Effects of growth and aging on the reference values of pulmonary nitric oxide dynamics in healthy subjects

J. Breath Res. 11 (2017)047103 https://doi.org/10.1088/1752-7163/aa7957 PAPER Effects of growth and aging on the reference values of pulmonary nitric oxide dynamics in healthy subjects M Högman 1 , A Thornadtsson 1,2 , P Liv 2 , T Hua-Huy 3 , A T Dinh-Xuan 3 , E Tufvesson 4 , H Dressel 5 , C Janson 1 , K Koskela 6 , P Oksa 6 , R Sauni 6 , J Uitti 6 , E Moilanen 7 and L Lehtimäki 8 1 Dept. of Medical Sciences, Respiratory, Allergy and Sleep Research, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden 2 Centre for Research and Development, Uppsala University/Region Gävleborg, Sweden 3 Dept. of Respiratory Physiology, Medical School, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France 4 Dept. of Clinical Sciences Lund, Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, Lund University, Sweden 5 Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, Division of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland 6 The Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Tampere, Finland 7 The Immunopharmacology Research Group, Faculty of Medicine and Biosciences, University of Tampere School of Medicine and Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland 8 Allergy Centre, Tampere University Hospital; and Faculty of Medicine and Biosciences, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland E-mail: [email protected] Keywords: breath test, nitric oxide, mathematical model, health, pulmonary gas exchange Supplementary material for this article is available online Abstract The lung just like all other organs is affected by age. The lung matures by the age of 20 and age-related changes start around middle age, at 40–50 years. Exhaled nitric oxide (F E NO)has been shown to be age, height and gender dependent. We hypothesize that the nitric oxide (NO)parameters alveolar NO (C A NO), airway flux (J aw NO), airway diffusing capacity (D aw NO)and airway wall content (C aw NO) will also demonstrate this dependence. Data from healthy subjects were gathered by the current authors from their earlier publications in which healthy individuals were included as control subjects. Healthy subjects (n=433)ranged in age from 7 to 78 years. Age-stratified reference values of the NO parameters were significantly different. Gender differences were only observed in the 20–49 age group. The results from the multiple regression models in subjects older than 20 years revealed that age, height and gender interaction together explained 6% of variation in F E NO at 50 ml s −1 (F E NO 50 ),4% in J aw NO, 16% in C aw NO, 8% in D aw NO and 12% in C A NO. In conclusion, in this study we have generated reference values for NO parameters from an extended NO analysis of healthy subjects. This is important in order to be able to use these parameters in clinical practice. Introduction The use of non-invasive methods to diagnose respiratory diseases and monitor treatment is advantageous for both patients and healthcare professionals. Exhaled nitric oxide (F E NO)has been used extensively since its discovery in human breath [1], especially in asthma where clinical practice guidelines have already been published [2]. The pulmonary nitric oxide dynamics models have the advantage of being a more precise assessment of nitric oxide (NO)dynamics, but their application has been limited [3]. The technical development has rapidly evolved and today we have NO analysers adopted for clinical use, both in specialized respiratory medicine andprimary care [4,5]. F E NO from one single exhalation will give a measured value of NO production from the entire respiratory system. A more detailed insight can be gained through the use of the mathematical two-compartment model (2CM)of pulmonary NO dynamics, which differentiates the NO exchange of the peripheral and central parts of the lung and explains the flow dependence of F E NO [6,7].Inbrief,the2CMconsistsofanalveolar compartment comprising the peripheral gas exchanging parts of the lung (respiratory bronchioles and alveoli) and an airway compartment comprising the conductive OPEN ACCESS RECEIVED 1 May 2017 REVISED 13 June 2017 ACCEPTED FOR PUBLICATION 14 June 2017 PUBLISHED 13 September 2017 Original content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence. Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s)and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI. © 2017 IOP Publishing Ltd airways larger than respiratory bronchioles. Gas in the alveolar compartment holds a certain concentration of NO (C A NO). During exhalation, alveolar gas travels through the bronchial compartment and more NO diffuses from the bronchial wall into the luminal gas (airway NO flux, J aw NO)[8].C A NO and J aw NO can be estimated based on a linear model if F E NO is measured at three flow rates at of least 100 ml s −1 [9].Ifaflow rate less than 30 ml s −1 is used together with a median and a high flowrate,i.e.100and300mls −1 , then a non-linear model can be applied which also estimates the airway wall concentration of NO (C aw NO)and the diffusing capacity of NO from the airway wall to the gas stream (D aw NO)[8,10]. Investigations have used the 2CM with interesting results, especially for C A NO where increased values have been found in severe asthma [11], alveolitis [12], and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [10,13] and early scleroderma [14].C A NO has been specifically used to identify scleroderma patients at high risk for lung function deterioration and advancing disease, with 5.3 ppb being suggested as the cut off value [15]. Reference values are necessary for any new method to be accepted in clinical practice, and reference values for F E NO at the recommended flow of 50 ml s −1 (F E NO 50 )have been published [16,17]. Height, age and gender have been shown to influence F E NO 50 . Reference values for NO parameters from extended NO analysis are limited to two publications, one with 89 adults [18]and one with 66 children [19]. The lung matures by the age of 20 in regard to closing volume [20]and in older age the diffusing capacity declines in a linear fashion with increasing age [21], and these changes in pulmonary physiology might also affect NO parameters. The aimofthisstudywastoestablishreferencevaluesfor NO parameters in healthy subjects ranging from young to old age. Methods Subjects Data from healthy non-smoking subjects were gathered by the current authors from their earlier publications in which healthy individuals were included as control subjects [10,14,18,19,22–30]. In the majority of these studies measurements of lung function and symptom questionnaires verified the health status. Gender, age and height were noted. The exhaled flow together with corresponding exhaled NOlevelswere collected. NO analysis F E NO 50 and F E NO values from exhalation with flows of 5–500 ml s −1 for the extended NO analysis were gathered. All data were recalculated either with the linear model (Tsoukias & George, TG)[9]using three flow rates of at least 100 ml s −1 or with the non-linear model (Högman-Meriläinen Algorithm, HMA)[10,22]using a low flow rate of 5, 10 or 20, a median rate of 100 and a high flow rate of 300, 400 or 500 ml s −1 . Data were fed into an algorithm in a standard Microsoft® Excel environment, available as supplementary information, for the estimation of the NO parameters (stacks.iop. org/JBR/11/047103/mmedia). When generating NO parameters from the linear model [9],Pearson’sr-value was noted. With the use of NO parameters from the non-linear model [10,22]aplotofflow with corresponding NO values can be generated; at a flow of 50 ml s −1 , a NO value was noted and compared to the measured F E NO 50 for a quality control of the estimation of the NO parameters. With the non-linear model there is also a built-in quality test of the curve [10].Thisisin line with the first guidelines for the extended NO analysis [31]. Statistical analysis Due to aging