Prevalence of schizophrenia in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus

RESEARCH—HUMAN—CLINICAL STUDIES Prevalence of Schizophrenia in Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Vasco Vanhala, BMed‡∗ Antti Junkkari, MD, PhD‡∗ Ville E. Korhonen, BMed‡ Mitja I. Kurki, PhD‡§ Mikko Hiltunen, PhD¶ Tuomas Rauramaa, MD, PhD|| Ossi Nerg, MD# Anne M. Koivisto, MD, PhD# Anne M. Remes, MD, PhD∗∗ ‡‡ Jonna Perälä, MD, PhD§§ ¶¶ Jaana Suvisaari, MD, PhD§§ |||| Soili M. Lehto, MD, PhD## ∗∗∗ Heimo Viinamäki, MD, PhD‡‡‡ Hilkka Soininen, MD, PhD§§§ Juha E. Jääskeläinen, MD, PhD‡ Ville Leinonen, MD, PhD‡∗∗ ¶¶¶ ‡Neurosurgery of NeuroCenter, Kuopio University Hospital (KUH) and University of Eastern Finland (UEF), Kuopio, Finland; §Analytical and Translational Genetics Unit, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Program in Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, and Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research, Broad Institute for Harvard and MIT, Boston, Massachusetts; ¶Institute of Biomedicine, UEF, Kuopio, Finland; ||Department of Pathology, KUH and UEF, Kuopio, Finland; #Neurology of NeuroCenter, KUH and UEF, Kuopio, Finland; ∗∗Medical Research Center, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland; ‡‡Unit of Clinical Neuroscience, Neurology, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland; §§Department Health, Mental Health Unit, National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland; ¶¶Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Turku, Finland; ||||Department of Social Psychiatry, School of Public Health, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland; ##Department of Psychology and Logopedics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; ∗∗∗Psychiatry and Clinical Research Centre, UEF, Kuopio Finland; ‡‡‡Department of Psychiatry,KUHandUEF,Kuopio,Finland; §§§Department of Neurology, UEF, Kuopio, Finland; ¶¶¶Unit of Clinical Neuroscience, Neurosurgery, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland ∗These authors contributed equally to this work. Correspondence: Antti Junkkari, MD, PhD, Neurosurgery of NeuroCenter, Kuopio University Hospital (KUH), University of Eastern Finland (UEF), POB 100, 70029 KYS, Kuopio, Finland. E-mail: antti.junkk[email protected] Received, September 28, 2017. Accepted, March 3, 2018. Published Online, May 8, 2018. C Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2018. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons AttributionNonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact [email protected] BACKGROUND: Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) is a progressive and potentially treatable neurodegenerative disease affecting elderly people, characterized by gait impairment and ventricular enlargement in brain imaging. Similar findings are seen in some patients with schizophrenia (SCZ). OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of SCZ among patients suffering from probable or possible iNPH and the specific effects of comorbid SCZ on the outcome of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunting. METHODS: All medical records of the 521 iNPH patients in the NPH registry were retrospectively analyzed from 1991 until 2017. The prevalence of comorbidity of SCZ was determined and compared to that of general aged (≥65 yr) population in Finland. RESULTS: We identified a total of 16 (3.1%) iNPH patients suffering from comorbid SCZ. The prevalence of SCZ among the iNPH patients was significantly higher compared to the general population (3.1% vs 0.9%, P<.001). All iNPH patients with comorbid SCZ were CSF shunted and 12 (75%) had a clinically verified shunt response 3 to 12 mo after the procedure. The CSF shunt response rate did not differ between patients with and without comorbid SCZ. CONCLUSION: SCZ seems to occur 3 times more frequently among iNPH patients compared to the general aged population in Finland. The outcome of the treatment was not affected by comorbid SCZ and therefore iNPH patients suffering from comorbid SCZ should not be left untreated. These results merit validation in other populations. In addition, further research towards the potential connection between these chronic conditions is warranted. KEY WORDS: Cohort study, Comorbidity, Normal pressure hydrocephalus, Schizophrenia, Outcome, Prevalence Neurosurgery 84:883–889, 2019 DOI:10.1093/neuros/nyy147 