Smart Mobility Adoption: A Review of the Literature

Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity Review Smart Mobility Adoption: A Review of the Literature Can Bıyık 1,* , Ahmad Abareshi 2, Alexander Paz 3, Rosa Arce Ruiz 4, Rosaria Battarra 5, Christopher D. F. Rogers 6and Carmen Lizarraga 7   Citation: Bıyık, C.; Abareshi, A.; Paz, A.; Ruiz, R.A.; Battarra, R.; Rogers, C.D.F.; Lizarraga, C. Smart Mobility Adoption: A Review of the Literature. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2021,7, 146. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/joitmc7020146 Received: 29 March 2021 Accepted: 18 May 2021 Published: 1 June 2021 Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Copyright: © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ 4.0/). 1Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University, 06760 Ankara, Turkey 2School of Accounting, Information Systems and Supply Chain, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia; [email protected] 3School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia; alexander[email protected] 4Transport Research Center, Polytechnic University of Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain; rosa.ar[email protected] 5Institute for studies on the Mediterranean, National Research Council, 00185 Roma, Italy; [email protected].it 6Department of Civil Engineering, School of Engineering, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK; [email protected] 7Department of Applied Economics, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain; [email protected] *Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Traffic congestion and air pollution continue to be serious concerns, especially in large cities, and going forward, this is not sustainable. Urban transport around the world is facing challenges, such as air pollution and inefficient use of resources, that often inhibit economic development. Simply building more roads cannot address such challenges. There is a need to integrate the urban infrastructure through smart connectivity. Smart mobility, as a vital cornerstone of a smart city, will potentially reduce traffic jams, commuting times, and road crashes and create an opportunity for passengers to customize their journeys. In fact, planning smart mobility solutions is among the top challenges for large cities around the world. It involves a set of deliberate actions backed by sophisticated technologies. The different elements and dimensions that characterize smart mobility are investigated to depict the overall picture surrounding the smart mobility domain. Additionally, the trends, opportunities, and threats inherent to smart mobility are addressed. There are four segments of smart mobility that are highlighted in this paper: intelligent transport systems, open data, big data analytics, and citizen engagement. These segments are all inter-related and play a crucial role in the successful implementation of smart mobility. Keywords: smart mobility; smart mobility; smart mobility; cities; trends; opportunities 1. Smart Mobility Smart mobility is becoming a significant area of research in urban planning [ 1 ]. Since the inception of the smart mobility concept, it has been utilized in transportation networks in both urban and transport planning spheres because of its innovativeness. Equally, smart mobility has been a part of policy-making as this approach gains more acceptance and technical feasibility [ 1 , 2 ]. In contrast with digital platforms that no longer focus on sustainable mobility, given that their emphasis has shifted to active mobility, academic work has always focused on sustainable forms of mobility [ 3 – 5 ]. Therefore, this paper attempts to clarify the meaning of a different idea whose competence has surpassed smart mobility. In this research, the objective is to focus on the methods and perspectives that underlie the research on smart mobility. Smart mobility is a deeply grounded notion typified by a significant research gap because it is in its early stages of development. As such, no standards have been developed to aid in the definition of the term “smart mobility”. Urban mobility is an important part of the integrated city strategy [ 1 ]. Tomaszewska and Florea [ 2 ] suggest that smart mobility is “a cornerstone of a smart city strongly associated with the J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2021,7, 146. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7020146 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/joitmc J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2021,7, 146 2 of 20 transboundary haze (routing, digital transformation systems, and forecast of car traffic) decisions and policy of municipalities that are focused on the tools and innovations of data and communication.” (citation and page no.) Some scholars [ 3 ] define smart mobility as an aspect that consists of the set of acts that encourage traffic flow, either on foot or by bicycle, or via federal or state transportation, all following a shared goal to minimize economic, environmental, and time costs. Other authors [ 4 ] claim that smart mobility emphasizes infusing technology into urban infrastructure and focuses on how people who interact with the urban environment can do so in an enlightened and stylish way. Table 1summarizes past research with a focus on the meaning of smart mobility. Table 1. Meanings of smart mobility. Meaning Source Smart mobility is a significant element of a smart city plan. [1] Smart mobility is the pinnacle of a smart city and is associated with a municipal verdict and technique grounded in communication, information, and technological instruments. [2] Smart mobility contains a number of actions that enhance users’ mobility by foot, public or private transportation, or any other means of transport. It leads to a reduction in economic costs that are incurred by the environment and time. [3] Smart mobility is not just the embedding of technology into an urban infrastructure, it also calls for citizens to pursue and relate to their urban surroundings in a smart and rational way. [4] Smart mobility is generally an approach that aids in the reduction of poisonous fumes expelled into the atmosphere by vehicles and human congestion. Equally, smart mobility aids in raising the quality of transportation in a manner that is environmentally friendly. [5] Smart mobility is not an entirely new campaign; however, it is an abstract set of plans and actions that have unparalleled technological and social aspects, such as a structure and goals. Table 2summarizes the definition of smart mobility. To date, researchers around the world have not agreed upon a definition of ‘smart mobility’. Diverse considerations of smart mobility contribute to multiple definitions, which are not limited to the following assertions: • Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSs) are advanced intermodal transport networks used for smart cities. As one of the key tenets of mobility solutions, ITSs are specialized systems for data collection, storage, and processing and provide expertise in the planning, execution, and assessment of the integrated initiatives and policies of smart mobility. Urban areas are also connected to innovative ideas enabled by the Internet of Things (IoT), as per the common idea of smart connectivity [6,7]. • Open-data and open-source transport frameworks are used to model mass transit connectivity, develop and mimic bicycle sharing schemes, collect mass transit routing data, offer real-time alternative route information [ 8 ], track and document traffic safety data, and perform travel time questionnaires. Open data implementation can be used by authorities and supervisors of urban countries to bring about cost-effective designs and execution [ 9 ]. Urban areas gather valuable information and create vast amounts of data for development, invention, and decision-making [10]. • Big data modeling and data gathering, virtualization, and structured recognitionbased methods are used to consider the commuter’s needs, traffic control, and shifts in prodding behavior. Through the introduction of modern IoT apps, the scale of collected data has increased tremendously. This scenario can be used for various reasons. It may be used to forecast movements in areas with a high population density. In traffic-related scenarios, the most popular applications with huge data sets are cooperative and sharing platforms that enable improved efficiency and control with the use of pre-existing traffic control resources [11,12]. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2021,7, 146 3 of 20 • The essence of this topic is to empower people to have views and input, as well as to engage in decision-making processes. Cities and neighborhoods welcome the opportunity to work with their residents to cocreate safer and smarter mobility for commuters with respect to new ways of community governance and involvement. It can be used to track road construction and maintenance, account for road incidents, evaluate safety and security issues, gather vehicle-sharing information, and curtail excessive pedestrian occupancy [11,12]. Table 2. Definitions of markers for smart mobility in the literature. Intelligent transport system (ITS) An ITS is a network that helps maximize the use of existing infrastructure through a range of technological means, such as traffic signals, travel planners, smart ticketing, and cooperative systems. [6] ITSs will make transportation safe, efficient, and sustainable by considering appropriate digital technologies for all types of passengers and freight. [7] Open-data and open-source transport applications Open-data and open-source technology is an international data portal in which anonymous vehicle and smartphone locations are converted into real-time and historical traffic analysis. [8] Open-source applications and accessible data help to provide social wellness; however, in a smart city implementation, they also relieve several of the unavoidable privacy concerns. Employment of open data is aimed at providing a global-level understanding of the differing facades of a state and the travel behavior of individuals who live in specific constituencies. [9] Applications for big data analytics Big data has drawn great interest from business and academia alike. Big data contains such large and complex data sets that conventional database management systems or analysis methods are insufficient to handle them. Big data transportation analytics are now providing valuable solutions in the fields of traffic routing, congestion control, and routing. [10] Citizen engagement and crowd-sourcing strategies from the ground up Public participation in the process of traffic management is an effort to ensure that civilians have a proper say in public decision-making. Public participation is central to urban planning. When it comes to the planning and implementation of transport infrastructure, there is a tendency to focus on how to involve the public and on what method should be used. [11] Citizen participation is recognized as a crucial factor in understanding the full impact of urban planning interventions, but the mechanism is still perceived as complicated, time-consuming, and expensive, with a lack of ability at the community level to execute the support programs. [12] The idea of smart mobility was articulated and presented as a broad, organic system [ 6 , 9 ]. Different types of mobility systems and methods of mobility preparation have been established and described in the literature on transportation planning [ 10 , 12 ]. Smart mobility, for example, is often viewed as comprising approaches that contribute to more efficient transportation systems [ 2 – 4 ]. Connectivity is a key feature of smart mobility, which, together with large data, enables consumers to send all travel data instantaneously while members of the local municipal administrations may perform strategic control simultaneously [ 10 ]. In different terms, smart mobility is mainly connected to real-time traffic operations, consumer-means administration, applications and logistics monitoring, automobile parking maintenance, automobile allocation services, and numerous other intelligent transport services [ 7 ]. Researchers currently emphasize the benefits of training urban administrations and decision-makers for the proliferation of emerging city innovations—be it the IoT, collaborative robotics, a shared market, big data, simulated intelligence, crowd sourcing, drones, or 3D production [1,13]. One further consideration concerns the need for smart mobility systems to be synergistic with all other infrastructure and urban systems that are operating in support of people and their activities. People’s mobility typically occurs in corridors that also facilitate the movement of resources that supply utility services throughout an urban area. Out of convenience, these utility service pipelines and cables are typically buried, and as a result are commonly overlooked when designing service mobility systems. However, when these buried pipelines and cables need to be maintained, repaired, or augmented by providing a new capacity, surface activity is disturbed, sometimes to a considerable J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2021,7, 146 4 of 20 degree and for a significant time. Often referred to as a consequence of infrastructure interdependencies, consideration should be given to the provision of local, temporary adjustments to smart mobility systems or, preferably, the introduction of technologies that would limit or remove such disturbances. This includes the mandatory adoption of trenchless technologies to maintain, repair, refurbish, upgrade, or install utility pipelines, aided by the use of robotic systems to assess the condition of the existing infrastructure (e.g., see www.pipebots.ac.uk, accessed on 16 June 2020) so that proactive action can be taken to avoid pipeline failures—the emergency repair of leaking water or gas pipelines often requires trenches to be excavated, thereby causing an unwanted disruption. Smart mobility and smarter engineering of associated infrastructure systems (see www.ukcric.com, accessed on 16 June 2020) must be pursued simultaneously. The impacts, difficulties, and openings that keen mobilities can offer residents have been introduced, for instance, in various projects, undertakings, and drives that urban areas everywhere in the world have carried out, focusing on sustainable social innovations, open innovation dynamics, open innovation cultures, open business models, car-sharing open innovations, intelligent robot open innovations, and social open innovation. In this paper, particular attention is paid to clarifying the meaning of the word “smart” in the context of urban mobility. To help clarify the concept, the authors conducted an in-depth literature review of recent and relevant studies. In this analysis, a bibliometric assessment based on the Scopus database preceded the review of the existing literature, enabling the analysis to identify the current research and tendencies of intelligent transport. The article describes international research patterns that include widely cited papers on transportation models from 2010 to 2020 based on a bibliometric review of these publications from the Scopus database’s SCI-E and International journals databases. This paper is divided into six sections. The following section presents an overview of smart mobility, including its importance and the potential benefits for different stakeholders. Section 3surveys state-of-the-art approaches and solutions across a broad range of projects for smart mobility systems. Section 4presents related works within the field. Section 5 revisits the existing methods in the related works on vehicular communication. Finally, we make some concluding remarks in Section 6, with suggestions for future research. 