scieee Open visual document viewer

Retrieval and validation of forest background reflectivity from daily Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) bidirectional reflectance distribution function (BRDF) data across European forests

Pisek, Jan,Erb, Angela,Korhonen, Lauri,Biermann, Tobias,Carrara, Arnaud,Cremonese, Edoardo,Cuntz, Matthias,Fares, Silvano,Gerosa, Giacomo,Grünwald, Thomas,Hase, Niklas,Heliasz, Michal,Ibrom, Andreas,Knohl, Alexander,Kobler, Johannes,Kruijt, Bart,Lange, H

Abstract

Information about forest background reflectance is needed for accurate biophysical parameter retrieval from forest canopies (overstory) with remote sensing. Separating under- and overstory signals would enable more accurate modeling of forest carbon and energy fluxes. We retrieved values of the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) of the forest understory with the multi-angular Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) bidirectional reflectance distribution function (BRDF)/albedo data (gridded 500m daily Collection 6 product), using a method originally developed for boreal forests. The forest floor background reflectance estimates from the MODIS data were compared with in situ understory reflectance measurements carried out at an extensive set of forest ecosystem experimental sites across Europe. The reflectance estimates from MODIS data were, hence, tested across diverse forest conditions and phenological phases during the growing season to examine their applicability for ecosystems other than boreal forests. Here we report that the method can deliver good retrievals, especially over different forest types with open canopies (low foliage cover). The performance of the method was found to be limited over forests with closed canopies (high foliage cover), where the signal from understory becomes too attenuated. The spatial heterogeneity of individual field sites and the limitations and documented quality of the MODIS BRDF product are shown to be important for the correct assessment and validation of the retrievals obtained with remote sensing.

Full text

Biogeosciences, 18, 621–635, 2021 h ps://doi.o g/10.5194/bg-18-621-2021 © Au ho (s) 2021. This wo k is dis ibu ed unde he C ea i e Commons A ibu ion 4.0 License. Re ie al and alida ion o o es backg ound e lec i i y om daily Mode a e Resolu ion Imaging Spec o adiome e (MODIS) bidi ec ional e lec ance dis ibu ion unc ion (BRDF) da a ac oss Eu opean o es s Jan Pisek1, Angela E b2, Lau i Ko honen3, Tobias Bie mann4, A naud Ca a a5, Edoa do C emonese6, Ma hias Cun z7, Sil ano Fa es8, Giacomo Ge osa9, Thomas G ünwald10, Niklas Hase11, Michal Heliasz4, And eas Ib om12, Alexande Knohl13, Johannes Koble 14, Ba K uij 15, Holge Lange16, Leena Leppänen17, Jean-Ma c Limousin18, F ancisco Ramon Lopez Se ano19, Denis Lous au20, Pe Lukeš21, La s Lundin22, Ricca do Ma zuoli9, Meelis Mölde 4, Leona do Mon agnani23,31, Johan Nei ynck24, Ma hias Peichl25, Co inna Rebmann11, E a Rubio19, Ma ga ida San os-Reis26, C ys al Schaa 2, Ma ius Schmid 27, Guillaume Simioni28, Kamel Soudani29, and Ca oline Vincke30 1Ta u Obse a o y, Uni e si y o Ta u, Tõ a e e, Ta umaa, Es onia 2School o he En i onmen , Uni e si y o Massachuse s Bos on, Bos on, Massachuse s, USA 3School o Fo es Sciences, Uni e si y o Eas e n Finland, Joensuu, Finland 4Lund Uni e si y, Lund, Sweden 5Fundación CEAM, Pa e na, Valencia, Spain 6ARPA Valle d’Aos a, Sain -Ch is ophe, I aly 7Uni e si é de Lo aine, Ag oPa isTech, INRAE, UMR Sil a, Nancy, F ance 8CNR – Na ional Resea ch Council, Rome, I aly 9Depa men o Ma hema ics and Physics, Uni e si à Ca olica del Sac o Cuo e, B escia, I aly 10Ins i u e o Hyd ology and Me eo ology, Depa men o Hyd o Sciences, Technische Uni e si ä D esden, D esden, Ge many 11Helmhol z Cen e o En i onmen al Resea ch – UFZ, Leipzig, Ge many 12Depa men o En i onmen al Enginee ing, Technical Uni e si y o Denma k, Kongens Lyngby, Denma k 13Facul y o Fo es Sciences and Fo es Ecology, Uni e si y o Gö ingen, Gö ingen, Ge many 14Umwel bundesam GmbH, Vienna, Aus ia 15Depa men o En i onmen al Sciences, Wageningen Uni e si y & Resea ch, Wageningen, he Ne he lands 16No wegian Ins i u e o Bioeconomy Resea ch, Ås, No way 17Space and Ea h Obse a ion Cen e, Finnish Me eo ological Ins i u e, Sodankylä, Finland 18CEFE, Uni e si é Mon pellie , CNRS, EPHE, IRD, Uni e si é Paul-Valé y Mon pellie , Mon pellie , F ance 19IER-ETSIAM, Uni e sidad de Cas illa-La Mancha, Albace e, Spain 20INRAE, Bo deaux, F ance 21Global Change Resea ch Ins i u e, Academy o Sciences o he