Point-of-sale loyalty analysis considering store environment (online and offline) and recency of purchase

480 R. Bras. Gest. Neg., São Paulo, v.25, n.4, p.480-497, out./dez. 2023 REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE GESTÃO DE NEGÓCIOS ISSN 1806-4892 e-ISSN 1983-0807 © FECAP RBGN 480 Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios https://doi.org/10.7819/rbgn.v25i4.4246 Received on: Jan/30/2023 Approved on: Oct/10/2023 Responsible editor: Prof. Dr. Francisco José Liébana Reviewers: Monica Cortiñas; Luis Callarisa Evaluation process: Double Blind Review This article is open data Point-of-sale loyalty analysis considering store environment (online and offline) and recency of purchase María Victoria Hermenegildo-Chávez1  David Martín-Ruiz2  Francisco Javier Rondán-Cataluña2  Abstract Purpose – First, to test our comparative model of online and offline purchase behavior; and second, to investigate whether recency moderates the model’s relationships in different time periods. Theoretical framework – This study is framed by Garbarino and Johnson’s (1999) theory of the roles of satisfaction, trust, and commitment. Design/methodology/approach – The sample consists of 768 purchases of products/services by Peruvian consumers. To test the hypotheses, we apply structural equation modeling based on covariance (SEM). Findings – The relationship between privacy/security of purchase and quality is stronger in an offline purchase than an online purchase, while the opposite is true for the relationship between quality and trust. Also, purchase recency moderates all relationships in our loyalty model. Practical & social implications of research – We focus this study on a Latin American country where recency of purchase is central to customer loyalty relationships. Originality/value – We provide a relevant perspective on point-of-sale loyalty in both offline and online environments, looking at the moderating role of recency of purchase (a variable that has been scarcely researched) in the context of a developing country such as Peru. Keywords: Loyalty at the point of sale, online channel, offline channel, purchase behavior, recency of purchase. 1. Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Departamento de Administración de Negocios Internacionales, Lima, Perú 2. Universidad de Sevilla, Departamento de Administración de Empresas y Marketing, Sevilla, España How to cite: Hermenegildo-Chávez, M. V., Martín-Ruiz, D., & Rondán-Cataluña, F. J. (2023). Point-of-sale loyalty analysis considering store environment (online and offline) and recency of purchase. Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios, 25(4), p.480-497. https://doi.org/10.7819/rbgn.v25i4.4246 481 R. Bras. Gest. Neg., São Paulo, v.25, n.4, p.480-497, out./dez. 2023 Point-of-Sale Loyalty Analysis Considering Store Environment (Online and Offline) and Recency of Purchase 1 Introduction In the early days of e-commerce, online stores competed with traditional stores, but technology and marketing strategies have impacted online shopping (Arce-Urriza & Cebollada, 2010). In addition, the use of mobile devices has transformed the shopping process and behavior, from a multichannel to an omnichannel consumer. For example, consumers used to look for lower prices by performing showrooming and webrooming shopping. Currently, the trend is boomerooming, caused by the COVID 19 pandemic (Palomino Pitaetal., 2020), which complicates customer loyalty, and there are differences in behavior between online and offline shopping. There is some literature comparing online and offline purchase behavior in a loyalty model, such as that of Shankaretal. (2003), but dynamic consumer behavior is forcing firms to develop strategies to retain customers and attract consumers with new purchasing habits (NielsenIQ, 2022). There are also few studies on recency of purchase, which plays a very important role in customer loyalty, since its derivative effects (in general) tend to decrease as more time passes from the moment of purchase (Farías, 2019). We consider Peru as the setting for this study, where the growth of e-commerce took off during the COVID 19 pandemic. This type of research has mainly been conducted in developed countries, and needs more attention in Latin American countries. The findings of this research will guide Peruvian companies to redesign their strategies and implement mechanisms to build customer loyalty over time. Following Bustamante (2015) and Martín Castejónetal. (2011), we designed a covariance-based loyalty model using SEM with the constructs: privacy/security, quality, trust, and loyalty (repeat purchase intention) at the point of sale. Thus, the objectives of the study are to investigate: 1) consumers’ point-of-sale loyalty according to their online and offline shopping behavior; 2) the performance of the proposed model considering the moderating variable recency of purchase. The main contributions of this study are: 1) to test a structural model of consumer loyalty by comparing behaviors in an online versus an offline purchase; 2) to investigate the influence of purchase recency on the model, a variable rarely addressed by academics; and 3) to contribute to the literature with a study referring to a developing country where e-commerce has taken off especially since 2020. The structure of the paper consists of developing the theoretical framework after the introduction, followed by an explanation of the methodology and the main results of the data analysis, and concluding with the discussion and conclusions. 