scieee AI-readable full text Open interactive document viewer

Modification of the optical properties of molecular chains upon coupling to adatoms

Müller, Marvin M.,Kosik, Miriam,Pelc, Marta,Bryant, Garnett W.,Ayuela, Andrés,Rockstuhl, Carsten,Słowik, Karolina

Abstract

M.M.M. acknowledges financial support through the Research Travel Grant by the Karlsruhe House of Young Scientists (KHYS). M.M.M. and C.R. acknowledge support by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) (Project No. 378579271) within Project RO 3640/8-1 and from the VolkswagenStiftung. M.K. and K.S. acknowledge the support from the National Science Centre, Poland (Project No. 2016/23/G/ST3/04045). A.A. acknowledges support from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation with Grants No. PID2019-105488GB-I00 and No. PCI2019-103657, the Basque Government through the University of the Basque Country Project No. IT-1246-19, and the European Commission from the NRG-STORAGE Project (No. GA 870114) and H2020-FET OPEN Project MIRACLE (No. GA 964450).

Full text

PHYSICAL REVIEW B 104, 235414 (2021) Modification of the optical properties of molecular chains upon coupling to adatoms Marvin M. Müller ,1,*Miriam Kosik ,2,†Marta Pelc ,2Garnett W. Bryant ,3,4 Andrés Ayuela,5,6Carsten Rockstuhl,1,7and Karolina Słowik2 1Institute of Theoretical Solid State Physics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany 2Institute of Physics, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toru´n, Grudziadzka 5, 87-100 Toru´n, Poland 3Joint Quantum Institute, University of Maryland and National Institute of Standards and Technology, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA 4Nanoscale Device Characterization Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899, USA 5Donostia International Physics Center (DIPC), Paseo Manuel Lardizabal 4, 20018 Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain 6Centro de Física de Materiales, CFM-MPC CSIC-UPV/EHU, Paseo Manuel Lardizabal 5, 20018 Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain 7Institute of Nanotechnology, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), 76021 Karlsruhe, Germany (Received 11 October 2021; revised 24 November 2021; accepted 30 November 2021; published 13 December 2021) Adsorbed atoms (adatoms) coupled to the matrix of solid state host materials as impurities can significantly modify their properties. Especially in low-dimensional materials, such as one-dimensional organic polymer chains or quasi-one-dimensional graphene nanoribbons, intriguing manipulation of the optical properties, such as the absorption cross section, is possible. The most widely used approach to couple quantum emitters to optical antennas is based on the Purcell effect. This formalism, however, does not comprise charge transfer from the emitter to the antenna, but only spontaneous emission of the quantum emitter into the tailored photonic environment, that is evoked by the antenna. To capture such effects, we present a tight-binding formalism to couple an adatom to a finite Su-Schrieffer-Heeger chain, where the former is treated as a two-level system and the latter acts as an optical antenna. We systematically analyze how the coupling strength and the position of the adatom influence the optical properties of the molecular chains in the model. We take into account charge transfer from the adatom to the chain and vice versa via an intersystem hopping parameter, and also include Coulomb interaction within the chain as well as between the adatom and the chain. We show that coupling the adatom to one of the bulk atoms of the linear chain results in a substantial change in optical properties already for comparatively small coupling strengths. We also find that the position of the adatom crucially determines if and how the optical properties of the chains are altered. Therefore, we identify this adatom-chain hybrid system as a tunable platform for light-matter interaction at the nanoscale. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.104.235414 I. INTRODUCTION The Su-Schrieffer-Heeger (SSH) model constitutes a simple yet powerful and instructive tight-binding (TB) based model to describe the electronic and topological properties of solids, and induced a large body of literature within the past four decades [1–13]. Besides being a playground to explore topological phases [6,14] and quasiparticles [1,15–17], it is also capable of revealing transport properties of organic polymers such as polyacetylene [18] and the electronic energy level diagrams of molecular chains, for instance, if applied to finite systems. Moreover, it is to a large extent analytically solvable and, therefore, allows for powerful conceptual insights into the underlying physical principles. Within the model, it can be readily decided if a given atomic chain is electronically conducting or acts as an insulator. Additionally, nontrivial topological phases and the appearance of near-zero energy edge states in finite chains can be investigated. All these features can be traced back to chains of atoms with *[email protected] †[email protected] only slightly different coupling constants that give rise to three fundamentally different systems: the linear atomic chain (conductor), the dimerized atomic chain (conventional insulator), and the topological insulator. These systems are physically realized in nature through several organic molecules. Linear polyenes, for instance, exhibit electrons that occupy pzorbitals of their hosting carbon atoms. Therefore, these molecules can be understood as a realization of a one-dimensional (1D) electron gas that is almost completely delocalized along the molecule. Hence an analogy to the metallic homogeneous 1D electron gas may be established [19]. Polyacetylenes, on the other hand, constitute representatives of insulating organic polymers with alternating bond strengths between neighboring carbon atoms and only exhibit considerable electronic transport upon doping [20–22]. Moreover, 1D atomic chains can as well be realized artificially by growing them on a substrate [23–30]. Quasi-1D reconstructions formed by metal deposition on silicon wafers [31,32], and also vacancies with dangling bonds on silicon wafers, may form 1D chains of atomlike systems [33–36]. We want to investigate the effect of introducing an electronically coupled adsorbed atom (adatom) into the TB description of the above mentioned finite SSH chains. 