scieee Open visual document viewer

Characterization of odour active compounds in strawberry vinegars

Úbeda Aguilera, Cristina; Callejón Fernández, Raquel María; Troncoso González, Ana María; Moreno-Rojas, J. M.; Peña, F.; Morales Gómez, María Lourdes

Abstract

Odour-active compounds in strawberry vinegars were determined by gas chromatography equipped with an olfactometer using the modified frequency (MF) technique. The initial strawberry substrate was also analysed showing that ethyl 2-methylbutyrate, mesifurane, β-damascenone, furaneol and γ-decalactone were preserved during the double fermentation process, presenting high MF values. The final aromatic profile of strawberry vinegars is formed both by compounds from the substrate and by those formed during alcoholic and acetous fermentation. Due to their high MF, a total of 12 odour zones, identified as acetic, butyric and isovaleric acids, methional, 3-nonen-2-one, 2-phenylethanol, pantolactone + furaneol, p-vinylguaiacol, sotolon, phenylacetic acid and vanillin, were considered as possible impact odorants of strawberry vinegars. Finally, all potential impact odorants with similar sensory descriptors were grouped into eight categories, these being: fruity, sweet, grassy, spicy, butter–lactic–cheesy, chemical, empyreumatic and miscellaneous. According to the MF percentage of these categories, grassy, fruity, sweet and spicy aroma seem to have the highest influence on the overall impression of strawberry vinegars.

Full text

1 Depósi o de in es igación de la Uni e sidad de Se illa h ps://idus.us.es/ “This is he pee e iewed e sion o he ollowing a icle: Ubeda, C., Callejón, R.M., T oncoso, A.M., Mo eno-Rojas, J.M., Peña, F. and Mo ales, M.L. (2012), Cha ac e iza ion o odou ac i e compounds in s awbe y inega s. Fla ou F ag . J., 27: 313-321, which has been published in inal o m a h ps://doi.o g/10.1002/ j.3103. This a icle may be used o non-comme cial pu poses in acco dance wi h Wiley Te ms and Condi ions o Use o Sel - A chi ed Ve sions. This a icle may no be enhanced, en iched o o he wise ans o med in o a de i a i e wo k, wi hou exp ess pe mission om Wiley o by s a u o y igh s unde applicable legisla ion. Copy igh no ices mus no be emo ed, obscu ed o modi ied. The a icle mus be linked o Wiley’s e sion o eco d on Wiley Online Lib a y and any embedding, aming o o he wise making a ailable he a icle o pages he eo by hi d pa ies om pla o ms, se ices and websi es o he han Wiley Online Lib a y mus be p ohibi ed." 2 Ti le: CHARACTERIZATION OF ODOUR ACTIVE COMPOUNDS IN STRAWBERRY VINEGARS Au ho s: C. Ubeda1, R.M. Callejón1, A.M. T oncoso1, J.M. Rojas2, F. Peña2, M.L. Mo ales1* Add ess: 1Á ea de Nu ición y B oma ología. Facul ad de Fa macia. Uni e sidad de Se illa. c/ P. Ga cía González nº2, E- 41012. Se ille. Spain. 2IFAPA Cen o Alameda del Obispo. A da. Menéndez Pidal s/n, E-14004. Có doba. Spain. *Co esponding au ho : e-mail: [email p o ec ed]; Tel.: 34-954-556760; Fax.: 34-954- 233765 Abs ac Odou -ac i e compounds in s awbe y inega s we e de e mined by gas ch oma og aphy equipped wi h an ol ac ome e (GC-O) using he modi ied equency (MF) echnique. The ini ial s awbe y subs a e was also analysed showing ha e hyl 2- me hylbu y a e, mesi u ane, β-damascenone, u aneol and γ-decalac one we e p ese ed du ing he double e men a ion p ocess, p esen ing high MF alues. The inal a oma ic p o ile o s awbe y inega s is o med bo h by compounds om he subs a e and by hose o med du ing alcoholic and ace ous e men a ion. Due o hei high MF, a o al o 12 odou zones, iden