scieee Open visual document viewer

Co-word analysis and academic perfomance of the term TPACK in Web of Science

Soler Costa, Rebeca; Marín Marín, José Antonio; Moreno Guerrero, Antonio José; López Belmonte, Jesús

Abstract

The progress of technology has led to the emergence of new teaching methods, among which Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) can be found in an attempt to promote the integration of technology and knowledge, combining technology, pedagogy and theoretical content. The aim of this research is to analyze the significance and evolution of the TPACK concept in the publications contained in Web of Science (WoS). The research method chosen is based on bibliometrics, specifically on the analysis of academic performance and on the analysis of co-words. The total number of documents analyzed is 471. The results show that research on TPACK is on the rise, increasing progressively in recent years. The main area of research is education and educational research, with articles, written in English, being the medium used by researchers to present their results. It can be concluded that, although there is an established research base, there is no single line of research. In this case, the main lines of research are “framework-framework-TPACK” and “technology-pedagogy-beliefs”. It can be determined that the studies on TPACK deal with the integration of technological resources and the analysis of their perception in student learning. Soler Costa, Rebeca; Moreno Guerrero, Antonio José; López Belmonte, Jesús; Marín Marín, José Antonio

Full text

sus ainabili y Re iew Co-Wo d Analysis and Academic Pe o mance o he Te m TPACK in Web o Science Rebeca Sole -Cos a 1, An onio-JoséMo eno-Gue e o 2, Jesús López-Belmon e 2,* and José-An onio Ma ín-Ma ín3   Ci a ion: Sole -Cos a, R.; Mo eno-Gue e o, A.-J.; López-Belmon e, J.; Ma ín-Ma ín, J.-A. Co-Wo d Analysis and Academic Pe o mance o he Te m TPACK in Web o Science. Sus ainabili y 2021,13, 1481. h ps:// doi.o g/10.3390/su13031481 Academic Edi o : Massimo A ia Recei ed: 11 Janua y 2021 Accep ed: 27 Janua y 2021 Published: 1 Feb ua y 2021 Publishe ’s No e: MDPI s ays neu al wi h ega d o ju isdic ional claims in published maps and ins i u ional a il- ia ions. Copy igh : © 2021 by he au ho s. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Swi ze land. This a icle is an open access a icle dis ibu ed unde he e ms and condi ions o he C ea i e Commons A ibu ion (CC BY) license (h ps:// c ea i ecommons.o g/licenses/by/ 4.0/). 1Depa men o Educa ional Sciences, Uni e si y o Za agoza, 50009 Za agoza, Spain; sole @uniza .es 2Depa men o Didac ics and School O ganiza ion, Uni e si y o G anada, 51001 Ceu a, Spain; ajmo eno@ug .es 3Depa men o Didac ics and School O ganiza ion, Uni e si y o G anada, 18071 G anada, Spain; jma in@ug .es *Co espondence: jesuslopez@ug .es Abs ac : The p og ess o echnology has led o he eme gence o new eaching me hods, among which Technological Pedagogical Con en Knowledge (TPACK) can be ound in an a emp o p omo e he in eg a ion o echnology and knowledge, combining echnology, pedagogy and heo e ical con en . The aim o his esea ch is o analyze he signi icance and e olu ion o he TPACK concep in he publica ions con ained in Web o Science (WoS). The esea ch me hod chosen is based on bibliome ics, speci ically on he analysis o academic pe o mance and on he analysis o co-wo ds. The o al numbe o documen s analyzed is 471. The esul s show ha esea ch on TPACK is on he ise, inc easing p og essi ely in ecen yea s. The main a ea o esea ch is educa ion and educa ional esea ch, wi h a icles, w i en in English, being he medium used by esea che s o p esen hei esul s. I can be concluded ha , al hough he e is an es ablished esea ch base, he e is no single line o esea ch. In his case, he main lines o esea ch a e “ amewo k- amewo k-TPACK” and “ echnology-pedagogy-belie s”. I can be de e mined ha he s udies on TPACK deal wi h he in eg a ion o echnological esou ces and he analysis o hei pe cep ion in s uden lea ning. Keywo ds: eaching–lea ning s a egies; eache p o essional de elopmen ; 21s cen u y abili ies; li elong lea ning; scien i ic mapping; bibliome ic analysis; SciMAT; TPACK 1. In oduc ion Technological ad ances in he 21s cen u y ha e looded all ace s o socie y, om comme ce o educa ion, om li e a u e (e-books) o social ela ions (social ne wo ks such as Facebook, Twi e o Ins ag am). In he case o educa ion, all o e he wo ld, in o ma ion and communica ion echnologies (ICTs) unde pin he discou se o coun less educa ion e o m mo emen s [ 1 , 2 ]. Educa ional policymake s, s akeholde s, esea che s and educa- o s a gue ha he shi om schools o he digi al age is c ucial o s uden s’ pa icipa ion in con empo a y socie y [ 3 ]. In his sense, as a as p e-se ice eache s a e conce ned, esea ch has shown ha a i udes owa ds he use o ICTs in educa ion play a c ucial ole in he in en ion o use hem [ 4 ]. The same applies o he p epa a ion o schools, i.e., suppo , esou ces, pe cep ion o he impo ance o ICT in eg a ion and exchange o ideas among eache s. These a e all i al aspec s o ICT in eg a ion [5]. Fo his eason, he aining o u u e eache s is a anscenden al issue because o hei in ol emen in e ec i ely in eg a ing echnology in o hei u u e class ooms [ 6 – 8 ]. In many cases, his aining is ca ied ou h ough speci ic echnological esou ce p og ams o aining h ough online pla o ms [ 9 ]. Howe e , ecen esea ch sugges s he need o aining s a egies o ha e a mo e in eg a i e and holis ic app oach [ 10 ]. F om his pe spec i e, he mos cu en app oaches o he de elopmen o eache compe ence in echnology in eg a ion ha e made echnological knowledge alone less impo an . In his Sus ainabili y 2021,13, 1481. h ps://doi.o g/10.3390/su13031481 h ps://www.mdpi.com/jou nal/sus ainabili y Sus ainabili y 2021,13, 1481 2 o 20 case, hey ha e ocused on he essen ial connec ions be ween echnology, pedagogy and con en knowledge (TPACK) [11,12]. TPACK is a amewo k o he in eg a ion o echnology and eache knowledge ha combines echnology, pedagogy and con en [ 11 ]. I is based on Schulman’s concep o pedagogical con en knowledge (PCK) [ 13 ] whe e con en and pedagogy a e combined o unde s and how a gi en con en equi es speci ic pedagogical s a egies o i s eaching. TPACK [ 14 , 15 ] has also been desc ibed as a amewo k used o explain and desc ibe eache s’ knowledge and skills in ela ion o echnology in eg a ion. The au ho s o Re . [ 16 ] de ine i as “Knowledge o how o combine di e en a eas, how o use app op ia e pedagogical app oaches o ce ain con en wi h app op ia e ICT”. The li e a u e ela ed o TPACK ep esen s his in eg a ion amewo k wi h a Venn diag am in which he h ee p ima y o ms o eache knowledge a e ela ed: “con en knowledge (CK)”, “pedagogical knowledge (PK)” and “ echnological knowledge (TK)”. The in e sec ion o hese h ee ypes o knowledge p omo es ou o he componen s com- p ising con en knowledge o echnology (TCK), pedagogical con en knowledge (PCK), pedagogical knowledge o echnology (TPK) and TPACK. The la e would appea in he cen e o he diag am a he in e sec ion o he h ee eache ’s p ima y knowledge ci cles (Figu e 1). In ela ion o he di e en elemen s ha make up his amewo k, some esea che s a gue ha he domains o basic knowledge in he TPACK amewo k a e p edic o s o eache s’ TPACK. PK has he g ea es impac on eache s’ TPACK p io o pe o mance [ 17 ]. O he esea che s sugges ha , al hough TK, PK and CK a e co ela ed wi h TPACK, TK is no a signi ican p edic