www.neurosurgery-online.com Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) is a progressive and potentially treatable neurodegenerative disease affecting elderly people and characterized by gait impairment and ventricular enlargement in ABBREVIATIONS: Abeta, amyloid beta; CSF, Cerebrospinal fluid; CT, computed tomography; DSM-IV, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 4th edition; HPtau, hyperphosphorylated tau; ICD-10, International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10th revision; iNPH, idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus; iNPHGS, iNPH Grading Scale; MMSE, Mini-Mental State Examination; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; NPH, normal pressure hydrocephalus; SCZ, Schizophrenia; sNPH, secondary normal pressure hydrocephalus. computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain, while cognitive impairment and urinary incontinence are often present.1-3The only available treatment, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunting, alleviates some the symptoms in the majority of those affected.4,5Schizophrenia (SCZ) is a serious mental disorder with high heritability characterized by hallucinations, social withdrawal, and cognitive decline.6SCZ is also associated with progressive structural brain changes, including the enlargement of lateral ventricles and the reduction of total gray matter volume.7In general, the risk of a Finnish person having SCZ in their lifetime is 0.9%;8the Eastern Finnish population exhibiting slightly higher 1.1% lifetime prevalence.9 iNPH has been associated with different types of psychiatric manifestations,10-24 ranging from NEUROSURGERY VOLUME 84 | NUMBER 4 | APRIL 2019 | 883 Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/neurosurgery/article-abstract/84/4/883/4993891 by Tampere University and University Hospital user on 27 May 2019 VANHALA ET AL apathy to psychotic symptoms,10-23 but SCZ as a comorbid condition has not been previously systematically analyzed; SCZ or psychotic symptoms accompanied by iNPH have been reported infrequently in the literature during the past 4 decades (Table 1),11,14-24 the majority being case reports.15-18,21-23 However, the latest prospective study indicated an increased prevalence of iNPH in older patients with SCZ (5/24, 24%) in a highly selected hospital population.14 The prevalence of psychotic symptoms or SCZ in patients with iNPH has been estimated to be low.12,16,20,24 In this study, we aim to determine (1) the prevalence of SCZ among Eastern Finnish population suffering from probable/possible iNPH, and (2) the specific effects of comorbid SCZ on the treatment outcome of CSF shunting. METHODS Study Design & Participants NPH Registry and Tissue Bank Permission for this research was received from the Research Ethics Board of the local University Hospital, a hospital that geographically provides serves neurosurgery to the Eastern Finnish population of approximately 900 000 inhabitants. The study was conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki and all patients provided informed consent. People suspected to suffer from iNPH in this geographical area were primarily examined by a neurologist and referred for further neurosurgical investigations if the patients exhibited 1 to 3 symptoms possibly related to NPH (impaired gait, impaired cognition, or urinary continence) together with enlarged brain ventricles disproportionate to the size of the sulci of cerebral convexities (Evans’ index >0.3)2in CT or MRI (Figure). From 1991 until 2010, the NPH protocol included a 24-h intraventricular pressure monitoring and a small right frontal cortical biopsy from all patients with suspected iNPH. In early 2010, a systematic CSF sampling from all patients was included and a 3-step prognostic test protocol was launched. First, a CSF tap test is performed to all patients with suspected iNPH, where at least 20% improvement in gait speed in repeated 10-m tests is considered as a positive result. In the second phase, those with a negative tap test undergo a lumbar infusion test, where pathological findings (such as conductance ≤10)3,25 are considered as a positive result. In the third step, participants with a negative finding in both of the abovementioned tests undergo a 24-h monitoring of intraventricular pressure. Similarly, as of 2010, brain biopsies are only acquired from participants who undergo intraventricular pressure monitoring or the CSF shunt