The Role of the Web and Social Media in the Tourism Promotion of a World Heritage Site. The Case of the Alcazar of Seville (Spain)

Revista de Estudios Andaluces (REA) | Núm. 41, febrero (2021) | e-ISSN: 2340-2776. https://dx.doi.org/10.12795/rea.2021.i41 | © Editorial Universidad de Sevilla 2021 https://editorial.us.es/es/revistas/revista-de-estudios-andaluces https://revistascientificas.us.es/index.php/REA CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 47 DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12795/rea.2021.i41.03 Formato de cita / Citation: Foronda-Robles, C. etal. (2021). The role of the web and social media in the tourism promotion of a world heritage site. The case of the Alcazar of Seville (Spain). Revista de Estudios Andaluces, 41, 47-64. https://dx.doi.org/10.12795/rea.2021.i41.03 Correspondencia autor: [email protected] (Concepción Foronda-Robles) 47 https://dx.doi.org/10.12795/rea.2021.i41.03 The Role of the Web and Social Media in the Tourism Promotion of a World Heritage Site. The Case of the Alcazar of Seville (Spain) El Papel de la Web y las Redes Sociales en la Promoción Turística de un Bien Patrimonio Mundial. El Caso del Alcázar de Sevilla (España) Concepción Foronda-Robles for[email protected] 0000-0002-3632-2410 Department of Human Geography, University of Seville. Maria de Padilla s/n. 41004 Seville (Spain). Caterina Mondelli [email protected] 0000-0003-0623-0651 Post-graduate scholarship, Decree Rep. No. 171/2018 - Prot. 1494 of 18/10/2018, at the Department of Humanities and Social Science, University of Sassari (Italy). Donatella Carboni [email protected] 0000-0002-1050-3344 Department of Humanities and Social Science, University of Sassari, Via Roma 151. Sassari (Italy). Concepción Foronda-Robles et al INFO ARTÍCULO ABSTRACT Received: 30-08-2020 Revised: 25-11-2020 Accepted: 05-12-2020 KEYWORDS Cultural promotion Alcazar of Seville Tourism Web Social media The information and communication technologies have revolutionized tourism and the promotion of cultural attractions. They constitute a tool with which to enhance the cultural heritage and economy of a territory in the context of tourism innovation. The article aims to analyze the potential of the website and social media of the Alcazar of Seville—declared a World Heritage Site by UNESCO—in promoting tourism. The quality of this official website and social media was analyzed and evaluated through the 7 Loci model and the Nvivo tool, with weaknesses and strengths being identified. The analysis highlighted weaknesses in areas such as the content, which needs to be optimized, the impossibility of viewing the information in other languages, and the global management of the website and social media, which should be reviewed. The study also presents strengths, including excellent visibility and good positioning in the main search engines, links from the website to social media (Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and YouTube) and the adequacy of the time needed to download the pages. PALABRAS CLAVE RESUMEN Promoción cultural Alcázar de Sevilla Turismo Web Redes sociales Las tecnologías de la información y la comunicación han revolucionado el turismo y la promoción de atractivos culturales. Estas son herramienta para potenciar el patrimonio cultural y la economía del territorio a partir de la innovación turística. El artículo tiene como objetivo analizar el potencial de la web oficial y las redes sociales del Alcázar de Sevilla en la promoción turística, Patrimonio Mundial de la UNESCO. La calidad del sitio oficial y sus redes sociales fue analizada y evaluada a través del modelo 7 Loci y la herramienta Nvivo, identificando sus debilidades y fortalezas. El análisis destacó entre las debilidades, el contenido a optimizar, la imposibilidad de visualizar la información en otros idiomas y una gestión global para revisar. El estudio presenta fortalezas como excelente visibilidad y buen posicionamiento en los principales buscadores, enlaces a redes sociales (Facebook, Twitter, Instagram y Youtube) y que los tiempos para descargar las páginas son los adecuados. Concepción Foronda-Robles etal / REA N. 41 (2021) 47 - 64 48 © Editorial Universidad de Sevilla 2021 | Sevilla, España| CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 | e-ISSN: 2340-2776 | doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.12795/rea.2021.i41.03 1. INTRODUCTION The advent of digitalization has led to a profound upheaval in the structure of the tourism industry. The Internet, and in particular the Web, allows tourists to find information, to book, to access products and services, and compare tourism offers in an independent way, and thus put together a holiday (Hayles, 2012; Rossi, 2005). The new technologies allow tourists to express themselves: through Web 1.0 the dissatisfied tourist could only express discontent through confidential questionnaires or pre-established modules, whereas today (from Web 2.0 to Web 4.0) it can be done publicly, with reviews and comments being shared on specialized websites or hotel reservation portals, for example. Web 2.0 is based on three pillars: interaction, sharing and participation. The proliferation of new digital tools and social media, including PDAs and smartphones, provides online interconnectivity and the ability to offer specific new content, with the limitations (of time and space) of the traditional channel-based services being exceeded (Noti, 2013; Parra-López etal., 2012). Web 3.0 is characterized by the greater awareness, and consequent greater control, of users with regard