i ied as ace ic, bu y ic and iso ale ic acids, me hional, 3-nonen-2- one, 2-phenyle hanol, pan olac one+ u aneol, p- inylguaiacol, so olon, phenylace ic acid and anillin, we e conside ed as possible impac odo an s o s awbe y inega s. Finally, all po en ial impac odo an s wi h simila senso y desc ip o s we e g ouped in o 8 ca ego ies, hese being: ui y, swee , g assy, spicy, bu e -lac ic-cheesy, chemical, empy euma ic and miscellaneous. Acco ding o he MF pe cen age o hese ca ego ies, 3 g assy, ui y, swee and spicy a oma seem o ha e he highes in luence on he o e all imp ession o s awbe y inega s. Keywo ds: impac odo an , ol ac ome y, inega , s awbe y, modi ied equency. In oduc ion Because o i s wo ldwide a ailabili y and i s g ea a ay o a ie ies, inega is one o he wo ld’s mos widesp ead and common p oduc s. In Spain, inega is mainly p oduced by he double e men a ion (alcoholic and ace ous) o g apes. P esen , inno a ions in inega p oduc ion alls in o wo a eas: imp o ing p oduc ion p ocesses and employing di e en aw ma e ials. S awbe ies a e p ized o bo h hei a oma and la ou . Spain is he wo ld’s second la ges s awbe y p oduce . Since he e a e su pluses o second quali y s awbe y, his makes i an a ac i e candida e o use as a aw ma e ial in p oducing new kinds o inega s. A oma is ce ainly one o he mos impo an de e minan s in ood quali y and accep ance[1]. The e o e, when in oducing a new ood p oduc , he cha ac e iza ion o i s a oma is an impo an aspec o be conside ed. A oma is de e mined by a la ge numbe o compounds ha a e in ol ed in di e en ways. Among he abo e, odou - ac i e compounds play an impo an ole in pe cei ed a oma and especially, impac odo an s, ha di ec ly in luence in i . An essen ial ool when cha ac e izing he ol ac o y impac o an odo an (i s odou desc ip o and in ensi y) is he coupling o Gas Ch oma og aphy/Ol ac ome y (GC/O)[2]. Among he di e en ypes o ol ac ome ic analysis, he h ee main ones a e: dilu ion me hods, pe cei ed in ensi y me hods and equency o de ec ion me hods. The equency o de ec ion has been p o ed o p o ide quan i a i e es ima es o he senso y impo ance o a compound [3] and has e en been p o ed o be accu a e enough o 4 p o ide a eal quan i a i e da a[4], bu i s limi ed due o he ac ha once he concen a ion becomes highe han he less sensi i e membe o he panel, he signal becomes sa u a ed[5]. This limi a ion can be pa ly o e come by combining he equency o de ec ion wi h a simple measu emen o in ensi y, which also has been p o ed o p o ide eliable quan i a i e da a[6]. As concen a ion inc eases, odou in ensi y may con inue o inc ease, howe e he equency o de ec ion migh no inc ease when all membe s o he panel a e inally able o de ec he odo an [5]. The combina ion o in ensi y and equency o de ec ion can be done h ough he so called modi ied equency (MF) which is he geome ic mean o he de ec ion equency o an a oma ic zone (exp essed as a pe cen age) and he a e age in ensi y (exp essed as a pe cen age o he maximum in ensi y)[7]. This concep is use ul because he disc imina i e capabili ies o he de ec ion equency may be imp o ed by aking in ensi y in o accoun [8] and, mo eo e , because he membe s o a as ing panel can ha e widely di e gen sensi i i ies[7]. MF, he e o e, p o ides mo e eliable esul s. The ola ile composi ion o s awbe y has been he objec o ex ensi e s udy. The a oma o his ui is gene ally a complex mix u e o es e s, u anones, and e pene alcohols wi h smalle amoun s o lac ones, aldehydes, alcohols and sulphu compounds[9-16]. Among he abo e, u aneol and mesi u ane