o o TPACK [18]. Sus ainabili y 2021, 13, x FOR PEER REVIEW 2 o 20 in echnology in eg a ion ha e made echnological knowledge alone less impo an . In his case, hey ha e ocused on he essen ial connec ions be ween echnology, pedagogy and con en knowledge (TPACK) [11,12]. TPACK is a amewo k o he in eg a ion o echnology and eache knowledge ha combines echnology, pedagogy and con en [11]. I is based on Schulman’s concep o pedagogical con en knowledge (PCK) [13] whe e con en and pedagogy a e combined o unde s and how a gi en con en equi es speci ic pedagogical s a egies o i s eaching. TPACK [14,15] has also been desc ibed as a amewo k used o explain and desc ibe each- e s’ knowledge and skills in ela ion o echnology in eg a ion. The au ho s o Re . [16] de ine i as “Knowledge o how o combine di e en a eas, how o use app op ia e peda- gogical app oaches o ce ain con en wi h app op ia e ICT”. The li e a u e ela ed o TPACK ep esen s his in eg a ion amewo k wi h a Venn diag am in which he h ee p ima y o ms o eache knowledge a e ela ed: “con en knowledge (CK)”, “pedagogical knowledge (PK)” and “ echnological knowledge (TK)”. The in e sec ion o hese h ee ypes o knowledge p omo es ou o he componen s com- p ising con en knowledge o echnology (TCK), pedagogical con en knowledge (PCK), pedagogical knowledge o echnology (TPK) and TPACK. The la e would appea in he cen e o he diag am a he in e sec ion o he h ee eache ’s p ima y knowledge ci cles (Figu e 1). In ela ion o he di e en elemen s ha make up his amewo k, some e- sea che s a gue ha he domains o basic knowledge in he TPACK amewo k a e p e- dic o s o eache s’ TPACK. PK has he g ea es impac on eache s’ TPACK p io o pe - o mance [17]. O he esea che s sugges ha , al hough TK, PK and CK a e co ela ed wi h TPACK, TK is no a signi ican p edic o o TPACK [18]. Figu e 1. Technology, pedagogy and con en knowledge (TPACK) amewo k. S udies conduc ed o e he pas decade on he in eg a ion o echnology in o educa- ion h ough he TPACK amewo k suppo he alidi y o his model o eache educa- ion [3,9,19–22]. The esul s o hese s udies show ha he g ea es p og ess is made in knowledge o educa ional con en . Fu he mo e, imp o emen s a e g ea e in a eas e- la ed o pedagogical knowledge han in a eas ela ed o echnology o con en knowledge. Howe e , in a eas wi hou pedagogical knowledge, he changes a e mo e mode a e. Sim- ila ly, i is clea om his esea ch ha eache s in aining need con inuous eedback and assessmen o hei skills. This is necessa y o help hem u he de elop hei knowledge, skills and a i udes ela ed o he use o ICT in he class oom [23,24]. Thus, he e is a need o p o ide hem wi h oppo uni ies o design lessons wi h ICTs, bo h in hei eache ain- ing cou ses and in hei ield expe iences [25]. This would help hem o de elop hei skills in he e ec i e use o echnology in hei class ooms. Figu e 1. Technology, pedagogy and con en knowledge (TPACK) amewo k. S udies conduc ed o e he pas decade on he in eg a ion o echnology in o ed- uca ion h ough he TPACK amewo k suppo he alidi y o his model o eache educa ion [3,9,19–22] . The esul s o hese s udies show ha he g ea es p og ess is made in knowledge o educa ional con en . Fu he mo e, imp o emen s a e g ea e in a eas ela ed o pedagogical knowledge han in a eas ela ed o echnology o con en knowledge. Howe e , in a eas wi hou pedagogical knowledge, he changes a e mo e mode a e. Simi- la ly, i is clea om his esea ch ha eache s in aining need con inuous eedback and assessmen o hei skills. This is necessa y o help hem u he de elop hei knowledge, skills and a i udes ela ed o he use o ICT in he class oom [ 23 , 24 ]. Thus, he e is a need o p o ide hem wi h oppo uni ies o design lessons wi h ICTs, bo h in hei eache aining cou ses and in hei ield expe iences [ 25 ]. This would help hem o de elop hei skills in he e ec i e use o echnology in hei class ooms. Sus ainabili y 2021,13, 1481 3 o 20 The TPACK model is used in a a ie y o impo an eaching and lea ning si ua ions, such as o eign languages [ 14 ], p o essional de elopmen o eache s o he inclusion o speci ic so wa e in social science classes [ 26 ], inclusion in special educa ion schools o s uden s wi h isual impai men [ 27 ], de elopmen o s uden s’ emo ional in elligence [ 28 ] o aining h ough i ual lea ning en i onmen s [29]. As we ha e seen, he impo ance o he TPACK model o aining and lea ning using echnology is a ac . This s udy aims o highligh he ele ance o his model h ough he s udy o co-wo ds in he a icles indexed in he Web o Science da abase and o p o ide a conc e e amewo k o esea ch ca ied ou using his aining model. To his end, he p esen manusc ip begins wi h an in oduc ion ha se es as a heo e ical amewo k whe e he alidi y o he TPACK model is de ined and explained. In a second sec ion, he bibliome ic analysis sys em o be ollowed and he objec i es o he s udy a e jus i ied. Nex , he ma e ials and he me hod ollowed in he esea ch a e p esen ed. The ollowing sec ion is de o ed o he esul s, ocusing on h ee aspec s in pa icula : scien i ic pe o mance and p oduc ion, s uc u al and hema ic de elopmen and he au ho s wi h he highes ele ance index. In he inal phase o he s udy, he discussion, conclusions and implica ions a e de eloped. 2. Jus i ica ion and Objec i es This esea ch add esses he analysis o he e m TPACK in he educa ional ield om a bibliome ic app oach. Fo his pu pose, he documen s indexed in he Web o Science (WoS) da abase we e used. This da abase has been chosen because i is conside ed one o he la ges da abases ha ela es o he ield o social sciences, wi h educa ion being encompassed in his ield o knowledge. Fu he mo e, Jou nal Ci a ion Repo s d aws on his da abase. So, WoS s udies o impac and scien i ic ele ance a e epo ed [30]. The no el y ha his s udy has wi h espec o p e ious s udies [ 31 ] ocuses on an inno a i e echnique o documen a y analysis. In pa icula , in his wo k, an analysis o he pe o mance and a scien i ic mapping o he publica ions ela ed o he selec ed cons uc ha e been used. This s udy has ollowed he analy ical s uc u e o di e en impac publica ions wi h he pu pose o ca ying ou e ec i e esea ch unde a alida ed model [30,32]. Speci ically, his s udy ocuses on analyzing he signi icance and e olu ion o he TPACK concep in he publica ions con ained in WoS. To he bes o ou knowledge, no s udy has been epo ed ha analyzes his concep unde he bibliome ic echnique o scien i ic mapping. The e o e, his esea ch is de eloped om an explo a o y pe spec i e wi h he in en ion o showing he scien i ic communi y he p og ess achie ed by TPACK in WoS documen s and i s u u e lines o ends. This will educe he gap ound in he li e a u e on he s a e o he a and build he basis o u u e esea ch. The e o e, he objec i es o mula ed in his s udy a e he ollowing: •To know he pe o mance o scien i ic p oduc ion on TPACK in WoS. •To de e mine he scien i ic e olu ion in WoS o he e m TPACK. • To disco e he mos ele an opics abou TPACK in he scien i ic li e a u e indexed in WoS. •To ind he mos ep esen a i e au ho s in WoS who s udy he TPACK model. 