scieee Open visual document viewer

Analysis of Medical Device Alerts Issued by the Portuguese Medicines Agency: Scoping the Purpose of New Regulatory Recommendations

Pires, Carla,Duarte, Dinah,Cavaco, Afonso M

Abstract

Introduction: Medical devices are healthcare technologies with a significantly growing market worldwide. This study aims to analyze medical device alerts issued by the Portuguese Medicines Agency, INFARMED, I.P. during 2017, as well as to identify the respective regulatory actions and to suggest additional recommendations. Material and Methods: All alerts on medical device alerts publicly available in the website of INFARMED, I.P. were identified and analyzed, including actions taken. Additionally, reports on medical devices from the Portuguese national competent authorities were compared with reports from other European Union member states such as Germany. Results: A total of 32 safety alerts were identified: 18 (56%) related with devices without identified records of commercialization in Portugal, six (19%) related with devices voluntarily withdrawn from the market, such as counterfeit products, and eight (25%) categorized as ‘other’. In both Portugal and Germany, 0.28 and 4.53 reports of national competent authorities per million inhabitants were identified, respectively. Diverse regulatory actions were taken, such as six compulsory indications to not acquire or use devices. Discussion: Considering that the European Union is an open market where citizens should have equal access to medical devices, the Portuguese system of medical device safety alerts seems to be functioning normally. The identified safety alerts seemed relevant, with Portugal registering a proportionally slightly lower number of alerts when compared with higher sales volume markets, which may be explained by an underreporting of this type of problems. Further studies are needed to confirm these preliminary results, although the development of databases comprising data on patients using medical devices is recommended in order to generate automatic email and text message alerts. Conclusion: A limited number of safety alerts on medical devices was identified in Portugal, with few reported cases of counterfeit or falsified devices. The Portuguese Medicines Agency contributes to the citizens’ access to quality medical devices, by issuing safety alerts, recommendations and mandatory market withdrawals for unsuitable or unsafe medical devices.

Full text

ARTIGO ORIGINAL R e i s a C i e n í i c a d a O d e m d o s Médicos www. a c a m e d i c a p o u g u e s a . c o m 201 RESUMO In odução: Os disposi i os médicos são ecnologias de saúde com um signi ica i o c escimen o a ní el mundial. Foi obje i o des e abalho analisa os ale as sob e disposi i os médicos emi idos pela Agência Po uguesa do Medicamen o: INFARMED, I.P. du an e 2017, iden i ica as espe i as ações egula ó ias e suge i ecomendações. Ma e ial e Mé odos: Todos os ale as e ações sob e disposi i os médicos publicamen e disponí eis no websi e do INFARMED, I.P. o am iden i icados e analisados. Adicionalmen e, os ela ó ios da au o idade compe en e nacional sob e disposi i os médicos o am compa ados com ela ó ios de ou os países da União Eu opeia como a Alemanha. Resul ados: Iden i icou-se um o al de 32 ale as de segu ança de disposi i os médicos: 18 (56%) sem egis os de come cialização em Po ugal, seis (19%) olun a iamen e e i ados do me cado, como p odu os con a ei os, e oi o (25%) ca ego izados como ‘ou os’. Em Po ugal e na Alemanha o am iden i icados 0,28 e 4,53 ela ó ios de au o idades compe en es po milhão de habi an es, espe i- amen e. Di e sas ações egulamen a es o am omadas, como seis indicações ob iga ó ias pa a não adqui i ou u iliza disposi i os médicos. Discussão: Conside ando que a União Eu opeia é um me cado abe o no qual os cidadãos de êm igual acesso à u ilização de dis- posi i os médicos, o sis ema Po uguês de ale as de segu ança sob e es es disposi i os pa ece e uma a i idade no mal. Os ale as de segu ança iden i icados apa en am se ele an es, com Po ugal a egis a um núme o ligei amen e in e io de ale as quando p opo cionalmen e compa ado com ou os me cados de maio olume de endas, o que e en ualmen e pode se explicado po uma subno i icação des e ipo de p oblemas. São necessá ios es udos adicionais pa a con i ma es es esul ados p elimina es, sendo o desen ol imen o de bases de dados sob e o uso de disposi i os médicos pelos doen es ecomendado de o ma a ge a emails e ale as ele ónicos au omá icos. Conclusão: Foi iden i icado um núme o limi ado de ale as de segu ança em disposi i os médicos em Po ugal, com escassas no i- icações de con a ação ou alsi icação. A Agência Po uguesa de Medicamen os con ibui pa a o acesso dos cidadãos a disposi i os médicos de qualidade, a a és da emissão de ale as de segu ança, ecomendações e e i ada ob iga ó ia de disposi i os médicos Analysis o Medical De ice Ale s Issued by he Po uguese Medicines Agency: Scoping he Pu pose o New Regula o y Recommenda ions Análise dos Ale as Sob e os Disposi i os Médicos Emi idos pela Agência Po uguesa do Medicamen o: Delineando o P opósi o de No as Recomendações Regula ó ias 1. Resea ch Cen e o Biosciences and Heal h Technologies. Uni e sidade Lusó ona. Lisboa. Po ugal. 2. Depa amen o de Sócio-Fa mácia. Faculdade de Fa mácia. Uni e sidade de Lisboa. Lisboa. Po ugal.  