Spark plasma sintering influence on microstructure and mechanical properties of Ti:Ta/carbonitride ceramic matrix composites

Spa k plasma sin e ing in luence on mic os uc u e and mechanical p ope ies o Ti:Ta/ca boni ide ce amic ma ix composi es Jos´ e Manuel C´ o doba Gallego Depa amen o de Química Ino g´ anica, Facul ad de Química, Uni e sidad de Se illa (US), C/T amon ana s/n, 41012 Se illa, Spain ARTICLE INFO Keywo ds: Ce amic ma ix composi e Spa k plasma sin e ing Mic os uc u e Mechanical p ope ies ABSTRACT A mechanically induced sel -sus aining eac ion was ca ied ou o syn hesize a Ti 0.9 Ta 0.1 C 0.5 N 0.5 /Co powde ed ce me s, and hen hey we e sin e ed by spa k plasma sin e ing. Mic os uc u al pa ame e s e ec s s udied by image analysis, and chemical composi ion (s udied by Rie eld analysis) on he mic oha dness, ha dening a e, ac u e oughness, ans e se up u e s eng h, and Young’s modulus we e ela ed o he sin e ing condi ions. The op imiza ion o he sin e ing condi ions (1150 ◦C, 30 MPa, and 8 min’ dwell ime) d o e o a homogeneous mic os uc u e and ou s anding mechanical p ope ies. Also, he an alum was sugges ed o in luence he in e acial ene gies o he sys em, yielding a s onge ha d phase skele on. 1. In oduc ion Technically and comme cially, ce me s a e among he mos impo - an composi e ma e ials due o hei excep ional ha dness and wea esis ance. Because he cons i uen phases o i anium ca boni ide a e excep ionally ha d and s able, he ce me s based on his ma e ial ha e ex ao dina y esis ance o wea and c eep. They a e excellen op ions o use as cu ing ools because o hese quali ies. Ca bides like TaC, NbC, Mo 2 C, and WC, a e equen ly u ilized in milling applica ions and in e up ed cu s o enhance cu ing pe o mance. These ca bides o m solid-solu ion phases o mixed ca boni ides and exhibi ema kable ho ha dness and he mal shock endu ance. [1–3]. The ha d componen o ce me s, called he mas e alloy, has a composi ion ha de e mines bo h he p oduc ion condi ions and he in ended applica ion’s echnical pe o mance, making i c ucial [4]. I is widely accep ed in li e a u e [5–7] ha he o ma ion o ca boni ide solid solu ions in e ms o e na y o qua e na y componen s uc u e is gi en excellen pe o mance o ce me s syn hesized om he mix u e o unalloyed ha d componen s wi h Co o Ni as binde . Ca boni ide solid solu ions, which combine he ca bide and ni ide componen s in o a single phase, ha e been ecommended as a way o enhance he cha - ac e is ics o ce me s [8]. Based on Ti y M T1-y C x N 1-x ca boni ides (M T = Ta, Nb, Z , V) wi h a na ow size dis ibu ion and submic ome ic cha ac e (250 nm), mechanically induced sel -sus aining eac ion (MRS) has ecen ly been p oposed as a us wo hy and s aigh o wa d me hod o p oducing high pu i y complex solid solu ion powde s [9–12]. Con en ional ce amic ma e ial sin e ing me hods in ol e high empe a u es. A high deg ee o sin e ing is achie ed by hea ing he g een specimen o high empe a u es o p olonged pe iods in a ypical sin e ing echnique. The sin e ed i em usually con ains la ge g ains as a esul o hese un a o able condi ions, which eg e ably encou age unwan ed ca bide g ain de elopmen in he p esence o me al liquids. As a esul , he ool’s mechanical capabili ies a e educed. I is commonly known ha a ine mic os uc u e esul s in be e mechanical quali ies and a longe p oduc li espan. Spa k plasma sin e ing (SPS), in