The N-Terminal Region of the Polo Kinase Cdc5 Is Required for Downregulation of the Meiotic Recombination Checkpoint

cells Article The N-Terminal Region of the Polo Kinase Cdc5 Is Required for Downregulation of the Meiotic Recombination Checkpoint Sara González-Arranz 1,† , Isabel Acosta 1,†, Jesús A. Carballo 2, Beatriz Santos 1,3 and Pedro A. San-Segundo 1,*   Citation: González-Arranz, S.; Acosta, I.; Carballo, J.A.; Santos, B.; San-Segundo, P.A. The N-Terminal Region of the Polo Kinase Cdc5 Is Required for Downregulation of the Meiotic Recombination Checkpoint. Cells 2021,10, 2561. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/cells10102561 Academic Editors: Miguel Vicente Manzanares, JoséM. Fuentes, Elena Llano and Pablo Martín-Vasallo Received: 2 September 2021 Accepted: 22 September 2021 Published: 27 September 2021 Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Copyright: © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ 4.0/). 1Instituto de Biología Funcional y Genómica (IBFG), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC) and University of Salamanca, 37007 Salamanca, Spain; [email protected] (S.G.-A.); [email protected] (I.A.); [email protected] (B.S.) 2Department of Cellular and Molecular Biology, Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas Margarita Salas, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), 28040 Madrid, Spain; [email protected] 3Departamento de Microbiología y Genética, University of Salamanca, 37007 Salamanca, Spain *Correspondence: pedr[email protected] † These authors contributed equally to this work. Abstract: During meiosis, the budding yeast polo-like kinase Cdc5 is a crucial driver of the prophase I to meiosis I (G2/M) transition. The meiotic recombination checkpoint restrains cell cycle progression in response to defective recombination to ensure proper distribution of intact chromosomes to the gametes. This checkpoint detects unrepaired DSBs and initiates a signaling cascade that ultimately inhibits Ndt80, a transcription factor required for CDC5 gene expression. Previous work revealed that overexpression of CDC5 partially alleviates the checkpoint-imposed meiotic delay in the synaptonemal complex-defective zip1 ∆ mutant. Here, we show that overproduction of a Cdc5 version (Cdc5- ∆ N70), lacking the N-terminal region required for targeted degradation of the protein by the APC/C complex, fails to relieve the zip1 ∆ -induced meiotic delay, despite being more stable and reaching increased protein levels. However, precise mutation of the consensus motifs for APC/C recognition (D-boxes and KEN) has no effect on Cdc5 stability or function during meiosis. Compared to the zip1 ∆ single mutant, the zip1 ∆ cdc5- ∆ N70 double mutant exhibits an exacerbated meiotic block and reduced levels of Ndt80 consistent with persistent checkpoint activity. Finally, using a CDC5-inducible system, we demonstrate that the N-terminal region of Cdc5 is essential for its checkpoint erasing function. Thus, our results unveil an additional layer of regulation of polo-like kinase function in meiotic cell cycle control. Keywords: meiosis; meiotic recombination checkpoint; Cdc5; polo kinase; yeast 1. Introduction Evolutionarily conserved Polo-like kinases (PLKs) are essential regulators of both mitotic and meiotic cell cycles. In addition to the kinase domain, PLKs are characterized by the presence of the polo-box domain (Figure 1A) that mediates the localization and recognition of their substrates, often primed by previous phosphorylation, providing an exquisite spatiotemporal mechanism for their regulation [ 1 ]. Unlike other organisms, such as worms and mammals, in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae there is a single member of this PLK family, the Cdc5 protein. Cdc5 is involved in multiple processes during the mitotic cell cycle, including entry into mitosis, cohesion cleavage, mitotic exit, and cytokinesis. In addition, Cdc5 also participates in the DNA damage response [2]. During the specialized meiotic cell cycle, a series of highly regulated events must be accomplished to ensure the distribution of exactly half of the chromosome complement to the gametes. These requirements include the establishment of physical connections between homologous chromosomes via pairing, synapsis, and recombination during prophase I, sequential release of sister-chromatid cohesion at chromosome arms, and centromeric Cells 2021,10, 2561. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10102561 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/cells Cells 2021,10, 2561 2 of 17 regions during meiosis I and II, respectively, and mono-orientation of sister kinetochores during the first meiotic segregation [ 3 – 5 ]. Cdc5 performs paramount roles in all these processes, highlighting the relevance of PLKs also during meiosis [ 6 ]. Cdc5 is required for exit from prophase I, triggering synaptonemal complex (SC) destruction and resolution of recombination intermediates [ 7 – 9 ]. Next, Cdc5 is also essential for meiotic chromosome segregation promoting removal of centromeric cohesion by Rec8 phosphorylation and establishing coorientation of sister kinetochores by triggering the nucleolar release of Lsr4/Csm1 and monopolin association to kinetochores [10–13]. Cells 2021, 10, x FOR PEER REVIEW 2 of 17 Figure 1. Unlike wild-type Cdc5 and Cdc5-db7A, overproduction of Cdc5-ΔN70 does not accelerate meiotic progression in zip1Δ. (A) Schematic representation of the polo-like kinase Cdc5, as well as the Cdc5-ΔN70 and Cdc5-db7A mutant versions, indicating the main functional domains: D-box, kinase, and polo-box. The sequence of the first 70 amino acids of Cdc5 is also presented. The consensus motifs RXXL and KEN for APC/C recognition are shown in red, as well as the corresponding mutations to generate cdc5-db7A. The reported CDK-dependent phosphorylation sites and the corresponding phosphomutants analyzed are shown in blue. (B) Time-course