Au o co esponden e: Ca la Pi es. [email p o ec ed] Recebido: 11 de janei o de 2020 - Acei e: 12 de maio de 2020 - Online issue published: 01 de ma ço de 2021 Copy igh © O dem dos Médicos 2021 Ca la PIRES1, Dinah DUARTE1, A onso CAVACO2 Ac a Med Po 2021 Ma ;34(3):201-208 ▪ h ps://doi.o g/10.20344/amp.13419 ABSTRACT In oduc ion: Medical de ices a e heal hca e echnologies wi h a signi ican ly g owing ma ke wo ldwide. This s udy aims o analyze medical de ice ale s issued by he Po uguese Medicines Agency, INFARMED, I.P. du ing 2017, as well as o iden i y he espec i e egula o y ac ions and o sugges addi ional ecommenda ions. Ma e ial and Me hods: All ale s on medical de ice ale s publicly a ailable in he websi e o INFARMED, I.P. we e iden i ied and analyzed, including ac ions aken. Addi ionally, epo s on medical de ices om he Po uguese na ional compe en au ho i ies we e compa ed wi h epo s om o he Eu opean Union membe s a es such as Ge many. Resul s: A o al o 32 sa e y ale s we e iden i ied: 18 (56%) ela ed wi h de ices wi hou iden i ied eco ds o comme cializa ion in Po - ugal, six (19%) ela ed wi h de ices olun a ily wi hd awn om he ma ke , such as coun e ei p oduc s, and eigh (25%) ca ego ized as ‘o he ’. In bo h Po ugal and Ge many, 0.28 and 4.53 epo s o na ional compe en au ho i ies pe million inhabi an s we e iden i ied, espec i ely. Di e se egula o y ac ions we e aken, such as six compulso y indica ions o no acqui e o use de ices. Discussion: Conside ing ha he Eu opean Union is an open ma ke whe e ci izens should ha e equal access o medical de ices, he Po uguese sys em o medical de ice sa e y ale s seems o be unc ioning no mally. The iden i ied sa e y ale s seemed ele an , wi h Po ugal egis e ing a p opo ionally sligh ly lowe numbe o ale s when compa ed wi h highe sales olume ma ke s, which may be explained by an unde epo ing o his ype o p oblems. Fu he s udies a e needed o con i m hese p elimina y esul s, al hough he de elopmen o da abases comp ising da a on pa ien s using medical de ices is ecommended in o de o gene a e au oma ic email and ex message ale s. Conclusion: A limi ed numbe o sa e y ale s on medical de ices was iden i ied in Po ugal, wi h ew epo ed cases o coun e ei o alsi ied de ices. The Po uguese Medicines Agency con ibu es o he ci izens’ access o quali y medical de ices, by issuing sa e y ale s, ecommenda ions and manda o y ma ke wi hd awals o unsui able o unsa e medical de ices. Keywo ds: Equipmen and Supplies; Pa ien Sa e y/legisla ion & ju isp udence ARTIGO ORIGINAL 202 Re is a C ie n í ic a d a O de m do s M édi co s ww w.ac am ed ic a po u gu es a.c om Pi es C, e al. Medical de ice ale s in Po ugal, Ac a Med Po 2021 Ma ;34(3):201-208 INTRODUCTION The Po uguese Law-Dec ee 145/2009 is based on he co esponding Eu opean Union (EU) di ec i e 93/42/EEC.1 This Law-Dec ee de ines a medical de ice (MD) as “any ins umen , appa a us, appliance, equipmen , ma e ial o ano he a icle, whe he used alone o in combina ion, in- cluding he so wa e necessa y o i s p ope applica ion in ended by he manu ac u e , o be used o human be- ings o he pu pose o diagnosing, p e en ing, con olling, ea ing o a enua ing a disease; diagnosing, con olling, ea ing, a enua ing o compensa ing o a lesion o a de i- ciency; s udying, subs i u ing o al e ing he ana omy o one physiologic p ocess; and bi h con ol.” MDs a e classi ied as (i) MDs o class I o low- isk de- ices (e.g., diape s, incon inence pads, elas ic s ockings, walking aids, e c.); (ii) MDs wi h a medium isk belong o classes IIa (e.g., hyd ophilic gauze, u ina y ca he e s, sy- inges, e c.) o IIb (e.g., insulin pens, diaph agms, con ac lenses), wi h a likely highe isk in IIb when compa ed wi h IIa; and (iii) MDs o class III o MDs o high isk (e.g., con- doms wi h spe micides, in au e ine de ice ha does no elease p oges ogens, e c.). This classi ica ion is based on isk c i e ia, such as he ime, deg ee o loca ion o con ac be ween a MD and he human body, since some MDs a e mo e in asi e han o he s o a e mean o ch onic use.2 Conside ing he egula ion 2017/746 o he Eu opean Pa - liamen and o he Council o he 5 h Ap il 2017 on in i o diagnos ic medical de ices (p elimina y poin 10): “all es s ha p o ide in o ma ion on he p edisposi ion o a medical condi ion o a disease, such as gene ic es s, and es s ha p o ide in o ma ion o p edic ea men esponse o eac- ions, such as companion diagnos ics, a e in i o diagnos- ic MDs”.3 Addi ionally, MDs mus ha e a con o mi é eu opéenne (CE) ma k, which is a con o mi y sign p o ing he de ice is complian wi h he ele an di ec i es. De ices wi h his ma k may be ma ke ed in any EU coun y.1-4 The con o mi y assessmen p ocedu es o MDs may be ca ied ou unde he esponsibili y o he manu ac u e s o Class I de ices (gene al ule). Class IIa de ices equi e he in e en ion o a no i ied body (NB), i.e. bodies esponsible o he con o mi y assessmen o MDs a e p oduc ion. NBs a e designa ed by he EU membe s a es and each membe s a e shall no i y he Commission, as well as he emaining membe s a es abou he designa ed bodies. NBs may ask he man- u ac u e o in o ma ion o da a o es ablishing/main ain- ing he a es a ion o con o mi y o MDs. Classes IIb and III necessa ily equi e he inspec ion by a NB conce ning he design and manu ac u e o MDs. Class III p oduc s explici ly equi e p io au ho iza ion ega ding con o mi y be o e be- ing placed on he ma ke .1 In he EU, he ma ke o MDs comp ises a ound 27 000 companies: 95% small and medium-sized en e p ises, wi h g ea inno a ion e o s: on a e age, a new pa en is issued e e y 40 minu es and he p oduc li ecycle is app oxima ely o 18 mon hs. These companies employ o e 675 000 wo k- e s, pa icipa ing in a g owing ma ke (o e €110 billion). The key end o MD indus ies on cos e iciency is based on he compulso y c ea ion o alue o paye s and pa ien s, which is in ended o ensu e ha use s o MDs bene i in e ms o