Promoting Sustainable and Resilient Constructive Patterns in Vulnerable Communities: Habitat for Humanity’s Sustainable Housing Prototypes in El Salvador

Citation: Jiménez-Expósito, R.A.; Serrano-Jiménez, A.; Fernández-Ans, P.; Stasi, G.; Díaz-López, C.; Barrios-Padura, Á. Promoting Sustainable and Resilient Constructive Patterns in Vulnerable Communities: Habitat for Humanity’s Sustainable Housing Prototypes in El Salvador. Sustainability 2023,15, 352. https:// doi.org/10.3390/su15010352 Academic Editor: Dušan Katunský Received: 8 November 2022 Revised: 12 December 2022 Accepted: 17 December 2022 Published: 26 December 2022 Copyright: © 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ 4.0/). sustainability Article Promoting Sustainable and Resilient Constructive Patterns in Vulnerable Communities: Habitat for Humanity’s Sustainable Housing Prototypes in El Salvador Rosa Ana Jiménez-Expósito 1,*, Antonio Serrano-Jiménez 2, Pablo Fernández-Ans 3, Gianluca Stasi 4, Carmen Díaz-López 1,2 and Ángela Barrios-Padura 1 1Department of Building Construction I, University of Seville, 41004 Sevilla, Spain 2Department of Building Construction, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain 3Research Department, Rehabilita-Energía, 41011 Seville, Spain 4Research Department, CTRL+Z Arquitectura, 41003 Seville, Spain *Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +34-606-645-817 Abstract: The global challenges regarding sustainability and the guarantee of minimum habitability requirements have led to the transformation of construction practices, where research has failed to achieve sufficient dissemination and findings. The purpose of this research is to promote sustainable and resilient patterns in construction in vulnerable neighbourhoods in emerging countries by disseminating techniques and mechanisms through in situ transfer workshops and by raising awareness of the environmental importance of construction. Regarding materials and methods, this paper contributes innovative insights by combining training workshops and awareness-raising sessions to promote both environmental education and sustainable and optimised habits in construction. These methods are applied and tested in a real case study in El Salvador. Subsequent to carrying out a multi-disciplinary assessment analysis, the outcomes and results have led to the design of prototypes that have obtained a global EDGE certificate on sustainable construction and efficient use of resources once the users’ testimonies, weaknesses, and strengths have been addressed. The conclusions indicate that families, volunteers, and technical workers need to be trained by promoting environmental awareness in social housing and establishing a plan for dissemination to communicate across universities and public and private institutions in order to replicate guidelines across American dry-corridor countries. Keywords: sustainable architecture; development cooperation; social housing; vulnerable communities; housing renovation; low-cost construction; decision-making; collaborative learning 1. Introduction The global challenge of addressing the urgent need for social housing by ensuring habitability requirements, along with introducing sustainable practices in developing countries, is covered and recognised in various global and national reports, plans, and public policies [ 1 , 2 ]. The Guide for Conducting a Housing Sector Profile and the Global Housing Strategy of UN-Habitat, highlight the importance of the housing sector in the Gross Domestic Product (GDP). In the last decade, this stands at 3.2% in El Salvador as a representative emerging country. These reports highlight the role of construction in the generation of jobs, the cost of a home for a family, and the contribution of construction to the increase in greenhouse gas emissions and the consumption of material resources [3,4]. According to the State of Housing in Central America 2016, the quantitative housing deficit in El Salvador is approximately 191,000 units, in addition to the further deficit in terms of safety, comfort, and habitability conditions [ 5 ]. The Ministry of Housing from El Salvador lacks the economic capacity to respond to this deficit, and private agents and Non-Governmental Organisations (NGOs) aim to address it through the implementation Sustainability 2023,15, 352. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010352 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/sustainability Sustainability 2023,15, 352 2 of 16 of new housing prototypes [ 6 ]. These urban guidelines are also aligned with the FiveYear Development Plan 2014–2019, which urges all institutions to adopt the sustainability approach in construction techniques, whose strategy involves reversing the environmental deterioration generated by vulnerability and reducing the risk of disasters, along with addressing most of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) [6,7]. An initial research question of this study arises: How could low-cost housing construction patterns in emerging countries improve by guaranteeing basic habitability conditions and ensuring efficient communication and coordination between agents? The cooperation projects carried out seek to introduce sustainable criteria into the construction techniques of social housing and to certify it by using the EDGE