ion o a bu s . The adial mode s uc u e al e s i s shape du ing he bu s . Like PDX ishbones, he modes expel apped ions in a ‘beacon’ wi h a de ini e phase ela ionship ela i e o he mode. Se en ypes o loss de ec o s measu e he beacon. The losses scale linea ly wi h mode ampli ude. The neu on a e changes mos apidly a maximum mode ampli ude bu , depending on he loss diagnos ic, he losses o en peak a ew cycles la e . The non-ambipola as -ion losses cause a sudden change in o oidal o a ion equency ac oss he en i e plasma. In addi ion o an o e all d op, he neu on signal oscilla es in esponse o he wa e. Unlike he beacon o los pa icles, which main ains a ixed phase ela i e o he mode, he phase o he neu on oscilla ions s eadily inc eases h oughou he bu s , wi h he g ea es phase slippage occu ing in he highly nonlinea phase nea maximum mode ampli ude. (Some igu es in his a icle a e in colou only in he elec onic e sion) 0741-3335/11/085028+23$33.00 © 2011 IOP Publishing L d P in ed in he UK & he USA 1 Plasma Phys. Con ol. Fusion 53 (2011) 085028 W W Heidb ink e al 1. In oduc ion The ishbone ins abili y was i s obse ed [1] du ing deu e ium nea -pe pendicula neu al beam injec ion in o he Poloidal Di e o Expe imen (PDX). The mode had an (m, n) =(1,1) s uc u e in he plasma, as expec ed o an in e nal kink. (He e mand ndeno e he poloidal and o oidal mode numbe s, espec i ely.) The ishbones occu ed in pe iodic bu s s. Du ing each bu s , he mode equency chi ped down in equency om ( ypically) 20 o 12 kHz. The neu on emission d opped a each bu s , wi h he a e o change peaking nea he ime o peak mode ampli ude [2]. Neu al pa icle analyze s (NPAs) de ec ed a ‘beacon’ o expelled apped as ions, a bu s o signal wi h a ixed phase ela i e o he magne ic luc ua ion on each mode cycle [3,4]. The anspo o as ions was explained as con ec i e adial anspo caused by esonance be ween he as -ion p ecession mo ion and he kink mode [5]. The ins abili y was iden i ied as a new b anch o he in e nal kink associa ed wi h he la ge ene ge ic ion popula ion [6]. Subsequen ly, q=1 ishbone ins abili ies we e obse ed on many o he de ices. (A comp ehensi e e iew o bo h he PDX ishbones and subsequen measu emen s on o he okamaks, including DIII-D, appea s in [7].) Bo h an MHD b anch [8] and an ene ge ic- pa icle b anch a e heo e ically p edic ed [9] and obse ed [7]. A comp ehensi e pic u e eme ged: a modes as -ion densi y, he apped ions help s abilize he luid b anch bu , a la ge as -ion densi y, hey des abilize he ene ge ic-pa icle b anch [10]. Fishbone-like modes in plasmas wi h cen al sa e y ac o well abo e uni y we e i s obse ed on JET [11]. Mo e ecen ly, ishbone-like modes we e s udied in JT-60U [12,13] and DIII-D [14,15] plasmas wi h simila qp o iles as he JET plasmas bu highe be a. While q=1 ishbones ha e eigen unc ions whose maximum is inside he q=1 su ace, he mode s uc u e o he o -axis ishbones peaks nea he q=2 su ace [11,15]. Some au ho s ha e sugges ed ha he o -axis ishbones a e in e nal kinks [11], while o he s sugges ha hey a e ela ed o an ex e nal kink [15]. In ei he case, i is likely ha he o -axis ishbone is an ene ge ic-pa icle b anch o he luid in e nal o ex e nal kink mode. A heo e ical s udy showed ha a modes as -ion popula ion can s abilize an in e nal double kink mode bu a la ge popula ion des abilizes a new ishbone b anch [16], jus as i does o he 1/1 in e nal kink. On he o he hand, he obse a ion ha he ins abili ies occu in plasmas ha a e suscep ible o esis i e wall modes sugges s ha he o -axis ishbones may be an ene ge ic-pa icle b anch o he MHD ex e nal kink [15]. (Resis i e wall modes occu in plasmas ha would be uns able o ex e nal kinks in he absence o a conduc ing wall [17].) A ecen pape [15] shows ha he JT-60U and DIII-D modes ha e he same phenomenology and discusses hei ela ionship o he esis i e wall mode. The goal o his pape is o p o ide a de ailed desc ip ion o he o -axis ishbone in DIII-D. The da a a e compa ed and con as ed o PDX ishbones h oughou he pape . The nonlinea e olu ion o he o -axis ishbone bu s s displays no el ea u es no p e iously epo ed o any as -ion d i en ins abili y. The pape begins wi h a desc ip ion o he plasma condi ions and diagnos ics (sec ion 2). Nex , he mode is cha ac e ized (sec ion 3.1) and he loss (sec ion 3.2) and con ined (sec ion 3.3) as -ion da a a e desc ibed. Specula ion abou he easons o he di e ences be ween PDX ishbones and o -axis ishbones appea s in sec ion 4, oge he wi h he conclusion. 2. Appa a us All o he da a in his pape a e om DIII-D. Mos o he discha ges desc ibed in his pape we e discussed in he DIII-D po ion o he pape by Okabayashi e al [15]. A da abase o 513 bu s s 2 Plasma Phys. Con ol. Fusion 53 (2011) 085028 W W Heidb ink e al 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.2 2.4 R (m) -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 z (m) BILD BES #141089 2315 ms q=2 1.7 2.5 3.0 3.5 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 150o BILD 210o 330o30o BES BES (b) (a) FILD FILD NPA NPA FIDA FIDA FIDA NEUTRONS NEUTRONS ICE ICE ISAT ISAT MIRNOV MIRNOV CER CER ECE ECE Figu e 1. (a) Ele a ion o he DIII-D acuum essel, showing he loca ions o he a ious measu emen s. (The BES, NPA and FIDA signals depend on he edge neu al densi y p o ile, so he indica ed posi ions