of the lung, the subjects were divided into three age groups, <20 years, 20–49 years and 50 years. Descriptive data of the subjects are presented as frequency or as medians and quartiles where appropriate. The distributions of the NO parameters, stratified by age groups, are presented as an arithmetical mean or geometrical mean (for skewed distributed data)and as 2.5th, 5th, 25th, 50th, 75th, 95th, 97.5th percentiles. A Kruskal-Wallis test and one-way ANOVA were used to test for differences in the distribution of NO parameters between the age groups. In the case of significant difference between age groups, post-hoc tests were performed using a pairwise Mann-Whitney U-test. Pearson Correlation was used to test correlations to C A NO. Spearman’s rank order correlation was used for the other NO parameters. Gender-stratified simple regression models were fitted with the logarithms of F E NO 50 ,C aw NO, D aw NO, and J aw NO, respectively, as the dependent variable, and with age as an independent variable. Logarithmically scaled regression lines were retransformed back into natural scale and all regression lines were then plotted along with their corresponding 95% reference intervals. Multiple regression modelling was performed on data where subjects younger than 20 years were excluded, as children differ from adults in regards to the relationship between age and height, which made if difficult to fit robust statistical models. The models were specified with the C A NO in natural scale, the logarithms of F E NO 50 ,C aw NO, D aw NO, and J aw NO, respectively, as the dependent variable, and with age, height and gender, including interaction terms between gender * height and gender * age, as independent variables. For all the models, ANOVA chunk tests were performed, jointly testing if the two interaction terms contributed significantly to the models as compared to omitting them from the model. As this was not the case for any of the NO parameters, the models were refitted without the interaction terms. To 2 J. Breath Res. 11 (2017)047103 M Högman et al account for a potential cluster effect in the data, we also controlled for study centre and estimation method (TG versus HMA). To help the interpretability of regression coefficients, the variables age and height were centred and age was scaled to a unit of 10 years and 10 cm respectively [32]. For the factor gender, B represents the expected ratio in geometrical means between a male and a female, keeping all other variables fixed. For the logarithmically transformed parameters, regression coefficients have been retransformed to natural scale using the exponential function. The bootstrap procedure produces optimism-corrected estimates of R 2 , with a correction factor based on the average difference, in over 5000 bootstrap samples, between the R 2 of the model fitto the bootstrap data and the R 2 of the bootstrap model applied to the original data. Model assumptions of normality and homoscedasticity of residuals were assessed from graphs. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Excel (Microsoft R Office 2011)was used for calculations of the NO parameters. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS, v. 22 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, MI, USA), and R [33]using the rms package [34]. Results Healthy subjects (n=433)aged between 7–78 years were analysed. There were more men (n=268)than women (n=165)(table 1). There was no difference in F E NO 50 between the study centres (p=0.37). The NO parameters were estimated using the linear model TG (n=87)with an r-value from 0.90 to 1.0, and with a median value of 1.0 (0.99, 1.0). In the non-linear model HMA (n=346), all passed the builtin quality test. The difference in measured and estimated F E NO 50 ranged from −5.0 to 5.0, with a median value of 0.3 (−0.6, 1.3)ppb. NO parameters in the different age groups There were statistically significant differences in the distribution of the NO parameters between the young, middle