system. However, there is currently a lack of research on the use of sustainable materials for construction and only limited production of technologies, materials, and construction systems in these developing countries [ 8 , 9 ]. Faced with these challenges and, consequently, with this research gap, the Housing Sector in El Salvador demands methodological mechanisms and strategies that enable the academic training of housing construction to be strengthened as a transversal discipline by introducing research into new technologies, innovation and promoting coordination between universities, government, companies, and NGOs in the training of families [ 10 ]. Under these circumstances, “Habitat for Humanity El Salvador” emerges as a representative NGO in this context that solves the established challenges and meets the aims of the research group [11,12]. The main aim of the research is to foster the sustainability and resilience of vulnerable communities through the construction of sustainable housing prototypes by promoting environmental awareness of the population and of the different cooperation agents through the implementation of technology transfer workshops. For its demonstration, testing, and application, a real experience in an in situ case study is carried out in El Salvador in collaboration with the NGO Habitat for Humanity El Salvador. This research has been led by the PAIDI TEP-954 In-Fact research group, which belongs to the Higher Technical School of Architecture of the University of Seville [ 13 ]. Indeed, critical reflections on the experience of the components of the research group in the field of international cooperation for development formed the starting point of this research. In this way, conversations began with Habitat Humanity El Salvador, whose outstanding work in the country involves improving the sustainability of its interventions in the field of Social Housing. 2. Literature Review and Justification A review of related research reveals that recent studies promote sustainability in the various areas of the built environment: in residential buildings, rural communities [ 14 ], schools [ 15 ], and other building uses. These studies lead to the readjustment of action strategies based on several alternatives, which are valued and weighted from the sustainability of resources, expenses, and user satisfaction, as stated by Mjörnell et al. [ 16 ]. However, it is necessary to carry out research studies that are specifically adapted to the socio-economic circumstances that vulnerable neighbourhoods present in order to be able to employ integrated urban renovation, which is especially needed in developing countries, as argued in the study by Mercader-Moyano et al. [ 17 ]. At the same time, advances and findings in research must be attained that focus on promoting and establishing environmental skills in society through teaching and education plans, which would enable the incorporation of guidelines of a more sustainable and eco-efficient nature into construction and resource management, as developed by Álvarez-García et al. [18] and Naukkarinen et al. [19]. The concept of urban regeneration goes beyond the concept of urban renovation and includes a system of changes and transformations in current cities that provide a response to the functional crisis of the city, where the increasing obsolescence of its buildings and the risk of poverty poses a crucial problem for the population [ 20 , 21 ]. Urban strategies presented by a variety of countries consider it essential to adapt to the specific socioeconomic circumstances existing in each context of application [22,23]. Sustainability 2023,15, 352 3 of 16 Several recent studies have evaluated the urban regeneration process and have taken into account the real perspectives of its occupants and the socio-economic impact of various rehabilitation strategies [ 24 , 25 ]. Other studies, such as that developed by Singh et al. [ 26 ], have generated new action protocols for low-cost housing in emerging economies that include social demands from residents through participatory surveys. More recently, Monzón and López-Mesa [ 27 ] and Femenias et al. [ 28 ] have highlighted the need to implement tools and methods that introduce multi-disciplinary indicators to support the decision-making process in building construction and renovation. Regarding decision-making, sustainable construction, and the educative dissemination of constructive techniques, Alberg Mosgaard et al. [ 29 ] analysed the influence of the promoters and the agents involved in construction projects using three different scenarios to identify and select the ideology that represents the most successful interventions. In addition, Invidiata et al. [ 30 ] proposed a multi-criteria decision-making method combined with interviews to help select the best action strategies in building rehabilitation. Moreover, Riera Pérez et al. [ 31 ] developed a sustainability assessment communication plan under three scenarios based on environmental goals for existing neighbourhoods. Both the management of the built environment from a sustainable construction approach and the educational implications in its social dissemination are research topics that imply the way to adjust the methodological mechanisms that serve to promote sustainable decision-making strategies in construction, as stated in