Citation: Gregoroviˇcová, E.; Pospíšil, J.; Sitek, T. The Bulk Density and Cohesion of Submicron Particles Emitted by a Residential Boiler When Burning Solid Fuels. Fire 2023,6, 445. https://doi.org/10.3390/fire6110445 Academic Editors: Michal Holubˇcík and Nikola ˇ CajováKantová Received: 24 October 2023 Revised: 10 November 2023 Accepted: 14 November 2023 Published: 19 November 2023 Copyright: © 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ 4.0/). fire Article The Bulk Density and Cohesion of Submicron Particles Emitted by a Residential Boiler When Burning Solid Fuels Eva Gregoroviˇcová, JiˇríPospíšil * and Tomáš Sitek Energy Institute, Brno University of Technology, 616 69 Brno, Czech Republic;
[email protected] (E.G.);
[email protected] (T.S.) *Correspondence: [email protected].cz Abstract: Particles emitted from combustion sources have a negative impact on human health and the environment. The solid fuel boilers that are used in households are a significant source of air pollution. The present study analyzes particulate matter (PM) produced during the combustion of wood pellets, wood logs, and coke in a residential boiler. The captured particles’ particle size distribution, bulk density, and cohesion are identified. A cascade impactor was used to capture the particles, and an optical digital microscope was used to determine the bulk density and cohesion (angle of repose) of the particles. The results show that the highest particle mass concentration emitted by the boiler falls within the interval of 89–146 nm, with the combustion of wood logs producing the most particles and coke combustion producing the least. The bulk density of particles of 51–595 nm (impactor stages 4–8) ranges from 320 to 785 kg/m 3 for wood logs, 372–1108 kg/m 3 for wood pellets, and 435–1330 kg/m3 for coke. The PM1 particles (impactor stage 4) have the highest bulk density. In the particle size range studied, the bulk density of particles decreases significantly with increasing particle size. Keywords: particulate matter; density; impactor; microscope; particle cohesion 1. Introduction Solid fuel boilers are still a frequent source of heat within households and are also a significant source of air pollution. The emitted pollutants have a negative impact on the environment and human health [ 1 ]. The combustion of solid fuels in small combustion devices produces emissions in the form of gaseous substances and combustion particles. Combustion particles bind various pollutants (e.g., benzo(a)pyrene, heavy metals, and volatile organic compounds (VOCs)). Particles with an aerodynamic diameter of less than 10 µ m (PM10) penetrate the upper and lower respiratory tract. PM2.5 particles enter the bronchi and lung chambers, and PM1 particles penetrate the bloodstream [ 2 , 3 ]. The size of the particles produced is essential information for assessing their human health effects [ 4 ]. Exposure to PM10 particles generally damages the respiratory and cardiovascular systems, reduces life expectancy, increases the risk of infant mortality, and can cause lung cancer [ 3 ]. In an effort to reduce the concentration of emitted harmful substances, emission limits are set for manufactured boilers [ 5 ], which are verified when the combustion source is put on the market. However, there is no further verification of compliance with these emission limits in long-term operation. The number of pollutants produced by combustion sources is mainly influenced by the design of the boiler, the way the boiler is operated, and the type of fuel burned. Only boilers complying with an eco-design can now be put into operation [ 6 ], and the main attention in recent years has been paid to reducing the emissions of fine combustion particles. The amount of emitted particulate matter is most often reported as a mass or volume concentration of particulate matter. For specific conversions between the volume and mass of particles, knowledge of their particle density is necessary. The knowledge of particle density is also necessary for specific numerical solutions for the trajectories of particles moving in a continuous phase (air). Fire 2023,6, 445. https://doi.org/10.3390/fire6110445 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/fire
Fire 2023,6, 445 2 of 13 Particle density is also essential for the design and calibration of measurement apparatus for particle identification. Laboratory particle size identification is most often based on indirect methods monitoring the electric charge on the particle surface ( SMPS—scanning mobility particle sizer), the effect of particles on the scatter of the light beam (OPS—optical particle sizer), the mass of the captured particles (impactor), or the dynamics of the particles’ behavior in the air stream (APS—aerodynamic particle sizer) [ 7 ]. The particle size measurement results obtained using these methods are valid for the respective calibration particles, but for other particles, there is often an unspecified systematic error. Another reason to pay attention to particle density is that density affects the deposition of