a e conside ed o be he wo majo la ou con ibu o s due o hei low odou h eshold and hei high quan i ies[17]. These compounds ha e been con i med in se e al s udies on he odou - ac i e compounds in di e en s awbe y a ie ies. In hese wo ks, he au ho s ha e iden i ied a conside able numbe o odou -ac i e compounds and hey ag ee on u aneol, mesi u ane and γ-decalac one as being impac odo an s in s awbe y[18,19]. In his wo k we ha e de e mined odou -ac i e compounds and he possible impac odo an s by GC-O in s awbe y inega s ob ained h ough double e men a ion. 5 Mo eo e , an ol ac ome ic analysis o he s a ing subs a e has been also pe o med o asce ain whe he he key odo an s o aw ma e ial emain in he inal p oduc s. Expe imen al Chemicals Dichlo ome hane and anhyd ous sodium sulpha e we e pu chased om Me ck (Da ms ad , Ge many), all o hem we e o analy ical quali y. S awbe y inega samples Vinega s analyzed in his s udy we e p oduced om second quali y s awbe ies o Cama osa a ie y. Fo ha pu pose, ui was c ushed and mixed wi h pec oly ic enzymes and sulphu dioxide. Besides, 50 g/L o suc ose we e added o ensu e an app op ia e inal acidi y in he esul ing inega . This s a ing subs a e (F8P2) was submi ed o wo ypes o alcoholic e men a ions, spon aneous and inocula ed wi h he yeas Saccha omyces ce e isiae QA23 a a concen a ion o 2x106 cells/mL. All esul ing wines we e spon aneously ace i ied by su ace cul u e. Thus, we ob ained wo di e en inega s: F8VI ( om inocula ed alcoholic e men a ion) and F8VE ( om spon aneous alcoholic e men a ion). Sample ex ac ion The liquid-liquid ex ac ion me hod was pe o med o ob ain a ep esen a i e ex ac o he samples[9]. The p ocedu e ollowed was: 5 g o anhyd ous sodium sulpha e was added o 50 mL o each sample and was ex ac ed wice du ing 5 minu es wi h 5 mL o dichlo ome hane using a magne ic s i ba . Then, 2.5 mL o he o ganic phase was concen a ed 5 imes unde a ni ogen s eam. Gas Ch oma og aphy-Ol ac ome y condi ions (GC-O) Analyses we e conduc ed using a Va ian 3800 GC (Middelbu g, The Ne he lands) equipped wi h a lame ioniza ion de ec o (FID) and an OP275 ol ac ome e (GL 6 Science Inc., Tokyo, Japan). Two mic oli e s o each ex ac we e injec ed in spli less mode in o a DB-WAX column wi h 60 m x 0.25 mm x 0.22 μm ilm hickness (J & W Scien i ic, Agilen Technologies Inc., San a Cla a, USA). The o en empe a u e p og am was as ollows: 40° o 1 min, inc easing o 220 °C a a a e o 2°C/min and held o 30 min. The column e luen was spli 2:3 in o a FID and a hea ed sni ing po . The injec o and de ec o empe a u e was 220ºC. The ca ie gas was H2 a a low a e o 1 mL/min. The senso y panel was composed o h ee ained as e s, all o hem sni ed each sample wice, assigning o each pe cei ed odou an in ensi y le el: 1, 2 o 3. Resul s we e exp essed as “modi ied equency” (MF), calcula ed wi h he o mula p oposed by D a nieks[20]. Gas Ch oma og aphy-Mass Spec ome y (GC-MS) condi ions Analyses we e conduc ed using an Agilen 6890 GC sys em coupled o an Agilen 5975ine quad upole mass spec ome e and equipped wi h a Ge s el MP2 headspace au osample (Müllheim an de Ruh , Ge many). The analy ical column was a CP-Wax 57CB column o 50 m × 0.25 mm and 0.20 µm ilm hickness (Va ian, Middelbu g, The Ne he lands). The injec o po was hea ed o 220°C and 2 L o sample ex ac we e injec ed in spli less mode wi h a pu ge low o 70 mL/min and pu ge ime o 2 minu e. The ca ie gas was He a a low a e o 1 mL/min. The o en empe a u e p og am was he same employed in GC-O. Quad upole, sou ce and ans e line empe a u es we e 150, 230 and 250 °C, espec i ely. Elec on ioniza ion mass spec a da a om m/z 29~350 we e collec ed in he scan mode, wi h an ioniza ion ol age o 70 eV. Iden i ica ion o A oma Compounds In he GC-MS analysis, ola ile compounds we e iden i ied based on he compa ison o he e en ion imes o indi idual s anda d and compu e ma ching wi h he e e ence mass spec a om he NIST 98 lib a y. 7 In he GC-O analysis, compounds we e iden i ied by he compa ison o hei linea e en ion indices (LRIs) wi h hose ob ained in GC-MS analysis o ex ac and s anda ds as well as wi h LRIs and odou quali ies om Fla o ne (www. la o ne .o g)[21] and Phe obase (www.phe obase.com)[22] online da a bases and li e a u e[9,23-38]. Linea e en ion indices (LRIs) we e calcula ed on he basis o e en ion imes o n- alkanes (C10–C32) unde iden ical condi ions o each ins umen . S a is ical analysis All s a is ical analyses we e pe o med using S a is ica so wa e e sion 7.0 so wa e package (S a so , Tulsa, USA). A p incipal componen analysis (PCA) was ca ied ou as an unsupe ised me hod in o de o asce ain he deg ee o di e en ia ion be ween samples and which compounds we e in ol ed. Resul s and Discussion In his s udy, we only conside ed hose odou zones which we e de ec ed in a leas hal o he o al sni ing ials as odou -ac i e. The odou zones and hei co esponding iden i ica ion a e lis ed in Table 1, some o hem we e only en a i ely iden i ied (TI). Thus, GC-O analyses e idenced 79, 55 and 49 odou -ac i e zones in subs a e, F8VI and F8VE inega s espec i ely. In he subs a e, he odou zones ha p esen ed maxima MF (100) we e hose which we e iden i ied as me hyl bu y a e (LRI 990, TI), isoamyl alcohol (LRI 1208), cis-2- nonenal (LRI 1504, TI), γ-decalac one (LRI 2150) , γ-dodecalac one (LRI 2382) and anillin (LRI 2564, TI). Some ha e been p e iously epo ed as impo an componen s in s awbe y a oma. Thus, me hyl bu y a e is one o he majo es e s p esen in his ui [39,40]. Acco ding o Gomes da Sil a and Cha es das Ne es[41], p ominen lac ones we e γ-decalac one and γ–dodecalac one, gi ing ui y no es. Cis-2-nonenal has been desc ibed as a equen odo an p esen in di e en s awbe y a ie ies[42]. On he o he 8 hand, he p esence o anillin among he a oma compounds in s awbe y has been sca cely obse ed by o he au ho s[43,44] and un il now i had been desc ibed as an odou -ac i e compound in one a ie y only [45]. As expec ed, u aneol (LRI 2034) and i s me hoxy de i a i e[46], mesi u ane (LRI 1594), he s awbe y componen s mos quo ed as cha ac e impac compounds, also eached high MF; 91 and 75, espec i ely. Wi hin hose odou zones which eached high MF, we can highligh hose ha we ha e en a i ely iden i ied o he i s ime in s awbe y such as 2,6-dime hylpy azine (LRI 1305), 2- u u yl hiol (LRI 1433), guaiacol (LRI 1881), 6,7-dyhyd o-7-hyd oxylinalool (LRI 1971), 4-e hylphenol (LRI 2183), so olon (LRI 2203) and e hyl hexadecanoa e (LRI 2270). The i s wo odo an s and so olon a e ypical compounds p oduced by he Mailla d eac ion[47-49]. The p esence o hese compounds may be due o he same o ma ion pa hway, since s awbe y has educing suga s as well as amino acids. Mo eo e , sni e s also pe cei ed some o -odou a ibu es en a i ely iden i ied as ola ile phenols wi h high MF: guaiacol and 4-e hylphenol. Se e al au ho s poin o hese compounds as o - la ou s in di e en ood ma ices[50,51]. Mo eo e , hey a e ela ed o ui con amina ion caused by di e en mic oo ganisms[52,53]. In addi ion o he abo e-men ioned compounds, we ound o he impo an odou zones wi h MF highe han 70, p o iding ui y no es, co esponding o ypical