Optimizing geometry of low-Q all-metal Fabry-Pérot microcavity for fluorescence spectroscopy

This is a self-archived version of an original article. This version may differ from the original in pagination and typographic details. Author(s): Title: Year: Version: Copyright: Rights: Rights url: Please cite the original version: CC BY 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Optimizing geometry of low-Q all-metal Fabry-Pérot microcavity for fluorescence spectroscopy © 2021 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd. Published version Dutta, Arpan; Tiainen, Ville; Toppari, J Jussi Dutta, A., Tiainen, V., & Toppari, J. J. (2021). Optimizing geometry of low-Q all-metal Fabry- Pérot microcavity for fluorescence spectroscopy. IOP SciNotes, 2(1), Article 015205. https://doi.org/10.1088/2633-1357/abec2b 2021 IOP SciNotes ARTICLE • OPEN ACCESS Optimizing geometry of low-Q all-metal Fabry-Pérot microcavity for fluorescence spectroscopy To cite this article: Arpan Dutta et al 2021 IOPSciNotes 2 015205 View the article online for updates and enhancements. This content was downloaded from IP address 81.197.41.56 on 23/03/2021 at 06:28 IOP SciNotes 2(2021)015205 https://doi.org/10.1088/2633-1357/abec2b ARTICLE Optimizing geometry of low-Q all-metal Fabry-Pérot microcavity for fluorescence spectroscopy Arpan Dutta ∗ , Ville Tiainen and J Jussi Toppari ∗ Nanoscience Center and Department of Physics, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland ∗ Authors to whom any correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: arpan.a.dutta@jyu.fiand j.jussi.toppari@jyu.fi Keywords: Purcell factor, fluorescence, Fabry-Pérot microcavity Abstract Fluorescence spectroscopy is commonly employed to study the excited-state photophysics of organic molecules. Planar Fabry-Pérot microcavities play an essential role in such studies and a strategic cavity design is necessary to attain an enhanced light-matter interaction. In this work, we computationally study different geometries for a planar metallic Fabry-Pérot microcavity tuned for the absorption of Sulforhodamine 101, a typical dye for fluorescence spectroscopy. The cavity consists of a polymer layer enclosed between two silver mirrors, where the thicknesses of all the three layers are varied to optimize the cavity. Our transfer-matrix and finite-difference time-domain simulations suggest that a cavity with 30 nm thin top mirror and 200 nm fully reflective thick bottom mirror, thus having only reflection and absorption and no transmission, is an optimal design for maximizing the Purcell factor and spectral overlap between the cavity and molecule, while still sustaining an efficient measurability of the fluorescence. 1. Introduction Low-Q planar Fabry-Pérot (FP)microcavities, doped with photoactive organic molecules, are essential in exploring light-matter interactions under weak [1–4]and strong coupling limit [5,6], and often employed in the studies of excited-state photochemistry [7,8], photovoltaics [9], and cavity-quantum electrodynamics [10]. Planar metallic FP microcavities are popular in spectroscopy [3,6]since they are simpler to fabricate and realize than dielectric cavities [11,12]. However, implementing them in fluorescence spectroscopy is challenging, because usually one can tune the cavity resonance and thus the enhancement either for molecular absorption or emission, but not fully for both. The usual choice has been to do the excitation or detection via light leaking through a thin enough mirror, which, however, limits the quality factor ( Q )of the microcavity to well below hundred. However, mode volumes ( V m )of the all-metallic microcavities are really small, which in the case of multimolecule coupling is enough to drive the system even to an ultrastrong coupling regime [13]. Performance of a FP cavity in fluorescence spectroscopy depends on its field-confinements in temporal ( Q ) and spatial ( V m )domains. Here ll=D Q , 0/where l 0is the wavelength of the cavity resonance and l D is the full-width at half-maximum of the resonance peak [14]; and, ò =  EEdVVmax, m22 ⎡ ⎣ ⎢⎤ ⎦ ⎥ ∣∣ [ (∣∣)]/ where  is the dielectric function and E is the electric-field amplitude inside the interaction volume V [15]. Purcell factor determines the fluorescence enhancement inside the cavity and it is pl=nF34 QV , P203m ()()()/// where n is the refractive index in V [16]. Increasing Q and decreasing V m readily improves F. P However, increasing Q often requires highly reflective mirrors, incurring a reduced cavity transmission, which further reduces the measurability of the fluorescence. Thus, an optimized compromise is needed. In addition, the aforementioned FPis ‘ideal’, assuming—perfect spectral overlap of the cavity mode with the fluorescence spectrum, and emitter location at the antinode of the cavity mode with its transition dipole aligned with the local electric field [17]. In reality, matching of the cavity mode of doped microcavities, with the emission spectrum of an ensemble of emitters spatially distributed within the cavity field with randomly oriented dipoles, OPEN ACCESS RECEIVED 22 December 2020 REVISED 2 March 2021 ACCEPTED FOR PUBLICATION 4 March 2021 PUBLISHED 15 March 2021 Original content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence. Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s)and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI. © 2021 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd can be challenging [18]. Hence, only a fraction of the emission couples to the cavity leading to an effective FP much lower than the ideal [4]. Improving the effective FPcan be done by spectral tuning between the cavity mode and the emitter responses. Increasing the spectral overlap between the molecular emission l P L() and the cavity absorption l A, c () i.e. emission overlap F E òlll=ÇAPLd , c () () will increase the fraction of the emission coupled to the cavity, resulting in more efficient fluorescence enhancement [19]. Similarly, excitation efficiency of the fluorescent molecules inside the cavity depends on the spectral overlap between l A c () and the molecular absorption l A , m() i.e. absorption overlap F A òlll=ÇAAd, cm () () which has to be high for an efficient cavity-molecular coupling [20]. Taking into account the above excitation efficiency ( µ F A )and considering that—only a fraction of the molecular emission coupled with the cavity absorption ( µ F E )is enhanced by a factor of FPand collected through a cavity mirror possessing an average transmissivity T avg , the total integrated fluorescence intensity measurable outside of the microcavity can be formulated as =FF I FT FL P avg E A. I FL is an estimation of the measurability of fluorescence, which is not necessarily optimal at optimal F. P Therefore, a strategic cavity design is needed to attain an optimal FP, F E , F A and T avg to obtain the best I , FL which we use as our main criteria for the cavity here. In this work, we computationally study different geometries for a planar metallic FP microcavity. To calculate I FL we have chosen sulforhodamine 101 (SR101)dye as our model molecule and tuned the cavities for its absorption maximum (576 nm). The cavity consists of a polymer layer enclosed between two silver mirrors, and the thicknesses of all the three layers are varied to optimize the cavity properties. Our transfer-matrix method (TMM)and finite-difference time-domain (FDTD)based simulations suggest that a reflective (nontransmitting)cavity is an optimal choice in maximizing FP, F A , F E and especially I FL . Our findings provide insights on designing low-Q all-metal FP microcavities for fluorescence spectroscopy. 2. Materials and methods Planar metallic FP microcavities with different geometries were studied using TMM [21,22]and FDTD [23,24] simulations. The two silver (Ag)mirrors with thicknesses t 1 and t 3 , and a layer (thickness t2 )of poly-vinyl alcohol (PVA)embedded in between, form the cavity (see figure 1). PVA was chosen since it is a suitable polymer matrix for SR101 molecules. The cavity mode was always tuned to the absorption maximum of SR101 (576 nm)by varying t2 . A thin PVA layer (30 nm)was also considered on top of the top Ag mirror as a protection layer, which prevents the oxidation of Ag in ambient condition in the case of real cavities. The glass (SiO 2 )substrate and the surrounding medium (air, refractive index is 1.0)were considered as semi-infinite. The material models for Ag, PVA and SiO 2 were extracted from [25–27], respectively. The absorption and emission spectra of SR101 were taken from [28]. Reflection, transmission and absorption ( R, T, A )of the modelled microcavities were calculated using TMM where =--A1RT. The Q values were calculated from the cavity absorption. Electric field distribution and mode volume in each cavity were computed using 3D-FDTD simulations where normal incidence of linearly polarized light with polarization defined in figure 1was considered as an excitation. The entire radiation zone of the cavity mode, as illustrated by the white dotted boundary in the field-distribution plot Figure 1. Schematic of FP microcavity. 