particles in the human respiratory tract; thus, it is essential to determine their impact on human health. It was found that particles with a higher density have a higher settling velocity than particles with a lower density [ 8 ]. The movement of smoke plumes in an atmosphere is determined by the atmospheric conditions, particle size, and particle density. The greater the particle density (particles are heavier), the higher the settling velocity and the more likely the particles are to deposit on surface areas. Furthermore, particle density is an important property for filter cake formation during filtration [ 9 , 10 ]. Particle density also affects the durability of the filter cake, i.e., the efficiency of filter regeneration. The greater the mass of the filter cake, the more efficient the filter regeneration [ 11 ]. Particle density is primarily influenced by combustion conditions (temperature, gas flow rate, oxygen content [ 12 ], combustion character, fuel type, particle size and shape, etc. [13]. Cohesion is a phenomenon caused by the action of attractive intermolecular forces between particles of a given substance, which cause particles of the same substance to bond together and agglomerate (create a cluster). Intermolecular forces can be hydrogen bonds or van der Waals attractive forces [14]. There are two types of particle densities—particle density and bulk density. Bulk density is commonly defined for bulk materials and expresses the ratio of the mass of the solid to the bulk volume, which includes air-filled interparticle voids. The bulk density is less than the particle density, and the relationship between the two is determined by the porosity of the bulk environment. Porosity is calculated as the ratio of the void volume to the total (bulk) volume [ 15 ]. The magnitude of the bulk density generally depends on the size, shape, and surface area of the particles, the density of the solid particles, and the cohesion of the particles [16]. The current state of knowledge shows that there are few studies dealing with the identification of the particle bulk density and particle cohesion of different size fractions of fine particles from different types of fuels. This paper focuses on the determination of the bulk density of combustion particles by combining the gravimetric identification of the mass of captured particles of different size classes and an optical method to determine the volume of captured particles. An optical analysis is also used to identify the bulk properties of the particles deposited. Specifically, this paper focuses on combustion particles emitted during the combustion of wood pellets, wood logs, and coke in a small residential combustion device. A 14-stage high-temperature Dekati low-pressure impactor (HT-DLPI+) was used to capture particulate matter (PM) from the combustion process to determine the mass size distribution of the particles in the flue gas in the size range of 13 nm–50 µm. The particles captured in each impactor stage were dimensionally evaluated via optical microscopy. The geometric characteristics of the particle layer (bulk volume, height, angle of repose) were obtained using an optical digital microscope, allowing for the assessment of the bulk density and cohesion of the particles. The novelty of this paper is that the evaluation of the bulk density and cohesion was performed using a new method, the optical method. 2. Materials and Methods Within the framework of this study, combustion tests of three selected fuels were carried out in a small residential combustion device. The sampling of the particles that were carried away in the flue gas stream and their subsequent mass and optical identification
Fire 2023,6, 445 3 of 13 were performed. Separately, the individual particle size fractions captured on the cascade impactor stages were monitored. Based on the obtained characteristics, the particle bulk density and the particle deposition characteristics of the individual particle size fractions were evaluated. 2.1. Combustion Equipment and Tested Fuels For the combustion tests, an automatic pellet boiler with a screw feeder (ATTACK FD32 6-part; year of manufacture, 2019; rated output, 30 kW) was used. The boiler had been in service for three years as a heat source for a residential building. The variable design of the boiler construction allows the burning of wood logs and coke in addition to wood pellets. Three types of fuel were burned in the boiler—wood pellets, wood logs, and coke. The ENplus A1 wood pellets are made only from pure spruce sawdust without admixtures and were stored in bags for two to three years. In addition, hard, dry wood logs (oak) were burned, which were stored under a ventilated shelter for four years. The last fuel that was burned was coke, which was stored in a dry ventilated room for a minimum of five years. Table 1shows the proximate analysis of the measured fuels. This table shows the average values of the three measurements and sample standard deviations (SSDs). To measure the water content, the samples were placed in a laboratory dryer oven