Holstein-Friesian milk performance in organic farming in North Spain: Comparison with other systems and breeds

RESEARCH ARTICLE OPEN ACCESS Holstein-Friesian milk performance in organic farming in North Spain: Comparison with other systems and breeds Ruth Rodríguez-Bermúdez1, Marta Miranda2, Inmaculada Orjales2, Francisco Rey-Crespo1,3, Nieves Muñoz4 and Marta López-Alonso1 1Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Facultade de Veterinaria, Departamento de Patoloxía Animal. 27002 Lugo, Spain. 2Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Facultade de Veterinaria, Departamento de Anatomía, Producción Animal e Ciencias Clínicas Veterinarias. 27002 Lugo, Spain. 3Centro Tecnológico Agroalimentario de Lugo (CETAL). 27003 Lugo, Spain. 4Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Facultade de Ciencias, Departamento Estatística e Investigación Operativa. 27002 Lugo, Spain Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA) Abstract Organic systems are highly dependent on the environment and require animals well adapted to local conditions. In Spain, organic dairy farmers are not satisfied with the productive performance of their herds and ask for technical advice to obtain suitable animals for organic systems. The milk productive performance (milk yield, nutritional composition, and somatic cell count) of Holstein-Friesian cows in organic farming in North Spain compared with conventional farms has been analysed. When breed diversity was present in the same organic farm, Holstein-Friesian milk performance was compared with other breeds and/or crosses. Holstein-Friesian cows in organic farming produce slightly less milk than grazing conventional cows, but milk was similar in composition and somatic cell count across systems. The limited data from organic farms where breed diversity exists indicate that Holstein-Friesian cows produce numerically more milk than other breeds and crosses but with statistically lower protein content. Considering that in Spain organic milk production is mostly used for liquid milk consumption and that the payment system is based only on milk volume, Holstein-Friesian cows would better fit the farmer interests than other breeds or crosses. However, in addition to productive performance, reproductive efficiency, animal health and consumer’s preferences should be fully considered when selecting a breed for organic production. If Holstein-Friesian was the selected breed, efforts should be made to identify cows within the breed that are best adapted to organic conditions. New productive, reproductive, nutritional and economic studies would be needed to develop a genetic merit index for organic systems. Additional key words: dairy cattle; milk composition; crosses; suitability; production systems. Correspondence should be addressed to Marta López Alonso: [email protected] Abbreviations used: DCR (dairy control record); FS (farm system); LG (lactation group); SCC (somatic cell count). Funding: Spanish Government (AGL2010-21026) and Centro Tecnológico Agroalimentario de Lugo, Spain (CETAL). RRB holds a pre-doctoral contract (Ref.14/01476) from the Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte, Spanish Government. Authors’ contributions: Conceived and designed the experiments: MM and MLA. Performed the experiments: RRB, IO and FRC. Analyzed the data: RRB, IO, NM and MLA. Wrote the paper: RRB. Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. Copyright © 2017 INIA. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-by) Spain 3.0 License. Citation: Rodríguez-Bermúdez, R.; Miranda, M.; Orjales, I.; Rey-Crespo, F.; Muñoz, N.; López-Alonso, M. (2017). Holstein- Friesian milk performance in organic farming in North Spain: Comparison with other systems and breeds. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, Volume 15, Issue 1, e0601. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2017151-10037 Received: 02 Jun 2016. Accepted: 23 Dec 2016. 15(1), e0601, 10 pages (2017) eISSN: 2171-9292 https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2017151-10037 Introduction Organic farming promotes a combination of providing good-quality feedstuffs, no use of chemical products, appropriate livestock husbandry systems and correct management practices to deal with the principles of health, ecology, fairness and care (IFOAM, 2012). Organic systems are highly dependent of the environment (Falconer & Mackay, 1996), and to deal with these principles the European Union organic regulation (EC, 2007) specifically states that the choice of breeds should take into account their capacity to adapt to local conditions, their vitality and their resistance to disease or health problems. During the last half of the 20th century, dairy genetic selection was nearly exclusively focused on the Holstein-Friesian breed to greatly improve milk production. The resulting cow could be considered a high maintenance animal for highly standardised intensive systems, an environment that clearly differs from that of organic production, mainly regarding feeding regimens and medical treatments (Ahlman, 2010). In parallel, this selection process has resulted Ruth Rodríguez-Bermúdez, Marta Miranda, Inmaculada Orjales, Francisco Rey-Crespo et al. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research March 2017 • Volume 15 • Issue 1 • e0601 2 in reduced reproductive efficiency, extended calving intervals, increased health problems, increased culling rates, and decreased productive life (González-Recio et al., 2006; Bluhm, 2009) especially when these highly selected cows are out of intensive nutritional and environmental management systems. The most notable exception to the high-producer Holstein- Friesian genetic selection was carried out in Australia and New Zealand, countries with seasonal, site adapted, and pasture-based milk production systems (Macdonald et al., 2008; Baudracco et al., 2010, 2011) which are closer to the organic principles. In this context, as organic dairy farming was growing in Europe, farmers realised that the available cows were not adapted to the organic requirements. Cows used in organic farming were similar to those in conventional systems (Endendijk & Baars, 2001; Nauta, 2001) and their suitability for organic productive conditions was questionable in that their potential performance under organic systems was not optimal (Diepen et al., 2007). With the aim of solving this problem, experts over the world propose to use Holstein-Friesian cows adapted to organic systems (Baars & Endendijk, 1990; Endendijk & Baars, 2001; Brotherstone & Goddard, 2005), or alternatively other purebred cows (Sundrum, 2001) or their crosses (Nauta et al., 2005; Rozzi et al., 2007; Begley et al., 2009). In the Netherlands, a survey by Nauta et al. (2006a) showed that different production and marketing strategies demand different breeds: some local or native breeds adapt well to the organic systems because they utilize lower quality feed, are more resilient to climatic stress, and are more resistant to local parasites and diseases. Interest in crossbreeding has grown over the past decade among both producers and researchers (Heins et al., 2006b) and crossbreeding of Holstein- Friesian and local breeds could help to minimize the decline of health, longevity and fertility by introducing favourable genes, removing inbreeding depression, and taking advantage of heterosis (Lopez-Villalobos et al., 2000; Rozzi et al., 2007); however this option needs to be further investigated before used on a large scale (Ahlman, 2010). Organic milk production in Spain is small (16,413 tons/year; MAGRAMA, 2014) but has been growing rapidly in recent years. Organic dairy farmers are not satisfied with the productive performance of their cows, nearly 60% of them would like to have a better adapted breed (Rodríguez-Bermúdez et al., 2015). However, due to the difficulty of getting technical advice for acquiring suitable animals, they kept maintaining the same cows as when they were in conventional farming; only a minority (18%) started to incorporate new breeds or use crossbreeding. The objective of this paper was to analyse the milk productive performance (milk yield, nutritional composition, and somatic cell count) of Holstein- Friesian cows in organic farming in North Spain compared with conventional farms in the region. When breed diversity was present in the same organic farm, milk productive performance of Holstein-Friesian was also compared to the other breed and/or crosses. Material and methods Farms involved Data on which this paper is based were collected from a subset of farms within an extensive research project to evaluate the nutritional and health status of organic dairy cattle in Northern Spain compared with conventional farming. That project involved all (n=56) organic dairy farms of Northern Spain, representing nearly the 80% of organic production in Spain (MAGRAMA, 2013). For this paper, data of Holstein-Friesian dairy cows from organic (n=9), pasture-based conventional (n=5) and zero-grazing conventional (n=5) farms were used. For those organic farms that presented an appreciable (>10% of herd) breed diversity (n=3) data of the different purebred and crossbred cows were obtained. Detailed productive and management characteristics of these farms are presented in Tables 1 and 2, respectively. Data collection Data related to milk production including milk yield, milk composition (% fat, % protein), and somatic cell counts (SCC) were collected in the selected farms from all lactating cows during the last complete lactation finished before December 2015. All farms used on this study were included in the Dairy Control Record (DCR) system. Milk samples were collected in 50 mL plastic containers with the preservative bronopol (2-bromo-2-nitro-1,3-propanediol) previously added. Percentages of fat and protein were determined by infrared spectroscopy and SCC (cell/mL) values using cell counter FOSSOMATICTM (MilkoScan, Foss, Hillerød, Denmark) according to the manufacturer instructions. All analyses were conducted monthly with data obtained from DCR in LIGAL (Laboratorio Interprofesional Galego de Análise do Leite). Statistical analyses All statistical analyses were done by using the SPSS program for Windows (V.21.0). Parameters related to Holstein-Friesian milk performance in organic farming in North Spain Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research March 2017 • Volume 15 • Issue 1 • e0601 3 milk production (milk yield) and composition (% fat and % protein) showed a normal distribution, but SCC data were converted to logarithmic scale in base 