Kamari et al. [ 32 ]. These two research trends need to provide contributions that promote comfortable, safe, and efficient housing environments for the most vulnerable social sectors of these emerging countries while ensuring the minimum required habitability conditions [33,34]. Based on this review of the literature and by analysing current policies on social and low-cost housing in emerging countries such as El Salvador, it is determined as an urgent priority that the lines of research should be focused on the development of new low-cost housing prototypes that would ensure the population’s access to safe, healthy, efficient, and comfortable housing. Likewise, it is considered essential to implement training actions and awareness-raising sessions to promote environmental awareness in the communities and promote sustainable practices in the area of social housing in El Salvador and to include the necessary parameters to obtain the EDGE certificate as an innovative element [35]. A main insight from the literature review reveals that it is essential that members of the work team that undertakes these interventions come from both the scientific field and the field of development cooperation since the former provides methodologies and rigour in the various stages while the latter supply in-depth knowledge of these vulnerable contexts from different families [36,37]. The implications of the literature review, therefore, state that a multi-disciplinary team is essential to ensure the success of interventions in social housing in emerging countries [ 38 ]. In the same way, the dissemination of the research results is crucial, both in the scientific field and in the context of international development cooperation, for the impact of the interventions to be increased and to serve as an example to other entities in the social housing sector in vulnerable communities [39,40]. The methodology proposed contains an element of innovation in that its aim is to become standardised and replicable since it allows the introduction of scientific methods into cooperation interventions while incorporating the strategies and dissemination sessions in development cooperation to guarantee the feasibility of actions in accordance with the unique characteristics of vulnerable contexts and communities [41,42]. 3. Materials and Methods The research has been carried out in different stages, beginning with the identification of needs and demands of the population, local institutions, and cooperation agents. Subsequently, a second phase of design of the housing prototypes follows the criteria of the EDGE certification program, which also responds to the needs and demands collected. In a third stage, the housing prototypes are built, thereby obtaining the EDGE certificate, and Sustainability 2023,15, 352 4 of 16 continues with a fourth stage of monitoring and evaluation of the prototypes and conducting interviews and surveys to ascertain the degree of satisfaction held by the beneficiary families, which enables improvements to be made in subsequent interventions. The methodology presented below is intended to be standardised and made replicable for other locations and geographic and socio-economic contexts, whereby the methodology itself, or the sequence of actions, are highlighted and exclusively described in order to strengthen the main insights of the methodology phases and enhance their development within the case in El Salvador. This is divided into 5 phases, as shown below: PHASE 1: IDENTIFICATION OF NEEDS AND DEMANDS Based on the guidelines established in the funded project, the work was divided into 3 stages: Stage 1: Documentary research Work began with documental and research work, in which the political, economic, and social situation of the country was studied in depth in order to understand the multidimensional context. Likewise, the work of Hábitat NGO was analysed related to the construction projects carried out and their scope, strategies, and goals in the short and long term, as were more purely architectural issues in terms of its housing models, construction details, programs used, infrastructure systems, and other information related to architecture. Likewise, the technical construction and housing regulations were reviewed, both locally and internationally, which can be applied to this type of housing. Finally, a review was made of the available bibliography on the country’s traditional architecture and the passive and bioclimatic initiatives carried out for their improvement. Stage 2: Site visits In the second stage, two members of the research group from the University of Seville travelled to El Salvador with the constant accompaniment of Habitat for Humanity. The professionalism of the entire Habitat for Humanity El Salvador team was key, with major support from both the population and the municipalities, universities, ministries, and other institutions. Likewise, visits were made to the beneficiary communities of the social interest housing programs of Habitat for Humanity El Salvador (Figures 1and 2). In these visits, the research members were able to learn first-hand about the lifestyles of Salvadoran families, typologies, modifications over time, and the strengths and weaknesses of the buildings (Figures 3and 4). Stage 3: Specification of action lines After carrying out the visits in El