Czech Republic, B no, Czech Republic 22Depa men o Soil and En i onmen , Swedish Uni e si y o Ag icul u al Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden 23Facul y o Science and Technology, F ee Uni e si y o Bolzano, Bolzano, I aly 24INBO, Ge aa dsbe gen, Belgium 25Depa men o Fo es Ecology and Managemen , Swedish Uni e si y o Ag icul u al Sciences, Umeå, Sweden 26cE3c – Cen e o Ecology, E olu ion and En i onmen al Changes, Lisbon, Po ugal 27Fo schungszen um Jülich, Jülich, Ge many 28INRAE URFM, A ignon, F ance 29Uni e si é Pa is-Saclay, CNRS, Ag oPa isTech, Ecologie, Sys éma ique e E olu ion, O say, F ance 30Facul y o Bioscience Enginee ing, Ea h and Li e Ins i u e, Uni e si é Ca holique de Lou ain, Lou ain-la-Neu e, Belgium Published by Cope nicus Publica ions on behal o he Eu opean Geosciences Union. 622 J. Pisek e al.: Re ie al and alida ion o o es backg ound e lec i i y 31Fo es Se ices, Au onomous P o ince o Bolzano, Bolzano, I aly Co espondence: Jan Pisek ([email p o ec ed]) Recei ed: 30 Sep embe 2020 – Discussion s a ed: 4 No embe 2020 Re ised: 12 Janua y 2021 – Accep ed: 12 Janua y 2021 – Published: 27 Janua y 2021 Abs ac . In o ma ion abou o es backg ound e lec ance is needed o accu a e biophysical pa ame e e ie al om o es canopies (o e s o y) wi h emo e sensing. Sepa a ing unde - and o e s o y signals would enable mo e accu a e modeling o o es ca bon and ene gy luxes. We e ie ed alues o he no malized di e ence ege a ion index (NDVI) o he o es unde s o y wi h he mul i-angula Mode a e Resolu ion Imaging Spec o adiome e (MODIS) bidi ec- ional e lec ance dis ibu ion unc ion (BRDF)/albedo da a (g idded 500m daily Collec ion 6 p oduc ), using a me hod o iginally de eloped o bo eal o es s. The o es loo back- g ound e lec ance es ima es om he MODIS da a we e compa ed wi h in si u unde s o y e lec ance measu emen s ca ied ou a an ex ensi e se o o es ecosys em expe i- men al si es ac oss Eu ope. The e lec ance es ima es om MODIS da a we e, hence, es ed ac oss di e se o es con- di ions and phenological phases du ing he g owing season o examine hei applicabili y o ecosys ems o he han bo- eal o es s. He e we epo ha he me hod can deli e good e ie als, especially o e di e en o es ypes wi h open canopies (low oliage co e ). The pe o mance o he me hod was ound o be limi ed o e o es s wi h closed canopies (high oliage co e ), whe e he signal om unde s o y be- comes oo a enua ed. The spa ial he e ogenei y o indi id- ual ield si es and he limi a ions and documen ed quali y o he MODIS BRDF p oduc a e shown o be impo an o he co ec assessmen and alida ion o he e ie als ob ained wi h emo e sensing. 1 In oduc ion The e lec ance om he o es canopy backg ound/ o es loo can o en con ound and e en domina e he adiome - ic signal om he uppe o es canopy laye o he a mo- sphe e. Fo es unde s o y is de ined he e as all he compo- nen s ound unde he o es canopy, including unde s o y ege a ion, lea li e , moss, lichen, ock, soil, snow, o a mix u e he eo (Pisek and Chen, 2009). I unaccoun ed o , o es unde s o y can in oduce po en ial bias in he es ima- ion o o e s o y biophysical pa ame e s (e.g., lea a ea in- dex, LAI, and ac ion o abso bed pho osyn he ically ac i e adia ion, APAR) and, subsequen ly, p oduc i i y es ima es (e.g., he ne p ima y p oduc i i y – NPP) as he con ibu ion o he unde s o y o he o al ene gy abso p ion capaci y o a o es s and can be qui e signi ican (Cla k e al., 2001; Law e al., 2001). The unde s o y ege a ion in o es ecosys ems should be ea ed di e en ly om he o e s o y in ca bon cy- cle modeling because o he di e en esidence imes o ca - bon ixed h ough NPP in di e en ecosys em componen s (Vogel and Gowe , 1998; Ren ch e al., 2003; Ma ques and Oli ei a, 2004; Kim e al., 2016). Cu en ly, he unde s o y is o en ea ed as an unknown quan i y in ca bon models due o he di icul ies in measu ing i p ope ly and consis- en ly ac oss la ge scales (Luyssae e al., 2007). The p e- dic ions ega ding he spec al a ia ion in o es backg ound ha e posed a pe sis en challenge (McDonald e al., 1998; Gemmell, 2000) because o he high a iabili y in incoming adiance below he o es canopy, challenges wi h he spec- al cha ac e iza ion, and weak signal in some pa s o he spec um o bo h o e s o y and unde s o y (Schaepman e al., 2009), and he gene al a ying na u e o he unde s o y (Mille e al., 1997). Mul i-angle emo e sensing can cap u e signals o di e - en o es laye s because he obse ed p opo ions o di - e en o es laye s a y wi h he iewing angle, making i possible o sepa a e o es o e s o y and unde s o y signal. He