scieee Open visual document viewer

A Latin-Hungarian Prisoners’ Song from the Beginning of the Eighteenth Century

Csörsz, Rumen István

Abstract

9

Full text

ALa in-Hunga ian P isone s’ Song om he Beginning o he Eigh een h Cen u y1 Rumen Is án Csö sz ABSTRACT ‘Inolus, Inolus’ is one o he mos mys e ious ex amilies in eigh een h-cen u y Hunga ian popula poe y. I eme ges in bo h La in and Hunga ian manusc ip e sions, p ima ily in Eas T ansyl a- nia and la e a ound Deb ecen oo. The sec e he o o he p isone ’s song is ajailed obbe who was sen enced o dea h. He mou ns his own a e lea ing amo al o hose a ound him, o o pos e i y. Acco ding o some esea che s, his song is abou aRumanian ou law leade , Gligo e Pin ea. O h- e s ied o iden i y ague A menian e e ences in he ex . A eassu ing solu ion has no ye been ound. Ano he complex mo i is he hidden easu e in he linden ee, abou which he p o ago- nis migh ha e sen some encoded message in La in om he p ison. This opic is e y popula in ales bu no in linguis ic con ex , so we a e almos unable o decode i . I is a ypical model-poem o ou popula poe y and wa ns us agains a oo easy and quick in e p e a ion; mo eo e , i gi es us s eng h and pa ience o p o ec us om he dange o a‘ oo clea -cu o be ue’ inal conclusion. KEYWORDS: p isone song, ou law, La in, Romania, Hunga y Sha e he linden ee un il i allows i sel o be sha ed (ea ly Hunga ian p o e b) János Bocsko Junio began collec ing his songbook2 on 16May 1716, in Csíkszen lé- lek ( oday’s Leliceni), ase lemen loca ed in he Eas e n bo de o T ansyl ania. The e was a umou abou i being he wo k o aku uc soldie (someone igh ing on P ince Fe enc Rákóczi’s side), as he li le pocke -sized book is ull o songs which we e popula in his his o ical pe iod. Rega dless, he collec o o hese songs mus ha e been as uden a he ime, mos p obably in Csíksomlyó ( oday’s Sumuleu, dis ic o Mie cu ea Ciuc). La e he became he assesso o Csíkszék; ou las da a on him is om 1767, allowing us o calcula e his age. His a he , Mihály Bocsko , was hiding in Molda ia wi h his ellow- igh e s, a e he all o he Rákóczi’s Wa o Independence (1703–1711). His son pe haps selec ed hese ku uc songs o ill he i s uni o his bookle o s eng hen his amily he i age and iden i y (Csö sz 2003, pp.20–30). 1 In Hunga ian: Egy la in–magya abének a18.század elejé ől (Csö sz, 2017, pp.87–110). T ansla ed by É a Pe őczi and Dá id Szabó. Special hanks o he help o László Szö ényi, Is án Vadai†, Benedek Zsigmond, Is án Kilián†, Imola Küllős, Judi Gulyás, Má ia Domo- kos, And ás Szabó, E nő Albe †, and Adél Csa a. 2 Cluj-Napoca, Uni e si y Lib a y Lucian Blaga, Special collec ion, Ms. 12. In de ail: S oll, 2002, n .180. OPEN ACCESS 10 STUDIA ETHNOLOGICA PRAGENSIA 1/2023 This poe ical collec ion was enla ged by János Bocsko by 1739 and he o de o ex s was la e modi ied (Ibid., pp.9–20). This a icle is abou wo poems which can be ound in he opening pa o he ‘ancien codex’, unde ahea ily deco a ed inne on ispiece ( oday si ua ed a 65a–b). The mys e ious La in ex consis s o 25 e ses, wi h he in- cipi , ‘Inolus, Inolus, co di mihi solus’. I is ollowed by aHunga ian e sion o 17 e ses, bu he wo