at 105 ◦ C for 12 h. Subsequently, the samples were placed in a desiccator to prevent the absorption of air moisture [ 17 ]. For the measurement of the ash content, the samples in ceramic crucibles were annealed in a kiln at 550 ± 10 ◦ C for 10 h (at least 60 min, according to the standard), and the samples were subsequently placed in a desiccator [ 18 ]. For the measurement of the volatile combustible content, the samples in ceramic crucibles were placed in an oven at 900 ± 10 ◦ C for 7 min, then placed in a desiccator [ 19 ]. The determination of the heat of combustion, also known as the higher heating value (HHV), was carried out using a Parr 6200 calorimeter [20]. Table 1. Proximate analysis of measured samples. Fuel Water Content (%) SSD (%) Ash Content (%) SSD (%) Volatile Matter (%) SSD (%) HHV (MJ/kg) SSD (%) Wood pellets 6.9 0.04 0.4 0.01 85.2 0.18 18.2 0.16 Wood logs 8.4 0.04 0.9 0.07 85.6 0.38 17.4 0.18 Coke 0.6 0.01 23.2 0.81 1.7 0.05 29.8 0.38 2.2. Combustion Tests Prior to each stoking, the boiler, including the heat exchangers and the flue pipe, was cleaned to ensure that no tar deposits were present in the boiler or flue. The pellet combustion was automatic using a screw feeder and the burner power was set at 17 kW. Sampling was carried out in a steady-state operation at a rated power level. After the boiler was rebuilt (removing the pellet burner, replacing the ash door, etc.), the boiler was operated on wood logs and then on coke. Boiler stoking of the wood logs was carried out to reach the boiler operating temperature in the shortest possible time. Subsequently, larger wood logs were added. The secondary air of the boiler was fully opened. Measurements were taken with the boiler operating at a steady state, with the boiler water temperature maintained at 80 ◦ C. The coke was burned in the same manner, but coke takes longer to kindle. Coke burns with a small flame or only glows compared to wood logs. The coke was fed to the back of the boiler. During the burning of the coke, only the primary air supply was provided under the grate; the secondary air was closed. The oxygen content of the flue gas during the flue gas sampling was ideal, at approximately 10%. 2.3. Particle Sampling Flue gas sampling was carried out in the flue pipe with a diameter of 150 mm, discharging the flue gases from the boiler. A sampling isokinetic probe, placed in the flue
Fire 2023,6, 445 4 of 13 pipe at approximately 1 m above the boiler, was used to sample the flue gas. The sampling probe was only oriented against the direction of the flue gas flow during the sampling period. For the remaining time, the probe was oriented in the direction of the flue gas flow to avoid the unwanted fouling of the probe. Flue gas sampling was carried out during the stable combustion phase when the flue gas temperature was kept constant. From the sampling probe, the flue gas passed through an insulated pipe that connected the probe to the impactor; see Figure 1. Fire 2023, 6, x FOR PEER REVIEW 4 logs. The coke was fed to the back of the boiler. During the burning of the coke, only the primary air supply was provided under the grate; the secondary air was closed. The oxygen content of the flue gas during the flue gas sampling was ideal, at approximately 10%. 2.3. Particle Sampling Flue gas sampling was carried out in the flue pipe with a diameter of 150 mm, discharging the flue gases from the boiler. A sampling isokinetic probe, placed in the flue pipe at approximately 1 m above the boiler, was used to sample the flue gas. The sampling probe was only oriented against the direction of the flue gas flow during the sampling period. For the remaining time, the probe was oriented in the direction of the flue gas flow to avoid the unwanted fouling of the probe. Flue gas sampling was carried out during the stable combustion phase when the flue gas temperature was kept constant. From the sampling probe, the flue gas passed through an insulated pipe that connected the probe to the impactor; see Figure 1. Figure 1. Experimental setup. The sampling of the flue gas for each fuel type was repeated three times; thus, 9 measurements were made with the impactor during the steady-state combustion operation. The flue gas sampling times and flue gas temperatures for the wood pellets, wood logs, and coke combustion are shown in Table 2. Table 2. Sampling time and flue gas temperature for individual fuels. Fuel Sampling Time (min) Flue Gas Temperature (°C) Wood pellets 15 150 Wood logs 5 225 Coke 25 210 The sampled flue gas was introduced into the high-temperature Dekati low-pressure impactor. The impactor is a device used to gravimetrically determine the distribution of particles. It consists of fourteen stages through which the flue gas passes, and particles in the size fractions of 13 nm–50 μm are captured. The flow of the flue gas sample through the impactor is provided by a pump connected to the outlet of the impactor. The exhaust gas sampling time was determined based on test measurements for each fuel. Prior to sampling, the impactor was heated to 130 °C