2 IOP SciNotes 2(2021)015205 A Dutta et al shown in figure 2(a), was considered as V in V m calculation. T avg were calculated as the average transmission of the top mirrors ( t 1 )within the SR101 emission (560–700 nm)as reported in figure 2(b). Spectral overlaps ( F A and F E )were calculated as an integral of the common area (shaded yellow/magenta regions)under the cavity absorption (black)and the molecular absorption/emission (blue/red)curves for each cavity, as shown in figures 2(c),(d). 3. Results and discussions In our first approach, we designed symmetric cavities where both mirrors had equal thicknesses. Five cavities (C1–C5)with increasing mirror thicknesses were considered with their geometrical parameters reported in table 1, while figures 3(a)–(c)show their R, T, A analysis. From figures 3(c),(d), it is clear that an increment in cavity mirror thickness makes the cavity absorption linewidth narrower, resulting a drastic fall in F A and F E . However, it simultaneously improves cavity Q, V m and FPas shown in figures 3(e),(f). The cavity C5 (50 nm mirrors)provides highest FPbut it yields poorest spectral overlaps and T avg (see figure 2(b)). Consequently, I FL drops at the highest FP. To overcome this limitation we designed asymmetric cavities where we made one mirror thin (leaky)for fluorescence collection while keeping the other mirror thick. Five cavities (C6–C10)were considered with increasing D t ( D =ttt 31 /)with their geometrical parameters reported in table 2and their R, T, A analysis shown in figures 4(a)–(c). Figure 2. (a) E -field distribution in the microcavity. (b) T avg as a function of top mirror ( t 1 )thickness. Spectral overlap of cavity absorption with (c)absorption and (d)emission of SR101. In (a),(c)and (d), the studied cavity is C1 (see table 1). Table 1. Geometries for symmetric microcavities. Cavity t ttnm 123 ( ) // C1 20/132/20 C2 25/138/25 C3 30/142/30 C4 40/146/40 C5 50/148/50 3 IOP SciNotes 2(2021)015205 A Dutta et al Figures 4(c),(d)show that the cavities with thin top and thick bottom mirrors ( D >t1: C8-C10)yield higher cavity absorption and spectral overlaps than the cavities with thick top and leaky bottom mirrors ( D <t1: C6-C7). An increment in D t improves cavity Q, V m ,FPand I FL as shown in figures 4(e),(f). The cavity C10 ( D =t3 )provides highest I FL ,FP, F A and F E . Moreover, the change in the cavity geometry from symmetric to asymmetric yields 7.54% drop in FPwith 223.33% rise in I FL on average. Therefore, by making a very thick bottom mirror with a thin top mirror, one can ensure a healthy trade-off between FPand I . FL Such findings motivated us to design a reflective (non-transmitting)cavity having a very thick bottom mirror and thin top mirror so that the cavity transmission becomes zero ( » T 0 )and the absorption becomes =-A1R. Five reflective cavities (C11–C15)with increasing top mirror thickness were considered while the bottom mirror thickness was kept constant. Figures 5(a),(b)present their R, A analysis with their geometries specified in table 3. Figure 5(c)depicts the leaky transmissivity of the top mirrors used for all the cavities. It was computed by considering an Ag layer between semi-infinite PVA and air. From C11 to C15, as the top mirror thickness is increased, the cavity absorption, F A and F E are increased with a significant drop in the transmissivity of the top mirrors, as shown in figures 5(b)–(d). However, a simultaneous improvement in cavity Q, V m and FPis also observed as depicted in figures 5(e),(f). In a reflective cavity, due to the non-transmitting bottom mirror, the omnidirectional fluorescence emission can only exit through the thin top mirror. Therefore, a fall in the leaky mirror transmissivity, as shown in figure 5(c), directly results a drop in I FL at highest FPas shown in figure 5(f). Nevertheless, the change in the cavity geometry from symmetric to reflective results 98.55% rise in FPalongwith 386.56% rise in I FL on average and clearly outperformed the asymmetric cavities. Therefore, we can conclude that of the cavities studied here, Figure 3. (a)Reflection, (b)Transmission, and (c)Absorption of the symmetric cavities. (d)Spectral overlaps, (e) Q and V m(f)FPand I F L as a function of cavity mirror thickness. Table 2. Geometries for asymmetric microcavities. Cavity t ttnm 123 ( ) // C6 60/146/30 C7 45/145/30 C8 30/145/45 C9 30/145/60 C10 30/145/90 4 IOP SciNotes 2(2021)015205 A Dutta et al Figure 4. (a)Reflection, (b)Transmission, and (c)Absorption of the asymmetric cavities. (d)Spectral overlaps, (e) Q and V m(f)FP and I F L as a function of Dt. Figure 5. (a)Reflection and (b)Absorption of the reflective cavities. (c)Transmission of leaky mirrors over SR101 emission. (d) Spectral overlaps, (e) Q and V m(f)FPand I F L as a function of leaky mirror thickness. 