he p oduc ’s e icacy, sa e y, e iciency, and cos . Fo ins ance, Aus alian impo e s a e speci ically o ien ed o acqui e cos -e ec i e MDs, which can imp o e pa ien heal h ou comes and educe heal hca e cos s due o he inc easing numbe o an aging popula ion.5 The egula ions on MDs co e di e se aspec s o p od- uc de elopmen and igilance sys ems, om design o manu ac u e, clinical es ing, au ho iza ion and pos -ma ke su eillance.6 Al hough pos -ma ke ing su eillance is es- sen ial in he de ec ion o non-con o mi ies, quali y issues, ad e se e en s, o he p esence o alsi ied de ices in he ma ke ,7,8 a speci ic pos -ma ke su eillance sys em o medical de ices was only de ined h ough a ecen /new Eu opean Commission egula ion (EC 2017/745) on medi- cal de ices in he EU (Chap e VII).9 The 520/2012 EC Regula ion es ablished a speci ic pha maco igilance sys- em o medicinal p oduc s,10 al hough a p e ious Council Di ec i e (93/42/EEC) s a ed ha he p o ec ion o heal h and he associa ed con ols should be mo e e ec i e by means o medical de ice igilance sys ems, in eg a ed a Communi y le el.1,9 In his sense, he Eu opean Da abase on Medical De ices (EUDAMED) is he in o ma ion sys em o exchanging legal in o ma ion ela ed o he applica ion o EU Di ec i es on MDs.7,11,12 Acco ding o he publicly a ailable in o ma ion o he EU, he o e all numbe o egis e ed ad e se MD e en s has been s able o he las i e yea s, despi e he cons an ma ke g ow h.12 In Po ugal, i he ollowing no i ica ions o inciden s and sa e y co ec i e ac ions ela ed o MDs a e epo ed in he o icial medicines s a is ics om INFARMED, I.P. (n = MDs egis e ed/no i ied un il he end o he yea ): 1542 (n = 199 823) in 2014, 1479 (n = 207 443) in 2015, 1790 (n = 226 948) in 2016, 1645 (n = 244 138) in 2017 and 1741 (n = 277 834) in 2018.13 Conside ing he NCAR (Na ional Compe en Au ho i ies Repo s) om 17 EU coun ies, a o al o 981 ele an e en s wi h MDs we e no i ied in 2017.7,12 NCARs a e “in ended o dissemina ion be ween Na ional Compe en Au ho i ies and he Commission”; hei quali a i e in o ma ion is no public. NCAR should be c ea ed in acco dance wi h a egula ed o m/ empla e: “This o m should be comple ed by NCAR pa icipan s only when exchanging sa e y in o ma ion abou ele an measu es and/o ecommenda ions ela ing wi h he p e en ion o ad e se inciden s conce ning medical de- ices. This o m is designed o exchanging in o ma ion be- ween NCAR pa icipan s; i should no be passed di ec ly inadequados ou insegu os do me cado. Pala as-cha e: Equipamen os e Sup imen os; Segu ança do Doen e/legislação & ju isp udência ARTIGO ORIGINAL R e i s a C i e n í i c a d a O d e m d o s M é d i c o s w w w.a c a m e d i c a p o u g u e s a . c o m 203 on o pa ien s, use s, hi d pe sons o he public.”. Among he examples o inciden s and ield sa e y co ec i e ac ions which he manu ac u e should epo a e “pa ien dies a e he use o a de ib illa o and he e is an indica ion o a p ob- lem wi h he de ib illa o ”, “loss o sensing a e a pacemake has eached end o li e; elec i e eplacemen indica o did no show up in due ime, al hough i should ha e acco ding o de ice speci ica ion” o “an in usion pump s ops, due o a mal unc ion o he pump, bu ails o gi e an app op ia e ala m; he e is no pa ien inju y”, i.e. se e e (o po en ially se e e) inciden s wi h MDs.14 In 2017, Ge many (popula- ion = 82 521 653 inhabi an s), Uni ed Kingdom (popula- ion = 65 884 142 inhabi an s), and F ance (popula ion = 66 809 816 inhabi an s) had he highes p e alence o such se ious inciden s (981 (100%) NCARS exchanged be ween 17 Coun ies): 363 NCARs (37.0%), 190 NCARs (19.3%), and 115 NCARs (11.7%), espec i ely, while only 3 NCARs (0.3%) such inciden s we e speci ically epo ed in Po ugal (popula ion = 10 309 573 inhabi an s). As o coun ies wi h a simila popula ion size o Po ugal, 2017 da a (981 (100%) NCARs exchanged be ween 17 coun ies), he numbe o NCARs and inhabi an s: Czech Republic 4 NCARs (0.4%) (popula ion = 10 578 820 inhabi an s), Aus ia ou NCARs (0.4%) (popula ion = 8 772 865 inhabi an s), Belgium 40 NCARs (4.1%) (popula ion = 11 351 727 inhabi an s) and Sweden 44 (4.1%) NCARs (4.5%) (popula ion = 9 995 153 inhabi an s).7,12,15 Besides egis e ing inciden s wi h MDs, na ional medi- cines agencies (one in each EU coun y) a e esponsible o o he unc ions, namely designa ion o MDs, inspec ion o manu ac u e s o MDs, including he collec ion o MDs samples, p oceedings o in ingemen (e.g. applica ion o ines) o implemen ing and moni o ing he implemen a ion o na ional and in e na ional egula ions on MDs, including he publica ion o MD sa e y ale s.1 These a e di ec ed o heal hca e p o essionals and pa ien s.16 Gi en ha MDs may be associa ed wi h se e e o po- en ial se e e inciden s/e en s and pa ien s may unde - use sa e y in o ma ion on MDs,7, 12-14 he aims o his s udy we e: (i) o iden i y and ca ego ize all ale s on MDs issued by he Po uguese Medicines Agency, INFARMED, I.P. du - ing 2017 and published in i s o icial websi e, (ii) o compa e he occu ence o Po uguese sa e y ale s wi h he a es in o he EU coun ies and, (iii) o discuss measu es o mi iga e he isks associa ed wi h sa e y conce ns on MDs, i.e., o discuss possible new egula o y sa e y ecommenda ions, which may be globally accep ed, knowing medicines agen- cies and heal h au ho i ies ha e a collabo a i e amewo k owa ds public heal h sa e y. MATERIAL AND METHODS Desc ip i e s udy: sa e y ale s on MDs we e collec ed h ough he web add ess o he Po uguese medicines agency (INFARMED, I.P.): h p://www.INFARMED.p /web/ INFARMED/ale as/disposi i os-medicos du ing Janua y 2018. These ale s also co e inciden s wi h MDs ma ke