2 Theoretical framework This work falls within the framework of the theory of the role of satisfaction, trust, and commitment in customer relationships, whose seminal work is credited to Garbarino and Johnson (1999). The value perception of a customer who makes online and/or offline purchases may vary with respect to the point of sale, with the following factors influencing their decision to choose a place of purchase: socio-demographic, psychographic, and behavioral. Also, recency of purchase can influence purchase behavior over time (Farías, 2019). 2.1 Conceptualization of research variables 2.1.1 Loyalty Cognitive loyalty is based on beliefs about the brand, while affective loyalty occurs when satisfaction is processed (Oliver, 1999). Conative loyalty (behavioral intention) is a recurrent positive affection towards the brand, which implies a commitment (strong motivation) linked to intention to repurchase. Intention is part of the attitude (affective loyalty) and may not be realized, but it must be converted into action (action loyalty) to build customer loyalty. Thus, affective-action commitment would lead to repurchase by the consumer (Oliver, 1999). Therefore, Aldás Manzanoetal. (2010) believe that it is necessary to use affective and conative loyalty to measure loyalty. 2.1.2 Recency of purchase Recency of purchase refers to the time elapsed since a customer’s last purchase at the time he or she is interviewed (Alet Vilaginés, 2020; Neslinetal., 2013). A customer will maintain the timeliness of a purchase if managers implement effective strategies to manage the “recent trap” (purchase recency dynamics) and allocate marketing resources effectively (Neslinetal., 2013). According to Alet Vilaginés (2020), this variable is used in RFM (recency, frequency, and monetary value) models, and adding the activation period variable (used to build purchase cohorts) moderates the RFMAP customer activation loyalty model, which is a priority for segmentation and marketing management in CRM (customer relationship management) systems. 482 R. Bras. Gest. Neg., São Paulo, v.25, n.4, p.480-497, out./dez. 2023 María Victoria Hermenegildo-Chávez / David Martín-Ruiz / Francisco Javier Rondán-Cataluña Likewise, Handojoetal. (2023) propose the MLRFM (Multi Layer Recency, Frequency, and Monetary) approach as an extension of the RFM approach by adding several layers. Each time period is divided into multiple layers, segmented by customer purchase recency, and in each layer, each variable is analyzed; justified by the fact that old customers buy less or stopped buying. Peasleyetal. (2021) apply the moderating variables primacy and timeliness and investigate how customer experience and (unfavorable) corporate social responsibility reputation affect the customer-firm relationship. In turn, Wuetal. (2018), in their study applied to the online ticketing market, propose a Bayesian method to quantify the short and long-term effectiveness of email marketing campaigns in relation to customer characteristics such as length of purchase history, recency of purchase, average ticket price and number, and number of purchases by gender, variables that affect the customer purchase rate. In this study, we found a strong positive interaction between the e-mail offer and purchase recency, with the offer serving as an effective catalyst to attract customers back. Therefore, purchase recency is gaining importance in marketing and management, as well as in other fields (Farías, 2019). 2.1.3 Privacy/security Privacy is the guarantee that only authorized persons will have access to the necessary data, while security is the protection of information and is especially important in the online context (Cristóbal Fransi & Marimon Viadiu, 2011), since a high level of security must be provided in the use of information. For this purpose, the use of tools such as fingerprints, passwords, facial recognition, and others is essential (Medina Quinteroetal., 2022). Thus, security/privacy is the security of credit card payments and the privacy of shared information. Therefore, the perceived risk should be reduced by protecting the user’s personal information, providing transaction security, and improving the level of service (Yuwenetal., 2022). 