e, we aim o consolida e p e ious e o s o acking un- de s o y e lec ance and i s dynamics wi h mul i-angle Ea h obse a ion da a (Canisius and Chen, 2007; Pisek and Chen, 2009; Pisek e al., 2010, 2012, 2015a, 2015b, 2016; Jiao e al., 2014) by es ing he alidi y o his app oach, using Mod- e a e Resolu ion Imaging Spec o adiome e bidi ec ional e- lec ance dis ibu ion unc ion (MODIS BRDF)/albedo da a (g idded 500m daily Collec ion; 6 MCD43 p oduc ), agains in si u unde s o y e lec ance measu emen s o e an ex- ended se o In eg a ed Ca bon Obse a ion Sys em (ICOS) o es ecosys em si es. The alida ion p ocedu e was de- ined o comply as much as possible wi h he bes p ac- ices p oposed by he Commi ee on Ea h Obse a ion Sa el- li es (CEOS) Wo king G oup on Calib a ion and Valida ion (WGCV) Land P oduc Valida ion (LPV) subg oup (Ga - igues e al., 2008; Ba e e al., 2006). I co esponds o S age 1 alida ion, as de ined by he CEOS (Nigh ingale e al., 2011; Weiss e al., 2014), whe e p oduc accu acy shall be assessed o e a small ( ypically <30) se o loca ions and ime pe iods by compa ison wi h in si u o o he sui able e - e ence da a. Using he ex ended se o ICOS o es ecosys- ems as alida ion si es, we asked he ollowing ques ions: 1. Can ICOS o es ecosys em si es se e as a sui able al- ida ion da a se wi h espec o hei oo p in and he pixel esolu ion o Ea h obse a ion (EO) p oduc s? Biogeosciences, 18, 621–635, 2021 h ps://doi.o g/10.5194/bg-18-621-2021 J. Pisek e al.: Re ie al and alida ion o o es backg ound e lec i i y 623 Figu e 1. Dis ibu ion o s udy si es ac oss Eu ope; o u he de- ails, e e o Table 1. 2. Can we e ie e eliable no malized di e ence ege a- ion index (NDVI; Rouse e al., 1973; Tucke , 1979) dy- namics o unde s o y wi h MODIS BRDF da a ac oss di e se o es condi ions du ing he g owing season? 3. A e he e impo an di e ences be ween he o al (o e - s o y and unde s o y) and unde s o y-only NDVI sig- nals? 2 Ma e ials and me hods 2.1 S udy si es The ICOS is a dis ibu ed pan-Eu opean esea ch in as- uc u e p o iding in si u s anda dized, in eg a ed, long- e m and high-p ecision obse a ions o lowe a mosphe e g een- house gas (GHG) concen a ions and land–a mosphe e and ocean–a mosphe e GHG in e ac ions (Gielen e al., 2017). In his s udy, we ca ied ou he e alua ion o e he ne wo k o 31 ICOS-a ilia ed o es ecosys em si es, complemen ed wi h addi ional si es in Spain, Po ugal, Aus ia, and Finland. Toge he , hese selec ed 40 s udy si es comp ise a la ge a i- e y o o es o e - and unde s o y ypes, spanning a wide la - i udinal g adien om almos 38◦N (Yes e, Spain) o 68◦N (Ken ä o a, Finland). Si e loca ions a e shown in Fig. 1, and ege a ion cha ac e is ics a e summa ized in Table 1. 2.2 Unde s o y spec a and o es canopy co e /closu e in si u measu emen s Following he e minology by Schaepman-S ub e al. (2006), we e e o he e lec ance ac o s mea- su ed by he ield spec ome e s as he sa elli e-de i ed hemisphe ical–di ec ional e lec ance ac o s (HDRFs). The gi en spec ome e ’s ield o iew is app oxima ed as being angula (cone) and na owe han a whole hemi- sphe e, wi h some aniso opy cap u ed which co esponds o no mal emo e sensing iewing geome y. An o e iew o he unde aken in si u campaigns a each si e and hei cha ac e is ics a e gi en in Table 1. The indi idual si es we e isi ed be ween Ap il 2016 and Augus 2019, mos ly du ing he g owing season. Following he p o ocol by Rau iainen e al. (2011), he unde s o y spec- a we e measu ed wi h he Sun comple ely obscu ed by he clouds o a a ound sunse (di use ligh condi ions), co e - ing he isible/nea in a ed (NIR) egion, depending on he spec ome e (see Table 1 o mo e de ails). A o al o h ee unde s o y spec a we e measu ed e e y 2m along wo 50m long ansec s laid a each si e, esul ing in 50 measu emen poin s (150 indi idual measu emen s). T ansec s co e ed and cha ac e ized condi ions wi hin he measu emen oo p in o he gi en owe . I should be no ed ha he owe oo - p in migh be di e en om he exac MODIS pixel oo - p in (see Sec . 