The role of Christianity in the European Union’s heritage and history initiatives

This is a self-archived version of an original article. This version may differ from the original in pagination and typographic details. Author(s): Title: Year: Version: Copyright: Rights: Rights url: Please cite the original version: CC BY 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ The role of Christianity in the European Union’s heritage and history initiatives © The Author(s) 2022 Published version Lähdesmäki, Tuuli Lähdesmäki, T. (2022). The role of Christianity in the European Union’s heritage and history initiatives. Journal of European Studies, 52(3-4), 170-186. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472441221115571 2022 https://doi.org/10.1177/00472441221115571 https://doi.org/10.1177/00472441221115571 Journal of European Studies 1 –17 © The Author(s) 2022 Article reuse guidelines: sagepub.com/journals-permissions DOI: 10.1177/00472441221115571 journals.sagepub.com/home/jes The role of Christianity in the European Union’s heritage and history initiatives Tuuli Lähdesmäki University of Jyväskylä, Finland Abstract In its political discourse, the European Union balances Christian heritage, the secularization of European societies, liberal values and Europe’s culturally and religiously diverse contemporary reality. This article explores how the European Union narrates the story of Europe and the role of Christianity in this narrative. This exploration is based on two qualitative case studies focusing on key heritage and history initiatives of the European Commission and the European Parliament: the European Heritage Label and the House of European History. The article argues that issues related to Christianity become easier to handle for the European Union when they are dealt with as memory, tradition and cultural heritage – and thus linked to the history of Europe. Keywords Christianity, cultural heritage, European Union, religion, secularism Introduction In the previous literature on the idea of Europe, Hellenistic aesthetics, Roman law and governance, and Christian religion and ethics have often been regarded as the foundation of European heritage (De Rougemont, 1966; Valéry, 1924). This foundation is also acknowledged in the political discourse of the European Union (EU) and its heritage and history initiatives – although the role of Christianity in them is in many ways problematic and a difficult subject for the Union. In its political discourse, the EU balances Christian heritage, the secularization of European societies, liberal values and Europe’s culturally and religiously diverse contemporary reality (Lähdesmäki, 2020b). Achieving equilibrium between these various factors is complicated by the Corresponding author: Tuuli Lähdesmäki, University of Jyväskylä, 40014 Jyvaskyla, Finland. Email: [email protected] 1115571JES0010.1177/00472441221115571Journal of European Studies X(X)Lähdesmäki research-article2022 Original Research Article 2 Journal of European Studies 00(0) different attitudes that EU member states have towards Christianity, Islam, secularism and the liberal values promoted by the Union. In this article, I explore the EU’s story of Europe and what kind of role Christianity has in this narrative. The subject is topical for various reasons: the core institutions of the EU, the European Commission (EC) and the European Parliament have launched several heritage and history initiatives aiming at increasing European citizens’ sense of belonging to Europe and the EU, as well as highlighting the positive impact of cultural diversity within the Union. The EU’s increased interest in cultural heritage and the narratives of Europe stemming from it can be seen as a counter-reaction to the challenges the Union has faced in the 2000s (Lähdesmäki et al., 2020). These challenges include a contest about the direction of EU integration policies and political legitimacy as well as right-wing varieties of anti-EU populism and nationalism that have gained a strong foothold all over Europe during the past decades. Both the EU and right-wing populist and nationalist actors have become increasingly interested in the cultural dimension of Europe and utilizing cultural heritage to describe its ‘shared’ features (De Cesari, 2020; Lähdesmäki, 2020a). The motives of these opposing actors are of course very different. While the Union aims at increasing unity and inclusion of Europeans, the right-wing populists and nationalists promote an exclusive Europe that is based on delineations between ‘us’ and ‘them’ – that is, ‘Europeans’ and the ‘non-European’ others. In these excluding views, Europe is framed as a coherent religious and cultural community, in which Christianity is the foundation of European culture, values, morals, and mentality. In the right-wing