2469-9950/2021/104(23)/235414(15) 235414-1 ©2021 American Physical Society MARVIN M. MÜLLER et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW B 104, 235414 (2021) Coupling the adatom may result in symmetry breaking of the structure leading to a modification of its electronic properties and optical response [37]. Here, we aim to identify the parameters in the system that—if altered—influence these properties most sensitively. To derive statements that are as general as possible, we choose to couple the adatom to the SSH chains, i.e., generic models that represent metallic and insulating systems, and an insulating system that additionally hosts nearzero energy edge states. Our study reveals that the metallic linear chain is most prone to considerable modifications of its optical properties among the mentioned SSH chains upon coupling to an adatom. Structural modifications of carbon nanostructures can be intrinsic, in the form of carbon adatoms [38] or lattice defects [39,40], or extrinsic, given by foreign adatoms [41–43]. In particular, transition metal adatoms interact with carbon nanostructures through their pzorbitals [44–47] and, therefore, can be described within the localized π-electron picture. The adatoms can be treated with the extended Hückel molecular orbital model [48,49], a nonmagnetic counterpart of the Anderson impurity model [50,51] that has been successfully employed before by the group of Jaroslav Fabian [52–56]. They coupled one-level adatoms to extended bulk graphene in a TB framework to investigate spin-orbit coupling. In our approach, we treat the adatom as an effective two-level system (TLS), allowing for intraimpurity charge dynamics, such as spontaneous emission from the excited to the ground state of the adatom. The adatom is coupled consecutively to different atomic sites of the chain at various coupling strengths. The article is structured as follows. We first introduce the model Hamiltonian, three scalar measures to characterize the single-particle eigenstates of said Hamiltonian, and discuss the optical properties that follow from it in Sec. II. In Sec. III, we investigate the stand-alone SSH chains without the adatom as a reminding preparatory work. Section IV focuses on the hybrid chain-adatom systems without Coulomb interaction, whereas in Sec. Vwe take into account electron-electron interaction before we summarize our findings in Sec. VI. II. THEORY We assume the hybrid system to consist of two components: a nanoscopic SSH chain that acts as an optical antenna and an adatom which is effectively described as a TLS. Both the adatom and the chain are treated in a TB framework. In particular, we assume one mobile electron per carbon atom in the chain’s pzorbitals {|l} that are localized at rlin the vicinity of the corresponding host atoms l∈[1,Na] for chain of Naatoms. Mediated through πbonds that connect pzorbitals of neighboring atoms land l, electrons may change their location with a probability quantified by the TB hopping parameters tll. They are proportional to the overlap integral of neighboring pzorbitals. For simplicity, we do not take into account the spin degree of freedom. The TLS is characterized by its ground and excited states |gand |e, representing two active orbitals of the adsorbed impurity with energies fixed at Eg=−0.5 eV and Ee= 0.5 eV relative to the isolated chain’s energy levels. The adatom is coupled to one of the chain’s carbon atoms only, as it is the case for hydrogen, fluorine, and hydroxyl groups as adatoms, for instance [49,57]. The ground and excited states couple to the host atom in the chain via hopping parameters tg and te. A. Model Hamiltonian The system Hamiltonian consequently reads H=HTB +HTLS +Hinteraction =−  l<l,l,l tll(|ll|+|ll|) +Ee|ee|+Eg|gg| +te(|lce|+|elc|)+tg(|lcg|+|glc|),(1) where the atomic site indices l,lrun over the chain atoms, l,ldenotes a pair of nearest neighbor atoms, and lcis the chain’s atomic site to which the adatom is coupled. We denote the N=Na+2 energy eigenstates of the hybrid system by {|j}, where j∈[1,N] and H|j=Ej|j.(2) Here, the energies Ejare given relative to the TB on-site energies which are set to zero in the Hamiltonian in Eq. (1). The energy eigenstates may be expanded into the complete and orthonormal real-space atomic site basis {|l}∪{|g,|e} according to |j=cje|e+cjg|g+ Na  l=1 cjl|l.