2.1.4 Service quality Conceptually, service quality and satisfaction are considered as attitudes (Van Birgelenetal., 2002), where perceived service quality is the difference between the service received by customers and their expectations. Similar to overall satisfaction (Angamarca Izquierdoetal., 2019), it is reflected in customers’ agreement or disagreement. In the online environment and social context, the source of products must be guaranteed, product categories must be expanded, and improvements in the design and interactivity of the platform must be implemented (Yuwenetal., 2022). In addition, value for money, correct delivery, and detailed product/service information should be provided (San Martín & Camarero, 2010). Therefore, companies should focus on improving online service quality as it is the main key to long-term competitive advantage (Sharma, 2017). 2.1.5 Trust Trust is vital in a future relationship because it is the confidentiality (reliability and integrity) between the parties (Morgan & Hunt, 1994). Two components define trust at the point of sale: 1) cognitive: this is a feeling of trustworthiness provided by the point of sale; 2) behavioral: this is the intention to continue trusting the point of sale. The risk of economic transactions is higher in the online environment than temporary transactions, so perceived trust (driven by factors such as e-commerce reputation and capability) is a priority for a trusting relationship between e-commerce and consumers (Yuwenetal., 2022). 2.2 Proposed model In this section, we develop the model and the hypotheses of the study. 2.2.1 Offline vs. online shopping behavior and recency Customer behavior in online shopping differs from traditional shopping behavior because of differences in brand, price, and other product/service attributes. Also, perceived quality is different in both channels and overall satisfaction is higher in the online shopping environment than offline (Shankaretal., 2003). Consumers of a fashion retailer prefer to shop offline (online) when their perceived affective commitment to the shopping situation is high (low) (Jebarajakirthyetal., 2021). Therefore, the following proposition is presented: P1. The purchase channel (offline vs. online) significantly moderates the relationships in the model explaining revisit intention at the point of sale (POS). When considering recent purchases (versus older ones), in any product category, these provide fresher exposure to the information offered, as memory fades over time. Therefore, a customer of an older purchase loses information 483 R. Bras. Gest. Neg., São Paulo, v.25, n.4, p.480-497, out./dez. 2023 Point-of-Sale Loyalty Analysis Considering Store Environment (Online and Offline) and Recency of Purchase about the reasons for that purchase (Farías, 2019), which reduces their behavioral perception. This leads us to the following proposition: P2. Recency of purchase (RP) significantly moderates the model relationships explaining revisit intention in the POS. 2.2.2 Conceptual model Figure1 shows the conceptual model analyzed in this study. 2.2.2.1 Privacy/security of purchase and service quality Recent studies show the impact of privacy/ security on service quality. For example, in ready-to-eat food outlets in sub-Saharan Africa, where the risk of disease transmission is high due to non-compliance with food safety standards, service performance and perceived safety must be ensured to achieve customer satisfaction (Shum & Ghosh, 2022; Parikhetal., 2022). Likewise, in the tourism sector, service quality directly and significantly depends on tourism security (Ruíz Ríos & Tello Reátegui, 2016); and in e-banking, improving reliability and privacy also impacts perceived service quality (Hernández Soriano & Cristóbal Fransi, 2016). Consequently, privacy/security of purchase increases the service quality of the POS. H1. Privacy/security of purchase positively influences POS service quality. 2.2.2.2 Privacy/security of purchase and trust Security is relevant because consumers perceive that online shopping involves higher risk, and to enhance online shopping, it is necessary to ensure transaction security and data privacy (security/privacy) in order to increase the trust of customers making online purchases (Miaoetal., 2022). According to San Martín and Camarero (2010), security is the most important psychological factor in fostering trust in online shopping. Therefore, there is a positive relationship between privacy and the level of trust of consumers who make online purchases (Miaoetal., 2022; Liuetal., 2005). Likewise, there is a positive effect of privacy and security on trust, which is greater in online purchases than offline (San Martín & Camarero, 2010). H2. Privacy/security of purchase positively influences trust in the POS. 2.2.2.3 Service quality and trust The relationship between service quality and trust has been demonstrated in multiple fields of study. In the field of organic food, consumer trust in producers is achieved through perceived quality (Ladwein & Sánchez Romero, 2021), in agreement with Correia Loureiro and Miranda González (2010) in the health context, and with San Martín and Camarero (2010) in other fields. Specifically, website quality and information (Aslametal., 2020) have a positive effect on trust in the company and the loyalty of consumers who make online purchases. H3. Service quality positively