populist agendas, antiimmigration, xenophobic, racist and Islamophobic views have been reframed as concern about the preservation and continuity of Christian heritage and values – and, hence, of all Europe (Brubaker, 2017; Lähdesmäki, 2020a; Vasilopoulou, 2017). In recent studies, Europe has been approached as a construct that continues to be conceptually and historically in flux and is, therefore, hard to define. Instead of exploring Europe through geographical or political ‘realities’, scholars have approached Europe as an image (Kockel et al., 2012: 1; Passerini, 2002: 201–202), narrative (Lee and Bideleux, 2009; Stone, 2014) or idea (Delanty, 1995; Mikkeli, 1998). Mikkeli (1998) notes how attempts to create images or narratives of Europe as a unified whole have culminated during the eras when the creators of such images and narratives have perceived Europe as facing threats by various ‘others’: the idea of Europe has usually been narrated as their negation. Defining Europe and the ‘European’ against what or whom they are not expected to be is not unique to contemporary right-wing populism. In the past centuries, Europe has been defined through both its inner and outer religious and cultural ‘others’ (Brague, 2002; Pagden, 2002; Stråth, 2000; Wiesner and SchmidtGleim, 2014): Jews, Muslims, Arabs as well as ‘uncivilized’ and indigenous peoples. Colonial politics strengthened the idea of racial difference in the attempts to define Europe. Whether Europe has been defined as the negation of a ‘foreign’ religion, culture or race, Christianity has had a pivotal role. Christianity has strongly influenced the cultural discourses of European identity, especially as religious and cultural traditions, values and norms intersect. The EU’s narrative of Europe constructs the continent as a unified entity. In this narrative, shared values and common political principles defined as European are centred. According to the Lisbon Treaty (EC, 2016b: 17), Lähdesmäki 3 [t]he Union is founded on the values of respect for human dignity, freedom, democracy, equality, the rule of law and respect for human rights, including the rights of persons belonging to minorities. These values are common to the Member States in a society in which pluralism, non-discrimination, tolerance, justice, solidarity and equality between women and men prevail. Although there is not much room for religion or Christian heritage in this liberal value discourse, the EU’s narrative of Europe is still founded upon Christianity in manifold ways. As this article shows, the relationship between the EU and Christian heritage is ambiguous and of a discursive rather than legislative nature. I explore how the EU balances Christian heritage and a secular value discourse through two case studies. I start this exploration with a discussion on the relationship between religion, secularism, modernism and European integration. This discussion contextualizes my analysis of how Christianity is dealt with in the promotion of European cultural heritage in two EU initiatives. The first case is the European Heritage Label (EHL) that the EC has awarded to 60 sites in 20 European countries since 2013 48 sites in 19 European countries since 2014. The second one is the House of European History (HEH), the European Parliament museum, which was opened in 2017 in Brussels. The article concludes with the main findings. Based on the analysis, I argue that issues related to Christianity become easier to handle for the EU when they are dealt with as memory, tradition and cultural heritage – and thus linked to the history of Europe. Christianity and the development of European integration The important role of Christian Democratic parties in Europe’s post-war politics and the influence of Christianity on its value discourses have been scrutinized in several recent studies (Chamedes, 2019; Chappel, 2018; Conway, 2020; Moyn, 2015). Besides this influence, the post-war era in Europe was impacted by a new social context: The founding of the EU and the beginnings of European integration in the 1950s coincided with rapid societal change, the loosening of value systems and secularization in Europe. Some scholars have interpreted this period as a post-Christian era, in which the meaning of religion was narrowed down or even disappeared from both public and private lives (Casanova, 2006: 65). However, the idea of a post-Christian Europe is profoundly complex; hence, other scholars relate the development of European integration to a plethora of religious meanings (Casanova, 2006: 65). Along with EU Eastern enlargement and especially after Catholic Poland joined the EU in 2004, Christianity has become a topic in discourses on the ‘European’ and the EU’s core values. Simultaneously, the discussions regarding the EU membership of Turkey (that