to content, and the evolution of graphics from 2D to 3D (Mistilis & Buhalis, 2012). Web 3.0 is a “semantic web”, in which sharing is not only a sharing of information and syntax but a continuous sharing of meanings, of semantics (Kourouthanassis etal., 2015; Tavakoli & Wijesinghe, 2019; Villa, 2015). The advent of new technological factors is leading the network to the next evolutionary stage: Web 4.0 (Gustafsson, 2019). These factors are: ‒Augmented reality: Google Glasses and smartwatches have allowed real-time interaction with the Web, overlaying the world that surrounds us with the virtual network (Chung etal., 2015; Garau & Ilardi, 2014; Jung etal., 2018). ‒The new interfaces: home automation will allow us to replace the information related to the real world with that provided by or for our digital alter ego. This step is characterized by both the electronic devices that surround us and the Internet (Cumo etal., 2015; Fagioli, 2015). ‒Greater control of information: if the transition to an enhanced Web allows us to change a company, by contributing to the information on the network we can change the reality that surrounds us (Galvagno, 2015). The new technologies have revolutionized tourism, and nowadays any destination that wants to be competitive must continually update itself according to the wishes of the visitor. Moreover, tourists now look for applications that can enhance the traditional ways of visiting cultural tourism attractions and often have a desire to intensify the travel experience with interactive content (Battelli etal., 2017; Yousaf etal., 2020). Social media constitute one of the communication channels most used by the general public, which is why cultural heritage companies have assigned more funding to these new Internet advertising technologies. In the current market, the use of social media, blogs and image galleries allows the companies that manage historic monuments to get to their potential customers faster and in real time (Handley 2012; Vila & Vila, 2012). The benefits of having a personalised company website are obvious: the possibility of being connected directly to and obtaining information on or from the customer; reducing costs by eliminating intermediaries; and offering the buyer the convenience of purchasing the product or service directly from the comfort of home or a mobile device. Thanks to the Internet, it is both easier and cheaper to update information, adapt to different situations and change strategy according to changing circumstances (Peukert, 2019). Through social media, for example, users exchange information and opinions on products or monuments and museums. A company reading the various comments on social media or platforms like TripAdvisor can easily understand what does or does not meet the needs and desires of the tourist and so take steps to improve its image (Massarotto, 2011; Van der Zee etal., 2020). It is evident that a new concept of tourism promotion now exists. Today, heritage organizations assign most of their promotional budget to online channels and less to traditional guides or media. Tourist service operators must face up to the increasingly stiff and global competition and more than ever take into account Concepción Foronda-Robles etal / REA N. 41 (2021) 47 - 64 49 © Editorial Universidad de Sevilla 2021 | Sevilla, España| CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 | e-ISSN: 2340-2776 | doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.12795/rea.2021.i41.03 the satisfaction of the customer, who now has access to a wide selection of tools with which to look for the best offer (Battelli etal., 2017; Cozzi, 2010). The tourism and cultural attraction sector is hugely influenced by the Web and the new information and communication technologies. The new technologies make it possible to find solutions to problems related to the restoration or conservation and use of cultural heritage, as well helping to improve the management of cultural heritage and enabling the generation of economic development based on innovation (López etal., 2010; Ortega & Labella, 2018; Padilla-Meléndez & del Águila-Obra, 2013; Pallud & Straub, 2014). Therefore, the new technologies play a considerable role in this sector: they are an instrument for the promotion and enhancement of the cultural heritage and the economy of a territory. The contribution of the new technologies to the cultural sector provides an opportunity to preserve, project and spread an area’s cultural heritage more quickly and effectively than with traditional tools; any tourism attraction that intends to be competitive must constantly update itself with new technologies, and this is especially true of cultural tourism, which is a sector that relies on offering and receiving a great deal of information (Garau, 2017; Verdiani, 2011). The new technologies facilitate the sharing of cultural content, and so the application of multimedia and new technologies to the cultural heritage sector is a necessary condition to guarantee the development of cultural heritage without geographical boundaries. There are several technological solutions commonly adopted in the cultural heritage sector, among the most productive being audio guides, touch screens, interactive paths, virtual visits on portable devices, direct experiments and interactive installations. Thus, the new technologies have undoubtedly led to a greater quality of communication and an increased number of ways to visit a cultural attraction, and are applied in conjunction with the traditional tools still in use, such as explanatory panels