2. Importance of Smart Mobility Evidence suggests that social infrastructure requires the collaboration of companies who understand the full benefits of the new technology [ 14 ]. New stakeholders may be derived from secondary stakeholders [ 15 , 16 ]. Primary stakeholders are defined more by the degree, or purpose, of their participation, and primary stakeholders are those with direct obligations in the management, service, and maintenance of the system [ 14 , 17 ]. However, those with minimal impact on a system’s operating activities and use are referred to as “alternative stakeholders” [ 18 ]. Evidently, both the primary and secondary players have positions in smart mobility project planning [ 19 ], growth [ 20 ], procedures [ 21 ], and maintenance [14,20]. All actors with potential involvement in the project must be defined and involved, as shown in Table 3, from the preparation and operations to the maintenance phase of a project [ 22 ]. One aim of smart mobility is to engage a broad spectrum of stakeholders and develop local alliances to build a consensus on the priorities and scale of development in smart mobility and collective problem-solving strategies [ 16 ]. It is essential to be prepared to respond to possible concerns as an intelligent transport project evolves in what might be an emerging situation [ 20 – 23 ]. Secondary stakeholders can introduce problems that need to be recognized and addressed [23]. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2021,7, 146 5 of 20 Table 3. Potential benefits of smart mobility for different stakeholders. Potential Stakeholder Benefits Public authorities Linked mass transit systems have one of the highest levels of potential for dramatically enhancing productivity gains across a city [14]. A well-designed smart mobility strategy provides city leaders with the opportunity to obtain and analyze vast amounts of data—and easily gather meaningful, actionable perspectives [15]. Town, national, or state government entities may affect the social and environmental influence of transportation services; that is, they can affect the actions of passengers by setting requirements for carriers (and individual transportation network operators) to establish incentives for acceptable behavior [16]. State subdivisions of transportation Encourages smart mobility to build enabling architectural, legal, and political structures that support the system [17]. Politicians Investment decisions in smart mobility are playing a crucial role in improving the regional and international productivity of cities to draw new businesses [18]. Smart mobility is an approach in which stakeholders—city leaders, executives, and administrations—will work in collaboration with suppliers to harness political control to maximize victors, minimize potential casualties, and eliminate organizational and structural obstacles to achieve the dream of smart mobility [19]. Planners Reduced congestion, driverless car production, and productive automobile navigation all minimize vehicle-related space requirements in city areas, potentially creating a ground for development [20]. Inhabitants The expansion of digital infrastructure in communities allows smart mobility to enhance connectivity among citizens [21]. Successful, intelligent transport approaches help a community to recognize transportation trends that will benefit the aspirations, needs, and concerns of citizens [22]. Venture Intelligent transport innovations—for example, intelligent parking control—enable cities to leverage extra funding streams [23]. Investment decisions in smart mobility are playing an increasingly significant role in boosting the competitiveness of regional and international cities to draw innovative businesses [24]. Cargo operators Smart mobility offers convergence of road traffic management for urban arteries and metropolitan highways [25]. Researchers Building new smart mobility efficiency strategies [26]. Different highway customers Several towns have begun spending on mobility solutions to help promote a healthier transportation community [27]. The outcomes of smart mobility projects impact stakeholders in considerable ways. [ 24 – 26 ]. This implies that the all-inclusive framework is followed to recognize and involve all stakeholders from the beginning of the project planning of smart mobility projects [ 14 , 27 ]. This may involve new stakeholders, including financial firms, sellers, broadcasters, telecommunications companies, and providers of value-added services [ 23 , 24 ]. Each stakeholder will have a diverse range of corporate practices and objectives; however, at every stage of the project, they must take responsibility for their duties and responsibilities [17]. Table 3demonstrates different levels of smart mobility advantages among different stakeholders. Customarily, the government sector has been accountable for highway and roadway network service and maintenance [ 14 – 16 ]. A public body, such as a road, a roadway agency, or a commission of public works, has traditionally been responsible for planning, construction, operations, and maintenance [ 15 , 16 ]. Public authorities, for example, are exclusively liable for programs supported by ITSs, such as disaster preparedness and traffic signal operations [16]. With the right development planning, state management can make urban areas more fiscally and ecologically viable, more functional, and more sustainable [ 18 ]. Efficient transportation also boosts the economic strength of a city [ 18 , 19 ]. Smart mobility is one J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2021,7, 146 6 of 20 area where performers—city representatives and administrative staff—can work as a team with providers to increase political influence to maximize benefits, minimize potential risks, and eliminate institutional and governance barriers to communicating the objectives of smart mobility [19]. A smart transport network enables seamless, affordable, and sustainable methods for residents and clients to get to and return from their destinations. The methods under which the system operates expand job prospects and economic opportunity [ 27 ]. Residents can experience a convenient, safe, active, balanced, and secure lifestyle because they can pick from many interlinked transit options [27]. 