scieee Open visual document viewer

Computing voter transitions: The elections for the Catalan Parliament, from 2010 to 2012

Corominas Subias, Albert,Lusa García, Amaia,Calvet Puig, Maria Dolors

Abstract

Purpose: To estimate the transition rates corresponding to the 2010 and 2012 elections to the Catalan Parliament for the four constituencies in which Catalonia is divided for this purpose. The main features of the results, which are obtained by means of mathematical programming, are commented. Design/methodology/approach: Mathematical programming optimization models are formulated in order to find the transition rates that yield a better adjust between the actual results in 2012 and those computed applying the transition rates to the 2010 results. The transition rate matrices are estimated for each one of the four constituencies, since the set of options is not the same for all them. No other assumptions that those of numerical consistency are adopted. Findings: The transition rate models provide satisfactory goodness of fit. Mathematical programming turns out to be an easy-to-use tool for estimating the transition rates and, at the same time, very flexible, since, if necessary, it allows incorporating the constraints corresponding to additional assumptions. Originality/value: The transition rates from 2010 to 2012 in Catalonia are particularly interesting, since 2012 results implied a significant change in the composition of the Catalan Parliament. To the best of our knowledge, no other scientific journal paper has dealt with this question. Our results are available to the researchers in order to interpret the change and try to foresee future flows of voters.

Full text

Jou nal o Indus ial Enginee ing and Managemen JIEM, 2015 – 8(1): 122-136 – Online ISSN: 2013-0953 – P in ISSN: 2013-8423 h p://dx.doi.o g/10.3926/jiem.1189 Compu ing Vo e T ansi ions: The Elec ions o he Ca alan Pa liamen , om 2010 o 2012 Albe Co ominas, Amaia Lusa, M. Dolo s Cal e Uni e si a Poli ècnica de Ca alunya (Spain) albe .co [email p o ec ed], [email p o ec ed], [email p o ec ed] Recei ed: June 2014 Accep ed: Feb ua y 2015 Abs ac : Pu pose: To es ima e he ansi ion a es co esponding o he 2010 and 2012 elec ions o he Ca alan Pa liamen o he ou cons i uencies in which Ca alonia is di ided o his pu pose. The main ea u es o he esul s, which a e ob ained by means o ma hema ical p og amming, a e commen ed. Design/me hodology/app oach: Ma hema ical p og amming op imiza ion models a e o mula ed in o de o ind he ansi ion a es ha yield a be e adjus be ween he ac ual esul s in 2012 and hose compu ed applying he ansi ion a es o he 2010 esul s. The ansi ion a e ma ices a e es ima ed o each one o he ou cons i uencies, since he se o op ions is no he same o all hem. No o he assump ions ha hose o nume ical consis ency a e adop ed. Findings and O iginali y/ alue: The ansi ion a e models p o ide sa is ac o y goodness o i . Ma hema ical p og amming u ns ou o be an easy- o-use ool o es ima ing he ansi ion a es and, a he same ime, e y lexible, since, i necessa y, i allows inco po a ing he cons ain s co esponding o addi ional assump ions. O iginali y/ alue: The ansi ion a es om 2010 o 2012 in Ca alonia a e pa icula ly in e es ing, since 2012 esul s implied a signi ican change in he composi ion o he Ca alan Pa liamen . To he bes o ou knowledge, no o he scien i ic jou nal pape has deal wi h his -122- Jou nal o Indus ial Enginee ing and Managemen – h p://dx.doi.o g/10.3926/jiem.1189 ques ion. Ou esul s a e a ailable o he esea che s in o de o in e p e he change and y o o esee u u e lows o o e s. Keywo ds: o e ansi ions, elec o al change, ma hema ical p og amming 1. In oduc ion When conside ing he esul s o wo consecu i e elec