analysis of meiotic nuclear divisions; the percentage of cells containing two or more nuclei is represented. Error bars: SD; n = 6. At least 600 cells were scored for each strain at every time point. (C) The thermosensitive cdc5-1 mutant was transformed with empty vector or high-copy plasmids expressing CDC5 or cdc5-ΔN70, as indicated. The plate was incubated at permissive (24 °C) or restrictive (37 °C) temperature. The cdc5-ΔN70 allele is able to complement the growth defect of cdc5-1 at 37 °C. (D) Western blot analysis of Cdc5/ Cdc5ΔN70/Cdc5-db7A and Ndt80 production throughout meiosis in the same strains analyzed in (B). The Cdc5 protein was detected with an anti-Cdc5 antibody. Pgk1 was used as a loading control. During the specialized meiotic cell cycle, a series of highly regulated events must be accomplished to ensure the distribution of exactly half of the chromosome complement to the gametes. These requirements include the establishment of physical connections between homologous chromosomes via pairing, synapsis, and recombination during prophase I, sequential release of sister-chromatid cohesion at chromosome arms, and centromeric regions during meiosis I and II, respectively, and mono-orientation of sister kinetochores during the first meiotic segregation [3–5]. Cdc5 performs paramount roles in all these processes, highlighting the relevance of PLKs also during meiosis [6]. Cdc5 is required for exit from prophase I, triggering synaptonemal complex (SC) destruction and resolution of recombination intermediates [7–9]. Next, Cdc5 is also essential for meiotic chromosome segregation promoting removal of centromeric cohesion by Rec8 phosphorylation and establishing coorientation of sister kinetochores by triggering the nucleolar release of Lsr4/Csm1 and monopolin association to kinetochores [10–13]. Figure 1. Unlike wild-type Cdc5 and Cdc5-db7A, overproduction of Cdc5- ∆ N70 does not accelerate meiotic progression in zip1 ∆ . ( A ) Schematic representation of the polo-like kinase Cdc5, as well as the Cdc5- ∆ N70 and Cdc5-db7A mutant versions, indicating the main functional domains: D-box, kinase, and polo-box. The sequence of the first 70 amino acids of Cdc5 is also presented. The consensus motifs RXXL and KEN for APC/C recognition are shown in red, as well as the corresponding mutations to generate cdc5-db7A. The reported CDK-dependent phosphorylation sites and the corresponding phosphomutants analyzed are shown in blue. ( B ) Time-course analysis of meiotic nuclear divisions; the percentage of cells containing two or more nuclei is represented. Error bars: SD; n = 6. At least 600 cells were scored for each strain at every time point. ( C ) The thermosensitive cdc5-1 mutant was transformed with empty vector or high-copy plasmids expressing CDC5 or cdc5- ∆ N70, as indicated. The plate was incubated at permissive (24 ◦ C) or restrictive (37 ◦ C) temperature. The cdc5- ∆ N70 allele is able to complement the growth defect of cdc5-1 at 37 ◦ C. ( D ) Western blot analysis of Cdc5/ Cdc5- ∆ N70/Cdc5-db7A and Ndt80 production throughout meiosis in the same strains analyzed in ( B ). The Cdc5 protein was detected with an anti-Cdc5 antibody. Pgk1 was used as a loading control. Cells 2021,10, 2561 3 of 17 Like in mitosis, cell-cycle surveillance mechanisms or checkpoints also operate during meiosis to ensure accuracy in the completion of critical events. In particular, the meiotic recombination checkpoint blocks or delays the prophase I to meiosis I transition in response to unrepaired DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) arising from defects in synapsis or recombination [ 14 ]. Briefly, unrepaired resected DSBs are initially detected by the Mec1Ddc2 complex [ 15 ], followed by the phosphorylation of Hop1, a component of the lateral elements (LEs) of the SC, by the activated Mec1 kinase. Red1, another component of the LEs is an essential mediator of this phosphorylation event. Among the different residues of Hop1 that can be potentially targeted by Mec1, phosphorylation of Hop1-T318 is critical for the checkpoint response [ 16 – 19 ]. The action of the Pch2 ATPase is also critical to sustain adequate levels of Hop1-T318 phosphorylation and Hop1 localization to axes [ 20 – 22 ], thus relaying the checkpoint signal through the activation of the Mek1 effector kinase [ 23 ]. Different targets of Mek1 have been identified, including Hed1-T40 and Rad54-T132 that contribute to preventing intersister recombination by different mechanisms [ 24 , 25 ]. Mek1 also phosphorylates threonine 11 of histone H3 (H3-T11ph) [ 26 ]. Although the biological relevance of this phosphorylation remains elusive, it is a useful readout for checkpointinduced Mek1 activity [ 27 ]. Finally, Mek1 also phosphorylates and inhibits Ndt80, which constitutes a crucial downstream target of the meiotic checkpoint signaling pathway [ 28 ]. Ndt80 is a transcription factor that activates the expression of a number of genes including those encoding factors required to execute the prophase I to meiosis I transition, such as the cyclin Clb1 and the polo-like kinase Cdc5. The inhibition of CLB1 transcription upon checkpoint-dependent inactivation of Ndt80 by Mek1 is thought to contribute to meiotic cell cycle arrest together with the inhibitory phosphorylation of CDK1 (Cdc28) by Swe1 [ 29 , 30 ]. Cdc5, in turn, is involved in a feed-forward mechanism that results in checkpoint inactivation by promoting Red1 degradation [ 31 ], thus enabling exit from prophase I when DSBs are repaired and the checkpoint is satisfied. The levels of the Cdc5 protein during the mitotic cell cycle are exquisitely regulated. After exiting from mitosis, Cdc5 is degraded during G1 by the action of the APC/C-Cdh1 complex [ 32 , 33 ]. Deletion of the first 70 amino acids of Cdc5 containing the regulatory motifs, D-boxes, recognized by APC/C greatly stabilizes the protein [ 33 ]. Failure to degrade Cdc5 in the mutant lacking the