3. Good Practices in Smart Mobility It is expected that the deployment of various technologies will boost transportation in the years to come, depending on expenditures and financing because of the increased awareness of using clean and innovative practices to optimize framework performance [ 6 – 12 ]. Table 4shows illustrations of the guiding principles in mobility solutions in many European countries [ 28 ]. Electric cars, mass transportation, and parking operations are the domains of urban transportation that have several opportunities to incorporate ICT [28]. Table 4. Potential mobility indicators [8]. Spain Developing infrastructure for billing Managing parking Optimized multiple mode lightweight goods transportation United Kingdom E-Bicycles Minibus battery-powered service Filling stations for electric vehicles Testing driverless cars Loading stations Switching gasoline to hybrid cars Powered cargo bikes Germany Meets the growing infrastructure for billing Intelligent credit cards Managing parking Shared hybrid and traditional cars and bicycles Construction of new multisensory transportation channels to boost e-mobility utilization Goods swapping and distribution stations Implementation of an established car-sharing system for e-cars Netherlands Smart autonomous car charging by optimizing the use of charging stations Chipping tickets Detailed parking space evaluation (real-time parking reference framework) Italy Quick-charge architecture secured for a frigate of e-taxis Swift charging points Bays to park in Smooth, hybrid, and battery-powered automobiles Motor homes Automobiles with e-logistics Power cabs France Stands on smart charging stations Chipping cards Self-driving automated electric shuttle Car-sharing electric cars Table 4shows that the latest mass transit innovations include, but are not limited to, smart cars, electric cars, driverless cars, planning tools for coordinating a mass transit system, data collection systems, data analysis tools, numerous real-time information systems, and smart public transit stops [ 28 ]. Existing technologies are placed in parking J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2021,7, 146 7 of 20 spaces; smart parking apps are meant to optimize parking spots, devices, and sensors for on-road parking options currently being offered; intelligent cards accept parking charges; and parking management platforms organize it all [ 28 ]. Popularly rated mobility strategies should offer effective intelligent transport approaches while promoting creativity, fostering a supportive atmosphere, and enabling sustainable development goals [ 29 – 37 ]. Table 5 shows that many developed nations are attempting to incorporate the idea of autonomous driving in metropolitan areas [ 29 – 37 ]. These frameworks form part of the quickly changing urban transportation environment as shown through the lens of a green technology planner [ 33 – 37 ]. Techniques to meet the challenges of urban transport and to address city mobility issues are unique to each nation (especially its urban areas), and they include: • the design of reliable, accessible, safe, and comfortable transport networks, integrated with ridesharing technologies (MaaS) as well as other channels; • adaptation to the acceptance and development of vehicles (fully independent, linked, battery powered, communicated, dockless); • development of effective public–private partnerships (PPPs) and collaboration with knowledgeable institutions to discuss problems, such as pollution levels, overcrowding, and sustainability; and • expansion of new infrastructure—both technical and electronic—to support creative government and industry mobility solutions. Table 5. Finest smart mobility practices. Region Measure Description Project Source Germany Computerized and linked vehicles Production and testing of autonomous and connected cars across the globe. The SPACE initiative reflects the concept that they will be implemented in thousands of shared vehicles and incorporated with public transit systems so autonomous cars can lead to greater transportation. [29] United Kingdom Vehicle electrification Battery advances, energy efficiency, and centralized control of transportation emissions propel vehicle electrification. EFLES aims to optimize the increasing electric vehicle (EV) fleet of shipping companies and to show how wireless grids will incentivize massive fleet companies to go green. [30] Finland Transportation as a Service Transport as a network is the convergence of different modes of transportation systems into a unified, on-request, open mobility service. The Whim app from Helsinki seeks to provide an alternative to private cars via versatile ride-sharing programs alongside monthly tickets for mass transit trips. [31] United States Sensor systems The aim of collaborative radar systems is to use interaction and networks to enhance highway safety and to prepare it. The highway safety Monitor Project Initiative will test new sensing devices applied to street lighting to analyze the information required for full transparency into how people are driving and where possible trouble spots might exist. [32] Australia Smart stations Intelligent stations leverage station capacity as a forum for the creation of innovative low-carbon and climate-friendly technologies and solutions. The project group from Aurecon conducted detailed client assessments, user and rail personnel interviews, and seminars to identify a “smart station” and devise layout criteria. [33] Germany Smart logistics Employ smart logistics to more efficiently manage the ever-increasing commodity flows, shippers, trans-shipment hubs, forwarders, and recipients. The intelligent PORT transportation driver-assist platform provides stakeholders with the knowledge that is important to them throughout the logistics chain. With the aid of a single, overall smart logistics network, the Hamburg transportation department can successfully monitor the growing mobility of goods. [34] J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2021,7, 146 8 of 20 Table 5. Cont. Region Measure Description Project Source United States First and last link information management The database offers up-to-date road traffic information by traffic volume station. The purpose of the Global City Groups contest is to identify resources afforded by firstand last-mile vehicles, including connected, low-speed, and driverless driving, and explain how cars and platforms will play a significant role throughout the last mile delivering packages as well as other cargo. [35] Czech Republic Feasible Technical and Electronic Infrastructure Practices in the nation received functional as well as inspirational motivation. The state is using innovation initiatives to expand knowledge and expertise. A modern smartphone app offers data on a wide range of paths, such as combined modality choices, informing cyclists where bicycles are welcome by bus and train and reminding drivers how often positions are vacant at the closest park-and-ride. [37] A sequence of illustrations depicting intelligent transport activities was coordinated by civil society organizations, academic institutions, and private entities and is accompanied by quality management illustrations from the cities [ 32 – 37 ]. The Shared Personalized Automated Connected Vehicles (SPACE) program will enable towns, users, enterprises, and developers by offering guidelines on how independent cars can be incorporated into mass transit. The research focuses on the idea that if driverless cars are being used as public vehicles incorporated into an efficient mass transit network [ 29 ], this would occur. One of the main problems with transportation modernization is the failure of community