ions in he same elec o al a ea, a usual way o ying o in e p e he esul s o he la e polls is seeing hem as he consequence o o e ansi ions om he op ions hey p e e ed in he o me . Poli icians, he media, poli ical scien is s and mos ci izens a e in e es ed in he changes o he p e e ences o people ha ing he igh o o e. Acco ding o Hawkes (1969) he his o ian T e o Lloyd was he i s o s a ing he ques ion. Be o e 1970, i was deal wi h in some sca ce wo ks (Benewick, Bi ch, Blumle & Ewbank, 1969; Be ing on, 1965; Bu le , 1952, 1953; Bu le & King, 1966;). Fo mally, gi en he esul s o wo consecu i e (o e en simul aneous) elec ions o each one o h e di isions (cons i uencies, municipali ies, polling s a ions o any o he pa i ion) o an elec o al a ea, he p oblem is o ind he ma ix o ansi ion a es om he op ions a ailable in he i s elec ion ( ows) o he op ions in he second one (columns). O cou se, i one conside s only agg ega e esul s o he whole e i o y o o any se o cons i uencies, in gene al he e a e in ini ely many solu ions o he ma ix. On he o he hand, applying a unique ansi ion a e ma ix o di e se cons i uencies o g oups o cons i uencies, he compu ed esul s will no always coincide wi h he eal ones. Clea ly, he elemen s o he ma ix mus be nonnega i e and hose belonging o any gi en ile mus sum up o 1 ( hese wo condi ions imply ha he elemen s mus be less han o equal o 1). A su ey can be used o es ima e he elemen s o he ansi ion a e ma ix. Howe e , he esul s a e highly un eliable, because o many easons ha a e discussed, o ins ance, in B own and Payne (1986) and in Van de Ploeg, Van de Pol and Kampen (2006). Mo eo e , unless he numbe o elemen s in he sample is e y high, many elemen s o he ma ix ( hose co esponding o small alues o he ansi ion a e) will be equal o ze o. The e o e, a he expense o g ea e modelling and compu ing e o s, he use o he esul s o bo h elec ions is a mo e eliable way o ob ain he ma ix. Hawkes (1969) ied “ o es ima e he numbe o people o ing o a pa icula pa y a one elec ion who subsequen ly o e o ano he speci ied pa y a he nex elec ion”. In o de o do his, p oposed h ee me hods. Howe e , hese did no gua an ee ha he esul s ul il he s a ed abo e condi ions. The e o e, he au ho concluded ha al hough “ he a emp has no been as success ul as one would wish, some use ul esul s a e ob ainable”. Mille (1972) and -123- Jou nal o Indus ial Enginee ing and Managemen – h p://dx.doi.o g/10.3926/jiem.1189 Up on (1977) adop an app oach ha may be insc ibed in he same s eam ha Hawkes (1969). O he ela ed wo ks a e Hayes (1976) and Moo es (1987). Ins ead, I win and Mee e (1969) and McCa hy and Ryan (1977) use quad a ic p og amming o es ima e he ansi ion a es, hus gua an eeing om he ou side he ul illing o he abo e men ioned condi ions, which a e imposed by means o cons ain s in he ma hema ical p og amming. Tzia e as (1986) uses an app oach simila o ha o McCa hy and Ryan (1977) and a a ian o i , which consis s in using he absolu e alue o he de ia ions ins ead o he squa es o hem. Up on (1978), conce ning McCa hy and Ryan’s app oach, obse es ha i gi es a high p opo ion o ze oes in he ma ix and concludes ha o e es ima es he p opo ion o s aye s ( o e s ha do no change hei p e e ences be ween he o elec ions –ac ually, elec o s ha o e o op ions whose name is he same in bo h elec ions−, con as ing wi h mo e s). This c i icism, which we do no deem ully jus i ied, has been assumed by o he au ho s, as, o ins ance Johns on and Hay (1983). The es ima ion o o e s’ ansi ion a es is o en seen as a pa icula case o he ecological in e ence p oblem, i. e., o deduc indi idual beha iou s om agg ega e da a, a p oblem which was deemed impossible, wi h he me hods a ailable a ha ime, in Robinson (1950). This no wi hs anding, many me