N-terminal region (hereafter, cdc5- ∆ N70) has detrimental consequences for the cell cycle, including impaired control of Cdc14 nucleolar release [ 34 ]. During meiosis, Cdc5 protein stability is also controlled by APC/C, but in this case, associated with the meiosis-specific activator Ama1 [ 35 ]. Ama1-dependent control of the levels of Cdc5 and other factors enables the extension of meiotic prophase I length compared to the mitotic G2 phase [36]. In this work, we examine the relevance of the N-terminal domain of Cdc5 for the regulation of the activity of the meiotic recombination checkpoint. We show that the Nterminal region comprising the first 70 amino acids of Cdc5 encompassing the destruction box is required for the ability of the polo kinase to override meiotic checkpoint signaling. Unexpectedly, we found that this requirement is independent of the consensus motifs recognized by APC/C, which are also dispensable for controlling Cdc5 protein stability during meiosis. Likewise, the regulation of the checkpoint by the N-terminal domain of Cdc5 does not require known sites of CDK-dependent phosphorylation. Thus, our results uncover potentially unrecognized aspects of Cdc5 function and regulation that impinge on the control of meiotic checkpoint activity. 2. Materials and Methods 2.1. Plasmids Plasmids used in this work are listed in Table S1. Plasmid pJC29 containing wildtype CDC5 with an HA epitope at the start codon in the high-copy vector pRS426 was described in [ 37 ] and kindly provided by David Morgan and Sue Jaspersen. The pSS122 plasmid overexpressing cdc5- ∆ N70 was constructed as follows. A DNA fragment lacking the sequence encoding the first 70 amino acids of Cdc5 was generated by fusion PCR of Cells 2021,10, 2561 4 of 17 two fragments with overlapping sequences amplified using pJC29 as a template. The fusion fragment was digested with ClaI and used to replace the ClaI-ClaI fragment of pJC29. Plasmid pSS360 overexpressing cdc5-db7A contains an XhoI-BamHI fragment from pSS359 (see below) in pRS426. Plasmids pSS308, pSS309, pSS310, and pSS311, containing cdc5-T23A,cdc5-T70A,cdc5S18A, and cdc5-T29A, respectively, were constructed by cloning a 2.7 kb EcoRI-BamHI fragment from pEM130, pEM131, pEM137, and pEM138, respectively, into the same sites of pRS426. Plasmids pEM130, pEM131, pEM137, and pEM138 have been described in [ 38 ], and they were kindly provided by D. Kellog. Plasmids pSS252 and pSS253 contain an XhoI-SacI fragment from pJC29 or pSS122 harboring CDC5 or cdc5- ∆ N70, respectively, flanked by promoter and terminator regions, cloned into the same sites of pBluescript SK+. The natMX4 marker was then inserted at the unique XbaI site located in the 3 0 UTR of CDC5 and cdc5- ∆ N70 in pSS252 and pSS253 to generate pSS254 and pSS255, respectively. Plasmid pSS359 was generated by replacing the EcoRI-NsiI fragment in pSS254 with a synthetic fragment (gBlock, IDT) containing the cdc5db7A mutations. pSS254, pSS255, and pSS359 were used for targeting CDC5,cdc5- ∆ N70, and cdc5-db7A, respectively, to the genome after XhoI-SacI digestion. Plasmid pMJ998 was kindly provided from M. Lichten and contains P GAL1 -CDC5, P GPD1 -GAL4(1-848-ER), and the natMX4 marker that can be targeted to the CDC5 genomic locus after NsiI digestion. Plasmid pSS425 derives from pMJ998 by deleting the sequence corresponding to the first 70 amino acids of Cdc5 in PGAL1-CDC5. 2.2. Strains Yeast strains and genotypes are listed in Table S2. All strains used in this work are in the BR1919 background, except the cdc5-1 thermosensitive mutant used in Figure 1C, which is W303. The zip1 ∆ :LYS2 and ndt80 ∆ :LEU2 gene deletions have been previously described. To replace the endogenous CDC5 gene with the cdc5- ∆ N70 or cdc5-db7A mutant versions, wild-type or zip1 ∆ strains were transformed with XhoI-SalI-digested pSS255 and pSS359 plasmids (see above) and selected for clonNAT resistance. As a control, the pSS254 plasmid containing the original wild-type HA-CDC5 was also used. To generate CDC5-IN, the zip1 ∆ ndt80 ∆ double mutant was transformed with pMJ998 cut with NsiI. The integration of this construct results in a non-tandem duplication of CDC5 with the following configuration: P CDC5 -CDC5—P GPD1 -GAL4(1-848)ER—natMX4—P GAL1 -CDC5. In the case of the cdc5- ∆ N70-IN strain, NsiI-digested pSS425 was used leading to this genomic disposition: P CDC5 -CDC5—P GPD1 -GAL4(1-848)ER—natMX4—P GAL1 -cdc5- ∆ N70. All constructions and mutations were confirmed by PCR analysis and/or sequencing. The sequences of all primers used in strain construction are available upon request. All strains were made by direct transformation of haploid parents or by genetic crosses always in an isogenic background. Diploids were made by mating the corresponding haploid parents and isolation of zygotes by micromanipulation. The plasmids and strains used in each figure are listed in Table S3. 2.3. Meiotic Time Courses, Sporulation Efficiency and Spore Viability To induce meiosis and sporulation, BR strains were grown in 3.5 mL of synthetic complete medium (2% glucose, 0.7% yeast nitrogen base without amino acids, 0.05% adenine, and complete supplement mixture from Formedium at twice the particular concentration indicated by the manufacturer) for 20–24 h, then transferred to 2.5 mL of YPDA (1% yeast extract, 2% peptone, 2% glucose, and 0.02% adenine) and incubated to saturation for an additional 8 h. Cells were harvested, washed with 2% potassium acetate (KAc), resuspended into 2% KAc (10 mL), and incubated at 30 ◦ C with vigorous shaking to induce meiosis. Both YPDA and 2% KAc were supplemented with 20 mM adenine and 10 mM uracil. The culture volumes were scaled up when needed. To induce CDC5 or cdc5- ∆ N70 from the P GAL1 promoter in strains expressing GAL4-ER (CDC5-IN or cdc5- ∆ N70-IN strains), 1 µ M Cells 2021,10, 2561 5 of 17 β -estradiol (Sigma E2257, St. Louis, MO, USA) dissolved in ethanol was added to the cultures 24 h after meiotic induction in prophase-arrested zip1∆ndt80∆cells (Figure S1). To score meiotic nuclear divisions, samples from meiotic cultures were taken at different time points, fixed in 70% ethanol, washed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and stained with 1 µ g/ µ L 4 0 ,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) for 15 min. At least 300 cells were counted at each time point. Meiotic time courses were repeated several times. Averages and error bars from at least three counts are shown. Sporulation efficiency was quantified by microscopic examination of asci formation after 62 h on a liquid sporulation medium. Both mature and immature asci were scored. Spore viability was determined by dissection of spores from asci and assessing the ability to form colonies after 3 days of incubation at 30 ◦C on YPDA plates. 