compa ison o p essu eless sin e - ing, is a no el sin e ing echnique ha applies p essu e and elec ic cu en o he sample simul aneously [13–14]. A compa a i ely low empe a u es (ap ox. 500 ◦C lowe han p essu eless sin e ing), and as e hea ing a es (ap ox. 100 ◦C/min), i enables he apid consoli- da ion o powde compac s o a high densi y. The SPS echnique has shown p omising esul s in educing he sin e ing empe a u e while simul aneously con olling g ain g ow h and seconda y phase o ma ion [15–17]. I is unique o esea ching bulk nanoma e ials because o he quick hea ing a e and po en ial o main ain he nanoscale du ing he apid sin e ing cycle. This s udy looked in o how he SPS se ings a ec ed he sin e ing o powde s wi h submic ome ic g ain sizes, Ti 0,9 Ta 0,1 C 0,5 N 0,5 /Co, ha we e p oduced ia MSR. The esul ing ce me s’ mic os uc u e and mechanical cha ac e is ics (ha dness, ac u e oughness, ans e se up u e s eng h (TRS), and Young’s modulus) we e assessed and con- as ed wi h hose o he compa able cemen ed ca bides and o dina y ce me s. E-mail add ess: [email p o ec ed]. Con en s lis s a ailable a ScienceDi ec In e na ional Jou nal o Re ac o y Me als and Ha d Ma e ials jou nal homepage: www.else ie .com/loca e/IJRMHM h ps://doi.o g/10.1016/j.ij mhm.2025.107094 Recei ed 4 Janua y 2025; Recei ed in e ised o m 29 Janua y 2025; Accep ed 12 Feb ua y 2025 In e na ional Jou nal o Re ac o y Me als and Ha d Ma e ials 128 (2025) 107094 A ailable online 13 Feb ua y 2025 0263-4368/© 2025 The Au ho . Published by Else ie L d. This is an open access a icle unde he CC BY license ( h p://c ea i ecommons.o g/licenses/by/4.0/ ). 2. Ma e ials and me hods The Ti 0.9 Ta 0.1 C 0.5 N 0.5 solid solu ion was syn hesized by MRS, and he desc ip ion o he syn hesis p ocedu e and cha ac e iza ion (XRD, SEM, TEM, and image analysis) o he as-syn hesized powde s pe o med in a p e ious esea ch [12]. The ob ained powde s we e sin e ed using SPS-1050-CE (D . Sin e , Japan) a 1150 ◦C unde di e en holding imes and p essu es (see Table 1). X- ay di ac ion diag ams and Scanning Elec on Mic oscopy images o ce me s polished su aces we e ob ained using simila pa- ame e s as desc ibed in [18] The la ice pa ame e s, phase olume ac ion, and ce amic s oichiome y we e de e mined om he XRD di- ag am using he Rie eld analysis by he use o he Fullp o [19] com- pu e p og am. The Vicke s es was ca ied ou in a Mic oha dness FM-700 (Fu u e- Tech. Co p) wi h a load o 49 mN, 196 mN, and 981 mN and dwell ime anging om 5 s o 90 s a oom empe a u e. Se e al mic o- inden a ions (12 imes) a di e en loca ions we e aken on he pol- ished ce me o e e y un. The s a ed alue was ound om he a e age o he measu ed alues ( σ = ±5 %). The ac u e oughness (KIC) was measu ed by using h ee inden a ion me hods unde an inden a ion load o 1 kg and hey we e desc ibed below. The pieces o lexu al es s we e cu om he spa k plasma sin e ed cylinde s and buil in o ingo s wi h ba shapes (dimensions o 3×4×25 mm). The oom empe a u e (RT) lexu al s eng h was ca ied ou in a h ee-poin bending a angemen , using a c osshead speed o 0.5 mm/ min and span o 20 mm (AGS-X 10kN Se ies Dual Column Elec ome- chanical Tes F ame, Shimadzu, Japan). All samples we e g ound o dimensions using esin-bound diamond g inding wheels and su ace g inde s o achie e dimensional accu acy as well as good su ace inishing. The image analysis was ca ied ou by using he Image P o-Plus 6.0 so wa e and mic os uc u al pa ame e s we e ob ained as desc ibed in C´ o doba e al. [20]. 