influences trust in the POS. 2.2.2.4 Service quality and loyalty High service quality means a higher level of customer satisfaction, with a high tendency to remain loyal to the organization. Thus, service improvement influences customer loyalty (Giao & Vuong, 2021; Shafiee & Bazargan, 2018). In the online environment, for Aslametal. (2020), website quality has a strong positive influence on customer loyalty. Therefore, service quality positively impacts customer loyalty (Giao & Vuong, 2021). H4. Service quality positively influences loyalty to the POS.Figure 1. Conceptual model 484 R. Bras. Gest. Neg., São Paulo, v.25, n.4, p.480-497, out./dez. 2023 María Victoria Hermenegildo-Chávez / David Martín-Ruiz / Francisco Javier Rondán-Cataluña 2.2.2.5 Trust and loyalty Vargas Rochaetal. (2020) examine the relationship between trust/expectations or trust/recovery of services on brand loyalty. Their findings indicate that the influence is very weak for both relationships. However, in e-commerce and goods/services transaction systems, trust and reputation are essential to support the perceived transparency, credibility, reliability, and intrinsic quality of the information (García-Avilésetal., 2014). Likewise, in e-banking, loyalty plays a fundamental role, resulting from the influence of trust and information quality (Medina Quinteroetal., 2022), as well as in the online sale of airline tickets (Aldás Manzanoetal., 2010). In the traditional context, oriented and ethical sales increase the level of customer satisfaction and trust, leading to loyalty (Martín Castejónetal., 2011). Consequently, trust has a positive effect on customer repurchase intention. H5. Trust positively influences loyalty to the POS. 3 Methodology This research has a non-experimental, exploratory, descriptive, correlational, explanatory, and cross-sectional design. The study refers to the last purchase made by the consumer and focuses on the channel (offline or online) in which the purchase was made, even if the decision was made and the search was initiated in a channel other than the one in which the purchase was made. This does not exclude omnichannel consumers, consumers who use webrooming, or those with a tendency for boomerooming (online search, offline visit, online purchase) or offline search, online visit, offline purchase. To complete the questionnaires, personal interviews were conducted with consumers who made purchases in physical stores. The questionnaire was promoted online (Facebook, email, Instagram) for participants who made online purchases, who had to refer to their last purchase; accordingly we classified the form of purchase as online or offline. For the variable recency of purchase, they were asked the category and the number of days elapsed from the purchase to the moment of the interview (see Appendix A - Measurement scale). The information was collected in early 2019 and we applied non-random sampling to consumers in Peru (in La Libertad and Lima), through face-to-face interviews and online questionnaires. The samples of consumers who made offline and online purchases are 614 and 154 (Appendix B shows socio-demographic characteristics), respectively, considering four categories of products/ services (Supplementary Data 1). The categories “IT” (including electronic products) and “travel” (including transportation tickets) are of high involvement in the Peruvian context, according to Becerra (2020) and ComexPerú (2022), respectively. These categories have the highest frecuencies, with 491 and 165, respectively, followed by the categories “household appliances” and “clothing” with a frequency of 56 each (see Appendix C), which are purchase categories that are generally spaced out in time. Therefore, the response in different periods would not be biased according to the product category, since the purchases analyzed were of products with high or medium involvement and low purchase frequency. Thus, we investigated the relationship between the constructs of privacy/security of purchase (PSPOS), service quality (SQPOS), trust (TPOS), and loyalty (repeat purchase intention - RPIPOS) considered in our conceptual model and measured by the perception of the POS. For this purpose, we worked with the covariance-based SEM methodology, which uses causal models and covariance analysis using maximum likelihood estimation. SPSS AMOS version 27 software was used to analyze the full model. We also ran two multigroup analyses: 1) using the environment (ET) as a moderating variable of the relationships in our model, analyzing the differences of the model tested for online vs. offline purchases; 2) testing whether RP influences the results of the relationships studied. We used the 33.3% and 66.7% percentiles to classify the information into three periods: PER1, PER2, and PER3 (from the most recent to the furthest time since the customer made the purchase, eliminating eight outliers, considered as greater than 365 days, so as not to bias the results of PER3), with observations less than or equal to 19 days, greater than 19 and less than or equal