2.5 o he spa ial homogenei y assessmen o MODIS pixels). The measu emen s conce ned condi ions on he o es loo and low he baceous and sh ubby species o ee seedlings and saplings, as he a ea sampled by each spec- al measu emen was es ima ed o co espond o a ∼50cm diame e ci cle on he g ound. The downwa d-poin ing spec- o adiome e (no o e op ics we e used) was held by he op- e a o ’s ou s e ched hand. A o al o h ee spec a abo e a 10in. (0.254m) Spec alon SRT-99–100 whi e panel we e eco ded a he beginning, a e e e y ou unde s o y spec- a measu emen poin s (e e y 8m), and a end o each an- sec . A hemisphe ical, conical e lec ance ac o was ob- ained wi h an uncalib a ed Spec alon e lec ance spec um and he linea ly in e pola ed i adiance. Finally, b oadband HDRFs o ed (620–670nm) and NIR (841–876nm) wa e- leng hs we e compu ed wi h ela i e spec al esponse unc- ions o he MODIS senso onboa d Te a. The unde s o y NDVI alue o gi en si e was calcula ed om he ed and NIR-band alues and a e aged o e he wo ansec s. Es ima es o o e s o y oliage co e and c own co e we e ob ained om digi al co e pho og aphs (DCPs). O e s o y oliage co e was de ined as he pe cen age o g ound co - e ed by he e ical p ojec ion o oliage and b anches and c own co e as he pe cen age o g ound co e ed by he e - ical p ojec ions o he ou e mos pe ime e s o he c owns on he ho izon al plane (wi hou double-coun ing he o e - lap; Gschwan ne e al., 2009). The DCPs we e aken om below he canopy e e y 8m along ansec s a each si e. The came a (Nikon CoolPix4500; 2272×1704 esolu ion) was h ps://doi.o g/10.5194/bg-18-621-2021 Biogeosciences, 18, 621–635, 2021 624 J. Pisek e al.: Re ie al and alida ion o o es backg ound e lec i i y Table 1. S udy si e cha ac e is ics and hei spa ial ep esen a i eness s a us. ICOS – In eg a ed Ca bon Obse ing Sys em si es; LTER – Long Te m Ecological Resea ch Ne wo k si es. No e ha he sampling da es a e shown in he o ma yyyy/mm/dd. Si e code Si e name La (◦) Long (◦) Sampling da e Spec ome e model Unde s o y ege a ion Rep esen a i eness AT-Zbn Zöbelboden (LTER) 47.842 14.442 2017/11/18 ASD FieldSpec 4 Calamag os is a ia, B achypodium syl a icum, Ho delymus eu opaeus, and Senecio o a us No ep esen a i e BE-B a B asschaa (ICOS) 51.304 4.519 2019/01/12 Ocean Op ics; FLAME-S-VIS-NIR-ES Be ula spec., Que cus obu , and So bus aucupa ia Rep esen a i e BE-Vie Vielsalm (ICOS) 50.3 5.983 2018/08/16 Ocean Op ics; FLAME-S-VIS-NIR-ES Spa se e n and moss co e Rep esen a i e a 0.5km CH-Da Da os (ICOS) 46.817 9.85 2018/07/12 Ocean Op ics; FLAME-S-VIS-NIR-ES Dwa sh ubs, bluebe y, and mosses Rep esen a i e CZ-BK1 Bílý Kˇ íž (ICOS) 49.502 18.539 2016/04/17 ASD FieldSpec 4 Vaccinium my illus L. Rep esen a i e a 1.5km CZ-Lnz Lanžho (ICOS) 48.682 16.948 2017/04/27 ASD FieldSpec 4 Allium u sinum and Asa um eu opeum Rep esen a i e DE-Hai Hainich (ICOS) 51.079 10.453 2018/04/12 Ocean Op ics; FLAME-S-VIS-NIR-ES Anemone nemo osa and Allium u sinum Rep esen a i e DE-HoH Hohes Holz (ICOS) 52.083 11.217 2018/04/11 Ocean Op ics; FLAME-S-VIS-NIR-ES Anemone nemo osa Rep esen a i e DE-RuW Wüs ebach (ICOS) 50.505 6.331 2018/08/16 Ocean Op ics; FLAME-S-VIS-NIR-ES Spa se Deschampsia lexuosa, Deschampsia cespi osa and Molinia cae ulea No ep esen a i e DE-Tha Tha and (ICOS) 50.967 13.567 2018/04/12 Ocean Op ics; FLAME-S-VIS-NIR-ES Fagus syl a ica,Abies alba, and De- schampsia lexuosa Rep esen a i e DK-So So oe (ICOS) 55.486 11.645 2018/09/26 Ocean Op ics; FLAME-S-VIS-NIR-ES Beech saplings and seedlings; P e id- ium aquilinum Rep esen a i e ES-AP1 Almodó a del Pina 39.677 −1.848 2017/11/09 ASD FieldSpec HandHeld 2 Que cus ilex ssp. ballo a,Rosma i- nus o icinalis, Thymus ulga is, La an- dula la i olia, Que cus cocci e a, and Genis a sco pius Rep esen a i e ES-CMu Cuenca del Majadas 40.252 −1.965 2017/11/12 ASD FieldSpec HandHeld 2 Junipe us communis,Junipe us oxyced us, and C a aegus monogyna Rep esen a i e a 0.5km ES-CPa Co es de Pallas 39.224 −0.903 2017/11/08 Ocean Op ics; FLAME-S-VIS-NIR-ES Rosma inus o icinalis,Ulex pa i lo us, and B achypodium e usum Rep esen a i e >0.5km ES-Ys Yes e 38.339 −2.351 2018/07/28 Ocean Op ics; FLAME-S-VIS-NIR-ES Rosma inus o icinalis L.,Thymus ul- ga is L., and Cis us clusii Dunal Rep esen a i e a 0.5km FI-Hal Halssiaapa 67.368 26.654 2017/06/13 ASD FieldSpec P o Sedge ege a ion Rep esen a i e FI-Hyy Hyy iälä (ICOS) 61.847 24.295 2018/06/28 Ocean Op ics; FLAME-S-VIS-NIR-ES Vaccinium spec. and No way sp uce seedlings Rep esen a i e a 0.5km Biogeosciences, 18, 621–635, 2021 h ps://doi.o g/10.5194/bg-18-621-2021 J. Pisek e al.: Re ie al and alida ion o o es backg ound e lec i i y 625 Table 1. Con inued. Si e Code Si e Name La (◦) Long (◦) Sampling da e Spec ome e model Unde s o y ege a ion Rep esen a i eness FI-Ken Ken ä o a (ICOS) 67.987 24.243 2017/06/13 ASD FieldSpec P o Vaccinium my illus,Empe um nig um, and Vaccinium i is-idaea and he o es mosses Pleu ozium sch ebe i, Hylocomium splendens, and Dic anum polyse um Rep esen a i e a 2km FI-Kns Kale ansuo 60.647 24.356 2017/06/15 ASD FieldSpec P o Dwa sh ubs and mosses Rep esen a i e a 0.275km FI-Le Le osuo (ICOS) 60.642 