3. Resul s and discussion 3.1. Composi ional analysis The phase composi ion o he sin e ed bodies was in es iga ed by XRD analysis as shown in Fig. 1. The XRD pa e ns show he peaks cha ac e is ic o he ce amic phase (•) and he me allic binde phases consis ing o he in e me allics (*) Ti x Ta 1-x Co 2 [Fd3m] and (○) Ti x Ta 1- x Co [Pm3m] p oduced du ing he high- empe a u e sin e ing. Table 2 desc ibes he quan i ica ion o he phases obse ed in he XRD pa e ns, he la ice pa ame e s, he cohe en di ac ion domains, and he co - esponding ce amic composi ion ob ained om Rie eld analysis. As shown in Table 2, he Ti/Ta a io was somewha cons an ega dless o he sin e ing condi ions used. Howe e , he C/N a io o (Ti, Ta)(C, N) dec eased when he sin e ing condi ions we e s onge (C/ N a io; SPS1, 1.50, SPS2, 1.38; SPS3, 0.92; SPS4, 0.75). This ca bon loss was a ibu ed o he ca bon dissolu ion inc easing in he binde phase. The mos signi ican change in he binde phase con en (Table 2) is obse ed in sample SPS4, when a p essu e o 60 MPa was used. Because he powde con aine o he SPS is no sealed, he e was some loss o he binde du ing he p ocess, and a smalle amoun was obse ed and quan i ied by he composi ional analysis in compa ison wi h he o he samples. This ac was co obo a ed by he p esence o solidi ied d op- le s a he ou side o he con aine . In Fig. 2 a e shown cha ac e is ic sample SEM images sin e ed unde Table 1 Summa y o spa k plasma sin e ing condi ions. Sample Nominal Composi ion Weigh [g] Sin e ing Pa ame e s 1 Ti 0.90 Ta 0.10 C 0.5 N 0.5 +20 %Co 4 1150 ◦C 30 MPa 120 s 2 12 1150 ◦C 30 MPa 120 s 3 12 1150 ◦C 30 MPa 480 s 4 12 1150 ◦C 60 MPa 120 s Fig. 1. XRD pa e ns o he sin e ed ce me s by SPS. (•) Ti x Ta 1-x C y N 1-y [Fm3m], (*) Ti x Ta 1-x Co 2 [Fd3m], (○) Ti x Ta 1-x Co [Pm3m]. Table 2 Composi ion, la ice pa ame e , cohe en di ac ion domain o he ce amic phase, and desc ip ion o e e y binde phase ound by Rie eld analysis. Fo e e y phase he % ol. is included. The las column illus a es he goodness o i ness o e e y analysis ca ied ou . Ce amic Phase Binde Phase Sample Ce amic Composi ion a (Å) D [nm] % ol. Ce am Co 2 Ti(Ta) [Fd3m] [%] CoTi(Ta) [Pm3m] [%] χ 2 SPS1 Ti 0.90 Ta 0.10 C 0.60 N 0.40 43,162 33 78,7 15,7 5,6 1,8 SPS2 Ti 0.86 Ta 0.14 C 0.58 N 0.42 43,184 67 75,2 19,0 5,8 2,2 SPS3 Ti 0.91 Ta 0.09 C 0.48 N 0.52 43,157 74 77,1 18,0 4,8 3,0 SPS4 Ti 0.92 Ta 0.08 C 0.43 N 0.57 43,170 52 86,5 11,0 2,5 2,7 Fig. 2. SEM images showing he cha ac e is ic mic os uc u e o he sin- e ed powde s. J.M. C´ o doba Gallego In e na ional Jou nal o Re ac o y Me als and Ha d Ma e ials 128 (2025) 107094 2 di e en condi ions. Da a ob ained om he image analysis a e p e- sen ed in Table 3. Quan i ica ion o he phases p esen ed on he sin e ed samples h ough image analysis ga e esul s consis en wi h hose ob- ained by he XRD esul s by Rie eld analysis. All he samples p esen ed a highly dense (densi ica ion o ~98 % ±2 %, om image analysis, i e images a simila scale we e analyzed) and uni o m mic os uc u e. Al hough ea ly milling p oduc s con ained ypical pa icle agg ega es, no anomalous de elopmen o g ains was de ec ed. This indica es ha he sin e ing be ween agg ega es and ine pa icles was p e en ed by he spa k plasma sin e ing. Mos o he mic ome ic pa