scieee AI-readable full text Open interactive document viewer

Correction: Ramírez-Vélez, R.; et al. Validation of Surrogate Anthropometric Indices in Older Adults: What Is the Best Indicator of High Cardiometabolic Risk Factor Clustering?

Ramírez-Vélez, R,Pérez-Sousa, MA,Izquierdo, M,Cano-Gutierrez, CA,González-Jiménez, E,Schmidt-RioValle, J,González-Ruíz, K,Correa-Rodríguez, M

Abstract

We would like to thank the staff, scientists, and participants of the Colombian Health, Well-Being and Aging study (SABE, 2015) Survey for making this work possible.

Full text

nutrients Correction Correction: Ramírez-Vélez, R.; et al. Validation of Surrogate Anthropometric Indices in Older Adults: What Is the Best Indicator of High Cardiometabolic Risk Factor Clustering? Nutrients 2019, 11, 1701 Robinson Ramírez-Vélez 1,* , Miguel Ángel Pérez-Sousa 2, Mikel Izquierdo 1,3 , Carlos A. Cano-Gutierrez 4, Emilio González-Jiménez 5, Jacqueline Schmidt-RioValle 5, Katherine González-Ruíz6and María Correa-Rodríguez 5 1 Department of Health Sciences, Public University of Navarra, Navarrabiomed-Biomedical Research Centre, IDISNA-Navarra’s Health Research Institute, C/irunlarrea 3, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, Navarra, Spain; [email protected] 2Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Huelva, Avenida de las Fuerzas Armadas s/n 21007, 21004 Huelva, Spain; [email protected] 3Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Fragilidad y Envejecimiento Saludable (CIBERFES), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28029 Madrid, Spain 4Hospital Universitario San Ignacio—Aging Institute, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá110111, Colombia; [email protected] 5Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Granada, Av. Ilustración, 60, 18016 Granada, Spain; [email protected] (E.G.-J.); [email protected] (J.S.-R.V.); [email protected] (M.C.-R.) 6Grupo de Ejercicio Físico y Deportes, Vicerrectoría de Investigaciones, Facultad de Salud, Universidad Manuela Beltrán, Bogotá110231, Colombia; [email protected] *Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +34-699-993-920 Received: 12 September 2019; Accepted: 22 September 2019; Published: 10 October 2019   The authors would like to make the following corrections to the published paper [1]: (1) In the result section replace: On page 6, in the text of the Section 3.1, ‘22.2 (20.9–23.8),’ must be replaced by ‘1.31 (1.26–1.37).’ On page 7, in the text of the Section 3.2, (r= − 0.42, p<0.001)’, ’CI (r= − 0.46, p<0.001)’ and ’CI ( r=−0.44 , p<0.001 )’, must be replaced by (r=0.38, p<0.001)’, ’CI (r=0.31, p<0.001)’ and ’CI (r=0.41, p<0.001)’. On page 9, in the text of the Section 3.3, ‘22.9’and ‘21.0,’ must be replaced by ‘1.33’and ’1.31’. On page 10, in the text of the Section 3.4, ‘10.9,’ must be replaced by ’12.8’. (2) In Table 1 replace: On page 6, Section 3.1, Table 1, ’22.2 (20.9–23.8)’, ’22.2 (20.9–23.8)’ and ’22.2 (20.9–23.8)’, must be replaced by ’1.31 (1.26–1.37)’, ’1.34 (1.29–1.39)’, ’1.30 (1.24–1.35)’. (3) In Figure 1 replace: On page 8, Section 3.2, Figure 1, Panel CI-CMRI, must be replaced by: Nutrients 2019,11, 2413; doi:10.3390/nu11102413 www.mdpi.com/journal/nutrients Nutrients 2019,11, 2413 2 of 2 Nutrients 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 2 of 2 (4) In Table 2 replace: On page 9, Section 3.3, Table 2, ’22.9’ and ’21.0’, must be replaced by ’1.33’, and ’1.30’. These changes have no material impact on the conclusions of our paper. The manuscript will be updated and the original will remain online on the article webpage. The authors apologize for these errors and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way Author Contributions: R.R.-V. and M.A.P.S. analyzed the data. All authors contributed to the text. Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest. References 1. Ramírez-Vélez, R.; Pérez-Sousa, M.Á.; Izquierdo, M.; Cano-Gutierrez, C.A.; González-Jiménez, E.; SchmidtRioValle, J.; González-Ruíz, K.; Correa-Rodríguez, M. Validation of Surrogate Anthropometric Indices in Older Adults: What Is the Best Indicator of High Cardiometabolic Risk Factor Clustering? Nutrients 2019, 11, 1701. © 2019 by the authors. Submitted for possible open access publication under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). (4) In Table 2 replace: On page 9, Section 3.3, Table 2, ’22.9’ and ’21.0’, must be replaced by ’1.33’, and ’1.30’. These changes have no material impact on the conclusions of our paper. The manuscript will be updated and the original will remain online on the article webpage. The authors apologize for these errors and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. Author Contributions: R.R.-V. and M.Á.P.S. analyzed the data. All authors contributed to the text. Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest. Reference 1. Ram í rez-V é lez, R.; P é rez-Sousa, M. Á .; Izquierdo, M.; Cano-Gutierrez, C.A.; Gonz á lez-Jim é nez, E.; Schmidt-RioValle, J.; Gonz á lez-Ru í z, K.; Correa-Rodr í guez, M. Validation of Surrogate Anthropometric Indices in Older Adults: What Is the Best Indicator of High Cardiometabolic Risk Factor Clustering? Nutrients 2019,11, 1701. [CrossRef] [PubMed] © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).