s awbe y es e s (e hyl bu y a e (LRI 1029) and e hyl hexanoa e (LRI 1234, TI)). Fu he mo e, we iden i ied linalyl ale a e/ci onellol (LRI 1766, TI) and ne olidol (LRI 2003) a ound his MF alue, gi ing g assy and ci ic a oma cha ac e s. Among he 38 odou zones wi h a signi ican con ibu ion o he a oma (MF>70), we we e, e en en a i ely, unable o iden i y ou o hem. 9 The compa ison o ol ac ome ic analysis esul s o subs a e and inega s showed ha a o al o 29 odo an s p esen in he s awbe y pu ee we e de ec ed bo h in inega s p oduced om wines whose subs a e had been inocula ed and hose which had been ob ained om spon aneous e men a ion. These odo an s we e, he e o e, p ese ed h oughou he double e men a ion p ocess. Mos o hem, howe e , p esen ed lowe MF alues in inega han in he subs a e due o he losses and ans o ma ions unde gone du ing he alcoholic and ace ous e men a ions[54,55]. The a oma ic p o ile o wine inega s is he esul o he pe manence o hose ola ile compounds om he aw ma e ial (g ape a ie als a oma), syn hesized by yeas du ing alcoholic e men a ion and hose o med du ing he ace ous e men a ion. The esul s showed ha a e he double e men a ion, some cha ac e is ic compounds o s awbe y[27,56] such as: γ-decalac one, u aneol, mesi u ane, β-damascenone (LRI 1821) and e hyl 2-me hylbu y a e (LRI 1040) we e p ese ed om he aw ma e ial o bo h inega s. Su p isingly, mo eo e , hey eached high MF alues. On he o he hand, he impac odo an s o s awbe y, e hyl bu y a e and γ- dodecalac one, we e only pe cei ed in inega p oduced om wine ob ained by inocula ion o he subs a e while me hyl bu y a e was pe cei ed only in inega om wine ob ained by spon aneous e men a ion. These esul s indica e ha he o e all odou imp ession o inega would e oke a oma ic no es o he aw s awbe y ma e ial used. Mo eo e , we obse ed he appea ance o odou zones, o an inc ease in he MF sco es o o he odou zones co esponding o compounds usually o med in ace ous e men a ion[9,57]. The e o e, a oma ic no es such as bu e (diace yl, LRI 970) and pungen (ace ic acid, LRI 1405), appea ed in he inega s. The cheese odou , iden i ied as iso ale ic acid (LRI 1669), inc eased i s MF (53 in he subs a e), eaching he 16 [31] Y. Wang, C. Finn, M. C. Qian, J. Ag ic. Food Chem. 2005, 53, 3563. [32] S. De e e, B. Rega, J. Dela ue, M. Decloux, M. Leb un, P. Giampaoli, Fla ou F ag . J. 2012, 27, 77. [33] S.S. Mahajan, L. Goddik, M.C. Qian, J. Dai y Sci. 2004, 87, 4057. [34] X. Du, C.E. Finn, M.C. Qian, Food Chem. 2010, 119, 1127. [35] A. Ba a a, E. Campo, M. Mal ei o-Fe ei a, V. Lou ei o, J. Cacho, V. Fe ei a, J. Ag ic. Food Chem. 2011, 59, 2543. [36] E. Campo, V. Fe ei a, A. Escude o, J.C. Ma qués, J. Cacho, Anal. Chim. Ac a 2006, 563, 180. [37] M.S. Su, P.J. Chien, Food Chem. 2010, 119, 923. [38] V. Fe ei a, M. Azna , R. Lopez, J. Cacho, J. Ag ic. Food Chem. 2001, 49, 4818. [39] C.F. Fo ney, W. Kal , M.A. Jo dan, Ho Science 2000, 35, 1022. [40] M.A. Hakala, A.T. Lap e elainen, H.P. Kallio, J. Ag ic. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 1133. [41] M.D.R. Gomes da Sil a, H.J. Cha es das Ne es, J. Ag ic. Food Chem. 1999, 47, 4568. [42] H. Ikeu a, N. Tsukamo o, K. Fukuha a, L. Xin-Xian, S. Yamashi a, S. Yui, Y. Inaba, M. Okimu a, M. Tamaki, Y. Haya a, In P oc. VI h In e na ional S awbe y Symposium, J. López-Medina (ed.). Ac a Ho icul u ae 842, ISHS, Leu en, 2009, pp 857-861. [43] T. Pyysalo, E. Honkanen, T. Hi i, J. Ag ic. Food Chem. 1979, 27, 19. [44] E. Ka kas, S. Ka kas, M. Koch-Dean, W. Schwab, O. La ko , N. La id, E. Ba , U. Ra id, E. Lewinsohn, Tu k. J. Ag ic. Fo . 