electrical networks to provide charging stations. Power technology is increasingly constrained, and affirmation of the network can be expensive. Consequently, the autonomous car project, Fleet-Center for Local Power Systems (EFLES), aims at the smart enhancement of corporations by increasing hybrid car fleets. The plan seeks to show how a smart grid will enable massive fleet companies to take the plunge to hybrid cars and, in effect, considerably reduce the expenses of carbon dioxide emissions, environmental damage, and energy [ 30 ]. The proposal provides an exciting opportunity for metro stations to fulfill their requirements as an essential component of human livelihoods and to react to the learners of both independent users and organizations. Equally, this plan offers an exciting opportunity to go further than traditional legislation and explore how new and creative transportation systems might be designed [ 33 ]. State-of-the-art modern media ensure a secure and productive operation in Germany. The Hamburg Port Authority’s management systems are world-leading, while the relationship among sensing technologies and analytics, prediction, and data analytics provides huge improvements in efficiency. The administration is increasing the performance of the harbor owing to smart approaches to the flow of vehicles and goods [ 34 ]. The world city Teams Strategy is exploring a variety of incentives that emerging mobility-related technology brings to the United States. They offer information on the preparation of these innovations and their effect on cities and public development, providing possible shortand long-term changes in health, affordability, the economy, jobs, and congestion. The first phase and the last phase of a strategy are meant to lead communities to a desirable future of metropolitan mobility [35]. The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) has established an on-demand mobility model (MOD) to simulate a multimodal, distributed, standardized, open, and wired transportation system across the United States. The MOD enables travelers to use ondemand data, real-time data, and predictive modeling to make design choices that ideally fit their needs and circumstances. The MOD consolidates innovations that enable a travelercentered solution and offers users improved vehicle options [ 36 ]. As the popularity of smart transportation initiatives keeps rising, there is also a huge demand to formulate and maintain tools and predictors that effectively evaluate the performance of such modalities [ 38 – 40 ]. It is elucidated in part by the numerous advantages that smart mobility evaluation actions can offer to similar actors and stakeholders [ 14 – 27 ]. Some of these tools and indicators can be found in Table 6. The various indicators of metropolitan competence (connectivity, prosperity, ICT, public transportation automobiles, and innovative transport J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2021,7, 146 9 of 20 strategies; transport and transportation support measures, information gathering, and storage and analysis structures; experience and data targeted at designing, implementing, and evaluating intelligent transport policies and interoperable programs; mass transit, bike paths, bike rentals, and ridesharing; and the confidential transportation support network and the mass transit support network) require a concise description of what encompasses smart mobility, what its characteristics are, and how it works in comparison to standard cities [38–40]. Table 6. List of metrics used in performance indicators for intelligent transport evaluation. Number of Indicators Intelligent Vehicle Metrics Source 28 Connectivity: need for mass transit, availability of public transit, mass transit roads, number of bus stations, rail networks, halts in the transport network, and ticket parking Viability: environmental buses, foot zones, congestion-enclosed spaces, bike paths, environmental vehicles, requests for carpooling, production of ridesharing, the production capacity of ridesharing, and the density of bike sharing Data communication innovation: traffic signage schemes, variable message symbols, text messaging for road warnings, automated parking payment systems, smartphone software, SMS for data pertaining to public transit, automated bus station signs, digital travel tickets, digital mobile device travel tickets, route maps, maps, dates, local public transport planners, and online tickets [38] 46 Some of the crowd transportation cars and inventive transport solutions employed include hybrid cars, EUR 5 buses, and consumption of renewable energy sources. Personal and corporate movement: vehicle rental, ride-pooling, and car sharing; bike rental, sable bus connecting, urban navigation, and environmental driving Mobility hold-up facilities and policies include parks and drives, cyclers’ pathways, pillars for charging self-directed cars, flexibility warning signs, interactive stop signs, pedestrianor automobile-free zones, controlled transit areas, bus or bus-only lanes, traffic management programs, pace monitoring and management systems, transportation practices focusing on vehicular networks, the level of pollutant emissions, detailed knowledge to help intelligent transport measures, division of traffic patterns, coordinated implementation of booking of pollutant emissions, detailed knowledge to help intelligent transport, strategic division of traffic patterns, coordinated implementation of booking of tax credits, and measures for sustainable mobility. Other measures include the establishment of a system that monitors those entering restricted areas. These may include cordon charging, congestion costing, digital toll systems, digital GPS tolling, charge-as-you-continue driving, computerized parking navigation systems, variable message signage, Metro Traffic Control, surveillance systems for area and ecosystem security, software solutions for mobility management, and traffic note-taking. [39] 19 Mass transit: concentrations of the transport system, mass transportation usage, stop signs Cycle lanes: number of cycle tracks, bike lanes for 10,000 residents Bike exchange: frequency of bicycle stations, a bike per 1000 people Ridesharing car for 1000 people, a station per population of 1000 Public transit support network: digital bus traffic signals, online ticketing payment method, route information, timetables and queue length, path estimation travel manager, and online travel booking [40] Table 6demonstrates that smart mobility requires the journey alone and the journey’s efficiency, taking into consideration the town’s key sustainability variables. There are several transportation resources and procedures for intelligent cities that can be considered and adopted by urban centers. The table explains many methods and initiatives funded by leading foreign unions [ 38 – 40 ] that provide in-depth information, effective techniques, and processes used in the transportation plans for intelligent cities. In this segment, the recommended solution is extracted from inspiring network-supporting organizations [ 39 ]. 