to 59 days, and greater than 59 days, with 246, 260, and 254 respondents, respectively (Table1). Finally, we compared the differences between similar pairs (a pair refers to two correlated constructs of the structural model, with each pair assigned a number according to the sample) to determine if there were significant differences between the relationships in the multigroup analyses considering first ET and then RP. 485 R. Bras. Gest. Neg., São Paulo, v.25, n.4, p.480-497, out./dez. 2023 Point-of-Sale Loyalty Analysis Considering Store Environment (Online and Offline) and Recency of Purchase 4 Results 4.1 Measurement model The covariances between the constructs of the model vary between 0.45 and 0.56, and the loadings of the items vary between 0.70 and 0.88, with the exception of one loading value of 0.69, which is close to the acceptable limit, since 0.7 is the minimum recommended value (Chin, 1998), although at the beginning of scale development less than 0.7 can be accepted. The SQPOS and TPOS constructs consist of four items each, PSPOS of three items, and RPIPOS of two items, confirming convergent validity. The goodness of fit indices for the online/offline shopping sample are: PCMIN/DF = 4.556; GFI = 0.950; AGFI = 0.922; CFI = 0.966, over 0.9; and RMSEA = 0.068, close to 0.06 (Hu & Bentler, 1999). Nunnally and Bernstein (1994) consider Cronbach’s alpha as a measure of internal consistency with a minimum value of 0.70, which was met in all scenarios (Table2), thus confirming the validity of the scale. For discriminant validity (Table2), the constructs in our model have an AVE ≥ 0.536, except for the value of 0.497, which is close to the acceptable limit. Table2 also shows a composite reliability (CR) ≥ 0.60, the minimum acceptable (Fornell & Larcker, 1981); and the correlation matrix and the square root of the AVE on the main diagonal. Table 1 Recency of purchase Purchase Recency of purchase (RP) Total PER1 PER2 PER3 Offline 220 202 187 609 Online 26 58 67 151 Total 246 260 254 760 Table 2 Scale reliability, discriminant validity, and composite reliability Offline/online sample - 768 observations Fα α CR AVE PSPOS SQPOS TPOS RPIPOS PSPOS 0.93 0.83 0.864 0.680 0.825 SQPOS 0.82 0.825 0.542 0.796 0.736 TPOS 0.90 0.899 0.691 0.714 0.803 0.831 RPIPOS 0.83 0.828 0.707 0.608 0.792 0.637 0.841 Recency of purchase sample - 760 observations Fα α CR AVE PSPOS SQPOS TPOS RPIPOS PSPOS 0.93 0.83 0.809 0.588 0.767 SQPOS 0.82 0.821 0.536 0.797 0.732 TPOS 0.90 0.881 0.642 0.715 0.803 0.801 RPIPOS 0.83 0.810 0.681 0.608 0.790 0.637 0.825 Offline sample - 614 observations Fα α CR AVE PSPOS SQPOS TPOS RPIPOS PSPOS 0.93 0.83 0.861 0.673 0.820 SQPOS 0.82 0.829 0.549 0.828 0.741 TPOS 0.90 0.904 0.703 0.756 0.816 0.838 RPIPOS 0.84 0.840 0.725 0.595 0.803 0.635 0.851 Online sample - 154 observations Fα α CR AVE PSPOS SQPOS TPOS RPIPOS PSPOS 0.91 0.83 0.866 0.685 0.828 SQPOS 0.80 0.797 0.497 0.642 0.705 TPOS 0.87 0.871 0.630 0.506 0.776 0.794 RPIPOS 0.77 0.775 0.633 0.612 0.716 0.610 0.796 Notes: Fα = overall reliability (considering 13 indicators); α = Cronbach’s alpha; CR = composite reliability. Fornell-Larcker criterion (under the main diagonal). The main diagonal: in italics, square root of the AVE. 486 R. Bras. Gest. Neg., São Paulo, v.25, n.4, p.480-497, out./dez. 2023 María Victoria Hermenegildo-Chávez / David Martín-Ruiz / Francisco Javier Rondán-Cataluña 4.2 Structural model and multigroup analysis For the offline/online shopping sample, the goodness of fit indices are: PCMIN/DF = 4.495, varying between 2 and 5; GFI = 0.950; AGFI = 0.923; CFI = 0.966; and RMSEA = 0.068. Therefore, we validated the structural model. Figure2 shows the results for the offline and online shopping samples (in that order), and their respective explained variances (R 2 ) vary between 0.47 and 0.69, and in the standardized loadings for the explanatory variables, 11 of the 13 items considered are greater than or equal to 0.7, and the minimum value is 0.64, confirming convergent validity; the latent variables are similarly measured by their indicators. Regarding the multigroup analysis considering ET, the result of the correlations and covariances between the respective pairs is zero (0), and the same occurs when analyzing with RP. Figure3 presents the structural model using RP (model segmentation variable) with results for samples PER1, PER2, and PER3, in that order. Table3 shows that all hypotheses except H5 are supported. Looking at Table4, according to the multigroup analysis using RP, for a confidence level of 95% and critical values of ±1.96, significance is met for all relationships: PSPOS→SQPOS, PSPOS→TPOS, SQPOS→TPOS, SQPOS→RPIPOS and TPOS→RPIPOS; for example for PSPOS→SQPOS, the correlations of PER1 and PER2 are 0.88 and 0.74, respectively, and the difference between the respective pairs P_11 and P_26 (comparing PER1 and PER2, where P_11 is the respective pair for the first period and P_26 for the second period, and corresponds to SQPOS←PSPOS) is -2.866, less than -1.96; similarly, the other relationships are compared and analyzed. Table3 