and older age groups (table 2).F E NO 50 was higher in the older age group compared to the young age group (p<0.001)and the middle age group (p=0.001), and F E NO 50 was higher in the middle age group than the younger age group (p<0.001).J aw NO was lower in the young age group compared to the middle age (p<0.001)as well as the older age group (p<0.001).C aw NO was higher in the older age group compared to the young age group (p<0.001)and the middle age group (p<0.001), and C aw NO was higher in the middle age group than in the younger age group (p<0.001).D aw NO was lower in the older age group compared to the young age group (p=0.023)and the middle age group (p=0.001).C A NO was lower in the middle age group compared to the young age group (p=0.001)and the older age group (p<0.001). NO parameters in the different age groups by gender There was only a difference between genders in the middle age group in F E NO 50 (p<0.001),J aw NO (p<0.001),C aw NO (p<0.001)and C A NO (p=0.027)but not in D aw NO (table 3). Regression analyses Relationships between age and the NO parameters (J aw NO, C A NO, D aw NO and C aw NO), with univariate regression lines and estimated 95% reference intervals, are shown in figure 1.F E NO 50 is shown in the supplementary material, available online. The multiple regression analyses, with the bootstrap validation step, showed in the age groups above 20 years that age, height and gender interactions together explained 6% of variation in F E NO 50, 4% in J aw NO, 16% in C aw NO, 8% in D aw NO and 12% in C A NO (table 4). Age was a significant predictor in all models (p<0.001)except for J aw NO (p=0.18) (table 4). The association was positive for F E NO 50 and all NO parameters. Gender contributed as a significant main effect for C aw NO and C A NO only. Multiple linear regression models poorly predicted the large variations in F E NO 50 and NO parameters. In the age group <20 years there were only 83 subjects and therefore multiple regression models were not applied. Age correlated positively to F E NO 50 (r=0.31, p=0.005)and to J aw NO (r=0.32, p =0.003).There were stronger correlations between height and F E NO 50 (r=0.45, p <0.001),andheightandJ aw NO (r=0.41, p=0.001), while no correlations were found between height and C A NO, C aw NO and D aw NO. Table 1. Subject characteristics in the different age groups presented by gender. Age group <20 yrs 20–49 yrs 50 yrs Gender Female Male Female Male Female Male Subjects, n 41 42 82 113 42 113 Age, years 10 (9, 11)10 (8, 12)33 (26, 40)39 (30, 44)53 (52, 60)56 (52, 65) Height, m 1.39 (1.32, 1.47)1.37 (1.31, 1.49)1.68 (1.64, 1.71)1.81 (1.75, 1.85)1.67 (1.63, 1.69)1.76 (1.72, 1.80) Weight, kg 34 (30, 38)32 (28, 39)60 (55, 68)80 (73, 87)70 (61, 76)79 (73, 88) BMI, kg/m 2 17 (16, 19)17 (16, 19)22 (20, 23)25 (23, 26)25 (23, 27)26 (24, 28) Data are given in median (25, 75 percentile). 3 J. Breath Res. 11 (2017)047103 M Högman et al Discussion In this study we have generated reference values for NO parameters from an extended NO analysis of healthy subjects. By pooling the healthy subjects’data from earlier published data the values of NO parameters for a large group of subjects can be presented. We have found that age influences F E NO and all the NO parameters, while gender affects NO parameters only in the middle age group. Multiple linear regression models poorly predicted the large variations in F E NO 50 and NO parameters. In the See et al paper (n=13.275)about 10% of the variation in F E NO was explained by a variety of variables [35], and this is in line with the current results (n=433)where about 6% of the variation in F E NO 50 was explained by age, height, gender, NO model and study centre. Lung development In the <20 age group, F E NO 50 and the airway NO parameters J aw NO and C aw NO were lower than in the other age groups. This could possibly reflect an increasing mucosal surface area with increasing height and growing lung volumes. This was also present in the study by Jacinto