and group guides (Bertacchini & Morando, 2013; Charitonos etal., 2012). The cultural tourist has gone from being a consumer of information to a generator of information on social media, in blogs, and so on, and actively collaborates by offering opinions on tourist destinations (Conti & Moriconi, 2012). The new cultural tourist is able to independently evaluate and analyze what is offered, without pressure from the tourism company, and prefers to consult the reviews and opinions of strangers, as they are in all certainty independent and therefore more reliable than a travel agency or tour operator (Ejarque, 2015). The new technologies improve the tourist experience and guarantee a return on investment for the tourist destination, having become key tools for the promotion of cultural heritage and establishing the profile of the visitor, at the same time as being very useful for the achievement of excellence in the cultural tourism destinations themselves (Caro etal., 2014; Tom Dieck & Jung, 2017). The international as well as the national tourist is increasingly attracted to culture and thanks to the new technologies can now learn more than previously about the cultural heritage of a territory. Technology used consciously to improve the visitors’ experience of a destination can become an important element of differentiation from the competition. The presence on the Internet of heritage organizations in the tourism sector and of associated entities has become increasingly important, because of which it is now necessary to invest first and foremost in a website, taking into account and evaluating all those aspects that determine its quality. There are several issues to consider when building a website capable of satisfying the needs of both the site owner and the end user, including the obligation to offer complete, adequate and reliable information, and the provision of all those functions necessary to guarantee for the user ease of access to and navigability within the site. As the Covid-19 pandemic spreads, millions of people in quarantine have sought out travel and cultural experiences in their homes. The culture was indispensable during this period, and the demand for virtual access to museums, heritage sites, theatres and performances reached unprecedented levels, despite the closure of more than 80% of UNESCO World Heritage properties. Sanitary confinement has demonstrated the importance of new technologies and means in daily life. For this reason, more and more digital solutions are being developed to create virtual tourism experiences. The aim of this study is to analyze the promotional strategy developed on the official website and on social media by the Alcazar of Seville. To this end, two specific aspects have been considered. First of all, the interventions and activities offered by the Alcazar are analyzed using the 7 Loci model. Secondly, the messages generated on social media are analyzed through a content cloud using Nvivo 11 software. Concepción Foronda-Robles etal / REA N. 41 (2021) 47 - 64 50 © Editorial Universidad de Sevilla 2021 | Sevilla, España| CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 | e-ISSN: 2340-2776 | doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.12795/rea.2021.i41.03 2. METHODOLOGY 2.1. Study area In the city of Seville (Spain), there is a UNESCO World Heritage Site (WHS)—so declared in 1987—consisting of the Cathedral, the Alcazar and the Archivo de Indias (Figure 1). These three buildings form a remarkable monumental complex in the heart of Seville, incorporating vestiges of Islamic culture, centuries of ecclesiastical power, royal sovereignty and the trading power that Spain acquired through its colonies in the New World. The three buildings enjoy the highest degree of protection that exists in heritage legislation, at both a regional and a national level, since they have been declared Properties of Cultural Interest in the Monuments category. The Alcazar of Seville sits on the southern edge of the historic city. The Alcazar is one of the oldest royal residences still in use in Europe. It is a military and palatial complex that consists of different palaces, urban defences and gardens (Tabales, 2010). The Alcazar comprises a group of buildings of approximately 14,000 m² and gardens that occupy an area of 70,000 m². It presents some specific features: it groups architectural ensembles and gardens from different artistic periods; it is considered the first civic building in Seville; and it faces the challenge of configuring a model of sustainable management and compatibility between public visits and events, tourism and the conservation of cultural heritage (Mínguez, 2012). The Alcazar is a place of interest for tourists, and manages to strike a balance between publicity and tourist visits and conservation, research and management. The World Heritage of Seville is an example of how cultural heritage is experiencing a remarkable change in dynamics as an engine of economic, social and tourism development (Fernández-Baca & Rodríguez, 2009). The Alcazar is accessible, with information boards throughout and an audio guide service for visitors. At the same time, complementary activities such as guided tours, temporary exhibitions and concerts are offered within the complex. Due to the beauty of its buildings and gardens, the Alcazar has been a source of inspiration for artists and thinkers over the centuries. In the 19th century it attracted numerous Romantic travellers and from the 20th century on it has become the setting for legendary films. The number of