(3) B. State characterization In the joint chain-adatom system, the energy eigenstates of the stand-alone chain and the ones of the adatom hybridize, making it difficult to identify the stand-alone modes. In this paper, it is our goal to determine the conditions under which the presence of the adatom considerably modifies the optical properties of the isolated chain. We especially focus on the tunability of the chain modes. To achieve this goal, we put in place scalar measures for certain properties of the energy eigenstates that help to understand, quantify, and illustrate the changes that the electronic structures of the systems undergo. These measures map single-particle energy eigenstates to real numbers and, therefore, provide an intuitive manner to quantify their characteristics, which translate into optical properties, and to assign a physically meaningful order to them. The measures characterize the hybrid system for different parameter sets and especially for various coupling strengths and coupling positions. For the sake of brevity, from now on we use {|˜ l} = {|l}∪{|g,|e} for the set of all realspace based active orbitals in the hybrid system. 1. State localization We introduce the localization L|j, a measure that quantifies how strongly state |jis localized on certain chain sites |lor adatom orbitals |eand |g, L|j=(1−p|j)N N−1∈[0,1],(4) 235414-2 MODIFICATION OF THE OPTICAL PROPERTIES OF … PHYSICAL REVIEW B 104, 235414 (2021) where the participation ratio [58–61] p|j=˜ l|cj˜ l|22 N˜ l|cj˜ l|4=N ˜ l|cj˜ l|4−1 ∈[1/N,1] (5) is a measure for the number of atomic site orbitals |˜ lthat are significantly involved in the spatial distribution of the energy eigenstate |j[the second equality in Eq. (5) holds for normalized states only]. If the spatial distribution of state |j is uniform on all the sites in the system, i.e., cj˜ l=1/√N, then p|j=1 and L|j=0, and we call the state completely delocalized. For a state localized on a single site l0, i.e., cj˜ l=δ˜ ll0, we obtain p|j=1/Nand L|j=1, and consequently call the state fully localized. 2. State hybridization To measure how strongly an eigenstate of the stand-alone isolated chain is disturbed and modified by the presence of the adatom, we introduce the hybridization h|j. It is defined as h|j=1−|j|j0|,(6) where |j0is an energy eigenstate of the Hamiltonian Eq. (1) for te=tg=0 that evolves to |jwhen the coupling is turned on. Hence, in the completely decoupled system, we have |j=|j0and h|j=0∀j∈[1,N]. We want to emphasize here that this definition of hybridization depends on the order (index) of the states. Therefore, it is necessary to scan the spectrum for energy level crossings before interpreting the results. 3. State activity We are particularly interested in the optical properties of the hybrid system and the modifications thereof as we increase the coupling strength and change the position of the adatom. Therefore, it is not only necessary to identify the configurations which modify the electronic states in general, but in particular we aim to modify the set of states that is optically active, i.e., that is responsible for the optical properties. To quantify if and to what extent a state is involved in the optical interaction, i.e., how strongly it contributes to the optical absorption cross section of the system, we define the state activity a|jof state |jas a|j= N  j=1|sjj |,(7) where sif =|Ef−Ei||f|ˆ r|i|2is the oscillator strength of the electronic single-particle transition |i→|fwith the realspace position operator ˆ racting as l|ˆ r|l=rlδll. In case a|j≈0, we call |joptically inert. For nondegenerate states, this is equivalent to vanishing transition dipole moments between state |jand all other states |j, for example, for symmetry reasons. High state activities, on the other hand, identify the given state as a donor or acceptor state for singleparticle transitions in the hybrid system. C. Optical properties As the central figure of merit to characterize the optical properties of the system we choose the linear absorption cross section σabs(ω). All measures mentioned above are quantizers that characterize single-particle energy states. So far, we have not been asking if these states are actually occupied by electrons or not. This is, however, crucial to determine the absorption cross section, which makes it a property not only of the energy level diagram itself, but also of the number of electrons that populate it. Throughout the whole paper, we assume half filling of the energy landscape, corresponding to one mobile electron per atomic site orbital. Consequently, all states below the Fermi energy are occupied by two electrons and are unoccupied above. To isolate the interaction-mediated effects from the characteristics of the optical response that rely on the single-particle energy level diagram, we distinguish between the noninteracting and the interacting absorption cross sections, σni abs(ω) and σi abs(ω). The latter includes Coulomb interaction between electrons in the system, whereas the former does not. The noninteracting absorption cross section of the hybrid system can be expressed as [62] σni abs(ω)∝ if sif δε(Ef−Ei−¯hω),(8) where sif is again the oscillator strength and δεdenotes Dirac’s delta distribution broadened to a Lorentzian by a parameter ε=20 meV according to δε(x)=2ε/(x2+ε2). The indices i∈[1,jHOMO] and f∈[jLUMO,N] denote the set of occupied initial single-particle states from below the Fermi energy and unoccupied final single-particle states from above the Fermi energy of the noninteracting system, respectively, that contribute to the transition |i→|f. To compute the interacting absorption cross section σi abs(ω), we probe the system with a small-amplitude spectrally broad electric field pulse E(t)=E(t)ˆ ex, polarized along the chain direction (x), and record the resulting dipole moment p(t). The system’s response to a pulse polarized perpendicular to the chain direction is much smaller and at much higher energy and, therefore, neglected in this work. The way we take into