surgery. Study Population and Study Design Between January 1991 and February 2017 (26 yr), 892 consecutive patients with suspected iNPH were included to the registry (Figure). Altogether 521 (58%) participants were identified to suffer from probable or possible iNPH and 371 (42%) participants were identified as unlikely to have iNPH (instead having, for example secondary NPH (sNPH)).1,2All medical records, prescriptions and comorbidities of probable/possible and unlikely iNPH patients were retrospectively and systematically examined for the diagnosis of SCZ. TABLE 1. The Results of the Literature Search of the Relevant Studies Focusing on Comorbid iNPH and SCZ or Psychotic Symptoms Search words used (Normal pressure hydrocephalus) and ((schizophrenia) or (psychotic)) Articles found from MEDLINE/Pubmed 30 Articles includeda10 Study Country Study type Number of patients Number of patients with probable or possible iNPH with comorbid SCZ Number of patients with probable or possible iNPH with psychotic symptoms PMID Yoshino et al. (2016)14 Japan Prospective survey 21b5(24%) b5(24%) b26 555 031 Oliveira et al. (2014)11 Brazil Prospective survey 35 0 7 (20%) 24 964 110 Agrawal et al. (2012)15 India Case report 1 1 1 (100%) 23 372 246 Mishra et al. (2011)16 India Case report 1 0c1 (100%) 21 353 138 Chopra et al. (2002)17 India Case report 1 0 1 (100%) 21 206 886 Pinner et al. (1997)18 UK Case report 1 0 1 (100%) 9 549 596 Mauritzi (1987)19 UK Theoretical paper 0 0 0 3 614 004 Dewan et al. (1985)20 USA Comment 0 0 0 4 041 514 Lying-Tunell (1979)21 Sweden Case report 2 0 2 (100%) 433 632 Price et al. (1977)22 USA Case report 1 0 1 (100%) 830 802 Abbreviations: SCZ, schizophrenia; iNPH, idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Legend: aAll articles were read and those included were as follows: (i) written in english and (ii) had participants suspected of probable or possible iNPH or (iii) contributed to the theoretical background on iNPH and schizophrenia or psychotic symptoms. bStudy consisted 21 older SCZ patients. cPatient was suspected to have secondary NPH.1,2 884 | VOLUME 84 | NUMBER 4 | APRIL 2019 www.neurosurgery-online.com Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/neurosurgery/article-abstract/84/4/883/4993891 by Tampere University and University Hospital user on 27 May 2019 PREVALENCE OF SCHIZOPHRENIA IN INPH FIGURE. Flowchart of the study population. aImpairment of gait, cognition or urinary incontinence. bEvans’ index >.3 in computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging;2cRelkin et al, 2005;1dMori et al, 2012.2Abbreviations: iNPH, idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus; sNPH, secondary NPH; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid. General Population Control Group Health 2000 was a general health examination survey based on a nationally representative sample of 8028 people aged 30 yr and older, including a sample of 2157 subjects aged 65 yr or older.8Psychotic disorders were screened using information from nationwide health care registers and self-reported symptoms as described in detail elsewhere,8 and DSM-IV diagnoses were confirmed by using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV and/or information on psychiatric symptoms from medical records of all lifetime psychiatric treatment contacts.8The prevalence of SCZ in the oldest age group has been reported previously.8 Here, the actual numbers were utilized for a formal statistical comparison of the prevalence of SCZ in patients with iNPH compared to the general population. Outcome Indicators To assess the severity of the characterizing symptoms of iNPH, a modified Finnish version of the 12-point iNPH Grading Scale (iNPHGS) was used (Table 2).26 iNPHGS is a clinician-rated scale to separately estimate the severity of each of the triad symptoms with a scoring based on interviews with the patients or their caregivers and observations by the physician.26 Lower scores represent less severe symptoms.26 It has been estimated that even a reduction in the iNPHGS by a single point results in a clinically observable improvement in the patient’s condition.27 Similarly, a clinically verified shunt response was assessed by a neurosurgeon 3 to 12 mo postoperatively at the outpatient clinic.28 The patient was classified to be nonresponsive to the CSF shunt if no improvement in the core symptoms (gait, cognition, and urinary incontinence) was detected.28 