Salvador, all the information was collected, and the work team focused on creating a motivation tree, which described the effects and causes in a graphical map along with the main aim and the subsequent particular actions, as a methodological output of the research. Based on this map, the research team was able to adjust and promote the following lines of research: Action line 1: Improvement of the architectural typologies of social interest housing generated by Habitat for Humanity El Salvador through the design and implementation of safe, comfortable, healthy, and sustainable housing prototypes Action line 2: Generation of more sustainable and efficient architectural solutions certified with the EDGE certification program endorsed by the World Bank. Action line 3: Training, education, and raising of awareness of vulnerable communities and cooperation agents in terms of sustainable and efficient design, construction, use, and maintenance of housing, as well as an improvement in environmental awareness. Action line 4: Evaluation of all actions and the drawing of conclusions and disseminating results both in the scientific field and in the context of international cooperation for development. Sustainability 2023,15, 352 5 of 16 Sustainability 2023, 15, x FOR PEER REVIEW 4 of 17 Subsequently, a second phase of design of the housing prototypes follows the criteria of the EDGE certification program, which also responds to the needs and demands collected. In a third stage, the housing prototypes are built, thereby obtaining the EDGE certificate, and continues with a fourth stage of monitoring and evaluation of the prototypes and conducting interviews and surveys to ascertain the degree of satisfaction held by the beneficiary families, which enables improvements to be made in subsequent interventions. The methodology presented below is intended to be standardised and made replicable for other locations and geographic and socio-economic contexts, whereby the methodology itself, or the sequence of actions, are highlighted and exclusively described in order to strengthen the main insights of the methodology phases and enhance their development within the case in El Salvador. This is divided into 5 phases, as shown below: PHASE 1: IDENTIFICATION OF NEEDS AND DEMANDS Based on the guidelines established in the funded project, the work was divided into 3 stages: Stage 1: Documentary research Work began with documental and research work, in which the political, economic, and social situation of the country was studied in depth in order to understand the multidimensional context. Likewise, the work of Hábitat NGO was analysed related to the construction projects carried out and their scope, strategies, and goals in the short and long term, as were more purely architectural issues in terms of its housing models, construction details, programs used, infrastructure systems, and other information related to architecture. Likewise, the technical construction and housing regulations were reviewed, both locally and internationally, which can be applied to this type of housing. Finally, a review was made of the available bibliography on the country’s traditional architecture and the passive and bioclimatic initiatives carried out for their improvement. Stage 2: Site visits In the second stage, two members of the research group from the University of Seville travelled to El Salvador with the constant accompaniment of Habitat for Humanity. The professionalism of the entire Habitat for Humanity El Salvador team was key, with major support from both the population and the municipalities, universities, ministries, and other institutions. Likewise, visits were made to the beneficiary communities of the social interest housing programs of Habitat for Humanity El Salvador (Figures 1 and 2). In these visits, the research members were able to learn first-hand about the lifestyles of Salvadoran families, typologies, modifications over time, and the strengths and weaknesses of the buildings (Figures 3 and 4). Figure 1. Visit to the headquarters and agencies of Habitat for Humanity El Salvador. Figure 1. Visit to the headquarters and agencies of Habitat for Humanity El Salvador. Sustainability 2023, 15, x FOR PEER REVIEW 5 of 17 Figure 2. Visit to the interior of the Habitat NGO pilot homes. Figure 3. Visit to the exterior of the dwellings. Figure 2. Visit to the interior of the Habitat NGO pilot homes. Sustainability 2023, 15, x FOR PEER REVIEW 5 of 17 Figure 2. Visit to the interior of the Habitat NGO pilot homes. Figure 3. Visit to the exterior of the dwellings. Figure 3. Visit to the exterior of the dwellings. Sustainability 2023,15, 352 6 of 16 Sustainability 2023, 15, x FOR PEER REVIEW 6 of 17 Figure 4. Visits to the works in progress of extension and improvement of the houses. Stage 3: Specification of action lines After carrying out the visits in El Salvador, all the information was collected, and the work team focused on creating a motivation tree, which described the effects and causes in a graphical map along with the main aim and the subsequent particular actions, as a methodological output of the research. Based on this map, the research team was able to adjust and promote the following lines of research: Action line 1: Improvement of the architectural typologies of social interest housing generated by