icles obse ed in samples SPS1 and SPS4 displayed a ypical co e- im mic os uc u e p o iding e idence o g ain g ow h by dissolu ion-p ecipi a ion p ocesses despi e he low empe a- u e and he sho esidence ime a he maximum sin e ing empe a- u e. In con as , he co e- im mic os uc u e app ecia ed in samples SPS2 and SPS3 is ba ely isible. The sample SPS1 showed he highes a e age ce amic pa icle size (Ø =2.56 μ m), while he samples SPS2, SPS3, and SPS4 we e lowe , and in c escendo om SPS2 o SPS4 (Ø =1.10, 1.95 and 2.28 μ m, espec- i ely). I is common o use an op ical py ome e ocused on he ou e su ace o he die o measu e and con ol he empe a u e du ing SPS expe imen s. This isn’ good enough o high hea ing a es, whe e he SPS p ocess’s iabili y is one o i s mos e iden bene i s. I migh be su icien o e y slow hea ing a es whe e he mal equilib ium can be eached. Mo eo e , because hea ing is esis i e, bo h he sample’s and he die’s conduc i i ies a ec he empe a u es inside and ou side he sample. The e is a no iceable empe a u e di e ence be ween he sam- ples when a low-conduc i e ma e ial is u ilized (in his example, a composi e made o ce amic and in e me allic phases) [21]. Due o he inc emen in mass on he samples om SPS1 o he es , he dis ance o be a eled by he cu en is inc eased, and he e o e he esis i i y o he sample ( esis i i y quan i ies how s ongly he ma e ial opposes he low o elec ic cu en and i is a unc ion o he dis ance oamed). So, he jump om 4 g (SPS1) o 12 g (SPS2, 3, and 4) inc eased he em- pe a u e g adien , he e o e he empe a u e eached inside sample SPS1 is highe han in he o he ones, and his e ec is shown in he coa sening o he SPS1 ce amic g ains espec he o he samples. Also, he o ma ion o a clea co e- im mic os uc u e in sample SPS1 (Fig. 2 (a)) co obo a ed he inside highe empe a u e eached. To o m a co e- im mic os uc u e, a liquid phase sin e ing has o be eached du ing he p ocess, and he e o e highe sin e ing empe a u es a e needed. When a simila weigh was used (samples SPS2, 3, and 4) and simila empe a u e inside he sample can be supposed, he g ain coa sening was due o an enhancemen o he elemen di usion du ing he sin e ing because o he inc emen in he sin e ing ime (SPS3) and p essu e (SPS4). Simila beha io was obse ed in e ms o con igui y and mean ee pa h. Sample SPS1 showed he highes con igui y and lowes mean ee pa h alues o he se o samples s udied, while samples SPS2, 3, and 4 showed an inc emen in he con igui y om SPS2(0.25) <SPS3(0.28) < SPS4(0.32) and a dec ease in he mean ee pa h om SPS2(1.32) > SPS3(1.27) >SPS4(1.20). As abo e, he coa sening o he g ains due o he highe empe a u e in sample SPS1 inc eased he con ac be ween he ce amic pa icles and he e o e he inc ease in he con igui y and he educ ion o he mean ee pa h. 3.2. Mechanical p ope ies In Table 3 is showed he ha dness, he ac u e oughness, he ans e se up u e s eng h and he young’s modulus o he samples s udied. Fig. 3 depic s SEM mic og aphs showing inden a ions c ea ed on he su ace o he in es iga ed objec , as well as c acks eme ging om hem, unde 1 kg o ce. Ha dness alues we e compu ed using he di- mensions o he imp ession c ea ed on he su ace o he specimens, and he alues epo ed in Table 3 a e he a e age o wel e uns. The SPS4 sample showed he highes ha dness (16.0 GPa) while he es o he samples p esen ed a mic oha dness o abou ~14 GPa. This can be explained by he