a ian s a e no closely connec ed.3 We ind ‘cu es’ in bo h, while in he La in e sion some poo ly copied lines also appea . The i s s ophe o he Hunga ian poem se es as an a gumen a ion and eminds us o he i le o la e a ian s: The pain ul song o a amous hillside highwayman, Who was imp isoned by his innume able sins.4 The pa allel o his o iginal La in s ophe looks like his: Inolus, Inolus, joy o my hea , Whose iendliness owa ds me was b igh . Acco ding o he ansla o , ‘Inolus’ is he name o ape son, and he is men ioned by he imp isoned highwayman, bu he is no add essed in he oca i e case (*Inole), he is no pe sonally named, bu a he spoken abou . The au ho hen bids a ewell o he moun ains ich in sil e , o he ocky landscape and hills and woods, in a e y pas- siona e s yle: Thou, small hills abo e, c y o me, And hou, o my being ap isone , agile lowe s. Though my body will be aken in p ison, alas, The a ewell o you won’ happen un il my dea h. ( e ses 5–6) A e hese highly poe ical lines, he hie add esses he linden ee di ec ly: My kindes gi l, ich in easu es, C y, my only hope, plan o my pleasu es. Towa ds he soil mo e you highe b anches, Send you lea es he e in hei ull g eenness! ( e ses 7–8) And ali le bi la e : Oh, my mos p ecious ee, Iwill no see you again, Send alamen o you son, hope ully no in ain! 3 Ea lie Iassumed he Hunga ian e sion o be he i s (due o he many mis akes and mis- unde s andings o he La in a ian s), bu Iam no su e now (Csö sz, 2005, p.214). 4 Bocsko Codex, 67b. All he Hunga ian e se ci a ions ha e been published only in English. OPEN ACCESS RUmEN ISTVáN CSöRSz 11 The e was no ee iche han hou upon he ea h, The one who inds hou, inds pleasu es. ( e ses 12–13) A e all hese yea nings, he con esses his sins and asks God o ake him o hea en a - e his dea h: Take my inal a ewell, which Ibid he e, unde a es , Unde you b anches Ican’ es any u he . Joy o my hea , emain in good heal h, Woe, I’m punished o my sins in hei ullness! Oh, judicious God o engeance, Iask Thee To be me ci ul wi h sin ul me, Gi e me aplace a You doo in hea en And be blessed o i , o e e , amen. ( e ses 14–17) The mos e iden di e ence be ween he Hunga ian ex and János Bocsko ’s La in e sion is he lack o Ch is ian cadence; ins ead, his ex is uled by my hological al- lusions. This is no acciden al: i all hese a e old by he cha ac e o an an ique, o an allego ical, ic i ious ex , his pe son is no p aying, no appealing o he Ch is ian God. The Hunga ian e sion hus g ea ly di e s om la e a ian s. I is suspicious ha , hough Bocsko was amilia wi h he Hunga ian ex , he g ea ly elied on his pe sonal memo y, p oducing asomewha mixed, bu eshened e sion, e e ing o some pa s aken om he La in e sion. Sicelides Musae, D iades puellae, Da e gemebundos T is e oce sonos.5 Ano he impo an poin is he ‘D iades puellae’ line. Dedica ing apa o he s ophe o d yads is na u al, as in G eek my hology hey we e he souls, nymphs o he ees and he singe expec s sympa hy and ea s om hem, sha ing his ill a e. O pheus is also men ioned in he La in e sion o s eng hen he my hological local colou as, in O id’s e ses, he ees— many haun ed, su e ing souls— a e lis ening o he song o O pheus (Me amo phoses, Book 10). This is p obably why in he Hunga ian ex he linden ee is called ‘my li le gi l’, pe soni ying his lo ely plan , and e e encing a ans o ma ion, based upon he g ea La in mas e . In his way, we can y o cla i y he linden ee simile om se e al di ec ions. 5 The adap a ion o he e se in ano he Hunga ian e sion: ‘G oup o nymphs, beau i ul choi o he Pa cas, mou n me wi h wails and you i e-co ded lu e!’ Memo ial o Mihály Dezső (1729–1761), pp.66–9. Az Pin yi Eneke (‘Song o Pin ea’), e ses 15–16. OPEN ACCESS 12 STUDIA ETHNOLOGICA PRAGENSIA 1/2023 The La in ex o Bocsko could ha e been ep esen a i e o ano he gen e: alo e song, sung by agi l, who was unable o egain he hea o he un ai h ul belo ed. I his supposi ion is ue— hough no ela i e o his La in e sion is known— hen his ex amily ollows he same pa e n as o he pieces o public poe y in he se en- een h and eigh een h cen u ies. These all eme ge om alo e heme, bu his heme la e abandons he songs, and hey li e hei li es as lamen s, hiding peoples’ o p is- one s’ songs. The widely known ‘Őszi ha ma u án’ (A e he Au umn Dews), ‘Bok os búk habjai’ (Wa es o G ea Sadness), e c., a e all amo ous a ewell-songs o cou ing ones (E.g. Csö sz, 2016, p.43). Simila changes can be wi nessed in he ex amily o ‘I’m aP isone , Wai ing o be Se F ee’, he i s e sions o which e e undoub edly o he soul being imp isoned by lo e, a he han a eal, conc e e imp isonmen si u- a ion (Csö sz & Küllős, 2015, p.411). This ex amily can be ollowed o almos ahund ed yea s. In he c i ical edi- ion, wi h Imola Küllős (Ibid., p.79), we ied o summa ise all known ac s abou his song, bu a inal conclusion has no ye been eached. The seemingly well-o de ed a ia ions a e hiding dozens o ques ions, a he as p oo o ou s eady sea ch han ou wisdom. The ‘Inolus, Inolus’ song is known om eigh een h and nine een h cen u y manu- sc ip s, i s om T ansyl ania, bu om o he egions as well. Whe he he e was ap in ed e sion is no known. The i s a ie ies we e Ca holic, he la e ones e i- den ly P o es an . Mos a ie ies a e bilingual, consis ing o pa allel La in and Hun- ga ian e ses, hough some imes hese consis o only one e se. Fi een a ie ies a e known. 1. Bocsko Codex (1716–1739), 65a–67b. ‘Inolus, Inolus, co di mihi solus’. 25 La in e ses. 2. Bocsko Codex (1716–1739), 65a–67b. ‘Egy ő hegyi ol aj kese es éneke’ (ALamen Song o aChie Moun ain Thie ). 17 Hunga ian e ses. 3. Memo iale o Mihály Dezső (1729–1761), 66–69. ‘Az Pin yi éneke [Song o Pin ea]’. Inolus, Inolus, co de mihi solus. 22 e ses (11 La in, 11 Hunga ian, al e na ely). 4. Szádeczky-Miscellania (1755), pp.256–257. ‘Inolus, Inolus, co de mihi solus’. 4 e ses (2 La in, 2 Hunga ian, al e na ely). 5. Balás Józse -ék. (1784–1787), 102a–103b. ‘Inolus, Inolus, co da mihi solus’. 22 e ses (11 La in, 11 Hunga ian, al e na ely). 6. Dá idné Sol á i (1790–1791), n .174, ‘Inolus, Inolus, co de mihi solus’. 20 e ses (10 La in, 10 Hunga ian, al e na ely), wi h p imi i e musical no a ion. 7. Songbook o Im e Szeel (1790–1794) pp.104–105. ‘Inolus, Inolus, co de mihi solus’. 16 e ses (8 La in, 8 Hunga ian, al e na ely). 