Habitat for Humanity El Salvador through the design and implementation of safe, comfortable, healthy, and sustainable housing prototypes Action line 2: Generation of more sustainable and efficient architectural solutions certified with the EDGE certification program endorsed by the World Bank. Action line 3: Training, education, and raising of awareness of vulnerable communities and cooperation agents in terms of sustainable and efficient design, construction, use, and maintenance of housing, as well as an improvement in environmental awareness. Action line 4: Evaluation of all actions and the drawing of conclusions and disseminating results both in the scientific field and in the context of international cooperation for development. PHASE 2: DESIGN OF SUSTAINABLE HOUSING PROTOTYPES, TRAINING WORKSHOPS, AND AWARENESS ACTIONS Based on the action lines established in the first phase, the work team advanced to the second phase thanks to the financial funding provided to carry out the aforementioned research project. Within the framework of this project, improved housing prototypes were designed under sustainability criteria which met the steps and requirements of the EDGE certification program (Figure 5). Due to the situation caused by the COVID-19 pandemic and the passage of storm Amanda, which caused serious damage in El Salvador, the project had to be carried out virtually for a period of time, which produced complex situations. In this way, the advantages and disadvantages of the implementation of cooperation projects were revealed since it was impossible to carry out the designed training and Figure 4. Visits to the works in progress of extension and improvement of the houses. PHASE 2: DESIGN OF SUSTAINABLE HOUSING PROTOTYPES, TRAINING WORKSHOPS, AND AWARENESS ACTIONS Based on the action lines established in the first phase, the work team advanced to the second phase thanks to the financial funding provided to carry out the aforementioned research project. Within the framework of this project, improved housing prototypes were designed under sustainability criteria which met the steps and requirements of the EDGE certification program (Figure 5). Due to the situation caused by the COVID-19 pandemic and the passage of storm Amanda, which caused serious damage in El Salvador, the project had to be carried out virtually for a period of time, which produced complex situations. Sustainability 2023, 15, x FOR PEER REVIEW 7 of 17 awareness workshops physically, and therefore, a Virtual Learning Classroom was created where various training sessions were carried out for technicians, builders, volunteers, and the university. Online awareness campaigns were also carried out for beneficiary families. The training provided and the awareness-raising focused on the area of sustainable building, diagnosis and technical improvements, impact assessment, calculations, and good practices in design, construction management, and maintenance of housing. New conclusions and improvements could be drawn from this project that were then taken into account in the subsequent project. Figure 5. Improved housing prototype designs under sustainability criteria. Regarding the activities related to the design of the new sustainable housing prototypes, it was possible to carry these out online through regular meetings between the counterparts and the work team. The research team developed a diagnosis of the efficiency of the housing prototypes, the proposed construction process, and the creation of a catalogue of architectural proposals of a more sustainable nature that sought efficiency in the areas of: The functionality of the prototypes and their adaptation to Salvadoran ways of life. Structural safety, by analysing the behaviour of house owners in the event of earthquakes and tropical storms and by proposing reinforcements. Accessibility, by verifying the removal of architectural barriers. The management of resources and waste for a reduction in the volume of construction materials, for the implementation of devices, to reduce the consumption of drinking water and recycling of grey water, and for rainwater harvesting and storage for various uses. Energy consumption for lighting and interior thermal conditioning through bioclimatic architectural resources and the improvement of façade and roof elements (Figure 6). Health, through the reconfiguration of the prototypes to guarantee the reduction of environmental humidity, the proposal of devices and resources to prevent infestations by insects and rodents, the proposal of the reconfiguration of windows and doors to guarantee suitable interior lighting for basic activities of daily life according to the families’ profile, and the possession of ventilation elements to facilitate the evacuation of toxins and to prevent unhealthy environments. The construction of the immediate exterior environment that prevents the flooding of gardens by avoiding the implementation of hard paving that causes the generation of a heat island and by recommending areas for growing food and managing domestic waste. Economic costs, through analysing the cost/benefit ratio and proposing financing systems. Figure 5. Improved housing prototype designs under sustainability criteria. In this way, the advantages and disadvantages of the implementation of cooperation projects were revealed since it was