a e es ima es.) The lux su aces o a ypical equilib ium a e labeled by hei q alue; q0=1.5 on axis and q95 =4.4. (b) Plan iew. The lines ep esen he cen e o he beamlines. The o oidal ield (plasma cu en ) is in he clockwise (coun e -clockwise) di ec ion. was compiled ha con ains all o he n=1 o -axis ishbone bu s s obse ed du ing wo days o ope a ion. The plasma condi ions a e simila o nea ly all o he bu s s: plasma cu en Ip=0.95–1.14 MA; o oidal ield BT=1.72; mino adius a=0.60 m; no malized be a βN=βT/(Ip/aBT)=2.1–2.7; line-a e age plasma densi y ¯ne=(3.4–4.2)×1019 m−3. The beam powe was he ac ua o o eedback con ol o βN, so i a ies be ween 5.7 and 14.9 MW o he bu s s in he da abase, wi h a ypical a e age powe o 10 MW . The beams injec bo h in he co-Ipdi ec ion (⩽15 MW ) and in he coun e -Ipdi ec ion (⩽5 MW ); bo h nea - angen ial ( angency adius R an =1.15 m) and nea -pe pendicula (R an =0.76 m) angles a e employed. The a e age injec ion ene gies o he co- angen ial, co-pe pendicula , coun e - angen ial, and coun e -pe pendicula beams a e 66–80 keV, 60–73 keV, 80–81 keV and 60– 75 keV, espec i ely. Typically, he beam be a is ∼1/6 o he o al be a. In many discha ges, ∼2.7 MW o elec on cyclo on cu en d i e powe is injec ed o a oid neoclassical ea ing modes [14]. The plasma is deu e ium, he neu al beams injec deu e ium a oms, and he p ima y impu i y is ca bon om he g aphi e walls (Ze ≃2). All o he discha ges ha e he shape shown in igu e 1, a lowe single null di e o con igu a ion. The ∇Bd i is downwa d owa d he di e o and all o he plasmas a e in H-mode. The equilib ium is based on EFIT [18] solu ions o he G ad–Sha ano equa ion ha use mo ional S a k e ec [19] measu emen s o he in e nal magne ic ield. The cen al sa e y ac o is q0=1.15–1.78, he magne ic shea is ela i ely weak nea he magne ic axis, c osses he q=2 su ace nea a majo adius o R=2.1 m and ises apidly o a alue o q95 =4.3–4.7 a he edge. (q95 is he sa e y ac o a he su ace ha encloses 95% o he poloidal lux.) Typical cen al elec on and ion empe a u es a e Te=5 and Ti=6 keV. 3 Plasma Phys. Con ol. Fusion 53 (2011) 085028 W W Heidb ink e al Figu e 1shows he loca ions o he p incipal diagnos ics. To oidal and poloidal a ays o Mi no coils [20] a e he p ima y luc ua ion diagnos ic. In his pape , all o he Mi no coil aces a e om a coil ha is loca ed a a o oidal angle o 307◦. A his magne ic ield and densi y, he elec on cyclo on emission (ECE) diagnos ic [21] measu es op ically hick, hi d ha monic ECE emission o he spa ial posi ions shown in he igu e. The cha ge-exchange ecombina ion (CER) diagnos ic [22] measu es he empe a u e, o oidal o a ion, and densi y o ca bon ions; on some discha ges, he CCD came a acqui ed da a in 0.5 ms ime bins o de ec apid changes in o oidal o a ion. The p ima y diagnos ic o he con ined as ions is a neu on scin illa o ha measu es 2.5 MeV neu ons p oduced in deu e ium–deu e ium usion eac ions. Two complemen a y scin illa o s wi h iden ical elec onics a e moun ed beside a acuum lange jus ou side he acuum essel: a plas ic scin illa o and a ZnS(6Li) scin illa o . The plas ic scin illa o can esol e oscilla ions in neu on lux wi h equencies 10 kHz, while he ZnS scin illa o has an e ec i e bandwid h o ∼3 kHz [23]. Consis en wi h he expec ed ins umen al esponse, he luc ua ions in neu on lux discussed in sec ion 3.3 a e much weake on he ZnS signal han on he plas ic signal. All neu on da a in his pape a e om he plas ic scin illa o . Se en di e en diagnos ics de ec escaping as ions. The beam-ion loss de ec o (BILD) is a Fa aday cup ha is moun ed on he edge o a acuum po 12 cm below he midplane [24]; in his pape , he signals a e om he oil ha de ec s co-ci cula ing o bi s. The as -ion loss de ec o (FILD) is a scin illa o -based diagnos ic ha esol es he gy o adius and pi ch o he escaping as ions in an image ha is eco ded on a CCD came a [25]. Fo highe bandwid h measu emen s, a pho omul iplie de ec s ligh om a po ion o he scin illa o . A ecip oca ing Langmui p obe wi h obus g aphi e ips [26] measu es luc ua ions in ion sa u a ion cu en (ISAT); a he ime o he measu emen s, he p obe was in he sc ape-o egion 6.1 cm om he las -closed lux su ace and 5.6 cm om he ou e wall. A solid-s a e NPA ope a ed in cu en mode measu es luc ua ions in cha ge-exchange eac ions when as ions escape o he high neu al densi y egion a he plasma edge. The as -ion D-alpha (FIDA) diagnos ic [27,28] measu es Dopple -shi ed ligh emi ed by as ions a e hey unde go a cha ge-exchange eac ion. Fo he apidly changing backg ound condi ions associa ed wi h hese ishbone bu s s, he empo al esolu ion o he spec oscopic FIDA diagnos ics p o ed inadequa e o de ec changes in co e as -ion densi y; howe e , bu s s o edge FIDA emission a e obse ed by he il e -based -FIDA diagnos ic [28] on bo h ‘ac i e’ sigh lines ha iew an injec ed beam and ‘passi e’ sigh lines ha do no in e sec an injec ed beam. The beam-emission spec oscopy (BES) diagnos ic [29] su e s om con amina ion by edge FIDA ligh o hese ishbone bu s s [30], complica ing use o he da a o in e nal eigen unc ion measu emen s o densi y luc ua ions. Howe e , o one discha ge whe e he neu al beams iewed by he BES diagnos ic we e o , he signals a e en i ely om passi e FIDA ligh p oduced when as ions a e expelled o he high neu al densi y egion a he