began in the early 2000s and has since been put on hold) and the plans to expand the EU into the Balkans have brought Islam into this cultural and political discourse. Increased immigration from Muslim countries and the increased public visibility of Islam in Western European societies has accelerated the debate. The strengthened cultural, ethnic and religious diversity in (Western) Europe has also been reflected in policies that are used to govern cultural diversification. Countries with high immigration, such as Great Britain, Germany and France, have changed their diversity policies in the 2010s to emphasize the promotion of interaction and dialogue between different cultural groups (Barrett, 2013). The Council 4 Journal of European Studies 00(0) of Europe and the EU have made a similar political move (Lähdesmäki et al., 2020; Lähdesmäki and Wagener, 2015). In practice, this has meant the discursive strengthening of secular values in the political rhetoric of these actors. Secularization (as a change of value system from religious to secular), secularism (as an ideology aiming at decreasing the influence of religion in society and especially in public institutions), the change of European societies and the development of European integration are closely connected. Since the 1950s, secularism has been seen in Western thought as a prerequisite of a modern, enlightened and progressive society, while religion has been encapsulated as the antithesis of these developments (Casanova, 2006: 66, 2009; De Cesari, 2017: 26). Thus, secularism and democratization have been seen as interlinked developments (Joppke, 2015: 84). The conceptions and ideas related to secularism are distorted by the ambiguity of the concept, multifaceted interpretations of it and resulting debate (Taylor, 2009). I see secularization and secularism as interlinked phenomena: the decrease in personal religious beliefs and practices leads to a decrease in the significance of religion in public arenas, activities of the state and politics. However, secularism should not be seen as a binary system where things are either completely based on or totally detached from religion, but rather as a continuum between these two positions. Because of this, in societies that are regarded as secular, religion can still have significant, even institutionalized roles in social, cultural and political practices (Casanova, 2009). Moreover, the state and society more broadly may relate to religion differently. The secularization of European societies and discussions about a post-religious Europe does not mean that religion no longer has significance on the continent. In fact, several scholars have stressed the new role that religion plays in Western countries. The cultural and religious diversification of Europe and the ways in which the state has responded to this have created a situation described by Habermas with the concept of a ‘post-secular society’. This society is characterized by a multifaceted adaption to various ongoing religious tensions and conflicts in a largely secular environment and in public life (Habermas, 2006, 2008). The concept stems from Habermas’ observation regarding the commonly held assumption that modernization shifts religion from the public into the private sphere, which has not happened in Europe as had been expected. In all contemplations related to a post-religious or post-secular Europe, it is important to ask what religion, faith or belonging to a religious community actually means (Cesari, 2014; Martin, 2010). While there has been a significant decrease in the people’s attendance at and involvement in traditional religious rituals, their personal religious convictions have not necessarily changed (Casanova, 2006: 65–66). For many, religion has become ‘believing without belonging’ to a religious community (Davie, 1994, 2000). Simultaneously, scholars have noticed how it has become typical for secular societies to ‘culturalize’ of religion, that is, to primarily give it meaning as cultural heritage without reference to belief (Casanova, 2006: 65–66; Foret and Riva, 2010: 793). This process refers to a shift in which religion as a belief has narrowed down or lost its meaning in people’s daily lives, while different habits, traditions and cultural heritage related to religion have become a mode of ‘belonging without believing’ (Bullock, 2000: 218; Hervieu-Léger, 2000: 162, 2003). In today’s European societies, the secular and Christian cultural identities are often intertwined. Christianity has Lähdesmäki 5 become a ‘cultural religion’ – the connection that people have to religion is maintained even when their participation in religious activities has decreased (Demerath, 2000: 136–137; Pew Research Center, 2018). A similar intertwinement of secular and religious dimensions