impossible to carry out the designed training and awareness workshops physically, and therefore, a Virtual Learning Classroom was created where various training sessions were carried out for technicians, builders, volunteers, and the university. Online awareness campaigns were also carried out for beneficiary families. The training provided and the awareness-raising focused on the area of sustainable building, diagnosis and technical improvements, impact assessment, calculations, and Sustainability 2023,15, 352 7 of 16 good practices in design, construction management, and maintenance of housing. New conclusions and improvements could be drawn from this project that were then taken into account in the subsequent project. Regarding the activities related to the design of the new sustainable housing prototypes, it was possible to carry these out online through regular meetings between the counterparts and the work team. The research team developed a diagnosis of the efficiency of the housing prototypes, the proposed construction process, and the creation of a catalogue of architectural proposals of a more sustainable nature that sought efficiency in the areas of: The functionality of the prototypes and their adaptation to Salvadoran ways of life. Structural safety, by analysing the behaviour of house owners in the event of earthquakes and tropical storms and by proposing reinforcements. Accessibility, by verifying the removal of architectural barriers. The management of resources and waste for a reduction in the volume of construction materials, for the implementation of devices, to reduce the consumption of drinking water and recycling of grey water, and for rainwater harvesting and storage for various uses. Energy consumption for lighting and interior thermal conditioning through bioclimatic architectural resources and the improvement of façade and roof elements (Figure 6). Sustainability 2023, 15, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 17 Figure 6. Environmental and sun path analysis of the designed prototype. Two prototypes of sustainable housing of social interest were chosen based on the diagnosis, demands, and needs collected both from Habitat for Humanity El Salvador and from the communities via the results obtained after the environmental, economic, and procedural evaluation of the various housing models designed and according to the parameters required by the EDGE certification program. These prototypes implied no major changes of those currently carried out by the entity, but they did include technical improvements in both design and materials, which enabled their efficiency, sustainability, and comfort to be improved. PHASE 3: CONSTRUCTION OF 2 SUSTAINABLE HOUSING PROTOTYPES: TRAINING WORKSHOPS AND AWARENESS-RAISING ACTIONS Once the design phase had been completed, it was necessary to continue with a third phase in which the prototypes were built in different climatic regions in accordance with the needs of the beneficiary families (Figure 7). To this end, in 2021, funding was obtained from the AACID (Andalusian Agency for International Development Cooperation) to carry out the project entitled “Resilient Communities in El Salvador: access for all people to safe, healthy, efficient, and comfortable housing”. This phase is divided into 6 stages: Stage 1: Analysis and selection of the plots and the contextual characteristics on which the housing prototypes would be built, together with the selection of the families to benefit from the housing prototypes. Stage 2: Drafting of the projects for two housing prototypes in two different climatic zones. These designs were adjusted to the particular conditions of the lots and to the needs and characteristics of the beneficiary families. This phase includes obtaining construction licenses. Stage 3: Construction of the prototypes by the staff of Habitat for Humanity El Salvador. Consultancy is carried out on the construction of the two houses by the Seville work team, who travelled to El Salvador to supervise the work and to monitor the EDGE certification process. Stage 4: Obtaining the EDGE certification of the prototypes after completion of the work. Stage 5: Implementation of awareness sessions and training workshops for both families and staff of Habitat for Humanity El Salvador. Stage 6: Meetings of the work team of the University of Seville with the many local institutions (Ministry of Housing, City Halls, Salvadoran Institute of Construction, Salvadoran Association of Engineers and Architects, and Universities) for the dissemination of the project, its objectives, and its scope. Figure 6. Environmental and sun path analysis of the designed prototype. Health, through the reconfiguration of the prototypes to guarantee the reduction of environmental humidity, the proposal of devices and resources to prevent infestations by insects and rodents, the proposal of the reconfiguration of windows and doors to guarantee suitable interior lighting for basic activities of daily life according to the families’ profile, and the possession of ventilation elements to facilitate the evacuation of toxins and to prevent unhealthy environments. The construction of the immediate exterior environment that prevents the flooding of gardens by avoiding the implementation of hard paving that causes the generation of a heat island and by