8. Holmi o Sámuel Rákosi (1791), 47b–49a. ‘Egy meg oga o ol aj éneke [Song o an A es ed Thie ]’. ‘Inolus, Inolus, co de mihi solus’. 28 e ses (14 La in, 14 Hunga ian, al e na ely). 9. Songbook o Má on Ve ess (1793), 78a. ‘Inolus, Inolus, ki mia szí em bús’. 2 Hunga ian e ses. OPEN ACCESS RUmEN ISTVáN CSöRSz 13 10. Academic Collec ion o Poems (end o he eigh een h cen u y), 6a–7a. ‘Can io ele- gans’. ‘Inolus, Inolus, ki mia szí em bús’. 12 e ses (6 La in, 6 Hunga ian, al e na ely). 11. Miklós Janko ich: Nemze i Dalok Gyűj eménye [Collec ion o Na ional Songs] (a e 1800), ol III, 173a–b. ‘Inolus, Inolus, co de mihi solus’. 20 e ses; copy o he a ian VI. 12 Songbook o János Rese ka (1801), 45b–46a. ‘Inolus, Inolus, co de mihi solus’. 12 e ses (6 La in, 6 Hunga ian, al e na ely). 13. Songbook o Sándo Jánosi (1802), p. [123], ‘Inolus, Inolus, co de mihi solus’. The page is cu om he manusc ip , we know he incipi only om he con en s. 14. Ádám Pálóczi Ho á h: Ö öd élszáz Énekek [450 Songs] (1813), n .206. sz. ‘Inol az ö - mény hegyekben’ [Inol in he A menian Moun ains]. ‘Inolus, Inolus, co de mihi solus’. 2 e ses (1 La in, 1 Hunga ian), wi h simple musical no a ion. 15. Collec ion o János Ve ess (1828–1830), 235. ‘Mindenha ó Is en, ki agy az egekbe’. 2 Hunga ian e ses.6 A e he i s La in e sion by Bocsko , wo pu ely La in a ie ies we e ound. Songbook om Lőcse / Le oča (1768), pp.129–130. ‘A ia de Inolo’. Songbook o Má on Lang (1789), 13b–14a. Thei ex s a e simila , bo h de i ed om he Highlands o Hunga y ( oday: Slo a- kia). The pu ely La in e sions we e composed ea lie han he bilingual ones. Apa om he ex by János Bocsko , jus one o ally Hunga ian e sion is known, ci ca 1828. I is no a a e phenomenon ha in he Bocsko Codex bo h he La in and he Hunga ian ‘U ex ’ di e om la e a ie ies. This collec ion is an excep ional one in many ways: i was ga he ed in an e hnog aphically pe iphe al egion, in Al-Csík (Lowe Csík), asmall and hidden illage. I s epe oi e is he e o e mo e unusual han hose collec ed in college ci cles. On he o he hand, Bocsko ew o e and en- la ged he poems. Because o he c ea i i y o i s au ho and he a e elemen s wi hin his local adi ion, his collec ion may be conside ed an excep ional piece o public poe y. These indi idual ea u es a e such ha on i s la e pages we ind u he p is- one s’ songs and lamen s w i en by he collec o , making i aco-mingling o adi- ional and pe sonal elemen s (E. g. ibid., pp.60–62). The la e e sions play a e y impo an ole. These a e connec ed o he wo in- ne s ophes o he Hunga ian ex o Bocsko , and wi h he inal Ch is ian p aye , which he lea ned somewhe e by hea and ci ed ‘a andom’; he e is no ace o i in his La in e sion. E en he opening o mula was al e ed, in he Bocsko ex we ind: ‘Inolus, Inolus, joy o my hea …’, implying he p esence o aposi i e pe son (o place?), bu in la e Hunga ian e sions a o ally di e en message can be seen: 6 See in de ail: (Ibid., pp.412–415). OPEN ACCESS 14 STUDIA ETHNOLOGICA PRAGENSIA 1/2023 Inolus, Inolus, The s a e o my hea is scandalous, The ock o A menus Is b inging back my ‘ ap us’.7 In p ose: ‘Inolus is he cause o my so ows; hey can be healed only by A menia’. Looking a he able