to prevent the passing gas from condensing in the impactor. During the flue gas sampling, the pressure was set at 40 mbar on the vacuum pump, and the temperature of the gas entering the impactor was Figure 1. Experimental setup. The sampling of the flue gas for each fuel type was repeated three times; thus, 9 measurements were made with the impactor during the steady-state combustion operation. The flue gas sampling times and flue gas temperatures for the wood pellets, wood logs, and coke combustion are shown in Table 2. Table 2. Sampling time and flue gas temperature for individual fuels. Fuel Sampling Time (min) Flue Gas Temperature (◦C) Wood pellets 15 150 Wood logs 5 225 Coke 25 210 The sampled flue gas was introduced into the high-temperature Dekati low-pressure impactor. The impactor is a device used to gravimetrically determine the distribution of particles. It consists of fourteen stages through which the flue gas passes, and particles in the size fractions of 13 nm–50 µ m are captured. The flow of the flue gas sample through the impactor is provided by a pump connected to the outlet of the impactor. The exhaust gas sampling time was determined based on test measurements for each fuel. Prior to sampling, the impactor was heated to 130 ◦ C to prevent the passing gas from condensing in the impactor. During the flue gas sampling, the pressure was set at 40 mbar on the vacuum pump, and the temperature of the gas entering the impactor was continuously recorded. The flue gas passing through the impactor flows through individual stages, which contain aluminum foils coated with Vaseline. The foils are used to gradually capture particulate matter via impaction. Around the foils are openings through which the flue gas sample flows to the next stages of the impactor, which have smaller and smaller openings (conditions for higher flue gas velocity—separation of smaller particles). To determine the gravimetric distribution of particles, the foils were weighed before and after the measurements. The weighing of the clean and used foils was repeated three times and
Fire 2023,6, 445 5 of 13 the final weight was obtained by averaging the values obtained. Prior to weighing, the electrical charge of the aluminum foils was removed using a frame ionizer. 2.4. Optical Identification of Captured Particles The determination of the volume and bulk properties of the particles captured on the foil was performed using a Keyence VHX-7000 optical digital microscope capable of 20–7000× optical magnification. The bulk volume of the captured particles was obtained via the 3D imaging of the captured particles; see Figure 2b. The 3D image was obtained at a high resolution using the “Fine Depth Composition” function at 700 × or 500 × magnification to assess the volume of a particular impaction deposit sample more accurately. The captured particles on the foils formed several separate impaction deposits, the number of which corresponded to the number of openings of each impactor stage; see Figure 2a. Fire 2023, 6, x FOR PEER REVIEW 5 continuously recorded. The flue gas passing through the impactor flows through individual stages, which contain aluminum foils coated with Vaseline. The foils are used to gradually capture particulate matter via impaction. Around the foils are openings through which the flue gas sample flows to the next stages of the impactor, which have smaller and smaller openings (conditions for higher flue gas velocity—separation of smaller particles). To determine the gravimetric distribution of particles, the foils were weighed before and after the measurements. The weighing of the clean and used foils was repeated three times and the final weight was obtained by averaging the values obtained. Prior to weighing, the electrical charge of the aluminum foils was removed using a frame ionizer. 2.4. Optical Identification of Captured Particles The determination of the volume and bulk properties of the particles captured on the foil was performed using a Keyence VHX-7000 optical digital microscope capable of 20– 7000× optical magnification. The bulk volume of the captured particles was obtained via the 3D imaging of the captured particles; see Figure 2b. The 3D image was obtained at a high resolution using the “Fine Depth Composition” function at 700× or 500× magnification to assess the volume of a particular impaction deposit sample more accurately. The captured particles on the foils formed several separate impaction deposits, the number of which corresponded to the number of openings of each impactor stage; see Figure 2a. Figure 2. Example of an optical microscope view: (a) view of the whole foils and (b) detail of one impaction particle deposit. Consequently, the stitching of the partial 3D images was performed to display a 3D image of the whole foils. Subsequently, the tilt correction of the 3D image was performed by defining the base plane. Since the particle volumes of individual impactor deposits vary only negligibly within a single impactor stage, the total volume of the particles captured in a single stage was obtained as