also shows the results of the multigroup ET analysis, where the differences between the correlations between the constructs for the offline and online shopping samples of H1, H2, and H3 are statistically significant at the 95% confidence level and critical values of ±1.96. Figure 2. AMOS structural model using the ET variable (multigroup offline vs. online) Figure 3. AMOS structural model using RP (multigroup recency) Table 3 Results of multigroup analysis using ET Hypothesis Relationships Paths(1) Par(2) Paths(2) Par(3) Paths(3) DP Results of multigroup analysis Hypothesis result H1 PSPOS→ SQPOS 0.79 P_11 0.81 P_26 0.68 -2.557* s. Accepted H2 PSPOS→ TPOS 0.21 P_13 0.28 P_28 -0.04 -2.941* s. Accepted H3 SQPOS→ TPOS 0.63 P_14 0.59 P_29 0.80 2.128* s. Accepted H4 SQPOS→ RPIPOS 0.77 P_10 0.80 P_25 0.75 -0.773* n.s. Accepted H5 TPOS→ RPIPOS 0.02 P_12 -0.02 P_27 0.03 0.330* n.s. Rejected Notes: (1)Sample results - 768 observations; (2)Offline sample results - 614 observations; (3)Online sample results - 154 observations; *ρ ≤ 0.05. DP = critical ratios for differences between parameters; n.s. = not significant; s. = significant. For H1, P_11 and P_26 are analyzed, for H2, P_13 and P_28 are contrasted, and for H3, P_14 and P_29 are compared. We cannot conclude that there is a clear difference in behavior between online and offline shopping, so we only partially validate P1. Finally, in the multigroup analysis considering RP (Table4), the intensity of PSPOS→SQPOS, PSPOS→TPOS, and SQPOS→TPOS, as well as SQPOS→RPIPOS and TPOS→RPIPOS, vary over time since purchase. Consequently, there are significant differences in consumer behavior and we validate P2. 487 R. Bras. Gest. Neg., São Paulo, v.25, n.4, p.480-497, out./dez. 2023 Point-of-Sale Loyalty Analysis Considering Store Environment (Online and Offline) and Recency of Purchase 5 Discussion and conclusions We study a structural model and analyze variables at the point of sale and the influence of the moderating variables environment (online vs. offline) and recency of purchase on the relationships of our loyalty model (measured by repurchase). Factors such as trust and quality are treated as direct antecedents of loyalty, all in the context of a developing country, where this topic is largely under-researched. According to our findings, privacy/security positively influences service quality, in line with Ruíz Ríos and Tello Reátegui (2016) in the offline channel and with Hernández Soriano and Cristóbal Fransi (2016) in the online environment. Moreover, this relationship is stronger in the offline channel than in the online channel. Customers prioritize the security provided by the store when making a purchase or acquiring a service, perceiving the minimization of physical theft and/or phishing. Also, the guarantee of protection of their data and that these will not be shared would lead to: 1) consumers making purchases offline would first perceive that the design and ambience of the store is very appropriate, and then that the store meets the agreed conditions of quality and punctuality of delivery; 2) consumers making purchases online would first perceive that the store offers products/ services with very good value for money, and then that the information is comprehensive and well structured, and also that the conditions of quality and delivery times are met. Privacy/security positively influences trust, in agreement with Miaoetal. (2022) and Liuetal. (2005), and in our findings the impact is weak. Moreover, the influence of privacy/security is only shown in the offline channel and in the same way. There is no relationship between the two variables in the online channel, which contradicts San Martín and Camarero (2010). The guarantee offered by the store regarding the privacy of the customer’s information and that it will not be shared, as well as the security provided by the store when purchasing a product/service, would impact the customer’s perception that the store would honor its commitments to him/her, considering it honest. On the other hand, in the online channel, the fact that the store guarantees the protection of the customer’s data and that it will not be shared with other people, companies, or web links is not enough reason for the customer to perceive that the store would honor its commitments to him/her and that it is honest. Likewise, service quality has a positive impact on customer trust in the point of sale, in line with Ladwein and Sánchez Romero (2021), San Martín and Camarero (2010), and Correia Loureiro and Miranda González (2010) in the offline environment, and with Aslametal. (2020) in the online environment. However, the intensity of the relationship is greater in the online sales channel than in the offline channel. Thus, for the customer to trust the store (which would fulfill its agreed commitments due to its honesty and transparency), the following factors would be decisive: 1) in the offline channel: a) that the store offers products/services with an acceptable quality/price ratio; b) that the customer appreciates that the