plasma edge [30]. The se en h edge loss diagnos ic is indi ec . When as ions a e expelled in o he sc ape-o egion, hey usually des abilize ion cyclo on emission (ICE) [7]. These wa es a e hough o be magne oacous ic wa es exci ed by he aniso opic ‘bump-on- ail’ dis ibu ion unc ion caused by he losses [31]. Fo hese expe imen s, he signal om a high-bandwid h o oidal coil [32] was il e ed by wo bandpass il e s, ec i ied and digi ized. The ‘lowe pass’ il e includes he i s deu e ium cyclo on ha monic a he plasma edge, while he ‘highe pass’ il e spans he second and hi d ha monics. All ishbone bu s s ha mee ce ain c i e ia a e included in he da abase. Figu e 2shows examples o included and excluded bu s s. Like he i s bu s in igu e 2(a), all o he included bu s s a e n=1 modes ha o a e in he di ec ion o he plasma cu en . Roughly 3% o he 4 Plasma Phys. Con ol. Fusion 53 (2011) 085028 W W Heidb ink e al -150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150 2313 2314 2315 2316 2317 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 TIME (ms) #141092 -200 -100 0 100 200 1950 1952 1954 1956 1958 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 n=4 n=1 TIME (ms) MIRNOV (T/s) BILD (V) #141086 (a) (c) (b) (d) Figu e 2. Sample Mi no coil (a), (b) and BILD (c), (d) signals o bu s s ha a e excluded om he da abase. (a), (c) The n=1 bu s a 1951 ms in (a) is included bu he n=4 bu s a 1957 ms is excluded. (b), (d) Bu s s wi h app eciable bea ing due o a s eady ea ing mode (in his case, an n=3 mode) a e also excluded. No e ha he BILD signals sa u a e a 5 V. obse ed bu s s ha e highe o oidal mode numbe s (usually n=3o n=4). Like he n=1 modes, hese highe equency modes chi p down in equency and cause losses ha ha e a de ini e phase ela i e o he wa e; howe e , hese highe equency modes a e no discussed u he he e. The e a e also many examples o ishbone bu s s ha occu in plasmas wi h s eady ea ing modes ( igu e 2(b)). Phenomenologically, hese bu s s appea iden ical o he e ained bu s s bu , because o di icul ies in accu a ely analyzing he Mi no coil signal in he p esence o s ong bea ing, hey a e excluded om ou da abase. 3. Da a 3.1. Mode p ope ies The o -axis ishbone bu s s ypically las o 2–3 ms and occu abou e e y 20 ms. Figu e 3 shows a ypical Mi no coil signal. Ini ially, he signal is nea ly sinusoidal du ing he g ow h phase. The ampli ude g ows app oxima ely exponen ially. A maximum ampli ude, he wa e o m becomes s ongly dis o ed om a sine wa e. Da a om he o oidal a ay show ha his dis o ion is associa ed wi h he appea ance o highe nha monics: in o he wo ds, he en i e s uc u e becomes dis o ed. The mode pe iod isibly leng hens as he bu s passes h ough i s maximum ampli ude. Figu e 3also illus a es analysis o he signal o inclusion in he da abase. Fi s , he maxima and minima a e iden i ied ( igu e 3(a)). Then he ec i ied ampli ude o he maxima and minima a e plo ed ( igu e 3(b)). No e ha , du ing he ise phase, he ampli udes o he maxima and minima ha e nea ly he same alue bu , du ing he decay phase, he maxima a e la ge han he minima. The ampli ude da a a e i o exponen ials o ob ain he g ow h and decay a es. In he hi d s ep, he ime di e ence be ween he maxima and minima is g aphed ( igu e 3(c)). The ini ial mode equency is ob ained om a i o he i s se e al cycles, while he inal mode equency is ob ained om he las wo cycles. The equency chi ping a e is ob ained om a linea i o he change in pe iod nea peak mode ampli ude. The mode dis o ion is de i ed om he di e ence in pe iod be ween hal -cycles, T1/2/¯ T1/2. 5 Plasma Phys. Con ol. Fusion 53 (2011) 085028 W W Heidb ink e al -400 -200 0 200 400 0.00 0.10 0.20 1837.5 1838.0 1838.5 1839.0 1839.5 1840.0 0 100 200 300 400 (a) Mi no (T/s) Rise TIME (ms) #141076 (b) Ampli ude (T/s) Fall Ini ial Final Chi p (c) Hal -pe iod (ms) Dis o ion 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Hal -c y cle # Figu e 3. (a) Mi no coil signal o a ypical ishbone bu s . The symbols indica e he maxima and minima used o calcula ion o he hal -pe iod. (b) Ampli ude o he maxima and minima o he same bu s , oge he wi h exponen ial i s o he g ow h and decay phases. (c) Hal -pe iod in milliseconds o each hal -cycle h oughou he bu s . The ini ial equency is de i ed om a ho izon al i a low ampli ude. The equency chi ping a e is ob ained om a linea i nea maximum ampli ude. (The dashed e ical line indica es he ime o maximum ampli ude.) The inal equency is an a e age o e he las wo cycles. Linea i s o he long hal -pe iods and he sho hal -pe iods a e used o measu e he wa e o m dis o ion. (This quan i y is ze o o a sine wa e.) This de ini ion o dis o ion gi es simila esul s o al e na i e de ini ions [15] based on he ampli ude o he de ia ion om a sine wa e. The a e o change o he dis o ion is also eco ded in he da abase. The obse ed ise ime inc eases wi h he maximum ampli ude o he mode ( igu e 4(a)). The co ela ion coe icien is 0.72 o hese da a. (Figu e 4(a) shows he co ela ion wi h d˜ B/d ; he co ela ion wi h he peak ampli ude ˜ Bis sligh ly highe ( =0.76).) PDX ishbones had a simila ise ime and dependence on mode ampli ude [33]. In con as , as shown in igu e 4(b), he decay a e is unco ela ed wi h mode ampli ude ( =0.05). Unlike PDX ishbones, he decay a e is gene ally as e han he g ow h a e. An example