characterizes the EU. The Union decision-making process and legal initiatives are easy to perceive as stemming from political secularism: religion has no explicit role in them. This does not mean that religion is insignificant in the activities and development of the EU. For instance, Casanova (2006, 66, 71; see also Kaiser, 2007) has interpreted the European Coal and Steel Community, a supranational organization that preceded the EU, as a collaborative project between the Christian democratic parties of its founding nations. The values of these parties impacted broadly the post-war politics in Europe (Moyn, 2015). In the geopolitical context of the Cold War, the founders of the Community emphasized freedom and the idea of ‘Christian civilization’ as the opposite of the totalitarian and atheist regimes in the Eastern Bloc. Although the EU has never had any specific policy on religion or competence in religious matters, the legacy of Christian morality and ethics influences the legislature of the community in many ways. McCrea (2010: 1) notes how ‘[t]he EU recognizes the promotion of public morality as a valid basis of law’, and therefore enables the influence of religious norms on its legislature. For him, the Union’s law-making process is shaped by religion – in this case, Christianity. Besides the EU law-making process, religion has a role in the discourse of EU treaties. References to religion were part of a broader debate on EU constitutional reform in the early 2000s. The debate regarding the values of the proposed constitution focused on the role of religion in it: whether Christian heritage should be mentioned as the foundation of the Union, or whether secular values, such as human rights, tolerance and inclusive multiculturalism, should be emphasized without any references to religion. The process of drafting the constitution resulted in a contest over values, where actors representing both secular and religious value systems attempted to emphasize their position in the constitution (Foret and Riva, 2010; Mudrov, 2016). The Vatican and Pope John Paul II joined the debate, demanding that references to Christianity and the Christian God should be included in the constitution (Mudrov, 2016: 6). Explicit references to Christianity were removed from the Lisbon Treaty, ratified in 2008, but religion is still present in its phrasing. Although this removal disappointed some, the Treaty was still praised for including references to churches (Willis, 2009). In Mudrov’s interpretation, the Treaty ultimately strengthened the role of religious elements in European identity, as well as the role of the Christian actors in constructing it (Mudrov, 2016: 1, 15–16). The preamble states how its parties draw ‘inspiration from the cultural, religious and humanist inheritance of Europe, from which have developed the universal values of the inviolable and inalienable rights of the human person, freedom, democracy, equality and the rule of law’ (EC, 2016b: 15). In the Treaty, religion is listed as one of the human traits protected by the EU against discrimination (EC, 2016b: 53). The Treaty declares that the EU ‘respects and does not prejudice the status under national law of churches and religious associations or communities’, although the Union also pledges to engage in open and continuous dialogue with churches and religious organizations (EC, 2016b: 55). Moreover, religion is mentioned in the articles regarding freedoms, education, non-discrimination and diversity included in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of 6 Journal of European Studies 00(0) the European Union (EC, 2016a: articles 10, 14, 21, 22). Instead of focusing exclusively on Christianity (though the wording ‘religious inheritance of Europe’ seems to imply it), the Treaty text takes an inclusive approach by referring more broadly to religion and religious associations, communities and organizations in addition to churches. The EU’s heritage and history initiatives and the way they deal with Christianity as part of the European narrative are easy to locate in the development of the EU and European integration. Christianity plays an ambiguous role in this development. On the one hand, Christianity seems to form the fundamental basis for it. On the other hand, this development seems to draw on secular value discourse. The role of Christianity in the EU’s heritage and history initiatives can be explained through the ‘culturalization’ of religion, as the following sections show. Case studies: The EHL and the HEH Since its foundation, the explicit goal of EU cultural policies has been to emphasize both Europe’s cultural diversity and features of European culture and heritage that are deemed to be common or shared. Promoting these common features results in what Anderson (1983) calls an imagined