The political potential of migrants is often overlooked in discussions around integration
Full text
This is an electronic reprint of the original article. This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Author(s): Title: Year: Version: Please cite the original version: All material supplied via JYX is protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights, and duplication or sale of all or part of any of the repository collections is not permitted, except that material may be duplicated by you for your research use or educational purposes in electronic or print form. You must obtain permission for any other use. Electronic or print copies may not be offered, whether for sale or otherwise to anyone who is not an authorised user. The political potential of migrants is often overlooked in discussions around integration Pirkkalainen, Päivi; Wass, Hanna; Weide, Marjukka Pirkkalainen, P., Wass, H., & Weide, M. (2016, 8.3.2016). The political potential of migrants is often overlooked in discussions around integration. Democratic Audit UK. http://www.democraticaudit.com/?p=20134 2016
ByDemocraticAuditUK08/03/2016 Thepoliticalpotentialofmigrantsis oftenoverlookedindiscussionsaround integration Inarecentstudy,HannaWass,PäiviPirkkalainenandMarjukkaWeidedrewonthe SomalicommunityinFinlandasacasestudytoconsiderimmigrantsasapolitical resource.TheyfoundthatturnoutamongSomali‐bornvoterswasonlyslightlylowerthan nativecitizens,andthattheirengagementincivicassociationsishighlydynamicand diverse.Theresultsdemonstratethatpoliticalpotentialofimmigrantsisoftenoverlooked andhighlightthateconomicandsocialinclusionarecloselyintertwinedwithpolitical inclusion. Liningupfor2008localelectionsineastHelsinki.Credit:TammistoCCBY‐NC‐ND2.0 Europeiscurrentlywitnessinganincreasingnumberofimmigrantswhoaremostly asylumseekersfromwar‐torncountriesoutsidetheEU.Asaconsequence,migration hasbecomeoneofthetopissuesontheEuropeanpoliticalagenda,butitisalsooneof themostcontested.Intermsofaccommodationofdiversityandsocialinclusion,the contemporaryEuropeancontextfacesseveralchallenges.Thesocietalatmosphereis characterisedbygrowingxenophobiaandanti‐immigrantsentiments,representedby populistandradicalrightpartiesandvariousactorsincivilsociety.Inpublicdiscussion onimmigration,muchattentionispaidtosecuritythreatscausedbyimmigrants,their vulnerabilityduetomarginalisation,andtoradicalisationasapossibleoutcome.
Therearealsomorepositivevoices,emphasisingthehumanrightsofthenewcomers,as wellasthosepointingouttheeconomicpotentialofmigration.Accordingtothelatter view,acceleratedimmigrationcouldbalancethedependencyloadinrapidlyaging Europeansocieties.Yet,thecurrentdebatehasalmostcompletelydisregarded immigrationasapoliticalresource.Whenpoliticalinclusionofnewcomersisaddressed, theperspectiveisusuallyanegativeone,highlightinglowerturnoutamong enfranchisedimmigrants,fewermobilisationattemptsbypoliticalpartiesandunder‐ representationofnewethnicminoritiesamongcandidatesandlegislators. OurrecentstudyexaminingtheSomalisinFinlandtakesnoticeoftheoftenoverlooked politicalpotentialamongimmigrants.[i]TheSomali‐speakingminorityhasaround 16,000membersandisthemostvisibleandwidelyknowngroupwithbackgroundin humanitarianmigration.AccordingtoanEU‐MIDISreport,italsoexperiencesmore ethnicdiscriminationthanotherforeign‐borngroupsinFinland,suchasRussiansand Estonians. Weconcentratedontwotypesofpoliticalparticipation,i.e.votinginmunicipalelections andactivityincivicassociations.Thefirstanalysiswasbasedonindividual‐leveldataon turnoutinthe2012Finnishmunicipalelections.InFinland,foreignresidents(other thanNordicandEUcitizens)areentitledtovoteand/orrunasacandidateinmunicipal electionsiftheyhaveadomicileinFinlandcontinuouslyfortwoyearsand51daysprior toanelection.Thedatawerecompiledfromthoseelectoralwardsthatutilised electronicvoterregister(n=585,839).Thedata,administratedbytheMinistryofJustice, werereleasedtoStatisticsFinlandaftertheelections.InStatisticsFinland,the informationonwhetherapersonvotedornotwaslinkedtovariousindicatorsofthe individual’ssocioeconomicstatusandmigrationhistorywiththehelpofpersonal identificationnumbers.Altogether,thedataincluded492votersborninSomalia. OurresultsshowthatturnoutamongSomali‐bornvotersinthe2012municipal elections,at40%,wasonlyslightlylowerthanamongvotersborninSwedenandclearly toppedparticipationamongEstoniansandRussians.Interestingly,Somalimenwere fractionallymoreactivevoterscomparedtowomen(40%vs.39%).Thisobservation challengesstereotypeofmigrantwomen,oftenportrayedasmorevulnerableandmore politicallypassivethanmenofthesameorigin. ElectoralparticipationamongSomali‐bornvotersis,however,negativelyinfluencedby theirsocioeconomicstatus,whichislowercomparedtonativecitizensandother foreign‐borngroups.Somalisoftenfacedifficultiesinfindingwork,especially opportunitiesthatwouldcorrespondtotheirlevelofeducation,whichleadstolower levelofincome.Inturn,economichardshipcanlimitbothresourcesandmotivationfor politicalengagementaswellasunderminethesenseofpoliticalinclusion.Asshownin Figure1,whenvariousindicatorsofsocioeconomicstatus(education,occupational class,incomeandhomeownership)aretakenintoaccount,votingpropensityamong Somali‐bornwasactuallyhigherthanamongnativecitizens.