Cognition was evaluated by using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE).29 MMSE ranges from 0 to 30, with lower scores indicating a greater cognitive decline.29 Frontal Cortical Biopsy Biopsy needles or forceps were used to obtain one to three cylindrical frontal cortical brain biopsies, of 3 to 7 mm in length and 2 to 5 mm in width, prior the insertion of the ventricular catheter of the CSF shunt (adjacent to the coronal suture of the skull and approximately 3 cm from NEUROSURGERY VOLUME 84 | NUMBER 4 | APRIL 2019 | 885 Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/neurosurgery/article-abstract/84/4/883/4993891 by Tampere University and University Hospital user on 27 May 2019 VANHALA ET AL TABLE 2. Comparison Between 521 Study Participants With and Without Schizophrenia Schizophrenia (n =16) no schizophrenia (n =505) Variables Mean or number of participants SD or % Number of observations if any missing data Mean or number of participants SD or % number of observations if any missing data Test statistics P-value CSF Shunting surgery CSF shunt surgery was performed (yes) 16 100 489 97 >.99c Favorable clinical outcome 3-12 mo postoperatively (yes) 12 75 407 83 .32c Favorable INPHGS outcome (yes) 3 mo postoperatively 440 10 104 48 219 .75c 12 mo postoperatively 2 50 4 87 50 173 >.99c Characteristics Age (at referral to the neurosurgical department) 65 5.3 73 7.2 Z =−4.22 <.001a Sex (Female) 850 267 53 χ2=.05 >.99b History of INPH INPH-related symptoms Impairment of gait 13 81 476 94 .07c Urinary incontinence or urge 9 56 374 74 .15c Impaired cognition 11 69 411 81 .20c Full triad 5 31 304 60 χ2=5.39 .035b Onset of iNPH-related symptoms 15 499 χ2=3.17 .11b Onset a year or less from the referral 10 66 217 43 Onset more than a year from the referral 534 282 57 First symptom of iNPH 494 Impairment of gait or imbalance 956 265 54 χ2=.09 .81b Cognition impairment 3 19 124 25 .77c Vertigo 213 53 11 .68c Urinary incontinence or urge 1 6 27 5 .59c Other 1 6 25 5.57c Severity of INPH-related symptoms preoperatively INPHGS total score (0-12) 6.0 2.1 10 6.2 2.8 247 Z=−.32 .75a Cognition impairment (MMSE score, 0-30) 20 4.1 13 22 4.6 429 Z =−.67 .10a Comorbidity Presence of Abeta or HPtau found in the frontal cortical biopsy 7 44 221 45 490 χ2=.01 >.99b ABBREVIATIONS: iNPH, idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus; iNPHGS, iNPH Grading Scale; MMSE, Mini-Mental State Examination; CSF, Cerebrospinal fluid. LEGEND: Statistically significant difference (P<.05) is bolded. aMann–Whitney U test; bPearson chi-square test cFisher’s exact test. the midline).28,30 The presence of hyperphosphorylated tau (HPtau) and amyloid-beta (Abeta) were assessed from all samples by a neuropathologist by using light microscopy (Table 2).31 Statistics The data were analyzed by using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS 19 for Windows, Version 19.0. IBM Corp, Armonk, New York). Pearson’s Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test was used in multiple comparisons to estimate group differences in nominal variables and the Mann–Whitney Utest for continuous variables, respectively. The Mann–Whitney Utest was used due to the nonnormal distribution of continuous variables. To test the difference in the prevalence of SCZ between the studied patients and the general population, the cases of SCZ were weighted by the amount of observations in both populations and compared. All tests for significance were 2-sided, with probabilities of <.05 accepted as statistically significant. RESULTS Sixteen (3.1%) participants with probable or possible iNPH were identified to have comorbid SCZ, the most common SCZ subtype being residual SCZ (25%; Figure, Table 3). All observed SCZ subtypes, 5-yr occurrences of SCZ, and the prognostic/ancillary tests performed on to patients suffering from SCZ prior to the CSF shunting, are presented in (Table 3). The observed prevalence of comorbid SCZ among iNPH patients was significantly higher compared to the age-weighted control sample set from the general population (3.1% vs 0.9%, absolute risk difference 2.2%; Fisher’s exact test, P<.001; Table 4). All participants with SCZ were CSF shunted and 12 (75%) of them had a favorable clinical outcome assessed by a neurosurgeon 3 to 12 mo after the procedure (Table 2). Favorable outcome rates, measured by INPHGS or assessed by a neurosurgeon, did not differ statistically between iNPH patients with 886 | VOLUME 84 | NUMBER 4 | APRIL 2019 www.neurosurgery-online.com Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/neurosurgery/article-abstract/84/4/883/4993891 by Tampere University and University Hospital user on 27 May 2019 PREVALENCE OF SCHIZOPHRENIA IN INPH TABLE 3. Characteristics of 16 Participants With Schizophrenia Number of subjects with schizophrenia (% of total sample) Number of participants with iNPH (% of participants with SCZ) SCZ subtypes (ICD-10) Residual schizophrenia (F20.5) 4 (25) Paranoid schizophrenia (F20.0) 3(19) Chronic schizophrenia (F20) 2 (13) Catatonic schizophrenia (F20.2) 1(6) Hebephrenic schizophrenia (F20.1) 1 (6) Schizophrenia, unspecified (F20.9) 1(6) SCZ without subtype specification 4 (25) 5-yr occurrence of SZC in the NPH registry 1991-1995 2 (13) 42 (5) 1995-2000 2(13) 48 (4) 2000-2005 1 (6) 85 (1) 2005-2010 2(13) 114 (2) 2010-2015 6 (37) 162 (4) 2015 3(18) 56 (5) Prognostics and ancillary tests used preliminary to CSF shunt CSF tap test 7 (44) CSF tap & infusion tests 2 (12) ICP monitoring 7 (44) ABBREVIATIONS:iNPH,idiopathic normal pressurehydrocephalus;CSF, Cerebrospinalfluid;ICP, Intracranialpressure;SCZ, Schizophrenia;ICD-10, InternationalStatisticalClassification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10th revision. TABLE 4. Comparison of Prevalence of Schizophrenia Between NPH Registry and a Sample From the General Population Population Comparisons NPH Registry n=521 Age-weightedaSample of 65 yr olds or older from the general population n =746 711 Absolute risk difference Fisher’s exact test P-value Schizophrenia Yes (%) 16 (3.1) 6835 (.9) 2.2% <.001 No (%) 505 (96.9) 746 711 (99.1) ABBREVIATIONS: NPH, Normal pressure hydrocephalus; DSM-IV, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 4th edition. Legend: aWeighted by age using SUDAAN-script to take into account the increased mortality8without weighting the general population was the size of 2157 of which 17 people had schizophrenia.8In the general population sample,8diagnoses of schizophrenia (DSM-IV diagnoses) were confirmed by using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV and/or information on psychiatric symptoms from the medical records of all lifetime psychiatric treatment contacts,8while in our study, the diagnosis of schizophrenia was retrospectively obtained by systematically examining all the medical records, prescriptions and comorbidities of the study population. Statistically significant difference (P<.05) is bolded. and without comorbid SCZ (Table 2). Patients with comorbid SCZ were referred to the neurosurgical department at a significantly younger age than those without SCZ (Mann–Whitney U-test, P<.001) and exhibited less frequently the triad of core symptoms associated with iNPH (31% vs 60%, Fisher’s exact test, P=.035; Table 2). Otherwise, the onset and first symptoms, the severity of iNPH-related symptoms and the cognitive impairment of patients with comorbid SCZ were similar to other iNPH patients (Table 2). There was no difference in the prevalence of Alzheimer’s disease-related pathology (Abeta or HPtau) in the frontal cortical biopsy between the patient groups (44% vs 45%; Table 2). DISCUSSION Interpretation SCZ was observed to occur 3 times more frequently among the iNPH patients compared to the general aged population in Finland (Table 4), and the number of patients with comorbid SCZ within the NPH registry seems to increase over time (Table 3). The increased awareness of iNPH24 or the change in the data collection method (Figure ) may partly explain the differences in the number of people with SCZ referred to the neurosurgical department and recorded to the registry (Figure and Table 3). As people with SCZ have a higher mortality rate32 and because NEUROSURGERY VOLUME 84 | NUMBER 4 | APRIL 2019 | 887 Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/neurosurgery/article-abstract/84/4/883/4993891 by Tampere University and University Hospital user on 27 May 2019 VANHALA ET AL iNPH affects mainly the elderly population,1-3the prevalence of comorbid SCZ among the people with iNPH could be underestimated. A recent study14 hypothesized that the increased prevalence of iNPH in people with SCZ could partly be explained by the vascular risk factors33 that are also common in patients with iNPH although their exact role in the pathogenesis of iNPH is yet to be determined.34,35 In 2010, the brief research history of iNPH and SCZ was