scieee AI-readable full text Open interactive document viewer

Antitumor activity of xanthone derivatives: effects on the immune microenvironment

Viviana Vilar da Silva

Full text

VIVIANA VILAR DA SILVA ANTITUMOR ACTIVITY OF XANTHONE DERIVATIVES: EFFECTS ON THE IMMUNE MICROENVIRONMENT Dissertação de Candidatura ao grau de Mestre em Oncologia (Especialização em Oncologia Molecular) submetida ao Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar da Universidade do Porto. Orientador: Doutor Rui Medeiros Professor Associado Convidado de Ciências Médicas Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal. Co-orientadores: Doutora Fátima Cerqueira Professora Associada de Ciências Médicas Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Fernando Pessoa, Porto, Portugal. Doutora Madalena M.M. Pinto Professora Catedrática em Química Orgânica e Farmacêutica Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal This work was developed in the Center of Investigation in Biomedicine of Fernando Pessoa – Energy, environment and health research unit (CEBIMED of FP-ENAS), in Laboratório de Química Orgânica e Farmacêutica, Departamento de Ciências Químicas, Faculdade de Farmácia da Universidade do Porto, and in the Centro de Química Medicinal da Universidade do Porto – CEQUIMED-UP and was funded through national funds from Fernando Pessoa Fundation, FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia under the project CEQUIMED – PEstOE/SAU/UI4040/2014, FEDER, POCI, POPH/FSE/QREN. Agradecimentos Não posso deixar de agradecer a quem direta ou indiretamente colaborou para a realização deste trabalho e que, assim, contribuiu para o meu crescimento tanto profissional como pessoal: Ao Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar, na pessoa do Digníssimo Diretor Professor Doutor António Sousa Pereira, e à coordenação do mestrado de Oncologia, na pessoa da Professora Doutora Berta Silva, pela oportunidade de aprofundar os meus conhecimentos ao longo destes dois anos de mestrado. À Universidade Fernando Pessoa, na pessoa do Digníssimo Reitor Professor Doutor Salvato Trigo, pelas condições de trabalho que me proporcionou. Ao Professor Doutor Rui Medeiros, agradeço a orientação e a oportunidade que me proporcionou, a simpatia com que sempre me recebeu e todos os conhecimentos que me transmitiu. À Professora Doutora Fátima Cerqueira, minha coorientadora, o meu sincero agradecimento pelo apoio constante, pela disponibilidade, pela amabilidade e pelos indispensáveis conselhos que forma determinantes na realização deste trabalho. À Professora Doutora Madalena Pinto, pela coorientação, porque me permitiu integrar este projeto, obrigada por toda a sabedoria que me transmitiu e pela enorme simpatia. Aos meus colegas de trabalho, nomeadamente à Jani Silva, Nair Campos, Liliana e Carla Gabriel pelos conselhos, pelo apoio e principalmente pelos bons momentos. Aos restantes membros do FP-ENAS/CEBIMED, aos professores, técnicos e auxiliares o meu muito obrigado pela simpatia e pela disponibilidade. À Mariana Santos, porque a tua amizade é indispensável, assim como os teus conselhos, obrigada por toda a ajuda e por, apesar de seres a que está mais longe, estares sempre presente. Ao Raphael Costa, pela enorme paciência, por me ajudares em tudo que podes, por estares ao meu lado em todos os momentos e porque o teu amor me ajudou a superar os piores momentos. Aos meus pais, porque as palavras não são suficientes para vos agradecer por tudo que fizeram e fazem por mim, por serem um exemplo de humildade e determinação, porque sempre me apoiaram incondicionalmente e porque me dão força para nunca desistir. Agradeço do fundo do coração todo o esforço que fazem diariamente para me proporcionarem uma vida melhor. Table of contents Nomenclature ................................................................................................................. i Resumo ........................................................................................................................ iii Abstract ......................................................................................................................... v I. General Introduction ...............................................................................................1 Chemistry of xanthones: General considerations .......................................................2 Biological activities of xanthones ...............................................................................3 Melanoma ..................................................................................................................5 Immune System .........................................................................................................6 Tumor immunology ..................................................................................................11 References ..............................................................................................................14 II. State of art ............................................................................................................23 Xanthones as potential agents in melanoma treatment ............................................24 Importance of immunomodulation in melanoma treatment .......................................25 References ..............................................................................................................27 III. Objectives and outline ..........................................................................................29 IV. Materials and Methods .........................................................................................31 Chemicals and reagents ..........................................................................................32 Xanthones ...............................................................................................................32 Cell lines ..................................................................................................................32 Cell growth assay ....................................................................................................33 Antitumor effect of conditioned macrophages culture medium .................................34 NO production assay ...............................................................................................34 NO scavenging assay ..............................................................................................35 Human mononuclear cells MTT-proliferation assay .................................................35 Cytokine quantification .............................................................................................35 MTT-viability assay ..................................................................................................36 Statistical analysis ...................................................................................................36 Ethics .......................................................................................................................36 References ..............................................................................................................37 V. Natural Xanthones: alpha-mangostin ....................................................................39 Paper 1 (submitted to Fitoterapia in 29-09-2014): Mangosteen extract: “angel or demon”? The role of xanthones of mangosteen in potential adverse effects.................40 Paper 2 (draft): “Alpha-mangostin antitumor activity: cytotoxicity and influence on the immune system microenvironment” ..............................................................................69 VI. Synthetic xanthone: 1,2-dihydroxyxanthone .........................................................89 Paper 3 (draft): “1,2-dihydroxyxanthone antitumor activity: cytotoxicity and influence on the immune system microenvironment” ...................................................................90 VII. Conclusions ........................................................................................................ 105 List of figures Figure 1 Xanthone basic skeleton .................................................................................2 Figure 2: Structure of the main xanthones from mangosteen........................................3 Figure 3: Polarization of macrophages and corresponding functions. Legend: GC indicate glucocorticoid; IC, immune complex; IL-1ra, IL-1 receptor antagonist; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; MR, mannose receptor; SR, scavenger receptor - adapted from (Chanmee et al. 2014). ......................................................................................................8 Figure 4 Cytokine network in immune system – adapted from (Zhang and An 2007) ..10 Figure 5: Schematic presentation of the role of immune system in cancer. Legend: APC indicates antigen -presenting cell; CTL, cytotoxic T lymphocyte or CD8+ T cell; NK, natural killer cell; Th, T helper cell; Treg, regulatory T cell and TAA, tumor-associated antigens - adapted from (Lakshmi Narendra et al. 2013)..................................................13 Figure 6 Xanthone basic skeleton ...............................................................................44 Figure 7 Structure of the main xanthones from mangosteen .......................................45 Figure 8 Effect of xanthones of mangosteen at different stages of cell cycle regulation. Legend: cdc indicate cell division cycle protein; CDK, cyclin-dependent kinases; Chk or CHEK2, checkpoint kinase; G1, gap phase; G2, gap phase 2; M, mitosis phase; MDM2, murine doble minute 2; MG, mangosteen xanthones; p21cip1, cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1; p27kip1, cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor; p53, tumor protein p53; S, DNA synthesis phase. ..............................................................................................................49 Figure 9: alpha-Mangostin ..........................................................................................71 Figure 10: Production of IL-1β, IL-10, TGF-β1 and TNF-α by THP-1 macrophages. Cytokine production was evaluated on unstimulated macrophages (basal), LPS-stimulated macrophages and macrophages treated with 3 and 6 µM of alpha-mangostin. Data are the mean ± SEM from tree independent experiments performed in duplicate. * p < 0.001; ┼ p > 0.05. ................................................................................................................................76 iv inibiu a interleucina 1 beta e a interleucina 10, estimulou ainda o fator transformador do crescimento beta 1 e o fator de necrose tumoral alfa em macrófagos. A alfa-mangostina também interferiu com a proliferação de linfócitos e a expressão da interleucina 10 e do fator de necrose tumoral alfa por estas células. Quanto ao impacto direto dessa modulação no crescimento de melanoma, os compostos apresentam uma melhoria de efeito citotóxico. No entanto, só no tratamento com 1,2-dihidroxixantona, esta melhoria pode ser associada com a modulação de macrófagos pela xantona, uma vez que o efeito da alfa-mangostina em doses baixas é semelhante aos macrófagos não tratados na linha celular em estudo. Em conclusão, estes resultados permitiram inferir um impacto potencial da alfamangostina e da 1,2-dihidroxixantona no tratamento do melanoma, devido à sua atividade citotóxica e ao sugestivo efeito imunoterapêutico em tumores. v Abstract Cancer is one of the most aggressive and lethal diseases, remaining a challenge for researchers and physicians, in spite of decades of research and investment in this area. Later detection and constrains of current therapies, associated with chemoresistance and toxic side effects, are the main problems. Melanoma is a melanocytic tumor highly immunogenic and with a great predisposition to metastasize. Its incidence is increasing worldwide and the mortality rates associated to the disease are very high. Therefore, it is imperative to find therapeutic alternatives that overcome the actual limitations of the treatment, namely improving the spectrum and efficacy of actuation and decrease the toxicity of currently used drugs. A good strategy to avoid the tumor resistance needs a drug that targets multiple pathways. Xanthones are naturally obtained from higher plants and microorganisms. Remarkable pharmacologic proprieties have been described for these compounds, mainly their antitumor potential, which contributed to their commercialization as dietary supplement, isolation and synthesis of numerous derivatives of xanthones. In cancer, their effect comprises several physiologic pathways, interfering with multiple hallmarks of cancer, including apoptosis, cell cycle, angiogenesis, inflammation and immune surveillance making them a prospective drug candidate. The main gold of this study was the evaluation of the effects of two xanthones, alphamangostin and 1,2-dihydroxyxanthone, on A375-C5 melanoma cell growth and their capacity to modulate the immune macrophages-dependent microenvironment. The ability for the compounds to interact with different immunologic parameters that may interfere with tumor treatment were evaluated, including production of nitric oxide and expression of cytokines interleukin-1β and tumor necrosis factor-α (characteristics of M1 phenotype) and interleukin-10 and transforming growth factor-β1 (characteristic of M2 phenotype). alpha-Mangostin was also tested in lymphocytes, namely in cell proliferation and cytokines production. This activity was previously described for 1,2-dihydroxyxanthone. In all assays, in vitro cellular systems were used, mostly of human origin. Xanthones caused a decrease in nitric oxide production and interfere with the expression of cytokines by stimulated macrophages and/or lymphocytes. Alpha-mangostin suppressed expression of interleukin-1β and transforming growth factor-β1, and stimulated tumor necrosis factor-α. 1,2-Dihydroxyxanthone inhibited interleukin-1β and interleukin-10, stimulated transforming growth factor-β1 and tumor necrosis factor-α in macrophages. Alpha-mangostin also interferes with lymphocytes proliferation and the expression of interleukin-10 and tumor necrosis factor-α by these cells. Concerning the direct impact of this modulation on melanoma growth, the compounds exhibit an vi improvement of cytotoxic effect. However, only in 1,2-dihydroxyxanthone treatment, this improvement could be associated with modulation of macrophages, since the effect of alpha-mangostin at lower doses is similar to non-treated macrophages in the cell line in study. In conclusion, these finds allowed to infer a prospective impact of alpha-mangostin and 1,2-dihydroxyxanthone in melanoma treatment, due to their cytotoxic activity and suggestive effect in cancer immunotherapy. I. General Introduction Xanthones, melanoma and immune system I. 2 Chemistry of xanthones: General considerations Xanthones are biologically active tricyclic molecules characterized by a dibenzo-γpyrone nucleus or 9H-xanthen-9-one (Figure 1) (Pinto et al. 2005; Mazimba et al. 2013). The diversity of xanthone derivatives is possible due to the variation of the nature and position of substituents on the A and B rings. According to that, natural xanthones may be categorized into: simple oxygenated, glycosylated, prenylated and their derivatives (xanthone dimers, xanthonolignoids, and miscellaneous). On the other hand, the synthetic xanthones can have simple groups such as hydroxyl, methoxyl, methyl, carboxyl, as well as more complex substituents such as epoxide, azole, methylidenebutyrolactone, aminoalcohol, sulfamoyl, methylthiocarboxylic acid, and dihydropyridine in their scaffold (Pinto et al. 2005). Natural xanthones of higher plants mainly occur in two families, Guttiferae and Gentianaceae, and can also be found in microorganisms as fungi and lichens (Vieira and Kijjoa 2005; Mazimba et al. 2013). The majority of these compounds was obtained from Garcinia mangostana Linn, being the most abundant and frequently studied, the αmangostin, β-mangostin, γ-mangostin, garcinone E and gartanin (Figure 2) (Shan et al. 2011). Figure 1 Xanthone basic skeleton I. 3 Xanthones have shown remarkable biological/pharmacological activities linked with their tricyclic scaffold, depending on the nature and/or position of the diverse constituents (Mazimba et al. 2013). As xanthones from natural origin are quite limited in type and position of the substituents due to the biosynthetic pathways, the syntheses of new xanthones can attempt to alter or improve their activity by having different nature and positions of the substituents on the nucleus of these compounds (Pedro et al. 2002). Biological activities of xanthones In the last decade, the interest for natural or derivative xanthones has been growing as readily confirmed by the increased numbers of scientific reports (Gutierrez-Orozco and Failla 2013). These have allowed to find a great variety of biological/pharmacological activities associated with xanthone derivatives including analgesic (Bianco et al. 1989; Garrido et al. 2001; Cui et al. 2010), antioxidant (Madan et al. 2002; Jung et al. 2006), anti-inflammatory (Lin et al. 1996; Madan et al. 2002; Teixeira et al. 2005; Chen et al. 2008), antitumor (Pinto et al. 2005; Pedraza-Chaverri et al. 2008; Shan et al. 2011; Gutierrez-Orozco and Failla 2013), antiallergic (Pfister et al. 1972; Nakatani et al. 2002), antimicrobial (Pinto et al. 2005; Pedraza-Chaverri et al. 2008), neuroprotective (Li and Ohizumi 2004; Weecharangsan et al. 2006) and immunomodulatory (Makare et al. 2001; Tang et al. 2009). In spite of all promising proprieties in the improvement of treatment of a number of pathologies as cancer (Pinto et al. 2005; Shan et al. 2011), diabetes (Ichiki et al. 1998; Figure 2: Structure of the main xanthones from mangosteen I. 4 Bumrungpert et al. 2009), cardiac (Jiang et al. 2004; Devi Sampath and Vijayaraghavan 2007), psychiatric (Chairungsrilerd et al. 1996), autoimmune (Madan et al. 2002; YusufMakagiansar et al. 2002; Leiro et al. 2004) and neurodegenerative pathologies (Weecharangsan et al. 2006; El-Seedi et al. 2010), it is important to note that the majority of the compounds were only evaluated in cell lines or animal models. According to that the safety and efficacy of these products cannot be completely assure. Vadimezan (5,6-dimethylxanthenone-4-acetic acid, DMXAA), a promising anticancer xanthone that presented important proprieties as vascular disrupting-agent is an example of the need of appropriated clinical trial. This compound was tested until phase II trial suggesting potential application in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin for nonsmall-cell lung cancer (McKeage et al. 2009). Although, the phase III revealed a lack of utility to human use against this cancer due to a specie-specific role (Baguley and Ching; Lara et al. 2011). Antitumor activity Among all physiological activities mediated by xanthone compounds, the antitumor capacity seemed to be quite remarkable since they exert their inhibitory effect in a significant range of tumors. This activity was demonstrated in vitro and/or in vivo on breast (Pedro et al. 2002; Moongkarndi et al. 2004; García-Rivera et al. 2011), colorectal (Gobbi et al. 2002; Nakagawa et al. 2007; Watanapokasin et al. 2010), prostate (Johnson et al. 2012), colon (Chitchumroonchokchai et al. 2013), lung (Kostakis et al. 2002; Suksamrarn et al. 2006; Rajendran et al. 2008), glioma (Chao et al. 2011), hepatoma (Ho et al. 2002; Zou et al. 2004), leukemia (Kostakis et al. 2002; Seo et al. 2002; Matsumoto et al. 2003; Yao et al. 2010) and melanoma (Joseph et al. 1999; Pedro et al. 2002; Wang et al. 2011), among others (Pinto et al. 2005; Gutierrez-Orozco and Failla 2013). Analyze analyse The chemotherapeutic and chemopreventive potential owing their inhibitory effect on every steps in the process of tumorigenesis (initiation, promotion, and progression) and on multiple signaling targets (Sun et al. 2002; Liu et al. 2013). Indeed, these compounds are able to modulate a considerable number of hallmarks of cancer by induce cell cycle arrest, suppression of tumor cell proliferation, induction of apoptosis, differentiation, reduction of inflammation, and inhibition of adhesion, invasion, and metastasis (Pinto et al. 2005; Akao et al. 2008; Pedraza-Chaverri et al. 2008; Shan et al. 2011; Gutierrez-Orozco and Failla 2013). The induction of apoptosis may be possible, among other factors, due activation of caspase cascade and disruption of mitochondrial membrane and consequent release of cytochrome c (Matsumoto et al. 2004). Antiproliferative effects of xanthones were demonstrated as result of cell cycle arrest at G1 and S phases (Matsumoto et al. 2005). I. 5 The inhibition of metastatic process is likely associated to inhibition of matrix metalloproteinase (MMPs; particularly MMP-2 and MMP-9) and u-PA (urokinase - plasminogen activator) expression by JNK1/2 (Jun N-terminal kinase), NF-κB (nuclear factor kappa-B) and AP-1 (activator protein 1) activity suppression (Hung et al. 2009). Therefore, xanthones could be agents of an emerging antitumor therapy capable of alter multiple signaling targets, affect various traits of cancer and consequently prevent adaptive resistance (Hanahan and Weinberg 2011; Liu et al. 2013). Anti-inflammatory activity There is a range of evidences from the involvement of inflammatory pathways in tumorigenesis (Kundu and Surh 2008). Xanthones have demonstrated both, antitumor and anti-inflammatory potential. Several xanthone derivatives, mainly the natural ones, attenuated the expression of inflammatory mediators as TNF-α (tumor necrosis factor-α) and interleukins 6 (IL-6) in cell lines of macrophages and adipocytes and decreased the activation of signaling pathways including IL-1, mitogen-activated protein kinase (MEK), Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK), extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK), signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 (STAT-1), NF-κB, AP-1 in these cells (Kumar et al. 2003; Leiro et al. 2004; Bumrungpert and Kalpravidh 2010; Liu et al. 2012). Immunomodulatory effects were also observed in murine models (Jang et al. 2012). Reduction of inducible NO synthase (iNOS) mRNA was reported for several xanthones in murine macrophages cell lines (Garrido et al. 2004; Teixeira et al. 2005; Chen et al. 2008; Tewtrakul et al. 2009) or murine models (Leiro et al. 2003). Decreased levels of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) were also associated with activity of xanthones (Leiro et al. 2004; Chen et al. 