2005, 29, 383. [45] K. Fukuha a, L. Xin-Xian; M. Okamu a, K. Nakaha a, Y. Haya a, J. Japan. Soc. Ho . Sci. 2005, 74, 300. 17 [46] N. La id, W. Schwab, E. Ka kas, M. Koch-Dean, E Ba , O. La ko , U. Ra id, E. Lewinsohn, J. Ag ic. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 4025. [47] T. Ho mann, P. Schiebe le, J. Ag ic. Food Chem. 1998, 46, 235. [48] I. Hwang, T.G. Ha man, R.T. Rosen, J. Lech, C.T. Ho, J. Ag ic. Food Chem., 1994, 42, 1000. [49] J. Sousa Cama a, J.C. Ma ques,M.A. Al es, A.C. Sil a Fe ei a, J. Ag ic. Food Chem. 2004, 52, 6765. [50] S. Vichi, A. Rome o, J. Galla do-Chacon, J.Tous, E. Lopez-Tamames, S. Buxade as, Food Chem. 2009, 116, 651. [51] C. Piza o, N. Pe ez-del-No a io, J.M. Gonzalez-Saiz, J. Sep. Sci. 2009, 32, 3746. [52] D. Gocmen, A. Els on, T. Williams, M. Pa ish, R.L. Rouse , Le . Appl. Mic obiol. 2005, 40, 172. [53] H.H. Jelen, J. K awczyk, T.O. La sen, A. Ja osz and B. Golebniak, Le . Appl. Mic obiol. 2005, 40, 255. [54] C. Bayono e, R. Baumes, J. C ouze and Z. Güna a. In Enología: Fundamen os cien í icos y ecnológicos, C. Flanzy (Ed.). Mad id: AMV Edi ions, 2000, pp. 137-176. [55] R. M, Callejón, W. Tes aye, M. J. To ija, A. Mas, A. M. T oncoso, M. L. Mo ales, Food Chem. 2009, 113, 1252. [56] B. d’Acampo a, P. Dugo, G. Dugo, L Mondello, J. Ch oma og . A, 2008, 1186, 123. [57] R.M. Callejón, W. Tes aye, M.J. To ija, A. Mas, A.M. T oncoso, M.L. Mo ales, Food Chem. 2009, 113, 1252. [58] M.L. Mo ales, G.A. González, J.A. Casas, A.M. T oncoso, Eu Food Res Technol. 2001, 212, 676. [59] S. Landaud, S. Helinck, P. Bonna me, Appl. Mic obiol. Bio echnol. 2008, 77, 1191. 18 Figu e Cap ions Figu e 1. Da a sco es (MF) (a) and a iable loadings (b) plo s on he planes made up o he fi s wo p incipal componen s (PC1 agains PC2). The compound names co esponding o he numbe o a iables a e loca ed in Table 1. Figu e 2. Con ibu ion o each a oma ca ego y as a pe cen age o he o al MF o odou zones ha migh be po en ial impac odo an s in a leas one sample. 19 Table 1. Odou ac i e compounds in s awbe y subs a e and ob ained inega s. LRI DB-Wax LRI CP-Wax o /and li e a u e Odou Desc ip o Odo an d Fa FMb Fa FMb Fa FMb Iden i ica ionc Subs a e Inocula ed Spon aneous 934 - s awbe y acid unknown - - - - 3 41 - 963 961e plas ic, syn he ic e hyl p opiona e - - 3 41 3 41 MS, OD 970 969[9];970[23,24] bu e diace yl - - 4 67 4 67 LRI, OD 990 990[21] s awbe y me hyl bu y a e1 6 100 - - 6 100 LRI, OD 1012 1012e; 1014[25] medicinal isobu yl ace a e 4 47 - - - - LRI, MS, OD 1020 1022[21] ui , s awbe y, pineapple me hyl iso ale a e2 6 71 - - - - LRI, OD 1029 1029e;1032[24] banana, s awbe y, soap e hyl bu y a e3 5 75 5 53 - - LRI, MS, OD 1040 1040e,1041[26] banana, ui e hyl 2-me hylbu y a e4 6 82 6 58 6 82 LRI, MS, OD 1055 1055e,1056[26] ui , s awbe y, banana e hyl iso ale a e 4 67 3 41 3 41 LRI, MS, OD 1066 1067[22];1069[27] me allic, ubbe , swea hexanal5 5 75 - - - - LRI 1069 - oas ed b ead, co ee unknown6 5 75 - - - - - 1083 1083e,1084[9,28] ubbe , swea , la ex isobu anol 4 67 - - - - LRI, MS, OD 1105 1105e banana isoamyl ace a e 3 41 - - - - MS, OD 1144 1146e,1145[21] /1145[21] boiled po a o, ege able, g ass 1-bu anol/my cene7 6 82 3 58 3 41 LRI, MS, OD/ LRI, OD 1166 1169[29] g een, plas ic, ubbe , limonene 3 41 - - - - LRI, OD 1183 1181[30]/1185[25] swee , medicinal, aspi in me hyl hexanoa e/e hyl 3- me hylpen anoa e 4 47 - - - - LRI, OD 1208 1205,1208[21]; 1212e ancid, ubbe , chemical isoamyl alcohols(2-me hyl-1- bu anol+3-me hyl-1-bu anol)8 6 100 4 47 6 58 LRI, MS, OD 1220 