loss o binde du ing he sin e ing p ocedu e which made he p ope combina ion o ce amic pa icle size and con- igui y o each he highes mic oha dness in sample SPS4. Mic oinden a ions a di e en loads (49 mN, 196 mN, and 981 mN) we e pe o med a se e al ime uns o es ablish he s eng hening o he ma e ial by wo k ha dening, and esul s a e p esen ed in Fig. 4. As a esul o disloca ion mo emen s and disloca ion gene a ion wi hin he ma e ial’s c ys al s uc u e, i is e iden ha he mic oha dness in- c eases wi h un ime. This esis ance o disloca ion- o ma ion shows up as a esis ance o plas ic de o ma ion, which accoun s o he obse ed Table 3 Vicke s ha dness, con igui y and a e age ee pa hway, wi h he a e age ce amic pa icle size, ce amic olume, binde olume and po ous olume ha we e ex ac ed om he image analysis o he selec ed samples. Image Analysis Mechanical P ope ies Con igui y (C) Mean ee pa h ( μ m) Ce amic Pa icle Size ( μ m) Ce amic Volume (% ol) Binde Volume (% ol) Po ous Volume (% ol) Sample H (1.0) [GPa] K ic [MPam 1/ 2 ]* T ans e se Rup u e S eng h [MPa] Young’s Modulus [GPa] 0,36 1,09 2,56 80 19 1 SPS114,1 6,2/5,4/ 5,0 130,6 139,7 0,25 1,32 1,10 78 21 1 SPS214,4 8,5/8,0/ 7,9 448,6 324,1 0,28 1,27 1,95 80 19 1 SPS314,6 7,4/7,0/ 7,1 546,0 402,7 0,32 1,20 2,28 85 14 1 SPS416,0 6,7/5,1/ 6,0 522,3 318,4 * Re , [22,23], [24,25]. Fig. 3. Cha ac e is ic SEM mic og aphs o mic oinden a ion ma ks ca ied ou on polished su ace o he sin e ed samples. J.M. C´ o doba Gallego In e na ional Jou nal o Re ac o y Me als and Ha d Ma e ials 128 (2025) 107094 3 s eng hening. F om he slope o he lineal i ing o he da a, he ha dening o he ma e ial as a unc ion o ime is p esen ed o e e y s udied sample o e e y load in Fig. 5. A highe load lowe ha dening a e was obse ed. A highe load, he a ea unde he inden a ion ip is bigge and he numbe o disloca ions, which con ibu es o he s eng hening, pe uni a ea was lowe han when low load was used. F ac u e oughness has been e alua ed o each sample using Eqs. (1)–(3). The esul s ob ained a e shown in Table 3, whe e sligh di e - ences in he calcula ed K ic can be seen depending on he exp ession used. (She y e al.) [22,23] KIC(P) = 0,0319×(P a× ∑l √)(1) (Shube e al) [24] KIC(S) = 0,0028× H ×P×∑l √(2) (E ans and Cha les e al.) [25] KIC(EC) = 0,16×H × a √ (c a) 3 / 2 (3) whe e K ic [M Pa m 1/2 ], P: load [N], l: c ack leng h: [mm], H : ha dness [N/mm 2 ], a: hal -diagonal [mm] and c: c ack+hal diagonal [mm]. I should be no ed a his poin ha he equa ion o Schube e al. [24] was de i ed om ha o She y e al. [22,23], and can be deduced by adjus ing he uni s and expe imen al pa ame e s. E en so, in ou case i was used as a way o in oducing di e en expe imen al pa ame e s in o an equa ion o ob ain K IC, and be able o compa e he da a ob ained wi h di e en expe imen al c i e ia. Finally, in his way, o K IC compa ison, while he E ans and Cha les equa ion, which was o med in he p e ious decade, was p oduced o ma e ials in gene al, he She y and Shube equa ions we e cons uc ed o composi e ma e ials, such as cemen ed ca bides (WC-Co), simila o he ma e ial p esen ed in his wo k. The a e age K ic alues ob ained om he equa ions used can be summa ized as; SPS1, 5.6; SPS2, 8.1; SPS3, 7.1 and SPS4, 5.9. These alues a e closely ela ed o he a e age g ain size and he mean ee pa h. The smalle he g ain size o highe he mean ee pa h is, he g ea e he ac u e