the average volume of the reference one deposit multiplied by the total number of the deposits of the respective impactor stage. The geometry of the reference impaction deposit was obtained as the average of the geometric characteristics of at least 3 analyzed impaction deposits within a single impactor stage. From the measured bulk volume and sample weight, the bulk particle density of the three tested fuel samples was calculated. The bulk density was identified with sufficient accuracy for a particle size range of 51–595 nm (impactor stages 4–8). In this size range, the particle deposition volumes identified with the microscope are significant. The particle deposits in the other impactor stages were too small to allow for the optical identification of their volume with sufficient accuracy. Using the data obtained through the microscopic analysis, a 3D profile of the reference impactor deposit was further obtained to evaluate the angle of repose. For this purpose, the angle between the horizontal plane and the maximum slope of the deposit contour was monitored; see Figure 3. Figure 2. Example of an optical microscope view: ( a ) view of the whole foils and ( b ) detail of one impaction particle deposit. Consequently, the stitching of the partial 3D images was performed to display a 3D image of the whole foils. Subsequently, the tilt correction of the 3D image was performed by defining the base plane. Since the particle volumes of individual impactor deposits vary only negligibly within a single impactor stage, the total volume of the particles captured in a single stage was obtained as the average volume of the reference one deposit multiplied by the total number of the deposits of the respective impactor stage. The geometry of the reference impaction deposit was obtained as the average of the geometric characteristics of at least 3 analyzed impaction deposits within a single impactor stage. From the measured bulk volume and sample weight, the bulk particle density of the three tested fuel samples was calculated. The bulk density was identified with sufficient accuracy for a particle size range of 51–595 nm (impactor stages 4–8). In this size range, the particle deposition volumes identified with the microscope are significant. The particle deposits in the other impactor stages were too small to allow for the optical identification of their volume with sufficient accuracy. Using the data obtained through the microscopic analysis, a 3D profile of the reference impactor deposit was further obtained to evaluate the angle of repose. For this purpose, the angle between the horizontal plane and the maximum slope of the deposit contour was monitored; see Figure 3.
Fire 2023,6, 445 6 of 13 Fire 2023, 6, x FOR PEER REVIEW 6 Figure 3. Analysis of impaction deposit with optical digital microscope. 3. Results The measured particle mass concentrations are given under normal conditions (101.325 kPa, 0 °C, and 0% gas humidity), and referenced to an oxygen level of 10%. 3.1. Mass Distribution of Particles The particle size distribution was identified gravimetrically from the particle samples collected at each stage of the cascade impactor. To compare the tested fuels with each other, the results of the measurements made with the same fuel were averaged and normalized based on the sampling time. The X-axis in the size distribution plot (Figure 4) represents the particle size and the Y-axis is the mass concentration of the captured particles. The figure shows that the flue gas from wood logs burning in the boiler carries the largest mass concentration of particles of the observed size, followed by the wood pellets, and the flue gas from coke burning carries the least particles. The highest particle mass concentration was identified for particles in the size range of 89–146 nm (stage 5) for all three fuels tested. Wood logs, wood pellets, and coke contribute 50%, 30%, and 20%, respectively, to the total sum of the mass concentrations of particles emitted from all three fuels. Table 3 shows the percentage mass concentrations of particles of each size fraction. Although coke produces the lowest particle mass concentration, it produces 12% percent more PM1 particles in the particle size range. Table 3. Percentage of size fractions for individual fuels Fuel PM1 (%) PM1–2.5 (%) PM2.5–10 (%) Wood pellets 50 47 3 Wood logs 50 45 6 Coke 62 36 2 Figure 3. Analysis of impaction deposit with optical digital microscope. 3. Results The measured particle mass concentrations are given under normal conditions (101.325 kPa, 0 ◦C, and 0% gas humidity), and referenced to an oxygen level of 10%. 