recommending areas for growing food and managing domestic waste. Economic costs, through analysing the cost/benefit ratio and proposing financing systems. Two prototypes of sustainable housing of social interest were chosen based on the diagnosis, demands, and needs collected both from Habitat for Humanity El Salvador and from the communities via the results obtained after the environmental, economic, and procedural evaluation of the various housing models designed and according to the parameters required by the EDGE certification program. These prototypes implied no major changes of those currently carried out by the entity, but they did include technical improvements in both design and materials, which enabled their efficiency, sustainability, and comfort to be improved. Sustainability 2023,15, 352 8 of 16 PHASE 3: CONSTRUCTION OF 2 SUSTAINABLE HOUSING PROTOTYPES: TRAINING WORKSHOPS AND AWARENESS-RAISING ACTIONS Once the design phase had been completed, it was necessary to continue with a third phase in which the prototypes were built in different climatic regions in accordance with the needs of the beneficiary families (Figure 7). To this end, in 2021, funding was obtained from the AACID (Andalusian Agency for International Development Cooperation) to carry out the project entitled “Resilient Communities in El Salvador: access for all people to safe, healthy, efficient, and comfortable housing”. This phase is divided into 6 stages: Sustainability 2023, 15, x FOR PEER REVIEW 9 of 17 Figure 7. Construction of the prototypes in Jocoaitique and La Palma. PHASE 4: MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT The motivation of this phase involves monitoring the dwellings in order to collect the results that verify improvement in the efficiency and comfort of the sustainable housing prototypes designed. This phase is divided into the following stages: Stage 1: Monitoring of parameters. To this end, monitoring equipment is installed in the housing prototypes built and in other existing dwellings in the area in order to verify and quantify the improvements produced. This monitoring produces results for several months, and the families play a key role in the care and monitoring of the equipment. Stage 2: Interviews with families. Surveys and interviews are carried out with the families, which lead to a quantitative and qualitative analysis of the degree of satisfaction with the sustainable prototypes they inhabit, thereby detecting their strengths and weaknesses. Stage 3: With the results obtained from the monitoring and interviews, an overall assessment is carried out to demonstrate that the newly designed and recently built prototypes have improved the degree of indoor comfort, efficiency, and sustainability patterns and have been approved through satisfaction levels from the occupants. Figure 7. Construction of the prototypes in Jocoaitique and La Palma. Stage 1: Analysis and selection of the plots and the contextual characteristics on which the housing prototypes would be built, together with the selection of the families to benefit from the housing prototypes. Stage 2: Drafting of the projects for two housing prototypes in two different climatic zones. These designs were adjusted to the particular conditions of the lots and to the needs and characteristics of the beneficiary families. This phase includes obtaining construction licenses. Stage 3: Construction of the prototypes by the staff of Habitat for Humanity El Salvador. Consultancy is carried out on the construction of the two houses by the Seville Sustainability 2023,15, 352 9 of 16 work team, who travelled to El Salvador to supervise the work and to monitor the EDGE certification process. Stage 4: Obtaining the EDGE certification of the prototypes after completion of the work. Stage 5: Implementation of awareness sessions and training workshops for both families and staff of Habitat for Humanity El Salvador. Stage 6: Meetings of the work team of the University of Seville with the many local institutions (Ministry of Housing, City Halls, Salvadoran Institute of Construction, Salvadoran Association of Engineers and Architects, and Universities) for the dissemination of the project, its objectives, and its scope. PHASE 4: MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT The motivation of this phase involves monitoring the dwellings in order to collect the results that verify improvement in the efficiency and comfort of the sustainable housing prototypes designed. This phase is divided into the following stages: Stage 1: Monitoring of parameters. To this end, monitoring equipment is installed in the housing prototypes built and in other existing dwellings in the area in order to verify and quantify the improvements produced. This monitoring produces results for several months, and the families play a key role in the care and monitoring of the equipment. Stage 2: Interviews with families. Surveys and interviews are carried out with the families, which lead to a quantitative and qualitative analysis of the degree of satisfaction with the sustainable prototypes they inhabit, thereby detecting their strengths and weaknesses. Stage 3: With the results obtained from the monitoring and interviews, an overall assessment is carried out to demonstrate that the newly designed and recently built prototypes have improved the degree