oughness. The olume pe cen age o g ain bo de s o in e aces g ows signi ican ly wi h dec easing g ain size o inc easing mean ee pa h. In ma e ials such as in e me allic compounds and ce- amics, which a e usually ex emely s ong bu e y b i le, educing he g ain size o inc easing he mean ee pa h inc emen p omo es duc ili y by inc easing he p obabili y o g ain bounda y sliding. Pe o mance gains and a la ge p ocessing ad an age a e p o ided by his. The TRS and Young’s modulus de e mined a oom empe a u e o he s udied samples a e p esen ed in Table 3. A cons an sin e ing empe a u e, he oughe is he sin e ing condi ions (highe ime o highe applied p essu e), he g ea e is he TRS. Samples SPS3 and SPS4 showed he highes combina ion o TRS and Young’s modulus in com- pa ison wi h samples SPS1 and SPS2, showing he sample SPS1 he lowes alues o all s udied samples. The ema kable inc emen in TRS and Young’s modulus om sample SPS1 o samples SPS2, SPS3, and SPS4 can be explained in e ms o con igui y and mean ee pa h. The highe he mean ee pa h and lowe Fig. 4. Mic oha dness e sus ime o he inden a ion un showing he inc emen in he mic oha dness o he sample by wo king ha dening. Fig. 5. Ha dening a e (GPa/s) e sus inden a ion load. J.M. C´ o doba Gallego In e na ional Jou nal o Re ac o y Me als and Ha d Ma e ials 128 (2025) 107094 4 he con igui y is, he g ea e he TRS and Young’s modulus a e [26,27]. The combina ion o alues o ce amic pa icle size, con igui y and mean ee pa h made o he sample SPS3 is he bes ma ch o ha e he highes TRS alue. Cha ac e is ics SEM image o a ac u e su ace o sample SPS3 is p esen ed in Fig. 6. In Fig. 6(a), a seconda y elec ons image shows he opog aphy o he ac u e su ace, and in Fig. 6(b), a backsca e ing elec on image shows he phase dis ibu ion associa ed wi h he di e en con as s. The ac u e su ace obse ed o s udied ce me s showed mainly a ypical ans-g anula ac u e. This kind o ac u e mechanism showed he high adhesion be ween he ce amic phase and he in e me allic phase. I is sugges ed ha an alum p esence in lu- enced he in e acial ene gies o he sys em, yielding a s onge ha d phase sca olding. The ce me ac u e su aces become ine and he a io o in e - g anula ac u e inc eases o some ex en wi h he inc easing o ine ce amic g ins con en (Fig. 6, igh op). I is e iden ha he me al binde is s ill co e ing he g ains on he ac u e su ace, displaying dimples. The ollowing desc ibes he oughening mechanisms: he p esence o co eless g ains (samples SPS2 and SPS3) can be hough o be ad an- ageous o he ce me s’ oughness. I is simple o p omo e mo e ac u e o ma ion a he in e ace be ween he co e and im since he bonding o ce he e is weake han ha o he homogeneous g ain (samples SPS1 and SPS4). I implies ha highe ac u e oughness is achie ed by ce me s wi h a single phase and no co e/ im in e ac ion [28,29]. In compa ison wi h o he epo s [30] whe e an alum p esence wo sens he mechanical p ope ies, he spa k plasma sin e ing ech- nique has p o en o o m an adequa e en i onmen o he ob aining o sin e ed bodies wi h ou s anding mechanical p ope ies. 4. Conclusions The e ec s o SPS pa ame e s on mic os uc u e and mechanical p ope ies o Ti 0.9 Ta 0.1 C 0.5 N 0.5 /Co-based ce me s we e in es iga ed and he conclusions ob ained in his s udy can be summa ized as ollows: (i) Highly densi ied p oduc s we e ob ained independen ly o he condi ions used. (ii) The bes combina