ed in he emaining EU coun ies. Thus, i is possible o ob ain an indi ec indica o o all signi ican inciden s wi h MDs in he EU. Inclusion and exclusion c i e ia All Po uguese na ional sa e y ale s on MDs published by INFARMED, I.P. on he o icial websi e in 2017 (inclusion c i e ia) we e analyzed because i was he mos ecen ly a ailable in o ma ion when he p esen s udy was ca ied ou . Exclusion c i e ia: publica ions desc ibing o he ypes o sa e y issues. Po uguese sa e y ale s on MDs S udy da a we e ex ac ed and p ocessed as ollows: (i) i s ly, sa e y ale s we e iden i ied i.e. all sa e y ale s on MDs published in he o icial si e o INFARMED, I.P. be- ween Janua y 1s 2017 and Decembe 31s 2017, (ii) sec- ondly, hey we e egis e ed i.e. all online a ailable in o ma- ion was collec ed in a wo d documen and he o iginal in o - ma ion was a chi ed in digi al o ma ; and (iii) hi dly, hese sa e y ale s we e analyzed as ollows: ype o equi ed ac- ion aken by he na ional compe en au ho i y (NCA) (de- ices ha a e olun a ily wi hd awn om he ma ke e sus ‘o he si ua ions’) o iden i ica ion o MDs ma ke ed in Po - ugal e sus MDs no ma ke ed in Po ugal. In he g oup o de ices olun a ily wi hd awn om he ma ke , coun e ei o alsi ied de ices we e also quan i ied. The ‘o he si ua- ions’ we e based on quali a i e classi ica ions a ibu ed by he esea che s a e eading he ull con en o each iden i- ied sa e y ale (please see ‘Po uguese sa e y ale s on MDs’ in he sec ion o esul s). The p esen analysis was double-checked by wo esea che s. S udy a iables we e con enien ly selec ed based on he publicly a ailable in o ma ion in he sa e y ale (pub- lished ale ). O he a iables we e no a ailable in hese published sa e y ale s (e.g. he se e i y o a possible inci- den , class o de ice, possible yea o comme cializa ion in Po ugal, he exis ence o Field Sa e y Ac ions). Ac ions aken by he egula o y au ho i y The ac ions aken by INFARMED, I.P. a e p esen ed in Table 1. Es ima ed p opo ions o NCARs pe million o inhabi - an s A sub-analysis abou NCARs was ca ied ou because i seems hese epo s a e ela ed wi h se e e o po en ially se e e sa e y e en s.7,12-14 Besides Po ugal, he selec ed coun ies o his compa ison we e Ge many, Uni ed King- dom and F ance because hey a e conside ed leading Eu- opean economies wi h a much la ge popula ion and MDs ma ke han Po ugal, hus po en ially app op ia e o de ec eme ging sa e y issues. Mo eo e , he Czech Republic, Aus ia, Belgium and Sweden we e e alua ed, since hey p esen a simila popula ion size o Po ugal.15,17 Acco ding o he o icial epo s, he numbe o NCARs sen by each coun y we e Po ugal (n = 3), Czechia (n = 4), Aus ia (n = 7), Belgium (n = 40), Sweden (n = 44), Pi es C, e al. Medical de ice ale s in Po ugal, Ac a Med Po 2021 Ma ;34(3):201-208 ARTIGO ORIGINAL 204 Re is a C ie n í ic a d a O de m do s M édi co s ww w.ac am ed ic a po u gu es a.c om Ge many (n = 363), Uni ed Kingdom (n = 190), and F ance (n = 115).12 The numbe o NCARs pe million inhabi an s in each o he e alua ed coun ies was calcula ed conside ing: (i) he da a o Eu opean 2011 census and he demog aphic da a o Eu os a (2017 da a) and (ii) he da a o 2017 NCAR; please see he public epo s he e: h ps://ec.eu opa.eu/heal h/ md_sec o /ma ke -su eillance-and- igilance_en.12,15,17 RESULTS Po uguese sa e y ale s on MDs A o al o 32 (100%) sa e y ale s on MDs we e iden i ied in he o icial websi e o INFARMED, I.P.. O e all, 18 ou o 32 (56%) de ices wi hou eco ds o comme cializa ion a a na ional le el; eigh ou o 32 (25%) o he si ua ions and six ou o 32 (19%) de ices olun a ily wi hd awn om he ma ke (Table 1). Ac ions aken by he egula o y au ho i y The main ac ions aken by INFARMED, I.P. a e p esen - ed in Table 1. Rega ding, he de ices wi hou eco ds o comme ciali- za ion a a na ional le el (18 in 32), INFARMED, I.P. has ecommended no o pu chase o use he MD. These ale s we e dissemina ed by NCAs om he Uni ed Kingdom, Ge - many, Denma k, and Poland. Pa icula ly, one ale om he 18 ale s wi hou eco ds o comme cializa ion a na ional le el was abou in i o diagnos ic medical de ices: a CE ma king was no a ixed in eagen s o in i o diagnos ics ( hese eagen s we e wi hd awn om he ma ke by he Ge man au ho i ies). Due he ee mo emen o goods in he Eu opean Union, INFARMED, I.P. has speci ically ec- ommended ha hese eagen s should no be pu chased o used since, he e is no e idence o hei sa e y, quali y o pe o mance. The ‘o he si ua ions’ (eigh ale s) conce ned limi a ions on he unc ioning o he MDs (e.g., so wa e o ins uc ion upda es o o e come unc ion issues, such as he limi ed capaci y o a ba e y; suspension o comme cializa ion and e u n o all de ices o he manu ac u e ; o new ins uc ions due o a quali y issue). The cases o coun e ei o alsi ied de ices a e included in he g oup o ale s om de ices ol- un a ily wi hd awn om he ma ke (six ale s). Es ima ed p opo ions o NCARs pe million o inhabi - an s O e all, a leas h ee ou o 32 MDs sa e y ale s we e ela ed o se ious inciden s, which is in line wi h he h ee NCARs no i ied in Po ugal du ing 2017.12 A a e o 0.28 NCARS (i.e. epo s o ele an inciden s, such as se e e o po en ially se e e inciden s) pe million inhabi an s in Po ugal was calcula ed using 2011 census da a and/o o 0.29 NCARs pe million inhabi an s using 2017 Eu os a da a.12,15,17 The EU coun ies wi h he highes p opo ion o NCARs we e: Ge many wi h 4.53 NCARs pe million in- habi an s, UK wi h 3.0 NCARs pe million inhabi an s, and F ance wi h 1.77 NCARs pe million inhabi an s. Rega ding he coun ies wi h a simila numbe o inhabi an s (popula- ion size) o Po ugal: Czech Republic wi h 0.38 NCARs pe million inhabi