o he wide a ia ion in beha io du ing he decay phase o a pai o o he wise simila bu s s is shown in igu e 5. This example illus a es he ollowing gene al ea u es: (1) he e olu ion o he bu s s is qui e ep oducible du ing he g ow h phase; (2) equency chi ping and mode dis o ion always occu nea maximum ampli ude; (3) he decay phase is highly a iable. Some imes he bu s decays in a ew cycles, while o he imes i pe sis s o many. O en he mode dis o ion emains la ge bu some imes nea ly sinusoidal successo oscilla ions pe sis a small ampli ude ollowing he p ima y, highly dis o ed, c ash. The magni ude o he equency chi ping scales wi h mode ampli ude ( igu e 4(c)) ( =0.77). The a e o change o he chi ping a e also scales wi h mode ampli ude ( =0.55). The equency chi ping also inc eased wi h mode ampli ude o PDX ishbones [2]. Wi hin a gi en bu s , he chi ping a e is la ges in he pe iod jus a e maximum ampli ude. Simila ly, 6 Plasma Phys. Con ol. Fusion 53 (2011) 085028 W W Heidb ink e al 0 2 4 6 8 0 5 10 15 0 50 100 150 200 250 PDX Peak Mi no Ampli ude (T/s) 0 1 2 3 4 5 RISE γ / ω (%)DROP γ / ω (%) (a) (b) (c) FREQ. CHIRP (kHz) Figu e 4. (a) G ow h a e, (b) decay a e and (c) change in equency i− inal e sus peak mode ampli ude o all o he bu s s in he da abase. The g ow h and decay a es a e no malized o he mode equency in he plasma ame, ω=2π( i− o ), whe e o is om he R=212 cm CER channel. The lines a e linea i s o he da a. The e o ba s a e he alues obse ed o ypical cases in PDX [33]. -1 0 1 2 -300 -200 -100 0 100 200 300 400 RELATIVE TIME (ms) MIRNOV (T/s) #141092 1801 ms 1981 ms Figu e 5. Example o wo simila bu s s wi h s ikingly di e en beha io in he decay phase. 7 Plasma Phys. Con ol. Fusion 53 (2011) 085028 W W Heidb ink e al 50 100 150 200 250 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 Dis o ion Peak Mi no Ampli ude (T/s) Figu e 6. Dis o ion o he wa e o m T1/2/¯ T1/2nea maximum mode ampli ude e sus peak Mi no ampli ude o all o he bu s s in he da abase. Illus a i e examples o wa e o ms wi h dis o ions o 0.32 and 0.76 a e included. PDX ishbones [33] and high equency chi ping ins abili ies in DIII-D [34] chi p he as es nea maximum mode ampli ude. All o he ishbones exhibi mode dis o ion ( igu e 6). Mos bu s s exhibi e y s ong dis o ion bu e en he mos weakly dis o ed wa e o ms de ia e signi ican ly om a sine wa e. Analysis o he poloidal Mi no coil da a [15] shows ha he sinusoidal po ion o he wa e o m has an m=3 s uc u e bu he dis o ed po ion has an m≃2 s uc u e. S ong mode dis o ion was no obse ed o PDX ishbones [33]. Figu e 7shows he adial mode s uc u e du ing he ea ly phase as measu ed by he ECE diagnos ic. The δTe luc ua ions a e la ges nea he q=2 adius (R≃2.1 m). The e is a ∼60◦phase a ia ion be ween he weak luc ua ions obse ed nea he magne ic axis and he s onge luc ua ions obse ed nea he q=2 su ace. In he heo y o ene ge ic-pa icle ins abili ies, i is impo an o de e mine i he eigen unc ion changes shape o emains cons an du ing a bu s . (I he eigen unc ion changes shape, p ope ea men o nonlinea e ec s equi es a ‘non-pe u ba i e’ model.) To in es iga e he empo al cons ancy o he mode s uc u e, we compa e he ela i e ampli ude o he a ious ECE channels o he Mi no coil as he bu s e ol es. Fo he example in igu e 8(a), he a io o wo ECE signals emains nea ly cons an du ing he g ow h phase bu de ia es nea maximum ampli ude. Du ing he g ow h phase, he ECE signals g ow mo e slowly han he in eg a ed Mi no signal; a e he maximum he ECE signals decay mo e slowly han δB. Figu e 8(b) shows he a e age beha io o a se o simila bu s s. Al hough he unce ain ies associa ed wi h incohe en Te luc ua ions and wi h condi ional a e aging o an ensemble o bu s s a e subs an ial, he da a appea o ollow he same end as he example in igu e 8(a): δTeg adually dec eases ela i e o δB du ing he g ow h phase, hen ises in he decay phase. Due o he la ge a iabili y o beha io in he decay phase, he s anda d de ia ions a e la ge bu examina ion o indi idual bu s s shows ha he e a e subs an ial di e ences in he e olu ion o he a ious channels du ing his phase. We conclude ha he mode s uc u e a ies, as expec ed o a s ongly d i en non-pe u ba i e ene ge ic-pa icle mode. The ini ial mode equency is de e mined by he as -ion p ecession equency. Figu e 9 shows calcula ions by an o bi - ollowing Mon e Ca lo (OFMC) code [35] o he p ecession equencies p e,0o as ions deposi ed by he ou di e en angles o beam injec ion in a ypical discha ge. These calcula ions neglec he adial elec ic ield bu analy ical heo y [36] and sepa a e calcula ions show ha inclusion o he elec ic ield inc eases he ac ual p ecession 8 Plasma Phys. Con ol. Fusion 53 (2011) 085028 W W Heidb ink e al 0 50 100 150 200 250 Peak Mi no Ampli ude (T/s) 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.12 0123456 F equency Chi p (kHz) 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.12 Peak beam-ion loss a e (ms-1)Peak beam-ion loss a e (ms-1) (a) (b) Figu e 14. Maximum neu on loss a e e sus (a) maximum Mi no ampli ude and (b) change in mode equency, i− inal o all o he bu s s in he da abase wi h cons an beam powe du ing he bu s . Linea (solid lines) and quad a ic (dashed line) i s o he da a a e included. las -closed lux su ace and 5.6 cm om he essel wall. This loca ion minimizes con ibu