reviewed in a book chapter on secondary SCZ;24 two studies36,37 suggested a common pathology between sNPH and SCZ, and the 2 conditions portrayed similar abnormalities in CSF dynamics in isotope cisternography. However, there was no further replication of these studies. Identifying iNPH in a person with SCZ is challenging. Even missed diagnoses are possible since ventriculomegaly seen in iNPH could be ignored as the increased volume of ventricles is common in elderly people with SCZ.24,38 The largely unknown origin of structural brain abnormalities in SCZ has been suggested to possibly reflect the neurodevelopment of SCZ,38,39 although the progressive enlargement of lateral ventricles can also occur after the onset of SCZ.7These structural changes have also been associated with long-term antipsychotic and benzodiazepine use in people with SCZ.40 Similarly, a part of the clinical appearance of iNPH, the impairment of gait or cognition, could easily be attributed to the side effects of longstanding antipsychotic treatment, or to the normal and highly varying progression/symptomology of SCZ, and thus lead to a missed diagnosis.14,24 It is important to acknowledge that if an aged person with SCZ exhibits progressive disturbances in gait, cognition, or urinary incontinence that cannot be entirely attributed to the SCZ or its treatment, and if the symptoms are accompanied by ventriculomegaly, iNPH should be considered when sNPH is excluded.1,2,14,23 In our study, the clinical characteristics of iNPH were nearly equal in the participants with and without comorbid SCZ, but on average, those with SCZ were expressing the classical symptom triad of iNPH less frequently and were referred to the neurosurgical investigations younger than their counterparts (Table 2). A previous study described a similar case of a iNPH patient with comorbid SCZ.15It could be hypothesized that coexisting SCZ or its treatment may affect the onset and possibly the progression of iNPH. Otherwise, no further differences were identified in the clinical characteristics. Comorbid SCZ did not have any effect on the CSF shunt response or the overall treatment outcome between the 2 groups. The observed shunt response rates were in line with the results previously reported in literature.5Therefore, iNPH patients suffering from comorbid SCZ should not be left untreated. In our study, due to the limited number of participants with SCZ, the accuracy of different prognostic tests applied prior to the CSF shunting in participants with and without comorbid SCZ and cannot be fully estimated. Based on clinical experience, we suggest that the prognostic tests should be performed in the same way to the patients with and without comorbid SCZ. Strengths and Limitations The strengths of this study include large representative population samples from both the people with iNPH and the general aged population. In addition, to the best of our knowledge, ours are the first published findings on the prevalence of SCZ in the iNPH population. Due to the cross-sectional setting in the analyses, we are unable to draw direct conclusions on the causal relationships between iNPH and SCZ. The effect of the CSF shunt on the psychotic symptoms in iNPH patients with comorbid SCZ would have further strengthened the study. The diagnosis of SCZ was retrospectively obtained by systematically examining all the medical records, prescriptions and comorbidities of the study population instead of a psychiatric interview. The participants that were admitted before the year 2008 to the NPH registry were gathered retrospectively at the time. The clinical outcome was not evaluated with INPHGS from all participants. Diagnosis date of SCZ was not captured in our study. However, it was, in all affected, set decades before any suspicion of iNPH. Two different diagnostic guidelines for iNPH exist.1,2 As symptomatic SCZ patients might be investigated by imaging studies more frequently than older patients without SCZ, an age bias is possible. CONCLUSION In summary, SCZ seems to occur 3 times more frequently among iNPH patients as compared to the general aged population in Finland. Still, the treatment outcome is not affected by comorbid SCZ and therefore iNPH patients suffering from comorbid SCZ should not be left untreated. These results merit validation in other populations. In addition, further research towards the possible shared underlying pathological mechanisms of these 2 long-lasting conditions is needed. Disclosure The authors have no personal, financial, or institutional interest in any of the drugs, materials, or devices described in this article. REFERENCES 1. Relkin N, Marmarou A, Klinge P, Bergsneider M, Black PM. Diagnosing idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery. 2005;57(3 Suppl):S4-16: discussion ii-v. 2. Mori E, Ishikawa M, Kato T, et al. Guidelines for management of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: second edition. Neurol. Med. Chir.