2.4. Microscopy To analyze meiotic nuclear divisions in DAPI-stained cells, a Leica DMRXA fluorescence microscope equipped with a Hamamatsu Orca-AG CCD camera and a 63X 1.4 NA objective was used. Bright-field microscopy images of asci were captured with a Nikon Eclipse 90i microscope controlled with MetaMorph software and equipped with a Hamamatsu Orca-AG CCD camera and a PlanApo VC 63X 1.4 NA objective. 2.5. Western Blotting Total cell extracts for Western blot analysis were prepared by trichloroacetic acid (TCA) precipitation from 5 mL aliquots of sporulation cultures, as previously described [ 39 ]. The antibodies used are listed in Table S4. The ECL or ECL2 reagents (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) were used for detection. The signal was captured on films or with a Fusion FX6 system (Vilber, Marne-la-Vallée, France) and quantified with the Evolution-Capt software (Vilber). 3. Results 3.1. The N-Terminus of Cdc5 Is Required to Bypass the zip1∆-Induced Meiotic Checkpoint We have previously reported that overexpression of CDC5 from a high-copy plasmid partially suppresses the robust delay in meiotic progression of the zip1 ∆ mutant imposed by the action of the meiotic recombination checkpoint ([ 39 ]; Figure 1B). Experiments using a kinase-dead allele have revealed that Cdc5 kinase activity is required for its effect on meiotic checkpoint bypass [ 39 ]. In order to gain additional insight into this meiotic function of Cdc5, we searched for other domains of Cdc5 that could influence its impact on the meiotic recombination checkpoint response. The N-terminus of Cdc5 has been previously described to be important for its function during mitosis. This region harbors a so-called destruction box that contains motifs recognized by the APC/C complex targeting Cdc5 for degradation at the end of mitosis [33]. We decided to investigate whether this domain is important for Cdc5 meiotic checkpoint function. We constructed a multicopy plasmid expressing a version of CDC5 lacking the sequence corresponding to the first 70 amino acids harboring the destruction box (cdc5- ∆ N70; Figure 1A). We transformed a zip1 ∆ mutant strain with 2 µ -based high-copy plasmids expressing full-length CDC5, the cdc5- ∆ N70 version, or the empty vector, and monitored the kinetics of meiotic progression by DAPI staining of nuclei. A wild-type strain transformed with an empty vector was also included as a reference for normal meiotic progression. As expected, the zip1 ∆ mutant transformed with vector alone displayed a strong meiotic arrest, undergoing meiotic divisions inefficiently and only after prolonged incubation under sporulation conditions (Figure 1B) [ 29 ]. Overexpression of CDC5 in zip1 ∆ resulted in an earlier onset of meiotic nuclear divisions and more efficient meiotic progression, though below wild-type levels, as described ([ 39 ]; Figure 1B). In contrast, overexpression of cdc5- ∆ N70 in the zip1 ∆ strain had no effect on the delayed and inefficient meiotic progression of zip1 ∆ (Figure 1B). The fact that cdc5- ∆ N70 overexpression does not suppress zip1 ∆ meiotic delay is not due to a lack of Cdc5 kinase activity of this truncated construct because, like Cells 2021,10, 2561 6 of 17 the plasmid expressing the wild-type version, it was able to complement the growth defect conferred by the thermosensitive cdc5-1 allele at the restrictive temperature ( Figure 1C ). We also monitored by Western blot the levels of Cdc5 and Ndt80 in these meiotic cultures. As expected, and consistent with the kinetics or meiotic divisions, the production of Ndt80 and Cdc5 was significantly delayed in zip1 ∆ compared to the wild type (Figure 1D). According to previous observations [ 39 ], in the zip1 ∆ mutant transformed with the multicopy plasmid expressing wild-type CDC5, the presence of the Cdc5 protein was detected at earlier time points, leading to an accelerated induction of Ndt80 production (at t = 20 h) in comparison with the zip1 ∆ strain transformed with an empty vector (at t=38h ). In contrast, although overexpression of the cdc5- ∆ N70 version led to sustained levels of this truncated form, it did not alter the deferred onset of Ndt80 induction characteristic of zip1 ∆ (t = 38 h). Notably, the delayed appearance of Ndt80 paralleled the late induction of the endogenous full-length Cdc5 protein expressed from the genomic locus (Figure 1D). Collectively, these results indicate that this Cdc5 N-terminal protein domain (1–70 amino acids) is essential for the ability of Cdc5 to suppress the checkpoint-induced meiotic delay of zip1∆when overproduced. 