community, that is ‘united in diversity’, as stated by the official slogan of the EU (see Sassatelli, 2002). During the past decade, the idea of a common history, memory and cultural heritage shared by Europeans has become a more prominent part of EU cultural and identity politics (Lähdesmäki, 2017; Littoz-Monnet, 2012; Prutsch, 2013). The EU’s increased attention to Europe’s past has produced a number of EU initiatives that attempt to create a European narrative through fostering (and constructing) European cultural heritage. My first case study focuses on the EHL, founded as an intergovernmental scheme and initiated by the French Ministry of Culture in 2006. The aim of the scheme was to identify and award sites that ‘have played a key role in building and uniting Europe’ and to promote ‘a European reading of these sites’ as opposed to ‘a national reading’ of cultural heritage (EC, 2010: 15). The ideological and political motives behind the scheme were to promote European cultural heritage as a foundation for building European identity and strengthening a sense of belonging among European citizens (EHL, 2007). By 2011, the committee consisting of European ministers of culture and representatives of the EC had awarded the EHL to 68 sites in 19 European countries. However, the national actors saw that the criteria of the scheme were confusing and it was difficult to implement without EU coordination (EC, 2010: 18–20; ECOTEC, 2009). The Commission considered the scheme important and turned it into an official EU action in 2011. Biannual application for the Label in the official EHL action is a two-stage process: preselection is organized by national panels and the final selection is made by a European panel of experts in cultural heritage and management, appointed by EU institutions. The EC grants the Labels on the basis of the European panel’s recommendations. A key criterion for the Label is the sites’ European significance: they must have ‘a symbolic European value and must have played a significant role in the history and culture of Europe and/or the building of the Union’ (European Parliament and the Council (EP&C), 2011: 4). My second case study is the European Parliament’s history museum, the HEH, the planning of which started in 2007. In his speech launching the initiative, the then President Lähdesmäki 7 of the European Parliament, Hans-Gert Pötter, expressed hope that the museum could function as ‘a locus for history and for the future where the concept of the European idea can continue to grow’ (Committee of Experts, 2008: 4). The Parliament invited nine experts in European history and culture to envision the concept for the museum. First, the European narrative of the museum was planned to start from the emergence and spread of Christianity. Two of the experts suggested that the museum’s narrative should be rooted in the heritage of Antiquity and the Homeric tradition. The selection of this starting point increased the secular dimension of the European narrative in the museum (Kaiser, 2017: 524). The experts’ concept report provoked a lively debate regarding the narrative of the museum and its focuses. Some members of the European Parliament (MEPs) hoped that small European peoples could be given a more prominent role in the concept of the museum, while others expected that it would highlight individual historical events, such as the wars against the Ottoman Empire and especially the Battle of Vienna (Huistra et al., 2014: 134). The Commission of the Bishops’ Conferences of the European Community (COMECE), representing the Catholic Church within the EU, also suggested changes to the concept of the museum in order to strengthen the role of Christianity in its narrative of the history of Europe (Huistra et al., 2014). None of these suggestions, however, impacted the museum’s narrative. After various delays caused by construction and restoration work, the HEH was opened in 2017 in Léopold Park in Brussels, in the Eastman building that used to house a dental clinic for poor children. According to its website, the museum focuses on telling the story of Europe from a transnational perspective, instead of emphasizing the role of any single nation (HEH, 2021a, 2021b). The introductory text of the permanent exhibition gives a thorough description of its goals. This text notes how, ‘today, Europe is multicultural and diverse but its nations share a common history, traditions, achievements and a way of thinking’ (HEH, 2017–2018). The exhibition highlights the development and change in Europe from the nineteenth century to today. Its main thematic focus is on the division and unification of the continent. The museum’s European narrative emphasizes political history, but it also examines Europe’s cultural history and internal and external relations. The