below, we see wo impo an ac s: 1) The Hunga ian equi alen s do no include all o Bocsko ’s ex s and 2) The i s Hunga ian e sion does no ha e asequel; he la e ansla ions keep o aphase ea lie han he ‘U ex ’, o a he i s pa allels. The ex below is mo e o less comple e:8 Song o aCap u ed Thie Inolus, Inolus, Co de mihi solus, Rupes Ameniae, Meae deliciae. Quando os con emplo , Sempe le e cogo , Pe os Ameniae Gaza [!] eliciae. Co pus cap i a u , Gaudis p i a u , Mens ibi aga u , Ubi ec ea u . Lugi e socium, Lugi e cap i um, Nam ego lugebo Vos sempe de lebo. Tilia, ilia, Dilec a ilia, Indos au ea, Ex e na lignea. 7 Memo ial o Mihály Dezső (1729–1761), pp.66–9. Az Pin yi Eneke, e se 2. 8 Holmi (mixed collec ion) o Sámuel Rákosi (1791), 47b–49a; RMKT XVIII/15, n .79/VIII. Inolus, Inolus, The s a e o my hea is scandalous, The ock o A menus Is b inging back my ‘ ap us’. My eyes a e lowing wi h ea s When looking a my dea s, To my humble shel e And o my easu y, he ea e . My body is si ing in chains, In my hea no happiness emains, My b ain is walking o and o, Sadness u ns in o happiness, so. C y o e his p isone , Send him ea s o e e , While I am lamen ing Un il I’ll be hanging. My g eenes linden ee, My only easu y, G asping you ichness again Would be my eedom, my gain. OPEN ACCESS RUmEN ISTVáN CSöRSz 15 Flo ibus hian es, Ramo um enelis, Plo a e lac imis, Sublimi p opensi. Gladicibus [?] on is Taesse eam ludi , Beo um dixe i , Qui e succede i . Sicediles Musae, D iades puellae. Da ae genebundae, T is e sono oce. Mon es, mei mon es, Ad amici on es, Vale e sodales, Sub imb is la en es. Nec cho eas ducam, Nec ca mina dicam, Amplius sono um Bis sona con icum [!] Si possem uge e, Ca ce es umpe e, Non os elinque em, Sed ad os edi em. Sal e, dulcis pinus, Talle o um signus, Si e conspice em, Sub diu jace em. Summus mise ico s, Co dis mei aces, Dolui o [!] queso, Exaudi o p aeces Jamque o es polli Po i um pe en i, Qua e co dis sono Alleluja dixi. Towa ds he soil Mo e you highe b anches, Send he e you lea es In hei ull g eenness! The one can be happy Whoe e inds you, eally, As all my good deeds Mo ed in o you body. You also, my dea nymphs, Fo me in cho us sing, Play you i e-co ded ly e Un il my soul’s inal expi e’! And now, you, high moun ains, Quick o en s and bushes, I p ay you o o ge my sins And ell me some good hings. All my a ou i e songs, All my belo ed dances, I’m bidding you a ewell, Pomp and joy he e won’ dwell. I I could un om he e, F ee walk would be so dea , I would si a you doo , Like a ai h ul pas o . My spa kling, good ‘ oo man’, Keepe o my ‘angel’ [‘Thale ’] I I could ouch you shel e , Could I be a ee goe . God o ue jus ice, Ha e o all sin, le me ask Thee To ake his sinne , me, To hy holy me cy! Gi e me place a You doo in hea en, And be blessed o i , Fo e e , amen! OPEN ACCESS 16 STUDIA ETHNOLOGICA PRAGENSIA 1/2023 The age o his p isone s’ song is s ill unce ain, only Bocsko ’s da a gi es us some clues. Mos p obably i was composed ea lie han he pe iod when i was pu down (1716–1718), bu i is impossible oday o p opose ace ain yea . Close eading o he ex is a e y di icul ask. One hing is su e: an imp isoned pe