3.2. The Meiotic Checkpoint Function of Cdc5 N-Terminal Domain Is Independent of the Consensus Motifs for Targeted Degradation via APC/C The 1–70 N-terminal domain of Cdc5 contains two RXXL “D-box” motifs and a “KEN” motif (Figure 1A). These signaling sequences are present in proteins whose APC/Cdependent degradation is tightly orchestrated at specific cell-cycle stages [ 40 , 41 ]; in the case of Cdc5, it is targeted for degradation by the APC/C Cdh1 complex at the end of mitosis [ 32 , 33 ]. Indeed, at least the KEN motif in the N-terminal domain of Cdc5 has been shown to be functionally relevant to control the stability of a chimeric Cdc5 N1−80 -GFP protein in mitotic cells [ 42 ]. Since we observed that deletion of the 1–70 N-terminal of Cdc5 prevented its capacity to suppress the zip1 ∆ -induced meiotic checkpoint response, we examined whether this outcome was due to the lack of signaling from the D-box and KEN motifs, which are absent in the cdc5- ∆ N70 construct. To address this possibility, we used site-directed mutagenesis to create a CDC5 allele (cdc5-db7A) in which all conserved amino acids in both RXXL and KEN consensus motifs were mutated to alanine ( Figure 1A ). Surprisingly, unlike cdc5- ∆ N70, a high-copy plasmid containing cdc5-db7A resulted in similar dynamics of Cdc5-db7A production during meiosis to that conferred by wild-type CDC5 overexpression in zip1 ∆ cells; moreover, the timing of Ndt80 induction was also similar in both conditions (Figure 1D). Accordingly, overexpression of cdc5-db7A partially suppressed the delayed meiotic progression of zip1 ∆ to the same extent as the wild-type CDC5 did (Figure 1B). We conclude that the functional contribution of the 1–70 N-terminal domain of Cdc5 to the control of the meiotic recombination checkpoint response does not rely on its regulation via the consensus D-box and KEN motifs. 3.3. CDK Sites in the N-Terminal Domain of Cdc5 Are not Required for Its Meiotic Checkpoint Function In addition to the APC/C recognition motifs, the 1–70 N-terminal domain of Cdc5 possesses several sites identified as targets of CDK phosphorylation in mitotic cells ( Figure 1A ; [ 38 ]). A function for some of these sites in the regulation of Cdc5 protein function or stability during the mitotic cell cycle has been reported [ 43 – 45 ]. In order to assess whether the inability of cdc5- ∆ N70 overexpression to accelerate the meiotic progression of zip1 ∆ was due to the absence of a particular CDK phosphorylation event in the 1–70 N-terminal region, we generated high-copy plasmids carrying cdc5-S18A,cdc5-T23A,cdc5-T29A, or cdc5-T70A phosphomutants, in which individual CDK target sites have been changed to alanine (Figure 1A). Overexpression of either cdc5-S18A,cdc5-T29A, or cdc5-T70A increased the efficiency of meiotic divisions in zip1 ∆ to comparable levels as overexpression of wild-type CDC5 did (Figure 2A). Likewise, induction of Ndt80 production was similarly accelerated upon overexpression of the S18A, T29A, and T70A mutants (Figure 2B, green arrowheads), paralleling the increased levels of Cdc5 protein achieved at earlier time points ( Figure 2B , Cells 2021,10, 2561 7 of 17 green asterisks). These results suggest that phosphorylation of S18, T29, and T70 is not required for the ability of Cdc5 overproduction to override the meiotic recombination checkpoint. On the other hand, the high-copy plasmid containing cdc5-T23A transformed into zip1 ∆ conferred little or no effect on meiotic divisions (Figure 2A) and Ndt80 production (Figure 2B, red arrowheads), displaying similar levels and kinetics to those of to the zip1 ∆ strain transformed with empty vector. However, we note that, in contrast with the other phosphomutants analyzed, the multicopy plasmid expressing cdc5-T23A does not generate higher levels of the Cdc5-T23A protein ( Figure 2B , red asterisks), thus explaining its incapability to alleviate zip1 ∆ meiotic delay. Indeed, this result is consistent with the observation that the stability of the Cdc5-T23A protein is compromised [ 44 ]. Since, unlike cdc5-T23A, overexpression of cdc5- ∆ N70 leads to high steady-state levels of the Cdc5- ∆ N70 protein (Figure 1D), we conclude that the inability of Cdc5- ∆ N70 to suppress the checkpoint-dependent block of zip1 ∆ does not stem from the absence of CDK phosphorylation events in the known target sites of the Cdc5 N-terminal region. Cells 2021, 10, x FOR PEER REVIEW 7 of 17 changed to alanine (Figure 1A). Overexpression of either cdc5-S18A, cdc5-T29A, or cdc5T70A increased the efficiency of meiotic divisions in zip1Δ to comparable levels as overexpression of wild-type CDC5 did (Figure 2A). Likewise, induction of Ndt80 production was similarly accelerated upon overexpression of the S18A, T29A, and T70A mutants (Figure 2B, green arrowheads), paralleling the increased levels of Cdc5 protein achieved at earlier time points (Figure 2B, green asterisks). These results suggest that phosphorylation of S18, T29, and T70 is not required for the ability of Cdc5 overproduction to override the meiotic recombination checkpoint. On the other hand, the high-copy plasmid containing cdc5-T23A transformed into zip1Δ conferred little or no effect on meiotic divisions (Figure 2A) and Ndt80 production (Figure 2B, red arrowheads), displaying similar levels and kinetics to those of to the zip1Δ strain transformed with empty vector. However, we note that, in contrast with the other phosphomutants analyzed, the multicopy plasmid expressing cdc5-T23A does not generate higher levels of the Cdc5-T23A protein (Figure 2B, red asterisks), thus explaining its incapability to alleviate zip1Δ meiotic delay. Indeed, this result is consistent with the observation that the stability of the Cdc5-T23A protein is compromised [44]. Since, unlike cdc5-T23A, overexpression of cdc5-ΔN70 leads to high steadystate levels of the Cdc5-ΔN70 protein (Figure 1D), we conclude that the inability of Cdc5ΔN70 to suppress the checkpoint-dependent block of zip1Δ does not stem from the absence of CDK phosphorylation events in the known target sites of the Cdc5 N-terminal region. Figure 2. Functional analysis of identified CDK sites in the N-terminal domain of Cdc5. (A) Percentage of cells containing two or more nuclei at the indicated time points in meiosis. Error bars: SD; n = 3. At least 300 cells were scored for each strain at every time point. (B) Western blot analysis of Cdc5 and Ndt80 production throughout meiosis in the same strains analyzed in (A). The Cdc5 protein was detected with an anti-Cdc5 antibody. Pgk1 was used as a loading control. Asterisks and arrowheads mark Cdc5 and Ndt80 production, respectively, at the 24 h time point. See text for details. 