ions o he ion sa u a ion cu en om he mal ions, while s ill allowing as ions o s ike he collec o ip. High-bandwid h FILD measu emen s became a ailable a he end o he expe imen al campaign. Fo his measu emen , he pho omul iplie imaged a po ion o he scin illa o cen e ed on a lowe pi ch angle (∼50◦) han he p ima y ishbone loss peak a ∼70◦. Ne e heless, e idence o a cohe en beacon is also obse ed by his diagnos ic ( igu e 15(c)). Two NPA channels made high-bandwid h measu emen s h oughou he campaign. The NPA sigh lines o igina e om a lowe po , ise up o in e sec he coun e beams nea he midplane, hen s ike he inne wall abo e he midplane; o oidally, he sigh lines a e no mal o he plasma. Whe he he iewed coun e beams a e o o on, ishbone modes cause beacon- like bu s s on he NPA de ec o s ( igu e 15(c)). P esumably, hese bu s s a e caused by as ions ha a e expelled o he high neu al densi y egion a la ge majo adius. On PDX, he signal on he e ically iewing NPA ha iewed he ou e edge o he plasma was wo o de s o magni ude la ge han he NPA ha iewed he inne edge o he plasma [3,40]. The e also a e some indica ions o educ ions in ac i e signal caused by he ishbone bu s . No mally, he signal o he BES diagnos ic is domina ed by beam emission om he ac i e injec ed beam bu , in he case o la ge losses o as ions, FIDA ligh om he edge plasma can also be app eciable [30]. In DIII-D, he BES il e s accep Dopple -shi ed D-alpha ligh p oduced by as ions on escaping apped o bi s. To a oid he complica ion o concu en beam emission, he da a in igu e 15(d) a e om a discha ge whe e he ac i e beams we e bo h o . Bu s s o ligh a e obse ed. In he case o he BES diagnos ic, wo bu s s pe cycle a e o en obse ed because he BES sigh line in e cep s he plasma edge a wo di e en o oidal 15 Plasma Phys. Con ol. Fusion 53 (2011) 085028 W W Heidb ink e al -1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 -0.4 -0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 0.40.0-0.4 120-1-2 4 2 -4 -2 0 #141089 2319 ms -0.8 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 -0.4 -0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 #142124 1618 ms -400 -200 0 200 400 -0.4 -0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 -400 -200 0 200 400 600 -1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 RELATIVE TIME (ms) RELATIVE TIME (ms) RELATIVE TIME (ms) RELATIVE TIME (ms) RELATIVE TIME (ms) RELATIVE TIME (ms) T/s T/s Vol s Vol s (a) (b) (d) ( ) (e) (c) #141069 1497 ms #142125 1614 ms #141069 1339 ms #142126 1662 ms BILD ISAT BES FILD NPA Lowe Band Re e ence Ac i e Highe Band ICE FIDA Figu e 15. Loss-de ec o da a du ing a ishbone bu s om (a) he BILD oil, (b) he Langmui p obe Isa ip, (c) he FILD scin illa o and SSNPA de ec o , (d) a cen al BES channel on a discha ge wi hou any beam emission, (e) ac i e and passi e -FIDA channels and ( ) ICE passband signals ha include he undamen al cyclo on esonance (lowe band) o he i s ew ha monics (highe band). The diamonds ep esen peaks used o measu e he phase ela i e o he Mi no signal. loca ions. The sigh line is angled sligh ly downwa d. The i s peak co esponds o a poloidal posi ion below he midplane, while he second peak co esponds o a poloidal posi ion abo e he midplane. Gene ally, he i s peak (lowe poloidal posi ion—in he di ec ion o he ∇B d i ) appea s ea lie in he e olu ion o he mode and is la ge in ampli ude han he second peak, al hough o en he wo peaks a e compa able du ing he decay phase. Like he o he edge diagnos ics, bo h peaks ha e a ixed phase ela i e o he mode. 16 Plasma Phys. Con ol. Fusion 53 (2011) 085028 W W Heidb ink e al 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 0 50 100 150 200 250 PHASE LAG (º) ISAT ICE SSNPA FILD BILD BES BES FIDA FIDA TOROIDAL ANGLE (º) Figu e 16. Measu ed phase lag ela i e o he Mi no signal e sus o oidal angle o he diagnos ic. The e ical e o ba ep esen s he s anda d de ia ion o e se e al cycles and he ho izon al e o ba is an es ima e o he unce ain y in angle. The solid lines show he expec ed a ia ion o an n=1 mode. Bu s s o edge FIDA ligh a e also obse ed by a dedica ed FIDA diagnos ic ( igu e 15(e)). The sigh lines o his diagnos ic look down a a can ed o oidal angle om an uppe po owa d he essel loo [28]. One channel iews one o oidal di ec ion o in e sec a hea ing beam ( o ac i e FIDA measu emen s), while he o he channel iews in he opposi e o oidal di ec ion o p o ide a e e ence signal. The bandpass il e o hese measu emen s accep s Dopple -shi ed ligh om co-going ions in he case o he ac i e iew and om coun e -going ions o he e e ence iew. Bo h sigh lines in e sec he edge egion nea he op and bo om o he essel. Bo h channels obse e beacon-like bu s s o signal ha p esumably a e caused by expulsion o as ions by he ishbones. Because he ∇Bd i is downwa d, he bu s s a e p obably caused by as ions ha cha ge exchange wi h neu als nea he bo om o he essel. Beacon-like bu s s o signal a e also measu ed by he ICE diagnos ic ( igu e 15( )). Bo h he highe band and lowe band il e ed signals measu e bu s s wi h a de ini e phase ela i e o he mode, al hough he a ia ion o he phase is somewha la ge han o he o he loss diagnos ics. The highe band signal co ela es mo e eliably wi h he Mi no signal han he lowe band signal. Fo he highe band, like he maximum neu on loss a e, he