permanent exhibition includes 1500 artefacts from 35 countries. The narrative is exhibited through a plethora of visual and sonic materials. As part of the visit, the audience can make use of interactive tablet computers, which include much information in textual and multimodal forms. My data for the first case study include the European panel’s EHL selection reports of the first five selection rounds published in 2013, 2014, 2015, 2017, and 2019. In the second case, the data include my field notes of the observation in the permanent exhibition at the European House of History, the textual information included in the tablets and the museum’s website and brochures. I have visited the museum several times since its opening. I have analysed these data by close reading of how it deals with Christianity, religion and the EU value discourse, and how it includes them in the narrative of Europe. This methodological approach was originally developed in literary studies aiming at the ‘mindful, disciplined reading of an object with a view to deeper understanding of its meanings’ (Brummett, 2010: 3). Conceptually, close reading refers to the analysis of words and the interpretation of texts by highlighting meanings, their structures and the contexts in which they are produced in the data. In practice, my 8 Journal of European Studies 00(0) analysis draws on identifying words, expressions and instances in the data that explicitly refer to (any) religions, religious objects, places, persons, symbols or ideas, and European values. In the first case study, I also compare the recognition of religious sites in the intergovernmental and official phases of the initiative. The decreasing role of Christian heritage in the EHL The basic criteria for the EHL did not significantly change when the initiative was turned into an official EU action coordinated by the EC. However, this shift affected the overall picture of European cultural heritage formed by the labelled sites: it became more secular. Before the shift, the old Label had been awarded to 12 churches or monasteries (19% of all sites). Six (9%) of the sites were connected to Christianity in some other way. Moreover, 11 sites consisted of clusters of buildings, broader archaeological sites or historical city centres that included a church, churches or other Christian buildings, but their religious meanings were not emphasized in the application documents or website of the former EHL scheme (Lähdesmäki, 2014). This strong presence of Christian heritage can be explained by the site selection process, in which the culture ministers of EU member states played a pivotal role. The personal views of ministers, officials from national ministries and national heritage authorities may have influenced the choices, as the scheme was not coordinated by the EU yet and a definition of the European dimension was specified later in the decision of the official EHL action. After the shift, the number of sites related to Christian heritage has decreased. The 48 sites that have received the official Label by 2021 include only one church and one monastery (4%), and 3 sites are related to Christianity in some other explicit way (6%). In addition, six sites consist of broader building clusters that include a church, churches or other Christian buildings or heritage sites, though these buildings are only mentioned in the description of two sites in the selection reports. The sites labelled under the old EHL scheme included two Reformed churches, a site of Byzantine religious heritage and a site of early Christian catacombs. Otherwise, both in the old scheme and the new EHL action, the Christian heritage sites related to the Roman Catholic denomination. The image of ‘European Christianity’ constructed by the EHL initiative thus draws on the Catholic Church. After gaining official status, the EHL action has started to emphasize sites through which European cultural heritage can be constructed with secular narratives. In these narratives, the role of religious buildings and sites is mainly as locations where peace has been built, tolerance increased, diversity celebrated and people from all over Europe have collaborated. Through these sites, the selection reports tell the narrative of European unification and integration without emphasizing or even mentioning Christianity. For example, Cluny Abbey in France is signified in the EHL selection report as a site of transnational civilization focusing on ‘the promotion of literacy and learning in many regions of Europe, serving to educate some of the most brilliant teachers and intellectual leaders of their time’, as well as a site of peace politics since ‘Cluniac abbots played a crucial role in international politics and diplomacy often seeking peaceful resolutions to conflicts’ (EC, 2014: 7). The