23.96 2017/06/15 ASD FieldSpec P o Dwa sh ubs, mosses, and he bs Rep esen a i e <1.0km FI-Sod Sodankylä (ICOS) 67.362 26.638 2017/06/13 ASD FieldSpec P o Lingonbe y, Calluna ulga is, and lichens Sphe oid does no i <1.5km; no ep esen a i e a >1.5km FI-Va Vä iö (ICOS) 67.757 29.616 2017/06/14 ASD FieldSpec P o Mosses, lichens, and dwa sh ubs Rep esen a i e FR-Bil Bilos – Salles (ICOS) 44.494 −0.956 2018/06/14 Ocean Op ics; FLAME-S-VIS-NIR-ES Molinia coe ulea Moench.,P e idium aquilineum, and Ulex eu opaeus Rep esen a i e <0.5km FR-FBn Fon Blanche (ICOS) 43.241 5.679 2018/06/12 Ocean Op ics; FLAME-S-VIS-NIR-ES Que cus cocci e a,Philly ea la i olia, and o he species Rep esen a i e a 1.5km FR-Fon Fon ainebleau–Ba beau (ICOS) 48.476 2.780 2018/06/16 Ocean Op ics; FLAME-S-VIS-NIR-ES Ca pinus be ulus Rep esen a i e a 0.5km FR-Hes Hesse (ICOS) 48.674 7.066 2018/08/18 Ocean Op ics; FLAME-S-VIS-NIR-ES Fagus syl a ica seedlings and black- be y Sphe oid does no i FR-MsS Mon ie s (ICOS) 48.537 5.312 2019/01/14 Ocean Op ics; FLAME-S-VIS-NIR-ES Spa se Sphagnum spec. ege a ion Rep esen a i e >1.0km FR-Pue Puéchabon (ICOS) 43.741 3.596 2018/06/13 Ocean Op ics; FLAME-S-VIS-NIR-ES Buxus sempe i ens,Pis acia len iscus, Philly ea la i olia,Sal ia osma inus, and Ruscus aculea us Rep esen a i e IT-BF Bosco Fon ana (ICOS) 45.202 10.743 2018/07/10 Ocean Op ics; FLAME-S-VIS-NIR-ES Hede a helix,Co ylus spec., and Rus- cus aculea us Rep esen a i e a 1.5km IT-Cp2 Cas elpo ziano 2 (ICOS) 41.704 12.357 2019/01/25 Ocean Op ics; FLAME-S-VIS-NIR-ES Phylli ea la i olia and Pis acia len is- cus Rep esen a i e a 1.5km IT-Ren Renon (ICOS) 43.732 10.291 2018/07/11 Ocean Op ics; FLAME-S-VIS-NIR-ES Deschampsia lexuosa L., Vaccinium my illus L., and Rhododen- d on e ugineum L. Rep esen a i e a 0.5km IT-SR2 San Rosso e (ICOS) 61.847 24.295 2018/06/28 Ocean Op ics; FLAME-S-VIS-NIR-ES Ligus um ulga e Rep esen a i e <1.5km IT-T To gnon 45.833 7.567 2018/07/07 Ocean Op ics; FLAME-S-VIS-NIR-ES Junipe us communis,Rhododend on e ugineum, and Fes uca a ia No ep esen a i e h ps://doi.o g/10.5194/bg-18-621-2021 Biogeosciences, 18, 621–635, 2021 626 J. Pisek e al.: Re ie al and alida ion o o es backg ound e lec i i y Table 1. Con inued. Si e Code Si e Name La (◦) Long (◦) Sampling da e Spec ome e model Unde s o y ege a ion Rep esen a i eness NL-Loo Loobos (ICOS) 52.167 5.744 2018/08/13 Ocean Op ics; FLAME-S-VIS-NIR-ES P unus se o ina,Vaccinium my illus, Deschampsia lexuosa, and mosses Rep esen a i e a 0.5km NO-Hu Hu dal (ICOS) 60.372 11.078 2018/09/27 Ocean Op ics; FLAME-S-VIS-NIR-ES Vaccinium spec. and No way sp uce seedlings Rep esen a i e PT-Co Co uche (LTER) 39.138 -8.333 2016/10/08 Ocean Op ics; FLAME-S-VIS-NIR-ES Rumex ace osella,Tube a ia gu a a, Tolpis ba ba a Plan ago co onopus, Ag os is pou e ii,B iza maxima, Vulpia b omoides, and Vulpia genicu- la a Sphe oid does no i SE-H m Hyl emossa (ICOS) 56.098 13.419 2018/09/28 Ocean Op ics; FLAME-S-VIS-NIR-ES Con inuous moss co e Sphe oid does no i SE-Knd Kindla (LTER) 59.754 14.908 2016/07/16 ASD FieldSpec P o E icaceous dwa sh ubs, mosses, and lichens Rep esen a i e SE-No No unda (ICOS) 60.086 17.48 2018/10/22 ASD FieldSpec P o Bilbe y, lingonbe y, and moss Rep esen a i e <1.5km SE-S b S a be ge (ICOS) 64.256 19.775 2019/08/23 ASD FieldSpec P o Bilbe y, lingonbe y, and moss Rep esen a i e se o au oma ic exposu e, ape u e-p io i y mode, minimum ape u e, and F2 lens (Mac a lane e al., 2007). The came a was le eled a he heigh o 1.4m abo e he g ound, and he lens was poin ed owa ds he zeni h. This se up p o ides a iew zeni h angle om 0 o 15◦, which is compa able wi h he i s ing o he LAI-2000 ins umen (Mac a lane e al., 2007). We used he algo i hm by Nobis and Hunzike (2005) o h eshold he majo i y o he DCP images. Howe e , some o he images we e isibly o e exposed, i.e., he 8bi digi al numbe s (DNs) o he backg ound sky we e 255, and pa s o any po ion o he sky we e black ( ypically a 240–250 DN). Nex , a me hod based on ma hema ical image mo phology (Ko honen and Heikkinen, 2009) was applied o es ima e he oliage and c own co e ac ions. In his me hod, black and whi e canopy images a e p ocessed wi h mo phological clos- ing and opening ope a ions ha a e well known in digi al im- age p ocessing (Gonzalez and Woods, 2002). As a esul , a il e o la ge gaps was ob ained. When a uning pa ame- e (called he s uc u ing elemen in image p ocessing) was se so ha la ge gaps only occu ed be ween indi idual ee c owns (Ko honen and Heikkinen, 2009), he p opo ions o gaps inside and be ween indi idual c owns could