account the induced Coulomb interactions and details on the computation of p(t) can be found in Appendix A. After Fourier transforming both quantities, we calculate the frequency-dependent polarizabilities according to αx,x(ω)= px(ω)/Ex(ω) and αx,y(ω)=py(ω)/Ex(ω). We then obtain the interacting absorption cross sections as σi x/y,abs(ω)∝ωIm[αx,x/y(ω)],(9) and σabs(ω)=σx,abs(ω)+σy,abs(ω), where Im[·] denotes the imaginary part. In Eq. (9), the Coulomb part is scaled by the parameter λthat (numerically) controls the Coulomb interaction strength. Setting λto 0 retrieves the noninteracting absorption cross section in Eq. (8) (see details in Appendix A). In the following, we successively discuss the electronic and optical properties of the stand-alone SSH chains, the hybrid chain-adatom system without Coulomb interaction, and finally the interacting hybrid chain-adatom system. 235414-3 MARVIN M. MÜLLER et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW B 104, 235414 (2021) FIG. 1. Jabłonski energy level diagrams (bottom left panel) and real-space illustrations of single-particle states (bottom right panel) of (a) the linear chain, (b) the dimer chain, and (c) the topological insulator composed of Na=70 atoms. The chains are illustrated in the top panel, where solid dark lines between neighboring atoms represent strong bonds and dashed light lines represent weak bonds. The black diamonds and color of the circles in the bottom right panels represent the real-valued expansion coefficients cjl of the states |j, whereas the size of the colored circles encodes their squared absolute values |cjl |2. We show the two single-particle states that are lowest and highest in energy, j∈{1,2}and j∈{69,70}, respectively. They are qualitatively equivalent for all three structures. Moreover, we depict representatives of the states that are most relevant for the optical interaction of the structure. They are located around the particle-hole symmetry line at E=0, which is also the Fermi energy for half filling. The topological insulator exhibits two strongly localized (nearly) degenerate edge states inside the band gap close to E=0. III. STAND-ALONE 1D SSH CHAINS As a first application, we study the three 1D molecular chains of the SSH model: the linear chain, the dimerized chain, and the topologically insulating chain. To create a topologically nontrivial system, we choose the number of atoms Na in our system to be even. The Hamiltonian reads Hchains TB =−(t+) Na−1  odd l=1 (|ll+1|+|l+1l|) −(t−) Na−2  even l=2 (|ll+1|+|l+1l|),(10) where we use the hopping parameter value of bulk graphene t=tll=2.66 eV [63] and =0 for the linear chain, = 0.3tfor the dimer chain, and =−0.3tfor the topological insulator (see schematic plots in Fig. 1). The transition from the semiconducting or insulating topologically trivial dimer chain (>0) to the nontrivial topological insulator (<0) takes place by crossing =0 via the gapless linear chain. As approaches zero from above, the dimer chain’s band gap decreases, it closes for =0 (linear chain), and opens up again for negative , however, bringing forth the two nearzero edge states of the topological insulator. Figure 1shows the energy level diagrams and several selected characteristic single-particle states of (a) the linear chain, (b) the dimer chain, and (c) the topological insulator made up by Na=70 atoms. As mentioned above, we assume half filling of the energy landscape, such that all states below (above) the Fermi energy E=0 are doubly occupied (unoccupied) in the linear chain and the dimer chain. The topological insulator exhibits two nearly degenerate edge states close to the Fermi energy E=0 that we populate with one electron each. We immediately notice that both the low-energy and the high-energy states are conceptually equivalent for all three structures. The physical difference between the systems becomes more pronounced the closer one gets to the energetic region around the Fermi energy E=0. However, this is also the energetic region where we find the single-particle states that are predominantly active in the optical interaction of the investigated systems. Therefore, we can indeed expect substantially differing optical responses from the three structures as we will show in the following. A. Linear chain The discrete energy level diagram of the finite linear chain in Fig. 1(a) results from quantizing the metallic band structure of the infinite chain. Additionally to the above mentioned lowand high-energy states, we show the |HOMOand |LUMO states. Their structures can be described as two nested modes of quarter wavelength shape of even and odd symmetry, respectively, on the two sublattices of the chain. In Fig. 2, the green dotted line shows the linear chain’s noninteracting absorption cross section as a function of the excitation energy. The energy of the most prominent low-energy absorption mode around ¯hω=0.24 eV coincides exactly with the energy difference of the |HOMOand |LUMOstates. To confirm the obvious conclusion, we quantify the contributions of single-particle transitions in the linear chain to the absorption spectrum with the state activity a|j. Figure 3(a) 235414-4 MODIFICATION OF THE OPTICAL PROPERTIES OF … PHYSICAL REVIEW B 104, 235414 (2021) FIG. 2. Noninteracting absorption spectrum σni abs(ω) for the linear chain (green dotted line), the dimer chain (brown solid line), and the topological insulator (yellow dashed line) for the parameter set given in Sec. III assuming half filling of the energy level diagram. The data of the linear chain have been scaled with the factor 1/4tomatchthe order of magnitude of the other two structures. (green diamonds) shows the state activity of all single-particle states of the linear chain. Indeed, we note that the |HOMO and |LUMOare the only states that significantly contribute to the noninteracting absorption spectrum. It can, therefore, be concluded that the prominent low-energy mode at ¯hω= 0.24 eV corresponds to the electronic transition |HOMO→ |LUMO. Along the same lines of reasoning, the two higherorder modes of the linear chain in Fig. 2can also be attributed to a set of single-particle transitions of nonvanishing osFIG. 