2008; Tewtrakul et al. 2009). This represents a small part of all the reported anti-inflammatory effects of xanthones, many others could be added to those as demonstrated in some published reviews (Pinto et al. 2005; Shan et al. 2011; Gutierrez-Orozco et al. 2013). Melanoma Melanoma is a malignancy of melanocytes or their precursors, the melanoblasts (Asnaghi et al. 2012). This is primarily located in the skin, but can also be found in ears, gastrointestinal tract, eyes, oral and genital mucosa and leptomeninges (McCourt et al. 2014). The main risk factor associated to this cancer is the excess of sun exposition as repeatedly referred in several prevention campaigns. In spite of this attempt to control I. 6 emerging cases, its incidence rate is still rising worldwide at highest levels than other tumors (Maio 2012; Liu et al. 2014). Melanocytic tumors presented a highly predisposition to metastasize, however, when early detected frequently means a successful treatment and increasing of survival. Contrariwise, metastatic tumors represent poor prognostic with high associated mortality (Korn et al. 2008; Gast et al. 2011). Melanoma tumorigenesis requires a multistep process, however, a great variety of evidences referred the crucial involvement of immune system in tumor progression (Hussein 2004). The character highly immunogenic of melanocytic tumors and the influence of host immune response and microenvironment inflammatory cells in cancer growth were verified (Hussein 2004; Dranoff 2009; Chen et al. 2011). Indeed, primary melanomas undergo spontaneous regression much more frequently than any other cancer that may be a sign of immunosurveillance or, by other way, it may be due melanoma are easier to visualize (Printz 2001; Kalialis et al. 2009). Nevertheless, other evidences corroborate the involvement of immune system, namely the relatively amount of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in melanoma microenvironment compared with other cancers and associated with favorable prognostic (Maio 2012; Kushnir and Merimsky 2013) and the appearance of autoimmune condition as vitiligo in melanoma patients or patients treated with immunotherapy which normally means a better disease outcome (Le Gal et al. 2001; Phan et al. 2001; Boasberg et al. 2006). In more advanced stages, this cancer became capable to avoid immunosurveillance (Reiman et al. 2007; Speeckaert et al. 2011) and its progression and metastatic potential may be supported by immune cells present in tumor microenvironment, as the tumorassociated macrophages (TAMs) since they are the most abundant leucocytes in melanoma and represent a poor prognostic (Brocker et al. 1988; Bernengo et al. 2000; Makitie et al. 2001; Varney et al. 2005; Porta et al. 2007; Solinas et al. 2009; Mantovani and Sica 2010; Qian and Pollard 2010). Immune System Immune system is a complex network of cells, tissues and organ that plays an important role in defense against multiple microorganisms and toxins and it is essential to organism homeostasis by respond not only to exogenous, but also to endogenous signals (Matzinger 2002). As is known, this system could be divided in two components, the innate and adaptive immunity. I. 7 Innate immunity is the immediate response to a “danger” and comprises a variety of cells, including dendritic cells (DC), macrophages, neutrophils and natural killer (NK) cells (Vesely et al. 2011; Lakshmi Narendra et al. 2013). Adaptive immunity is antigen specific due to somatic rearrangement on genes that codify each receptor of lymphocytes, i.e. the T cell receptor (TCR) for T lymphocytes and immunoglobin for B lymphocytes. Beyond T and B lymphocytes, adaptive immune system comprises humoral mediators including cytokines and antibodies (Vesely et al. 2011; Lakshmi Narendra et al. 2013). Macrophages Macrophages are essential cells of innate immune system that play an important role in host defense and tissue homeostasis maintenance (Gordon and Martinez 2010). They derived from circulating monocytes originates from monocytic precursors of bone marrow. Monocytes are attracted to target tissues where differentiate into mature macrophages (Murray and Wynn 2011; Davies et al. 2013). Macrophages are heterogeneous cells able to polarize in different subtypes among the classic phenotype (M1) and the alternatives (M2-like), according to the received stimuli which influence their immune response (Figure 3) (Mantovani et al. 2002; Martinez et al. 2009). The M1 phenotype is triggered by Th1 (T-helper 1 lymphocyte) cytokine interferonγ (IFN-γ), bacteria constituents (like LPS) or Toll-like receptors (TLRs) agonists. Once activated, M1 macrophages produce pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α, IL-1β, IL6 and IL-23, great quantities of MHC (major histocompatibility complex) class I and II (essential for antigen presentation), nitric oxide (NO) and pro-inflammatory chemokines. They promote the recruitment of Th1 cells, CD8+ CTL (cytotoxic T cells) and NK cells leading to an inflammatory response and antitumor immunity. (Mantovani et al. 2002; Mantovani et al. 2004; Fairweather and Cihakova 2009; Hao et al. 2012; Sica and Mantovani 2012). Conversely, M2 macrophages are activated by Th2 cytokines, including IL-4 and IL-13, or only by IL-10. They express high levels of IL-10 and TGF-β and immunosuppressive chemokines. M2-like phenotype favors the recruitment and development of Treg (regulatory T cells) and Th2, leading to a response that supports tumor growth through immunosuppression (Coffelt et al. 2009; Martinez et al. 2009; Siveen and Kuttan 2009; Hao et al. 2012; Sica and Mantovani 2012). However, is difficult to establish a linear effect of M1 and M2 macrophages in immune system. I. 14 References Akao Y, Nakagawa Y, Iinuma M et al (2008) Anti-cancer effects of xanthones from pericarps of mangosteen. Int J Mol Sci 9: 355-70. Akhurst RJ & Derynck R (2001) TGF-β signaling in cancer – a double-edged sword. Trends in Cell Biology 11: S44-S51. Apte RN & Voronov E (2008) Is interleukin-1 a good or bad ‘guy’ in tumor immunobiology and immunotherapy? Immunological Reviews 222: 222-241. Asnaghi L, Ebrahimi KB, Schreck KC et al (2012) Notch signaling promotes growth and invasion in uveal melanoma. Clin Cancer Res 18: 654-65. Baguley BC & Ching L-M DMXAA: An antivascular agent with multiple host responses. International Journal of Radiation Oncology • Biology • Physics 54: 1503-1511. Balkwill F (2006) TNF-alpha in promotion and progression of cancer. Cancer Metastasis Rev 25: 409-16. Bergmann C, Strauss L, Zeidler R et al (2007) Expansion of human T regulatory type 1 cells in the microenvironment of cyclooxygenase 2 overexpressing head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Res 67: 8865-73. Bernengo MG, Quaglino P, Cappello N et al (2000) Macrophage-mediated immunostimulation modulates therapeutic efficacy of interleukin-2 based chemoimmunotherapy in advanced metastatic melanoma patients. Melanoma Res 10: 5565. Bianco A, Passacantilli P, Righi G et al (1989) Synthesis of 2-hydroxyacetyl-7-acetylxanthone, a new xanthone derivative endowed with antianaphylactic, analgesic, and antiinflammatory activities. Farmaco 44: 547-54. Boasberg PD, Hoon DS, Piro LD et al (2006) Enhanced survival associated with vitiligo expression during maintenance biotherapy for metastatic melanoma. J Invest Dermatol 126: 2658-63. Brocker EB, Zwadlo G, Holzmann B et al (1988) Inflammatory cell infiltrates in human melanoma at different stages of tumor progression. Int J Cancer 41: 562-7. Bumrungpert A, Kalpravidh R, Chitchumroonchokchai C et al (2009) Xanthones from mangosteen prevent lipopolysaccharide-mediated inflammation and insulin resistance in primary cultures of human adipocytes. The Journal of Nutrition: 1185-1191. Bumrungpert A & Kalpravidh RW (2010) Xanthones from mangosteen inhibit inflammation in human macrophages and in human adipocytes exposed to macrophageconditioned media. The Journal of …: 1-6. Chairungsrilerd N, Furukawa K, Ohta T et al (1996) Histaminergic and serotonergic receptor blocking substances from the medicinal plant Garcinia mangostana. Planta Med 62: 471-2. Chanmee T, Ontong P, Konno K et al (2014) Tumor-associated macrophages as major players in the tumor microenvironment. Cancers (Basel) 6: 1670-90. Chao AC, Hsu YL, Liu CK et al (2011) alpha-Mangostin, a dietary xanthone, induces autophagic cell death by activating the AMP-activated protein kinase pathway in glioblastoma cells. J Agric Food Chem 59: 2086-96. Chen G & Goeddel DV (2002) TNF-R1 signaling: a beautiful pathway. Science 296: 1634-5. Chen LG, Yang LL & Wang CC (2008) Anti-inflammatory activity of mangostins from Garcinia mangostana. Food Chem Toxicol 46: 688-93. Chen P, Huang Y, Bong R et al (2011) Tumor-associated macrophages promote angiogenesis and melanoma growth via adrenomedullin in a paracrine and autocrine manner. Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research 17: 7230-9. Chitchumroonchokchai C, Thomas-Ahner JM, Li J et al (2013) Anti-tumorigenicity of dietary alpha-mangostin in an HT-29 colon cell xenograft model and the tissue distribution of xanthones and their phase II metabolites. Mol Nutr Food Res 57: 203-11. I. 15 Choi BM, Pae HO, Jang SI et al (2002) Nitric oxide as a pro-apoptotic as well as antiapoptotic modulator. J Biochem Mol Biol 35: 116-26. Choudhari SK, Chaudhary M, Bagde S et al (2013) Nitric oxide and cancer: a review. World J Surg Oncol 11: 118. Coffelt SB, Hughes R & Lewis CE (2009) Tumor-associated macrophages: effectors of angiogenesis and tumor progression. Biochim Biophys Acta 1796: 11-8. Costa NL, Valadares MC, Souza PP et al (2013) Tumor-associated macrophages and the profile of inflammatory cytokines in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol 49: 21623. Cui J, Hu W, Cai Z et al (2010) New medicinal properties of mangostins: analgesic activity and pharmacological characterization of active ingredients from the fruit hull of Garcinia mangostana L. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 95: 166-72. Davies LC, Jenkins SJ, Allen JE et al (2013) Tissue-resident macrophages. Nat Immunol 14: 986-95. Devi Sampath P & Vijayaraghavan K (2007) Cardioprotective effect of alphamangostin, a xanthone derivative from mangosteen on tissue defense system against isoproterenol-induced myocardial infarction in rats. J Biochem Mol Toxicol 21: 336-9. Dranoff G (2009) Targets of protective tumor immunity. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1174: 74-80. El-Seedi HR, El-Barbary MA, El-Ghorab DM et al (2010) Recent insights into the biosynthesis and biological activities of natural xanthones. Curr Med Chem 17: 854-901. Fairweather D & Cihakova D (2009) Alternatively activated macrophages in infection and autoimmunity. J Autoimmun 33: 222-30. Fauci A, Braunwald E, Kasper D et al (2009) Harrison's Manual of Medicine, 17th Edition, McGraw-Hill Education. García-Rivera D, Delgado R, Bougarne N et al (2011) Gallic acid indanone and mangiferin xanthone are strong determinants of immunosuppressive anti-tumour effects of Mangifera indica L. bark in MDA-MB231 breast cancer cells. Cancer Letters 305: 21-31. Garrido G, Delgado R, Lemus Y et al (2004) Protection against septic shock and suppression of tumor necrosis factor alpha and nitric oxide production on macrophages and microglia by a standard aqueous extract of Mangifera indica L. (VIMANG). Role of mangiferin isolated from the extract. Pharmacol Res 50: 165-72. Garrido G, Gonzalez D, Delporte C et al (2001) Analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects of Mangifera indica L. extract (Vimang). Phytother Res 15: 18-21. Gast A, Bermejo JL, Claus R et al (2011) Association of inherited variation in Toll-like receptor genes with malignant melanoma susceptibility and survival. PLoS One 6: e24370. Gastl GA, Abrams JS, Nanus DM et al (1993) Interleukin-10 production by human carcinoma cell lines and its relationship to interleukin-6 expression. International Journal of Cancer 55: 96-101. Giavazzi R, Garofalo A, Bani MR et al (1990) Interleukin 1-induced augmentation of experimental metastases from a human melanoma in nude mice. Cancer Res 50: 4771-5. Gobbi S, Rampa A, Bisi A et al (2002) Synthesis and antitumor activity of new derivatives of xanthen-9-one-4-acetic acid. J Med Chem 45: 4931-9. Gordon S & Martinez FO (2010) Alternative activation of macrophages: mechanism and functions. Immunity 32: 593-604. Gross SS & Wolin MS (1995) Nitric oxide: pathophysiological mechanisms. Annu Rev Physiol 57: 737-69. Gutierrez-Orozco F, Chitchumroonchokchai C, Lesinski GB et al (2013) alphaMangostin: anti-inflammatory activity and metabolism by human cells. J Agric Food Chem 61: 3891-900. Gutierrez-Orozco F & Failla ML (2013) Biological activities and bioavailability of mangosteen xanthones: a critical review of the current evidence. Nutrients 5: 3163-83. Hamidullah, Changkija B & Konwar R (2012) Role of interleukin-10 in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 133: 11-21. I. 16 Hanahan D & Weinberg RA (2011) Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell 144: 646-74. Hao N-B, Lü M-H, Fan Y-H et al (2012) Macrophages in Tumor Microenvironments and the Progression of Tumors. Clinical and Developmental Immunology 2012: 11. Herman JM, Wild AT, Wang H et al (2013) Randomized phase III multi-institutional study of TNFerade biologic with fluorouracil and radiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: final results. J Clin Oncol 31: 886-94. Ho CK, Huang YL & Chen CC (2002) Garcinone E, a xanthone derivative, has potent cytotoxic effect against hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines. Planta Medica 68: 975-979. Hou YC, Janczuk A & Wang PG (1999) Current trends in the development of nitric oxide donors. Curr Pharm Des 5: 417-41. Hung SH, Shen KH, Wu CH et al (2009) Alpha-mangostin suppresses PC-3 human prostate carcinoma cell metastasis by inhibiting matrix metalloproteinase-2/9 and urokinase-plasminogen expression through the JNK signaling pathway. J Agric Food Chem 57: 1291-8. Hussain SP, Hofseth LJ & Harris CC (2003) Radical causes of cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 3: 276-85. Hussein MR (2004) Genetic pathways to melanoma tumorigenesis. J Clin Pathol 57: 797-801. Ichiki H, Miura T, Kubo M et al (1998) New antidiabetic compounds, mangiferin and its glucoside. Biol Pharm Bull 21: 1389-90. Jang HY, Kwon OK, Oh SR et al (2012) Mangosteen xanthones mitigate ovalbumininduced airway inflammation in a mouse model of asthma. Food Chem Toxicol 50: 404250. Javelaud D, Alexaki VI & Mauviel A (2008) Transforming growth factor-beta in cutaneous melanoma. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res 21: 123-32. Jiang DJ, Dai Z & Li YJ (2004) Pharmacological effects of xanthones as cardiovascular protective agents. Cardiovasc Drug Rev 22: 91-102. Jin P, Panelli MC, Marincola FM et al (2004) Cytokine polymorphism and its possible impact on cancer. Immunol Res 30: 181-90. Johnson JJ, Petiwala SM, Syed DN et al (2012) α-Mangostin, a xanthone from mangosteen fruit, promotes cell cycle arrest in prostate cancer and decreases xenograft tumor growth. Carcinogenesis 33: 413-419. Joseph WR, Cao Z, Mountjoy KG et al (1999) Stimulation of tumors to synthesize tumor necrosis factor-alpha in situ using 5,6-dimethylxanthenone-4-acetic acid: a novel approach to cancer therapy. Cancer Res 59: 633-8. Jung H-A, Su B-N, Keller WJ et al (2006) Antioxidant Xanthones from the Pericarp of Garcinia mangostana (Mangosteen). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 54: 2077-2082. Kalialis LV, Drzewiecki KT & Klyver H (2009) Spontaneous regression of metastases from melanoma: review of the literature. Melanoma Res 19: 275-82. Korn EL, Liu PY, Lee SJ et al (2008) Meta-analysis of phase II cooperative group trials in metastatic stage IV melanoma to determine progression-free and overall survival benchmarks for future phase II trials. J Clin Oncol 26: 527-34. Kostakis IK, Magiatis P, Pouli N et al (2002) Design, synthesis, and antiproliferative activity of some new pyrazole-fused amino derivatives of the pyranoxanthenone, pyranothioxanthenone, and pyranoacridone ring systems: a new class of cytotoxic agents. J Med Chem 45: 2599-609. Kouklakis G, Efremidou EI, Pitiakoudis M et al (2013) Development of primary malignant melanoma during treatment with a TNF-alpha antagonist for severe Crohn's disease: a case report and review of the hypothetical association between TNF-alpha blockers and cancer. Drug Des Devel Ther 7: 195-9. Krasagakis K, Tholke D, Farthmann B et al (1998) Elevated plasma levels of transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta1 and TGF-beta2 in patients with disseminated malignant melanoma. Br J Cancer 77: 1492-4. I. 17 Kumar IV, Paul BN, Asthana R et al (2003) Swertia chirayita mediated modulation of interleukin-1beta, interleukin-6, interleukin-10, interferon-gamma, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha in arthritic mice. Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol 25: 573-83. Kundu JK & Surh YJ (2008) Cancer chemopreventive and therapeutic potential of resveratrol: mechanistic perspectives. Cancer Lett 269: 243-61. Kundu N & Fulton AM (1997) Interleukin-10 inhibits tumor metastasis, downregulates MHC class I, and enhances NK lysis. Cell Immunol 180: 55-61. Kuo PC & Schroeder RA (1995) The emerging multifaceted roles of nitric oxide. Ann Surg 221: 220-35. Kurzrock R (2001) Cytokine deregulation in cancer. Biomed Pharmacother 55: 543-7. Kushnir I & Merimsky O (2013) The evolution in melanoma treatment as a reflection of precision-oriented medicine. Oncol Lett 5: 424-426. Lakshmi Narendra B, Eshvendar Reddy K, Shantikumar S et al (2013) Immune system: a double-edged sword in cancer. Inflamm Res 62: 823-34. Lala PK & Orucevic A (1998) Role of nitric oxide in tumor progression: lessons from experimental tumors. Cancer Metastasis Rev 17: 91-106. Lara PN, Jr., Douillard JY, Nakagawa K et al (2011) Randomized phase III placebocontrolled trial of carboplatin and paclitaxel with or without the vascular disrupting agent vadimezan (ASA404) in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 29: 2965-71. Le Gal FA, Avril MF, Bosq J et al (2001) Direct evidence to support the role of antigenspecific CD8(+) T cells in melanoma-associated vitiligo. J Invest Dermatol 117: 1464-70. Leiro J, Arranz JA, Yanez M et al (2004) Expression profiles of genes involved in the mouse nuclear factor-kappa B signal transduction pathway are modulated by mangiferin. Int Immunopharmacol 4: 763-78. Leiro JM, Alvarez E, Arranz JA et al (2003) In vitro effects of mangiferin on superoxide concentrations and expression of the inducible nitric oxide synthase, tumour necrosis factor-alpha and transforming growth factor-beta genes. Biochem Pharmacol 65: 1361-71. Li Y & Ohizumi Y (2004) Search for constituents with neurotrophic factor-potentiating activity from the medicinal plants of paraguay and Thailand. Yakugaku Zasshi 124: 41724. Lin CN, Chung MI, Liou SJ et al (1996) Synthesis and anti-inflammatory effects of xanthone derivatives. J Pharm Pharmacol 48: 532-8. Lin W-W & Karin M (2007) A cytokine-mediated link between innate immunity, inflammation, and cancer. The Journal of Clinical Investigation 117: 1175-1183. Liu J, Fukunaga-Kalabis M, Li L et al (2014) Developmental pathways activated in melanocytes and melanoma. Arch Biochem Biophys. Liu SH, Lee LT, Hu NY et al (2012) Effects of alpha-mangostin on the expression of anti-inflammatory genes in U937 cells. Chin Med 7: 19. Liu Z, Antalek M, Nguyen L et al (2013) The effect of gartanin, a naturally occurring xanthone in mangosteen juice, on the mTOR pathway, autophagy, apoptosis, and the growth of human urinary bladder cancer cell lines. Nutr Cancer 65 Suppl 1: 68-77. Madan B, Singh I, Kumar A et al (2002) Xanthones as inhibitors of microsomal lipid peroxidation and TNF-alpha induced ICAM-1 expression on human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs). Bioorg Med Chem 10: 3431-6. Maio M (2012) Melanoma as a model tumour for immuno-oncology. Ann Oncol 23 Suppl 8: viii10-4. Makare N, Bodhankar S & Rangari V (2001) Immunomodulatory activity of alcoholic extract of Mangifera indica L. in mice. J Ethnopharmacol 78: 133-7. Makitie T, Summanen P, Tarkkanen A et al (2001) Tumor-infiltrating macrophages (CD68(+) cells) and prognosis in malignant uveal melanoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 42: 1414-21. Mantovani A & Sica A (2010) Macrophages, innate immunity and cancer: balance, tolerance, and diversity. Curr Opin Immunol 22: 231-7. Mantovani A, Sica A, Sozzani S et al (2004) The chemokine system in diverse forms of macrophage activation and polarization. Trends Immunol 25: 677-86. I. 18 Mantovani A, Sozzani S, Locati M et al (2002) Macrophage polarization: tumorassociated macrophages as a paradigm for polarized M2 mononuclear phagocytes. Trends Immunol 23: 549-55. Mariette X, Matucci-Cerinic M, Pavelka K et al (2011) Malignancies associated with tumour necrosis factor inhibitors in registries and prospective observational studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Rheum Dis 70: 1895-904. Martinez FO, Helming L & Gordon S (2009) Alternative activation of macrophages: an immunologic functional perspective. Annu Rev Immunol 27: 451-83. Matsumoto K, Akao Y, Kobayashi E et al (2003) Induction of apoptosis by xanthones from mangosteen in human leukemia cell lines. Journal of Natural Products 66: 11241127. Matsumoto K, Akao Y, Ohguchi K et al (2005) Xanthones induce cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis in human colon cancer DLD-1 cells. Bioorg Med Chem 13: 6064-9. Matsumoto K, Akao Y, Yi H et al (2004) Preferential target is mitochondria in αmangostin-induced apoptosis in human leukemia HL60 cells. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry 12: 5799-5806. Matzinger P (2002) The danger model: a renewed sense of self. Science 296: 301-5. Mazimba O, Nana F, Kuete V et al (2013) 11 - Xanthones and Anthranoids from the Medicinal Plants of Africa. In: KUETE, V. (ed.) Medicinal Plant Research in Africa. Oxford: Elsevier. Mccourt C, Dolan O & Gormley G (2014) Malignant Melanoma: A Pictorial Review. Ulster Med J 83: 103-110. Mckeage MJ, Reck M, Jameson MB et al (2009) Phase II study of ASA404 (vadimezan, 5,6-dimethylxanthenone-4-acetic acid/DMXAA) 1800mg/m(2) combined with carboplatin and paclitaxel in previously untreated advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 65: 192-7. Meyer C, Sevko A, Ramacher M et al (2011) Chronic inflammation promotes myeloidderived suppressor cell activation blocking antitumor immunity in transgenic mouse melanoma model. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108: 17111-6. Moncada S, Palmer RM & Higgs EA (1991) Nitric oxide: physiology, pathophysiology, and pharmacology. Pharmacol Rev 43: 109-42. Moongkarndi P, Kosem N, Kaslungka S et al (2004) Antiproliferation, antioxidation and induction of apoptosis by Garcinia mangostana (mangosteen) on SKBR3 human breast cancer cell line. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 90: 161-166. Morrison CD, Parvani JG & Schiemann WP (2013) The relevance of the TGF-beta Paradox to EMT-MET programs. Cancer Lett 341: 30-40. Munk ME & Emoto M (1995) Functions of T-cell subsets and cytokines in mycobacterial infections. Eur Respir J Suppl 20: 668s-675s. Murray PJ & Wynn TA (2011) Protective and pathogenic functions of macrophage subsets. Nat Rev Immunol 11: 723-37. Nakagawa Y, Iinuma M, Naoe T et al (2007) Characterized mechanism of αmangostin-induced cell death: Caspase-independent apoptosis with release of endonuclease-G from mitochondria and increased miR-143 expression in human colorectal cancer DLD-1 cells. Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry 15: 5620-5628. Nakatani K, Atsumi M, Arakawa T et al (2002) Inhibitions of histamine release and prostaglandin E2 synthesis by mangosteen, a Thai medicinal plant. Biol Pharm Bull 25: 1137-41. Parker DC (1993) T cell-dependent B cell activation. Annu Rev Immunol 11: 331-60. Pedraza-Chaverri J, Cárdenas-Rodríguez N, Orozco-Ibarra M et al (2008) Medicinal properties of mangosteen (Garcinia mangostana). Food and Chemical Toxicology 46: 3227-3239. Pedro M, Cerqueira F, Sousa ME et al (2002) Xanthones as inhibitors of growth of human cancer cell lines and their effects on the proliferation of human lymphocytes in vitro. Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry 10: 3725-30. I. 19 Pfister JR, Ferraresi RW, Harrison IT et al (1972) Xanthone-2-carboxylic acids, a new series of antiallergic substances. J Med Chem 15: 1032-5. Phan GQ, Attia P, Steinberg SM et al (2001) Factors associated with response to highdose interleukin-2 in patients with metastatic melanoma. J Clin Oncol 19: 3477-82. Pinto MM, Sousa ME & Nascimento MS (2005) Xanthone derivatives: new insights in biological activities. Curr Med Chem 12: 2517-38. Porta C, Subhra Kumar B, Larghi P et al (2007) Tumor promotion by tumor-associated macrophages. Adv Exp Med Biol 604: 67-86. Printz C (2001) Spontaneous regression of melanoma may offer insight into cancer immunology. J Natl Cancer Inst 93: 1047-8. Qian BZ & Pollard JW (2010) Macrophage diversity enhances tumor progression and metastasis. Cell 141: 39-51. Raimondi G, Turner MS, Thomson AW et al (2007) Naturally occurring regulatory T cells: recent insights in health and disease. Crit Rev Immunol 27: 61-95. Rajendran P, Ekambaram G, Magesh V et al (2008) Chemopreventive efficacy of mangiferin against benzo(a)pyrene induced lung carcinogenesis in experimental animals. Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology 26: 278-282. Reiman JM, Kmieciak M, Manjili MH et al (2007) Tumor immunoediting and immunosculpting pathways to cancer progression. Semin Cancer Biol 17: 275-87. Romagnani S, Parronchi P, D'elios MM et al (1997) An update on human Th1 and Th2 cells. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 113: 153-6. Roncarolo MG, Bacchetta R, Bordignon C et al (2001) Type 1 T regulatory cells. Immunol Rev 182: 68-79. Roncarolo MG, Gregori S, Battaglia M et al (2006) Interleukin-10-secreting type 1 regulatory T cells in rodents and humans. Immunol Rev 212: 28-50. Sabat R, Grutz G, Warszawska K et al (2010) Biology of interleukin-10. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 21: 331-44. Santibanez JF, Quintanilla M & Bernabeu C (2011) TGF-beta/TGF-beta receptor system and its role in physiological and pathological conditions. Clin Sci (Lond) 121: 23351. Seo EK, Kim NC, Wani MC et al (2002) Cytotoxic prenylated xanthones and the unusual compounds anthraquinobenzophenones from Cratoxylum sumatranum. J Nat Prod 65: 299-305. Shan T, Ma Q, Guo K et al (2011) Xanthones from mangosteen extracts as natural chemopreventive agents: potential anticancer drugs. Curr Mol Med 11: 666-77. Sica A & Mantovani A (2012) Macrophage plasticity and polarization: in vivo veritas. J Clin Invest 122: 787-95. Siveen KS & Kuttan G (2009) Role of macrophages in tumour progression. Immunol Lett 123: 97-102. Solinas G, Germano G, Mantovani A et al (2009) Tumor-associated macrophages (TAM) as major players of the cancer-related inflammation. J Leukoc Biol 86: 1065-73. Speeckaert R, Van Geel N, Vermaelen KV et al (2011) Immune reactions in benign and malignant melanocytic lesions: lessons for immunotherapy. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res 24: 334-44. Spurrell EL & Lockley M (2014) Adaptive immunity in cancer immunology and therapeutics. Ecancermedicalscience 8: 441. Suksamrarn S, Komutiban O, Ratananukul P et al (2006) Cytotoxic prenylated xanthones from the young fruit of Garcinia mangostana. Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin 54: 301-305. Sun J, Chu YF, Wu X et al (2002) Antioxidant and antiproliferative activities of common fruits. J Agric Food Chem 50: 7449-54. Tang YP, Li PG, Kondo M et al (2009) Effect of a mangosteen dietary supplement on human immune function: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Med Food 12: 755-63. I. 20 Teixeira M, Cerqueira F, Barbosa CM et al (2005) Improvement of the inhibitory effect of xanthones on NO production by encapsulation in PLGA nanocapsules. J Drug Target 13: 129-35. Tewtrakul S, Wattanapiromsakul C & Mahabusarakam W (2009) Effects of compounds from Garcinia mangostana on inflammatory mediators in RAW264.7 macrophage cells. J Ethnopharmacol 121: 379-82. Tsutsui S, Yasuda K, Suzuki K et al (2005) Macrophage infiltration and its prognostic implications in breast cancer: the relationship with VEGF expression and microvessel density. Oncol Rep 14: 425-31. U. F (2012) Regulation of nitric oxide synthase expression and activity. In: MAYER, B. (ed.) Nitric Oxide. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Varney ML, Johansson SL & Singh RK (2005) Tumour-associated macrophage infiltration, neovascularization and aggressiveness in malignant melanoma: role of monocyte chemotactic protein-1 and vascular endothelial growth factor-A. Melanoma Res 15: 417-25. Vesely MD, Kershaw MH, Schreiber RD et al (2011) Natural innate and adaptive immunity to cancer. Annu Rev Immunol 29: 235-71. Vieira LM & Kijjoa A (2005) Naturally-occurring xanthones: recent developments. Curr Med Chem 12: 2413-46. Wang JJ, Sanderson BJS & Zhang W (2011) Cytotoxic effect of xanthones from pericarp of the tropical fruit mangosteen (Garcinia mangostana Linn.) on human melanoma cells. Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association 49: 2385-91. Watanapokasin R, Jarinthanan F, Jerusalmi A et al (2010) Potential of Xanthones from Tropical Fruit Mangosteen as Anti-cancer Agents: Caspase-Dependent Apoptosis Induction In Vitro and in Mice. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 162: 1080-1094. Weecharangsan W, Opanasopit P, Sukma M et al (2006) Antioxidative and neuroprotective activities of extracts from the fruit hull of mangosteen (Garcinia mangostana Linn.). Med Princ Pract 15: 281-7. Wiemann B & Starnes CO (1994) Coley's toxins, tumor necrosis factor and cancer research: a historical perspective. Pharmacol Ther 64: 529-64. Wilson CB, Rowell E & Sekimata M (2009) Epigenetic control of T-helper-cell differentiation. Nat Rev Immunol 9: 91-105. Wink DA, Kasprzak KS, Maragos CM et al (1991) DNA deaminating ability and genotoxicity of nitric oxide and its progenitors. Science 254: 1001-3. Wink DA, Vodovotz Y, Laval J et al (1998) The multifaceted roles of nitric oxide in cancer. Carcinogenesis 19: 711-21. Woo CH, Eom YW, Yoo MH et al (2000) Tumor necrosis factor-alpha generates reactive oxygen species via a cytosolic phospholipase A2-linked cascade. J Biol Chem 275: 32357-62. Yao YB, Peng ZG, Liu ZF et al (2010) [Effects of mangiferin on cell cycle status and CDC2/Cyclin B1 expression of HL-60 cells]. Zhong yao cai = Zhongyaocai = Journal of Chinese medicinal materials 33: 81-85. Yusuf-Makagiansar H, Anderson ME, Yakovleva TV et al (2002) Inhibition of LFA1/ICAM-1 and VLA-4/VCAM-1 as a therapeutic approach to inflammation and autoimmune diseases. Med Res Rev 22: 146-67. Zeng L, O'connor C, Zhang J et al (2010) IL-10 promotes resistance to apoptosis and metastatic potential in lung tumor cell lines. Cytokine 49: 294-302. Zhang JM & An J (2007) Cytokines, inflammation, and pain. Int Anesthesiol Clin 45: 2737. Zhou L, Chong MM & Littman DR (2009) Plasticity of CD4+ T cell lineage differentiation. Immunity 30: 646-55. Ziche M & Morbidelli L (2000) Nitric oxide and angiogenesis. J Neurooncol 50: 139-48. I. 21 Zijlmans HJ, Fleuren GJ, Baelde HJ et al (2006) The absence of CCL2 expression in cervical carcinoma is associated with increased survival and loss of heterozygosity at 17q11.2. J Pathol 208: 507-17. Zou YS, Hou AJ, Zhu GF et al (2004) Cytotoxic isoprenylated xanthones from Cudrania tricuspidata. Bioorg Med Chem 12: 1947-53. II. State of art III. 30 The main goal of this project was the evaluation of two xanthone derivatives, alphamangostin and 1,2-dihydroxyxanthone, in modulation of macrophages activity as well as the result in cytotoxic effect on melanoma cell line, since macrophages are key cells in tumor immune microenvironment. Therefore, the following were required: Evaluate the antitumor activity of referred compounds in the growth of A375-C5 human melanoma cell line by SRB assay; Measure the effects of xanthone-induced macrophage-conditioned medium on the proliferation of the human melanoma cell line A375-C5 by SRB assay; Compare the effects of the compounds and the macrophages-conditioned medium on the growth of A375-C5 cell line; Evaluate the interference of the compounds with NO production by LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7 murine macrophages, using Griess reagent; Access the impact of compounds on the cytokine expression profile by PMAdifferentiated THP-1 cells and their polarization into M1 (IL-1 and TNF-α) or M2 (IL10 and TGF-β1) phenotype, by an ELISA kit; Determine the antiproliferative effect of compounds on PHA stimulated human mononuclear cells by MTT assay and their interference with cytokines expression, using an ELISA kit. Define THP-1, RAW 264.7 and human mononuclear cells viability after treatment with the compounds by MTT-assay. IV. Materials and Methods IV. 32 Chemicals and reagents Reagents used in cell culture, including RPMI-1640, DMEM medium, and fetal bovine serum (FBS) were purchased from Gibco® Invitrogen Co. (Barcelona, Spain), 2mercaptoethanol for synthesis was obtained from Merck (Whitehouse Station, NJ, USA), Glutamine cell culture grade and Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) from Applichem (Darmstadt, Germany). N.N-Dimetilformamida (DMF) was acquiring from Spectramol Science Incorporated. Reagents used in SRB assay as Trichloroacetic acid (TCA) and Acetic acid glacial 99100% were purchased from Prolabo (Oeiras, Portugal) and CHEM-LAB (Zedelgem, Belgium), respectively. IL-1β, IL-10, TNF-α and TGF-β1 ELISA Ready-Set-Go Kits were acquired from eBioscience (San Diego, CA, USA). All other chemicals of analytical grade used in the experiments and unless otherwise indicated were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich® (St. Louis, MO, USA). Xanthones Alpha-mangostin (α-MG) was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich® (ref.M3824) and 1,2dihydroxyxanthone (1,2-DHX) was synthetized in Laboratory of Organic and Pharmaceutic Chemistry (Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Porto) and in CEQUIMED (Centro de Química Medicinal; University of Porto) as previously described (Gales et al. 2001) Stock solution of compounds kept at -20ºC in DMSO. Just prior each assay, stock solutions were diluted in appropriate complete medium to the maximum concentration desired to test and 1:2 dilutions were serially prepared. Cell lines A375-C5 human malignant melanoma cell line and RAW 264.7 mouse macrophage cell line are part of CEQUIMED cell culture collection. THP-1 human monocyte cell line was a courtesy of Rui Appelberg. A375-C5 was routinely maintained in 25 cm2 flasks containing RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1 µL mL-1 Gentamycin at 37ºC in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2. For the THP-1 cell line the culture medium just described was also supplemented with 0.05 mM 2-mercaptoethanol. RAW 264.7 cell line was maintained in 75 cm2 flasks containing DMEM medium with the same percentage of FBS and gentamycin, and at the same conditions. IV. 33 Cell lines were sub-cultured every 2 or 3 days by trypsinization (A375-C5), replacement of the medium (THP-1) or scraping (RAW 264.7) and used for each experiment when the cells were in exponential growth. Human mononuclear cells were isolated from peripheral blood of healthy volunteers by Histopaque-1077 density centrifugation. All volunteers assign an informed consent. Mononuclear cells were ressuspended in RPMI medium supplemented with 10% FBS and 1 µL mL-1 gentamycin. Cell growth assay The effect of α-MG on the growth of A375-C5 cell line was determined by sulphorrodamine B (SRB) method adopted by the National Cancer Institute (NCI, USA) (Monks et al. 1991) and as already described by our group (Pedro et al. 2002; Gupta et al. 2008). A375-C5 cell line was plated into 96-well flat-bottom tissue culture plates at a concentration of 7,5 x 104 cells mL-1 in complete culture medium and incubated for 24 h in a 5% CO2 humidified incubator (HERA cell 150, Heraeus) at 37ºC. Once adherent, cells of one of the plates were immediately fixed for a no-growth control (designed Tzero plate) to determine the basal protein amount. Simultaneously, cell of test plates were treated with serial dilutions of xanthones and incubated for another 48h. Cells were then fixed with 50 µL of 50% TCA solution and incubated for 1h at 4ºC. Cells were washed five times with deionized water and allowed to dry. Fixed cells were exposed to 50 µL SRB dye (0,4% w/v in 1% acetic acid) for 30 minutes at room temperature. The unbound dye was removed by wash five times with 1% (v/v) acetic acid manually. Once completely dried, 100 µL of 10 mM Tris base solution was added and left for 30 minutes at room temperature to solubilize SRB. The absorbance was measured in an ELISA reader (Stat Fax 3200, Awareness Technology). Doxorubicin (1:10 dilutions) was used as positive control. Growth inhibition of 50% (GI50) was calculated by comparing, after 48 h, the absorbance of the xanthone-treated cells with the absorbance of Tzero plate. Lower absorbance after 48 h of treatment indicate occurrence of cell death instead of growth arrest (Monks et al. 1991). IV. 34 Antitumor effect of conditioned macrophages culture medium THP-1 human monocyte cell line is a simple, suitable and reliable model to study monocytes and macrophages functions or responses and the possible effects from external stimuli as new drugs. Differentiation of this cell line in mature THP-1 monocytederived macrophages can be achieve using phorbol-12-myristate-13-acetate (PMA), the most efficient differentiation agent in this case (Chanput et al. 2012; Chanput et al. 2014). THP-1 cell line was plated at 1 X 105 cells mL-1 in 96-wells flat-bottom plates and differentiated into THP-1 macrophages by adding 50 µL of 10 ng mL-1 PMA for 72h in a humidified incubator at 37ºC and 5% CO2 (He et al. 2012). Once differentiated, cells were washed twice with complete medium and they were incubated for another 24h in culture medium to obtain the resting stages of macrophages (Chanput et al. 2012; Chanput et al. 2014). Then, they were stimulated by 100 µL of a solution of 1 µg mL-1 LPS, simultaneously treated with the xanthone in test and incubated for 24h at 37ºC in a 5% CO2 humidified incubator (He et al. 2012). Plates were centrifuged to deposit the compounds and half of the volume of each well was added to A375-C5 adherent cells, previously plated as described in section “cell growth assay”. After a 48h incubation, SRB assay was performed, absorbance was measured and cell-growth inhibition determinate as just described (Pedro et al. 2002; Gupta et al. 2008). NO production assay The effect of the different compounds in nitric oxide (NO) production by RAW 264.7 was determined by the Griess reaction as previous described by our group (Teixeira et al. 2005). RAW 264.7 (1 X 106 cells mL-1) were platted on 96-well flat-bottom plates and allowed to adhere for 2h. Supernatants were removed and replaced by 100 µL of fresh medium containing 1.5 µg mL-1 LPS in order to induce iNOS synthesis by macrophages. The cell were also treated with 100 µL of each xanthone concentration (1:2 dilution) and incubated for 24h at 37ºC in a 5% CO2 humidified incubator. Then, 100 µL of supernatants were transferred to a new 96-well flat-bottom plates, 100 µL of Griess reagent (some quantities of a solution of 1% w/v sulphanilamide in 5% v/v phosphoric acid and a solution of 0.1% w/v naphtylethylenediamide in deionized water) was added and it was incubated for 10 min at room temperature (Green et al. 1982). Nitrite production was quantified by spectrophotometry at 550nm in an ELISA reader. N-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (LNAME) (inhibitor of iNOS activity) and Dexamethasone (inhibitor of iNOS expression) were used as positive controls. Inhibition of 50% NO production was measured by comparing percentage of NO in treated cells and in non-treated cells. IV. 35 Compounds were also added 6h or 14h after LPS stimulation and significant differences detected in NO production between the different moments when xanthones were added, works to infer if compounds act in iNOS expression and/or activity. NO scavenging assay To discard NO scavenging effect by xanthones, nitrite was chemically generated, as previously described (Teixeira et al. 2005). 50 µL of sodium nitoprusside (5 mM) in PBS was added to xanthone dilution and incubated for 150 min at 25ºC. Griess reagent was added and nitrite accumulation was quantified. Sodium nitoprusside in PBS (100% production) and in ethanol/PBS (9:1; 0% production) were used as controls. Scavenging activity, determined in terms of percentage of nitrite formation, was present when the percentage of nitrite formed in the presence of the sample was less than 70% of the sodium nitroprusside control. Human mononuclear cells MTT-proliferation assay Human mononuclear cells (50 µl of a concentration of 2-3 X 106 cell mL-1) were plated in 96-well flat-bottom plates, treated with 50 µL of serial dilutions of α-MG and stimulated with 50 µL of PHA (Phytohaemagglutinin; used as a mitogen to trigger T-lymphocyte cell division) (10 µg mL-1) and incubated for 96h at 37ºC in a 5% CO2 humidified incubator. After incubation, 25 µL of 1 mg mL-1 MTT solution (3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5Diphenyltetrazolium Bromide) was added to cells. After 4h, the formazan product was solubilized overnight with a sodium lauryl sulfate/N,N-dimethylformamide (SDS/DMF) solution and absorbance measured at 550 nm (Pedro et al. 2002; Cerqueira et al. 2003; Teixeira et al. 2005). Cyclosporin A was used as positive control. Lymphocyte toxicity, determined in terms of the percentage of viable cells, was present when the viability of the treated cells, compared with that of the non-treated control cells, was less than 70%. Cytokine quantification Culture supernatants of THP-1 differentiated, stimulated and treated cells, as previously described in section “Antitumor effect of conditioned macrophages culture medium”, were storage at - 20ºC until cytokine analyses. Levels of interleukin-1β (IL-1β), interleukin-10 (IL-10), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and transforming growth Factor-β1 (TGF-β1) in culture supernatants were quantified by IV. 36 ELISA, using ELISA Ready-SET-Go kit (affymetrix, ebioscience) according to manufacturers’ instructions. The same cytokines were also evaluated in supernatants of human mononuclear cells treated with xanthones for 48h (Lou et al. 2013; Wang et al. 2013), incubation with PHA stimulus and three concentrations of α-MG. Interference of both compounds or α-MG in cytokines expression by THP-1 and lymphocytes, respectively, was accessed comparing treated with non-treated cells. MTT-viability assay Viability assays were performed as described elsewhere by our group (Cerqueira et al. 2003; Teixeira et al. 2005). For lymphocytes, MTT-viability assay was performed after 24h of cells treatment with xanthones. For all the other cells, viability assay was executed at the end of the experiments to determine the effect of the compound on the cell line. Briefly, to cells supernatants, 25 µL of MTT solution was added followed by 4 h incubation at 37ºC in a 5% CO2 humidified incubator. After incubation, 50 µL of SDS/DMF solution was added and absorbance measured at 550 nm (Pedro et al. 2002; Cerqueira et al. 2003; Teixeira et al. 2005). Cell toxicity was considered when the viability of the exposed cells was less than 70%. Statistical analysis Except otherwise stated, results are the mean ± SEM of at least three independent experiments, performed in duplicate. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS for Windows (version 20.0). Statistical significance between two mean was calculated by Mann-Whitney Test and it is considered for p values less than 0.05. Ethics Ethics approved was obtained by the Ethic Comity of University Fernando Pessoa. IV. 37 References Cerqueira F, Cordeiro-Da-Silva A, Araujo N et al (2003) Inhibition of lymphocyte proliferation by prenylated flavones: artelastin as a potent inhibitor. Life Sci 73: 2321-34. Chanput W, Mes JJ & Wichers HJ (2014) THP-1 cell line: An in vitro cell model for immune modulation approach. Int Immunopharmacol. Chanput W, Reitsma M, Kleinjans L et al (2012) beta-Glucans are involved in immunemodulation of THP-1 macrophages. Mol Nutr Food Res 56: 822-33. Gales L, Sousa MED, Pinto MMM et al (2001) Naturally occurring 1,2,8trimethoxyxanthone and biphenyl ether intermediates leading to 1,2-dimethoxyxanthone. Acta Crystallographica Section C 57: 1319-1323. Green LC, Wagner DA, Glogowski J et al (1982) Analysis of nitrate, nitrite, and [15N]nitrate in biological fluids. Anal Biochem 126: 131-8. Gupta S, Rodrigues LM, Esteves AP et al (2008) Synthesis of N-aryl-5-amino-4cyanopyrazole derivatives as potent xanthine oxidase inhibitors. Eur J Med Chem 43: 771-80. He X, Shu J, Xu L et al (2012) Inhibitory effect of Astragalus polysaccharides on lipopolysaccharide-induced TNF-a and IL-1beta production in THP-1 cells. Molecules 17: 3155-64. Lou X, Hou Y & Liang D (2013) Effects of hepatitis B virus X protein on human T cell cytokines. Can J Microbiol 59: 620-6. Monks A, Scudiero D, Skehan P et al (1991) Feasibility of a high-flux anticancer drug screen using a diverse panel of cultured human tumor cell lines. J Natl Cancer Inst 83: 757-66. Pedro M, Cerqueira F, Sousa ME et al (2002) Xanthones as inhibitors of growth of human cancer cell lines and their effects on the proliferation of human lymphocytes in vitro. Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry 10: 3725-30. Teixeira M, Cerqueira F, Barbosa CM et al (2005) Improvement of the inhibitory effect of xanthones on NO production by encapsulation in PLGA nanocapsules. J Drug Target 13: 129-35. Wang H, Daniel V, Sadeghi M et al (2013) Differences in the induction of induced human CD4(+) CD25(+) FoxP3(+) T-regulatory cells and CD3(+) CD8(+) CD28(-) Tsuppressor cells subset phenotypes in vitro: comparison of phorbol 12-myristate 13acetate/ionomycin and phytohemagglutinin stimulation. Transplant Proc 45: 1822-31. V. Natural Xanthones: alpha-mangostin Papers 1 and 2 V. 46 change according to several conditions as age, gender, stress, environment, among others. Consequently, the immune response is hard to predict and interpret (Cohen et al. 1991; Lesourd 2002; Beery 2003; Srinivasan et al. 2005). In cancer, for example, the innate and adaptive immunity have a dual effect, either preventing tumour progression or stimulating their growth, invasiveness and metastatic activity (Dranoff 2004; Gutkin and Shurin 2014). The immune function is essential for organism homeostasis, responding to exogenous and endogenous risk signals (Matzinger 2002). Therefore, the uncontrolled and unmeasured use of antiphlogistic agents, as mangosteen products, may cause severe adverse effects in consumers. Exploring recent reports of immunomodulation mediated by these products, we noticed that many of these possibly trigger body deregulation. The inhibition of pro-inflammatory genes triggered by lipopolysaccharides (LPS) was recurrently described and related with xanthones exposure in different cell lines. Many authors reported a decrease in gene expression of tumour necrosis factor α (TNF-α), several interleukins (IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8), monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) and Toll-like receptor-2 (TLR-2) in primary cultures of human adipocytes, human U937 macrophages-like cells and murine RAW 264.7 macrophage-like cells treated with αand/or γ-mangostin (Sampath and Vijayaragavan 2008; Bumrungpert et al. 2009a; Bumrungpert et al. 2009b; Tewtrakul et al. 2009; Bumrungpert et al. 2010; Liu et al. 2012; Gutierrez-Orozco et al. 2013). But this effect is not considered to be exclusive of macrophages and adipocytes, Gutierrez-Orozco et al. detected similar inhibition, mediated by α-mangostin, in human monocyte cell line (THP-1) and different cancer cell lines (HepG2, Caco-2 HTB-37, and HT-29) (Gutierrez-Orozco et al. 2013). The described alterations on pro-inflammatory genes seems to be associated with the interference in some immune pathways, those involving conventional mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs), activator protein 1 (AP-1), signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 (STAT-1) and nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) (Sampath and Vijayaragavan 2008; Bumrungpert et al. 2009a; Tewtrakul et al. 2009; Liu et al. 2012). These protein cascades are also involved in stress response and participate in crosstalk with other signal pathways (Ghosh et al. 1998; Ramana et al. 2000; Chang and Karin 2001; Li and Verma 2002; Bonizzi and Karin 2004; Wada and Penninger 2004) which means that the effect of xanthones from mangosteen, namely αand/or γ-mangostin, will probably not be confined to immune system modulation. V. 47 Additional restriction on immunity cells action seems to occur at basophils and mast cells level. Xanthonic compounds (α-, βand/or γ-mangostin) and extracts of mangosteen reduce degranulation of these cells preventing histamine release possibly by interfering with downstream signals (Nakatani et al. 2002a; Itoh et al. 2008). Moreover, the histaminergic receptors are blocked by α and γ-mangostin (Chairungsrilerd et al. 1996). As consequence of this blockage, these compounds deregulate the interaction histamine-receptors, a binding implicated in some pathological functions including cancer and intestinal ischemia promotion (Kusche et al. 1980; Raithel et al. 1998), along with several vital functions, as neurotransmission, immunomodulation, haematopoiesis, wound healing and day-night rhythm (Maintz and Novak 2007). According to that, a careful medical follow-up is needed to prevent possible complications. Anti-inflammatory activity of mangosteen extracts and αand/or γ-mangostin have been still linked with enzymatic alterations, namely through inhibition of the mRNA expression and/or activity of cyclooxygenases 1 and 2 (COX-1 and COX-2) and/ or inducible nitric oxide synthases (iNOS) (Nakatani et al. 2002b; Nakatani et al. 2004; Chen et al. 2008; Tewtrakul et al. 2009). COX-1 and COX-2 are involved in physiologic processes as well as pathophysiologic events. COX-1 is traditionally associated with homeostasis functions, including gastric cytoprotection and haemostasis. COX-2 is connected to inflammation and tumourigenesis. In spite of this, complementary functions between the two enzymes and variations on their actions depending of the specific target organs were reported (Masferrer et al. 1994; Dubois et al. 1998; Marnett 2009; Rouzer and Marnett 2009). Inducible nitric oxide synthases (iNOS) is responsive for nitric oxide (NO) production after stimulation by immunological stimuli, being an intermediary of inflammatory response, however the excess or insufficiency of nitric oxide production can cause equally cell damage (Gross and Wolin 1995). In cancer, NO seems to have dual effects: multiple reports has associated NO with cancer progression while others has defended the therapeutic benefits of NO donors in different cell lines and organisms (Wink et al. 1991; Lala and Orucevic 1998; Wink et al. 1998; Ziche and Morbidelli 2000; Lala and Chakraborty 2001; Choi et al. 2002; Mocellin et al. 2007; Coulter et al. 2008; Yasuda 2008). Considering the importance of all these enzymes in biochemical and physiological events the role of xanthones contained in mangosteen extracts should be carefully evaluated. V. 48 3.2. Cell Cycle arrest Cell cycle is a sequence of highly regulated events essential for all living beings. In multi-cell organisms are necessary several rounds of cell division to create a new individual and during their lifetime it is a crucial mechanism for maintaining appropriate cellular and tissue condition once cell death and damages are constant (Alberts 2008). Mechanisms of action of some xanthones from mangosteen are frequently associated with cell cycle arrest. Since the cell cycle deregulation is a hallmark of cancer and one of the earliest processes of oncogenesis (Syljuasen et al. 1999; Hanahan and Weinberg 2011), several authors purposed and proved this effect of xanthones in different tumor (Matsumoto et al. 2005; Wang et al. 2011; Johnson et al. 2012; Kurose et al. 2012; Leão et al. 2013). Matsumoto et al. related that xanthones induced cell-cycle arrest in a human colon cancer cell line. Mangostins α and β up-regulated p27 and down-regulated cyclin A, B1, D1 and E1 and cdc2, phospho-cdc2 (tyrosine 15) expression and consequently act at G1-phase, blocking the division progression. However, while some authors affirm that γ-mangostin acts at S-phase in human colon cancer (Matsumoto et al. 2005), others indicate a G1-phase arrest in a human melanoma cell line (Wang et al. 2011). Johnson et al. reported that a prostate cancer cell line treated with α-mangostin inhibited cyclins/cyclin-dependent kinases 4 (CDK4) binding, an vital protein complex to cell cycle progression from G1 to S-phase (Johnson et al. 2012). According to that, Kurose et al. described an up-regulation of p21cip1 and CHEK2 (regulator factors of G1-phase) in breast cancer model after treatment with α-mangostin (Kurose et al. 2012). The inhibition of p53-MDM2 interaction due to a potential binding between αmangostin and MDM2 was also detected by some of our group (Leão et al. 2013). Free p53 stops cell division at both G1 and G2 checkpoints (Agarwal et al. 1995). In accordance with our finds, further authors have reported enhance of p53 levels after colon and blander cancer treatment with α-mangostin and gartanin, respectively (Aisha et al. 2012; Liu et al. 2013). In summary, some xanthones from mangosteen are potent inhibitors of cell cycle progression by blocking the division at different levels in different cell models, as illustrated in Figure 8. V. 49 Figure 8 Effect of xanthones of mangosteen at different stages of cell cycle regulation. Legend: cdc indicate cell division cycle protein; CDK, cyclin-dependent kinases; Chk or CHEK2, checkpoint kinase; G1, gap phase; G2, gap phase 2; M, mitosis phase; MDM2, murine doble minute 2; MG, mangosteen xanthones; p21cip1, cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1; p27kip1, cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor; p53, tumor protein p53; S, DNA synthesis phase. Besides the importance of that effect in cancer treatment, normal cells have to be replaced to keep the tissue homeostasis, specially, tissues with constitutive division. Labile tissues as hematopoietic cells in the bone marrow and the majority of epithelial tissue (e.g., skin, oral cavity, vagina and cervix, salivary glands, pancreas, biliary and gastrointestinal tracts, uterus, fallopian tubes and urinary tract) must have a functional cell-cycle to replace the lost cells in injuries and aging process (Kumar et al. 2012). Hence that, xanthones of mangosteen referred above (mangostins α, β, γ and gartanin) as cell cycle arrest agents may interfere with normal cells replacement. 3.3. Antioxidant effect Oxidative stress is a natural process implicated in cell damage or death and it has been associated with several human pathologies, like cardiac and neurodegenerative diseases and cancer (Valko et al. 2007). The prevention of such stress through antioxidant products has been extensively study, however the potential benefits or risks associated are still ambiguous (Stanner et al. 2004; Bjelakovic et al. 2013). In oncologic patients the advantages of antioxidant use are unclear. Some studies admitted survival gains or no interference with chemo or radiotherapy, while others V. 50 suggest a reduction of the therapeutic effect of chemo or radiotherapy in patients simultaneous using antioxidant products (D'Andrea 2005; Moss 2007; Lawenda et al. 2008; Block et al. 2009). As referred previously, many xanthones from mangosteen have antioxidant activity (Moongkarndi et al. 2004; Jung et al. 2006; Weecharangsan et al. 2006; Devi Sampath and Vijayaraghavan 2007; Kosem et al. 2007; Chin et al. 2008). In fact, Devi Sampath and Vijayaraghavan 2007 described an attenuation of isoproterenol oxidative effect in rats treated with α-mangostin compared with no-treated rats. They demonstrated an augment of antioxidant enzymes glutathione-S-transferase (GST), glutathione peroxidase (GPx), superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT), as well as a reduction of glutathione (GSH), lipid peroxides and serum enzymes, including lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), creatine phosphokinase (CPK), glutamate oxaloacetate transaminase (GOT) and glutamate pyruvate transaminase (GPT) (Devi Sampath and Vijayaraghavan 2007). In generally, it is known that some drugs, including cancer drug therapies, can be affected by xanthones from mangosteen antioxidant potential. These xanthonic derivatives have been connected with alterations on metabolizing enzymes responsible for the metabolism of several drugs (Foti et al. 2009). The changes that can occur in effect of drugs when co-administrated with these compounds will be discussed in the following section. Considering the referred controversial use of antioxidants, further studies are necessary to confirm the safety of the use of that herbal folk medicine. 3.4. Modifications in the metabolism of therapeutic agents On living organisms, exogenous compounds are subjected to biochemical modifications catalysed by enzymes responsible for detoxification. Alterations in activity of these drug-metabolizing enzymes may jeopardize the treatment response, namely in efficacy, toxicity or both (Lu 1998; Evans and Relling 2004). Xanthonic components of mangosteen were already associated with modulation of enzymes involved in phase I and phase II of the metabolism (Devi Sampath and Vijayaraghavan 2007; Balunas et al. 2008; Foti et al. 2009). The CYP family are phase I enzymes capable to metabolize the majority of drugs (Kalra et al. 2009) including natural xanthones, as already was referred. In spite of that, mangosteen has been associated with inhibition of enzymatic activity of some CYP members. Foti et al. showed that aqueous mangosteen extract extensible V. 51 reduced the activity of CYP2C8 and CYP2C9 in human liver microsomes; further enzymes were also inhibited but to a less extent. These authors proposed that such effect is associated with the presence of α-mangostin, β-mangostin, gartanin, 3isomangostin and 8-desoxygartanin in the extract (Foti et al. 2009). Balunas et al. also described a potent inhibition of CYP19 (aromatase) mediated by methanol and chloroform-soluble extracts of G. mangostana in a human placental microsomes and by some xanthones (specially γ-mangostin) in a human breast cancer cell line (Balunas et al. 2008). CYP2C8 and 2C9 metabolize important drugs (as indicated in Table 1) including the therapeutic agents ibuprofen (Davies 1998; Garcia-Martin et al. 2004), paclitaxel, phenytoin (Burns 1999; Foti et al. 2009) and warfarin (Burns 1999; Rettie and Tai 2006; Foti et al. 2009), as well as amitriptyline (Ghahramani et al. 1997; Olesen and Linnet 1997), cyclophosphamide (Chang et al. 1993; Chang et al. 1997), diazepam (Shou et al. 2000) and losartan (Zhou et al. 2009; Mannheimer and Eliasson 2010). Therefore, it is predictable that some of these drugs may become less or even ineffective when co-administered with mangosteen products and their toxicity can also be increased. Similarly, the aromatase inhibition mediated by mangosteen might increase the adverse effects of drugs like methadone (Nekhayeva et al. 2005) and hormones androstanolone and nortestosterone (Silberzahn et al. 1988; Douglas et al. 2005) or reduce the treatment response to others such as methadone derivate levacetylmethadol (Deshmukh et al. 2004) and the testosterone (Silberzahn et al. 1988; Rendic 2002; Morale et al. 2008) (Table 1). Additionally to the metabolic activity, CYP19 are also responsible for the bioconversion of androgens into estrogens (Simpson et al. 1994). Consequently, the potential of aromatase inhibitors, like mangosteen (α, γ-mangostin and garcinones D/E), in treatment of many hormoneresponsive tumors as breast cancer cannot be ignored (Azria et al. 2005; Brueggemeier 2006; Kendall and Dowsett 2006). Beyond the CYP family, the antioxidant effect of α-mangostin by stimulating several enzymes including the glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) (Devi Sampath and Vijayaraghavan 2007) must be considered. GSTs are phase II enzymes that catalyse the conjugation of many endogenous substances and xenobiotics with glutathione (GSH) (Uetrecht and Trager 2007; Oakley 2011; Bousova and Skalova 2012). GSHconjugation results, normally, in drug activity inhibition due to increase in solubility of compounds and consequently the facility of excretion (Barnouin et al. 1998; Peklak- V. 52 Scott et al. 2005). However in some cases, drug conjugation promotes drug activation (Morgan et al. 1998; Findlay et al. 2004; Tew 2005). The anticancer drugs, PABA/NO and TLK286 are examples of compounds activated after conjugation (Morgan et al. 1998; Findlay et al. 2004; Tew 2005) (Table 1). Consequently, the co-administration with α-mangostin could promote accumulation of the active metabolites and increasing the side effects. Table 1. Potential effects of xanthones derivatives on drugs metabolism. Effect on some drug-metabolizing enzymes Drugs metabolized by the enzymes # Therapeutic activity affected References # Decrease CYP2C8 and CYP2C9 activity Amprenavir Antiretroviral (HIV-1 inhibitor) (Fung et al. 2000) Bupropion Antidepressant tetracyclic (Preissner et al. 2010; Knox et al. 2011) Capsaicin Analgesic (natural) (Reilly et al. 2003) Cisapride Gastrointestinal prokinetic agent (Desta et al. 2000; Preissner et al. 2010) Clozapine * Antipsychotic (Fang et al. 1998; RostamiHodjegan et al. 2004) Cyamemazine Antipsychotic and anxiolytic (Arbus et al. 2007) Dapsone * Antibacterial (Winter et al. 2000) Dextromethorphan Cough suppressant (von Moltke et al. 1998; Preissner et al. 2010) Diclofenac * Analgesic, antipyretic, antiinflammatory (Mancy et al. 1999) Diltiazem * Cardiovascular (Sutton et al. 1997) Estradiol Sex hormones (estrogen) (Yamazaki et al. 1998; Cheng et al. 2001) Fluvastatin * Lipid regulating (Scripture and Pieper 2001) Ibuprofen * Non-Steroidal AntiInflammatory (Davies 1998; Garcia-Martin et al. 2004) Irbesartan * Cardiovascular (Hallberg et al. 2002; Preissner et al. 2010) Ketamine Anesthetic and analgesic (Hijazi and Boulieu 2002; Preissner et al. 2010) Ketobemidone Analgesic (Kristensen et al. 1996; Yasar et al. 2005) Lansoprazole * Gastro-intestinal (Pearce et al. 1996) Methadone Analgesic, antipyretic, antiinflammatory (Rendic 2002; Zhou et al. 2009) Omeprazole * Gastro-intestinal (Foti et al. 2009; Preissner et al. 2010) Paclitaxel Antineoplastic (Burns 1999; Foti et al. 2009) Perphenazine Antipsychotic (Olesen and Linnet 2000; Rendic 2002; Preissner et al. 2010) Phenytoin * Antiepileptic (Burns 1999; Foti et al. 2009) Phenprocoumon Cardiovascular (Ufer et al. 2004) Piroxicam * Analgesic, antipyretic, Non-steroidal antiinflammatory (Zhao et al. 1992; Perini et al. 2005; Preissner et al. 2010) Progesterone * Sex hormone (Progestagen) (Yamazaki and Shimada 1997; Preissner et al. 2010) Propofol * General anesthetic (Guitton et al. 1998) Quinidine * Cardiovascular (Nielsen et al. 1999; Preissner et al. 2010) Rosiglitazone * Antidiabetic (Baldwin et al. 1999; Malinowski and Bolesta 2000) V. 53 Selegiline, Deprenyl * Antidepressant (Rendic 2002; Salonen et al. 2003) Seratrodast * Cardiovascular (Kumar et al. 1997) Temazepam Anxiolytic, sedative, hypnotic (Ono et al. 1996; Yang et al. 1998; Rendic 2002) Terbinafine Antifungal (Vickers et al. 1999; Rendic 2002) Thalidomide Antineoplasic (Ando et al. 2002) Tolbutamide * Antidiabetic (Srivastava et al. 1991; Rendic 2002) Torasemide, Torsemide Cardiovascular (Diuretic) (Rendic 2002; Kerdpin et al. 2004; Vormfelde et al. 2004) Trimethadione, Troxidone Antiepileptic (Kurata et al. 1998; Rendic 2002; Tanaka et al. 2003) Verapamil * Cardiovascular (Tracy et al. 1999; Anthony and Berg 2002) Warfarin* Cardiovascular (Anticoagulant) (Burns 1999; Rettie and Tai 2006; Foti et al. 2009) Zafirlukast * Bronchodilators and Antiasthma (Dekhuijzen and Koopmans 2002; Preissner et al. 2010) Zopiclone Anxiolytic, sedative, hypnotic (Becquemont et al. 1999; Rendic 2002) Acetylsalicylic acid Anticoagulants and Antithrombotics (Preissner et al. 2010; Knox et al. 2011) Amitriptyline* Antidepressant (Ghahramani et al. 1997; Olesen and Linnet 1997) Cyclophosphamide * Antineoplastic (Chang et al. 1993; Chang et al. 1997) Diazepam * Anxiolytic, sedative, hypnotic (Shou et al. 2000) Ifosfamide * Antineoplastic (Chang et al. 1993) Lidocain(e) Local anesthetic (Narang et al. 1978; Rendic 2002) Losartan * Anti-Hypertensives (Zhou et al. 2009; Mannheimer and Eliasson 2010) Pioglitazone * Antidiabetic (Jaakkola et al. 2006; Preissner et al. 2010) Sulfadiazine * Antibacterial (Cribb et al. 1995; Rendic 2002) Testosterone Sex hormone (Androgen and anabolic) (Yamazaki and Shimada 1997; Rendic 2002) Troglitazone * Antidiabetic (Yamazaki et al. 1999b; He et al. 2004) Zidovudine, azidothymidine Antiviral (Eagling et al. 1994; Rendic 2002) Brompheniramine Antihistaminic (Preissner et al. 2010; Knox et al. 2011) Caffeine Xanthine (CNS stimulant) (Preissner et al. 2010; Knox et al. 2011) Carbinoxamine Antihistamine and anticholinergic (Preissner et al. 2010; Knox et al. 2011) Leflunomide * Antirheumatic (Rozman 2002) Mefenamic acid * Analgesic, antipyretic, antiinflammatory (Preissner et al. 2010; Knox et al. 2011) Mephenytoin Antiepileptic (Relling et al. 1990; Goldstein et al. 1994) Meloxicam * Analgesic, antipyretic, antiinflammatory (Turck et al. 1996; Chesne et al. 1998; Preissner et al. 2010) Mirtazapine Antidepressant (Stormer et al. 2000; Rendic 2002) Nicotine Supplementary drugs and other substances (Yamazaki et al. 1999a; Rendic 2002) Paracetamol, acetaminophen Analgesic, antipyretic, antiinflammatory (Raucy et al. 1989; Rendic 2002) Phenazone, Antipyrine Analgesic, antipyretic, non-steroidal anti- (Engel et al. 1996; Rendic 2002) V. 54 Information concerning Cytochrome P450s and Glutathione S-transferases metabolism was obtained from SuperCYP (Preissner et al. 2010), DrugBank database (Knox et al. 2011) and additional papers; all drugs inflammatory Rifampicin * Antibacterial (Preissner et al. 2010; Knox et al. 2011) Rofecoxib Non-steroidal antiinflammatory (Preissner et al. 2010; Knox et al. 2011) Sulfinpyrazon(e) * Antigout (Rendic 2002) Theophylline Xanthine (Bronchodilator) (Preissner et al. 2010; Knox et al. 2011) Trimethoprim * Antiepileptic (Rendic 2002) Decrease CYP19 (aromatase) activity Betamethason(e) * Corticosteroid (Paakki et al. 2000) Letrozole * Antineoplastic (Azria et al. 2005) Androstanolone Sex hormones (Androgen) (Douglas et al. 2005) Methadone Analgesic, antipyretic, antiinflammatory (Nekhayeva et al. 2005) Nandrolone, nortestosterone Sex hormone (Progestagen) (Silberzahn et al. 1988) Levacetylmethadol (methadone derivate) Analgesic, antipyretic, antiinflammatory (Deshmukh et al. 2004) Testosterone Sex hormone (Androgen and anabolic) (Silberzahn et al. 1988; Rendic 2002; Morale et al. 2008) Increase GST activity Adriamycin or Doxorubicin Antineoplastic (Hayes and Pulford 1995; Lien et al. 2002; Hamilton et al. 2003) Busulfan Antineoplastic (Vassord et al. 2008; Elhasid et al. 2010) Carboplatin Antineoplastic (Marsh et al. 2009) Carmustin or BCNU Antineoplastic (Hayes and Pulford 1995; Lien et al. 2002; Hamilton et al. 2003) Chlorambucil Antineoplastic (Hayes and Pulford 1995; Lien et al. 2002; Hamilton et al. 2003; Parker et al. 2008) Cisplatin Antineoplastic (Hayes and Pulford 1995; Peters et al. 2000; Lien et al. 2002; Hamilton et al. 2003) Cyclophosphamide Antineoplastic (Hayes and Pulford 1995; Lien et al. 2002; Hamilton et al. 2003) Ecteinascidin-743; ET-743 or Trabectedin Antineoplastic (Brandon et al. 2006) Ethacrynic acid Diuretic (Hayes and Pulford 1995; Lien et al. 2002; Hamilton et al. 2003) Etoposide Antineoplastic (Mans et al. 1992) Glutathione Supplementary drug (Hayes et al. 2005) Melphalan Antineoplastic (Hayes and Pulford 1995; Lien et al. 2002; Hamilton et al. 2003) Mitozantrone Antineoplastic (Hayes and Pulford 1995; Lien et al. 2002; Hamilton et al. 2003) Oxaliplatin Antineoplastic (Marsh et al. 2009) Thiotepa Antineoplastic (Hayes and Pulford 1995; Lien et al. 2002; Hamilton et al. 2003) Azathioprine Antineoplastic (Gianluigi Zaza et al. 2010) TLK286 Antineoplastic (Morgan et al. 1998; Tew 2005) PABA/NO Antineoplastic (Findlay et al. 2004) V. 55 indicated on the table are approved by FDA; in drugs metabolized by CYP2C8 and 2C9, only those that are metabolized by the two enzymes was listed because the effect of xanthones might be more significant. LEGEND: CYP: Cytochrome P450; GST: Glutathione S-transferases; * drugs that, besides substrates, are also inhibitors and/or inducers of enzyme activity; # references related to drugs metabolized by such enzyme. 