design is attractive and the equipment is adequate; c) that the store meets the conditions of quality and punctuality of delivery; 2) in the online channel: (a) that the customer perceives the store as having a very attractive design (structure, ease of use, and interactivity) and adequate Table 4 Results of multigroup analysis using RP Relationships Par/ paths (1) DP(1) Par/ paths (2) DP(2) Par/ paths (3) DP(3) Par/ paths (1) Results of multigroup analysis PSPOS→ SQPOS P_11 -2.866* P_26 -0.284* P_41 -2.848* P_11 s. 0.88 s. 0.74 n.s. 0.69 s. 0.88 PSPOS→ TPOS P_13 -2.426* P_28 -1.475* P_43 -3.640* P_13 s. 0.53 s. 0.16 n.s. 0.00 s. 0.53 SQPOS→ TPOS P_14 2.676* P_29 0.003* P_44 2.730* P_14 s. 0.33 s. 0.68 n.s 0.81 s. 0.33 SQPOS→ RPIPOS P_10 -2.695* P_25 0.096* P_40 -2.411* P_10 s. 1.00 s. 0.55 n.s. 0.52 s. 1.00 TPOS→ RPIPOS P_12 2.500* P_27 0.465* P_42 2.564* P_12 s. -0.18 s. 0.21 n.s. 0.24 s. -0.18 Notes: (1)Results of sample PER1 - 246 observations; (2)Results of sample PER2 - 260 observations; (3)Results of sample PER3 - 254 observations; *ρ ≤ 0.05. DP = critical ratios for differences between parameters; n.s. = not significant; s. = significant. 488 R. Bras. Gest. Neg., São Paulo, v.25, n.4, p.480-497, out./dez. 2023 María Victoria Hermenegildo-Chávez / David Martín-Ruiz / Francisco Javier Rondán-Cataluña technology; (b) that the firm offers products/services with a good quality/price ratio; (c) with less intensity, that the buyer finds sufficient and detailed information. Service quality strongly and positively influences customer loyalty. Thus, we agree with Giao and Vuong (2021) and Shafiee and Bazargan (2018) regarding the offline channel. Although in the online context Aslametal. (2020) claim that website quality positively and strongly influences service consumer loyalty because of the ease of obtaining information (Shankaretal., 2003), our findings indicate that the relationship is similar and strong in both channels. We disagree with Shankaretal. (2003), who state that this relationship is stronger in the online channel than in the offline channel. We justify this statement by considering that, regardless of the purchase channel, consumers would make the decision to return to the store to make a purchase, whether or not they had previously visited the competition, because of the ease of obtaining and understanding the information, which is comprehensive and accurate; and secondly, because of the excellent quality/price ratio of the products/services offered. In both contexts, trust does not influence loyalty at the point of sale, disagreeing with Martín Castejónetal. (2011) and Medina Quinteroetal. (2022), who state that trust positively influences the loyalty of consumers who make offline purchases, similar in the online environment (Aldás Manzanoetal., 2010). Factors such as the store being transparent, honest, and fulfilling its commitments are not very important for the customer to feel motivated and interested in purchasing a product/service again. Therefore, the behavior in an offline purchase is slightly different from in an online purchase at the point of sale, because the environment only moderates the relationships: privacy/security over quality, privacy/security over trust, and quality over loyalty. Finally, recency of purchase moderates the intensity of all relationships: privacy/security over service quality, privacy/security over trust, and service quality over trust. Similarly, it also moderates service quality and trust over loyalty at the point of sale. The most relevant factors for purchase recency that moderate the impact of privacy/security on service quality (e.g., the customer perceives the price/quality ratio of the products/services offered to be very good and is pleased with the store design) are that the store provides security for the purchase, followed by the guarantee that the information will not be shared with third parties through any communication channel, and the relationship between privacy/security and quality is very strong in the most recent period, decreasing imperceptibly over time. On the other hand, the effect of privacy/security on trust is moderate in the period closest to the purchase. The decisive factors for the customer to perceive that the store would honor its commitments to him/her because of its truthfulness and transparency is precisely because the store guarantees that his/her information will not be shared, and because it provides security when making a purchase. However, these two factors would not be enough to generate an impact on trust over time. Regarding the relationship between service quality and trust, the influence of service quality on the consumer’s perception that the store is truthful/ transparent (as well as honest) lasts over time, ranging from moderate to intense. Specifically, in the first period, what would influence trust are the good design, structure, and ambience of the store (as well as the timeliness of delivery). This factor influences with the same intensity in the following periods. However, the customer already