Nighttime Appendectomy is Safe and has Similar Outcomes as Daytime Appendectomy : A Study of 1198 Appendectomies

https://doi.org/10.1177/1457496920938605 Scandinavian Journal of Surgery 1 –6 © The Finnish Surgical Society 2020 Article reuse guidelines: sagepub.com/journals-permissions DOI: 10.1177/1457496920938605 journals.sagepub.com/home/sjs SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY SJS Nighttime AppeNdectomy is sAfe ANd hAs similAr outcomes As dAytime AppeNdectomy: A study of 1198 AppeNdectomies t. mönttinen1, h. Kangaspunta2, J. laukkarinen2,3, m. ukkonen2,3 1New Children’s Hospital, Helsinki, Finland 2Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland 3Department of Gastroenterology and Alimentary Tract Surgery, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland AbstrAct Introduction: Although it is controversial whether appendectomy can be safely delayed, it is often unnecessary to postpone operation as a shorter delay may increase patient comfort, enables quicker recovery, and decreases costs. in this study, we sought to study whether the time of day influences the outcomes among patients operated on for acute appendicitis. Materials and Methods: consecutive patients undergoing appendectomy at tampere university hospital between 1 september 2014 and 30 April 2017 for acute appendicitis were included. primary outcome measures were postoperative morbidity, mortality, length of hospital stay, and amount of intraoperative bleeding. Appendectomies were divided into daytime and nighttime operations. Results: A total of 1198 patients underwent appendectomy, of which 65% were operated during daytime and 35% during nighttime. patient and disease-related characteristics were similar in both groups. the overall morbidity and mortality rates were 4.8% and 0.2%, respectively. No time categories were associated with risk of complications or complication severity. Neither was there difference in operation time and clinically significant difference in intraoperative bleeding. patients undergoing surgery during night hours had a shorter hospital stay. in multivariate analysis, only complicated appendicitis was associated with worse outcomes. Discussion: We have shown that nighttime appendectomy is associated with similar outcomes than daytime appendectomy. subsequently, appendectomy should be planned for the next available slot, minimizing delay whenever possible. Key words: Appendectomy; appendicitis; surgery; morbidity; mortality; efficiency; organizational Correspondence: Mika Ukkonen, M.D., Ph.D., M.Econ. Department of Gastroenterology and Alimentary Tract Surgery Tampere University Hospital Teiskontie 35 33521 Tampere Finland Email: [email protected] 938605SJS0010.1177/1457496920938605The safety of nighttime appendectomyT. Mönttinen, H. Kangaspunta, J. Laukkarinen, M. Ukkonen research-article2020 Original Research Article T. Mönttinen, et al.2 INTrODUCTION Acute appendicitis is the most common emergency gastrointestinal operation (1–3). While it is debated, surgical care is still the golden standard care for acute appendicitis (4). Acute appendicitis can be divided to uncomplicated and complicated disease. When there is an abscess or appendix perforation involved with the appendicitis, the disease is considered complicated. Complicated appendicitis is associated with higher morbidity, mortality, and longer hospital stay (5). According to the studies, 16%–38% of the acute appendicitis patients develop a perforation during the 36 h after their symptoms began and the risk remained at 5% for each following 12-h period (6). In a recent meta-analysis (7) there was no significant difference in the 12to 24-h delay in operation in terms of the acute appendicitis developing complication. However, the assumption is that the sooner the patients would get operated, the sooner they would also get home (6). Early surgery would reduce the costs of the treatment, especially from the aspect of the ward stay. As patients with acute appendicitis present to emergency department any time of day, minimizing the delay would sometimes mean that patients are required to be operated during nighttime. However, after normal working hours, fatigue and sleep deprivation may increase the risk of adverse outcomes (8). There are several reports from different surgical fields reporting worse outcomes for surgeries performed during after-office hours or nighttime (9). However, patient-related demographics among those operated during nighttime are often different than among those operated during daytime. These differences may explain some of the worse results. In this study, we sought to study if nighttime surgery is associated with worse outcomes. MATErIALS AND METHODS