son, clea ly desc ibed as ‘achie hillside highwayman’, bids a ewell o his coun- y and his iends. This can be lea ned p ima ily om he i le; he ex o he song does no men ion ha i s he o was a hie . Bu he hidden easu es a e men ioned, being concealed in he ca i y o alinden ee (‘ ilia’) o in apine ee (‘pinus’) and ou he o would gain much by eaching his easu e. The La in ex does no e e o he ac ha he imp isoned he o will be hanged, bu i is a eal Lei mo i in Hunga ian a ian s. I is no hing o he han ha , a e lec ion o he Hunga ian he i age o a e- well songs o pe sons sen enced o dea h. Bu wha can be ound abou he conc e e he o o his poem? Acco ding o some schola s i was ace ain Vasile Feke e (Black Vasile) who ough in he ku uc a my and wi h his oop o hie es, escaped o he hills o Gye gyó ( oday: Gheo gheni). The Ge - man (Aus ian) soldie s ied o ca ch him, wi h no success, and he con inued igh - ing agains hem. The p oblem is, ha ‘Vasile’ is anickname, he belonged o Rákóczi’s ci cles, and his eal name was László Mojszén (Se es, 2007, p.360). In spi e o being ac uel and b u al hie (o pe haps o his s ange ‘me i ’) in he ku uc a my he go highe and highe posi ions. In 1710 he was commanding 150–200 soldie s. We know absolu ely no hing abou his imp isonmen , a leas no abou alonge one, i ing in o apoem. A e he gene al amnes y he emained (mos su ely) asoldie and an o ice o he Habsbu g a my. Consequen ly, he was no a adi ional highwayman, and his sup- posed imp isonmen would no ha e led o he gallows. And om olklo e he is o ally missing. No like ano he he o-candida e, Pin e Gligo e (Pin ea, he he o, 1670–1703), he o he amous e olu iona y pe son. Acco ding o Ká oly Köllő, ‘[Józse ] G adányi9 could ha e hea d one a ie y o hese in Má ama os, whe e he bilingual ‘ku uc’ songs we e no ‘ou o ashion’ in he nine een h cen u y’. His announcemen e e s o only one sen ence o G adányi, un o una ely, wi hou any ex ological simila i y (1796). AHunga ian manusc ip (The Memo ial o Mihály Dezső, 1729–1761) connec s his song o ano he one, en i led The Song o Pin yi. And The Song o he Famous Thie Pin ye, was, acco ding o him, ‘amanusc ip om he diso de ed ma e ial o he Re o med College o Kolozs á / Clausenbu g [ oday: Cluj]’. Pin ea Vi ez is conside ed oday aRumanian na ional he o, and no jus an e - e yday hie — which he ne e was, only he eigh een h-cen u y unjus eco de conside ed him one. Bu we can ha dly p o e he iden i y o he Inolus-song wi h any o he Pin ea-ballads, hough in he Rumanian olklo e and in some Hunga ian legends— he was also he he o o innume able pieces o poe y. Józse G adányi’s U szuly (‘Bea ’), aRumanian pe son om Má ama os (G adányi, 1796, pp.46) could ha dly accep aHunga ian-La in song as his model, while being amilia wi h dozens o simila Rumanian ones. Pin ea did no die in p ison, he ell in ba le o he owne ship o he own Nagy- bánya ( oday: Baia Ma e), on 14 h Augus 1703, acco ding o o he s he con inued o 9 One o he bes known Hunga ian epic poe s in he eigh een h cen u y (1725–1801). OPEN ACCESS RUmEN ISTVáN CSöRSz 17 igh somewhe e else. In Rumanian olklo e he appea s in anoble ole: no as ap is- one , bu as a ue-bo n he o