perceives that the store offers products/services with an excellent quality/price ratio (second factor), an effect that could have been generated by his/her personal appreciation or by interaction with his/her environment. On the other hand, in the last period, the second factor has a strong impact on the perception of truthfulness/transparency of the store. If we add the moderating effect produced by the customer’s perception of abundance, structure, and accuracy of information on the products/services offered by the firm (first factor), a strong impact on trust is generated, where the WOM/eWOM effect could have been added. However, with respect to the relationship between service quality and loyalty, the intense (in the first period) to moderate (in the remaining periods) impact of service quality on the customer’s decision to return to the store to repurchase would be produced whether or not he/she consults prices, brands, or other attributes of the product/service required in the competition. This is because the customer perceives: 1) that the store provides ample and well-structured information about the products/services sold, which facilitates his/her search; 2) that the products/services are sold at a good quality/price ratio, which makes his/her purchase viable. Finally, regarding the relationship between trust and loyalty, the influence of trust on the customer’s decision to return to the store to make a purchase is not evident in the first period or in the remaining periods. 495 R. Bras. Gest. Neg., São Paulo, v.25, n.4, p.480-497, out./dez. 2023 Point-of-Sale Loyalty Analysis Considering Store Environment (Online and Offline) and Recency of Purchase APPENDIX B - Sociodemographic characteristics – offline/online sample – 768 observations Table A2 Frequencies of ET vs. sociodemographic characteristics Offline Online Frequency Percentage (%) Sex Female 325 72 397 51.7 Male 289 82 371 48.3 Age (years) Age ≤ 20 180 57 237 30.9 20 < age ≤ 26 206 56 262 34.1 Age > 26 228 41 269 35.0 Education Primary 3 0 3 0.4 Secondary 66 2 68 8.9 Technical/Baccalaureate 131 4 135 17.6 University 414 148 562 73.2 No studies 0 0 0 0 Employment status Student 276 86 362 47.1 Unemployed 23 2 25 3.3 Self-employed 107 13 120 15.6 Salaried employee 208 53 261 34.0 Pensioner 0 0 0 0 Housewife 0 0 0 0 Total 614 154 Note: Age was segmented according to the 33.3% and 66.7% percentiles. 496 R. Bras. Gest. Neg., São Paulo, v.25, n.4, p.480-497, out./dez. 2023 María Victoria Hermenegildo-Chávez / David Martín-Ruiz / Francisco Javier Rondán-Cataluña APPENDIX C - Product/service categories Table A3 Product/service categories Category Frequency Percentage Clothing 56 7.29 IT 491 63.93 Electrical 56 7.29 Travel 165 21.48 Total 768 100.0 Note: IT includes electronic products. 497 R. Bras. Gest. Neg., São Paulo, v.25, n.4, p.480-497, out./dez. 2023 Point-of-Sale Loyalty Analysis Considering Store Environment (Online and Offline) and Recency of Purchase Financial support: The authors declare that no financial support was received. Open Science: Hermenegildo-Chávez, María Victoria; Martín-Ruiz, David; Rondán-Cataluña, F. Javier, 2023, “Supplementary Data - Point-of-Sale Loyalty Analysis considering Store Environment (Online and Offline) and Recency of Purchase”, https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/PVIXIP, Harvard Dataverse, V1, UNF:6:gZAgnKIwfbAo3EOJ409Zgg== [fileUNF] Conflicts of interest: The authors have no conflict of interest to declare. Copyrights: RBGN owns the copyrights of this published content. Plagiarism analysis: RBGN performs plagiarism analysis on all its articles at the time of submission and after approval of the manuscript using the iThenticate tool. Authors: 1. María Victoria Hermenegildo-Chávez, Professor of Quantitative Methods, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima, Perú. E-mail: [email protected] 2. David Martín-Ruiz, Professor of Marketing, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, España. E-mail: dma[email protected] 3. Francisco Javier Rondán-Cataluña, Full Professor of Marketing, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, España. E-mail: ronda[email protected] Authors’ contributions: 1st author: Definition of research problem; development of hypotheses or research questions (empirical studies); development of theoretical propositions (theoretical work); definition of methodological procedures; data collection; literature review; statistical analysis; analysis and interpretation of data; critical revision of the manuscript; manuscript writing. 2nd author: Definition of research problem; development of theoretical propositions (theoretical work); definition of methodological procedures; data collection; statistical analysis; analysis and interpretation of data; critical revision of the manuscript; manuscript writing. 3rd author: Definition of research problem; development of theoretical propositions (theoretical work); definition of methodological procedures; analysis and interpretation of data; critical revision of the manuscript; manuscript writing.