3.4. The N-Terminal Domain of Cdc5, but not the APC/C Recognition Motifs, is Required for Efficient Meiotic Progression and Sporulation We next generated diploid strains in which we replaced the endogenous wild-type CDC5 gene by either the cdc5-ΔN70 or cdc5-db7A versions at its own genomic locus to further investigate the relevance of the N-terminal domain of Cdc5 for meiotic development. We found that higher levels of the Cdc5-ΔN70 protein were detected throughout Figure 2. Functional analysis of identified CDK sites in the N-terminal domain of Cdc5. ( A ) Percentage of cells containing two or more nuclei at the indicated time points in meiosis. Error bars: SD; n = 3. At least 300 cells were scored for each strain at every time point. ( B ) Western blot analysis of Cdc5 and Ndt80 production throughout meiosis in the same strains analyzed in ( A ). The Cdc5 protein was detected with an anti-Cdc5 antibody. Pgk1 was used as a loading control. Asterisks and arrowheads mark Cdc5 and Ndt80 production, respectively, at the 24 h time point. See text for details. 3.4. The N-Terminal Domain of Cdc5, but Not the APC/C Recognition Motifs, Is Required for Efficient Meiotic Progression and Sporulation We next generated diploid strains in which we replaced the endogenous wild-type CDC5 gene by either the cdc5- ∆ N70 or cdc5-db7A versions at its own genomic locus to further investigate the relevance of the N-terminal domain of Cdc5 for meiotic development. We found that higher levels of the Cdc5- ∆ N70 protein were detected throughout the whole meiotic time course (Figure 3A) suggestive of increased stability of the protein lacking the N-terminal domain. The peak of Cdc5- ∆ N70 (t = 20–24 h) was coincident with the induction of Ndt80 indicating that its gene expression is also normally controlled by Ndt80-dependent Cells 2021,10, 2561 8 of 17 transcriptional regulation. In contrast, the dynamics and levels of Cdc5-db7A production were similar to those of the wild type, indicating again that Cdc5 stability during meiosis is not significantly regulated by canonical APC/C signaling via the known consensus motifs. Furthermore, analysis of the kinetics of meiotic nuclear divisions revealed that meiotic progression was slightly, but reproducibly, slower, and less efficient in the cdc5- ∆ N70 mutant (Figure 3B). However, meiotic progression was not altered in cdc5-db7A (Figure 3B). We also monitored the formation of spores by microscopic examination of asci. The cdc5- ∆ N70 mutant, but not cdc5-db7A, showed decreased sporulation efficiency (Figure 3C) with a marked reduction in the formation of mature 4-spored asci. In particular, cdc5- ∆ N70 exhibited a preponderance of dyads compared to the wild type or the cdc5db7A mutant (Figure 3D and 3E). The immaturity of cdc5- ∆ N70 asci largely impeded their micromanipulation to assess spore viability, and it was impossible to dissect full 4-spore tetrads. In any case, the subset of spores that could be dissected from the cdc5- ∆ N70 mutant showed reduced viability (Figure 3F). We conclude that the 1–70 N-terminal domain of Cdc5 contains regulatory features different from the RXXL and KEN boxes that contribute to the normal development of meiotic nuclear divisions and spore formation. Cells 2021, 10, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 17 the whole meiotic time course (Figure 3A) suggestive of increased stability of the protein lacking the N-terminal domain. The peak of Cdc5-ΔN70 (t = 20–24 h) was coincident with the induction of Ndt80 indicating that its gene expression is also normally controlled by Ndt80-dependent transcriptional regulation. In contrast, the dynamics and levels of Cdc5db7A production were similar to those of the wild type, indicating again that Cdc5 stability during meiosis is not significantly regulated by canonical APC/C signaling via the known consensus motifs. Furthermore, analysis of the kinetics of meiotic nuclear divisions revealed that meiotic progression was slightly, but reproducibly, slower, and less efficient in the cdc5-ΔN70 mutant (Figure 3B). However, meiotic progression was not altered in cdc5-db7A (Figure 3B). We also monitored the formation of spores by microscopic examination of asci. The cdc5-ΔN70 mutant, but not cdc5-db7A, showed decreased sporulation efficiency (Figure 3C) with a marked reduction in the formation of mature 4-spored asci. In particular, cdc5-ΔN70 exhibited a preponderance of dyads compared to the wild type or the cdc5-db7A mutant (Figure 3D and 3E). The immaturity of cdc5-ΔN70 asci largely impeded their micromanipulation to assess spore viability, and it was impossible to dissect full 4-spore tetrads. In any case, the subset of spores that could be dissected from the cdc5-ΔN70 mutant showed reduced viability (Figure 3F). We conclude that the 1–70 N-terminal domain of Cdc5 contains regulatory features different from the RXXL and KEN boxes that contribute to the normal development of meiotic nuclear divisions and spore formation. Figure 3. Meiotic progression, sporulation, and spore viability are affected in the cdc5- ∆ N70 mutant, but not in cdc5-db7A. ( A ) Western blot analysis of Cdc5 and Ndt80 production throughout meiosis. The Cdc5 protein was detected with an anti-Cdc5 antibody. Pgk1 was used as a loading control. Quantification of Cells 2021,10, 2561 9 of 17 relative Cdc5 and Ndt80 levels is presented in the graphs. Protein levels were normalized with Pgk1 and relativized to the maximum value in the experiment set to 1. ( B ) Time course analysis of meiotic nuclear divisions; the percentage of cells containing two or more nuclei is represented. Error bars: SD; n = 3. At least 300 cells were scored for each strain at every time point. ( C ) Sporulation efficiency after 62 h in meiosis. Error bars: range; n = 2. At least 300 cells were scored for each strain. (D) Percentage of asci containing 1, 2, and 3–4 spores, as indicated, after 3 days on sporulation plates. ( E ) Representative bright-field microscopy images of asci from samples analyzed in ( D ). Scale bar, 2µm . ( F ) Spore viability analyzed by tetrad/triad dissection. In the case of cdc5- ∆ N70, only 3-spore asci were dissected. 