3.5. Blocking serotonin receptors Serotonin is a ubiquitous molecule that plays multiple physiological roles including cardiovascular, gastrointestinal and endocrine functions, as well as development, sensory perception, behaviours such as aggression, appetite, sex, sleep, mood, cognition, and memory (Aghajanian and Sanders-Bush 2002). The inhibition of 5-HT2A serotonin receptors mediated by γ-mangostin (Chairungsrilerd et al. 1996) was described in animal models; this effect may disrupt several essential functions to human survival. Serotonergic receptor blocking agents are current drugs used in nervous system disorders (Chairungsrilerd et al. 1996) making mangosteen supplements good candidates for intervention at this level. Their use by healthy people however needs to be monitored once this neurotransmitter is intervener in a variety of essential biological processes. 3.6. Other effects Many others unfavourable proprieties have been linked with the use of mangosteen-based products. Wong, et al described a case of severe lactic acidosis in a woman who took mangosteen juice. The authors postulated that this effect was mediated by αmangostin causing mitochondrial injuries (Wong and Klemmer 2008). The loss of mitochondrial potential has been described in general by many reviews concerning G. mangostana (Pinto et al. 2005; Pedraza-Chaverri et al. 2008; Obolskiy et al. 2009; Shan et al. 2011; Chitchumroonchokchai et al. 2013; Gutierrez-Orozco and Failla 2013); even if only a case of lactic acidosis was reported until now, associated with an acute respiratory illness, it is necessary to be watchful to understand the possible conditions that improve that risk of its use (Wong and Klemmer 2008). Several mangosteen products available in market advertise for their antidiabetic potential based on scientific reports. In fact, many authors reported a decrease of insulin-resistance augment of sensibility to insulin in animal or cell models after treatment with xanthones, namely mangiferin and α and γ-mangosteen (Ichiki et al. 1998; Miura et al. 2001a; Miura et al. 2001b; Bumrungpert et al. 2009a; Bumrungpert et al. 2010). Must be taking in account that mangosteen, as other fruits, contains high V. 62 Kalra K, Jarmal G & Mishra N (2009) Drugs impact on CYP-450 enzyme family: A pharmacogenetical study of response variation. Indian J Hum Genet 15: 78-83. Kaomongkolgit R, Jamdee K & Chaisomboon N (2009) Antifungal activity of alphamangostin against Candida albicans. J Oral Sci 51: 401-6. Kendall A & Dowsett M (2006) Novel concepts for the chemoprevention of breast cancer through aromatase inhibition. Endocr Relat Cancer 13: 827-37. Kerdpin O, Elliot DJ, Boye SL et al (2004) Differential contribution of active site residues in substrate recognition sites 1 and 5 to cytochrome P450 2C8 substrate selectivity and regioselectivity. Biochemistry 43: 7834-42. Knox C, Law V, Jewison T et al (2011) DrugBank 3.0: a comprehensive resource for 'omics' research on drugs. Nucleic Acids Res 39: D1035-41. Kosem N, Han Y-H & Moongkarndi P (2007) Antioxidant and Cytoprotective Activities of Methanolic Extract from Garcinia mangostana Hulls. Science Asia 33: 283-292. Krajarng A, Nakamura Y, Suksamrarn S et al (2011) α-Mangostin Induces Apoptosis in Human Chondrosarcoma Cells through Downregulation of ERK/JNK and Akt Signaling Pathway. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 59: 5746-5754. Kristensen K, Christensen CB, Christrup LL et al (1996) The mu1 and mu2 opioid receptor binding of ketobemidone, norketobemidone and 3-dimethylamino-1,1diphenylbutene. Pharmacol Toxicol 79: 103-4. Kumar GN, Dubberke E, Rodrigues AD et al (1997) Identification of cytochromes P450 involved in the human liver microsomal metabolism of the thromboxane A2 inhibitor seratrodast (ABT-001). Drug Metab Dispos 25: 110-5. Kumar V, Abbas AK, Fausto N et al (2012) Robbins Basic Pathology, Elsevier Health Sciences. Kurata N, Nishimura Y, Iwase M et al (1998) Trimethadione metabolism by human liver cytochrome P450: evidence for the involvement of CYP2E1. Xenobiotica 28: 1041-7. Kurose H, Shibata MA, Iinuma M et al (2012) Alterations in cell cycle and induction of apoptotic cell death in breast cancer cells treated with alpha-mangostin extracted from mangosteen pericarp. J Biomed Biotechnol 2012: 672428. Kusche J, Bieganski T, Hesterberg R et al (1980) The influence of carcinoma growth on diamine oxidase activity in human gastrointestinal tract. Agents Actions 10: 110-3. Lala PK & Chakraborty C (2001) Role of nitric oxide in carcinogenesis and tumour progression. Lancet Oncol 2: 149-56. Lala PK & Orucevic A (1998) Role of nitric oxide in tumor progression: lessons from experimental tumors. Cancer Metastasis Rev 17: 91-106. Lawenda BD, Kelly KM, Ladas EJ et al (2008) Should supplemental antioxidant administration be avoided during chemotherapy and radiation therapy? J Natl Cancer Inst 100: 773-83. Leão M, Gomes S, Pedraza-Chaverri J et al (2013) Alpha-mangostin and gambogic acid as potential inhibitors of the p53-MDM2 interaction revealed by a yeast approach. J Nat Prod 76: 774-8. Lesourd B (2002) [Malnutrition and immunity]. Rev Med Interne 23 Suppl 2: 353s-359s. Li Q & Verma IM (2002) NF-kappaB regulation in the immune system. Nat Rev Immunol 2: 725-34. Lien S, Larsson AK & Mannervik B (2002) The polymorphic human glutathione transferase T1-1, the most efficient glutathione transferase in the denitrosation and inactivation of the anticancer drug 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea. Biochem Pharmacol 63: 191-7. Liu SH, Lee LT, Hu NY et al (2012) Effects of alpha-mangostin on the expression of anti-inflammatory genes in U937 cells. Chin Med 7: 19. Liu Z, Antalek M, Nguyen L et al (2013) The effect of gartanin, a naturally occurring xanthone in mangosteen juice, on the mTOR pathway, autophagy, apoptosis, and the growth of human urinary bladder cancer cell lines. Nutr Cancer 65 Suppl 1: 68-77. Lu AY (1998) Drug-metabolism research challenges in the new millennium: individual variability in drug therapy and drug safety. Drug Metab Dispos 26: 1217-22. V. 63 Maintz L & Novak N (2007) Histamine and histamine intolerance. Am J Clin Nutr 85: 1185-96. Malinowski JM & Bolesta S (2000) Rosiglitazone in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a critical review. Clin Ther 22: 1151-68; discussion 1149-50. Mancy A, Antignac M, Minoletti C et al (1999) Diclofenac and its derivatives as tools for studying human cytochromes P450 active sites: particular efficiency and regioselectivity of P450 2Cs. Biochemistry 38: 14264-70. Mannheimer B & Eliasson E (2010) Drug-drug interactions that reduce the formation of pharmacologically active metabolites: a poorly understood problem in clinical practice. J Intern Med 268: 540-8. Mans DR, Lafleur MV, Westmijze EJ et al (1992) Reactions of glutathione with the catechol, the ortho-quinone and the semi-quinone free radical of etoposide. Consequences for DNA inactivation. Biochem Pharmacol 43: 1761-8. Marcason W (2006) What are the facts and myths about mangosteen? J Am Diet Assoc 106: 986. Marnett LJ (2009) The COXIB experience: a look in the rearview mirror. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 49: 265-90. Marsh S, Mcleod H, Dolan E et al (2009) Platinum pathway. Pharmacogenet Genomics 19: 563-4. Masferrer JL, Zweifel BS, Manning PT et al (1994) Selective inhibition of inducible cyclooxygenase 2 in vivo is antiinflammatory and nonulcerogenic. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 91: 3228-32. Matsumoto K, Akao Y, Kobayashi E et al (2003) Induction of apoptosis by xanthones from mangosteen in human leukemia cell lines. Journal of Natural Products 66: 11241127. Matsumoto K, Akao Y, Ohguchi K et al (2005) Xanthones induce cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis in human colon cancer DLD-1 cells. Bioorg Med Chem 13: 6064-9. Matzinger P (2002) The danger model: a renewed sense of self. Science 296: 301-5. Mazimba O, Nana F, Kuete V et al (2013) 11 - Xanthones and Anthranoids from the Medicinal Plants of Africa. In: KUETE, V. (ed.) Medicinal Plant Research in Africa. Oxford: Elsevier. Miura T, Ichiki H, Hashimoto I et al (2001a) Antidiabetic activity of a xanthone compound, mangiferin. Phytomedicine 8: 85-7. Miura T, Ichiki H, Iwamoto N et al (2001b) Antidiabetic activity of the rhizoma of Anemarrhena asphodeloides and active components, mangiferin and its glucoside. Biol Pharm Bull 24: 1009-11. Mocellin S, Bronte V & Nitti D (2007) Nitric oxide, a double edged sword in cancer biology: searching for therapeutic opportunities. Med Res Rev 27: 317-52. Moongkarndi P, Kosem N, Kaslungka S et al (2004) Antiproliferation, antioxidation and induction of apoptosis by Garcinia mangostana (mangosteen) on SKBR3 human breast cancer cell line. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 90: 161-166. Morale MC, L'episcopo F, Tirolo C et al (2008) Loss of aromatase cytochrome P450 function as a risk factor for Parkinson's disease? Brain Res Rev 57: 431-43. Morgan AS, Sanderson PE, Borch RF et al (1998) Tumor efficacy and bone marrowsparing properties of TER286, a cytotoxin activated by glutathione S-transferase. Cancer Res 58: 2568-75. Moss RW (2007) Do antioxidants interfere with radiation therapy for cancer? Integr Cancer Ther 6: 281-92. Nakagawa Y, Iinuma M, Naoe T et al (2007) Characterized mechanism of αmangostin-induced cell death: Caspase-independent apoptosis with release of endonuclease-G from mitochondria and increased miR-143 expression in human colorectal cancer DLD-1 cells. Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry 15: 5620-5628. Nakatani K, Atsumi M, Arakawa T et al (2002a) Inhibitions of histamine release and prostaglandin E2 synthesis by mangosteen, a Thai medicinal plant. Biol Pharm Bull 25: 1137-41. V. 64 Nakatani K, Nakahata N, Arakawa T et al (2002b) Inhibition of cyclooxygenase and prostaglandin E2 synthesis by gamma-mangostin, a xanthone derivative in mangosteen, in C6 rat glioma cells. Biochem Pharmacol 63: 73-9. Nakatani K, Yamakuni T, Kondo N et al (2004) gamma-Mangostin inhibits inhibitorkappaB kinase activity and decreases lipopolysaccharide-induced cyclooxygenase-2 gene expression in C6 rat glioma cells. Mol Pharmacol 66: 667-74. Narang PK, Crouthamel WG, Carliner NH et al (1978) Lidocaine and its active metabolites. Clin Pharmacol Ther 24: 654-62. Nekhayeva IA, Nanovskaya TN, Deshmukh SV et al (2005) Bidirectional transfer of methadone across human placenta. Biochem Pharmacol 69: 187-97. Nielsen TL, Rasmussen BB, Flinois JP et al (1999) In vitro metabolism of quinidine: the (3S)-3-hydroxylation of quinidine is a specific marker reaction for cytochrome P-4503A4 activity in human liver microsomes. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 289: 31-7. Oakley A (2011) Glutathione transferases: a structural perspective. Drug Metab Rev 43: 138-51. Obolskiy D, Pischel I, Siriwatanametanon N et al (2009) Garcinia mangostana L.: a phytochemical and pharmacological review. Phytother Res 23: 1047-65. Olesen OV & Linnet K (1997) Metabolism of the tricyclic antidepressant amitriptyline by cDNA-expressed human cytochrome P450 enzymes. Pharmacology 55: 235-43. Olesen OV & Linnet K (2000) Identification of the human cytochrome P450 isoforms mediating in vitro N-dealkylation of perphenazine. Br J Clin Pharmacol 50: 563-71. Ono S, Hatanaka T, Miyazawa S et al (1996) Human liver microsomal diazepam metabolism using cDNA-expressed cytochrome P450s: role of CYP2B6, 2C19 and the 3A subfamily. Xenobiotica 26: 1155-66. Paakki P, Kirkinen P, Helin H et al (2000) Antepartum glucocorticoid therapy suppresses human placental xenobiotic and steroid metabolizing enzymes. Placenta 21: 241-6. Parker LJ, Ciccone S, Italiano LC et al (2008) The anti-cancer drug chlorambucil as a substrate for the human polymorphic enzyme glutathione transferase P1-1: kinetic properties and crystallographic characterisation of allelic variants. J Mol Biol 380: 131-44. Pearce RE, Rodrigues AD, Goldstein JA et al (1996) Identification of the human P450 enzymes involved in lansoprazole metabolism. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 277: 805-16. Pedraza-Chaverri J, Cárdenas-Rodríguez N, Orozco-Ibarra M et al (2008) Medicinal properties of mangosteen (Garcinia mangostana). Food and Chemical Toxicology 46: 3227-3239. Pedro M, Cerqueira F, Sousa ME et al (2002) Xanthones as inhibitors of growth of human cancer cell lines and their effects on the proliferation of human lymphocytes in vitro. Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry 10: 3725-30. Peklak-Scott C, Townsend AJ & Morrow CS (2005) Dynamics of glutathione conjugation and conjugate efflux in detoxification of the carcinogen, 4-nitroquinoline 1oxide: contributions of glutathione, glutathione S-transferase, and MRP1. Biochemistry 44: 4426-33. Perini JA, Vianna-Jorge R, Brogliato AR et al (2005) Influence of CYP2C9 genotypes on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of piroxicam. Clin Pharmacol Ther 78: 362-9. Peters U, Preisler-Adams S, Hebeisen A et al (2000) Glutathione S-transferase genetic polymorphisms and individual sensitivity to the ototoxic effect of cisplatin. Anticancer Drugs 11: 639-43. Pinto M & Castanheiro R (2009) Natural Prenylated Xanthones: Chemistry and Biological Activities. In: BRAHMACHARI, G. (ed.) Natural Products: Chemistry, Biochemistry and Pharmacology. Oxford, UK: Alpha science International. Pinto MM, Sousa ME & Nascimento MS (2005) Xanthone derivatives: new insights in biological activities. Curr Med Chem 12: 2517-38. V. 65 Preissner S, Kroll K, Dunkel M et al (2010) SuperCYP: a comprehensive database on Cytochrome P450 enzymes including a tool for analysis of CYP-drug interactions. Nucleic Acids Res 38: D237-43. Raithel M, Ulrich P, Hochberger J et al (1998) Measurement of gut diamine oxidase activity. Diamine oxidase as a new biologic marker of colorectal proliferation? Ann N Y Acad Sci 859: 262-6. Ramana CV, Chatterjee-Kishore M, Nguyen H et al (2000) Complex roles of Stat1 in regulating gene expression. Oncogene 19: 2619-27. Raucy JL, Lasker JM, Lieber CS et al (1989) Acetaminophen activation by human liver cytochromes P450IIE1 and P450IA2. Arch Biochem Biophys 271: 270-83. Reilly CA, Ehlhardt WJ, Jackson DA et al (2003) Metabolism of capsaicin by cytochrome P450 produces novel dehydrogenated metabolites and decreases cytotoxicity to lung and liver cells. Chem Res Toxicol 16: 336-49. Relling MV, Aoyama T, Gonzalez FJ et al (1990) Tolbutamide and mephenytoin hydroxylation by human cytochrome P450s in the CYP2C subfamily. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 252: 442-7. Rendic S (2002) Summary of information on human CYP enzymes: human P450 metabolism data. Drug Metab Rev 34: 83-448. Rettie AE & Tai G (2006) The pharmocogenomics of warfarin: closing in on personalized medicine. Mol Interv 6: 223-7. Rostami-Hodjegan A, Amin AM, Spencer EP et al (2004) Influence of dose, cigarette smoking, age, sex, and metabolic activity on plasma clozapine concentrations: a predictive model and nomograms to aid clozapine dose adjustment and to assess compliance in individual patients. J Clin Psychopharmacol 24: 70-8. Rouzer CA & Marnett LJ (2009) Cyclooxygenases: structural and functional insights. J Lipid Res 50 Suppl: S29-34. Rozman B (2002) Clinical pharmacokinetics of leflunomide. Clin Pharmacokinet 41: 421-30. Sahoo N & Manchikanti P (2013) Herbal drug regulation and commercialization: an Indian industry perspective. J Altern Complement Med 19: 957-63. Sakagami Y, Iinuma M, Piyasena KG et al (2005) Antibacterial activity of alphamangostin against vancomycin resistant Enterococci (VRE) and synergism with antibiotics. Phytomedicine 12: 203-8. Salonen JS, Nyman L, Boobis AR et al (2003) Comparative studies on the cytochrome p450-associated metabolism and interaction potential of selegiline between human liverderived in vitro systems. Drug Metab Dispos 31: 1093-102. Sampath PD & Vijayaragavan K (2008) Ameliorative prospective of alpha-mangostin, a xanthone derivative from Garcinia mangostana against beta-adrenergic cathecolamineinduced myocardial toxicity and anomalous cardiac TNF-alpha and COX-2 expressions in rats. Exp Toxicol Pathol 60: 357-64. Scripture CD & Pieper JA (2001) Clinical pharmacokinetics of fluvastatin. Clin Pharmacokinet 40: 263-81. Shan T, Ma Q, Guo K et al (2011) Xanthones from mangosteen extracts as natural chemopreventive agents: potential anticancer drugs. Curr Mol Med 11: 666-77. Shankaranarayan D, Gopalakrishnan C & Kameswaran L (1979) Pharmacological profile of mangostin and its derivatives. Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther 239: 257-69. Shi S & Klotz U (2012) Drug interactions with herbal medicines. Clin Pharmacokinet 51: 77-104. Shou M, Lu T, Krausz KW et al (2000) Use of inhibitory monoclonal antibodies to assess the contribution of cytochromes P450 to human drug metabolism. Eur J Pharmacol 394: 199-209. Silberzahn P, Gaillard JL, Quincey D et al (1988) Aromatization of testosterone and 19nortestosterone by a single enzyme from equine testicular microsomes. Differences from human placental aromatase. J Steroid Biochem 29: 119-25. V. 66 Simpson ER, Mahendroo MS, Means GD et al (1994) Aromatase cytochrome P450, the enzyme responsible for estrogen biosynthesis. Endocr Rev 15: 342-55. Singh RP, Waldron RT & Hahn BH (2012) Genes, tolerance and systemic autoimmunity. Autoimmun Rev 11: 664-9. Srinivasan V, Maestroni GJ, Cardinali DP et al (2005) Melatonin, immune function and aging. Immun Ageing 2: 17. Srivastava PK, Yun CH, Beaune PH et al (1991) Separation of human liver microsomal tolbutamide hydroxylase and (S)-mephenytoin 4'-hydroxylase cytochrome P-450 enzymes. Mol Pharmacol 40: 69-79. Stanner SA, Hughes J, Kelly CN et al (2004) A review of the epidemiological evidence for the 'antioxidant hypothesis'. Public Health Nutr 7: 407-22. Stormer E, Von Moltke LL, Shader RI et al (2000) Metabolism of the antidepressant mirtazapine in vitro: contribution of cytochromes P-450 1A2, 2D6, and 3A4. Drug Metab Dispos 28: 1168-75. Suksamrarn S, Komutiban O, Ratananukul P et al (2006) Cytotoxic prenylated xanthones from the young fruit of Garcinia mangostana. Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin 54: 301-305. Suksamrarn S, Suwannapoch N, Phakhodee W et al (2003) Antimycobacterial activity of prenylated xanthones from the fruits of Garcinia mangostana. Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo) 51: 857-9. Sutton D, Butler AM, Nadin L et al (1997) Role of CYP3A4 in human hepatic diltiazem N-demethylation: inhibition of CYP3A4 activity by oxidized diltiazem metabolites. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 282: 294-300. Syljuasen RG, Krolewski B & Little JB (1999) Loss of normal G1 checkpoint control is an early step in carcinogenesis, independent of p53 status. Cancer Res 59: 1008-14. Tanaka E, Kurata N & Yasuhara H (2003) Involvement of cytochrome P450 2C9, 2E1 and 3A4 in trimethadione N-demethylation in human microsomes. J Clin Pharm Ther 28: 493-6. Tang YP, Li PG, Kondo M et al (2009) Effect of a mangosteen dietary supplement on human immune function: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Med Food 12: 755-63. Teixeira M, Cerqueira F, Barbosa CM et al (2005) Improvement of the inhibitory effect of xanthones on NO production by encapsulation in PLGA nanocapsules. J Drug Target 13: 129-35. Tew KD (2005) TLK-286: a novel glutathione S-transferase-activated prodrug. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 14: 1047-54. Tewtrakul S, Wattanapiromsakul C & Mahabusarakam W (2009) Effects of compounds from Garcinia mangostana on inflammatory mediators in RAW264.7 macrophage cells. J Ethnopharmacol 121: 379-82. Tracy TS, Korzekwa KR, Gonzalez FJ et al (1999) Cytochrome P450 isoforms involved in metabolism of the enantiomers of verapamil and norverapamil. Br J Clin Pharmacol 47: 545-52. Turck D, Roth W & Busch U (1996) A review of the clinical pharmacokinetics of meloxicam. Br J Rheumatol 35 Suppl 1: 13-6. Uetrecht JP & Trager W (2007) Drug Metabolism: Chemical and Enzymatic Aspects, Taylor & Francis. Ufer M, Svensson JO, Krausz KW et al (2004) Identification of cytochromes P450 2C9 and 3A4 as the major catalysts of phenprocoumon hydroxylation in vitro. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 60: 173-82. Valko M, Leibfritz D, Moncol J et al (2007) Free radicals and antioxidants in normal physiological functions and human disease. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 39: 44-84. Vassord C, Lapoumeroulie C, Koumaravelou K et al (2008) Endothelial cells do not express GSTA1: potential relevance to busulfan-mediated endothelial damage during haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Eur J Haematol 80: 299-302. V. 67 Vickers AE, Sinclair JR, Zollinger M et al (1999) Multiple cytochrome P-450s involved in the metabolism of terbinafine suggest a limited potential for drug-drug interactions. Drug Metab Dispos 27: 1029-38. Von Moltke LL, Greenblatt DJ, Grassi JM et al (1998) Multiple human cytochromes contribute to biotransformation of dextromethorphan in-vitro: role of CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, and CYP3A. J Pharm Pharmacol 50: 997-1004. Vormfelde SV, Engelhardt S, Zirk A et al (2004) CYP2C9 polymorphisms and the interindividual variability in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the loop diuretic drug torsemide. Clin Pharmacol Ther 76: 557-66. Wada T & Penninger JM (2004) Mitogen-activated protein kinases in apoptosis regulation. Oncogene 23: 2838-49. Wang JJ, Sanderson BJS & Zhang W (2011) Cytotoxic effect of xanthones from pericarp of the tropical fruit mangosteen (Garcinia mangostana Linn.) on human melanoma cells. Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association 49: 2385-91. Wang JJ, Zhang W & Sanderson BJ (2013) Altered mRNA expression related to the apoptotic effect of three xanthones on human melanoma SK-MEL-28 cell line. Biomed Res Int 2013: 715603. Watanapokasin R, Jarinthanan F, Jerusalmi A et al (2010) Potential of Xanthones from Tropical Fruit Mangosteen as Anti-cancer Agents: Caspase-Dependent Apoptosis Induction In Vitro and in Mice. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 162: 1080-1094. Weecharangsan W, Opanasopit P, Sukma M et al (2006) Antioxidative and neuroprotective activities of extracts from the fruit hull of mangosteen (Garcinia mangostana Linn.). Med Princ Pract 15: 281-7. Wink DA, Kasprzak KS, Maragos CM et al (1991) DNA deaminating ability and genotoxicity of nitric oxide and its progenitors. Science 254: 1001-3. Wink DA, Vodovotz Y, Laval J et al (1998) The multifaceted roles of nitric oxide in cancer. Carcinogenesis 19: 711-21. Winter HR, Wang Y & Unadkat JD (2000) CYP2C8/9 mediate dapsone N-hydroxylation at clinical concentrations of dapsone. Drug Metab Dispos 28: 865-8. Wong LP & Klemmer PJ (2008) Severe lactic acidosis associated with juice of the mangosteen fruit Garcinia mangostana. Am J Kidney Dis 51: 829-33. Yamazaki H, Inoue K, Hashimoto M et al (1999a) Roles of CYP2A6 and CYP2B6 in nicotine C-oxidation by human liver microsomes. Arch Toxicol 73: 65-70. Yamazaki H, Shaw PM, Guengerich FP et al (1998) Roles of cytochromes P450 1A2 and 3A4 in the oxidation of estradiol and estrone in human liver microsomes. Chem Res Toxicol 11: 659-65. Yamazaki H, Shibata A, Suzuki M et al (1999b) Oxidation of troglitazone to a quinonetype metabolite catalyzed by cytochrome P-450 2C8 and P-450 3A4 in human liver microsomes. Drug Metab Dispos 27: 1260-6. Yamazaki H & Shimada T (1997) Progesterone and testosterone hydroxylation by cytochromes P450 2C19, 2C9, and 3A4 in human liver microsomes. Arch Biochem Biophys 346: 161-9. Yang TJ, Shou M, Korzekwa KR et al (1998) Role of cDNA-expressed human cytochromes P450 in the metabolism of diazepam. Biochem Pharmacol 55: 889-96. Yasar U, Annas A, Svensson JO et al (2005) Ketobemidone is a substrate for cytochrome P4502C9 and 3A4, but not for P-glycoprotein. Xenobiotica 35: 785-96. Yasuda H (2008) Solid tumor physiology and hypoxia-induced chemo/radio-resistance: novel strategy for cancer therapy: nitric oxide donor as a therapeutic enhancer. Nitric Oxide 19: 205-16. Yoo J-H, Kang K, Jho EH et al (2011) αand γ-Mangostin inhibit the proliferation of colon cancer cells via β-catenin gene regulation in Wnt/cGMP signalling. Food Chemistry 129: 1559-1566. Zhao J, Leemann T & Dayer P (1992) In vitro oxidation of oxicam NSAIDS by a human liver cytochrome P450. Life Sci 51: 575-81. V. 68 Zhou SF, Zhou ZW, Yang LP et al (2009) Substrates, inducers, inhibitors and structureactivity relationships of human Cytochrome P450 2C9 and implications in drug development. Curr Med Chem 16: 3480-675. Ziche M & Morbidelli L (2000) Nitric oxide and angiogenesis. J Neurooncol 50: 139-48. V. 69 Paper 2 (draft): “Alpha-mangostin antitumor activity: cytotoxicity and influence on the immune system microenvironment” Abstract Alpha-mangostin is known to interfere with multiple pathways of carcinogenesis. Therefore, it has been proposed as prospective cancer drug candidate. In melanoma, alpha-mangostin antitumor effect may be increased by the immunomodulation of tumor microenvironment, since melanocytic tumors are highly immunogenic. The main gold of this study was evaluate alpha-mangostin (i) cytotoxic effect on A375C5 melanoma cell line and (ii) it interference with the immune macrophages induced microenvironment of the tumor. This xanthone showed inhibition of A375-C5 melanoma growth (GI50 = 11.3 ± 0.9 µM). Concerning the direct impact of alpha-mangostin on macrophages function, it was observed an inhibition of nitric oxide production by RAW 264.7 murine macrophages (IC50 = 13.8 ± 0.7 µM) and decreased the concentration of IL-1β and TGF-β1 and stimulated TNF-α expression by THP-1 human macrophages. In order to complement the described effect of α-MG on the immune microenvironment of melanoma, it was also study in proliferation and cytokines production by human lymphocytes. Alpha-mangostin strongly inhibited PHA-stimulated human mononuclear cells proliferation (IC50 = 9.2 ± 0.3 µM) but not interfering for IC50 for IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-10 and TGF-β1. In conclusion this study proved that alpha-mangostin interferes with cytokine and NO production by activated macrophages leading to the evidence that the xanthone interferes with immune microenvironment of the tumor. Introduction Melanoma is a melanocytes’ malignant tumor that metastasizes very early in the disease process, causing elevated mortality rates. According to the Oncologic register of Portugal (2007), the world incidence of melanoma of the skin is about 4,5 cases for 100000 habitants (RORENO 2013) and, although it is a relative rare kind of cancer, it contributes for about 80% of the deaths caused by cutaneous cancer (Kuphal and Bosserhoff 2009; Gast et al. 2011; Raaijmakers et al. 2013). The tumorigenesis of this cancer requires a multistep process, in spite of alterations in immune system has a crucial involvement, namely the immunosuppressive and pro-tumor character of tumor microenvironment (Hussein 2004; Chen et al. 2011). Among inflammatory cells, V. 70 macrophages are of pivotal importance in malignancy development, being specifically referred to as tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) (Chen et al. 2011). TAMs are the most abundant leukocytes in the melanoma and their presence represent a poor prognostic (Brocker et al. 1988; Bernengo et al. 2000; Makitie et al. 2001; Varney et al. 2005), due to induction of an immunosuppressive microenvironment that, among other consequences, inhibits tumor-specific CD8+ T cell-mediated cytotoxicity (Kono et al. 1996; Wang et al. 2012c). The growing understanding of immune involvement in tumorigenesis, contributed to therapies aiming immunologic targets (Dranoff 2009; Raaijmakers et al. 2013). However some of these therapies are only effective in a brief period of time while others have considerable side effects (Hodi et al. 2010; Solit and Rosen 2011; Graziani et al. 2012). Obviously, it is important to find new therapies for melanoma that target multiple biochemical pathways, in order to avoid tumor escape mechanisms (Smalley et al. 2006). Prenylated xanthones, including alpha-mangostin (α-MG) (Figure 9), the most studied and abundant xanthone present on mangosteen pericarp (Garcinia mangostana Linn), have been associated to multiple benefits in several pathological conditions. In cancer, its effect is through the alteration of a significant number of physiological pathways, comprising the influence in immune system (Obolskiy et al. 2009; Shan et al. 2011; Gutierrez-Orozco and Failla 2013). Beside the previous reports of α-MG effect in immune functions, as far as we know the interference of this xanthone in the immune system microenvironment of melanoma has never been studied. Recently, a number of evidences suggested that α-MG has a potent antitumor effect against melanoma. These reports evaluated the effect of the compound in different melanoma cell lines (B16-F10 murine cell line, SK-MEL-28 human cell line) and described induction of apoptosis, cell cycle arrest and differentiation, and inhibition of both cell proliferation and metastasis (Wang et al. 2011; Wang et al. 2012a; Wang et al. 2012b; Wang et al. 2013). During the development of this study, Beninati et al reported some experiments of α-MG effect on the A375 cell line (Beninati et al. 2014). In spite of these insights, and as far as we know, no studies on α-MG-dependent modulation of the immune microenvironment and its effect on melanoma growth were performed. Due to the importance of immune targets in melanoma therapies, the aim of the present work is to study α-MG effects on the immune system in order to potentiate its antitumor effect on A375-C5 melanoma cell line. V. 71 Figure 9: alpha-Mangostin Material and Methods Chemicals and reagents Reagents used in cell culture, including RPMI-1640, DMEM medium, and fetal bovine serum (FBS) were purchased from Gibco® Invitrogen Co. (Barcelona, Spain), 2mercaptoethanol for synthesis was obtained from Merck (Whitehouse Station, NJ, USA) and Glutamine cell culture grade and Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) from Applichem (Darmstadt, Germany). N.N-Dimetilformamida (DMF) was acquiring from Spectramol Science Incorporated. Reagents used in SRB assay as Trichloroacetic acid (TCA), Acetic acid glacial 99100% and Trizma base were purchased from Prolabo (Oeiras, Portugal), CHEM-LAB (Zedelgem, Belgium) and Frilabo (Maia, Portugal), respectively. IL-1β, IL-10, TNF-α and TGF-β1 ELISA Ready-Set-Go Kits were acquired from eBioscience (San Diego, CA, USA). All other chemicals of analytical grade used in the experiments and unless otherwise indicated were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich® (St. Louis, MO, USA). Xanthones Alpha-mangostin (α-MG) was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich® (ref.M3824) and stock solution kept at -20ºC in DMSO. Just prior each assay, stock solution was diluted in appropriate complete medium to the maximum concentration to test and 1:2 dilutions were serially prepared. Cell lines A375-C5 human malignant melanoma cell line and RAW 264.7 mouse macrophage cell line are part of CEQUIMED cell culture collection. THP-1 human monocyte cell line was a courtesy of Rui Appelberg. A375-C5 was routinely maintained in 25 cm2 flasks containing RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1 µL mL-1 Gentamycin at 37ºC in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2. For the THP-1 cell line the culture medium just V. 78 Antitumor effect of conditioned macrophage culture medium As modulation of the immune system has been a promising approach in melanoma treatment. It was investigated the possible influence of conditioned macrophage supernatants on A375-C5 cells growth to teste the influence of soluble immunologic factors produced by macrophages on melanoma cell line. A significant (p < 0.001) decrease in melanoma cell growth was observed after exposure to supernatants from both α-MG-treated and untreated THP-1 macrophages (Figure 12), which is in favor of an α-MG-independent anti-tumor effect of soluble mediators produced by cultured THP-1 macrophages. Figure 12: Antitumor effect of alpha-mangostin, macrophages supernatants and alpha-mangostin conditioned macrophage culture medium on A375-C5 melanoma cell line. THP-1 PMA-differentiated macrophages were treated with xanthone and supernatants were added to melanoma cells. Results show mean values ± SEM (n = 3). * p < 0.001 Discussion Natural xanthones, including those from mangosteen extract have antitumor and immunomodulatory effects (Pinto et al. 2005; Obolskiy et al. 2009; Shan et al. 2011; Gutierrez-Orozco and Failla 2013). In particular, alpha-mangostin has been repeatedly associated with modulation of a great variety of physiologic pathways, including inflammation. These findings reinforce their antitumor potential, fighting tumor progression and treatment resistance (Pinto et al. 2005; Shan et al. 2011; Gutierrez-Orozco and Failla 2013). In melanoma, several evidences reported the potential of immune targets as therapeutic agents. This facts result in the current use of ipilimumab, an immunomodulating antibody that target CTLA4 on activated T cells and inhibit regulatory T cells, in spite of the severe toxicity associated (Hodi et al. 2010; Graziani et al. 2012). The character highly immunogenic of melanocytic tumors and the influence of host immune response and microenvironment inflammatory cells in cancer growth were Growth inhibition (% of control) Alpha-mangostin (6,25 μM) 5.4 ± 2.9 % Macrophages supernatants 25.0 ± 2.5 % * α-MG (6,25 μM) conditioned macrophages supernatants 24.4 ± 2.7 % * V. 79 verified (Hussein 2004; Dranoff 2009; Chen et al. 2011). Indeed, primary melanomas undergo spontaneous regression much more frequently than any other cancer that may be a sign of immunosurveillance or, by other way, it may be due melanoma are easier to visualize (Printz 2001; Kalialis et al. 2009). Nevertheless, other evidences corroborate the involvement of immune system, namely the relatively amount of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in melanoma microenvironment compared with other cancers and associated with favorable prognostic (Maio 2012; Kushnir and Merimsky 2013) and the appearance of autoimmune condition as vitiligo in melanoma patients or patients treated with immunotherapy which normally means a better disease outcome (Le Gal et al. 2001; Phan et al. 2001; Boasberg et al. 2006). In more advanced stages, this cancer became capable to avoid immunosurveillance (Reiman et al. 2007; Speeckaert et al. 2011) and its progression and metastatic potential may be supported by immune cells present in tumor microenvironment, as the tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) since they are the most abundant leucocytes in melanoma and represent a poor prognostic (Brocker et al. 1988; Bernengo et al. 2000; Makitie et al. 2001; Varney et al. 2005; Porta et al. 2007; Solinas et al. 2009; Mantovani and Sica 2010; Qian and Pollard 2010). In spite of the verified interaction of immune system in melanoma treatment and the potential of xanthones as antitumor and immunomodulatory agent, any research was based on the direct effect of any immune cell treated with xanthonic compounds in the tumor growth. According to the established influence of inflammation on cancer (induces carcinogenisis, tumor progression and promotes angiogenisis) (Apte and Voronov 2008; Germano et al. 2008; Kundu and Surh 2008; Colotta et al. 2009; Mantovani 2010) and particularly in melanoma, it was investigated the potential effect of the compound in different immune pathways in human and murine macrophage cell lines and human mononuclear cells from peripheral blood. Indeed, α-MG inhibited NO production and TNFα secretion by murine macrophages cells (Chen et al. 2008; Tewtrakul et al. 2009). In spite of that finds, any studies were performed in the cytokines interleukin - 1β (IL-1β), IL10, the tumor grow factor - β1 (TGF-β1) and the tumor necrosis factor - α (TNFα) in THP-1 macrophages as performed in this paper. RAW 264.7 was used for investigation of NO production, since this cell line was referred as an appropriate model to study iNOS system (Dirsch et al. 1998; Shih et al. 2010). Human macrophages in vitro produce low quantity of NO in response to stimuli (Thomassen and Kavuru 2001). However, either in vitro murine cells and in vivo human macrophages express great quantities of NO in inflammatory conditions (Ochoa et al. 1991; Dirsch et al. 1998) V. 80 α-MG was a strong inhibitor of NO production by LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7 (IC50 = 13.8 ± 0.7 µM). Since α-MG effect was not due to cell death or scavenging of chemicaly generated NO, it may act at the level of NO production by iNOS. In inflammatory process, NO is produced by inducible NO synthetase (iNOS or NOS2) from L-arginine and molecular oxygen (Gross and Wolin 1995; Aramaki 2000). The inductible form is stimulated by imunologic factors and expressed in virtually all cells (Gross and Wolin 1995). In macrophages, its production is stimulated by a number of cytokines and LPS (Lowenstein et al. 1993; Gross and Wolin 1995). Production of NO could be a consequence of iNOS regulation at transcriptional and post-transcriptional level, depending of gene transcription, stability and translation of mRNA, stability of the protein, availability of substrates or co-factors, inhibitors that compete with substrates and the known NO feedback effect (Nathan and Xie 1994; Bogdan et al. 2000; Brunet 2001). Therefore, the underlying mechanism to α-MG inhibition of NO production needed further investigation. For that, α-MG was added at different hours: 0h (simultaneously), 6h and 14h after RAW 264.7 macrophages stimulation with LPS. In spite of α-MG exhibit a potent inhibition of NO production when added simultaneously with LPS-stimulation, this production remained stable either when it was added 6 or 14h after stimulation. This findings suggest an interference on iNOS expression since the enzyme is transcribed within 2-4 hours and translated within six hours after LPS-stimulation in macrophages (Xie et al. 1994). L-NAME (inhibitor of iNOS activity) (McCall et al. 1991), and Dexamethasone, inhibitor of iNOS expression (Korhonen et al. 2002) was used as positive controls and the obtained results was in accordance with the mechanism proposed to these inhibitors by our technique. In accordance to our finds, Chen et al and Tewtrakul et al reported an inhibition of iNOS mRNA expression on RAW 264.7 macrophages by α-MG. Inhibition of iNOS expression indicates an anti-inflammatory potential of α-MG. However, in cancer, this inhibition represents controversial effects because NO has been reported as cytotoxic in melanoma and many other tumors, but simultaneously it modulates many pro-tumor pathways including resistance to apoptosis, cell cycle progression, angiogenesis invasion, and metastasis (Ying and Hofseth 2007; Choudhari et al. 2013). So, the result of α-MG-dependent inhibition of NO production for melanoma progression needs further investigation. Macrophages, including TAMs, are dynamic and heterogeneous cells mainly due to their capacity to respond to stimulus. According to the microenvironment they may be polarized into a spectrum of phenotypes between the extremes M1 (classic) and M2 (alternative). M1 macrophages produced high levels of iNOS, TNF-α, IL-1β and other pro- V. 81 inflammatory molecules, while M2 macrophages are immunosuppressive, significantly expressing IL-10 and TGF-β (Allavena et al. 2008; Biswas et al. 2013). Several evidences indicate that macrophage phenotypes can change during tumor progression (Zaynagetdinov et al. 2011). M1 activation may induce chronic inflammation, a factor that could predispose to tumor initiation (Greten et al. 2004; Pikarsky et al. 2004). However, in early stages of tumor progression, TAMs adopt an M1-like phenotype that contributes to anti-tumor immunity. M2 phenotype is mainly expressed in established tumors and induce immunosuppressive, angiogenic and metastatic effects (Mantovani et al. 2004; Sica et al. 2006; Gordon and Mantovani 2011; Zaynagetdinov et al. 2011; Liao et al. 2014). α-MG had a dual influence on the immune system, either inhibiting IL-1β and NO responses, or inhibiting TGF-β1 and stimulating TNF-α expression. IL-1β, a pro-inflammatory cytokine mainly produced by monocytes and macrophages is an example of the pleiotropism of immune system. In melanoma its expression was associated to tumor progression and promotion of lung metastases from melanoma (Giavazzi et al. 1990; Meyer et al. 2011). Therefore, IL-1β has been associated with all steps of malignancy (carcinogenesis, progression, invasion and metastasis) and may even be expressed by the tumor cells (Apte and Voronov 2008). In contrast, M1 macrophages phenotype produced interleukin induce an immune response against malignant cells (Fairweather and Cihakova 2009). Considering all that was stated above, the inhibition of IL-1β mediated by α-MG could be beneficial so this cytokine induces tumor progression and metastasis. Melanoma is a highly metastatic kind of cancer contributing to the high mortality associated (Kuphal and Bosserhoff 2009; Raaijmakers et al. 2013), therefore a therapy that suppress or control angiogenesis and invasion may be an important approach. TGF-β1 regulates multiple cellular processes, including proliferation and differentiation. It acts as a potent inducer of differentiation in normal cells which leads to the concept that this cytokine protects against cancer in early stages of carcinogenesis (Yang et al. 2008). By the other hand, several tumors express increasing amounts of TGF-β1 which is associated with disease progression, invasion and metastasis both in vivo and in vitro (Akhurst and Derynck 2001). In melanoma, TGF-β isoforms (TGF-β1/2/3) are highly expressed and increase in parallel with tumor progression (Krasagakis et al. 1998; Javelaud et al. 2008). According to that, this cytokine is commonly produced by M2-like macrophages leads to a Th2 response, i.e., promotes an immunosuppressive microenvironment that allows the tumor immune escape (Coffelt et al. 2009; Martinez et al. 2009; Siveen and Kuttan 2009; Hao et al. 2012; Sica and Mantovani 2012). The V. 82 inhibition of TGF-β1 by α-MG may benefit the treatment of melanoma, mainly in later stages of tumorigenesis. TNF-α stimulation predicts a favorable outcome in melanoma treatment since several reports associated the use of TNF inhibitors as a factor that appear to increase the risk of skin cancer, including melanoma (Mariette et al. 2011; Kouklakis et al. 2013). In spite of that, the concentration expressed by THP-1 cells was minimal even in LPS-stimulated and non-treated macrophages. IL-10 is an anti-inflammatory cytokine able to induce tumor progression through the promotion of angiogenesis and suppression of immune surveillance. In melanoma, its influence facilitates metastasis formation (García-Hernández et al. 2002; Itakura et al. 2011). In the present study, it was observed no alteration on IL-10 concentration after treatment with α-MG. Taking into account the pattern of cytokines altered by the treatment with α-MG, it was inferred the potential underling mechanism of iNOS inhibition by xanthone. NOS2 gene expression and translation was stimulated by a number of pro-inflammatory cytokines, particularly TNF-α, IL-1β and IFN-γ, compounds of bacterial origin as LPS (Nathan 1992) and stress signaling as hypoxia (Ferreiro et al. 2001). These stimuli may activate NF-κB or JAK-STAT (janus tyrosine kinase - signal transducers