In this retrospective study, consecutive patients operated at Tampere University Hospital between 1 September 2014 and 30 April 2017 for acute appendicitis were included. Patients were identified from the institutional database by retrieving all surgeries associated with the Nordic Medico-Statistical Committee (NOMESCO) classification of surgical procedures (Version 1.13) code “JEA00” (appendectomy) and “JEA01” (laparoscopic appendectomy). Hospital records including surgical and histopathological reports were carefully retrieved from each patient individually. Patients with negative appendectomies were excluded. Appendicitis was considered complicated if there was perforation either with peritonitis or abscess. STUDy HOSPITAL In-house emergency surgeons working in a highvolume tertiary care emergency center with the hospital catchment area exceeding 1 million inhabitants operated all patients. All surgeons were experienced on acute care surgery and were either experienced residents or consultant surgeons. There was also a consultant surgeon available on-call at all times. In-house surgeons in the study hospital work in approximately 24-h shifts (7:30 a.m. to 8:00 a.m. during weekdays and 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. during weekends). In the study hospital, there was one operation theater available for the acute abdominal surgeries all the time during the study. OUTCOME Patients were divided into two groups based on the time of day of the surgery. We used the time of day (beginning of the surgery) from 8 a.m. to 10 p.m. to define a daytime operation (Group A) and 10 p.m. to 8 a.m. to define a nighttime operation (Group B). Primary outcome variables were the following: postoperative morbidity, mortality (⩽30 days), operation times (minutes), amount of intraoperative bleeding (milliliters), and length of hospital stay (hours). Morbidity was defined and classified by using Clavien–Dindo (C-D) classification (10). Postoperative outcomes, including readmissions and complications, were accurately recorded from all regional health care facilities. The follow-up data were available for all patients. ETHICAL ASPECTS The study was performed according to the Helsinki Declaration, and institutional review board approval was obtained. STATISTICAL ANALySIS All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS Statistics version 22 for Windows (IBM Corp, Armonk, Ny, USA). Two-tailed chi-square tests were performed to compare categorical variables and Mann–Whitney U test for continuous variables. Multivariate analysis (binary logistic regression analysis, Enter-method) was used to identify risk factors associated with worse outcomes. Statistical significance was set at a p value less than 0.05. rESULTS A total of 1198 patients were included to this study, of which 65% (n = 776) were operated in daytime surgery group and 35% (n = 422) in nighttime surgery group. The overall morbidity and mortality rates were 4.8% and 0.2%, respectively. Patientand disease-related demographics were similar in both groups, as shown in Table 1. Median time from treatment decision to surgery was 10 h (interquartile range (IQr): 4–18) in daytime surgery group and 5 h (IQr: 3–10) in nighttime surgery group (p < 0.001). When patients undergoing surgery in these two groups were compared, overall morbidity (4.8% vs 4.7%, p = 0.982) and 30-day mortality rates (0.1% vs 0.2%, p = 0.662) were similar. The length of hospital stay was shorter among those operated in nighttime surgery group (median, 40 h (IQr: 27–60) vs 37 h (IQr: 20–61), p < 0.001). None of the deaths were acute appendicitis or surgery-related. The safety of nighttime appendectomy 3 Postoperative outcomes among those with complicated and uncomplicated acute appendicitis at different time of day are shown in Fig. 1. The most common postoperative complication was organ/space surgical site infection. Overall, the risk of these infections was similar in both groups (2.6% vs 2.6%, p = 0.976). Sixtyone percent of patients with postoperative abscesses required percutaneous drainage, 35% conservative care alone, and 3% underwent laparoscopic drainage. The median amount of intraoperative bleeding was less than 5 mL (range: 0–510 mL). While the amount of intraoperative bleeding was slightly higher among those undergoing daytime surgery, the risk of major bleeding that required blood transfusion was similar in both groups (0.2% vs 0.3%, p = 0.945). Neither there was association with other typical complications, including postoperative ileus (0.9% vs 0.6%, p = 0.728), pneumonia (0.4% vs 0.5%, p = 0.823), and superficial surgical site infections (0.6% vs 0.2%, p = 0.340). Severe complications (C-D III or more) were registered