hods ha e been p oposed o dealing wi h i . Some o hem assume, pe haps implici ly, ha he beha iou pa e n is he same o e y simila in all he a eas (ecological eg essions; see: Goodman, 1953; Goodman, 1959; conce ning ansi ion a es: Fülle, 1994; an de Ploeg e al., 2006). O he s, conside ha he beha iou pa e n may depend on he a eas and usually adop a p obabilis ic app oach (ecological in e ence; see: Glynn & Wake ield, 2010; G eine & Quinn, 2009; G o man & Me ill, 2004; King, 1997; conce ning ansi ion a es –p obabili ies−: And eadis & Chadjipadelis, 2009; An weile , 2007; B own & Payne, 1986; Johns on & Hay, 1983). The pu pose o he p esen pape is o de e mine, o he 2010 and 2012 elec ions o he Pa liamen o Ca alonia, a ansi ion ma ix o each cons i uency ha (i) ul ils he nonnega i e and sum- o-one cons ain s; (ii) applied o he agg ega e esul s o he i s elec ion gi e exac ly he esul s o he second one o each one o he a ailable op ions in his la e and (iii) minimises a unc ion o he disc epancies be ween he esul s ob ained wi h he ma ix and hose gi en by he coun o o es in e e y di ision. No e ha we nei he o mula e any assump ion abou he di e ences o coincidences be ween he beha iou pa e ns o he elec o s co esponding o di e se polling s a ions no adop a p obabilis ic poin o iew. The e o e, he p oblem can be s a ed as a ma hema ical p og amming model, which o some kinds o disc epancy unc ions is easy o sol e. E en hough ou pu pose is o ind ansi ion ma ices o any se o di isions (and o di e en kinds o di isions), wi hou in oducing any a -124- Jou nal o Indus ial Enginee ing and Managemen – h p://dx.doi.o g/10.3926/jiem.1189 p io i assump ion abou he alues o he ansi ion a es, we will commen some esul s gi en by he models in o de o acili a e hei in e p e a ion. The layou o he es o he a icle is as ollows. Sec ion 2 p esen s he p oblem and i s ma hema ical p og amming o mula ions. The da a and he ob ained esul s a e p esen ed and commen ed in Sec ion 3. Sec ion 4 ends he pape wi h some sho conclusions. 2. S a emen o he P oblem and i s Ma hema ical P og amming Fo mula ion I is assumed ha we ha e he esul s co esponding o wo elec ions in he same elec o al a ea, such ha he i s one happened a and he second one a ’(≥ ). When ’ is e y close o (o e en equal o ) i may be ha he censuses co esponding o bo h elec ions a e iden ical. I ac ually hey a e no , howe e , i is usual o ci cum en his di icul y assuming ha he beha iou o he elec o s no belonging o he in e sec ion o bo h censuses is no di e en om hose ha belong o i . In ac , his is equi alen o assume ha bo h censuses a e iden ical and his assump ion is easonable when ’ is no a om (B own & Payne, 1986; Hawkes, 1969; McCa hy & Ryan, 1977), as happen wi h he wo elec ions conside ed in his pape , sepa a ed by only wo yea s (2010, 2012). The elec o al a ea is pa i ioned in o cons i uencies and hese, a he end, in o polling s a ions. The e o e he esul s a e a ailable o all he polling s a ions o he elec o al a ea. I may happen ha he polling s a ions belonging o a gi en cons i uency do no coincide om one elec ion o ano he (because some a e c ea ed, supp essed o di ided) and in his case one can only compa e he esul s co esponding o he polling s a ions common o bo h elec ions. On ano he hand, he a ailable op ions (including blank o e, null o e and abs en ion) may be di e en om one cons i uency o ano he (in he case o he elec ions o he Ca alan Pa liamen , hey a e, since he candida es o win he sea s a e di e en , e en o he op ions wi h he same name). The e o e, he cons i uencies ha e o be conside ed sepa a ely. Hence, he da a mus e e always o a gi en cons i uency o a subse o polling s a ions belonging o a gi en cons i uency. The conside ed polling uni s can be g ouped