scieee AI-readable full text Open interactive document viewer

Multivalent reuse of web data about temporary art exhibitions: The Exhibitium Project

Rodríguez-Ortega, Nuria,Pino-Díaz, José,Suárez, Juan Luis,Bailón-Moreno, Rafael

Abstract

Our proposal aims to display the analysis techniques, methodologies as well as the most relevant results expected within the Exhibitium project framework (http://www.exhibitium.com). Awarded by the BBVA Foundation, the Exhibitium project is being developed by an international consortium of several research groups . Its main purpose is to build a comprehensive and structured data repository about temporary art exhibitions, captured from the web, to make them useful and reusable in various domains through open and interoperable data systems.

Full text

(http://dh2016.adho.org) DHHome(http://www.dh2016.adho.org) / Abstracts(/abstracts/) / 419(/abstracts/419) Showinfo Howtocite XMLVersion(/static/data/542.xml) Multivalentreuseofwebdataabouttemporaryart exhibitions:theExhibitiumproject Ourproposalaimstodisplaytheanalysistechniques,methodologiesaswellasthemostrelevantresultsexpectedwithin theExhibitiumprojectframework(http://www.exhibitium.com).AwardedbytheBBVAFoundation,theExhibitiumprojectis beingdevelopedbyaninternationalconsortiumofseveralresearchgroups[1].Itsmainpurposeistobuildacomprehensive andstructureddatarepositoryabouttemporaryartexhibitions,capturedfromtheweb,tomakethemusefulandreusablein variousdomainsthroughopenandinteroperabledatasystems. TheExhibitiumprojectaimstofacethenewchallengesposedbythedatadrivensocietyrespecttotheproduction, management,useanddistributionofdigitalculturalcontent.Specifically,thequestionthatwewanttorespondis:howto takeadvantagesoftheuniverseofdatarelatedtoculturalactivitydistributedthroughtheInternettogeneratevalueatvery differentlevels(academicresearch,newcriticalnarratives,culturalmanagement,economicdevelopment,processesof socialandculturaltransformation,etc.)?Accordingly,multivalency,asakeynotionofthenewknowledgeeconomy(Roney etal.,2012),istheguidingaxisoftheExhibitiumproject. Tothinkonapreciseworkingprototype,wehaveadoptedasacentralobjectofourresearchtheartexhibitionsthat regularlyheldgalleries,museumsandartcenters,sincetheyproduceaverylargeandheterogeneoussetofdatathatcan potentiallybecapturedbymeansofwebminingstrategies. Forthat,wehavedevelopedatechnologyinfrastructure,whichhasbeenimplementedintwodimensions: a)Acomputingprototypeconsistsoftwomodulesoperatinginacomplementarymanner:Beagle,anautomateddata capturesystemwhichextractsinformationaboutartexhibitionsfromanywebsource;andExpoFinder,asystemfor collectingandenhancingtheinformationcapturedbyBeagle(http://www.expofinder.es). b.Anaggregateofthreedataanalysisandvisualizationplatforms(SylvaDB,TechneCoword©andGeowave),which connectwiththeBeagleExpoFindersystemusinganautomatedexportapplication[2].(Seeinfigure1asimplifieddiagram ofthesystem). Figure1.Simpifliedschemaandflowchart Asregardsthetheoreticalframework,Exhibitiumfacesthephenomenonofartexhibitionsaccordingtotheactornetwork theory(ANT)developedbyBrunoLatour(2007),thatissay,ascomplexculturalphenomenaresultingfromofaseriesof relationshipsestablishedbetweenheterogeneoushumanandnohumanactorsartists,curators,exhibitioncenters,funding agencies,publishingcompanies,artisticmovements,artisticthemes,etc.thatconstitutedynamicnetworksamongthem. Theapplicationoftheactornetworktheorytothefieldofartexhibitionsraisesaninterestingperspective,sincethe emphasis,ratherthanontheexhibitionsthemselves,isplacedonthe«mediation»processes(production,distribution, reception,etc.)aspartofasocialsysteminwhichthepowerrelationsthatcharacterizetheculturalinstitutionsare unveiled. Consequently,theExhibitiumprojectalignswiththegrowingresearchfieldorientedtoexplorecomplexnetworksinartand humanities(Schich,2014).Particularly,weareusingtwotypesofmethodologies. a)Networkanalysisstrategiesthroughagraphdatabase(SylvaDB)thatwehavestructuredaccordingtoanontology specificallydevelopedfortheproject(seefigure2). Figure2.Ontologyofthe“temporaryartexhibition”domainintheSylvaDBinterface