1220[21] plas ic 2-hexenal 4 67 - - - - LRI, OD 1224 - chicken, cooked, syn he ic, ege able unknown - - 3 41 - - - 20 1234 1230e,1240[30] s awbe y, blackbe y, ci us, iole e hyl hexanoa e9 5 75 - - - - LRI, MS, OD 1247 - ege able, plas ic, lowe unknown 3 41 - - - - - 1264 1269[31] boiled po a o, boiled ege able α- e pinolene 4 58 - - - - LRI,OD 1289 - me allic, pain unknown - - - - 3 41 - 1302 1303[25];1306[24] plas ic, cooked ege able, me allic 1-oc en-3-one 5 53 - - - - LRI, OD 1305 1308[21] oas ed co n, boiled po a o 1-oc en-3-one+2,6- dime hylpy azine10 5 75 4 47 5 53 LRI, OD/ LRI, OD 1317 1315[25] ba becue 2-me hyl-3- u an hiol - - 3 58 5 53 LRI, OD 1327 1331[33] oas ed, chicken soup, dai y p oduc , plas ic 2-ace yl-1-py olidone - - - - 6 58 LRI, OD 1347 1345[21]/1345[21] ege able, g ass 2-oc enal/3-nonenal 3 41 - - - - LRI, OD 1350 1350[28]; 1355[34]; 1357e plas ic 1-hexanol 3 58 - - - - LRI, MS, OD 1373 1368[24];1377[34]/ 1377[21] g een lea , ish dime hyl isul ide/ ans-2-hexenol11 6 71 - - - - LRI, OD/LRI, OD 1391 - baked po a o, ege able unknown 3 58 - - - - - 1396 1394[25, 30]; 1396e baked po a o, mush oom cis-3-hexenol12 5 75 3 41 3 41 LRI, MS, OD 1405 1405e pungen ace ic acid13 - - 6 82 6 82 MS, OD 1419 1424[25] anise, swee , plas ic doll e hyl cyclohexanoa e 5 53 - - - - LRI, OD 1433 1436[25] oas , co ee 2- u u yl hiol14 6 82 - - - - LRI, OD 1435 1432e;1436[21] ui , s awbe y, lemon e hyl oc anoa e 3 58 3 41 - - LRI, MS, OD 1450 1449[35]/1452[25] baked po a o me hional15 - - 6 100 4 82 LRI, OD 1463 1568 s awbe y, banana, anilla, swee benzaldehyde - - 3 41 - - MS, OD 1500 - oas , bu ned, ho i on unknown 3 41 - - - - - 1502 - ege able, baked po a o, o ange unknown 3 58 - - - - - 1504 1502[35] oas ed, ege able, i e wa e cis-2-nonenal16 6 100 4 47 3 41 LRI, OD 1508 1511[36] i e wa e , apou 3-nonen-2-one17 4 67 5 91 5 91 LRI, OD 1535 1534e plas ic, ancid 2-(me hyl hio)e hanol 3 58 - - - - MS, OD 1560 1560[30] g ass, boiled g een beans, lowe linalool 4 67 - - - - - 1563 1563[21]; 1565e cheese, omi isobu y ic acid - - - - 4 58 LRI, MS,OD 21 1581 1575[21] iole , lowe , ege able, soap E,Z-2,6-nonadienal18 6 82 4 75 3 71 LRI, OD 1594 1584[22]; 1592e ca amel, swee , co on candy mesi u ane19 5 75 3 41 6 71 LRI, MS, OD 1611 - i e wa e , ancid unknown 3 58 - - - - - 1616 - cu g ass, i e wa e unknown 3 50 - - - - - 1619 1621[25] oas ed, peanu , ancid 2-ace ylpy azine 3 58 - - - - LRI, OD 1623 1623e; 1632[35] cheese, omi bu y ic acid 6 82 6 82 6 82 LRI, MS, OD 1648 1645[21];1647e i e wa e , ui compo e, swee , plas ic ace ophenone 3 41 - - 3 41 LRI, MS, OD 1669 1665[21] cheese iso ale ic acid20 5 53 6 100 6 100 LRI, OD 1692 1692e ui , lowe , plas ic, apou γ-hexalac one 3 41 - - - - MS, OD 1700 1702e; 1711[22] cu g ass, soap, plas ic, lowe α- e pineol 4 67 4 47 - - LRI, MS, OD 1715 1718e;1706[37] plas ic doll, anise benzyl ace a e21 5 75 - - - - LRI, MS, OD 1721 1720[21] min , lemon, ege able ca one 5 65 5 53 3 58 LRI, OD 1731 1731e;1738[38] plas ic, i e wa e me hionol 3 58 4 67 - - LRI, MS, OD 1740 - plas ic, bi umen, pneuma ic unknown 4 67 - - 4 58 - 1766 1765[21]/1762[21]; 1769[34] ancid, lowe , ci ic, esh linalyl ale a e/ci onellol22 5 75 - - 3 41 LRI, OD/ LRI, OD 1785 1784[21] min , plas ic e hyl salicyla e 3 58 - - - - LRI, OD 1810 - plas ic, peanu , ba becue unknown23 3 58 5 75 4 67 - 1821 1818[25] ui p ese e, quince compo e, oas apple -damascenone24 6 82 5 75 3 58 LRI, OD 1824 1823e;1829[21] min , lowe , jasmine 2-phenyle hanol ace a e - - 4 58 - - LRI, MS, OD 1836 lico ice, cu y, spicy