ion o mechanical p ope ies and homogeneous mic os uc u e was ob ained when sin e ing ime was held o 8 min a 30 MPa and 1150 ◦C. (iii) Ha dening a e was quan i ied as a unc ion o he mic oha dness e sus un ime. Conside ing he simplici y o he composi ions, hese ce me s showed g ea po en ial o u u e applica ions. The p esence o an alum is hough o ha e a posi i e e ec on he g ain and/o phase bo de s. I is p oposed ha an alum a ec s he sys em’s in e acial ene gies, esul ing in he p oduc ion o an in e me allic binde and a s onge ha d phase skele on. CRediT au ho ship con ibu ion s a emen Jos´ e Manuel C´ o doba Gallego: W i ing – e iew & edi ing, W i ing – o iginal d a , Visualiza ion, Valida ion, Supe ision, So wa e, Re- sou ces, P ojec adminis a ion, Me hodology, In es iga ion, Fo mal analysis, Da a cu a ion, Concep ualiza ion. Decla a ion o compe ing in e es The au ho s decla e ha hey ha e no known compe ing inancial in e es s o pe sonal ela ionships ha could ha e appea ed o in luence he wo k epo ed in his pape . Acknowledgmen s I would like o hank An onia Gallego C´ a denas and Jos´ e F ancisco C´ o doba Sosa o hei unwa e ing s eng h and suppo , o always pushing me o mo e o wa d e en in he mos di icul and haza dous si ua ions. Da a a ailabili y No da a was used o he esea ch desc ibed in he a icle. Re e ences [1] H. Yu, Y. Liu, Y. Jin, J. Ye, E ec o seconda y ca bides addi ion on he mic os uc u e and mechanical p ope ies o (Ti, W, Mo, V)(C, N)-based ce me s, In . J. Re ac. Me als Ha d Ma e . 29 (5) (2011) 586–590. [2] Dizaji V. Rahimi, , e al.J. Akba i, Mic os uc u e and cu ing pe o mance in es iga ion o Ti(C, N)-based ce me s con aining a ious ypes o seconda y ca bides, In . J. Mach. Tools Manu . 47 (5) (2007) 768–772. [3] P. Wu, Y. Zheng, Y. Zhao, H. Yu, E ec o TaC addi ion on he mic os uc u es and mechanical p ope ies o Ti(C,N)-based ce me s, Ma e . Des. 31 (7) (2010) 3537–3541. [4] P. E maye , H. Kolaska, W. Lengaue , K. D eye , Ti(C,N) ce me s-me allu gy and p ope ies, In . J. Re ac . Me . Ha d Ma e . 13 (6) (1995) 343–351. [5] F. Qi, S. Kang, S udy on mic os uc u al changes in Ti(C, N)-NbC-Ni ce me s, Ma e . Sci. Eng. A 251 (1–2) (1998) 276–285. [6] Te uuchi K., Yano N., Ti anium ca boni ide-based ce me cu ing inse , US Pa en No. 5,518,822, 1996. [7] V.I. T e ’yako , V.I. Mashe skaya, E ec o an alum on he p ope ies and s uc u e o ha d alloys based on i anium ca boni ide, V.I, Powde Me al. Me . Ce am. 38 (1–2) (1999) 64–67. [8] Rudy E., Spinodal ca boni ide alloys o ool and wea applica ions, US Pa en No. 3,971,656, 1976. [9] J.M. C´ o doba, M.J. Sayagu´ es, M.D. Alcal´ a, F.J. Go o , Monophasic nanos uc u ed powde s o niobium, an alum, and ha nium ca boni ides syn hesized by a mechanically induced sel -p opaga ing eac ion, J. Am. Ce am. Soc. 90 (2) (2007) 381–387. Fig. 6. SEM images o sample SPS3, (a) Seconda y elec on SEM image showing ac u e su ace opog aphy, and (b) Backsca e ing SEM image showing he ac u e su ace phases composi ion dis ibu ion (da k g ey, ce amic; b igh g ey, binde ). J.M. C´ o doba Gallego In e na ional Jou nal o Re ac o y Me als and Ha d Ma e ials 128 (2025) 107094 5 [10] J.M. C´ o doba, M.J. Sayagu´ es, M.D. Alcal´ a, F.J. Go o , Monophasic Ti y Nb 1-y C x N 1-x nanopowde s ob ained a oom empe a u e by MSR, J. Ma e . Chem. 17, [7] (2007) 650–653. [11] J.M. C´ o doba, M.D. Alcal´ a, M.A. A il´ es, M.J. Sayagu´ es, F.J. Go o , New p oduc ion o TiC x N 1-x -based ce me s by one s ep mechanically induced sel -sus aining eac ion: powde syn hesis and p essu eless sin e ing, J. Eu . Ce am. Soc. 28 (10) (2008) 2085–2098. [12] J.M. C´ o doba, M.A. A il´ es, M.J. Sayagu´ es, M.D. Alcal´ a, F.J. Go o , Syn hesis o complex ca boni ide powde s Ti y M T1-y C x N 1-x (M T : Z , V, Ta, H ) ia a mechanically induced sel -sus aining eac ion, J. Alloys Compd. 