Maps from Bπ into X
Abstract
Wojtkowiak, Zdzislaw
Full text
Pub . Mat . UAB Vol . 30 ns 2-3 Des . 1986 Let n be a finite group and lets Bn be its classifying space . With every subgroup yc n there is associated a covering i(y,n) : By - " Bn . If g E n then multiplicationby g on En induces a map cg : By - B(g -1 yg) . Let E be an infiniteloop space . Then there is the following exact sequence i*,j* (*) 0 - [Bw ;E] -~ II[Bn ;E] II [B(n ngn g-1) ;E] nP n p ~gER P P P where u is a p-Sylow subgroup of n , products II ... and P n nP gtlc II . . . are over all p-Sylow subgroups for all p primes p , i * = II i(ir ngn P9 -1 ; 3c ) and j * = II i(gn -1 gnn " n ) oc . (see (2]) . nP g P P n P g P P ' P 9 From the sequence (*) it follows that a map from Bn to an infinite loop space is homotopic to zero if and only if its restrictions to classifying spaces of all Sylow subgroups are homotopic to zero . We want to see whether the same statement is true for an arbitrarysimply connected space . For example if n = IIx p then wehave the P following proposition MAPS FROM Bn INTO X Zdzislaw Wojtkowiak
Proposition 1 . If X is simply-connected then Proof . The map VBn p - Bn is a homological equivalence . Therefore p using an obstruction theory we obtain a required isomorphism for any simply connected space X . In further considerations we restrict our attentionto a very smallclass of groups . Let np be a maximal p-Sylowsubgroup of n Let N(n p ) be a normalizor' of np in u and let W p = N(np)/np Definition 1 . We say that n satisfies W -condition if the map p H*(n ;Z(P)) H*(ir ;Z(P)) p is an isomorphism . Examples 1 . If n is a normaldivisor in n then W -condition is satisfied . p p 2 . If n is abelian then W -condition is satisfied . p p 3 . W p -condition is satisfied for the binaryicosahedralgroup I* 4 . If n = GL(n ;F q ) then W p -condition is satisfied for some Notation . - means "is homotopic to" . p-Sylow subgroup of n .) 90 and allprimesp . primesp [Ba :X] ~z n[Bn p ;X] p Wehave the following sequence of cofibrations (up is a maximal i j 6 S (i) (**) Bnp - Bn --~ Cone (i) = C - S (Bn p ) 1 S (Bn) -~ " "
Let () (P) denotes the p-completion functor and let ( ) (P) denotes the p-localization functor . After applying ( )(P) to (**) we obtain the following sequence of cofibrations (BnP) (P) = BnP P, (B n) (P) p _ C (P) - C (P) P - S(BnP) (P) = S(Bwp) S (i) P . S(Bn) (P) = S(Bn) (P) -" Furtherwe shall deal onlywith a case of a fixed príme p and therefore we always drop the índex p in iP,jP,6P, . . . . Theorem 1 . (F . Cohen [1 )) If n satisfies Wp condition then s (i) : S(BrtP ) - S(Bn) (P) has a left inverse k , bvk : C(P)v S(B7r) (P) - S(Bir P ) is a homotopy equivalence and j : (B n) P - C (P) is homotop ic to zero . Proof . Let k = jWP1 . Every element g EW P induces a map h g : Bic P - Bn P (conjugation by g ) . Let N = % S(h9) : S(BirP ) - S(B,rp) g sW and let k-N = k " id-N : S(Bn P ) - S(Bn P ) . One P easilychecks that the natural map r=r 1 + r2 : S(Bn ) P Tel(N)v Tel(k-N) is a homotopy equivalence . Every element g e WP induces also a map hg : Bn " Bit homotopicto the identity . Let N = S S(h9) _ geW P = k : (SBn) (P) -" (SBn) (P) . The maps Q: Tel (N) - Tel (N) and r - , : (SBn) (P) - Tel (N) are homotopy equivalences . Let i 1 : Tel(N) - Tel(N)v Tel(k-N) be the natural inclusion . One can check'that k = .(r 2+ r1)-1o i1oe-1'r1 is a left inverse to S(i) . Therefore b v k is a homotopy equivalence . It rests to show that j -O . b has a right inverse t . This implies that j -j , bot . Hence wehave that j -0 . t