4. Research Design This section examines the methodology adopted in this article. In this part, consideration will be given to the methodological decisions of this exploration. These decisions are important to the execution of this exploration. It comprises an examination system, an exploration plan, an assortment of tests and information (a literature survey and a subjective and quantitative methodology), the utilized measurable techniques, an evaluation of the legitimacy and dependability of the investigation, and, finally, exploration suggestions. This article reviews the literary works over the period 2002–2018 on the advancement of detection frameworks for smart mobilities. We briefly talk about the foundation, and J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2021,7, 146 16 of 20 ing calculations during research, solving problems in a manner that is well defined, and producing sound solutions. The previous articles had diverse approaches to research (i.e., empirical studies, cross-sectional studies, and explanatory assessments). Some articles analyzed policies on smart mobility and collected data by conducting face-to-face interviews, while others posted results from laboratory tests. The outcome of this article may have a significant impact on the role of stakeholders. The different stakeholders involved are all bound to achieve their different corporate objectives. However, in the different stages of development of smarter modalities of transportation, stakeholders are expected to be held accountable for smart projects. Success indicates the effectiveness of the framework put in place by the stakeholders when they see the project come to fruition—from the planning phase of the project to its completion. In developing this system, all available stakeholders are expected to participate in the process to help develop a consensus on such factors as priority and the scale of the project. An inclusive approach to developing smart mobility solutions also produces superior problem-solving. Therefore, the concept of smart mobility is a complex and long-term vision of a more efficient urban mobility, factoring in the rising growth rates of urban populations. Moreover, the concept is largely supported by ICT, which implies that both forward and backward applications can be applied to support optimized traffic flow and improve the quality of urban transportation. 7.1. Smart Mobility: Now and into the Future The future of smart mobility is broad, complex, and involves significant uncertainty and challenges. For example, currently there is a vast amount of intellectual effort and resources being invested in the development of autonomous vehicles. However, there are competing technologies and systems under development that are likely to evolve faster because they face less challenges than those involved in the development of fully autonomous and safe vehicles. Examples of competitive modes and alternatives include flying cars, virtual traveling, electric bicycles, and active transportation. Similarly, as society evolves, the demand for transport and associated activities is likely to change; therefore, the adoption of alternative and more sustainable travel modes should be encouraged and pursued. The truth of changing mobility is, as of now, clear. Various patterns, from energy decentralization to the Internet of Things, are probably going to converge to produce radical changes in versatility frameworks over the course of the following 10 to 15 years. These progressions will permit individuals to travel more proficiently, more efficiently, more frequently, and in an unexpected way. The versatility frameworks of the future are probably going to be altogether different from those that currently exist. By 2030, we anticipate that a number of additional systems will be at the main edge of the subsequent period of cutting-edge mobility. In broad terms, the best systems will integrate shared versatility, selfrule, and charging with energy frameworks, public vehicles, and a foundation. In explicit terms, urban communities will explore these potential outcomes in an unexpected way. Neighborhood conditions—such as populace thickness, abundance, the condition of streets and public travel frameworks, contamination and clog levels, and nearby administration abilities—will determine what changes happen, and how rapidly. 7.2. Smart Mobility and Open Innovation The investigation shows that another way to deal with open innovation is arising. This methodology joins technological advances with individuals, metropolitan domains, and different urban areas and will probably become progressively more compelling in the future. We think that this methodology of utilizing open innovation to share dreams, information, abilities, experiences, and methodologies for planning the conveyance of administrations, products, and strategies in urban areas will be successful, effective, and manageable. Notwithstanding, predictable systems, standards, and key plans are required in order to ideally tie these components together. Digitalization, open structures, and open information are needed to help these cycles of open metropolitan advancement in an J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2021,7, 146 17 of 20 ICT-empowered city. One further thought concerns the requirement for brilliant portability frameworks to be synergistic with the existing foundation and metropolitan frameworks that are working on the side of individuals and their activities. Individuals’ movement commonly happens in corridors that likewise work with the assets that utility administrations use all through a metropolitan territory. Out of comfort, these utility pipelines and links are normally covered, and subsequently are generally disregarded when planning administration versatility frameworks. Be that as it may, when these covered pipelines and links require maintenance, fixing, or an increase in capacity, the surface movement is upset, in some cases to an extensive degree and in a critical time frame. Regularly alluded to as a result of foundation interdependencies, thought ought to be given to the arrangement of the neighborhood, brief acclimations to smart mobility frameworks, or, ideally, the presentation of technologies that would restrict or eliminate such an unsettling influence. This incorporates the conservative reception of trenchless advances to look after, fix, renovate, overhaul, or introduce utility pipelines, supported by the utilization of automated frameworks to survey the condition of the current foundation so that a proactive move can be made to avoid pipeline disappointments; in a crisis, the fixing of spilled water or gas in pipelines frequently requires channels to be unearthed, in this way causing an undesirable interruption. Smart mobility and a more brilliant design of related frameworks should be sought after. The effects, challenges, and opportunities that smart mobilities can offer to occupants has been presented, for example, in different activities, endeavors, and drives that metropolitan regions around the world have completed, zeroing in on manageable social innovations, open advancement elements, open development societies, open business models, vehicle-sharing open innovations, intelligent robot open innovations, and social open innovation. 