10 (logSCC) previously to the statistical analysis to fulfil the Anova assumptions. Data of Holstein-Friesian cows in organic, conventional pasture-based, and zero-grazing conventional systems were analysed by using Linear Mixed Models where Farm, Farm_System (FS) and Lactation_Group (LG) were placed as factors and milk production parameters (milk yield, % fat, % protein, logSCC) as dependent variables. FS, LG and FS×LG interaction were introduced as fixed factors and Farm as an aleatory factor. Lactation groups were considered as group 1 (including cows of 1st and 2nd parities), group 2 (3rd and 4th parities) and group 3 (5th or more parities). Post-hoc analyses (Bonferroni test) were used to subsequent group comparison within each variable. When considering milk productive performance in Holstein-Friesian and other purebred or crossbred cows when present in the same farm, number of parities was not homogenously distributed within the different breeds. Because of the significant effect of parity on the milk parameters evaluated in this study (as described later) parity could not be introduced as a factor in the analysis, therefore data were analysed in each farm separately by using planned contrasts considering three groups of cows: group 1 (including cows of 1st and 2nd parities), group 2 (3rd and 4th parities) and group 3 (5th or more parities). Results Comparison among Holstein-Friesian cows in organic, pasture-based and zero-grazing conventional systems Summarised data of Holstein-Friesian milk production in organic, pasture-based, and zero-grazing conventional systems by LG are presented in Table 3. Farm System was a significant factor in the Linear Mixed Model (p=0.001) for milk yield. Overall, milk yield was lower in organic farms (22.5 L/day) compared with zero-grazing conventional farms (34.6 L/day) and pasture-based conventional farms (24.8 L/ day) having an intermediate position between both. On the contrary, no statistically significant differences were observed between FS for % fat (3.87, 3.58, and 3.88), % protein (3.15, 3.13, and 3.19) and logSCC (5.04, 4.92, and 4.80) for organic, pasture-based and zero-grazing conventional farms, respectively. Table 1. Details of the different Holstein-Friesian farms analysed in Northern Spain. Data are expressed as mean and range in brackets. Organic (n=9) Conventional Pasture-based (n=5) Zero-grazing (n=5) Type of farm Free stall Free stall Free stall Number of milking cows 68.4 (30-207) 55.6 (36-71) 55.8 (32-90) Milk production (kg /cow·year) 6962 (5696-9089) 7757 (4973-9565) 9987 (7838-12110) Age of cows (years) 5.14 (2.6-13.5) 4.69 (2.6-11.9) 4.55 (2.5-10.3) Concentrate intake (kg/animal day) 3.50 (1.82-5.45) 5.28 (3.62-7.18) 6.99 (3.61-10.5) Forage intake (kg/animal day) 13.5 (9.40-19.2) 15.3 (10.6-18.8) 13.3 (8.24-16.2) Main activity/Core business Direct milk sale. Cheese and yogurt manufacturing. Ecoturism Direct milk sale Direct milk sale Table 2. Details of the organic farms with breed diversity analysed in Northern Spain. Data are expressed as mean and range in brackets. Farm#1 Farm#2 Farm#3 Type of farm Free stall Free stall Free stall Number of milking cows 48 34 111 Milk production (kg/cow · year) 6921 (6200-7300) 5600 (4800-6200) 6500 (6000-6700) Age of cows (years) 5.5 (2.6-9.3) 6.2 (2.6-11.2) 5.28 (2.6-9.5) Concentrate intake (kg/animal · day) 5 (5-5) 4 (3-5) 3 (3-3) Forage intake (kg/animal · day) 14.1 (11.6-17.3) 12.5 (9.4-13.9) 16.0 (12.5-18.1) Main activity/Core business Direct milk sale Ecotourism. Cheese manufacturing Direct milk sale Ruth Rodríguez-Bermúdez, Marta Miranda, Inmaculada Orjales, Francisco Rey-Crespo et al. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research March 2017 • Volume 15 • Issue 1 • e0601 4 As expected, LG was a significant factor in the analysis for all the milk parameters analysed in this study. In all FS milk yield significantly increased from LG-1 to LG-2 and decreased from LG-2 to LG-3 (Table 3). The increase of milk yield from LG-1 to LG-2 in organic farms (15%) was similar to that observed in conventional farms (12 to 18%), even though the decrease of milk yield from LG-2 to LG-3 was lower (1%) than in conventional farms (3 to 9%). For the nutritional composition parameters (% fat and % protein) variation along LG was lower (generally <5% for fat and <1% for protein) although significant interactions between LG and FS were observed: whereas in organic and pasture-based conventional farms the % fat showed the same pattern as observed for the milk yield (increase from LG-1 to LG-2 and decrease from LG-2 to LG-3 in the zero-grazing conventional systems the % fat progressively increased along the number of lactations. When analysing the % protein, both zero-grazing and pasture-based conventional farms showed the same evolution as the milk yield, although for organic farms % protein progressively decreased from LG-1 to LG-3. Finally, SCC progressively increased with number of lactation in all FS: the increases of SCC from LG-1 to LG-2 and from LG-2 to LG-3 in organic farms (59 and 105%, respectively) were similar to those observed in conventional herds, except that the increase in SCC for the LG-2 to LG-3 in pasture-based conventional farms was about double. Finally, Farm explained the 26.9% of variability for milk production, 20.0% for % fat, 2.52% for % protein and 8.11% for logSCC. Comparison among Holsteins-Friesian and other purebred or crossbred cows within the same farm in organic systems Summarised data of milk productive parameters in comparable groups of lactations in farms with appreciable breed diversity (n=3) are presented in Figure 1. The detailed evaluation of the effect of breed only for the comparable groups of parity along the lactation in each farm revealed that breed was a significant factor for the % protein in the three farms, Holstein-Friesian cows showing statistically significant lower values compared to the other breeds or crosses in the same farm. In addition, for the LG-2 in farm#2, Table 3. Summarised data (expressed as mean±SE) of Holstein-Friesian milk production in organic, conventional pasture-based and zero-grazing conventional systems in North Spain. Different letters within the same row indicate statistically significant differences between farm systems (p<0.05). Different numbers within the same column indicate statistically significant differences between lactation groups (LG) (p<0.05). Organic (n=9) Conventional Pasture-based (n=5) Zero-grazing (n=5) Number of samples LG-1 4914 3009 4089 LG-2 3643 1968 2126 LG-3 2336 686 808 Milk, L/day LG-1 20.8±6.4a1 23.2±7.7a1 33.1±8.2b1 LG-2 24.0±7.7a3 27.3±8.7ab2 37.0±10.2b3 LG-3 23.6±7.7a2 24.9±8.8ab2 35.9±9.6b2 Fat, % LG-1 3.86±0.8423.59±0.8623.77±1.281 LG-2 3.92±0.8933.63±0.9723.81±1.171 LG-3 3.80±0.9513.39±0.9013.90±1.132 Protein, % LG-1 3.17±0.4123.12±0.3623.19±0.402 LG-2 3.14±0.3113.16±0.3933.20±00.412 LG-3 3.12±0.3713.08±0.3213.16±0.391 SCC, log10(103 cells/mL) LG-1 4.90±0.5314.79±0.5214.68±0.521 LG-2 5.10±0.5824.97±0.5924.89±0.632 LG-3 5.21±0.6135.31±0.6234.96±0.643 LG-1=cows at 1st and 2nd lactation; LG-2= cows at 3st and 4nd lactation; LG-3= cows at 5 or more lactation; SCC=somatic cell count Holstein-Friesian milk performance in organic farming in North Spain Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research March 2017 • Volume 15 • Issue 1 • e0601 5 extreme conditions they will be more productive and production costs will be lower (Simm et al., 2004). In this sense, it has been found that G×E caused a reranking of Holstein-Friesian animals between organic and conventional systems for fertility traits in Sweden and production traits in the Netherlands (Nauta et al., 2006b), indicating that some Holstein-Friesian cows are better suited for organic production than others (Ahlman, 2010). The results of our study indicate that at the circumstances of dairy farming in North Spain, organic farms produce less milk compared to conventional farms. Overall, organic Holstein- Friesian cows of various LG produced 52 to 59% less milk compared to their counterparts in zero-grazing Holstein Friesian × Brown Swiss cows had statistically significant higher % fat (3.73±0.17%) but lower milk production (16.3±1.2 L/day) than pure Holstein-Friesian cows (fat: 3.27±0.20%, milk yield: 24.6±1.7 L/day). Discussion Animal productive performance is the result of the interaction between genotype and environment (G×E), this interaction being specially relevant when animals are reared under particular environmental conditions (Diepen et al., 2007). When animals are genetically adapted to specific (such as organic production) or Figure 1. Milk production in organic farms with breed diversity (n=3). Details of lactation groups (LG) are given in the text. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences between breeds within each LG (p<0.05). Ruth Rodríguez-Bermúdez, Marta Miranda, Inmaculada Orjales, Francisco Rey-Crespo et al. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research March 2017 • Volume 15 • Issue 1 • e0601 6 conventional farms, but only about 10% less than pasture-based conventional farms. Differences in milk yield of Holstein-Friesian cows in organic and pasturebased conventional systems respect to those producing in zero-grazing conventional systems are likely greatly related to nutrition management (Walker et al., 2004). Horan et al. (2005) observed that Holstein-Friesian cows selected for high production have better milk yield under systems of high concentrate supplementation. As indicated in Table 1, in our study cows in zero-grazing conventional systems are supplemented with higher concentrate compared with the organic and grazingbased conventional groups. Our results are in accordance with a survey conducted in organic farms across 12 European countries that showed a lower milk yield per cow (5 to 25%) in organic than in conventional farms (Offermann & Nieberg, 2000). In addition, Ahlman (2010) showed similar results (lower production in organic) when considering Swedish Holstein and Swedish Red cows in organic and conventional systems in Sweden. However, in our study in the organic farms where breed diversity exits, Holstein-Friesian cows produce numerically (but not statistically significant) more milk litres than other breeds and crosses. It is well assumed that in zero-grazing conventional systems Holstein- Friesian cows have higher milk yields compared to other breeds (Heins et al., 2006a; Bjelland et al., 2011), because cows with high genetic potential for milk yield have better responses to supplements (Baudraco et al., 2010). In organic systems, information