et al where the F E NO 50 increase breakpoint appeared around 14 years in girls and 16 years in boys [17]. This is in line with the growth of the body, and more specifically the development of the bronchial tree. Ageing In the middle and older age groups pulmonary aging seems to increase C A NO. This possibly reflects decreased diffusivity of gases in the distal portion of the lung, as C A NO is determined not only by factors producing NO in the lung periphery but also by how much alveolar NO can diffuse into the pulmonary circulation where it is rapidly scavenged by haemoglobin. In older age, the diffusing capacity declines in a linear fashion with increasing age [21]and in elderly healthy subjects there is a decrease in steady-state transfer capacity for carbon monoxide (CO)[36]and NO [37]. There is also an increase in residual volume Table 2. Mean values and percentile distribution of F E NO 50 and NO parameters in the three age groups. Percentile distribution Age groups Mean p-value * 2.5 5 25 50 75 95 97.5 1 F E NO 50 , ppb <20 yrs 10.8 <0.001 4.7 4.9 7.1 10.5 15.9 25.6 27.0 20–49 yrs 16.0 6.6 7.4 12.0 15.3 20.9 38.0 45.5 50 yrs 18.2 7.7 8.5 13.2 18.2 25.3 36.5 44.9 1 J aw NO, nl/s <20 yrs 0.40 <0.001 0.08 0.10 0.26 0.38 0.66 1.36 1.60 20–49 yrs 0.76 0.31 0.34 0.53 0.70 1.08 2.01 2.51 50 yrs 0.81 0.27 0.31 0.52 0.83 1.23 2.00 2.23 1 C aw NO, ppb <20 yrs 64 <0.001 19 21 34 58 123 208 439 20–49 yrs 105 30 35 65 105 160 309 441 50 yrs 155 40 51 89 150 267 491 535 1 D aw NO, ml/s <20 yrs 7.5 0.002 0.9 1.3 4.8 8.7 13.1 25.6 26.9 20–49 yrs 7.8 1.3 2.5 5.3 8.3 12.7 19.1 21.6 50 yrs 5.7 1.0 1.2 3.5 6.2 10.3 17.1 20.8 C A NO, ppb <20 yrs 2.07 <0.001 0.11 0.61 1.52 2.05 2.73 3.59 3.88 20–49 yrs 1.72 0.21 0.29 1.13 1.61 2.23 3.66 3.93 50 yrs 2.2 0.33 0.51 1.48 2.25 2.85 3.77 3.88 1 Data with skewed distribution are given in geometrical mean, * Kruskal-Wallis test for difference in mean values between age groups. Table 3. F E NO 50 and NO parameters in the different age groups presented by gender. Age group <20 yrs 20–49 yrs 50 yrs Gender Female Male Female Male Female Male 1 F E NO 50 , ppb 11 (8, 16)10 (7, 15)13 (10, 17)18 (13, 23) * 17 (12, 23)19 (14, 26) 1 J aw NO, nL/s 0.43 (0.28, 0.66)0.37 (0.23, 0.66)0.63 (0.44, 0.83)0.87 (0.60, 1.25) * 0.75 (0.49, 1.14)0.84 (0.54, 1.26) 1 C aw NO, ppb 76 (48, 130)54 (30, 84)77 (54, 115)126 (77, 211) * 121 (71, 173)163 (100, 288) 1 D aw NO, ml/s 6.5 (4.0, 10.9)8.7 (5.5, 17, 4)8.8 (6.2, 12.8)7.3 (4.8, 12.7)7.1 (4.8, 11.4)5.4 (3.2, 9.8) C A NO, ppb 2.12 (1.78, 2.39)1.98 (1.25, 2.33)1.99 (1.22, 2.39)1.52 (1.07, 2.06) * 2.44 (1.25, 2.92)2.20 (1.45, 2.83) Data are given in median (25,75 percentile). 1 Geometrical mean. Mann-Whitney U-test for gender differences, * p<0.05. 4 J. Breath Res. 11 (2017)047103 M Högman et al Figure 1. Relationship between age and the NO parameters, airway NO flux (J aw NO), alveolar NO (C A NO), airway diffusing capacity (D aw NO)and airway wall content (C aw NO), with univariate regression lines and estimated 95% reference intervals. Since children differ markedly from adults, in particular regarding the associations between height and age, the young age group was treated separately. 5 J. Breath Res. 11 (2017)047103 M Högman et al [38]reflecting obstruction of the distal part of the airways that could possibly contribute to the increase in C A NO seen in this study. Thus, there is an accumulation of NO from the alveolar region together with the inhaled NO from the airways that increases with age, and both can contribute to the increase of C A NO. However, the uptake of NO in pulmonary capillaries is very high [39], and the increase in C A NO could also be due to other causes. One of these other causes affecting C A NO may be that clinically healthy older subjects have an altered inflammatory cell profile and can actually have a low-grade inflammation in the lower respiratory tract [40]. This could be due to the macrophages becoming less efficient in scavenging invading microorganisms in older age