3. Ma e ials and Me hods 3.1. Resea ch Design To de elop he s udy and achie e he p oposed objec i es, esea ch based on a biblio- me ic me hodology has been designed [ 33 , 34 ]. This me hodology assumes a ele an ole in he quan i ica ion and in eg al e alua ion o scien i ic documen s [ 35 , 36 ]. This esea ch design allows o e icien ly ca ying ou he ac ions o sea ching, egis a ion, analysis and p edic ion o he scien i ic li e a u e [37,38]. The esea ch me hod chosen was based on a co-wo d analysis [ 39 ], as well as on he h, g, hg and q2 indices [ 40 , 41 ]. The analysis o co-wo ds allows us o analyze he Sus ainabili y 2021,13, 1481 4 o 20 keywo ds epo ed om he di e en scien i ic documen s, wi h he pu pose o looking o connec ions be ween he opics s udied on he s a e o he ques ion, as well as p edic ing he issues ha could po en ially be conside ed in he nea u u e [ 42 ]. This analy ical app oach has allowed he c ea ion o maps wi h nodes o ep esen yield, he loca ion o e minological subdomains and hema ic de elopmen [ 43 ] on TPACK in he documen s egis e ed in WoS. 3.2. P ocedu e The esea ch has ollowed a s ic and s uc u ed p ocedu e in di e en phases, in o - de o educe he appea ance o bias in he s udy, as equi ed by his ype o analysis [44,45]. •Fi s ly, he da abase o be analyzed (WoS) was selec ed. • Secondly, he keywo ds ha would allow he p oduc ion o a documen a y epo we e de ined (“TPACK”, “TPCK” and “ echnology pedagogy and con en knowledge”). • Thi dly, he ollowing sea ch equa ion was de eloped: (“TPACK” OR “TPCK” OR “ echnological pedagogy and con en knowledge” OR “ echnology pedagogy con en knowledge”) TITLE. This equa ion was used o sea ch he i les o WoS publica ions. This sea ch equa ion was applied in he main WoS collec ion, since he ield o ed- uca ion is implici in he concep analyzed. The sea ch and epo ing p ocess ook place in No embe 2020. In he inal documen epo , i was decided o choose all ypes o documen s and languages o encompass all he WoS li e a u e on he s a e o he issue. These ac ions esul ed in a o al o 556 publica ions. The pu i ica ion o his docu- men a y olume was ca ied ou by es ablishing di e en c i e ia. The ollowing we e es ablished as exclusion c i e ia: documen s published in he yea 2020 ( o no ha ing inished he yea ); documen s epea ed o badly indexed in WoS. The inclusion c i e ion is e e ing o he abo e-men ioned subjec ma e . The applica ion o hese c i e ia p oduced a inal uni o analysis o 471 scien i ic documen s. The ac ions ollowed a e shown in he ollowing low cha acco ding o he PRISMA decla a ion and he p o ocol de i ed om i (Figu e 2). This igu e shows he di e en ac ions included in he s anda dized p o ocol o PRISMA, whe e he ini ial epo o documen s on he analyzed cons uc is es ablished and he educ ions su e ed by he ini ial olume a e he applica ion o he ma ix c i e ia, un il eaching he inal uni o analysis es ablished in his s udy. 3.3. Da a Analysis Da a analysis was pe o med using he p og ams Analyze Resul s, C ea ion Ci a ion Repo and SciMAT [ 46 ]. The i s wo we e used o collec and s udy he yea , au ho ship, coun y, ype o documen , ins i u ion, language, medium and mos ci ed documen s. The inclusion c i e ia o show he da a we e: yea o publica ion (all excep 2020); language (x ≥ 2); publica ion a ea (x ≥ 10); ype o documen s (x ≥ 10); o ganiza ions (x ≥ 15); au ho s (x ≥ 9); sou ces o o igin (x ≥ 14); coun ies (x ≥ 40); he eigh mos ci ed documen s (x ≥ 271). These c i e ia a e associa ed wi h a numbe ing ha e e s o he numbe ha mus be me in each case (c i e ion) o he publica ions o be included in he analy ical ables p esen ed in his wo k. O he wise, he gene a ed ables would be e y long. I mus be speci ied ha all he li e a u e has been analyzed, bu only he documen s ha mee he c i e ia a e es ablished in he ables o his manusc ip . Sus ainabili y 2021,13, 1481 5 o 20 Sus ainabili y 2021, 13, x FOR PEER REVIEW 5 o 20 Figu e 2. Flowcha acco ding o he PRISMA decla a ion. Co-wo d analysis was pe o med wi h SciMAT using he ollowing p ocesses [49,50]:  Recogni ion: The keywo ds o he epo ed WoS documen s we e analyzed (n = 1061). Co-occu ence node maps we e made. A s anda dized co-wo d ne wo k was de- signed and he mos signi ican keywo ds (n = 1000) we e ex ac ed. The mos ou - s anding opics and e ms we e de e mined wi h a clus e ing algo i hm.  Rep oduc ion: Di e en hema ic ne wo ks we e gene a ed (Figu e 3a, 3b), whe e he connec ions be ween a main ocus and i s de i ed concep ual associa ions a e isu- ally e lec ed, as well as s a egic diag ams o place each o he cons uc s acco ding o hei p ojec ion. These we e di ided (Figu e 3a) in o ou quad an s (Q): op igh (Q1) = d i ing and ele an issues; op le (Q2) = deep- oo ed and isola ed p oblems; bo om le (Q3) = eme ging o disappea ing p oblems; bo om igh (Q4) = c oss- cu ing and unde de eloped issues. The p inciples o densi y and cen ali y we e e- spec ed. Densi y measu es he in e nal s eng h o he ne wo k. Cen ali y measu es he le el o connec ion o a ne wo k wi h o he s [51].  De e mina ion: The documen a y epo was a icula ed in di e en pe iods wi h he pu pose o analyzing he p og ession o he nodes in di e en pe iods o ime. Spe- ci ically, h ee pe iods we e es ablished (P1 = 2006–2014; P2 = 2015–2017; P3 = 2018– 2019). The c i e ion aken o his empo al con igu a ion was based on he achie e- men o simila i y in he numbe o documen s be ween he di e en pe iods. How- e e , o he au ho - ocused analysis, we simply de e mined an o e all pe iod ha encompasses he en i e empo ali y o publica ions (PX = 2006–2019). To ind he s eng h o he associa ion be ween pe iods, he numbe o keywo ds o subjec s in common be ween hem was aken as a e e ence. Figu e 2. Flowcha acco ding o he PRISMA decla a ion. SciMAT was used o ma e ialize he s uc u al and dynamic de elopmen o publi- ca ions om a longi udinal pe spec i e. Tha is, i analyzes he e olu ion o a keywo d ans o med in o a heme in es ablished pe iods o e ime. No e ha his ollows he conside a ions o p e ious s udies [47,48]. Co-wo d analysis was pe o med wi h SciMAT using he ollowing p ocesses [ 49 , 50 ]: • Recogni ion: The keywo ds o he epo ed WoS documen s we e analyzed (n= 1061). Co-occu ence node maps we e made. A s anda dized co-wo d ne wo k was designed and he mos signi ican keywo ds (n= 1000) we e ex ac ed. The mos ou s anding opics and e ms we e de e mined wi h a clus e ing algo i hm. • Rep oduc ion: Di e en hema ic ne wo ks we e gene a ed (Figu e 3a,b), whe e he connec ions be ween a main ocus and i s de i ed concep ual associa ions a e isually e lec ed, as well as s a egic diag ams o place each o he cons uc s acco ding o hei p ojec ion. These we e di ided (Figu e 3a) in o ou quad an s (Q): op igh (Q1) = d i ing and ele an issues; op le (Q2) = deep- oo ed and isola ed p oblems; bo om le (Q3) = eme ging o disappea ing p oblems; bo om igh (Q4) = c oss- cu ing and unde de eloped issues. The p inciples o densi y and cen ali y we e espec ed. Densi y measu es he in e nal s eng h o he ne wo k. Cen ali y measu es he le el o connec ion o a ne wo k wi h o he s [51]. • De e mina ion: The documen a y epo was a icula ed in di e en pe iods wi h he pu pose o analyzing he p og ession o he nodes in di e en pe iods o ime. Speci i- Sus ainabili y 2021,13, 1481 6 o 20 cally, h ee pe iods we e es ablished (P 1 = 2006–2014; P 2 = 2015–2017; P 3 = 2018–2019). The c i e ion aken o his empo al con igu a ion was based on he achie emen o simila i y in he numbe o documen s be ween he di e en pe iods. Howe e , o he au ho - ocused analysis, we simply de e mined an o e all pe iod ha encompasses he en i e empo ali y o publica ions (P X = 2006–2019). To ind he s eng h o he associa ion be ween pe iods, he numbe o keywo ds o subjec s in common be ween hem was aken as a e e ence. • Pe o mance: Se e al p oduc ion indica o s associa ed wi h he inclusion c i e ia [ 52 ] (Table 1) we e es ablished and he hemes de eloped o e he es ablished