(Tokyo). 2012;52(11):775-809. 3. Williams MA, Malm J. Diagnosis and treatment of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2016;22(2 Dementia):579-599. 4. Kazui H, Miyajima M, Mori E, SINPHONI-2 Investigators . Lumboperitoneal shunt surgery for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (SINPHONI-2): an open-label randomised trial. Lancet Neurol. 2015;14(6):585-594. 5. Toma AK, Papadopoulos MC, Stapleton S, Kitchen ND, Watkins LD. Systematic review of the outcome of shunt surgery in idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Acta Neurochir. 2013;155(10):1977-1980 6. Sekar A, Bialas AR, de Rivera H, et al. Schizophrenia risk from complex variation of complement component 4. Nature. 2016;530(7589):177-183. 7. Olabi B, Ellison-Wright I, McIntosh AM, Wood SJ, Bullmore E, Lawrie SM. Are there progressive brain changes in schizophrenia? A meta-analysis 888 | VOLUME 84 | NUMBER 4 | APRIL 2019 www.neurosurgery-online.com Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/neurosurgery/article-abstract/84/4/883/4993891 by Tampere University and University Hospital user on 27 May 2019 PREVALENCE OF SCHIZOPHRENIA IN INPH of structural magnetic resonance imaging studies. Biol Psychiatry. 2011;70(1): 88-96 8. Perala J, Suvisaari J, Saarni SI, et al. Lifetime prevalence of psychotic and bipolar I disorders in a general population. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2007;64(1):19-28. 9. Perala J, Saarni SI, Ostamo A, et al. Geographic variation and sociodemographic characteristics of psychotic disorders in Finland. Schizophr Res. 2008;106(2-3):337347. 10. Israelsson H, Allard P, Eklund A, Malm J. Symptoms of depression are common in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery. 2016;78(2):161-168. 11. Oliveira MF, Oliveira JR, Rotta JM, Pinto FC. Psychiatric symptoms are present in most of the patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Arq NeuroPsiquiatr. 2014;72(6):435-438. 12. Kito Y, Kazui H, Kubo Y, et al. Neuropsychiatric symptoms in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Behav Neurol. 2009;21(3):165-174. 13. Devito EE, Pickard JD, Salmond CH, Iddon JL, Loveday C, Sahakian BJ. The neuropsychology of normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH). Br J Neurosurg. 2005;19(3):217-224. 14. Yoshino Y, Yoshida T, Mori T, Hirota S, Iga J, Ueno S. Risk of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus in older inpatients with schizophrenia. Int Psychogeriatr. 2016;28(5):863-868. 15. Agrawal A, Tiwari AM, Tiple P, Chauhan MK, Nagarale M. Normal pressure hydrocephalus in a case of schizophrenia. Indian J Psychiatry. 2012;54(4):385-386. 16. Mishra BR, Sarkar S, Mishra S, Praharaj SK, Mahapatra P, Sinha VK. Antipsychotic sensitivity in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2011;33(1):83.e11-83.e13. 17. Chopra VK, Sinha VK, Das S. Normal pressure hydrocephalus presenting as psychotic depression: moderately successful treatment with a course of ect & pharmacotherapy: a case report. Indian J Psychiatry. 2002;44(1):71-75. 18. Pinner G, Johnson H, Bouman WP, Isaacs J. Psychiatric manifestations of normal-pressure hydrocephalus: a short review and unusual case. Int Psychogeriatr. 1997;9(4):465-470. 19. Maurizi CP. The pathophysiology of enlarged ventricles in normal pressure communicating hydrocephalus and schizophrenia: a possible therapeutic role for melatonin. Med Hypotheses 1987;23(1):61-66. 20. Dewan MJ, Bick PA. Normal pressure hydrocephalus and psychiatric patients. Biol Psychiatry. 1985;20(10):1127-1131. 21. Lying-Tunell U. Psychotic symptoms in normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1979;59(4):415-419. 22. Price TR, Tucker GJ. Psychiatric and behavioral manifestations of normal pressure hydrocephalus. A case report and brief review. J Nerv Ment Dis 1977;164(1):51-55. 