groups [41,42]. This could be an explanation for the increased exhaled F E NO 50 and NO parameters, i.e. J aw NO, C aw NO and C A NO, in our older subjects. In studies with older unhealthy patients, it is important that the control subjects be matched to them by age until there is enough data for this age group. Therefore, the increased C A NO that has been found in COPD patients should be re-evaluated since they have been compared in some studies to younger individuals [10,13]. However, in other studies, e.g. in cases of systemic sclerosis or alveolitis, the C A NO values are surely increased since there were no age differences between the patients and control subjects [12,14,43].Matching by gender should also be taken into account for the middle age group, since C A NO increases earlier in females. This is possibly explained by a decrease in the capillary blood volume of the lung [44]causing an impaired gas exchange in women in the middle age group. D aw NO decreased with increasing age. This is interesting, as D aw NO is the total diffusivity of NO from bronchial mucosa to luminal air, and it can be assumed to reflect both the total surface area available for diffusion and also the physical properties of the mucosa affecting the diffusivity of gases. As individuals grow so do their bronchial trees, and one would assume that D aw NO increases with increasing height, but we did not see this. Instead, we found that C aw NO increased and this explained the increase in J aw NO and F E NO 50 during the growth period. The decrease of D aw NO found in older age might reflect the physical changes occurring in the bronchial mucosa of the aging lung. Gender It was only in the middle age group where a gender difference could be found in F E NO 50 ,J aw NO, C aw NO and C A NO. In the regression model only the variations in C aw NO and C A NO were significant for gender. Olin et al found F E NO 50 to be higher in men than in women around 50 years of age with 18 resp. 15 ppb respectively, but when comparing F E NO 50 between the sexes with similar heights and ages no difference was found [16]. Jacinto et al have shown a gender difference in the same age group with men slightly above 15 ppb and women around 12 ppb [17]. The corresponding values for F E NO 50 in the present study with the young age group excluded are 16 ppb for men and 15 ppb for women, which are in line with the values obtained by Olin et al using the same analysing method, namely chemiluminescence. A limitation in this study is that data were pooled, which resulted in more men than women, especially in the old age group. In addition, the cross-sectional design of the study is not optimal to assess the relation between age and NO parameters. However, long enough longitudinal studies would require decades of follow-up. It would be interesting to put lung function in relation to the NO parameters, but unfortunately we did not have lung function data from all of the subjects. We did check that there was no significant difference in the mean F E NO 50 values between the different centres, which suggests that the methodology was similar enough to allow for the pooling of the data. In conclusion, in this study we have generated reference values for NO parameters from an extended NO analysis of healthy subjects. This is important in order to be able to use these parameters in clinical practice. We found that pulmonary aging seems to increase C A NO, which is possibly a reflection of a decreased diffusivity of gases in the gas exchange area. The impaired immune defence system that occurs with old age could also explain the increase in all NO parameters except D aw NO that was decreased in this group. Further studies or additional pooling of data are needed before we can provide even better age-related reference values for the NO parameters and Table 4. Regression coefficents (B)and p-values of the multiple regression models for NO-variables. The R 2 is the unadjusted coefficient of determination of the models