on 1.7% and 2.1% of patients (p = 0.573) and all these were related to organ/space surgical site infections requiring either percutaneous drainage or new laparoscopy. A total of 199 patients (26%) in daytime surgery group and 106 patients (25%) in nighttime surgery group had complicated acute appendicitis. The overall morbidity among patients with complicated (12% vs 10%, p = 0.755) and uncomplicated acute appendicitis (2.4% vs 2.8%, p = 0.704) was similar in both groups, as shown in Table 2. The median length of hospital stay was shorter among those with uncomplicated appendicitis operated during nighttime (35 h (IQr: 23–43) vs 23 h (17–39), p < 0.001), while there was no statistically significant difference in the length of hospital stay among those with complicated disease. When variables including time of day of appendectomy (daytime surgery and nighttime surgery), patients’ American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physiological score (I–II and III or more), surgeons’ experience (resident and specialist surgeon), and complicated disease (complicated appendicitis and uncomplicated appendicitis) were inserted into multivariate analysis (binary logistic regression analysis, Enter-method), only complicated disease was associated with higher morbidity (odds ratio (Or): 4.52, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 2.59–7.89, p < 0.001), as shown in Table 3. DISCUSSION Although it is controversial whether appendectomy can be safely delayed (7, 11–13), it is often unnecessary to postpone operation as a shorter delay may increase patient comfort, enables quicker recovery, and decreases costs (4). In some studies, the risk of surgical site infections increased in correlation with postponing the operation (11, 14, 15). Consequently, here we study whether it is safe to perform appendectomy during night hours. According to this study, there was no difference in morbidity, mortality, risk of surgical site infections, and organ/space surgical site infections or in other complications regardless of time of day during the surgery. The length of hospital stay was shorter among those operated during night hours. TABLE 1 Patient and operation-related characteristics of the study population. Variable Nighttime surgery Day-time surgery n = 422 (35%) n = 776 (65%) Age, median (min–max) 33 years (2–93) 34 years (2–91) 0–17 years 67 (16%) 93 (12%) 18–29 years 101 (24%) 213 (27%) 30–64 years 206 (49%) 391 (50%) 65–79 years 39 (9.2%) 65 (8.4%) ⩾80 years 9 (2.1%) 14 (1.8%) Sex, female 185 (44%) 373 (48%) ASA score I–II 376 (89%) 693 (89%) ASA score ⩾III 56 (11%) 83 (11%) CrP (mg/L), median (IQr) 37.1 (14.3–114) 46.1 (18.1–95.9) WBC (109), median (IQr) 12.8 (10.0–15.7) 12.4 (9.9–15.7) Delay before surgery, median (IQr) 5 h (3–10) 10 h (4–18)** Laparoscopic appendectomy 345 (82%) 672 (87%) Open appendectomy 69 (16%) 92 (12%) Conversion from laparoscopic to open surgery 8 (1.9%) 12 (1.5%) Uncomplicated appendicitis 316 (75%) 577 (74%) Complicated appendicitisa106 (25%) 199 (26%) Abscess 17 (4.0%) 38 (4.9%) Length of hospital stay, median (IQr) 37 h (20–61) 40 h (27–60)* Morbidity 20 (4.7%) 37 (4.8%) 30-day mortality 1 (0.2%) 1 (0.1%) ASA: American Society of Anesthesiologists; CrP: C-reactive protein; IQr: interquartile range; WBC: white blood cell. aComplicated appendicitis = appendiceal perforation with either perforation or abscess. *p value: 0.05–0.001; **p value < 0.001. T. Mönttinen, et al.4 In this study, we report postoperative morbidity and mortality lower than reported previously in the literature (16–18). Of all patients, 4.8% suffered from postoperative complications and 0.2% died. None of the deaths were associated with acute appendicitis or surgery itself. There were no intraoperative complications. The results cannot be explained by a lower rate of complicated disease—one in four of the operated patients had complicated disease, which is more than reported previously in the literature (19). In general, the operative results of the hospital were better than average, which can be seen in the material. Complications reported in this study are similar to that reported in the literature before (20). The most common was organ/space surgical site infection, of which majority required percutaneous drainage later. The risk was not associated with time of day. Furthermore, patient, disease, and surgery-specific demographics were similar in both groups. In contrast to previous studies, both morbidity and mortality rates were similar regardless of time of day (7). We emphasize that it is not always necessary to perform appendectomies immediately, and it is may be safer to delay at least difficult operations if immediate surgery is not required