3. (a) State activity a|jof the three molecular chains of the SSH model. The data of the linear chain (green diamonds) have been scaled with the factor of 1/4 to match the order of magnitude of the other two structures. (b)–(d) State localizations L|j∈[0,1] of the single-particle states of the linear chain (b), the dimer chain (c), and the topological insulator (d). While the linear and dimer chains exhibit localization values around Llc ≈0.33, the topological insulator’s near-zero energy states j=35 and j=36 localize strongly at the edges of the chain, cf. Fig. 1(c), and nearly reach L|j≈1. TABLE I. Energies of the single-particle transitions that contribute the three prominent modes of the linear chain’s absorption cross section that is shown in Fig. 2(green dashed line). Mode Energy (eV) Contributing transitions j 1st 0.235 |HOMO→|LUMO1 0.705 |HOMO −2→|LUMO3 2nd 0.706 |HOMO −1→|LUMO +13 0.705 |HOMO→|LUMO +23 1.170 |HOMO −4→|LUMO5 1.173 |HOMO −3→|LUMO +15 3rd 1.175 |HOMO −2→|LUMO +25 1.173 |HOMO −1→|LUMO +35 1.170 |HOMO→|LUMO +45 cillator strength. The precise correspondence is given in Table I. Furthermore, we note that, besides the states between |HOMO −4and |LUMO +4, all other single-particle states are optically inert, i.e., a|j≈0. This is in stark contrast to the activity of the single-particle states of the dimer chain and the topological insulator, as can be seen from Fig. 3(a) as well (brown squares and yellow circles). To engineer the optical properties of the linear chain, it is, therefore, desirable to either modify the optically active |HOMOand |LUMO states or to increase the optical activity of other states that are located further away from the Fermi energy by means of coupling the adatom to the system. Figures 3(b)–3(d) show the localizations L|jof the three chains’ states. It is interesting to notice that the localization of all the linear chain’s states have the exact same value. We can compute this value by plugging the analytical solution of the SSH model [6] for the linear chain’s lowest-energy state c1l= 2 Na+1sin( πl Na+1), for instance, into Eqs. (5) and (4). We obtain Lchain |1=1 3(1 −1 Na−1), which evaluates to 0.33 for a chain of length Na=70. It can further be shown that all single-particle states of the linear chain evaluate to this exact same value, Lchain |j=:Llc, independent of j. To visualize the weight with which the transition |i→|f contributes to the optical absorption, we present in Fig. 4the absolute value of the transition dipole moment |f|ˆ r|i|,as well as the oscillator strength |f|ˆ r|i|2·|Ef−Ei|of the transition. For the linear chain [Figs. 4(a) and 4(d)] and the dimer chain [Figs. 4(b) and 4(e)] we observe that both quantities behave similarly. The squares of the transition dipole moments in the top row are multiplied by the energy difference |Ef− Ei|and result in the oscillator strengths in the bottom row. For the topological insulator, however, we see a qualitatively different behavior. The |HOMOand |LUMOstates have a comparatively high transition dipole moment [see Fig. 4(c)]. Yet, the small energy gap of only E≈2×10−9eV effectively disables the channel between the edge states and leads to a vanishingly small oscillator strength [Fig. 4(f)]. B. Dimer chain The energy level diagram of the dimer chain in Fig. 1(b) is of insulating character. We observe a lower-lying and a 235414-5 MARVIN M. MÜLLER et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW B 104, 235414 (2021) FIG. 4. (a)–(c) Absolute value of the transition dipole moments |f|ˆ r|i|of initial and final states |iand |f, respectively, around the Fermi energy of the linear chain (a), dimer chain (b), and the topological insulator (c). (d)–(f) Oscillator strength |f|ˆ r|i|2·|Ef−Ei|of said states for the linear chain (d), dimer chain (e), and the topological insulator (f). higher-lying quasicontinuum of states which would constitute the valence band and the conduction band in the limit of an infinitely extended chain (Na→∞), with a band gap of size 4||≈3.19 eV. Besides the lowand highenergy states, Fig. 1(b) also shows the |HOMOand |LUMO states of the dimer chain. They display two nested modes of half wavelength shape of even and odd symmetry, respectively. We notice that especially the states around the Fermi energy exhibit a dimerized nature, i.e., neighboring atoms act alike and behave collectively as a two-atomic unit cell and not as individual atoms anymore. This is not the case for the lowand high-energy modes that conceptually look similar to the corresponding modes of the linear chain. Just as for the linear chain, the single-particle transition |HOMO→|LUMOproduces the most prominent resonance at 3.19 eV at the lower edge of the quasicontinuum in Fig. 2(brown solid line). Unlike in the case of the linear chain, however, the absorption spectrum is much richer. We observe many more modes above 3.19 eV that are of the same order of magnitude as the most prominent one. A way to consistently complement this finding is through the state activities of the dimer chain in Fig. 3(a) (brown