ime pe iods we e analyzed (Figu e 3c). Sus ainabili y 2021, 13, x FOR PEER REVIEW 6 o 20  Pe o mance: Se e al p oduc ion indica o s associa ed wi h he inclusion c i e ia [52] (Table 1) we e es ablished and he hemes de eloped o e he es ablished ime pe i- ods we e analyzed (Figu e 3c). Figu e 3. (a) S a egic diag am; (b) Thema ic ne wo k; (c) Thema ic e olu ion [40]. Table 1. P oduc ion indica o s and inclusion c i e ia. Con igu a ion Values Analysis uni Keywo ds au ho s, keywo ds Web o Science (WoS) F equency h eshold Keywo ds: P1 = (2), P2 = (2), P3 = (2) Au ho s: PX = (2) Ne wo k ype Co-occu ence Co-occu ence union alue h eshold Keywo ds: P1 = (2), P2 = (2), P3 = (1) Au ho s: PX = (2) No maliza ion measu e Equi alence index: eij = cij2/Roo (ci − cj) Clus e ing algo i hm Maximum size: 9; Minimum size: 3 E olu iona y measu e Jacca d index O e lapping measu e Inclusion a e 4. Resul s 4.1. Scien i ic Pe o mance and P oduc ion The e a e a o al o 471 documen s on s udies ela ed o he e m TPACK in he WoS da abase. The p oduc ion o hese documen s began o be egis e ed in his da abase in 2006. Speci ically, wo manusc ip s, which e e o he pedagogical inno a ion in ol ed in he use o ICT in educa ion [53], and he quali ies o eache s who use ICT in aining p ocesses [54]. This shows ha i is a ela i ely young ield o esea ch. F om 2006 o 2019, p oduc ion has been inc easing, wi h wo no able p oduc ion peaks; one s ands ou in 2013 and ano he in 2017. As can be seen in Figu e 4, he e m TPACK may be p e en ed om gaining mo e in e es in he scien i ic communi y. I is ue ha he olume o p o- duc ion does no exceed 90 manusc ip s in any o he yea s analyzed. Al hough he e o- lu ion is upwa d in e ms o he numbe o publica ions, i is ema kable ha he ascend- ing e olu ion is no egula . Taking in o accoun wha is es ablished in Table 2, i can be indica ed ha English is he language chosen by he scien i ic communi y o p esen s udies ela ed o TPACK. I is ollowed by Spanish. Wi h espec o he ype o documen , a icles a e he mos used by he esea che s. This is ollowed by p oceedings pape s. In e ms o o ganiza ion, Nan- yang Technological Uni e si y s ands ou abo e he es , al hough i is ollowed, a a sho dis ance, by he Na ional Ins i u e o Educa ion (NIE) Singapo e. Figu e 3. (a) S a egic diag am; (b) Thema ic ne wo k; (c) Thema ic e olu ion [40]. Table 1. P oduc ion indica o s and inclusion c i e ia. Con igu a ion Values Analysis uni Keywo ds au ho s, keywo ds Web o Science (WoS) F equency h eshold Keywo ds: P1= (2), P2= (2), P3= (2) Au ho s: PX= (2) Ne wo k ype Co-occu ence Co-occu ence union alue h eshold Keywo ds: P1= (2), P2= (2), P3= (1) Au ho s: PX= (2) No maliza ion measu e Equi alence index: eij = cij2/Roo (ci −cj) Clus e ing algo i hm Maximum size: 9; Minimum size: 3 E olu iona y measu e Jacca d index O e lapping measu e Inclusion a e 4. Resul s 4.1. Scien i ic Pe o mance and P oduc ion The e a e a o al o 471 documen s on s udies ela ed o he e m TPACK in he WoS da abase. The p oduc ion o hese documen s began o be egis e ed in his da abase in 2006. Speci ically, wo manusc ip s, which e e o he pedagogical inno a ion in ol ed in he use o ICT in educa ion [ 53 ], and he quali ies o eache s who use ICT in aining p ocesses [ 54 ]. This shows ha i is a ela i ely young ield o esea ch. F om 2006 o 2019, p oduc ion has been inc easing, wi h wo no able p oduc ion peaks; one s ands ou in 2013 and ano he in 2017. As can be seen in Figu e 4, he e m TPACK may be p e en ed om gaining mo e in e es in he scien i ic communi y. I is ue ha he olume o p oduc ion does no exceed 90 manusc ip s in any o he yea s analyzed. Al hough he e olu ion is upwa d in e ms o he numbe o publica ions, i is ema kable ha he ascending e olu ion is no egula . Sus ainabili y 2021,13, 1481 7 o 20 Sus ainabili y 2021, 13, x FOR PEER REVIEW 7 o 20 Figu e 4. E olu ion o scien i ic p oduc ion. Table 2. Language, ype o documen s and o ganiza ion in he ield o TPACK esea ch. Language Publica ions O ganiza ions Publica ions English 470 Nanyang Technological Uni e si y 39 Spanish 18 Na ional Ins i u e o Educa ion (NIE) Singapo e 29 Tu kish 8 Na ional Taiwan Uni e si y o Science Technology 20 Type o documen s Publica ions A icle 337 P oceedings pape 97 Book chap e 25 In ela ion o he a ea o publica ion, esea ch ela ed o TPACK is mainly ound in educa ion and educa ional esea ch. The es o he a eas a e a e . Wi h espec o he au ho s, i is Chai, C.S. ha accumula es he mos p oduc ion in his ype o s udy. He is ollowed, a a conside able dis ance, by Koh, J.H.L. In ela ion o he sou ce o p oduc ion, he e a e mainly wo, he Aus alasian Jou nal o Educa ional Technology and Compu e s & Educa ion. Among he coun ies wi h mo e p oduc ion, he Uni ed S a es is he na ion ha esea ches mos in his ield o s udy. I is ollowed, a a conside able dis ance, by Tu key (Table 3). Table 3. A eas o knowledge, au ho s, sou ces and coun ies in he ield o TPACK esea ch. A eas o Knowledge Publica ions Au ho Publica ions Coun ies Publica ions Educa ion and Educa ional Resea ch 421 Chai, C.S. 37 Uni ed S a es 124 Educa ion Scien i ic Disciplines 52 Koh, J.H.L. 27 Tu key 80 Compu e Science In e disciplina y Applica ions 51 Tsai, C.C. 18 Taiwan 51 Compu e Science Theo y Me hods 15 Tondeu , J. 9 China 49 Linguis ics 11 Sou ces Publica ions Aus alasian Jou nal o Educa ional Technology 25 Compu e s & Educa ion 23 Jou nal o Resea ch on Technology in Educa ion 22 Jou nal o Educa ional Compu ing Resea ch 20 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Numbe o manusc i p Yea o publica ion TPACK Figu e 4. E olu ion o scien i ic p oduc ion. Taking in o accoun wha is es ablished in Table 2, i can be indica ed ha English is he language chosen by he scien i ic communi y o p esen s udies ela ed o TPACK. I is ollowed by Spanish. Wi h espec o he ype o documen , a icles a e he mos used by he esea che s. This is ollowed by p oceedings pape s. In e ms o o ganiza ion, Nanyang Technological Uni e si y s ands ou abo e he es , al hough i is ollowed, a a sho dis ance, by he Na ional Ins i u e o Educa ion (NIE) Singapo e. Table 2. Language, ype o documen s and o ganiza ion in he ield o TPACK esea ch. Language Publica ions O ganiza ions Publica ions English 470 Nanyang Technological Uni e si y 39 Spanish 18 Na ional Ins i u e o Educa ion (NIE) Singapo e 29 Tu kish 8 Na ional Taiwan Uni e si y o Science Technology 20 Type o documen s Publica ions A icle 337 P oceedings pape 97 Book chap e 25 In ela ion o he a ea o publica ion, esea ch ela ed o TPACK is mainly ound in educa ion and educa ional esea ch. The es o he a eas a e a e . Wi h espec o he au ho s, i is Chai, C.S. ha accumula es he mos p oduc ion in his ype o s udy. He is ollowed, a a conside able dis ance, by Koh, J.H.L. In ela ion o he sou ce o p oduc ion, he e a e mainly wo, he Aus alasian Jou nal o Educa ional Technology and Compu e s & Educa ion. Among he coun ies wi h mo e p oduc ion, he Uni ed S a es is he na ion ha esea ches mos in his ield o s udy. I is ollowed, a a conside able dis ance, by Tu key (Table 3). Sus ainabili y 2021,13, 1481 8 o 20 Table 3. A eas o knowledge, au ho s, sou ces and coun ies in he ield o TPACK esea ch. A eas o Knowledge Publica ions Au ho Publica ions Coun ies Publica ions Educa ion and Educa ional Resea ch 421 Chai, C.S. 37 Uni ed S a es 124 Educa ion Scien i ic Disciplines 52 Koh, J.H.L. 27 Tu key 80 Compu e Science In e disciplina y Applica ions 51 Tsai, C.C. 18 Taiwan 51 Compu e Science Theo y Me hods 15 Tondeu , J. 9China 49 Linguis ics 11 Sou ces Publica ions Aus alasian Jou nal o Educa ional Technology 25 Compu e s & Educa ion 23 Jou nal o Resea ch on Technology in Educa ion 22 Jou nal o Educa ional Compu ing Resea ch 20 Among he mos ci ed a icles on s udies ela ed o TPACK, he s udy by Mish a and Koehle (2006) s ands ou mainly due o i s la ge numbe o ci a ions, wi h a o al o 2238 ci a ions. This s udy e e s o he es ablishmen o a concep ual amewo k ela ed o educa ional echnology and he o mula ion o [ 11 ] on “pedagogical con en knowledge”. The nex mos ci ed a icle is by [ 55 ], wi h a o al o 380 ci a ions. This esea ch ocuses on de e mining and speci ying he di e en pedagogical models ela ed o he de elopmen o he ICT-TPCK model (Table 4). Table 4. TPACK: mos ci ed a icles. Re e ence Ci a ions Mish a, P.; Koehle , M. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Con en Knowledge: A F amewo k o Teache Knowledge [11]2238 Angeli, C.; Valanides, N. (2009). Epis emological and me hodological issues o he concep ualiza ion, de elopmen , and assessmen o ICT-TPCK: Ad ances in echnological pedagogical con en knowledge (TPCK) [55]380 Schmid , D.A.; Ba an, E.; Thompson, A.D.; Mish a, P.; Koehle , M.J.; Shin, T.S. (2009). Technological Pedagogical Con en Knowledge (TPACK): The De elopmen and Valida ion o an Assessmen Ins umen o P ese ice Teache s [56] 378 Ha is, J.; Mish a, P.; Koehle , M. (2009). Teache s’ Technological Pedagogical Con en Knowledge and Lea ning Ac i i y Types: Cu iculum-based Technology In eg a ion Re amed [57]272 Voog , J.; Fisse , P.; Roblin, N-P.; Tondeu , J.; Van B aak, J. (2013). Technological pedagogical con en knowledge-a e iew o he li e a u e [58]205 G aham, C.R. (2011). Theo e ical conside a ions o unde s anding echnological pedagogical con en knowledge (TPACK) [59]190 Tsai, C.C.; Lee, M.H. (2010). Explo ing eache s’ pe cei ed sel e icacy and echnological pedagogical con en knowledge wi h espec o educa ional use o he Wo ld Wide Web [60]187 A chambaul , L.M.; Be ne , J.H. (2010). Re isi ing echnological pedagogical con en knowledge: Explo ing he TPACK amewo k [61]181 4.2. S uc u al and Thema ic De elopmen The e olu ion o he keywo ds be ween he di e en es ablished ime pe iods shows he le el o coincidence o keywo ds. The in o ma ion p o ided includes he numbe o keywo ds ha a e no longe p esen in he nex pe iod ( ep esen ed by an upwa d and oblique a ow), he keywo ds ha a e included as new, compa ed o a p e ious pe iod, in he new pe iod ( ep esen ed by a downwa d and oblique a ow), he keywo ds ha exis in a gi en pe iod ( ep esen ed wi hin a ci cle) and he ma ching pe cen age o keywo ds be ween pe iods ( ep esen ed by a ho izon al a ow poin ing o he igh ). In his case, Figu e 5shows ha he ield o s udy on TPACK has a solid esea ch base. In o he wo ds, he scien i ic communi y o ien s i s esea ch on ela ed aspec s. This is con as ed by he ac ha he le el o coincidence o keywo ds be ween pe iods is o e 35%. In addi ion, he e is a highe le el o awa eness be ween he i s and second pe iod han be ween he second and hi d pe iod. This may indica e a change in he lines o esea ch by he scien i ic communi y. Sus ainabili y 2021,13, 1481 9 o 20 Sus ainabili y 2021, 13, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 o 20 Among he mos ci ed a icles on s udies ela ed o TPACK, he s udy by Mish a and Koehle (2006) s ands ou mainly due o i s la ge numbe o ci a ions, wi h a o al o 2238 ci a ions. This s udy e e s o he es ablishmen o a concep ual amewo k ela ed o ed- uca ional echnology and he o mula ion o [11] on “pedagogical con en knowledge”. The nex mos ci ed a icle is by [55], wi h a o al o 380 ci a ions. This esea ch ocuses on de e mining and speci ying he di e en pedagogical models ela ed o he de elopmen o he ICT-TPCK model (Table 4). Table 4. TPACK: mos ci ed a icles. Re e ence Ci a ions Mish a, P.; Koehle , M. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Con en Knowledge: A F amewo k o Teache Knowledge [11] 2238 Angeli, C.; Valanides, N. (2009). Epis emological and me hodological issues o he concep ualiza ion, de elopmen , and assessmen o ICT-TPCK: Ad ances in echnological pedagogical con en knowledge (TPCK) [55] 380 Schmid , D.A.; Ba an, E.; Thompson, A.D.; Mish a, P.; Koehle , M.J.; Shin, T.S. (2009). Technological Ped- agogical Con en Knowledge (TPACK): The De elopmen and Valida ion o an Assessmen Ins umen o P ese ice Teache s [56] 378 Ha is, J.; Mish a, P.; Koehle , M. (2009). Teache s’ Technological Pedagogical Con en Knowledge and Lea ning Ac i i y Types: Cu iculum-based Technology In eg a ion Re amed [57] 272 Voog , J.; Fisse , P.; Roblin, N-P.; Tondeu , J.; Van B aak, J. (2013). Technological pedagogical con en knowledge-a e iew o he li e a u e [58] 205 G aham, C.R. (2011). Theo e ical conside a ions o unde s anding echnological pedagogical con en knowledge (TPACK) [59] 190 Tsai, C.C.; Lee, M.H. (2010). Explo ing eache s’ pe cei ed sel e icacy and echnological pedagogical con en knowledge wi h espec o educa ional use o he Wo ld Wide Web [60] 187 A chambaul , L.M.; Be ne , J.H. (2010). Re isi ing echnological pedagogical con en knowledge: Explo - ing he TPACK amewo k [61] 181 4.2. S uc u al and Thema ic De elopmen The e olu ion o he keywo ds be ween he di e en es ablished ime pe iods shows he le el o coincidence o keywo ds. The in o ma ion p o ided includes he numbe o keywo ds ha a e no longe p esen in he nex pe iod ( ep esen ed by an upwa d and oblique a ow), he keywo ds ha a e included as new, compa ed o a p e ious pe iod, in he new pe iod ( ep esen ed by a downwa d and oblique a ow), he keywo ds ha exis in a gi en pe iod ( ep esen ed wi hin a ci cle) and he ma ching pe cen age o key- wo ds be ween pe iods ( ep esen ed by a ho izon al a ow poin ing o he igh ). In his case, Figu e 5 shows ha he ield o s udy on TPACK has a solid esea ch base. In o he wo ds, he scien i ic communi y o ien s i s esea ch on ela ed aspec s. This is con as ed by he ac ha he le el o coincidence o keywo ds be ween pe iods is o e 35%. In ad- di ion, he e is a highe le el o awa eness be ween he i s and second pe iod han be- ween he second and hi d pe iod. This may indica e a change in he lines o esea ch by he scien i ic communi y. Figu e 5. Con inui y o keywo ds be ween con iguous in e als. Figu e 5. Con inui y o keywo ds be ween con iguous in e als. The academic pe o mance o he es ablished pe iods p esen s he mos ele an hemes and wi h he mos alues in he bibliome ic indices, among which a e he h index, he g index, he hg index and he q2 index. On he o he hand, he in e al diag am ies o show he le el o impo ance o each o he analyzed subjec s in he subjec pe o mance. To his end, i akes in o accoun a p ocess o g ouping, by means o he Callon index [ 62 ]. This indica o analyzes he deg ee o in e ac ion o a ne wo k wi h espec o o he ne wo ks, om wo pe spec i es: cen ali y, which measu es he s eng h o ex e nal links wi h o he opics, being he measu e o he impo ance o a opic in he de elopmen o a ce ain ield o esea ch; and densi y, which analyzes he in e nal s eng h o he ne wo k, iden i ying he in e nal links be ween all he keywo ds ha a e g ouped a ound a speci ic opic, hus o e ing he deg ee o de elopmen o he ield o s udy analyzed. As es ablished in Figu e 6, in he i s pe iod (2006–2014), he heme wi h he highes academic pe o mance, ha is, he one wi h he mos bibliome ic alues, is “ amewo k”. I is ollowed, a a e y conside able dis ance, by “ eache -educa ion” and “ eache s”. In