an s; Aus ia wi h 0.46 NCARs pe million in- habi an s; Belgium wi h 3.52 NCARs pe million inhabi an s and Sweden wi h 4.40 NCARs pe million inhabi an s.7,12,15 The Ge man, F ench, UK and Po uguese ma ke s ac- coun ed o 26; 14.5; 9.8 and 1.2 billion eu os in sales o MDs, espec i ely (2015 da a).18,19 Rega ding expo s and impo s espec i ely o MDs (2017 da a), he s udied coun- ies accoun ed o : Ge man (25 811 and 16 676 million o eu os), F ance (6984 and 9785 million o eu os), Uni ed Kingdom (5513 and 7334 million o eu os), Czechia (1053 and 974 million o eu os), Aus ia (1909 and 1930 million o eu os), Belgium (12 071 and 9689 million o eu os) and Sweden (1441 and 1595 million o eu os).20 DISCUSSION O e all, he numbe o public ale s on MDs in he o - icial websi e o INFARMED, I.P. (32 sa e y ale s in 2017) is clea ly below he o al numbe o no i ica ions o inciden s and sa e y co ec i e ac ions conce ning MDs in Po u- gal (n = 1645 ou o 244 138 egis e ed MDs in 2017).13 In his sense, i is likely ha INFARMED, I.P. has speci ically published hese ale s based on sa e y and po en ial isk c i e ia. Fo ins ance, he medicines agencies o he USA and Aus alia [Food and D ug Adminis a ion (FDA) and he The apeu ics Goods Adminis a ion (TGA), espec i ely] ha e also only published 11 and a ound 20 sa e y commu- nica ions abou MDs, espec i ely (2017 publica ions),21,22 which seems o be aligned wi h he numbe o sa e y ale s on MDs published by INFARMED, I.P.. I seems MDs in- dus y is sa ely ope a ing, conside ing he limi ed numbe o Pi es C, e al. Medical de ice ale s in Po ugal, Ac a Med Po 2021 Ma ;34(3):201-208 Table 1 – Ac ions aken by he Po uguese na ional medicines agency a e a sa e y ale on MDs (n = 32; 100% sa e y ale s)* Type o ac ion Desc ip ion Recommenda ions n1 = 26 (81.2%) - con ac ing he e ail selle o ecei e a new sa e y ale 6.3% (2 in 32) - con ac ing he dis ibu o s o ecei e a so wa e upda e 9.3% (3 in 32) - ecommenda ions o no pu chase o use a ce ain MD, conce ning MDs wi hou eco ds o comme cializa ion in Po ugal 56.3% (18 in 32) - using he MD acco ding o he ins uc ions 9.3% (3 in 32) Manda o y Decisions n2 = 6 (1.8%) - immedia ely suspend comme cializa ion and e u n all de ices o he manu ac u e and no acqui e o use he MD 18.8% (6 in 32) To al (n1 + n2) 32 (100%) * The same MD can issue di e en sa e y ale s simul aneously ARTIGO ORIGINAL R e i s a C i e n í i c a d a O d e m d o s M é d i c o s w w w.a c a m e d i c a p o u g u e s a . c o m 205 sa e y ale s published on he websi es o medicines agen- cies, such as INFARMED, I.P., FDA and TGA.21,22 Howe e , mo e s udies on he p esen opic a e ecommended. On he o he hand, 981 NCARS we e exchanged be ween 17 EU Coun ies du ing 2017,12 al hough hese NCARs may be abou he same ype o MDs. Po uguese sa e y ale s on MDs and ac ions aken by he egula o y au ho i y Conce ning he 32 sa e y ale s iden i ied in he o icial websi e o INFARMED, I.P., mo e han hal o hese ale s we e ela ed wi h de ices wi hou iden i ied eco ds o com- me cializa ion a a na ional le el. This can be conside ed e y encou aging ega ding he dissemina ion o sa e y in- o ma ion, since people and p oduc s can ci cula e wi hin he EU and ci izens li ing in Po ugal may be using an MD no ma ke ed in his e i o y. Al e na i ely, i may be an indi- ca o o lowe usage o MDs wi hin he Po uguese popula- ion due o a mo e limi ed budge (i.e. economic es ic ions), en o cemen o na ow c i e ia o selec /buy MDs a hospi al le el o di e en popula ion heal h needs. In e es ingly, only one ale abou an in i o MDs no ma ke ed in Po ugal was de ec ed. This may e lec he lowe p opo ion o in i o MDs in ela ion o he global numbe o ma ke ed MDs. Fo ins ance, he o al heal hca e expendi u e in Eu ope is as ollows: 76.9% inpa ien & ou pa ien ca e, o he ; 15.9% pha maceu icals & o he medical non-du ables and 7.2% medical echnology (6.5% medical de ices, including imag- ing and 0.7% in i o diagnos ics) (2017 da a).20 The ypes o ac ions aken by he na ional medicines agency ( ecommenda ions o manda o y decisions) we e dependen on he se e i y o he ale . This was he case o he six manda o y decisions ela ed wi h quali y issues, e.g., coun e ei de ices ecei ing ma ke suspension and ecall o de aul MDs, which we e in ol ed in he h ee inciden s. Rele an in o ma ion is lacking on he ale s o s udied MDs, such as he se e i y o a possible inciden , class o a de ice, possible yea o comme cializa ion, he exis ence o ield sa e y ac ions, e c. These could be ela ed wi h con iden ial- i y issues and/o he in o ma ion o ma . Na ional medicines agencies a e legally equi ed o p esen his in o ma ion in a s uc u ed way (NCAR), and some egula o y in o ma- ion should emain con iden ial (see Annex VII o MEDDEV 2.12/1 e .8).14 Aside om he ale s on he EU websi es, na ional medi- cines agencies and he compulso y MDs inciden epo ing sys em (Eudamed),12 compu e -based sys ems in eg a ed in o MDs o in apps o pa ien s may con ibu e o inc ease he sa e use o MDs. Fo ins ance, elec onic means (e.g., au oma ed emails), o so wa e pla o ms, which a e based on indi idual da a and sui able algo i hms and a e p o- g ammed o simula e he use o MDs. O he applica ions a e cu en ly unde de elopmen o assis he selec ion o he sa es de ice o a ce ain pa ien .23,24 Ac ions o inc ease he awa eness o heal hca e p o es- sionals and pa ien s a e also needed. Mo eo e , di e ences in he p opo ions o no i ied sa e y ale s be ween coun ies could be jus i iable by a po en ial unde epo ing o cases, al hough he e is no da a o con i m his assump ion. Use s o MDs should be mo i a ed o p o ide ac i e eedback on how o imp o e MDs and how