squares). Although the |HOMOand |LUMOstates exhibit the highest state activity here as well, many states around E=0 are optically active and contribute to the absorption spectrum, and none of them is completely inert. As a consequence, many pairs of optically active states couple and lead to the formation of the quasicontinuum of comparatively dense lying absorption modes above the band gap. The slightly different localization values for the dimer chain’s and topological insulator’s states j=18 ≈Na/4 and 53 ≈3Na/4 with respect to other states in Fig. 3(c) do not affect the optical properties of the structure substantially due to the low activity of these states. C. Topological insulator The energy level diagram of the topological insulator in Fig. 1(c) strongly resembles the one of the dimer chain and is of insulating character as well. The states j=34 and j=37 are conceptually equivalent to the |HOMOand |LUMOof the dimer chain. However, we additionally find two near-zero degenerate states inside the band gap. They are strongly localized at the edges of the chain and attain localization values close to 1, as is shown in Fig. 3(d). Moreover, Fig. 3(a) reveals that they are mildly optically active as well, which leads to the formation of a few absorption peaks in Fig. 2(yellow dashed line) on the outskirts of the quasicontinuum in the range between ¯hω=2||and ¯hω=4||. This distinguishes the absorption spectrum of the topological insulator from the one of the dimer chain of equal length. While the most prominent mode at 3.19 eV is present in both insulating systems, the spectral position of the modes differs more the higher the energies of the modes get. The highest energy modes of the dimer chain and topological insulator, presented in Fig. 2, show this complementary behavior. D. Size-dependent effects In this work, we concentrate on chains that consist of Na= 70 atoms. To address the question of whether the number of atoms in the chain plays a crucial qualitative role in our study, we investigate the absorption characteristics and state activities of linear chains with different sizes. In Fig. 5(a),we present the square root of the absorption cross section for the linear chain of various lengths, with even numbers of atoms forming the chain. We note that the fundamental mode as well as all of the higher order modes redshift with increasing length of the chain. Additionally, the absorption gets stronger for longer chains. 235414-6 MODIFICATION OF THE OPTICAL PROPERTIES OF … PHYSICAL REVIEW B 104, 235414 (2021) FIG. 5. (a) Square root of the absorption cross section for the linear chain as a function of the number of atoms Nain the chain. The chain with Na=N0=70 atoms considered in this work is marked with a white dashed line. (b) Size-normalized square root of the absorption cross section for the linear chain as a function of the number of atoms Nain the chain. (c) Size-normalized state activities a|j/(Na/N0)forall single-particle states |jin the respective chains of various lengths. Please note the logarithmic color bar scale in panel (c). To account for these size-dependent effects, we show the adjusted normalized root of the absorption cross section σni abs/(Na/N0)inFig.5(b). We observe that the adjusted modes, and especially the fundamental mode, are spectrally rather stable and mostly size independent. Moreover, the peak values of the modes remain constant as a function of the number of atoms in the chain. The normalized state activities of the single-particle states in the linear chain a|j/(Na/N0) are shown in Fig. 5(c).The triangular shape of the plot originates from the fact that a chain of Naatoms provides exactly Nasingle-particle states in our TB framework. This different number of states limits the comparability of chains with different lengths. However, in chains with different numbers of atoms, we observe the exact same value for the normalized state activities of the |HOMO and |LUMOstates, for instance. The same reasoning applies also to all other states of sufficiently large chains. Consequently, we conclude that both the energies and the strengths of the normalized absorption modes, as well as the normalized state activities, behave uniformly in the sense that the normalized absorption and the normalized state activities are nearly independent of the chain’s size. Within the size range that we looked at, there are neither discontinuities nor other size-dependent effects that hint to the existence of a threshold size above (or below) which qualitatively different behavior is expected. Hence, in the following, we continue to concentrate our discussion to chains of a single length (Na=70), having in mind, however, that changing the size of the chain leads to quantitative modifications. IV. HYBRID CHAIN-ADATOM SYSTEM In the previous sections, we have discussed the electronic and optical properties of the stand-alone chain antennas. In the following, we will discuss the optical absorption in the presence of an adatom when te=tg>0. It is instructive to first investigate the case of noninteracting electrons. Within this idealized model one may directly deduce how modifications, that the single-particle states undergo upon sensing the adatom’s presence and that are due to the hybridization with the newly introduced adatom states, translate into optical properties through Eq. (8). In contrast, effects that manifest due to Coulomb interaction can be analyzed in an isolated manner from the previously mentioned aspect and are discussed in Sec. V. Figure 6shows the noninteracting absorption cross section of the hybrid chain-adatom systems