addi ion, he “ amewo k” heme is conside ed in his pe iod as he d i ing heme, since i is loca ed in he Q1 quad an . This heme is ela ed o “sel -e icacy”, “belie s”, “educa ion”, “model”, “ pack”, “ICT”, “pedagogical-con en -knowledge” and “science”. I can be indica ed, he e o e, ha in his pe iod, s udies on TPACK ocused on he model i sel , on he echnological esou ces used o i s applica ion and on he pe cep ion o i s alidi y by hose in ol ed in he eaching and lea ning p ocesses. In he second pe iod (2015–2017), he amewo k heme is again he one wi h he highes bibliome ic le els. I is ollowed, a behind, by he hemes o “ echnology in e- g a ion”, “in eg a ion” and “ espec ”. In his pe iod, wo hemes a e conside ed o be he d i ing o ces, he case o “ amewo k”, which is epea ed, and “ espec ”. In his case, he “ amewo k” heme is ela ed o “science”, “educa ion”, “ma hema ics”, “pe cep ion”, “ echnology”, “ pack”, “ICT” and “pedagogical-con en -knowledge”. The heme “ espec ”, on he o he hand, ela es o “DEEP”, “ eliabili y”, “p eschool- eache s”, “science- eache s”, “ eache s”, “ins umen ”, “ alida ion” and “cons uc ”. I is he e o e shown ha his sec- ond pe iod ollows he lines o in es iga ion se ou in he i s pe iod, bu wi h some mino nuances. In his pe iod o ime, esea ch is ex ended o he ield o ma hema ics, in addi ion o es ablishing ins umen s o he analysis o his me hod o s udy (Figu e 7). In he hi d and las pe iod (2018–2019), he e is a change o end wi h espec o he wo p e ious pe iods. The heme wi h he highes bibliome ic alue is “TPACK”, ollowed by “educa ion”. In his ime in e al, he hemes conside ed o be d i ing o ces a e “ alidi y” which is ela ed o “con i ma o y- ac o -analysis”, “FIT”, “scale”, “sel - e icacy”, “ espec ”, “ins umen ”, “e icacy” and “quali y”; “educa ion” which is ela ed o “design- hinking”, “s uc u al-equa ion-modelling”, “inqui y”, “a i udes”, “design”, “p e-se ice- eache s”, “ amewo k” and “suppo ”; “ eache -belie s” which ela es o “in eg a ion”, “cons uc ion”, “online- eaching”, “class oom”, “concep ualiza ion”, “p o- g am”, “p o essional-de elopmen ” and “achie emen ”; and “TPACK” which ela es o “ echnology-in eg a ion”, “pedagogical-con en -knowledge”, “ eache -educa ion”, “pe - cep ions”, “p e-se ice- eache s”, “ eache s”, “ echnology” and “ICT”. In o he wo ds, Sus ainabili y 2021,13, 1481 16 o 20 I should also be no ed ha he e olu ion o keywo ds clea ly indica es he exis ence o a consolida ed esea ch base. In ac , his bibliome ic s udy allows us o a i m ha he pe iod be ween 2006 and 2014, ha is, he i s pe iod, includes he subjec ma e wi h he highes academic pe o mance, wi h “ amewo k” as he subjec ma e wi h he mos bibliome ic alues. This is ollowed by “ eache -educa ion” and “ eache s”. This shows ha in his pe iod, he s udies on he TPACK me hod we e ocused on he in eg a ion o echnological esou ces and on he analysis o hei pe cep ion in s uden lea ning. Thus, he second pe iod (2015–2017) shows ha he amewo k heme con inues o be by a he one wi h he highes academic pe o mance. The undamen al di e ence is ha his pe iod also seems o be cha ac e ized by he hemes “ echnology-in eg a ion”, “in eg a ion” and “ espec ”. Fu he mo e, i ep esen s a con inua ion o he line o esea ch al eady begun in he p e ious pe iod wi h he sys ema ic e olu ion o o he esea ch in he a ea o ma hema ics. Las , bu no leas , he hi d pe iod (2018–2019) shows a adical change o end, and now he subjec ha shows he highes index o ep esen a ion is “TPACK”, oge he wi h “educa ion”. This indica es ha he lines o esea ch o his pe iod change subs an ially o ocus on he alida ion o he assessmen ins umen s o he TPA CK mod el. Howe e , his bibliome ic s udy allows us o a i m ha he e is no a heme ha is epea ed in a sys ema ic way in he h ee pe iods, ha is o say, he line o in es iga ion “ amewo k- amewo k- pack” is consolida ed as he line ha acqui es mo e s eng h, and he line “ echnology-pedagogy-belie s” also g ows. This clea ly shows ha he esea ch ca ied ou in hese pe iods is ocused on he same p edominan heme. 6. Conclusions In summa y, his s udy o he TPACK model om he bibliome ic analysis allows he esea che o o e a se o ends in he opics ha he scien i ic communi y gene a es as new and necessa y. Thus, i shows an epis emological and e minological knowledge ha , oge he wi h he scien i ic one, con ibu es o i s di usion as a eaching me hod. The p ospec i e o his esea ch allows us o a i m ha he esul s can help many esea che s o alue he inclusion o his model in he eaching–lea ning p ocesses. Al hough educa ional echnologies wi h his model con ibu e o he dissemina ion o pedagogical knowledge, hey also equi e cons an eache aining p ocesses o ob ain he bes esul s. P ima ily, in his s udy, we ha e shown ha he TPACK model can add ess he chal- lenge o sus ainabili y, ha i can imp o e he aims o u u e esea ch and how i can p o ide new indings o o e come epis emological and e minological eme ging needs. Once again, he alue o his model is unques ionable because i can help di e en p o es- sionals in he de elopmen o aining p ocesses. The limi a ions o his esea ch include he debugging o he WoS da a. We need o insis on he ac ha his esea ch only ocuses on a single da abase and, o his eason, his cons i u es one s udy limi a ion. Fu he mo e, he e a e epea ed documen s, and o he s ha a e no ela ed o he subjec o he s udy. On he o he hand, i is wo h men ioning ha he ime pe iods a e no egula ly main ained, i.e., he analyzed documen s show g ea di e ences depending on he analysis in e al. Finally, he pa ame e s o his esea ch ha e been se based on he esea che s’ own c i e ia, always wi h he aim o showing consis en esul s. Fo his eason, i is conside ed ha he da a analyzed can be ex apola ed o o he esea ch, bu his should be done wi h cau ion. Al hough u he esea ch can be en iched, i can also coun e ac he pa ame e s and modi y he connec ions in he subjec s analyzed. As o u u e lines o esea ch, i should be s a ed ha i would be con enien and necessa y o ca y ou a s udy on he TPACK me hod in o he speci ic a eas o knowledge, such as, o example, he social sciences. In pa icula , in hese a eas o knowledge, i would be highly bene icial o know da a o his ype. 7. Implica ions o he S udy This s udy is he i s wo k ha has analyzed he TPACK model om a deepe biblio- me ic pe spec i e, h ough he scien i ic mapping o he concep . The esul s achie ed in Sus ainabili y 2021,13, 1481 17 o 20 his esea ch ha e gi en ise o a ious heo e ical and p ac ical implica ions. A a heo e i- cal le el, he p esen wo k con ibu es o he inc ease in he scien i ic li e a u e on TPACK. In addi ion, he indings ob ained ha e allowed de e mining he ends unning h ough he ield o s udy on he s a e o he a . This allows he scien i ic communi y o be guided on he main ocuses o in e es ha esea che s ha e been aking du ing hei scien i ic p oduc ion and whe e esea ch is heading. Likewise, he esul s ha e made i possible o e eal he p o ile o he s udies ca ied ou on TPACK, alluding o he a ious bibliome ic indica o s analyzed. These can se e as a guide and suppo o u u e wo k by o he scien is s who need o consul in o ma ion, wi h ha on languages, ins i u ions, media and a eas o publica ion, au ho s and mos ci ed documen s among he mos p ominen . Addi ionally, wi hin he heo e ical spec um, he li e a u e e lec s wi h special ele ance he alida ion o ques ionnai es abou he di e en applica ions o he TPACK model. In his sense, he publica ions show he pedagogical p ospec s his model