Corollary 1 . If n satisfies W P -condition and X is simply-connected and p-local then the map f : Bn - X is homotopically trivial if and only if its restriction to B7r p is homotopically trivial . Proof . If f .¡ -0 then .there is f' : C - X such that f'oj _ f . This implies that f -O . (7 understand its restrictions to Tel(N) and Tel(k-N) . L emma 1 . Let us suppose that X = gY . Then there is an isomoüphism Proof . Wehave a directsystem of spaces There is the following exact sequence of Milnor Let us notice that N .N = k " N (resp . (k-N)a(k-N) = k(k-N)) implies that our inverse systems satisfy the Mitag-Leffler conditions . This implies that lim 1 termsvanish . 0 If f e [SBn p ;S?Y] and Y is p-local then for any n e Z (P) we can define n .f in the following two ways . i) Maps .(S 1 ;Y) = S2Y has the same hcmotopy type as Maps .(S( P) ;Y) For any ne Z (p) there is a map_ n : S 1 - S1 of degree n and we define n .f as a composition nof . Let us suppose that we have a map f : SBn P - X . We wantto [Tel(N) (resp . Tel(k-N)) ;X] 11 lim [SBn p ;X] N(resp . k-N) SBn N(resp . k-N) P SB n - . P O - " lim 1 [SBn , X] - [Tel(N) (resp .k-N)) ;X] - lim [SBn P ;X]- O N(resp . k-N) P N(resp . k-N)
ii) Slh Bn S1P) ^ B :r p .,The map n : S ~P) - " S ~P) induces P n : S~ p) ^ B .p S( P) n Bf p . We define n " f as a composition f . . Let f : SBn p - " X = 4Y . Let us set f i = k " (faN) and f = 1 " (f- (k-N)) . Then f* f } s lim[SB7r ;X] and 2 k 1 kn 1 ne{1,2 . . .} N p f* = { 1 f } e lim[SBg ;X] . Therefore by Lemma 1 f* and 2 kn 2 ne{1,2 . . .} k-N p 1 f2 define maps f* : Tel (N) - X and f2 : Tel (k-N) - X . f* v f* restricted to SBn P (i .e . (fi v f2) or where r = ri + r 2 : SBn p - " Tel(N)v Tel(k\N) is a sum of inclusions onto the first segments of the mapping telescopes) is homotopic to k f -N +-' f o (k-N) = f Propos ition 1 . The natural isomorphism r* : lim[SB7r ;X]®lim[SBwr ;X] - " [SBwp ;X] ÑP k-N P is given by ((fn) ;(gn)) - f1+ 9 1 . The inverse map is given by f - (f*~ ;f2) Proof . Themap r : SBn - Tel(N)v Tel(k-N) induces a map P [Tel(N) ;X] ® [Tel(k-N) ;X] - " [SBn p ;X] which is given by the sum of restrictions to the first segments of the telescopes . This shows the first part of the proposition . By the previous discussions f - (f*,f2) defines a map in th e opposite direction which is the inverse of r* . Corollary 2 . If f-N is homotopic to k " f then iii) for any gE W P we have that f oS (h 9 ) - f
Proof . i) follows from the definition of E* . We have ehat fob ^, (f1 V f2) oreó ^ . fiorob -f* .P -1.Qor l on fioe -lor L oS(i) oil ^ .O ii) implies that there is fl : SBR - X such that f' .S(i) - f . This implies that foS (h g ) - f - El Corollary_ 3 . If X = 0 2 Y and X is simply connected then i : Bn - Bn induces an isomorphism p W L(B)r) p ;X] _ [Bnp ;X] p . . Proof . Wehave that .z,oS(i)-f o r 1 . r l and Q are homotopy equivalences . Therefore it is enough to show that W r* : [Tel(N) ;X] = lim[SBi ;QY] -+ [SBn p ;QY] p NW is an isomorphism . Let us suppose that f e[SBn P ;4Y] P . Then f* _ { ñ 1 k f .N lim[SBn P= ;oY] and r*(f1) f . This } n,{1,2, ... } e - implies that r* is an epimorphism . r* is also a monomorphism and therefor=_ it is an isomorphism . Theorem 2 . If X is a nilpotent, p-local space and if n satisfies W p -condition then the natural map W [Bn ;X] -» [Bn p ;X] P is a surjection . If X is a loop space then W [Bn ;X] [Bn p ;X] P is a bijection . roof . We have alreadyproved theorem when X is a double loop space . Let us suppose that X is a loop and that X has only a finite number ofnon-trivialhomotopy groups . Let us consider a part of the Postnikoff tower of X ,