3.5. Persistent Checkpoint Activity in the Absence of Cdc5 N-Terminal Domain To gain further insight into the impact of the Cdc5 N-terminal domain in meiotic recombination checkpoint function, we also examined meiotic progression in zip1 ∆ , zip1 ∆ cdc5- ∆ N70, and zip1 ∆ cdc5-db7A mutants by DAPI staining of nuclei. In addition, checkpoint function was monitored by following the levels of the Ndt80 transcription factor, whose production is inhibited when the checkpoint is active [ 46 ]. As expected, the zip1 ∆ single mutant exhibited a marked meiotic arrest, although a fraction of the cells resumed meiotic nuclear divisions at late time points (Figure 4A); accordingly, induction of the Ndt80/Cdc5 module was also significantly delayed compared to the wild type ( Figures 3A and 4B ). The zip1 ∆ cdc5- ∆ N70 double mutant displayed an even more pronounced meiotic delay than that of zip1 ∆ (Figure 4A) that was accompanied by reduced production of Ndt80, despite the presence of higher levels of Cdc5- ∆ N70 (Figure 4B). These observations are suggestive of more persistent zip1 ∆ -induced checkpoint activity when the N-terminal domain of Cdc5 is deleted. On the contrary, in zip1 ∆ cdc5-db7A, the kinetics of meiotic progression and Cdc5/Ndt80 production were comparable to those of the zip1 ∆ single mutant ( Figure 4A and 4B ), further corroborating that the role of the N-terminal region of Cdc5 in meiotic checkpoint control is independent of the consensus motifs for APC/C-dependent regulation. 3.6. The N-Terminal Domain of Cdc5 Is Required for Efficient Checkpoint Downregulation Previous work has demonstrated that, when meiotic DSBs are repaired, Cdc5 is necessary and sufficient to silence checkpoint signaling triggering degradation of Red1, a component of the Red1-Hop1-Mek1 (RHM) complex, which is required for Mek1 activation [ 31 ]. To assess whether the more persistent checkpoint activity in the zip1 ∆ cdc5- ∆ N70 mutant was due to the inability of Cdc5 ∆ N70 to turn the checkpoint off, we took advantage of the use of a CDC5 version controlled by the GAL1 promoter (hereafter, CDC5-IN) that can be induced by the addition of estradiol in strains harboring the Gal4 transcriptional regulator fused to the estradiol receptor (Figure S1; [ 47 ]). Thus, estradiol triggers CDC5-IN expression independent of its normal activator, Ndt80, allowing us to explore exclusively the effect of Cdc5 or Cdc5 ∆ N70 on checkpoint inactivation. For this purpose, we monitored the levels of Red1 and Mek1 proteins as well as phosphorylation of Hop1-T318 and H3-T11 as readouts of Mec1 and Mek1 checkpoint kinases, respectively. We generated zip1 ∆ ndt80 ∆ strains containing either the wild-type CDC5-IN allele or the version lacking the sequence corresponding to the 1–70 N-terminal region, cdc5- ∆ N70-IN. In this system, the checkpoint is initially activated by the lack of Zip1, but the cells remain arrested in prophase I throughout the time course, due to NDT80 deletion, regardless of the status of checkpoint activity. This allows us to evaluate the impact of Cdc5 on the levels of checkpoint markers without interference from cell cycle progression. Twenty-four hours after meiotic induction, when ndt80 ∆ cells of the BR strain background are arrested in prophase I, estradiol was added to half of the culture, and samples were collected at successive time points for Western blot analysis. In the absence of estradiol, the checkpoint was activated in both CDC5-IN and cdc5- ∆ N70-IN strains, as manifested by the accumulation of Red1 and Mek1 and high levels of Hop1-T318 and H3-T11 phosphorylation (Figure 5A, dark Cells 2021,10, 2561 16 of 17 27. Cavero, S.; Herruzo, E.; Ontoso, D.; San-Segundo, P.A. Impact of histone H4K16 acetylation on the meiotic recombination checkpoint in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Microb. Cell 2016,3, 606–620. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 28. Chen, X.; Gaglione, R.; Leong, T.; Bednor, L.; de Los Santos, T.; Luk, E.; Airola, M.; Hollingsworth, N.M. Mek1 coordinates meiotic progression with DNA break repair by directly phosphorylating and inhibiting the yeast pachytene exit regulator Ndt80. PLoS Genet. 2018,14, e1007832. [CrossRef] 29. González-Arranz, S.; Cavero, S.; Morillo-Huesca, M.; Andújar, E.; Pérez-Alegre, M.; Prado, F.; San-Segundo, P. Functional Impact of the H2A.Z Histone Variant During Meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Genetics 2018,209, 997–1015. [CrossRef] 30. Leu, J.Y.; Roeder, G.S. The pachytene checkpoint in S. cerevisiae depends on Swe1-mediated phosphorylation of the cyclindependent kinase Cdc28. Mol. Cell 1999,4, 805–814. [CrossRef] 31. Prugar, E.; Burnett, C.; Chen, X.; Hollingsworth, N.M. Coordination of double strand break repair and meiotic progression in yeast by a Mek1-Ndt80 negative feedback loop. Genetics 2017,206, 497–512. [CrossRef] 32. Charles, J.F.; Jaspersen, S.L.; Tinker-Kulberg, R.L.; Hwang, L.; Szidon, A.; Morgan, D.O. The Polo-related kinase Cdc5 activates and is destroyed by the mitotic cyclin destruction machinery in S. cerevisiae.Curr. Biol. 1998,8, 497–507. [CrossRef] 33. Shirayama, M.; Zachariae, W.; Ciosk, R.; Nasmyth, K. The Polo-like kinase Cdc5p and the WD-repeat protein Cdc20p/fizzy are regulators and substrates of the anaphase promoting complex in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.EMBO J. 1998 ,17, 1336–1349. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 34. Visintin, C.; Tomson, B.N.; Rahal, R.; Paulson, J.; Cohen, M.; Taunton, J.; Amon, A.; Visintin, R. APC/C-Cdh1-mediated degradation of the Polo kinase Cdc5 promotes the return of Cdc14 into the nucleolus. Genes Dev. 2008 ,22, 79–90. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 35. Cooper, K.F.; Mallory, M.J.; Egeland, D.B.; Jarnik, M.; Strich, R. Ama1p is a meiosis-specific regulator of the anaphase promoting complex/cyclosome in yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000,97, 14548–14553. [CrossRef] 36. Okaz, E.; Arguello-Miranda, O.; Bogdanova, A.; Vinod, P.K.; Lipp, J.J.; Markova, Z.; Zagoriy, I.; Novak, B.; Zachariae, W. Meiotic prophase requires proteolysis of M phase regulators mediated by the meiosis-specific APC/CAma1. Cell 2012 ,151, 603–618. [CrossRef] 37. Jaspersen, S.L.; Charles, J.F.; Tinker-Kulberg, R.L.; Morgan, D.O. A late mitotic regulatory network controlling cyclin destruction in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Mol. Biol. Cell 1998,9, 2803–2817. [CrossRef] 38. Mortensen, E.M.; Haas, W.; Gygi, M.; Gygi, S.P.; Kellogg, D.R. Cdc28-dependent regulation of the Cdc5/Polo kinase. Curr. Biol. 2005,15, 2033–2037. [CrossRef] 39. Acosta, I.; Ontoso, D.; San-Segundo, P.A. The budding yeast polo-like kinase Cdc5 regulates the Ndt80 branch of the meiotic recombination checkpoint pathway. Mol. Biol. Cell 2011,22, 3478–3490. [CrossRef] 40. Pfleger, C.M.; Kirschner, M.W. The KEN box: An APC recognition signal distinct from the D box targeted by Cdh1. Genes Dev. 2000,14, 655–665. 41. Pfleger, C.M.; Lee, E.; Kirschner, M.W. Substrate recognition by the Cdc20 and Cdh1 components of the anaphase-promoting complex. Genes Dev. 2001,15, 2396–2407. [CrossRef] 42. Arnold, L.; Hockner, S.; Seufert, W. Insights into the cellular mechanism of the yeast ubiquitin ligase APC/C-Cdh1 from the analysis of in vivo degrons. Mol. Biol. Cell 2015,26, 843–858. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 43. Rodriguez-Rodriguez, J.A.; Moyano, Y.; Jativa, S.; Queralt, E. Mitotic Exit Function of Polo-like Kinase Cdc5 Is Dependent on Sequential Activation by Cdk1. Cell Rep. 2016,15, 2050–2062. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 44. Simpson-Lavy, K.J.; Brandeis, M. Phosphorylation of Cdc5 regulates its accumulation. Cell Div. 2011 ,6, 23. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 45. Simpson-Lavy, K.J.; Sajman, J.; Zenvirth, D.; Brandeis, M. APC/CCdh1 specific degradation of Hsl1 and Clb2 is required for proper stress responses of S. cerevisiae.Cell Cycle 2009,8, 3003–3009. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 46. Tung, K.S.; Hong, E.J.; Roeder, G.S. The pachytene checkpoint prevents accumulation and phosphorylation of the meiosis-specific transcription factor Ndt80. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000,97, 12187–12192. [CrossRef] 47. Carlile, T.M.; Amon, A. Meiosis I is established through division-specific translational control of a cyclin. Cell 2008 ,133, 280–291. [CrossRef] 48. Attner, M.A.; Miller, M.P.; Ee, L.S.; Elkin, S.K.; Amon, A. Polo kinase Cdc5 is a central regulator of meiosis I. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013,110, 14278–14283. [CrossRef] 49. Galander, S.; Barton, R.E.; Kelly, D.A.; Marston, A.L. Spo13 prevents premature cohesin cleavage during meiosis. Wellcome Open Res. 2019,4, 29. [CrossRef] 50. Klapholz, S.; Esposito, R.E. Isolation of SPO12-1 and SPO13-1 from a natural variant of yeast that undergoes a single meiotic division. Genetics 1980,96, 567–588. [CrossRef] 51. Shirk, K.; Jin, H.; Giddings, T.H., Jr.; Winey, M.; Yu, H.G. The Aurora kinase Ipl1 is necessary for spindle pole body cohesion during budding yeast meiosis. J. Cell Sci. 2011,124, 2891–2896. [CrossRef] 52. Neiman, A.M. Sporulation in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Genetics 2011,189, 737–765. [CrossRef] 53. Alfaro, E.; López-Jiménez, P.; González-Martínez, J.; Malumbres, M.; Suja, J.A.; Gomez, R. PLK1 regulates centrosome migration and spindle dynamics in male mouse meiosis. EMBO Rep. 2021,22, e51030. [CrossRef] 54. Niu, H.; Wan, L.; Baumgartner, B.; Schaefer, D.; Loidl, J.; Hollingsworth, N.M. Partner choice during meiosis is regulated by Hop1-promoted dimerization of Mek1. Mol. Biol. Cell 2005,16, 5804–5818. [CrossRef] Cells 2021,10, 2561 17 of 17 55. Ontoso, D.; Acosta, I.; van Leeuwen, F.; Freire, R.; San-Segundo, P.A. Dot1-dependent histone H3K79 methylation promotes activation of the Mek1 meiotic checkpoint effector kinase by regulating the Hop1 adaptor. PLoS Genet. 2013 ,9, e1003262. [CrossRef] 56. Bailis, J.M.; Roeder, G.S. Pachytene exit controlled by reversal of Mek1-dependent phosphorylation. Cell 2000 ,101, 211–221. [CrossRef] 57. Lai, Y.J.; Lin, F.M.; Chuang, M.J.; Shen, H.J.; Wang, T.F. Genetic requirements and meiotic function of phosphorylation of the yeast axial element protein Red1. Mol. Cell Biol. 2011,31, 912–923. [CrossRef] 58. Almawi, A.W.; Langlois-Lemay, L.; Boulton, S.; Rodríguez González, J.; Melacini, G.; D’Amours, D.; Guarne, A. Distinct surfaces on Cdc5/PLK Polo-box domain orchestrate combinatorial substrate recognition during cell division. Sci. Rep. 2020 ,10, 3379. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 59. Sanchez, A.; Adam, C.; Rauh, F.; Duroc, Y.; Ranjha, L.; Lombard, B.; Mu, X.; Wintrebert, M.; Loew, D.; Guarne, A.; et al. Exo1 recruits Cdc5 polo kinase to MutLgamma to ensure efficient meiotic crossover formation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020 ,117, 30577–30588. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 60. Ishiguro, K.; Kim, J.; Fujiyama-Nakamura, S.; Kato, S.; Watanabe, Y. A new meiosis-specific cohesin complex implicated in the cohesin code for homologous pairing. EMBO Rep. 2011,12, 267–275. [CrossRef] 61. Jumper, J.; Evans, R.; Pritzel, A.; Green, T.; Figurnov, M.; Ronneberger, O.; Tunyasuvunakool, K.; Bates, R.; Zidek, A.; Potapenko, A.; et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 2021,596, 583–589. [CrossRef] [PubMed]