be calcu- la ed. 2.3 Backg ound signal e ie al me hod wi h EO da a The o al e lec ance o a pixel (R) esul s om he weigh ed linea combina ion o e lec ance alues by he o es canopy, o es backg ound, and hei sunli and shaded componen s (Li and S ahle , 1985; Chen e al., 2000; Bacou and B éon, 2005; Chopping e al., 2008; Roujean e al., 1992) as ollows: R=kTRT+kGRG+kZT RZT +kZGRZG,(1) which includes he e lec i i ies o he sunli c owns (RT), sunli unde s o y (RG), shaded c owns (RZT ), and shaded unde s o y (RZG). RGma ks he bidi ec ional e lec ance ac o (BRF) o he a ge (unde s o y). The kja e he p o- po ions o hese componen s a he chosen iewing angle o in he ins an aneous ield o iew o he senso a he gi en i - adia ion geome y. Following Canisius and Chen (2007), we de i e he unde s o y e lec i i y (RG) wi h he assump ion ha he e lec i i ies o he o e s o y and unde s o y a he gi en illumina ion geome y di e li le be ween he chosen iewing angles. While he componen s may no ully mee he de ini ion o Lambe ian e lec o s (i.e., e lec ing elec- omagne ic adia ion equally in all di ec ions), se e al p e- ious s udies (e.g., Bacou and B éon, 2005; Dee ing e al., 1999; Pel oniemi e al., 2005) ound o wa d-sca e ing e- lec ance ac o s o a ious a ge s o he p incipal plane o be ai ly cons an . The mos sui able iewing con igu a ion o he e ie al has been iden i ied by Pisek e al. (2015a), using a high angula esolu ion BRF da a se o Kuusk e al. (2014) and accompanying in si u measu emen s o unde - s o y e lec ance ac o s (Kuusk e al., 2013). The con igu- Biogeosciences, 18, 621–635, 2021 h ps://doi.o g/10.5194/bg-18-621-2021 J. Pisek e al.: Re ie al and alida ion o o es backg ound e lec i i y 627 a ion consis s o he BRF a nadi (Rn=0◦), wi h he sola zeni h angle (SZA) co esponding o he Sun’s posi ion a 10:00 local ime (LT) o gi en day and ano he zeni h angle (Ra=40◦) wi h ela i e azimu h angle PHI=130◦. I can be exp essed by Eqs. (2) and (3) as ollows: Rn=kT nRT+kGnRG+kZT nRZT +kZGnRZG (2) Ra=kT aRT+kGaRG+kZT aRZT +kZGaRZG.(3) The p opo ions o he componen s (kj) we e ob ained using he ou -scale model (Chen and Leblanc, 1997) wi h pa am- e e s o gene alized deciduous and coni e ous ee s ands as an inpu (see Table 2; Kuusk e al., 2013). The unde s o y e lec ance a he desi ed wa eleng hs can be calcula ed by combining and sol ing Eqs. (2) and (3) and he inse ion o Rnand Raes ima es de i ed om app op ia e EO da a. The indi idual componen s (sunli /shaded o e s o y and unde - s o y) canno be esol ed wi h he MODIS spa ial esolu ion. The e lec ances o shaded ee c owns (RZT ) and unde s o y (RZG) a e ela ed o sunli ones ia Mas RZT =M×RTand RZG =M×RG, whe e M=RZ/R o a e e ence a ge , which can be measu ed in he ield o p ede e mined wi h he ou -scale model. He e, he same Mis assumed o o e s o y ees and he unde s o y. Based on his ield wo k in Canadian bo eal o es s, Whi e (1999) sugges ed ha angula ly con- s an , wa eleng h-dependen M alues may be app op ia e, a leas du ing he g owing season. The inpu s and pa ame- e s om Table 2 may no be always p ecisely known while e ie ing he unde s o y signal o e la ge a eas. Figu e 2 shows he ela ionships be ween he a ailable in si u da a o ee heigh s o ee densi ies o e ou s udy si es wi h he 1km2 esolu ion es ima es om he global maps o Sima d e al. (2011) and C ow he e al. (2015). The weak ela ionships indica e he cu en unsui abili y o he si e-speci ic a iable es ima es o in e es ( ee heigh and ee densi y) om cu - en ly a ailable global maps a a gi en spa ial esolu ion o ou pu pose. A he same ime, he calcula ed mean alues o he ee heigh s o needlelea ed (17.5m) and b oadlea ed ee s ands (22.7m) om Sima d e al. (2011) o e he s udy si es we e easonably close o ou o iginal gene alized inpu pa ame e alues in Table 2. Following Gemmell (2000), we op ed o epo a ange o unde s o y NDVI (NDVIu) al- ues ob ained wi h he combina ion o pa ame e alues om Table 2 o each si e and da e. Speci ying he co ec con- s ain s (window) o backg ound alone has been p e iously ound o g ea ly educe he e o s in he es ima ion o o e - s o y pa ame e s (Gemmell, 2000). 