signal peaks a he same ime as he maximum Mi no ampli ude (wi hin s a is ical e o ). The magni ude o he ICE signal summed o e he bu s also co ela es s ongly wi h he maximum mode ampli ude ( =0.52). Gi en ha he ICE adia ion is p oduced h ough a wo-s age p ocess ( he ishbones expel as ions, which hen exci e magne oacous ic wa es), i is a he su p ising ha he ICE signal p o ides such a eliable measu emen o he beacon and o he iming and magni ude o he losses. The phase o all o he beacon measu emen s is summa ized in igu e 16. Fo diagnos ics ha measu e he same quan i y, such as he wo FIDA measu emen s and he wo BES peaks, he phase di e ence be ween he measu emen s ag ees wi h he o oidal sepa a ion o he de ec ion poin s, as expec ed o an n=1 mode. Fo he la ge da ase , al hough each diagnos ic measu es a well-de ined phase ela i e o he mode, he e is no clea pa e n o he en i e se o measu emen s. Upon e lec ion, his is no su p ising. The ishbone mode o a es a he ela i ely slow p ecession equency. On he o he hand, he phase o any pa icula diagnos ic signal depends on he inal leg o he o bi o he as ions ha p oduce ha signal; his inal leg occu s a he much highe bounce equency. On his inal leg, a loss o bi such as he one shown in igu e 12(b) mo es o e 90◦ o oidally. Since he di e en diagnos ics 17 Plasma Phys. Con ol. Fusion 53 (2011) 085028 W W Heidb ink e al -0.01 0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 125 130 135 140 110 115 120 125 130 76 78 80 82 84 86 88 90 -4 -2 0 2 4 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 -4 -2 0 2 4 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 -4 -2 0 2 4 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 RELATIVE TIME (ms) RELATIVE TIME (ms) RELATIVE TIME (ms) RELATIVE TIME (ms) TOROIDAL ROTATION (km/s) NEUTRON LOSS RATE (ms-1) (a) (b) 177 cm (c) 187 cm (d) 193 cm (h) 219 cm (g) 212 cm( ) 204 cm(e) 199 cm Figu e 17. Time e olu ion o (a) he as -ion loss a e in e ed om he d op in neu on signal and (b)–(h) he o oidal o a ion o 7 CER channels. The da a a e condi ionally a e aged o e an ensemble o ela i ely la ge (130 <B max <180 T s−1) ishbone bu s s. The e o ba in (a) ep esen s he s anda d de ia ion o he peak loss a e. The e o ba s in (b)–(h) ep esen he s anda d de ia ion o he ela i e change be ween −0.75 and −0.25 ms. measu e di e en ypes o loss o bi s, he inal o bi leg e ec i ely sc ambles he o oidal phase o he a ious measu emen s. A simila esul was ob ained o PDX ishbones. Bo h he NPA [3] and a silicon de ec o ha di ec ly measu ed los as ions [41] obse ed a beacon bu he wo diagnos ics did no obse e he same phase ela i e o he mode [33]. Since he as -ion losses a e non-ambipola , hey should ansien ly al e he adial elec ic ield E . Because he plasma mus p ese e adial o ce balance, a changing elec ic ield al e s he o oidal o a ion. To de ec his e ec , CER measu emen s o o oidal o a ion a e acqui ed in 0.5 ms ime bins. To ob ain adequa e s a is ics, da a om 16 simila ishbone bu s s a e condi ionally a e aged. The esul s appea in igu e 17. All CER channels measu e an ab up d op in o oidal o a ion o ∼−10 km s−1(1 kHz) when he neu on loss a e is g ea es . This sugges s ha as -ion losses occu h oughou he plasma. Compa ing channels, he d op pe sis s longe a la ge majo adius han i does in he co e. The magni ude o he d op is compa able o he ∼+10 km s−1jump in o oidal o a ion ha is obse ed when a single neu al beam sou ce injec s o 10 ms [42]. E iden ly, he ishbone bu s ac s like a ‘nega i e beam blip.’ A 10 ms beam blip injec s abou +0.5 C o cha ge. F om he ∼10% d op in neu on a e o hese bu s s, he es ima ed cha ge o expelled as ions is ∼−0.3 C, so he ‘nega i e beam blip’ associa ed wi h he ishbone should educe he o oidal o a ion abou as much as a posi i e beam blip inc eases i , jus as is obse ed. 3.3. Con ined as ions In addi ion o he d op in signal associa ed wi h as -ion losses, he neu on signal also con ains oscilla ions ( igu e 18). A e il e ing ou high- equency noise, hese oscilla ions a e isible 18 Plasma Phys. Con ol. Fusion 53 (2011) 085028 W W Heidb ink e al -400 -200 0 200 400 1837 1838 1839 1840 0.80 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00 1.05 1838.0 1838.5 1839.0 1839.5 1840.0 (a) Mi no (T/s) (b) Neu ons (a.u.) TIME (ms) (c) #141076 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 (d) Hal -cycle # 0 0.4 0.8 Dis o ion Neu on Phase 0 400 800 Figu e 18. Time e olu ion o (a) he Mi no coil signal and (b) he neu on signal du ing a ishbone bu s . (c) O e lay o he oscilla ions in he Mi no signal and he neu on signal. An e o unc ion i o he d op in he neu on a e is used o de end he neu on signal. (d) E olu ion o he mode dis o ion and neu on phase (deg ees) e sus hal -pe iod numbe . The dashed e ical line indica es he ime o maximum ampli ude. in he o al signal ( igu e 18(b)) bu hey become pa icula ly e iden a e de ending he signal o emo e he o e all d op ( igu e 18(c)). In con as o all o he los -ion measu emen s, he phase o hese neu on oscilla ions does no emain cons an h oughou he ishbone bu s . Ins ead, he phase s eadily slips ela i e o he Mi no ace as he bu s e ol es ( igu e 18(c)). The phase slippage is la ges nea maximum ampli ude, which is also when he mode dis o ion 19 Plasma Phys. Con ol. Fusion 53 (2011) 085028 W W Heidb