on the effect of breed on milk yield is sparse, although seemingly lower than in conventional systems: organic systems are based on pasture utilisation with low concentrate supplementation, a diet that could make interbreed differences less evident. In fact, when comparing different type of diets in conventional systems, Oldenbroek (1988) found that differences between Holstein-Friesian and other breeds, although always present, were more evident with diets with higher amounts of concentrate compared with those based on forages. Moreover, the evolution of the milk yield along the productive life of our organic Holstein- Friesian cows was very similar to that observed in their conventional counterparts. Milk yield production along the productive life has been well studied (Ray et al., 1992; Mellado et al., 2011; Ríos-Utrera et al., 2013): the increase of milk yield with increased parity is due to differences in the control of tissue mobilization between primiparous and multiparous cows (Wathes et al., 2007); lower consumption of feed per day of primiparous cows than multiparous cows (Dado & Allen, 1994), and increasing body size of older cows over that of firstlactation animals (Mellado et al., 2011). In general it is assumed that milk yield per lactation increased significantly until 3rd lactation and is maximum between 4th and 5th lactation (Ray et al., 1992; Gader et al., 2007; Ríos-Utrera et al., 2013). The fact that older Holstein- Friesian cows (LG-3) on organic farms were able to better maintain the milk yield could be interpreted as a positive fact. Longevity has decreased in conventional dairy populations due to selection mainly on production traits (Essl, 1998) and milk production has been shown to be unfavourably correlated with functional traits (animal health, longevity, and reproduction) (Ahlman, 2010); this situation leads to cows being culled because of health and fertility reasons, so productive life of modern cows is rapidly declining (Oltenacu & Algers, 2005). When analysing milk composition (namely % fat and % protein) no statistically significant differences were found between Holstein-Friesian cows in organic systems compared with conventional systems, even though both organic and zero-grazing conventional Holstein-Friesian cows produce milk with numerically high fat content (3.88%) compared with cows in pasture-based conventional systems (3.58%). On the contrary, protein concentrations were less variable and differences between production systems were slight. It is well assumed that fat and protein production is highly related to nutrition (Gordon & McMurray, 1979; King et al., 1990; Walker et al., 2001), depending not only on the quantity of forage and supplements but also in the composition of them (Palmquist, 1993); Walker et al., 2004). Consequently, differences in fat and protein production depend not only on the production system, but also along the year and the region. Ahlman (2010), in a study in Sweden, found lower fat and protein yield in organic farms compared with conventional farms, although the opposite was found in Canada by Rozzi et al. (2007). However, when comparing Holstein-Friesian cows with other breeds/crosses in the same organic farm, all breeds and crosses showed statistically significant higher milk protein concentrations than purebred Holstein-Friesian. On the contrary, differences in the fat content were lower, with the only exception of Holstein × Brown Swiss cows in farm#2 that produced milk with a high fat content compared to pure Holstein-Friesian. It is well assumed that in conventional systems Holstein- Friesian cows produce higher milk volumes but with a lower fat and protein content compared to other breeds such as Brown Swiss, Jersey or Swedish Blond (Oldenbroek, 1988; Heins et al., 2006a; Vance et al., 2009; Prendiville et al., 2011). Crossbred cows may be beneficial under a milk payment scheme that rewards higher components in contrast to systems where the payment is based on milk volume; in those systems care Holstein-Friesian milk performance in organic farming in North Spain Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research March 2017 • Volume 15 • Issue 1 • e0601 7 would have to be taken to select breeds, and bulls within breeds that could maintain milk volume (Bluhm, 2009). In organic farming information of the effect of breed on milk composition is sparse. Similarly to milk yield, organic (pasture-based) diets would make the interbreed influence on milk composition less evident compared with those based on large amounts of concentrate (Oldenbroek, 1988). The evolution of milk composition along the productive life of Holstein-Friesian cows reared on organic farms is very similar to that observed in their conventional counterparties; in general fat and protein concentrations increase from LG-1 to LG-2 and significantly decreases in the LG-3. The only exceptions were the slight (1%) although significant progressive decrease of % protein from LG-1 to LG-3 for the organic Holstein-Friesian cows and the increase of % fat also from LG-1 to LG-3 for the zero-grazing conventional. It is generally assumed that fat and protein percentages decreased when increasing lactation number (Schutz et al., 1990; Yoon et al., 2004), and we are not aware of the reasons behind this