wounded in aba le o u ns in o as o m when— upon his black s allion— he escapes om his enemies.10 We can mee ‘ he song o achie moun ain highwayman’ in many u he pa a- ph ases. I can lead us o he ci cle o T ansyl anian olk-ballads, o he a che ype o ‘The G ea Moun ain Thie ’, which i s appea ed in he Molda ian collec ion o Ince János Pe ás, eco ded in 1843.11 The an i-he o o his shocking s o y is abou o kill ‘an A menian p ies ’, while his wi e— belonging o ano he na ion, ic im o a o ced ma iage12— is c ying a home. The husband e u ns, makes inqui ies, kills he and sends he body as a igh ening example o B assó ( oday B aşo ). Consequen ly, we ha e a ela ed he o and somehow ela ed ci cums ances; bu he s o y i sel is o ally an upside down one: ha man can’ be cap u ed and e enged, and he woman is an in- nocen ic im. The e is no wo d abou eg e ing sins, com o , o hidden easu es. Bu wha can we do wi h he ‘A menian line’ in he song? Though in he majo i y o he eigh een h-cen u y a ia ions o he ‘Rupes A meniae’ (Cli s o A menia, II:- XIV) i is epea ed e e y ime, his ac inc eases ou ins abili y. In he ex by János Bocsko ano he wo d, ‘a geniae’ appea s he e and he ansla es i as ‘huge cli s ich in sil e ’. In he i s s ophe o he VIII a ie y he e y wo d ‘Ameniae’ is no he ill-spelling o ‘A meniae’, bu one o he wo ds ‘amoeniae’ (kindness). In his case he A menian e e ence can be conside ed as ag amma ical e o o he ea ly copy; due o he La in educa ion and cul u al expe ience o he copying pe sons, ‘sa u a ed by’ he elemen s o La in and G eek poe y. The e o e, his au ho ial logic became e iden o Ádám Pálóczi Ho á h in 1813, so much ha in 1813 he o mula ed he i le like his: ‘Inol in he Moun ains o A menia’. Bu e en in he case o ha ing an A menian hie as ahe o (i migh be possible!), i would be a he s ange o men ion A menia as he coun y o eedom. The na i es o A menia could ha dly ha e such expe iences in se en een h-eigh een h cen u y T ansyl ania. A ha ime, hey became aspo adic na ion; a e he occupa ion o hei homeland, hey we e h own h oughou he Balkan Peninsula and T ansyl- ania. One hing migh be possible: a hie o A menian o igin could be longing o his home coun y as he symbol o hei los na ional eedom, when, pe haps in he mys e ious coun y o ‘Inolus’— p obably in Molda ia o T ansyl ania— he became imp isoned. Bu a e we able o unde s and his opening line a all? This ‘Inolus’ can be ageo- g aphical name, bu no an accu a e one: p obably he ‘Imaus’, ( he La in-G eek name 10 Pape s in Hunga ian: Domokos, 1959, pp.418–28; Niculescu, 1988, pp.157–72. 11 ‘Vidd el jó széjel, búma , / Vidd el bána oma …’ (Blow away, good wind, my so ow and my ouble). (Domokos & Rajeczky, 1956, pp.61–3). Abou he ype o his ballad: Va gyas, 1976, ol. II, n .20 (‘The wi e o he Rogue’); Küllős, 2012, pp.402–9. 12 One o he sub ypes o his ballad desc ibes he o ced ma iage om he pe spec i e o he wi e, Bo bála Sep ődi, who was ma ied o in Poland. The ballads a ian he sub- ype ‘Rákóczi kis ú i’ (Young Mas e Rákóczi) is abou he agg essi e iancé, which migh ha e been impo ed o Hunga y by Mediae al Vallonian se le s (i belongs o he sub ype Ma ianson). OPEN ACCESS