ink e al 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 -8-6-4-20246 -100 0 100 200 300 400 4 5 6 7 8 9 PERIOD # ( ela i e o Mi no peak) 0 200 200 150 150 100 100 50 50 MIRNOV AMP. (T/s) MIRNOV FREQ(kHz) (c) 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 0 50 100 150 200 250 Peak Mi no Ampli ude (T/s) 0 100 200 300 400 NEUT. AMP. (%) NEUT. AMP. (%) NEUT. PHASE (º) PHASE SLIP (º) (a) (b) (d) Figu e 19. A e age neu on luc ua ion (a) ampli ude and (c) phase e sus pe iod numbe o 40 ela i ely la ge (140 <B max <162 T s−1) ishbone bu s s. The e olu ion o he mode (a) ampli ude and (c) equency o he same bu s s is also shown. The e o ba s ep esen he s anda d de ia ion o his ensemble. (b) Neu on luc ua ion ampli ude and (d) phase slippage e sus maximum Mi no ampli ude o all bu s s wi h cons an beam powe du ing he bu s . The lines a e linea i s o he da a. The ampli ude is an a e age o e cycles −3–0; he phase slippage is he a e age o e cycles −5—3 sub ac ed om he a e age o e cycles 1–3; he u ilized cycles a e highligh ed by boxes in (a) and (c), espec i ely. and equency chi ping apidly inc ease ( igu e 18(d)). Fo his pa icula case, in he cou se o he bu s , he phase slips o e 360◦. Because i measu es (p edomina ely) i gin neu ons, he plas ic scin illa o signal is sensi i e o he geome ical posi ion o he con ined as ions ha p oduce he neu on eac ions. Neu on oscilla ions o simila ampli ude we e measu ed o PDX ishbones [2]. S achan e al [2] showed ha hese oscilla ions we e caused by he helical dis o ion o he neu on- emi ing co e. Using he expec ed geome ical e iciency o he plas ic scin illa o and he measu ed displacemen o he in e nal kink mode, hey showed ha he p edic ed oscilla ions ag ee in bo h ampli ude and phase wi h he obse a ions. No phase slippage was epo ed. S achan’s model canno accoun o he phase slippage associa ed wi h o -axis ishbones. P esumably, as o PDX ishbones, he oscilla ions a e associa ed wi h mo ion o con ined as ions owa d and away om he de ec o . (Mo ion ela i e o he he mal deu e ium densi y g adien may also con ibu e.) Bu he phase slippage indica es ha he oscilla ions o he majo i y o con ined as ions decouples om he mode i sel , e en while he expelled ions e ain hei phase. This decoupling accele a es when he mode is la ge, dis o ing and changing apidly in equency. This phenomenon occu s o all o -axis ishbone bu s s. Figu es 19(a) and (c) show he a e age beha io o a se o simila bu s s. The neu on luc ua ion ampli ude usually peaks sligh ly be o e maximum Mi no ampli ude. (Fo an a e age o all o he bu s s in he da abase, he peak occu s wo cycles p io o he Mi no maximum.) The phase changes mos apidly when he equency changes. No e ha a ixed empo al delay ela i e o he mode would p oduce phase changes o he opposi e sign. Fo he en i e da abase, he neu on luc ua ion ampli ude scales linea ly wi h maximum Mi no ampli ude ( igu e 19(b)) ( =0.80). The phase slippage also ends o inc ease wi h maximum Mi no ampli ude ( igu e 19(d)) ( =0.55). In his la e case, he ela i ely la ge unce ain y in de e mina ion o he phase slip may accoun o some o he sca e . 20 Plasma Phys. Con ol. Fusion 53 (2011) 085028 W W Heidb ink e al 4. Discussion and conclusion Many ea u es o DIII-D o -axis ishbones a e simila o PDX q=1 ishbones. •The modes occu in high-be a plasmas nea an MHD s abili y limi . •They a e n=1 modes d i en by neu al beam ions. •The ini ial mode equency ma ches he p ecession equency o ull-ene gy apped ions; also, he adial p o ile o he p ecession equency is ai ly la , so as ions can s ay in esonance while being anspo ed adially. •The equency chi p is la ge ( / i≃0.4) and inc eases wi h inc easing mode ampli ude. Also, du ing a bu s , he equency chi p a e is la ges nea maximum mode ampli ude. •The g ow h a e is γ/ω ≃5%. •The modes appea in epe i i e bu s s. (The bu s cycle was mo e egula o PDX ishbones bu his di e ence is p obably caused by he s ong beam modula ion in he DIII-D expe imen s.) •The modes cause losses o as ions ha peak nea he ime o maximum mode ampli ude. •The magni ude o he losses scales app oxima ely linea ly wi h mode ampli ude. •Fas ions a e expelled o he ou side o he plasma in a ‘beacon’ (wi h a ixed phase ela i e o he mode). •Highe nmodes wi h simila phenomenology a e occasionally obse ed, as hey we e on PDX [2]. In addi ion, he loss o as ions causes a sudden d op in o oidal o a ion. This e ec was no measu ed on PDX bu p obably occu ed. On he o he hand, se e al ea u es o DIII-D o -axis ishbones di e om PDX ishbones. •On PDX, he decay a e was smalle han he g ow h a e bu he opposi e is ue o o -axis ishbones. Also, he decay phase is highly a iable o o -axis ishbones bu , in PDX, excep when a saw oo h c ash occu ed, he decay a e was egula . •On PDX, he wa e o m emained nea ly sinusoidal h oughou he bu s . In con as , o o -axis ishbones, he wa e o m always becomes highly dis o ed nea maximum mode ampli ude. •On PDX, he luc ua ions in he neu on signal main ained a ixed phase ela i e o he mode. Fo o -axis ishbones, he neu on phase slips con inuously when he ampli ude is la ge and he mode equency and wa e o m shape a e changing apidly. In addi ion, o o -axis ishbones, he adial eigen unc ion changes shape du ing he e olu ion o a bu s . This in o ma ion is no a ailable o PDX