and activators of transcription) pathways (Kleinert et al. 1998; Xuan et al. 2001). Additionally, MAPK pathway most likely contributes to iNOS expression (Janssen-Heininger et al. 1999; Chan et al. 2001). It is also known that TGF-β1 inhibits iNOS expression by mRNA destabilization (Perrella et al. 1994). NF-κB pathway contributes to iNOS synthesis and upregulate IL-1β level. α-MG treated THP-1 macrophages expressed lower IL-1β and NO levels comparatively to control cells leading us to hypothesize the interference of the xanthone with NF-κB pathway. More studies must be performed in order to corroborate this supposition. Macrophage activation and polarization are triggered by T helper cells (Th1 induce M1 phenotype and Th2 the M2-like phenotype). In turn, M1 macrophages recruit Th1 cells, CD8+ CTL (cytotoxic T cells) and NK cells leading to an inflammatory response and antitumor immunity, while M2-like macrophages favor the recruitment and development of Treg (regulatory T cells) and Th2, leading to a response that supports tumor growth through immunosuppression (Mantovani et al. 2002; Mantovani et al. 2004; Martinez et al. 2009; Siveen and Kuttan 2009; Sica and Mantovani 2012). In order to complement the described effect of α-MG on the immune microenvironment of melanoma, a study in influence of the compound in proliferation and cytokines production by human lymphocytes was performed. The compound strongly inhibit PHA-stimulated human mononuclear cells proliferation. V. 83 As weel as discussed to macrophages, lymphocytes have divergent roles in cancer due to their plasticity (Lakshmi Narendra et al. 2013). With the aim of establish the impact of proliferation inhibition in tumors, a set of four cytokines was evaluated in PHAstimulated mononuclear cells from peripheral blood. At IC50 (≃ 10 µM) concentration of αMG any cytokine concentration was altered. IL-10 and TNF-α was reduced to basal levels and TGF-β1 was stimulated at twice IC50 concentration. This finds indicate and absent effect of α-MG in T lymphocytes at concentrations required for inhibition of melanoma cells growth and for the immunomodulatory influence in macrophages which may indicate no significant impact of lymphocytes treated with α-MG on melanoma growth inhibition or in modulating of macrophages. Recently, Kasemwattanaroj et al, 2013 reported no alteration in IL-1β and TNF-α expression levels by conavalin A stimulated human mononuclear cells treated with α-MG (Kasemwattanaroj et al. 2013). Considering the results of cytokines modulation in THP-1 human macrophages mediated by α-MG and the established involvement of immune system in melanoma treatment (Brocker et al. 1988; Bernengo et al. 2000; Makitie et al. 2001; Varney et al. 2005; Porta et al. 2007; Solinas et al. 2009; Mantovani and Sica 2010; Qian and Pollard 2010), it was hyphotisised if condicioned macrophages culture medium may potentiate the cytotoxic activity of α-MG. Anticancer effect of α-MG was previously evaluated in different melanoma cell lines (Wang et al. 2011; Wang et al. 2012a; Wang et al. 2012b; Wang et al. 2013; Beninati et al. 2014). In this work, the antitumor activity of α-MG on melanoma A375-C5 cells was determined and compared with that of α-MG treated macrophages supernatants. α-MG strongly inhibited melanoma growth (GI50 = 11.3 ± 0.9 µM). The results also demonstrated that the supernatants od THP-1 macrophages either treated or not with α-MG significantly interfere with melanoma cell growth. This results prove that the immune microenvironment created by macrophages associated to tumors interfere with tumor cell viability. For α-MG dose tested (6.25 µM), below GI50 concentration, no significantly differences were observed for the cytotoxic activity of macrophages supernatants, when treated or not with xanthone. However, it was proved that α-MG interferes with cytokine and NO production by activated macrophages leading to the evidence that the xanthone interferes with immune microenvironment of the tumor. Therefore, it was expected a difference between the cytotoxic effect of treated and non-treated macrophages supernatants. Our results could be due to the lower dose used since for 6.25 µM only a ≃ 5% inhibition of melanoma cell growth was observed. Althought, no higher doses could be used in the assays since they were associated with a significant loss of viability of THP-1 macrophages, as determined by the MTT assay. V. 84 Therefore, further studies in other in vitro or/and in vivo models must be performed in order to clarify the α-MG effect in melanoma treatment and consequently establish α-MG as a prospective co-adjuvant drug in these tumors. From this set of data find in this study it is possible to infer that α-MG could be very interesting agent for melanoma treatment. References Akhurst RJ & Derynck R (2001) TGF-β signaling in cancer – a double-edged sword. Trends in Cell Biology 11: S44-S51. Allavena P, Sica A, Solinas G et al (2008) The inflammatory micro-environment in tumor progression: the role of tumor-associated macrophages. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 66: 1-9. Apte RN & Voronov E (2008) Is interleukin-1 a good or bad ‘guy’ in tumor immunobiology and immunotherapy? Immunological Reviews 222: 222-241. Aramaki Y (2000) Liposomes as immunomodulator--inhibitory effect of liposomes on NO production from macrophages. Biol Pharm Bull 23: 1267-74. Beninati S, Oliverio S, Cordella M et al (2014) Inhibition of cell proliferation, migration and invasion of B16-F10 melanoma cells by alpha-mangostin. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. Bernengo MG, Quaglino P, Cappello N et al (2000) Macrophage-mediated immunostimulation modulates therapeutic efficacy of interleukin-2 based chemoimmunotherapy in advanced metastatic melanoma patients. Melanoma Res 10: 5565. Biswas SK, Allavena P & Mantovani A (2013) Tumor-associated macrophages: functional diversity, clinical significance, and open questions. Semin Immunopathol 35: 585-600. Boasberg PD, Hoon DS, Piro LD et al (2006) Enhanced survival associated with vitiligo expression during maintenance biotherapy for metastatic melanoma. J Invest Dermatol 126: 2658-63. Bogdan C, Rollinghoff M & Diefenbach A (2000) Reactive oxygen and reactive nitrogen intermediates in innate and specific immunity. Curr Opin Immunol 12: 64-76. Brocker EB, Zwadlo G, Holzmann B et al (1988) Inflammatory cell infiltrates in human melanoma at different stages of tumor progression. Int J Cancer 41: 562-7. Brunet LR (2001) Nitric oxide in parasitic infections. Int Immunopharmacol 1: 1457-67. Cerqueira F, Cidade H, Van Ufford L et al (2008) The natural prenylated flavone artelastin is an inhibitor of ROS and NO production. Int Immunopharmacol 8: 597-602. Cerqueira F, Cordeiro-Da-Silva A, Araujo N et al (2003) Inhibition of lymphocyte proliferation by prenylated flavones: artelastin as a potent inhibitor. Life Sci 73: 2321-34. Chan ED, Chan J & Schluger NW (2001) What is the Role of Nitric Oxide in Murine and Human Host Defense against Tuberculosis? American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology 25: 606-612. Chanput W, Mes JJ & Wichers HJ (2014) THP-1 cell line: An in vitro cell model for immune modulation approach. Int Immunopharmacol. Chanput W, Reitsma M, Kleinjans L et al (2012) beta-Glucans are involved in immunemodulation of THP-1 macrophages. Mol Nutr Food Res 56: 822-33. Chen LG, Yang LL & Wang CC (2008) Anti-inflammatory activity of mangostins from Garcinia mangostana. Food Chem Toxicol 46: 688-93. Chen P, Huang Y, Bong R et al (2011) Tumor-associated macrophages promote angiogenesis and melanoma growth via adrenomedullin in a paracrine and autocrine manner. Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research 17: 7230-9. V. 85 Choudhari SK, Chaudhary M, Bagde S et al (2013) Nitric oxide and cancer: a review. World J Surg Oncol 11: 118. Coffelt SB, Hughes R & Lewis CE (2009) Tumor-associated macrophages: effectors of angiogenesis and tumor progression. Biochim Biophys Acta 1796: 11-8. Colotta F, Allavena P, Sica A et al (2009) Cancer-related inflammation, the seventh hallmark of cancer: links to genetic instability. Carcinogenesis 30: 1073-81. Dirsch VM, Stuppner H & Vollmar AM (1998) The Griess assay: suitable for a bioguided fractionation of anti-inflammatory plant extracts? Planta Med 64: 423-6. Dranoff G (2009) Targets of protective tumor immunity. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1174: 74-80. Fairweather D & Cihakova D (2009) Alternatively activated macrophages in infection and autoimmunity. J Autoimmun 33: 222-30. Ferreiro CR, Chagas ACP, Carvalho MHC et al (2001) Influence of Hypoxia on Nitric Oxide Synthase Activity and Gene Expression in Children With Congenital Heart Disease: A Novel Pathophysiological Adaptive Mechanism. Circulation 103: 2272-2276. García-Hernández ML, Hernández-Pando R, Gariglio P et al (2002) Interleukin-10 promotes B16-melanoma growth by inhibition of macrophage functions and induction of tumour and vascular cell proliferation. Immunology 105: 231-243. Gast A, Bermejo JL, Claus R et al (2011) Association of inherited variation in Toll-like receptor genes with malignant melanoma susceptibility and survival. PLoS One 6: e24370. Germano G, Allavena P & Mantovani A (2008) Cytokines as a key component of cancer-related inflammation. Cytokine 43: 374-379. Giavazzi R, Garofalo A, Bani MR et al (1990) Interleukin 1-induced augmentation of experimental metastases from a human melanoma in nude mice. Cancer Res 50: 4771-5. Gordon S & Mantovani A (2011) Diversity and plasticity of mononuclear phagocytes. Eur J Immunol 41: 2470-2. Graziani G, Tentori L & Navarra P (2012) Ipilimumab: A novel immunostimulatory monoclonal antibody for the treatment of cancer. Pharmacological Research 65: 9-22. Greten FR, Eckmann L, Greten TF et al (2004) IKKbeta links inflammation and tumorigenesis in a mouse model of colitis-associated cancer. Cell 118: 285-96. Gross SS & Wolin MS (1995) Nitric oxide: pathophysiological mechanisms. Annu Rev Physiol 57: 737-69. Gupta S, Rodrigues LM, Esteves AP et al (2008) Synthesis of N-aryl-5-amino-4cyanopyrazole derivatives as potent xanthine oxidase inhibitors. Eur J Med Chem 43: 771-80. Gutierrez-Orozco F & Failla ML (2013) Biological activities and bioavailability of mangosteen xanthones: a critical review of the current evidence. Nutrients 5: 3163-83. Hao N-B, Lü M-H, Fan Y-H et al (2012) Macrophages in Tumor Microenvironments and the Progression of Tumors. Clinical and Developmental Immunology 2012: 11. He X, Shu J, Xu L et al (2012) Inhibitory effect of Astragalus polysaccharides on lipopolysaccharide-induced TNF-a and IL-1beta production in THP-1 cells. Molecules 17: 3155-64. Hodi FS, O'day SJ, Mcdermott DF et al (2010) Improved Survival with Ipilimumab in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma. New England Journal of Medicine 363: 711-723. Hussein MR (2004) Genetic pathways to melanoma tumorigenesis. J Clin Pathol 57: 797-801. Itakura E, Huang RR, Wen DR et al (2011) IL-10 expression by primary tumor cells correlates with melanoma progression from radial to vertical growth phase and development of metastatic competence. Mod Pathol 24: 801-9. Janssen-Heininger YMW, Macara I & Mossman BT (1999) Cooperativity between Oxidants and Tumor Necrosis Factor in the Activation of Nuclear Factor (NF)- κ B. American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology 20: 942-952. Javelaud D, Alexaki VI & Mauviel A (2008) Transforming growth factor-beta in cutaneous melanoma. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res 21: 123-32. V. 86 Kalialis LV, Drzewiecki KT & Klyver H (2009) Spontaneous regression of metastases from melanoma: review of the literature. Melanoma Res 19: 275-82. Kasemwattanaroj P, Moongkarndi P, Pattanapanyasat K et al (2013) Immunomodulatory activities of alpha-mangostin on peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Nat Prod Commun 8: 1257-60. Kleinert H, Wallerath T, Fritz G et al (1998) Cytokine induction of NO synthase II in human DLD-1 cells: roles of the JAK-STAT, AP-1 and NF-κB-signaling pathways. British Journal of Pharmacology 125: 193-201. Kono K, Salazar-Onfray F, Petersson M et al (1996) Hydrogen peroxide secreted by tumor-derived macrophages down-modulates signal-transducing zeta molecules and inhibits tumor-specific T cell-and natural killer cell-mediated cytotoxicity. Eur J Immunol 26: 1308-13. Korhonen R, Lahti A, Hamalainen M et al (2002) Dexamethasone inhibits inducible nitric-oxide synthase expression and nitric oxide production by destabilizing mRNA in lipopolysaccharide-treated macrophages. Mol Pharmacol 62: 698-704. Kouklakis G, Efremidou EI, Pitiakoudis M et al (2013) Development of primary malignant melanoma during treatment with a TNF-alpha antagonist for severe Crohn's disease: a case report and review of the hypothetical association between TNF-alpha blockers and cancer. Drug Des Devel Ther 7: 195-9. Krasagakis K, Tholke D, Farthmann B et al (1998) Elevated plasma levels of transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta1 and TGF-beta2 in patients with disseminated malignant melanoma. Br J Cancer 77: 1492-4. Kundu JK & Surh YJ (2008) Cancer chemopreventive and therapeutic potential of resveratrol: mechanistic perspectives. Cancer Lett 269: 243-61. Kuphal S & Bosserhoff A (2009) Recent progress in understanding the pathology of malignant melanoma. J Pathol 219: 400-9. Kushnir I & Merimsky O (2013) The evolution in melanoma treatment as a reflection of precision-oriented medicine. Oncol Lett 5: 424-426. Lakshmi Narendra B, Eshvendar Reddy K, Shantikumar S et al (2013) Immune system: a double-edged sword in cancer. Inflamm Res 62: 823-34. Le Gal FA, Avril MF, Bosq J et al (2001) Direct evidence to support the role of antigenspecific CD8(+) T cells in melanoma-associated vitiligo. J Invest Dermatol 117: 1464-70. Liao Q, Zeng Z, Guo X et al (2014) LPLUNC1 suppresses IL-6-induced nasopharyngeal carcinoma cell proliferation via inhibiting the Stat3 activation. Oncogene 33: 2098-109. Lou X, Hou Y & Liang D (2013) Effects of hepatitis B virus X protein on human T cell cytokines. Can J Microbiol 59: 620-6. Lowenstein CJ, Alley EW, Raval P et al (1993) Macrophage nitric oxide synthase gene: two upstream regions mediate induction by interferon gamma and lipopolysaccharide. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 90: 9730-4. Maio M (2012) Melanoma as a model tumour for immuno-oncology. Ann Oncol 23 Suppl 8: viii10-4. Makitie T, Summanen P, Tarkkanen A et al (2001) Tumor-infiltrating macrophages (CD68(+) cells) and prognosis in malignant uveal melanoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 42: 1414-21. Mantovani A (2010) Molecular pathways linking inflammation and cancer. Curr Mol Med 10: 369-73. Mantovani A, Allavena P & Sica A (2004) Tumour-associated macrophages as a prototypic type II polarised phagocyte population: role in tumour progression. Eur J Cancer 40: 1660-7. Mantovani A & Sica A (2010) Macrophages, innate immunity and cancer: balance, tolerance, and diversity. Curr Opin Immunol 22: 231-7. Mantovani A, Sozzani S, Locati M et al (2002) Macrophage polarization: tumorassociated macrophages as a paradigm for polarized M2 mononuclear phagocytes. Trends Immunol 23: 549-55. V. 87 Mariette X, Matucci-Cerinic M, Pavelka K et al (2011) Malignancies associated with tumour necrosis factor inhibitors in registries and prospective observational studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Rheum Dis 70: 1895-904. Martinez FO, Helming L & Gordon S (2009) Alternative activation of macrophages: an immunologic functional perspective. Annu Rev Immunol 27: 451-83. Mccall TB, Feelisch M, Palmer RMJ et al (1991) Identification of N-iminoethyl-lornithine as an irreversible inhibitor of nitric oxide synthase in phagocytic cells. British Journal of Pharmacology 102: 234-238. Meyer C, Sevko A, Ramacher M et al (2011) Chronic inflammation promotes myeloidderived suppressor cell activation blocking antitumor immunity in transgenic mouse melanoma model. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108: 17111-6. Monks A, Scudiero D, Skehan P et al (1991) Feasibility of a high-flux anticancer drug screen using a diverse panel of cultured human tumor cell lines. J Natl Cancer Inst 83: 757-66. Nathan C (1992) Nitric oxide as a secretory product of mammalian cells. Faseb j 6: 3051-64. Nathan C & Xie QW (1994) Regulation of biosynthesis of nitric oxide. J Biol Chem 269: 13725-8. Obolskiy D, Pischel I, Siriwatanametanon N et al (2009) Garcinia mangostana L.: a phytochemical and pharmacological review. Phytother Res 23: 1047-65. Ochoa JB, Udekwu AO, Billiar TR et al (1991) Nitrogen oxide levels in patients after trauma and during sepsis. Ann Surg 214: 621-6. Pedro M, Cerqueira F, Sousa ME et al (2002) Xanthones as inhibitors of growth of human cancer cell lines and their effects on the proliferation of human lymphocytes in vitro. Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry 10: 3725-30. Perrella MA, Yoshizumi M, Fen Z et al (1994) Transforming growth factor-beta 1, but not dexamethasone, down-regulates nitric-oxide synthase mRNA after its induction by interleukin-1 beta in rat smooth muscle cells. J Biol Chem 269: 14595-600. Phan GQ, Attia P, Steinberg SM et al (2001) Factors associated with response to highdose interleukin-2 in patients with metastatic melanoma. J Clin Oncol 19: 3477-82. Pikarsky E, Porat RM, Stein I et al (2004) NF-kappaB functions as a tumour promoter in inflammation-associated cancer. Nature 431: 461-6. Pinto MM, Sousa ME & Nascimento MS (2005) Xanthone derivatives: new insights in biological activities. Curr Med Chem 12: 2517-38. Porta C, Subhra Kumar B, Larghi P et al (2007) Tumor promotion by tumor-associated macrophages. Adv Exp Med Biol 604: 67-86. Printz C (2001) Spontaneous regression of melanoma may offer insight into cancer immunology. J Natl Cancer Inst 93: 1047-8. Qian BZ & Pollard JW (2010) Macrophage diversity enhances tumor progression and metastasis. Cell 141: 39-51. Raaijmakers MI, Rozati S, Goldinger SM et al (2013) Melanoma immunotherapy: historical precedents, recent successes and future prospects. Immunotherapy 5: 169-82. Reiman JM, Kmieciak M, Manjili MH et al (2007) Tumor immunoediting and immunosculpting pathways to cancer progression. Semin Cancer Biol 17: 275-87. Roreno (2013) Registo Oncológico Nacional 2007. Shan T, Ma Q, Guo K et al (2011) Xanthones from mangosteen extracts as natural chemopreventive agents: potential anticancer drugs. Curr Mol Med 11: 666-77. Shih MF, Cheng YD, Shen CR et al (2010) A molecular pharmacology study into the anti-inflammatory actions of Euphorbia hirta L. on the LPS-induced RAW 264.7 cells through selective iNOS protein inhibition. J Nat Med 64: 330-5. Sica A & Mantovani A (2012) Macrophage plasticity and polarization: in vivo veritas. J Clin Invest 122: 787-95. Sica A, Schioppa T, Mantovani A et al (2006) Tumour-associated macrophages are a distinct M2 polarised population promoting tumour progression: potential targets of anticancer therapy. Eur J Cancer 42: 717-27. VI. 94 measured at 510 nm in an ELISA reader (Stat FAX3200, Awareness Technology) (Cerqueira et al. 2003). NO production assay The determination of nitric oxide (NO) production by RAW 264.7 (1 X 106 cells mL-1) after treatment and stimulation with 1.5 µg mL-1 LPS was quantified by Griess assay as previous described by our group (Teixeira et al. 2005; Cerqueira et al. 2008). N-nitro-Larginine methyl ester (L-NAME), and inhibitor of inductive nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) activity, and Dexamethasone, an inhibitor of iNOS expression, were used as positive controls. Since inhibition of NO production could be a consequence of an inhibition of iNOS expression and/or activity, it was necessary to investigate 1,2-DHX mechanism. For that, the compound was also added 6h and 14h after RAW 264.7 macrophages stimulation with LPS (Cerqueira et al. 2008). NO Scavenging assay To discard NO scavenging effect by xanthone, nitrite was chemically generated using sodium nitroprusside as previously described. Nitrite was quantified by Griess assay (Teixeira et al. 2005; Cerqueira et al. 2008). MTT-viability assay Toxicity of 1,2-DHX on THP-1 cell line and RAW 254.7 cell line was evaluated by MTTviability assay (Pedro et al. 2002; Cerqueira et al. 2003; Teixeira et al. 2005). Statistical analysis Except otherwise stated, results are the mean ± SEM of at least three independent experiments, performed in duplicate. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS for Windows (version 20.0). Statistical significance between groups was calculated by MannWhitney Test and it is considered for p values less than 0.05. Ethics Ethics approval was obtained by the Ethic Comity of University Fernando Pessoa. VI. 95 Results Antitumor effect of 1,2-DHX and conditioned macrophages culture medium The evaluation of 1,2-DHX effect on A375-C5 melanoma growth was performed by SRB assay and revealed a moderate inhibitory effect of the xanthone (Table 6). This effect showed to be dose-dependent (data not show). Table 6: Effect of 1,2-dihydroxyxanthone on the growth of A375-C5 human melanoma cell line. Growth inhibition (GI50) 1,2-DHX 55.0 ± 2.3 µM Doxorrubicin 1.8 X 10-3 ± 0.4 X 10-3 µM Results are the mean ± SEM of three independent experiments performed in duplicate. Doxorrubicin was used as positive control. As modulation of immune system has been a promising approach in melanoma treatment, it was investigate the possible influence of 1,2-DHX conditioned macrophages supernatants on A375-C5 cells growth. The results demonstrated a similar inhibition of cancer cells growth by the compound at 50 μM and non-treated macrophages. However, xanthone-treated macrophagesconditioned medium showed a significant (p < 0,001) decrease of melanoma cell growth comparatively with the other two conditions, as demonstrated in Figure 14. Figure 14: Cytotoxic activity of 1,2-Dihydroyixanthone, macrophages supernatants and 1,2dihydroxyxanthone conditioned macrophages supernatants on A365-C5 melanoma cell line.THP-1 PHAdifferentiated macrophages were treated with the compound and supernatants were added to melanoma cells. Results show mean values ± SEM (n = 3). * p < 0.001 Grow inhibition (% of control) 1,2-DHX (50 μM) 31.6 ± 4.9 % Macrophages supernatants 25.0 ± 2.5 % 1,2-DHX (50 μM) conditioned macrophages supernatants 55.4 ± 4.4 % * VI. 96 Effect on IL-1β, IL-10, TGF-β1 and TNF-α production by macrophages Further experiments were carried out to determine the underling mechanism of 1,2DHX on macrophages. Two concentrations of the compound (over and below GI50) were studied in order to evaluate the effect of this xanthone on the kinetics of cytokines production by LPS-stimulated THP-1 macrophages cell line (Figure 15). The expression of four cytokines was evaluated: IL-1β and TNF-α characteristic of M1 phenotype and IL10 and TGF-β1 characteristic of M2 phenotype. 