3.1. Mass Distribution of Particles The particle size distribution was identified gravimetrically from the particle samples collected at each stage of the cascade impactor. To compare the tested fuels with each other, the results of the measurements made with the same fuel were averaged and normalized based on the sampling time. The X-axis in the size distribution plot (Figure 4) represents the particle size and the Y-axis is the mass concentration of the captured particles. The figure shows that the flue gas from wood logs burning in the boiler carries the largest mass concentration of particles of the observed size, followed by the wood pellets, and the flue gas from coke burning carries the least particles. The highest particle mass concentration was identified for particles in the size range of 89–146 nm (stage 5) for all three fuels tested. Wood logs, wood pellets, and coke contribute 50%, 30%, and 20%, respectively, to the total sum of the mass concentrations of particles emitted from all three fuels. Table 3shows the percentage mass concentrations of particles of each size fraction. Although coke produces the lowest particle mass concentration, it produces 12% percent more PM1 particles in the particle size range. Fire 2023, 6, x FOR PEER REVIEW 7 Figure 4. Particle size distribution of three measured fuels with HT-DLPI+. 3.2. Particle Image Analysis Figure 5 shows details of the particles captured with the impactor during wood pellet, wood log, and coke combustion for the selected size classes (stages 7, 9, and 12). The first column of figures shows particles of 247–373 nm, the second shows 595–939 nm, and the third shows 2460–3650 nm. In general, the particles from wood pellets are black, from wood logs, they are brown, and from coke, they are white or black–white–brown, depending on the combustion temperature. The coke particles that are shown are white, and the larger coke particles are orange. In the case of a different type of boiler and different combustion conditions, the chemical composition of the particles may vary, and therefore, the color of the particles may also be different. However, the chemical analysis and optical analysis of the particles in terms of their particle color under different combustion conditions is beyond the scope of this article. 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 Particle concentration [mg/Nm3] Particle size [μm] Wood pellets Wood logs Coke Figure 4. Particle size distribution of three measured fuels with HT-DLPI+.
Fire 2023,6, 445 7 of 13 Table 3. Percentage of size fractions for individual fuels. Fuel PM1 (%) PM1–2.5 (%) PM2.5–10 (%) Wood pellets 50 47 3 Wood logs 50 45 6 Coke 62 36 2 3.2. Particle Image Analysis Figure 5shows details of the particles captured with the impactor during wood pellet, wood log, and coke combustion for the selected size classes (stages 7, 9, and 12). The first column of figures shows particles of 247–373 nm, the second shows 595–939 nm, and the third shows 2460–3650 nm. In general, the particles from wood pellets are black, from wood logs, they are brown, and from coke, they are white or black–white–brown, depending on the combustion temperature. The coke particles that are shown are white, and the larger coke particles are orange. In the case of a different type of boiler and different combustion conditions, the chemical composition of the particles may vary, and therefore, the color of the particles may also be different. However, the chemical analysis and optical analysis of the particles in terms of their particle color under different combustion conditions is beyond the scope of this article. Fire 2023, 6, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 Figure 5. Detail of captured particles: (a) wood pellets; (b) wood logs; (c) coke. 3.3. Bulk Density of Particles Table 4 shows the average values of the identified particle bulk densities obtained for the particle size fraction o f 51–595 nm. The results show that the particles emitted during wood log combustion have the lowest bulk density, followed by particles emitted during pellet combustion, and the particles emitted during coke combustion have the highest bulk density. For all fuels, the bulk density of the particles decreases with the increasing particle size. The greater measurement uncertainty is due to the measurement method—the ability of the instrument to capture the entire volume of the deposit in 3D. A larger number of measurements could reduce the measurement uncertainty. Figure 6 shows the bulk densities with a linear trend line (dashed lines), expressed based on the following equations: Coke: 𝑦 = −1974𝑥 + 1384 (1) Wood pellets: 𝑦 = −1974𝑥 + 1384 (2) Wood logs: 𝑦 = −1974𝑥 + 1384 (3) Table 4. Relationship between identified particle bulk density and particle size. Particle Size (µm) Bulk Density (kg/m3) Stage Range Wood Pellets SSD Wood Logs SSD Coke SSD 4 0.0512–0.0887 1108 215 785 70 1330 165 5 0.0887–0.146 716 98 696 104 1080 47 6 0.146–0.247 661 86 597 93 978 110 7 0.247–0.373 569 86 492 89 806 231 8 0.373–0.595 372 30 320 99 435 69 Figure 5. Detail of captured particles: (a) wood pellets; (b) wood logs; (c) coke. 3.3. Bulk Density of Particles Table 4shows the average values of the identified particle bulk densities obtained for the particle size fraction of 51–595 nm. The results show that the particles emitted during wood log combustion have the lowest bulk density, followed by particles emitted during pellet combustion, and the particles emitted during coke combustion have the highest bulk density.