ishbones. The many simila i ies be ween PDX ishbones and o -axis ishbones suppo s he no ion ad anced by Okabayashi e al [15] ha o -axis ishbones a e an ene ge ic-pa icle b anch o a kink mode, jus as PDX ishbones a e an ene ge ic-pa icle b anch o he 1/1 in e nal kink. In his pa adigm, he bu s cycle esembles classic p eda o –p ey elaxa ion oscilla ions because he inc ease in as -ion densi y associa ed wi h beam ueling pushes a ma ginally s able mode ac oss he s abili y bounda y, hen he expulsion o he as ions s abilizes he mode [6,43]. In con as o a esis i e wall mode (o o he no mal mode o he backg ound plasma), he mode equency is de e mined by he p ecession equency o he as ions. The la ge equency chi ping and he non-pe u ba i e na u e o he eigen unc ion a e consis en wi h he idea ha he o -axis ishbone is a beam mode ha exis s due o he in ense as -ion popula ion. Wha accoun s o he di e ences in nonlinea beha io o PDX and o -axis ishbones? One possible explana ion is ha he o -axis ishbone is an ex e nal mode ins ead o an in e nal mode. (The esponse o he ins abili y o eedback is s ong e idence o he ex e nal na u e o 21 Plasma Phys. Con ol. Fusion 53 (2011) 085028 W W Heidb ink e al he o -axis ishbones [15].) In his hypo hesis, he mode dis o ion is caused by he dissipa ion associa ed wi h he conduc ing wall. Ano he di e ence be ween PDX ishbones and o -axis ishbones is he beam ueling. In PDX, all o he sou ces injec ed a he same angle, so he as -ion dis ibu ion unc ion was concen a ed a a single pi ch angle. In con as , he DIII-D expe imen s employ many angles o injec ion. (In addi ion, Teis su icien ly high ha he pi ch-angle sca e ing a e is compa able o he slowing-down a e, which u he iso opizes he dis ibu ion unc ion.) Pe haps he esponse o con ined as ions om o he sou ces is esponsible o he phase slippage in he neu on oscilla ions and also con ibu es o he dis o ion o he mode. A key goal o he ene ge ic-pa icle communi y is o de elop a p edic i e capabili y o as -ion d i en ins abili ies. The ascina ing nonlinea e olu ion o o -axis ishbones is a ipe opic o heo e ical s udy. Acknowledgmen s We hank John deG assie, Bo is B eizman, Liu Chen, and he e e ees o help ul insigh s and g a e ully acknowledge he in aluable con ibu ions o he DIII-D eam. This wo k was unded by he US Depa men o Ene gy unde SC-G903402 and DE-FC02-04ER54698 DE-FG02-07ER54917. Re e ences [1] Mcgui e K e al 1983 Phys. Re . Le . 50 891 [2] S achan J D e al 1985 Nucl. Fusion 25 863 [3] Beie sdo e P, Kai a R and Golds on R J 1984 Nucl. Fusion 24 487 [4] Golds on R J e al 1987 Nucl. Fusion 27 921 [5] Whi e R B e al 1983 Phys. Fluids 26 2958 [6] Chen L, Whi e R B and Rosenblu h M N 1984 Phys. Re . Le . 52 1122 [7] Heidb ink W W and Sadle G J 1994 Nucl. Fusion 34 535 [8] Coppi B and Po celli F 1986 Phys. Re . Le . 57 2272 [9] Chen L 1994 Phys. Plasma 11519 [10] Po celli F 1991 Plasma Phys. Con ol. Fusion 33 1601 [11] HuysmansGTAe al 1999 Nucl. Fusion 39 1489 [12] Ma sunaga G e al 2009 Phys. Re . Le . 103 045001 [13] Ma sunaga G e al 2010 Nucl. Fusion 50 084003 [14] Okabayashi M e al 2009 Nucl. Fusion 49 125003 [15] Okabayashi M e al 2011 Phys. Plasma 18 056112 [16] Helande P, Gimble C G, Has ie R J and Mcclemen s K G 1997 Phys. Plasma 42181 [17] F eidbe g J P 1987 Ideal Magne ohyd odynamics (New Yo k: Plenum) sec ion 9.4.6 [18] Lao L L, S John H, S ambaugh R D, Kellman A G and P ei e W 1985 Nucl. Fusion 25 1611 [19] Rice B W, Nilson D G and W oblewski D 1995 Re . Sci. Ins um. 66 373 [20] S ai E J 2006 Re . Sci. Ins um. 77 023502 [21] Aus in M E and Loh J 2003 Re . Sci. Ins um. 74 1457 [22] Gohil P, Bu ell K H, G oebne R J and Se ayda ian R P 1990 Re . Sci. Ins um. 61 2949 [23] Heidb ink W W 1986 Re . Sci. Ins um. 57 1769 [24] Zhu Y B, Heidb ink W W and Picke ing L D 2010 Nucl. Fusion 50 084024 [25] Fishe R K e al 2010 Re . Sci. Ins um. 81 10D307 [26] Wa kins J G e al 1992 Re . Sci. Ins um. 63 4728 [27] Luo Y, Heidb ink W W, Bu ell K H, Gohil P and Kaplan D 2007 Re . Sci. Ins um. 78 033505 [28] Musca ello C M, Heidb ink W W, Taussig D and Bu ell K H 2010 Re . Sci. Ins um. 81 10D316 [29] Gup a D K, Fonck R J, Mckee G R, Schlossbe g D J and Sha e M W 2004 Re . Sci. Ins um. 75 3493 [30] Heidb ink W W, Mckee G R, Smi h D R and Bo olon A 2011 Plasma Phys. Con ol. Fusion 53 085007 [31] Go elenko N N and Cheng C Z 1995 Nucl. Fusion 35 1743 [32] Wa son G W and Heidb ink W W 2003 Re . Sci. Ins um. 74 1605 22 Plasma Phys. Con ol. Fusion 53 (2011) 085028 W W Heidb ink e al [33] Buchenaue DAJ1985 Fas ion e ec s on magne ic ins abili ies in he PDX okamak PhD Thesis P ince on Uni e si y [34] Heidb ink W W 1995 Plasma Phys. Con ol. Fusion 37 937 [35] Shinoha a K e al 2007 Nucl. Fusion 47 997 [36] G a es J P, Has ie R J and Hopc a K I 2000 Plasma Phys. Con ol. Fusion 42 1049 [37] Whi e R B 2001 The Theo y o To oidally Con ined Plasmas 2nd edn (London: Impe ial College P ess) [38] Van Zeeland M A e al 2011 Phys. Plasma 18 056114 [39] Budny R V 1994 Nucl. Fusion 34 1247 and e e ences he ein [40] Heidb ink W W and Beie sdo e P 1987 Nucl. Fusion 27 608 [41] Buchenaue D, Heidb ink W W, Roquemo e L and Mcgui e K 1987 Re . Sci. Ins um. 58 2264 [42] Deg assie J S, G oebne R J and Bu ell K H 2006 Phys. Plasma 13 112507 [43] Heidb ink W W e al 1993 Phys. Fluids B52176 23