23. Korhonen VE., Solje E, Suhonen NM, et al. Frontotemporal dementia as a comorbidity to idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH): a short review of literature and an unusual case. Fluids Barriers CNS 2017;14:10. 24. Trollor J. Normal pressure hydrocephalus. In: Sachdev PS, Keshavan MS, eds. Secondary Schizophrenia. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2010;257262. 25. Malm J, Jacobsson J, Birgander R, Eklund A. Reference values for CSF outflow resistance and intracranial pressure in healthy elderly. Neurology. 2011;76(10):903909. 26. Kubo Y, Kazui H, Yoshida T, et al. Validation of grading scale for evaluating symptoms of idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2008;25(1):37-45. 27. Ishikawa M, Yamada S, Yamamoto K. Early and delayed assessments of quantitative gait measures to improve the tap test as a predictor of shunt effectiveness in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Fluids Barriers CNS. 2016;13: 20. 28. Koivisto AM, Alafuzoff I, Savolainen S, et al. Poor cognitive outcome in shuntresponsive idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery. 2013;72(1): 1-8. 29. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12(3):189-198. 30. Koivisto AM, Kurki MI, Alafuzoff I, et al. High risk of dementia in ventricular enlargement with normal pressure hydrocephalus related symptoms1. J Alzheimers Dis. 2016;52(2):497-507 31. Seppala TT, Nerg O, Koivisto AM, et al. CSF biomarkers for Alzheimer disease correlate with cortical brain biopsy findings. Neurology. 2012;78(20):15681575. 32. Kiviniemi M, Suvisaari J, Pirkola S, Häkkinen U, Isohanni M, Hakko H. Regional differences in five-year mortality after a first episode of schizophrenia in Finland. Psychiatr Serv. 2010;61(3):272-279. 33. Papanastasiou E. The prevalence and mechanisms of metabolic syndrome in schizophrenia: a review. Ther Adv Psychopharmacol. 2013;3(1):33-51. 34. Malm J, Graff-Radford NR, Ishikawa M, et al. Influence of comorbidities in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus-research and clinical care. A report of the ISHCSF task force on comorbidities in INPH. Fluids Barriers CNS. 2013; 10(1):22. 35. Israelsson H, Carldberg B, Wikkelsö C, et al. Vascular risk factors in INPH: a prospective case-control study (the INPH-CRasH study). Neurology. 2017;88(6):577-585. 36. Oxenstierna G, Bergstrand G, Bjerkenstedt L, Sedvall G, Wik G. Evidence of disturbed CSF circulation and brain atrophy in cases of schizophrenic psychosis. Br J Psychiatry. 1984;144:654-661. 37. Oxenstierna G, Bergstrand G, Edman G, Flyckt L, Nybäck H, Sedvall G. Increased frequency of aberrant CSF circulation in schizophrenic patients compared to healthy volunteers. Eur Psychiatry. 1996;11(1):16-20. 38. Shepherd AM, Laurens KR, Matheson SL, Carr VJ, Green MJ. Systematic metareview and quality assessment of the structural brain alterations in schizophrenia. Neurosci Bio. 2012;36(4):1342-1356. 39. Lewis DA, Levitt P. Schizophrenia as a disorder of neurodevelopment. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2002;25(1):409-432. 40. Huhtaniska S, Jääskeläinen E, Heikka T, et al. Long-term antipsychotic and benzodiazepine use and brain volume changes in schizophrenia: the Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966 study. Psychiatr Res. 2017;266:73-82. COMMENT This study of iNPH in schizophrenia patients performed in Eastern Finland, a reliable health care system environment for such a study, indicates several interesting findings that have remained sidelined until now. In addition to the 3 times higher prevalence of iNPH among schizophrenic patients, the similarity of clinical and radiological phenomena makes the differentiation of the two conditions regarding effect of shunting and prognosis rather difficult. This is the first systematic approach to identify schizophrenic patients that can benefit of shunting (they are usually younger) and the study attempts to assess the outcome that can be expected; in fact, these patients benefitted from shunting at the same rate as general iNPH patients. We believe that with these presented data that we have to consider initial, the relation of iNPH to some of the manifestations of schizophrenia will attract attention and we will improve its understanding. Madoka Nakajima Tokyo, Japan NEUROSURGERY VOLUME 84 | NUMBER 4 | APRIL 2019 | 889 Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/neurosurgery/article-abstract/84/4/883/4993891 by Tampere University and University Hospital user on 27 May 2019