and R2boot is the corresponding optimism-corrected R 2 values as estimated by bootstrapping. Intercept Age Height Gender (male) B B p-value B p-value B p-value R 2 R 2 boot F E NO 50 ppb 15.8 1.07 <0.001 1.04 0.29 1.12 0.13 0.08 0.06 J aw NO nl/s 0.77 1.03 0.18 1.05 0.33 1.10 0.26 0.07 0.04 C aw NO ppb 86.6 1.16 <0.001 0.87 0.04 1.70 <0.001 0.19 0.16 D aw NO ml/s 8.6 0.88 <0.001 1.21 0.01 0.69 0.01 0.11 0.08 C A NO ppb 1.95 0.2 <0.001 −0.03 0.68 −0.24 0.09 0.15 0.12 6 J. Breath Res. 11 (2017)047103 M Högman et al possibly create reliable reference equations. However, this is currently the largest dataset for NO parameters that can be used as a basis for comparisons in future studies regarding health and disease. References [1]Gustafsson L E, Leone A, Persson M, Wiklund N and Moncada S 1991 Endogenous nitric oxide is present in the exhaled air of rabbits, guinea pigs and humans Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 181 852–7 [2]Dweik R A et al 2011 An official ATS clinical practice guideline: interpretation of exhaled nitric oxide levels (F E NO)for clinical applications Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care. Med. 184 602–15 [3]Högman M 2012 Extended NO analysis in health and disease J. Breath Res. 6047103 [4]Cristescu S M, Mandon J, Harren F J, Meriläinen P and Högman M 2013 Methods of NO detection in exhaled breath J. Breath Res. 7017104 [5]Maniscalco M, Vitale C, Vatrella A, MolinoA, BiancoAand Mazzarella G 2016 Fractional exhaled nitric oxide-measuring devices: technology update Med. Devices (Auckl) 9151–60 [6]Högman M, Strömberg S, Schedin U, Frostell C, Hedenstierna G and Gustafsson L E 1997 Nitric oxide from the human respiratory tract efficiently quantified by standardized single breath measurements Acta. Physiol. Scand. 159 345–6 [7]Silkoff P E et al 1997 Marked flow-dependence of exhaled nitric oxide using a new technique to exclude nasal nitric oxide Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 155 260–7 [8]GeorgeSC,HögmanM,PermuttSandSilkoffPE2004Modeling pulmonary nitric oxide exchange J. Appl. Physiol. 96 831–9 [9]Tsoukias N M and George S C 1998 A two-compartment model of pulmonary nitric oxide exchange dynamics J. Appl. Physiol. 85 653–66 (PMID: 9688744) [10]Högman M et al 2002 Extended NO analysis applied to patients with COPD, allergic asthma and allergic rhinitis Respir. Med. 96 24–30 [11]Lehtimäki L, Kankaanranta H, Saarelainen S, Turjanmaa V and Moilanen E 2002 Increased alveolar nitric oxide concentration in asthmatic patients with nocturnal symptoms Eur. Respir. J. 20 841–5 [12]Lehtimäki L et al 2001 Extended exhaled NO measurement differentiates between alveolar and bronchial inflammation Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 163 1557–61 [13]Brindicci C, Ito K, Resta O, Pride N B, Barnes P J and Kharitonov S A 2005 Exhaled nitric oxide from lung periphery is increased in COPD Eur. Respir. J. 26 52–9 [14]Wuttge D M et al 2010 Increased alveolar nitric oxide in early systemic sclerosis Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 28 (5 Suppl 62)S5–9 [15]Tiev K P et al 2012 Alveolar concentration of nitric oxide predicts pulmonary function deterioration in scleroderma Thorax 67 157–63 [16]Olin A C and Toren K 2006 Height, age, and atopy are associated with fraction of exhaled nitric oxide in a large adult general population sample Chest 130 1319–25 [17]Jacinto T, Malinovschi A, Janson C, Fonseca J and Alving K Evolution of exhalednitric oxide levels throughout development and aging of healthy humans J. Breath Res. 9036005 [18]Högman M, Lafih J, Meriläinen P, Bröms K, Malinovschi A and Janson C 2009 Extended NO analysis in a healthy subgroup of a random sample from a Swedish population Clin. Physiol. Funct. Imaging 29 18–23 [19]Sepponen A, Lehtimäki L, Huhtala H, Kaila M, Kankaanranta H and Moilanen E 2008 Alveolar and bronchial nitric oxide output in healthy children Pediatr. Pulmonol. 43 1242–8 [20]Mansell A, Bryan C and Levison H 1972 Airway closure in children J. Appl. Physiol. 