2.4 MODIS BRDF da a The MCD43A1 V6 bidi ec ional e lec ance dis ibu ion unc ion and albedo (BRDF/albedo) model pa ame e da a se is a 500m g idded daily p oduc . MCD43A1 is gene - a ed by in e ing mul i-da e, mul i-angula , cloud- ee, a mo- sphe ically co ec ed, and su ace e lec ance obse a ions acqui ed by MODIS ins umen s onboa d he Te a and Aqua Figu e 2. (a) Rela ionship be ween a ailable in si u es ima es o ee heigh (in me e s) wi h Sima d e al.’s (2011) es ima e. (b) Re- la ionship be ween a ailable in si u es ima es o ee densi y ( ees pe hec a e) wi h C ow he e al.’s (2015) es ima es. DBF – decidu- ous b oadlea o es ; EBF – e e g een b oadlea o es ; DNF – de- ciduous needlelea o es ; ENF – e e g een needlelea o es ; MF – mixed o es . sa elli es o e a 16d pe iod (Wang e al., 2018). The Julian da e ep esen s he nin h day o he 16d e ie al pe iod, and consequen ly, he obse a ions a e u he weigh ed o es i- ma e he BRDF/albedo o ha pa icula day o in e es . The MCD43A1 algo i hm uses all high-quali y obse a ions ha adequa ely sample he iewing hemisphe e o i an app o- p ia e semiempi ical BRDF model ( he RossThickLiSpa se- Recip ocal model; Roujean e al., 1992; Luch e al., 2000) o ha loca ion and da e o in e es . We compu ed he bidi- ec ional e lec ance ac o (BRF) a he op o he canopy wi h he iso opic pa ame e and wo ( olume ic and geo- me ic) ke nel unc ions (Roujean e al., 1992) o MODIS band 1 ( ed – 620–670nm) and band 2 (NIR – 841–876 nm). We used he Ross and Li ke nels o econs uc he BRF al- ues o equi ed geome ies (see Sec . 2.3) o each da e, and hen we de i ed he unde s o y signal, using he o mulas de- sc ibed in Sec . 2.3. The associa ed da a quali y (MCD43A2) p oduc was employed o assess he e ec o he e ie al quali y on he accu acy o he calcula ed unde s o y signal. All MODIS da a ha e been accessed and p ocessed h ough he Google Ea h Engine (Go elick e al., 2017). 2.5 Spa ial ep esen a i eness assessmen o he alida ion si es A me hod de eloped by Román e al. (2009), and e ined by Wang e al. (2012, 2014, 2017) was adop ed o e alua e he spa ial ep esen a i eness o in si u measu emen s o assess he unce ain ies a ising om a di ec compa ison be ween ield-measu ed o es unde s o y spec a and he co espond- ing es ima es wi h MODIS BRDF da a. To cha ac e ize he spa ial ep esen a i eness o a es si e o ep esen a sa el- li e e ie al, his me hod uses h ee a iog am model pa- ame e s ( he ange, sill, and nugge ), ob ained by he anal- ysis o nea -nadi su ace e lec ances om cloud- ee 30m Landsa /Ope a ional Land Image (OLI) da a (Román e al., 2009) collec ed as close o he sampling da e as possible. h ps://doi.o g/10.5194/bg-18-621-2021 Biogeosciences, 18, 621–635, 2021 628 J. Pisek e al.: Re ie al and alida ion o o es backg ound e lec i i y Table 2. S and pa ame e s o he ou -scale model. S and Deciduous Coni e ous S and densi y ( eesha−1) 500, 1000, and 2000 500, 1000, and 2000 T ee heigh (m) 25 16 Leng h o li e c own (m) 9.2 4.2 Radius o c own p ojec ion (m) 1.87 1.5 Lea a ea index (m2m−2) 1, 2, and 3 1, 2, and 3 Figu e 3. Sho wa e BRF composi es cen e ed a ICOS si es o (a) No unda in Sweden and (c) Wüs ebach in Ge many. (b, d) Va iog am es ima o s (poin s), sphe ical model esul s (do ed cu es), and sample a iances (solid s aigh lines) ob ained o e he si es wi h Ope a ional Land Image (OLI) subse s and spa ial elemen s o 0.275, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2km as a unc ion o he dis ance be ween obse a ions. Va iog am legend explana ions: a – a iog am ange; a – sample a iance; c – a iog am sill; c0 – nugge a iance. Whe e alid image y was no a ailable wi hin a easonable window o he sampling da e, image y om he co espond- ing season o a di e en yea was used. As such, he analy- sis was done o illus a e he ep esen a i eness o he owe si e wi h espec o a pa icula poin in ime. Campagnolo e al. (2016) showed ha he e ec i e spa ial esolu ion o 500m g idded MODIS BRDF p oduc a mid-la i udes is a ound 833×618m because o he a ied oo p in s o he sou ce mul i-angula su ace e lec ance obse a ions. We analyzed each si e wi h i e di e en spa ial ex en s (0.275, 0.5, 1, 1.5, and 2km) o assess and illus a e he changes in spa ial ep esen a i eness wi h di e en spa ial esolu ions. 3 Resul s and discussion 3.1 Spa ial ep esen a i eness Table 1 p o ides he assessmen o spa ial he e ogenei y o all si es included in his s udy, using OLI subse s acqui ed a ound he ime o in si u measu emen s. The example e- sul s o he ICOS si es o No unda (SE-No ) in Sweden and Biogeosciences, 18, 621–635, 2021 h ps://doi.o g/10.5194/bg-18-621-2021 J. Pisek e al.: Re ie al and alida ion o o es backg ound e lec i i y 629 Wüs ebach (DE-RuW) in Ge many, using h ee OLI subse s, a e shown in Fig. 3. The a iog am unc ions wi h ele an model pa ame e s o he wo si es a e displayed in Fig. 3b and d. The ange co esponds o he alue on he xaxis whe e he model la ens ou . The e is no u he co ela ion o a biophysical p ope y associa ed wi h ha poin beyond he ange alue. The sill