as a function of coupling strengths, i.e., varying chain-adatom distances or TLS dipole orientations, and for different chain coupling atoms lc.The evolution of the system as a function of the chain-adatom coupling strength is presented in Figs. 7and 8. The former shows the state activity, the hybridization measure, and the localization of those states of the hybrid linear chain-adatom system that are close to the Fermi energy. The latter depicts the energy landscape of the three chains as a function of chainadatom coupling strength; the color of the lines encodes the parity of the wave function part on the chain of the respective states according to P|j=j|ˆ P|j=NA l=1cj,lcj,NA+1−l. In general, we note the linear chain to be much more prone to hybridize with the adatom and change its optical properties than the other systems under consideration. We show the main results for all three SSH model structures. However, we limit our detailed discussion to the more attractive case of the linear chain. A. Coupling to the edge The absorption spectra of the hybrid linear chain-adatom system in the top row of Fig. 6show that the coupling position plays a crucial role for the optical absorption. While coupling to lc=1 and lc=3 shows a similar effect, we notice that the absorption spectrum of the system is barely affected if one couples the adatom to lc=2. This observation can be explained via the absolute value of the real-space expansion coefficients |cj1|and |cj3|of the stand-alone chain’s energy eigenstates, which are energetically closest to the adatom’s states at ±0.5 eV. They are significantly larger than |cj2|. 235414-7 MARVIN M. MÜLLER et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW B 104, 235414 (2021) FIG. 6. Square root of the noninteracting absorption cross sections σni abs(ω) of the linear chain (a)–(e), dimer chain (f)–(j), and topological insulator (k)–(o). The very left column shows the absorption cross section in case the adatom is coupled to the edge atom lc=1 of the chain. The other columns show the same quantity for other coupling positions mentioned in the title of the figure. Please note that coupling to lc=18 corresponds to partitioning the chain according to the ratio 1:3 and coupling to lc=35 divides the chain in the middle into two parts of equal length. Furthermore, please note that the energy axis of the linear chain is cut at 2 eV, whereas the two insulating structures are shown up to 5 eV since they are lacking lowenergy modes in the uncoupled case. Also note that for te=tg=0 the shown spectra can be regarded as pertaining to the stand-alone chains without adatom as the absorption of the stand-alone adatoms is negligibly small. In fact, |cj2|≈0 holds true not only for the |HOMOand |LUMOstates [as can be seen in Fig. 1(a)], but also for the other states in the vicinity of the Fermi energy E=0. As a consequence, coupling effects are negligible in this configuration. In Figs. 6(a) and 6(c), we notice a strong redshift of the most prominent low-energy |HOMO→|LUMOtransition mode which is accompanied by a decrease in energy difference of the |HOMOand |LUMOstates in the energy landscape, as can be confirmed in Fig. 8(a). At the same time, the mode intensity drops for higher coupling strengths, since the |HOMOand |LUMOstates, that were of purely odd and even parity in the uncoupled case, P=−1 and P=1, change their symmetry behavior and couple less strongly. Moreover, another prominent mode builds up in the same spectral region. As can be seen from Fig. 7(a), especially the states |HOMO −1and |LUMO +1become optically active, when the adatom is coupled stronger to the linear chain. Indeed, a thorough analysis of this newly occurring mode reveals that it is related to the transitions |HOMO −1→ FIG. 7. (a) State activity a|jfor states closely below and above the Fermi energy of the linear chain as a function of the coupling strengths te=tgof the adatom states to lc. We investigate different coupling positions lc∈{1,2,3,18,35}. (b) Hybridization h|jof the adatom states with the states of the linear chain for different coupling positions. (c) Localization of the states of the hybrid linear chainadatom system. |LUMOand |HOMO→|LUMO +1.InFig.8(a),wesee that the transition |HOMO −1→|LUMOis symmetry forbidden in the uncoupled system, since both states are of even parity P=1. By increasing the coupling strength, however, the transition becomes allowed and manifests itself in Fig. 6 as the previously mentioned mode of increasing intensity. To further illustrate the inertia of the chain to couple to the adatom for lc=2inFig.6(b), we compare the hybridization in Fig. 7(b) for lc=1,3 and lc=2. In the former two cases (lc=1,3) we observe that all states in the given range show nonzero hybridization already for adatom coupling strength below t, i.e., they sense the presence of the adatom and are modified accordingly. In Fig. 8(a), this is reflected by the fact that all states are spectrally shifted and lose their well-defined symmetry. In the latter case (lc=2), however, we observe a vanishing hybridization for almost all states. Please note that the hybridization values for the two states below the |HOMO and above the |LUMOare nonzero only because they interchange their index [see Fig. 8(d)]. This is not the case for lc=1,3 [see Fig. 8(a)]. Furthermore, Fig. 8(d) reveals that the spectrum is not modified much by the adatom states. In particular, we notice that all states retain their parity and only states |HOMO −1and |LUMO +1interact with the adatom when they change their index in an anticrossing pattern. Figure 7(c) shows the localization