Fire 2023,6, 445 8 of 13 Table 4. Relationship between identified particle bulk density and particle size. Particle Size (µm) Bulk Density (kg/m3) Stage Range Wood Pellets SSD Wood Logs SSD Coke SSD 4 0.0512–0.0887 1108 215 785 70 1330 165 5 0.0887–0.146 716 98 696 104 1080 47 6 0.146–0.247 661 86 597 93 978 110 7 0.247–0.373 569 86 492 89 806 231 8 0.373–0.595 372 30 320 99 435 69 For all fuels, the bulk density of the particles decreases with the increasing particle size. The greater measurement uncertainty is due to the measurement method—the ability of the instrument to capture the entire volume of the deposit in 3D. A larger number of measurements could reduce the measurement uncertainty. Figure 6shows the bulk densities with a linear trend line (dashed lines), expressed based on the following equations: Coke: y=−1974x+ 1384 (1) Wood pellets: y=−1974x+ 1384 (2) Wood logs: y=−1974x+ 1384 (3) Fire 2023, 6, x FOR PEER REVIEW 9 Figure 6. Relationship between identified particle bulk density and particle size. 3.4. Evaluation of Cohesion Particle cohesion was assessed using a geometric analysis of the shape of the captured particles’ profile. The contour line of the profile was obtained through an automated microscopic measurement in a selected vertical plane passing through the highest point of the particle deposition. The captured particles of smaller sizes (stages 3–6) form a nearly rotationally symmetric compact particle deposit below each impaction nozzle. Particles of larger sizes (stage 7 and above) form an irregularly shaped deposit. This trend is the same for all fuels. Another optically observable trend for all fuels is the decrease in the cohesion of the particle arrangement with the increasing size of the particles, which is fully consistent with the bulk density pattern depicted in Figure 6. A similar conclusion was reached by Shi et al. in their study, for particle sizes up to 150 μm [21]. Figure 7 shows an example of the shape of the identified contours of the particulate deposits obtained during wood log burning in impactor stages 3–8. The Xand Y-axes are not to scale. The cohesion of the particles was evaluated by identifying the angle between the horizontal plane and the greatest slope of the deposit contour (the angle of repose); see Figure 3. The average angle of repose of the deposition of the captured particles is 30–40° for the smallest particles (stage 4). As the particle size increases, the angle of repose increases and approaches 90°. The angles of repose of the different fuels do not differ significantly from each other. Therefore, the average values of the angle of repose of all tested fuels were evaluated; see Table 5. An evaluation of the detailed differences in the bulk properties of the particles emitted by the different fuels cannot be obtained using this procedure. The condition of identical particle mass deposition from different fuels is not ensured for a detailed evaluation. 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.5 Bulk density [kg/m3] Particle size [µm] Coke Wood pellets Wood logs Figure 6. Relationship between identified particle bulk density and particle size. 3.4. Evaluation of Cohesion Particle cohesion was assessed using a geometric analysis of the shape of the captured particles’ profile. The contour line of the profile was obtained through an automated microscopic measurement in a selected vertical plane passing through the highest point of the particle deposition. The captured particles of smaller sizes (stages 3–6) form a nearly rotationally symmetric compact particle deposit below each impaction nozzle. Particles of larger sizes (stage 7 and above) form an irregularly shaped deposit. This trend is the same for all fuels. Another optically observable trend for all fuels is the decrease in the