o an icipa e possible inci- den s. E en hough end-use s a e heo e ically unable o acqui e MDs (a leas om he high- isk ca ego ies), since hese MDs a e acqui ed/pu chased by hospi als, pa ien s should emain in o med on he con en o MDs ale s, es- pecially i consume s ca y one MDs inside he body (o di ec ly con ac ing wi h he body). Only MDs coded by IN- FARMED, I.P. and included in he espec i e da abase may be pu chased by he Na ional Heal h Se ice (SNS) in Po - ugal.25 In his sense, a unique ID code o each MD in he EU ma ke would be an impo an s ep o ensu e aceabili y and o es ablish causali y in bo h posi i e and nega i e pa- ien ou comes.26 Es ima ed p opo ions o NCARs pe million o inhabi - an s The es ima ed p opo ion o NCARs pe million inhabi - an s in Po ugal is below he alues egis e ed by he o he e alua ed EU coun e pa s, including he analyzed coun- ies wi h simila popula ion sizes o Po ugal (i.e. Czech Republic, Aus ia, Belgium and Sweden).12 This si ua ion may be explained by he ac ha Po ugal and he Czech Republic a e among he coun ies wi h he lowes numbe o sales o MDs, hus being mo e likely o p esen a small numbe o NCARs pe million inhabi an s.15,18-20 Addi ion- ally, his seems o be a low p opo ion o epo s looking a he Ge man ma ke , which is app oxima ely 23 imes mo e aluable han he Po uguese one; howe e , Ge many eg- is e ed a a e o MD sa e y ale s only 16 imes highe han Po ugal.18-20 Finally, a leas some MDs sa e y p oblems may no ha e been no i ied by use s/pa ien s o heal hca e p o essionals (i.e., unde epo ing o sa e y p oblems o MDs) and he numbe o inspec ions o iden i y alsi ied o unsa e MDs may be limi ed in ou coun y. In his sense, ig- ilance and inspec ions sys em on he sa e y o MDs should be s eng hened by he na ional medicines agency, since moni o ing sa e y o MD is pa amoun . New EU egula ion on MDs Recen EU legisla ion on medical de ices has come in o o ce ecen ly: he Regula ion 2017/745 o he Eu o- pean Pa liamen and o he Council o 5 h Ap il 2017 (no ye ansposed).9 The da a and/o analysis in he p esen s udy ha e no eme ged om he applica ion o his new egula- ion, conside ing his egula ion will only be ansposed o applied by each o he Eu opean coun ies in he nex ew yea s ( ansi ion pe iod). Impo an ly, i seems ha he old concep s and de ini ions a e conside ed in his new egula- ion; howe e , Regula ion 2017/745 is b oade , and among o he s, i includes mo e designa ions ega ding medical de ices and/o medical pu poses. Fo ins ance, implan s and eagen s ha e been speci ically conside ed MDs, as well as, addi ional medical pu poses ha e been speci i- cally conside ed such as moni o ing an inju y o disabili y; Pi es C, e al. Medical de ice ale s in Po ugal, Ac a Med Po 2021 Ma ;34(3):201-208 ARTIGO ORIGINAL 206 Re is a C ie n í ic a d a O de m do s M édi co s ww w.ac am ed ic a po u gu es a.c om Pi es C, e al. Medical de ice ale s in Po ugal, Ac a Med Po 2021 Ma ;34(3):201-208 in es iga ion, eplacemen o modi ica ion o he ana omy o a pa hological p ocess o s a e; o “p o iding in o ma ion by means o in i o examina ion o specimens de i ed om he human body, including o gan, blood and issue dona- ions, and which does no achie e i s main in ended ac ion by pha macological, immunological o me abolic means, in o on he human body, bu which may be assis ed in i s unc ion by such means”.8 Thus, as expec ed, he isk clas- si ica ion was also upda ed, al hough MDs a e s ill classi- ied in he same numbe o classes: I e.g., non-in asi e de- ices no included in he o he classes such as non-in asi e de ices in ended o be used as a mechanical ba ie , o comp ession o o abso p ion o exuda es; IIa e.g., non- in asi e de ices in ended o channelling o s o ing blood, body luids, cells o issues, liquids o gases o he pu pose o e en ual in usion, adminis a ion o in oduc ion in o he body o in asi e de ices in ended o sho - e m use – and no included in ano he class; IIb e.g., non-in asi e de ices in ended o modi ying he biological o chemical compo- si ion o human issues o cells, blood, o he body liquids o o he liquids in ended o implan a ion o adminis a ion in o he body o in asi e de ices in ended o long- e m use – and no included in o he class; and III e.g., su gically in asi e de ices in ended speci ically o con ol, diagnose, moni o o co ec a de ec o he hea o he cen al ci - cula o y sys em h ough di ec con ac wi h hose pa s o he body, o o al o pa ial join eplacemen s. I seems like class I MDs emain, espec i ely, classi ied as low- isk de ices, IIa and IIb medium- isk de ices and class III high- isk de ices in acco dance wi h a icle 51 and Annex VIII o Regula ion 2017/745. Ano he ele an poin in his docu- men is he p e ision o a speci ic pos -ma ke su eillance sys em on MDs (Chap e VII), which s a es ha , “ o each de ice, manu ac u e s shall plan, es ablish, documen , im- plemen , main ain and upda e a pos -ma ke su eillance sys em in a manne ha is p opo iona e o he isk class and app op ia e o he ype o de ice” (a icle 83).9 Among he possible consequences o he applica ion o Regula ion 2017/745 a e a highe numbe o egis e ed MDs and sa e y ale s on MDs in he EU, since he scope o applica ion o he new Regula ion is b oade . On he o he hand, i is likely ha he use o MDs in he EU will end o be- come sa e because mo e ypes o MDs and i s espec i e applica ions a e co e ed by his new egula ion and manu- ac u e s a e equi ed o de ine a pos -ma ke su eillance sys em in acco dance wi h Chap e VII. 9 Addi ional egula o y ecommenda ions on MDs The de elopmen o da abases comp ising pa ien da a om MDs use is ecommended because i may ensu e he gene a ion o au oma ic