acqui es in he ield o educa ion. The main pu pose is o o ien a e u u e esea ch and se e as a heo e ical and concep ual amewo k o he eaching communi y in i s applicabili y o lea ning spaces. On he o he hand, his s udy lea es a se ies o p ac ical implica ions o in e es o a ious g oups ela ed o he educa ional ield. This anges om eache s, esea che s and s uden s, o en i ies and ins i u ions in cha ge o aining and he de elopmen o inno a i e educa ional ools. Among he indings mo e ocused on eaching p ac ice, he scien i ic li e a u e shows he main pedagogical me hods ca ied ou in di e en con ex s, as well as hei esul s and bene i s in he applica ion o he TPACK model. Along he same lines, he s udies ca ied ou o da e show he po en ial ha educa ional echnology has ob ained in i s applica ion in lea ning spaces and how eache s ha e in eg a ed i in o hei p o essional p ac ice. In addi ion, he esea ch ca ied ou includes he belie s and pe cep ions o bo h eache s and s uden s ega ding he TPACK model. This acqui es a sup eme alue, since i s accep ance by he di e en membe s o he educa ional communi y will allow i s p omo ion and deploymen . All his will lead o he de elopmen o aining ac ions and he imp o emen o a eaching and lea ning p ocess ypical o a echnological e a. Finally, he esul s ob ained can se e as a guide o he en i ies and ins i u ions in cha ge o de eloping aining plans and digi al applica ions, wi h he pu pose o knowing he educa ional eali y o his model and de eloping p oposals ha con ibu e o i s de elopmen and in eg a ion in he aining p ocesses. Au ho Con ibu ions: Concep ualiza ion, J.-A.M.-M. and R.S.-C.; me hodology, J.L.-B.; so wa e, A.-J.M.-G.; alida ion, A.-J.M.-G.; o mal analysis, A.-J.M.-G.; in es iga ion, J.-A.M.-M., R.S.-C., A.-J.M.-G. and J.L.-B.; da a cu a ion, A.-J.M.-G.; w i ing—o iginal d a p epa a ion, J.-A.M.-M., R.S.-C., A.-J.M.-G. and J.L.-B.; w i ing— e iew and edi ing, J.-A.M.-M., R.S.-C., A.-J.M.-G. and J.L.-B.; isualiza ion, J.-A.M.-M., R.S.-C., A.-J.M.-G. and J.L.-B.; supe ision, J.-A.M.-M., R.S.-C., A.-J.M.-G. and J.L.-B. All au ho s ha e ead and ag eed o he published e sion o he manusc ip . Funding: This esea ch was unded by he p ojec I+D+i OTRI: Ac i e me hodologies o lea n- ing h ough echnological esou ces o he de elopmen o socie y (CNT-4315), Uni e si y o G anada (Spain). Da a A ailabili y S a emen : Da a a e con ained wi hin he a icle. Acknowledgmen s: To he esea ch g oup AREA (HUM-672) o he Uni e si y o G anada (Spain). Con lic s o In e es : The au ho s decla e no con lic o in e es . Re e ences 1. Ande son, J. ICT T ans o ming Educa ion: A Regional Guide; UNESCO: Bangkok, Thailand, 2010. 2. Val onen, T.; Soin u, E.; Kukkonen, J.; Mäki alo, K.; Hoang, N.; Häkkinen, P.; Jä elä, S.; Näykki, P.; Vi anen, A.; Pön inen, S.; e al. Examining p e-se ice eache s’ Technological Pedagogical Con en Knowledge as e ol ing knowledge domains: A longi udinal app oach. J. Compu . Assis . Lea n. 2019,35, 491–502. [C ossRe ] 3. Elas, N.I.B.; Majid, F.B.A.; Na asuman, S.A. De elopmen o Technological Pedagogical Con en Knowledge (TPACK) Fo English Teache s: The Validi y and Reliabili y. In . J. Eme g. Technol. Lea n. 2019,14, 18–33. [C ossRe ] Sus ainabili y 2021,13, 1481 18 o 20 4. Teo, T.; Milu ino i´c, V. Modelling he in en ion o use echnology o eaching ma hema ics among p e-se ice eache s in Se bia. Aus alas. J. Educ. Technol. 2015,31, 363–380. [C ossRe ] 5. Pe ko, D.; P asse, D.; Can ieni, A. The In e play o School Readiness and Teache Readiness o Educa ional Technology In eg a ion: A S uc u al Equa ion Model. Compu . Sch. 2018,35, 1–18. [C ossRe ] 6. D ummond, A.; Sweeney, T. Can an objec i e measu e o echnological pedagogical con en knowledge (TPACK) supplemen exis ing TPACK measu es? B . J. Educ. Technol. 2016,48, 928–939. [C ossRe ] 7. Miguel-Re illa, D.; Ma ínez-Fe ei a, J.M.; Sánchez-Agus í, M. Assessing he digi al compe ence o educa o s in social s udies: An analysis in ini ial eache aining using he TPACK-21 model. Aus alas. J. Educ. Technol. 2020,36, 1–12. [C ossRe ] 8. I dalisa, I.; Paidi, P.; Djuk i, D. Implemen a ion o Technology-based Guided Inqui y o Imp o e TPACK among P ospec i e Biology Teache s. In . J. Ins . 2020,13, 33–44. [C ossRe ] 9. Ba an, E.; Bilici, S.C.; Sa i, A.A.; Tondeu , J. In es iga ing he impac o eache educa ion s a egies on p ese ice eache s’ TPACK. B . J. Educ. Technol. 2019,50, 357–370. [C ossRe ] 10. Polly, D.; Mims, C.; Shephe d, C.E.; Inan, F. E idence o impac : T ans o ming eache educa ion wi h p epa ing omo ow’s eache s o each wi h echnology (PT3) g an s. Teach. Teach. Educ. 2010,26, 863–870. [C ossRe ] 11. Ma ín-Ma ín, J.A.; Sole -Cos a, R.; Mo eno-Gue e o, A.J.; López-Belmon e, J. Makey Makey as an In e ac i e Robo ic Tool o High School S uden s’ Lea ning in Mul icul u al Con ex s. Educ. Sci. 2020,10, 239. [C ossRe ] 12. Chai, C.-S.; Ng, E.M.W.; Li, W.; Hong, H.-Y.; Koh, J.H.L. Valida ing and modelling echnological pedagogical con en knowledge amewo k among Asian p ese ice eache s. Aus alas. J. Educ. Technol. 2013,29, 1–12. [C ossRe ] 13. Shulman, L.S. Those Who Unde s and: Knowledge G ow h in Teaching. Educ. Res. 1986,15, 4–14. [C ossRe ] 14. Bus aman e, C. TPACK-based p o essional de elopmen on web 2.0 o Spanish eache s: A case s udy. Compu . Assis . Lang. Lea n. 2019,33, 327–352. [C ossRe ] 15. TPACK: Whe e do we go now? TechT ends 2009,53, 46–47. [C ossRe ] 16. Val onen, T.; Leppänen, U.; Hyypiä, M.; Soin u, E.; Smi s, A.; Tondeu , J. F esh pe spec i es on TPACK: P e-se ice eache s’ own app aisal o hei challenging and con iden TPACK a eas. Educ. In . Technol. 2020,25, 2823–2842. [C ossRe ] 17. Chai, C.S.; Koh, J.H.L.; Tsai, C.C. Facili a ing P ese ice Teache s’ De elopmen o Technological, Pedagogical, and Con en Knowledge (TPACK). Educ. Technol. Soc. 2010,13, 63–73. 18. Ka al, T.; A acan, Ö. Examining Tu kish p e-se ice science eache s’ echnological pedagogical con en knowledge (TPACK) based on demog aphic a iables. J. Tu k. Sci. Educ. 2017,14, 1–22. [C ossRe ] 19. Bus aman e, C. TPACK and Teache s o Spanish: De elopmen o a Theo y-Based Join Display in a Mixed Me hods Resea ch Case S udy. J. Mix. Me hods Res. 2019,13, 163–178. [C ossRe ] 20. Cas é a, J.; Ma e, C.C.; Yok, M.C.K.; She ab, K.; Impedo o, M.A.; Sa apuu, T.; Ped egosa, A.D.; Malik, S.K.; A mand, H. Sel - epo ed TPACK o eache educa o s ac oss six coun ies in Asia and Eu ope. Educ. In . Technol. 2020 ,25, 3003–3019. [C ossRe ] 21. Eichelbe ge , A.; Leong, P. Using TPACK as a amewo k o s udy he in luence o college acul y’s belie s on online eaching. Educ. Media In . 2019,56, 116–133. [C ossRe ] 22. Koh, J.H.L. TPACK design sca olds o suppo ing eache pedagogical change. Educ. Technol. Res. De . 2018 ,67, 577–595. [C ossRe ] 23. Habibi, A.; Yusop, F.D.; Razak, R.A. The ole o TPACK in a ec ing p e-se ice language eache s’ ICT in eg a ion du ing eaching p ac ices: Indonesian con ex . Educ. In . Technol. 2019,25, 1929–1949. [C ossRe ] 24. Roussinos, D.; Jimoyiannis, A. Examining P ima y Educa ion Teache s’ Pe cep ions o TPACK and he Rela ed Educa ional Con ex Fac o s. J. Res. Technol. Educ. 2019,51, 377–397. [C ossRe ] 25. Açıkgül, K.; Aslane , R. E ec s o Geogeb a suppo ed mic o eaching applica ions and echnological pedagogical con en knowledge (TPACK) game p ac ices on he TPACK le els o p ospec i e eache s. Educ. In . Technol. 2019 ,25, 2023–2047. [C ossRe ] 26. Oda, K.; He man, T.; Hasan, A. P ope ies and impac s o TPACK-based GIS p o essional de elopmen o in-se ice eache s. In . Res. Geog . En i on. Educ. 2019,29, 40–54. [C ossRe ] 27. Huang, K.