of the hybrid linear chain-adatom system’s states around the Fermi energy. In the uncoupled case (te=tg=0), we observe that the adatom’s states |eand |gexhibit a localization of 1, since the state’s real-space wave function is fully localized on the respective orbital of the adatom. All other states attain a localization value of Llc ≈0.33, as already discussed in Sec. IIIA. 235414-8 MODIFICATION OF THE OPTICAL PROPERTIES OF … PHYSICAL REVIEW B 104, 235414 (2021) FIG. 8. Energy landscape of the linear chain (a),(d), the dimer chain (b),(e), and the topological insulator (c),(f) as a function of coupling strengths teand tgfor coupling locations lc=1 (a)–(c) and lc=2 (d)–(f). The color indicates the parity P|j=j|ˆ P|jof the part of the wave function that is localized on the chain sites, and which is the discretized analogon of ψj(r)|ψj(−r)in our framework. The edge states of the topological insulator have been slightly shifted away from zero for the sake of better visibility. Again, we observe a qualitatively different behavior of the localization for lc=1,3 on the one hand and for lc=2on the other hand. In the latter case, the ground and excited states of the adatom interchange indices around te=tg≈0.8tin the energy level diagram with the states |HOMO −1and |LUMO +1, respectively [see also Fig. 8(d)]. The states attributed to the linear chain’s continuum barely change their energy as a function of coupling strength. For lc=1,3, on the other hand, the energy landscape does not exhibit energy level crossings, but the adatom’s states fit seamlessly into the state continuum of the linear chain. An almost equally spaced energy ladder is building up again, similar to the energy level diagram in Fig. 1(a), however, incorporating the adatom’s orbitals [Fig. 8(a)]. Figures 8(b) and 8(e) show the energy landscape of the dimer chain for lc=1,2 as a function of coupling strength. We note that the adatom states in the energy gap of the insulator approach each other and produce a small-intensity low-energetic and redshifting mode in the noninteracting absorption cross section in Figs. 6(f) and 6(g). The remaining spectrum remains mostly unmodified. The topological insulator’s absorption cross section in Fig. 6(k) exhibits two strongly blueshifting modes for comparably small coupling strengths already. From Fig. 8(c) we deduce that the higher-energetic one belongs to the transition between the strongly dispersive parityless modes that dive into the quasicontinua at a coupling strength around 0.5t.The lower-energetic mode can be related to the transition from one of the strongly dispersive parityless states to the edge states. Hence their energies exactly differ by a factor of two. As revealed by Fig. 8(f), the topological insulator is less reactive for lc=2. The only modifications we see in Fig. 6(l) are the buildup of two redshifting weak modes in the low-energy region related to the states within the band gap, reminiscent of the dimer chain. B. Coupling to the bulk Before discussing the two right columns of Fig. 7where we couple the adatom to bulk sites lc=18 and lc=35 of the chain, we need to understand Fig. 9first. It shows the realspace representations of the single-particle energy states of the hybrid linear chain-adatom system for different coupling strengths (a) te=tg=0, (b) te=tg=0.5t,(c)te=tg=t, and (d) te=tg=2t. We have always coupled the adatom to lc=18, which divides the chain geometrically according to the ratio 1:3. In the decoupled system (a), the linear chain and the adatom are not hybridized and the real-space wave function either lives completely on the adatom orbitals (|eand |g) or completely on the chain (all other states). When we increase the coupling (decrease the distance of the adatom to the chain or align its dipole moment suitably), we observe in Fig. 9(b) that we induce population on the adatom’s sites for a significant number of energy eigenstates. Simultaneously, the wave functions of the lowest-energy and highest-energy states get attracted by the adatom. By further increasing the coupling strength [Figs. 9(c) and 9(d)], we observe that the adatom acts as a potential barrier for the wave function and effectively splits the chain apart into two stand-alone chains of smaller lengths. The real-space wave functions of most of the energy eigenstates are apparently locked on either side of the chain. Exceptions thereof are (i) the lowest-energy ( j=1) and highest-energy ( j=72) modes which are strongly localized on the adatom and in the close vicinity of the coupling atom and (ii) the |HOMOand |LUMOof the strongly coupled system which are localized on the adatom and on the shorter part of the chain. It is interesting to observe that the single-particle electronic structure of the whole hybrid system seemingly collapses into a small chain on the left of the adatom in Fig. 9and a longer part on the right. The 18 atoms belonging to the smaller subpart of the chain host nine prominent energy eigenstates below the Fermi energy and nine above. This sums up to 18 states, which is exactly the expected structure for a standalone linear chain of 18 atoms. The larger part of the chain behaves accordingly. Especially in the vicinity of the Fermi energy where the optically active states are hosted, we notice that every fourth state is localized on the left shorter side of the system, reflecting the partitioning ratio of the chain. These geometrical features are also apparent in the localization figure of merit in Fig. 7(c) for lc=18, where we see that one in four states shows a substantially increased localization for high coupling 235414-9