ale s, e.g., email and/o phone wa nings. O he ypes o web-based applica ions may be de eloped o ensu e sa e use o MDs in pa ien s. Among o he s, new applica ions may be dissemina ed in he web- si es o egula o y agencies, which a e commonly used o dissemina e igilance in o ma ion. Social ne wo ks may be used o dissemina e in o ma ion on sa e y o e icacy ale s o MDs, al hough mo e s udies on he use o social ne - wo ks as a way o dissemina ing sa e y in o ma ion on MDs a e equi ed. Na ional medicines agencies may ecommend ha na ional medicines agencies suppo /s eng hen he publica ion o mo e dedica ed in o ma ion abou he sa e y ale s o MDs in ended o pa ien s and consume s, since he analyzed sa e y ale s and EU s a is ics only p o ide limi ed in o ma ion. Fo ins ance, i was no possible o ind speci ic in o ma ion abou he se e i y o inciden s, possible causes, class o de ice, e c. This in o ma ion is pa icula ly ele an o heal hca e p o essionals, and he gene al pub- lic in o de o inc ease pa ien sa e y.27 As a as he egula o y ecommenda ions on MDs he e p oposed a e conce ned, he scope o in e en ion o he na ional medicines agencies may need o be ex ended and ampli ied, o ins ance wi h he en o cemen o egula ion 2017/745.9 Mo eo e , p i a e o semi-public o ganiza ions may be c ea ed in o de o supe ise he in e en ion o medicines agencies, NB and/o manu ac u e s, namely wi h compulso y en ollmen o pa ien s and p o ide s. S udy limi a ions The MDs om he sa e y ale s we e no checked agains he Po uguese Code o he Medical De ice (CMD) and i s espec i e Po uguese Nomencla u e o Medical De ices (NPDM),28 because ei he CMDs o NPDMs we e no made a ailable in he sa e y ale s published by INFARMED, I.P.. Howe e , b ands and/o p oduce names o MDs we e p esen ed in he published sa e y ale s, and almos all o hese b ands and/o p oduce s we e no mo e a ailable in he CMD Po uguese da abase (h ps://www.in a med.p / web/in a med/pesquisa-disposi i os)28 (e.g. PRIMEDIC De iMoni o XD®, A asningsse EPI-SPINAL Pack®, Fenix Face Resu acing Sys em® o Thomas Moni o Sys ems). Simila ly, he exis ence o a possible combina ion o de- ices and he Classes o he MDs o he sa e y ale s we e no speci ically in es iga ed, which was due o he limi ed in o ma ion on he published ale s. The websi es o o he compe en medicines agencies (Eu opean o non-Eu ope- an) we e no checked ega ding he sa e y ale s on MDs, al hough compa a i e analyses on ele an inciden s based on NCARS epo s we e no ca ied ou .12 Finally, speci ic compa isons (e.g., be ween di e en MD classes o di e - en se e i ies o e en s) o sa e y ollow-ups we e no spe- ci ically ca ied ou . CONCLUSION The Po uguese Medicines Agency con ibu es o he ci izens’ access o quali y medical de ices, by issuing sa e- y ale s, ecommenda ions and manda o y ma ke wi h- d awals o unsui able o unsa e MDs. Despi e he limi ed numbe o sa e y ale s in Po ugal, cases o coun e ei o alsi ied MDs ha e been iden i ied. These si ua ions we e ollowed by co ec i e ac ions o ensu e public heal h. The low numbe o sa e y ale s in Po ugal, compa ed o o he EU coun ies may be explained by he ollowing po en ial easons: (i) some MDs sa e y p oblems may ha e no been ARTIGO ORIGINAL R e i s a C i e n í i c a d a O d e m d o s M é d i c o s w w w.a c a m e d i c a p o u g u e s a . c o m 207 no i ied by use s/pa ien s o heal hca e p o essionals (i.e., unde epo ing o sa e y p oblems wi h MDs), (ii) limi ed numbe o MDs ma ke ed in Po ugal p obably due o eco- nomic es ic ions, (iii) he numbe o inspec ions o iden i y alsi ied o unsa e MDs may be limi ed o (i ) MDs in he na- ional ma ke may be less p one o sa e y p oblems, since no all MDs ma ke ed in he EU a e a ailable in Po ugal. Among o he s, ein o cing igilance and inspec ion sys- ems ega ding he sa e y o MDs is ecommended and new egula o y sa e y ecommenda ions may comp ise he compulso y deli e y o elec onic ale s, such as emails o ensu e he ecep ion o sa e y in o ma ion by all pa ien s. Mo eo e , he de elopmen o apps o o he applica ions o assis pa ien use, including op imiza ion o MDs in eal- ime o he exis ence o a unique ID code in he EU o ensu e he aceabili y o MDs. Fu he s udies a e equi ed o con i m hese p elimina y esul s. DISCLOSURE A chap e on a simila opic was published in: Pi es C, Dua e D. A egula o y and sa e y pe spec i e on medical de ices. In: Mehdi Khos ow-Pou DB, edi o . Encyclopedia o In o ma ion Science and Technology - Chap e 125. 5 h ed. IGI Global; 2021:1815-26. doi: doi:10.4018/978-1-7998- 3479-3.ch125. PROTECTION OF HUMANS AND ANIMALS The au ho s decla e ha he p ocedu es we e ollowed acco ding o he egula ions es ablished by he Clinical Re- sea ch and E hics Commi ee and o he 2013 Helsinki Dec- la a ion o he Wo ld Medical Associa ion. DATA CONFIDENTIALITY The au ho s decla e ha ing ollowed he p o ocols in use a hei wo king cen e ega ding pa ien s’ da a publica- ion. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST The au ho s epo no con lic s o in e es . FUNDING SOURCES Fundação pa a a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT) p ojec UID/DTP/04567/2016. Pi es C, e al. Medical de ice ale s in Po ugal, Ac a Med Po 2021 Ma ;34(3):201-208 REFERENCES 1. Council o The Eu opean Communi ies. Council Di ec i e 93/42/EEC conce ning MDs. O J Eu Communi ies. 1993:169:1–43. [accessed 2012 Feb 10]. A ailable om: h p://eu -lex.eu opa.eu/legal-con en /EN/ TXT/PDF/?u i=CELEX:31993L0042& om=PT. 2. INFARMED. Medical de ices in Pha macy; 2016. [accessed 2018 Feb 13]. A ailable om: h p://www.INFARMED.p /web/INFARMED/ en idades/disposi i os-medicos/aquisicao-e-u ilizacao/disposi i os_ medicos_ a macia. 