482 (1–2) (2009) 349–355. [13] Z.A. Muni , U. Anselmi-Tambu ini, M. Ohyanagi, The e ec o elec ic ield and p essu e on he syn hesis and consolida ion o ma e ials: a e iew o he spa k plasma sin e ing me hod, J. Ma e . Sci. 41 (2006) 763–777. [14] M. Omo i, Sin e ing, consolida ion, eac ion and c ys al g ow h by he spa k plasma sys em (SPS), Ma e . Sci. Eng. A 287 (2) (2000) 183–188. [15] E. Khaleghi, Y.S. Lin, M.A. Meye s, E.A. Ole sky, Spa k plasma sin e ing o an alum ca bide, Sc ip a Ma e . 63 (2010) 577–580. [16] V. Mamedo , Spa k plasma sin e ing as ad anced PM sin e ing me hod, Powde Me all. 45 (4) (2002) 322–328. [17] C.C. Jia, H. Tang, X.Z. Mei, F.-Z. Yin, X.H. Qu, Spa k plasma sin e ing on nanome e scale WC-Co powde , Ma e . Le e s 59 (19–20) (2005) 2566–2569. [18] J.M. C´ o doba, e al., Spa k plasma sin e ing o Ti x Ta 1-x C 0.5 N 0.5 -based ce me s: e ec s o p ocessing condi ions on chemis y, mic os uc u e and mechanical p ope ies, Chem. Eng. J. 230 (2013) 558–566. [19] J. Rod íguez-Ca ajal, R. Thie y, FullP o ILL. h ps://www.ill.eu/si es/ ullp o /, May, 2010. [20] J.M. C´ o doba, E. Chica di, F.J. Go o , De elopmen o mul icomponen -mul iphase ma e ials based on (Ti,Ta,Nb)C x N 1-x ca boni ide solid solu ions, Chem. Eng. J. 192 (2012) 58–661. [21] U.A. Tambu ini, S. Genna i, J.E. Ga ay, Z.A. Muni , Fundamen al in es iga ions on he spa k plasma sin e ing/syn hesis p ocess II. Modeleing o cu en and empe a u e dis ibu ions, Ma e . Sci. Eng. A 394 (2005) 139–148. [22] D.K. She y, I.G. W igh , P.N. Mince , A.H. Claue , Inden a ion ac u e o . WC-Co ce me s, J. Ma e . Sci. 20 (1985) 1873–1882. [23] D.K. She y, I.G. W igh , On es ima ing ac u e oughness o cemen ed ca bides om Palmq is c ack sizes, J. Ma e . Sci. Le . 5 (1986) 365–368. [24] W.D. Schube , H. Neumeis e , G. Kinge , Ha dness o oughness ela ionship o ine-g ained WC-Co ha dme als, In . J. Re ac . 16 (1998) 133–142. [25] A.G. E ans, E.A. Cha les, F ac u e oughness de e mina ion by. inden a ion, J. Am. Ce am. Soc. 59 (1976) 371–372. [26] K. Chang-Soo, Mic os uc u al-mechanical p ope y ela ionships in ungs en ca bide-cobal composi es, Doc o al Thesis, Ca negie Mellon Uni e si y, 2004. Publica ion N◦: AAI3146413; ISBN: 9780496075584; Ad iso : Massa, Ted R, h p://mimp.ma e ials.cmu.edu/~g 20/ heses/Kim_ hesis.pd . [27] Z. Guo, J. Xiong, M. Yang, C. Jiang, WC–TiC–Ni cemen ed ca bide wi h enhanced p ope ies, J. Alloys Compd. 465 (2008) 157–162. [28] A. Celli, A. Tucci, L. Esposi o, C. Palmona i, F ac u e analysis o c acks in alumina–zi conia composi es, J. Eu . Ce am. Soc. 23 (2003) 469–479. [29] S. Pa k, S. Kang, Toughened ul a- ine (Ti, W)(CN)–Ni ce me s, Sc . Ma e . 52 (2005) 129–133. [30] M. Fides, e al., TiTaCN-Co ce me s p epa ed by mechanochemical echnique: mic os uc u e and mechanical p ope ies, P ocedia Eng. 149 (2016) 87–93. J.M. C´ o doba Gallego In e na ional Jou nal o Re ac o y Me als and Ha d Ma e ials 128 (2025) 107094 6