o o m di isions ( he e o e, a di ision is a se o one o e mo e polling s a ions; e e y conside ed polling s a ion mus belong o one and only one di ision). The di isions may be, o ins ance, municipali ies, dis ic s o any se s o polling uni s ha be con enien o he analysis. -125- Jou nal o Indus ial Enginee ing and Managemen – h p://dx.doi.o g/10.3926/jiem.1189 The no a ion ha we use o he da a a e as ollows: mNumbe o di isions (common o bo h elec ions). n, n’ Numbe o op ions a and ’, espec i ely. pik P opo ion o o es ob ained a by he op ion k in he di ision i (i = 1, …, m; k = 1, …, n). pij P opo ion o o es ob ained a ’ by he op ion j in he di ision i (i = 1, …, m; j = 1, …, n’). ciCensus (i.e., numbe o people ha ing he igh o o e) o di ision i a ’, assumed o be equal o ha o (i = 1, …, m). And o he decision a iables: kj T ansi ion a e om op ion k a o op ion j a ’ (k = 1, …, n; j = 1, …, n’). The ma ix R made up o he ansi ion a es kj mus belong o he se F de ined by he ollowing cons ain s: (1) (2) (3) Equa ion 1 impose ha he ansi ion a es om an op ion a o e e y o he a ’ mus sum up o one; Equa ion 2, ha he o al numbe o o es ob ained in he cons i uency by an op ion a ’ equals he numbe ha esul s when applying he ansi ion a es o he numbe o o es co esponding o (unde he assump ion ha he census a and a ’ a e he same); Equa ion 3 en o ce he ob ious non-nega i i y condi ion. The ma hema ical p og amming models p oposed in McCa hy and Ryan (1977) and Tzia e as (1986) include cons ain s (1) and (3). Cons ain s (2) a e simila o hose p oposed in Johns on and Hay (1983). These cons ain s de ine a se o ma ices ha ing gene ally in ini ely many elemen s. One way o selec one o hese elemen s is o minimise he disc epancies be ween he ac ual esul s o elec ions a ’ and hose esul ing om he applica ion o he ansi ion a es. O cou se, he selec ed ma ix depends on he used measu e o he disc epancies. -126- Jou nal o Indus ial Enginee ing and Managemen – h p://dx.doi.o g/10.3926/jiem.1189 This way we de ine he ollowing ou models: The objec i e unc ions o he models a e (M1) he sum o he squa ed disc epancies be ween ac ual and modelled numbe o o es, (M2) he sum o he squa ed disc epancies be ween ac ual and modelled p opo ions, (M3) he alue o he maximum disc epancy be ween ac ual and modelled numbe o o es and (M4) he alue o he maximum disc epancy be ween ac ual and modelled p opo ions. Since he cons ain s ha de ine he se F a e linea , M1 and M2 a e quad a ic p og ams. Fo hei pa , M3 and M4 can be e o mula ed as linea p og ams as ollows: As i is known, howe e , minmax p oblems ha e usually mul iple op imums, since he objec i e unc ion does no ake in o accoun he alues o he disc epancies ha a e s ic ly less han he op imum alue. The e o e, a e sol ing M3 and M4, mo e sa is ac o y solu ions may be ob ained using a second c i e ion ( he sum o he absolu e alues o all he disc epancies); his leads o he ollowing wo quad a ic p og amming models: -127- Jou nal o Indus ial Enginee ing and Managemen – h p://dx.doi.o g/10.3926/jiem.1189 Whe e * and  * a e, espec i ely, he op imum alues o he objec i e unc ion co esponding o M3 and M4. 3. Da a and esul s The da a se s used in he compu a ional expe imen co espond o he elec ions o he Pa liamen o Ca alonia held on 28 No embe 2010 and 25 No embe 2012. The cons i uencies coincide wi h he ou p o inces o Ca alonia: Ba celona, Gi ona, Lleida and Ta agona. Each p o ince is di ided in o coma ques, and, o i s pa , each coma ca is di ided in o municipali ies. Ca alonia has 41 coma ques and 947 municipali ies. The municipali ies, o elec o al pu poses, a e di ided in o sec ions, so ha in each sec ion he numbe o egis e ed elec o s belongs o he in e al 500-2,000 (wi h he possible excep ion o small