-Y.; Chen, Y.-H.; Jang, S.-J. TPACK in Special Educa ion Schools o SVI: A Compa a i e S udy be ween Taiwanese and Chinese In-se ice Teache s. In . J. Disabil. De . Educ. 2020, 1–16. [C ossRe ] 28. Wang, C.-J. Facili a ing he emo ional in elligence de elopmen o s uden s: Use o echnological pedagogical con en knowledge (TPACK). J. Hosp. Leis. Spo Tou . Educ. 2019,25, 100198. [C ossRe ] 29. Yang, J.; Wang, Q.; Wang, J.; Huang, M.; Ma, Y. A s udy o K-12 eache s’ TPACK on he echnology accep ance o E-schoolbag. In e ac . Lea n. En i on. 2019, 1–14. [C ossRe ] 30. Segu a-Robles, A.; Mo eno-Gue e o, A.-J.; Pa a-González, M.-E.; López-Belmon e, J. Re iew o Resea ch T ends in Lea ning and he In e ne in Highe Educa ion. Soc. Sci. 2020,9, 101. [C ossRe ] 31. Mo eno, J.R.; Mon o o, M.A.; Colón, A.M.O. Changes in Teache T aining wi hin he TPACK Model F amewo k: A Sys ema ic Re iew. Sus ainabili y 2019,11, 1870. [C ossRe ] 32. Leung, X.Y.; Sun, J.; Bai, B. Bibliome ics o social media esea ch: A co-ci a ion and co-wo d analysis. In . J. Hosp. Manag. 2017 , 66, 35–45. [C ossRe ] Sus ainabili y 2021,13, 1481 19 o 20 33. Pe ushka, A.; Komo a, M.; Fedushko, S. Scien i ic Con en : Language Expansion in Bibliome ic Da abases. In P oceedings o he In e na ional Wo kshop on Cybe Hygiene, Kyi , Uk aine, 30 No embe 2019; Volume 2654, pp. 375–389. 34. Fedushko, S.; Sye o , Y.; Ko zh, R. Valida ion o he use accoun s pe sonal da a o online academic communi y. In P oceedings o he 2016 13 h In e na ional Con e ence on Mode n P oblems o Radio Enginee ing, Telecommunica ions and Compu e Science (TCSET); IEEE: New Yo k, NY, USA, 2016; pp. 863–866. 35. Ca mona-Se ano, N.; López-Belmon e, J.; Cues a-Gómez, J.-L.; Mo eno-Gue e o, A.-J. Documen a y Analysis o he Scien i ic Li e a u e on Au ism and Technology in Web o Science. B ain Sci. 2020,10, 985. [C ossRe ] [PubMed] 36. Ma ínez, M.A.; Cobo, M.J.; He e a, M.; He e a-Viedma, E. Analyzing he Scien i ic E olu ion o Social Wo k Using Science Mapping. Res. Soc. Wo k. P . 2014,25, 257–277. [C ossRe ] 37. López-Belmon e, J.; Mo eno-Gue e o, A.-J.; López-Núñez, J.-A.; Hinojo-Lucena, F.-J. Augmen ed eali y in educa ion. A scien i ic mapping in Web o Science. In e ac . Lea n. En i on. 2020, 1–15. [C ossRe ] 38. Hi sch, J.E. An index o quan i y an indi idual’s scien i ic esea ch ou pu . P oc. Na l. Acad. Sci. USA 2005 ,102, 16569–16572. [C ossRe ] 39. Ca mona-Se ano, N.; López-Belmon e, J.; López-Núñez, J.-A.; Mo eno-Gue e o, A.-J. T ends in Au ism Resea ch in he Field o Educa ion in Web o Science: A Bibliome ic S udy. B ain Sci. 2020,10, 1018. [C ossRe ] 40. Mo eno-Gue e o, A.-J.; Gómez-Ga cía, G.; López-Belmon e, J.; Jiménez, C.R. In e ne Addic ion in he Web o Science Da abase: A Re iew o he Li e a u e wi h Scien i ic Mapping. In . J. En i on. Res. Public Heal h 2020,17, 2753. [C ossRe ] 41. López-Belmon e, J.; Segu a-Robles, A.; Mo eno-Gue e o, A.-J.; Pa a-González, M.-E. Machine Lea ning and Big Da a in he Impac Li e a u e. A Bibliome ic Re iew wi h Scien i ic Mapping in Web o Science. Symme y 2020,12, 495. [C ossRe ] 42. Ramos-Na as-Pa ejo, M.; Cáce es-Reche, M.P.; Sole -Cos a, R.; Ma ín-Ma ín, R. The use o ICT o Reading anima ion in ulne able con ex s: A sys ema ic e iew in he las decade. Tex o Li e Ling. Tecnol. 2020,13, 240–261. [C ossRe ] 43. Ca mona-Se ano, N.; Mo eno-Gue e o, A.-J.; Ma ín-Ma ín, J.-A.; López-Belmon e, J. E olu ion o he Au ism Li e a u e and he In luence o Pa en s: A Scien i ic Mapping in Web o Science. B ain Sci. 2021,11, 74. [C ossRe ] 44. Pa a-González, M.E.; Segu a-Robles, A.; Vicen e-Bújez, M.-R.; López-Belmon e, J. P oduc ion Analysis and Scien i ic Mapping on Ac i e Me hodologies in Web o Science. In . J. Eme g. Technol. Lea n. 2020,15, 71–86. [C ossRe ] 45. López-Belmon e, J.; Mo eno-Gue e o, A.-J.; López-Núñez, J.-A.; Sánchez, S.P. Analysis o he P oduc i e, S uc u al, and Dynamic De elopmen o Augmen ed Reali y in Highe Educa ion Resea ch on he Web o Science. Appl. Sci. 2019 ,9, 5306. [C ossRe ] 46. Mo al-Munoz, J.A.; He e a-Viedma, E.; Espejo, A.S.; Cobo, M.J. So wa e ools o conduc ing bibliome ic analysis in science: An up- o-da e e iew. P o . In . 2020,29, 1–20. [C ossRe ] 47. López-Núñez, J.-A.; López-Belmon e, J.; Mo eno-Gue e o, A.-J.; Ramos-Na as-Pa ejo, M.; Hinojo-Lucena, F.-J. Educa ion and Die in he Scien i ic Li e a u e: A S udy o he P oduc i e, S uc u al, and Dynamic De elopmen in Web o Science. Sus ainabili y 2020,12, 4838. [C ossRe ] 48. Mon e o, J.; Cobo, M.J.; Gu ié ez-Salcedo, M.; Segado-Boj, F.; He e a-Viedma, E. A science mapping analysis o ‘Communica ion’ WoS subjec ca ego y (1980-2013). Comunica 2018,26, 81–91. [C ossRe ] 49. López-Belmon e, J.; Pa a-González, M.-E.; Segu a-Robles, A.; Sánchez, S.P. Scien i ic Mapping o Gami ica ion in Web o Science. Eu . J. In es ig. Heal h Psychol. Educ. 2020,10, 832. [C ossRe ] 50. He e a-Viedma, E.; López-Robles, J.R.; Gualla , J.; Cobo, M.J. Global ends in co ona i us esea ch a he ime o Co id-19: A gene al bibliome ic app oach and con en analysis using SciMAT. P o . In . 2020,29, 1–20. [C ossRe ] 51. Mo eno-Gue e o, A.-J.; López-Belmon e, J.; Ma ín-Ma ín, J.-A.; Sole -Cos a, R. Scien i ic De elopmen o Educa ional A i icial In elligence in Web o Science. Fu u e In e ne 2020,12, 124. [C ossRe ] 52. López-Belmon e, J.; Ma ín-Ma ín, J.-A.; Sole -Cos a, R.; Mo eno-Gue e o, A.-J. A duino Ad ances in Web o Science. A Scien i ic Mapping o Li e a y P oduc ion. IEEE Access 2020,8, 128674–128682. [C ossRe ] 53. Fe dig, R.E. Assessing echnologies o eaching and lea ning: Unde s anding he impo ance o echnological pedagogical con en knowledge. B . J. Educ. Technol. 2006,37, 749–760. [C ossRe ] 54. Mish a, P.; Koehle , M.J. Technological Pedagogical Con en Knowledge: A F amewo k o Teache Knowledge. Teach. Coll. Rec. 2006,108, 1017–1054. [C ossRe ] 55. Angeli, C.; Valanides, N. Epis emological and me hodological issues o he concep ualiza ion, de elopmen , and assessmen o ICT–TPCK: Ad ances in echnological pedagogical con en knowledge (TPCK). Compu . Educ. 2009,52, 154–168. [C ossRe ] 56. Schmid , D.A.; Ba an, E.; Thompson, A.D.; Mish a, P.; Koehle , M.J.; Shin, T.S. Technological Pedagogical Con en Knowledge (TPACK). J. Res. Technol. Educ. 2009,42, 123–149. [C ossRe ] 57. Ha is, J.; Mish a, P.; Koehle , M. Teache s’ Technological Pedagogical Con en Knowledge and Lea ning Ac i i y Types. J. Res. Technol. Educ. 2009,41, 393–416. [C ossRe ] 58. Voog , J.; Fisse , P.; Roblin, N.P.; Tondeu , J.; Van B aak, J. Technological pedagogical con en knowledge—A e iew o he li e a u e. J. Compu . Assis . Lea n. 2013,29, 109–121. [C ossRe ] 59. G aham, C.R. Theo e ical conside a ions o unde s anding echnological pedagogical con en knowledge (TPACK). Compu . Educ. 2011,57, 1953–1960. [C ossRe ] 60. Lee, M.-H.; Tsai, C. Explo ing eache s’ pe cei ed sel e icacy and echnological pedagogical con en knowledge wi h espec o educa ional use o he Wo ld Wide Web. Ins . Sci. 2008,38, 1–21. [C ossRe ] Sus ainabili y 2021,13, 1481 20 o 20 61. A chambaul , L.M.; Ba ne , J.H. Re isi ing echnological pedagogical con en knowledge: Explo ing he TPACK amewo k. Compu . Educ. 2010,55, 1656–1662. [C ossRe ] 62. Callon, M.; Cou ial, J.P.; La ille, F. Co-wo d analysis as a ool o desc ibing he ne wo k o in e ac ions be ween basic and echnological esea ch: The case o polyme chemsi y. Science 1991,22, 155–205. [C ossRe ]