1,2-DHX significantly inhibited the expression of IL-1β and stimulated the expression of TNF-α at the two concentrations. At concentration above GI50, xanthone stimulated expression of TGF-β1 and suppressed IL-10 by THP-1 macrophages. Figure 15: Effect of 1,2-DHX on IL-1β, IL-10, TGF-β1 and TNF-α production by THP-1 macrophages. Cytokines production was evaluated on Unstimulates macrophages (basal), LPS-stimulated macrophages (positive control) and macrophages treated with 6 and 3 µM 1,2-dihydroxyxanthone. Data are the mean ± SEM from one experiment, performed with duplicate cultures, and it representative of tree experiments carried out independently. * p < 0.001; ┼ p > 0.05 Effect on NO production by macrophages The production of NO by RAW 264.7 murine macrophages cell line was strongly inhibited by 1,2-DHX (IC50 = 22.0 ± 0.9 µM) (Table 7) in a dose-dependent manner (data not show). NO inhibiton was not associated to cell death since at IC50 values, viability was near 100% (Table 7). 1,2-DHX did not show any scavenging activity of NO generated in a cellfree system (data not show). α VI. 97 Table 7: Effect of 1,2-DHX on NO production by LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7 macrophages NO inhibition (IC50) Viability at IC50 1,2-Dihydroxyxanthone 22.0 ± 0.9 µM 100 % L-Name 62.4 ± 7.8 μM 96.0 ± 2.5 % Dexamethasone 4.3 ± 0.6 μM 100 % Results are the mean ± SEM (n = 3). L-Name and Dexamethasone was used as positive control. It was next investigated whether the inhibition of NO production was due to a decrease in iNOS expression or impairment of iNOS activity. iNOS is transcribed within 2-4 hours and translated within six hours after LPS-stimulation in macrophages (Xie et al. 1994). As such, 1,2-DHX was added at a concentration close to IC50 value and NO was measured at 0, 6 and 14 h after RAW 264.7 macrophages stimulation with LPS. When 1,2-DHX was added simultaneously with the stimulus, about 57% of NO production was inhibited. When the compound was added 6 h after stimulation, the effect significantly decreased to 26% (p < 0.001), while a lack of inhibitory effect was observed when the compound was added 14 h after stimulation (Table 8). Once again, toxicity was excluded by MTT viability assay, since cells showed viability higher than 90 % at dilution closest to IC50 of 1,2-DHX. Concentrations of xanthone and controls (L-NAME and Dexamethasone) used in this study were the dilution closest to IC50, previously determined. Table 8: Inhibitory effect of 1,2-DHX on NO production by RAW264.7. NO inhibition (% of control) 0 h 6 h 14 h 1,2-DHX at 25 μM 56.6 ± 1.8 % 25.0 ± 2.8 % * n.i. L-Name at 62,5 μM 52.1 ± 6.0 % 50.7 ± 3.8 % ┼ 24.7 ± 3.1 % * Dexamethasone at 6,25 μM 55.9 ± 2.3 % 15.7 ± 6.0 % * n.i. Macrophages were exposed to LPS and treated with 1,2-dihydroxyxanthone at different times after stimulation: 0 h (simultaneously with the stimulus), 6 h and 14 h after stimulation. Results are the mean ± SEM (n = 3). n.i.= no inhibition. * p < 0.001, ┼ p > 0.05. L-NAME and Dexamethasone was used as positive controls. VI. 98 Discussion The anticancer and immunomodulatory effect of natural and synthetic xanthones have been extensible reported in literature (Pinto et al. 2005; Teixeira et al. 2005; Castanheiro et al. 2007; Obolskiy et al. 2009; Gutierrez-Orozco and Failla 2013). In particular, 1,2-DHX inhibited the gowth of several cancer cell lines and the proliferation of stimulated T lymphocytes (Pedro et al. 2002; Sousa et al. 2002). In spite of these insights, and as far as we know, no studies were performed considering the immune microenvironment of 1,2DHX-conditionated macrophages mediated effect on melanoma cell. In the present study, the effect of 1,2-DHX on A375-C5 melanoma cell line was evaluated. However, a significant difference of potency was observed when comparing the GI50 fot A375-C5 (GI50 = 55.0 ± 2.3 µM) and UACC-62 melanoma cell line (GI50 = 14.0 ± 0.3 µM), this may be explained by the difference morphology of the cell, i.e. epithelial (A375-C5) and non-epethelial (UACC-62). Melanoma is a highly immunogenic tumor (Hussein 2004), therefore it was hyphotesised the possible improvement of anticancer capacity of 1,2-DHX by immune system involvement. It was showed that 1,2-DHX strongly interfere with macrophages immune microenvironment, resulting in a two-fold increase of the cytotoxic effect of macrophages on A375-C5 melanoma cells. This finds indicates a possible induction of an antitumor macrophages phenotype by 1,2-DHX since supernatants of non-treated macrophages by it self showed much lower inhibition comparatively to treated macrophages. In order to certify the underlying mechanism mediated by 1,2-DHX in macrophages, the expression of cytokines, namely interleukin - 1β (IL-1β) and tumor necrosis factor - α (TNFα) (characteristic of a M1 phenotype) and tumor grow factor - β1 (TGF-β1) and IL10 (characteristic of a M2-like phenotype) was evaluated. Macrophages are dynamic and heterogeneous cells mainly due to their capacity to respond to stimulus. According to the microenvironment they may be polarized into a spectrum of phenotypes ranging from the pro-inflammatory M1 (classic) to the immunossupressive M2 (alternative) (Allavena et al. 2008; Biswas et al. 2013). Several evidences indicate that macrophages phenotypes can change during tumor progression (Zaynagetdinov et al. 2011). M1 activation may induce chronic inflammation, a factor that could predispose to tumor initiation (Greten et al. 2004; Pikarsky et al. 2004). However, in early stages of tumor progression, TAMs adopt a M1-like phenotype that contributes to tumor immunity. M2 phenotype is mainly expressed in established tumors and induce immunosuppressive, angiogenic and metastatic effects (Mantovani et al. 2004; Sica et al. 2006; Gordon and Mantovani 2011; Zaynagetdinov et al. 2011; Liao et al. 2014). VI. 99 1,2-DHX suppress the expression of IL-1β to concentrations similar to basal and stimulated TNF-α expression. It also inhibited IL-10 production and stimulated TGF-β1 expression but only at concentration above GI50 (100 µM), while any alteration was detected at lower concentration. IL-1β, a pro-inflammatory cytokine mainly produced by monocytes and macrophages is an example of the pleiotropism of immune system. In melanoma its expression was associated to tumor progression and promotion of lung metastases from melanoma (Giavazzi et al. 1990; Meyer et al. 2011). Therefore, IL-1β has been associated with all steps of malignancy (carcinogenesis, progression, invasion and metastasis) and may even be expressed by the tumor cells (Apte and Voronov 2008). In contrast, it induces an immune response against malignant cells associated to the M1 macrophages phenotype (Fairweather and Cihakova 2009). TNF-α stimulation predicts a favorable outcome in melanoma treatment since several reports associated the use of TNF inhibitors as a factor that appear to increase the risk of skin cancer, including melanoma (Mariette et al. 2011; Kouklakis et al. 2013). TNF-α expression by THP-1 cells at basal and LPS-stimulated level was significantly lower when compared to 1,2-DHX treated cells. IL-10 and TGF-β1 are anti-inflammatory cytokine involved in carcinogenisis process. In melanoma, IL-10 was associated with metastatic formation (García-Hernández et al. 2002; Itakura et al. 2011) and TGF-β1 are highly expressed and increase in parallel with tumor progression (Krasagakis et al. 1998; Javelaud et al. 2008). In spite of the differences observed, the antitumor effect of 1,2-DHX conditioned macrophages medium was not due neither to IL-10 nor TGF-β1 expression, since for treatment with 50 µM of 1,2-DHX no significantly differences were observed for the expression of these cytokines by THP-1 macrophages. Production of nitric oxide (NO) by macrophages in tumors has controversial funtions. It was reported that below a critical concentration of NO, it causes DNA mutations (Wink et al. 1998), inhibits apoptosis (Choi et al. 2002), promotes angiogenesis (Ziche and Morbidelli 2000), limits immune response against cancer (Wink et al. 1991) and promotes metastasis (Lala and Orucevic 1998). When it exceeds the critical concentration, NO induce apoptosis and suppress the growth of the tumor (Choudhari et al. 2013). NO has been reported as cytotoxic in melanoma and many other tumors, but simultaneously it modulates many pro-tumor pathways including resistance to apoptosis, cell cycle progression, angiogenesis invasion, and metastasis (Ying and Hofseth 2007; Choudhari et al. 2013). In order to clarify this relation and better understand the mechanism mediated by 1,2-DHX in macrophages, production of NO by macrophages was evaluated. VI. 100 In NO production assay, RAW 264.7 was used instead of THP-1 human macrophages cell line since this was referred as an appropriet model to study iNOS system (Dirsch et al. 1998; Shih et al. 2010). Human macrophages in vitro produce low quantitie of NO in response to stimuli (Thomassen and Kavuru 2001). However either in vitro murine cells as in vivo human macrophages express great quantities of NO in inflammatory conditions (Ochoa et al. 1991; Dirsch et al. 1998) 1,2-DHX is a potent inhibitor of NO production by LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7 murine macrophages cell line (IC50 = 22.0 ± 0.9 µM). This effect was not due to cell death or to NO scavenging, thus it was proved that interference was at the level of NO production. In stimulated macrophages, NO is produced by the inducible form of NO synthetase (iNOS or NOS2) from L-arginine and molecular oxygen (Gross and Wolin 1995; Aramaki 2000). NOS2 gene regulation, as the majority of genes may occur at transcriptional and post-transcriptional level (Nathan and Xie 1994; Bogdan et al. 2000; Brunet 2001). With the purpose of evaluate the time point when the compound interfere with the enzyme to inhibit NO production, xanthone was added at different hours: 0h (simultaneously), 6h and 14h after RAW 264.7 macrophages stimulation with LPS. Although, 1,2-DHX added simultaneously has potent inhibition; when it was added 6h after stimulation the effect decreased significantly (p < 0.001) and when added after 14h, the effect was nule. This finds leads us to conclude that the compound may exerts their action by interfering with iNOS expression, once this enzyme is transcripted within 2-4 hours and translated within six hours after LPS-stimulation in macrophages (Xie et al. 1994). L-NAME (inhibitor of iNOS activity) (McCall et al. 1991), and Dexamethasone, inhibitor of iNOS expression (Korhonen et al. 2002) was used as positive controls and the obtained results was in accordance with the mechanism proposed to these inhibitors by our technique. Inhibition of iNOS indicated an anti-inflamatory potential of 1,2-DHX. However, inflammation and NO production has controversial effects in cancer. NO has been reported as cytotoxic in melanoma and many other tumors, but simultaneously it modulates many pro-tumor pathways including resistance to apoptosis, cell cycle progression, angiogenesis, invasion and metastasis (Ying and Hofseth 2007; Choudhari et al. 2013). The underling mechanism of inhibition of iNOS expression by 1,2-DHX may be explained by the stimulation of TGF-β1. This cytokine has been reported as a destabilizer of iNOS mRNA avoiding gene translation and inhibiting NO production. Involvement of NF-κB pathway may also be involved since it contributes to iNOS synthesis and upregulate IL-1β level and 1,2-DHX treated THP-1 macrophages expressed either lower IL-1β and NO levels comparatively to control cells. This finds leads us to hypothesize the VI. 101 interference of the xanthone with NF-κB pathway. More studies must be performed in order to corroborate this supposition. The set of all data find in this study allowed to infer a potential of 1,2-DHX in melanoma treatment, due to its cytotoxic activity through direct inhibition of cell growth and by modulation of macrophages immune microenvironment. Characteristics of 1,2-DHX in melanoma are even more important taking in account the lack of appropriated therapeutic alternatives in this tumor. However, further studies are needed to attest this relation in vivo. References Allavena P, Sica A, Solinas G et al (2008) The inflammatory micro-environment in tumor progression: the role of tumor-associated macrophages. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 66: 1-9. Apte RN & Voronov E (2008) Is interleukin-1 a good or bad ‘guy’ in tumor immunobiology and immunotherapy? Immunological Reviews 222: 222-241. Aramaki Y (2000) Liposomes as immunomodulator--inhibitory effect of liposomes on NO production from macrophages. Biol Pharm Bull 23: 1267-74. Bernengo MG, Quaglino P, Cappello N et al (2000) Macrophage-mediated immunostimulation modulates therapeutic efficacy of interleukin-2 based chemoimmunotherapy in advanced metastatic melanoma patients. Melanoma Res 10: 5565. Biswas SK, Allavena P & Mantovani A (2013) Tumor-associated macrophages: functional diversity, clinical significance, and open questions. Semin Immunopathol 35: 585-600. Bogdan C, Rollinghoff M & Diefenbach A (2000) Reactive oxygen and reactive nitrogen intermediates in innate and specific immunity. Curr Opin Immunol 12: 64-76. Brocker EB, Zwadlo G, Holzmann B et al (1988) Inflammatory cell infiltrates in human melanoma at different stages of tumor progression. Int J Cancer 41: 562-7. Brunet LR (2001) Nitric oxide in parasitic infections. Int Immunopharmacol 1: 1457-67. Castanheiro RaP, Pinto MMM, Silva AMS et al (2007) Dihydroxyxanthones prenylated derivatives: synthesis, structure elucidation, and growth inhibitory activity on human tumor cell lines with improvement of selectivity for MCF-7. Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry 15: 6080-8. Cerqueira F, Cidade H, Van Ufford L et al (2008) The natural prenylated flavone artelastin is an inhibitor of ROS and NO production. Int Immunopharmacol 8: 597-602. Cerqueira F, Cordeiro-Da-Silva A, Araujo N et al (2003) Inhibition of lymphocyte proliferation by prenylated flavones: artelastin as a potent inhibitor. Life Sci 73: 2321-34. Chanput W, Mes JJ & Wichers HJ (2014) THP-1 cell line: An in vitro cell model for immune modulation approach. Int Immunopharmacol. Chanput W, Reitsma M, Kleinjans L et al (2012) beta-Glucans are involved in immunemodulation of THP-1 macrophages. Mol Nutr Food Res 56: 822-33. Chen P, Huang Y, Bong R et al (2011) Tumor-associated macrophages promote angiogenesis and melanoma growth via adrenomedullin in a paracrine and autocrine manner. Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research 17: 7230-9. Choi BM, Pae HO, Jang SI et al (2002) Nitric oxide as a pro-apoptotic as well as antiapoptotic modulator. J Biochem Mol Biol 35: 116-26. VI. 102 Choudhari SK, Chaudhary M, Bagde S et al (2013) Nitric oxide and cancer: a review. World J Surg Oncol 11: 118. Dirsch VM, Stuppner H & Vollmar AM (1998) The Griess assay: suitable for a bioguided fractionation of anti-inflammatory plant extracts? Planta Med 64: 423-6. Dranoff G (2009) Targets of protective tumor immunity. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1174: 74-80. Fairweather D & Cihakova D (2009) Alternatively activated macrophages in infection and autoimmunity. J Autoimmun 33: 222-30. Gales L, Sousa MED, Pinto MMM et al (2001) Naturally occurring 1,2,8trimethoxyxanthone and biphenyl ether intermediates leading to 1,2-dimethoxyxanthone. Acta Crystallographica Section C 57: 1319-1323. García-Hernández ML, Hernández-Pando R, Gariglio P et al (2002) Interleukin-10 promotes B16-melanoma growth by inhibition of macrophage functions and induction of tumour and vascular cell proliferation. Immunology 105: 231-243. Gast A, Bermejo JL, Claus R et al (2011) Association of inherited variation in Toll-like receptor genes with malignant melanoma susceptibility and survival. PLoS One 6: e24370. Giavazzi R, Garofalo A, Bani MR et al (1990) Interleukin 1-induced augmentation of experimental metastases from a human melanoma in nude mice. Cancer Res 50: 4771-5. Gordon S & Mantovani A (2011) Diversity and plasticity of mononuclear phagocytes. Eur J Immunol 41: 2470-2. Gottlieb OR, Mesquita AaL, De Oliveira GG et al (1970) Xanthones from Kielmeyera speciosa. Phytochemistry 9: 2537-2544. Graziani G, Tentori L & Navarra P (2012) Ipilimumab: A novel immunostimulatory monoclonal antibody for the treatment of cancer. Pharmacological Research 65: 9-22. Greten FR, Eckmann L, Greten TF et al (2004) IKKbeta links inflammation and tumorigenesis in a mouse model of colitis-associated cancer. Cell 118: 285-96. Gross SS & Wolin MS (1995) Nitric oxide: pathophysiological mechanisms. Annu Rev Physiol 57: 737-69. Gupta S, Rodrigues LM, Esteves AP et al (2008) Synthesis of N-aryl-5-amino-4cyanopyrazole derivatives as potent xanthine oxidase inhibitors. Eur J Med Chem 43: 771-80. Gutierrez-Orozco F & Failla ML (2013) Biological activities and bioavailability of mangosteen xanthones: a critical review of the current evidence. Nutrients 5: 3163-83. He X, Shu J, Xu L et al (2012) Inhibitory effect of Astragalus polysaccharides on lipopolysaccharide-induced TNF-a and IL-1beta production in THP-1 cells. Molecules 17: 3155-64. Hodi FS, O'day SJ, Mcdermott DF et al (2010) Improved Survival with Ipilimumab in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma. New England Journal of Medicine 363: 711-723. Hussein MR (2004) Genetic pathways to melanoma tumorigenesis. J Clin Pathol 57: 797-801. Itakura E, Huang RR, Wen DR et al (2011) IL-10 expression by primary tumor cells correlates with melanoma progression from radial to vertical growth phase and development of metastatic competence. Mod Pathol 24: 801-9. Javelaud D, Alexaki VI & Mauviel A (2008) Transforming growth factor-beta in cutaneous melanoma. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res 21: 123-32. Korhonen R, Lahti A, Hamalainen M et al (2002) Dexamethasone inhibits inducible nitric-oxide synthase expression and nitric oxide production by destabilizing mRNA in lipopolysaccharide-treated macrophages. Mol Pharmacol 62: 698-704. Kouklakis G, Efremidou EI, Pitiakoudis M et al (2013) Development of primary malignant melanoma during treatment with a TNF-alpha antagonist for severe Crohn's disease: a case report and review of the hypothetical association between TNF-alpha blockers and cancer. Drug Des Devel Ther 7: 195-9. Krasagakis K, Tholke D, Farthmann B et al (1998) Elevated plasma levels of transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta1 and TGF-beta2 in patients with disseminated malignant melanoma. Br J Cancer 77: 1492-4. VI. 103 Kuphal S & Bosserhoff A (2009) Recent progress in understanding the pathology of malignant melanoma. J Pathol 219: 400-9. Lala PK & Orucevic A (1998) Role of nitric oxide in tumor progression: lessons from experimental tumors. Cancer Metastasis Rev 17: 91-106. Liao Q, Zeng Z, Guo X et al (2014) LPLUNC1 suppresses IL-6-induced nasopharyngeal carcinoma cell proliferation via inhibiting the Stat3 activation. Oncogene 33: 2098-109. Makitie T, Summanen P, Tarkkanen A et al (2001) Tumor-infiltrating macrophages (CD68(+) cells) and prognosis in malignant uveal melanoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 42: 1414-21. Mantovani A, Allavena P & Sica A (2004) Tumour-associated macrophages as a prototypic type II polarised phagocyte population: role in tumour progression. Eur J Cancer 40: 1660-7. Mantovani A & Sica A (2010) Macrophages, innate immunity and cancer: balance, tolerance, and diversity. Curr Opin Immunol 22: 231-7. Mariette X, Matucci-Cerinic M, Pavelka K et al (2011) Malignancies associated with tumour necrosis factor inhibitors in registries and prospective observational studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Rheum Dis 70: 1895-904. Mccall TB, Feelisch M, Palmer RMJ et al (1991) Identification of N-iminoethyl-lornithine as an irreversible inhibitor of nitric oxide synthase in phagocytic cells. British Journal of Pharmacology 102: 234-238. Meyer C, Sevko A, Ramacher M et al (2011) Chronic inflammation promotes myeloidderived suppressor cell activation blocking antitumor immunity in transgenic mouse melanoma model. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108: 17111-6. Monks A, Scudiero D, Skehan P et al (1991) Feasibility of a high-flux anticancer drug screen using a diverse panel of cultured human tumor cell lines. J Natl Cancer Inst 83: 757-66. Nathan C & Xie QW (1994) Regulation of biosynthesis of nitric oxide. J Biol Chem 269: 13725-8. Obolskiy D, Pischel I, Siriwatanametanon N et al (2009) Garcinia mangostana L.: a phytochemical and pharmacological review. Phytother Res 23: 1047-65. Ochoa JB, Udekwu AO, Billiar TR et al (1991) Nitrogen oxide levels in patients after trauma and during sepsis. Ann Surg 214: 621-6. Pedro M, Cerqueira F, Sousa ME et al (2002) Xanthones as inhibitors of growth of human cancer cell lines and their effects on the proliferation of human lymphocytes in vitro. Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry 10: 3725-30. Pikarsky E, Porat RM, Stein I et al (2004) NF-kappaB functions as a tumour promoter in inflammation-associated cancer. Nature 431: 461-6. Pinto M & Castanheiro R (2009) Natural Prenylated Xanthones: Chemistry and Biological Activities. In: BRAHMACHARI, G. (ed.) Natural Products: Chemistry, Biochemistry and Pharmacology. Oxford, UK: Alpha science International. Pinto MM, Sousa ME & Nascimento MS (2005) Xanthone derivatives: new insights in biological activities. Curr Med Chem 12: 2517-38. Porta C, Subhra Kumar B, Larghi P et al (2007) Tumor promotion by tumor-associated macrophages. Adv Exp Med Biol 604: 67-86. Qian BZ & Pollard JW (2010) Macrophage diversity enhances tumor progression and metastasis. Cell 141: 39-51. Raaijmakers MI, Rozati S, Goldinger SM et al (2013) Melanoma immunotherapy: historical precedents, recent successes and future prospects. Immunotherapy 5: 169-82. Shih MF, Cheng YD, Shen CR et al (2010) A molecular pharmacology study into the anti-inflammatory actions of Euphorbia hirta L. on the LPS-induced RAW 264.7 cells through selective iNOS protein inhibition. J Nat Med 64: 330-5. Sica A, Schioppa T, Mantovani A et al (2006) Tumour-associated macrophages are a distinct M2 polarised population promoting tumour progression: potential targets of anticancer therapy. Eur J Cancer 42: 717-27.