b)KDD(KnowledgeDiscoveryinDatabases)techniques,speciallythecowordanalysisstrategy(He,1999)[3],whichare mainlyorientedtothediscoveryofimplicitknowledgeinlargerepositoriesofstructureddata(EchevarríaandGonzález, 2009;RodríguezOrtegaetal,2015). Throughtheseanalyseswearegettingasetofgraphsthatisallowingustodiscovercorrelationsbetweencertainartists, centers,curators,financinginstitutions,themesandgeospatialcontexts.Notethattheconfigurationofclustersofthis nature,understoodasnetworkofstrongrelationshipsestablishedbetweentheirnodes,canbereadaspowerstructures operantinacertaindomain. Theconceptualandmethodologicaldifferencesexistingbetweenthecowordanalysisstrategy,whichextractstheactors andtheirrelationshipsdirectlyfromthedataprocessing,andthenetworkanalysisstrategy,basedonaschemepreviously established(ontology)thatderivesfromourdirectobservationoftherealworld,itisallowingustomakeinteresting comparisonsbetweenhowweunderstandthedomain“artexhibitions"andwhat(implicit)structureemergesnaturallyfrom theprocessingofthekeywordsassociatedtothisfield. Alongwiththisknowledgekeytodevelopnewcriticalnarratives,thediscoveryofcertainpatternsisalsoprovidinga prospectiveknowledgeaboutpossibleandfuturetrendsinthefieldoftemporaryartexhibitions,whichcanbestrategically usedbyexhibitioncentersorotherstakeholders(tourismcompanies,entertainmentindustries,etc.)intheirdecisionmaking processes. Inaddition,thesemethodsofanalysisareallowingustoinvestigatetheperipheriesthatarealsoassociatedtothefieldof artexhibitionsasaresultoftheprevalenceofsomeinstitutionswhichcentralizetheflowofpublicamongotherthingsdue totheirmediaimpactcapacity.Tofacilitatethesocialvisibilityofthoseinitiativesusuallyunknownweareproceedingto integratetheExhibitiumdataintheGeowavesystem,ageoreferencedplatformtomanageculturalcontent. NOTES [1]Theyare:iArtHis_Lab(http://www.iarthislab.es)andKhaos(http://khaos.uma.es)attheUniversityofMálaga;Techne, ingenieríadelconocimientoydelproducto(http://www.ugr.es/~tep028/quienes_somos_es.php (http://www.ugr.es/~tep028/quienes_somos_es.php))attheUniversityofGranada;andCulturePlexattheUniversityof WesternOntario(http://www.cultureplex.ca). [2]Sincethenatureofthistextdoesnotallowustoprovideadetailedexplanationofsuchsystem,wesuggesttoseethe sitehttp://admin.expofinder.es/test/xmlrpc/[Viewed:28/10/2015]. [3]Thecowordstrategyisbasedonabasicprinciple:allactorsinanetwork,regardlessoftheirnature,canberepresented bywordsordescriptors(actually,thisishowthedataarerepresentedmostlyinbibliographicrepositories).Naturalrelations ofcooccurrenceofwordsindatarepositoriesformanetworkthatcanbeanalyzedandmapped.Thewordsthatcooccur morefrequentlyformclustersthatcanbeanalyzedasnetworkswithstronglinks;atthesametime,itispossibletoanalyze howthesenetworkschangethroughoutdifferentperiodsoftimesorgeospatialcontexts.Forexample,wecananalyzehow thenetworkgeneratedbyanartist(i.e.,Picasso)changesaccordingtothegeographicalprovenanceofthedata(exhibitions inSpain,Europe,USA,LatinAmerica,etc.). Bibliography 1.Echevarría,J.andGonzález,M.I.(2009).LaTeoríadelActorRedylatesisdelaTecnociencia,ArborCiencia,PensamientoyCultura, 738:70520. 2.He,Q.(1999).KnowledgeDiscoveryThroughCoWordAnalysis,LibraryTrends,48(1):13359. 3.Latour,B.(2007).ReassemblingtheSocial:AnIntroductiontoActorNetworkTheory.OxfordandNewYork:OxfordUniversityPress. 4.RodríguezOrtega,N.etal.(2015).Repesandolosestudiosmetadisciplinaresenlasociedaddatacéntrica:análisisdinámicodelasredes deconocimientodelaHistoriadelArteatravésdelabasededatosISOCArtedelCSIC.IICongresodelaSociedadInternacionalde HumanidadesDigitalesHispánicas.Innovación,globalizacióneimpacto,57deoctubrede2015,Madrid:UNEDCreatespace,pp.32236. 5.Roney,D.etal.(2012).Knowledgeispeopledoingthings,knowledgeeconomiesarepeopledoingthingswithbetteroutcomesformore people.InHandbookontheKnowledgeEconomy,ElgarOriginalReferenceSeries,EdwardElgarPublishing,Incorporated,pp.114. 6.Schich,M.etal.(2014).Arts,Humanities,andComplexNetworks,4 edition,Leonardo,Cambridge:MITPress. th