5 IOP SciNotes 2(2021)015205 A Dutta et al the reflective cavities, and more precisely C13 is the optimal choice for fluorescence spectroscopy of SR101, providing the best possible I . FL 4. Conclusions We computationally investigated different geometries of a planar metallic FP microcavity tuned for the absorption of SR101. The cavities were modelled using TMM and FDTD simulations to optimize the Purcell factor, the spectral overlap between the cavity mode and the molecular responses, and the measurability of fluorescence. To quantify the total fluorescence measurability, we defined =FF I FT FL P avg E A, which takes into account all the above properties. However, we also analyzed the different properties separately since they can be important for other studies. Our findings revealed that the symmetric cavities are limited in providing high Purcell enhancement along with an acceptable measurability of fluorescence. Asymmetric cavities can provide more efficient light-matter interaction while maintaining a pathway to collect the fluorescence through the leaky top mirror. Finally, we achieved an optimal design, i.e. a reflective cavity (C13)with 30 nm thin/leaky top mirror and 200 nm thick/ non-transmitting bottom mirror, which provides high Purcell factor and spectral overlaps, and most importantly, the best I FL for fluorescence spectroscopy of SR101. Acknowledgments The authors gratefully acknowledge Academy of Finland (Projects: 323995, 289947)for the funding. Data availability statement The data that support the findings of this study are available upon reasonable request from the authors. ORCID iDs Arpan Dutta https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0139-2611 J Jussi Toppari https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1698-5591 References [1]Deppe D G and Lei C 1992 Appl. Phys. Lett. 60 527–9 [2]Pokhriyal A, Lu M, Chaudhery V, George S and Cunningham B T 2013 Appl. Phys. Lett. 102 221114 [3]Nyman M, Shevchenko A, Shavrin I, Ando Y, Lindfors K and Kaivola M 2019 APL Photonics 4076101 [4]Kaupp H, Deutsch C, Chang H-C, Reichel J, Hänsch T W and Hunger D 2013 Phys. Rev. A88 053812 [5]Agranovich V M and La Rocca G C 2005 Solid State Commun. 135 544–53 [6]Hobson P A, Barnes W L, Lidzey D G, Gehring G A, Whittaker D M, Skolnick M S and Walker S 2002 Appl. Phys. Lett. 81 3519–21 [7]Ribeiro R, Martinez-Martinez L, Du M, Campos-Gonzalez-Angulo J and Yuen-Zhou J 2018 Chem. Sci. 96325–39 [8]Sanvitto D and Kéna-Cohen S 2016 Nat. Mater. 15 1061–73 [9]Wang Y, Shen P, Liu J, XueY, Wang Y, Yao M and Shen L 2019 Sol. RRL 31900181 [10]Flick J, Ruggenthaler M, Appel H and Rubio A 2017 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114 3026–34 [11]Connolly L G, Lidzey D G, Butté R, Adawi A M, Whittaker D M, Skolnick M S and Airey R 2003 Appl. Phys. Lett. 83 5377–9 [12]Wang Z, Gogna R and Deng H 2017 Appl. Phys. Lett. 111 061102 [13]Suzuki M, Nishiyama K, Kani N, Yu X, Uzumi K, Funahashi M, Shimokawa F, Nakanishi S and Tsurumachi N 2019 Appl. Phys. Lett. 114 191108 [14]Bitarafan M H and DeCorby R G 2017 Sensors 17 1748 [15]Hu S, Khater M, Salas-Montiel R, Kratschmer E, Engelmann S, Green W M J and Weiss S M 2018 Sci. Adv. 4eaat2355 [16]Vahala K 2003 Nature 424 839–46 Table 3. Geometries for reflective microcavities. Cavity t ttnm 123 ( ) // C11 20/140/200 C12 25/143/200 C13 30/145/200 C14 40/148/200 C15 50/149/200 6 IOP SciNotes 2(2021)015205 A Dutta et al [17]Gerard J-M and Gayral B 1999 J. Light. Technol. 17 2089–95 [18]Gu Q and Fainman Y 2017 Semiconductor Nanolasers (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) [19]Herrera F and Spano F C 2017 Phys. Rev. A95 053867 [20]Groenhof G, Climent C, Feist J, Morozov D and Toppari J J 2019 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 10 5476–83 [21]Mackay T G and Lakhtakia A 2020 The Transfer-Matrix Method in Electromagnetics and Optics (San Rafael: Morgan & Claypool Publishers) [22]Pascoe K J 2001 Reflectivity and Transmissivity through Layered, Lossy Media: A User-Friendly Approach (Ohio: Wright Patterson Air Force Base) [23]Gedney S 2011 Introduction to the Finite-Difference Time-Domain (FDTD) Method for Electromagnetics (San Rafael: Morgan & Claypool Publishers) [24]ANSYS Lumerical FDTD Solutions R2.4 2020 [25]Johnson P and Christy R 1972 Phys. Rev. B64370–9 [26]Schnepf M J et al 2017 Nanoscale 99376–85 [27]Palik E D 1997 Handbook of Optical Constants of Solids (Burlington: Academic) [28]Birge R R and Duarte F J 1990 Kodak Optical Products (Rochester: Kodak Publication) 7 IOP SciNotes 2(2021)015205 A Dutta et al