visits to the Alcazar has increased considerably, the inclusion of this monument in the WHS register certainly having had a significant promotional effect, and continues to grow, in part due to the dissemination of its heritage within the context of World Heritage Sites, but also due to the celebration of events and its use as a setting for TV series, the latter having made an important contribution to this increase. The number of visitors has risen from 1,085,647 in 2008 to 2,067,016 in 2019—190% over 11 years— (Figure 2). The Alcazar visitor profile is 24.5% groups and 75.5% individual visitors, with 40% being Spanish and 60% foreign (Troitiño etal., 2020). The COVID-19 crisis has left the city empty of tourists. Even so, the Alcazar has remained open, apart from during the period of confinement from March to June. The number of tourist visits has been well below that of other years, due to the reduced capacity imposed by the COVID-19 health and safety regulations: from January to August 2020, the Alcazar received 351,422 visitors (Seville Tourism Website, 2020). 2.2. Method In order to verify the effectiveness of the official website of the Alcazar of Seville as a tool for tourism and cultural promotion, we used the 7 Loci model (2QCV2-3Q). The 7 Loci model is so called because it incorporates the seven loci communes that Cicero introduces in his treatise “Rhetoricorum, seu De inventione rhetorica”, in which he expresses the principles of a good orison (prayer). In the model in question, the seven loci identify seven different elements that comprise a website and which must be taken into consideration when evaluating the quality of the site as a whole. Concepción Foronda-Robles etal / REA N. 41 (2021) 47 - 64 51 © Editorial Universidad de Sevilla 2021 | Sevilla, España| CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 | e-ISSN: 2340-2776 | doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.12795/rea.2021.i41.03 Figure 1. Map of the UNESCO World Heritage Protection Zone, consisting of Cathedral, Alcazar and Archivo de Indias, Seville (Spain). Source: UNESCO (2010). Concepción Foronda-Robles etal / REA N. 41 (2021) 47 - 64 52 © Editorial Universidad de Sevilla 2021 | Sevilla, España| CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 | e-ISSN: 2340-2776 | doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.12795/rea.2021.i41.03 ‒QUIS? In the first dimension, the identity consists of the elements that determine the image and communicate to the visitor the identity of the website, its owner and the organization that maintains it. The identity can be expressed through the use of brands, graphic features, and so on. This dimension requires adequate skills and sensitivity on the part of the webmaster in the field of graphics and marketing. ‒QUID? The content covers the information that can be expected to be found on the website and is evaluated in terms of coverage, accuracy, reliability and value. ‒CUR? The services included represent the set of functions offered by the website with which the site users’ aims can be achieved and the owner’s strategies supported. These services must be effective and guarantee the correct execution of the operations or transactions carried out through the site, as well as an adequate level of security. ‒UBI? This identification is determined by the set of characteristics that contribute to the visibility of the website and how easily it is found in the Web universe; it is not enough for it simply to be present on the Web for the site to be successful—it must be found. ‒WHEN? The maintenance carried out is focused on those characteristics of the website that guarantee its correct functioning and ensures that it is updated regularly and effectively. This dimension is related to all the aspects of a website, such as texts, animations, links, technologies, graphics, and so on. In addition to computer checks on the correctness of the code, the functioning of links and access to data, for example, the maintenance must be accompanied by an appropriate model of the times and specific objectives of updates to contents, services and other technological elements. ‒QUAMODO? Usability comprises all those factors that contribute to determining the user-friendliness of the website, such as navigation structure, information search aids, available languages, terminology, and so on. ‒QUIBUS AUXILIIS? The feasibility dimension incorporates the evaluation of both the financial situation and the human resources necessary for the design of the website and its subsequent management (Mich etal., 2003). Figure 2. Visitors to the Alcazar from 2008 to 2019. Source: Seville Tourism Website, 2020. Concepción Foronda-Robles etal / REA N. 41 (2021) 47 - 64 53 © Editorial Universidad de Sevilla 2021 | Sevilla, España| CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 | e-ISSN: 2340-2776 | doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.12795/rea.2021.i41.03 So that both the strengths and the weaknesses of the official website of the Alcazar—http://www.alcazarsevilla.org/—could be identified and understood, a decision was made to apply the 7 Loci model, as this model facilitates the identification of certain elements, the opportunely combined evaluation of which may lead to suggestions as to how the quality of a website may be improved. Moreover, the application of the 7 Loci model is relatively simple and does not require specific IT skills (Signore, 2005). There are several models available for website evaluation but we chose to work with the 7 Loci model as it is particularly adaptable to the tourism sector and allows the classification of all the features present on existing web sites, even on those that are very innovative. Among the most well known models for assessing the quality of a website, apart from the 7 Loci model, the following should be mentioned: the sectorial indices (Censis-Rur, 2002), Website Quality Features (Yang etal., 2005), Quality Principles for Cultural Websites (Mavromoustakos & Andreou, 2007; Rio & Brito, 2010), A Quality Model for Websites (Polillo, 2005) and Evaluating Web Pages (Biscoglio, 2007; Karkin & Janssen, 2014). The 7 Loci model can be used for different purposes: to compare sites, to deepen the evaluation of a site, to discover the strengths and weaknesses of a site, and so on (Kumar etal., 2017). 