to working hours. However, we encourage that appendectomy can be performed safely regardless of time of day if doing so. Furthermore, appendectomy is a quick operation and in case of emergencies requiring immediate surgery, it should not cause delay to these operations. In this study, operation time was similar in both groups, while patients operated during night hours had a slightly lower length of hospital stay. The impact of fatigue on surgeon’s surgical skills has been evaluated with the help of simulators, for example. Studies have shown a consistent decline in cognitive function, but in technical skills, the outcomes have been mixed (9). In some articles, it was shown that acute partial sleep deprivation can also have positive short-term effect on cognitive skills and therefore enhanced technical performance with increased objective alertness within complex tasks (21). Despite increase in workload and sleepiness, subjects were able to learn new things proficiently and complete the tasks given (22). Also, operating during nighttime does not necessarily cause excessive fatigue if sufficient recovery time before and after on-call shifts is provided. A wide systematic review (23) on resident’s duty hour restrictors in surgery also showed that restrictions were not associated with improvements in surgical resident’s wellbeing. The review also revealed that restrictions had some negative impacts on patient outcomes and performance on certification exams. The study has some limitations. This is a retrospective single-center study. However, a high number of patients were included in this study. In addition, the data are comprehensive and postoperative outcomes are precisely recorded for all patients. These data were collected in a high-volume tertiary care center; therefore, it is uncertain whether the results can be applied to smaller hospitals, and to hospitals where appendectomies are usually performed by the residents in the beginning of their specialization. Whether the surgeons’ experience influences the postoperative outcomes requires more research. Fig. 1. Postoperative morbidity among patients with uncomplicated and complicated acute appendicitis according to the time of day. Statistical comparison (chi-square test) between patients undergoing surgery during daytime (reference group) and nighttime (16:00–21:59 and 22:00-07:59). The safety of nighttime appendectomy 5 We conclude that nighttime appendectomy is safe and not associated with increased risks. All outcome measures in this study, including morbidity, mortality, length of the surgery and amount of intraoperative bleeding were similar regardless of time of day of the surgery. Therefore, we recommend that appendectomy would be performed without unnecessary delay even during nighttime, if needed. DECLArATION OF CONFLICTING INTErESTS The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. TABLE 2 Postoperative outcomes among patients undergoing appendectomy. Variable Nighttime surgery Daytime surgery p-value All AA patients 422 (35%) 776 (65%) Operation time, median (IQr) 40 min (28–55) 39 min (30–54) 0.140 Morbidity 20 (4.7%) 37 (4.8%) 0.982 Superficial SSI 1 (0.2%) 5 (0.6%) 0.340 Organ/space SSI 11 (2.6%) 20 (2.6%) 0.976 Ileus 3 (0.7%) 7 (0.9%) 0.728 Bleedinga1 (0.2%) 2 (0.3%) 0.945 Pneumonia 2 (0.5%) 3 (0.4%) 0.823 Other complication 3 (0.7%) 2 (0.3%) 0.245 Clavien–Dindo I–II 11 (2.6%) 25 (3.2%) 0.355 Clavien–Dindo III–IV 9 (2.1%) 13 (1.7%) 0.573 30-day mortality 1 (0.2%) 1 (0.1%) 0.662 Length of hospital stay, median (IQr) 33 h (18–63) 37 h (25–63) < 0.001 Complicated AA 106 (35%) 199 (65%) Operation time, median (IQr) 55 min (39–74) 54 min (35–65) 0.393 Morbidity 11 (10%) 23 (12%) 0.755 Superficial SSI 0 (0.0%) 1 (0.5%) 0.465 Organ/space SSI 8 (7.5%) 15 (7.5%) 0.998 Ileus 1 (0.9%) 6 (3.0%) 0.250 Bleedinga1 (0.9%) 0 (0.0%) 0.170 Pneumonia 1 (0.9%) 1 (0.5%) 0.650 Other complication 1 (0.9%) 2 (1.0%) 0.959 Clavien–Dindo I–II 6 (5.7%) 14 (7.0%) 0.644 Clavien–Dindo III–IV 5 (4.7%) 9 (4.5%) 0.938 30-day mortality 0 (0.0%) 1 (0.5%) 0.465 Length of hospital stay, median (IQr) 74 h (53–98) 72 h (47–97) 0.963 Uncomplicated AA 316 (35%) 577 (65%) Operation time, median (IQr) 33 min (24–47) 37 min (26–45) 0.213 Morbidity 9 (2.8%) 14 (2.4%) 0.704 Superficial SSI 1 (0.3%) 4 (0.7%) 0.471 Organ/space SSI 3 (0.9%) 5 (0.9%) 0.900 Ileus 2 (0.6%) 1 (0.2%) 0.256 Bleedinga0 (0.0%) 2 (0.3%) 0.295 Pneumonia 1 (0.3%) 2 (0.3%) 0.941 Other complication 2 (0.6%) 0 (0.0%) 0.056 Clavien–Dindo I–II 5 (1.6%) 11 (1.9%) 0.727 Clavien–Dindo III–IV 4 (1.3%) 4 (0.7%) 0.385 30-day mortality 1 (0.3%) 0 (0.0%) 0.176 Length of hospital stay, median (IQr) 23 h (17–39) 35 h (23–43) <0.001 AA: acute appendicitis; IQr: interquartile