ela i ely isola ed illages, in which he numbe o egis e ed elec o s may be less han 500). Acco ding o his, because o he changes in popula ion, om one elec ion o he nex a sec ion can be di ided in o wo o mo e o can be inco po a ed o ano he . O cou se, he da a used in he compu a ional expe imen a e only hose co esponding o sec ions ha emain unchanged. The alues o m, n and n’ co esponding o he ou cons i uencies in he used da a se a e included in Table 1. -128- Jou nal o Indus ial Enginee ing and Managemen – h p://dx.doi.o g/10.3926/jiem.1189 Cons i uency Numbe o di isions (m) Numbe o op ions in 2010 (n) Numbe o op ions in 2010 (n’) Ba celona 3573 32 19 Gi ona 523 29 19 Lleida 390 32 19 Ta agona 523 33 19 Table 1. Sizes o he da a se s used in he compu a ional expe imen . In all cases, he numbe o op ions includes null and blank o es and abs en ion To sol e he six ma hema ical p og amming models desc ibed in he p eceding sec ion o each one o he cons i uencies he so wa e CPLEX 12.2 was used. The compu ing imes we e no signi ican in any case. The ansi ion ma ices ob ained wi h models M3 and M4 can be dis ega ded, since hose co esponding o models M3’ and M4’, espec i ely, a e always p e e able; only he op imum alues o hei espec i e objec i e unc ions a e used (as inpu s o models M3’ and M4’, espec i ely). In o de o e alua e he goodness o i o he solu ions p o ided o he di e en models we will use he ollowing c i e ia, espec i ely ela ed o he objec i e unc ions o models M1, M2, M3’ and M4’: •, coe icien o de e mina ion co esponding o he numbe s o o es, de ined as ollows: whe e (i.e., he p opo ion o o es ob ained globally by he op ion j in he se o di isions). •, coe icien o de e mina ion co esponding o he p opo ions: -129- Jou nal o Indus ial Enginee ing and Managemen – h p://dx.doi.o g/10.3926/jiem.1189 •max, he maximum disc epancy be ween ac ual and modelled numbe s o o es. •  max, he maximum disc epancy be ween ac ual and modelled p opo ions o o es. Coe icien s o de e mina ion, which a e use ul as complemen a y in o ma ion o assess he goodness o i o he models, may be de ined o each op ion as well: O cou se, models M1 and M2 will yield always he bes alues o and , espec i ely (since he denomina o s in he de ini ion o hese c i e ia a e cons an s and he espec i e nume a o s a e he objec i e unc ions o M1 and M2). In a simila way, models M3-M3’ and M4-M4’ will be he bes o max and  max, espec i ely. The beha iou o he men ioned models wi h ega d o he o he c i e ia is di icul o o ecas , excep ing ha M1 and M2 a e mo e obus han M3’ and M4’ in ela ion o ou lie s. The ansi ion a es ma ices and he alues o all he c i e ia desc ibed abo e o Ba celona, Gi ona, Lleida and Ta agona, can be ound in: h ps://dl.d opboxuse con en .com/u/6741065/RESULTS%20BARCELONA.xlsx, h ps://dl.d opboxuse con en .com/u/6741065/RESULTS%20GIRONA.xlsx, h ps://dl.d opboxuse con en .com/u/6741065/RESULTS%20LLEIDA.xlsx and h ps://dl.d opboxuse con en .com/u/6741065/RESULTS%20TARRAGONA.xlsx, espec i ely. Table 2 shows he alues o he ou c i e ia co esponding o he ou models M1, M2, M3’ and M4’ and o he ou cons i uencies. One can see ha he alues o and a e good (high). The la e , wi h M2, eaches 0.97 o Ta agona, while he bes alue o is 0.86 (Ba celona and Gi ona). Conce ning hese wo c i e ia, he esul s a e e y simila o bo h M1 and M2, al hough, o cou se, M1 ge s he bes alues o and M2 o . The wo s alue, om hose gi en by M1, o is 0.77 (Ta agona) and he wo s o , om hose gi en by M2, is 0.75 (Lleida). Fo hei side, he alues o max and  max a e high, e en o M3’ and M4’ and, al hough hey a e no e y much be e han hose ob ained wi h M1 and M2, when he objec i e o minimising hese c i e ia is imposed (M3’ and M4’) he alues o and de e io a e. -130-