Fire 2023,6, 445 9 of 13 cohesion of the particle arrangement with the increasing size of the particles, which is fully consistent with the bulk density pattern depicted in Figure 6. A similar conclusion was reached by Shi et al. in their study, for particle sizes up to 150 µm [21]. Figure 7shows an example of the shape of the identified contours of the particulate deposits obtained during wood log burning in impactor stages 3–8. The Xand Y-axes are not to scale. The cohesion of the particles was evaluated by identifying the angle between the horizontal plane and the greatest slope of the deposit contour (the angle of repose); see Figure 3. The average angle of repose of the deposition of the captured particles is 30–40 ◦ for the smallest particles (stage 4). As the particle size increases, the angle of repose increases and approaches 90 ◦ . The angles of repose of the different fuels do not differ significantly from each other. Therefore, the average values of the angle of repose of all tested fuels were evaluated; see Table 5. An evaluation of the detailed differences in the bulk properties of the particles emitted by the different fuels cannot be obtained using this procedure. The condition of identical particle mass deposition from different fuels is not ensured for a detailed evaluation. Fire 2023, 6, x FOR PEER REVIEW 10 Figure 7. Profile of captured particles. Table 5. Average angles of repose. Stage Particle Size (µm) Angle of Repose (°) 4 0.0512–0.0887 34 5 0.0887–0.146 45 6 0.146–0.247 50 7 0.247–0.373 55 8 0.373–0.595 84 4. Discussion The studies from Stringer et al. and Freeman indicate that with a smaller particle size (less mass), the contribution of gravitational forces decreases and the influence of interparticle forces increases [22,23]. Specifically, for particle sizes smaller than 100 μm, the interparticle attractive van der Waals forces exceed gravity. When the attractive forces exceed the mass of the particle by at least an order of magnitude, the particles become very cohesive and form aggregates (strongly bound particles). At the same time, smaller particles have a relatively large specific surface area, resulting in very high adhesion and an associated increase in interparticle forces [24]. In general, smaller particles tend to be more cohesive for these reasons. Larger particles tend to pack tightly into homogeneous layers with a rigid structure. Such layers may have significant void spaces between touching particles but are generally free of large voids [23]. Generally, the smaller the particles, the more they stick together due to smaller void spaces, resulting in a higher bulk density and cohesion. However, it must be considered that the cohesion and bulk density are also influenced by the particle type and other particle properties (see Introduction). The cohesion of fine particles significantly influences the formation of particle clusters and particle deposits in the flue gas paths. Depending on the properties of the particles, the particles are either permanently joined or only briefly contacted with subsequent separation. The maintenance of long-term particle contact is used, for example, in the filtration of fine particles using porous filters [25–28]. The pores of the filter are, in most cases, significantly larger in size than the particles to be captured. The capture process 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 1000 2000 3000 Height [μm] Length [μm] Stage 3 Stage 4 Stage 5 Stage 6 Stage 7 Stage 8 Figure 7. Profile of captured particles. Table 5. Average angles of repose. Stage Particle Size (µm) Angle of Repose (◦) 4 0.0512–0.0887 34 5 0.0887–0.146 45 6 0.146–0.247 50 7 0.247–0.373 55 8 0.373–0.595 84 4. Discussion The studies from Stringer et al. and Freeman indicate that with a smaller particle size (less mass), the contribution of gravitational forces decreases and the influence of interparticle forces increases [ 22 , 23 ]. Specifically, for particle sizes smaller than 100 µ m, the interparticle attractive van der Waals forces exceed gravity. When the attractive forces exceed the mass of the particle by at least an order of magnitude, the particles become very cohesive and form aggregates (strongly bound particles). At the same time, smaller