range; SSI: surgical site infection. aBleeding = intraoperative bleeding requiring blood transfusion. TABLE 3 Predictors of higher morbidity after appendectomy. Variable Morbidity Or 95% CI p value Complicated diseasea4.52 2.59–7.89 <0.001 Nighttime surgery 1.02 0.58–1.80 0.942 ASA class 3 or more 1.31 0.56–3.10 0.532 resident surgeon 1.21 0.70–2.10 0.499 Age ⩾65 years 1.01 0.41–2.45 0.990 Sex, male 1.55 0.88–2.74 0.129 Or: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval; ASA: American Society of Anesthesiologists. aPerforation with either peritonitis or abscess. T. Mönttinen, et al.6 FUNDING The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This study was conducted with the funding from The Finnish Medical Foundation. OrCID ID M. Ukkonen https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3092-5245 rEFErENCES 1. Ilves I, Paajanen HE, Herzig KH et al: Changing incidence of acute appendicitis and nonspecific abdominal pain between 1987 and 2007 in Finland. World J Surg 2011;35(4):731–738. 2. Bhangu A, Soreide K, Di Saverio S et al: Acute appendicitis: Modern understanding of pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management. Lancet 2015;386(1000):1278–1287. 3. McCoy CC, Englum Br, Keenan JE et al: Impact of specific postoperative complications on the outcomes of emergency general surgery patients. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2015;78(5):912–920. 4. Sartelli M, Viale P, Catena F et al: 2013 WSES guidelines for management of intra-abdominal infections. World J Emerg Surg 2018;8(3):1749–1778. 5. Kim M, Kim SJ, Joo H: Effect of surgical timing and outcomes for appendicitis severity. Ann Surg Treat res 2016;91(2):85–89. 6. Bickell NA, Aufses AH Jr, rojas M et al: How time affects the risk of rupture in appendicitis. J Am Coll Surg 2006;202(3):401–406. 7. United Kingdom National Surgical research Collaborative, Bhangu A: Safety of short, in-hospital delays before surgery for acute appendicitis: Multicentre cohort study, systematic review, and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 2014;259(5):894–903. 8. Sturm L, Dawson D, Vaughan r et al: Effects of fatigue on surgeon performance and surgical outcomes: A systematic review. ANZ J Surg 2011;81(7–8):502–509. 9. Sikder S: Assessment of surgeon fatigue by surgical simulators. Open Access Surg 2015;8:43–50. 10. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA: Classification of surgical complications: A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004;240(2): 205–213. 11. Ditillo MF, Dziura JD, rabinovici r: Is it safe to delay appendectomy in adults with acute appendicitis? Ann Surg 2006;244(5): 656–660. 12. Jeon BG, Kim HJ, Jung KH et al: Appendectomy: Should it be performed so quickly? Am Surg 2016;82(1):65–74. 13. Udgiri N, Curras E, Kella VK et al: Appendicitis, is it an emergency? Am Surg 2011;77(7):898–901. 14. Lee JM, Kwak BS, Park yJ: Coloproctology is a one night delay of surgery safe in patients with acute appendicitis? Coloproctology 2018;34(1):11–15. 15. Teixeira PG, Sivrikoz E, Inaba K et al: Appendectomy timing: Waiting until the next morning increases the risk of surgical site infections. Ann Surg 2012;256(3):538–543. 16. Margenthaler JA, Longo WE, Virgo KS et al: risk factors for adverse outcomes after the surgical treatment of appendicitis in adults. Ann Surg 2003;238(1):59–66. 17. Frazee rC, Bohannon WT: Laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis. Arch Surg 1996;131(5):503–509. 18. Frazee rC, roberts JW, Symmonds rE et al: A prospective randomized trial comparing open versus laparoscopic appendectomy. Ann Surg 1994;219(6):725–731. 19. Ingraham AM, Cohen ME, Bilimoria Ky et al: Effect of delay to operation on outcomes in adults with acute appendicitis. Arch Surg 2010;145(9):886–892. 20. Jaschinski T, Mosh C, Eikermann M et al: Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in patients with suspected appendicitis: A systematic review of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. BMC Gastroenterol 2015;15:48. 21. Schlosser K, Maschuw K, Kupietz E et al: Call—associated acute fatigue in surgical residents—subjective perception or objective fact? A cross-sectional observational study to examine the influence of fatigue on surgical performance. World J Surg 2012;36(10):2276–2287. 22. Tomasko JM, Pauli EM, Kunselman Ar et al: Sleep deprivation increases cognitive workload during simulated surgical tasks. Am J Surg 2012;203(1):37–43. 23. Ahmed N, Devitt KS, Keshet I et al: A systematic review of the effects of resident duty hour restrictions in surgery impact on resident wellness, training, and patient outcomes. Ann Surg 2014;259(6):1041–1053. received: October 30, 2019 Accepted: June 4, 2020