other Christian building that was granted the Label, the Church of the Holy Spirit in Javorca, Slovenia, is described in the report from the point of view of peace building. This is brought out by Lähdesmäki 15 EuroparlTV (2017) The House of European History: a tale like no other. EuroparlTV, 5 May. Available at: https://www.europarltv.europa.eu/programme/society/the-house-of-europeanhistory-a-tale-like-no-other (accessed 8 February 2021). European Commission (EC) (2010) Impact Assessment: Commission Staff Working Document SEC(2010) 197. Brussels: European Commission. European Commission (EC) (2013) European Heritage Label. Panel report, European Commission, Brussels. European Commission (EC) (2014) European Heritage Label. Panel report, European Commission, Brussels. European Commission (EC) (2015) European Heritage Label. Panel report, European Commission, Brussels. European Commission (EC) (2016a) Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (2016/C 202/02). Official Journal of the European Union 202: 389–405. European Commission (EC) (2016b) Consolidated versions of the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty on the functioning of the European Union (2016/C 202/01). Official Journal of the European Union 202: 1–405. European Commission (EC) (2017) European Heritage Label. Panel report, European Commission, Brussels. European Commission (EC) (2019) European Heritage Label. Panel report, European Commission, Brussels. European Heritage Label (EHL) (2007) Building the future for European citizens Introduction. Madrid: Ministry of Education, Culture and Sport. Available at: http://en.www.mcu.es/patrimonio/MC/PatrimonioEur/docs/en_introductionMinistrosPatEu.pdf (accessed 12 April 2013). European Parliament and the Council (EP&C) (2011) Decision no. 1194/2011/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 November 2011: establishing a European Union action for the European Heritage Label. Official Journal of the European Union 303: 1–9. Foret F and Riva V (2010) Religion between nation and Europe: the French and Belgian ‘no’ to the Christian heritage of Europe. West European Politics 33(4): 791–809. Fornäs J (2011) Signifying Europe. Bristol: Intellect Press. Habermas J (2006) On the relations between the secular liberal state and religion. In: H de Vries and LE Sullivan (eds) Political Theologies: Public Religion in a Post-secular World. New York: Fordham University Press, pp.251–60. Habermas J (2008) Secularism’s crisis of faith: notes on post-secular society. New Perspectives Quarterly 25(1): 17–29. Hervieu-Léger D (2000) Religion as a Chain of Memory. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press. Hervieu-Léger D (2003) Religion und sozialer Zusammenhalt. Transit 26: 101–19. House of European History (HEH) (2017) Brochure. Brussels: European Union. House of European History (HEH) (2017–2018) Texts in the visitors’ tablet computer, documented by the author in 2017 and 2018. House of European History (HEH) (2021a) Mission & vision. Available at: https://historia-europa. ep.eu/en/mission-vision (accessed 8 February 2021). House of European History (HEH) (2021b) Shaping Europe. Available at: https://historia-europa. ep.eu/en/permanent-exhibition/shaping-europe (accessed 8 February 2021). Huijgen A (2017) The House of European History erases religion. Acton Institute, Transatlantic Blog, 14 June. Available at: https://acton.org/publications/transatlantic/2017/06/14/houseeuropean-history-erases-religion (accessed 8 February 2021). Huistra P, Molema M and Wirt D (2014) Political values in a European Museum. Journal of Contemporary European Research 10(1): 124–36. 16 Journal of European Studies 00(0) Joppke C (2015) The Secular State Under Siege. Cambridge: Polity. Kaiser W (2007) Christian Democracy and the Origins of European Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Kaiser W (2017) Limits of cultural engineering: actors and narratives in the European Parliament’s House of European History project. Journal of Common Market Studies 55(3): 518–34. Kockel U, Nic Craith M and Frykman J (2012) Introduction: the frontiers of Europe and European ethnology. In: U Kockel, M Nic Craith and J Frykman (eds) A Companion to the Anthropology of Europe. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, pp.1–10. Lähdesmäki T (2014) Transnational heritage in the making. Strategies for narrating cultural heritage as European in the intergovernmental initiative of the European Heritage Label. Ethnologica Europaea 44(1): 75–93. Lähdesmäki T (2017) Narrativity and intertextuality in the making of a shared European memory. Journal of Contemporary European Studies 25(1): 57–72. Lähdesmäki T (2020a) European culture, history, and heritage as political tools in the rhetoric of the Finns Party. In: C De Cesari and A Kaya (eds) European Memory in Populism. (Mis)Representations of Self and Other. London: Routledge, pp.191–209. Lähdesmäki T (2020b) Uskonto ja sekularismi Euroopan Union kulttuuriperintökertomuksissa. In: H Pirinen, T Lähdesmäki and A Waenerberg (eds) Kulttuuriperinnön Muuttuvat Merkitykset. Helsinki: Society for Art History in Finland, pp.184–95. Lähdesmäki T and Wagener A (2015) Discourses on governing diversity in Europe: critical analysis of the White Paper on Intercultural Dialogue. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 44: 13–28. Lähdesmäki T, Čeginskas VLA, Kaasik-Krogerus S et al. (2020) Creating and Governing Cultural Heritage in the European Union: The European Heritage Label. London: Routledge. Lähdesmäki T, Koistinen AK and Ylönen SC (2020) Intercultural Dialogue in European Education Policies: A Conceptual Approach. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Lee C and Bideleux R (2009) ‘Europe’: what kind of idea? The European Legacy 14(2): 163–76. Littoz-Monnet A (2012) The EU politics of remembrance: can Europeans remember together? West European Politics 35(5): 1182–202. McCrea R (2010) Religion and the Public Order of the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Martin D (2010) The Future of Christianity. London: Routledge. Meotti G (2017) Europe’s new official history erases Christianity, promotes Islam. Gatestone Institute, 18 October. Available at: https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/11188/europe-eraseschristianity (accessed 8 February 2021). Mikkeli H (1998) Europe as an Idea and an Identity. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Moyn S (2015) Christian Human Rights. Pennsylvania, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press. Mudrov SA (2016) Religion in the Treaty of Lisbon: aspects and evaluation. Journal of Contemporary Religion 31(1): 1–16. Pagden A (ed.) (2002) The Idea of Europe. From Antiquity to the European Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Panikkar R (1982) Is the notion of human rights a Western concept? Diogenes 30(120): 75–102. Passerini L (2002) From the ironies of identity to the identity of irony. In: A Pagden (ed.) The Idea of Europe. From Antiquity to the European Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.191–208. Pew Research Center (2018) Being Christian in Western Europe. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. Prutsch MJ (2013) European Historical Memory: Policies, Challenges and Perspectives. Directorate-general for Internal Policies. Policy Department B: Structural and Cohesion Policies. Culture and Education. Brussels: European Parliament. Lähdesmäki 17 Sassatelli M (2002) Imagined Europe. European Journal of Social Theory 5(4): 435–51. Sharma A (2006) Are Human Rights Western? A Contribution to the Dialogue of Civilizations. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Stone D (2014) Goodbye to All That? The Story of Europe since 1945. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Stråth B (ed.) (2000) Europe and the Other and Europe as the Other. Brussels: PIE-Peter Lang. Taylor C (2009) The polysemy of the secular. Social Research 76(4): 1143–66. Ukielski P, Kareniauskaite M and Hrynko Y (eds) (2017) The House of European History. Report on the permanent exhibition. Platform of European Memory and Conscience, 30 October. Available at: https://www.memoryandconscience.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/ Report-on-the-HEH-by-the-Platform-of-European-Memory-and-Conscience-30.10.2017.pdf (accessed 8 February 2021). Valéry P (1924) Váriété. Paris: Gallimard. Vasilopoulou S (2017) European integration and the radical right: three patterns of opposition. In: C Mudde (ed.) The Populist Radical Right: A Reader. London: Routledge, pp.124–38. Wiesner C and Schmidt-Gleim M (2014) The meanings of Europe: introduction. In: C Wiesner and M Schmidt-Gleim (eds) The Meanings of Europe. Changes and Exchanges of a Contested Concept. London: Routledge, pp.1–15. Willis A (2009) Lisbon treaty strengthens role of religion says EU. Euobserver, 11 May. Available at: https://euobserver.com/social/28106 (accessed 8 February 2021). Author biography Tuuli Lähdesmäki (PhD in Art History; DSocSc in Sociology) is an Associate Professor at the Department of Music, Art and Culture Studies, University of Jyväskylä, Finland. She has the title of Docent in Art History (University of Jyväskylä) and Area and Cultural Studies (University of Helsinki, Finland). Her research interests and publications focus on intercultural dialogue, cultural identities, belonging, cultural heritage, and heritage, diversity, and cultural policies of the European Union. Lähdesmäki is currently leading the HERIDI project (EU Heritage Diplomacy and the Dynamics of Inter-Heritage Dialogue), funded by the Academy of Finland.