different result apparently related to the production system. We are conscious that the number of farms in our study is small and these results may be due to chance. When considering the sanitary status of the farms, no significant differences on the SCC were observed between Holstein-Friesian cows from different farm systems or between Holstein-Friesian cows and other breeds or crosses within the same organic farm. As expected, SCC significantly increased with number of lactation in all production systems and breeds (Reneau, 1986), particularly in cows with a high number of lactations (Tancin, 2013). Numerous studies have compared the SCC in organic and conventional farms worldwide, however no consensus has been found. Even though some studies indicate a lower SCC in organic dairy farms (Busato et al., 2000; Hamilton et al., 2006), most of them found the opposite (Hovi & Roderick, 2000; Zwald et al., 2004; Roesch et al., 2007; Rozzi et al., 2007; Sundberg et al., 2009) or very little difference between both production systems (Hardeng & Edge, 2001; Vaarst et al., 2006; Fall et al., 2008; Haskell et al., 2009). In addition to clinical and subclinical udder disease, factors like husbandry, management, genetics, and nutrition and associated metabolic and endocrine changes have some influence on the SCC. In this sense, at a hypothetical identical sanitary condition the lower milk yield and the higher mean age of lactating cows in organic farms compared with conventional farms could leave to a higher SCC in the former (Villar & López- Alonso, 2015). Differences in the udder health between organic and conventional herds are not necessarily only due to a direct effect of the organic management, and many other differences in management routines may exist between organic and conventional farms besides the “purely” organic and such differences might vary across studies (Fall et al., 2008). In fact, in studies conducted using identical experimental conditions, no differences were observed between organic and conventional herds (López Villalobos & Scott, 2003; Fall et al., 2008; Fall & Emanuelson, 2009). In our study, comparisons between SCC were always made at the same conditions, particularly number of parities and mastitis management (antibiotic based); however, if the SCC count was made at the bulk tank level it would be likely that SCC would be higher in organic herds because the mean age of the herd is higher, and the milk yield lower in organics (Table 1). Our results indicate that at the conditions of organic production of Spain the udder sanitary status is similar to that of conventional systems along all the productive life, and consequently it does not like that Holstein-Friesian cows could have a higher risk to suffer udder disorders related to a lack of adaptation to the productive system. In conclusion, the detailed evaluation of milk productive performance of organic dairy farms in North Spain, by comparing Holstein-Friesian cows (the main dairy breed in the region) from different production systems and, within the same organic farm, with other breeds and their crosses, did not show a lack of adaptation of Holstein-Friesian cows to the organic conditions. In organic farms, Holstein-Friesian cows produce slightly less milk (10%, but with a lower ingestion of concentrate) that in pasture-based conventional farms, but milk was similar in nutritional composition and for somatic cell counts. The limited available data from organic farms where breed diversity exists indicate that Holstein-Friesian cows produce numerically more milk than other breeds and crosses but with statistically lower protein content. Considering that in Spain organic milk production is mostly applied to liquid milk consumption and that the payment system is only based on milk volume, Holstein-Friesian cows would better fit the farmer interests than other breeds or crosses; in fact only 13% of organic farmers would consider the milk solid concentration as a relevant trait when selecting their cows. Other advantages of using Holstein-Friesian in organic dairy farming are more available information and fewer difficulties to find replacement heifers compared with other breeds. However, in addition to the productive performance, other parameters related to reproductive efficiency, animal health and consumer’s preferences should be fully considered when choosing Holstein-Friesian or other breeds or crosses for organic dairy. If finally, Holstein-Friesian was the selected breed, efforts should be made to find the cow best adapted to the organic Ruth Rodríguez-Bermúdez, Marta Miranda, Inmaculada Orjales, Francisco Rey-Crespo et al. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research March 2017 • Volume 15 • Issue 1 • e0601 8 conditions. New productive, reproductive, nutritional and economic studies would be needed to develop a genetic merit index for organic systems. This genetic merit index could be useful not only for organic dairy systems but would also be relevant for pasture-based conventional systems. Acknowledgment The authors thank all the farmers who participated in the study and the staff of regional dairy laboratories for analyzing the milk samples. References Ahlman T, 2010. Organic dairy production. Doctoral Thesis. Univ. Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden. 60 pp. Baars T, Endendijk D, 1990. 21 Jaar Familieteelt, 1967-1988. Louis Bolk Institute. Driebergen. 75 pp. Baudracco J, Lopez-Villalobos N, Holmes CW, Macdonald KA, 2010. Effects of stocking rate, supplementation, genotype and their interactions on grazing dairy systems: a review. New Zeal J Agr Res 53 (2): 109-133. https://doi. org/10.1080/00288231003777665 Baudracco J, Lopez-Villalobos N, Romero LA, Scandolo D, Maciel M, Comeron EA, Holmes CW, Barry TN, 2011. Effects of stocking rate on pasture production, milk production and reproduction of supplemented crossbred Holstein-Jersey dairy cows grazing lucerne pasture. Anim Feed Sci Tech 168 (1-2): 131-143. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.03.017 Begley N, Pierce KM, Buckley F, 2009. Milk production, udder health, body condition score and fertility performance of Holstein-Friesian, Norwegian Red and Norwegian Red × Holstein-Friesian cows on Irish dairy farms. In: Breeding in robustness in cattle; Klopčič M, Reents R, Philipsson J, Kuipers A (eds.). pp: 191-198. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen. Bjelland DW, Weigel KA, Hoffman PC, Esser NM, Coblentz WK, Halbach TJ, 2011. Production, reproduction, health, and growth traits in backcross Holstein × Jersey cows and their Holstein contemporaries. J Dairy Sci 94 (10): 5194- 5203. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2011-4300 Bluhm W, 2009. The role of crossbreeding in UK dairy breeding. https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/view/11739604/therole-of-crossbreeding-in-uk-dairy-breeding Brotherstone S, Goddard M, 2005. Artificial selection and maintenance of genetic variance in the global dairy cow population. Philos T R Soc B 360: 1479-1488. https://doi. org/10.1098/rstb.2005.1668 Busato A, Trachsel P, Schällibaum M, Blum JW, 2000. Udder health and risk factors for subclinical mastitis in organic dairy farms in Switzerland. Prev Vet Med 44 (3-4): 205- 220. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-5877(00)00104-5 Dado RG, Allen MS, 1994. Variation in and relationships among feeding, chewing, and drinking variables for lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 77 (1): 132-144. https:// doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(94)76936-8 Diepen P Van, McLean B, Frost D, 2007. Livestock breeds and organic farming systems. ADAS Pwllpeiran, 39 pp. http://orgprints.org/10822/1/breeds07.pdf EC, 2007. Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 of 28 June 2007 on organic production and labelling of organic products and repealling Regulation (ECC) No 2092/91. Official Journal of European Communities L189: 1-23. 28 June 2007. Endendijk D, Baars T, 2001. Family breeding at the Rivelinohoeve, a case study. Proc IV NAHWOA Workshop Network for Animal Health and Welfare in Organic Agriculture,Wageningen (The Netherlands), March 24-27. pp: 35-43. Essl A, 1998. Longevity in dairy cattle breeding: A review. Livest Prod Sci 57 (1): 79-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0301-6226(98)00160-2 Falconer DS, Mackay TFC, 1996. Introduction to quantitative genetics. Biochim Biophys Acta 4 (9):1-464. Fall N, Emanuelson U, Martinsson K, Jonsson S, 2008. Udder health at a Swedish research farm with both organic and conventional dairy cow management. Prev Vet Med 83 (2): 186-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2007.07.003 Fall N, Emanuelson U, 2009. Milk yield, udder health and reproductive performance in Swedish organic and conventional dairy herds. J Dairy Res 76: 402-410. https:// doi.org/10.1017/S0022029909990045 Gader A, Ahmed M, Musa L, Peters K, 2007. Milk yield and reproductive performance of Friesian cows under Sudan tropical conditions. Arch Tierz 50: 155-164. González-Recio O, Alenda R, Chang YM, Weigel KA, Gianola D, 2006. Selection for female fertility using censored fertility traits and investigation of the relationship with milk production. J Dairy Sci 89 (11): 4438-4444. https:// doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72492-4 Gordon F, McMurray C, 1979. The optimum level of protein in the supplement for dairy cows with access to grass silage. Animal Prod 29: 283-291. https://doi.org/10.1017/ S0003356100023539 Hamilton C, Emanuelson U, Forslund K, Hansson I, Ekman T, 2006. Mastitis and related management factors in certified organic dairy herds in Sweden. Acta Vet Scand 48: 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1751-0147-48-11 Hardeng F, Edge VL, 2001. Mastitis, ketosis, and milk fever in 31 organic and 93 conventional Norwegian dairy herds. J Dairy Sci 84 (12): 2673-2679. https://doi.org/10.3168/ jds.S0022-0302(01)74721-2 Haskell MJ, Langford FM, Jack MC, Sherwood L, Lawrence AB, Rutherford KMD, 2009. The effect of organic status Holstein-Friesian milk performance in organic farming in North Spain Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research March 2017 • Volume 15 • Issue 1 • e0601 9 and management practices on somatic cell counts on UK dairy farms. J Dairy Sci 92 (8): 3775-3780. https://doi. org/10.3168/jds.2009-2105 Heins BJ, Hansen LB, Seykora AJ, 2006a. Production of pure Holsteins versus crossbreds of Holstein with Normande, Montbeliarde, and Scandinavian Red. J Dairy Sci 89 (7): 2799-2804. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022- 0302(06)72356-6 Heins BJ, Hansen LB, Seykora AJ, 2006b. Fertility and survival of pure Holsteins versus crossbreds of Holstein with Normande, Montbeliarde, and Scandinavian Red. J Dairy Sci 89 (12): 4944-4951. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds. S0022-0302(06)72545-0 Horan B, Dillon P, Berry DP, O’Connor P, Rath M, 2005. The effect of strain of Holstein-Friesian, feeding system and parity on lactation curves characteristics of spring-calving dairy cows. Livest Prod Sci 95 (3): 231-241. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.livprodsci.2004.12.021 Hovi M, Roderick S, 2000. Mastitis and mastitis control strategies in organic milk. Cattle Practice 8 (3): 259-264. IFOAM, 2012. The IFOAM norms for organic production and processing. https://www.ifoam.bio/sites/default/files/page/ files/ifoam_norms_version_august_2012_with_cover.pdf King K, Stockdale C, Trigg T. 1990. Influence of high energy supplements containing fatty acids on productivity of pasture-fed dairy cows. Aust J Exp Agr 30: 11-16. https:// doi.org/10.1071/EA9900011 Lopez-Villalobos N, Garrick DJ, Holmes CW, Blair HT, Spelman RJ, 2000. Profitabilities of some mating systems for dairy herds in New Zealand. J Dairy Sci 83 (1): 144- 153. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(00)74865-X Lopez-Villalobos N, Scott J, 2003. Frequency of mastitis and variation in somatic cell counts throughout the lactation in cows managed organically or conventionally; Year 1. Proc New Zeal Soc Anim Prod, Queenstown (New Zealand). pp: 138-139. Macdonald KA, Penno JW, Lancaster JAS, Roche JR, 2008. Effect of stocking rate on pasture production, milk production, and reproduction of dairy cows in pasturebased systems. J Dairy Sci 91 (5): 2151-2163. https://doi. org/10.3168/jds.2007-0630 MAGRAMA, 2014. Agricultura ecológica, Estadísticas 2013. Ministerio de Agricultura, Alimentación y Medio Ambiente, Secretaría General Técnica. http://www. mapama.gob.es/es/alimentacion/temas/la-agricultura- ecologica/Estadisticas_AE_2013_tcm7-351187.pdf Mellado M, Antonio-Chirino E, Meza-Herrera C, Veliz FG, Arevalo JR, Mellado J, de Santiago A, 2011. Effect of lactation number, year, and season of initiation of lactation on milk yield of cows hormonally induced into lactation and treated with recombinant bovine somatotropin. J Dairy Sci 94 (9): 4524-4530. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2011-4152 Nauta WJ, 2001. Breeding strategies for organic animal production, an international discussion. Proc IV NAHWOA Workshop Network for Animal Health and Welfare in Organic Agriculture, Wageningen (The Netherlands), March 24-27. pp: 4-13. Nauta WJ, Groen AF, Veerkamp RF, Roep D, Baars T, 2005. Animal breeding in organic dairy farming: an inventory of farmers’ views and difficulties to overcome. NJAS - Wag J Life Sci 53 (1): 19-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1573- 5214(05)80008-9 Nauta WJ, Brascamp EW, Veerkamp RF, Bovenhuis H, 2006a. Genotype environment interaction between organic and conventional dairy production. Proc JointEuropean Organic Congress: Organic Farming and European Rural Development, Odense (Denmark), May 30-31. pp: 30-31. Nauta WJ, Veerkamp RF, Brascamp EW, Bovenhuis H, 2006b. Genotype by environment interaction for milk production traits between organic and conventional dairy cattle production in The Netherlands. J Dairy Sci 89 (7): 2729- 2737. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72349-9 Offermann F, Nieberg H, 2000. Economic performance of organic farms in Europe organic farming in Europe : Economics and policy. Univ. Hohenhein, Stuttgart, Germany. 220 pp. Oldenbroek JK, 1988. The performance of Jersey cows and cows of larger dairy breeds on two complete diets with different roughage contents. Livest Prod Sci 18 (1): 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-6226(88)90064-4 Oltenacu PA, Algers B, 2005. Selection for increased production and the welfare of dairy cows: are new breeding goals needed? Roy Swed Acad Sci 34: 312-315. https:// doi.org/10.1579/0044-7447-34.4.311 Palmquist DL, Denise-Beaulieu A, Barbano DM, 1993. Feed and animal factors influencing milk fat composition. J Dairy Sci 76: 1753-1771. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds. S0022-0302(93)77508-6 Prendiville R, Shalloo L, Pierce KM, Buckley F, 2011. Comparative performance and economic appraisal of Holstein-Friesian, Jersey and Jersey x Holstein Friesian cows under seasonal pasture-based management. Irish J Agr Food Res 50 (2): 123-135. Ray DE, Halbach TJ, Armstrong DV, 1992. Season and lactation number effects on milk production and reproduction of dairy cattle in Arizona. J Dairy Sci 75 (11): 2976-2983. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022- 0302(92)78061-8 Reneau JK, 1986. Effective use of dairy herd improvement somatic cell counts in mastitis control. J Dairy Sci 69 (6): 1708-1720. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022- 0302(86)80590-2 Ríos-Utrera A, Calderón-robles RC, Galavíz-rodríguez JR, 2013. Effects of breed, calving season and parity on milk yield, body weight and efficiency of dairy cows under subtropical conditions. Int J Anim Vet Adv 5 (6): 226-232. Rodríguez-Bermúdez R, López-Alonso M, Rey-Crespo F, Cortés L, Orjales I, Miranda M. 2015. Raças de Bovinos de