unknown25 - - 6 82 - - - 1844 1838e;1842[21] plas ic, swea , dung, ancid e hyl dodecanoa e26 5 75 - - - - LRI, MS, OD 1861 1864[25] i e wa e , oli e, clo e, ba becue guaiacol27 6 82 4 67 4 67 LRI, OD 1877 1880e boiled po a o, me allic, min , iole benzyl alcohol 4 58 - - 4 58 MS, OD 1915 1916[25] ose, hyacin h 2-phenyle hanol28 5 53 6 71 5 75 LRI, MS, OD 1919 1920e coconu , swee hyd oxycinnamyl ace a e - - 3 41 - - MS, OD 1926 - cu g ass, lima beans, gasoline unknown 29 5 75 - - - - - 1941 - chamomile, u ine unknown - - 4 67 - - - 1957 - lemon, baked po a o unknown 3 41 - - - - - 22 1967 1967[34] ipe ui , quince compo e, oas apple δ-oc alac one - - 4 47 - - LRI, OD 1971 1972e lemon, washing powde , g een beans, g ass 6,7-dihyd o-7-hyd oxylinalool30 6 82 - - - - MS 1988 - ca amel, me allic, swee , honey unknown 3 41 - - 4 58 - 2003 2009[21]/2006[27]; 2010[22] soap, ege able ans-ne olidol/cis-ne olidol31 5 75 3 41 - - LRI, MS, OD 2034 2034e;2033[21]/ 2033[33] co on candy, ca amel, quince pan olac one+ u aneol32 6 91 6 100 5 75 LRI, MS, OD 2054 - swea , g ass, s agnan wa e unknown 33 5 75 - - - - - 2064 - g een beans, baked po a o, ancid oil unknown34 5 75 - - - - - 2085 2084[35]/2091[25] empe a, bu ned plas ic p/m-c esol 35 - - 5 75 - - LRI, OD 2150 2157e;2165[38] ui , blackbe y, peach γ-decalac one36 6 100 6 100 4 67 LRI, MS, OD 2155 - men hola ed unknown - - 3 58 2 47 - 2167 2170e; 2159[28]; 2176[25] clo e, sponge cake eugenol37 6 82 3 41 - - LRI, MS, OD 2183 2182[35]; 2185[25] empe a, cucumbe 4-e hylphenol38 4 75 5 75 3 58 LRI, OD 2196 2198[21] coconu , clo e, oas ed p- inylguaiacol39 4 75 6 82 5 91 LRI, OD 2203 2203[22]; 2204[25] lico ice, cu y so olon40 3 71 6 82 4 82 LRI, OD 2219 2216[22] liquo δ-decalac one41 - - - - 3 71 LRI, MS, OD 2230 2223[21]/2234[38] g ass, banana, ui , honey o-aminoace ophenone - - 3 41 3 58 LRI, OD 2241 2247[21] spice, coconu , lowe , oas ege able abhexone42 4 67 5 75 3 58 LRI, OD 2270 2269e empe a, ba becue, bu ned plas ic e hyl hexadecanoa e43 4 75 5 75 - - MS, OD 2319 - min , lemon, oo hpas e, ui unknown 4 47 3 58 3 58 - 2382 2384[21]; 2385e apple, ap ico , s awbe y, swee , milk γ –dodecalac one 44 6 100 4 58 - - LRI,MS, OD 2396 - banana, lowe , clo e unknown 4 47 - - 3 58 - 2437 2426[21] i e wa e , clo e, spicy, ba becue δ –dodecalac one45 4 82 6 58 - - LRI, OD 2455 2452e swee , cinnamon couma an - - 4 58 - - MS, OD 2490 - plas ic, bleach, ancid unknown 4 67 - - - - - 2545 - swee , coconu unknown - - 4 67 - - - 2556 2251[21];2553e[37] ose, honey phenylace ic acid46 4 75 6 100 5 91 LRI, OD 2564 2569[22] anilla, ca amel anillin47 6 100 5 75 4 75 LRI, OD 23 2600 2598[21] honey, anilla me hyl anilla e - - 3 58 - - LRI, OD 2636 - Compo e, banana, s awbe y unknown 3 41 - - - - - 2644 2640[21] honey ace o anillone - - 3 71 - - LRI, OD aF: F equency o occu ence bMF: Modi ied equency. cLRI: Inden i ied by Lineal Re en ion Index; MS: Iden i ied by ma ching mass spec a o GC-MS analysis o ex ac wi h hose om he NIST 98 lib a y; OD: Odou desc ip o . dCo esponding numbe o his compound in Figu e 1. eLRI in column CP-Wax 57CB o compound iden i ied by GC-MS. 24 Figu e 1a Subs a e Inocula ed Spon aneous -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 Fac o 1: 73,42% -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Fac o 2: 26,58% 25 Figu e 1b 1, 4 3 8,10 15 18 19 13,17,20,40 22 23 28 31 32 35 37 39 41 42 43 46 -1,5 -1,0 -0,5 0,0 0,5 1,0 1,5 Fac o 1 : 73,42% -1,5 -1,0 -0,5 0,0 0,5 1,0 1,5 Fac o 2 : 26,58% 36 27,29,30,33,34,47 2,5,6,9,11,12,14,21,26 16 45 24 45 7 38 25