2.3. Tecniqhes The tool used was the NVivo 11 content analysis software for tourism and cultural promotion, and the work was carried out with the Ncapture plugin, which was installed in the Chrome browser. Interesting information was obtained on the publications of the Alcazar of Seville and the actions presented in its strategy. The research began in November 2017 and ended in June 2020. The contents under study are text and multimedia files—image, video and audio files, for example— taken from the official website (https://www.alcazarsevilla.org/), Facebook (https://es-es.facebook.com/ RealAlcazarSevilla/), Twitter (https://twitter.com/sevillaalcazar), Instagram (https://www.instagram.com/realalcazarvilla/) and YouTube (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC24bMHEFlmUNAgS7AaYHSjg). The authors analyzed 324 news posts from the Alcazar website, 1,867 Facebook posts, 5,049 Tweets, 216 Instagram posts and three YouTube videos. The data for 2019 are looked at in more detail those for the other years, and are grouped into the following categories: gardens, palace rooms, events and others. 3. RESULTS The promotion of the Alcazar of Seville has changed over the decades and consists of three stages. First, in the 1980s and 1990s, the opening days and hours of the monument were published in the form of announcements in magazines and newspapers. There were also fullor double-page spread ads to promote exhibitions and other cultural activities within the Alcazar complex. Second, since 2000 there has been an expansion in the promotion of the site, which began specifically in May 2000 when the annual magazine “Annotations from the Alcazar of Seville” was first published, this being both a scientific and cultural magazine and a promotional tool. Third, the Alcazar makes itself available for forums and programmes of an academic, cultural and educational character aimed at both promoting this cultural heritage site as a meeting and training space and increasing its presence on social media. The tour of the Alcazar follows no official itinerary. However, the Alcazar does offer a free map with 53 points of interest (Figure 3) and the opportunity to pay for the audio guide, which is available in eight different languages at a price of 5 euros; alternatively, a guided tour can be taken with one of the external guide organizations that can be found outside the monument. The Alcazar is a much visited cultural monument, so it is essential that its official website be efficient and well structured so that tourists who are visiting for the first time can find as quickly and easily as possible the desired information and services related to ticket booking and opening days and hours in order to avoid long queues, for example. The main results that emerged from the application of the 7 Loci model show a Concepción Foronda-Robles etal / REA N. 41 (2021) 47 - 64 54 © Editorial Universidad de Sevilla 2021 | Sevilla, España| CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 | e-ISSN: 2340-2776 | doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.12795/rea.2021.i41.03 positive identity for the website in question, content to be optimized, considerable problems related to ticket booking services, excellent location and visibility, management issues to be reviewed, especially as regards site maintenance, insufficient use, and feasibility appropriate to the type of website (Table 1). Through the 7 Loci model, the main characteristics of the website have been identified, which could be used in the future for making improvements to and ensuring better use of the website. The first dimension of the 7 Loci model, which is the identity of the website, identifies a recognizable and clearly visible logo—communicating the identity of the website—placed in the upper central part of each page. In the top right-hand corner of the homepage are located the logos of the various social media that act as links to the official pages managed by the Royal Alcazar Board of Patronage: Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and YouTube (Figure 4). The Alcazar’s promotion strategy is constantly expanding, from the most traditional techniques of monument promotion to promotion on the Web and the most advanced technologies, such as virtual reality or Seville World Heritage (Figure 5), a Web and mobile app providing information about the Cathedral, Alcazar and Archivo de Indias monumental complex, the latter service being increasingly demanded by the digital tourist (Mascort-Albea etal., 2016). On the official Alcazar website, there are several tools that offer visibility and cultural dissemination. Among these tools, some are official, such as the social media—Facebook, Twitter and Instagram—and others are unofficial, such as TripAdvisor. However, they all offer, albeit in different ways, visibility of the asset (Table 2). Table 3 displays the types of content found on social media. Since 2012, the news website has focused on providing information on the celebration of events and only publishes an average of 40 publications a year. Figure 3. Map of the Alcazar offered to visitors. Source: Alcazar de Sevilla (2020). Concepción Foronda-Robles etal / REA N. 41 (2021) 47 - 64 55 © Editorial Universidad de Sevilla 2021 | Sevilla, España| CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 | e-ISSN: 2340-2776 | doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.12795/rea.2021.i41.03 Table 1. Application of the 7 Loci model to the Alcazar website. 