is he o dina e alue o he ange. A smalle sill alue indica es a mo e homogenous su ace (less a ia ion in su ace e lec ance). A su ace can be conside ed spa ially ep esen a i e wi h espec o he MODIS oo p in when he sill alue is <5.0e−4(Román e al., 2009; Wang e al., 2017). The sill alues o all spa ial ex en s a e well below he alue o 5.0e−4, up o 1km spa ial esolu ion in he case o No unda (Fig. 3b), which indica es ha he ield measu e- men s a e ep esen a i e and allow compa ison wi h MODIS e ie als a a 500m spa ial esolu ion. While he Wüs ebach si e can be conside ed spa ially homogeneous wi hin he im- media e icini y o 275m a ound he owe , he sill alue ex- ceeds he c i e ia o 5.0e−4 a >0.5km spa ial esolu ion. Du ing la e summe /ea ly au umn o 2013, ees we e almos comple ely emo ed in an a ea o 9ha wes o he owe in o - de o p omo e he na u al egene a ion o a nea -na u al de- ciduous o es om a sp uce monocul u e o es . The clea - elling a ea can be seen in Fig. 3d. This ac ion esul ed in an inc ease in he spa ial he e ogenei y o his ICOS si e. In si u measu emen s collec ed wi hin he oo p in o he Wüs ebach owe , hus, canno be deemed ully compa able wi h he e ie als wi h MODIS a a 500m spa ial esolu ion. O e all, mos o he si es we e ound ep esen a i e a he spa ial esolu ion o MODIS BRDF g idded da a. The non- ep esen a i e cases and he e ec on he unde s o y signal e ie al and ag eemen wi h he co esponding in si u mea- su emen s ca ied wi hin he measu emen oo p in o he indi idual owe s a e u he discussed in Sec . 3.2 and 3.3. Román e al. (2009) p o ide u he de ails on he assessmen o spa ial ep esen a i eness, using a se o ou geos a is ical a ibu es de i ed om semi a iog ams. 3.2 NDVI anges The e is only a weak ela ionship be ween he o al (o e - s o y and unde s o y) NDVI signal e ie ed wi h MODIS BRDF da a and co esponding in si u unde s o y NDVI mea- su emen s (R2=0.19; Fig. 4). To al NDVI alues alone do no allow one o disen angle he co ec unde s o y signal. In con as , ou e ie al me hod could ack he unde s o y signal dynamics o e a b oad NDVI ange (Fig. 5). The p e- dic ed unde s o y NDVI anges we e beyond he unce ain y limi s o in si u unde s o y measu emen s (co esponding o ±1 s anda d de ia ion (SD) he e) in less han 15% o cases. These si es wi h poo e ie als we e ca e ully in es iga ed o iden i y he issues p ecluding good esul s. Below, we o- cus on a discussion o esul s whe e he p edic ed and in si u measu ed NDVI anges o he unde s o y laye did no ag ee. Figu e 4. Rela ionship be ween o al (o e s o y and unde s o y) NDVI alues compu ed om nadi NDVI alues, using MODIS BRDF/albedo da a and in si u measu ed unde s o y NDVI alues o e he s udy si es. The unde s o y domina ed he o e all signal o open sh ubland a he Co es de Pallas (ES-CPa) si e and he decid- uous b oadlea o es si e a Mon ie s (FR-MsS) du ing he lea -o pa o he season (Fig. 5). Bo h si es we e ound o be spa ially ep esen a i e o compa ison wi h MODIS oo - p in da a a he ime o he a ailable in si u measu emen s (Table 1). The e a e only e y ew ees sca e ed ac oss he Co es de Pallas si e, and g ound ege a ion is ully exposed. Ex emely low ee densi y does no ma ch wi h any o he o iginal gene alized inpu pa ame e alues in Table 2, and he p edic ed unde s o y signal does no ma ch well wi h he in si u measu emen s. In si u measu emen s a Mon ie s we e ca ied ou du ing he lea -o pa o he season, which al- lowed a ull exposu e o he unde s o y. Despi e his, he p edic ed unde s o y NDVI ange om he MODIS da a did no o e lap wi h he in si u measu emen s a Mon ie s a all. Howe e , he MODIS BRDF alues o hese si es we e ma ked wi h lowe da a quali y lags (QA >1), which co - ec ly signals a dec ease in accu acy in he calcula ions o he unde s o y e lec ance as well. O e all, ou esul s con- i m ha , unde condi ions o e y low ee densi y/lea -o condi ions, he unde s o y signal can be assumed o be iden- ical o he o al scene NDVI. The pe o mance o he me hod u ns ou o be limi ed o e si es wi h a closed canopy, such as Bílý Kˇ íž (CZ- BK1), Hesse (FR-Hes), o Vielsalm (BE-Vie; Fig. 5). This is because he shadowing e ec makes di use sca e ing he dominan mechanism in such s ands, and he unde s o y ca - ies only a negligible in luence on he op-o -canopy signal. Bosco Fon ana (IT-BF ) is ano he b oadlea o es si e wi h e y high oliage co e (FC=0.91), ye he p edic ed unde - s o y NDVI ange en i ely o e laps wi h he collec ed in si u alues. I should be no ed ha , in con as o o he si es wi h h ps://doi.o g/10.5194/bg-18-621-2021 Biogeosciences, 18, 621–635, 2021