- . S?X n- , L " - K( nn,n) -1 X n c Xn-1 d K(ic n n+1) Let us suppose that the theorem is true for Xn-l . We have the following commutative diagram [Bic,4X n-1 1 : [Brt ;K(Rn ,n) 1 b [Bu ;X n 1 -S- [Bn,Xn-11 d [B . jc ;K(7c n 'n+1) 1 114 i 1ijj 1f k ti¡ Q 11 ; m w 1 W b W c i w d 1 W [BnP ,ox n-1 1 p [Bit P ;K(n n 'n) 1 P -+ [Bn P ;Xn1 P y [Brc P;Xn-1 P 1 P_ . [Bic ;K(jc n ;n+1) ] P we must show that k is a bijection . If k(x) = k(y) then c(x) = c(y) . Hence there exists zE[Bu ;K(n n ;n)] such that z = x -1 . y . This implies that . 1 . 3 (z) = k(x) k (y) . Therefore there is w E [B3t ; 4X n-1 ] such that al (w) = j (z) . Let w1= k E woh g . Then gEw p W a l (w 1 ) = j (z) and w 1 E [Bnp ;QXn-11 P . There is v E [Bn ;QX n-1 1 such that i (v) = w 1 . we have j (a (v)) = a l (i (v) ) = a l (w 1 ) = j (z) . This implies that a (v) = z and therefore x=y W Let us suppose that xE [BKp ;Xh1 P and let y E F-1 (c 1 (x) ) There exists z such that c(z) = y because d(y) = O . We have that c1 (k(z)) = c 1 (x) . Therefore there is w E [Bn p ; K(n n ;n) 1 such that b1 (w) =x " k 1 (z) . Let w 1 = B wah g . Then b 1 (w 1 ) _ (x " k -1 (z)) k . g EW It fOllOws from the standard P properties of fibrations thát 1 w (x " k (z) k ) lies in the center of [B7cP ;Xn1 P . Therefore b1 (k w 1 ) =x " k(z) _1 . We have also that b 1 ( k w 1 ) - k(b ( k w 1 ) ) " This implies that x Eim k .
It rest to show the theorem for an arbitrary nilpotent, p-local space X . We use once more the Postnikoff tower of X and th e same diagram as before . Themap i is an isomorphism because QX n-1 is a loop space . We assume,that Q is surjective . To show that k is surjective wemust use the following lemma . Lemma 2 . Let M be a finitely generated Z (P) -module . Let us suppose that the abelian group . M acts on a set X in such a way that isotropy subgroups are Z(P)-submodules of M . Wedenote ' this action by * . Let us suppose further that a finite group G acts on M and on X , the action of G on M is . Z(P)-linear, the order of G is k e z* p) and h 9 *xg = (h*x) g If x,x 1 E X G and w*x = x l then ( £ k W 9 ) * X = xl g EG Proof . w*x = x 1 and x,x 1 EX G imply that wg *x = x1 for each 9E G wg* (w-wg) *x)) = wg*x implies that (w-w 9 ) *x = x for each g E G Therefore (k £ (w-w g ))*x = x . Wehave that k £ wg+ k £ (w-w g )= wgEG gEG gEG This implies (k £ w g ) *x = x l . I~ gEG The action of [Bit p ;K(n n ;n)] on [B p ;Xn ] satisfies the assumptions of Lemma 2 . Weprove that k is surjective in the same way as for a double'loop space . Wehave that c 1 (k (z) ) = c 1 (z) . Therefore there is w such that wkk(z) = x . It follows from Lemma 2 that ( £ k (w,h ) ) *k (z) = x . ( £ k (w,h ) ) = j (wl) implies that 9 EW 9 9EW 9 P P k(w i* z) = x . The spaces Bn and Bit Phave only finite homology groups therefore wehave isomorphisms 96
[Bn ;X] lim[Bu,X n 1 and . [Bn p ;X] Z lim[Bn p ,X n ] . (If {X n } nEN 'is n n an inverse system of p-complete spaces then the functor lim[ ;X ] nn is representable by Sullivan i .e . lim[ ;Xn ] _ [ ;Z] and Z = holim X n . n In our case holim(X) = X and np [B n (or Bn p ) ; x (or X n ) ] _ [B n (or Bir p ) ;X p (or(X n)p) ] because Bit and Bn p have finite homotopy groups .) Wehave the following commutative diagram [Brr ;X] r lim[Bir ;X R : r n] n W p pr1 W [Bn p , X] 3 lim[Bnp n ;X] p n pr is an isomorphism, b is an epimorphism (resp . isomorphism if X is a loop space) and pr 1 is a monomorphism . This implies that a is an epimorphism (resp . isomorphism if X is a loop space) . This finishes the proofof Theorem 2 . If we analize the proofs carefully then it appears that in fact wehave proved much more general result . Let us suppose that a finite group G acts homotopically on a space X ,i .e . there is a homomorphism G - n 0(e (X) ) where e(X) is the space of all homotopy equivalences of X . Let us suppose that 1 G 1 = k , X is p-local and k E Z( p) . By the result of Cooke there is a space X 1 with a free action of G and a homotopy equivalence i : X - " X 1 which is homotopy equivariant with respect to the homotopy action of G .