7 Loci Model Strengths Weaknesses QVIS Logo recognizable and clearly visible. No trademark related to the Seville or Andalusia brand. Direct links to social media (Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and YouTube channel). Lack of UNESCO World Heritage Site logo. Graphic appearance maintains consistency with the brand. — QVID General information on its cultural heritage, history, events, exhibitions, activities for children, and so on. No reference links to regional or municipal bodies. CVR Online ticket booking service. Booking services are not always guaranteed and queues at the monument are a problem. VBI Intuitive URL. — Excellent visibility and good positioning on the main national and international search engines. — Possibility of contacting the institution. — QVANDO — Slow information updates. —Proper operation of the site during maintenance and updating is not guaranteed. QVOMODO Graphic design for viewing the site from a smartphone and/or tablet. Available languages: Spanish, English and French (the latter only in the “Tickets” section). Clear menus, easy navigability, and site map. — QUIBUS AUXILIIS? Intuitive terms and symbols. — Time required to download the appropriate pages. — Source: Own elaboration. Table 2. Dissemination of content on the Alcazar of Seville. 2011–June 2020. Information Start date Visits Publications Web news March 2012 — 324 news posts Facebook January 2013 259,788 visits 1,867 news posts, 818 photos and 33 videos Twitter December 2011 6,249 followers 5,049 Tweets Instagram April 2017 7,362 followers 216 publications YouTube January 2019 94 subscribers 3 videos TripAdvisor May 2011 34,445 opinions — Source: Own elaboration. Concepción Foronda-Robles etal / REA N. 41 (2021) 47 - 64 62 © Editorial Universidad de Sevilla 2021 | Sevilla, España| CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 | e-ISSN: 2340-2776 | doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.12795/rea.2021.i41.03 REFERENCES Agostino, D., Arnaboldi, M., & Lampis, A. (2020). Italian state museums during the COVID-19 crisis: from onsite closure to online openness, Museum Management and Curatorship, 35 (4), 362-372. https://doi.org/10.1080/09647775.2020.1790029 Alcázar de Sevilla (2020, 25 de octubre). Alcázar de Sevilla. https://www.alcazarsevilla.org/ Ayuntamiento de Sevilla (2016, 15 de julio). App Sevilla Patrimonio Mundial. https://sig.urbanismosevilla.org/sevilla_patrimonio_mundial/?lang=en Battelli, E., Cortese, B., Gemma, A., & Massaro, A. (2017). Patrimonio culturale: profili giuridici e tecniche di tutela. Roma: Roma Tre Press. Edited Book. Bautista, S. S. (2014). Museums in the digital age: changing meanings of place, community, and culture. AltaMira Press. Bertacchini E. & Morando F. (2013). The Future of Museums in the Digital Age: New Models of Access and Use of Digital Collections, International Journal of Arts Management, 15(2), 60-72. Biscoglio, I. (2007). Quality Model for Websites: Theories and Criteria of Evaluation. University of California. Caro, J. L., Luque, A., & Zayas, B. (2014). Aplicaciones tecnológicas para la promoción de los recursos turísticos culturales. XVI Congreso Nacional de Tecnologías de la Información Geográfica, 938-946. http://hdl.handle.net/10045/46827 Censis-Rur (2002). Le città digitali, Rapporto 2001, Milano, Franco Angeli. Charitonos K.; Blake C.; Scanlon, E.& Jones, A. (2012). Museum learning via social and mobile technologies: (How) can online interactions enhance the visitor experience? British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(5), 802-819. https:// doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01360.x Chung, N., Han, H., & Joun, Y. (2015). Tourists’ intention to visit a destination: The role of augmented reality (AR) application for a heritage site. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 588-599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.068 Conti, E., & Moriconi, S. (2012). Le esperienze turistico-culturali: creare valore per i turisti culturali e gli stakeholders e valorizzare il patrimonio culturale della destinazione turistica. Il caso Marcheholiday. Mercati e competitività, 4, 7398. https://doi.org/10.3280/MC2012-004006 Cozzi, P. (2010). Turismo & Web. Marketing e comunicazione tra mondo reale e virtuale, Milano. Franco Angeli. Cumo, F., Garcia, D. A., Stefanini, V., & Tiberi, M. (2015). Technologies and strategies to design sustainable tourist accommodations in areas of high environmental value not connected to the electricity grid. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 10(1), 20-28. https://doi.org/10.2495/SDP-V10-N1-20-28 Del Vecchio, P., Mele, G., Ndou, V., & Secundo, G. (2018). Creating value from social big data: Implications for smart tourism destinations. Information Processing & Management, 54(5), 847-860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2017.10.006 Dieck, M. C.T., & Jung, T. H. (2017). Value of augmented reality at cultural heritage sites: A stakeholder approach. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 6(2), 110-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2017.03.002 Ejarque, J. (2015). Social Media Marketing per il turismo: Come costruire il marketing 2.0 e gestire la reputazione della destinazione. Hoepli Editore. Fagioli, M. C. (2015). Human Smarties: The Human Communities of the Future. Computational Science and Its Applications (ICCSA), 2015 15th International Conference, 57-61. http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/ICCSA.2015.14 Fernández-Baca, R. & Rodríguez, M.C. (2009). Patrimonio Mundial en Sevilla: Catedral, Alcázar y Archivo de Indias. Revista del Patrimonio Mundial, 53, 10-16. Galvagno, P. (2019, January 25). Web 4.0: quali differenze? https://www.posizionamento-seo.com/search-engine-marketing/web-4-0 Garau, C. (2017). Emerging technologies and cultural tourism: Opportunities for a cultural urban tourism research agenda. Tourism in the City (pp. 67-80). Springer, Cham. Garau, C., & Ilardi, E. (2014). The “Non-Places” meet the “Places:” Virtual tours on smartphones for the enhancement of cultural heritage. Journal of Urban Technology, 21(1), 79-91. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2014.884384 Garibaldi, R. (2015). The use of Web 2.0 tools by Italian contemporary art museums. Museum Management and Curatorship, 230-243. https://doi.org/10.1080/09647775.2015.1043329 Gustafsson, C. (2019). Conservation 3.0–Cultural Heritage as a driver for regional growth. SCIRES-IT-SCIentific RESearch and Information Technology, 9(1), 21-32. Handley, A. (2012). Content Marketing: Fare business con i contenuti per il web-Video, Blog, Podcast, Ebook e Webinar di successo. Hoepli Editore. Concepción Foronda-Robles etal / REA N. 41 (2021) 47 - 64 63 © Editorial Universidad de Sevilla 2021 | Sevilla, España| CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 | e-ISSN: 2340-2776 | doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.12795/rea.2021.i41.03 Hayles, N. K. (2012). How we think: Transforming power and digital technologies. Understanding digital humanities, 42-66. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230371934_3 Huertas, A., & Marine-Roig, E. (2015). Destination brand communication through the social media: What contents trigger most reactions of users? Information and communication technologies in tourism (pp. 295-308). Springer, Cham. Ioannides, M., Magnenat-Thalmann, N., & Papagiannakis, G. (Eds.). (2017). Mixed reality and gamification for cultural heritage (Vol. 2). Springer. Jung, T.H., Lee, H., Chung, N. & Tom Dieck, M.C. (2018). Cross-cultural differences in adopting mobile augmented reality at cultural heritage tourism sites, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 30 (3), 1621-1645. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-02-2017-0084 Karkin, N., & Janssen, M. (2014). Evaluating websites from a public value perspective: A review of Turkish local government websites. International Journal of Information Management, 34(3), 351-363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2013.11.004 Katsoni, V., Upadhya, A., & Stratigea, A. (2017). Tourism, Culture and Heritage in a Smart Economy. Springer International Publishing. Koramaz, T. K. (2018). 12 Information and communication technologies in cultural heritage management. Cultural Heritage, 155166. Kourouthanassis, P., Boletsis, C., Bardaki, C., & Chasanidou, D. (2015). Tourists responses to mobile augmented reality travel guides: The role of emotions on adoption behavior. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 18, 71-87. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.pmcj.2014.08.009 Kumar, N., Dadhich, R., & Shastri, A. (2017). MAQM: a generic object-oriented framework to build quality models for Web-based applications. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 8(2), 716-729. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-016-0512-5 Llopis-Amorós, M. P., Gil-Saura, I., Ruiz-Molina, M. E., & Fuentes-Blasco, M. (2019). Social media communications and festival brand equity: Millennials vs Centennials. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 40, 134-144. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2019.08.002 Lopez, M.; Margapoti, I.; Maragliano, R. & Bove, R. (2010). The presence of Web 2.0 tools on museum website: a comparative study between England, France, Spain, Italy, and the USA, Museum Management and Curatorship, 25(2), 238-249. https://doi.org/10.1080/09647771003737356 Mascort-Albea, E. J., Ruiz-Jaramillo, J., López Larrínaga, F., & Peña Bernal, A. D. L. (2016). Sevilla, Patrimonio Mundial: guía cultural interactiva para dispositivos móviles. PH, (90), 152-168. Massarotto, M. (2011). Social Network: costruire e comunicare identità in Rete. Apogeo Editore. Mavromoustakos, S. & Andreou, A.S. (2007). WAQE: a Web Application Quality Evaluation Model, International Journal of Web Engineering and Technology, 3 (1), 96-120. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJWET.2007.011529 Mich, L., Franch, M., & Gaio, L. (2003). Evaluating and Designing the Quality of Web Sites. IEEE Multimedia, 1(10), 34-43. https://doi.org/10.1109/MMUL.2003.1167920 Milano, C. (2018). Overtourism, social unrest and tourismphobia. A controversial debate. PASOS, 16, 551–564. Mínguez, C. (2012). The management of cultural resources in the creation of Spanish tourist destinations. European Journal of Geography, 3(1), 68-82. Mistilis, N., & Buhalis, D. (2012). Challenges and potential of the Semantic Web for tourism. e-Review of Tourism Research (eRTR), 10(2), 51-55. Nguyen, T. T., Camacho, D., & Jung, J. E. (2017). Identifying and ranking cultural heritage resources on geotagged social media for smart cultural tourism services. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 21(2), 267-279. https://doi. org/10.1007/s00779-016-0992-y Noti, E. (2013). Web 2.0 and the its influence in the tourism sector. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 9(20), 115-123. Ortega, G., & Labella, A. (2018). El uso de dispositivos para la interpretación de los bienes culturales en Andalucía. International Journal of scientific management and tourism, 4(1), 589-630. Padilla-Meléndez, A., & del Águila-Obra, A. R. (2013). Web and social media usage by museums: Online value creation. International Journal of Information Management, 33(5), 892-898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2013.07.004 Pallud J.& Straub D.W. (2014). Effective website design for experience-influenced environments: the case of high culture museums, Information Management, 51, 359-373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2014.02.010 Concepción Foronda-Robles etal / REA N. 41 (2021) 47 - 64 64 © Editorial Universidad de Sevilla 2021 | Sevilla, España| CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 | e-ISSN: 2340-2776 | doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.12795/rea.2021.i41.03 Parra-López, E., Gutiérrez-Taño, D., Diaz-Armas, R. J., & Bulchand-Gidumal, J. (2012). Travellers 2.0: Motivation, opportunity and ability to use social media. Social media in travel, tourism and hospitality: Theory, practice and cases, 171-187. Peukert, C. (2019). The next wave of digital technological change and the cultural industries. Journal of Cultural Economics, 43(2), 189-210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10824-018-9336-2 Polillo, R. (2005). Un modello di qualità per i siti web. Mondo digitale, 4(2), 32-44. Rio, A., & Brito, F. (2010). Websites Quality: Does It Depend on the Application Domain? Quality of Information and Communications Technology, 493-498. https://doi.org/10.1109/QUATIC.2010.86 Rossi, C. (2005). Le imprese dell’intermediazione turistica di fronte alla sfida del digitale. Risposte strategiche e condotte operative. Napoli: Liguori. Ryu, K. H. (2017). Research on Semantic Web-Based Custom Travel Model. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 12(20), 9794-9798. Seville Tourism Website (2020, November 13) Anual Report https://www.visitasevilla.es/en/professionals/research-statistics Shi, M., Zhu, W., Yang, H., & Li, C. (2016). Applying semantic web and big data techniques to construct a balance model referring to stakeholders of tourism intangible cultural heritage. International Journal of Computer Applications in Technology, 54(3), 192-200. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJCAT.2016.079873 Signore, O. (2005). A comprehensive model for web sites quality. Web Site Evolution (WSE 2005). 30-36. https://doi. org/10.1109/WSE.2005.1 Tabales, M. Á. (2010). La transformación del Alcázar de Sevilla y sus implicaciones urbanas. Archeologia dell ´Architettura XIV, 117-130. Tavakoli, R., & Wijesinghe, S. N. (2019). The evolution of the web and netnography in tourism: A systematic review. Tourism Management Perspectives, 29, 48-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2018.10.008 Tom Dieck, M. C., & Jung, T. H. (2017). Value of augmented reality at cultural heritage sites: A stakeholder approach. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 6(2), 110-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2017.03.002 Troitiño, MA; Troitiño, L.; Salmeron, P. & Pérez, RM (2020). La visita pública del Real Alcazar de Sevilla. Bases para la reordenación funcional del conjunto monumental. Apuntes del Real Alcázar 20, 126-169. UNESCO (2020, 25 October). UNESCO World Heritage Cathedral, Alcazar and Archivo de Indias in Seville (Spain). https://whc. unesco.org/en/list/383/ Van der Zee, E., Bertocchi, D., & Vanneste, D. (2020). Distribution of tourists within urban heritage destinations: A hot spot/cold spot analysis of TripAdvisor data as support for destination management. Current Issues in Tourism, 23(2), 175-196. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2018.1491955 Verdiani, G. (2011). Il ritorno all’immagine, nuove procedure image based per il Cultural Heritage. Lulu. com. Vila, T. D., & Vila, N. A. (2012). El fenómeno 2.0 en el sector turístico. El caso de Madrid 2.0. Revista de Turismo y Patrimonio Cultural, 10(3), 225-238. https://doi.org/10.25145/j.pasos.2012.10.031 Villa, D. (2015). Crowdsourced Heritage Tourism Open-Data, Small-Data and e-Participatory Practices as Innovative Tools in Alps Cultural Heritage Topic: Information Technology and e-Tourism. Cultural Tourism in a Digital Era (pp. 229230). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15859-4_19 Widrich, M. (2018). Moving Monuments in the Age of Social Media. Future Anterior, 15(2), 132-144. Yang, Z., Cai, S., Zhou, Z., & Zhou, N. (2005). Development and validation of an instrument to measure user perceived service quality of information presenting web portals. Information & Management, 42(4), 575-589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2004.03.001 Yousaf, A., Amin, I., Jaziri, D. and Mishra, A. (2020). Effect of message orientation/vividness on consumer engagement for travel brands on social networking sites. Journal of Product & Brand Management, Ahead-of-print. https://doi. org/10.1108/JPBM-08-2019-2546