3. Eu opean Pa liamen , Council o he Eu opean Union. Regula ion 2017/746 o he Eu opean Pa liamen and o he Council o 5 Ap il 2017 on in i o diagnos ic medical de ice. O J Eu Union. 2017:117:176- 332. [accessed 2020 Ma 28]. A ailable om: h ps://eu -lex.eu opa.eu/ legal-con en /EN/TXT/PDF/?u i=CELEX:32017R0746& om=p (). 4. Council o The Eu opean Communi ies. Council Di ec i e 90/385/EEC ac i e implan able MDs. O J Eu Communi ies. 1990:189;17–36. [accessed 2018 Fe 13]. A ailable om: h p://eu -lex.eu opa.eu/legal- con en /EN/TXT/PDF/?u i=CELEX:31990L0385& om=EN. 5. In e na ional T ade Adminis a ion. 2016 Top Ma ke s Repo Medical De ices. [accessed 2019 Feb 4]. A ailable om: h ps://www. ade.go / opma ke s/pd /Medical_De ices_Top_Ma ke s_Repo .pd . 6. Ge emia F. Quali y aspec s o MDs, quali y sys em and ce i ica ion p ocess. Mic ochem J. 2018;136:300–6. 7. Eu opean Commission. EUDAMED: Eu opean Da abase on MDs; 2001. [accessed 2018 Ap 8]. A ailable om: h p://ec.eu opa.eu/idabc/en/ documen /2256/5637.h ml. 8. K ame DB, Tan YT, Sa o C, Kesselheim AS. Pos ma ke su eillance o MDs: a compa ison o s a egies in he US, EU, Japan, and China. PLoS Med. 2013;10:e1001519. 9. Eu opean Pa liamen , Council o he Eu opean Union. Regula ion (EU) 2017/745 o he Eu opean Pa liamen and o he Council o 5 Ap il 2017 on medical de ices. [accessed 2019 Feb 02]. A ailable om: h ps://eu - lex.eu opa.eu/legal-con en /EN/TXT/PDF/?u i=CELEX:32017R0745. 10. Eu opean Commission. Commission Implemen ing Regula ion (EU) No 520/2012 o 19 June 2012 on he pe o mance o pha maco igilance ac i i ies p o ided o in Regula ion (EC) No 726/2004 o he Eu opean Pa liamen and o he Council and Di ec i e 2001/83/EC o he Eu opean Pa liamen and o he Council. [accessed 2019 Feb 7]. A ailable om: h p://eu -lex.eu opa.eu/LexU iSe /LexU iSe .do?u i=OJ:L:2012:159: 0005:0025:EN:PDF. 11. Eu opean Commission. Medicinal P oduc s o Human Use: The EU Pha maco igilance Sys em. [accessed 2018 Ap 8]. A ailable om: h p://ec.eu opa.eu/heal h/human-use/pha maco igilance/index_ en.h m. 12. Eu opean Commission. Ma ke su eillance (NCARs sen by coun y - EU s a is ics): igilance s a is ic on medical de ices 2007 o 2017. 2017. [accessed 2020 Ma 28. A ailable om: h p://C:/Use s/cmbpi/ Downloads/s a s_2017_en.pd . 13. INFARMED. S a is ics o Medicines and Heal h P oduc s. 2018. [accessed 2020 Ma 28]. A ailable om:h ps://www.in a med.p / documen s/15786/1229727/Es a %C3%ADs ica+do+ medicamen o+20 18+%28pd %29/343a8 0-40 e-0be3-be6d-82c79be3 680? e sion=1.3. 14. Eu opean Commission. Guidance documen - Ma ke su eillance - Guidelines on a Medical De ices Vigilance Sys em - MEDDEV 2.12/1 e .8. 2013. [accessed 2019 Feb 10]. A ailable om: h p://ec.eu opa. eu/DocsRoom/documen s/32305/a achmen s/1/ ansla ions. 15. Eu os a . EU Popula ion: demog aphic da a. 2020. [accessed 2020 Ma 28]. A ailable om: h ps://ec.eu opa.eu/eu os a /da ab owse / iew/ ps00001/de aul / able?lang=en. 16. Food and D ug Adminis a ion. Manda o y epo ing equi emen s: manu ac u e s, impo e s and de ice use acili ies. [accessed 2021 Fe 04]. A ailable om: h ps://www. da.go /medical-de ices/ pos ma ke - equi emen s-de ices/manda o y- epo ing- equi emen s- manu ac u e s-impo e s-and-de ice-use - acili ies. 17. Eu os a . Census da a 2011. 2018. [accessed 2018 May 19]. A ailable om: h p://ec.eu opa.eu/eu os a /da a/s a is ics-a-z/abc. 18. EMERGO. UK – O e iew o medical de ice indus y and heal hca e s a is ics, 2019. [accessed 2019 Dec 22]. A ailable om: h ps://www. eme gobyul.com/ esou ces/ma ke -uni ed-kingdom. 19. Mau i i M. Disposi i os médicos undamen ais pa a ganhos em saúde. In QUEM é QUEM nos Disposi i os Médicos em Po ugal. J Económico. [accessed 2018 May 19]. A ailable om: h p://lei o .jo naleconomico. p /download? oken=e1a42e6930648 caa9ec009629dd 456& ile= QQ_2017_MED.pd . 20. MedTech Eu ope. The Eu opean Medical Technology Indus y – in igu es 2019. [accessed 2020 Ma 28]. A ailable om: h ps://www. med echeu ope.o g/wp-con en /uploads/2019/04/The-Eu opean- Medical-Technology-Indus y-in- igu es-2019-2.pd . 21. U.S. Food and D ug Adminis a ion. Medical De ices 2017 Sa e y Communica ions. 2017. [accessed 2020 Ma 28]. A ailable om: h p:// wayback.a chi e-i .o g/7993/20171114005153/h ps://www. da.go / MedicalDe ices/Sa e y/Ale sandNo ices/ucm553873.h m. 22. The apeu ics Goods Adminis a ion - Aus alian Go e nmen , Depa men o Heal h. Medical De ices Sa e y Upda e: 2017. 2020. [accessed 2020 Ma 28]. A ailable om: h ps://www. ga.go .au/ publica ion/medical-de ices-sa e y-upda e. 23. Dah ia K, Gonga Y, Loewen P. A quan i a i e and quali a i e assessmen ARTIGO ORIGINAL 208 Re is a C ie n í ic a d a O de m do s M édi co s ww w.ac am ed ic a po u gu es a.c om o he u iliza ion o mobile compu ing de ices by clinical pha macis s. Heal h Policy Technol. 2016;5:285–90. 24. S ine I, Rice M, Dunlap S, Peca ina J. A cybe isk sco ing sys em o MDs. In J C i In P oc . 2017;19:32–46. 25. Gabine e da Sec e á ia de Es ado da Saúde. Despacho n.º 860/2018. Diá io da República, II Sé ie, n.º 15 (2018/01/22). p.2659. 26. Bay aka T, Çopu b F. E alua ion o he unique de ice iden i ica ion sys em and an app oach o MD acking. Heal h Policy Technol. 2017;6:234–41. 27. Pi es C, Rosa P, Vigá io M. Sho assessmen o Heal h Li e acy (SAHL) in Po ugal: de elopmen and alida ion o a sel -adminis e ed ool. P im Heal h Ca e Res De . 2018;20:1-18. 28. CDM – Codi icação de Disposi i os Médicos. Po uguese Code o he Medical De ice. [accessed 2020 Ma 28]. A ailable om: h p://ex ane . in a med.p /cdm/CdmPublic.aspx. Pi es C, e al. Medical de ice ale s in Po ugal, Ac a Med Po 2021 Ma ;34(3):201-208