8. Conclusions These are but a few advantages that may come to be obtained if municipalities joined hands with private stakeholders to fulfill this vision. Arguably, the idea is to create a self-sustaining transportation network with the ability to operate without a human operator. This technological approach may present a solution to the increased demand for infrastructure and maintenance. According to the research, an intelligent transit network has more economic advantages than a human-monitored transit network, which requires social skills and capability. Equally, instead of incorporating many policies, encouraging vehicle owners to maintain specific agreements with the necessary authority controlling autonomous driving should be encouraged. Generally, this lowers the hassle that comes with intense policy requirements in the transportation sector. This is a relatively new concept in the sense that it is an integrative approach that uses holistic and system-level perspectives to deal with the complex problem of mobility around urban centers. For optimal efficiency, the strategy requires the involved authorities to leverage big data to engage citizens with the operations of the intelligent transport system. Smart transportation will only become more popular as time goes by. This is evidenced by the increase in initiatives pushing for smarter transportation options. With such demand comes the need for the scientific community to create tools they can use to evaluate how practical, effective, and safe these new modalities of transportation will be for the general public. Such evaluations will protect the different stakeholders involved in the process of developing smart transportation options. Its wide range of benefits surpasses any other transportation solution in the current, and future, transportation sphere, especially with innovation and flexibility as transportation elements. As such, smart mobility remains the solution for transportation systems for future cities. This paper may be useful to policymakers to facilitate the conceptualization of smart mobilities, to plan incentives for their development, and to monitor the smart progress of future transportation systems. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2021,7, 146 18 of 20 Funding: The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council under grant numbers EP/J017698 (Liveable Cities–Transforming the Engineering of Cities to Deliver Societal and Planetary Wellbeing), EP/R017727 (UKCRIC Coordination Node), MR/T045353 (REPLENISH–REimagining PLaces and ENgineered Infrastructure Systems for Health), and EP/S016813 (Pipebots–Pervasive Sensing for Buried Pipes). Institutional Review Board Statement: Not applicable. Informed Consent Statement: Not applicable. Data Availability Statement: Not applicable. Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest. Ethical Consent: All subjects gave their informed consent for inclusion before they participated in the study. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and the protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of EP/J017698 and EP/R017727. References 1. Yigitcanlar, T.; Kamruzzaman, M. Smart cities and mobility: Do the smartness of Australian cities lead to sustainable commuting patterns? J. Urban Technol. 2019,26, 21–46. [CrossRef] 2. Tomaszewska, E.J.; Florea, A. Urban smart mobility in the scientific literature—Bibliometric analysis. Eng. Manag. Prod. Serv. 2018,10, 41–56. [CrossRef] 3. Aletà, N.B.; Alonso, C.M.; Ruiz, R.M.A. Smart mobility and smart environment in the Spanish cities. Transp. Res. Procedia 2017 , 24, 163–170. [CrossRef] 4. Allam, Z.; Newman, P. Redefining the smart city: Culture, metabolism and governance. Smart Cities 2018,1, 4–25. [CrossRef] 5. Gabrys, J. Programming environments: Environmentality and citizen sensing in the smart city. Environ. Plan. D Soc. Space 2014, 32, 30–48. [CrossRef] 6. Bazzan, A.L.; Klügl, F. Introduction to intelligent systems in traffic and transportation. Synth. Lect. Artif. Intell. Mach. Learn. 2013 , 7, 1–137. [CrossRef] 7. Giannopoulos, G.A. The application of information and communication technologies in transport. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2004 , 152, 302–320. [CrossRef] 8. Pigni, F.; Piccoli, G.; Watson, R. Digital data streams: Creating value from the real-time flow of big data. Calif. Manag. Rev. 2016 , 58, 5–25. [CrossRef] 9. Nallur, V.; Elgammal, A.; Clarke, S. Smart route planning using open data and participatory sensing. In IFIP International Conference on Open Source Systems; Springer: Cham, Germany, 2015; pp. 91–100. 10. Cui, L.; Yu, F.R.; Yan, Q. When big data meets software-defined networking: SDN for big data and big data for SDN. IEEE Netw. 2016,30, 58–65. [CrossRef] 11. Khisty, C.J. Citizen involvement in the transportation planning process: What is and what ought to be. J. Adv. Transp. 2000 , 34, 125–142. [CrossRef] 12. Irvin, R.A.; Stansbury, J. Citizen participation in decision making: Is it worth the effort? Public Adm. Rev. 2004 ,64, 55–65. [CrossRef] 13. Yigitcanlar, T.; Desouza, K.C.; Butler, L.; Roozkhosh, F. Contributions and risks of artificial intelligence (AI) in building smarter cities: Insights from a systematic review of the literature. Energies 2020,13, 1473. [CrossRef] 14. Lakshmanan, T.R.; Chatterjee, L.R. Economic consequences of transport improvements. ACCESS Mag. 2005,1, 28–33. 15. Chong, M.; Habib, A.; Evangelopoulos, N.; Park, H.W. Dynamic capabilities of a smart city: An innovative approach to discovering urban problems and solutions. Gov. Inf. Q. 2018,35, 682–692. [CrossRef] 16. Sochor, J.; Arby, H.; Karlsson, I.M.; Sarasini, S. A topological approach to Mobility as a Service: A proposed tool for understanding requirements and effects, and for aiding the integration of societal goals. Res. Transp. Bus. Manag. 2018,27, 3–14. [CrossRef] 17. Docherty, I.; Marsden, G.; Anable, J. The governance of smart mobility. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 2018 ,115, 114–125. [CrossRef] 18. Jessop, B. Entrepreneurial City. In The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Urban and Regional Studies; Wiley Blackwell: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2019; pp. 1–10. 19. Gironés, E.S.; Vršˇcaj, D. Who Benefits from Smart Mobility Policies? The Social Construction of Winners and Losers in the Connected Bikes Projects in the Netherlands’. In Governance of the Smart Mobility Transition; Emerald: Bingley, UK, 2018; pp. 85–101. 20. Merlin, L.A. Comparing automated shared taxis and conventional bus transit for a small city. J. Public Transp. 2017,20, 2–7. 21. Anthopoulos, L. Smart utopia vs. smart reality: Learning by experience from 10 smart city cases. Cities 2017 ,63, 128–148. [CrossRef] 22. Appio, F.P.; Lima, M.; Paroutis, S. Understanding Smart Cities: Innovation ecosystems, technological advancements, and societal challenges. Technol. Forecast. Social Chang. 2019,142, 1–14. [CrossRef] J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2021,7, 146 19 of 20 23. Perboli, G.; Ferrero, F.; Musso, S.; Vesco, A. Business models and tariff simulation in car-sharing services. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 2018,115, 32–48. [CrossRef] 24. Turetken, O.; Grefen, P.; Gilsing, R.; Adali, O.E. Service-dominant business model design for digital innovation in smart mobility. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 2019,61, 9–29. [CrossRef] 25. Chen, P.; Sun, J.; Qi, H. Estimation of delay variability at signalized intersections for urban arterial performance evaluation. J. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2017,21, 94–110. [CrossRef] 26. Zawieska, J.; Pieriegud, J. Smart city as a tool for sustainable mobility and transport decarbonisation. Transp. Policy 2018 ,63, 39–50. [CrossRef] 27. Ismagilova, E.; Hughes, L.; Dwivedi, Y.K.; Raman, K.R. Smart cities: Advances in research—An information systems perspective. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2019,47, 88–100. [CrossRef] 28. European Commission. The Making of a Smart City: Best Practices across Europe; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2017; pp. 10–256. Available online: https://smart-cities-marketplace.ec.europa.eu/insights/publications/making-smart-city-bestpractices-across-europe (accessed on 16 July 2020). 29. Space. The Road to Better Mobility. 2019. Available online: https://space.uitp.org/ (accessed on 16 June 2020). 30. Moixa. Driving Forward with Smart EV Fleet Charging: Another Exciting Innovation Project for Moixa. 2019. Available online: https://www.moixa.com/blog-smart-ev-fleet-charging-driving-forward-with-ups/ (accessed on 16 June 2020). 31. Ministry of Infrastructure and Water Management. Exploring Mobility-as-a-Service: Insights from Literature and Focus Group Meetings Netherlands Institute for Transport Policy Analysis. 2019. Available online: https://maasalliance.eu/wpcontent/ uploads/sites/7/2018/11/MaaS-brochure-ENG.pdf (accessed on 16 June 2020). 32. Smart City PDX. Traffic Safety Sensor Project. 2019. Available online: https://www.smartcitypdx.com/traffic-safety-sensorproject (accessed on 23 June 2020). 33. Aurecon. Smart Stations, Australia: Putting User Needs at the Heart of Future Station Design. 2019. Available online: https://www.aurecongroup.com/projects/transport/smart-stations (accessed on 16 June 2020). 34. Hamburg Port Authority. In Hamburg We Are Smart. 2019. Available online: https://www.hamburg-port-authority.de/en/hpa360/smartport/ (accessed on 24 June 2020). 35. Global City Teams Challenge. Blueprint for Improving First and Last Mile Connections for Transit and Freight. 2019. Available online: https://pages.nist.gov/GCTC/uploads/blueprints/20180225_TransportationBlueprintFeb24.pdf (accessed on 16 June 2020) . 36. Federal Transit Administration. Mobility on Demand (MOD) Sandbox Program. 2020. Available online: https://www.transit.dot. gov/research-innovation/mobility-demand-mod-sandbox-program (accessed on 26 June 2020). 37. Caballero, J.; Colclough, A. Best Practice Guide 2017–2018. In European Mobility Week; 2018; pp. 1–15. Available online: https://mobilityweek.eu/fileadmin/user_upload/materials/participation_resources/2018/2018%20EMW%20Best%20 Practice%20Guide%20LR.pdf (accessed on 26 June 2020). 38. Battarra, R.; Gargiulo, C.; Tremiterra, M.R.; Zucaro, F. Smart Mobility in Italian Metropolitan Cities: A comparative analysis through indicators and actions. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2018,41, 556–567. [CrossRef] 39. Benevolo, C.; Dameri, R.P.; D’Auria, B. Smart mobility in smart city. In Empowering Organizations; Springer: Cham, Germany, 2016; pp. 13–28. 40. Garau, C.; Masala, F.; Pinna, F. Cagliari and smart urban mobility: Analysis and comparison. Cities 2016,56, 35–46. [CrossRef] 41. Xian, H.; Madhavan, K. Anatomy of scholarly collaboration in engineering education: A big-data bibliometric analysis. J. Eng. Educ. 2014,103, 486–514. [CrossRef] 42. Ellegaard, O.; Wallin, J.A. The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? Scientometrics 2015 , 105, 1809–1831. [CrossRef] 43. Li, W.; Zhao, Y. Bibliometric analysis of global environmental assessment research in a 20-year period. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2015,50, 158–166. [CrossRef] 44. Braga, I.P.C.; Dantas, H.F.B.; Leal, M.R.D.; Almeida, M.R.D.; Santos, E.M.D. Urban mobility performance indicators: A bibliometric analysis. Gestão Produção2019,26, 1–17. [CrossRef] 45. Fu, Y.; Zhang, X. Trajectory of urban sustainability concepts: A 35-year bibliometric analysis. Cities 2017 ,60, 113–123. [CrossRef] 46. Trindade, E.P.; Hinnig, M.P.F.; Moreira da Costa, E.; Marques, J.S.; Bastos, R.C.; Yigitcanlar, T. Sustainable development of smart cities: A systematic review of the literature. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2017,3, 11. [CrossRef] 47. Knupfer, M.S.; Pokotilo, V.; Woetzel, J. Elements of Success: Urban Transportation Systems of 24 Global Cities; McKinsey Company: New York, NY, USA, 2018; pp. 5–69. Available online: https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/sustainability/ourinsights/elements-of-success-urban-transportation-systems-of-24-global-cities (accessed on 11 June 2020). 48. Van Audenhove, F.J.; Dauby, L.; Korniichuk, O.; Pourbaix, J. The Future of Urban Mobility 2.0: Imperatives to Shape Extended Mobility Ecosystems of Tomorrow. 2014, pp. 20–72. Available online: https://www.uitp.org/sites/default/files/members/ 140124%20Arthur%20D.%20Little%20%26%20UITP_Future%20of%20Urban%20Mobility%202%200_Full%20study.pdf (accessed on 17 June 2020). 49. Shaheen, S.; Cohen, A. Mobility on demand (MOD) and mobility as a service (MaaS): Early understanding of shared mobility impacts and public transit partnerships. In Demand for Emerging Transportation Systems; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 37–59. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2021,7, 146 20 of 20 50. Toutouh, J.; Arellano, J.; Alba, E. BiPred: A bilevel evolutionary algorithm for prediction in smart mobility. Sensors 2018 ,18, 4123. [CrossRef] 51. Mangiaracina, R.; Perego, A.; Salvadori, G.; Tumino, A. A comprehensive view of intelligent transport systems for urban smart mobility. Int. J. Logist. Res. Appl. 2017,20, 39–52. [CrossRef] 52. Noy, K.; Givoni, M. Is ‘smart mobility’ sustainable? Examining the views and beliefs of transport’s technological entrepreneurs. Sustainability 2018,10, 422. [CrossRef] 53. Ilarri, S.; Stojanovic, D.; Ray, C. Semantic management of moving objects: A vision towards smart mobility. Expert Syst. Appl. 2015,42, 1418–1435. [CrossRef] 54. Lacey, G.; MacNamara, S. User involvement in the design and evaluation of a smart mobility aid. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 2000 , 37, 709–723. [PubMed] 55. Olaverri-Monreal, C. Autonomous vehicles and smart mobility related technologies. Infocommun. J. 2016,8, 17–24. 56. Cledou, G.; Estevez, E.; Barbosa, L.S. A taxonomy for planning and designing smart mobility services. Gov. Inf. Q. 2018 ,35, 61–76. [CrossRef] 57. Poslad, S.; Ma, A.; Wang, Z.; Mei, H. Using a smart city IoT to incentivise and target shifts in mobility behaviour—Is it a piece of pie? Sensors 2015,15, 13069–13096. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 58. Amoretti, M.; Belli, L.; Zanichelli, F. UTravel: Smart mobility with a novel user profiling and recommendation approach. Pervasive Mob. Comput. 2017,38, 474–489. [CrossRef] 59. Torres-Sospedra, J.; Avariento, J.; Rambla, D.; Montoliu, R.; Casteleyn, S.; Benedito-Bordonau, M.; Huerta, J. Enhancing integrated indoor/outdoor mobility in a smart campus. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 2015,29, 1955–1968. [CrossRef] 60. Földes, D.; Csiszár, C. Conception of future integrated smart mobility. In 2016 Smart Cities Symposium Prague (SCSP); IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2016; pp. 1–6. 61. Ning, Z.; Xia, F.; Ullah, N.; Kong, X.; Hu, X. Vehicular social networks: Enabling smart mobility. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2017 , 55, 16–55. [CrossRef] 62. Peprah, C.; Amponsah, O.; Oduro, C. A system view of smart mobility and its implications for Ghanaian cities. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2019,44, 739–747. [CrossRef] 63. Nam, T.; Pardo, T.A. Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference: Digital Government Innovation in Challenging Times; Association for Computing Machinery: New York, NY, USA, 2011; pp. 282–291.