33 711–4(PMID: 4643846) [21]Stam H, Hrachovina V, Stijnen T and Versprille A 1994 Diffusing capacity dependent on lung volume and age in normal subjects J. Appl. Physiol. 76 2356–63 (PMID: 7928858) [22]Högman M, Thornadtsson A, Hedenstierna G and Meriläinen P 2014 A practical approach to the theoretical models to calculate NO parameters of the respiratory system J. Breath Res. 8016002 [23]Pedroletti C, Högman M, Meriläinen P, Nordvall L S, Hedlin G and Alving K 2003 Nitric oxide airway diffusing capacity and mucosal concentration in asthmatic schoolchildren Pediatr. Res. 54 496–501 [24]Lehtimäki L et al 2010 Pulmonary inflammation in asbestosexposed subjects with borderline parenchymal changes on HRCT Respir. Med. 104 1042–9 [25]Tiev K P et al 2007 Severity ofscleroderma lung disease isrelated to alveolar concentration of nitric oxide Eur. Respir. J. 30 26–30 [26]Koskela K et al 2015 Pulmonary inflammation in foundry workers J. Occup. Environ. Med. 57 124–8 [27]Tufvesson E, Aronsson D, Ankerst J, George S C and Bjermer L 2007 Peripheral nitric oxide is increased in rhinitic patients with asthma compared to bronchial hyperresponsiveness Respir. Med. 101 2321–6 [28]Tufvesson E, Andersson C, Weidner J, Erjefält J S and Bjermer L 2016 Inducible nitric oxide synthase expression is increased in the alveolar compartment of asthmatic patients Allergy 72 627–35 [29]Tiev K P, Le-Dong N N, Duong-Quy S, Hua-Huy T, Cabane J and Dinh-Xuan A T 2009 Exhaled nitric oxide, but not serum nitrite and nitrate, is a marker of interstitial lung disease in systemic sclerosis Nitric Oxide 20 200–6 [30]Sauni R et al 2012 Increased alveolar nitric oxide and systemic inflammation markers in silica-exposed workers J. Occup. Environ. Med. 69 256–60 [31]Horvath I et al 2017 A European Respiratory Society technical standard: exhaled biomarkers in lung disease Eur. Respir. J. 49 1600965 [32]Harrell F L Jr, Lee K L and Mark D B 1996 Tutorialin biostatistics multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors Stat. Med. 15 361–87 [33]R Core Team 2015 R: a language and environment for statistical computing R Foundation for Statistical Computing https://www.r-project.org [34]Harrell F E Jr 2016 Regression Modeling Strategies (New York, USA: Springer Science +Business Media) [35]See K C and Christiani D C 2013 Normal values and thresholds for the clinical interpretation of exhaled nitric oxide levels in the US general population: results from the national health and nutrition examination survey 2007–2010 Chest 143 107–16 [36]Guenard H and Marthan R 1996 Pulmonarygas exchange in elderly subjects Eur. Respir. J. 92573–7 [37]Zavorsky G S et al 2017 Standardisation and application of the single-breath determination of nitric oxide uptake in the lung Eur. Respir. J. 49 1600962 [38]Sharma G and Goodwin J 2006 Effect of aging on respiratory system physiology and immunology Clin. Interv. Aging. 1253–60 [39]Guenard H, Varene N and Vaida P 1987 Determination of lung capillary blood volume and membrane diffusing capacity in man by the measurements of NO and CO transfer Respir. Physiol. 70 113–20 [40]Meyer K C, Ershler W, Rosenthal N S, Lu X G and Peterson K 1996 Immune dysregulation in the aging human lung Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 153 072–9 [41]Plowden J, Renshaw-Hoelscher M, Engleman C, Katz Jand Sambhara S 2004 Innate immunity in aging: impact on macrophage function Aging Cell 3161–7 [42]Lloberas J and Celada A 2002 Effect of aging on macrophage function Exp. Gerontol. 37 1325–31 [43]Tiev K P, Coste J, Ziani M, Aubourg F, Cabane J and Dinh-Xuan A T 2009 Diagnostic value of exhaled nitric oxide to detect interstitial lung disease in systemic sclerosis Sarcoidosis Vasc. Diffuse Lung Dis. 26 32–8(PMID: 19960786) [44]Stam H, Versprille A and Bogaard J M 1983 The components of the carbon monoxide diffusing capacity in man dependent on alveolar volume Bull. Eur. Physiopathol. Respir. 19 7–22 (PMID: 6850142) 7 J. Breath Res. 11 (2017)047103 M Högman et al