of indoor comfort, efficiency, and sustainability patterns and have been approved through satisfaction levels from the occupants. PHASE 5: DISSEMINATION OF RESULTS, CONCLUSIONS, AND IMPLICATIONS This final phase focuses on the dissemination of the results, conclusions, and implications. For this phase, the work team obtained funding in 2022 from the Office of Development Cooperation of the University of Seville to carry out the project entitled “Knowledge transfer workshops and results obtained in the project: Sustainable and resilient communities in El Salvador: access for all people to safe, healthy, efficient, and comfortable housing”. The objective of this phase is to transmit the experience and knowledge generated throughout the investigation to policy-makers and to promulgate the implications and conclusions generated from the process, both in the scientific field and in the contexts of development cooperation in matters of sustainable social interest housing. In this way, awareness-raising conferences and workshops will be held at the Higher Technical School of Architecture of the University of Seville in order to present the results of the research and increase its degree of impact in the educational field. Likewise, in El Salvador, dissemination will be carried out during the trips made by the team to said country through meetings with the various public and private institutions related to the field of sustainable social interest housing. 4. Results and Discussion The sustainable housing prototypes have been very well received by the counterpart entity and the country’s public and private institutions. This is a highly valued initiative among the staff of Habitat for Humanity El Salvador, who are highly motivated to bring their housing catalogue closer to models of a more sustainable nature, thereby fulfiling particular actions from the main aim of the research (Figure 8). The increase in costs and the technical improvements introduced have turned out to be viable both in their design and construction. Sustainability 2023,15, 352 16 of 16 30. Invidiata, A.; Lavagna, M.; Ghisi, E. Selecting Design Strategies Using Multi-Criteria Decision Making to Improve the Sustainability of Buildings. Build. Environ. 2018,139, 58–68. [CrossRef] 31. Riera Pérez, M.G.; Laprise, M.; Rey, E. Fostering Sustainable Urban Renewal at the Neighborhood Scale with a Spatial Decision Support System. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2018,38, 440–451. [CrossRef] 32. Kamari, A.; Corrao, R.; Kirkegaard, P.H. Sustainability Focused Decision-Making in Building Renovation. Int. J. Sustain. Built Environ. 2017,6, 330–350. [CrossRef] 33. Serrano-Jiménez, A.; Blandón-González, B.; Barrios-Padura, Á. Towards a Built Environment without Physical Barriers: An Accessibility Assessment Procedure and Action Protocol for Social Housing Occupied by the Elderly. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2022 ,76, 103456. [CrossRef] 34. Shooshtarian, S.; Rajagopalan, P.; Sagoo, A. A Comprehensive Review of Thermal Adaptive Strategies in Outdoor Spaces. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2018,41, 647–665. [CrossRef] 35. Intternational Finance Corporation IFC EDGE Certificate. Available online: https://edgebuildings.com/ (accessed on 4 December 2022). 36. Poortinga, W.; Calve, T.; Jones, N.; Lannon, S.; Rees, T.; Rodgers, S.E.; Lyons, R.A.; Johnson, R. Neighborhood Quality and Attachment: Validation of the Revised Residential Environment Assessment Tool. Environ. Behav. 2017,49, 255–282. [CrossRef] 37. Gade, A.N.; Jensen, R.L.; Larsen, T.S.; Nissen, S.B.; Andresen, I. Value-Based Decision Making in the Pre-Design Stage of Sustainable Building Renovation Projects–Exploring Two Methods for Weighting Criteria. Int. J. Constr. Manag. 2021 ,21, 648–663. [CrossRef] 38. Alawneh, R.; Ghazali, F.; Ali, H.; Sadullah, A.F. A Novel Framework for Integrating United Nations Sustainable Development Goals into Sustainable Non-Residential Building Assessment and Management in Jordan. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2019 ,49, 101612. [CrossRef] 39. Heatwole-Shank, K.S.; Cutchin, M.P. Processes of Developing “Community Livability” in Older Age. J. Aging Stud. 2016 ,39, 66–72. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 40. Akkar Ercan, M. Challenges and Conflicts in Achieving Sustainable Communities in Historic Neighbourhoods of Istanbul. Habitat Int. 2011,35, 295–306. [CrossRef] 41. Napoli, G.; Bottero, M.; Ciulla, G.; Dell’Anna, F.; Figueira, J.R.; Greco, S. Supporting Public Decision Process in Buildings Energy Retrofitting Operations: The Application of a Multiple Criteria Decision Aiding Model to a Case Study in Southern Italy. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2020,60, 102214. [CrossRef] 42. Baek, C.; Park, S. Policy Measures to Overcome Barriers to Energy Renovation of Existing Buildings. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2012,16, 3939–3947. [CrossRef] 43. Thuvander, L.; Femenías, P.; Mjörnell, K.; Meiling, P. Unveiling the Process of Sustainable Renovation. Sustainability 2012 ,4, 1188–1213. [CrossRef] 44. García-gonzález, J.A.; Palencia, S.G.; Ondoño, I.S. Characterization of Environmental Education in Spanish Geography Textbooks. Sustainability 2021,13, 1159. [CrossRef] Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.