Figure1Estimatedturnoutprobabilitybycountryoforigininthe2012Finnish municipalelections. Note:Theturnoutprobabilitieswereestimatedonthebasisoflogisticregressionmodels. InscrutinisingSomali’sinvolvementincivicassociations,weusedinterviewdatawhich weregatheredasapartofPäiviPirkkalainen’spreviousresearch.Theresultsindicate thattheorganisationalstructureofassociationsishighlydynamicanddiverse,ranging fromactivitiesrelatedtosupportingintegrationintotheFinnishsociety,suchas languagecoursesandemploymenttraining,toleisureactivitiesandchildren’safternoon clubs. Theassociationsareoftenmaintainedbyahandfulofactivistsandtheirpersonal networks.Thustheassociationalfieldisinconstantfluxassomeorganisationsare disbanded,forinstanceduetoterminationofprojectfunding,whilenewonesare simultaneouslyformed.Inadditiontospecificethnicassociations,manySomalisare activeinnativeFinnishormulticulturalorganisations. Somali‐bornvotersconstitutearevelingexampleofaccumulatingcharacterofpolitical engagement.Activityinethnicandothertypesoforganisationsoftenincreases institutionalandsocialtrust,whichpavesthewayforpoliticalparticipation.Itmayalso
reduceexperiencesfromdiscrimination,whichisparticularlyimportantinthecaseof SomalisinFinland. TherearecertainfactorsthatcontributetopoliticalactivityamongSomali‐bornvoters. Somalifamilieshaveoftenseveralchildren.ApreviousstudybyWassatal.,basedon thesameindividual‐levelregisterdatafromthe2012Finnishmunicipalelections, showsthattheparenthoodofminorchildrenincreasesvotingpropensityamong foreign‐bornvoters.Thisseemslogicalasregularcontactwithschoolsformsasocial bondbetweentheparentsandthepublicinstitution,whichmayincreasealsotrustin politicalinstitutionsinnewhomecountry.Moreover,Somalistypicallylivethecapital areaandspecificneighborhoods.AsthestudiesconductedintheUKhavedemonstrated (Cuttsetal.2007;Sobolewskaetal.2013),regionalconcentrationnotonlyenhancesthe internalmobilisationamongacertainethnicgroupbutalsomakesitmoreidentifiable forpartiesasapotentialconstituency. Theimplicationsofthesefindingsaretwo‐fold.First,theyunderlinethepolitical potentialamongnewcomersthatsofarhaveremainedlargelylatent.Forinstance,there arestillrelativelyfewforeign‐borncandidatesrunninginelectionsandevenfewer becomeelected.Dependingontheirownpoliticalidentityandprofile,suchcandidates canbringoutissuesmeaningfulfornotonlytoethnicminoritiesbutnativevotersalike. Increaseddiversityonthepoliticalagendawouldhavepositivedemocratic consequencesbyenhancingrepresentativenessofthesystem. Second,asourresultsdemonstrate,economicandsocialinclusionareclosely intertwinedwithpoliticalinclusion.Thecausalchainbetweenthesethree,ishowever, notself‐evident.Politicalengagementcanenhancewidersocietalaccumulationin severalways.Itwouldbevaluabletorecognisethisaspectinpublicdiscussionon migrationandvariousintegrationprograms. __ ThispostrepresentstheviewsoftheauthorsandnotthoseofDemocraticAuditUKorthe LSE.Pleasereadourcommentspolicybeforeposting. __ PäiviPirkkalainenisapost‐docresearcherintheDepartmentofSocial SciencesandPhilosophyattheUniversityofJyväskylä.Hercurrentresearchanalyses theroleofmigrantyouthorganisationsintheFinnishthirdsector.Herworkhasbeen publishedinjournalsuchasJournalofEthnicandMigrationStudies,NordicJournalof AfricanStudiesandFinnishJournalonCivilSociety.
HannaWassisanacademyresearchfellowanduniversitylecturerintheDepartment ofPoliticalandEconomicStudiesattheUniversityofHelsinki.Hercurrentproject “Equalityinelectoralparticipationandvotechoice”,fundedbytheAcademyofFinland, examinesturnoutandrepresentationfromvariousperspectives.Sheisamemberofthe steeringcommitteefortheFinnishNationalElectionStudy,andtheco‐convenorofthe ECPRstandinggroup“PublicOpinionandVotingBehaviourinaComparative Perspective”.HerworkhasbeenpublishedinjournalssuchasElectoralStudies,the EuropeanJournalofPoliticalResearch,ParliamentaryAffairsandPoliticalResearch Quarterly.Sheisaco‐authorofthebook“Healthandpoliticalengagement”,forthcoming inRoutledgein2017. MarjukkaWeideisadoctoralcandidateintheDepartmentofSocial SciencesandPhilosophyattheUniversityofJyväskylä.Sheconductsherdoctoral researchasapartoftheproject“Superdemocracy:acriticalassessmentofthe participativeturn”,fundedbytheAcademyofFinland. __ Note [i]TheoriginalstudyisavailableonlyinFinnish. CreativeCommonspolicy AllofDemocraticAuditUKarticlesarealsopublishedundertheCreativeCommons licence,(CCBY‐NC‐ND2.0)andotherblogsandpublicationsarefreetousethem,with attribution.Ifyoudonotwishforyourarticletoberepublishedanywhereelse,please letusknow.